....S. HRG. 113-177 2 OMNIBUS TERRITORIES AND PALAU AGREEMENT HEARING BEFORE THE - COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION TO CONSIDER S. 1237, THE OMNIBUS TERRITORIES ACT OF 2013 AND S. 1268, TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE REPUBLIC OF PALAU JULY 11, 2013 Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 86-710 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 .... 75 In sum, the American Samoa Citizenship Plebiscite Act raises significant constitu- tional concerns because it asks the wrong question. Whether American Samoa con- tinues to remain a part of the United States is a question that should be answered by the people of American Samoa. Votes in the past have always been to keep Amer- ican Samoa a part of the United States. So long as it is, the question of citizenship is determined by the U.S. Constitution. Note: As a technical matter, Section 19(c) also incorrectly states that "As United - States Citizens .. . Persons born in American Samoa will no longer be United States COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES nationals." Under current federal law, all U.S. citizens are also U.S. nationals.13 Sincerely, RON WYDEN, Oregon, Chairman 9 CHARLES V. ALA'ILIMA, ESQ., TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska - Law Ofice of Charles V. Ala'itima, PLLC MARY L. IANDRIEU, Louisiana JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming NEIL WEARE, MARIA CANTWELL, Washington JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho - President, We the People Project. BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont MIKE LEE, Utah DEBBIE STAI$ENOW, Michigan DEAN HELLER, Nevada MARK UDALL, Colorado JEFF FLAKE, Arizona 0 AL FRANKEN, Minnesot:a TIM SCOM, South Carolina JOE MANCHIN, III, West Virginia LAMAR ALEXANDER, Tennessee BRIAN SCHATZ, Hawaii ROB PORTMAN, Ohio MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico JOHN HOEVEN, North Dakota TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin JOSHUA SHEINKMAN, Sta/T Director SAM E. FOWLER, Chief Counsel KAREN K BILLUPS, Republican Staff Director PATRICK J. MCCORMICK III, Republican Chief Counsel 138 U.S.C. § 1401. (II) .... 74 Citizenship Clause enshrined within the Constitution the automatic guarantee that everyone born within the territorial limits of the United States would be a U.S. cit- izen, including those born in U.S. territories or the District of Columbia.5 This June, the D.C. District Court set aside the text and history of the Citizenship Clause to rule that "[t]he Citizenship Clause does not guarantee birthright citizen- ship to American Samoans."6 In doing so, the District Court relied on controversial decisions known as the Insular Cases that were decided by a deeply divided Su- preme Court in the early 19005. First Circuit Judge Juan Torruella has compared the Insular Cases to Plessy v. Ferguson, criticizing them as establishing a "doctrine CONTENTS of separate and unequal" status for the more than 4 million Americans living in U.S. territories.7 While acknowledging "none of the Insular Cases directly addressed the Citizenship Clause," the District Court; nonetheless applied an overly broad STATEMENTS reading of the Insular Cases' outdated and deeply flawed logic to conclude «that citi- zenship is not guaranteed to people born in unincorporated territories."8. - Page The District Court's embrace of an expansive reading the Insular Cases doctrine Bordallo, Hon. Madeleine Z., Delegate to Congress, Guam ................................. 12 to determine the application of constitutional rights in American Samoa today con- trasts with language from the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Boumediene v. Christensen, Hon. Donna M., Delegate to Congress, U.S. Virgin Islands .......... 8 Faleomavaega, Hon. Eni F. H., Delegate to Congress, American Samoa ........... 4 Bush. There, the Supreme Court stated that "[t]he Constitution grants Congress Kagan, Edgard, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of East Asian and the President the power to acquire, dispose of, and govern territory, not the and Pacific Affairs, Department of State 47 power to decide when and where its terms apply."9 Boumediene expressly rejected Murkowski, Hon. Lisa, U.S. Senator From Alaska 3 the idea that "the political branches have the power to switch the Constitution on Pierluisi, Hon. Pedro R., Resident Commissioner to Congress, Puerto Rico ...... 20 or off at will," explaining that "[tlhe test for determining the scope of [a constitu- Sablan, Hon. Gregorio Kilili Camacho, Delegate to Congress, Northern Mar- tional] provision must not be subject to manipulation by those whose power it is de- iana Islands 17 signed to restrain."10 Singh, Vikram J., Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for South and Addressing the Insular Cases application to current U.S. territories, the Supreme Southeast Asia, Office of the Secretary of Defense for Policy, Department Court in Boumediene cited to Justice Brennan's view in an earlier case that of Defense 44 "[wlhatever the validity of the [Insular Cases] in the particular historical context Sobeck, Eileen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Insular Areas, Department in which they were decided, those cases are clearly not authority for questioning the of the Interior 23 application of [constitutional rights in U.S. territories today]."11 The Court ex- Wyden, Hon. Ron, U.S. Senator From Oregon 1 plained, 'Tilt may well be that over time the ties between the United States and any of its unincorporated Territories strengthen in ways that are of constitutional APPENDICES significance."12 History matters. As the findings of Section 19 indicate, the islands of American APPENDIX I Samoa have been a part of the United States for over 113 years ago-fully half the existence of the U.S. Constitution. All living persons born in the islands that con- Responses to additional questions 57 stitute the U.S. territory of American Samoa were born after the islands were ceded by voluntary deed. American Samoans have become an integral part of the fabric APPENDIX II of America, with American Samoa's sons and daughters serving in the U.S. armed forces at a higher rate than any other jurisdiction. Additional material submitted for the record 59 In considering the significance of the District Court's ruling in Tuaua, it is impor- tant to note that the question whether the Citizenship Clause applies in American Samoa is an open question before the Supreme Court and the D.C. Circuit. On ap- peal, the D.C. Circuit will have the opportunity to follow the guidance of Boumediene and place the text and history of the Constitution over dicta from the Insular Cases. 5 During the debate over the Fourteenth Amendment, one of the chief architects of the Citizen- ship Clause observed that while "[t]he second section [of the Fourteenth Amendment] refers to no persons except those in the States of the Union" in apportioning representatives, "the first section [of the Fourteenth Amendment] refers to persons everywhere, whether in the States or in the Territories or in the District of Columbia." Cong. Glob, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. 2894 (1866) (statement of Sen. Trumbull) (emphasis added). Four years after the Fourteenth Amendment , was ratified, the Supreme Court in the Slaughterhouse Cases confirmed in dicta that the Citi- zenship Clause "put[] to rest" the notion that "[t]hose... who had been born and resided always in the District of Columbia or in the Territories, though within the United States, were not citi- zens." 83 U.S. 36, 72-73 (1872) (emphasis added). Indeed, at the time the Fourteenth Amend- ment was ratified, the understanding of the Supreme Court was that "the United States ... is the name given to our great republic, which is composed of States and territories." Ikughborough v. Blake, 18 U.S. 317, 319 (1820) (emphasis added). 6 Tuaua v. United States, No. 12-01143, slip op. at 9 (D.D.C. June 26, 2013) (emphasis in origi- nal) 7 JUAN R. TORRUELLA, THE SUPREME COURT AND PUERTO RICO: THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARATE AND UNEQUAL (1988). 8Tuaua slip. op. at 10-11, FNll. 9553 U.S. 723,765 (2008) (emphasis added). lo Id at 765-66. 11 Id. at 759 (citing Torres v. Puerto Rico, 442 U.S. 465, 475-476 (Brennan, J., concurring in judgment)). 12 Id. (III) .... 73 July 11,2013. Hon. RON WYDEN, Senator, 221 Dirksen Senate Office Bldg; Washington, DC. Hon. LISA MURKOWSK[, Senator, 709 Hart Senate Building, Washington, DC. DEAR CHAIRMAN WYDEN AND RANKING MEMBER MURKOWSKI, To assist the Com- mittee in its consideration of the issues presented in its hearing "To consider S. 1237, the Omnibus Territories Act," we write to address the significant constitu- tional issues raised by Section 19 of S.1237, titled the American Samoa Citizenship Plebiscite Act. We represent Leneuoti Tuaua and seven other people born in American Samoa in the federal case Tuaua v. United States. Our clients are challenging the constitu- tionality of federal statutes that deny them U.S. citizenship, labeling them instead with the inferior status of so-called "non-citizen national."1 Like all other Ameri- cans, they owe permanent allegiance to the United States as U.S. nationals. But people born in American Samoa are the only Americans who, although U.S. nation- als, are not reco~ized as citizens. The impact this has had on our clients' lives has been significant. Our clients' case asks one simple question: so long as American Samoa is part of the United States, do people born in American Samoa have an individual right under the U.S. Constitution to be recognized as citizens? They believe that the Citi- zenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides a clear and definitive an- swer: "All persons born...in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States." Our clients' case, however, does not ad- dress-nor will it answer-any questions about American Samoa's future political status. Such questions about the territory's political status should be answered by the people of American Samoa. The American Samoa Citizenship Plebiscite Act raises significant constitutional concerns because it asks the wrong question. As the President's Task Force on Puer- to Rico Status highlighted in its 2011 report, the "core question" facing the people of U.S. territories is "whether they would like to be part of the United States or would like to be independent."3 The Task Force's report repeatedly emphasized that on this question the "will of the people" is paramount. But so long as American Samoa remains part of the United States, we believe the question of citizenship is answered by the Constitution, not Congress. The individual right to citizenship guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, like the individual rights of free speech or freedom of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment, is simply not something the Constitution permits to be put up for a vote. That is not how the Constitution works. History shows why the Citizenship Clause includes a constitutional guarantee of U.S. citizenship by birth within the territorial limits of the United States. The Citi- zenship Clause was ratified shortly after the Civil War, and it was written against a backdrop of prejudice against newly freed slaves and growing immigrant commu- nities who lived in both states and territories. The purpose of the Clause was to take the power away from Congress or any state or territory to use the political process to deny the citizenship of people born in the United States.4 The Citizenship Clause was intended to overturn the Supreme Court's infamous pre-Civil War deci- sion in Dred Scott v. Sanford, which allowed the government to deny citizenship to people of certain races who were considered inferior. By overturning Dred Scott, the 18 U.S.C.§ 1408(1). 2 For example, lead plaintiff Leneuoti Tuaua is pursuing this litigation because he wants his children to have opportunities that were denied to him-as a young man he was unable to pur- sue a law enforcement career in California because the federal government does not recognize him as a citizen. Another plaintiff living in Seattle lost her job at the DMV because her U.S. passport says she is not a citizen. A plaintiff who lives in Hawaii is unable to vote in state or federal elections despite ten years of service as an officer in the U.S. Armed Forces-he is also denied the right to bear arms. A plaintiff who received two purple hearts in Vietnam and is 80% disabled would face significant obstacles in obtaining an immigrant visa for his foreign na- tional wife should he have to relocate from American Samoa to Hawaii for medical care. A plain- tiff who served in the Liberation of Kuwait was unable to vote alongside his fellow soldiers after returning to the states from their deployment. See, Complaint, 4-10, available at http:// www.equalrightsnow.org/case overview. 3 Report by the President's-Task Force on Puerto Rico's Status ('Tresident's Report") at 30 (March 11, 2011), available at http://www. whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/iga/puerto-rico. 4 As the Reconstruction Framers explained, the Fourteenth Amendment "settles the great Question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the Onited States," putting the "question of citizenship... beyond the legislative power.." Cong. Glob, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. 2890, 2896 (Sen. Howard). .... 72 by government policies, and can be corrected by taking appropriate actions such as honoring the law that was passed in 2007 to incrementally raise the minimum wage in the CNMI. When the vast majority of a population lives below the poverty level, they cannot afford to stimulate the economy with any purchases other than those needed to sur- vive. As long as the federal minimum wage is substantially less than a living wage, there will continue to be an exodus of people from the islands, and the economy will not improve. An economy built on the backs of indentured servants will not grow. OMNIBUS TERRITORIES AND PALAU There is no economic basis for proposing two more delays in the scheduled annual AGREEMENT $.50 minimum wage increases in the CNMI. The tourism sector of the economy in the CNMI has increased significantly according to the Marianas Visitors Authority, which reported a boost in tourism, the CNMI's main industry.6 In May 2013 visitor arrivals were up 16 percent compared to May 2012. In fact, it was reported that there is currently a shortage of hotel rooms in the CNMI to support the increase THURSDAY, JULY 11, 2013 in visitor arrivals.7 In January 2013, HANMI reported the hotel occupancy rate was at 91.05 percent, the highest in 15 years. U.S. SENATE, In his 2013 State of the Union Address, President Barack Obama called on Con- COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES, gress to increase the national minimum wage to $9.00, stating, "Working folks shouldn't have to wait year after year for t~!e minimum wage to go up while CEO Washington, DC. pay has never been higher." The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 9:40 a.m. in room SD- At the same time that some members of Congress are pushing to keep the CNMI 366, Dirksen Senate Office Building, Hon. Ron Wyden, chairman, federal minimum wage at an immoral $5.55 an hour, we see other members heeding President Obama's message by supporting an increase in the federal minimum presiding. wage. S. 460, introduced on March 5, 2013 by Senator Tom Harkin, and the com- panion bill, H.R.1010 introduced by Rep. George Miller on March 6, 2013, both pro- OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. RON WYDEN, U.S. SENATOR pose an increase of the federal minimum wage. FROM OREGON S. 460 and H.R. 1010, The Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2013, amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) to increase the federal minimum wage for em- The CHAIRMAN. The committee will come to order. ployees to: (1) $8.20 an hour on the first day of the third month after the enactment Today the committee meets to consider S. 1237, the Omnibus of this Act; (2) $9.15 an hour after one year; (3) $10.10 an hour after two years; Territories Act and S. 1268, a bill to approve the September 10, and (4) the amount determined by the Secretary of Labor (based on increases in the Consumer Price Index) after three years, and annually every following year.8 2010, agreement between the United States and the Republic of It is perplexing that CNMI Delegate Gregorio Sablan who introduced H.R. 2200, Palau. which proposes to delay the federal minimum wage increase in the CNMI, is also We have with us the delegates from each of the territories, the one of the 141 cosponsors of H.R. 1010 that proposes to increase the federal min- Resident Commissioner from Puerto Rico and Eileen Sobeck from imum wage. Likewise, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), who sponsored H.R. 2200's com- the Department of the Interior for our first panel on S. 1237. panion bills, S. 1237 and S. 256, is one of the 30 cosponsors of S. 460 that would raise the federal minimum wage. Both support delaying a fair wage for the workers Ms. Sobeck will also appear on the second panel along with in the CNMI who are some of the lowest paid workers on U.S. soil, while both sup- Vikram Singh from the Department of Defense and Edgard Kagan port raising the minimum wage for other U.S. workers. Why? from the Department of State to discuss the Palau agreement. It is time to end the disparity between workers who toil on U.S. soil in the CNMI Good morning to all of our witnesses. We welcome you. and workers who toil on U.S. soil in the U.S. mainland. The vast majority of the Let me just say a few words about S. 1237, the Omnibus Terri- workers in the CNMI are disenfranchised, oppressed, and voiceless. Elected officials in the CNMI and in the U.S. must listen not only to employers and business organi- tories Act. The committee has jurisdiction over matters relating to zations who stand to benefit by keeping wages artificially low, but to the workers the territories of our country. However because the territories are -residents and nonresidents-most impacted by the low wages. not represented in the Senate, few legislative proposals dealing Income inequality in the CNMI prevents sustained economic growth, keeps U.S. with the territories are introduced here. citizens from applying for low-paying private sector jobs, and holds those working That's why Senator Murkowski and I have asked Congressman in the private sector in extreme poverty. The proposed wage delays mean that the Sablan to round up legislative proposals from the territories and resident and nonresident workers of the CNMI will not even see a federal minimum - wage of $7.55 an hour until 2018, five years from now. That is truly unacceptable send them to us. Senator Murkowski and I have introduced those and unjust. I urge members of Congress to stop any further delays of the scheduled proposals as S. 1237, the Omnibus Territories Act. Congressman, minimum wage increases in the CNMI. we thank you for your cooperation with us. Senator Murkowski and I have introduced the bill by request. As many of the Senators know introducing a bill by request is a cour- tesy that Senators usually provide to the Executive branch. How- ever, it can be extended to others. We're happy to be able to do so. It also means that Senator Murkowski and I are not endorsing GThe Saipan Tribune, May visitor arrivals up by 16 percent, says MVA, Press Release, June 18, 2013. the bill or expressing support today for all of its provisions. We 7 The Saipan Tribune, More rooms needed to sustain tourism recovery, by Moneth Deposa, merely offer it for consideration at the request of others, in this March 01, 2013 case the elected representatives of the various territories. 8 The Library of Congress, Bill Summary & Status 112th Congress (2013-2014) H.R. 1010 CRS Summary,http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d113:HR01010:@@@D&summ2=m& (1) .... 2 71 The Omnibus Territories Act contains a wide variety of pro- porary structure drastically reduces the effectiveness of the policy and actively dis- posals. Some have been considered by our committee before. Others courages new or long term investing. Thank you for your time and your interest in these matters. are new. Some are a bit controversial. Others have significant support. Let me just talk for a minute about two of the proposals. STATEMENT OF WENDY L. DOROMAL, HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCATE, ON S. 1237 Section 12 of the bill, the Guam War Claims Act has come before As a labor and human rights advocate, I would like to express my strong objection the Senate a number of times in different forms. It has been con- to the provision in S. 1237 and in its companion bill, H.R. 2200, that would delay troversial. It certainly has a high cost. the increase of the federal minimum wage in the U.S. Commonwealth of the North- Few would deny the extraordinary heroism and steadfast loyalty ern Mariana Islands (CNMI) every other year starting in 2013. of the citizens of Guam during World War II. Many were subjected SEC. 4. ADJUSTMENT OF SCHEDULED WAGE INCREASES IN THE to forced labor, tortured, raped and killed by Japanese military COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS. Section 8103(b)(1)(B) of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, forces, often simply because they were Americans. However, as I Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007 (as touched on, the cost of the payment of reparations to the victims amended by section 2 of Public Law 111-244) is amended by striking '2011' and survivors has made this a bit of a challenge to get the bill and inserting '2011, 2013, and 2015'. passed. A separate Senate bill, S. 256, also calls for a delay in the CNMI's $.50 federal But the Congresswoman is here, Ms. Bordallo. I hope I'm pro- minimum wage increase in 2013 and 2015. nouncing that right. Again, we welcome her. The Fair Minimum Wage Act of 2007 component of P.L. 110-28 required the She's tackled the issue by providing a creative way to pay for the CNMI minimum wage to be increased by $.50 an hour each year until it reached the level of the national minimum wage in 2015. Before P.L. 110-28 became law in proposal. The Guam War Claims would be paid using Guam tax May 2007 the CNMI minimum wage was a mere $3.05 an hour. Six years later the dollars that are normally sent to Guam's treasury. So this is a cre- federal minimum wage in the CNMI remains at a shameful $5.55 an hour. ative offset, certainly. Hopefully this wi11 bring Senators and col- The scheduled 2011 $.50 federal minimum hourly wage hike was delayed by pas- leagues together with respect to the cost issue. ' sage of H.R. 3940, which became P.L. 111-244. The delay was promoted by the Saipan Chamber of Commerce and the Hotel Association of the Northern Mariana One of the new proposals in the bill, section 9, the Temporary Islands (HANMI) and backed by CNMI Delegate Gregorio (Kilili) Sablan.1 Although Heating and Energy Assistance to the Virgin Islands, a provision they claimed that the weak economy would be further harmed by the scheduled $.50 designed to help those who have been hit hardest by the significant hourly increase, the U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis in- spike in electricity prices on the Islands. When the oil refinery on dicated that the CNMI economy actually grew 2.3 percent in 2010.2 When members of Congress make decisions involving delaying the scheduled St. Croix closed last year, the Islands faced something of a double CNMI minimum wage increase, they primarily weigh the opinions of the Chamber whammy where they were hit with big job losses and a huge in- , of Commerce, the Hotel Association of the Northern Mariana Islands (HANMI) and crease in the cost of electricity. The economy of the Islands has other business owners who advocate for lower wages to ensure their own higher cor- been devastated. porate profits. The members routinely ignore the needs and opinions of the 12,000 disenfranchised, legal long-term foreign workers who make up more than 80 percent Congressman Christensen has been doing a lot of hard work on of the private sector workforce. Although most of the foreign workers have lived and this. The Governor has. The Departments of Interior and Energy worked legally in the CNMI for 5, 10, 20 or more years, they remain the Northern and local leaders have all been toiling diligently to address this Mariana Island's voiceless underclass. The U.S. citizens who work in the private sector deserve a fair wage. An under- economic disaster. lying purpose of Title VII of P.L. 110-229 was to phase out foreign contract workers They've been working to install a variety of renewable and tradi- while training U.S. citizens to learn the skills needed to replace foreign workers tional energy sources and increase efficiency. So a lot of people thus reducing the unemployment among U.S. citizens in the CNMI. Maintaining an talked about all of the above in terms of energy policy. Congress- unfair minimum wage that promotes poverty and a poor quality of life is not the woman, I know you really are practicing it. way to encourage U.S. citizens to work in the private sector. More and more of the CNMI's residents are leaving the CNMI to move to Guam and the U.S. mainland It's going to take several years for these measures to provide re- where they have opportunities to make a decent living. lief. In the meantime, the Congresswoman is proposing that the Resident and nonresident workers in the CNMI struggle to survive. Their meager Virgin Islands receive a greater share of Low Income Home Energy earnings cannot keep up with the rising costs of commodities and utilities. Many Assistance Act dollars. She proposes that eligibility be expanded to ~ of the workers must choose between paying rent and healthcare. According to the 2010 Census, over 33 percent of the CNMI population has no health insurance, 85.3 individuals with income up to 300 percent of poverty. These would percent of families with children under 18 years of age live in poverty, and the per be temporary measures, in effect, to get the Virgin Islands through capita income is a mere $9,6563. As of January 2013 there were 3,518 household the disaster. We are anxious to hear from the Congresswoman members and 9,522 individual recipients of the federal food stamp program.4 The CNMI Medicaid client base is about 18,000.5 The poverty in the CNMI is worsened about her proposal. One other point, just a few words about S. 1268, to approve the September 10, 2010, agreement between the United States and 1 The Saipan Tribune, Obama delays CNMI wage hike for 2011, by Haidee V Eugenio, Octo- ber 2, 2010. Palau. This agreement certainly has significant strategic value to 2 The U.S Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis Blog, http://blog. bea.gov/ our country. We're anxious to hear from the Pentagon and the De- ?s=northern+mariana,September 17, 2012 3 United States Census Bureau,http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/ partment of State on those matters this morning. productview.xhtml?pid=DEC-10_ DPMP MPDP3&prodType=table. It's hard to place a dollar value on an unsinkable aircraft carrier 4 The Saipan Tribune, Additional $12Mto $24M into CNMI economy, by Haidee V. Eugenio, April 2, 2013. in the Pacific, unchallenged authority over a huge swath of the 5 Pacific Islands Report, CNMI Medicaid Program Expects More Clients in 2014: High Pre- ocean and a steadfast international ally. But we do know the cost, miums Leading toFamilies Dropping Medical Insurance, by Moneth Deposa, April 4, 2013. .... 70 3 ity was built in the early 19605, and we have been there ever since. In fact, this $175 million by the way, of one F-35 fighter jet. So it is hard to August, StarKist will be celebrating our 50th anniversary manufacturing in the ter- overstate the value and strategic necessity of approving an agree- ritory. It was American Samoa's prime location in the heart of the most prolific fish- ing ground in the world that drew processors to the island initially. The advantages ment. that come with being a U.S. territory also drew processors; specifically, the ability I hope the Administration will continue to work with the com- to send finished tuna product to the mainland U.S. duty-free. Because of these and mittee to find an acceptable offset for the Palau agreement so that other factors such as wages, American Samoa offered a favorable cost structure for many years. America can address an important national security issue. It was in this environment that the tuna industry thrived, growing to be the is- My friend and colleague, Senator Murkowski, is here. I want to land's largest source of private sector employment by far. Until the closure of the . let her make whatever statement she chooses. Chicken of the Sea facility, tuna processing accounted for 80 percent of American Samoa's private sector employment. It is also important to note that most of the [The prepared statement of Senator Risch follows:] other private sector employers in American Samoa are dependent on the tuna indus- PREPARED STATEMENT OF HON. JAMES E. RISCH, U.S. SENATOR FROM IDAHO, try, as their businesses consist of providing goods and services to us, the fishing ves- sels that come into port to supply us, and to our employees. StarKist alone employed oN S. 1237 40 percent of the island's private sector workers. StarKist has employed generation I would like to note my strong opposition to Section 7 of S. 1237, as introduced after generation of American Samoans, and we value the dedication the island's peo- on June 27, 2013 and as considered by the Committee today. That section would pie have demonstrated to StarKist for decades. We recognize that our success has require the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands to hold a referendum on whether in many ways been due to their hard work and commitment. the Federal government may establish an unelected Chief Financial Officer (CFO) While these factors have historically combined to attract whole-fish processors to for the Territorial government. The provision then sets out a Rube Goldberg-type American Samoa, in today's global economy, the fierce foreign competition faced by of process whereby a CFO would be identified and selected. The provision is strongly U.S.-based processors means that mere proximity to fish and a favorable trade sta- opposed by the Governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands. tus are no longer enough to make American Samoa competitive. As a former governor, I cannot imagine a more unwieldy and unnecessary intru- sion into the local self-governance of the Virgin Islands. Apart from the questionable CHANGES IN THE TUNA PROCESSING BUSINESS merits of establishing a new bureaucracy to replicate the existing duties of the Ter- Two Different Business Models ritory's executive branch , I believe the proposal sends the wrong signal that the Ter- The increasingly global nature of the tuna business has enabled the industry to ritory is incapable of self-governance and that the Federal government must some- shift operations from one location to another, allowing producers to adjust more eas- how intervene to settle local disputes. Indeed, it would appear to violate the prin- ily to supply and demand and the changes in input costs and prices. An example ciples of federalism and to be a step backwards, not forward, in the Territory's path , of this dynamic is the shift made by my competitors to outsource the most labor to greater self-governance. Certainly no governor of any State of which I am aware intensive aspects of tuna processing to low-wage countries, and then make final would tolerate federal legislation requiring (or even permitting) the establishment product and packaging from imported frozen tuna loins. The loin is the light, meaty, of a CFO in their respective States. erlihle part, of ti.ina: If the people of the Virgin Islands believe that a CFO would be useful or bene- In a full scale tuna cannery, such as the cannery we operate in American Samoa, ficial, they are certainly free to require the same, through local referendum or local the manufacturing process starts with a whole fish-known as a "round" fish-and legislation. They do not need Congress to tell them what to do or how to do it. ends with a consumer-ready product in a can. Upon delivery to our dock, the whole fish is cleaned, cooked, combined with other ingredients and packaged into cans by STATEMENT OF HON. LISA MURKOWSKI, U.S. SENATOR our American Samoan workforce. We then ship those cans directly to the U.S. main- land and distribute throughout the country for sale. FROM ALASKA In contrast, the alternate business model adopted by our competitors is the use Senator MURKOWSKI. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good morning of outsourced foreign labor for nearly all of the tuna preparation and then a small domestic loinery for final product packaging. In their business model, they have to each of you. Thank you for your representation in your respec- outsourced the most labor intensive aspect of tuna processing to extremely low wage tive regions. We welcome you to the committee here this morning. countries. In these mostly South Asian factories, workers making as little as sixty Mr. Chairman, I want to thank you for holding the hearing on cents per hour clean, prepare, and cook the whole tuna fish and transform it into a tuna loin. That loin is then frozen and exported to the Unites States nearly duty two pieces of legislation that impact the territories and the freely free. Having removed nearly 80 percent of the labor expense, my competitors then associated states. As you have recognized, this is an area of a com- take the frozen loin and use minimal U.S. employment to place the product into mittee's jurisdiction. It probably doesn't generate as many head- cans for consumers. To illustrate the impact, Chicken of the Sea was able to replace lines as some of the other issues that we take up. But nonetheless, its 2,000 person workforce in American Samoa with fewer than 300 workers in Georgia. very important to our Nation's economic and clearly, physical, secu- As you can see, two different business models have emerged in the tuna industry. rity. One model involves outsourcing the bulk of the labor-intensive work to low-wage So it is an important issue, a series of important issues, that we countries, using as little U.S. labor as possible to create the finished product and address today. avoid import duties. The other model-the model we are trying to preserve in Amer- ican Samoa-uses more U.S. labor to manufacture a can of tuna. The owners of - The first bill, the Omnibus Terntories Act of 2013, 20 sections loineries in the United States have already maximized their competitive advantage contained within it and really a very wide range of issues, going by using an outsourced labor approach. everywhere from the minimum wage to HUD programs to fisheries, Star·Kist applauds your efforts to identify, through this legislation, alternatives for endorsements and everything in between that may impact the ter- less expensive energy in the territory-a major cost associated with business there. We also applaud your efforts to examine the fairness of the application of existing ritories both individually and collectively. federal cost benefit requirements and local cost sharing requirements for federal As you note, Mr. Chairman, this bill was introduced by request. economic development assistance. Significant improvements can, and must, be made We have made some changes to the bill compared to what was in- to American Samoa's infrastructure, ports, and shipping capabilities. Finally, while troduced over on the House side. I anticipate that we're probably not addressed in this legislation or within your committee's jurisdiction, we submit that the existing federal tax-based incentives for businesses operating in American going to see further changes as we move forward with this. I look Samoa are critical for survival of the territory's economy. However, the existing tem- forward to working with each of the delegates on these matters. .... 4 69 With respect to the second piece of legislation and this is the partments and agencies. This will free up scarce local government resources and agreement between the United States and Palau. I do thank the allow us to address pressing matters impacting the people of the Vir~in Islands, and again in this instance I presume to believe I can speak for practically all residents Administration for transmitting the language to Congress so that of the Vir