DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. CROIX
5
CAMILLE MACEDON a/k/a KING DERBY,
5
5
Plaintiff,
5
2001-CV-0079
v.
5
5
GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS,5
VIRGIN ISLANDS CARNIVAL
5
COMMITTEE,
5
5
Defendants.
5
__________________________________________5
TO:
Lee J. Rohn, Esq.
Carol Thomas Jacobs, Esq., AAG
Tamika Archer, Esq., AAG
Arturo Watlington, Jr., Esq.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND GRANTING
DEFENDANT GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS’ MOTION  TO QUASH
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider
“Admonishments” and Sanctions (Docket No. 221) and Defendant Government of the
Virgin Islands’ Motion to Quash Amended Notice of Deposition of Alvin Burke (Docket
No. 224).  Defendant Government of the Virgin Islands filed an opposition to Plaintiffs’
motion to reconsider, and Plaintiffs filed a reply thereto.  Plaintiffs filed an opposition to
Defendant Government of the Virgin Islands’ motion to quash, and said Defendant waived
its reply by telephone communication with undersigned’s chambers.
Case: 1:01-cv-00079-HB-GWC   Document #: 228   Filed: 11/30/07   Page 1 of 4
Macedon v. Government of the Virgin Islands
2001-CV-0079
Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider and Granting Defendant Government of the Virgin Islands’
Motion to Quash
Page 2
With regard to Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration, the Court finds that Plaintiffs
fail to persuade the Court that its Order Regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion of [sic] Protective
Order (Docket No. 218), entered October 19, 2007, requires modification or reversal.  Said
order granted Plaintiffs’ motion wherein Plaintiffs sought a protective order regarding the
depositions of Plaintiffs as noticed because of the unavailability of Plaintiffs.
It is well established that a court may issue, “for good cause shown,” orders “to
protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden
or expense,  including . . . that the . . . discovery may be had only on specified terms and
conditions . . . .”  Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(2).  Despite the “admonishments and sanctions”
language contained in said order, the Court merely was specifying the terms and
conditions upon which the discovery “may be had”, as authorized by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26.
Even if the order is construed as actual sanctions, as Defendant Government of the
Virgin Islands duly notes in its opposition, it is within the Court’s “[s]ound discretion [to]
identify and determine the legal basis for each sanction charge sought to be imposed, and
whether its resolution requires further proceedings . . . . [This] rule . . . permits some cases
to be disposed of on the record and . . . prevents unnecessary expenditure of judicial time.”
Jones v. Pittsburgh Nat’l Corp., 899 F.2d 1350, 1359 (3d Cir. 1990).  The Court had ample
Case: 1:01-cv-00079-HB-GWC   Document #: 228   Filed: 11/30/07   Page 2 of 4
Macedon v. Government of the Virgin Islands
2001-CV-0079
Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider and Granting Defendant Government of the Virgin Islands’
Motion to Quash
Page 3
evidence before it of Plaintiffs’ conduct with regard to the depositions at issue and stated
its reasons for the terms and conditions it imposed regarding the rescheduling of the said
depositions.  Consequently, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider.
Counsel for Defendant Government of the Virgin Islands maintains that they cannot
be in both St. Thomas and St. Croix for depositions scheduled on December 6, 2007.
Because the Court will not disturb its Order Regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion of [sic] Protective
Order (Docket No. 218), entered October 19, 2007, nor the depositions that have been
noticed in accordance with said order by Defendant Government of the Virgin Islands, the
Court now will grant said Defendant’s motion to quash and cancel the deposition of Alvin
Burke as noticed for December 6, 2007, in St. Croix.  The parties shall meet and confer
regarding the re-scheduling of said deposition, which shall be completed on or before
January 11, 2008.
Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider “Admonishments” and Sanctions (Docket
No. 221) is DENIED.
2.
Defendant Government of the Virgin Islands’ Motion to Quash Amended
Notice of Deposition to Alvin Burke (Docket No. 224) is GRANTED.
Case: 1:01-cv-00079-HB-GWC   Document #: 228   Filed: 11/30/07   Page 3 of 4
Macedon v. Government of the Virgin Islands
2001-CV-0079
Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reconsider and Granting Defendant Government of the Virgin Islands’
Motion to Quash
Page 4
3.
The deposition of Alvin Burke noticed by Plaintiffs in the above-captioned
matter for December 6, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. is CANCELED.
4.
Plaintiffs may issue a new notice of deposition for Alvin Burke, for a
mutually acceptable date, time, and location.  Such deposition shall be
completed on or before January 11, 2008.
ENTER:
Dated: November 30, 2007
                                /s/                                   
GEORGE W. CANNON, JR.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 1:01-cv-00079-HB-GWC   Document #: 228   Filed: 11/30/07   Page 4 of 4