DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN JEAN E. TOLUD and DIONNE G. SINCLAIR, Plaintiffs, v. ALEXANDER S. BOUIS and TARA BOUIS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:19-cv-0039 ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER THESE MATTERS came before the Court on several pretrial motions. For the reasons stated on the record prior to the commencement of the bench trial on February 22, 2021, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Offering Non- Expert Testimony of Speculative Future Loss Rental Income, ECF No. 51, is DENIED without prejudice; it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Extrinsic Evidence of Fraud, ECF No. 52, is DENIED without prejudice; it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Offering Non- Expert Testimony of Latent Structural Defects, ECF No. 53, is DENIED without prejudice; it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Prohibit Plaintiffs from Requesting a Specific Dollar Amount be Awarded for Their Loss of Use, ECF No. 54, is DENIED without prejudice; it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Documents not Produced in Discovery, ECF No. 55, is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 9-19, ECF No. 61, is DENIED; it is further Case: 3:19-cv-00039-RAM-GAT Document #: 91 Filed: 02/26/21 Page 1 of 2 Tolud et al. v. Bouis et al. Case No. 3:19-cv-0039 Order Page 2 of 2 ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Documents that were not Produced in Response to a Rule 34 Request for Production, ECF No. 70, is DENIED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Combined Motion and Memorandum to Exclude Documents Produced Pursuant to Subpoenas Issued after the Close of Discovery, ECF No. 80, is DENIED without prejudice. Dated: February 26, 2021 /s/ Robert A. Molloy ROBERT A. MOLLOY District Judge Case: 3:19-cv-00039-RAM-GAT Document #: 91 Filed: 02/26/21 Page 2 of 2