Y J ifs’ V7-S29 NY A io! 7 Calendar No. 766 971TH CoNGRESS SENATE Report 2d Session No. 97-529 SEP 9 1982 VIRGIN ISLANDS NONIMMIGRANT ALIEN | 45 ADJUSTMENT ACT OF 1981 AvucustT 18 (legislative day, Avaust 17), 1982.—Ordered to be printed Mr. THurmonp, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following REPORT {To accompany H.R. 3517] The Committee on the Judiciary, to which was referred the bill (H.R. 3517) to authorize the granting of permanent residence status to certain nonimmigrant aliens residing in the Virgin Islands of the United States, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment and recommends that the bili, as amended, do pass. AMENDMENT On page 7, line 2, strike “States.” and insert the following; “States other than for employment as an entertainer or as an athlete and for a period not exceeding 45 days.” PURPOSE OF THE BILL The purpose of the bill, as amended, is to authorize the granting of lawful permanent resident status to certain nonimmi rant alien (H-2) workers and their families who reside in the US. Virgin Island: and to require the Secretaries of various Federal Depart- ments. in consultation with officials of the Virgin Islands, to assess, and issue a report on, the impact on the Government of the Vir in Islands of providing needed services to individuals whose status has been adjusted under this bill. ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION—ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS H.R. 3517 would allow an alien who was admitted to the US. Virgin Islands as a temporary worker, and who has resided in those “™° BEST DOCUMENT AVAILABLE | 2 islands continuously since June 30, 1975, to have his status adjusted to that of lawful permanent resident of the United States. The alien’s spouse and minor children could also adjust under the bill if they, like the alien worker, have met the specified residence requirement. No alien may have his status adjusted if he is found to be exeludable from the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Justice Department estimates that up to 7,360 aliens would be eligible for adjustment of status under the bill. PREFERENCE SYSTEM RESTRICTIONS Under U.S. immigration law over 300,000 immigrant visas per year are made available to relatives of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. These visas, which are allocated under what is called the “preference system,” are not to be issued unless the U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident files a petition with the Immi- gration and Naturalization Service requesting the admission to the United States of the alien relative. H.R. 3517 places certain restrictions on the ability of individuals whose status is adjusted under the bill to utilize the preference system. Specifically, the bill gives the Secretary of State discretionary author- ity to limit the number of immigrant visas that may be issued to aliens who are the spouses or unmarried children of aliens who become law- ful permanent residents pursuant to this bill. Similarly, aliens who eventually become U.S. citizens pursuant to this bill will be unable to effectuate the admission of their married children or siblings unless they show that the denial of this ability would, under the facts of the particular case, result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. The Committee is convinced that these restrictions are necessary to prevent a further influx of new immigrants to the already over- populated and resource-strained U.S. Virgin Islands. Preference system restrictions of the type contained in H.R. 3517 are without precedent in U.S. immigration law. In considering these novel restrictions. the Committee obtained legal memoranda discussing the constitutional issues which these restrictions could ey :aise. Such memoranda were supplied by the Congressional Research Service, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, and the Office of Legal Counsel in the Department of Justice. According to the memoranda, the most prominent legal issues posed by H.R. 3517 involved equal protection (i.e. the right to be free of discriminatory or arbitrary treatment) and the constitutional right to travel. With respect to the right to travel, as originally introduced, H.R. 3517 would have allowed aliens affected by the bill to regain their preference system petitioning powers by moving to the United States and living there continuously for two years. This provision, although deemed by the legal memoranda to be constitutional, was deleted by the Committee. Each of these three memoranda concluded that the most likely constitutional challenge remaining, one based on equal protection, would not succeed. In reaching this conclusion the memoranda pointed variously to the plenary power of Congress in immigration matters, the general reluctance of the courts to examine Congress alien admis- 3 sions policies, and the important governmental purposes served by the restrictions. TERMINATION OF TEMPORARY WORKER PROGRAM II.R. 3517 terminates the temporary worker program in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Comniittee is convinced that for the foreseeable future no labor shortages requiring the importation of alien tempo- rary workers will exist. Accordingly, the Committee finds it reason- able and proper to relieve the Secretary of Labor of authority with respect to this matter. Should current circumstances suflicientiy change, Congress could reexamine its decision to terminate the program. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND REPORT The bill also provides for a report to Congress and the President on the tinpact on the U.S. Virgin Islands of providing needed services to aliens whose status has been adjusted or who have been permitted to Immigrate as a result of the bill. This report, including recom- mendations, is to be the joint product of the specified Department Secretaries, the Attorney General, and Virgin Islands officials. Fund- ing for these activities is to be derived only from otherwise available appropriations, SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF H.R. 3517 Section 1(a) states that this Act may be cited as the “Virgin Is- lands Nonimmigrant Adjustment Act of 1981.” Section 1(b) expresses the findings of Congress, to wit: that the aliens addressed by this Act have been in the U.S. Virgin Isiands for many years: that they have become an integral part of their society and should be given the opportunity to become lawful per- manent residents; that the Virgin Islands 1s a small territory with limited resources; and that in accordance with Congress’ special authority for the welfare of U.S. territories, it is necessary for Con- gress to prevent a further influx of significant. numbers of aliens into the Virgin Islands by limiting the ability of those whose status is wljusted under this bill to file immigrant visa petitions for their alien relatives, Section 2(a) of the bill provides for the adjustment of status of any alien ceseribed in subsection 2(b) of the bill to that of lawful permanent resident alien if application therefor is made within one year of the bilPs enactment, and is otherwise eligible to receive an immigrant visa and (with certain exceptions) is otherwise admissi- ble to the United States for permanent residence, and is physically present in the Virgin Islands of the United States at the time the upplhieation is filed. Section 2(b) applies the benefits noted in Sec. 2(a) to any alien who was inspected and admitted to the Islands as a nonimmigrant alien worker under section 101 (a) (15) (H) (ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) or the spouse or minor child of such worker: aml has resided continuously in the Islands since June 30, 1975. Scetion 2(¢)(1) exeludes adjustments under this bill from the numerical limitations of Sections 201(a) and 202 of the INA and 7 fa? t , Fe Te © eee ) wv 4 forecloses any reduction in the number of aliens who may acquire lawful permanent residence status under the INA by reason of this Bill. Section 2(¢) (2) provides the Secretary of State with discretionary authority (after consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the Governor of the Virgin Islands) to limit the number of immi- vrant visas that may be issued in any fiscal year to aliens who are leneficiaries of second preference petitions filed by persons who have adjusted status under this bill. Section 2(¢) (3) denies (with certain exceptions) an immigrant visa (or adjustinent of status to lawful permanent resident) to any alien by virtue or a fourth or fifth preference petition filed by an individ- ual who had his status adjusted under this section. Similar benefits are denied an alien for whom a second preference petition is filed by an individual admitted to the United States as an immigrant on the basis of an immediate relative petition filed by the individual’s -on or daughter, who, in turn, had his or her status adjusted under this section. Section 2(c) (4) is a technical section relating descriptive terms to specific sections of the INA. Section 2(d) isa general savings clause. Section 3 is a blanket provision prohibiting the Attorney General from approving any petition filed in the case of the importation of uny temporary worker under section 1O1L(.A) (15) (IL) (ii) of the INA for employment in the U.S. Virgin Islands, other than for employ- nent as an entertainer or as an athlete and for a period not exceeding 1 days. Section 4 directs the Secretaries of HHS, HUD, Labor, and the Interior, and the Attorney General, in consultation with Govern- nent officials of the Virgin Islands, to assess the social and eco- nome impact of this Act on the Virgin Islands, and report their find- ings and recommendations to the President and Congress within one year of this bill’s enactment. DEPARTMENTAL POSITION The Administration supports passage of the bill. A copy of state- ments by Ambassadors Diego C. Asencio, Assistant Secretary for Consular Affairs, Department of State, David O. Williams, Admin- istrator, U.S. Employment Service, U.S. Department of Labor, and a Statement of Billy Lee Hart, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Operations), Territorial and International Affairs, Department of Interior, regarding the bill follow: STATEMENT OF AMBASSADOR DIEGO C, ASENCIO, ASSISTANT SECRE- TARY FOR CONSULAR AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF STATE Mr. Chairman, members of the subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear before you today to present the department’s comments on H.R. 3517, and on the situ- ation in the United States Virgin Islands. The Department of State has been involved in this situa- tion over the years only on a collateral basis, since the so- 5 called “off-isliand™ workers, who have been admitted to the Virgin Islands, have been exempt from the visa require- ment, Thus, the process of documenting these workers and of processing their applications for admission and stay in the islands has been handled by the Departments of Jus- tice ant Labor without the operational participation of the Department of State. However, the Department has had an intevest in the situation because the ability of these workers te continue their employment in the United States Virgin Islands has been of fundamental ceonomic import- ance for the British, French, and independent islands whence they canie. Therefore, any action which would alter the exist- ing state of affairs has implications for these other islands and, thus, implications which concern us. These off-island workers have lived and worked in the United States Virgin Islands for years. They have devel- oped enduring economic, social and family ties there, yet under existing immigration law they have no real chance of obtaining legal resident status. It is the Department of State's view that, in general, the provisions of this Bill, H.R. 3527, supply the best solution for this knotty problem which has long been a source of concern for the people and Government of the Virgin Islands and the Government of the United States. Section 2(a) of the bill provides for the adjustment of status of any alien described in subsection 2(b) of the Bill to that of lawful permanent resident alien if application therefor is made within one year of the bill’s enactment, and is otherwise eligible to receive an immigrant visa and (with certain exceptions) is otherwise admissible to the United States for permanent residence, and is physically present in the Virgin Islands of the United States at the time the application is filed. Section 2(b) applies the benefits noted in Sec. 2(a) to any alien who was inspected and admitted to the islands as 2 nonimmigrant alien worker under section 101 (a) (15) (H) (ii) of the Immigration and N ationality Act (INA) or the spouse or minox child of such worker, and has resided continuously in the Islands since June 30, 1975. Section 2(c) (1) excludes adjustments under this Bill from the numerical limitations of Section 201(a) and 202 of the INA and forecloses any reduction in the number of aliens who may acquire lawful permanent residence status under the INA by reason of this Bill. The Department supports these provisions, Section 2(c) (2) provides the Secretary of State with dis- cretionary authority (after consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the Governor of the Virgin Islands) to limit the number of immigrant visas that may be issued in any fiscal year to aliens who are beneficiaries of petitions filed by persons who have adjusted status under this bill. Discretionary authority such as this could result in frivo- 72 OP 9 7p ge Tr BP Po es pe 7 | aoa s es ,* : , ‘7 , ¥ ’ bd . ry ” - we Ww Gy dis aad WD ae ee eee 6 lous, but extensive litigation against the Secretary for ex- ercising this discretion in an allegedly discriminatory man- ner. The Department therefore cannot support this provision. Section 2(c) (3) denies (with certain exceptions) an immi- grant visa (or adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident) to any alien by virtue of a fourth or fifth prefer- ence petition filed by an individual who had his status ad- justed under this section. Similar benefits are denied an alien for whom a second preference petition is filed by an individ- ual admitted to the United States as an immigrant on the basis of an immediate relative petition filed by the individ- ual’s son or daughter. Who, in turn, had his or her status adjusted under this section. Once again this provision may open the gateway to litigation, particularly by citizens who file fourth or fifth preference petitions, to claim discrimina- tion and a denial of due process under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, The Department cannot support this pro- vision, which, in its effect, would establish a second-class citizenship. It should be noted that the provisions of section 2(c) (3) could nut become operative for three to five years after the acquisition of lawful permanent resident status. One final thought on these provisions. If the Congress retains its intention to enact them denial action should be taken at the time of petitioning, not at the time of visa issuance. Section 2(c) (4) is a technical section relating descriptive terms to specific sections of the INA. Section 2(1) is a general savings clause. Section 3 is a blanket provision prohibiting the Attorney (reneral from approving any petition filed in the case of the importation of any temporary worker under section 101(A) (15) (HH) (II) of the INA for employment in the U.S. Virgin {slands. The Department of State defers to the Departments of Justice and Labor on this provision. Section 4 of the Bill establishes an Interagency Task Force on Virgin Islands Immigration. Although believing there may be a less expensive solution to the problem posed there- in, the Department of State defers in its views to those of the Departments named in that Section. Once again, may I express my appreciation for the oppor- tunity, extended to us by the Subcommittee, to present the views of the Department of State, Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the subcom- mittee. STATEMENT OF DAVID O. WILLIAMS, ADMINISTRATOR, U.S. EMPIAYMENT SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, I appre- ciate the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss H.R. 3517. the Virgin Islands Nonimmigrant Alien Adjust- ment Act. of 1981. The Department of Labor defers to the 7 other Federal agencies with respect to those provisions of IER. 3517 that affect their jurisdiction and responsibilities. I shall therefore restrict my comments to those provisions in this bill that relate to the Department of Labor's responsibil- ity for labor certifications of noaimmigrant aliens for tempo- rary services or labor (H-2’s) in the U.S. Virgin Islands. As the Subcommittee is aware, the current H-2 situation in the U.S. Virgin Islands is the result of sui generis conditions that go back many years. Briefly stated. a long history of inter-island travel and labor migration prior to the applica- tion and enforcement of U.S. immigration laws, severe labor shortages during World War H, and a postwar U.S. Virgin Islanas policy of rapid economic growth, in a time of very low unemployment, combined with a series of changes in’ U.S. lmmigravion laws to produce a large influx of aliens and an unusual I{-z situation. By 1970, the population of the Virgin Islands (62,468) had almost doubled since 1960, the alien pop- ulation had more than quadrupled (rising from 3,826 in 1960 to 18,928 by 1970), and foreign workers constituted almost half of the Virgin Islands lavor force. Many of these non- inunigrant workers had been employed in the Virgin Islands for a number of years. in order to ameliorate a situation of deteriorating labor conditions and inadvertent economic dependency on foreign labor, the Department sought to integrate these nonimmigrant workers into the Islands’ permanent labor force. During the late 1960s, when changes in the Immigration and Nationality Act increased the number of availabie immigrant visas, this Department issued permanent labor certifications to H-2 workers employed at prevailing wage rates in permanent jobs in the Virgin islands economy. A total of 13,466 permanent labor certilications were issued by the end of fiscal year 1969. The current H-2 situation retlects special procedures set down by the Department in May 1970 to deal with the large number of H-Zs for whom permanent labor certifications were granted but immigrant visas were not yet available. To enable these H-2s to remain employed in the Virgin Islands, the Department also issued them indefinite certitications for em- ployment in the Virgin Islands as nonimmigrants. These non- immigrant workers have also been free to change employers, provided that the new jobs meet prevailing wage rates, and that no more than 60 days have lapsed between Vepartment- approved jobs. During the past decade, the number of nonimmigrant work- ers in the Virgin Islands has progressively declined. as im- migrant Visas became available or job opportunities declined. Most labor certification activity has consisted of renewals of nonimmigrant labor certifications of the kind 1 have pre- viously mentioned—that is, most certifications have been ap- provals of job changes. For example, by 1977, the Depart- ment’s Alien Certification Office in St. Thomas estimated that there were only 6200 H-2 workers in the Virgin Islands, and an additional 5,600 H-z spouses and children. mm 4, TR Tn owe P “-» #9 es “SS We Sd ontial 6 q 8 In fiscal year 1980, the Department issued 2,302 labor cer- tifications for employment in the Virgin Islands. Approxi- mately 95 pereent were renewals. The remainder were per- manent certifications for permanent resident visas or tem- porary certifications for H-2s admitted for temporary jobs, such as entertainers, with certifications generally issued for 60 days. Nonimmigrant labor certifications of the group of alien workers who were granted permanent labor certification be- fore 1970 are renewed only if the alien seeks a new job. Be- cause the Virgin Islands program has been a part of our com- puterized data system for only about two years, cumulative data on labor certifications are available only through a man- ual check of files. Data from the 1978 INS Annual Report, however, suggest that relatively few aliens remain in non- immigrant status. Of the 22,449 aliens who reported under the alien address system, 13,353 were immigrants. We un- | derstand that about half of the remaining 9,096 are H-2s and H-—ts, Our New York Regional Office estimates that only about 100 certifications have been issued for newly arriving aliens since June 30, 1975. We believe, therefore, that virtually all the H-2s and the H-4s currently residing in the Virgin Is- lands would be eligible for the benefits provided by the sec- tion 2 of H.R. 3517. I would like to turn to certain provisions of the bill affect- ing the Department of Labor. Section 2 of H.R. 3517 would authorize the granting of permanent resident alien status to aliens admitted as H-2s or as an H-2 spouse or minor child, if they have resided continuously in the U.S. Virgin Islands since June 30, 1975. Such an adjustment of status would obviate the need for indefinite special H-2 certifica- tions. We believe that this provision is a fair and equitable solution to the problem of aliens whose status has been in limbo for many years because of the unavailability of pref- erence numbers. These aliens have established roots in the Virgin Islands and have contributed to its social and eco- nomic development. Section 3 of the bill would terminate the H-2 program for the Virgin Islands. It may be useful to point out that, under such an extension as contemplated by section 3, only aliens of distinguished merit and ability (H-1s) and industrial trainees (H-3s) would be admissible for tempo- rary employment in the Virgin Islands. Aliens not qualify- ing as H-1s or H-3s now admissible for temporary services or labor, if unemployed persons capable of performing such services or labor cannot be found (H-2s), would no longer be admitted in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The Depart- ment of Labor believes the resulting effect of this provision would be premature. The Immigration and Nationality Act incorporates territories as “States” for coverage purposes through the provisions of sections 101(a) (36) and (38). As 9 such, the H-2 program is operable in the various territor- ies. While we recognize that historically the Virgin Islands has had particular labor force considerations, we do not believe that a special immigration policy, as provided by section 3 of the bill, should be enacted absent full consider- ation of the broader policy question of how territories should be treated under the Act. Section 4 of the bill would establish an Interagency Task Force on Virgin Islands Immigration to analyze the impact on the government of the Virgin Islands of this legislation. In our view, the purposes of this provision could be accom- plished by increased interagency cooperation. The Depart- ment of Labor would be pleased to provide whatever assist- ance may be needed which is within its expertise. This concludes my prepared statement. I would be pleased to answer any questions you may have. STATEMENT OF BILLY LEE HART, ACTING DEPUTY ASSISTANT SEC- RETARY (OPERATION S), TERRITORIAL AND INTERNATIONAL AF- FAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Mr. Chairman, I am pleased to be here today to express the views of the Department of the Interior on H.R. 3517, w bill that would adjust the status of a number of alien workers who have been long-term residents of the United States Virgin Islands. THE PROBLEM In the 1950’s and 1960’s, a large number of alien workers were imported into the United States Virgin Islands to relieve an acute labor shortage. At that time there was insufficient local labor to fill the jobs created by that era’s economic boom. These alien workers entered the Virgin Islands under section 101(a) (15) (H) (11) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which allows entry into the United States of nonimmigrant aliens for temporary periods of time to work at temporary jobs. The spouses and minor children of many of these workers entered the Virgin Is- lands under the so-called H-4 provision. The temporary jobs soon evolved into permanent jobs and the Virgin Is- lands became the permanent home for these workers and their families. The alien worker problem in the Virgin Islands did not become acute until the end of the 1960s when the econom- ic boom lost its momentum and periods of recession were experienced. Job competition among alien laborers and with United States citizens intensified. Despite strong ties with the Virgin Islands, many were forced to return to their countries of origin due to lack of work. The insecur- ity caused by this tenuous status has reputedly made these nonimmigrants, with strong ties in the Virgin Islands, ripe for exploitation. " POMEIRAL AIT RUA APE i 6 o2 10 THE BILL H.R. 3517 presents a viable solution to this long-standing immigration problem in the Virgin Islands. We recom- mend enactment of H.R. 3517 with the amendments I will outline shortly. Section 2 of H.R. 3517 would establish a mechanism whereby the Attorney General may adjust the status of a qualified nonimigrant alien in the Virgin Islands to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States. Section 2 also contains provisions for the potential limitation on the granting of immigrant visas to relatives of an individual who has his status adjusted under H.R, 3517. Section 3 of H.R. 3517 would repeal applicability of the temporary alien worker program in the Virgin Islands under section 101 (a) (15) (IL) (11) of the Immigration and Na- tionality Act. Section 4 would establish a task force with an authoriza- tion of $100,000 to examine the impact on the Government of the Virgin Islands of providing health, education, hous- ing, and other social services to individuals who have their status adjusted under section 2 of the bill. THE INTERIOR RECOM MENDATIONS The Department of the Interior recommends enactment of section 2. That section with its objective mechanism for adjusting the status of Virgin Islands nonimmigrant alien Workers and their families to that of permanent residents of the United States presents a viable solution to the iim- migration problem that has long plagued the Virgin Is- lands. The Department of the Interior does not recommend enactment of section 3 at this time. We note that the tem- porary worker program is not needed in the Virgin Islands at this time. If, in the future, a shortage of labor should de- velop in the Virgin Islands, the problem could probably be met by the importation of United States citizens from Puerto Rico or the 50 States. Therefore, assuming the United States labor supply is sufficient reactivation of the (H) (ii) pro- gram for the Virgin Islands may not be necessary. Notwithstanding the fact that the (H) (ii) program is not being used in the Virgin Islands at present, and the fur- ther fact that the Virgin Islands labor needs in the future could probably be met by United States resources, we ney- ertheless recommend that access to the program by the Virgin Islands not be foreclosed. The program should be kept as a stand-by alternative should the United States labor supply prove insufficient to meet Virgin Islands needs. While it may be desirable to modify the program, we agree with the De- partment of Labor that we should not legislate a special pol- icy for the Virgin Islands until consideration of the broader 11 policy question of the treatment of the territories under im- inigration law is resolved. As to the section 4 provision for a task force that would assess the impact of this bill on the Government of the Virgin Islands, we believe that the Government of the Virgin Islands itself is capable of, and should be responsible for, as- sessing any impact. We see no need to establish a new task force and spend an additional $100,000 for this purpose. We recommend, therefore, that section 4 of H.R. 3517 be deleted. CONCLUSION We support setcion 2 of H.R. 3517—the heart of the bill— because it is the best solution to this persistent immigration problem that we have seen. We appreciate the opportunity to present our views on the bill. STATEMENT OF ANDREW CARMICHAEL, ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER, EXAMINATION, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, I am pleased to be here today to testify on H.R. 3517, a bill to provide for the adjustment of status of certain alien workers who have for some years lived and worked in the United States Virgin Islands. H.R. 3517 addresses a rg that has its roots in the acute labor shortage in the U.S. Virgin Islands in the 1950's. An economic boom on the islands created thousands of tourist related and industrial Jobs which could not be filled by the local labor market. In_ 1956, therefore, a temporary worker program was instituted, Initially, only British subjects who resided in the British Virgin Islands could enter under the program, and they could perform only certain kinds of labor. In 1959, the program was expanded to include workers from the British, French, and Netherlands West Indies. By the early 1960's the program’s original geographical and occupa- tional restrictions had been abandoned. By the late 1960's, over 13,000 temporary workers had entered the U.S. Virgin Islands under the program. Nonimmigrants were then estimated to constitute 45 percent of the labor market, and to hold up to 90 percent of the construction jobs and 60 percent of the so- called “service” jobs. Although these workers entered as nonimmigrants, under i “temporary” worker program, it soon became obvious that they in fact were permanent workers, or at least that their stays in the United States would be of indefinite duration. The Department of Labor recognized this reality in 1970, when it issued a policy statement authorizing these aliens to be indefi- nitely certified for employment in the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, they continued to be admitted as nonimmigrants, In the 1970's the situation in the Virgin Islands began to change. Economic conditions worsened, and for the first time since the institution of the temporary worker program, un- [ME ITNT AyRe hock om 's if aes 12 employment became a problem. In response, the Department of Labor in 1973 announced that it would issue no more “IL-2” temporary work certifications to persons who had not been previously certified. As a result of this policy, the num- ber of temporary workers in the U.S. Virgin Islands now hov- ers around 2,000, The problem addressed by H.R. 3517 is how to now handle the temporary workers still in the Virgin Islands. Although, as indicated above, these aliens were technically admitted as temporary workers, in fact their work was usually of a per- Inanent nature, and many of the aliens who would be afiected by the bill have now lived in the U.s. Virgin Islands for many years. They have raised their families there, and many have had United States citizen children. They entered to perform labor no one else then on the islands could, or would, perform. Yet their status has always been tenuous; despite their strong ties to the islands, they have had no permanent right to remain there. H.R. 3517 would give some of these workers, and their immediate families, that right. H.R. 3517 would allow an alien who was admitted to the U.S. Virgin Islands as a temporary worker, and who has resided in those islands continuously since June 30, 1975, to have his status adjusted to that of a lawful permanent resident of the United States, subject to certain conditions. His spouse and minor children could also adjust under the proposed law. The Department views this bill as an appro- priate method of regularizing the status of aliens who have made their homes in the United States, and who have over the years made valuable contributions to the economy of the U.S. Virgin Islands. The burden on the government in processing these ad- justments would be manageable. It is estimated that less than 5,600 persons would be adjusted under the proposed law, including workers presently in status and their Spouses and children, applicants for suspension of deportation, and aliens who have been awaiting visa numbers to adjust their status. Approximately 1,850 of those adjusted would be “H-2” workers currently in status, 2.000 would be the spouses and children of these workers. 1.050 would be former “H-2” workers with pending suspension of deportation applica- tions, and 600 would be former “H-2” workers eligible for adjustment under section 245 of the Act. but awaiting visa numbers. Processing the adjustment applications would take an addi- tional 10 employees, four CS-11 examiners and six GS-4 clerk-tvpists. Present INS emplovees could be detailed to the Virgin Islands for this proiect. The total cost of the program would be approximately $100,000, and it would take approxi- mately nine weeks. As the people who would adjust under the bill have already been living in the U.S. Virgin Islands for some vears. the immediate impact on social services provided by the Virgin Islands government should not be great. If these people begin ~ PAcperery 13 to bring in other relatives, however, the burden on social serv- ices may grow. At the same time H.R. 3517 responds to the needs of per- sons who previously entered as iemporary workers, it also puts an end to a program that is no longer necessary. Given the present economic climate in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the continuing presence of individuals willing and able to perform any required labor, we think that statutory termi- nation of the so-called temporary worker program is ap- propriate. However, we are concerned that section 3 of the bill goes too far. This section is entitled “Termination of Temporary . Worker Program in the Virgin Islands,” which would indi- cate that the section’s intent is simply to put an end to the special worker program in the Virgin Islands, through which, in practical effect, aliens coming to work perma- nently entered on nonimmigrant “H-2” visas. The actual language of the section, however, is so broad that no “H- 2” worker could, after enactment, enter the Virgin Islands for employment, even of a truly temporary nature. If this is in fact what is intended by the bill, we think it is ill- advised, as there may be times when bona fide temporary workers legitimately could be needed on the islands. We recommend that section of the bill be changed so that “H- 2” workers are not actually banned in the islands, but rather are admitted only in strict accordance with section 101(a) (15) (H) (ii) of the Act—that is, that they be ad- mitted only for work that really is temporary. We are somewhat concerned about sections 2(b)(2) and 2(b) (38) of H.R. 3517. These provisions of the bill seek to avert an influx into the Virgin Islands of the relatives of those adjusted under the bill. The reasoning behind these provisions is clear. It is feared that if the status of thou- sands of aliens is adjusted under the proposed law, many thousands more will eventually enter as the relatives of those adjusted. These concerns are especially acute in the U.S. Vir- gin Islands because of the very smail size of the islands (a combined land area of approximately 130 square miles, and an estimated population of less than 100,000), and because schools, hospitals, and other social services are already heav- ily overburdened. Despite the rationale for these sections of the bill, the possible constitutional questions raised by it should be con- sidered. These will be discussed in more detail in a formal bill report. I wish to point out to the Committee today, however, that we know of no statutory precedent for condi- tioning the ability of citizens to bring in relatives upon the place where the citizens live, or the method by which they originally became lawful permanent residents. Moreover, en- acting such a law now could set a bad precedent. We also question the need for these provisions. Many of the persons who would be adjusted under the proposed law come not from independent nations, but from colonies or de- = ee ot, oS Pm er eat assess PGF! gS | 14 pendent areas of foreign states, such as the British Virgin Islands. Immigration from any one colony, component or dependent area of a foreign state is strictly limited by the immigration laws to 600 persons a year. Thus, unless this small statutory quota is raised, or the colonies gain their in- dependence. we do not anticipate huge numbers of aliens en- tering the United States as the relatives of persons adjusted under the bili. } The impact of this bill will also be lessened because most of those adjusted under it will not be eligible for citizen- ship until five years after adjustment. Some will choose not to seek naturalization after they become eligible. Thus, visa petitions under the fourth and fifth preferences, which can only be filed by citizens, will not begin to be filed until years after enactment of this bill, and even then, their numbers will probably be limited. In view of the likely judicial challenge to the provisions, and our belief that elimination of the provisions would not have a huge impact on immigration in the U.S. Virgin Islands, we recommend that these provisions be deleted. Except for the reservations I have expressed regarding certain portions of H.R. 3517, we support the bill, and re- spectfully urge the distinguished members of the Committee to adopt it. We consider the bill, overall, to be a fair one. and to be a reasoned response to a difficult problem which has long been of great concern to both citizens and aliens in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to address you on this important matter. REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT In compliance with paragraph 11 Rule XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate it is hereby stated that the Committee anticipates that the bill will have no additional direct regulatory impact. After dlue consideration, the Committee has determined that the changes in existing law contained in the bill will not increase or diminish any present regulatory responsibilities of the U.S. Denartment of Justice or of any other Department which exercises a law enforce- ment responsibility. COST ESTIMATE U.S. Conaress, CoNnGRESSIONAL Bupcet OFFice, Washington, D.C., August 5, 1982. Hon. Strom Trrurmonp, Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, Dirksen Senate Office Building. Washington, D.C. Dear Mr. Crrairman: Pursuant to Section 403 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Congressional Budget Office has reviewed H.R. 3517, the Virgin Islands Nonimmigrant Alien Adjustment Act of 1981, as passed by the House of Representatives on November 4, 1981, 15 and ordered reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, August 3, 1982, The act provides for the adjustment of immigration status of any nonimmigrant alien meeting certain conditions to that of lawful per- manent resident alien. Eligible individuals must make application within one year of the date of enactment of the act, be eligible to receive a U.S. immigration visa, have resided continuously in the Virgin Is- lands since June 80, 1975, and have been inspected and admitted to the Virgin Islands either as a nonimmigrant alien worker or as a spouse or minor child of such worker. Approximately 5,600 individuals are affected by this bill. The act also authorizes the Secretary of State to limit the number of immigrant visas that may be issued in any fiscal year to aliens with respect to whom second preference petitions are approved. Addition- ally, the bill denies the eligibility of aliens to receive immigration visas by virtue of a second, fourth, or fifth preference petition except in cer- tain circumstances and terminates the temporary worker program in the Virgin Islands. Finally, H.R. 3517 directs the Secretaries of Health and Human Services, Education, Housing and Urban Development, Labor, and the Interior, and the Attorney General, in consultation with the govern- ment of the Virgin Islands, to assess the social and economic impact of the act on the Virgin Islands and to report their findings to the Presi- dent and the Congress. Information available from the Immigration and Naturalization Service indicates that enactment of this act would result in the deploy- ment to the Virgin Islands of a temporary task force of four immigra- tion officers and six clerks for a period of approximately nine weeks to handle the administrative duties involved. It is expected that the net cost to the federal government in the form of per diem and travel fees would be approximately $100,000 in fiseal year 1983. The study of the social and economic impact of this act on the Virgin Islands will result in no net cost to the government because it is to be funded out of available appropriations. Should the Committee so desire, we would be pleased to provide fur- ther details on this estimate. Sincerely, Raymonp C, Scuerracu (For Alice M. Rivlin, Director). O “= PA Agee rae AUR aA ess ke iad | ee |