UNIVERSAL LIBRARY THE DANISH WEST INDIES How ihc colonies were actually governed; wkai Ae colonists did at work and Tplay; horn the motker country stamped her image upon ikem^ and to tvkat extent the lineaments of that image toere modified, by contact with local forces—these are matters that interest the reader of to-day —IP. jij. Shepherd. CHHIr^TIAXSTKI). ST. fit* flX. IX THE DANISH WEST INDIES UNDER COMPANY RULE (1671-1754) WITH A SUPPLEMENTARY CHAPTER 1755-1917 WALDEMAR WESTEEGAABD Ph D ASSISTANT PEOFBSSOB OP HISTOET AT POMONA COILBGB WITH AN INTRODUCTION BV H MORSE STEPHENS M A Litt D (Harv) 6AIEBB PKOIESSOK 01 HISIORY AX XHE OIOVEItStlX 01 CAUXOSmA MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS Npm fotit THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1917 All r%ghta reserved Ooi»YRtOMT, 1917 Bt THK macjsui.i.an company Hi^t u|> anti printed, l^ublitihtui June, 14)17» PREFACE Since the opening of the Panama Canal, the attention of the United States has been drawn more and more to those Caribbean and Gulf regions, which were, until comparatively recent times, the economic center of the New World and the source of a considerable part of that wealth which kept the wheels of industry running in the Old. If Tobacco was King in the seventeenth, and Cotton in the nineteenth, then Sugar surely held the scepter in the eighteenth century. This book was written before the United States began the negotiations that have resulted in the transfer of the Danish West Indian islands to the United States. The increased in- terest of Americans in Caribbean lands, and the scarcity of authoritative historical books upon the subject will it is hoped justify its appearance now. It assumes a certain curiosity on the part of the reader, first, as to how the Danish-Norwegian state became interested in the islands off the Spanish Main, and second, how so small a state has managed to retain its hold for nearly two centuries and a half. The pages which follow record an episode in the time when Sugar was King. They are the result of ah attempt to identify and appraise a number of official and other papers found in the Bancroft Collection at the University of California. These documents had come from the Danish West Indian islands, and were fihst brought to the writer’s attention by Professor Henry Morse Stephens under whose inspiration and guidance the subsequent investigations were carried on. The paucity of the printed material dealing with the history of Danish colonization in America led to a search in the Danish libraries and archives for further light. The entire archives of the Danish West India and Guinea Company were found substan- tially intact in their repository in the state archives building of Denmark near Christiansborg castle. Except for the labors of VI PREFACE a few scholars in search of genealogical and biographical in- formation, the collection had to all appearances scarcely been touched. With such a wealth of material to go through, the writer caimot claim to have exhausted his subject, but he hopes to have made more intelligible than hitherto the story of one of those commercial joint-stock companies that were so closely associated with the seventeenth and eighteenth century ex- ploitation of New World resources. Treated by itself, colonial history is well-nigh meaningless. Only when considered as part of European history—indeed, when related somehow to universal history—does it become vital. It is obvious that the political and economic development of American colonies cannot be adequately followed without giving considerable attention to the forces that prompted, and largely guided, commercial ventures- The present work is the history of a company composed mainly of Danish business men intent upon embracing such commercial opportunities as the New World seemed to offer them. Their headquarters were in Copenhagen, their factories, or trading centers, in the West Indies and on the Guinea coast. Business was the chief aim, the establishment of a colony an incident, of their en- deavors. Yet one caimot be understood apart from the other. The r6le played by Denmark-Norway in tropical colonijza- tion was indeed not large and not infrequently the interest of the English—or American—^reader will center in what the men of the North saw and heard in the West Indies, rather than in what they did there. Yet, there was enough of what might be called economic solidarity in the Western commercial world to lend the Danish occupation a genuine interest. Despite local differences, the experiences of the Danes were fairly typical of those of the Dutch, the French, the English, and even the Spanish merchants and administrators. The physical condi- tions with which all had to contend were nearly identical. The political and economic ideas which the Europeans who sought to earn their livelihood in the West Indies brought witli them had many points of similarity. In fact, the population of many of the islands was surprisingly cosmopolitan. PREFACE Vll In the eighty-four years of its existence, the Company led a varied and interesting life. During its early years it sur- vived the competition of Dutch, French, English, and Branden- burg business, whether private or corporate. With the opening of the new century it experienced the welcome, if rather hectic, glow of a period of prosperity induced by a general European war, that of the Spanish Succession. In the era of speculation and depression that followed the return of peace, the Danish Company had its experience with paper money expedients as a cure for hard times. In the history of the slave trade and of that tropical agri- culture which it was calculated to promote, and in the growth of the idea of self-government, the experience of the Danish colonies is suggestive. Though St. Thomas has been popularly associated with buccaneers and pirates, some of whose exploits are recorded in the following pages, it has scarcely been sus- pected heretofore that a considerable part of Captain Kidd’s ‘‘treasure” found its way to the warehouses and ships of Danes and Brandenburgers on the island. But what was after all far more important than random calls by pirates was the fact that the Company helped to supply Europe with sugar, cotton and what are still known in Danish shops as colonial wares. Moreover, it served as a training school for statesmen who after this experience found the transition from the business of the Company to affairs of state less dif- ficult to compass. The writer has not hesitated to let the actors tell their own story, but to obviate needless obstruction to the narrative, and for the benefit of those readers who may care to probe deeper into the subject, such illustrative and statistical ma- terial as could not well be included in the body of the text has been incorporated into the appendix. Many names of char- acters and places not familiar to English readers in their Danish form have been anglicized where possible. The following list of Danish equivalents for the rendering of proper names given in the text is offered in the hope of preventing undue confusion for such as may care to consult the original records. Chris- tian « Christiem; George ~ Jdrgen; Peter == Peder, Pieter; PREFACE viii John = Jan, Johan, Johannes, Jens; Oliver = Oliger; William = Willem, Wilhelm; Severin == Sciren; also Unicorn = Enhiorn- ingen; Unity = Eenigheden; Electoral Prince ~ Churprinz; tlie Peace = Freden; the Gilded Crown = den Forgyldte Krone; the Red Cock = den Rode Hane, To friends who have assisted him in numerous ways, the writer wishes to express his gratitude. Chief among these is Professor H. Morse Stephens, Sather Professor of History at the University of California, to whose generous ent^ourage- ment this work owes its inception. He has followed the progress of the investigations with a never-flagging interest, and has always been ready to place his great store of knowledge at the writer's disposal. To Professor Charles IL Hull of Cornell University for patient guidance and valued instruction during a year at that institution as Fellow in American history, to Professor Herbert E. Bolton of the University of (^/alifornia for constructive criticism, to Mr. Herbert L Priestley for valuable bibliographical hints, to Professor W. R. R. Pinger and Miss Florence Livingstone for suggestions as to style, sincere thanks are due. To the oflGicials in the Danish archives and libraries whose services were generously placed at his dis- posal, the author takes pleasure in acknowledging his debt, and especially to former Rigsarkivar^ Dr. V. Secher and his staff at the state and provincial archives, Dr. V. Christensen of the Raadsticearkiv, Professor Knud Fabricaus, Dr. Ove Paul- sen, the officials of the Royal and University Libraries, atul to Fru Anna Backer. Their uniform courtesy and helpfulness are among the writer’s pleasant memories of his year in Co|H^n- hagen. To His Excellency Dr. Maurice Francis Egan. Axiieri<*an minister to Denmark, the writer desires to express his gratitude for assistance in securing access to materials. To the Regents of the University of California for aid in making pen- hagen to IH Dutdb famiUes who were bwmiJit In to encourage gardening. D. B. E., m (a), 245. ** C. C. A. Gosdb, Danish Ardio BafpsdMam, I (Haldiiyt Soc.). INTRODUCTION 17 which was part of their errand. These colonies had been planted in the Viking Age,^^ but Denmark had had no conununication with them since the Black Death in the fourteenth century. It was the King’s desire to reestablish the dominion of the Danish-Norwegian crown over these regions. In 1619 the search for the northwest passage to India, which had been proposed in the reign of Christian II, was actually attempted by the famous Jens Munk, whose Navigationes septentrionales has become one of the classics of North Atlantic exploration. Jens Munk had been suggested as captain of that fleet which the newly organized Danish East India Company sent out from Copenhagen on November ^9, 1618, to sail around the Cape of Good Hope for the East Indies; but he seems to have been unable to come to terms with the company, in the establishment of which he had been interested. Instead he ventured out from the Danish capital on May 9, 1619, with two ships, the Unicom with a crew of forty-eight and the Lamprey with sixteen men. After passing through the Hudson Strait, they sailed south- westward over Hudson’s Bay, waters that had been crossed so far as is known only by the discoverer Henry Hudson, by Cap- tain Thomas Button in 1612--1613, and possibly by Hawkridge in 1617. They wintered at the mouth of the Churchill River and after fearful sufferings from cold and scurvy, the captain and two other survivors arrived on the Norway coast in the Unicom on September 21, 1620.^® After so severe a disappoint- ment, the expedition that had been planned for the following year was given up. The most lasting contribution of Christian IV to overseas commerce was the chartering of the Danish East India Com- pany in 1616. The prime movers, besides Jens Munk, were two Dutchmen, John de Willom of Amsterdam and Herman Rosencrantz of Rotterdam. The fact that the Danish factory at Tranquebar in India was kept alive at all during the early years of the company was due, more than to any other cause, to the skill and perseverance of the second governor, Roland Crapp^, a Dutchman by birth, who directed the factory from Erik the Red discovered and settled Greenland in 985. C. C. A. Gosch, Danish Ardic Explorations, II- 18 THE DANISH WEST INDIES 16^1 to 1636.^^ In organizing this company the Danes were following closely in the footsteps of the Dutch, whose great company had already scored some conspicuous successes. So long as states did not possess navies strong or numerous enough to patrol distant as well as home waters, the plan employed to secure reasonable safety for trading vessels was for merchants to band themselves together in joint-stock companies under liberal charters from the crown and then send out, when neces- sary, whole merchant fleets, properly armed, to Muscovy or Turkey, to India or Cathay. These companies became the instruments by which states fought each other openly or by intrigue for the control of the foreign trade of alien lands- The custom of issuing letters of marque and reprisal had become prevalent in the wars of the sixteenth century. Privately owned vessels were thereby permitted to make seizures of enemies’ ships. Hence trade by means of single private vessels became exceedingly unsafe. Danish merchants organized other companies for trade nearer home. A company organized in 1619 secured a monopoly of the trade with Iceland.^® The salt and wine trade with Spain and France had suffered so severely from captures and lack of capital that the king, again taking his cue from the Dutch, decided to have the trade carried on by a large number of com- panies with seats to be located in the various cities of the king- dom, that should serve as distributing centers. It was hoped to produce a merchant fleet that would be of service in defence, but the plan failed, and with its failure the whole scheme of govern- mentally encouraged commercial companies received a serious setback.^® It is interesting to note that in this period of commercial activity, in which the"king plays a leading part, we hear for the first time of proposals for a Danish West India Company. They come as one might expect, from a Dutchman, in fact from that John de Willom who had helped in the organization of the East India Company. On January 25, 1625, he received permission K. Larsea, 1, 14 ei seq., 170. 104. Ibid,, 105, 109. INTRODUCTION 19 to establish a company which should have for a term of eight years the privilege of trade with the West Indies, Brazil, Virginia, and Guinea.^^ Nothing is known to have come of the venture. The extent of Christian IV’s commercial plans is strikingly illustrated by his foundation of cities. In 1616 he had begun the building of Gliickstadt, on the Elbe, with the intention of making it a rival of Hamburg. In 1624 he compelled the inhabitants of Oslo in Norway to move into the newly planned city of Chris- tiania, named in the king’s honor, a city that was to become a rival to Bergen, which had lost its Hanseatic privileges in 1559.^® But just as conditions appeared to favor the rapid development of Danish commerce in new fields, Christian de- cided to take a hand in settling the religious strife in Germany. The intervention of the king as champion of the German prot- estant princes and head of the Lower Saxon Circle of the Em- pire came to an inglorious end (peace of Ltibeck, May 22, 1629) and reacted unfavorably upon commercial conditions in the kingdom. The East India Company was reorganized in 1684 and a Greenland company formed in 1686, but the results seem to have been exceedingly meager.^^ Peace with her neighbors, particularly with Sweden and the Netherlands, was the chief condition on which the prosperity of Denmark-Norway rested. Her selfish policy with regard to the navigation of the Sound drove the Netherlands into an alliance with Sweden (1640) which was to last for fifteen years. At the instance of Axel Oxenstierna, Sweden declared war against Denmark in 1648. As a result of aid extended by Dutch ships and the threat of Dutch intervention in Sweden’s behalf, Den- mark was forced in 1645 to conclude a peace at Bromsebro in pe Willom had in 1616 with the assistance of Jens Munk organized a com- pany to undertake whale fishing on the Greenland coast; in 1623 he had taken over the royal silk weaving factory in Copenhagen from the king. He is buried in the cemetery of Nicolaj church, Copenhagen. D. R. H., IV, 104. V. Chris- tensen, HistorisJce Meddeles&r om Kjdbenhavn, II, 420. D. R. H., IV, 97, 98. ®®Two ships were sent out to Greenland in 1636, and mention is made by Thaarup of “an unfortunate voyage undertaken by Commander Kirk Albertz in the year 1639.” Vejledning til del dcmshe monarchies Staiistik (KjSbenhavn, 1794), n, 365. £0 THE DANISH WEST INDIES which she made important concessions concerning the Sound duties. This was the beginning of Denmark’s actual decline as a Baltic power. Immediately on the accession of Charles X as king of Sweden in 1654 began that series of wars which involved Sweden in struggles with Poland, Brandenburg, the Empire, Russia, and Denmark, and which finally ended, so far as the last named state was concerned, in her humiliation by the peace of Copenhagen (1660). Denmark lost the three southern provinces of the Swed- ish peninsula, Scania, Hailing, and Bleking, as well as her lord- ship over the Sound. In this strenuous period, when the Danes were fighting for their very existence as a nation, they had no means or energy to devote to commerce with distant lands. During the lull between the two Swedish wars, however, Henry Muller, chief of the Copenhagen customs house and a man of extensive manufacturing and trading interests, sent expeditions to Greenland in 165^ and 1653.^ In the later year Frederick III granted privileges to certain '"participants” to engage in West Indian trade. It was a grant, as the royal letter reads, "to our subjects who have already sailed to the Caribbean islands in the West Indies in a recent year, and who now desire with such other shareholders as may join them to sail again to these islands.” The privileges had mainly to do with Sound and harbor dues and had nothing to say of occupation of any terri- tory.'^^ The results were at first exceedingly meager. It appears that in 1654, the year that Charles X began his martial career, eleven ship owners from Elsinore ventured to send a single ship to the West Indies. Though the beginnings were small and early efforts timid, the possibilities of the Guinea-West Indies trade loomed large. It ^ No further expeditious appear to have visited Greenland until Hans Egede went there to establish his famous mission in 1721. Thaamp, 30S. The Dutch had organized a Gre^and company as early as 1614, but apparently made no attempt at settlement. BergsQe, Pen danshe Sicds StaMHik, IV, 607. No. 73, Sjodl. aabne Breee, Apr. 29, 1662 {Indkeg). Mads Mortensen, Joh. Hansen, Lambert Ebbesen, Jac. Albcrtsen, Xsbrandt V. Holten, Hans Jensen, Joan Wilders, and Hans Hansen, Herm. Voogt, Berendt WiUumsen, and Jan Hm. No. 73, BjmlL aabne Breee, Apr. 29, 1602 (IndUefff 5, 1663). INTRODUCTION 21 was not long before the scene of Danish-Swedish rivalry was shifted from the Baltic Sea to the coast of Guinea in Western Africa. Just as the Portuguese monopoly in the East Indies gradually crumbled before the onslaughts of skippers with letters of marque and reprisal, and of companies with royal charters sailing under the Dutch, English, French, or Danish flag, so had the Portuguese monopoly of the African slave trade been broken into, first by the English, of whom John Hawkins stands as a type, and later by Dutch, French, and Courlanders, and in 1614 by the Swedes. Negro slaves were in chief demand among the Spanish planters on the mainland of America and the larger islands, where the use of native labor had threatened the extermination of the Indians and the Caribs. The Swedes had built their Guinea factory in the neighborhood of Cabo Corso or Cape Coast, where they seem to have displaced the Portuguese.^^ During the war of 1657-1658 with Denmark, the Swedish factor, one Henry Carloff, turned traitor and went into the Danish service as a privateer, and captured the chief factory, called Carolusberg. Although forced to give up this place, the Danes secured other places near at hand where they built the forts of Fredericksborg and Christiansborg. An African company with headquarters at Gliickstadt appears to have been established without delay (1659), though the extent of its activities is not yet known. There was some trading by private Danish adven- turers who took cargoes of slaves from Guinea to the Spanish American colonies early in Frederick Ill's reign.'^^ In the realm of political history the most important event in Frederick’s time (1648-1670) was the establishment of the absolute monarchy, probably the most thoroughgoiag abso- lutism that Europe has ever seen. Recent events had demon- strated the necessity for unified and efficient action, and cer- Lucas, in, 67. On 17 Nov., 1653, Jens Lassen, a treasury clerk and merchant, with certain associates, petitioned Philip IV for permission to carry on a trade with Spanish America in Guinea slaves. The Spanish ambassador in Copenhagen, the Count of Rebolledo, had favored the grant on the ground that if the king refused, the trade would no doubt stUl take place. He reported that all the northmn lands traded with the Spanish colonies. E. Gigas, Cfrev Bernardino de RehoUedo . . . (Kidbeohavn, 1883), pp. 181, 877. 22 THE DANISH WEST INDIES tainly it is diflScult to imagine a more ‘'eflScient” government than an absolute monarchy under a capable despot. Since it was not until this reorganization of government had taken place that the state assumed a leading and consistent part in en- couraging commerce and industry, a brief summaiy of what happened in 1660 will be appropriate. There was felt a crying need, especially by the peasantry, for a new order, and the nobility was held mainly responsible for existing oppressive conditions. It was in fact chiefly upon the peasants and burghers, assisted to some extent by the clergy, that the king depended in putting through his coup d'Stat. For government by the king and estates, was substituted govern- ment by the king alone, who delegated a large part of his work to colleges or boards appointed by himself. Some of these as the Privy Council (Rigaraadet)^ a remnant of the old order, the Council of State (Statskollegiet)^ and the Board of Trade {Kora- merce-kollegiet), were advisory; others, as the Danish and Ger- man chanceries and the treasury board {Shatkarrvra&rkollegiet), were adininistrative. The supreme court which had hitherto been filled entirely by the nobility, now came under the Danish chancery. The chancellor became its president, and trained burghers were given seats in it. Besides these institutions, which were modifiied as conditions changed and circumstances demanded it, special commissions were at one time or another appointed to investigate special subjects; sometimes the king would issue acts or ordinances under his own hand, and some- times one or another board would prepare an act which would be issued from the royal chamber or cabinet.^^ It was this con- centration of power in the royal hands that made possible a concentration of effort in matters of trade. About the time when Danish and Norwegian merchants were beginning to think seriously of securing the establishment of a chartered company for trade with America {%, e., the West Indies), or of making some arrangement with the French who were preparing ^ Medddeker fra ArUvet, t886-‘8b, 65 ei seq, D. R. H., IV, 470 ei “ Cab- inet Orders” play an important part during the Guldberg period (177J^-1784) when much of the government was carried on through orders xnade out by advisers and signed by the king. INTRODUCTION 23 under Colbert’s direction to reorganize their West India Com- pany, that the Board of Trade was established (1668) as a de- partment of the Danish government, with the Dutchman Simon Petkum as its first president.^ The question naturally arises. What was the actual situation in Europe and the West Indies with which this new-fl.edged absolutism would be called upon to cope before it could success- fully launch a colonizing and commercial company for New World exploitation? The sudden death of Charles X in 1660 had lessened the immediate danger from the Swedish quarter. The accession of Charles II to the throne of the restored mon- archy in England could not but be viewed hopefully in Denmark, which state had all but openly assisted the Netherlands against England in the first Anglo-Dutch war (1652--1654). Denmark’s position in the second Anglo-Dutch war (1665-1667) was still more diflGicult.^^ The Dutch, by virtue of alliances with both powers, were straining every effort to secure the assistance, active or passive, of France and Denmark, while Charles II was laboring to draw Frederick away from the Dutch alliance. Al- though forced to resist the Dutch, Louis XIV succeeded through a combination of circumstances in thwarting Charles’ Danish plans. Frederick HI made a show of remaining neutral, but he succeeded in saving the Dutch East India fleet in Bergen harbor from English captors.^ Events in Europe reacted on conditions in the West Indies. Jamaica had been seized in 1655 by the Penn-Venables expedi- tion sent to American waters to make reprisals against the Spaniards. In 1660 the English, French, and Caribs signed a peace at Guadaloupe by which the Indians should be allowed undisturbed occupation of the two Leeward Islands of St. Vincent and Dominica, provided they kept the peace else- where.^^ During the second Anglo-Dutch war, the French had « D. R, R., IV, 490; MedddeUerfra Arkivet, 1886-1888, p. 106. One of the immediate causes of this war was the rivalry between Dutch and English traders on the Guinea Coast. ^ Schoolcraft, “ Anglo-Danish Relations, 1660-67,^* in The English Historieal Review, vol. 25, p. 479. " Lucas, n, 57. 24 THE DANISH WEST INDIES seized the English part of St. Kitts, Antigua and Montserrat in 1667, only to give them back by the treaty of Breda in the same year. The English in their turn had seized Surinam in South America from the Dutch, but returned it in 1674 on the final cession to England of New Amsterdam. In Europe, the ambitions of Louis XIV were presently to change the general aspect of affairs. The treaties of Breda were followed by the Triple Alliance between England, the Nether- lands and Sweden (1668). This alliance Louis immediately set about to break; only by isolating the Netherlands could he hope to carry out his plans on the Continent. He was aided in this by the circumstance that Charles II had scarcely any more liking for the Dutch than Louis, and was quite inclined to lend his aid to any scheme that promised to cripple or destroy the United Netherlands. The secret treaty of Dover by which Charles pledged his aid to Louis in the event of a war with the Dutch was signed June 1, 1670. Under these circumstances an alliance between England and Denmark would weaken the Dutch and hence should add to the joy of France. And so it happened that not later than June ^1, 1670, Arthur Capel, first Earl of Essex, left England for Copenhagen as ambassador ex- traordinary to conclude a treaty of alliance with the new Danish king, Christian Denmark’s interest in the West Indies was only secondary, and was based upon the interest aroused in her merchants as a result of recent voyages which will be considered later. What English as well as French diplomacy played upon in Den- mark was fear of Sweden and a feeling that the Dutch had long treated them insolently in the Sound disputes and would be “ever ready and resolute in defence of Hamburg, whenever the Danes should have strength enough to attack it; ” for Hamburg, as Sir William Temple expressed it, was their "‘chief ambition abroad, it seems.” In Europe England’s wars with the Dutch had materially “ Cd. Dom., 1$70 and Add., 166(hl670, pp. 105, 378; Cd. Trm., m^im, V. 3, pt 1 (Nov. 10, 1670). The rdusal of Essac to strike his flag on entering Damrii waters created considerable stir in En|^and. Sir W. Templet, WoTh$, H, *17 (London, 1814, 4 vj. INTRODUCTION £5 enhanced her sea power, while in the West Indies her ability to hold Jamaica against Spanish attempts at reconquest had made her a serious rival of France as a West Indian power. If Denmark hoped to secure any lesser islands as footholds from which to carry on trade with Porto Rico or other of the larger Spanish islands, an understanding with England was imperative, for while the French had their buccaneering colonies on San Domingo and Tortuga, and some small Leeward colonies to the north, French ships of war were mainly concentrated near the fertile islands of Guadaloupe and Martinique, the southernmost of the Leeward group. But although Spain had lost Jamaica, she yet remained the leading colonial power in the West Indies and on the neighboring mainland. The destruction of the Armada in 1588 had lost Spain her naval prestige, and had left her commerce and her colonies all but helpless at the hands of all sorts of searovers, privateers, buccaneers, pirates, or by whatever name they might be called. These men were gathered from many nations; their common enemy was Spain and their common aim was plunder; while French, English, and Dutch authorities in the West Indies winked at their depredations, when they did not actually encourage them. Not infrequently did the Spaniards send out punitive expeditions that wreaked terrible vengeance for ills previously suffered, by capturing or dispersing many a young colony which ventured to settle in their proximity. A secret article to the treaty of Vervins arranged between France and Spain in 1598 had expressly provided that the peace should not hold good in regions west of the longitude of the Azores and south of the tropic of Cancer. French and Spanish ships meeting each other beyond these lines, “les lignes de Tenclos des amities,” might make lawful prize of one another as in time of war.®^ With the Dutch, lawlessness had often enough been possible without a treaty, though they had secured the recognition by the Spaniards of their independence in the Treaty of Miinster in 164!8. The first state to negotiate a treaty with Spain that would actually prepare the way for order in West Indian regions was England, whose buccaneers and log- Haring, Buccaneers in the West Indies, 48. £6 THE DANISH WEST INDIES wood cutters were threatening to extend the English frontier from Jamaica to the Spanish Main in the logwood district about Campeachy and Honduras Bay.^^ The time had come for Spain to admit by treaty what was already an established fact; that she no longer held a monopoly over the Caribbean Islands. So while Essex was negotiating in Copenhagen, Sir William Godolphin had been received in Spain, where on April 18, 1670, he secured from Charles II of Spain the Treaty of Madrid, composing diiBEerences, restraining depredations, and establishing peace” in America. For the first time, Spain definitely recognized England’s right to possess undisturbed the American islands and coloixies which she actually occupied, although the Pacific was to remain, as hereto- fore, strictly a closed sea.^^ Before the news of the treaty could be published in the English and Spanish colonies, the arch- buccaneer, Henry Morgan, most notorious of his tribe, had led an expedition which had sacked the two isthmian cities of Porto Bello and Panama. The subsequent knighting of Morgan by the king and his appointment as lieutenant-governor of Jamaica were hardly calculated to inspire confidence in England’s inten- tions to bring about peace in Caribbean waters. And yet, as we shall see, an honest attempt was made in that direction in which Sir Henry Morgan figured as the faithful representative of law and order. Though the treaty was far from instantaneous in its effects, it furnished a basis for mutual relations and strengthened Eng- land’s position in the West Indies to the extent that she was An expedition from Jamaica had attacked the Castle of Santa Cnu; on the Campeachy coast in February, 166S. Logwood cutting on the coast of Cam- peachy, Honduras and Yucatan had begun among the English about 1665. Haring, Bticcanem, 107, SW)8. An interesting episode that forms a connecting link between the Elizabethan struggle with Spain and the English conquest of Jamaica is the Puritan coloniaa* tion scheme of 1629-164f0, when the Providence Company hdd the islands of Providence (Santa Catalina), Henrietta (San Andreas), and Association (Tor- tuga) until they were seized by the Spaniards. A detailed account is to be found in A. P. Newton's The Colonizing AdmUes of the Early Furitane (New Haven, 1914). Haring, op, ait,, 197, INTRODUCTION 27 able actually to bring about peace by ‘^composing differences” and ‘‘restraining depredations.” Denmark’s position could not but be improved by her being an ally of the power that had been able to humble the Dutch sea power and to score a diplomatic victory over his Most Catholic Majesty. A word remains to be said concerning the position of Denmark with respect to France whose king persisted in treating the states of Europe as pawns on the diplomatic chess board. The immediate aim of Louis XIV, as already indicated, was to check the United Netherlands and if possible wipe them off the board. England had been brought within his schemes by the Treaty of Dover. It remained to detach Sweden from her alliance with the Dutch, after which he would be ready to throw off the cloak of diplomacy and disclose the iron fist. Meantime Colbert, Louis’ great minister of finance, was quite willing to make use of Denmark to help destroy Dutch commerce in the Baltic, and to promote that of the French; but he was unwilling to go as far in the matter of reciprocal trade privileges in Danish and French ports as the gentlemen who were engaged in 1668 in organizing the Company of the North.^® The proposal of these French merchants was considered by the Board of Trade, a body created at this time apparently for the very purpose of giving proper consideration to the French suggestions. But the president of this board was a Dutchman named Simon Petkum, who pro- fessed to see small prospects in this French trade. Private Danish traders had already visited the French West Indian islands. An attempt had been made in fact to occupy St. Thomas, and hence a counter proposal of the Board of Trade must have been made with the previous experience in mind and in the hope of increasing this trade. The Board proposed that the Danes send annually to the French colonies of St. Christo- pher and Martinique such goods as were needed and at a reason- The Danish ambassador at Paris) Frederick Gabel, had reported that “the French trade was so managed that in time it woxdd center entirely in France and that a foreign state would hardly go into a partnership with it unless it received very considerable advantages [referring to French subsidies].” GabeFs Relation, October 5, 1668 (N. S.), and October 19 ^quoted in K. Fabridus, “ Colbert og Danmark,” 9). 28 THE DANISH WEST INDIES able price on condition of Denmark’s receiving certain staple rights in France, e. g., in La Rochelle and Nantes. But Colbert’s idea was protection, not reciprocity. He had no desire to encourage the establishment of a Danish West India company that might become an active competitor with the Com- pany of the North, so he turned the negotiations to the subject of Dansborg, the Danish factory on the Malabar coast of India, which he attempted in vain to buy for France. In these futile negotiations the idea of co5perating for the pursuit of West Indian trade was lost sight of, and Danish merchants were left to form their own company Of the expeditions which were sent to the West Indies by private Danish adventurers previous to the couf d'Hat of 1660, mention has already been made. It remains to consider those expeditions which took place after the disastrous war with Sweden, and which led eventually to the choice of St. Thomas as the site of Denmark’s first West Indian colony. A memorial dated February 15, 1662, and hitherto unpublished, epitomizes the state of Danish trade in the West Indies during the troublous years that had just passed. We have to thank Your Majesty, ” runs the meihorial, '‘most graciously and humbly for the priv- ileges [to trade] upon the Caribbean islands, which were granted to us several years ago, although by God’s will we suffered great losses on the journeys undertaken during those times, in- asmuch as Cromwell and those ruling with him took away from us two ships with cargoes, worth over 32,000 rdl. And besides, one of our ships with full cargo and twenty-two persons was swept away from the land by God’s weather, by the wdnd called hurricane, on the 11th day of August, 1657, and never has there been heard of ship or men since; so that we have suffered a very great loss during the two years. Since that time we liave been unable to continue our voyages thence, both for the reasons given and because of the dangers due to the present wars. . . . Meantime our former privil^es have expired, and we have again undertaken in the Lord’s name to have our former skipper, “ Knud Pabridus, ** Colbert og Damnark . . (Bistomk TUiskift, B R., IV, TUL). Qud hedged disverr. INTRODUCTION £9 Erik Nielsen Schmidt, navigate these islands in the good hope that God Almighty will grant us some share of the good things of the land by way of restitution for our former losses. We pray Your Majesty to renew the grant of our former privileges for another term of years.” Hans Nansen, Schmidt, and three others signed their names to the petition which was granted substantially in the form asked, for ‘‘the present year” only. The Hans Nansen who signed this petition appears to have been the son of the wealthy burgher and Iceland merchant of the same name. After attendance in a Copenhagen “Latin school” he had been sent to Danzig in 165£ to learn bookkeeping, and went thereafter on business missions to Prussia, the United Netherlands, and Iceland. In 1655 he was the “winter mer- chant” of the Iceland-Paero company; in the winters of 1656- 1657 he was in Amsterdam learning seamanship and nautical mathematics. In the summer of 1657 he was made merchant in Iceland for the new company; the year following he was in GlUckstadt and Hamburg. During the last Swedish war, being unable to return to Copenhagen, he was in business for his associates and himseW in Hamburg, Gliickstadt and Iceland. He was certainly one of the organizers of the West India Com- pany in 1671, and may be taken as a type of the shrewd, ad- venturous entrepreneurs of the age of the commercial com- panies. The skipper, Erik Nielsen Schmidt, was evidently selected for his knowledge of West Indian waters and conditions. How many previous voyages their “former skipper” may have made, it is impossible to say, but he is certainly found on February £5, 1663, passing through the Sound with a cargo of tobacco, ginger, etc., from the West Indies; ^ he is referred to in a contract dated June 8, 1665, at Copenhagen as royal commandant and governor of the island of St. Thomas.®^ On July 1 he passed Elsinore with No. 73, SjcsH, aahne Breve, April 29, 1662 {Indlmg). Rind Nielsen, Cliris- toffer Hanse, and Jorgen Hansen Raffn. Schmidt's name appears as Erich Nielsen ScKmit in the document, and is signed Erich Nielsen Smit, It was granted on April 29, 1662, udi nosrvfBrende Aar, dremndstoldregrishdbei for 1663. In KirhehiH, Sami., 5 R. II B., pp. 293 et seq. E, V. Lose quotes in extenso the contract entered into between Schmidt and Kield Jensen Slagelse, the 30 THE DANISH WEST INDIES a cargo of provisions bound for the West Indies.®^ Early in 1666 (February 15) he sent a small cargo containing three hundred “rolls” of tobacco and one and one-half hhds. of sugar to Co- penhagen.®® Not long thereafter, in the same year, he died at St. Thomas. The Lutheran minister, Kjeld Jensen Slagelse, seems to have succeeded him and to have returned to Denmark with the remaining colonists. The last ship from the West Indies recorded as passing through the Sound before the or- ganization of the Company in 1671, and probably the one by which the St. Thomas colonists came, sailed into Copenhagen harbor on August 30, 1666, under Holger Freder’s command. The cargo contained 50,000 lbs. of pockwood, 20,000 lbs. of sugar, and 70,000 lbs. of tobacco,®® which may partly have been bought on French or English islands. Such then, in its main features, was that long train of cir- cumstances that had attracted the interest of kings and sub- jects of Denmark-Norway to the western world, and particu- larly to those parts adjacent to the Spanish Main. The success of those trading vessels that had returned with fair cargoes from successful ventures in those distant tropical waters had at least served to whet the appetites of Danish-Norwegian merchants and skippers. They began to hope that by following the course laid out by other western European states, notably the Dutch and the English, they, too, might secure some share in that commerce of which Spain was finding it increasingly difficult to keep a monopoly. It remains to explain how Danish mer- chants were able through a royally chartered commercial com- pany to gain for the state a permanent foothold in those regions. Lutheran minister who was to accompany him. A copy of the same is to be found in the Bancroft Collection, but the date given is 1655. OremmMoldregruhabet for 1655. •' Ibid, for 1666. for 1666. CHAPTER I THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMPANY By 1671, circumstances were more favorable to the establish- ment of a Danish West India Company with broad powers and considerable latitude of action than at any previous time. The several expeditions already described gave sufficient encourage- ment to suggest a more ambitious plan for getting into the field of Caribbean commerce. An unoccupied island with an excel- lent harbor had been found, the peaceful occupying and retain- ing of which had become a more likely possibility as a result of recent diplomatic developments in Europe. The newly founded Board of Trade took on a new lease of life after the accession to the throne of the new king, Christian V, in 1670. On September of that year the Board received its first official instructions, and presently it was organized with Frederick XJlrik Gyldenlove, the illegitimate son of the king, as its president and Jens Juel, a statesman and diplomatist and a brother of the famous admiral, as vice-president. The remaining members included the well-known merchant Hans Nansen, Peter Peterson Lerke, the Danish master of the mint, Andrew Timpf who had held a similar position in Poland, Gabriel Marselis, a reputable Dutch merchant, and as secretary, Melkior Rotlin, formerly employed in Bergen as secretary of the Liibeck office. To these men the king’s trusted adviser, Peter Schumacher (created Count Griffenfeld and made Chancellor in 1673) lent his en- thusiastic support in all matters pertaining to the encourage- ment of trade and industry.^ On November 20* 1670, the second Danish East India Company was organized and given a charter for forty years. On the eleventh day of the following March, ^ K. Fabricius, Oriffenfeld (KSbenhavn, 1910), 160, 166. The contemporary spelling of Lerke’s name is Lerche. 2 Z). JB. H., IV, 539. [ 31 ] 32 THE DANISH WEST INDIES the Danish West India Company received its charter from the royal hand.^ In America and the Far East Denmark was planning to enter into commercial competition with her enter- prising neighbors. As directors of the West India Company the king named three of the members ("^assessors*’ or judges) of the Board of Trade, Jens Juel, Peter Lerke, and the burgher, Hans Nansen,^ the last named on the nomination of Peter Schumacher. This charter, like the usual seventeenth century commercial company charters, conferred very broad powers upon the com- pany. In describing it, reference will be made by way of com- parison with an organization established just the year before, the continuous existence of which from that day to this renders it unique in the annals of chartered companies, namely, the Hudson Bay Company, whose official corporate title was “the governor and company of Adventurers of England trading into Hudson Bay.’’ The English had no company exactly corre- sponding to the Danish company. The Royal African Com- pany, founded in 1672, made Guinea the main scene of its operations, with the British islands in the West Indies the chief market for what soon came to be their principal article of com- merce, African slaves. But the Hudson Bay Company was, like the Danish, intended for the exploitation of the New World and offers at its inception, despite the different nature of its sphere of action, some interesting resemblances to its con- temporary. The charter issued by Christian V authorized the Danish West India Company to occupy and take possession of the island of St. Thomas “and also such other islands thereabouts or near the mainland of America as might be uninhabited and * C. P. Lucas, II, 52, III, 67, naistakenly places the incorporaticm of the company in 17S4. For the second East India Company, see Kay Larsen, D$ dm^h-ostindiBhe Koldniers Hisiorie (Kdbenhavn, 1907), I, 4S. * P. Manager, ffutoruk Efterretning w&r de VestindUke og Otdneuke Com- pagnies EiabUs$e7nmter udi VesUndim og OuinoOf p. 2. This xnazmsoript work by a bookkeeper of the Company is in the Royal library at Copenhagen and is of prime importance. (Cited hereafter as Manager M8J) Hans Nansen was also a judge on the Admiralty Board, and lata? became, as his father had been before him, president of the dty of Copenhagai (168S). THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMPANY 33 suitable for plantations, or if inhabited, then by such people who have no knowledge concerning us/’ ^ Like the Hudson Bay Company, it was authorized to build forts and lodges and to take proper measures for its own defence in case of attack; it ad- ministered justice to all in the Company’s service or within its immediate jurisdiction. Direct appeal to the Supreme Court at Copenhagen was permitted by the Danish company; the Eng- lish government granted the Hudson Bay Company final juris- diction, merely stipulating that all causes should be judged and local justice carried out by one of the local governors and his council, where such authority was available, ‘‘according to the laws of this kingdom.” ® The Danish king bound himself to issue no “seabriefs” or passports to Danish captains navigating the Danish West Indies and promised the Company the proceeds of all prizes except the usual tenth part which was the perquisite of the admiral of the realm. The Hudson Bay Company was origi- nally empowered to seize the persons of English or any other subjects who sailed into Hudson Bay or were found in the Com- pany’s territory without its permission. No such amazing powers were conferred on the Danish company; and in any case, there would have been no opportunity for their exercise. The En^sh company like the Danish had government oflSicials on its board of directors, but the association of government and com- pany was far closer in Denmark than in England because of the absolute, thoroughly centralized administration established by Frederick III and continued by his son Christian V. The in- ternal government of each company was managed by a general assembly, or “general court,” as the arrangement was called in the English charter. The Danes were charged with the re- sponsibility of converting the Indians, not a difficult task, as only two or three are to be fotmd in the entire period of the Company’s existence.^ We may judge of the success with which this injunction was carried out by the fact that “John Indian,” * J. e,, Indians. ® Cawston and Keane, The Early Chartered Companies (London, 1896), 292 ei eeq. See Appendix C for translation of Danish charter. 7 Cf. Lucas, H, 188. 34 THE DANISH WEST INDIES himself a large fraction of his tribe, finally was punished by the loss of a leg for his various attempts at running away.® Besides the three royally appointed directors, two of whom were nobles, three were to be elected by the shareholders (‘"participants”) from among themselves by a majority vote, those chosen being required to have a minimum of 2,000 “Slet- tedaler” invested in the Company’s stock.® A paragraph (If13) the consequences of which the promoters could not have fore- seen was that which provided for the upkeep of the population of the young colony by the promise of as many of the men condemned in the home country to labor in irons or to serve in prison as the company might deem necessary for its plantations, and as many as they might wish of those women whose dis- orderly lives had brought them into arrest in the “spinning house” and other places. This was not the first time that Europe deliberately plaimed to empty her jails on American soil nor was it to be the last time, but on St. Thomas as in the English colonies, the authorities soon learned that convicts were not deemed good timber for plantations by the colonial oflGlcials. Not like the English company, where the owner of each block of stock worth £100 was entitled to vote, the Danish company gave each shareholder one vote, and only one vote. The minimum size of the shares was one hundred rixdoUars. The Company received free use of rooms in the Copenhagen Stock Exchange, and was provided with suitable pack house quarters on “Holmen” near the present site of “Hohnens” church. The king, the queen, and Prince George, each sub- scribed 3,000 SkUedakry while the total amount of this first subscription was 64,300 sldl*y which was to be paid in three ® Even the negroes did not becsome the objects of serious missionaiy effort until the arrival of the Moravian missionaries in and then the imf^tus came from drdes entirriy outside of the official class. • A Slettedaler « 64 SkilhEg; a rigsdaler (rixdoUar) * 96 SidUing « 0 Mark. 1 i>eso8 8 reals « 96 granos (or 48 stivers). A rixdolkr was about equal to a pesos or piece-crf-rig^it, and to four kroner (1 J5>. »» in present day coin. The purchasing value during the Company’s career was perhaps two to three times that of the present time in Denmark. Onmon^ values, see D.iiH., IV, 103, note; W. Sdharling, Pengetm eynkende VosrM (Edbenhavn, 18^); Arent Bemtsen, Danmark og Norgee Frugibar HerUghed, (Kj^^b^^vn, 1656). THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMPANY 35 equal parts, the first to be available on June 11, 1671, the last instalment on March 31, 1673.^^ A proposal to require the royal assent to the election of directors by the shareholders was struck out by Peter Schumacher, who was responsible for the arrangement by which two directors instead of six should have the full power to attend to the Company's current business.^^ As a sort of advisory body there was formed a group of those who had invested not less then 1,000 rdZ., and who were known as the chief participants.^^ From this group a committee of four was provided for,—^two nobles and two burghers, who should have the power to inspect the Company's books at any time, and who audited the bookkeeper's accounts once in each year. The first chief participants appointed were Admiral Kordt Adeler and Frederik Poggenberg.^^ The former was by birth a Norwegian and had distinguished himself in the Venetian navy in the struggle with the Turks. Such was the constitution of the Danish West India Company whose corporate existence continued, although with a number of changes, for eighty-four years. Under this charter and the ‘^reglement” which accompanied it, preparations for the settle- ment of St. Thomas were begun in the summer of 1671. On the nomination of Lerke, the directors selected George Iversen as governor of the new colony. The new governor, though a man but thirty-three years of age when he received his appoint- ment, had led a life full of incident and of the sort of experience that served to prepare him for his post.^^ His surname of Dyp- pel, the modern Dybbol, testifies to a Schleswig origin, although he was himself born in Elsinore, where his father was a baker. Not long after his twelfth year, when his schooling was ended, he was bound to service and sent to the West Indies by one of those privately owned ships referred to above, perhaps by the ^0 Manager MS., 14, 15. Fabricius, Griffenfeld, 169. 12 See Regiment of March 11, 1671 (C. P. Rothe, Christian Vs Rescripter for Norge ... 11 B.). 12 Mariager MS., 15. i^This account of Governor George {Jorgen) Iversen*s life is based mainly on the excelleat and eadiaustive sketch by Fr. Erarup in the PersonaUdstorisIc Tidsshrift, 11 R. 6 B. (Kobenhavn, 1891). 86 THE DANISH WEST INDIES ship that left Elsinore in 1654. It is at any rate certain that he entered the service of an English merchant on St. Christopher (St. Kitts), and that about 1660 he returned to Europe with a Dutch merchant. There he joined a company including three business men from Zeeland, of whom one John Bassplaer, was the leader; Iversen participated in the enterprise, holding one-sixth of the capital. He was himself to accompany the ship to the West Indies and to take charge of the trade there, of which he was to enjoy one-half of the profits. All went on smoothly until 1665, when Iversen returned to Europe and there learned that war had broken out between England and the Netherlands. This information was brought in upon him in a way that was not to be mistaken, and he paid dearly for his instruction. His ship and cargo were seized by an English privateer. The skipper himself went to Copen- hagen hoping to obtain restitution through diplomatic channels. Admiral Henry Bjelke procured him an audience with Fred- erick III. The king not only acceded to Iversen's desire that Charles II of England be petitioned to deliver over to the in- jured party his share of the damages, estimated at 8,000 rdZ., but had Iversen come to him three times to teU him concerning life in the New World and of his personal experiences there. Inasmuch as the Danes appeared to show too much sympathy with the Dutch, and particularly since the failure of the Danes to coSperate with the English fleet in capturing the Dutch East Indiamen in Bergen harbor, Iversen’s petition came to nothing. Although he kept up his connections with his Zeeland partners, he appears to have remained in Denmark during the years following. In 1670, the year of the embassy of Essex, he was married ‘‘in the house,'* a distinction which indicates a fairly high social position, and with other evidences, shows him still to have been a man of some means, despite his severe loss. The newly elected governor invested 1,000 rdl. in the West Indian enterprise at the start. He also took charge of fitting out two ships provided by the new king, Christian V, for the use of the Company. About 20,000 fdl. were espended in the outfitting. Captain Arent Henriksen, a Dutch skipper, took THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMPANY 87 the yacht, The Gilded Crown^ and set sail on August 80, 1671.^® He was to look over the ground, for it was not entirely certain that the English might not have occupied it. On the failure of the Fero to arrive within the time expected. Captain Hen- riksen returned to Denmark with ship and cargo, only to find that the Governor had left on February 26,^® after having been delayed in Bergen since November ^0, because of a leaky ship. The passenger list of the Fero makes interesting reading. Be- sides the crew, which totaled only twelve men, those who had bound themselves to service and engaged themselves as em- ployees of the Company numbered one hundred and sixteen. The remaining sixty-one had been selected, as the charter had permitted, from the convicts in Bremerholm and other places. Several culprits had escaped at Bergen, but were promptly re- placed by others equally unpronaising. With this motley throng, to manage, an assemblage that was to form the nucleus of the new colony, Governor Iversen would have abundant opportunity to show of what stuff he was made. After leaving Bergen, and especially on the approach to the warmer latitudes, the toll of death began to be taken in earnest. Eighty-six persons of both sexes died on the journey or had es- caped in Bergen. One of the victims was Kjeld Jensen Slagelse, the minister, who had accompanied Erik Schmidt on his voyage in 1665. The ship,, with a cargo valued at 18,172 sldl. arrived in St. Thomas harbor on May 25, 1672,^^ just three months after its departure from Bergen. The pioneer band went ashore on the following morning, raised the Danish flag, and took formal possession. They found an island that seemed to them, as the governor expressed it, well suited and large enough for their purposes. No one was there to dispute ownership, the English who had occupied it, having left six or seven weeks earlier, after burning off the roof of the storehouse.^® The land had to be cleared of bush and forest before it could be planted; pockwood Mcariager MS., 15. Mariager MS. has it February 29 (p. 16). Mariager MS,, 16, 18. ^Ihid., 18. 38 THE DANISH WEST INDIES was sufficiently in demand in Denmark to furnish a profitable ballast for returning ships during the earlier years of the colony. The problem of securing cane for the newly cleared patches of plantation ground was solved by the aid of the English, who had recently seized Tortola, a little island just northwest of St. John, from the Dutch. The English officer in charge there generously gave the Danes full permission to use anything they found on the island, and they made no find more precious than the shoots of sugar cane. The new masters had scarcely begun settlement, before colonists of various sorts began to seep in. The greater number of them belonged to the Dutch nation, and were seeking the protection of a state that they supposed to be on friendly terms with the English, who were harrying the Dutch wherever they dared. Some of these, as John von Beverhoudt, became plant- ers of distinction and even founded influential families; others, like Carl Baggaert, an absconder from Middelburg, became trouble makers who soured the life of the governor and those in authority with him. Although French, Germans, English, and Jews were among these early settlers, Dutch became the pre- vailing language from the beginning. To keep such a variously confused assemblage in reasonable restraint while the necessary pioneering work was being done, was the new governor’s task. That Iversen should succeed in laying the foundation of a civil government out of the crude materials that he had at hand was in itself a creditable per- formance, and something for which his masters had reason to be grateful. But in putting through this pioneer work one is not surprised to find that he gained for himself a reputation for severity that made the directors declare that Governor Iver- sen^s brutal management ‘‘has given the Company such a bad reputation among the common people in Denmark that they are of the opinion that if they should serve in the West Indies they would be worse off than if they had served in Barbary.” There was indeed considerable ground for such a belief, and the fault did not all lie with Iversen’s government. w Spoken of by Kranip (Jdrgm Ivmm, S^) as Burd. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMPANY 39 Besides the eighty-nine who died on board the Ferd, seventy- five died not long after landing. The Pelican, which arrived in St. Thomas March 29, 1673, lost seven of its people en route and fifty-three after landing, out of a total of only sixty-seven. The galliot St Thomas, which arrived at the island June 2, 1675, lost five out of nine men; and the Merman, which arrived on May 12, 1675, lost thirty-four out of fifty-eight persons. There were enough survivors, however, to spread reports which required no exaggeration to give the West Indies the reputation of being a veritable charnel house. The resulting depletion was made good by further recourse to convicts and nondescripts, immi- grants against whom the governor never ceased to rail. “Un- controllable fellows, whom neither Holmen ^ nor the penitentiary could improve,” ^‘lazy; shiftless louts, who were of no use at home,” “vagabonds and idlers,” are terms employed by Iversen in describing various of his former charges, even after several years had intervened. To obtain honest or capable employees under these circumstances became well-nigh impossible. The knotty problem of securing suitable ministers reflects the pre- vailing difiSculties. After Kjeld Jensen’s death on the outward voyage in 1672, George Jensen Morsing was appointed minister, but he dropped dead on April 23, 1673, just as he was about to take possession of the house assigned to him. The Schleswiger, Theodore Christensen Risbrich (Theodoras Christianm HoU satus), who succeeded to the post, quarrelled with the governor from the beginning, called him a tyrant, and insisted on preach- ing in German, to the governor’s disgust. He was finally per- naitted, in fact urged to leave the land in October, 1677. In 1679 he brought a damage suit against the Company, and met its counter-charge of drunkenness by explaining that such a state “was easily brought about by the terrible stuff they make in that land,”—^referring to the young rum called “kill- devil” because of its reputed powers. The Danes were obviously passing through the most difficult pioneering period m the founding of plantation colonies, and learned, m common with other plantation pioneers, whether Spanish, English, Dutch or French, that the first serious prob- ^ Holmen: workhouse for prisoners in Copenhagen. 40 THE DANISH WEST INDIES lem clamoring for solution was that of labor supply. As early as the beginning of the sixteenth century, when the Spanish government began to concern itself with the preservation of the aborigines, who proved unadaptable to severe labor, African slaves had been resorted to as a substitute for native and white labor. White convict labor was cursed at in Virginia, Barbados and ]>Iartinique as heartily as at St. Thomas. Indentured servants were among those who accompanied Governor Iversen on the initial voyage; but fevers, climate, and careless living killed them off faster tlian they could be replaced. This labor difficulty seems to have been anticipated in the charter to some extent when provision was made for absorption of the African company of Gliickstadt into the West India Company.^^ The union was in fact complete November £8, 1674, when ChristianV issued an edict allowing the Danish West India Company to trade on the Guinea coast.^^ Meanwhile the African company had sent over a ship to Guinea in 1673 which added one hundred and three slaves to the St. Thomas labor supply; some smaller purchases were made from local dealers, and another voyage was taken by the Cornelia in the summer following, probably for the same company.^® In 1675 a Portuguese bark was found wrecked on the shore with a slave cargo, from which were secured twenty-four wretched negroes, of whom ten survived long enough to be entered on the books of the Company. The Dutch traders seemed peculiarly gifted with the power to scent a bargain from afar, whether in slaves, sugar, or silks. A certain Landert van See Mims, Cdberfs West India Policy, p. JfcSS, for a statement of the con- ditions in the French islands; also Pierre Heinrich, La Louxsiane scm la Ctmr pagnie des Indes, pp. SSS et seq, ** G. iScelle, La fraiti negnbre am Indes de CastiUe (Paris, 1906), I, lS83-ljW, 139-161. ** See If 16 octroi* *'*Kramp, Jdrgm Iversen, 81. Christiansborg Castle, near Accra on the Guinea coast, had been built by the Swedes in 1646 and captured from them by the Danes in 1657. The history of the Gliickstadt African Company up to the date of its merger with the Danish West India Company is estceedmi^y meager. Denmark finally sold its African possessions to Great Britain in 1850. ^ Mariager M8*p StSt, ** L. Fogtman, Alphahetish Register , . . (see July 10, 1^4). THE ESTABLISHMENT OP THE COMPANY 41 der Busse disposed of a batch of sixteen slaves to the Company in 1678, perhaps the remnant of a cargo that he had retailed down the islands. One Paul Jensen from Stade on the Elbe, but recorded as a “Swede,” also sold slaves to the Company. That the slave trade of the Company was practically at a standstill is shown by the fact that the king in 1680 granted permission to Oliver Pauli, for a time secretary of the Company in Copen- hagen, to send a ship to Guinea for slaves. The growth of the colony in these early years, when rumors of pestilence and dis- affection were plentiful and dividends were scarce, was nat- urally slow. From a population of barely a hundred each of whites and blacks in 1673, the number had risen by 1680 (the last year of Iversen’s stewardship) to a himched and fifty-six whites and one hundred and seventy-five blacks.^^ During these early years the colony at St. Thomas was too much concerned with keeping alive to become a dangerous com- petitor to the 'Dutch, French, or English. Nevertheless, the appearance of the Danes was greeted by a number of protests. The English governor of the Leeward Islands, General Sir Charles Wheler, lost no time in denying the rights of the Danes to any of the Virgin Islands, but on the vigorous representations of the Danish ambassador in London, Marcus Gioe, Charles II disavowed Wheler’s actions, recalled him from his post and appointed Sir William Stapleton in his place. Charles’ letter was dated September ^3, 1672.^ Spanish protests came in from the governor of Porto Rico in 1673 and 1675, based on the argu- ment that St. Thomas lay on the coast of Yucatan and Cam- peachy, which with the surrounding islands were the property of Spain. The directors, by way of reply, presented a memoran- dum to the Danish king, setting forth the fact that Spain claimed all the Virgin Islands in opposition to the claims of all nations, but that she did not actually occupy one; and further, that the Danes were looked upon by Charles 11 of England, in his letter (September 23, 167^) as rightful occupants. Christian V had his envoys at Madrid, George Reedtz, set forth these arguments, ^ Erarup, Iversen, SS; E. V. Lose (in Kirkehistomk Sami., 6 R. 11 B., 298) 28 GqL CoL 1675-76, Addenda 157Jhl67^ No. 397. The relations of Stapleton with the Thomas authorities will be discussed in the next chapter. 42 THE DANISH WEST INDIES and gradually the pretensions of the Spaniards dwindled down for the time to an occasional more or less innocuous reference.^ The French had no valid grounds for protest. Their nearest colony was St. Croix which had been taken from the Spaniards in 1650 by an expedition sent by de Poincy from St. Christopher. Colbert, in his efforts to build up French commercial power, had practically closed French colonies to foreign trade, but the Dutch wars of Louis XIV made traffic between France and her West Indian colonies so precarious that Governor de Baas of St- Croix was forced in 1678 to open the island to Danish com- merce during six months to save his people from starving.^^ But when Denmark joined in the war against the French, this trade ceased, and the St. Thomas creditors were left with some thousands of rixdollars worth of valueless paper on their hands.^^ The news that war had broken out came in September, 1675, and for the time being the French contented themselves with seizing the Company’s yacht at St. Croix. Finally, on Feb- ruary 2, 1678, the French actually attacked St. Thomas. Gov- ernor Iversen had made valiant efforts to complete the fort to the point where it could withstand attack j a tower had recently been finished, and when requested to surrender he was able to bid the enemy defiance. The French left after carrying off a few slaves and some free negroes. After their departure the work on the fort was continued with greater vigor than ever so that by 1680 the governor was able to record that the fort was completed. With the one hundred and fifty men, white and black, that he had available, he felt himself able, so he reported to his masters, to beat off six hundred or even one thousand men. But the strenuous work involved in preparation against out- side attack had driven the planters as well as the governor al- most to desperation. With the malcontents under the Dutch- man Baggaert against him, with his health undermined by the strain of responsibility, and his temper becoming more and Manager MS,, 18, 19. Mims, 8ZS; Krarup, Iversen, 85. ** Debtors on St. Croix** were still ia 1708 debited with rdl,, 5 marks in the Company’s books at St. Thomas. N. /. for St Th„ 1705-1708. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMPANY 43 more violent, his wife dead, and revengeful enemies on all sides, Governor Iversen finally insisted so strongly on being relieved that the directors proceeded in August and September, 1679, to choose a successor. They found one in the Holsteiner Nicholas Esmit, the only available candidate applying. He did not arrive until July 4, 1680, when he was received by Governor Iversen with appropriate pomp and ceremony. The new governor found the harbor supplied with a good fort, a road running through the island, fifty plantations surveyed, of which forty-sis were actually occupied, the other four not having recovered from the attack of the French; he found the Company in possession of two plantations of its own, equipped with forty-nine slaves (men, women, and children), thirty-one cattle, seven horses, poultry, numbers of hogs, and with sheep and goats pastured on nearby islets.®^ Although the little colony showed signs of vitality, the Com- pany could not begin to pay dividends. Of seven ships, in- cluding yachts and the like, which the Company or King had put into the West India or Guinea trade, several had undergone expensive repairs or costly seizures, and two, the Charlotte Amalia and the St Vincent^ had been wrecked altogether, bringing about a direct loss of 40,000 rdt to the Company.^® In the cargoes brought into Copenhagen hadbeen included sugar, cotton, indigo, tobacco, ginger, cacao, ‘‘carret” (sea turtle), hides, pockwood and other valuable timber.^^ Only a haU score of passports had been issued during the years 1671-1680 to ships bound from Copenhagen to the West Indies, and five for ships sailing to Guinea. Even the extension of trading priv- ileges granted by the Company in its mandate of February 1675, did not bring about the hoped for results.^® Matters had ®*Buck (“Bocken”) and St. George (“S. Jorris”) islets, and particularly Water Island, just outside the harbor, were used for pasturage purposes, Krarup, Iversen, 38. Manager MS,, 22. Ibid,, 19, 23. By this mandate, the Company permitted its own shareholders to trade with St. Thomas on the payment to the government there of a ten per cent, duty on goods imported; while if they imported slaves they should pay a “recog- nition’* or duty of one slave out of each fifty. Strangers might bring in goods 44 THE DANISH WEST INDIES come to a low pass largely because of the reaction of conditions in Europe upon the commercial situation both in the capital and in the colony. In carrying out his second war against the Dutch, Louis XIV had indeed secured the assistance of the former ally of the United Provinces, Sweden, and for a time that of England. The Netherlands were allied from the first with the Hohenzollern elector of Brandenburg and were later to be joined by the Em- peror and by their traditional enemy, Spain. Into this armed camp Denmark threw herself on the side of the Dutch, but against the Swedes, from whom she hoped to regain her lost provinces. Such a state of war not only militated against the success of the Company’s efforts, but threatened the very existence of its American factory. for these return cargoes at the same rate of ten per cent. Each of"the Danish skippers was to bring to St. Thomas two capable workingmen, for whom the Company would pay 10 rdl. each; while each failure to make such delivery was to be penalized by a fine of iiO rdl. This was very similar to the ArrU promulgated by Colbert, January 22, 1671, to encourage the importation of white servants. Vessels of 100 tons or over were to carry two cows or two mares, and those of less to carry two indentured servants in place of each cow or mare. Mims, op, dU 282. Three Bergen merchants, Jfirgen Thonnohlen, Cordt von Woyda, and Daniel Wolszman, received permission to send ships to the West Indies in this trade. A Christiania ship seems to have got to St. Thomas with a passport from the king, but with- out the knowledge or permission of the directors. Mariager MS., 26-28. CHAPTER II THE CEITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) The conclusion of the peace with Sweden in 1679 was followed by a series of efforts on the part of the Danish crown to revive and quicken the economic life of the kingdom. The Board of Trade applied itself anew to the task, and a special commission with Jens Juel at its head was created in September, 1681, to supplement that body.^ In this revival of interest in commer- cial and kindred matters, the West India and Guinea venture came in for its share of attention. On March 3, 1680, the king issued an order, the provisions of which indicate clearly the low state of the company and the heroic measures necessary to fan into a flame its spark of remaining life. In this order the king pledged his assistance by offering to fit out and send a ship to Guinea to fetch slaves for use in St. Thomas; and he promised to send the needed number of men to the Guinea forts, which were sadly in need of assistance.^ The resolution of February 8, 1675, confiscating to the Company the capital of participants who had not paid in their full quota was confirmed, and now each shareholder was assessed an amount equal to ten per cent, of the par value of his share. If he failed to pay, he was liable to lose his entire investment. Moreover, all government em- ployees in his majesty’s dominions were “invited” to invest ten per cent, of their salary, if the latter was over 300 rdl. a year, in shares; if th^ had not paid in the required amount within four or six weeks, it would be deducted from their salaries. Finally, the king reached out after those wealthy but apathetic burghers and others who had hitherto refrained from investing or had been unduly cautious, by requiring that all carriage ^ Other members of this commission were Michael Vibe, Peter Brandt, Paul * Rosenpalm, and ^^procureur-^giniraV^ Peter Scavenius. D. R. H., TV, 615. * Manager MS., 37, 38. [ 45 ] 46 THE DANISH WEST INDIES owners whose shares did not amount to 500 sldl. must invest 60 rdl, once for all. Whatever the king and company’s directors might propose, it was after all the servants of the company in the West Indies and on the Guinea coast on whom would rest the duty of dis- posing; and the success of their efforts would be largely condi- tioned by various external circumstances over which they had no control. To carry out the details required by this scheme of rehabilitation and readjustment, a committee of four ® headed by Herman Meyer, councilor of war, admiralty and commerce, was appointed to take charge of supplying the Guinea forts with men and munitions and equipping ships for both Guinea and the West Indies. The result was that the Merman was sent out to Guinea ^ under Captain Ove Ovesen, who took with him a new merchant and commander for the Guinea factory, while the Crowned Griffin was sent to St. Thomas, passing Kronborg castle on September 4, 1680, under Captain John Blom.^ The home authorities had done all that they could, and as- suredly no less than was needed. It remained to be seen to what extent their efforts would be seconded by their employees and favored by circumstances. The new governor of St. Thomas, Nicholas Esmit, had given the directors plenty of promises, but had been unable to produce any recommendations. The pend- ing resignation of Iversen gave them no time to search about for candidates. Esmit claimed to have been a skipper, called him- self captain, and asserted that he had served his apprenticeship with the English at Jamaica. His name Esmit was probably * The others were Peter Bladt, Assmor in the Board of Trade, Mauritz van der Thy, and Claus Sohn. * No pass appears to be recorded in VeaHndish Reg, 1671-^99 for this ship. Merman »» Bafmanden or Haimandm, * Manager MB,, 84 rf eeq,; Vest, Reg,, 1671-99, The Crowned Griffin » dm Cronede Griffs THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 47 originally Schmidt and would point to a sojotirn in Spain. He was apparently related to that John Esmit who, according to a petition filed in 1671 had been consul in Spain for four years and thereafter receiver of customs in Copenhagen for twelve years and had been at one time in charge of the renovation of the city.® On his arrival at St. Thomas, Captain Esmit was all amiabil- ity, but he began very soon to lend his ear to George Iversen’s enemies, particularly to the Dutch absconder, Carl Baggaert. He released one Peter Jansen from the prison into which his predecessor had cast him, and before Iversen had got ready to leave for home via St. Croix, which he did on September ^0, 1680, Esmit had so far broken with the former governor as to forbid his living at the fort. The obvious attempt of the new encumbent to curry favor with the lawless element did not bode well for the colony. It must be borne in mind that since the treaty of Madrid (1670) the English governors in the West Indies had been strictly enjoined to suppress privateering. Their task had been a diflSicult one, for Spain not only protested against English logwood cutters being allowed to exploit the swamps of Yucatan but effected a considerable number of captures.^ The distinc- tion between logwood cutting and piracy was apparently not very clear to the Spanish official mind. Among the most conscientious officials were Sir Thomas Lynch, who was governor of Jamaica in 1671 and after an ab- sence of a few years was reappointed in 1681, and Sir William Stapleton, governor of the Leeward Islands. Assuredly pri- vateering and the development of plantations and legitimate trade did not go hand in hand. Until there was reasonable guarantee that plantation products would be safe from seizure on the high seas, men would be chary of sinking their funds or investing their labor in plantations. From the viewpoint of British expansion, commercial and territorial, the Danish islands, like the Dutch and French, were ® Nielsen, KdherJtam^ V, 62 et seq. ^ It was reported in 1674 that 75 English ships had been seized by the Span- iards since 1670. Beer, The Old Colonial System, 166(hl688, 11, 68. 48 THE DANISH WEST INDIES on the frontier between the Spaniards and the English. This frontier had been pushed forward by a straight conquest to in- clude Jamaica; buccaneers had made sport of it and were finally to extend it permanently into Campeachy. It was in this twi- light zone, haunted by buccaneers and men of their type, that St. Thomas had found itself since its settlement. To keep the island out of complications with its powerful neighbor required more firmness and clear-headedness than was possessed by Nicholas Esmit. Of his early history as governor only a few en- lightening documents exist, but a letter written by him to the directors May 17, 168^, is sufficiently illustrative of the ways of the privateers and of their reception in St. Thomas to justify quotation: ** There arrived here February 8 [1682] a ship of unknown origin, some two hundred tons in size, without guns, passport or letters, and with seven men, French, English, and German. On being questioned they replied that they had gone out of Es- paniola [Hispaniola] from the harbor of Petit Guava (sic) with two hundred men and a French commission to cruise on the Spaniards. They had come to the coast of Terra Firma and landed in the river of Danan [Darien?] where they were joined by the wild Indians who were to show them the way over the landtotheSouthSea, which they also did; . . . and they took a little ship or bark with a hundred blocks [bars?] of silver, next a large vessel, and finally a Spanish galleon, with which they did much damage over all the South Sea; and after having robbed for two years in the South Seas, they escaped around Terra de fago [del Fuego] . . . and on January 28 came to anchor in Antigo [Antigua], where all the English in the crew went over on the English ship with all their gold and silver. The rest, namely seven men, who had risked [?] and doubled their money, sailed for Petit Goava, but on the way the boat leaked, so they asked to come in to St. Thomas and there careen the boat, which was done at Strand Slucken [Gregerie Beach?] by the aid of thirty men sent out by me. I bou^t what little cacao they had, the rest of their plunder they brought ashore and divided among our people. The ship was no longer usable. I have decided not to confiiscate it, in order to avoid any unfriendliness THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 49 with sea-robbers. The inhabitants of St. Thomas have decided that the said seven men shall remain among them.” ® But clearly enough such cheerful receptions coidd not go on very long without arousing serious misgivings in the watchful governor of the Leeward Islands, Sir William Stapleton. On August 18, 168^, one Captain ^^Toms Wadsten” (Thomas Watson?) came into St. Thomas harbor with his sloop, the Prosperous^ and received permission of the governor to come in to revictual. The vessel had come from Barbados, it was said, and was bound for Jamaica. On the captain’s remaining in the harbor longer than the time agreed on, and selling great quantities of ‘‘kiU-devU,” stuffs, linen, gloves, and the like, his vessel and remaining goods were seized and declared good prize. A commission headed by the Carl Baggaert before mentioned, and including ‘‘Mr. William Borth” (Burke?) an “expert buyer of English and Irish wares,” found the confiscated cargo to be worth £108, ISs. M. On August 26, Captain Watson and his mate, John Campion, were condemned to be hanged. This in- teresting ceremony occurred “in the proper place, where or- dinary justice is done.” There the victim was suspended “by a strap;” “Robbert Wautersen van Rotterdam” was ordered banished, while the chief witness, John Finlasson, was to leave 8 Breve og DoJcumenfer, 1683-1689, from a copy by O. Pauli, the company's secretary in Copenhagen. This rather quaint account of the rovings of a buc- caneering expedition in the South Seas is really the Danish version in a nutshdU of the famous voyage described at length in John Exquemelin’s history of the buccaneers. In the London edition of that work, which was published in 1685, was included under a separate title “The Dangerous Voyage and Bold Attempts of Capt, Bartholomew Sharp and others, written by Mr. Basil Ringrose, who was all along present.” One of the nine “captains” of whom that writer makes mention was Bartholomew Sharp, who was sent to England with some of his f^ows, at the instance of the Spanish ambassador in Iiondon, where they were to be tried for piracy. After having secured his acquittal with the others on the plea that the Spaniards had fired tihe first shot. Captain Sharp returned to the West Indies, eventually settling down in St. Thomas, where he succeeded in making the governor’s existehce miserable. In John Lorentz’s term of ojEce, sixteen years after his South Sea exploit, after sickness had deprived him of the use of his hands, he was still able, through the indiscriminate use of an active and violent tongue, to earn a sentence of imprisonment for life from an indig- nant governor and council. Lorentz to Directors (24 June, 1698).. (7. R., mo-ms. 60 THE DANISH WEST INDIES the island within a fortnight. The order was signed by Bag- gaert and one Jochum Delicaet, a wily Dutchman who will come in for attention later.® Before Governor Stapleton could get a chance to secure the delivery of the sloop to him, Nicholas Esmit was replaced by his brother Adolph, who had become the leader of a faction of the more unruly planters.^® Adolph was shifty, shrewd, vain, and at times boastful, and an exceedingly exasperating neighbor to deal with. It is in the period when the Esmit brothers were responsible for the government of St. Thomas, that the island gained its reputation as a resort for pirates. For that reason their relations with pirates, or with persons suspected of being such, deserve to be examined with some minuteness. On October 7, 1782, Governor Stapleton sent Thomas Biss, his deputy on Tortola, to ‘*the Honorable Governor Esmit in St. Thomas Island,” for to have written of St. Thomas Island” would have been an official recognition of the usurpation. On the demand of Biss for the restoration of a sloop, which he maintained had been seized from its lawful owner, as well as on the request for the de- livery of seven white servants who had run away from Mont- serrat, Adolph Esmit gave contradictory and evasive answers. When the English official demanded the runaway servants, Esmit had replied that this was a free port and that anyone asking for protection was entitled to it. “ Sir,” was the reply of Biss, ‘‘if your port is free, why did you seize the sloop? If some rogues have freedom here, why not all?” Later, in a communication to Biss, Esmit offered to restore the sloop (which he had already sold at auction for twenty-five pieces of eight) on the presentation of a certificate from Gover- ® -4. E., . . . 1689-85, “Lit. A.** and “Lit. B.” appended to A. Esmit’s letter to the king (1 Sept., 1683). Delicaet’s first name was frequently spelled Jo- achim, ^ On 8 August, 1682, Nicholas had discharged a debt of 8,000 rdl. to hia brother, described in the document as “yoimg of years and faithful,*' by deeding him his share of a plantation 8,000 feet long and stocked with 87 slaves, houses, indigo, “works,” etc. The deposing of Nidbiolas took place in the autumn. (B, & D,, 1685-89) This appears to be the first reference to St. Thomas as a free port. « Cd. Col,, 1681-85, No. 777 (11 Nov., 1682). THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 51 nor Stapleton showing that he had authority to receive it, and on payment of certain charges.^^ In a moderately toned letter of December 12 , addressed to “Capt. Adolphus Eastmitt/^ Staple- ton reiterated his demand for restitution of sloop and runaways '^now that I understand that you have the power in yr hand/’ Esmit’s reply did not entirdy suit the English governor who wrote, ‘‘It doesn’t show much inclination to live in peace, to say that some [of the seven servants] have gone to Leeward and one is in the [Danish] king’s service, which is all one with saying their money in part is employed in the king’s service soe is the boat in which they were transported and ye sloop and goods too.” But the governor wanted his neighbors to understand that his patience had limits. “You may be confident,” he added, “that the detention of sloop goods and servants will not be forgotten. It were no hard matter for me to let you otherwise know it but my inclination is otherwise.” Esmit declined to be bluffed, however. In his reply, dated January 8, 1688, he re- fused to assume responsibility for the acts of his brother or to trouble himself further concerning the whole matter, saucily adding that “I know you serve his Mayts (Majesty) of Engen- lant whom I have had the Honner to Serve as Capt: whose Commission I have [and] alsoo another from his Rojail Heighnis : and att present I Sarve my Master the Souerin King of Denne- marck and thus I conclude.” Meantime Governor Stapleton had incorporated his griev- ances into a vigorous letter which he had sent to the Lords of Trade and Plantation on November 11, 1682.^® They suffered alike, he explained, from Dutch and Danes, froii fugitive serv- ants, black and white, and from seamen and other debtors, who had run away to these islands and were never restored, on the ground that the freedom of their port protects all, and he de- spaired as to how to proceed except by the law of the Turks and Algerines. The complaint was promptly conveyed to the Danish envoy at London, Christian Lente, by the Earl of A. Esmit to Mr. Biss (20 Nov., 1682). A. E*, 1682-89, iM. E., 1682-89, Cd, Col, 1681-85, No. 777. 52 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Sunderland, with a request for the restoration of the sloop and servants.^® Within a fortnight the Danish king had written a vigorous letter to Esmit rebuking him and ordering him to restore ship and fugitive servants forthwith, on pain of summary pxmishment of death. Further complaint of violence would certainly bring this punishment upon him.^^ It could assuredly not have missed the observation of the de facto governor that serious trouble was in the wind; and so long as he had secured no commission, his position was bound to be exceedingly precarious. The directors of the company in Copenhagen had early learned of Nicholas Esmit’s doings at St. Thomas, and decided to have him replaced at the earliest opportunity by a more likely incumbent. In March 168^ George Iversen who had recuperated from his severe expe- rience again sought his former post. In this and in his plans for strengthening the colony by another consignment of convicts Iversen was supported by Jens Juel and Albert Gyldensparre who with Edward Holst, assumed the direction of the company's affairs in 1682, on the resignation of Hans Nansen and Herman Meyer. The governor-elect received his commission Septem- ber 26, 1682, his final instructions on October 28, and left Elsinore on November 10, just when Stapleton was formulating his charges against Adolph Esmit. But Iversen was never to reach his destination, for after he had passed the Azores, he and those in authority with him fell victims to a mutiny instigated by their convict cargo.^^ As the news of this latest misfortune was reaching the direc- tors at Copenhagen, Adolph Esmit was sending his recently married English wife Charity to Denmark to plead his case and procure him a commission.^ He sent in numerous documents “ Cal. Col., 1681-85, No. 993 (Mar. 8, 1683). Ibid., No. 1003 (Mar. 17, 1683). Another copy of the same docu- ment has been calendared by mistake under date of Mar. 17, 1684 (No 1597). Manager MS., 44. Krarup, Iversen, 43 et seq. Most of the mutineers were caught and horribly put to death in Copenhagen. Cf Haring, Buccaneers, iS7, where **Everson” is confused with Milan. ^ A. JE., 168^-89 (May 1, 1683). THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 53 intended to prove his brother’s treachery and justify his own actions. Charity Esmit was a shrewd woman, of wide ac- quaintance in official, if not indeed in royal circles. She was an adept at intriguing, and lost no time in pulling all available wires to keep her husband in his place. Her insistence was rewarded when the king and the directors decided early in July that the low estate of the company demanded that for the present the incumbent be confirmed in his office, and issued the commission on July 17. Before Charity could bring her husband the much desired commission, matters had rapidly approached a crisis in St. Thomas. In response to requests from West Indian governors for men of war to protect their interests, the English king had sent H. M. S. Rvby under Capt. Richard May to the Leeward Islands early in 1683. In his search for a French pirate ship, La TrompeiLse, captained by the notorious Jean Hamlin, he visited St. Thomas early in July,^^ but failed to find the ship, although Sir Thomas Lynch had reported the presence of La Trompeuse in a letter to the Lord President of the Council, written on May 6}^ But the English were not to be balked so easily of their prey. At three o’clock on the morning of July 30, Capt. Charles Carhle put into St. Thomas harbor with H. M. S. Francis y a ship sent by the king early in the year with ammuni- tion and supplies for the new forts at St. Christopher, Nevis, Montserrat, and Antigua. Carlile had with him a letter of recommendation from Sir William Stapleton. The obj'ect of the search. La TrompeusCy a ship of thirty-two guns and six boats (patararoes) was lying at anchor within, and (according to Capt. Carlile) the Francis was greeted by some shots from either the pirate or the fort. On Tuesday, July 31, the English An English pirate, George Bond, was one of those whose depositions were included. Various threats made by Nicholas Esmit at St. Christopher and St. Eustatius against St, Thomas inhabitants were adduced. A, E., 168^-^89 (May 1, 1683). One of Adolph Esmit’s most steadfast friends was Steen Andersen Bille, vice commandant of Copenhagen in 1676, appointed to the war college in 1679, and made a noble in that year. <^ A E., ms-86 (Juty 2/l2, 1686). « Co/. Co/., 1681-86, No, 1066 (May 6, 1683), 54 THE DANISH WEST INDIES captain sent a protest to the governor concerning the shooting, and planned to burn up the pirate ship that night. The gover- nor’s explanation that he had already taken her into custody and sent her men ashore did not help matters, for in that case he was responsible for the firing on the English flag. Esmit’s efforts to cajole Carlile ashore by sending him a present and an invitation to dine were too transparent to succeed. Carlile was in no mood to risk a delay that might bring in the pirate ship’s consort, which was daily expected, so he sent his men on board her that evening (Tuesday) and fired her. In the conflagration, another privateer lying near at hand caught fire and was burned. In vain did Esmit fulminate against this confessedly high- handed measure and against Carlile’s threat to summon three more frigates to his assistance if Esmit did not deliver up the pirate Englishmen who were ashore. Esmit admitted the firing of a shot from the castle but maintained that his purpose was merely to secure due salute. Since he was accused of undue intimacy with pirates, he sent over in irons the man who fired the shot. The rest, he explained, had fied.^® Esmit’s first care was to notify the French governor of St. Croix, for the French might be expected to put in a claim for the restitution of property belonging to one of their subjects, although in his claim to Carlile Esmit argued that the frigate belonged to the Eang of Denmark. Stapleton had now secured the means by which he could back up his words with powder and ball, and was prepared to press his advantage. On Au- gust 15 he demanded that Esmit deliver up Jean Hamlin, whom the St. Thomas governor had evidently befriended. ‘‘Have a care, he wrote, “I shall come from the Leeward Islands with an armed force, blow you up as quickly as the Trompeusey and pound any pirate that you may have fitted out. If you have a spark of honesty in you restore me the sloop and runaway serv- « Cd, Col, 1681-85, Nos. 1168, 1173, 1188, 1190; A. E., 1682-89 (Aue. 1, 1683). Ibid., No. 1173. Esmit to Stapleton (Aug. 1, 1683). ^ Ibid,, No. 1381. The Chevalier of St. Laurens, Preach governor of Martinique sent a protest to Governor Stapleton Nov. 13, 1683, main- taming not without reason that his men should have spared the ships and punished the pirates. THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 55 ants that I have already claimed.” ^ In a letter to the Lords of Trade written on the same day Stapleton expressed himseK with equal vigor and at greater length. He was sending Carlile out after Cooke and Bond, two other English pirates who had been befriended by the Danish governor. '‘There is more need of such [i. good ships] in the Leeward Islands than in any other government,” he wrote, "with their mixture of Spanish, French, Danes, Dutch, and Indians.” Stapleton’s wounded feelings received some bahn when a copy reached him of Christian V’s order to Esmit’s brother Nicholas to deliver to the English island of Montserrat the sloop and goods seized, and likewise to restore the seven runaway servants.^® He may also have extracted com- fort from the success of his men in breaking up the "castle” that Esmit had caused to be built on St, John, and in despoiling of their hve stock the grazmg islets near St. Thomas harbor.^^ Esmit was nothing daimted by Stapleton’s threats. He seized English sloops when he could lay hands on them and sold Jean Hamlin a new sloop, perhaps one of those seized from the English. Hamlin went back to his old trade in company with a Captain Morgan, a pirate and a namesake of that other Morgan who was trying in the capacity of lieutenant governor of Jamaica to suppress piracy in Caribbean waters. Captain George Bond, master of the ship Summer Island of London, had bought a Dutch vessel at St. Thomas, fitted her out there, turned pirate, and sent some of his captured booty back to St. Thomas for safe keeping.^^ Madame Esmit’s return from Copenhagen in November 1683 with the coveted commission was a triumph of which neither she 28 Cal. Col, 1681-85, No. 1189 (Aug. 16, 1688). 28 Ibid., No. 1188. The Indians were on the rampage in the Windward Islands at this time. *8 Adolph Esmit’s commission was dated July 17, 1683. The order for the release of the sloop was signed Oct. 4, 1683. Cal. Col, 1681-85, No. 2087. 81 A. E., 1682-89 (Aug. 26, 1683). *‘Lit. D.” 82 Cal. Col, 1681-85, No. 1223. Stapleton to Lords of Trade (Aug. 30, 1683). Before long Hannlin is again heard of as a captain of La NoumlU Trompeuse, which Stapleton asserted was fitted and protected by the godly New England independents. Ibid., No. 2042 (Jan. 7, 1686). 88 Ibid., Nos. 1471-1474, 1636. 56 THE DANISH WEST INDIES nor her husband was slow to take advantage. Difficulty of communication between new and old world meant that the offences and grievances of the summer, which had been accu- mulating in London and Copenhagen, became the topic of dip- lomatic negotiation in the winter following. The commission arrived none too soon, for malcontents within the colony were already plotting Adolph Esmit’s overthrow. Now that he was governor in his own right, he could proceed against his local enemies with a vigor born of authority. The first to become a target for the governor’s wrath was the leader of the plot, Otto Eden, who was condemned to death in the month following Madame’s return.^^ His two chief accomplices got off with fines, and banishment to their plantations for nine months.^® Esmit showed very much the same instability of character in dealing with the inhabitants, that he showed in his relations with his neighbors, on other islands. The return of Madame Esmit could not but further embitter the life of the conscientious, if irascible, Stapleton. ‘"Never was like impudence on the earth as of Esmit and his wife,” he wrote to the Lords of Trade, Feb- ruary 13, 1684. “She gives out that she is the relict of an English baron.” Had Governor Iversen lived to arrive safely at his post early in 1683 when he was expected, the company might have been spared much expense and annoyance, and the colony a harrowing experience. For Esmit was no more inclined to give up his habits than Stapleton was to let him cultivate them in peace. In April 1684 Sir William issued an order to Col. Thomas Hill, authorizing him to secure any persons that he might find in the Virgin Islands, especijally Danes, and bring them to Nevis.®® Before long Esmit’s secretary, Martin Borel, with three negroes was captured and detained in arrest at Nevis. When Esmit threatened to send the secretary’s seven children over into Stapleton’s safekeeping in case their mother who was danger- ously ill, should die,®^ the secretary was returned. ** A. E., 168^-89 (Nov. 20, and Dec., 1683). Ibid, (Jan. 26, 1684). They were Jodimn Ddicaet and Jan Borris. Cd, Cd., 1681-85, 1947, IH (April 8, 1684). 37 Ibid., 1947, n (June 11, 1684); A. E. (June 16, 1684). THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 57 About two months before Madame Esmit's return, and too early to permit the news of it to reach Copenhagen before she had made ofiE with her husband’s precious commission, Stapleton had sent in two letters with his latest grievances against his recalcitrant neighbor.®® The news transmitted by Stapleton concerning Jean Hamlin proved the last straw, and on Novem- ber 14, 1683 th^ king issued an Order in Council authorizing Governor Stapleton to seize the governor of St. Thomas and to hinder the further harboring of pirates in that place.®^ The Danish envoy was notified of the action taken, and the sending of the order was delayed until he could communicate with the government at Copenhagen.^ In February, 1684, the Earl of Sunderland, Secretary of State, was informed by Christian Lente, the Danish envoy, that the King of Denmark had ordered the arrest of the governor of St. Thomas.'^^ Affairs were by this time moving rather too swiftly for the comfort of the directors at Copenhagen. On account of Iversen’s death, they had been forced against their will to confirm the usurper and harborer of pirates in his office until they could se- ciue a new incumbent. But the patience of the English govern- ment was evidently exhausted, and it was in no mood to listen to Esmit’s counter complaints. So in a shareholders’ meeting held on March 10, the directors of the Danish company were asked to choose a new governor. Two available candidates presented themselves, ‘^auditor” BalthasarLachmann and Gabriel Milan. The latterwas selected because of his knowledge of languages and of his business ability to fill the vacant place.^ The recommendation, dated March 14, was signed by the executive committee of the directors, con- sisting of Albert Gyldensparre, a brotjher of the disgraced Count Griffenfeld, Abraham Wtist, later to become a member of the Board of Trade, and Edward Holst. The terms on which the office was to be bestowed were presently agreed upon, and on C(d. CoU 1681-85, No. 1188 (Aug. 15) and (Aug. 80, 1683). Ibid., No. 1382. ^9 Exanip, Milan, 3. " Cal. C6L., 1681-85, No. 1547 (Feb. 10). - ** Krarup, 3. 58 THE DANISH WEST INDIES May 7, 1684, the king issued an order deposing Adolph Esmit and naming Gabriel Milan as governor of St. Thomas in his stead.^^ To take the new governor and his retinue over to the West Indies, the king set aside the warship, Fortuna, armed with forty guns and provided with a crew of eighty men, and placed in command Captain George Meyer, a German-speaking oflScer who had been in the Danish service for five years. Besides his own family, consisting of a wife, a grown son, Felix, and four children, Milan brought with him a governess, three maids, three lackeys, a laborer, and a Tartar. As merchant at the St. Thomas factory and next in authority to the governor, the directors sent along Niels Lassen, and as “assistant” in the company’s office (a clerical place) John Lorentz, a young man from Flensborg in Schleswig who had contracted to serve the company for four years. Lavish provision was made for the governor’s conofort. Various kinds of foreign wines were taken on board, and place was even found for six or seven dogs. The king had furnished him with 6,000 rdl. cash for his immediate needs and given him part of his salary in advance. Certainly no charge of niggard- liness could be laid against the Company, the entire original stock of which amounted to not more than 44,866 rdl, (64,300 sldL), Captain Meyer was entrusted with a secret order direct- ing that in case of Milan’s death Niels Lassen should succeed to the governorship, and that in case of the death of the latter. Lieutenant Christopher Heins of St. Thomas should take charge. The Fortuna remained long enough to receive a copy of Charles II’s orders to Stapleton to assist the new governor in case Esmit should resist.^® The man who was charged with the responsibility of re- deeming the good name of his country in the far-off Caribbean had led an eventful life. Milan came of a reputable Jewish family which had coimections in Portugal, Flanders, and “ Christian V. to A. Esmit. A. E., 168^-89, Krarup, MUan, 5. 6 . ^ Cal. Col., 1681’-85, No. 1676 (May 18). THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 59 Hamburg. His family was related by marriage to tbe well- known Portuguese-Jewish houses of da Costa and de Castro. He had, according to his own account, begun his career as a soldier, and had served under Cardinal Mazarin in France. In 1667 he appears in the r61e of an Amsterdam merchant; he was concerned with financing a foreign journey undertaken by Prince George of Denmark; in 1668 he was made Danish factor, and in 1670 factor-general, in Amsterdam. In this capacity he composed reports on political and com- mercial matters, a circumstance that brought him into con- fidential relations with various important personages at the Danish court, among whom the Peter Schumacher (Count Griffenfeld) before mentioned was his chief stay imtil the latter’s fall in 1676. Among his linguistic acquisitions he counted Spanish, French, Portuguese, German, and Dutch. Milan had tried in vain to get an appointment to the Board of Trade on the ground that he knew the tricks of traders and money-changers, and he had accumulated a list of claims against his royal master for services rendered in the Netherlands—^from espionage to loans of money—which he had small chance of collecting in cash. His prospects of getting into the employ of the state were improved when on January 18, 168^, he secured a certificate showing that he had discussed with a Hamburg Lutheran minister the relative merits of Catholicism and Protestantism, had thereby become convinced of the truth of the Augsbxirg Confession, and had partaken of the Holy Com- munion. In depending upon the favor of princes he had been forced, even before his appointment as governor, to drink deep from the cup of misfortune. However praiseworthy the THE DANISH WEST INDIES King’s selection of this fifty-three years old soldier of fortune for service in the company might have been from motives of human- ity, his choice could scarcely have been looked upon by hard- headed business men with anything but misgivings.^’^ The Fortuna arrived at St. Thomas on October 13, 1684, after a voyage of about nine weeks.^ At Nevis Milan called on Octo- ber 6 to pay his respects to Governor Stapleton and to receive the latter’s “instructions.” Sir William seems to have availed himself of the opportunity to accompany Milan and to witness Adolph Esmit’s final disgrace. Esmit handed over the reins of office without delay or resistance. He also handed over a treasury so empty that when the English were ready to depart, after having been entertained for ten days, the money needed for the purchase of parting gifts for the English dignitaries had to be borrowed by the government from a planter. What was worst of all, Esmit handed over to Milan an island that had become an outlaw among its more reputable neighbors. This was shown clearly enough two months before the latter’s ar- rival, when, on May ^2, a Spanish captain, Antonio Martino, landed and carried fifty-six slaves off to Hispaniola or Haiti. Lieutenant Heins had been sent over with two planters to de- mand the return of the loot, but without success.^ That Esmit had been prepared for the present contingency there could be no doubt. The gold, silver, and other property that he was able to scrape together had been sent to the Dutch island of St. Eustatius, whence they were to be shipped to Flushing. Although Milan had been instructed only to secure the persons of Esmit and his fanodly and to have them sent to Copenhagen, he took it upon himself to try to secure the latter’s property as well, by sending Niels Lassen to Governor Hout- coper of St. Eustatius with an alleged copy of his instructions and a demand for the delivery of the goods. But neither this nor subsequent attempts availed the crafty governor. Instead of In Persondhistoriak TidahriSt, 3 R. 2 B. (KjSbenliavii, 1898) 102 ^ $eq, F. Krarup has given an admirable and exhaustive account of Milan’s early life, which has been followed in the preceding paragraphs. 6. THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 01 seeking redress through diplomatic channels, as his masters ex- pected him to do, he authorized Captain Delicaet to take the company’s ship Charlotte Amaliay find the skipper who had transported the goods and make his ship lawful prize.^ It was to avoid just this sort of complication that Esmit had been dis- placed. But Milan was an exponent of direct action, he sought advice from none, and the council dared not oppose his will. Instead of sending his deposed predecessor back to Copen- hagen to answer for his stewardship over the company’s affairs, and to act as defendant in a suit brought by his brother Nicholas, he clapped him into confinement, first keeping him at the fort as his guest, but later putting him in a prison ceU.®^ Madame Esmit had rightly decided that she could be more useful in Copenhagen than in St. Thomas, and had started on her journey before Milan arrived. By this time matters had grown rather beyond her power of control, despite all her influential friends and her genius for intrigue; so she confined herself to taking measures to save what she could of the fanuly property. She returned to St. Thomas in December to share the hardships of prison life with her husband. The story of how Governor Milan, his sick body racked with fever almost from the first, restlessly suspicious and ofttimes with reason of his fellow men, jealous of his official power and position, administered the affairs of St. Thomas during his sixteen months’ incumbency may be dealt with rather briefly. In Captain Meyer’s attempt to provide the Fortuna with a good return cargo the governor took but an indifferent interest, and as to the Esmits’ returning on the Fortunay he would have none of it. Just why he should deliberately keep with him persons who could not but be a source of trouble as long as they were near, is difficult to explain on other groimds than cupidity. Milan had been unable to lay his hands on Esmit’s gains. In his relations with his council, he showed his arbitrariness and wil- fulness. In place of Lieutenant Heins, who happened to be absent on the company’s business when Milan arrived, the Personalhistorisk TidsTcrift, 3 R. 2 B., 9. The skipper’s name was Jochum Samuelsen. Esmit to Gyldensparre (September 23, 1686).^.4. E., 168^89, 62 THE DANISH WEST INDIES governor promptly appointed liis son, Felix. Instead of select- ing permanent councilors from among the planters as he had been instructed to do under certain specified conditions, he put in now one, now another, until fourteen planters had taken part in the government with him.®® With the other planters Milan was equally whimsical. For trifling misdemeanors he instituted elaborate investigations and meted out extravagant fines and punishments where a wiser man would have overlooked the whole matter.®^ Offending negroes were made to feel the pressure of the governor’s heavy hand. A runaway who might have been mercifully beheaded was impaled alive on a sharpened stick to die in horrible agony.®® Another negro, arrested on a similar charge, had his foot cut off, after which he was confiscated to the governor’s use and put to work in his kitchen. When in the spring following the departure of the Forluna (on March 31, 1685), Milan got wind of what he at once sus- pected to be a nefarious plot against his life, he vented his fury upon the unfortunate persons with swift and fiendish vengeance.®® In the midst of charges and counter-charges, one fact stood out with a clearness that was unmistakable. Milan’s stewardship of his own plantation property was above reproach; seventy negroes remained on the plantation even after twenty-five had been returned to an Englishman from whom they had been forcibly seized.®^ Here prosperity was rife. In Copenhagen Captain Meyer’s arrival was naturally awaited with a good deal of interest, even anxiety. The cap- tain’s report when he arrived on June 10, 1685, without Adolph Esmit, and even without a word from Milan, gave the directors and shareholders food for thought. Although they had only the captain’s unsupported word, the small cargo and Milan’s silence could not but rouse their fears that something was Ejarup, Milan, 9. Ibid., 10. Ibid., 12, 23, 26, 36. Ibid., n, iS. w Ibid., 23-26. ^Ubid.,SQ. THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 63 seriously wrong at St. Ttomas. A meeting of the Company’s shareholders was held within two days, and it was decided that the situation was serious enough to justify sending a memorial to the king asking once more for the loan of the Fortunay and for the sending thence of a commissioner with power to settle all the diflSculties. They suggested an attorney or fiscal in the navy department, Michael (MiJcheT) Mikkelsen.®^ The king could do nothing but fall in with the company’s recommendations. Commissioner Mikkelsen, armed with full power, left Copen- hagen on the Fortuna October 15, 1685, touched at Nevis on February 19 to get the latest St. Thomas advices, and arrived at his destination on February £4, 1686. The governor’s son, Ferdinand, had already sent his father a warning from Copen- hagen that it was planned to send out a new governor, namely. Captain Meyer, whom the governor had blamed for most of his misfortunes, even his illness. Milan, whose nerves had scarcely recovered from the shock of the ‘‘conspiracy,” called the plant- ers together in the “German” (Dutch Reformed?) church. There he informed them of this last “conspiracy,” namely, the attempt to place this “rascal” Mikkelsen in the governor’s seat “when he ought to be hanged to the highest tree.” He coun- selled resistance, exhorted their aid, and by cajolings and threats secured their signatures to a document by which they pledged themselves to leave the land before they would see their governor leave them. But if he proposed to give battle, he must needs secure the sinews of war. He chose a method consistent with his nature. On February 17, 1686, just as the royal commissioner was ap- proaching the West Indian waters, the governor authorized Captain Daniel Moy to take the company’s ship, Charlotte Amalia, and cruise upon the Spaniards wherever they might be found. With a ship scarcely seaworthy, provided with a crew of thirty men. Captain Moy put to sea to make war upon the kingdom of Spain. The Charlotte Amalia had no difficulty in finding a Spanish ship on the Porto Rico coast, but the latter vessel had the temerity to answer Captain Moy’s fire, wounding Manager MS., 49, 50. Krarup, Milan, 27. 64 THE DANISH WEST INDIES one man, killing another, and forcing the valiant captain to beat a hasty retreat to St. Thomas. It was withal an in- glorious ending to a sorry enterprise, and not calculated to re- deem the good name of the island.®® The commissioners had arrived in the harbor before the news of the ‘‘reprisal” fiasco could reach the governor, and before his “valet,” Moses Caille, could return from the French islands, whence he had been sent by the desperate governor in search of help.®^ Sitting in his private room and surrounded by all manner of firearms, the governor drew the parley out for three days before he finally surrendered to the king’s repre- sentative. Mikkelsen’s intimation that Milan’s attitude ren- dered him liable to the charge of rebellion, combined with the fact that the men on whom he could depend were rapidly dimin- ishing in number, brought the governor to his knees. A guard consisting of twelve men from the Fortuna and twelve planters, all under the command of Christopher Heins, was placed at the fort. With his removal to the ship the reign of Gabriel Milan came to a sudden end. Adolph Esmit and his wife. Charity, likewise the company’s merchant, Niels Lassen, who had been in prison since April 30, were taken out of their dungeons and put on board ship. The scene of interest, as far as the company is concerned, was soon to shift to Copenhagen. Nicholas Esmit had already lost his reason while in a Copenhagen prison waiting for a chance to clear himself and to bring action against his brother. The two successors of Nicholas were now to be given a chance to defend their oflScial actions in the Danish courts and before the directors of the company. Commissioner Mikkelsen was employed from March until July with collecting evidence from the planters concemkig Milan’s conduct. A few extracts from a letter written by the official reporter, Andrew Brock, to director Albert Gylden- sparre on June 30, 1686, just before the Fortuna sailed, will give an idea of the proceedings. “I wish for my part that your Excellency could have been here a single day and heard what Eramp, MUan, 29. Caille’s mission appears to have borne no fruit beyond arousing the Span- iards. THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 65 thundering there has been in the commission, with howling, shouting, and screaming, one against the other, and I had to write it into the protocol just as fast [as they spoke] . . . but God be thanked it is over, and former Lieutenant Christopher Heins was yesterday made governor and vice commandant here. May God in heaven aid him to carry on his government better than his predecessors, which I expect him to do, as he has shown himself only as an honest and upright man. . . M^an himself dictated a letter to the directors in justification of his conduct in which he vented his wrath on those inhabitants and employees who had attested to his zeal and faithfulness, but were now shouting, Crucify him, crucify him ! The letters of the two prisoners, Esmit and Lassen, which were sent over at the same time, bore out on the whole the testimony of the planters, whose sympathies were on the side of those two victims of Milanas wrath.®® Mikkelsen left St. Thomas with his rather uncongenial com- pany on July 5, and did not arrive in Copenhagen until Octo- ber 1^, 1686. Besides the two governors with their families and negro servants, the list of passengers included Niels Lassen, Gerhart Philipsen, and John Lorentz, whose testimony was desired in the suits. A commission was appointed within a week to try the case against Milan, but delays in getting the tangled evidence straightened prevented a decision being reached before November 17, 1687. An appeal to the Supreme Court brought further delays, but finally the case was opened on February 14, 1689. The judges rendered their individual opinions on March 14, and judgment was finally pronounced on March £1, The sentence was not a surprise to those who had followed the case. After a fair, impartial trial Gabriel Milan was found guilty and condemned to lose his property, honor, and life, and his head and hand were to be put upon a stake.®^ A royal pardon saved him from the last grim disgrace,®® and at 168S-89. •• Esmit to Directors; Lassen to same (March 13, 1686). A, 1682-^9. ^ Erarup, Milan, 47. ^ Qneen Charlotte AmaHa had earlier befriended Madame MRan, and was one of the chief participants” in the company. She had hdped to mitigate THE DANISH WEST INDIES dawn on March 26, 1689, he was beheaded on the New Square (Nytorv) in Copenhagen. Adolph Esmit’s long imprisomnent both on St. Thomas and in Copenhagen in 1686 and 1687 had given him grounds for ap- pearing as the injured party, and for demanding some form of restitution. While the Milan trial was dragging slowly on, the former governor and his wife seem to have been kept in prison in Copenhagen. From their arrival on October 12, 1686, until March, 1687, when Nicholas’ case against his brother was finally ready for trial, they remained in confinement.®® Here, as in the case of Milan, a commission was appointed,®^ and al- though a number of petty irregularities and cases of tampering with accounts were found, Adolph Esmit was on November 2, 1687, given a verdict of not guilty. On the same day, the di- rectors of the company actually named him governor of St. Thomas,®® and a few days later a fleet of three ships, the Young Tobias^ the Red Code (Den Rode Dane) and the Maria left Copenhagen for the West Indies. Accompanying Adolph Esmit, and in command of the fleet, was vice-admiral Iver Hoppe who seems to have had secret orders to bring Esmit back with him to Denmark in case he proved intractable. The latter was evidently being given his last chance, but at best it is difficult to see how the directors could have hoped that a speU of confinement could make the leopard change his spots. A report Comnussioiier Mildk^lsen’s instructions, and may have used her good oi^ces here. Adolph’s “brothers-in-law” Steen Andersen Bille and Jurgen Jurgensen gave bonds for his appearance. A. E., 1682-89 (March 585, 1687). Jens Jueb Mathias Moth, Muhle and Hbyer. ** One condition was that he should invest 2,000 rdl, within one year after he took possession at St. Thomas. THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1680-1690) 67 of the Swedish ambassador at Copenhagen (Anders Leyenclo) dated November 11> 1687, oflFers an explanation for the strange conduct of the directors: ‘‘Three ships are now lying at anchor here and entirely ready to sail out of the harbor with the first wind. The first of these carries thirty, the second twelve, and the third six pieces, which [ships] those in charge are to take over to St. Thomas in the West Indies, and there install Governor Adolph Smitt [Esmit] who was brought here from thence as a prisoner. He has now been entirely acquitted of the serious charges made against him, but Milan [has been] condenmed to lose his life, although the judgment has not yet been carried out. And inasmuch as said Smidt [Esmit] has informed the king of a scheme concerning a Spanish galleon, which is said to have been very heavily laden with silver and stranded not far from St. Thomas some forty years ago, Vice-admiral Hopp[e] is accompanying him with some divers and a lot of machines and implements with the intention of finding the silver. With what success it may be possible to report by the dose of next May, especially since January and February, the months when the sea is most calm, are to be used for that purpose. Not only his Majesty, but other private persons, have advanced as much as 20,000 rdL to promote this fishing scheme in the hope of securing a large return.” In the February following, after the two smaller ships had arrived,^® vice-governor Heins in a letter to the directors ex- plained the circumstances concerning the treasure ship. It lay on the north coast of “ Spaniola,” he wrote; twenty-six ships and sloops were gathered about the wreck until a royal English ship of fifty-six pieces came there and drove them all away. “We have received news from the English themselves that their captain has employed one hundred and fifty divers, and I think he had made a clean sweep, for many tons of gold had already been taken out.” The incident is not without significance, for DansJce SamUnger, 11 R. 5 B., p. 175. The Young Tohias arrived at St. Thomas on January 29, 1688, and the EM Cock on February 28. The Jfana with Esmit and Hoppe arrived a monlh later (March 24). C. Heina to directors (February 24, 1688). R. & Df^JMS-89. 68 THE DANISH WEST INDIES it indicated the king’s willingness to jeopardize the interests of the colony by an impossible appointee for the chance of securing precious metal from a galleon wrecked on a Spanish coast. After his arrival on March 24, 1688, in the leading-strings of vice-admiral Hoppe, it took Adolph Esmit just three months to convince all concerned of his utter incapacity. On June 22, his quarters were moved from the fort to the ship, where they re- mained until he had finished his last voyage to Denmark. Be- fore the Ifana’^ departure, the vice-admiral called the in- habitants together (July 7) and told them that he wished to know if Esmit’s statement that he held the affection of all on the island was true. ‘‘If you want Adolph Esmit to become governor, speak now while there is yet time,” the vice-admiral said. To this the planters all responded as with one voice, “No! if that should happen, we should all leave the land!” When asked concerning vice-governor Heins, they replied that they asked for no better governor."^^ This time Charity’s pulling of wires could not avail, but she pulled at them with her wonted vigor to the last as the directors learned from an intercepted letter to her husband,^^ Thus ended nearly a decade of weary & jD., 1683-89, Esmit’s diary (July 7, 1688). This was finished in another hand, apparently Lorentz’s. See Appendix E, p. SOS. The case against Adolph Esmit was resumed by the company on his return,, but apparently without result, for the ship and goods he had sent to Flushing m 1684 were confiscated before he could get hold of them, so he had nothing to be seized. Early in 1689 he offered the Swedish ambassador in Copenhagen his services in seizing the island of St. Thomas for Sweden without loss of life. Nothing came of it, and on January 25, 1690, the case against him was finally dropped, and he was allowed to go whither he would. He seems to have left Denmark for Courland, after whidi all trace of him is lost. THE CRITICAL PERIOD (1080-1690) 69 administrative turmoil. During this time three governors had been tried and found utterly wanting. Of dividends there had been no thought; the stockholders could count themselves fortunate that the island was still under Danish sovereignty. It became the business of Christopher Heins to cany out the work with which Adolph Esmit had been charged. Esmit had brought with him a lengthy series of instructions, the cariying out of which came to be left in the steadier hands of his successor, who served the company faithfully and well until his death on October 1689. He was ably seconded by John Lorentz, a young man who had begun his career in St. Thomas as assistant in the company’s office, had been in Copenhagen at the Milan and Esmit trials, and had returned with Adolph Esmit in 1688 with a commission as bookkeeper and assistant for the company. The young man was engaged for four years at a salary of 14 rdZ. per month. Heins’ administration was a quiet one if contrasted with the turbulent times when the Esmits and Milan held the fort. There was nothing for the Company to do but mark time until conditions might invite renewed action. As a result of a mandate issued in Esmit’s last brief term offering eight years’ exemption from taxes to intending settlers from other islands, a few French Huguenot and Dutch planters moved to St. Thomas with their negroes. Louis XIV’s revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 was car- ried out by zealous Jesuits for whom distance did not dim the sense of duty. Some slight progress in planting was made during these troubled years. Cotton, sugar, tobacco, and indigo were sold by the planters to the Company. Trade with the home country being irregular, considerable petty trade was carried on with the lesser islands, with the French on St. Croix and St. Eatts, with the Dutch on Saba, St. Eustatius and Curasao. Besides planting, some of the inhabitants, as Captain Delicaet, made a living by fishing turtle, which were particularly numerous in the Vest, Beff,, 1671-99 (January SS5, 1690); Damhe Sami,, II B. 5 B., p. jJ97 (March 1, 1689); H. FRug, den dansJce PtUegrim, p. 1174. Hdna* council alter Esmit’s departure consisted of Henry Irgens, Capt. Delicaet, John de Windt, and John Lorenta. 70 THE DANISH WEST INDIES vicinity of Crab Island. The company had begun before Heins’ time to go into the planting business, and managed to secure eighty slaves from one of the Guinea cargoes brought to America by Pauli, the secretary of the Company.^® A most significant effort to start the island on the road toward prosperity had been made in 1685, when the Elector of Bran- denburg entered into a treaty with the King of Denmark, by which a company organized under his protection and patronage was to be permitted to establish a factory and a plantation at St. Thomas under certain conditions. Occupation had been begun in 1686, and hopes were entertained that the Branden- burg occupation might help put new life into the poor, distracted little colony . The accession of John Lorentz to the post of act- ing governor in 1696 was the beginning of an oflGicial career of notable efficiency which ended with the death of Lorentz in 170^. Although not governor during the entire interval, he never re- laxed his interest in the Company’s welfare. The connection of John Lorentz with the Danish West India and Guinea Company as its acting head brings to an end what may properly be called its most critical period. The contract was made October 26, 1686, and the slaves were delivered by Captain Cordt (Cort) May 14, 1687. C. E. (May 26, 1687.) CHAPTER HI THE BHANDENBTJRGERS AT ST. THOMAS It will be remembered that in the second war of Louis XIV against the Dutch, which was ended by the treaties of Nimeguen (1678-1679), the Elector of Brandenburg and the King of Denmark-Norway were both allied with the Protestant Nether- lands against Prance and Sweden. Brandenburg, like the other German states, had not yet recovered from the horrors of the Thirty Years’ War, and was distinctly to be reckoned among the weaker European states. That it was able to play even a small part in European diplomacy was due in a considerable degree to the energetic and capable government of Frederick William of Hohenzollem, the Great Elector, who was Duke of Prussia as well as Elector of Brandenburg. Sweden’s Baltic ambi- tions, and particularly her possession of Western Pomerania on the south shores of that sea, made her a natural rival of Brandenburg-Prussia. The fact that Sweden was the common enemy of Denmark and Brandenburg would of itself tend to drive the two states into an alliance. Early in the reign of Frederick William, Brandenburg had attempted, through negotiations first with Denmark, and later with Austria and Spain, to form a company and establish fac- tories in East Indian lands, but without success.^ During the negotiations in connection with the peace of Nimeguen, she had attempted to secure French support in her efforts to estab- lish a trade in Guinea that would survive the opposition of the Dutch and English companies. Her ambassador in Paris, Meinders, was instructed to try to secure a permanent factory on the Guinea coast. In a letter from Benjamin Raule, at that time director-in-chief for naval affairs (OberdireJctor in Seesachen) he was urgently requested to ‘Tabor energetically to bring ^ R. Sdillck, Brandenburg-Preuisens Kolonial PolifUc ... 1, S et aeg., 48 et eeq. The attempt was made to buy the Danish factory of Dansborg in 1647. im^ 19. 171 ] 7i THE DANISH WEST INDIES about the sanction [of France] to lands,” and be willing to make considerable sacrifices by way of reciprocal trade privileges. The French, however, did not consider Brandenburg trade of sufficient importance to be worth the trouble of a treaty,^ The first proposal to establish a Brandenburg African com- pany appears to have been made by Benjamin Raule in Decem- ber, 1679.' It was to this Dutchman, more than to any other one man, that the interest of Brandenburg in Guinea and the West Indies during the last two decades of the seventeenth century is due, Raule was born at Flushing (Vlissingen) in Zeeland, and had become, before the outbreak of war with France, a shipowner on a large scale (Orossreeder)^ and a coun- cilor in the nearby town of Middelburg. In the naval war of 167£ he was practically ruined, and in the war that followed Sweden’s invasion of the Mark of Brandenburg he sought to re- coup his fortunes by serving the Elector as a privateer. On the conclusion of peace the Elector made him director-in-chief for naval affairs, and in 1681 he became director-general of marine with the rank of colonel, A man of restless activity and bold imagination, he was brimful of schemes for promoting the commerce of Brandenburg-Prussia. At one time it was an East India Company, at another an Iceland company, and now it was a company for trading with the Guinea and Angola coasts in “wax, gold, ivory, grain, blacks, and whatever the coast pro- duces.” ^ In June, 1677, before the French had concluded their treaty with the Dutch, he had offered to lead a privateering expedition against the French and another against Spain, the latter for the purpose of securing the equivalent in ships for the subsidies promised by Spain to Brandenburg in a treaty made in 1674. That, he argued, would cause not only the Spaniards, but the entire world to open their eyes in astonishment at the Elector’s sea power, and would lead French, Swedes, and Dutch to try to make commercial treaties with him.^ * Schtick, I, 135, 136. Haule had proposed engaging in the Guinea trade and having the Elector partidpate with him when he was first called to Berlin in 1676. im,, IS7. 11.89-94, o8als for establishing a paper money bank in the district of Nordenfield in Norway and submitted to a searching cross-examination. On December 6, 1697, U. E. GyldenlSve, Stadihcdder in Norway, expressed himself as entirely opposed to the paper money idea. Protocol over Kommissionen i Raadstuen for Slottet, 2 B (April 24, 1695); tbid^ 4 B. (December 6, 1697); ibid, (December 9, 1699); E. Hohn, Danmarh^Norffes Indre Rist., H, 403. ^ For a brief biographical sketch, see C. F. Bricka, DaneJc Biographish Lexi~ Icon, V. 17, p. 278. THE LEASING OF GUINEA AND ST. THOMAS 99 Company was signed February 13, 1690. Thormohlen con- tracted to lease the island of St. Thomas and the surrounding is- lands for a term of ten years; but the Company was to have the privilege of resuming the trade at the end of three years, when he likewise might abrogate the lease (Hl^) if he did not care to continue the arrangement. The annual rental was to be 4,630 sldl, (3,086 rdL 64 sic.), which was four per cent, of an estimated capitalization of 115,750 sldL (77,166 rdL 64 The con- tract was to become eflFective on June 11, 1690. The first pay- ment was to become due on that date if he took possession of the land by that time, or if not, then immediately after re- ceipt of the news that he had taken possession. He was to take charge of all the Company’s property, including fort, planta- tions, negroes, and magazines, which he was to deliver back in the condition or number that he found them. He was on the whole to be allowed the same privileges in disposing of his goods, entering his ships and the like, that the Company had enjoyed. If he took any of the surrounding islands into possession the Company was to have the right of buying them from him at double their cost to him. Failure to pay the rental promptly would make the contract void. It was understood that any dues received from the Brandenburg company should be appUed to Thormohlen’s account. Thormohlen’s orders to vice-governor Lorentz, whom he re- quested to continue in office until a successor could be named, did not reach St. Thomas until January 1691,^® and the actual transfer of authority took place on February 7, just after the Candlemas holiday. In the contract with the Company the proprietor had agreed to maintain as many soldiers at the fort as had the Company; but he met his first rebuff when he at- tempted to induce the colonists to share in bearing the burden of defence. In this, as in his efforts to raise the duties on out- going goods from five to six per cent., he was unable to secure C. B., 169Chl713. See Appendix Jf., p. SS2, for recdpts duiing these years. Moth to Thormohlen (August 15, 1693). C. B., 1690-1713. Lorentsts joumxd (January 29, 1690 et seg.). The dqparture of ThormoHen’s ship had been delayed until September 27, 1690. Manager MSn 94. 100 THE DANISH WEST INDIES the support of the directors who declared that any increase in taxation was contrary to the agreement and would tend to drive the planters off the island.^® It was becoming painfully evident that the demands of the West Indian situation had grown beyond the proprietor's ability to meet them. To Thormohlen’s request for a hundred officers and men at a total cost in wages of 5,110 rdl. the directors replied that they did not care how many were sent over, pro- vided he paid the bills. To his plea that “ the greatest part of the resources belonging to me and my modest house are sunk in that lease" the directors Juel and Moth turned an unsympathetic ear.^^ Their interest was now directed towards the prospects of being able to satisfy the shareholders with the proceeds expected from the lessee-ship. Among the passengers on one of the three ships sent out by Thormohlen in the summer of 1692 was the latter's new ap- pointee to this governorship, Francis Delavigne, who arrived on September 17.^^ Lorentz had no taste for continuing in the service under the new management and handed over the reins of power to Delavigne with a light heart. He described his successor as ‘‘a person by the name of Franz de la Wigne who is reported to have been born in Copenhagen, and whose stepfather is said to be the queen’s master in languages^ namely Visconti.” ^ Again an untrained hand was chosen to direct the affairs of this distant colony in a difficult time. Whether Delavigne’s zeal for his master could make up for his lack of experience wiU presently appear. One of the first duties that fell upon his shoulders was the painful one of returning to the Brandenburgers the 16,000 rdl, worth of sugar which Lorentz had seized during the previous year and which was already on board ship ready to be taken ^ ThormShlen to government and people of St. Thomas (September 1, 1691), P. B. 0.y 168S-1728; Directors to Lorentz (December 22, 1691), Directors’ reso- lution (November 12, 1692), C. B,, 1690-1713, Thormohlen to Directors (November 28, 1691); Directors to ThormOhlen (Decemb^ 5, 1691); ThormShlen’s reply (December 5, 1691), C. J5., 1690-1713, “ Lorentz to Directors (September 17, 1692), ibid. The names of the ships were the St, TJumas, Madame ThormSMen, and Jmg&ren (the Huntsman). Delamgne papers (November 25, 1692). Lorentz to Directors (January 6, 1693), C, B., 1690-1713, THE LEASING OP GUINEA AND ST. THOMAS 101 home.^^ The governor’s chagrin must have been still deeper when he received a copy of the king’s order of September 3, 169^, directing Thormohlen to pay 8,000 of the 16,000 rdl.—^in case he had not dehvered the contested goods to the Brandenburgers al- ready—^to Vice-admiral Iver Hoppe- This was by way of resti- tution for a seizure made by the Brandenburg commissioners at Emden in 1689,^^—sl characteristic seventeenth century mode of ‘"settling” an international dispute. But the king’s previous order of June 7, 1692,^^ had already been received and executed. Delavigne made a poor start when he tried to carry out Thormohlen’s schemes for raising the taxes. His attempts to curry favor with the Brandenburg director-general imme- diately after his arrival made him an object of suspicion to John Lorentz, who was watching his every move with an eagle eye and reporting his observations to Juel and Moth in Copenhagen. Lorentz was a man worth reckoning with, for he retained a strong hold upon many of the planters and hold-over officials (like the factor, von Holten and assistant, Peter Chris- tensen), and he could no doubt have been of real assistance as an adviser on matters of inter-island trade. Before Lorentz had returned from Copenhagen in the autumn of 1694 to replace Delavigne, the latter had imprisoned and put von Holten in irons, charging him, and apparently on good grounds, with misappropriating funds and juggling accounts.^^ Likewise the assistant Peter Christensen, as a result of the irresponsible talk of a negress,—“a loose heathenish female,”—^had been chained to a block in a cell at the fort, and his entire estate condemned “without any judgment, summons or warning,” One Engel Huysen had been kept for months “in a dark room, without air, sun or moonshine” because of alleged rebellious action.^^ The “vexation and chagrin” which this caused sent the governor to bed “with a deathly illness” for seven weeks, according to his own account. Dela- vigne to Thormbhlen (November 25, 1692). Ddavigne pa'pers. ^2 Christian V to Iver Hoppe (September 3, 1692). Vest, Reg., 1670-1699. See NeberirRezess zum Interime-Vergleick, June IO/20, 1692 (Schilck, op, eit., II, 405-407). Von Holten, Lisle paa hvis jeg Jcommer tiU kort paa Cassen^* (November 15, 1694). Delavigne papers. Lorentz to Directors (January 17, 1695). C. B., 1690-171S. 10^ THE DANISH WEST INDIES Thomas Berentsen, an influential planter, had been removed from his lieutenant’s post and his place on the council.^® Delavigne’s relations with the Brandenburgers did not long retain that spirit of mutual confidence which Thormohlen and the king had imposed upon him as one of his first duties. On Thormohlen’s failure to secure from the Brandenburg company the 3,000 rdl, with which he expected to make part of his annual payment for the lease, Delavigne had seized Brandenburg goods to the amount of 0,320 pieces-of-eight.^’^ The directors seem in fact to have left the collection of the rental dues from the Bran- denburgers to Thormohlen, who naturally disclaimed all respon- sibility for the whole Brandenburg matter.^^ Acting upon his master’s orders Delavigne had successfully protested against the attempt of the Brandenburgers to lay claim to Crab Island.^® While the governor was being kept thoroughly occupied with local problems, the proprietor Thormohlen was having troubles of his own with the implacable directors of the Company. This dfficulty began when the first payment became due in 1692. The situation had even then begun to look dark to Thormohlen. Brandenburg had negotiated a new treaty with Denmark pro- viding for a rental very much lower than what the directors had insisted on when the Thormohlen lease had been drawn up, and the latter had not even been consulted in the matter. The king had peremptorily ordered Thormohlen’s governor to deliver up the 16,000 rdl, worth of sugar which Lorentz had seized. Al- though not included, according to Moth’s statement, in the in- ventory of the property taken over by Thorm5hlen, the latter had looked upon it as one of his perquisites.^® ^ Berentsen to Delavigne (December 18, 1694); Delavigne to Berentsen (Feb- ruary 20, 1695). Delavigne 'papers. ^ Directors to Lorentz (July 28, 1694). C. B,, 169(hl713, ^Molh to TliormSblen (August 15, 1693); ThormOhlen to Juel and Moth (February 28. 1694). lUd. ^ Ddavigne had sent Capt. Peter Iversen to Crab Island on December 19, 1694, just two days before the Brandenburg director had sent his frigate, the Licm, there with orders to tahe formal possession. See above, pp. 88, 90. Delamgne papers, Joum. (December 17 et seq.) ; Lorentz to Directors (January 6, 1693), C, B„ 1690-1713. Moth to Tliormbhlen (June 25, 1692); same to same (July 15, 1693). C. B., 1690-1713. THE LEASING OP GUINEA AND ST. THOMAS lOS By the end of the second year of the contract, the directors began to breathe forth threats as to what the lessee might expect if he failed to make prompt payment of his arrears.^^ Finally in February, 1694, Juel and Moth went to the length of making a formal demand on Thormohlen through a royally appointed notary public, for categorical answers to the following questions: (1) whether he desired to abide by the contract any longer, and (£) whether he would make immediate payment of the rental for 1693. Failure to render a satisfactory reply on these points was to constitute a breach of contract. In his reply Thormohlen pointed out that the Brandenburgers had not only been awarded 16,000 rdl. ‘‘of my effects, which according to the inventory, I should have and hold as long as the contract lasted,” but that he had seen nothing of the 3,000 rdl. rental dues, in vain search of which he had made a difficult journey.®^ In March Thormohlen began to bring suit for damages against the Company, and immediately the directors nominated John Lorentz as governor, giving him the title of “vice commandant in our land St. Thomas in the West Indies.” The king conJBrmed the latter as governor on March £4, and on April 7 issued an order to Delavigne to hand over to Lorentz the command en- trusted to him by Thormohlen.®^ On Lorentz’s arrival in St. Thomas with these letters the connection of Thormohlen with the proprietorship of St. Thomas was entirely severed. It only remained to determine the extent of the damage caused to Thormohlen by the company, or the reverse. Before the court appointed to investigate his claims Thormahlen maintained that the damage suffered from Brandenburgers, or from 21ee- landers and Hamburgers masquerading under the Brandenburg name, brought his losses up to 76,000 rdl, not counting other Moth to ThormSMeii (July 1 and 16, 1693). C. B,, 1690-171$. Jud and Moth to ThonnOhlen (Fcbruaiy ^6, 1694); Thomibhlen^s reply (February iS, 1694). Ibid. Keport of Directors’ rdeetiiig (March 19, 1694), C. B., 1690-171$; Christian V’s order to Lorentz (March 24, 1694); Christian V’s order to Delavigne (April?, 1694); Vest. 1671-99. This commission consisted of “his HI^ Excellency,” Stadtholder U. P. GyldenlSve, Reventlow, J. Jud, von Plessen, Moth, von Jessen, and Harboe. Pfotokd over Kimmhaionerne udi Baadstuen . . . voL 3 (July 24, 1694). 104 THE DANISH WEST INDIES inconveniences, loss of credit, and the like. Out of 98,875 rdh expended, he had received oiJy 39,341 rdl in return, making a total cash loss of 59,534 rdl. The court admitted that he had considerable ground for complaint, and in recommending that the king extend him his good offices, that body called to mind his former enterprises in various lines and held that he might render the state considerable service in the future by remaining in business.^^ Whether Thormohlen secured any further satisfac- tion from the Company is doubtful. Though he never recovered from the shock which the West Indian proprietorship and the accidents of war gave his finances, he rose during the reign of Frederick IV (1699-1717) to membership once more on the Board of Trade (1704-1708), and just before his death in 1708 (December 25) he was made a member of the newly established Board of Police and Trade.^^ The leasing of the factories in Guinea and the West Indies had brought profit neither to the lessees nor to the Company’s stockholders. If the investors were to enjoy any appreciable returns, it was more likely to come about through the honest efforts of their own trained employees, loyally supported by directors who were willing to repose con- fidence in them. One great Europ^n war was nearing its close; another was to begin after the death of Charles II of Spain in 1700. In the lull between these two great struggles the Danish West India and Guinea Company was to go through a period of internal readjustment that was to enable it, better than in the past war, to reap the advantages of Denmark-Norway’s neutral position in any future complications. In this attempt to bring the Company into line with the commercial demands of the age, a chief part was played by the oft-mentioned John Lorentz who, beginning afresh in 1694, gave the Company nearly eight years of continuous and capable service. Protokol ewer Kommi^sioneme tidi Raadstum . . . vol. 3 (July 24, 1694.) He stated tliat twelve of his ships had been seized by one or another of the warring factions. 0. Nielsen (op. cit, VI, 171), mentions a petition from N. J. Arff, IliormShlen and W. and N. Edinger, presented in 1697 in which they claim to have lost 500,000 rdl. on ships seized during the war. ^ ArhiihMeddel., 1886—88, 163, 164. The Board of Trade was united with the Police Board by a royal order issued on March 23, 1708. The new Board continued in existence until 1781. CHAPTER V THE GOVERNORSHIP OP JOHN LOEENTZ When John Lorentz returned to St. Thomas to replace Dela- vigne as governor in November, 1694, he had been for ten years a participant in the troubled history of the company and its colony as above related. This young Flensborger, according to Pere Labat, had traveled in France, Spain and Italy, and spoke French fluently. He first came over as assistant in the company’s oflSce with the irascible Milan. He had humbly done the governor’s bidding and bent before his violent wrath, and he managed to survive Milan’s administration and to do service as a witness against him in Copenhagen. When Com- missioner Mikkelsen was sent to St. Thomas to give Adolph Esmit a trial as governor and as loadstone for Spanish treasure, Lorentz returned to his former post to the gratification of the company’s directors whom he had impressed as a young man of promise. After Esmit’s return to Denmark Lorentz served under vice-governor Heins as the company’s bookkeeper. On Heins’ death in October, 1689, two deputies from each of the “nations” on the island (Danish, Dutch, French, and pos- sibly German) elected him vice-governor to the great satisfac- tion of the inhabitants. In 1691 he induced Madame Heins to remam on the island as his wife, and on May fifth and skth a brilliant wedding was celebrated in die town of Charlotte Amalia, to which the leading planters, Brandenburg function- aries, and French and English captains in the harbor lent dis- tinction by their presence.^ ^ Lateniit Journal (Match 31, May 5, etc., 1691). [105] 106 THE DANISH WEST INDIES After Thormohlen had leased the island Lorentz remained in charge until Delavigne’s arrival in September, 1692. Even be- fore Lorentz had been displaced, the directors had required him to keep them accurately informed as to the state of Thormoh- len’s trade. In the summer of 1693 he returned to Copenhagen to give the directors a verbal report on the St. Thomas situa- tion. About the time that Lorentz was departing for Copen- hagen, Joachim von Holten (who was later to become the eighth governor of St, Thomas) wrote a letter to Thormohlen filled with complaints against Delavigne and assuring Thormoh- len that he had ‘Tost a good servant {Sorgtrager) in John Lor- entz.^ Whether the letter was written with or without the latter’s knowledge may not be said, but it was certainly in line with Lorentz’s personal ambitions. Captain Peter Iversen’s arrival in Copenhagen that summer with but a small cargo for the proprietor Thormohlen led to an investigation by the latter which caused him to issue a long list of charges against Gov- ernor Delavigne, and to order one George Lorentzen (or Lau- rentsen), whom he asserted that he had ‘Trained to take charge of the government,” to proceed to St. Thomas, place the incumbent under arrest, and assume the vice-governor’s position.^ With another administrative dispute threatening at St. Thomas, and with the directors preparing to bring suit against the proprietor at Copenhagen, it was surely the part of the discreet office-seeker to be on hand where he might fish in the troubled waters. For some unexplained reason the new appointee never took office.' Lorentz assumed charge of the government on November 23, 1694, immediately following his arrival. He had come over by way of the Dutch island of Curasao whence he had sent the directors a letter telling of the bad conditions reported at St. Thomas.^ Lorentz, according to his own account, had come ® J, von Holt^ to Thormohlen (May 25, 1693). Delaxdgne papers, ® Thormohlen’s examination of Captain Iversen and “Imst” Rongel (Sep- temb^- 20); Thormohlen's nine charges against Delavigne (September 25); Thor- mohlen’s order to George Lorentsen (September 25, 1693). Ibid. The latter’s name was also spelled Laurenisen. * In his letter of January 17, 1695, Lorentz mentions haying sent a letter from Cnragao on October 22, 1694. 0. 5., 1690-1713 . THE GOVERNERSfflP OF JOHN LORENTZ 107 not a wliit too soon, for the English authorities in the neighbor- ing islands had already forbidden their people from trading with St. Thomas, while the French were designing to remove Delavigne from his fort by force and bring him to the general at Martinique because of alleged high-handed treatment of a French ship in St. Thomas harbor. Lorentz found two of the company’s three plantations ® badly run down, the inhab- itants dissatisfied with the government, and the Brandenbxirgers still smarting under the robbery perpetrated by the ‘‘blond Legendre scarcely three weeks before. He prepared to apply himself immediately to the task of rehabilitating the colony as best he might under the Kberal set of instructions with which the directors had furnished him. These instructions deserve some passing notice. With respect to the Brandenburgers (^14) he was to abide by the three-year arrangement made on April ^3, 1692, after which he should proceed according to the original treaty of 1685. He was to keep on good terms with all foreign ‘^generals’^ and governors, assert the company’s right to St. John, Passage (a small island just east of Porto Rico), and Crab Islands, resist attacks from without, and prevent re- bellion, whether of blacks or whites, from within. Governor Lorentz was especially urged, by way of keeping on good terms with his neighbors in the West Indies, to have noth- ing to do with ‘"sea-robbers,” though he was to be allowed to buy properly condemned prizes when they might be offered for sale. In his relations with the English, who were becoming more aggressive as the war went on, he was soon to have a chance to show his mettle. The most radical departure from the previous policy, however, came as a result of an offer made by Lorentz himself to the directors. “Inasmuch as he [Lo- rentz] had undertaken to support himself tod all the company’s employees and soldiers on the income from the company’s plantations and tihe poll tax,” so ran their acceptance of his offer (1[ 8), “we are satisfied on behalf of the company to accept for it such surplus as may be left over, if any there be, leaving it to his honesty and his oath to see that the company may re- ® These ware known as the “New Quarter plantation/’ the “ Sugar plantation ” and **£xum]bays plantation.” 108 THE DANISH WEST INDIES ceive what is due/’® In other words, Lorentz was given a free hand to administer the Company’s affairs in the West Indies exactly as he saw fit. The concluding paragraph of their in- structions gives a still better idea of the new incumbent’s lati- tude of action. "‘He may do whatever he finds needful for the Company’s best interests, provided he immediately notifies the directors; and inasmuch as we have confidence in his re- liability and in his desire to promote the Company’s welfare in all things, we shall not hold him responsible if he should risk some of the Company’s resources and (which may God in his mercy prevent) it should not turn fortunately as was expected. And we shall besides, when the Company gains headway and gets upon its feet, show our appreciation for his faithful service in such a way that he shall see that he is not dealing with un- grateful people. Finally,” they concluded by way of a parting benediction, “we will wish him such a measure of success that his good resolution may redound to the service of his Majesty, the prosperity and growth of the Company, and to his own honor and fame.” ^ The success or failure of the West Indian colony was put squarely up to the new governor. The part he played in curb- ing the efforts of the Brandenburgers and helping to bring about the collapse of their plans for commercial expansion has been discussed in the previous chapter. The perfect unity that had characterized his former relations with directors Juel and Moth continued during the years following his return. In March, 1701, he was able to report to his masters that the Branden- burgers were carrying on little or no trade, having for a long time bought nothing from outside merchants but a few slaves ® ®The original resolutions of the shareholders, passed at their meeting of March 19, was signed by the following directors and shareholders: Jens Juel, P. Bran[d]t, M. Moth, W. Worm, A. Gyldensparre, N. Ejag, R. Meier, W. Mule, V. Lerdie (Lerke), F. C. Adelaer (Adeler), P. Hiort, P. Lemvig, Nicol. Janson (sic) Arf[f], C. Braem, J. Wurger, J. Kroyer, J. Matisen (for *‘Hr Cane. Raad Adela^*’), and Frid. and Niels Moller. Resolutions of Directors (March 19, 1694). G, R., 169(^1713. 7 Directors’ instruclions to Lorentz (March 29, 1694). C. B., 169(hl713. ® Lorentz and Van Belle had together bought a cargo of 154 slaves from a Zeeland slave ship. THE GOVERNORSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 109 and some ‘^Campeachy’^ wood. On the island they had no trade except a little in cotton when th^ made an occasional purchase from a planter. *‘On the whole, they are quite civil,” he reported, "^and are waiting for a new treaty.”^ John Lorentz had every reason to be pleased with such a quiescent situation and to pray for its long continuance. The most numerous nation among the planters of St. Thomas was the Dutch. Inasmuch as the number of prosperous planters largely determined the size of the return cargoes, there was considerable competition among the islands to secure planters of means and induce them to settle permanently. Organized into a militia corps these burghers could become an important factor in defence against outside attack. As early as 1688, when Europe was on the verge of war, Adolph Esmit had oiBPered eight years’ exemption from taxes to intending planters. In the years 1690 and 1691 a number of Dutch planters had come from St. Eustatius and Saba to avoid confiscation of their property, especially their negroes, by the French who had just taken possession of the island.^® During the course of the war, Governor Lorentz took measures to prevent their leaving. As the war closed, and the refugees repeated their desire to go, on the ground that St. Eustatius was a more healthful place to live than St. Thomas (which was admittedly true) he intimated that their real reason was the expiration of the eight years’ tax exemption. He tried to induce those leaving to pay the tax for four of the eight years but was unable to prevent five families from going, although one planter, Lucas Beverhoudt, left his plantation on St. Thomas in full working order, to the governor’s great joy. Just how many others eventually re- turned does not appear. The greatest obstacle to Lorentz’s constructive efforts was privateering. Although Brandenburg was ostensibly an enemy * Lorentz to Directors (March Z7, 1701). C. R., 1690-1713. Among these were Adrian RSnnds, Lawrence Westerbaen, Adrian Sorgeloos, and John le Ducq (Duq). Delavtgne papers; Lorerdsfs Journal (February 11, 1691, passim). Lorentz to Directors (September 6, 1696), C. S., 1690-17IS; same to same (January 1698), Oov. C. B., 169!rt700; same to same (June 20 and 24, 1698), V. B., 1690-1713. no THE DANISH WEST INDIES of France, its African company’s factor 5n the West Indies bought Spanish and English prizes captured by French priva- teers whenever opportunity offered.^^ These difficulties reached their height in 1696 when French captains holding commissions from Governor Du Casse of Petit Goave swarmed like birds of prey around the mouth of St. Thomas harbor, seizing not only enemies’ ships but vessels belonging to St. Thomas inhabitants.^^ To Governor Lorentz’s vigorous protests against these acts of violence towards a friendly power, Du Casse gaUy replied that those complained of were rascals, and advised Lorentz to have them hanged when they came to St. Thomas again. Further, Du Casse accused Lorentz of sellmg passports to Curagao skippers at 10 rdL each. According to Lorentz’s account, the Petit Goave governor bore a particular grudge against the St. Thomas government because of Delavigne’s failure to pay him for two kegs of indigo which he claimed were stUl due him, and he threatened to get Lorentz out of his government ‘‘as he had Delavigne.” The last thrust probably did not disturb Lorentz, who knew better than Du Casse why Delavigne had been re- moved. For the Count of Blenacq, general” at Martinique, the governor had mainly words of praise for the good order he had kept among his privateers.^^ Although Denmark had not openly sided with Louis XIV, her attitude of neutrality was looked upon as an indication of her friendliness. For the Spaniards who had joined the league against Louis XIV and Sweden it was not difficult to find an excuse for attacking St. Thomas. The report that they were planning an attack upon the island with three thousand men in the summer of 1696 spread consternation among the planters and well-nigh demoralized the population. The planters took Lorentz to Directors^ (October 19, 1697); same to same (November 30, 1696), c, 5., mo-ms. Governor Lorentz cites several instances. Benjamin Frank, a Jew, but a Danisb subject, bad his ship detained and his skipper maltreated and robbed; John de Wbidt^s ship was seized on the way from Curagao to St. Thomas, the cargo was confiscated and the ship only released on deposit of 5,080 rdl. as surety; two inhabitants who had a bill of sale from thg Brandenburg factor had their bark seized. Lorentz to Directors (September 6, 1696). C,B., 1690-1718, THE GOVERNORSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 111 measures for their own protection by sending their families and movable property to Curasao and some of the Leeward Islands ofver Eilande^'). The report that the Spaniards had planned to get the negroes* help in turning St. Thomas over to them made the governor take measures to send as many slaves as possible out of the island, especially the most unruly ones.^® The arrival of the French fleet imder Pointis in West Indian waters made the Spaniards retire to Havana, so by November the Danish refugees had begun to retum.^^ Lorentz hastened to advise the directors of the company to procure protection for St. Thomas by making representations at Madrid,^® which ad- vice they promptly followed.^ But the Spanish plans were only postponed. Fortunately for St. Thomas a squadron of six French men-of-war met the Spanish “Barlovento” fleet ^ when it was reported to be on its way to attack St. Thomas, probably early in 1697. The battle took place in the waters between Porto Rico and San Domingo, with the result that the Spanish vice-admiral, three hundred men, and fifty-four guns were captured by the French and brought into Petit Goave.^^ While this danger was thus averted by the opportune ap- pearance of a French squadron, an equally serious danger was threatening from another quarter. The Brandenburgers on St. Thomas had been carrying on considerable trade with the French colony at Petit Goave by collusion with the local French authorities who should by right have seized the Brandenburg vessels as belonging to an enemy of their king. At a time when France and England were getting ready to grapple for naval supremacy in West Indian waters it behooved Denmark with her little colony strictly to avoid getting into the melee. Madame Lorentz was among the refugees to Curasao, w C. R., 1690-171S. . Lorentz^$ Journal (November, 1696, passim). Lorentz to Directors (Nov, SO, 1696). C. B., 1690-171$. Directors to Cbiistian V (April 16, 1697). Ibid. The “Armada de Barlovento” was a small fleet that the Spaniards had used for the protection of their mainland and for catching int^lopers. The visits of this fleet to Crab Island prev^ted its permanent occupation by either Danes or English. The fleet at this time consisted of five ships and one small snow. Cf. E^tring, Bttoeaneers, 109. Lorentz to Dkectors (March 17, 169T). C. R., 1690-171$, THE DANISH WEST INDIES In January, 1697,^^ the French fleet above referred to left Brest for the West Indies under Jean-Bernard Desjeans, baron de Pointis. At Petit Goave, Pointis was joined by a fleet of privateers under the command of Governor Du Casse and de- parted in March for Carthagena on the coast of New Granada. After a difficult siege the citadel was captured, and booty esti- mated to be worth forty million crowns (ecus) was loaded on the French ships and promptly started for home. The English vice-admiral Nevell had meantime come to the West Indies in search of the French, who were assumed to have gone to some part of the Spanish Main, probably to Porto Bello.^^ It was important to prevent the captured loot from reaching Louis XIV who might be able with it to prolong the war considerably. As soon as a Martinique bark had brought the news of Nevell's presence in Caribbean waters to Petit Goave, the French au- thorities compelled a Brandenburg captain in the latter harbor, one Arduin, to take on board a French captain, a steersman, and six French seamen and proceed to Carthagena to warn Pointis and Du Casse of NevelFs whereabouts. The French fleet ar- rived in Brest on August £9 with the loss of but a single ship. Admiral Nevell was furious when he heard how the warning had been sent and fixed the blame upon the Danish authorities on St. Thomas, who were after all responsible for the govern- ment there. He wrote to the surrounding English governments that they should try to break up St. Thomas’s trade on the sea, and three privateers from Curagao and several from Jamaica ‘‘were sent out to cruise on this island’s vessels, to prevent the carrying on of trade with the French islands.” The conclusion of the Peace of Ryswick in September, 1697, helped presently to relieve the tension between St. Thomas and her neighbors. With the consummation of peace, however, piracy took the place of privateering.^^ During the course of the war it had been Chevalier, in his Eistoire de la marine frangaise (Paris, 1902), p. 205, mis- takenly places the date at June 7, 1696. Guerin (Eistoire maritime de France, Paris, 1862) is probably more nearly accurate in placing the date of de Pointis’ departure at January 9, 1697 (TV, 69). « Cal. Cd., 1696-97, No. 824 (March 18, 1697). Lorentz to Directors (October 19, 1697). C. B., 1690-1713. Cod. Cd., 1697-98, No. 269 (March 1, 1698) and passim. THE GOVERNORSHIP OP JOHN LORENTZ 113 deemed necessary only to determine whether a prize had been legally condemned by a properly constituted admiralty court before it was offered for sale in a neutral port. After the peace it would be more necessary than ever for skippers to present a clean ^^bill of health” for ships brought into foreign harbors. The attitude of John Lorentz toward strange craft suspected of irregularities is well illustrated by his action in the case of cer- tain ‘‘rovers of the sea” of whom the most notorious is Captain Kidd. Captain Kidd has passed into tradition to such an extent that it may be interesting to see how this arch-pirate of legend impressed people of his own time who had had unusual facilities for studying men of his alleged profession at close range. Kidd appeared before St. Thomas harbor on April 6, 1699 (O. S.?) having lately come from Madagascar in the Quidah Merchant^ a Genoese vessel of four himdred tons, thirty guns, and eighty men, and having been refused succor by the English at An- guilla.^ His appearance and action may best be told in Gov- ernor Lorentz’s own words as he put them down at the time in his carefully kept diary.^ “April 6.—^Today, Maundy Thxnrsday, there arrived before the harbor an English ship which anchored just outside of can- non range. Presently the captain sent his sloop [boat] ashore with a person on board who came to ask the vice commandant [i. e.y Lorentz] whether he might come in free with his ship, which his men had compelled him to seize from the Moors in the East Indies—he could produce proof that he had been com- pelled to seize it. The vice-commandant answered that it he could produce proof in writing that he was an honest man, he might enter, which message he sent by Lieut. Claus Hansen and Peter Smith [a well-to-do merchant who had been associated with the Brandenburgers in the slave-trade] who, however, were not satisfied with his explanations, for he [Kidd] had re- » Cal, Col, 1$99, No. 404 (May 18); qf. Cal. Col, 1689-9^, No. 136 (May IS, 1689), where a letter from coundl of Nevis to Blathwayt has been dated 1689 instead of 1699. ^ LormtzU Jovmal (April 6, 1609, etc.). Lorentz spelled the captain’s name Odd. Maundy Thursday: the day preceding Good Friday, Green Thursday. The tran^fio^n is not qlose, though reQonstrncted from very full npt^ 114 THE DANISH WEST INDIES quoted the vice-commandant to give him protection from the English royal ships, should they seek him here without orders, from which the vice-commandant saw that he was a pirate, and therefore deferred his answer tUl the morrow. April 7.—^In the morning the vice-commandant called the council together to consult as to whether or not the said sea- robber’s request could be granted; but as he saw that it would produce considerable friction between this land and the English if the pirate were admitted and not delivered up on their re- quest, it was resolved that no word, beyond yesterday’s mes- sage, should be sent to him. A man came ashore . . . with a written request that Kidd receive protection on land until he could send a bark to New England, present his case there, and prove that he was no sea- robber, inasmuch as the governor there, Mylord BeUamont, was the chief owner in the ship in which he sailed out of England three years ago to cruise on the Red Sea for pirates. But his request was flatly refused him, and besides, he was forbidden to send bis men ashore again unless they came into the harbor with the ship. ‘"Long Friday was celebrated in the church today. “April 8,—^Today the pirates lying outside the harbor have twice sent boats ashore at the harbor’s point. The vice- commandant at once sent his men there, and they found that seven men had been put ashore who maintained that they were passengers . . . [and proved it]. Two of these secured permis- sion to take a canoe and fetch their baggage, but when they were on the way the ship sf>read sails and left, the canoe follow- ing. “Watch was kept in the harbor that night by Captain Vinck’s boat.” Although Captain Kidd was forced meekly to leave the harbor of St. Thomas in his leaky vessel, and ceases thereupon to have any personal connection with St. Thomas history, the island authorities were presently to concern themselves with part of his cargo,—his “treasure.” On leaving St. Thomas, Kidd steered for San Domingo, but instead of risking putting in at Petit Goave, he stopped at the little island of Mona, just off the THE GOVERNORSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 115 southeast coast of Hispaniola, and apparently he anchored later in the mouth of the ‘‘River Romano” near “Catherine” island on the same coast.^ Here he was met—or followed—^by traders from Curagao, Antigua, and St. Thomas, to whom he disposed of a large part of his cargo. According to information given by the St. Thomas trader, Peter Smith, to Nevis officials, one Henry Bolton of Antigua had furnished him with provisions, and had undertaken to act as his agent in getting rid of his cargo. To William Burke,^ an Irish trader who had recently taken a cargo of slaves from Barbados to Carthagena, and who had done considerable business with the Dutch at Curagao in his time, Kidd sold one hundred and twenty or one hundred and thirty bales of muslin,^® and finally, when he had disposed of nearly all of his cargo, he bought a smaller boat (from Bolton?) and left for New York.^^ There he was to attempt to prove his innocence before Lord Bellamont, part owner of the ship in which he had left England, and the admiralty judges. On Friday, May 27, 1699, about seven weeks after Kidd^s departure, Burke came into St. Thomas on an English barken- tine, approached Governor Lorentz, and asked the favor of a private interview. With only Madame Lorentz present to act as interpreter, Burke stated that he had been with the sea- robber Captain “Cidd” and that if the governor would partic- ipate with him, a large profit could be got from the said pirate. To this the governor vigorously replied that he would have nothing to do with pirates, and thereby give the land an evil reputation. But if Lorentz was unwilling to receive the stolen goods, the Brandenburg factor, Van Belle, had no such scruples. That very night the searobbers’ goods were landed and stored in the Brandenburg warehouse. The guard had informed the governor of the stir in the harbor during the night, so the latter began an investigation on the following day with a view to finding out whether Van Belle had made the investment on his own account or on that of the Brandenburg company. 28 Cat. Col, mo. No. 616, 1 (July 7), No. 680, IX (July 10). 28 Also spelled Bourck, Burch, Burcke. 80 Cal, Col, mo. No. 616, 1 ^uly 7). Lands-Protokoller for St. Thomas . . . 1694-1711 (June 7, 1600). 116 THE DANISH WEST INDIES The governor’s prompt measures alarmed the Brandenburg officials. Their bookkeeper, Sivert Hoesz, as well as Burke, came to parley with him in the hope of reaching an agreement. On Monday the governor managed to seize some of the goods which had been brought into the house of an inhabitant.^^ Lor- entz, in a letter written July .-4, 1699, mentions fifteen small packages and sixty sacks of saltpetre as having been seized and placed in the fort,^^ Perhaps these included the goods referred to. On June 1 Burke was arrested, to be released on June 7, when the suit against him was begun. In the course of the hearing, Burke testified that besides Van Belle, Messrs. Beck and Moyart from Curagao and some gentlemen on Barbados had a share in the cargo in question,^^ and that he remembered haviug paid Eidd 1^,000 pieees-of-eight. A [Brandenburg?] gunner testified that he had recorded dehvery of 158 packages, large and small, into the Brandenburg magazine. The court concluded that Van Belle must have been cognizant of the origin of the goods, and that he should therefore have a protest sent to him, charging him with action prejudicial to the island, that Burke should pay a fine of 300 pieces-of-eight for his In- solentie, and deposit 5,000 pieces-of-eight by way of guarantee that Kidd’s title to the goods was a legal one.®^ In his letter to the directors describing the affair, Lorentz mentions their having fined Van Belle 5,000 which helps to confirm a suspicion that the latter was forced to put up the deposit for Burke, who was only a go-between. The governor refrained from seizing those goods which actually reached the Brandenburg magazine. They were eventually put on board the Brandenburg ship, the Seven Provinces^ which Lorentz re- Lorentz’s Journal (May 27, etc., 1699). Lorentz to Directors (JiiTy 4, 1699). C. B., 1690-1713. In a letter of April 15, 1700, Lorentz informed the Directors that he had caused the 69 sacks of saltpetre and 12 bales of cotton and “Netteldug’^ to be loaded on the Christian V on the company’s account. ** Burke case (June 7, 1699). Lcmds-Prot., 1694.-1711. Ibid. The court was composed of the governor and John (Johannes) de Windt, Thomas Berentsen, Claus (Claes) Hansen, J. Rasmussen and Abraham Matheusen, who signed with his mark. Lorentz to Directors (June 19, 1699). C. B., 1690-1713. THE GOVERNORSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 117 ported to be laden with ‘‘a deal of searobbers" goods, of pock- wood, some cotton and money, for no sugar was to be had.^ The governor and council considered the case extremely grave. The governor’s instructions had expressly prohibited him from having dealings with pirates, but from the point of view of the colony it was just as dangerous for the Brandenburgers to engage in such traffic as for the Danes, for the Company would be held responsible in any case. Councilor Claus Hansen was sent over on the Danish ship Gyldenlove^ Captain Vinck, which left St. Thomas on Jime 20, 1699, provided with documents to prove where the responsibility for collusion with the pirates really lay.^ The problem for the Danes in the West Indies was how to convince the English that there was no collusion between them and the pirates. From New York, the Carolinas, and the Bahamas, came complaints from zealous English officials like Edward Handolph against the encouragement given to piracy and to evasion of the acts of navigation.^® In the West Indies, the Danes and the Dutch were held largely responsible for such wrong-doings, although it was the attitude of the planters that made smuggling practically impossible to repress. The English had made some progress in discouraging piracy when they succeeded in getting Captain Eidd shipped off to England for trial. Local laws did not permit hanging, and conviction by local authorities would have been problematical.^ Another victory for the forces of order was secured when Bolton was seized and brought to England for trial.^^ With respect to Burke they were less lucky. Threats of Rear-admiral Benbow, who appeared at St. Thomas in October, 1699, with a ship of fifty-four pieces and two small frigates of twenty or twenty-two guns each, could not make the governor give up Burke, who had sought refuge with the Brandenburgers, liOreatz to Directors, Gov, C, B,, 169^-1700 (August 10, 1699). Lorentz^s Journal (June 20, 1699). Edward Randolph was Collector of Customs and Deputy Auditor for New England. Beer, op. cit., I, 222. ^ See, e, g. Cal. CoL, 1701, No. 180 (February 19). Cd, Col., 1699, No. 1034 (December 4); ibid., 1701, No. 26 (January 11). 118 THE DANISH WEST INDIES or surrender the money that Burke (or Van Belle) had deposited in the Company’s treasury. Instead, Benbowmade a report on the island and its harbor, in which he stated that it '"would be of great use to our English nation in case of war in these parts,” that it could be easily fortified, whereas at present it was but "a receptacle for thieves.” The stubbonmess of Lorentz, whose main concern was the retention of the five thousand pieces-of-eight and the seized goods for the Company, led the Earl of Bellamont, the English governor of New York, to con- tend that Burke had bought protection from the Danish gov- ernor with the proceeds of Kidd’s spoils.^^ His statement that Burke "will not be parted with” turned out entirely true, for in August, 1701, that pirates’ friend was reported out of reach of the arm of English lawin the French part of St. Kitts.^® Lorentz was able to assume so bold a front because he knew through in- formation secured by Peter Smith on Nevis that Admiral Ben- bow was merely putting up a bluffing game, and was exceeding his orders in the hope of forcing the restitution of Kidd’s and Burke’s boat.^® In July, 1699, another Madagascar pirate, Tempest Roger (or Rogers) a former acquaintance of Kidd’s from those regions, appeared in St. Thomas harbor to ask leave to repair his ship, but he was not allowed to remain.^^ But pirates did not always get off so easily. In a letter written in April, 1700, Lorentz mentions having meted out exemplary punishment to four out of nine pirates "who came here some time ago,” leaving the fate of the remaining five in the hands of the directors.^® Their con- fiscated goods, amounting to £,600 rdZ., helped to justify his zeal for the interests of his masters and make the performance of duty doubly joyous. ^ Lorentz to Directors (November 9, 1699). Gov, C. B., 16H-1700; Cal. Col, 1699, No. 907 (October 28), ^B^bow to Vernon, Cal. Col, 1699, No. 907 (October 28). ^ Bellamont to Lords of Trade, ibid.. No. 890 (October 23, 1699). Codrington (Antigua) to Council of Trade, ibid., 1701, No. 784 (August 25). " Lorentz to Directors (November 9, 1699). Gov. C. B., 1694.-1700. ^ Same to same, ibid. (August 10, 1699); Cal. Col, 1699, No. 880, 11 (Au- gust 17, etc.); ibid., 1700, No. 848 (October 18). ^Lorentz to Directors (April 15, 1700). C. B., 1690-171$. THE GOVERNORSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 119 The willingness of the Brandenburg factor to encourage un- lawful commerce did not escape the English Leeward Islands governors. In September, 1698, Van Belle attempted to send two score slaves to St. Eitts in a boat flying a Danish flag, but a Mr. Mead, the English commissioner and collector of customs at Nevis, seized them, apparently on the basis of the first clause, of the Act of Navigation, which provided that ‘^no goods or commodities whatsoever shall be imported into or exported out of any of his Majesty’s plantations except in English or Planta- tion shipping, and manned as specified in the Act.” The Coun- cil of Trade and Plantations were not disposed to intervene in Van Belle’s behalf, since they had ^^rather much reason to sus- pect him well versed in methods of interloping and trading there illegally, a practice very prejudicial to [British] service and interests.” ^ Prom the various circxunstances above related it will be seen that the governor’s position at St. Thomas was not a sinecure. He must stand ready to assert the claims of King and Company against all comers. In 1698 the governor sent an expedition to Crab Island to protest against its occupation by that Scotch Darien conipany promoted by William Paterson, an enterprise through which the sponsors hoped to revolutionize Caribbean commerce.^® The conscientious governor must discriminate between legal and illegal commerce, he must permit the Bran- denbmgers a certain stipulated freedom in trade without en- dangering Danish sovereignty on the island. He must keep on good terms with the planters, prevent uprisings among the ^ Peter Vanbelle (Van Belle) to king. Cal. Colt 1699, No. 648, 1 (July 13); Council of Trade and Plantations to Earl of Jersey, ibid.. No. 685 (July 27). Lorentz to Directors (October 12, 1698), Gov. C. B., 169Jhl700; Cal. Col., 1699, No. 866 (October 16): Host, op. cit., 40 et seq., gives Lorentz’s protest to Captain Robert Pinkerton, of October 2, 1698, and extracts from Lieut. Claus Hansen’s Journal of the Danish expedition to Crab Island. It is curious to note that as early as October 15/25, 1688, four “English {$ic) merchants” had ap- plied to the Elector of Brandenburg for an octroi for a new "American Com- pany.” The names given by Walter (Schiick, H, 528) are Heinridbi Bulen, Wilhelm Pocock, William Paterson, and James Schmitten. The only one of these who is mentioned in the act of Parliament of Jime 26, 1695, incorpo- rating the Darien Company, is Paterson. For James Smith see p. 189 above. 1^0 TBE DANISH WEST INDIES negroes, and maintain good relations with the neighboring governments* He must see to it that the Company’s planta- tions and magazine pay a surplus above their expenses, and particularly that homeward-bound ships of the Company have a good cargo that will enable the shareholders to secure dividends on their investment. That even as capable a man as John Lorentz should be successful in all these respects was quite im- possible, but that he should be able to hold his position until his death, and retain possession of the island against the threats of Spaniards and English, is something for which he deserves no little credit. Lorentz was always alive to what he considered the Com- pany’s best interests. His prompt report of John Mathew Leers’ attempt to lease the island in 1695 helped to nip that proposal in the bud, for he wrote that the rumor had “caused considerable grumbling among the inhabitants, who had all sworn to leave the land if itwere leased out again.” His letters concerning the lucrativeness of the slave trade led the share- holders of the Company to undertake with Jacob Lerke the sending of a ship to Guinea for a cargo of slaves, and eventually brought the Company into the business on its own account.®^ On June 10, 1702, Governor John Lorentz died in office, the first governor save one to obtain that distinction.^^ Of the six- teen years that had elapsed since he first arrived in St. Thomas as an humble “assistant,” he had served the Company eleven years as its governor. Under his clear-headed and vigorous guidance, the Company had been brought from bankruptcy to solvency, and its colony had become firmly established in the Caribbean. Loreatz to Directors (May 8, 1695), C. B., 1690-1713, The Leers’ project was supported by the Brandenburgers, who expected to be able to agree with Leers better thaa with the Danish company. Schiick (1, 248, 249) discusses the matter, but is unable from the Brandenburg documents to explain why it was dropped. Ibid (November 80, 1696), Gov. C, B., 169Jrl700. ^ Christopher Heins. See above, p. 80. CHAPTER VI ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES (1688-1733) Ip the importance of the history of the Danish islands in the West Indies is to be judged by the extent of the interests in- volved, or is to be measured by the actual influence of the is- lands upon the history of the Caribbean or on the state of Den- mark-Norway, the propriety of devoting an entire volume to them might well be questioned. But if a rather detailed study will disclose the rise of a fairly typical plantation society, if it will show on a small scale the sort of thing that took place in West Indian lands in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries on a large scale, such as the rise of the sugar industry and the slave trade, the effort need require no apology. Por the islands reflected very distinctly the economic solidarity of the West In- dian community at a time when it was looked upon as one of the main sources of the world’s wealth. St. Thomas can scarcely be said to have assumed its place as a regular plantation colony until 1688, when the Company’s accounts first b^an to be kept in money instead of sugar. In that year the first census was taken, and although not a scien- tific affair, its results are not without interest.^ This report showed that there were 30 plantations surveyed, and a total white planting population to record of just 148. These were distributed among deven nationalities as follows: 66 Dutch, 31 English, 17 Danes and Norwegians, 17 French, 4 Irish, 4 Flem- ish, 3 Germans, 3 Swedes, and one each of Scotch, Brazilians, and Portuguese. Of the 76 adults listed, 56 are entered as plant- ers, 5 as carpenters, £ as planters and m^chants, and one each as minister (Lutheran), schoolmaster, fisher, captain on the ^ LandListerfpr St. Thomas, 1688. The figures given in HSst, op. cit,, S&9, vary slightly from those given here. The report was signed by Franz Marta[is, who was a member of the council and a tavOTi keeper, Andreas Brock, who acted as secretary, and Sigmont LUck. THE DANISH WEST INDIES Company's bark, tavern keeper, overseer, turner, planter and tailor, and planter and miller. In the village of Charlotte Amalia,^ 37 persons were enumerated, of whom 21 were adults (12 men and 9 women), 11 were children, one was an indentured servant, and 4 were negroes. Of the adidts, 8 were Dutch, 4 were Danish, 3 were English; there was one each of French, Spanish, and “high German” inhabitants, while the nationality of the remaining three was not recorded. The trades repre- sented in the village and the number in each were: tailor, 2; innkeeper, 1; seamstress, 1; shoemaker, 1; carpenter, 2; black- smith, 1; and cotton ginner, 1. Among the 21 adults were 10 Calvinists (Reformed), 7 Lutherans (distributed among high Germans, Danes, and Dutch), and 2 Catholics. The number of white men, women, and children in the island totalled 317, and the negroes 422, which latter figure includes one Carib Indian, three squaws, and three mulatto women. In the census taken three years later (1691), just when Thormohlen’s proprietor- ship began, the information seems to have been gathered with greater precision, especially with regard to the plantations. The increase from 317 whites in 1688 to 399 in 1691 was no doubt partly due to the publication of the edict concerning the eight years’ exemption from taxes offered to new settlers, coupled with the outbreak of hostilities in Europe. The num- ber of negroes had risen at a rather more rapid rate, they num- bering 555, of whom 361 were put down as ‘‘capable,” which meant full-grown negroes capable of performing their full quota of work.^ It must be borne in mind that despite the voluminous na- ture of the census records, they are not such as to permit the investigator to claim absolute accuracy for the figures drawn from them. They will, on the whole, give a reasonably ac- curate idea of the actual state of affairs in many respects; but with regard to the number of slaves, especially in the second decade of the next century and after, when St. Thomas has be- * Cliarlotte Amalia, tlie name wMch the port of St. Thomas still bears, was named in honor of the queen of Christian V, in whose time the town was founded. For present-day view of town, see photo facing p. 257. ^ One Indian squaw and four children are included in the list of negroes. MAP OF ST. THOMAS (T715-1733) (MS. Map, undated, Royal Library, Copenhagen) [Facing -page ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES 12S come the home of a class of capitalist planters, the figures quoted will invariably be lower than they should be. Governor Bredal, writing to the directors in 1718, complained that the plantation owners did not fill out their records concerning the poll and land taxes they were supposed to pay, “ but the planters let their negroes hide themselves for the time being in the forest, and only a few of them are to be seen.^ By 1691, the number of plantations had increased to one hundred and one. Only twenty-eight of these had been under cultivation for eight years or more, while the average length of time that each of the plantations had been cultivated amounted to just four years, eleven months. The newness of the colony is further seen by the fact that as yet only five plantations were devoted to sugar cane even in part, while on 87 cotton was the chief product. Provisions (‘‘Cosf* or which in- cluded cassava, millet and maize, were raised on nine-tenths of the plantations. Eventually, the negroes were allotted plots of ground on which they raised their own food supply. Indigo culture had been begun. In 1699 l^eter Smith was the only person who planted mdigo, though others had tried it before him.^ In their instructions issued to Adolph Esmit in 1687 before his departure for St. Thomas, the directors named cotton, indigo, tobacco, pockwood, and other valuable dye woods as the chief products of the island. ^ The failure of the inhabitants to plant much sugar was as- cribed to their having taken up the ‘‘fattest” land from the start, whereas the “poorer” and stonier land was really better suited to the sugar cane. The northern and more fertile slopes were naturally taken up later than the southern and more ac- cessible side. The hope of the directors that rice and vine cul- ture be given a trial seems not to have been justified by ex- perience.® In 1689 the governor and council proposed that a * E. Bredal to Directors (March, 1718), B, & D., 1717-1720. ® The Company had indigo “works*’ as early as 1688. Cf. A. E. Esmit’s Journal (June 19, 1688); Lorentz to Directors (February 20, 1699), C. B., 169k- 1700. ® Millet (“Milien,” or “Millie,”) was used quite commonly for food for the slaves; “tobi” and cacao were also mentioned by the directors as worthy of attention. Directors* instructions to Esmit (November 9, 1687). Hems re- m THE DANISH WEST INDIES sugar Tuill should be put up on Milan’s former plantation, and ventured the opinion that if sugar cane should prove successful on the Company’s plantations, it would prove more profitable than cotton or tobaccoJ The main reason for the Company’s having hitherto received so scant returns from its investment was explained by the fact that the older islands yielded more sugar than the newly settled.^ As the area devoted to sugar increased, the culture of tobacco decreased. There was always a good market for the latter in Denmark, however, and to- bacco from Porto E-ico, Virginia, and other regions frequently found a place in the Company’s homeward-bound cargoes. Sugar and cotton remained the leading products during the period under discussion. The sugar cane was cut by the ne- groes with a sort of hatchet called kapmesser^ and carried by them to the mill or sugar works” with which the greater part of the plantations after 1700 were usually provided.® In 1696 Governor Lorentz reported seven sugar mills to be at work pro- ducing brown sugar, which was to be sent to Denmark by a ship expected from Copenhagen.^® By 1715, the number of sugar plantations provided with nrills had reached thirty-two out of a total of forty plantations devoted solely to sugar. The motive power was furnished mainly by wmdmfils, though these came gradually to be supplemented by treadmills turned by mule-power. Compared with modern methods the waste was of course tremendous. At least ten negroes were required to keep one such mill running; two, who were called “rollers,” feeding the cane stalks between the upright wooden cylinders, ported a successful trial in growing ginger. Heins to Directors (January 2, 1689), J5. A 1683-89, ^Resolutions of governor and council (February 19, 1689). The members of the council were Henry Irgens, Joachim Delicaet, John de Windt, and John Lorentz. ® Heins to Directors (August 20, 1689). B, & D, 1683-89, * See Appendix H„ p. 318. “ Lorentz to Directors (November 30, 1696), C. B., 1690-1714, Land Listerfor St, Thomas^ 1716. For description of an eighte^th century sugar mill, see Ozhohn, De danshe vestindiske oers TUstand . . pp. 44 et seq., and J. C. Schmidt, Blandede Arnnoerkninger samlede paa og over Ejlandet Si. Kroix . . . (Samleren, 1788, 2 B}, ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES 125 others carrying in the fresh stalks and removing the crushed ones. An ax always lay near at hand, with which to amputate the arm of the careless negro whose hand might get caught by the revolving cylinders; for when help was scarce, even three- quarters of a negro was better than none. The juice of the cane required expert handling, and negroes who were adept at boiling sugar brought fancy prices. As the juice was transferred from one copper kettle to another and larger one, xmtil it had run the gamut of a battery ’’ of three or four kettles, the foam was removed and used for the distilla- tion of rum. The crystallized sugar was finally “cured” in the coolers in the curing house, and emptied from these into molds. The molasses which was drained off went to the distillery to help make rum. With great, husky blacks cutting cane in the fields, with negro boys leading the loaded mules or asses to the mill, with stin others to carry in the stalks and to tend to the crushing, boiling, and distilling, the scene presented during harvest must have been a busy and noisy one indeed. The cotton plantations were smaller and more numerous than those devoted to sugar. They, too, were usually provided with “works” where the cotton was ginned. The proportion of the number of plantations devoted to the raising of cotton as com- pared with the entire number fell from eighty per cent, in 1601 to forty-four per cent, in 1715, and rose again to fifty per cent, by 1733. Of the total number of plantations, the part devoted to sugar rose from five per cent, in 1691 to thirty-five per cent, in 1720, falling back to twenty-four per cent, in 1733. The de- cline shown by the figures for 1733 is due to a series of mis- fortunes, of which drought, storms, and disasters at sea formed a part.^^ The cotton production was worth perhaps a third to a fourth as much as the sugar. It is impossible to determine the exact ratio or the exact amount, for the planters frequently refused to seU their produce to the Company, and the /oc^ura or invoices of the cargoes often include items from neighboring islands. The “boom” period in early St. Thomas history was the first decade and a haK of the eighteenth century, substantially the See Appendix H., p. 318. 1^6 THE DANISH WEST INDIES period of the War of the Spanish Succession. This was due to a variety of causes, both local and general. John Lorentz, with Juel and Moth, had done much to put the Brandenburg African Company out of the running. Quarrels within that company’s management had done the rest. The revival of the Danish company’s slave trade had bene- fited both it and the planters. The liberties allowed the latter in disposing of their plantation produce had helped to make them capitalists. This prosperity is indicated by the increase in the niunber of plantations laid out just after the opening of the new century. In the years 1692 to 1700 only fourteen new plantations were assigned to planters.^^ These plantations had a total working force of seventy-nine slaves. By 1705 an addi- tional thirty-seven new plantations had been laid out, with a working force in that year of two hundred and eighty slaves. From 1691 to 1715, the total number of plantations had, risen from one hundred and one to ohe hundred and sixty. It is the increase of negroes, both relatively and absolutely, that gives the most striking proof of the rapid development of St. Thomas as a plantation colony during these years. While the number of white men, women, and children increased only from three hundred and eight-nine to five hundred and forty-seven (1 :1.4), thenumber of negro slaves increased from five hundred andfifty- five to three thousand and forty-two (1 : 5.5), during the same in- terval (1691-1715). In other words, the number of slaves had risen nearly four times as fast as the number of whites. John Lorentz had laid the foundations of a fiscal system by which the inhabitants of the colony bore a proper share of the expenses of the civil government. These expenses were largely defrayed by a poll and a land or ground” tax. The poll tax, which appears first to have been collected in the year 1692-1693, amounted to 2J^ rdl, for each planter and for each ‘‘capable” slave, and to IJ^ rdl, for the planter’s wife and for each of his adult children. For “manquerons,” or those unable to do a full Land Listerfor St. Thomas. The names of the planters as they appear in the records are: David Liron, Reynier Claever, Jean Cramy, Zent van Wundergem, Jan Amout, Samson Burin, Mintje de Tooy, Jiirgen Hansen, Mathias Terling, Jiirgen Carstensen, Joris van Overschelde, Pieter de Windt. :MAP of ST. JOHK (1780) (Prepared and published by P, L. Oxholm, Copenhagen, 1800) [Facing page 127] ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES 127 day’s work, and for minor wHte children, the planters were not required to pay any poll tax. The land tax on St. Thomas (and St. John after its occupation and the expiration of the eight years of exemption) was assessed according to the width of the plantation, the length being in most instances jSxed at three hundred feet,^^ For each one hundred feet in width, the planter paid 10 styver, or 20 shilling. Inasmuch as the width of the sugar plantations on St. Thomas in 1783 averaged one thousand five hundred and forty feet,,and the average number of negroes employed on each one was a trifle over twenty-six, the amount due from each planter in poll and groimd taxes amounted to about 3 rdl., 1 mart, for the latter, and nearly 70 rdL for the former tax. Similarly, the owner of a sugar plantation on St. John, of average width and average slave equipment (thirteen negroes), would have to pay nearly 2 rdl. in land tax and 85 rdl, in poll tax. So long as the returns were properly made out by the planters, the burden would seem to have fallen upon the persons taxed very nearly in proportion to their ability to pay. Indigent persons were indeed, as a rule, entirely exempted from the pay- ment of the poll tax.^^ The indirect taxes that the planters were forced to pay through being obliged in certain cases to sell their produce to the company, or to ship them on the company’s vessels, and to buy goods needed from the Company’s magazine, wiU be discussed in another coimection. St. John had been claimed by the Danes as early as the first administration of Adolph Esmit. In a letter written early in 1684, the latter mentions having made an attempt through two moneyed merchants from Barbados to set up ‘‘works” (forts?) on St. John; but the English governor, Stapleton, sent two sloops over to the island, thus driving away forty men sent over by the Barbados merchants. “This is the third time,” wrote the Danish governor, “that he has driven our people [from St. John?]”.^® On his return to St. Thomas in 1688, Esmit was instructed to attempt the settlement of St. John by The Danish foot is sKghtly longer than the English. L. SL Tk.t passim. 16 Esmit to Directors (January 26, 1684), A. E., 1S82-89. 1^ THE DANISH WEST INDIES placing from four to six men there and encouraging them to begin planting,^^ but it was not until 1717 that the project was actually carried out. In November, 1716, Governor Erik Bredal wrote the directors that many of the St. Thomas in- habitants were inclined to go to settle St. John, but that they were held back solely by fear of the English, who were unwilling to let any nation go there to cut down the timber.^^ On the twenty-fifth of the following March, the governor had a vessel loaded with guns and ammunition, and with provisions from a ship that had recently brought in a cargo of flour, meat, etc., to take him to St. John with twenty planters, sixteen negroes, and five soldiers. have planted there the flag of our most gracious king, and fired a salute,’" wrote the governor, ‘‘and then we feasted, and drank the health, first of our sovereign, and then of the Com- pany. Later, I selected a place on which to build a fort, a con- venient location which commands the inlet to the harbor as well as the harbor itself, and a level space beneath it on which a village can stand. The harbor is quite secure, and when a person is within it ... he sees land all about him. I have permitted the planters to indicate which pieces of land they preferred, and have selected a place for the Company’s plantation just a cannon-shot distant from the fort (which is to be built there). Later the planters have returned because of their fear of the English and are simply waiting cautiously to see what the latter will attempt. . . .” Directors’ instructions to Esmit (November 9, 1687). A. E., 1682-89. Bredal and Coundl to Directors (November 1716), B. & D., 1717-20. In a letter dated July 23, 1715, Governor Crone and council iaformed the directors that John Henry Sieben had recently proposed, on bdialf of himself and fifteen other planters from St. Thomas, to begin tiie occupation and cultivation of St. John. B. P., 171^-17. ^ Bredal to Directors (May 8, 1718), B. & P., 1717^0. “ Thi defrygterfar de EngeUke og sidder ikkun og hirer ^paa^ kvad de tiUe tentere^ ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES 1£9 Meantime Bredal proceeded to have the ground cleared for the fort, and a road cut through the brush for bringing up the nine four-pounders that were to guard the fort. The five soldiers under a Danish officer, named Axel Dahl, and the sixteen negroes, took charge of this preparatory work. When the English Leeward Islands’ governor. General W. Hamilton, saw that the Danish efforts were serious, he sent John Marshall, the "‘Capt. Commendant” of Hamilton’s regiment, with the man- of-war Scarborough, one of the two English ships then in West Indian waters, to St. Thomas to forbid the Danes to occupy St. John, hinting that they had no good right to St. Thomas itself.^ Bredal replied firmly that whatever he was doing was being done on the authority of his sovereign, and he was not aware of having transgressed his rights. ‘‘If they [the directors] would only assist me with a hundred men,” the governor pleaded in his letter to the directors, ‘T weU believe that when the English come with their two ships ... they will not perform any great miracles.” Despite the report of English threats that they would dis- lodge the infant settlement, the work went on. After long searching fresh water was found on the island. This not only made it unnecessary to bring water by boat from St. Thomas, but made it possible to begin work promptly on the fort, which required fresh water for the lime and the cistem.^^ Maize and sweet potatoes (Patatter) were planted in the cleared space to furnish provisions for the negroes.^^ According to the ordinance issued by the St. Thomas govern- ment on March 24, 1718, the St. John planters were required to have one white man on each plantation within three months from the time it was taken up; exemption from taxes was granted for the first eight years as omSt. Thomas; sugar mills were to be erected within five years on pain of confiscation; and planters were to be permitted to take as much lime and wood as they Hamilton to Bredal (November 19, 1717), B, & 1717-20; see also Jolm Mars[c]liall*s ** ExpUcaMm,’'^ (undated), ibid. Both Hamilton’s letter and Marshall’s “E^lication” are copies. Bredal to Directors (May 8, 1718). Ibid. ** Bredal to Directors (July 8, 1718). Ibid. 130 THE DANISH WEST INDIES needed.^ By 17^0-17^1, tbirty-nine planters had received deeds to plantations on St. John.^^ The early inhabitants came entirely from St. Thomas and were equally varied in their nationality. Nine of these were Danes, five were French Huguenot refugees or of refugee stock, and nearly all the rest were Dutch. Their coming was prompted by a variety of motives. Some had sunk hopelessly into debt on St. Thomas, others had had badly located plantations there, while many of them naturally expected to improve their previous state. Their plantations were nearly fifty per cent, larger than those on St. Thomas, their average width being one thousand five hundred and fifty-six feet. The number of negroes held at this early period cannot be ascertained, but within a decade of the actual settlement,—^namely in 17^8—^there were one hun- dred and twenty-three whites to six hundred and seventy-seven blacks (1: 5.5), while in 1733, the year of the first serious slave insurrection, the whites numbered two hundred and eight, and the slaves one thousand and eighty-seven, a slightly higher ratio of white inhabitants (1: 5.2).^^ Although the number of plantations was increased only twenty-five per cent, in those five years, the number of negroes on them increased sixty per cent. Nevertheless in 1733 St. John had but ten negroes on the average to each plantation, to St. Thomas’s twenty-five. The Company went into the plantation business on its own account early in its career. The encouragement that it was ex- pected to give to plantation life on St. Thomas undoubtedly accounts in large part for the willingness of the Company’s di- rectors to permit the Brandenburgers to establish a factory Conditioner iUstaaed St. Jans Indvaanere (March 24, 1718). Ibid, See Appendix H., p. 407. ^ Governor Frederick Moth wrote to the Directors early in 1726: ‘*St. John is now entirely settled, [so] that there is no more land left to give away except at the Fort, and the Company's plantation, which is still lying idle, as it is not yet surveyed. . . . Next year the greater number of the St. John inhabitants are to begin paying the poll and land tax. There are already about 20 sugar works built, and others in process of building, so that I calculate that St. John will produce 600,000 to 800,000 pounds of sugar, besides [some] cotton, on [all of] whidi customs duties must be paid. . . Moth to Directors (March 6, 1726), B. & D., mk-iS7. ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES 131 there. The failure of the latter to found a plantation was the chief basis for the complaints made by Danish diplomats con- cerning the failure of the Brandenburg African Company to fulfil its treaty obligations. The first plantation, the Com- pany's Sugar Plantation,” appears to have been established in the Old Quarter on the southeast shore of the Great Northside Bay. The second of the Company’s plantations was probably the ‘^New Quarter Plantation,” built on or near the present ''Ny Eermhuf^ midway between Long and Jerse Bays. The third and smallest plantation was located at Mosquito Bay, from which the plantation took its name. The Company also secured a plantation on Krum Bay (or Crum Bay) which seems to have been of little value, and was sold at auction in 1726, at which time the Mosquito Bay Plantation was disposed of.^ Lorentz’s proposal to have the Company start a plantation at Crab-Pan Bay on the southwest side seems not to have been followed up. The size of the Company’s plantations has been impossible to ascertain because of the confused and complicated system of bookkeeping that prevailed and the omission of reference to them in the census reports (Land Lister). The latter fact is explained by the circumstance that the purpose of the annual census was to ascertain the amount of taxes due from each inhabitant. Na,turally the Company did not propose to tax itself. A fairly accurate idea of its planting activities may be gained from an examination of the number of negroes credited to the Company’s account year by year. The greater part of these must have been employed on the plantations, though the number, no doubt, includes those used at the Company’s forts and magazines. In 1698, when the Company was begin- ning to take over the Guinea trade, it owned 178 slaves, whose mventory value was placed at 9,043 rdZ., or about 50 rdl. each. In the same year the ‘‘Sugar Plantation” was valued at 3,654, the “New Quarter Plantation” at 3,763, and the “Mosquito Bay Plantation ” at 536 rdl. The effect of the War of the Span- ish Succession on St. Thomas plantation life is indicated by the * The purchaser was Governor Predaick Moth. See Negate Journal for St. Th. (August 29. 1726). THE DANISH WEST INDIES figures for 1705. At this time, when the island was prepared to reap the advantages of Danish neutrality, the number of negroes had jumped to 251, their inventory value to 13,441 rdL (53.7 rdL each), while the three plantations were entered on the books at 6,289, 3,14 1, and 905 rdL respectively. Although the second had fallen eight per cent, in value, the first had in- creased seventy-two and one-half per cent, and the third sixty- nine per cent, over its inventory value in 1698. After 1715 the value of the plantation as recorded in the books remains stationary, while the number of the negroes gradually decreases from two hundred thirty-eight in 1716 to one hundred ninety- six in 1726.27 The following table, while based upon a careful examination of the Company’s books, is not presented as giving an absolutely dependable picture of the plantations as dividend-paying propo- sitions. It is never quite certain that accounts have not been ** doctored” for emergencies, or that the intricacies of the elaborate bookkeeping of two centuries ago have been con- pletely solved; In fact the officials themselves were at times hopelessly tangled in the meshes of their own system. THE COMPANY’S PLANTATIONS ON ST. THOMAS Abbreviations: S- PL, CompaDy’s “Sugar Plantation”; N. Q., “ New Quarter Plantation” ; M. B., “Mosquito Bay Plantation.” Year 1690 1691 1693 1698 1700 1701 1702 1703“ 1704 Total negroes,. 122.. 158.. 191.. 178.. 180.. 176.. 177.. [6912® Value of ne- groes 10,957. .14,038. .16,144. . 9,043. . 9,504. . 9,380. . 9,500. . 4,019. . Value of S. PI. . 4,572.. 4,743.. 7,122.. 3,651.. 3,654.. 3,638.. 4,155.. 5,415. .6,374 Value of N.Q.. 2,318.. 3,300.. 6,371.. 3,414.. 3,763.. 3,763.. 3,679.. 2,981. .3,206 ValueofM.B. 457.. 457.. 1,112.. 536.. 536.. 536.. 536.. 380.. 905 Total invest- ment 18,424. .22,538. .30,74930 16,644. .17,457. .17,317. .17,870. .12,795. . Proceeds from S. PI 1,137.. 2,026.. 2,514.. 2,941.. 2,422.. 807.. 2,260.. 2,219. .2,849 Proceeds from Proceeds from M.B 248.. 645.. 268.. .. 135.. 134.. 155 . . [-472] . . 464 Total 1,795.. 6,157.. 5,133.. 4,382.. 3,794.. 1,661.. 3,351.. 2,116. .4,976 Per cent, profit oninvestment 9,7.. 27.2.. 16.7.. 26.381 21.6.. 9.6.. 19.1.. 17..26(?) Cf. Appendix H., p. 318. L. L,, St Tk. 2® The figures given for 1703 cover the period from June 9, 1702, to Decem- ber. 31, 1703. All money values are given in rdl. This includes only the sound or “capable” slaves. The high values for 1693 apparently have some connection with Thor- mbhlen’s contract which was discontinued in 1694[. ” This percentage covers IJi years (August 8, 1698, to February 8, 1700). ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES 133 It would add to the value of the above figures if it could be determined exactly on what basis the profits were calculated, —^whether, for example, the sugar and cotton are credited to the plantations at the same rates as those paid to the private planters. Likewise, the exact amount of sugar, cotton, etc., produced on each plantation would be useful in the study of plantation economy, but unfortunately the accoimts were not kept separately, and it is practically impossible to extract the individual items in a way that will give a dependable result. A few of the available figures wiU give an idea of the productive- ness of the Company’s plantations. John Lorentz, in writing to the directors in April, 170£, informed them that sixty-seven hhd. of sugar had been cooked on the Sugar Plantation and that as much more was expected; that the New Quarter Plantation, despite the* recent drought and the attack of worms upon the cane,^^ had yielded during the past year and the cur- rent one one hundred and seventy casks (Tonder). Governor Gardelin, in reporting the state of the Company’s plantations to the directors in June, 1733, which was like 1701 a dry year, stated that the Company’s sugar plantation had thus far yielded eighty-eight hhd. of sugar, and 433 rdl, worth of cotton; the New Quarter Plantation, one hundred and three hhd. of sugar; and the Company’s plantation on St. John,^^ sixty-two hhd. in place of the expected one hundred and fifty hhd. The severe drought had crushed the hopes for a good crop, and the governor proposed the sale of the last-named property, “since it is worth nothing, but does more damage to the Company [than good].” The sugar, cotton, etc., raised on St. Thomas and on St. John after its occupation, were usually bought in whole or in part by the Company’s St. Thomas factor at a price fixed by the gover- nor and council alone, or by agreement with the planters. They 32 Lorentz to Directors (April U, 1702), C. B., 1690-1718. The effect of these calamities is seen in the percentage of profits that the plantation yielded, as shown in the table above. 33 See above, p. ISO (n. 9t>5). 34 Gardelin and Council to Directors (June 18, 17SS), B. Sc D., 17SB- 134 THE DANISH WEST INDIES were stored in the Company’s warehouses until one of its ships arrived from Copenhagen or the Guinea coast. If the directors were not certain of a cargo they would leave it to the Guinea slave-ship captain to take whatever cargo was on hand back with him to Denmark. As long as the company had only St. Thomas and St. John, it was rarely necessary to employ more than two ships a year to empty the St. Thomas magazine, and frequently a single vessel was ample. The difficulties that the local factor often met when he tried to force the planters to sell their produce to the Company at a fixed price, will be dealt with in a later chapter. Europe-bound ships usually took dye woods (pockwood, fustic, Campeachy wood, etc.) on board for ballast. Sometimes a schooner was sent over to Porto Rico for hides or tobacco if interloping trade at St. Thomas had been dull. A few illustrations will serve to show the character of the trade, and give some indication as to its extent. The Frederick the Fourthy under Captain Peter Andersen Wseroe, left St. Thomas on April 6, 1700, with the following cargo, secured at the prices indicated,^^ quoted in rixdoUars, ‘‘Mark’’ and “Skill- ing.” Rdl. M. Sk. 9,112 lbs. Campeachy wood at 2 rdl. per 100 182 1 6 7,507 “ stock fish (dried cod) at 2 rdl, per 100 150 - 12 4,484 fustic 67 3 — 33,867 “ Brazil wood 529 3 — 360,005 ‘‘ [brown] sugar at rdl. per 100 12,600 1 — 11,672 “ white sugar at [price not given] 620 1 — 29,137 “ cotton at 12 sk. per Ib. 3,642 - 12 6,739 “ cacao 914 2 — 1,242 “ tobacco 44 5 10 129 “ indigo at 1 rdl. per lb. 129 - — 89 ‘‘ caret (sea turtle) 69 3 14 staves for barrels and casks 180 2 4 32 — provisions beyond those needed 167 3 — 19,329 In the following year, Peter Smith, the wealthy Dutch mer- « N. J, far SU TL, 1705-08 (April 6, 1703). ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES 135 chant, paid the required duty ^ on the following goods which he sent to New York on an English bark : htd. (2,674 lbs.) white sugar 10 sacks (1,012 lbs,) cacao 12 hbd. (5,500 “ ) brown sugar 4 bales (1,000 “ ) cotton 27 bales (5,838 “ ) cotton 4 sacks ( 340 “ ) cacao. It will be noticed that sugar and cotton were by far the most valuable items in the Copenhagen as well as in the New York cargo. Whether a ship was able to secure a good cargo or not depended on the funds that the St. Thomas factor had at his command, and upon the prices he was willing to pay. The amount of the funds depended in turn upon the sale of the Company's cargoes. The one sort of cargo the arrival of which was most frequently hailed with joy, not only by the St. Thomas planters, but by their various neighbors, was ‘‘black ivory, —^African slaves. When times were good, slaves meant cash in the St. Thomas treasury, cash meant good cargoes for the return voyage, and bulging ships meant good dividends for the European stockholders. The distribution of these cargoes after their arrival in Copen- hagen remains to be considered. First, as much as possible of the cargo was sold at auction. The sugar refiners came to buy the brown sugar, the cloth manufacturers bid for the cotton, the dyers for the dyewoods and so on. The dyewoods had to be ground or pulverized by hand before they could be used, and as the work was exceedingly injurious to the health, the state kept up an institution called “ Rdsphmet where it set those criminals to work whose long continued existence was least desirable.^ Export trade was especially to be encouraged, as it brought ready money into the couniry^ The duly on exports to foreign places was only one per cent., while on goods shipped from Copenhagen to places within the kingdom of Demnark- Norway, a duty of two and one-half per cent, had to be paid. Six per cent, on some goods and four per cent, on others. ” N, J.far St, Th^ 1705-08 (October 18, 1707). The white sugar in these and the preceding cargoes probably came from the French islands, where there were refinCTies. Motion of **Ra8pku8et” is made in O. Nielsen, Kjobenhcam paa Hotbergi Tid, p. 360. m THE DANISH WEST INDIES The foreign ports to which the West Indian cargoes were re- shipped were mainly in the Baltic region, and included Liibeck, Danzig, Stettin, Konigsberg, on the South Baltic, Stockhohn and Gotenborg in Sweden, and (beginning with 1750) St. Peters- burg in Russia, and Amstetdam in Holland. Among local towns to which West Indian products were distributed were Kiel, Flensborg, and Aabenraa in the duchies; Elsinore, Nyborg, Slagelse, Odense, and Aalborg in Denmark proper; and Bergen, Christiania, Trondhjem and Fredrikshald in Norway.^® According to the list of shipments from Copenhagen to foreign and domestic points which is contained m the Company’s ‘^Udshibnings og Passeer Sedlers Copie-Bog, 1709-175^,^^ no sugar and little cotton were shipped out of Copenhagen from 1712 to 1720, inclusive. From 1721 to 1733, when St. Croix was purchased, the shipments to foreign ports were more than twenty times those to domestic ports. During the period from 1729 to 1749, sugar was exported but a single year to a foreign port. It was in September, 1729, that the Company began re- fining its own sugar,^^ and this fact, combined with the king’s edict of July 4, 1733, requirmg privately owned refineries to use only the sugar that came from the West Indian colonies as long as the supply held out, will explain the falling off in exports. The purchase by the Company in 1737 of the two principal refineries, those owned by the Pelt and Weyse families, gave the Company a monopoly of the refining business,"^^ and made it possible for It to absorb most of its own sugar.^^ ^ UdsMbnings og Passeer Sedlers-Copie-Bog, 1709-175J/,, passim. " In 1741, 11,443 lbs. of sugar were sent to Stockholm. Ibid. *2 Mariager MS.^ 130. The Company had been granted the privilege of put- ting up a refinery, by the king on April 17, 1721. Vest. Reg., 1699-17^6. ** Manager MS., 149. ** See table showing exports to domestic and foreign places in Appendix L, pp. 328-331. MAPLOF NORTHERJSr EP^ROPE: BALTIC AND NORTH SEA LANDS CHAPTER VII THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH WEST INDIES The rise of a class of capitalist planters in the Danish as well as in the other West India islands, was made possible through the labors of the African slave. Indentured white servants too frequently succumbed to the climate or proved quite in- tractable as laborers; while the attempt to use deported crim- inals from the home coimtry proved generally abortive, in the West Indies as elsewhere. The sudden change in habits and environment practically prohibited strenuous effort on the part of the whites whose lot was cast in tropical America. If the agricultural resources of those regions were to be appreciably developed, it must come about through the white man's efforts to earn his bread by the sweat of the negro's brow. It was “the blacks bought by way of trade" who by reason of their ready adaptability to field labor early became “the most useful appurtenances of a plantation, and perpetual servants." ^ This trade, so loathsome to the modem mind, had been be- gun by the Portuguese before the discovery of America. But the few hundred negroes that they had bought from the Moors had been brought into Europe itself.^ After the occupation of America had begun, Portuguese traders not only supplied their own colony of Brazil but made contracts or “asientos" to supply the Spanish colonies with slaves. Interloping expe- ditions from the Guinea coast of Africa to the West Indies like those of Sir John Hawkins are conspicuous in the sixteenth cen- tury because they were rare. During the period of union be- tween Spain and Portugal (1580-1640) the Dutch wrested from the Portuguese their monopoly of the Guinea trade, and jeal- ously guarded the trade thus won against encroachments by other nations. The rise of the English plantation colonies, 1 Ce that the Company would take up the Guinea trade, since all other trade is as nothing compared with this slave trade/* If the directors would only make a beginning with a few hundred Guinea slaves, urged Lorentz, they would not find it a bad ven- ture, but “the first experience would give them such joy, that the slave trade would hold its place before all other sorts of commerce, and the Company would feel itself impelled to con- tinue it.** The governor’s enthusiasm was not lost on the di- rectors, who had great faith in their representative at St. Thomas and were especially anxious to get the Company to the point where it could pay dividends and thus regain the confidence of the investing public. Nicholas Arff, the Guinea lessee, had, as we have seen, per- “ Frederick III under Capt. Jacob Lambrecht with six hundred and thirty, and the Electoral Princess under Capt. Wouter Ypes with four hundred and ei^ty slaves. Lorentz to Directors (November 30, 1096), G. R., 1690-171$, ^ Ibid. The French were also becoming increasin^y active in the Gninea trade during the interval preceding the outbreak of the War of the Spanish Succession. On July 9, 1701, Louis XIV issued an arret granting to a new Guinea company certain rights that had been held by a former one. Scelle, La traite negriere, H, 687. 146 THE DANISH WEST INDIES mitted his lease to expire because of serious and unforeseen losses brought about by the European war. Just at the time that the Ryswick negotiations were being concluded, the Danish West India and Guiaea Company was being reorganized under a new charter which bore the date of September £8, 1697. New conditions demanded a corresponding readjustment. Baron Jens Juel and Mathias Moth, who had so faithfully backed the governor in his endeavor to stifle the Brandenburg African Company’s activities at St. Thomas, were retained as directors.^^ The Company’s total capital, including a ten per cent, assess- ment made in 1695 m order to secure capital to send a ship to St. Thomas for a cargo,^ was just 84,883 rdh, 2 marJcs. On this investment the shareholders had received no other returns than the three or four per cent, yielded by the Thormohlen lease. It was not until late m 1697 or early in 1698 that the directors decided to send a ship and cargo to Guinea and the West Indies. Finding themselves unable to secure a large enough sum from the stockholders, the directors turned to a wealthy merchant, one Jacob Lerke, who contributed half of the fimds necessary for the new venture. The result was the voyage of the Copen- hagen Bourse to the Guinea coast under joint auspices. But this initial venture fell below expectations, for out of the five hxmdred and sk slaves taken on at Christiansborg and along the Guinea coast, only two hundred and fifty-nine were delivered at St. Thomas in September, 1698, and thirty-seven of these died shortly after landing. A mutiny had broken out on board, in the course of which many had been killed or had jumped overboard. To cap this misfortune scurvy had helped to reduce the numbers to scarcely more than half of the original cargo.^^ The surviving slaves were sold at 85 rdh each> which appears to have been three times their cost price in Guinea.^^ The excellent state of the West Indian market as compared with the low prices prevailing ^ Manager lOS. ^ The Company had resumed its administration after the ThormUhlen fiasco late in 1694. On March 7, 1702, Matthias Moth made a dear and fairly detailed resume of the Company’s activities in Guinea and the West Indies since 1695. See Comp. Prot, 1697-173^, Lorentz to Directors (October 12, 1698), Gov. C. B., 169^-1700^ ** See Appendix J, jpp. 320-326. THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH V^ST INDIES 147 on the Guinea coast made the disappointment of the owners all the keener.^® Before the news of this partial failure reached them, the directors had arranged for the purchase in Holland of another vessel, for which a cargo valued at 30,000 rdL was planned. Ten thousand rixdoUars were to be invested in slaves, the re- mainder in other Guinea products, presumably ivory, gold, palm oil, and the like.^^ The new ship, called Christian F, had to be fitted out by the wealthier shareholders on their personal credit, for the others were in no mood for paying further assess- ments. This second ship left for Guinea in August, 1698. It fared rather better than the first, for Captain Grabner succeeded in July, 1699, in bringing into St. Thomas harbor three hundred and fifty"three slaves, almost two-thirds of the number taken on in Africa.^^ About this time the Company managed to take over Lerke’s share in the Copenhagen Bourse^ paying 7,800 rdL for it.^® The Danes were not alone in this attempt to supply a market that had been starved during a general European war. The Dutch at Ciuagao immediately prepared to resume the business with the Spanish Main which had been seriously interrupted by the war. Peace had scarcely been proclaimed before the Dutch magazines there were filled with Spanish-American goods that had been paid for largely in African slaves. The English parliament passed a bill modifying the monoiK)ly of the slave trade in favor of private traders for not less than thirteen years beginning with Jime 24, 1698.^ In the investigation institute by the St, Thomas governor and his council, the captain. Lanes Petersen, seems to have been absolved from re^nsibility. The same captain lost in his next voyage three hundred of a total of five hundred and thirty-eight slaves. Landsprot, for St. Th.^ 1694r-1711 (October 6, 1698). See Appendix J. ^ Comp. Prot., 1697-173^ (April 29, 1698). See Appendix ,J. 26 Comp. ProU 1697-173^ (June 9, 1699). ^ The Royal African Company was merely to keep up the forts and castles and was to recdive a ten per cent, duty on aU goods imported to Guinea and five and ten per cent, on certain goods exported. Gold, silver, and negroes went out duty-free. But the market was so large and the possibilities for profitable agriculture so vast that the demand was not easily satisfied. After the suppres- 148 THE DANISH WEST INDIES When the report spread through the islands that the Danish governor was expecting a slave-ship to arrive, a Jamaica trader sent word to St. Thomas that he would like to invest 30,000 rdl. in slaves if the governor would guarantee their delivery at a certain time.^ This the latter was unable to do, so that when the expected slave cargo did arrive he had to employ a local merchant to take the surplus slaves to Hispaniola and the sur- rounding islands.^ A very considerable share of the negroes sold at St. Thomas were brought in by interlopers.^ Unless its treasury happened to be empty, the Company rarely permitted planters to buy directly from the slave captain, and never allowed slaves to be landed without charging an import duty,—^usually four per cent. This duty or “recognition” was as a rule paid in naturae which in a cargo of men, women, and children of assorted sizes often required some ingenious calculations. The selling price varied from twenty-five to one hundred per cent, above the cost or wholesale price, according to market conditions. In one of the agreements with the Brandenburgers it was stipulated that either party might share with the other in the purchase of interlopers" cargoes. After the coronation of Frederick I as king in Prussia in 1701 the Brandenburg African Company was left to its own fate, and practically its sole activity until its discontinuance in the reign of Frederick William I consisted of such occasional purchases as those referred to, and of pro- testing if its rights appeared to have been transgressed or ignored. The distribution of slaves to other islands was usually done by traders from those islands. The keen trader, hearing of the approaching arrival of a cargo from Guinea would hasten to St. Thomas, if business conditions would warrant it, and wait there for weeks in order to get the first chance at buying a sion of the buccaneers, Jamaica in particular progressed rapidly in its plantation life. Lorentz to Directors (January 22, 1698), C. B, 169^1700; W. R. Scott, Joint-Stock Companies to 1720 (3 v., Cambridge, 1910-1912), II, 23. ^ Lorentz to Directors (January 22, 1698), C. B., 169Jrl700. ^ In this way Peter Smith took a batch of forty-four negroes off on his bark, on condition of receiving half the profits. Appendix J, THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH WEST INDIES 149 slave cargo. The local St, Thomas traders frequently bought considerable numbers of negroes for customers in other islands. Some good-sized fortunes were built up at St. Thomas during the War of the Spanish Succession in just this way. The following summaiy taken from the Company’s journals kept at the St, Thomas factory indicates how the Company disposed of one entire cargo. On July 8, 1710, a Zieeland inter- loper, Captain David Diniesen, sold the following slaves to the Danish company: 134 men = 134 Pies de Indies 23 women = 11 “2/3 boys” = 71/3 20 “1/2 boys” = 10 2 “2/3 girls” = 11/8 3 “1/2 girls” = 21/2 2 “1/3 boys” = 2/3 200 head = 181 5/6 Pies de Indies at 65 rdl, » 11,819 rdl., 1 mark RECEIPTS (in the order of purchase) Date July 10 Rdl. Rdl.\ Rdl. Rdl. Number Price each Total] Date Number Price each Total 2 “1/2 boys’* 50 100 July 12 3 men 100 300 1 “1/2 boy” 50 2 “2/3 boys” ^ 85 170 1 “1/2 girl” 50 9 men 100 900 1 “1/2 boy” 60 1 man 100 1 “1/2 boy” 65 1“ 1/2 girl” 55 1 “1/2 boy” 60 1 “2/3 girl” 85 1 “1/2 boy” 60 3 men 100 300 8 “1/^ boys” 60 480 2 women 100 200 l“l/2boy” 40 24 men 100 2400 1 “1/2 boy” 60 3 women 100 300 1 “1/2 girl” 60 1 “1/3 boy” 331/3 2 “2/3 boys” 90 180 l“l/2 boy” 45 1 “2/3 boy” 100 5 men 100 500 1 “2/3^1” 90 July 14 1 man 100 2 “1/2 boys” 60 120 July 26 8 men 100 800 1 “1/2 girl” 60 2 women 100 200 4 “2/3 boys” 75 300 37 men 100 3700 1 “1/2 boy” 60 4 women 100 400« 1 “1/2 boy” 60 Aug. 14 20 men 100 2000 4 men 100 400 9 men 100 000 1 woman 100 8 women 100 800 4 men 100 400 Sept. 19 1 “2/3 boy” 80 Totals .187 head 14,443 ] Expenditvree: Provisions from July 10 to August 31 140 rdl., 1 tnorife. Losses: From July 10 to November 8, 7 n^o men died and were debited on the books at 65 rdl. each. Summino up: No. of n^roea sold by September 19 187 ** “ “ dying before sale 7 “ unaccounted for 6 Total bought 200 150 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Total receipts from negro sales 14,443 1/3 rdl. Total cost of negroes '-i i * oi o ^ ^ Pood 1*^0 1/6 11,959 1/6 Net profit * 2,484 1/6 rdl. 3,48476 11.95976 = 20Vio. the percentage of net profit on the cargo, according to the books, exclusive of current ex- penses. It will be noticed that the cargo was sold mainly in small lots, that the Pies de Indies had no definite relation to the price except in the case of the full-grown negroes, and that the cargo was practically disposed of within five weeks. The larger lots were sold mainly to government officials who knew the intrica- cies of the business and were often able to take advantage of the situation to their own profit.^^ The prices of slaves, wholesale and retail, during the War of the Spanish Succession afford a good trade barometer for St. Thomas. Denmark was neutral, and in a better position than in the previous war to reap the advantages of neutrality. From 45 and 80 rdl, in 1702, the wholesale and retail prices respectively rose by 1704 to 60 and 100 rdL and three years later to 80 and 100 rdl. The highest point seems to have been reached in 1714, when slaves sold at St. Thomas for 120 rdl, each. This price is excelled in 1722 by a cargo that brought 125 rdL per head. Business conditions at St. Thomas, which were evidently stimulated by Demnark-Norway’s neutral position during the Spanish Succession War, suffered a slump after its close. Not until the end of the Northern War (the treaty of Nystadt was concluded between Sweden and Russia in 1721) when Sweden had been reduced to a second-rate power, do commercial condi- tions in the Danish islands, as evidenced by the state of the slave trade, begin to show improvement. During the years preceding the conclusion of peace with Denmark (1720) the St. Thomas government prepared itself more than once to resist a rumored Swedish attack.^^ The depredations of pirates, re- See below, p. 191. ** VStog ai Searet-Raada Prot.^ 1710-S0 (AugiMt 5. 1715; June 22, 1716). MaHfddt MSS.,\fA.VL THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH WEST INDIES 151 viving difficulties with the Spanish neighbors of St. Thomas, complications with the English in the Leeward Islands because of Danish occupation of St. John, and the peculations of its local officials, combined to make the position of the Danish company and its colonists extremely uncertain. Besides, this was a period of hard times when the St. Thomas government supplied the lack of coin by issues of paper money. In attempt- ing to account for the business depression the St. Thomas au- thorities were inclined to place the emphasis upon the ruin of the formerly lucrative trade with Spanish America.®^ The planters on the other hand were convinced that the Company’s officials at St. Thomas and those directing the Company’s policy were responsible for the changed conditions.^^ Certain it is that the loss of the principal foreign market and the disappearance of hard cash were bound to affect all forms of business and partic- ularly the slave trade, which was very difficult to carry on except on a cash basis, and which required considerable sums for its successful prosecution. To be forced to wait until crops matured and then to find themselves face to face with a variety of petty local restrictions, was the prospect that awaited the traders who attempted to carry on business at St. Thomas on a barter basis. The Danish West India and Guinea Company seems rarely if ever to have had more than two ships at a time on the Copen- hagen-Guinea-West India run. Dutch interlopers furnished far greater numbers of slaves for the St- Thomas market than the Danish Company.^® In view of the expertness and dmng of the ubiquitous Dutch trader it was not necessary to invest much of the Company’s capital in slave-ships except when the Dutch slavers failed to appear. As a rule the St. Thomas au- thorities had only to await the arrival of a cargo which they could accept or refuse as they saw fit according to the condition of the slaves and the state of the market. During the years from 1697 to 1733,—that is, from the time Governor and Council to Directors (August 10, 1714), 5. & D., 171^17. ^ The commission sent over by St. Tbomas planters in 1715 in nrd^ to bring about certain changes in policy is dealt vdth in Chapter IX. ** See Appendix /. 152 THE DANISH WEST INDIES the Company began the Guinea-West India trade on its own account until the directors voted for its discontinuance,—^the Comi)any lost not fewer than eight ships. The greater number of these were employed in the Guinea as weU as in the West India carrying trade. The total number owned by the Company at one time or another in this period amounted only to twenty.^® The following resume of the losses will show their approximate extent: The GtddenleWy intended for the Copenhagen-St. Thomas run, was lost at Lessee, off the Norwegian coast, on Novem- ber 20, 1702. The Cronprincen (the Crown Prince) was lost at Isle de Prince in the Guinea gulf on May 31, 1706, through the explosion of its powder magazine while en route from Guinea to St. Thomas. Only five on board were saved of whom three eventually reached Denmark. The Christian V and Frederick IV left Guinea on May 29, 1709, with a rich cargo of gold and slaves. Both of them missed St. Thomas and were wrecked in the Bay of Honduras on March 7, 1710. The Spaniards confiscated their cargoes and brought them to Porto Bello. The Christiansfort, while on its way to Copenhagen from Bergen where it had been forced to winter, was lost with its West Indian cargo at Hoje Wserde March 2-8, 1713. The Jomfru Alette was captured on October 31, 1717, by a Swedish privateer, while on its way from Norway to Copenhagen with a West India cargo. The Salvator Mundi was wrecked, August 15, 1729, on Anegada reef near Virgin Gorda wMe en route from St. Thomas to Coi)enhagen with a return cargo. The Christiamhorg was wrecked in the Cattegat on its return from St. Thomas on September 17, 1730. During the decade preceding the purchase of St. Croix (1733) the poKcy to be pursued with regard to the slave trade was an all absorbing question at the meetings of the stockholders. In their instructions’ of November 16, 1723, the directors had specifically sought to encourage private traders to sell their Vest. Reg,, 1699-17^6; Manager MS., 110 et seg. THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH WEST INDIES 15S slaves at the St. Thomas factory Four years later Frederick Holmsted who had been employed as bookkeeper in the Com- pany’s Copenhagen office for about twenty years advised the directors against the Company’s active participation in the slave trade, but his advice was not heeded* From 17£8 to 17SS, inclusive, the Company made a vigorous attempt to revive its Guinea-West Indian commerce. At least three new ships were put into active commission, and about 200,000 rdl, according to Holmsted’s accoimt were sunk in the venture, but with no prospect of the Company’s being able to pay interest on more than hah of that sum. When the directors and chief stock- holders met in February, 1734, there ensued a heated debate as to whether or not the Company should continue the trade. In this discussion there seems to have been no mention of humanitarian or religious arguments, the sole question being one of dividends. The news of the arrival of the Laarburg Galley at St. Thomas with only two hundred forty-two of her original cargo of four hundred forty-three slaves ^ was used with telling effect by those who opposed the continued partici- pation of the Company in the slave trade. These opposition leaders included three directors ^ and three “chief sharehold- ers” ^ {Hoved'partid'panter). In the written argument drawn up by these men is included the following estimate of moneys ex- pended and received in connection with the Laarburg Galley, which statement they assert to be a “proper and true rda- tion” of how matters really stood.^^ The ship Laarburg Galley has cost. 7,683 rdl, 4 sk. Repairs and equipmept 15^881 “ 3 m. 15 “ Cargo . . . and insurance on slaves 31,066 “ 5 13 Interest on ship and equ^ment from date ci sailing to return, and of cargo ... at only 6 pa^ cent. .... 3,022 “ 3 “ Total cost of expedition 65,554 rdl, 1 m. ^ EoLmste^s ^'Deduction’' (February 4,. 1734), Co, Prob., 1607-1731, CJ, also Host 64 et eeq, w B, dc D., 1732-3^ (May 8, 1733). Blome, Holmsted, Elauman. C. A. von Plessen, Dose^ Kreyer. « Deduction og Voto (February 26, 1734), Comp, ProL, 1697-175^, 154 THE DANISH WEST INDIES On the other hand, there should be deducted for deteriora- tion of ship 5,000 rd/. Profit on gold and other goods. . .3,157 rdl. 4 m. 10 sh. Prei^t -which ship should earn from St. Thomas hither 4,110 “ 2“ 6“ 7,268 Iw. 12,268 rdl, 1 m. Delivered to Fort Christians- borg surplus of various goods from the ship, which mth usual 10 per cent, advance for frei^t amounts to 14,281 rdl. 4 m. 14 sh On the other hand, the ship has taken slaves, etc., at the fort for 3,976 “ Leaving 10,305 rdl. 4 m. 14 sh An order (Assignation) for which is to be redeemed at Cape Coast 1,608 “ 3 “ Slaves on St. Thomas have been sold for goods, in part for 50 per cent, above the cash price 26,658 “ 3 “ 6 To balance accoimt 16 8 “ Total. 50,SS7 rdl. 8 sh The advocates of Company participation in the slave trade had used figures based on the Laarhurg Galley's last voyage as an argument in support of their views. According to the figures we have quoted,” ran in effect the arguments of the opponents of slave-trade under the Company, ‘‘there is a loss, up to the time of the ship's return, of but (sic) 4,fi97 rdZ., 4 sk. on this voyage, which with one exception is the most fortunate of twenty voyages which have been undertaken. It must at best be called a bad business, when so considerable a capital as over 50,000 rdl. must be furnished and is expected to yidd interest while it is being risked in the waters of three contineiits> and, after all that, is still unable to make a better diowing to the stockholders.” The^ victory of the opposition was decisive. In the final vote eighty-five out of a possible one hundred and thirty-four votes were regist^ed against the Company’s continuing in the THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH WEST INDIES 155 slave trade, and only twenty-two in favor of it. Twenty-seven refrained from voting. The votes of the royal family wereamong the majority. The slave trade was formally thrown open to sub- jects in the Danish West Indies who might wish to participate by a royal mandate issued April 1734. The directors fixed a duty of eight rixdoUars on slaves brought to St. Thomas and half that sum on those brought to St. Croix.^^ Since this con- cession to freedom in trade failed to bring about the hoped-for increase, the trade was thrown open to all Danish subjects, whether they lived in home lands or in the colonies. The re- sults were just encouraging enough to make it worth while for the Company to enter into an agreement with private merchants and shipowners on December 3, 1745, with a view to preventing needless competition and duplication of effort. Finally, in 1747, a plan was formulated and put into operation which re- sulted in the Company’s virtually absorbmg the private inter- ests. The reorganization of the Danish West India and Guinea Company mder the Convention of 1747” marks the last stage of the slave trade as a field of investment for that Com- pany. An attempt was made to correct some of the more common abuses connected with the Guiuea trade. Captains and officers were forbidden under severe penalty to take slaves on board on their own account, and by way of encouragement to large cargoes a progressive bounty was provided, beginning with 7 rdL and rising to ^0 rdl, for each slave above three hun- dred.^ But the years that elapsed before the king took over the Company’s holdings in 1754 were too few to permit of any ex- tensive development. It became clearer and clearer after 1750 that the days of the Company were numbered; consequently it was more important for the latter to conis^e its resources than to divert them into imcertain channels. So long as men’s ideas of human rights suffered no substantial change, and so long as the demand for sugar and cotton made it profitable to raise those products, just so long would there be a demand for slave labor an the West Indian plantations. The «* Manager M8^ 174. ** Trykte Octroyer . . . /or 1760 (Mandate ci October 14, 1747). 156 THE DANISH WEST INDIES labor problem as it appeared to the merchants and statesmen who were called upon to solve it was merely one of method; for African slaves remained in the eighteenth, as they had been in the seventeenth, century “the strength and sinews of this western world.” They were indeed the chief agency that fur- nished the wealth, for the control of which European nations were willing to throw down the gage of conflict and usher in titanic wars. In fact, no small part of those resources which were dissolved in the smoke of eighteenth-century European battlefields was extracted from fertile West Indian plantations of cotton and cane by the sweat of the negro’s brow. CHAPTER Vni THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTER Few indeed are the negroes in America who are able to tell from what part of Africa their ancestors came or to what tribe they belonged. Though they have every “prosi>ect of pos- terity” the sources by which they might develop a ‘‘pride of ancestry” are shrouded in impenetrable mystery. Which of his forbears came from Calabar or Loango, from the El Mina tribe or from Madagascar, it would be next to impossible for any negro to tell, and the problem would certainly tax the in- genuity of the most skilful genealogist. Yet the black popula- tion was as varied in its way as the white. Besides the brand of the importing company and the owner there might be formd on the imported negroes ^ in any plantation colony the tattoo marks and slashings that were peculiar to tribes of many diflEer- ent characters, scattered along the African coast from Senegal to Loango. These imported negroes were drawn from all sta- tions of life in their native land. Their numbers embraced rich and poor, haughty chiefs and humble retainers. Not in- frequently had a chief been forced to sell some of his own numer- ous wives that he might keep his contract with a punctilious trader.^ A negro who had been accustomed to rule in his na- tive land was not unlikely to prefer death to bondage. If he was landed alive he might be expected to make trouble for his owner by running away or by stirring up rebellion among his fellows. Freshly imported slaves were distributed among the older and the native-bom slaves in order that the problem of adjustment to the new condition of servitude might be ren- dered less acute. But the period of “apprenticeship,” during which the raw laborer had to be broken in to the routine of his task, must always have been trying both for slave and owner. ^ ^ Called Bosal negroes by the Danes and Dutch. * Oldendorp, Udtog , . . (Kjdbenhavn, 1784), Part 1, p. 179. [157] 158 THE DANISH WEST INDIES The status of the negro was not fixed by any single ‘‘black code/" but was determined by a series of laws passed by the colonial authorities from time to time. These regulative mandates began to appear before 1700 and became more severe as the ratio of negro to white population increased. When there were three adult whites for each five adult slaves, as was the case in 1691, there was obviously little difficulty; but when there came to be not fewer than eight full-grown slaves for each adult white person, as was the ratio indicated by the census re- ports made in 1720 and 1725, the situation became vastly more complicated. With the increasing size of the plantations ^ absentee landlordism became more general, a larger number of planters was forced to resort to white managers, and in many instances the supervision of the slaves was left to negro drivers.'* The local government often found it difficult to impress upon the planters the urgent need of keeping close watch upon their slaves. Upon an owner"s taking possession of a plantation, his first care was to have his negroes clear a plot of ground and plant such things as maize, yams, sweet potatoes, beans and cassava upon it. The negroes were expected to raise all their own food, except for such low-grade fish or defective Irish beef as might be allotted to them when the food supply ran short/ A very few plantations were devoted mainly to “provisions,” particularly on St. Thomas, but never to exceed four per cent, of the total number.® In course of time each negro or negro family was allotted a plot of ground, and not ^requenUy the negroes were permitted to sell the surplus for themselves. In the busy season the negroes" working day was long and hard, though no harder than the lot of many a white farm hand of to-^y in the Mississippi valley during the harvest and threriiing season. At about four o’clock in the morning the » Tke size ctf the av^»ge plantation on St. Thomas in 1725 was nearly twice that m 1591. * XJsaaUy refecred to as Bomba negroes. «Bredal to Diredx>rs (July 8, 1718), A D., 1717-^, Provisions are generally referred to as Kaast or Cost in the documents, ^ In 1725, out of a total of on^ hundred and seventh-seven plantations on St. Thomas, sev^ were used for product provisions. C/. Appendix H, p. 818. THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTER 159 negro driver, or bomba, would rouse the sleeping slaves by riuging a bell or blowing a tuttue, or conch shell. The working day began at daybreak, and at eight or nine o^clock they were allowed half an hour in the field for a breakfast consisting of corn bread and salt meat with perhaps a little sugar-cane juice if rations were short. The noon intermission from twelve to half past one gave them a chance to prepare their meal and to rest during the fierce midday heat. The day’s work usually ended at sundown, though in harvest season they often con- tinued until nine or ten in the evening feeding live-stock, carry- ing wood to cook-house and water to cisterns and distilleries. Saturday afternoons and Sundays they had to themselves. The constant influx of fresh hosal negroes from Guinea helped to keep alive the negroes’ native customs and super- stitions. Witches were especially dreaded. The glance of a witch into the eyes of a new-born babe was believed to be likely to take away its breath and to cause it to die. A hungry witch might even devour an mfant that was not protected from its gaze. The chief influence that helped to eradicate these be- liefs was the presence of the Moravian missionaries. Despite bitter opposition from local oJEcials as well as from planters, they kept up their beneficent labors from the time of their fibrst landing in 1733 imtil they became a permanent factor in the life of the islands. They labored incessantly, whether in the fields or in the meeting houses, to teach the simple, ignorant slaves the precepts of Christ.’^ After over two decades of Moravian missionary efforts the Danish Lutheran church finally established a regular mission on the islands in 1755. Respect for the property of others was not a virtue to which the West Indian slave could truthfully lay claim; hence the various repressive measures by which the local authorities attempted to check the v^ding of goods by negroes except when written permission had been granted by their owners.^ The dassic account of early Moravian missionary efforts in the West Indies is that of Oldendorp {q. u.) whidi forms the basis for the earlier pages of H, Lawaetz’s Brodremenighedens Mission i Doms:h-Vestindim (Kobenhavn, 1902). * The first of these appears to have be^ issued March 29^ 168S, by Adcdph Esmit. Qf. Gonemors" Orders, Bancroft Collection; Martjeldt MSS., VoL I. 160 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Such goods were too frequently found to have been stolen from the slaveys owner or from some neighboring planter. The planters’ most constant difficulty was with runaways. Although St. Thomas was but a small island, it did not reach its maYirmim cultivation until towards the end of the first quarter of the eighteenth century. The result was that with the increasing severity that accompanied the development of the St, Thomas plantations, slaves were constantly disappearing into the “bush” or wild forest. In order to cope with this problem the planters were early organized into a sort of militia whose members were assigned to do duty, either on horseback or on foot, in the various parts of the island. This planter-police was especially useful during the War of the Spanish Succession in guarding against raids on St. Thomas plantations by lawless elements from among the belligerents.® Not infrequently hunts for runaways {maron-negers) were organized in which slaves who could be trusted were employed to do the rough work. The chief means of communication between the more remote and inaccessible plantations and the harbor on the south side was by canoe. The mountainous character of the island and the torrential downpour^ to which it was subject rendered the making and repairing of roads a costly matter; but the numer- ous “bays” with their convenient beaches lent themselves to the keeping of canoes and small sailboats. The latter were frequently used by white men who with a few negroes would sail off to Crab Island, for instance, the best turtle-fishing ground near St. Thomas. When the slave-hunt in the bush became too successful, it is not strange that the hunted negroes, who were often proficient in handling the canoes, should take to the boats and pull for Porto Rico. There, just beyond Crab Island, was a promised land from which rarely indeed was a slave returned. The government at St. Thomas labored in- Plaeater for St. Thomas. The preteeding paragraphs on negro life on the planta- tkms are drawn mainly from an article by J. C. Schmidt, an employee on the Princess plantation owned by Governor-General SrLhiTnTnelTna.Tt , It appeared in Samlerm for 1788 B.) und^ the title Blandede Anmosrhninger, samlede paa Off ooer Ejlcmdet St. Kroix i Amerika. ® I*^ Kopihog for St. Thomas, 170S—1S (July StSt, 1704) is a list of the various planters, etc., with th^ d.iities and places to which they were assigned. THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTER 161 cessantly to prevent an exodus of slaves from the island. From the days of John Lorentz to the end of the Company's career, numerous ordinances, mandates, and the like were issued cau- tioning planters to keep their canoes chained up, and threaten- ing them with fines and worse if they failed to obey.^ The question of the return of fugitive slaves formed during the greater part of the history of the Comi>any the principal theme of the relations between St. Thomas and Porto Bico. The instances where slaves fled from Porto Rico to St. Thomas were so exceedingly few that it is impossible to escape the con- clusion that lie St. Thomas plmiters, with their more intensive cultivation and their desire to gain a competence in a short time, treated their slaves far more harshly than the Spanish planters.^^ The Spanish argument for refusing the return of fugitive slaves was rather ingenuous in that they hdd that the slaves came over to be baptized. In a claim against the Spanish nation made out in the Company’s office in Copenhagen in 1745 and evidently intended for use by the Danish envoy at Madrid, the number of slaves that had escaped from both St. Thomas and St. Croix to Porto Rico was fixed at three hundred. These were of course ‘‘the best and most valuable of the Com- pany’s and the inhabitants’ slaves.” The arrival of each new Spanish governor became the s^nal for sending over a deputa- tion from St. Thomas to congratulate him and to inquire whether or not he brought with him orders from his king ci0m- ceming the fugitive slaves. Althou^ the Danish goveilEK>r usually sent over presents in the form of t^le delicacies and was offered others in return,^® he received no runaway negroes nor any equiv^nt for them. These claims for fugitive slaves appear never to have hem satisfied during the Compai^’s existence, and were indeed not adjusted until 1706. “ Extracts for 1703-09 (October 2, 1706), M(srifddt MSS., VoL VI. Nrancr- 0119 ord^ weri9 ksued at It^ier teres. ^ In the census list for 1715-16 occurs the item ^twenty-^our fugitive daves,** whidb seem, however, to have be^ shives esci^ed from Eustates. ^ This did not include slaves stolen in 1702, nor two di^loads that slirailded on the Honduras coast in 1710. Dir. K. R., 17SS^^ (May 11, 1745). See, for instance, Govecnor Eramnsco Dania’s letter to Crovetncr (February 10, 1700) in €. B., 1709-W. €1. Affiertt Skwdtcmdddn^ Sid&rie, 238. 16^ THK DANISH WEST INDIES The matter of doling out punishment to unruly negroes had its serious difficulties. It early became apparent that with the establishment of sugar planting as a fixed industry, the punish- ment of slaves would have to be done under the supervision of the Company’s officials. In theory the “Danish law” of Christian V was supposed to apply, but the local officials were given considerable leeway in its administration, with the result that punishments were inflicted pretty much according to custom and necessity. The planter would recommend what he wished done, and the privy council with the governor would issue the final order. One planter’s request, made in 1704, that a slave be punished for running away by having his foot chopped off, was Considered too severe, so the poor wretch was only “hamstrung.” Sixteen years later another negro belonging to the same planter was punished with the amputation of a foot, and his owner was reimbursed with an indemnity of 1£0 rdl}^ From 17£0 onwards, indemnification of planters for legally lolled or injured negroes appears to have been regularly re- sorted to, a special tax being levied on the planters for that purpose.^^ Occasionally a case for which no law could be found to apply was appealed to the directors in Copenhagen, and judgment requested. This occurred once when a planter’s daughter had had illicit relations with a negro belonging to another planter. The West Indian officials recommended corporal punishment and life imprisonment for the woman, and burning [alive?] “according to the custom of the English and the Dutch” for the man. The negro appears to have escaped, though the king’s sentence seems to have been solemnly pronounced from the pulpit, both in the West Indies and in Guinea. The woman’s fate is not revealed. The privy council of St. Thomas, itself a body of planters, was naturally inclined to give the planter the benefit of the doubt when his relations with his slaves were called into ques- (April 1704). ^ N. JJtyr irm (May 18). ^ In 1743, a planter who thus lost a slave reedved 170 xdL, Roy. Libr., TUdaXL No, SOfol, (October 21, 1743). ^ P. Mariager’s note to Directors (May 26, 1732). B, & D., 1732-Sk, THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTER 16S tion. When in 1735 a prominent planter had shot one of his slaves so that he died shortly after, his explanation that he acted in seK-defense was accepted without serious question, though not without an elaborate argument based on the Mosaic code and the king’s law.^^ The many slaves who must have been well cared for and humanely treated have left but few traces behind them in the records; with them the arm of the law had little or nothing to do. As in all plantation societies the hardest work and harshest treatment fell upon the field slave. In 1733, the very year in which the slave insurrection on St. John broke out, the Com- pany’s officials on St. Thomas complained that it was nearly impossible to get any work out of former Governor Suhm’s house negroes, whom the Company had taken over, ‘‘unless we permit them to seek a master themselves.” ^ They reported at the same time the safe arrival at St. Thomas of a negress be- longing to the Company, but insisted that she had come back from Denmark so lazy that they doubted if they could ever get her to work on a plantation again. “So we will have to see,” they wrote, rather resignedly, “how the Company can secure any interest on that capital, for to sell her out of her family would bring with it bad consequences.” This is a small gleam, in- deed, yet it throws its faint light upon the more humane side of the slave-owner’s nature. The rum shop laid its blighting influence on the land almost from the beginning. Tavern brawls were frequent, and the murders and assaults for which the taverns furnished the scene gave an unpleasant variety to the judicial labors of the local authorities. In a land where soldiers received their regular allowances of “kill-devil” ^ and where many of the slaves were allotted their weekly portion, it is not strange that ordinances should have been issued strictly forbidding tavern keepers or Kop, & Extr. S. St. TK 1735-52 (October U, 17S5). Henry Suhm was governor of St Thomas and St John from ITSW' to 1733, See Appendix A, p. 286. ^ Governor, etc., to Directors (April 16, 1733), B. & D., 1732-3J^. Garddm papers^ pamm,, Bancroft Collection. 164 THE DANISH WEST INDIES other inhabitants from selling intoxicants to negroes.^^ The idea that alcoholic drinks helped to acclimatize the new arrival had a firm hold on the popular mind. Negro feasts and dances were considered a constant menace. It is easy to imderstand why the whites should especially fear a negro mob crazed by drink. The legislative device of prohibition by law was not to be seriously applied to the negro until after slavery had ceased to exist, and then in the present chief home of the American negro, the southern United States. Insurrection among its slaves has always been considered the most terrible experience that a slave-holding society could suffer. Whether in Rome with its slave risings, in Sicily or on the Italian peninsula, in Virginia with Nat Turner, or in a sugar colony in the West Indies, the prospect of a general servile uprising has equally alarmed the ruling class. It was during the first governorship of John Lorentz in 1691, a year after the first serious insurrection reported in the English colony of Jamaica, that clearly defined rumors of a negro plot against the whites are first heard.^^ During those early years, when the greater number of the slaves on St. Thomas were native Africans, it is not strange that threats should have been breathed against the govemor^s life and that planters and Company officials alike were constantly on the lookout for conspiracies among the slaves. Cruelty on the part of an individual planter was likely to be rewarded by his slaves running away. Planters ^ and officials must have realized the economic advantages of good treatment of so valuable a part of their plantation invest- ment as their slaves. It was likely to require something more than individual cases of cruelty to bring about actual insurrec- tion. The most persistent motive that led to general unrest among the slaves was lack of food. When months of drought ruined tihe crops of maize, sweet potatoes, and other foods which the a P., im9-17U {Mardi 19, 1706); (jf. Ma^eldt MSS., Vol. II (Mandate of GovOTor Moth's bound with Martfeldt’s iiotes; dated Deceiiiber 11, 1741). Southey, Chpondop^ Mistory of the British West InHes (2 vols., London, 1826), H, 158. Lorents^s Journal (Pdinmairy 28, 1691). THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTOR 165 negroes were expected to raise for their own sustenance, the planters were obliged to buy provisions from outside sources if they were to save their negroes’ lives and prevent them from rising against their masters. In 1725-1726 the drought was unusually severe and protracted. A number of the planters let their slaves starve to death; others gave them extra hol- idays, with the natural result that the blacks stole right and left and became exceedingly dlSScult to manage.^ Since open resistance to the whites was the worst of crimes, it is not sur- prising to find recorded in the Company’s books for 1726 that seventeen slaves distributed among thirteen planters had been executed and were debited to the community at a price of about 120 rdL each.^ The planters secured the equivalent for their losses in fresh slaves from the next incoming Guinea cargo.^ In the time that elapsed between the War of the Spanish Succession and 1738, when the first serious rebellion began in the Danish islands, the Northern War had brought the activi- ties of the Company almost to a standstill. Besides this the money stringency in the commercial world following the collapse of John Law’s Mississippi Company made the revival of trade in the West Indies very slow. The Company had managed nevertheless to assist a group of planters in occupying the small, mountainous, but fertile island of St. John.^ St. Thomas reached its maximiun slave population and its maximum num- ber of plantations during its government by the Company, about 1725. St. John’s plantations had risen from thirty- nine in 1726-1721 to eighty-seven plantations containing a slave population of 677 in 1728. By 1738 there were one hundred and nine plantations with one thousand and eighty- seven slaves on St. John. In other words, there had been an increase of sixty per cent, in the number of slaves dur- & D., m4r^ (November 22. 1725); S. P.. St. Th. (May 26, 1725); P. B. O., 1683-1729 (December 18, 1725). N. J. for 1726 (Jtuie 29). Hus may represent tke daves executed since 1723, as tbe planters were requested in 1725 to send in lists of slaves wbo had been condemned to death or severe punishment since that date. Cf. MaHfdit MSS., Vol. I, ^^BlmOerfw St Thomas^^ (1684-1744). 28 Mandate of April n, 1725, Martfddt MSS., I. See abov^ 127-130. 166 THE DANISH WEST INDIES ing those five years, but of only twenty-five per cent, in the number of plantations. Clearly St. John was rapidly forg- ing ahead as a sugar island. St. Thomas, on the other hand, had begun to decline as a plantation colony; much of its ground had been under cultivation for half a century. Many of its planters, as the census lists show, secured planta- tions on St. John which they managed by means of hired over- seers, they themselves remaining on St. Thomas.®® The diflSculty so often experienced by planters in securing honest and capable managers {Mesterknegte) intensified the dangers of absentee landlordism. It was not always possible for aU the plantation owners to keep their plantations supplied with white overseers despite the Company’s threats of fines and confiscation. The uprising of the slaves on St. John began late in Novem- ber, 1733. During the spring and summer preceding there had been a long period of drought, followed in July by a destructive hurricane which had inflicted considerable damage upon the already suffering crops as well as upon buildings and shipping.®^ A plague of insects had destroyed many of the products of the islands, and the negroes were threatened with famine. Another storm in the early winter was especially severe on the maize crop on which the negroes largely depended for their food. In order to check the disorders among slaves which such a suc- cession of disasters naturally encouraged, Philip Gardelin, Land Listefor St Jan^ 1733; ibid, St Thomas, 1733. The gavemor and coundl reported two ships, thirteen barks, t^o schooners, and two two-masted boats, many canoes, sloops, and ships’ boats to have been wadxed ashore and practically destroyed. Majrtfddt MSS., Vol. VI, 227 et seq. (July 28, 1783). In the report (Genercdbrev) sent by the St. Thomas govern- ment to the Directors on June 18, 1733, it is stated that because'of the drought, the Company’s plantation on St. John yielded only sixty-two hhd. of sugar, where one hundred and fifty hhd. had been expected. B. & D., 173^-34-. THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTER 167 who had risen from the posts of bookkeeper and merchant for the Company at St. Thomas to the position of governor, issued on September 5, 1733, a mandate whose terrible severity reflects the prevailing tension between master and slave.^^ Governor Gardelin’s mandate provided that leaders of run- aways should be pinched thrice with red-hot irons and then hanged. A negro found guilty of conspiracy was to lose a leg, unless the owner requested lightening the sentence to one hundred fifty lashes and the loss of the negro’s ears. Slaves fading to report a plot of which they had knowledge were to be branded in the forehead and to receive one hundred lashes besides. Informers of negro plots could secure cash premiums and have their names kept secret. Runaways caught within a week were to be punished with one hundred fifty lashes; those of three months’ standing were to lose a leg; if they re- mained away for six months, it would cost them their lives. Thievery, and assistance of thieves and runaways, were to be punished by whipping and branding. A negro raising his hand against a white man must be pinched three times with a hot iron; whether he should be hanged or merely lose a hand was left to the discretion of his accuser. The testimony of a reputa- ble white man against a negro ordinarily sufficed; in case of doubt the negro might be submitted to torture. A negro meet- ing a white man on the road was to stand aside tmtil the latter had passed him. The carrying of sticks or knives^ witchcraft among negroes, attempts to poison, dances, feasts and music, loitering in the village after drumbeat,—^all were provided against. Free negroes implicated in runaway plots or found to have encomaged thievery were to be deprived of liberty and property, and after receiving a flogging, to be banished from the land. This mandate with its nineteen paragraphs was to be proclaimed to the beat of drum three times each year.®^ HSst, Efterretmnger, 85 et aeq. J. P. Ejiox (Historical account qf 8t Thomas, New York, 185JJ), pp. 69 et seq^ gives a crude, inaccurate translation of this mandate, dating it January 31, 1733. B, V. Petersen (Historisk Beretmng, Xjenhavn, 1855) pp. 49 et seq. follows HSst’s summary word for word, but uses Knox’s date. Cf, Qarddin Order-book (S^tember 9, 1733), Bancroft CoUecdon. 168 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Thus did the authorities attempt to strike terror into the hearts of the restless, half-famished negro population. On Monday afternoon, November 23, 1733, a very badly frii^tened soldier and some panic-stricken refugees from St. John appeared in the fort at St. Thomas harbor and poured into the ears of the astonished governor and his council a most fearful tale. Early that morning twelve or fourteen of the Company's negroes had come up the path on the mountain- side to the fort overlooking Coral Bay on St. John, each of them with an armful of wood. When the sentinel shouted, ‘^Who is there?” he received the answer, ‘‘Negroes with wood,” and opened the door. Bushing inside, the negroes pulled sugar- cane knives (Kapmesser) out from the wood and murdered the soldier on the spot. Meantime other negroes had assembled and together they rushed in upon the sleeping corporal and his six soldiers, killing all but one (John Gabriel) who in the early twili^t managed to save himself by crawling under a bed, and later escaped through the bush and down to a canoe by the seashore. With the garrison out of the way the negroes pro- ceeded to raise the flag and fire three shots from the cannon at the fort. This was the signal for a general slaughter on all the plantations on the island. The ranking magistrate on St. John, John Reimert Soedt- mann,^^ and his stepdaughter were among the first victims v- emor Gardelin to John Beverhoudt on St. John, to send as many as six hundred men to the assistance of the Danes. The planters contributed seventy-four West Indian negroes to assist in the chase, though the governor had asked for a hundred and fifteen.^^ Why the French should respmnd so joyfully it would be rather diflScult to explain were it not for certain European con- ditions. France was preparing to take up the cause of Stanis- las Leszczynski, father-in-law of Louis XV, in his attempt to secure the Polish throne. France, which had scarcely re- covered from the collapse of the Mississippi Bubble, was in serious need of money. She was also anxious for Denmark’s neutrality in the coming War of the Polish Succession. In this extremity a shrewd director of the Danish company turned the trick by offering the French envoy 750,006 livres for the island of St. Croix, with Denmark’s neutraKly thrown in. But the news of the transfer and of Denmark’s friend- ship reached the French islands through their home govern- ment considerably before the directors at Copenhagen got ready to send a ship to St. Thomas. Nor do the French from Martinique appear to have divulged to the Danish authorities at St. Thomas the main^rings of their zeal.^ To the dis- Horn’s instructioiis induded varioas alternative proposals. He was em- powered to hire a vessd, engage a hundred men and to buy provisions for them on the Company’s account. Cy. Garden MSS, (March 91, 1784) Iot these instructions* ^ Oc^ddm MSS, (April 28 and 8, 17S4) ^ves a hst d tbe skty-dj^t planters. •^Eor a detaied account oi the acquisitioii of St. Crcux, see Chap- ter X 174 THE DANISH WEST INDIES tressed planters and Company it was the fact of assistance and not its motives that mattered. On the day following their arrival the French xmder their commander Longueville were promptly dispatched to St. John. The Danish governor lost no time in sending on planks for the soldiers’ barracks and fresh meat for food.^ Crown attorney Friis was ordered to St. John to take charge of the negroes as they were captured. He was to try and judge half of those caught and the others were to be sent to St. Thomas for trial. The French commandant was to preside over the drumhead court-martial when it should be called, but a Danish represen- tative was to be present.®^ A force of twenty-five or thirty Danes under Lieutenant Froling was got together and sent over to work in conjunction with the French.^® Within three or four days of their arrival the French forces were encamped and ready for their grim labors. Only five days before the arrival of the French on St. John, a party of about forty rebels had made a fierce attack, lasting an hour and a half, upon the burghers who were encamped on Deurloo’s plantation. They managed to set the supply magazine on fire, but suffered a loss of three killed and six badly wounded.®^ From April £9 when they met their first party of rebels to May £7 when they returned to St. Thomas, the French force climg tenaciously to the heels of their quarry until they were unable to find the trace of a single live rebel. During the first three weeks they had to march up hill and down dale, through bush and bramble in an almost continual downpour of rain. By working in shifts they completely wore out the energies of the rebels, some of whom in lack of gims had armed themselves wdth bows and arrows.®® On May 9 they learned that the ne- groes were assembled on a certain point or small peninsula of land. The band escaped, but a wounded boy showed the ®®GardeIin to “Commandeur Sergiant” Ottingen (April 588, 1784). Gar^ ddin MSS, Garddin to Friis (April 24. 1734). Garddin MSS. Garddin to FrSling (April 24, 1784). Ihid. w Om RMlionen . . . (May 4, 1784). Martfddt MSS,, IH. ^ Domme afsagt om Negere (May 21, 1734), B. & D., 1782-Sl, THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTER 175 French where eleven rebels lay in the bush, dead by their own act. A week later eight rebels gave themselves up in the hope of averting the captured rebeFs fate. Two more were killed with a single shot, and two were found murdered. Of the rest there was no trace until May £4, when a report came in that twenty-four dead rebels had been found on an outjutting point of land in an unsuspected place, with their muskets broken.®^ They were reported as having lain there for perhaps a fort- night. The Danish oflS.cials in their reports to the directors could not praise highly enough the courage of the French on the field and their uniform courtesy everywhere. “The fatigues that the French have imdergone,’^ wrote the governor in his report to his masters, “from the first day that they came to St. John cannot be adequately described. . . . The obligations that we are under to the French oflSicers merits a far greater reward than we are able to give them. The commandant himself marched with his men for four days through forests and valleys, up steep mountain-sides, and in a continuous slush and rain, with no roof above him but the sky. Next to God, they [the oflSicers], because of their tireless effort, deserve the credit for the present peace. Their bravery and persistence and the cheerfulness with which they encouraged their men, who began very early to tire from their strenuous efforts, will we trust be properly rewarded in high places. . . On their arrival at St. Thomas on May 27 Commandant Longueville and his officers and men were shown every attention and courtesy. An offer of 5,000 “French guldens ” was i)olitdy refused by the French officer. After five days of celebration the French, accompanied by John Horn, embarked for Martin- ique. There, in turn, the Danes were treated by the French officials with marked cordiality and deference.®^ This happy outcome, happy so far as the whites were con- cerned, was marred by a bitter quarrel between the local govem- This may be the group that tradition, as recorded by Hbst and those follow- ing his account, has magnified to three hundred. See Host, op, cU,, p. 96. Om, Rebdlionen . . . (July 26, 17S4). Martfddt MSS,, VoL m. m THE DANISH WEST INDIES ment and the planters, each side trying to blame the other for the uprising with a view to being relieved of part of the expense. But the end of the rebellion was not quite at hand; for early in August—two months after the French had left—the report came in that a party of fourteen negroes and negresses, led by one Prince was still at large, though without firearms. To avoid an expensive maroon hunt” Theodore Ottingen, an officer who had taken part in the suppression of the rebellion since its beginning, managed on promise of pardon to lure the fifteen remaining rebels to their former owners’ plantations.®^ On the pretext that they would have to be appraised, every one of them was seized at a given signal on the morning of August £5 and brought to St. Thomas. Prince was not among them, for he had—fortunately for himself—^been beheaded, and his head was a trophy in Ottingen’s baggage. Of these fifteen rebels four “died” in prison before they could be brought to trial, four were condemned to be worked to death on the St. Croix fortifications, and the rest were done to death in various ways “such as they deserved because of their gruesome deeds, ” as the official letter has it.®® With this piece of treachery, as it would be called in this age, a success for which the responsible officer received high praise from his sui>eriors and a lieutenancy on St. Croix, the insurrec- tion of 1738-1734 on St. John came to an end. Besides those killed in conflict and those belonging to the Company, twenty- seven negroes were estimated to have been tried and executed.®’^ A list made out in February, 1734, just before Maddox’s ill- fated attempt, showed one hundred forty-six negro men and women implicated in rebellion at that time. It is clear that the story of the three hundred negroes found dead in a circle on a mountain near “Brims Bay” is pure fancy. It was first told by Hdst®® whose account of the rebdhon is based pmrtly on A negro bekai|^s^ to Madame Elizabeth Runnela. ^ See OarddinV kustmcticma and letters to Otting^ in Garddm MSS, (Au- gust 9, 16, and 21, 17S4.) ^OmRei>emmm . , . December 28, 1734. Mm^ddtMSS,, VoL TO. ^Uhid. “ Host, Efterreimnger, 96. A recent repetition erf this story is to b^ found in Keller, CoUmissaHcm, p. 606. THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTER 177 documents and partly on hearsay and has been repeated numer- ous times since. When the time for stock-taking came, it was found that planters were entitled to remuneration for thirty slaves that had been condemned to death or to work in irons,®® and for six olliers —^two belonging to St. John and four to St. Thomas planters. These six had been killed while fighting for their owners.^ Of ninety-two plantations listed by Theodore Ottingen probably late in 1734 or in 1735, forty-ei^t were recorded as having suffered damage, forty-four as having escaped it. Of the forty- eight, thirty were being cultivated when the report was made; of the forty-four not damaged, thirty-two were being cultivated. On forty-one plantations, valuable buildings had been partly or wholly burned down by the rebels. The money loss was estimated, according to Host, at 7,905 rdl, a considerable sum for so small an island.^^ As to loss of life by the white popula- tion, probably not a fourth of the whites were killed by the negroes. But this human hurricane had been far more devastat- ing than any sent out from Nature^s workshop, for it had not only destroyed men and their labor of years, but hardened their hearts and greatly delayed the prospect for more normal and human relations between master and slave in the Danish islands. It was perhaps fortunate that the acquisition of the fertile island of St. Croix occurred so shortly after this event, for this gave a welcome opportunity for the recuperation of the de- moralized planters and turned the attention of men to new problems. With the development of St. Croix the economic center of gravity was gradually to be shifted to the new island, and the awful experiences of 1733 and 1734 were destined soon to become receding memories. The government and colonists had learned a lesson in vigilance which it would be hard to forget. As reflection took the^place of passion, perhaps they saw still more dearly the ^cacy of PlaatCTs received 120 rH. each for all fidl-grown slaves legally condemned to death. S. P., 8t Tk (October 22, 17S0). **SpeciJicaH(m paa de Plantagier ...” (17S4?). B, 173£~^J^ H6st, 07, 08. 178 THE DANISH WEST INDIES humaneness. At any rate, it was a quarter of a century before the Danish colonists were again seriously threatened with a slave insurrection, and then it was on the new and rapidly de- veloping island of St. Croix. The story of the attempted re- bellion of 1759 belongs to the post-Company history of that island. CHAPTER IX THE PLANTER AND THE COMPANY The powers of government which Christian V placed in the hands of the directors of the Danish West India and Guinea Company were almost as absolute within their West Indian sphere as were the powers of the Danish king within his Euro- pean dominions. This was necessarily so, for the venture was primarily commercial. Its purpose was to furnish a profitable field of investment for men with capital; hence the need of concentrating the management of the Company’s resources in few hands. The absolutism which Christian V inherited from his father was based upon the theory of Divine Right. The directors of the Company, on the other hand, received their powers from a very worldly body of shareholders to whom they rendered account and by whom they might be removed. The directorates of the Danish East and West India com- panies at the beginning were in a sense committees delegated to the work from the recently established Board of Trade. The kiug, as the most powerful shareholder in the Company, appointed the three origmal directors himself, but entirely from among the members of the Board of Trade. Acting with these directors in an advisory capacity and representing in a fairly direct manner the interests of the bulk of the shareholders, was a body of men known as ‘‘chief shareholders.” From 1671 to 173S the membership of the board of directors rose from three to seven; that of the chief shareholders, from two to five. The part played by two able directors, Juel and Moth, in guiding the Company through a maze of commercial misfortunes and diplomatic diflBlculties, has been brought out in a preceding chapter.^ In the inunediate supervision of affairs on St. Thomas, these men were given practically a free field. ^ See Ch{U)ter in, above. For lists of offidals see Appendix B. 11701 180 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Wlxen matters which especially affected the stockholders in general came up, such as the need of securing additional funds to enlarge the Company's activities, the situation was presented to the General Assembly of the Company, where each holder of a full share of stock had one vote.^ Serious problems con- nected with the Company were sometimes referred by the king to a special commission appointed (as was the case during the first two decades of Christian V’s reign) from the membership of the Board of Trade, or they were turned over (as was the case from 1690 to 1705) to special bodies known from their place of meeting as ‘^Commissions in the Council Chamber of the Royal Castle.” The majority of the members of such commissions were usually officials of the Company. In 1704, early in Frederick IV’s reign, the Board of Trade was revived, and four years later it was combined with the Police Board of Copenhagen into the Board of Police and Trade which continued down to 1731. On at least two occasions, in 1715 and in 17^, this body submitted to the king reports on petitions from St. Thomas planters.^ The dimensions of Denmark’s commercial and colonial enter- prises were never such as to permit the Board of Trade to develop into a body which could be compared in its specialized advisory functions to the Board of Trade and Plantations in England. When William IH foimded the latter board in 1696, the greater number of the English colonies had already passed out of the control of chartered companies. The active control of the business of the Danish West India and Guinea Company rested, as has been indicated, almost solely upon the directors. They selected the governors and chief officials both in Guinea and in St. Thomas, subject only to confirmation by the king; they found captains for their trading vessels and pro- vided m inisters to care for the souls of employees, planters, and slaves. The directors through their factor in Copenhagen were expected to find a market either at home or abroad for African ivory and West Indian sugar, cotton, and indigo.^ They were ® See above, p, 34. * See below, pp. 190-191. See also Ajtpmdix F, pp. 306-314. ^ Parts of the cargoes Tvere uauaEy offered at auction to local buyers. THE PLANTER AND THE COMPANY 181 obliged to keep in close touch with the Dutch money market and to buy insurance for both ships and cargoes from Dutch insurance firms. In disputes between planters and Company oflScials in the West Indies, they were expected to act as arbiters unless the appeal was made directly to the king; in any case they were consulted before judgment was rendered. They were supi>osed to maintain the authority and dignity of the king among the colonists and with their various foreign nei^bors. Although the directors were given practicafiy full power in the general management of the Company, they were forced in turn to give considerable latitude of action to their West Indian officials. The “Governor and Council of St. Thomas’^ were to be sure provided with most elaborate sets of instructions in- tended to cover every emergency, but the remoteness of the island from Denmark and the difficulty of keeping in close touch with it by post led the island officials to take more and more liberties with their orders and sometimes to use their positions for peculation and graft. For instance, as a result of his opera- tions during the later years of the War of the Spanish Succession, Governor Crone was accused of collusion with the governor of Porto Eico and of gross fraud in the conduct of the Company's affairs. He died before the suit against him came to an end, but one of the members of his council, Christian Seeberg, treasurer at St. Thomas, was finally convicted of fraud and forced to pay a large fine. Governors Bredal and Gardelin owed their advancement to their reputation for hon^y and to their abiKty to expose corruption in the management of the Com- pany's affairs. The diief official besides the governor consisted in the be- ginning of the merchant or factor, the bookkeeper, and the secretary. After John Iiormtz*s death in 170^, the factor Joachim voaa Hdten who had failed to secure the governorship ^ cd interim was made “chief factor” (Opper-KjGbrrmnd) by way of solace. In 1708 the office of treasurer (Casserer) began to appear in the list of officials.^ This continued to be the com- * Claus Hansen was elected as governor ad interim by the council (Interims^ Vice^ommmdant) February, VTOi. « Mar^ddt MSS„ VoL VI, p. ji07 (June 10, 1703), 18^ THE DANISH WEST INDIES position of the council, or privy council (Secrete-Raad), as it came early to be called, until the reorganization of the Company after the purchase of St. Croix. With the governorship of John Lorentz the Company began the policy of procuring its adminis- trators from officials who had had experience in actual service in the Company’s government at St. Thomas. Lorentz himself had begun as an assistant and was secretary and ex officio mem- ber of the council when Heins’ death called him to the governor- ship. His successor Claus Hansen had been lieutenant at the fort and a council member. In fact, of the eight governors who held office in St. Thomas from 170£, when Lorentz died, to 1738, when GardeUn became governor, only two had not had their preliminary training in St. Thomas. One of these, Otto J. Thambsen, had been a commander {SchouibynacM) in the Danish navy; and the other, Henry Suhm, had been in charge of Fort Christiansborg on the Guinea coast.^ Neither of these men found his work congenial or was able to get on well with the inhabitants of the colony. The success of the Company as a commercial venture de- pended very largely upon the ability and integrity of its West Indian representatives. In order to procme those full return cargoes on the advantageous sale of which the Company relied mainly for its dividends, the West Indian government needed to keep on good terms with the planters. Whenever a planter re- ceived better offers from Dutch or other skippers than from the Company, it became a difficult and delicate matter to force him to part with his produce. Although in theory the Company’s officials held all administrative, legislative, and judicial powers in their own hands, they were obliged m practice to pay very real heed to the desires of the islanders. The relations between government and planters were affected by a variety of circumstances. Too high duties or other annoy- ing trade restrictions led the planters to attempts at evasion. In this they were aided by the numerous indentations or “bays ” which made smuggling easy. Threats of shortage in provisions through drought, hurricanes or other causes sometimes forced the local government to take prompt measures for the relief of ^ Cf. Appendix A^ p. 5^. THE PLANTEK A2TO THE COMPANY 18S the inhabitants. During the severe drought in St. Thomas in 17^-1726, when negroes were dying for lack of food/ the St. Thomas government admitted free of duty all incoming provisions except liquors. The request of a delegation of planters that outgoing goods likewise be freed from duly was not granted,^ At that time St. Thomas was mainly dependent upon New York for its lumber and provisions. The duly had previously been five per cent, on incoming and six per cent, on outgoing goods, according to the St. Thomas market price; and as recently as May 18, 17£4, Governor Thambsen had issued an order granting to New York skippers the special privilege of importing provisions at five per cent, duty, calculated on the cost price in New York, and receiving payment in sugar and cotton on which no export duty was required/'^ The home authorities were rather slow to admit the necessity of consulting the inclinations of the colonists in the selection of their West Indian governors. Governor Lorentz was the choice of the planters, and the directors gladly confirmed his election by the council; but Thormohlen’s governor, Delavigne, suc- ceeded so poorly in winning the good will of the planters that the colony might have gone to min except for Lorentz’s timely return. On the latter’s death the council appointed eight of the leading planters to act with it in selecting a successor. The council nevertheless proceeded to elect the merchant Joachim von Holten to the governorship, regardless of the planters’ desires. The result was a mass meeting of all the planters on the day following, called, as the records of the privy coxmcil rather euphemistically report, ^*at the order of the honorable council,” On the insistence of eighty planters, of whom twenty-one signed a vigorously worded petition with their marks, the ^‘honorable coxmcil” reconsidered the election and chose the planters’ candi- date, Lieutenant Claus Hansen. The directors confirmed the election, but they took particular pains to remind the planters that the election of a governor was none of their concem.^^ * See above, p. 165. « S. P.for St. Th. (October 3, 21, 28, 1725). w P. B. 0.. im-m9 (May 18, 1724). “ Kop. og Extr.. 8. P.for St. Th, 1699-1714, “ Libra S” (June 12. 13, 1702); Matr^ddl MSS, voL TI, p. 207 et teq. 184 im DANISH WEST INDIES On the death of Governor Hansen^s successor, Joachim von Holten in 1708 the privy council actually called in twelve in- habitants to assist them in electing a governor.^^ The War of the Spanish Succession, with the West Indies as the scene of much of its sea-fighting, furnished a golden opporttmity for venturesome neutrals; and especially on St. Thomas had the planters and traders become wealthy and influential through dealing in captured ships and cargoes brought in by the priva- teers of the warring nations. The fact that the governor rarely succeeded in outliving his term of office had resulted in giving the local officials and planters their opportunity to take a hand in naming their chief executive, at least until the directors could be heard from. Governor Erik Bredal who succeded Michael Crone in 1716 in- sisted so strongly on being relieved of his office that in Sep- tember, 1723, the directors found themselves for the first time in many years nominating and electing a governor.^® The re- client of this signal honor was Otto Jacob Thambsen, Com- mander in the Royal Navy. He was awarded the imusually large salary of 1200 rdl. per annum. On his arrival late in April, 1724, he found the books in great confusion, the secre- tary quite useless, customs duties uncollected for years back, the council refractory, and the planters unwilling to do the directom^ bidding.^^ After ten weeks at St. Thomas he wrote to his masters; “You must not suppose that because I do not complain, I jSnd it enjoyable here ... I pray that the gentle- men wiU not take it amiss if I remark that St, Thomas and my office appear to me like the lion^s cave, where all the footprints pointed in and from which none pointed out.”^^ The directoi^ who oldfce^^ Diedik^ tteasui:^ R, Henuingsai, and secretary C. Sedberg. Mar^ddt MBS., Vd. VI, 1703-1700 (June 12, 1708). ^Ihid. *0 von was dected m February, l706. 186 THE DANISH WEST INDIES curred during the first week in April, the planters held a meet- ing, appointed two of their number, Andrew Zinck and Amthony Zytsema, to act as commissioners, and prepared for them an elaborate set of instructions with the demands enumerated in an imposing list of sixteen paragraphs. The instructions were signed by sixty-nine planters of whom eight signed with their marks. The signers included practically all the influential planters.^^ A resume of these demands will serve to show the sort of con- ditions and regulations by which the planters of St. Thomas felt themselves aggrieved. They began by urging an appeal to the Danish government to bestir itseh to secure the St. Thomas vessels that had been seized by the French, English, and Spanish during the war. A number of the planters owned vessels with which they had carried on various kinds of trade, both permitted and forbidden. The St. Thomas inhabitants rightly felt that something might be gained if the home govern- ment could secure exemption from seizure of vessels not carry- ing contraband. But in such a titanic struggle, nothing but a generous display of force could make the powers involved accede to any request that Denmark might make, especially when it touched upon their own interests. They desired, as St. Thomas planters continued to desire for the next forty years, the return of slaves that had escaped to Porto Rico. This presupposed their expressed hope that Denmark might again come into peaceful relations with Spain, something that was not likely to be speedily brought about, since Denmark had not even had an envoy at Madrid after the beginning of the Spanish Succes- sion war.^^ With respect to matters of local taxation they asked for the revocation of the charges known as ‘‘skth” and "‘tenth” taxes, amounting to twenty-five per cent., which were laid upon the property of persons leaving the island. These were especially B. orts and exports fixed by the governor and privy council as a result of the directors’ orders were as follows: on goods leav- ing St. Thomas, six per cent.; on incoming European goods, four per cent.; on incoming West Indian goods, two per cent.; on all provisions from New England, four per cent.^ The results of the planters’ mission of 1706 were on the whole meager enough, yet in 1714-1715, when the planters felt their situation agaiu becoming desperate, they proceeded as before to smd a delegation to Copenhagen. The pressure of hard times was already being felt in the West Indies; the home country was fully occupied with the Northern War against Sweden under Charles XII; in St. Thomas prizes and confis- cated cargoes ceased being brought into the harbor. The Spaniards on Porto Eico and the larger islands upon whom the planters depended for cash were suffering severely, for it had been more than two years since the Spanish fleet had visited them.®® What cash the planters were able to get hold of went for provisions; they were concerned with keeping alive the slaves they had, rather than with buying new ones. When under these conditions the Company insisted on re- taming the hated twenty-five per cent, tax on the property of persons leaving the island, feeling among the planters tan high. In numerous secret meetings the Company and its St. Thomas 1717-^0, copy (November 5, 1707). Ihe letter menticmed gepretendeerde 6% penrdng^het mlcke vuyt de hru^ han genm warden, opgehoven,’^ which, if the copy be acOuracte, may possibly refer to the mxth penning'* tax. But the tax seems to have r^miained im force nevertheless, ^ Cop, og mor^ 8. F./of 8t. TK (April S8. 170^ “ F. ife D„ 171^17 (Atgoflt 10, 17l§). THE PLANTER AND THE COMPANY 180 representatives came in for most severe denunciation. In May and July, 1714, leading citizens made a strong plea to the gover- nor and council requesting the return of various former priv- ileges which they had enjoyed in Governor Lorentz’s time and before, and they threatened in case of refusal to send their dep- uties to Denmark to lay the matter directly before the king.^^ This threat was finally carried out when, early in 1715, a com- mission of three influential planters, George Carstensen, Jacob Magens and John Johnson de Windt, set out for Copenhagen to represent the planters at the Danish court.^^ Theindependent spirit shown by the West Indian planters had alarmed the local oflScials, who were quick to scent a conspiracy against the gov- ernment. In their report to the directors, the governor and council charged one James Smith, son of the erstwhile Branden- burg factor Peter Smith,^^ with beiag the main author of the disturbance, the inheritance of a portion of his father’s fortune having affected his interests. In their desire to expose the character of the ringleaders, the local ojfficials alleged that James Smith had been treasurer of the Scotch Darien Company, and that when its trade had been ruined by the English, he had escaped with the treasury’s money.®® The delegates from St. Thomas arrived in Copenhagen in the summer of 1715, determined to secure some definite con- cessions and not to permit any such failme as had occurred in 1706. Besides the remission of the twenty-five per cent., and the substitution for it of the usual six per cent, tax on all goods exported, they petitioned to be permitted to ship out their products to whatever port they pleased. They asked, as in 1706, that representatives of the planters be consulted by the governor & D., 171^17 (July 11, 1714). Those signing the COTnmmiicatioii of July 11 were: L. Beverhoudt, Johauuea Sots, Jan Jansen de \?mdt, Damd Jansen, David Bourdeaiqc, Johannes Cramieuw, Hans E^yer, Tobias van Wondergem Mid Ja[me]s Snidt (&nith). Vest, Beg., 1699-17^ (April 14, 1716). George Cfurstensen became the founder of a distinguMied line of Danish nobility, the Castaiskjolds. He was a n^hew of Governor Lozentz. See above, pp. IIS, 115. See abov^ p. 119. R. & mirVr (Ai^t 10, 1714). 190 THE DANISH WEST INDIES and council on matters pertaining to the land and its inhabitants. They requested permission, on behalf of the members of the Reformed or Calvinist faith, for the latter to elect their own minister. They asked as had the delegates of 1706 that the government take measures to secure satisfaction from Spain for slaves escaped to Porto Rico and for ships seized by the Spanish, French, and English during the War of the Spanish Succession. They requested more efficient assistance from the Company in the prevention of rimaways and a remission of the mterest on slaves bought in 1707.^® These various desires and grievances were presented in the form of memorials or petitions to the directors and to the king. The memorial to the former was dated September 1715, and to this the directors made reply on October 28 following.®^ King Frederick IV referred the matter for further investiga- tion to royal commissions, including the Board of Police and Trade. The St. Thomas delegates remained in Copenhagen through the winter of 1715-1716 and succeeded in gettmg definite statements from both the Company and the crown on aU the points in dispute. A commission was appointed by the king on April 14, 1716, consisting of privy councilors Christian Sehested and Frederick Christian Adder, supreme court judge and coimcilor in chancery Christian Berregaard, and Jens Kuur, a member of the Copenhagen city council.^^ This body really acted as arbiter in the dispute between the planters and the Company. The king’s resolution on each of the disputed points was handed down on August 16, 1716. The mission of 1715-1716 was certainly productive of result. The tax on the property of persons leaving St. Thomas was reduced from twenty-five to ten per cent. Trade was thrown open to St. Thomas inhabitants on payment of six per cent, for outgomg, and five per cent, for incoming goods. On these terms the inhabitants of St. Thomas were to be permitted to trade with all places except the Danish European lands and “ It is not dear just why this was asked for. Manager MS., 119, ^ Comp. Pfot, 1697-178^ (October 28, 1715). ^ Vest, Reg., 1699~’17^6 (April 14, 1716). Assessor and CanceUie^Baad were the Danish n^es for Berregaard’s offices. THE PLANTER AND THE COMPANY 191 Hamburg and Bremen, but were expected to assist the Company in securing full cargoes, though at market rates, instead of the discount of one-sixth which the directors had held out for. The planters^ attempt to secure a legal standing as a legislative body for their common court failed, although the king ordered that their decisions were to be appealed to the directors, thus depriv- ing the governor and council of their judicial functions. The kingapproved the directors’ proposal to issue a letter of presenta- tion (Kaldsbrev) to any suitable Reformed Church minister nomi- nated by the St. Thomas congregation. With regard to slave refugees in Porto Rico, to runaways on St. Thomas, and to seiz- mes made by various nations durhig the late war, the authori- ties joined in promising assistance. The interest on the debt due for slaves purchased in 1707 was not remitted, but reduced from eight to six per cent. Speedier handling of probate cases was promised.^® This outcome, on the whole favorable to the planters, was partly due to the vigorous championship of their interests by a committee of the Board of Police and Trade, which the king had deputed to report upon the case.^ The whole-hearted sympathy which this body showed towards the planters indi- cates an intelligent grasp of commercial matters considerably in advance of that generally held in Danish administrative circles of the early eighteenth century. The planters’ victory was gained in the face of bitter opposition from Governor Michael Crone, who had counsdled banishment and fines for the leaders if actual revolution was to be averted and the Com- pany was to be saved from ruin.^^ In view of Crone’s question- able dealings with privateers and the care with which he looked after his own fortunes, while he neglected the interests of the ^ For the king’s resolution on each of the matters in dispute, see Martfeldt MSS,, VoL VI., “ JJdtog of en Kongdig Re^oliiMon . . (August 24, 1716). Of, Manager MS., pp. 120 et seq. ^ The monbers w^e: Niels Slange, Johan Bertram Ernst, Andreas Franck, Christian Braem, Morten Munck, Markus Johansen, and Abraham Klocker. PoUH og Commerce CoUegiete Memoricd Bog, vol. 21 (1716-1720), in City Hall archives, Copenhagen. See Ajypertdix F, pp. 306-314, for translation of this report. Crone to Directors (February 19, 1715), B. ., mJhl7 (My 23, 1716). THE PLANTER AND THE COMPANY 197 Company slaves and furniture, whicli could not have been used in paying the Company’s employees.^^ The crisis was thus tided over by paper money issues, but not without inconvenience and loss. In 1722 Grovemor Bredal issued an order requiring possessors of “false paper bills” to present them for signing within fourteen days, on pain of con- fiscation.^ In 1724, in the seventh year of their use. Governor Frederick Moth and his coimcil took measures for the with- drawal and confiscation of the old notes, which were scarcely recognizable any longer, and proceeded to the issue of new ones that were less easily raised.^® The governor and council de- cided to issue 2,000 bills of each of the following denominations: one, two, four, and eight reals.®® Counting eight reals to each piece-of-eight brings the sum thus issued to 3,750 pieces-of- eight, which was equivalent to the same number of rixdoUars. Two years later a new issue worth 1,000 rdl. more replaced the above,®^ but the planters began to demand twenty-five per cent, higher prices for their produce when paid in papier money. This caused the local officials to take measures for the redemp- tion of the bills by accepting them at their face value in pay- ment of debts to the Company. On March 21, 1727, PhiHp Gardelin, the factor at St. Thomas, requested the retirement and destruction of the paper money. His suggestion was ac- cepted, and after a decade of experience the Company went back to a hard money footing.®^ The financial stringency that had prompted the experiment had disappeared. The Company had avoided the disaster that befell the French and English companies of this period by refraining from issuing more paper money than it was able to absorb in the course of its business. Far more permanent as a medium of exchange were the so- ^ Bredal to Directors (September 27, 1717). B, D., 1717-W. 58 Martfddi MSS., Vol. I, 1684-1744 (July 27, 1722). 58 S. P. for SL Th. (May 11, October 12, 1724); Marifeldt MSS., Vol. VI, 1723-1739 (October 12, 1724). 88 S. P.for St Th. (October 12, 1724). 8^ Ihid. (July 30, 1726). 82 Ihid. (March 21, 1727). The half-tone engravings of Danish and colonial coins planned for this volume have had to be omitted, as the Danish museum coin collections have been stored away until the close of the war. 198 THE DANISH WEST INDIES called "‘Seeberg dollars.” The silver ware and plate of the de- faulting treasurer had been cut into convenient sizes and stamped, and some of the money thus created continued in circulation after the Danish West India and Guinea Company had passed out of existence. In spite of wars and panics, the Company had during the first third of the new century not only held St. Thomas, but had acquired and settled St. John. It had seen the rise of a class of capitalist planters, and had at the same time been able to pay its shareholders a twelve per cent, dividend in 1714 and salaries to the directors and chief participants for their service from 1696 onP In 1721 it had been able to pay an eight per cent, dividend, but no ^'Solarium froportionaliterJ' No further div- idends were declared until 1734, when the purchase of St. Croix made other arrangements necessary. With two little islands in its possession but both gradually decreasing in fertility, with a restless planter population which insisted most strenuously upon its rights, and with a trade that could scarcely supply more than one or two ships a year with cargoes, it became evident to live Danish business men that a fresh start of some sort would soon have to be made to prevent utter stagnation. The opportunity came when French interest in the affair of the Polish Succession suggested to French states- men that Danish neutrality and Danish money might be se- cured by offering to Denmark-Norway the all but abandoned island of St. Croix. The acquisition of this fertile island marks the beginning of a new era in Danish West Indian history, whic^i it will be the purpose of the succeeding chapters to describe. Manager MS., 117. CHAPTER X a?HE ACQUISITION OF ST. CBOIX The acquisition by Denmark of the island of St, Croix in 1733 may properly be viewed in the nature of a windfall. This small but precious tropical fruit fell into Denmark’s lap during one of those capricious diplomatic storms which shook the chanceries of Europe from 17£3 to 1733. During this decade an intriguing and ambitious Italian woman, Elizabeth Famese, seated on the throne of Spain as the consort of the incompetent Philip V, ‘‘was the pivot upon which the diplomacy of Europe turned.” Failing in her efforts to bring about a marriage alliance between France and Spain, Elizabeth through her minister, the Dutch adventurer, Ripperd^, managed to effect an alliance with Austria in 17^ by which among other things Spain was to secure the restoration of Gibraltar and Minorca, and Austria was to receive Spanish support for her Ostend East India Company. This reversal of alliance, which brought together two of the chief opponents of the Spanish Succession war, threatened the revival of the empire of Charles the fifth. By way of restoring the “balance of power” and averting the dangerous consequences of such a combination, the rq)resent- atives of France, England, and Prussia met at Herrmhausen where later in the same year they formed what became known as the League of Hanover. They were subsequently joined by Sweden, Denmark, and the United Provinces. It was the marriage of the young and weakly Louis XV to Marian Leszczynska, the daughter of Staoislas Leszczynski, ex-king of Poland, that had definitdy terminated Elizabeth’s schemes for a French-Spanish alliance. The inopportune death of Augustusn of Poland on February 1, 1733, left France as the chief champion of the rights of Stanislas to the Polish throne. The question of the aged, i)eace-loving Cardinal Fleury, “Must we ruin the king to aid his fathm’-in-law?” was ignored. France [1991 SCO TEE DANISH WEST INDIES consequently found herself in the difficult position of guarantor of a royal candidate who was opposed by the arms of Russia and Saxony, both of which states were actively backing the Saxon candidate, Augustus. Since Austria supported Russia and Saxony, Cardinal Fleury expected Sweden to attack her inveterate enemy, Russia, while he looked for Denmark, which controlled the entrance to the Baltic, at least to remain neutral. This would permit the French fleet to enter the Baltic and thus come to the aid of Stanislas. The negotiations of France with Denmark were carried on by Count Plelo,^ who had been sent to Copenhagen in 1728, where he had become very popular because of his knowledge of Danish history and his acquaintance with northern literary and scien- tific men.^ Plelo’s task was not an easy one, for only eight months before the death of the Polish king Denmark had con- cluded a treaty of friendship and alliance with Russia and Austria at Copenhagen, with a view towards securing a favor- able settlement of the vexing questions concerning Denmark’s relations with the duchies of Schleswig and Holstein. Under these conditions, the Danish court was obliged to move with circumspection. Austria must not be offended, for Holstein was within the Empire; Prance must not be turned away en- tirely, for there was no telling when French support might be- come very desirable for Denmark. The Danish king, Chris- tian VI, managed to draw out the negotiations until March 27, 1734, when he definitely refused the French offer of alliance; ^ but meantime the island of St. Croix had been purchased from Prance for the Danish West India and Guinea Company. This enabled France to secure needed fxmds for carrying on her war in Poland, and the Danish company to gain a new and fertile island. The ten or twelve years following the collapse of the Missis- sippi and South Sea companies were years when money went ^ Louis Kobert Hypolite de Brehan, Comte de P14lo. ® It was during P141o*s stay in Copenhagen that Ludwig {Louis) Holberg, Denmark-Norway’s great dramatist and historian, was laying the foundations of a national drama in the Danish capital. * For conditions preceding the purchase of St. Croix, see L. Koch, Christian den Sjeftes Hisilorie (Kjdbenhavn, 1886), pp. St57 et seq. THE ACQUISITION OP ST. CROIX 201 into hiding and was exceedingly difficult to coax out. A time when it was common to resort to paper money to carry on the minimum of necessary trade was not favorable to the prosperity of commercial companies. Under the successors of Governor Bredal,^ the Danish West India and Guinea Company, unable to pursue an aggressive commercial policy, gradually relin- quished its monopoly in favor of private traders and proceeded to collect as many as possible of its outstanding debts. Even in the slave trade, its one remaining source of profit, headway was very difficult. A number of poor crops, due to drought and other causes, left the planters with little surplus to invest in slaves. The East India Company too was practically at a standstill. Its low estate was ascribed mainly to the Northern War and to the plague in Copenhagen in 1711. In the course of an in- vestigation Frederick IV sent a letter under date of November 1726, to the investigating commission asking them to report upon the advisability of uniting the two India companies.® The commission was dissolved in 1728 without having achieved any tangible result.® When Christian VI came to the throne in 1780, the prospects for the India companies began to improve. As crown prince, Christian had already shown a live interest in these ventures. In the East India Company he had held the presidency and on April 12, 1782, within two years after his accession, that com- pany was reorganized as “The Royal Chartered East Indian or Asiatic Company.” ^ The West India Company's opportu- nity for rehabilitation came when the directors saw the chance to buy the island of St. Croix from Prance. In 1782, at the time that Plelo^s negotiations with the Danish * Commander Otto J. Thambsen was governor for a few months in 17S&4; Captain Frederick Moth, until 1727; and Henry Suhm, until 1733, when PhiHp Gardelin became governor (February 21). ® The committee consisted erf August Friderieh von John and Daniel Ben- jamin Weyse, with Andreas HSyer as secretaiy. Htst. Sami, og Shdier . . . H. Rordam, ed. (Kjobenhavn, 1878), 4 B. HI, pp, 144 et seq, ® E. Holm, Danmarh-Norges Historie i Fred&ridc TWa aidate ti B^gervngaaaf, pp. 439 et aeq, ^ Kay Larsen, De danah-oatinddahe Kdomera Hiatorie, I, 73. THE DANISH WEST INDIES court were under way, the directorate of the West India Com- pany consisted of Ferdinand Anthon (Count of Laurwigen), councilors of state Severin Junge and Christian Berregaard, Hans J. Soelberg, and Gregorius Elauman. The chief partic- ipants were Frederick Seckman and the mayor of Copenhagen, iVederick Hohnsted.^ When the president, Laurwigen, pre- sented his resignation to the shareholders on September 12, 1732, the latter immediately began the search for another “high minister” and instructed councilor of justice Frederick L. i)ose to soimd ‘^his High Excellency,” privy councilor Charles Adolph von Plessen in the matter.® From September until the following April (1733), von Plessen kept his own counsel, but he set to work informing himself on the state of the Company and the possibilities for its improvement. Von Plessen had conferred with Holmsted during the interval and had found that the Company was scarcely able to pay interest on its debts, and the stockholders still less able to secure returns on the capital invested. He had ‘^studied such pro- posals, ways, and means as could be suggested, not only to assist, rescue, and support the Company, but also [such as would help] to place it on a sounder basis.” Commerce to and from the West Indies, ‘‘especially in these times of general peace” was indeed according to Hohnsted’s admission entirely demoralized; St. Thomas bought its goods direct from other lands, while the Company was forced to pay the planters rdl. per hundred pounds for their sugar, and from eleven to thirteen shillings a pound for their cotton, higher prices than the planters themselves could secure in Europe, especially for the sugar. These observations, which von Plessen and the directors communicated to the shareholders at their meeting on May 8, 1733, led his High Excellency to the conclusion “that the lands of the Company are too small and its inhabitants too few and that the colonial administration is on too limited a scale and has not from the beginning been established upon a sufficiently * Manager 3f3., pp. 138 et seq. ® Comp, Prci,, 1697-17$^ (September 18, 1738). loZ&id., (May8,1734). MAP OF ST. CROIX (MS. Map, 1734 [?]. Royal Library, Copenhagsn) [Facing page 202] THE ACQUISITION OF ST. CROIX 203 well-ordered footing or upon a plan properly suited to carry on commerce successfully with these lands/’ The only way out that appeared to von Plessen lay in the possibility of the Com- pany’s securing the neighboring island of St. Croix, which was at the time in the possession of France. The suggestion thus skillfully presented by a man so distin- guished in rank and prestige must have taken the assembled stockholders by surprise, for they had received no dividends since 1721, and many of them had in fact advanced to the Com- pany in 1723 loans amounting to thirty per cent, of their stock, and received in return the Company’s notes yielding six per cent, interest.^^ The sort of confidence instilled into the minds of the Company’s “general court” as they listened to the courageous proposals of a high official who was willing to stake his reputation upon the success of his scheme, must have been comparable to that produced in a meeting of the board of di- rectors of a run-down railway in these days when a Hill or a Morgan offers to puU them out of the slough. When von Plessen appeared before the stockholders in May, 1733, the entire plan as he presented it was known only to the king, who had given it his approval, to Holmsted and himself and to “a couple of confidential friends whom Mr. Holmsted had employed,” and of course to Coimt Plelo. Although se- crecy was still enjoined, he was able to announce that Holmsted had brought the negotiations to the point where the island could be secured for 164,000 “French crowns” (ecus?). This included the advantage of an “alliance or treaty” with France, providing for “mutual obligation and neutrality in aQ cases, perpetual friendship in America regardless of the situation in Europe, and mutual defense and succor if need be against all who might attempt to disturb the American establishments, colonies, and commerce of these nations. . . Whether or not a treaty of alliance actually was contemplated in these preliminary negotiations is not mitirely dear from the minutes of the Company. It was assmned by those who had begun the negotiations that the island was well worth buying. Von Plessai estimated Comv, Prot^ 1697-173^ (May 8, 1784) HO. 204 TBOE DANISH WEST INDIES that the island when surveyed would be found to contain not fewer than 800 large plantations besides many smaller ones; that it would yield cacao, indigo, and coflPee, as well as sugar and cotton; and that the land was of such a high quality that the plantations would be worth from 500 to 1,000 rdL from the beginning. He expressed the belief that there would be no lack of purchasers, and that the 164,000 rdL needed would come back within a few years. Granted that the shareholders were willing to concede the value of the island, the questions of next greatest importance were those which dealt with the readjustment of the Company’s internal affairs on the basis of the new conditions. How were the shares iu the new investment to be distributed? What special privileges should purchasers of the new shares enjoy? How should the Company provide for the payment of the pur- chase price? To what extent should trade be free and on what branches of commerce should the Company hold the monopoly? At what price should the old shares be estimated and how shoidd holders of shares in the recently established refineiy be treated? All of these questions were suggested by von Plessen at the general assembly held on May 8, and he sketched out tentative answers, but the shareholders were not ready as yet to express their opinions on every one of them. They did however vote in favor of the purchase, and made arrangements for securing voluntary subscriptions to stock, the preference to be given to holders of the old shares. On May 18 the various groups met once more in general as- sembly, During the five-day interval, a committee of share- holders had discussed the mooted points with the directors and the chief participants,^^ and the following resolutions were presented, and received the approval of the assembly when it met on May 15. (1) The Company’s old shares, about eighty- four in number, with a par value of 1,000 rdL each, were to be i2“Coimcaars of Conference” Lars Benzon and Christian Berregaard, and Coim^ors of State Phillip Julius Bomemann and Thomas Bartholin. Councilor of Conference Severin Junge, Hans Jorgen Soelberg, and Grego- rius Elauman. ? “Chancery director” Frederidr Sechman and Frederick TTnlTtnrf.,1 THE ACQUISITION OF ST. CROEX ^ reduced to 500 rdZ. a share, by way of encouraging the buyers of shares in the Company and the refinery; (^) the value of the shares in the sugar refinery was to be raised from 600 to 1,000 rdt each, and persons investing for the first time were to have the right to buy them; (8) after June 11 the above shares were to be combined into single shares on the basis already resolved upon, and the profits from Company and refinery put into the common treasury; (4) the possessor of each old share was to advance 2,000 rdL towards the purchase of the island, and to receive in return two plantations on St. Croix, each of them 8.000 feet long and 2,000 feet wide; (5) the 2,000 rdl, was to constitute part of each full share and be combined with the 1.000 rdL in refinery, and 500 rdZ. in Company, shares; (6) it was agreed that the stockholders should have the opportunity if they desired it of selling the plantations assigned to them before the Company began disposing of its plantations; (7) those failing to fall in line were given the chance to dispose of their refinery and Company shares within eight days on pain of confiscation; (8) the outstanding debts were not to be inter- fered with; (9) the dividends on the sugar refinery and the old shares were fixed at seven per cent, beginning with June 11, 1788, but from the 2,000 rdl. investment, each was to receive such returns as the tide of fortune might bring him; and finally (10) after the shares should all have been paid up, the Company pledged itself not to force any shareholder ^to advance money to the Company against his will.^® Thus was the Danish West India and Guinea Company once more reorganized to meet the demands of a new time. Many things had happened since Governor Lorentz urged the directors to take up the activities laid down by Thonnohlen and Arff, and counseled them to push with vigor the promising Guinea trade. While the reorganization of 1697 was made chiefly with a view towards the slave-trade, that of 1788-1784 looked rather in the direction of plantation development and of the monopoly in the business of refining and distributing sugar in Denmark- Norway. Ccmp, Prat., 1$97-173^ (May IS, 1738). Mariaa&r MS, (pp. 140 et seq.) fc^ows the minutes of the Company almost literally here. 206 THE DANISH WEST INDIES The treaty with France, which was concluded at Copenhagen by Plelo and Holmsted June 15, 1733, and ratified by Louis XV just thirteen days later, provided for the purchase of St. Croix from the French by the Company but said nothing of any alliance with France.^® It arranged for the payment of 750,000 livres in French coin, half to be paid in cash on the exchange of ratifications and the remainder in eighteen months. In their general assembly of August 8, the shareholders were oflBcially notified by the directors of the consummation of the treaty, and they accepted the directors’ plans for raising the money. The time that was to be allowed to the holders of the old shares to participate in the new plan was extended, so that those within the city were allowed another fortnight, and those in the provinces, six weeks, to pay up the required sum. Holders of old shares were to be given six months’ time before they were to be required to give a final answer to the notification of the directors. Meantime the king, through privy coimcilor and director of finances Christian Louis von Plessen (brother of Charles Adolph), had offered to loan the Company such sums as might be necessary to complete the payments to France.^® The plans of the directors for taking over St. Croix from the French general ” at Martinique, for having the island surveyed and laid out into “quarters” and plantations, and for giving four instead of two plantations to those investing 2,000 rdi., were presented to the assembled shareholders, and accepted by them in their meeting of September 26, 1733.^® By way of assuring the reorganized Company a market for its West Indian cargoes, the king had issued an order on July 4, 1733, providing that private refineries should be required there- after to buy their raw sugar from the Danish islands as long as that source of supply held out.^ This move in the Company’s For full text of treaty and pleinpoufxnrSt see Host, 98 et seq. ^ Tins amounted in Danish coin to 141,926 rd/., 52 el., according to Comp, Prot., im-m4 (September 26, 1733). “ Cg~KommercekoU€giet (1735-1768) continued the commercial functions of the Board of Police and Trade (Politi-og-Kommeree- hMegiet, 1708-1731) and commanded the services of some of the most dis- tinguiahed men of the state. m THE DANISH WEST INDIES directors were able to announce that the number of shares in the Company’s "‘circulating fund,” as the new capital stock was called, had been increased from three hundred and sixty- eight to one thousand, and those in the sugar refinery from one hundred and seventeen to two hundred and fifty, —all within the space of a few days. On March £7 an edict was published abrogating all private trade with the colonies and on April 12, 1747, the old and new shareholders of the Company met to set the new scheme in operation. This reorganization had increased the resources of the Company by 816,000 rdZ., and those of the refineiy by 66,500 rdZ., or more than one hundred fifty per cent.^^ Results so highly pleasing to the stockholders of the corpora- tion were likely to be viewed in a different light by colonists who felt that this was simply another scheme to promote the interests of the Company at their expense. The center of co- lonial opposition was naturally to be found in the recently acquired and nearly virgia island of St. Crok, where plantation industry had made rapid progress and where in 1741 were to be found about three hundred Englishmen who were none too amenable to Danish law or Company regulations. A brief survey of the rise of the planting industry on St. Croix will reveal those evidences of economic strength that made the enlargement of the Company’s capital appear feasible in 1746- 1747. The first census on St. Croix was taken in 1742, on the expiration of the seven year exemption period. In that year two hundred sixty-four plantations were recorded on the books with the names of the owners, and at least two hundred forty of these were surveyed. Although the normal size of a planta- tion on St. Croix was two thousand feet in width and three thou- sand feet in length, making 6,000,000 square feet, the average size of St. Croix plantations in 1742 was slightly less than 5,000,000 square feet.^^ Only one hundred twenty of the entire number were listed as “sugar plantations,” while one hundred « Com'p, ProU 17U-6^ (April 12, 1747). H. J. 0. Stoud, letter to C.A. von Plessen, January II, 1741 (Kirkchist Sami,, 4 It 2 B., p. 56). ^ The average area was 4,913,100 square feet. THE COMPANY UNDER THE NEW CHARTER twenty-two were set down as cotton plantations.” Over one thousand nine hundred slaves/^ large and small, were credited to the island. What the nature of Danish West Indian society was during these years of struggle between England and Spain for domina- tion in the Caribbean Sea, is disclosed but meagerly in the Company’s records. This paucity of information is in part atoned for by two letters; one written in 1738 by Soren Som- mer, who appears to have been sent out from Denmark to serve as a manager on one of von Plessen’s plantations; the other by a Lutheran minister, H. J. O. Stoud, who came to the islands late in 1740. Sommer was a man of mediocre attainments, but apparently an honest observer. In a letter written at St. Thomas shortly after his arrival he comments upon the high prices of cattle, poultry, provisions, and especially of linens.^® The prices on St. Croix are higher than on St. Thomas, he explains, because goods must all come St. Thomas. He finds decent people rather scarce, and seems surprised that ‘‘white women are not expected to do anything here except drink tea and coffee, eat, make calls, play cards, and at times sew a little.’’ Nearly all the women would consider it quite beneath their dignity to go into the kitchen even to supervise it. The men are as leisurely as the women, but take their comfort in the bil- liard houses, and, he might have added, in the taverns, in which enormous quantities of intoxicants were consumed, and which the governors found to be constant sources of disorder. ^ One thousand, five hundred fiifty-nine “ capable slaves, thirty-one defect- ives or “ manquerons,” and three hundred sixteen children. ^ Sfiren Sommer’s letter to parents, d. St. Thomas, April 29, 1738. Ny, KgL Sand, 764. ^ Among the prices quoted by Sommer are the following: a bull, 60 to 70 rdl,; a cow, 30 rdl.; a sheep or goat, 4 rdl.; a goose, 1 rdl.; a turkey gobbler, 1 rdl., 3 m.; flour i)er bbl., 6-8 rdl.; salt meat, 9-12; beer, 8-10; Bourdeaux red wine, per hhd., 30 rdl.; Provencal wine, 20 rdl.; Madeira wine, per pipe, 60-100 rdl.; 3 marks was the charge for a very ordinary meal, while 1 rdl. was the usual charge per day. Linen selling in Denmark at 3 m. could bring 1-2 sldl. in St. Thomas. It must be remembered that prices were affected by England’s being at war with Spain at this time. 224 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Pew if any of the Lutheran ministers who took up the arduous duties of caring for the spiritual needs of this motley and tur- bulent population left a deeper impression upon the communi- ties which they served than Hans Jacob Ottesen Stoud.^ During his nine years of service (1740-1749) he managed to buy three cotton plantations/^ with which he was able to augment a very slender salary What was equally out of the ordinary for a minister was his election to a place on the privy council (of St. Croix.?*) where he was particularly concerned with matters appertaining to religion and education. Stoud's interest in his surroundings began with his arrival. In a letter to Charles Adolph von Plessen early in 1741, he ex- presses himself with great freedom on local conditions^ especially in St. Croix. He divided his time between his congregations on St. Croix and St. Thomas, spending four weeks alternately at each place.^ He pays his compliments to the population, which, he finds, has little respect for the laws of God or man. Concerning the three hundred or so of Englishmen on St. Croix, he says that ''they must rather be looked upon as traitors and* rebels than subjects and inhabitants of this country; for they have during my stay caused such tumult by threatening to leave the land in order to fight for their king against the Span- iards,^ that we should not have dared to remain here without securing help from St. Thomas. They dare, indeed, to threaten the lives of us Danes if they cannot get what they want, for they know that we are but a handful, sixty persons in aU, as compared to their great power. ...” Like Sommer, he notes the high prices of provisions, and sug- gests encouraging Norwegian ships to sail to the Danish islands, ^ For a brief sketch of his life, see H. F. Rordam, ** Kirkelige Forholde paa St. Croix 1741 ” {Kirhehist. Sami., 4 R. 2 B., pp. 67 et seq.). ^ They contained 6, 3, and 234 million sq. ft., respectively. In the census for 1743, he is taxed for 13 working slaves, and is credited with three who are under age. ^BKs salary at first was 220 rdl. RSrdam, “Klrkdige Forholde/’ p. 61 . ® Dining his stay at St. Thomas, he usually gave one Sunday of each month to St. John. 50 The “War of Jenkins' Ear” began in 1739. THE COMPANY UNDER THE NEW CHARTER 225 for they could bring lumber as well as provisions.^^ He finds sick people sleeping in the same room with well people, and dying from want of proper food. You high lords!’’ he exclaims in indignation, ‘‘I heard much whining and complaining while at home because of the small profit which this land yields, but may God have mercy upon you and save this country and us aU from curse and disaster because of the many souls who have so innocently lost their lives in such a fashion.” As a result of Stoud’s vigorous representations of local needs, ground for a hospital was actually bought on St. Thomas in 1743. The present hospital on that island, which stands on the site then selected, thus owes its origin to Stoud’s energetic measures. In his busy life and despite the lack of text-books, Stoud even found time to instruct a half hundred blacks in the art of reading and in the rudiments of religion. The Moravians had indeed begun their self-sacrificing labors nearly a decade before, but this appears to have been the first instance where a Danish Lutheran minister has done missionary work among the negroes on a measurable scale. Systematic missionary work with the blacks was not begun until the close of the Company’s career. While Stoud was no doubt largely right in looking on St. Croix in these early years as ‘‘very poor,” especially from the viewpoint of the men who had to work on a meager wage, people with capital could, if they were enterprising and if fortune smiled on them, rise very rapidly. During the interval from 1742 to 1745 the number of plantations on St. Croix re- mained practically stationary, for little idle land was left, but the number of slaves increased from nineteen hundred and six to twenty-eight htmdred and seventy-eight, a gain of fifty- one per cent, in three years. The outbreak of war between “ In these thnes candles cost 2 marks the pound; butter, 24 sk; 1 hen, 24 sk, at least; 1 pot of beer, 24 sls^ 1 pot of wine, 2 to 3 m.; 1 bbl. salt meat, 10 rdl. and poor at that; 1 lamb, 2 to 3 rdl,; an egg, 2 sk; a cow, 40 to 50 rdl.; a horse 100 to 150 rdl. I am not mentioning furniture and clothes and other things equally necessary which are al fearfully ^cpensive, in fact are not procurable most of the time.’* KirkehiUL Sarnl,^ 4 R. 2 B., p. 58. 226 THE DANISH WEST INDIES France and England had led Governor Schweder and his council to remit the duties on slaves imported into St. Croix, and thus encourage planters to move thither from the dis- turbed area.^^ For St. Thomas, on the other hand, the en- tire period from about 1725 up to the Company’s reorgani- zation in 1747 was one of decline, if the slave population be a reliable index. Among the early settlers of St. Croix was a Dutchman from St. Eustatius by the name of Peter Heiliger,^^ The possessions of this man and those of others of the same name, as recorded in the census lists, may be taken fairly to represent the condition of the prosperous planter during the last decade and a half of the Company’s life. In 1742 four members of the Heiliger tribe held five cotton and four sugar plantations totalling fifty million square feet in area, and commanding the labors of ninety-five slaves. Three years later the family plantations had increased by nearly sixteen million square feet, and the family store of slaves by forty-four.®® Peter Heiliger had boasted to the gov- ernor that he did not expect to retire from planting until he and his brothers had amassed four hundred slaves.®® Although this increase suggests a fairly healthy state of affairs among an arbitrarily selected group of planters, it was scarcely as large as the rate of increase for the entire island. The prices of sugar and cotton were naturally facts of the most vital concern to the life of the West Indian planter, to whom it must often have appeared that the chief business of the Com- pany was to see how far below the current West Indian price it could force the planter to sell his goods. During the depression following the Peace of Utrecht the price of sugar at St. Thomas had gradually declined from 5 rdl, per hundred pounds until finally it reached its lowest point in 1789, when it brought but « SecretrRaadett Breve , . . 17S9--J^7 (Martfddi MSS., Vol. VI). ^ Or HeyUger. He had been governor of St. Eustatius, and had apparently moved to St. Thmnas with his slaves on the outbreak of the war b^ween France and Engknd. See letter of Governor and Council to Directors, January 31, 1744 (Mar^ddi MSS., VoL VI). Land Lister for St Croix. These census lists are the sources for the statistical information in this chapter except where otherwise specified. ** Martfeldt MS8,, vol. VI, pp. ISiS et seq. THE COMPANY UNDER THE NEW CHARTER 3 to 3 rdl. The cotton market was slightly better, for whereas cotton brought 13 to 14 sh per pound in 1716, it commanded a price of 14 to 143^ sh in 1739.^^ In 1741, not long after John Heiliger and his brother had come over from St. Eustatius, the price of sugar had risen to 4-4J4 per hundred poimds. To what extent, if any, this increase was due to the outbreak of a war in Europe which involved both England and France, it is difficult to say. The increased prices secured by planters for their sugar were no doubt a chief cause in bringing about the increase in the slave population already noted. Other influences were at work which tended to draw the attention of Danish statesmen to the necessity of providing a new set of navigation laws for West Indian trade, or, indeed, of entirely reorganizing the Company. By waging war against Spain over the matter of "‘Jenkins^ Ear,"^ England had lost her chance of carrying on legally that trade with Spain which had been secured to the South Sea Company by the Asiento of 1713, With the opening of the War of the Austrian Succession, when it appeared inevitable that England would be drawn into the war against France, Danish statesmen began to incline toward the latter state. By a treaty made in 1739, England had secured from Denmark the promise of six thousand Danish troops to be provided under certain contingencies, but when it appeared that these troops were desired rather to help England hold Hanover than to assist Maria Theresa of Austria in her struggle with Frederick II of Prussia, the Danish ministers,^ who were anxious to keep out of the complications, decided to cultivate the friendship of his most Christian Majesty- On March 16, 1742, the very day following the expiration of the treaty with Eng- land, a treaty of friendship was concluded with France.®^ These events in Europe had their significance for the Danish Udtog af S^hrete-Raads ProtohoUer^ 1710-20; Udtog af . . , Breve til Direo- Uonen, 1739-^.7, MartfeLdt MSS., Vol. VI. See also Appendix E. Berckentin and Sohulin. E. Holm, Den dansh-norshe Sfais Stilling under Krigene i Europa 177t(hJt3l {Kjohenham, 1891), p. 55. This treaty marks the beginning of a policy of friendship with France which continued for twenty-three years, and was sup- ported first by Schulin and later by J. H. E. Bemstorff. lUd., p. 60. 228 THE DANISH WEST INDIES West India and Guinea Company and its islands. The mandate of June 18, 1743, gave to private traders an opportunity to carry on with the Spanish islands an illicit trade which would be quite beneath the Company’s dignity to enjoy. On July 25, 1742, there went out from San Ildefonso a royal order signed by the Spanish king’s minister, Campillo, requesting that the Porto Rico government should cease disturbing the Danes in their possession of St. Croix and St. Thomas, and should permit them to buy—^for cash—^such Porto Rico wares as they might desire.®® But the matter of the restitution of the slaves escaped to Porto Rico from St. Thomas was not clearly provided for and it re- mained the chief stumbling block in the relations between the Danes and the Spaniards.®^ A similar order was issued on May 12, 1745, with equally meager results. When in 1746 a canoe containing eight slaves belonging to Governor Colomo’s secretary, Manuel de Pando, landed on the west end of St. Thomas, the Danish authorities acted with alacrity to prevent the slaves from returning. Could the tide of fugitive slaves have been induced to turn towards St. Thomas rather than from it, Spain might have made a more serious effort to effect a settle- ment through diplomacy.®® But the Spanish authorities prob- ably knew that the Danes gained more from forbidden trade than they lost from escaped negroes. In concluding the treaty with Louis XV in 1742, Christian VI had had his eye on conditions in northern Europe rather than on those in the distant tropics. Governor Schweder and his council, in one of their first letters to the directors®^ after the 80 Vest, Dir. K. B,f 17S3-5^. This communication, which is of course only a copy, and is uncertified, was addressed to Matthias Abadia, then governor of Porto Rico. Mariager MS., p. 198. 02 Juan Joseph Colomo succeeded Abadia as governor about 1745. o*The accumulated claims of the Company against “the Spanish Nation in America” were estimated in 1745 at SS5,911 rdl. This included 104,443 rdt. for two ships lost in Honduras Bay in 1710; 81,467 rdl. for negroes stolen in 1702; 150,000 rdl. for three hundred negroes escaped from St. Thomas and St. Croix, not to mention inhabitants’ ^ps that had been seized and confiscated. Vest. Dir. K. B.. mS-5Ji, (May 11, 1745). Udtog af . . . Breve til Dvrectionen, ^.739-^7 (July 3, 1744). Mar^eldt M8S., Vol. VI. THE COMPANY UNDER THE NEW CHARTER 229 resignation of Governor Frederick Moth, called attention to the absence of any Danish-English treaties among the documents recently received from home, for ‘‘these are the ones of which we can make the best use, inasmuch as it is the English alone who have molested us of late. . . Later in the same year (1744) an English privateer, one “Dromgool,’^ entered St. Thomas harbor one night and seized and made ofif with a French sloop or small bark.®^ A Spaniard “ who had secured Danish passports and had become a naturalized Danish citizen, was seized by an English privateer and brought to Antigua, although the Danish authorities at St. Thomas insisted that he was carrying non-contraband goods. The Antigua admiralty court actually made plans for sending a commission to St. Thomas in order to investigate the Spaniard’s status. Against such an infringement of its sovereignty the St. Thomas government naturally protested.®^ These examples will serve to illustrate the unstable conditions again obtaining in the West Indies as the result of a European war. If the Company wished to be in a position to share some of those advantages which enterprising skippers had shown themselves able to secure, it clearly needed to augment and revitalize its resources.®^ Von Plessen, who had assumed the presidency of the Com- pany in 1735, remained in its service until 1749, and in March, 1750, his place was taken by Adam Gottlob Moltke. During these years von Plessen had upheld the interests of the Com- pany against many kinds of opposition, from that of the enter- prising ship-owner Bjorn to that advanced by as experienced a skipper as J. N. Holst, who in a communication to the king not only delivered a scathing arraignment of the Company’s admin- istration but volunteered his opinions on matters of justice and religion as well as commerce and colonial administration.®® Mwrtfddt MSS., Vol. VI, September 25, 1744. “Don Francisco Hinestroca Martinez.’^ See ibid. (April 28, 1745). ^ TJdtog a/ . . . Breve til DirecHonen, 1139-17 (April 28, 1745). One of tbe constant difficulties "was with soldiers and marines, who were likely rither to fall victims to the fever or to desert to a foreign ship for the sake of ike higher wages offered. See iiM. (July 3, 1744). Mar^Mt MSS., Vol. VI. ** “It is a well-known fact that all monopolies are injurious to a country in 230 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Administrative difficulties in the islands added to the cares of the directors. Christian Schweder, a lieutenant of artillery in Copenhagen, was selected in 1743 to take the place of Moth, whose stewardship was not giving satisfaction.*^^ Besides these disorders within, the Company had suffered serious losses in ships. During twelve years (1735-1746, inclusive) five of its ships, two of them with full West Indian cargoes and their entire crews, were completely lost.^^ With the adoption of the plan of union between the Company and its active commercial rivals, the opposition in Denmark was for the time being silenced. The position of distinguished leaders like von Plessen was strengthened by the fact that sev- eral of them had become actively engaged in the planting busi- ness on St. Croix; they had retained and developed plantations secured as a bonus with each share of a specified size. So the situation was hot so very different from that in the English sugar colonies where it was said in 1760 that ‘‘Many Gentlemen of the West Indies have seats in the British House of Com- mons.” The Danish West India planters did not lack ad- vocates in Danish government circles,^^ although they were certainly not “represented” there in any modern sense. The royal edict clinching the reorganized Company’s monop- oly of the trade with the West Indies was issued in March, 1747, and the news reached the West Indies during the summer. When the inhabitants learned that the king had forbidden that the highest degree, likewise all monopolistic companies except the Asiatic com- panies. ...” On what basis Holst arrived at this interesting conclusion is not dear; apparently he was expressing a generally accepted current opinion. ThoUske SamL,, No. 515 (September 11, 1746). Roy. Libr. For Bjdm, see E. Holm, Danmark og Norges Historie, III B., p. 236. Comp, Prof., im-5k (April 8, 1744). Schweder’s health broke down bdore he had been in office many months, and he was succeeded by Christian Suhm. Mariager MS., pp. 205 et seq. For earlier losses, see above, p. 152. Remarks on the Letter Addressed to Two Great Men (London, 1760), quoted in Beer, British Colonial Policy, 176^-66, p. 136. ” Among the Danish owners of St. Croix plantations in 1745 were the king (four cultivated plantations), C. A. von Plessen (six plantations), and “Com- mandeur” Captain Lovenom (six). The other original grantees had apparently sold their West Indian holdings. THE COMPANY UNDER THE NEW CHARTER 2S1 trade by private ship-owners which had been permitted by the edict of April 25, 1735 and subsequent mandates, they became well-nigh desperate. A third of a century had passed since the last delegation had been sent by Danish West Indian planters to present their case before the high and mighty lords of trade in Copenhagen. The projected restriction of their freedom to trade and to dispose of their produce seemed to strike at the very roots of their hard-earned prosperity. Schweder’s successor, Governor Christian Suhm, and his coimcil were alarmed at the opposition raised by the king’s edict, and expressed their fears for the ruin of the islands and the Company’s trade.^^ All sorts of threats of reprisals against the Company were in the air,—^flight, boycott, hoarding of the sugar on hand and in prospect, to prevent the Company’s ships from securing cargoes,—“for they insist absolutely on being masters over their own property,” wrote Suhm, “and on enjoy- ing the same sort of liberties as the French and English subj‘ects have. . . .” The report that the Danish planters were known in neighboring islands as “the Company’s negroes” would, they feared, frighten ofiE planters who might desire to move to the Danish islands.^® The thing most feared by the planters as a result of the new navigation laws was that the ships from New York and New England would cease entirely to come to the Danish islands. Not only did the vessels from New York, Providence and Boston bring provisions (floim, dried codfish, etc.), but such plantation requisites as hoops, barrel staves and bottoms, planks, shingles, ^Suhm and council to Directors (February 3, 1748). Mar^eldt MSS., Vol. VI, pp, 76 et seq. To the Company’s complaint that the price of cotton and sugar had been set at too high a figure, Gk>yemor Suhm replied that formeriy, when sugar brou^t , Copenhagen, Septmber 88, [IdJW. APPENDIX E LETTER OF CHARITE ESMIT TO ADOLPH ESMIT ^ My dearest! We thank God for the good news regarding your safe arrival in Barbados; though nine weeks old, it was very welcome to everybody. I had heard from various sources about town that letters had arrived. Madame Hoppe had kept hold of her letters three days before she had allowed me to see them. I hope all my letters have arrived, and that you will answer them before the supreme court begins its session and calls upon me for them.2 Last week Milan had the smith, Anna, Karen and the negro Sent called up before the magistrate and had two hundred questions put to them. We had no one there ; Munch is out of town on orders from the king, T., our good friend, is on Fiinen, Mickelsen and Captain Meyer have been there [at the magistrate’s?]. Milan has managed it so that Sent has taken the sacrament at the French ambassador’s. Your brother 8 wiU appeal; he has taken orders” from Sidenborg, which has cost half a hundred rixdoUars, and is to cost me an equal sum, but whence I shall get it I do not know. I am in great hopes that you will send me some [money] but I fear that you will not be able to. May God bless you on your naission, otherwise your reputa- tion here is gone. People here are all awaiting eventu«dities eagerly; I cannot write all that they say. Be sure that yoi^ 1 og Dohumenter, 1683-1689 (Rigmrhiv). This letter^ acoQtding to a statement signed by C. Heins, H. Irgens, J. Delicaet, and I- Lorentz, amyed in St. Thomas after Adolph Esmit’s enforced retvim in company with vice admiral Hoppe. It had come viA France and a Brandenhuxg bark had bronght it from St. EnstatiuB. The letter was written in English, Madame Esmit’s native tongue, but only the Danish translation is to be found in the Con^pany’a ar- chives. The paragrt^hitig is that of the translator. ^ J$g fofhaaber at i aUe wine har bekonmei, i viUe anart sm4e wig Svar derpaa fdrand dmd E6yeaU Bait Kommer og hestiUe dem Ul ndg atm j^g Eder heaver beedet. • Nicholne Esmit. See ohove, p, 4td, at aeq. The Sidenborg referred to can- not be Jacob Sidenborg, since the latter died Mardi 81, 1685, after having been gecr^aiy to, and a member ot the Board of Trade. [ 808 ] 304 APPENDIX E don’t forget to write to Luxdorph,^ Harbo,s and Baron Juell; ^ you must also write to Motli,^ Mule ^ and to those whom you wish to retain as your friends. They are all expecting it. Do not forget the directors, for we are under their thumbs. There are no news from the Red Cock and the schooner.^ I have had the matter herewith enclosed with me for six days, but I don’t think that it amounts to much. He complains of lack of money, and has told me that you were to send him five to six hundred dollars on account.^® I find that the account appears to be quite large. I hope that it will please God to bless you to the end that we may get away from this people. I believe in my good God, who has never during my life left me in need, and if he wills to spare my life, I shall not remain here in this place after your case is closed. With this post came letters from Guinea [stating] that all the people were rebellious. I believed that it was on St. Thomas. Rosenheim has been in England and has sold the Guinea fort for 4,000 rdl. I have inquired about your instructions but can get no reply. For God’s sake, be careful that you are not caught in others’ snares. You must write in quite friendly fashion to the Old Man so long as I am here. ^ Verily, I am quite melancholy, full of fear, grief and distress. I have been [so] unwell . . . that I have hardly been able to draw my breath. I have taken a purgative, and have had some blood let. Thank God, I am now somewhat better. I am unable to get any money from Madame Westervyck; she has none. The president here in Copenhagen is dead. I do * Bolle Luxdorph had held various positions in the chancery since 1669. In 1680 he became a councilor and secretary to the chancery, in 1684, a councilor of state (Etaisraad), and in 1688, first secretary. ® Perhaps the Jens Harboe who was first secretary in the war department from 1691 to 1699, and a privy councilor. ® Jens Juel, the statesman. ^ Matthias Moth, Cf. above, pp. 90-92. * Probably Christian Mule, secretary in the chancery from 1685 to 1697. ® Kreyert, Paa Tians RegensJcaha afJcortning, Jens Tolder (Rosenheim) had become a councilor of conamerce (Kommerce- road) in October, 1681, and in December had been elected to the board of shareholders in the Company. For Guinea negotiations, cf. Mariager, Historisk Efterretning, pp. 51 et seq. “ Possibly Steen Andersen Bille, “vice commandant” of the city of Copen- hagen. This was Peder Resen, the predecessor of Elans Nansen, who became “Pres- APPENDIX E 305 not know what sort of an account your cousin here in Vlissingen has given you, for he hasn’t even troubled himself to answer my letter since your departure. I beg of you to have nothing to do with him. You must not ship the cotton to England; no price can be got for it there. Deldyn seems to be your most reliable man; [he] is of the opinion that sugar and indigo are selling well in England, and he is a good man there. I haven’t much confidence in Johan Lorentz and all those who are associated with you, except [Hendrick] Irgens alone. The good God will guide you. I implore you most heartily, my dearest, to say your prayers to God and to keep him as your friend; then you need have no fear of anything men may do to you.^ And remember always the former grace, and feel obliged at all times to fear and serve him who has done such great filings for you, and always will do. For otherwise you are miserable, poor, poor. Hendriette greets you heartily. When you write, remember to write to Pauli; he is my friend. You probably know that I have signed MarcoUi’s note, and at that time [when it is due], he must have his money. You must write to Claes Sohn,i« and not forget Mr. Becker. Mr. Fadderbye is the best friend I have here. He sends you his greetings. Adieu, my dearest. That the good God may grant that we shall meet happily once more is the constant prayer of Your affectionate last wife, Charite Esmits. My sincere greetings to the good admiral. His entire family is in good health; his wife is to go to Holstein to her sister’s wedding. ident” of Copenhagen July 7, 1688. Resen had been an active member of the Council of State from 1673 to 1676, had become a councilor of justice in 1677, and councilor of state in 1684. He died June 1, 1688. Flushing. Oliger ovEolger Pauli, the first secretary of the Company in its Copenhagen ofl&ce. Claes or Clam Sohn was elected to the board of shareholders in 1679. Mar- iager, op. dt, 31. APPENDIX F BEPOBT OP BOABD OF POUCE AND XBADB TO KING FBEDEBICK IV (1716) Most mighty king. Most gracious hereditary ruler: In accordance with your Majesty’s most gracious order, we humbly present herewith our sincere opinion concerning those privileges and [other] matters [in dispute] which the delegates sent ou^ from St. Thomas in America have asked the West In- dian Company to adjudicate that their commerce and means of livelihood might be sustained, [and] which the Company considers that it can not grant them without serious invasion of Ihe rights granted it in the charter. Which points are as follows: Query 1, Whether the inhabitants of St. Thomas may be pennitted free trade with their goods, in America as well as in Europe (excepting Copenhagen and Hamburg) without the West India Company’s charter being violated by said free trade? The condition of the island ought to be observed in this con- nection; since it is such that nothing grows there except sugar, cotton-wool of which they make cotton, and millet, which is a sort of plant smaller than rice, and is used mainly by the poorest whites and by the slaves of the land. The nature of the soil and the climate is said to be such that nothing can grow there except beans and other small truck which cannot be taken to Europe; for which reason the inhabitants must necessarily procure from other places all things necessary for food as wdl as clothing, such as flour, meat, pork, butter, oil, cloths and stuffs, muslin, linen, leather, tobacco, all sorts of implements for cultivating their land, all kinds of tools for trades, and all their equipment of silver, tin, copper, iron and the like. Either the Company must bring these things to the planters in suflS- cient quantity for their daily needs, and at as reasonable a price as they can get them in that region from the English, French, and Spaniard colonies in the vicinity, or they must be allowed to seek them where they may. ^ Prom Poltti” og Commerce-^CoUegiets Memorial Bog^ Bd. 21 (1716-1720), in Copenhagen Municipal Archives (Raadstuearhiv). The paragraphing is largely that of the translator. See above, pp. 179-180. [ 306 ] APPENDIX F 307 Hitherto the Company has not demonstrated its ability to provide them the planters with suflBcient of the above-mentioned goods to satisfy their bare needs,—^to say nothing of providing a plenty,—^and even had they been able to bring in such goods, it would have been impossible, and will be stiU more so in the future, for them to bring in provisions at as low a price as they could have been secured in the neighboring colonies. For example, how will it be possible to bring in a barrel of English flour weighing 180-190 lbs. net for 6-7 rdl., a bbl. of meat weigh- ing 200 lbs. net at the same price, a barrel of pork for 10-11 rdl, when the price here is very nearly as high? Besides it will also be dfficult for the Company to furnish enough provisions to keep those lands properly supplied from one journey to an- other, and it that cannot be done, the inhabitants wfll surely die of hunger and so the Company would be the loser in the end. For unfortunately, there has not been a year since the first establishment of the Company, when it has been able to fit out and send from here more than a single ship, or at most two ships. How often, indeed, has it not happened, especially in times when these dominions or those of our neighbors have been disturbed by war, that St. Thomas has seen but a single ship every other year!^ Next must be considered the goods which must be carried thither, and especially woolen and linen goods, which the Com- pany must itself import from foreign places, and which it cannot, therefore, bring thither at the price at which they can be se- cured in the neighborhood; for either the Company must bring them in at a great loss, or St. Thomas must suffer the mis- fortune of being impoverished by paying exorbitant prices for such good^, and higher prices than are paid on all the sur- rounding islands. And if that happens, the colony will no doubt decay of itself, and the colonists move to other places where prices are more reasonable and there is greater freedom. Besides, it must be taken into consideration that some of the Company's ships on leaving here first sail to Guinea and the African coasts to fetch slaves, which are the very best and most profitable of commodities that can and must be brought to St. Thomas to be sold for the cultivation of the land and the de- velopment of the plantations. Now they are obliged to bring from here a double cargo, part of it to use for provisioning their forts and lodges in Guinea, and for purchasing slaves, and part for the West Indian colony; for which reason the ships that do * Ja hvor Hi og hesyniedig i ufreds Tiider saavd her % Bigerne aom andeneteda er det akeet at St Thmaa ikhin har 9eet eet Skib fra Compagniet kcer Andet Aar, 308 APPENDIX F not sail directly to the colonies are en route so much longer. Meantime the colony is likely to be subject to various dangers, such as violent hurricanes which harry those regions yearly, and often bring great disaster down upon them; sea-robbers, who descend upon the land to rob its inhabitants; sicknesses and other plagues which are likely to increase their misery. All these things may come upon them without their being able by post to advise the Company thereon, and when they do not learn of the colonists’ needs and sufferings until the ships arrive in the islands, they cannot bring with them the needed relief. Would it not be un-Christian, then, to forbid them the chance of making their living in the best way that they can, inasmuch as the Company itself is obliged almost every year to supply its own fortress and plantation from New York and [from] the surrounding islands, and ships practically nothing from here [Copenhagen] for their [St. Thomas’] provision? Besides this, there are other goods in the islands, not includ- ing sugar and cotton, which the Company either will not or can not ship out, such as brandy, which they make from sugar cane, beans, cassava, [sweet] potatoes, yams, etc., on which products alone many families who have no plantations live, and which are brought in from other places.® It is indeed a sin that these goods should be lost to commerce, and the families either be forced to starve or to move out. And who would suffer more therefrom than the Company itseff which would lose its surest and largest source of income,^ the poll tax. [?] The directors, to be sure, are continually harping upon their privileges and charter, which provides that no one, whoever he may be, excepting themselves alone, may trade with the col- onies, but may not the colony seek its living and trade with outsiders, when the Company itself suffers no hardship thereby, and can secure enough return cargo for its ships [?] It appears, too, that the Company has lost nothing by the free trade which the inhabitants have connived to enjoy during the past few years,® inasmuch as it has not only had full cargoes for the homeward voyages, but while its ship has been lying in the harbor [in St. Thomas], the Company has frequently disposed of two or three cargoes to other places before its own ship was loaded. The directors may say that this occurred without their knowledge or consent. But it is scarcely believable that ® Alleeniste leve, og andensteda henfores, * Intrade. ^Ved Ind Byggernes Frt Handel, som de nu i nogle Aar af deret Connivence have nydt, . . . APPENDIX F S09 their servant (the governor) should have been a party to such peculation within sight of the Company’s own ship, which was to take on all [the cargo] that there was and that it could secure and take back to the home land, without special orders or per- mission. It also appears that the Company has not suffered through the free trade thus connived at, since they permit their own plantations, which are the largest and best, to lie uncultivated, and to be used, according to report, only as grazing land for their horses and mules; so that one is .inclined to ask how the needed provisions could be obtained upon the island, except through the inhabitants enjoying free trade, which enables them to secure much white and brown sugar from the French colonies. From all of which circumstances, we can by no means con- cede that free trade with the surrounding islands should be for- bidden to the inhabitants, because they should not be subjected to privation as a result of the Company’s and colony’s pros- perity and growth, because they ought not to be treated with greater severity than the other neighboring colonies round about, since thereby the island might become desolate and other nations might avail themselves of an opportunity to seize it; because they ought not to be treated as serfs and slaves of the Company, since they are, indeed, a free people. If the Com- pany would confine its restrictions to one sort of goods or an- other, which they were not to be allowed to ship out of the is- land, and if it would, on the other hand, agree to take such produce from them at a reasonable price, and also to furnish them with aU necessaries, which it cannot possibly do, such as the free use of money,® horses, mules, etc., it wouldn’t have been so bad, and then the Company and the colony might sub- mit to certain rules, as is the case with Iceland and the Faeroe islands, but now it is making such demands that we can by no means lend it support. It is not necessary to forbid free trade with Europe, except with Hamburg, Bremen and Denmark. Query 2, Whether the Company shall have the right of pre- emption [with respect to colonial goods] in the colony and [if so] at what prices? The Company should indisputably have the right of pre- emption, as the Company’s store-house must always^ have a sufficient quantity on hand to furnish fuU cargoes for its ships on their return voyages. But it ought to be observed that such right of priority should not be abused, either by the Company or by its employees at the forts and lodges, as they have hitherto ® Ofalia Contanter. 310 APPENDIX F done to their own profit and the loss and injury of the inhab- itants, For the way the Company's employees there have man- aged and kept the inhabitants from making a living has been improper and ought not to have been tolerated. If the Company could inform the inhabitants how large a cargo it planned to take out, it should certainly furnish its pack houses with the needed quantity; but the Company should, on the other hand, either be obliged to keep up its own plantations, which are the best, or they should sell or rent them to others on such terms as would be considered reasonable on the island. For when these plantations He imcultivated the colony must make up the difference, and thus they will lack produce to sell to private traders in exchange for provisions. The chief ques- tion of dispute will be the price. The directors maintain that they should secure the produce at one-sixth less than the current market price. The colonists say, on the other hand, that this amounts to more than 16 per cent.,^ and are imable to perceive why they should sell their goods at a better rate than the market price, inasmuch as they are now paying a six per cent, duty on all outgoing goods, whereas previously they paid but four per cent., and where they formerly paid no duties on incoming goods, they now pay five per cent. Hence the Company, after it had permitted free trade ® now receives seven per cent, more of the colonists’ goods than before, and if it should now secure their goods at one-sixth off, it would then secure twenty-three per cent., and poll tax for persons over 16 and 20 years of age, whether they are free or slave, besides; which runs up to a pretty considerable total. It is our firm conviction that the inhabitants [of St. Thomas] have much reason on their side. The prospect of their losing so high a percentage of their produce is hard indeed, since ihey must not only pay a high price for their plantations, and for living on and ciiltivating the land, but also pay so large an im- port and export tax, especially [large] in view of the necessity of importing from abroad all their food and clothing. What is most to be feared is that the most substantial of the inhabitants will ptrt their heads together and dehberately raise the price of the goods which should be deHvered to the Company. But to that they have repUed that such was impossible, for the Company’s employees being in business as well as themselves, are as well informed concerning the state of the market, and ’ Crossed out in MS.: of aUe udgaaende Vahre, i sUedm de ichun Gave. 8 Siden de Conniverede udi Peres fit Bandel, APPENDIX F 311 when they so desire, they can both raise and lower (sic) the price as they please.® It is onr humble opinion that since the Company has already raised their customs duties, both for exports and imports, in which matter the colony will make no protest if those taxes shall remain unchanged where they are at present, it would be very severe, indeed, if the planters should have to dispose of their produce at such a fearful loss; for the Company has already a sufficient handicap, both through its prior right of purchase, and its customs duties. Query S is whether or not planters who leave the island should pay the sixths and tenths out of their resources which the di- rectors claim, and which they have never known of nor paid hitherto until the year 1702, when one was compelled to pay it. Besides, when anyone at present comes to the island, they re- ceive from the privy council there a promise of exemption from that tax should they desire to move away. . . . 1° For one must distinguish between Europe where such Abzug Gelder^ Nachsteuery Jus Detraciionisy and other [taxes], by what- ever name they might be called, are everywhere in use, and the regions of Africa and America, where they are not used. Here in Europe, it is Jus Gentiumy but it is by no means thus in those lands, and if it is not practicable in one place, it is hardly ad- visable to introduce it in another [near at hand] unless the object is to instil a fear of such a place in men^s minds, and prevent them from coming there to settle. The directors should con- sider that scarcely one tenth—^indeed hardly one twelfth—of the colony consists of native Danes, but most of them are Dutch, English and French, for there are reported to be not more than ten or twelve Danish families who are in a position to own slaves or plantations or to carry on trade. The rest are for- eigners. . . .11 Query 5.^^ Whether it is advisable that a number of the leading inhabitants shall have seats in the council or the courts, in matters concerning the internal affairs of the island? The directors oppose this, _since they fear the inhabitants will become too greedy for power and encroach by intrigue upon the Company's sovereignty and commercial privileges.^^* But we are of the opinion that if their rights are liimted to certain fields, ® Hvof^ter de meestfoar at rette Sig^ Vanoufi diaborate argumeiits against these taxes are here omitted. Arguments favoring various definite immunities and guaraatees along the lines above indicated conclude the repl7 to Query 3. ^ Query 4 does not appear in the MS. Intriguere $%g vdi Deres Eyendoms Eett of D&res Frajereme vdi Negoem, AtPENDIX P such as disputes arising within the islands, De Meo et Tuo and other matters in which the Company is not interested, then a number of the most intelligent and best of the inhabitants should have a place in the courts. But that concerns the [de- partment of] justice and not the Board of Trade. Yet we shall take the hberty of saying that in so far as we have been informed by the [St. Thomas] delegates, the administration of justice there should beyond doubt be recognized and placed upon a different footing; which need is indicated by their complaints concerning the probating of their estates. The remaining grievances and Gravamina have to do with fugitive slaves, the seizure of their vessels, and the like, in which matters we have nothing more to suggest than either the seeking for satisfactory adjustment through your majesty’s efforts, or reprisals, it such are possible, or to ^ve blow for blow, for which the Company is too weak. But with respect to the calling or securing of ministers, as well as freedom in the exercise of reli- gion, the directors have already promised a remedy. . . . Besides all this, some of us have, hit upon the idea that your royal majesty might himself place a commandant at the fort who might be supported from those imposts which the Company draws from the island, such as customs duties and poll tax; and the commandant could defend the inhabitants when any in- justice was done them. Besides, the inhabitants and their property would be more secure against unexpected attack, con- cerning which rumors of danger have gone out this spring, inasmuch as the fort is described as being in so poor a condition that it is to be feared that imless an improvement takes place there will be danger of losing the island. This is discussed in the communication of the [St. Thomas] deputies, art. 2, of May 20, 1716, and further in the letter of the inhabitants dated F[eb- ruary] 24, 1716, already referred to, wherein it appears that for a long time the garrison has consisted of not more than twenty- two soldiers largely incapacitated by lack of food and proper care; for in five or six months they had received no wages, so that they had become desperate [and] wished to be relieved. Besides, for this small garrison, there was not more than one month’s provisions, only ten usable pieces, two hundred good balls; no small arms to put in the hands of the inhabitants; the commandant is apparently not a man of military training, but interested more in trade than in looking out for such matters of necessity. . . lAbero exercitio Religionis, Here the members of the investigating Board failed to agree, J, B. Ernst, A. APPENDIX F 313 Your royal majesty’s most humble, dutiful and faithful servants N[iels] Slange J[ohan] B[ertram] Ernst A[ndreas] Franck C[hristian] Braem M[orten] Munck M[arkus] Johansen A[braham] Klocker Board of Police and Trade [Copenhagen] June [?], 1716. To this statement was added the following: Information con- cerning^ the cargo which the last ship sent by the Company took with it from the fatherland to St. Thomas in the West Indies. A small quantity of copper work, such as sugar kettles and the like, of which nothing has been sent thither during recent years, so that the planters have been forced to supply their needs from other sources. Silesian linen Grindstones A small quantity of Liibeck beer Iron Goods which the colony on St. Thomas needs and must pro- cure from other places: Victuals: Meat, pork, butter, etc. May be secured at far lower prices in New York than in Denmark. Goods for clothing, etc. English stufiPs, wool and silk stock- ings, woolen and silk puoser (?), camelots, English Bay (?), Hol- land linen, French “ Rouan ” [Rouen cloth], table-cloths, all kinds of linens from Flanders, Westphalia, Harlem and other places, silk and threads, flax and hemp, lace, pottery, spices, iron im- plements for the cultivation of plantations, domestic imple- ments, sail cloth. From the French islands : sugar, both white and brown, cacao, indigo, ginger, powder, money. Franck, C. Braem, and M. Johansen favoring prompt reinforcements, the others arguing that this matter was not for them, but for the King and the Company to determine, “ Of these Braem had been on the directorial board since 1697, and KLocker was to become a director in 1727. The last four or five items ‘*may be had from the English, French, and Dutch islands,” Klincker Tilestones Norwegian planks Rope Pitch and tar, though they may be secured cheaper from New York 314 APPENDIX F Prom the Spanish islands: cattle, hides and leather, cacao, Virginia tobacco, money, etc. Exceedingly necessary for sugar mills and plantations: mules from the Spaniards; horses from New York. From the English: Brazil-wood, Campeachy and other woods suitable for rasping and dyes. APPENDIX G GOVERNOR ERIK BREDAL TO DIRECTORS, 1719, 1722 i St. Thomas, May 25, 1719. . . . The English nation is the one that does us the most good, and from which we have most to fear, for truth to say, they hold our very lives in their hands; and if they, (who dis- pute our right to St. Thonias, and threaten St. John) should adopt the expedient of forbidding the sending of provisions to this place for half a year, the inhabitants would be obliged to leave the island, for their live-stock (now that the land is laid out in cotton and sugar works) would not suffice, according to my calculation, to keep them supplied with food during that time, the less so, since a butchered ox cannot be preserved here more than a couple of days on account of the heat. But although the English General Hamilton ^ might enter- tain such a plan because of the evil intentions he bears toward this land on account of the occupation of St. John, yet it is for- tunate for us that the governors of the other English colonies from which we secure provisions are not on good terms with him, and are not prepared to carry through any such plan. Be- sides, Mr. Hamilton might easily have taken the chance (con- sidering the malice he bears us) to ruin both of these islands if he had thought of it. For a long time, there have been a great many English sea-robbers here, who have always kept their posts at the English islands Spanishtown (sic) and Tortola, where they have had free passage. He would only have had to set them upon us secretly to bring about our ruin. For the amnesty that they have been granted is so liberal that they cannot even be held by the English inhabitants for murder, robbery or other misdeeds, if they but return within a certain time and receive amnesty. In that manner the French have received the greater part of Hispaniola [Haiti] from the Span- iards in the midst of peace. I do not say it because of any fear, and I do not think that anyone accuses me of that, but because of the caution which I think is needed here to prevent the seizure or plimdering of this land (especially in the cold months when sickness is general),—^which may God avert! ^ jB. any 1709 . . . 8,950 br Ltlbeck 54tSrdl. ct . . . 6,804 “ Kiel 425 “ c< . . . 2,519 wh « 348 “ << . . . 4,600 br « 281 “ « . . . 1,274 wh 179 “ <( 100 “ Aarhus <( . . . 1,169 ** 120 “ <( . . . 3,904 “ 544 “ 1710 . . . 5,000 br 377 . . . 2,302 wh a 263 “ 1711 . . . 4,000 br 312 “ Circulating * Private < Interest s Rate of < capital capital capital paid interest 1747 108,534... 83,163 7,169.. 037 1748 108,921... 62,966.... ...292,235... 8,182.. 047 1749 116,034... 75,208.... ...281,265. .. 11,921.. 062 1750 123,200... 136,831.... . . .284,684. . . 14,556.. 056 1751 128,854... 194,264.... . . .269,910. . . 16,901.. 052 1762. 129,646... 238,343.... ...262,865... 20,563. . 056 1753 129,826... 297,446. . . . ...279,172... 22,480. . 052 1764 127,734... ...280,868... 26,753.. 063 ^ From Negotie Joumaler for St Thorms. See above, pp. 221-222. * Capital Conto vedk. Comps, faate og staaende Fond. ® Capital Conto vedh. Comps, oiroulerende Fond. * Capital Conto iiedk. Comps, particvlaire Vahre og tilstaaende Gield. ® Interesse Conto. * The rate is calculated on the basis of the “fixed” and “circulating” capital, and the results are offered for what they may be worth. imi APPENDIX P THE COMPANY’S BtJSINESS IN BROWN SUGAR (An estimate based on its account books) ^ Income Outgo 2 Year Lhs. [Year] [1/68.] 1700 there came in .... 513,732 1700 waste s deducted . . 6,382 and .... 356,568 and . . 2,168 1701 .... 94,456 1701 deducted . . 2,612 209,149 1702 “ . . 6,052 1702 and 1703 .... 560;545 1703 and 1704 nothing deducted. 1704 .... 726,683 1705] 1705 .... 445,533 1706 h nothing [deducted]. 1707 J 1706 : 1707 .... 299,639 .... 723,992 1708 waste deducted . .205,869 1708 to May 4 .... 378,779 4,310,976 [4,308,976] 223,073 During the period that the late Diderich Mogensen was factor, the waste deducted is found to have amounted to about five and a quarter per cent. 1709 there came in 1,036,048 1709 1710 659,212 1710 1711 93,086 1711 no waste deducted, nor here either. 1712 1713, 321,673 654,660 1712 deducted “without money.” Total 1713 none. 96,276 During this period, during the greater part of which likewise Diderich Mogensen was factor, the deducted waste is found to have amounted to a little over three and a half per cent. 1714 1715, 1716, 273;425 1715 I deducted. 131,114 1716.! 92,603 1,064,205 During SSeberg’s term as factor, the waste is found to have amounted to a trifle more than eight and one-half per cent. 1717 694,676 1717 1718 248,861 1718 1719 513,713 1719 j- no waste deducted. 1720 617,944 1720 1721 136,620 1721 During SchnelfejTs and Jan Vlak’s terms as factor, no waste is found to have been de- ducted in the books, hence the same brown sugar from those years remains, viz., 38,846 lbs. net, which makes a tolerable waste, viz., about one and three-fourths per cent., which waste will be deducted, in so far as it will be necessary to determine the actual stock on hand. ^ Translated from Secret-Frotocollen for St. Thomas^ 1729-1730, This com- pilation was made by Philip Gardelin at the instance of the privy council of the island, about 1729. ^For aaa vidt som dend paa TV. & T. Reigning afskrecne Leccage angaaet. ® Leccage. [ 336 ] APPENDIX Q THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS IN COTTON (For factor Sdeberg’s time, according to the books) i Income Year] [1714 1715 1716 to Sept. 14 Lhs. 43,986 14,665 28,927 85,578 So he (Soeberg) may have charged against him only the stock that the books for 1713 in- dicate to have been on hand, which is 6,956 Hence there still remains on SOeberg’s cotton account 927 94,461 [Year] Outgo 1714 delivered 1715 1716 to Sept. 9 Stock delivered to Schnelfejl, ac- cording to books Lie. 38,093 15,386 27,423 1,923 82,825 The Commission has decided that Soeberg must pay, for cotton taken out of the warehouse for Crone and himself 11,636 94,461 Estimate of cotton [handled] in Schnelfejrs time. Received from SQeberg: Stock, aoc. to books 1,923 1716 from Sept. incUusive] 767 1717 until his death, Oct. 24 26,923 Also for what Sdeberg delivered in 1717, which he is credited with by the Commission, but not until now in the books 1,103 1716 nothing delivered out. 1717 to his death 6,776 Stock at Schnelfejl’s should then be 22,931 29,706 29.706 [Cotton handled] in factor Jan Vlak’s time. On hand 22.931 1717 from Sept 3,479 1718 23,096 1719 30,691 1720 26,786M 1721 to May 16-^n the 19th he was suspended—there came in 10,810 For what SCeberg had delivered in 1718 according to Jan Vlak’s own account, with which the Com- mission has credited him, but which has not been observed until now 1,686 . . . [ 1 abm which ought to be de- ducted from the capital account . . 4,670 3 24,048 1717 delivered from Oct. 10 10,991 1718 37,412 1719 26,970^ 1720 30,407 1721 to April 29 : . . 8,7603^ Delivered to Stage after being properly inventoriedT. 916 H^enoe Ylak has fallen short in his cotton account 8,69234 124,04834 ^From Seeret-ProtocoUm for St Thomas (1729-1780), compiled by Ph. Gardelm at imitaiice of St. Tliomas privy council, about 1720. APPENDIX R RETURNS ON COMPANY’S CAPITAL Gewinst og Verlies Dehet til Capital Canto saameget er udi dette Aar vide Gevyinst og Verlies Reigningen, Gud vwre mrity netto vundet som paa Capital Conto pier] Saldo hentransporteres"^ Numbers in parentheses refer to months, thus: 4= April. Year Year Rdl. 1688 1715 1689 (4-10) . 748 1716 4,506 1690 1,669 1717 12,016 1691 35,998 1718 8,698 1692 1719 12,650 1693“ 642 1720 25,095 1694-97 1721 10,222 1698 (Aug.) ] 1722 12,973 1 14,020 1723 25,036 1700 (Feb.) ] 1724 28,386 1700 14,825 1725 21,792 1701 2,904 1726 [loss—662] 1702 (2-6). . 5,948 1727 14,729 1703 29,180 1728 8,698 1704 .18,844 1729 35,386 1705 6,678 1730 15,704 1706 5,183 1731 26,449 1707 22,899 1732 28,073 1708 18,885 1733 39,760 1709 26,008 1734 2,525 1710 32,312 1735 29,610 1711 21,366 1736 15,561 1712 1737 4,782 » 1713 12,163 1738 15,165 4 1714 30,879 1739 11,932 ^ The marks and skilling are omitted here. * The Thormdhlen and Arff leases covered most of thifl period. * Because of the many expenses in connection with St. Croix.” * *‘Qewinsi til Capital Conto burde vcere mere, da der paa Negere de Robert Stewart og Comdis Marshalk ere vundne mindst 6,000 rdl., men del beregnee mor [ 338 ] APPENDIX R 339 RETURN ON COMPANY’S CAHTAL-Coniintted Year m. Year mo 8,912 1748 34.531 1741 15.991 1749 21,323 ‘ 1742 8,929 1750 19.384 1743 15,040 1751 24.684 1744 20,265 1752 20,159 1745 23,278 1753 34.211 1746 32,863 1754 ^ . 28.567 1747 29,418 * “Vedk Compi. jMrtumdaire Vahre og tihtaaenie Gidd.' APPENDIX S ST. THOMAS STATISTICS; MISCELLANEOUS (1700-1708; 1723-1754) Govemor^s Interest Value of Ammunition Salaries table account Christianfort account 1700 3,151 rdL. ... 9,750 rdZ... 4,825 rdl 1701 3,279 . . . 9^750 4,757 1702 1,085 ... 9,750 6)561 1703 4,694 . . . 9^750 6,213 1704 ... 9)750 5)900 1705 3,989 . . . 9)750 5)835 1706 2,978 ... 9,750 5)874 1707 3,082 ... 9,750 5,783 1708 ... 9)750 6)025 1723. 6,368 ....5,9511 . .. 6,620.. . . . 10,570 ....4)988 1724 10,665 . . . 10,570 4,410 1725 10,318 . , . 10)570 4)902 1726 6,026 .. 3,109.. . . . 10,570 4)605 1727 10,323 .. 347.. . . .10,570 4,924 1728 7,211 671... .. 5,876.. . . .10)570 5)651 1729 8,359 671... ..25,313.. . . . 10,570 5)780 1730 13,501 .... 671... ..10,457.. ...10)570 ....5,700 1731 9,145 .... 671... ..11,009.. ...10,570 ....5,721 1732 9,121 .... 671... ..18,208.. ...10,570 ....6,078 1733 9,389 671... .. 6,925.. . . . 10,570 6,547 1734 7,912 .... 671... .. 3,265.. ...20,385 ....4,606 1735 8,189 ..18,130.. . . .22,627 3,904 1736 8,525 .. 3,849.. 4,628 1737 10,251 .. 1,065.. 4,509 1738 9,461 ., 4,482.. 4,738 1739 10,820 .. 3,056.. 4,629 1740 9,983 .. 1,940.. . . . .4,627 1741 10,626 .. 1,911.. 4,142 1742 10,203 .. 2,421.. 4,141 1743 9,484 .. 2,137.. 3,835 1744 8,338 . . 3,303.. 3,399 1745 8,418 .. 3,471. . . . .3,997 1746 8,960 . . 4,445. . 3,982 1747 9,827 .. 7,169. . 1 ! ! 10,000 ! ! 4,537 1748 9,360 .. 8,182.. ti 3,011 1749 10,036 . .11,921. . <1 3,201 1750 15,553 . .14,556. . * * ti . . . .4,607 1751 13,482 , .16,901. . aa8im. Frederick William I, king of Prussia, 91, 94 Fredericksborg, Guinea, 21 Fredericksted, St. Croix, 235 French in West Indies, early settle- ment of, 12-13 Friia, D. N..^^col, 172, 174 Frhling, Danish lieutenant, 174 354 INDEX G Gabel, Frederick, Danish ambassador in France, (n. 55) Gardelin MSS., cited, 168, 169, 170- 174, 210 Gardelin, Philip, governor, signature (1732), 166; his mandate on slave disorders, 167; the St. John insur- rection, 168-178, •passim; 181, 182, 197, 246 (n. 4) GUded Crovm, Danish yacht, 37 Gibe, Marcus, Danish ambassador in London, 41 GMckstadt, as rival of Hamburg, 19; Guinea company formed in G., 21, 29; company absorbed into West India company, 40; M. J. Hen- riques’ petition to trade in slaves, 96 (n, 9) Governors in West Indies and Guinea, Hst of, 285-289 Great Fredericksburg, Guinea, 76, 92, 93 Greenland, 14, 19, 20 Griffenfeld. See Schumacher, Peter. Gross-FHedrichsberg. See Great Fred- ericksburg. Guadaloupe, peace of, 23; island, 12, 25, 249 Guinea coast, Swedish factory, 21, Danish factor of Gliickstadt com- pany, 21, 43, 45; new plans in 1680, 46, 71; Brandenburg African Com- pany, 73-78, 82, 83 (n. 55), 89, 91; the Arff lease, 95-97; Danish trade, Ch. Vn; 162, 165, 180, 182, 192, 220, 234, 237, 239 Gustavua I (Vasa), 18, 14 GyldenlSve, U. F., son of Christian V, 31, 76, 98 (n. 11), 103 (n. 34) Gyldensparre, Albert, statemsan, 52, 57,64 H Hamburg, 19, 29, 103; Danish de- signs on, 24, 191, 306, 809 Hamburg-American Line, 252-260 Hamilton, Alexander, on hurricane of 1772, 6-7, 249 Hamlin, Jean, French pirate, 53-55, 57 Hans, Danish king, 14 Hanseatic League, 13, 14, 19 Hansen, Claus, lieutenant and gover- nor, 11$, 117, 181-185 Hansen, Jens, St. Croix governor, 236 (n. 87), 237 Haring, C. H., cited, 25, 26, 111 Hay, John, American secretary of state, 259 Heiliger, Peter, 226, 235, 236 (n, 86) Heins, Christopher, St. Thomas lieu- tenant and governor ad interim, 60, 61, 64; signature (1687), 68, 69. 70, 80, 182 Helsingborg, Sweden, 15 Helsingbr. See Elsinore. Hill, Thomas, 56 Hoesz, Sivert, 116 Holm, Edvard, cited, '201, 227, 230, 238, 239 Holmsted, Frederidc, 153, 202-207, passim, 211 Holst, Edward, director of Company, 52, 57 Holst, J, N., Danish skipper, 229 Holstein, Danish duchy, 250, 258 Holten, Joachim von, governor, 84 (n. 59), 101, 106, 181, 183-185 Honduras coast, 26, 161 Hoppe, Iver, vice-admiral, 66-68, 101 Horn, John, Company's St. Thomas bookkeeper, 172, 173, 175 Hombech, Dr., meteorological ob- servations, 5 Hbst, George, goveamor ad interim, 240; work cited, 4, 119, 121, 163» 167, 175, 176, 177, 206, 211, 213, 214, 222, 236, 240 Houtcoper, governor of St. Eustatius, 60 Houtman, Comelis, Dutch explorer, 10 INDEX S55 Htibner, Martin^ authority on inter- national law, 243 Hudson’s Bay, 17; the Company, 32- 34 Huguenots, refugees from French islands, 69, ISO Humanism in Denmark, 14, 15 Hurricanes, described, 5-7 I Iceland, 1, 18, 29, 309 Indians, 21, 23; on St. Thomas, 33, 55, 122 Indigo, 123, 180, 194, 204 Isert, P. F., on slave trader’s voyage, 141-143 Iversen, George, first governor of St. Thomas, Chapter I, passim; 52, 56, 57 J Jackson, D. H., negro editor, 257 Jamaica, 23, 25, 26, 46-49. 188, 164 Jenkins’ Ear, War of, 224 (n. 50), 227 Johnson, A., President, 258, 259 Johnson, Willis F., cited, 256 Juel, Jens, minister of state, 31, 45, 62, 76, 90-92, 103, 108, 146, 179, 304 K Kalmar, Union of, 18, 14 Keller, A. G„ cited, 176, 208 Kidd, William, English captain, 113- 118 Kommeroe-kollegiet. See Board of Trade. Kdnigsberg, 136 L Labat, Phre, dted, 91 (n. 97). 105 Ld>or XJnioin, St. Croix newspaper, 257 Lang, Major, observations of rainfall, 5 Lansing, Kobert, American secretary of state, 261 Laporte, Brandenburg offimal, 79, 81, 8^8 Larsen, Kay, cited, 11, 32, 201 (n. 7) Lassen, Jens, Danish merchant, 21 (n. 44) Laurentsen. See Lorentzen. Laurvigen, Coimt (Ferdinand An- thon), 202 Leers, J. M., merchant, 120 Legendre {le hlond), French privateer, 89, 107 Lente, Christian, 51, 67 Lerke, Jacob, 120, 146, 147, 188 Lerke (JLerche) Peter P., director of Company, 31, 32, 35 Leszczynska, Maria, 199 Leszczynski, Stanislas, 173, 199 Leyenclo, Anders, Swedish ambassa- dor, report on St. Thomas, 67, 73, 95 Lincoln administration and St. Thomas, 257 Linschoten, Jan van, 10 Longueville. French commander, 174, 175 Lorentzen, George, 106 Lorentz, John, St. Thomas governor, 48, 58. 69, 70, 81-91, 97, 99-104; signature (1685), 105; Chapter V, 124, 144, 164, 181-183, 189, 205, 303 (n. 1), 305 Louis XIV, King of France, 23, 24, 27, 42, 44, 45; Louis XV, 199, 206, 228 Ltibeck, peace of (1629), 19, 31 Lund, treaty of (1679), 45 Lutheran church in islands, 122, 159, 210, 214, 223, 224 Lynch, Thomas, governor of Jamaica, 47,53 M Maddox, English captain, 172 Madrid, treaty of (1670), 26, 47 Magens, Theodore {Dietrich)^ gover- nor, 161 (n. 13), 185 (n. 18), 189, 192 Mahan, A. T., historian, 262 Malabar (India), 28 Maria Theresa, Empress-queen, 227 Martfeldt, C., cited, 4, 150, 169, 164- 356 INDEX 166, 168, 169. 171. 172, 174-176, 181, 183-185, 187, 191, 194, 197, 216-218, 226-231, 246, 247 Martmique, 12. 25, 27, 40, 107, 112, 172, 173, 175, 192, 206, 208, 210 Meyer, George, Danish captain, 58, 62, 63, 95, 96 Meyer, Herman, director of Com- pany, 52 Mikkelson, M., royal commissioner, 63-65, 97, 98 Milan, Gabriel, St. Thomas governor, 57-70, 'passim; signature (1686), 59, 75. 81, 97, 105, 124 Mims, S. L., cited, 20, 40, 42, 44 Moltke, A. G., Danish minister, 229, 238 Money, values of, 34 (n. 9), paper issues, 151, 197; Spanish issues, 196 Montserrat, 12, 24, 53, 248 (n. 6) Moravian missionaries, 34 (n. 8), 159 Morgan, Henry, buccaneer, 26, 73 Moth, Frederick, governor, 130, 131, 170, 185, 197, 208; signature (1732), 209; 210, 211, 229, 230 Moth, Mathias, 90-92, 103, 108, 146, 179, 304 Moy, Daniel, St, Thomas captain, 63 MilUer, Henry, 20 Munk, Jens, 17 Munster, treaty of (1648), 25 N Nansen, Hans, 29, 31, 52 Nantes, Edict of, 69 Napoleon HI, Emperor of French, opposed transfer of St. Croix, 258 Negroes in islands, life of, 123-25, Ch. VHI, 218, 219 Netherlands, United (Protestant Netherlands), 19, 23, 24, 29, 44 Nevell, John, English vice-admiral, 112 Nevis, 12, 53, 56. 60 New Amsterdam, 24 New England, 188, 193. 195, 231, 233, 234 Nevrton, A. P., cited, 26 (n. 53) New York, 195, 196, 231, 233, 234, 308 Nimeguen, treaties of (1678-79), 71, 73 Northern War, 188, 201 Norway, smuggling in, 220, 238 Nystadt, treaty of (1721), 150 0 Ostend East India Company, 199 Ottingen, Theodore. 176, 177, 211 (n. 40) Oxenstieraa, Axel, Swedish states- man, 19 Oxholm, P. L., cited, 124, 254 P Panama, Spanish American city, 26 Panama Canal, 256 Pannet, P, J., cited, 169 (n. 37), 171; present at St. Croix (1734), 211, 232 (n. 77) Paper money. See Money, Passage, island, 107 Paterson. William, Scotch financier, 98, 119 Pauli, Oliver, Company's secretary, 41, 49 (n. 8). 305 Pedersen, Christian, friend of Chris- tian n, 15 Pedy, John, 74-75 Pelt, A.,‘ sugar refiner, 136, 207, 219 Penn-Venables expedition, 23 Perry, H. A., cited, 92 Peterson, Harding, Guinea governor, 96 Petit Goave, 48. 97, 110-112, 114 Petkum, Simon, president of Board of Trade (1668), 23, 27 Philip H, king of Spain, 9, 15 Pies de Indies, described, 141 Piracy in West Indies, 113-119, passim Plan of 1747. See Convention. INDEX 357 Plant resources of islands, 7-8 Plelo, L* R. H. de B., 200, 201. 203, 206 Plessen, C. A. von, 202-206, 210, 211, 213, 222 (n. 41), 223, 224, 229, 230 Plessen, C. L. von, 206 Pointis, Jean-Bemard Desjeans, baron de, 111, 112 Polish Succession, War of, 173, 198- 200 Poll taxes. Sec Taxation. Population of St. Thomas, character and number, 37, 39, 121, 122, 247, 252, 253; of St. Croix (1754), 235, 248, 249, 253 Porto Bello, 11, 26, 112 Porto Rico, 3, 4, 25, 41, 124, 160, 161, 181, 186, 188, 190-192, 208, 228, 246, 251, 252, 316 Portuguese, monopoly in East Indies broken by Dutch, 10; slave trade, 40, 137 Prices of plantation produce, 133, 232, 233 Privateering, 109-119, passim Providence, Bahamas, 316 Providence, Rhode Island, 231 Provisions, list of, 195 Provisions, plantations for growing, 158 Purchase of Danish islands by United States, 261; proposals for, 257-260 Q Quidah Merchant See Kidd. R Raaslbff, General, Danish minister, 257 Rainfall, 5 Randolph, Edward, 117 Raule, Benjamin, Br^denburg states- man, 71; 71-94, passim Rdbolledo, Count, Spanish ambas- sador, 21 (n. 44) Reedtz, George (Jorgen), Danish envoye at Madrid, 41 Reformed faith. See Calvinist. Religion, freedom of (on St. Thomas), 76 Revolution, American, 249, 250 Rivera, Porto Rico governor, 192 (n. 42) Roepstorff, Danish governor, 244 Rbrdam, H., cited, 201, 224 Rosenkrantz, Herman, 17 Royal African Company (British), 147 (n. 27) Rogal Danish American Gazette, 248, 249 Rule of 1756, 243 Rum, distillation of, 125; products, 163 Ryswick, Peace of (1697), 112, 145 S Saba (Sabath), 12, 69, 109, 247 (n. 6) St. Christopher (St. Kitts), 12, 24, 27, 53, 69, 85, 119, 172, 208, 248 (n. 6), 316 St. Croix, 2, 3, 5-8, 12, 47, 144, 155, 173, 177, 178; acquisition of, by Denmark, Chap. X; 213, 215-227, 228, 230, 233, 234, 235-237, 239, 244-263, passim St. Croix under the French, 42, 69, 75, 198, 208 St. Eustatius, 12, 53 (n. 21), 60, 69, 80, 84, 109, 161 (n. 11) 187, 192, 226 (n. 54), 227, 247 (n. 6) St. John, slave insurrection on, 168- 178, 246 St. John, 2-4, 8, 38, 80, 107, 127-130, 138, 134, 151, 163, 165, 166, 168- 178, 193, 198, 207, 213, 216, 236, 246-248, 250. 258, 315, 316 St. Kitts. See St. Christopher. St, Lucia, 317 St. Martin, 248 (n.) St. Peter, island in West Indies, 80 S58 INDEX St. Thomas, area, 2; description, 3, 4; climate, 4~7; plant resources, 8; first attempts at settlement, 28, 29; preparations for settlement, 34, 35; settlement begun, 37-44; guber- natorial troubles, 45-68; Branden- burgers at St. Thomas, 71-94; Thombhlen lease, 95, 98-104; Lorentaj’s governorship, 105-120; plantations, 121-127, 130-133; slave trade at St. Th., 137-155; life of slaves in St. Th.. 157-167; St. Th. planters and the Company, Ch. IX; prices of goods, 223-227; fugitive slaves, 228; privateers (after 1740), 229; trading privileges, 233; separa- tion from St. Croix government, 236; population (1765), 247; free trade edict (1764), 250; shipping in 19th century, 252-253; population (1773-1901), 253; sugar planting (1796-1851), 254-255; purchase plans of U. S., 257-261 St. Vincent, 23, 75 San Domingo, 12, 13, 25, 111, 208, See also Petit Goave. Santa Lucia, 252, 317 Scelle, G., cited, 145 Schimmelmann, Ernest, 247 Schleswig, Danish duchy, 85, 250, 258 Schmidt, Erik Nielsen, 29, 37 Schmidt, J. C., cited, 158-160; 159 (n.8) Schopen, J. W., planter delegate, 232, 239, 240 Schumacher, Peter, Count Griffen- feld, 31, 57 Schweder, Christian, governor, 226, 228, 230, 231 Scott, W. B., cited, 148 Seeberg, Christian, 181, 185, 196, 198 Sehested, C., 190 Seward, W H., American secretary of state, 257-260 Shareholders of Company, 292-293, 342-849 Sharp, Bartholomew, buccaneer, 49 (n. 8) Shipping in Danish islands, 249-253 Slagelse, K. J., 30, 37, 39 Slave insurrection, St. John (1733), 168-178; St. Croix (1759), 246-247 Slaves, runaways, 190, 191, 228, 246 Slave trade, 21, 43, 45, 73-79, 95-97, 131, 135, Chapter VII, 195, 218, 221, 234, 239, 247, 253, 320-326. See also Guinea Coast, Glttckstadt, Christiansborg, Great Fredericks- ‘ burg, Asiento. Sleswig. See Schleswig. Smith, James, connection with Darien Company, 119 (n. 50), 189 Smith, Peter, St. Thomas merchant, 113, 115, 123, 189 Soedtmann, J. R., St. John official, 168 Sommer, Soren, 223, 224 Sound, control of the, 15, 19, 20 Spain, her monopoly of America con- tested, 10-13; protest against Danes on St. Thomas, 41; report of projected attack, 110; Danish claims against, 228 Spaniards in America, 75, 147, 186, 217, 223, 288, 233, 306, 815-317 Spanish Succession, War of, 126, 131, 149, 150, 160, 165, 181, 184, 185, 190, 192, 195, 199 Spice Islands, 11 Stanislas Leszcuynski. See Leszczyn- ski. Stapleton, William, British Leeward Islands governor, 41, 47, 50, 51-57, 60, 127 Stettin, 136 Stoud, H. J. 0., Lutheran minister, 223-225 Sugar, 80, 43, 123-125; Chapter VI, passim; 180, 194, 195, 204, 206, 207, 213, 216-220, 222, 226, 283, 238, 245, 249. 253-256; mills, 254-255; r^ery, 186, 205-207, 219, m, 237, 238, 328-331, 336 . INDEX S59 SuliiQ, Christian, governor, 230 (n. 70) 231, 236 (n. 87) Suhm, Henry, governor, 163, 170, 182 Sumner, Charles, U. S. Senator, 259 Sunderland, Earl of, 52, 57 Surinam, 24 Swedish mbassador. Leyenclo. Sweden, in Union of Kalmar, 13; in- dependent under Gustavas I, 14; gains the three provinces, 20; se- cures factory on Guinea coast of Africa, 21, 23, 24, 27, 28, 44; peace with Denmark (1678), 45; threat- ened attack on St. Thomas, 150; trade in sugar, 136 T Tallard, English captain, 171 Taxation of planters, 123» 126, 127, 131 Taxes on Danish islands, 186-190, 194, 215-218, 236, 237 Temple, Sir 'William, quoted, 24 Thambsen, 0. J., governor, 182, 183, 184 Theaters on St. Croix, 248 ThormOhlen, George, Bergen mer- chant, 82, 89, 95, 98-104, passim, 205 Tobacco, 1, so, 43, 69, 79 (n. 37), 123, 124, 134, 294 Tobago, 12, 80, 88 Tortola, 3, 38, 50, 90, 171, 172 (n. 49), 247 (n* 6) Tortuga, 12, 25 Tranquebar, East India Company factory, 11, 17 Trinidad, 12 Triple Alliance (1668), 24 Trompsuse, JLa, 53-55 ' U Unicorn, Jens Munk’s ship, 17 Utrecht, Peace of (1713), 196, 226 V Van Belle, Peter, Brandenburg factor, 108 (n. 8), 115, 116, 118, 119 Vera Cruz, 11 Versailles, Peace of (1783), 251 Vervins, treaty of (1598), 25 Vessup, William, 171 Vieques, island. See Crab. Virginia, 19, 40, 124, 317 von Frock, Baron, C. L. B., Danish governor, 245, 246 (n. 3) W West India trade, beginnings under Frederick HI, 20; other early voy- ages, 28-30 Weyse family, sugar refiners, 136, 207 (n. 21), 219 Wheler, Charles, British Leeward Islands governor, 41 Willom, John de, 17, 18, 19 (n. 37) Windt, J. J. de, St. Thomas planter, 189 Y Yeaman, G. H., 258, 259 Yucatan, 26 (n. 55), 41, 47 Z Zahle (Danish) ministry, 261 Zeeland, province of Netherlands, 1Q> 72, 83, 108 Zinck, A<, St. Thomas delegate (1706), 186-188 Zytsema, A., St. Thomas delegate (1706), 186-188 Printed in the United States of America. AMERICAN HIGHWAYS AND BYWAYS SERIES By CLIFTON JOHNSON Each illustrated, l^mo, $1.60 Highways and Byways of New England “Mr. Johnson has a rare gift for getting the most intimate view of things.' He knows history, but he do^nH bore the reader with too much of it. He has a keen appreciation of natural beauty and knows how to describe it without affectation. What is perhaps most imj^rtant, he knows people, and is able to discern whatever in them is most characteristic and vital, and to make his readers understand it. Therefore this book is worth reading, even by people who do but little traveling.'^—TAe Living Age (Boston). Highways and Byways of the Mississippi Valley “Mr. Johnson has written no book of more interest to Americans than this one.''—New York Times. “From cover to cover the book is both entertaining and in- structive.'^—Brooftit/n Eagle. Highways and Bywaj« (rf the South “Mr. Johnson gives more illuminative descriptions of homely details in life than any other modern writer."—Town and Country. Highways and Byways of the Pacific G)ast “A more readable booK of travel is not often published ... he has described the rurally picturesque and typical and has avoided the urbanly conventional and uninteresting."—The Dial. Highways and B3^ays of the Rocky Mountains “ It is a book that is as mteresting as it is vaJuable, as picturesque as it is typical and as pleasurable as it is sincere."—Boston Times. “It is a book for those planning pleasure tours and contains many valuable suggestions for travelers."—New York Herald. Highways and Byways of the Great Lakes “ Vacation travel^s, whose thoughts turn to opr inland se^ will find information and inspiration in this volume.”— V ewYork World. “A real picture of the country covered and its people."—Boston Globe. Highways and B3rways from the St. Lawrence to Virmnia “Mr.^ohnson has done much to inspre Americpis to see Amer- ica first: he writes an entertaining stoiry and he wdces beautiful pictures that obviously are selected by one who knows a good sub- ject whaa he sees it."—Boston Transcript. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY finblishera 6i^6 Fifth Aveaue New Yoifc Through the Grand Canyon from Wyo- ming to Mexico Bt E. L. KOLB, with an introduction by OWEN WISTER New edition, Col. III., 8vo, $2.25 “The Kolb brothers are by no means the first adventurers to complete the voyage through the Grand Canyon of the Colorado from Wyoming to Mexico, but none of their predecessors suc- ceeded in m aking so fine a series of photographs of this scenic wonder of the Southwest . . . there is a new interest in this fresh story as told by the latest explorers, an interest which is greatly heightened by the remarkably vivid photographs.” Review of Reviews. “Straightforward and entertaining ... an admirable piece of writing in its unassuming simplicity, lit up by good nature and enthusiasm ... a capital book for boys to read.” Inde- pendent. “Mr. Kolb writes his book exactly as it should be written, with an admirable mixture of incident, adventure, reflection, and personality . . . could be read with delight by a boy and with an equal delight by the boy’s father ... a stirring record of a remarkable achievement and told with a simplicity and modesty which only serve,to enhance the quality of suspense, it is a work calculated to fiire the imagination and to set the pulses beating more quickly.” Argomvi. “A story of absorbing interest . . . conveys vivid impres- sions of the region, its natural history and prehistoric life and contains an excellent description of some of the remarkable and curious pictographs found in Glen Canyon.” Boston Daily Advertiser. “One of the most exhilarating books of adventure produced in this country . . . the most complete pictorial survey of the Grand Canyon region that has yet been brought together.” Los Angeles Graphic. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 04r-66 Fifth Aveaue New Yodc The Philippines, Past and Present By dean C. WORCESTER Secretary of the Interior, Philippine Insular Government, 1901-1913 Author of “The Philippine Islands and Thek People,” etc. New revised edition, 2 volumes, Dec. Clo., lU., 8vo, $6.00 There is no greater authority on these insular possessions than Mr. Worcester who, as early as 1887, and again in 1890 was a prominent member of scientific expeditions to the Islands; from 1899 to 1901 was a memloer of the U. S. Philippine Commission; since 1901 has been Secretary of the Interior to the Insular Government, ^d who in 1899 published “The Philippine Is- lands and Their People,” a record of personal observation and experience, with a short summary of the more important facts in the history of the archipelago, which has ever since been the acknowledged standard work of information concerning the Islands. In Mr. Worcester’s valuable new work, past and present conditions are minutely reviewed with regard for strict accuracy of statement. The author’s position giving him free access to all the government records, much of the information thus made available has never been before made public. With practically unlimited material on which to draw in the way of illustrations, very fine and rare photographs intimately related with the text emphasize the lessons which they are respectively intended to teach. The result is a work of the greatest importance as well as of the greatest interest to all concerned as to the future possibilities of the Philippines and as to the course the United States Govern- ment should pursue in the interest of the several peoples of the Islands. “Just the kind of book that is needed .”—The New York Tribune. “It not only satisfies an immediate want, but it has a per- manent value as a record of American achievement.”—The San Francisco Chronicle. “It is not gomg too far to say that ‘The Philippines, Past and Present’ is one of the most important books of the decade. A clear and complete recital.”—The Philadelphia Enqmrer. “Of real value, and deserves to be widely read.”—The BosUm Globe. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Ptiblisliacs 64^ Fifth Avenue New York The Cruise of the SnaA By jack LONDON Author of The Call of the Wild^^ The Sea Wolf The Scarlet Plague^ etc Illustrated with over 150 halftones from photographs by the author and a frohtis^iecc in colors Decorated cloth 8vo 00 Deserves an honorable place m the literature of travel and adventure ^—OuUook Nowhere is it without that insistent touch of personality that makes everything from Mr London s pen irresistible — Boston Transcript ^‘InMr London s most rapid and Vivid style ^—N Y World A delight ^—Philadelphia Ledger The Early History of Cuba, 1 492-1 586 By IRENE A WRIGHT Author of Cuba This book represents a vast amount of research It is not often that a pohtical history such as this, covenng nearly one hundred years is wntten almost wholly from original sources Mies Wnght however, who has for many years been a resident of Cuba and Spain, has had unusual facilities for discovermg and employing in her narrative hitherto unused and unknown documents and manuscripts Her work is almost the first senous one from a histoncal ppmt of view to deal with this penod THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 61-68 Fiftii Aveaue New York