DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
5
JOAN OAT,
5
5
Plaintiff,
5
3:03-cv-115
v.
5
5
SEWER ENTERPRISES, LTD f/k/a SEWER
5
DOLIN ASSOCIATES, LTD., and ESTATE
5
OF LLEWELLYN A. SEWER,
5
5
Defendants. 5
__________________________________________5
TO:
Joan C. Oat, Pro Se
A. Jeffrey Weiss, Esq.
Samuel H. Hall, Jr., Esq.
Kevin W. Weatherbee, Esq.
ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon the Motion For Reconsideration of
February 3, 2010[,] Order (Docket No. 450).  The time for filing any response has expired.
Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3, parties may seek reconsideration of
an order or decision of the Court based upon “1. intervening change in controlling law; 2.
availability of new evidence, or; 3. the need to correct clear error or prevent manifest
injustice.”  LRCi 7.3.  It is well established that “[a] motion for reconsideration ‘[i]s not a
vehicle for registering disagreement with the court's initial decision, for rearguing matters
Case: 3:03-cv-00115-JRS-RM   Document #: 456   Filed: 03/09/10   Page 1 of 2
Oat v. Sewer Enterprises
3:03-cv-115
Order
Page 2
already addressed by the court, or for raising arguments that could have been raised before
but were not.’” Worldwide Flight Services v. Government of the Virgin Islands,  S.Ct. Civ. No.
2008-014, 2009 WL 152316 at *3 (V.I. January 21, 2009) (quoting Bostic v. AT & T of the Virgin
Islands, 312 F. Supp. 2d 731, 733 (D.V.I. 2004)).  Having reviewed the matter and upon due
consideration thereof, the Court finds that reconsideration is not warranted.  While movant
notes that the Court has the authority to appoint a substitute receiver, movant fails to
persuade the Court that such appointment is mandatory.  Consequently, movant has
provided no basis for reconsideration.
Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED that the Motion For Reconsideration of
February 3, 2010[,] Order (Docket No. 450) is DENIED.
ENTER:
Dated: March 9, 2010
/s/ George W. Cannon, Jr.                           
GEORGE W. CANNON, JR.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 3:03-cv-00115-JRS-RM   Document #: 456   Filed: 03/09/10   Page 2 of 2