NOT FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
PACIFIC BUSINESS CAPITAL CORP., 
Plaintiff,
v.
LITTLE SWITZERLAND, INC. and, L.S.
WHOLESALE INC.,
Defendants.
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
 
)
)
)
Civil No. 2004-159
)
)
)
)
)
)
ATTORNEYS:
Marshall A. Bell, Esq.
St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.
For the plaintiff,
Christopher A. Kroblin, Esq.
St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.
For the defendants.
ORDER
GÓMEZ, C.J.
On December 1, 2008, having been advised that the matter was
settled, the Court entered an Order directing the parties to
file, within thirty days from the date of the Order, “a
stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily
dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment.” (Order 1, Dec. 1,
Case: 3:04-cv-00159-CVG-GWB   Document #: 56   Filed: 03/04/09   Page 1 of 3
Pacific Business Capital Corp. v. Little Switzerland Inc., et al.
Civil No. 2004-159
Order
Page 2
2008.)  The Order further stated that “[f]ailure to timely comply
. . . shall result in dismissal of the matter with prejudice.”
(Id. at 2.)  
On January 27, 2009, at which time no documents had been
filed in accordance with the December 1, 2008, Order, the Court
entered an Order dismissing the matter.  The January 27, 2009,
Order stated that “the Court retains jurisdiction for thirty days
from the date of this Order to enforce the settlement . . . .”
(Order 2, Jan. 27, 2009.)
Now, the plaintiff, Pacific Business Capital Corporation
(“PBCC”), and the defendants, Little Switzerland, Inc. (“Little
Switzerland”) and L.S. Wholesale, Inc. (“L.S.”), jointly move to
extend the time for retention of this Court’s jurisdiction to
enforce the settlement by an additional sixty days.  In support
of their motion, the parties assert that the settlement agreement
reached during their mediation gave PBC ninety days to comply
with the terms of the settlement agreement by submitting a check
to Little Switzerland and L.S..  That ninety-day period does not
expire until after the expiration of the thirty-day period for
retention of jurisdiction provided by the January 27, 2009,
Order.  The premises considered, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED; and it is further
Case: 3:04-cv-00159-CVG-GWB   Document #: 56   Filed: 03/04/09   Page 2 of 3
Pacific Business Capital Corp. v. Little Switzerland Inc., et al.
Civil No. 2004-159
Order
Page 3
ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce
the settlement agreement until April 27, 2009.
 
  S\                      
     Curtis V. Gómez
       Chief Judge
Case: 3:04-cv-00159-CVG-GWB   Document #: 56   Filed: 03/04/09   Page 3 of 3