DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. CROIX
5
KENNOX “LEE” PLANTE,
5
5
Plaintiff,
5
2005-CV-0126
v.
5
5
ORGILL INCORPORATED,
5
5
Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff 5
5
v.
5
YUN FU ENTERPRISES CO.
5
5
Third-Party Defendant.
5
________________________________________________5
TO:
Lee J. Rohn, Esq.
Simone R.D. Francis, Esq.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT FOR A
MORE COMPLETE RESPONSE TO DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION NO. 11
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant
For a More Complete Response to Demand For Production No. 11 (Docket No. 47).
Defendant contends that the documents identified in Plaintiff’s Demand For
Production No. 11 are irrelevant.  Having reviewed the said demand and Defendant’s
response and contentions, the Court agrees.  Consequently, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s
request.
Case: 1:05-cv-00126-RLF-GWC   Document #: 55   Filed: 09/12/07   Page 1 of 2
Plante v. Orgill Inc.
2005-CV-0126
Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel
Page 2
In the text of the joint stipulation Plaintiff also requests further supplementation of
Defendant’s First Supplemental Rule 26 Disclosures to provide the business address for
Brian Dempsey.  Defendant states that it already has provided the business address for
Brian Dempsey.  Therefore, Plaintiff’s request is moot.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Competl Defendant
For a More Complete Response to Demand For Production No. 11 (Docket No. 47) is
DENIED.
ENTER:
Dated: September 12, 2007
                                /s/                                   
GEORGE W. CANNON, JR.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 1:05-cv-00126-RLF-GWC   Document #: 55   Filed: 09/12/07   Page 2 of 2