DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. CROIX
5
ANITA ROBERTS,
5
5
Plaintiff,
5
1:08-cv-90
v.
5
5
KMART CORPORATION,
5
5
Defendant.
5
__________________________________________5
TO:
Lee J. Rohn, Esq.
Eugenio W.A. Geigel-Simounet, Esq.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL
THIS MATTER came before the Court for consideration upon Plaintiff’s Motion to
Compel Defendant Kmart to Respond to Plaintiff’s Second Demand For Production of
Documents (Docket No. 26) and Motion to Compel Kmart Corporation to Respond to
Discovery (Docket No. 28).  Defendant filed an opposition in which it advised that
Defendant had served its responses to the request for production of documents and filed
notice thereof with the Court.  This order is issued without necessity of any further
response or reply.
Being advised in the premises and upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds
the motions moot.
Case: 1:08-cv-00090-DWA-GWC   Document #: 32   Filed: 08/18/09   Page 1 of 2
Roberts v. Kmart Corporation
1:08-cv-90
Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motions to Compel
Page 2
Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Kmart to Respond to Plaintiff’s
Second Demand For Production of Documents (Docket No. 26) is DENIED
AS MOOT.
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Kmart Corporation to Respond to Discovery
(Docket No. 28) is DENIED AS MOOT.
ENTER:
Dated: August 18, 2009
/s/ George W. Cannon, Jr.                           
GEORGE W. CANNON, JR.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 1:08-cv-00090-DWA-GWC   Document #: 32   Filed: 08/18/09   Page 2 of 2