NOT FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
CHESTER CROMWELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION, INC.,
d/b/a INNOVATIVE TELEPHONE, d/b/a
VITELCO,
Defendant.
___________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 2007-56
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
APPEARANCES:
Chester Cromwell
P.O. Box 303297, St. Thomas, U.S.V.I. 00803
Pro se plaintiff,
Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative Telephone d/b/a
Vitelco
St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.
Pro se defendant.
ORDER
GÓMEZ, C.J.
Upon review of the record, the Court notes that the file
contains no proof of service upon, nor entry of appearance on
behalf of Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative
Telephone d/b/a Vitelco (the “Defendant”) in this matter.  It
does not appear that service of the complaint has been made
within 120 days after the filing of the complaint on March 22,
Case: 3:07-cv-00056-CVG-GWB   Document #: 3   Filed: 06/29/09   Page 1 of 2
Cromwell v. Innovative Communication, Inc. d/b/a Innovative Telephone d/b/a
Vitelco
Civil No. 2007-56
Order
Page 2
2007, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).  The
premises considered, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the plaintiff shall, no later than Monday,
July 13, 2009, either file proof of service on the defendants or
show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of
timely service; and it is further
ORDERED that a failure to file proof of service or show
cause by the designated deadline may result in dismissal of this
action.
       S\                          
        CURTIS V. GÓMEZ
       
     Chief Judge
Case: 3:07-cv-00056-CVG-GWB   Document #: 3   Filed: 06/29/09   Page 2 of 2