i:
r -
~T
'm\
•&*%
NUS
CORPORATION
A Halliburton Company
OO1 
OOC>1
*64409*
64409
02-9102-11-HR
REV. NO. 1
FINAL DRAFT
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION
TUTU WELLFIELD
ST. THOMAS, USVI
VOLUME 1 OF 5
PREPARED UNDER
TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-9102-11
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346
FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
AUGUST 28,1991
NUS CORPORATION
SUPERFUND DIVISION
SUBMITTED BY: 
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY:
RICHARD L FEINBERG 
I 
RONALD M. NAMAN
PROJECT MANAGER 
, / 
FIT OFFICE MANAGER
OO1 
0002
SECTION I: SITE SUMMARY
TUT 
001 
O003
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
SITE SUMMARY
Tutu Wellfield is located in a mountainous semi-rural area of eastern central St. Thomas, U.S.V.I..
The site, is an area of groundwater contamination with known and unknown sources. The area of confirmed
groundwater contamination, verified in 1990 by Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) sample analysis, covers
approximately 17 acres. However, contamination may be spread over an approximate 50 acres in the area.
The Tutu section of Anna's Retreat is located in the Upper Turpentine Run Basin. An intermittent stream
leading to Turpentine Run is within a few hundred feet to the southwest. Turpentine Run is also intermittent
and drains southward approximately 2.8 miles (when flowing) to Mangrove Lagoon which is hydraulically
connected to the Caribbean Sea. The Atlantic Ocean lies approximately 1 mile to the north.
In July 1987, a strong petroleum odor was detected in one of the several major commercially owned
supply wells (the Tillet Well), which a provide public drinking water source throughout the island. The Virgin
Island Department of Planning and Natural Resources (VIDPNR) requested assistance from the U.S. EPA in
sampling this well and others in the area. From July through September in 1987 the U.S. EPA Technical
Assistance Team (TAT), Roy F. West on, Inc. sampled over 100 hundred wells and cisterns. Analysis
performed with photovac gas chromatograph instrumentation detected volatile and chlorinated hydrocarbons
such as benzene, toluene, 1,2-trans dichloroethylene, trichloroethylene (TCE), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
in several wells, including public supply, institutional, commercial, and domestic wells. Samples were also
sent to US EPA's Region 2 Environmental Services Laboratory for Total Organic Carbon which subsequently
detected contamination in wells and also in the sample blank. Some of these compounds were detected
above and below the maximum permissible concentration levels, 10-Day Health Advisory Levels, and
Removal Action Levels. Thirteen commercial (including the Tillet Well) and five private wells were
subsequently closed down and alternative plans including trucking water to the area began. As of January
6, 1988, VIDPNR has issued 10 orders to close down 16 wells.
In July 1987, VIDPNR issued an Administrative Order on Consent to Tutu Texaco Service Station
to investigate the release of petroleum from their underground storage tanks (USTs). In addition, Texaco was
ordered to stop all work relative to disturbing the potentially contaminated area. In early August 1987, this
Order was amended to include specific details required of the investigation (e.g. Sampling/Contingency Plan
prior to tank excavation). In 1987, Tutu Esso Car Care Center was also issued a similar Administrative Order.
In August 1987, nine Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) were identified by the U.S. EPA. In addition to
Tutu Texaco and Tutu Esso, one other gasoline service station (Rodriguez Auto Parts), two vehicle
maintenance repair stations (Ramsay Motor Co. and Consolidated Auto Parts/Gasset Motors), two territorial
government agencies (Virgin Island Housing Authority and Department of Education/LAGA Building), a dry
cleaner (O'Henry Cleaners), and a silk screening operation (Jim Tillet, Inc./Tillet Gardens) were identified as
PRPs. Potential sources at these locations include petroleum and waste oil USTs, drum storage areas,
contaminated catch basins, oil separators, floor drains, a sump holding tank, a leaching pit, above ground
tanks, and an evaporation pit. Potential wastes which may have been disposed of include solvent based auto
flushes, treatments, degreasers, cleaners, and lubricants; freon; antifreeze; kerosene; hydraulic fluid; waste
oils; spent PCE waste and filters; dry cleaning fluids such as 2-butoxyethanol, hexylene glycol, and dye
stripper; ammonium hydroxide; and mineral spirits. In September 1987, CERCLA funds were approved for
the removal response action at the site.
In September 1988, soil samples from O'Henry Cleaners, Ramsay Motor Co., Gasset Motors, Tillet
Gardens, and Tutu Texaco were collected and analyzed. Volatile organics such as benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) were detected in soils on the properties of Ramsay, Gasset, Tillet, and
Tutu Texaco. Soil samples were collected from a tank excavation at Tutu Texaco. Volatile organics including
PCE were detected in the soils at O'Henry Cleaners. In August 1987 and June 1989, waste oil samples were
collected from several storage and collection vessels including USTs at Ramsay Motor Co., Tutu Texaco,
and Tutu Esso. Analysis of these samples detected BTEX; and other volatiles such as PCE and 1,1,1-
trichloroethane. Additional soil samples were collected from soil piles and pit excavations at Tutu Texaco
TUT 
OO1
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
and Tutu Esso; and surface soils from the properties of O'Henry Cleaners, LAG A Building, and Ramsay Motor
Co.. Volatiles such as 1,1,1 -trichloroethane, 1,2-trans dichloroethylene, BTEX, TCE, and PCE were detected.
Semivolatiles such as phenols, polyaromatic hydrocarbons and other semivolatiles were also detected at a
few of these properties.
After the initial monitoring well sampling in 1987, quarterly monitoring continued on 24 of the 100
wells. In addition to TAT Photovac gas chromatograph analysis between September 1987 and September
1990, confirmation analysis was perform by the U.S. EPA Region 2, Environmental Services Division (ESDI
Laboratory and PRP solicited laboratories in the Contract Laboratory Program. Analyses of samples from
these wells consistently detected 1,2-trans dichloroethy lene, BTEX, TCE, and PCE. Tert-butylmethylether
was detected in many wells during a the first Target Compound List sampling event conducted in October
of 1987. These compounds were detected above and below their Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs).
In addition, selenium was detected above the MCL. In September 1990, CLP analysis of 24 wells detected
observed releases cadmium, TCE, PCE, and 1,2 dichloroethylene in nine wells. Cadmium and TCE were
detected above their MCLs. The wells sampled are drilled into bedrock as it is the most productive aquifer
in the area. The bedrock aquifer is the aquifer of concern. The groundwater contamination has migrated to
the bedrock aquifer. Alluvial material overlies and is hydraulically connected to the bedrock. The ambient
groundwater flow in this area is generally to the south. However, flow may be slightly different in response
to pumping.
On January 6, 1988, an US EPA Action Memorandum to authorize funds for preliminary assessment
and removal actions at the site was issued. In September 1988, USEPA an Action Memorandum (dated
August 22, 1988) to continue authorization of removal activities at the site was issued. In June 1989,
O'Henry Cleaners, Tutu Esso, and Tutu Texaco were issued an Administrative Order on Consent by the EPA
for the investigation of the area. All parties claimed to be not guilty, however agreed to investigate the
extent of plume contamination. In March 1990, the EPA issued another Administrative Order on Consent
stating that O'Henry Cleaners, Tutu Esso, and Tutu Texaco should pay for water connections for three
residences. On March 22, 1990, an Administrative Order was issued to ESSO Standard Oil S.A., Limited
Texaco Caribbean, Inc., and L'Henri, Inc., alias O'Henry Cleaners by the US EPA. The Order stated that these
PRPs shall take actions (described in the Order)" to abate the release or threat of release".
The site is defined as an area of groundwater contamination with known and unknown sources
located within 1 mile of each other. The waste source quantity is also unknown. The contaminants detected
in groundwater match those detected in soils and waste oils at the suspected and known PRP properties
listed above, however definitive documentation of attribution to those sources is lacking. Tutu Esso and Tutu
Texaco are gasoline stations and thereby might present constituents excluded from CERCLA remediation.
However, while constituents detected in the groundwater can be attributed to some of the nine PRPs, we
can consider contaminant contribution of the two gas stations because of oil waste disposal practices that
have taken place there.
I LIT 
OO1
SECTION II: MRS SCORESHEETS
TUT 
001 
0006
SITE NAME: 
TUTU WELLFIED 
SITE SCORE: 
50.00
REVISED HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM
SCORING SPREADSHEET
VERSION 2.1
Developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
by
NUS Corporation
SITE NAME: 
TUTU WELLFIED
EPA ID #: 
VID982272569
LOCATION: 
ST. THOMAS, USVI
REGION: 
2
DATE: 
AUGUST 28, 1991
RHRS SCORER: R.FEINBERG
PATHWAY 
SCORES
GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY 
100.00
SURFACE WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY 
0.00
Overland Flow/Flood 
GW to SW
Drinking Water Threat 
0.00 
0.00
Human Food Chain Threat 
0.00 
0.00
Environmental Threat 
0.00 
0.00
Overland Flow/Flood Component 
0.00
Ground Water to Surface Water Cotnp. 
0.00
SOIL EXPOSURE PATHWAY 
0.00
Resident Population Threat O.OOE+00
Nearby Population Threat 
O.OOE+00
AIR MIGRATION PATHWAY 
0.00
OVERALL MIGRATION SCORE 
50.00
001
SITE NAME:
SOURCE 1 NAME:
TUTU WELLFIED
AREA OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
SITE SCORE: 
50.00
HAZARDOUS WASTE QUANTITY
Constituents (Ib) 
101
HWQ (Ib) 
0
Volume (cu yd) 
0
Area (sq ft) 
0
Contain Area(sq ft) 
0
Final HWQ for the Source
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE SOURCE
VALUE 
SOURCE TYPE (choose one)
101 
0 Landfill
0 
Surface Impoundment
0 
Surface Impoundment(buried)
0 
Drums
0 
Tanks & Non-drum Containers
101 
Contaminated Soil
Pile
Land Treatment
1 Other
* CODE CONTAMINANT
L12 Dichloroethylene, trans-1,
L124 Trichloroethylene
LI16 Tetrachloroethene
LSI Cadmium
0 
0
CONTAINMENT 
VALUES
2Ground Water Containment 
10
(Table 3-2)
Surface Water (overland) 
0
(Table 4-2)
Flood Plain (years)
(1, 10, 100, 500, NA) 
NA
Flood Frequency Value 
0
(Table 4-9)
Attractiveness/Access. 
0
(Table 5-6)
Air Containment (gas) 
0
(Table 6-3)
Air Containment (part.) 
0
(Table 6-9)
Air Source Type (gas) 
0
(Table 6-4)
Air Source Type (part.) 
0
(Table 6-4)
Type an "L" in front of the Code / if the substance
is present or was deposited as a liquid (i.e., L##).
TUT
00 i 00 OS
SITE NAME: 
TUTU WELLFIED 
SITE SCORE: 
50.00
GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY SCORESHEET
MAXIMUM
VALUE
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
Y/N
LIKELIHOOD OF RELEASE to an AQUIFER
IB the Aquifer of Concern (AOC) KARST?
Are all layers to the AOC KARST?
Is there an Obs. Release to the AOC?
Is there an Obs. Release to ground water?
If Yes: 
CODE 
CONTAMINANT
124 
Trichloroethylene
116 
Tetrachloroethene
51 
Cadmium
12 
Dichloroethylene, trans-1,2-
0 
0
1. Observed Release 
550
2. Potential to Release
2a. Containment 
10
Net Precipitation (inches) 
Calc.Val:
2b. Net Precipitation Value 
10 
0
Depth to Aquifer (feet)
2c. Depth to Aquifer Value 
5
2d. Travel Time 
35
Lowest Hydraulic Conductivity
Thickness of Layer
2e. Potential to Release 
500
3. Likelihood of Release 
550
WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
4. Toxicity/Mobility 
*
5. Hazardous Waste Quantity 
*
6. Waste Characteristics 
100
ASSIGNED
VALUE
N
N
Y
Y
550
10
0
0
0
0
0
O.OOE+00
0
0
550
10000
100
32
TARGETS
Distance to Nearest Well (miles)
7. Nearest Well Value
8. Population
Level I Population
8a. Level I Concentrations Value
Level II Population
8b. Level II Concentrations Value
Potential Contamination
50
0
50
243
2430
12
12
Distance
0 - 1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2-1.0
1.0-2.0
2.0-3.0
3.0-4.0
Population
0
0
1528
0
0
0
Value
0
0
523
0
0
0
9.
8c. Total Potential Contamination Value
3d. Total Population Value
Resources
**
**
5
52
2494
0
TUT
OOi 
OO09
SITE NAME: 
TUTU WELLFIED 
SITE SCORE: 
50.00
10. Wellhead Protection Area 
20 
0
11. Total Targets 
** 
2544
GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY SCORE FOR THE AQUIFER
Ground Water Pathway Score: Uncapped 
** 
542.72
12. Ground Water Pathway Score 
100 
100.00
TUT' O01 00.10
SECTION III: DOCUMENTATION RECORD
TUT 00.1 
O 0.1.1
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
MRS DOCUMENTATION RECORD-REVIEW COVER SHEET
Name of Site: Tutu Wellfield
Contact Persons
Site Investigation: Not Applicable
(Name) 
(Telephone)
Documentation Record: Richard L. Feinberg 
(908) 225-6160
(Name) 
(Telephone)
Pathways. Components, or Threats Not Evaluated
The surface water, soil, and air pathways were not evaluated in this documentation record due
to fact that this site is an area of groundwater contamination with known and unknown sources.
(Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 1-5; 46, pp. 1, 4, 7; 50, pg. 7). In addition, the nearby surface water body (an
intermittent stream which leads to Turpentine Run) is not known to be used for drinking water
and there are minimal environmental threats. Turpentine Run is also intermittent stream that
discharges approximately 2.1 miles downstream into the Caribbean Sea when flowing.
Environmental targets such as mangrove lagoons and tropical reefs exist at or near the mouth of
Turpentine Run, and desalination plants providing potable water exist further downstream (Ref.
Nos. 36, pp. 13, 15, 20; 44; 45, appendix A pp. A-3, A-4, and A-5). Soil exposure may pose a
threat to employees working at and residents living near suspected sources. However, until these
sources are confirmed as contributing to the ground water contamination, soil exposure targets
cannot be counted in the in HRS score (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 2, 3, 4, 5; 9, pp.
1 -6; 10, pp. 1 -7; 11, pp. 1 -7).
TUT 
OO1 0012
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
HRS DOCUMENTATION RECORD
Name of Site: Tutu Wellfield
EPA Region: 2 
Date Prepared: 4/30/91
Street Address of Site: Tutu Area/Anna's Retreat
County and State: St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
General Location in the State: Central eastern part of the island.
Topographic Map: Eastern St. Thomas, V.I.
Latitude: 18° 20' 30" N 
Longitude: 64C 53' 06" W
Air Pathway 
- Not evaluated
Ground Water Pathway - 100.00
Soil Exposure Pathway - Not evaluated
Surface Water Pathway - Not evaluated
HRS SITE SCORE 
- 50.00
TUT 
O01 
OO1
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
WORKSHEET FOR COMPUTING HRS SITE SCORE
1. 
Ground Water Migration Pathway Score (S^) 
100.00 
10.000
(from Table 3-1, line 13)
2a. Surface Water Overland/Rood Migration Component 
0.00
(from Table 4-1, line 30)
2b. Ground Water to Surface Water Migration Component 
0.00
(from Table 4-25, line 28)
2c. Surface Water Migration Pathway Score (S.J 
0.00 
0.00
Enter the larger of lines 2a and 2b as the pathway score.
3. 
Soil Exposure Pathway Score (S.) 
0.00 0.00
(from Table 5-1, line 22)
4. 
Air Migration Pathway Score (S.) 
O.QQ 0.00
(from Table 6-1, line 12)
5. 
Total of S 2 + $„* + S.2 + S.2 
10.000
6. 
HRS Site Score Divide the value on line 5
by 4 and take the square root 
50.00
TUT 
OO1 
GO14
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
REFERENCES
Reference
Number 
Description of the Reference
1. 
Hazard Ranking System; Rnal Rule, 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 300.
Federal Register, Volume 55, No. 241, pp 51532- 51667, December 14, 1990.
2. 
Superfund Chemical Database Matrix Data. May 1991.
3. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, Work Assignment Manager, CDM Federal Programs
Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. September 19, 1988.15 pages]
4. 
Preliminary Assessment Report for Tutu Texaco, St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands,
NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, revised May 26, 1989, TDD No. 02-
8902-40.[30 pages]
5. 
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Survey, St. Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix,
U.S. Virgin Islands. Donald I. Hamlin Consulting Engineers, Inc. February 1986.
[12 pages]
6. 
Field Notes, Tutu Wellfield, CDM Federal Programs Corporation,
April 8 and 9, 1988.17 pages]
7. 
Reld Notes, Tutu Wellfield, CDM Federal Programs Corporation,
September 6-15, 1988.[62 pages]
8. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES V Regional Manager, CDM Federal Programs
Corporation, to Cathy Moyik, Regional Project Officer. May 30, 1990. and Letter
from Scott B. Graber, Work Assignment Manager, CDM Federal Programs
Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. May 2, 1990. Data validation and
analysis sheets also included for the letter report. (443 pages]
9. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES III Regional Manager, CDM Federal Programs
Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. March 31, 1989.18 pages]
10. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES III Regional Manager, CDM Federal Programs
Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. March 31, 1989.[7 pages]
11. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES V Regional Manager, CDM Federal Programs
Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. February 2, 1990. Data validation and
analysis sheets also included for the letter report. [90 pages]
12. 
Letter from Sally Odland for Scott B. Graber, Work Assignment Manager, CDM
Federal Programs Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. May 2, 1990.[3 pages)
TUT 
001 
OOl'
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
13. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, TES III Regional Manager, COM Federal Programs
Corporation, to Caroline Kwan, U.S. EPA. June 27, 1989.13 pages]
14. 
Final Report on Results of Soil Gas Survey, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Geoscience Consultants, Ltd., December 18, 1987.[41 pages]
15. 
Summary of Laboratory Results for Oil and Water Samples Collected from Tanks,
Storm Drains, and Sumps at Gasoline Stations and Auto Body Shops in Tutu, St,
Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands on August 17, 1987, U.S. EPA Region 2 Technical
Assistance Team, Weston/SPER Division, February 23, 1988.152 pages]
16. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, COM Federal Programs Corp., to Caroline Kwan, U.S.
EPA. October 31, 1988.[4 pages]
17. 
Letter from Scon B. Graber, COM Federal Programs Corp., to Caroline Kwan, U.S.
EPA. March 6, 1989. Data validation and analysis sheets also included for the data
summary.[53 pages]
18. 
Preliminary Assessment Report for Tutu Esso, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS
Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, TDD No. 02-8902-43.116 pages]
19. 
Field Notes, Tutu Wellfield, Esso Tank Excavation, CDM Federal Programs
Corporation, June 5-10, 1989.[45 pages]
20. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, CDM Federal Programs Corp., to Caroline Kwan, U.S.
EPA. April 24, 1989.12 pages]
21. 
Letter from Ana Gloria Ramos, P.E., Environmental Coordinator, Esso Standard Oil
S. A. Limited, to Francine Lang, Director, Department of Planning and Natural
Resources. February 22, 1988.[22 pages]
22. 
Esso Tutu Service Station Soil Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report, St. Thomas,
U.S.V.I. Belgodere and Associates. June 14, 1988.162 pages]
23. 
Laboratory Analysis of Soil at Tutu Esso Car Care Center, Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S.
Virgin Islands. Soil Tech Corp. January 11, 1989.174 pages]
24. 
Preliminary Assessment Report for Gasset Motors, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands,
NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, TDD No. 02-8902-41.124 pages]
25. 
Preliminary Assessment Report for Ramsey Motors, 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, March 24, 1989, TDD No. 02-8902-42,
Rev. No. 1.123 pages]
26. 
Preliminary Assessment Report for LAGA Building/Virgin Islands Department of
Education, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT,
March 24, 1989, TDD No. 02-8902-44.[20 pages]
TUT 
OOi
OO16
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
27. 
Preliminary Site Assessment Report for L'Henry, Inc., St. Thomas, U.S.V.I., Pedro
Panzardi and Associates, October 1989.[38 pages]
28. 
Reld Notebook No. 0398, Virgin Islands Drum Reconnaissance,
TDD No. 02-8901-29, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey,
February 2-15, 1989.[10 pages]
29. 
Memorandum from Ivan Garcia, Roy F. Weston, Inc. TAT to Carlos O'Neill, U.S.
EPA Caribbean Field Office, Subject: Photovac results 1987-1990, Tutu Wells, St.
Thomas. April 17,1990.118 pages]
30. 
Memorandum from Ivan Garcia and Arnarldo Martinez, Roy F. Weston, Inc. TAT to
Luis Santos (OSC), U.S. EPA Caribbean Reld Office, Subject: Results of February
1990 quarterly sampling of Tutu Wells, St. Thomas, USVI. April 12,1990.[6 pages]
31. 
U.S. EPA Region 2 Environmental Services Division Laboratory, Turpentine Run,
Laboratory Analysis from a Roy F. Weston TAT, Region 2, sampling event
conducted on October 6-7, 1987. Project No. 262, Organic Analysis, Project No.
263, Inorganic Analysis. December 22, 1987. [93 pages]
32. 
Memorandum from Joseph Soroka, Chief, Organic Chemistry Section, to
Kevin Kubik, Chief, Superfund Support Section, (Both of U.S. EPA, Region 2,
Environmental Services Division). Subject: Detection Limits For Turpentine Run.
April 4, 1991.[5 pages]
33. 
1st Sampling Report September 1990, Tutu Wells Site Quarterly Sampling, St.
Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Geraghty and Miller, Inc., January 1991.[239 pages]
34. 
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 - Protection of Environment, Parts 199 to
299, Section 261.24, pg. 406. Revised July 1, 1988.11 page]
35. 
Donnelly, T.W. Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, In
Caribbean Geological Investigations, Geological Society of America, Memoir 98 ed.
H.H. Hess. 1966, (pp. 88, 89, 94-97, 115, 120-122, plate No. 1).
36. 
" 
Jordan, D.G. and O.J. Cosner,. A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas,
Virgin Islands, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 1973, (pp.4-6, 13, 15, 20,
34, 37-39, 42-45).
37. 
Letter from Judy Steiger, Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey, to Caroline Kwan,
U.S. EPA. August 10, 1990.114 pages]
38. 
Memorandum from Judy Steiger, U.S. Geological Survey to Richard Feinberg, NUS
Corp. Subject: Tutu Well Inventory. March 27, 1991.122 pages]
39. 
Well Logs from selected wells in the Tutu Section of Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas,
U.S. Virgin Islands. 1977 - 1981.118 pages]
OO1 
CO1
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
40. 
Potentiometric Surface of the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer in the Tutu Area,
Eastern St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, September 11, 1987. U.S. Geological
Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 88-4131 .[1 sheet]
41. 
Well Appropriation Permits issued in St. Thomas/St. John as of July 31, 1987.
Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources.[12 pages]
42. 
Project Note: From Richard L. Feinberg to File, TDD. No. 02-9102-11, Cross
Reference of Well Inventories Provided in the Documentation Record.
April 26, 1991.11 page]
43. 
Federal Reporting Data System, Public Water System - Comprehensive Report for
Community and Non-Community Supplies, U.S EPA Region 2, Virgin Islands, Fiscal
Year 1988. March 3, 1989, (pp. 5, 6, 47, 86, 93, 94, 106, 281, 295, 300, 310,
311).
44. 
U. S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Map, 7.5 minute
series, "Eastern St. Thomas, USVI", 1954, Revised 1982.
45. 
Final Report, Water Management Plan For The Public Water System - U.S. Virgin
Islands. CH2M Hill Southeast, Inc. July 1983.122 pages]
46. 
Tutu Well Site Potable Water Alternatives Report, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S.
Virgin Islands. Region 2 Technical Assistance Team (TAT), Weston/SPER Division.
December 1988.183 pages]
47. 
U.S. EPA, Pollution Report (POLREP), Nos. 10 (January 11, 1988); 11 (June 30,
1988); 14 (May 1, 1989); 15 (January 10, 1990). Tutu Well Site, January 10,
1990.118 pages]
48. 
Letter from Scott B. Graber, CDM Federal Programs Corp., to Caroline Kwan, U.S.
EPA. April 20, 1990.[7 pages]
49. 
Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Order, In The Matter of Texaco
Caribbean, Inc. St. Thomas. July 27, 1987. and Rrst Amended Order, In The
Matter of Texaco Caribbean, Inc. St. Thomas. August 5, 1987.18 pages]
50. 
U.S. EPA Draft Action Memorandum from Luis Santos, U.S. EPA On Scene
Coordinator (OSC) to William J. Muszynski, P.E., Acting Regional Administrator,
thru Stephen D. Luftig, Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division.
February 1989.112 pages]
51. 
US EPA Region 2 Administrative Order, In The Matter Of The ESSO Standard Oil
S.A., Limited Texaco Caribbean, Inc., L'Henri, Inc., d/b/a O'Henry Cleaners, Tutu
Well Site, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Island. Prepared for the U.S. EPA
by CDM Federal Programs Corp. October 14, 1989.[25 pages]
52. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Sally Odland, Camp Dresser and Mckee, and
Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., May 23, 1991.[1 page]
TUT 
O01 0018
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
53. 
Facsimile from Ben Nazario, Virgin Island Department of Natural Resources, and
Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., April 30, 1991.[3 pages]
54. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Ben Nazario/Ms. Monsanto, Virgin Islands
Department of Natural Resources, and Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., May 1,
1991.14 pages]
55. 
Project Note From Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., to Rle, Subject: Calculation of
Ground Water Population Apportionment, May 30, 1991.11 page]
56. 
U.S. EPA Action Memorandum from Carlos O'Neill, U.S. EPA On Scene Coordinator
(OSC) to Stephen D. Luftig, Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division,
thru George Zachos, Acting Chief, Response and Prevention Branch January 6,
1988.112 pages]
57. 
U.S. EPA Action Memorandum from Carlos O'Neill, U.S. EPA On Scene Coordinator
(OSC) to William Muszynski, Acting Regional Administrator, thru Stephen D. Luftig,
Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division. August 22, 1988. Signed
September 14, 1988.15 pages]
58. 
Standard Calculation Sheet From Richard L. Feinberg, NUS Corp., to File, Subject:
Calculation of Area of Observed Contamination, August 24, 1991.[3 pages]
59. 
U.S. EPA Region 2 Environmental Services Division Laboratory, Tutu Well Site V.I.,
Laboratory Analysis from a Roy F. Weston TAT, Region 2, sampling event
conducted on July 22, 1987. Project No. 162, July 30, 1987. [4 pages]
60. 
Sampling, Analysis, and Monitoring Plan for Wells, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas,
U.S. Virgin Island. Prepared for Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee by
Geraghty and Miller, Inc., International Group. September 1990.[56 pages]
61. 
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 - Protection of Environment, Parts 100 to
149, Pt. 136, App. A Meth. 624 pp. 427-437. Revised July 1, 1986.110 pages]
62. 
Method 524.2. Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by
Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. J. W. Eichelberger, W.L.
Budde, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and
Development, US EPA. Revision 3.O., pages 285-323, 1989.138 pages]
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
SD-Characterization and Containment
SOURCE DESCRIPTION
2.2 Source Characterization
Number of the source: Known sources and unknown sources
Name and description of the source: Groundwater contamination with known and unknown
sources
In July 1987, it was reported that several wells used for public drinking supply in the Tutu area
exhibited a strong unpleasant odor. Sampling and analysis of 24 wells in July and October of
1987 detected high concentrations of chlorinated organic compounds (trichloroethylene,
tetrachloroethylene, 1,2-trans dichloroethylene, benzene, toluene, and xylenes). Subsequently,
13 commercial and 5 private wells were ordered closed and alternative plans including trucking
water to the area began (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 1, 4, B-1, B-9, B-12; 48, pg. 2; 50, pp. 1, 2, 3).
At least nine Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) were identified as to contributing to this
groundwater contamination. These PRPs included three gasoline stations (Tutu Texaco Service
Station, Tutu Esso Care Center, and Rodriguez Auto Parts); two vehicle maintenance repair
stations (Ramsay Motors and Consolidated Auto Parts [Gasset Motors] ); two territorial
government agencies (Virgin Island Housing Authority [VIHA] and Department of Education/Laga
Building [formerly a clothing manufacturing plant]); one dry cleaner (O'Henry Cleaners); and a silk
screening business (Tillet Inc.). One of the three gas stations was abandoned (Ref. Nos. 3, pp.
1-5; 46, pp. 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 27, 32, 33-41, B-1, B-9; 22, pg. 5; 51, pp. 1-10; 52).
The following is a list of potential sources on the properties of the suspected PRPs:
• Tutu Texaco Service Station
This facility has contributed to groundwater contamination via unleaded and leaded
gasoline underground storage tanks (USTs), an oil separator, catch basins, a drum storage
area, a collection pit/trap, floor drains, and waste oil spills. Three 4,000 gallon gasoline
USTs were taken out of service in 1980 due suspected leaks and mechanical integrity test
failure. These three tanks were excavated in September 1988. Large and small holes were
discovered in the tanks during the investigation. Strong odors of petroleum hydrocarbons
and air readings above background were detected on the HNu Photoionizer during the
excavation. In 1987, soil on the property was observed being saturated with waste oil or
petroleum products. During a 1989 NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Preliminary Assessment site
reconnaissance, it was observed that the drum storage area did not exhibit any
containment. In addition, stains were evident on the grounds of the facility (Ref. Nos. 3,
pg. 4; 4, pp. 1, 2, 3, 4, 27, 28, 29; 5, pp. 9, 11, 12; 6. pp. 2, 3; 7, pp. 56, 57; 16, pp.
1, 2; 28, pp. 13A, 14, 14A, 15).
TUT 
001 
0020
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
cation indicated that besides gasoline and waste oil, the following
t the facility: freon, antifreeze, and a large variety of solvent based
s, degreasers, cleaners, and lubricants. The hazardous materials
were indicated to be xylenes, naphtha, ethoxylated nonyl phenol,
e, 1,1,1 -trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene (PCE), and ethylene
-5; 6, pg. 3).
oil samples collected from sumps, an oil water separator, a waste
n were submitted for Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) analysis.
>ds were detected: acetone (2,200 ug/kg), 2-butanone (6,300
jg/kg). toluene (43,000 ug/kg), ethylbenzene (14,000 ug/kg), total
, chloroform (260 ug/kg), and 1,1,1 -trichloroethane (2,400 ug/kg)
i September 1988, soil samples collected from a tank excavation
; were submitted for CLP analysts and the following compounds
xoethane (10 micrograms/kilogram [ug/kg]), 4-methyl 2-pentanone
1,000 ug/kg), xylene (58,000 ug/kg), benzene (4,600 ug/kg), and
ig/kg). In some samples, estimated values of these and other
re significantly higher than those represented above (Ref. No. 10.
soil samples were collected from a pile and submitted for CLP
compounds along with their maximum concentrations detected:
) ug/kg) and PCE (160 ug/kg). Other volatiles were detected at low
; (Ref No. 8, pp. 1-5, 25). In July 1989, oil samples were collected
tor, collection pit, and five drums, and were submitted for CLP
How" - compounds were detected at estimated concentrations:
xylt^, (1,600,000 ug/kg), benzene (46,000 ug/kg), ethylbenzene
', 1-trichloroethane (3,900 ug/kg) (Ref. Nos. 9, pp. 1-5, 52, 53;
jas survey of the central Tutu area detected high concentrations
ns and a very low concentration of PCE in the unsaturated zone
Texaco (Ref. No. 14, pp. 1, 13, 15, 17, 22, 23, 28).
listorica! information indicate that Tutu Texaco has contributed
amination in the area. Waste units and former product storage
:e of poor containment. Products used at the facility contain some
s found in groundwater. Soil and waste oil analyses from the
iany of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants
>r.
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
i via leaded and unleaded
s. In 1987, a petrotite leak
was questionable. In June
troleum, oily sheens in the
hotoionizer were detected
IT Preliminary Assessment
placed into the UST. No
ste units (Ref. Nos. 3, pg.
13, 16-26.31,34-36,39,
nd waste oil, the following
riety of solvent based auto
hazardous materials found
c acid, and other solvents
• separator were submitted
compounds were detected:
jne (200,000 ug/kg), total
jg/kg), and PCE (110,000
sample was collected from
allowing compounds were
|/kg), 1,1,1 -trichloroethane
No. 17, pp. 1-4). In June
!es and were submitted for
jizene (60 ug/kg), toluene
10 ug/kg), chlorobenzene (8
000 ug/kg), fluorene (300
mated values of these and
i represented above. In July
or and an UST, and were
were detected at estimated
j), benzene (12,000 ug/kg),
, 1 -trichloroethane (42,000
'., 13). In April 1988, a soil
zene, toluene, and xylenes
urinated hydrocarbons such
stected (Ref. No. 22, pp. 5,
TUT
O01 
GO 2.1.
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
The analytical data and historical information indicate that Tutu Esso has contributed to the
groundwater contamination. Waste units and former product storage units have shown
evidence of poor containment. Products used at the facility contain some of the same
constituents found in the groundwater. Soils and waste oil analyses from the property have
detected many of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in
the groundwater.
• Rodriguez Auto Parts (Esso)
The facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via leaded and
unleaded gasoline USTs, drum storage, an underground oil collection pit, floor drains, and
a cement cistern used car wash water collection. The containment of these waste units
is unknown (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 4; 5, pp. 9, 11).
A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that besides gasoline and waste oil, the following
products were present at the facility: Shell Sol (low aromatic white spirit/ Stoddard
Solvent), miscellaneous solvents, kerosene, and grease. Another hazardous compound
known to present on site is xylenes (Ref. No. 3, pg. 4).
There is a potential that this facility is contributing to the groundwater contamination. The
products used on site contain hazardous constituents found in the groundwater. There are
no analytical data and the containment of the waste units on site are unknown.
• Ramsay Motor Company
The facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via a UST and
55-gallon drums. During a 1989 NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Preliminary Assessment site
reconnaissance, it was observed that the drums were not properly contained and small
quantities of oil appeared to be leaking. Oil stains and pools were evident on the grounds
during the reconnaissance. In addition personnel from NUS Corp. observed an oily material
that had migrated from a nearby property. In June 1989, personnel from Camp Oresser and
Mckee observed that oily material was still migrating onto the property. The containment
or integrity of the UST is unknown (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 2; 7, pg. 7; 12; 13; 20; 25, pp. 1, 2,
3; 28, pp. 15A, 16).
A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that besides waste oil, the following products were
present at the facility: antifreeze, and a large variety solvent based auto flushes,
treatments, degreasers, cleaners, and lubricants. The hazardous materials found in these
products were indicated to be xylenes, naphtha, ethoxylated nonyl phenol, propane, butyl
cellosolve, 1,1,1 -trichloroethane, PCE, petroleum distillates, and ethylene glycol (Ref. Nos.
3, pg. 3; 6, pg. 6).
11
"UT 
00.1. 0022
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
(n August 1987, waste oil samples collected from a waste oil storage tank were submitted
for Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) analysis. The following compounds were detected:
2-butanone (150,000 ug/kg), benzene (210,000 ug/kg), toluene (1,400,000 ug/kg),
ethylbenzene (290,000 ug/kg) and total xvlenes (1,700,000 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 15, pp. 2-4).
In September 1988, two surface soil samples were collected and submitted for CLP
analysis and the following compounds were detected: 4-methyl 2-pentanone (8 ug/kg),
toluene (2 ug/kg), xylene (7 ug/kg), benzene (6 ug/kg), 2-hexanone (55 ug/kg), and
ethylbenzene (18 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 9. pp. 1, 4). In June 1989, a surface soil sample was
collected submitted for CLP analysis. The following compounds were detected: naphthalene
(4,400 ug/kg), 2-methylnaphthalene (6,100 ug/kg), pyrene (2,000 ug/kg), and bis(2-
ethylhexyDphthalate (5,400 ug/kg). Other compounds were detected at estimated values.
In July 1989, oil samples were collected from a UST and were submitted for CLP analysis.
Some of the following compounds were detected at estimated concentrations: 2-hexanone
(180,000 ug/kg), toluene (450,000 ug/kg), xylene (1,200,000 ug/kg), benzene (64,000
ug/kg), and ethylbenzene (130,000 ug/kg) (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 1-5, 43-50; 11, pp. 1, 3; 12,
13).
The analytical data and historical information indicate that Ramsay Motor Company may
have contributed to the groundwater contamination. Waste units have shown evidence of
poor containment. Products used at the facility contain some of the same constituents
found in the groundwater. Waste oil and soil analyses have detected some of the same
CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in the groundwater.
• Gasset Motors/Consolidated Auto Parts
The facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via 55-gallon
drums (waste oil and raw material); and messy house-keeping of service yard and bays.
During a 1989 NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Preliminary Assessment site reconnaissance, it was
observed that waste oil from a drainage ditch was discharging onto a nearby property
(Ramsay Motors) and stained soil was evident in other parts of the facility. During the same
reconnaissance it was observed that the drums were not properly contained. The containment
of the UST is unknown (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3; 6, pg. 6; 7, pg. 58; 12; 24, pp. 1,2,3; 28, pp. 15).
A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that besides waste oil, the following products were
present at the facility: engine fluids and miscellaneous chemicals (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3; 6,
pg. 6).
12
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
In August 1987, waste oil samples collected from a gutter and a storm drain were
submitted for Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) analysis. The following compounds were
detected: acetone (2,100), 2-butanone (4,200 ug/kg), toluene (780 ug/kg), ethylbenzene
(390 ug/kg), and total xylenes (2,600 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 15, pp. 2-4). In September 1988,
two surface soil samples and a surface water sample were submitted for CLP analysis and
the following compounds were detected: toluene (1,300 ug/kg), xylene (5.600 ug/kg),
ethylbenzene (2,100 ug/kg), and styrene (6 ug/kg). Benzene was also detected at
estimated concentrations (Ref. No. 9, pp. 1, 4, 5). In July 1989, an oil sample was
collected from a drainage ditch and submitted for CLP analysis. Acetone was detected at
a low estimated value, however this sample was mistakenly analyzed as a water (Ref. Nos.
11, pp. 5, 6; 12; 13).
The analytical data and historical information indicate that Gasset Motors/Consolidated
Auto Parts may have contributed to the groundwater contamination. Waste units and
former product storage units have shown evidence of poor containment. Products used at
the facility contain some of the same constituents found in the groundwater. Waste oil and
soil analyses have detected some of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible
contaminants also found in the groundwater.
Virgin Island Housing Authority (VIHA)
Formerly Tropical Motors (automobile dealership), the facility is suspected of contributing
to the groundwater contamination via a UST. A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that
hydraulic fluid was reportedly stored in the UST. No further information is known about the
containment of this unit nor is there any analytical data from this property
(Ref. No. 3, pg. 3).
In August 1987, waste oil samples collected from a UST were submitted for Contract
Laboratory Program (CLP) analysis. The following compounds were detected: benzene
(97,000 ug/kg), toluene (98,000 ug/kg), ethylbenzene (500,000 ug/kg), and total xylenes
(2,900,000 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 15, pp. 2-4).
There is a potential for this facility to have contributed to the groundwater contamination
due to past operations. However, very little is known about the past operations and more
information is needed to characterize the site.
Department of Education/Laga Building
Formerly a clothing manufacturing plant, the facility is suspected of contributing to the
groundwater contamination via abandoned 55-gallon drums. During a February 1989 NUS
Corp. Region 2 FIT Preliminary Assessment site reconnaissance, it was observed that the
abandoned drums were not contained and were deposited in a haphazard manner on the
property. These drums were badly corroded or perforated and some were empty. Access
to these drums or the property was not restricted. In June 1989, Camp Dresser and Mckee
observed that drums were still on the property. In addition, past operations at the facility
include the extensive use of PCE (Ref. No. 7, pp. 31, 32; 14, 1, 2, 3, 24; 26, pp. 1, 2, 3;
28, pg. 17).
13
TUT 
OOi 
0024
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
In November 1987, a soil gas survey in the area revealed the highest concentration of PCE
was found adjacent to a loading dock at the facility (Ref. No. 14, pp. 1, 21, 22, 23).
In June 1989, surface soil and drum samples were collected and submitted for CLP
analysis. The following compounds were detected: phenol (900,000 ug/kg), 2-
methylphenol (320,000 ug/kg), naphthalene (4,100 ug/kg), and endosulfan sulfate I (92
ug/kg). The following compounds detected at estimated concentrations are noted due their
high values: 4-methylphenol (1,300,000 ug/kg), 2,4-dimethylphenol (42,000 ug/kg), and
naphthalene (7,700 ug/kg) (Ref. No. 8, pp. 1-5, 39-43).
The analytical data and historical information strongly suggests that the Department of
Education/Laga Building may have contributed to the groundwater contamination.
Abandoned drums have shown evidence of poor containment. Products used at the facility
contain some of the same constituents found in the groundwater. Soil analysis has
detected some of the same CERCLA and non-CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in
the groundwater.
O'Henry Cleaners
The facility has contributed to the groundwater contamination via a leaching pit, a sump
holding tank, a raw material (PCE) storage area, aboveground fuel tanks, drains,
effluent discharges for steam condensate from the presses and the clothes dryer), and 5-
gallon containers of spent PCE residue or filters. Little information about the containment
of these waste units is known, however spills of PCE reportedly have occurred. The PA
indicates that O'Henry uses 1.5 to 1.75 gallons of PCE per month and has disposed of the
PCE residues and spent filters at a "local dump site" in the past. The PA also indicates that
a small amount PCE residue and waste was possibly disposed of on site in the past (Ref.
Nos. 3, pg. 2; 6, pg. 5; 7, pg. 6; 13; 27, pp. 4-10).
A CERCLA 104(e) notification indicated that products other than PCE used on site include
dry cleaning fluids such as 2-butoxyethanol, hexylene glycol, hydrofluoric acid, degreaser,
unspecified volatile solvents, and dye stripper (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 2; 33, pp. 5).
In September 1988, one soil sample was collected and submitted for CLP analysis and
tetrachloroethane was detected at 440,000 ug/kg (Ref. No. 9, pg. 3; 13). In June 1989,
three surface soil samples were collected and submitted for CLP analysis. The following
compounds were detected: TCE (75 ug/kg) and PCE (180,000 ug/kg). Other compounds
were detected at low estimated levels including 1,2 dichloroethylene (total) (Ref. No. 8,
pp. 1-5, 31-36).
The analytical data and historical information indicate that O'Henry's Cleaners has
contributed to the groundwater plume. Reportedly spillage and improper disposal of waste
might have occurred. Products used at the facility contain some of the same constituents
found in the groundwater. Soil analysis has detected some of the same CERCLA and non-
CERCLA eligible contaminants also found in the groundwater.
14
TUT
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
Jim Tillet Inc.
The facility is suspected of contributing to the groundwater contamination via paint
containers, a raw material storage area, floor drains, and evaporation pit. Dry residue was
disposed at a local dump. In September 1988, during a Camp Dresser and Mckee visit to
the property, spilled dry paint was observed on the ground (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3; 6, pg. 4;
7, pp. 18-20).
A CERCLA 104{e) notification indicated that products used on site included water-based
dyes (ammonium hydroxide, mineral spirits) (Ref. Nos. 3, pg. 3).
In November 1987, a soil gas survey in the area, detected concentrations of hydrocarbons,
PCE, trichloroethane, and TCE in the Tillet Garden area (Ref. No. 14, pp. 14-21). In
September 1988, one soil sample was collected and submitted for CLP analysis and xylene
was detected at a low estimated concentration (Ref. No. 9, pp. 1,5).
There is a potential that this facility is contributing to the groundwater contamination. The
products used on site contain hazardous constituents found in the groundwater. There are
no analytical data and the containment of the waste units on site are unknown.
15
TUT 
OO1 
0026
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
From July 1987 to February 1990, photovac (portable field gas chromatograph) sampling
results indicated that benzene, toluene, PCE, TCE, and dichloroethylene were consistently present
in domestic wells. In addition, US EPA Region 2 Environmental Services Division Laboratory and
Contract Laboratory Program analyses of many of these same wells detected the presence of
PCE, TCE, 1,2- trans dichloroethylene, and cadmium (Ref. Nos. 29, pp. 1-18; 31, pp. 1-89; 33,
pp. N-1 -N-19).
Location of the source, with reference to a map of the site: An area of contaminated ground water
with known and unknown sources located on the eastern end of St Thomas, USVI in the Tutu
section of Anna's Retreat (Figure No. 1; Ref. No. 44).
Containment
Gas release to air
Not evaluated.
Paniculate release to air
Not evaluated.
Release to ground water
An area of groundwater contamination in the Tutu Section of Anna's Retreat has been
documented. Several suspected sources have been identified, including a dry cleaners, gas
stations, and auto repair shops (Ref. No. 46, pp. 1, 4, 7). Several mechanisms for contaminant
transport from these sources have been presupposed or documented including: leaking USTs;
contaminated oil separators, catch basins, floor drains, ditches; uncontained drum storage areas;
raw material storage areas; leaching and evaporation pits; aboveground fuel tanks; paint
containers; and improper handling of wastes (Ref. Nos. 3, pp. 1-5; 6, pp. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7).
Release via overland migration and/or flood
Not evaluated.
16
TUT 
001
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
SO-Hazardous Substances
Source No.: 1
2.4.1 Hazardous Substances
Hazardous substance 
Evidence 
Reference
Cadmium 
U. S. EPA Environmental Services 
Ref. Nos. 29,
1,2 Trans Dichloroethylene 
Division analytical results, U. S. EPA 
pp. 1-18:31,
Trichloroethylene 
Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Photo vac pp. 1-89; 33,
Tetrachloroethylene 
results. Potentially Responsible Party 
pp. N-1 - N-19
analytical results
17
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
Source No.: 1
2.4.2. Hazardous Waste Quantity
The waste quantity for this groundwater plume cannot be ascertained. However, an observed
release including Level I and II concentrations has been exhibited, therefore the default value for
hazardous waste quantity (100) would be used as stated in section 2.4.2.2 of the HRS final rule
Federal Register Vol. 55, No. 241, December 14, 1990, (pages 51519-51592).
18
001 
0029
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
SD-Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value
Source No.: 1
2.4.2.1.5. Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value
Source Hazardous Waste Quantity Value: 100
19
TUT 
001 
OO30
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
So-Summary
SITE SUMMARY OF SOURCE DESCRIPTIONS
Containment
Source Hazardous
Source 
Waste Quantity 
Ground 
Surface 
Air
No. 
Value 
Water 
Water 
Gas 
Particulate
1 
100 
non-zero 
N/A 
N/A 
N/A
20
TUT 
OO1 
OO31
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-General
3.0 GROUND WATER MIGRATION PATHWAY
3.0.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Aquifer/Stratum 1 (shallowest)
Aquifer/Stratum Name: Turpentine Run Basin Alluvium
Description: In certain areas on the island, including the Turpentine Run Valley, alluvium
overlies the bedrock (Ref. Nos. 35, plate No. 1; 36, pp. 4, 6). The alluvium consists of silt, fine
sand, and clay and discontinuous beds/lenses of sand and gravel 2 to 3 feet thick (Ref. No. 36,
pp. 5, 6). Well logs from the area show that the average range of thickness is between 20 and
45 feet thick. However, deposits have been found to be 70 feet thick in some places (Ref. Nos.
39, pp. 9, 10). These deposits are known to have a high porosity with a low permeability,
therefore creating a low yielding aquifer. The sand and gravel beds/lenses may have a higher
yield than the rest of the aquifer. The hydraulic conductivity of the alluvial deposits are
estimated to be between 10"* to 10"* cm/sec. This unit primarily recharges the bedrock aquifer
in this area of the island (Ref. Nos. 1, pg. 51601; 36, pp. 34, 38, 39). The site which is
located in the Tutu area is in the uppermost section of the Turpentine Run River Basin. The
alluvium is known to be under water table conditions in the vicinity of the site. However, there
are few exceptions where the sand and gravel deposits are artesian (Ref. No. 36, pg. 34). The
depth to groundwater in the area of the site ranges from 2 to 15 feet (Ref. Nos. 40; 36, pg.
37). Groundwater flows south, east, and west from higher elevations into the upper basin; and
then exhibits a generally southerly flow throughout the lower basin (Ref. Nos. 40; 36, pp. 38,
39, 41, 42, 43; 22, pg. 8). The principal alluvium aquifer is in the lower Turpentine Run Basin
as it is recharged by intermittent stream base flow and storm water runoff from the upper
portion of the basin (Ref. No. 36, p. 44).
References: 1, 35, 36, 39, 40
Aquifer/Stratum 2 (deepest!
Aquifer/Stratum Name: Water Island and Louisenhoj Formations
Description: The Louisenhoj Formation overlies the Water Island Formation in the area of the
site. Both of these formations are volcanic in nature. The Louisenhoj Formation consists of
augite-andesite breccia, volcanic tuff, and conglomerate. These rocks exhibit a variety of
colors including, but not limited to blue, brown, brick red, and purple. They have also been
found to have greenish to grayish fragments. In addition, these rocks may contain a wide
variety of minerals including plagioclase, clinopyroxene, chlorite, feldspars, pumpellyite, quartz,
21
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
magnetite, pyrite, and hematite. The Water Island Formation consists of volcanic flow breccias,
tuffs, spilite flows, and keratophyre flows. Keratophyre is a reddish gray to greenish gray
intrusive volcanic rock predominantly consisting of albite and quartz, with mica, chlorite, and
iron oxides. Spilites are a greenish intrusive volcanic rock predominantly consisting chlorite and
albite, with epidote, prehnite, calcite, and clinopyroxene (Ref. Nos. 36, pp. 4, 5, 6; 39, pp. 1-
19; 35, pp. 88, 94, 95, 96, 97, 115, 120, 121, 122, plate No. 1). These formations were
tilted uniformly northward to form a homocline. The homocline is cut by sets of faults trending
north 45° west, north 55" east, and north. "Three well-defined joint sets parallel each of the
major fault directions".The topography of the island show similar trends creating high yielding
groundwater zones in the valleys (e.g. Turpentine River Basin) (Ref. Nos. 35, plate No. 1; 36,
pg. 6). Dips appear to range from 35 to 75 degrees in the vicinity of the site (Ref. No. 35, plate
No. 1). The hydraulic conductivity of these formations is estimated to be 10"* to 10'* cm/sec
(Ref. No. 1, pg. 51601). The bedrock aquifer is principally recharged by infiltration, storm
water runoff, and stream flow discharge. The bedrock aquifer is hydraulically connected to the
unconsolidated aquifer, however the bedrock aquifer has a different potentiometric surface.
Groundwater in the bedrock aquifer flows ultimately in a southerly direction following the joint
and fracture sets (Ref Nos. 22, pg. 5; 36, pp. 34, 38, 41, 42, 43, 44; 39; 40).
References: 1, 35, 36, 39, 40
22
TUT 
001
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
3.1 LIKELIHOOD OF RELEASE 
GW-Observed Release
3.1.1 OBSERVED RELEASE
Aquifer Being Evaluated: Bedrock Aquifer
Contaminants from groundwater contamination present in the downgradient domestic and
commercial wells (Ref. Nos. 29, 31, 32, 33, 38, 40, 46, 47, 48).
Chemical Analysis:
Background Concentration
Sample ID 
Depth* 
Screened Interval 
Date 
Reference
VIHA No. 3 
17ft 
73 to 142ft 
"* 
37, pp. 2 - 4;40
+ 222 MSL* * +166 to + 97 MSL
* 
Highest seasonal depth to groundwater for well listed above using available background
data
'* 
(MSL) - Elevation in feet measured in reference to mean sea level
*** 
Sample collected between September 24 - October 3, 1990
23
TUT 
OO1 
OO34
Sample ID
VIHA No. 3
(Sept. 1990)
Hazardous
Substance
Cadmium
Concentration
Not Detected
Tetrachloro-
ethylene (PCE)
Trichloro-
ethylene (TCE)
Not Detected
Not Detected
1,2 Trans Di- 
Not Detected
chloroethylene (DCE)
VIHA No. 3
(Oct. 1987)
1.2 Trans DCE
PCE
Not Detected
Not Detected
* Method Detection Limit
Contract
Required
Quantitation
Limit
5 ug/L
1 ug/L
1 ug/L
1 ug/L
1.6 ug/L*
4.1 ug/L*
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
Reference
Nos. 33, Table
No. 2, pp. N-
17, N-131; 60,
pg. 30 of 56
Nos. 33, Table
No. 1, pg. N-17;
Table No. 2, pg.
N-119; 60, pg.
30 of 56
Nos. 33, Table
No. 1, pg. N-17;
Table No. 2, pg.
N-119; 60, pg.
30 of 56
Nos. 33, Table
No. 1, pg. N-17;
Table No. 2, pg.
N-119; 60, pg.
27 of 56
No. 31, pg. 33;
32, pg. 146
No. 31,pg. 33;
32, pg. 146
24
TUT 
OO1 
OO35
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
Contaminated Samples
Sample ID 
Depth* 
Screened Interval
Four Winds 
8.02ft 
36 to 285ft
No. 2 
+156.98 MSL" + 125 to -120 MSL
Date 
Reference
37, pp. 2. 3, 5; 40; 42
Hartman
Crusher
25.67 ft 
40 to 125 ft
+ 114.33 MSL +100 to +15 MSL
37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42
Elgin 2
14.37ft 
40 to 225 ft
+ 134.63 MSL + 109 to -79 MSL
37. pp. 2. 3, 5; 40; 42
Elgin 3
18.27ft 
40 to 325ft
+ 133.73 MSL +112 to-173 MSL
37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42
Matthias
Smith
Harvey
Hartman Estate
Steele
Tillet
10.00ft
+ 80.00 MSL
8.54ft
+ 81.46 MSL
23.57 ft
+ 114.43 MSL
? to 
50 ft
?to +40 MSL
unknown
? to 160 ft
? to -22 MSL
35ft 
100 to 200ft
+ 161 MSL 
+96 to-100 MSL
62.74 ft
+ 87.26 MSL
22.46 ft
+ 163.54 MSL
? to 150ft
? to +25 MSL
10 to 100ft
+ 176 to +86 MSL
37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42
37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42
37, pp. 2, 3, 5; 40; 42
38, pp. 5, 8, 11; 40; 42
37, pp. 2. 3, 5; 40; 42
37. pp. 2, 3, 5
* 
Highest seasonal depth to groundwater for wells listed above using available back-
ground data
** 
(MSL) - Elevation in feet measured in reference to mean sea level
*** 
Sample collected between September 24 - October 3, 1990
25
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
Sample ID
Hazardous
Substance
Elgin 2 
Cadmium
(Sept. 1990)
Four Winds 
Cadmium
No.2 
Cadmium
(Sept. 1990)
Hartman 
Cadmium
Crusher (No.2)
(Sept. 1990)
Elgin 3
(Sept. 1990)
Matthias
(Sept. 1990)
Smith
(Sept. 1990)
TCE
TCE
TCE
Steele 
TCE
(Sept. 1990)
Harvey 
PCE
(Sept. 1990)
Concentration
11 ug/L
6 
ug/L*
5 ug/L1
8 ug/L
14 ug/L
11 ug/L
20 ug/L
48 ug/L
890J ug/L
Hartman (No.3) 1.2 Dichloroethylene 
2 ug/L
Estate 
(OCE)
(Sept. 1990)
Matthias 
1,2 DCE
(Sept. 1990)
Smith
(Sept. 1990)
Steele
(Sept. 1990)
1,2 DCE
1.2 DCE
22 ug/L
58 ug/L
120 ug/L
Contract
Required
Quantitation
Limit 
Reference
5 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
2, pp. N-15. N-132;
60, pg. 30 of 56
5 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
5 ug/L 
2, pp. N-12, N-131;
60, pg. 30 of 56
5 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
2, pp. N-15, N-131;
60, pg. 30 of 56
1 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
1, pp. N-11, N-120;
60, pg. 27 of 56
1 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
1, pp. N-13, N-135;
60, pg. 27 of 56
1 ug/L1 
Nos. 33, Table No.
1, pp. N-12, N-118;
60, pg. 27 of 56
1 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
1, pp. N-12, N-118;
60, pg. 27 of 56
1 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
1, pp. N-12, N-118;
60, pg. 27 of 56
1 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
1, pp. N-11, N-118;
60, pg. 27 of 56
1 ug/L 
Nos. 33. Table No.
1, pp. N-13, N-135;
60, pg. 27 of 56
1 ug/L1 
Nos. 33, Table No.
1, pp. N-12, N-118
60, pg. 27 of 56
1 ug/L 
Nos. 33, Table No.
1,pp. N-12, N-118;
60. pg. 27 of 56
26
UT
Sample ID
Harvey
(Oct. 1987)
Harvey
(Oct. 1987)
Smith
(Oct. 1987)
Smith
(Oct. 1987)
Tillet
(Oct. 1987)
Tillet
(Oct. 1987)
J-
1 -
Hazardous
Substance
1,2-Trans DCE
PCE
1,2-Trans DCE
PCE
Concentration
49 uo/L
2,000 ug/L
100 ug/L
150 ug/L
Method
Detection
Limit
1.6 ug/L
4.1 ug/L
1.6 ug/L
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
Reference
Nos. 31, pg. 49;
32, pg. 146
Nos. 31, pg. 50;
32, pg. 146
Nos. 31, pg. 55;
32, pg. 146
1,2-TransDCE 
600 ug/L
PCE 
140 ug/L
4.1 ug/L 
Nos. 31, pg. 55;
32, pg. 146
1.6 ug/L 
Nos. 31, pg. 14;
32, pg. 146
4.1 ug/L 
Nos. 31, pg. 15;
32. pg. 146
Value is estimated (Ref. No. 33, pg. N-119).
This compound was flagged "J" because it failed the Method Detection Limit
(MDL) Study. The MDL study consists of seven repeat analyses of target
compounds at concentrations of 1 part per billion (ppb). The QC limits for
mean accuracy (percent recovery) are 80 - 120 percent. PCE was just below
the lower limit at 76 percent. This MDL study indicates that the laboratory
instrumentation had difficulty recovering certain compounds (including PCE) at
low concentrations (1 ppb) (Ref. No. 33. pp. 80, 81). Therefore, the PCE value
of 890 ug/L may represent a lower limit. In addition, the sample was analyzed
using higher detection limits.
There is a preponderance of evidence that PCE has been detected in this well
at high concentrations. In October 1987, US EPA Region 2 ESD Laboratory
analysis detected PCE at 2,000 ug/L in the Harvey Well (Ref. Nos. 31, pg. 50;
32). Photovac gas chromatograph analyses of samples from this well in 1987
and 1988 detected PCE concentrations between 500 ppb and 7,600 ppb (Ref.
No. 29, pp. 6, 10)
The data assessment explains that the sample from the Smith Well was
originally analyzed using Method 524.2, however concentration values were
not within the calibration range of the instrumentation and the laboratory
defaulted to Method 624 to meet a holding time constraint. This was
considered a breach of contract because Method 624 achieves higher
detection limits than Method 524.2. One of the data objectives for Sampling,
Analysis, and Monitoring Plan was to achieve lower detection limits. For HRS
purposes, concentrations of TCE and 1,2 dichloroethylene contaminants were
still above the higher detection limits set forth in Method 624. This indicates
the presence of these compounds in this well (Ref. Nos. 33, pg. N-83; 60, pp.
9, 44, 45, of; 61; 62).
Duplicate Analysis
27
TUT 
001
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
Level I Samples
Sample ID: Matthias
Reference for Benchmarks: Superfund Chemical Database Matrix
Hazardous 
Hazardous Substance 
Benchmark
Substance 
Concentration 
Concentration 
Benchmark
Trichloroethylene 
11 ug/L 
5 ug/L 
MCL
Sample ID: Steele
Reference for Benchmarks: Superfund Chemical Database Matrix
Hazardous 
Hazardous Substance 
Benchmark
Substance 
Concentration 
Concentration 
Benchmark
Trichloroethylene 
48 ug/L 
5 ug/L 
MCL
Sample ID: Harvey
Reference for Benchmarks: Superfund Chemical Database Matrix
Hazardous 
Hazardous Substance 
Benchmark
Substance 
Concentration 
Concentration 
Benchmark
Tetrachloroethylene 
2,000 ug/L 
350 ug/L 
Reference Dose
Screening Cone.
Sample! D: Tillet
Reference for Benchmarks: Superfund Chemical Database Matrix
Attribution: This site is an area of groundwater contamination with hazardous waste
substances that can be attributed to known and unknown sources as described in a
Administrative Order Index No. ll-CERCLA-00401, signed March 22. 1990. The Order further
discusses the 1987 sampling and analytical results which lead to the closure of 24 domestic,
commercial, and institutional wells in the Tutu area 1987. Additional sampling information from
1987 to 1990 and enforcement stipulations are further discussed in the Order (Ref. Nos. 46,
pp. 1,32; 51, pp. 1-25).
U. S. EPA Region 2 ESD laboratory analysis from this sampling consistently detected volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) including, but not limited to 1,2-trans dichloroethylene (DCE), TCE,
and PCE in many residential and commercial wells. These include the wells that detected
observed releases according to the September 1990 CLP analysis as well as others. The
following is a list of contaminant concentration ranges detected during the October 1987
sampling: 1,2-trans DCE at non-detected levels to 600 ug/L (Tillet); TCE at non-detected levels
to 25 ug/L (Tillet); and PCE at non-detected levels to 2,000 ug/L (Harvey) (Ref. No. 31, pp. 14,
15, 50). In addition, tert-butylmethylether was detected in many wells during this sampling
event. Highest concentrations of tert-butylmethylether were detected in the Tillet and Four
Winds Plaza No. 1 wells at an estimated 470 ug/L (Ref. No. 31, pp. 14, 15, 17, 18). Low
concentration of many other VOCs and semivolatiles were also detected, with the exception of
methylene chloride (detected in the Harvey well at 120,000 ug/L) (Ref. No. 31, pg. 49). U. S.
EPA Technical Assistance Team photovac sampling results from residential and commercial
28
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
wells between July 1987 and February 1990 indicate that VOCs were detected consistently
from the commercial and residential wells. The contaminant concentration ranges of the PCE,
TCE, dichloroethylene (DCE), benzene, and toluene which were consistently found in these
wells are as follows: PCE at non-detected levels to 7,600 ug/L (Harvey); TCE at non-detected
levels to 711 ug/L (Tillet); and DCE at non-detected levels to 620 ug/L (Tillet); benzene at non-
detected levels to 6,950 ug/L (Tillet); and toluene at non-detected levels to 492 ug/L (Tillet)
(Ref. No. 29, pp. 1-19). Based on the US EPA ESD laboratory and photovac results, the
residential and commercial wells were closed down by the VIDPNR between July 31, 1987 and
September 2, 1987 to protect public health. The wells that were closed down include Tillet
(Tutu Water Wells), Steele, Elgin Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Four Winds No. 1 (Plaza Associates),
Harvey. Hartman Estate, Hartman Crusher, and Hartman Estate (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 4, 11, 19,
32, B-5, B-9; 47, p. 3; 51, pp. 4, 5). The VIHA Nos. 1 and 3 were closed due to
contamination, however the exact date of closure is unknown (Ref. Nos. 46. pg. 32). The
Smith well was closed down or prohibited from being used in July 1987 as evidence of
alternate supply and its operating status is discussed in the references (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 11,
19, 32; 47, pg. 3). In September 1990, Contract Laboratory Program analysis of samples from
downgradient wells detected an observed release of TCE, PCE, 1,2-trans dichloroethylene, and
cadmium. Cadmium and TCE were found above the Maximum Contaminant Levels (Ref. No.
33. pp. N-1 -N-19).
Several suspected sources have been identified including gas stations, a dry cleaner, and
auto repair shops. The soils from these properties were sampled and analyzed. The same
indicator contaminants found in groundwater were also detected in soils from the suspected
sources. Waste quantity and waste source fingerprinting has been vague. The amount of
contaminants deposited at or releasing from these sources has not been defined. The
groundwater contamination appears to be confined to the Turpentine Run Upper Basin (Ref.
Nos. 29, pp. 1-18; 30; 31, pp. 1-89; 32; 33, pp. N-1 -N-19; 46, pp. 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11. 12,
32-37, B-1 - B-37; 47; 48. pp. 1-7).
In September 1988 and June 1989, sampling and analysis of soils occurred at several
suspected sources of contamination including the properties of Tutu Texaco Service Station,
Tutu Esso Car Care Center, O'Henry Cleaners, Consolidated Auto Parts (Gasset Motors),
Ramsay Motor Co., Department of Education Building (formerly LAG A), and Tillet Gardens (Ref.
Nos. 3, pp. 1-5; 7, pp. 1-62; 8, pp. 1-5). Low levels of volatile organics such as 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, trichloroethylene (TCE), and tetrachloroethylene (PCE) were also detected in an
excavated soil pile at Tutu Texaco (Ref. No 8. pg. 25). Volatile organics detected in soils on the
O'Henry Cleaners property were tetrachloroethane (440,000 ug/kg), 1,2-trans dichloroethylene
(20 ug/kg estimated), and tetrachloroethylene (180,000 and 190,000 ug/kg) (Ref. Nos. 8, pp.
1-5, 31 ;9, pg. 3. In addition, it is known that O'Henry Cleaners stored PCE, however their
disposal practices were unknown (Ref. No. 50, pp. 6, 7). Semivolatiles detected in soils at the
LAGA Building included but were not limited to phenol (900,000 ug/kg), 2-methylphenol
(320,000 ug/kg), and 4-methylphenol (1,300,000 ug/kg estimated). (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 1-4, 39).
Inorganic E.P. Toxicity analysis of soils identified the presence of cadmium, lead, and barium at
levels below the maximum allowable limits for this test. This analysis is inconclusive for HRS
purposes because it only quantifies the teachable characteristics of those compounds. In
addition, there are no background soils samples for comparison (Ref. Nos. 8, pp. 16, 23, 29,
35, 42, 49; 34, pg. 406)
In June 1989, waste oil samples were collected from underground storage tanks (USTs),
oil/water separators, and other collection/storage vessels at Ramsay Motor Co., Tutu Texaco,
and Tutu Esso. Analysis of these samples detected BTEX and other volatiles such as PCE and
1,1,1-trichloroethane (Ref. Nos. 11, 12).
29
TUT 
OO1 
O04<"i
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
Hazardous Substances Released
Cadmium, 1,2 Dichloroethylene, Trichloroethylene, and Tetrachloroethylene.
Ground Water Observed Release Factor Value: 550
30
001 
OO41
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Toxicity/Mobility
3.2 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
3.2.1 Toxicttv/Mobilitv
Hazardous 
Source 
Toxicity 
Mobility 
Toxicity/
Substance 
No. 
Factor Value 
Factor Value 
Mobility 
Ref.
No. 2,
Appendix B-1
Cadmium 
1 
10,000 
1 
10,000 
pg. B-3
1,2 
1 
100 
1 
100 
pg. B-6
Dichloroethylene
Tetrachloro- 
1 
100 
1 
100 
pg. B-12
ethylene
Trichloro- 
1 
10 
1 
10 
pg. B-13
ethylene
As stated in the HRS final rule in section 3.2.1.2 of the Federal Register Vol. 55 (55 PR), No.
241, December 14, 1990, (page 51601), the following applies to this site "For any hazardous
substance that meets the criteria for an observed release by chemical analysis to one or more
aquifers underlying the site, regardless of the aquifer being evaluated, assign a mobility factor
of 1.
Toxicity/Mobiltty Factor Value: 10,000
31
001 
OO42
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Hazardous Waste Quantity
3.2.2 Hazardous Waste Quantity
Source Hazardous 
Is source hazardous
Waste Quantity 
constituent quantity
Source Number 
Value (Section 2.4.2.1.5) 
data complete? (ves/no)
1 
The waste quantity for this 
NO
groundwater cannot be ascer-
tained. However, an observed
release including Level I and
II concentrations has been
exhibited, therefore the default
value for hazardous waste quantity
(100) would be used, as stated
in section 2.4.2.2 of the HRS
final rule (55 PR 51519-51592,
December 14, 1990).
Sum of Values: SEE ABOVE
3.2.3 Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value
Highest Toxicity/Mobility = Cadmium at 10,000 (see section 3.2.1)
Hazardous Waste Quantity = 100 (see section 3.2.2)
The Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value (32)
is derived from Table 2-7 in section 2.4.3.1 of
the HRS final rule (55 PR 51592, December 14, 1990)
Toxicity/Mobility Factor Value X Hazardous
Waste Quantity Factor Value: 1X10*
10,000 x 100 = 1 x 10e
Hazardous Waste Quantity Factor Value: 100
Waste Characteristics Factor Category Value: 32
32
TUT' 
OO1 
OO43
3.3 TARGETS
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Targets
Distance
Well 
From Source 
Aquifer
Steele 
0 feet
Matthias 0 feet
Harvey 
0 feet
Tillet 
0 feet
Smith 
0 feet
Bedrock
Level I
Contam.
(Y/N)
Bedrock 
Y
Bedrock 
Y
Bedrock 
Y
Bedrock 
N
Bryan #1 4,000 feet 
Bedrock 
N
Bryan #2 4,000 feet 
Bedrock 
N
Demitry 
2,675 feet 
Bedrock 
N
Level II
Contam.
(Y/N)
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Potential
Contam.
(Y/N) 
Ref. Nos.
N 
37, pp. 2, 3,
5, 13; 38, pg.
7; 40; 42; 46,
pg. 19; 53; 54
N 
37, pp. 2, 3,
5, 13; 38, pg.
7; 40; 42; 53;
54
N 
37, pp. 2, 3,
5, 13; 38, pg.
7; 40; 42; 46,
pg. 19; 53; 54
N 
37, pp. 2, 3,
5, 13; 38, pg.
8; 43, pg. 6;
53; 54
N 
37, pp. 2. 3.
5. 13;38, pg.
7; 40; 42; 46,
pg. 19; 53; 54
Y 
37, pp. 2, 3.
5, 13; 40; 42;
53; 54
Y 
37, pp. 2, 3,
5, 13; 40; 42;
53; 54
Y 
37, pp. 2, 3,
5, 13; 40; 42;
53; 54
33
TUT
GO 4 4
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Nearest Well
3.3.1 Nearest Well
Well: Steele
Level of Contamination (I, II, or potential): I
If potential contamination, distance from source in miles:
Nearest Well Factor Value: 50
34
TUT 
OOi 
OO45
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Level I Concentrations
3.3.2 Population
3.3.2.1 Level of Contamination
3.3.2.2 Level I Concentrations
Level I Well 
Population 
Reference
Harvey' 
10 
46, pg. 19
Steele** 
28 
46, pg. 19
Matthias**• 
5 
53. 54
Tillef** 
200 
53. 54
On September 2, 1987, this well was closed by the VIDPNR to protect public health due
volatile organic contamination (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 4, 11, 32; 47, pg. 3; 51, pg. 5). An
alternate drinking water has been provided since 1987 at and been maintained at least
through March 1990 (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19; 51, pg. 6). A December 1988 Potable Water
Alternatives report prepared by Roy F. Weston, Region 2 TAT indicates that this well
served 10 people (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August
1990 and March 1991 indicate that this well was not being used (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2,
3; 38, pg. 7). In addition, a well appropriations permit list dated July 31, 1987 states
that this well was permitted for domestic use in 1978 (Ref. No. 41, pg. 5). April 1991
and May correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates this well presently serves 4 people
and the current usage is for flushing and secondary use (Ref. Nos. 53, 54). A population
of 10 was assigned to this well because this was the population when the well was
closed down or prohibited from being used. Present use of the this well also indicates
that it is available for potable water usage.
On September 2, 1987, this well was closed by the VIDPNR to protect public health due
volatile organic contamination (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 4, 11, 32; 47, pg. 3; 51, pg. 5). An
alternate drinking water has been provided since 1987 and been maintained at least
through March 1990 (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19; 51, pg. 6). A December 1988 Potable Water
Alternatives report prepared by Roy F. Weston, Region 2 TAT indicates that this well
served 28 people (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August
1990 and March 1991 indicate that this well was being used for irrigation/stock and
domestic purposes, respectively (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3; 38, pg. 7). April 1991 and May
correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates this well presently serves 20 people. The
current well usage is unknown (Ref. Nos. 53, 54). A population of 28 was assigned to
this well because this was the population when the well was closed down or prohibited
from being used.
35
TUT 
001 
0046
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
'** 
In 1987, this well apparently was not closed down. However, PCE and TCE have been
consistently detected in this well since 1987 (Ref. Nos. 30, pp. 6, 10, 14, 18; 31, pg.
52). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August 1990 and March 1991 indicate
that this well was being used for and domestic purposes (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3; 38, pg.
7). April and May 1991 correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates that this well
presently serves 5 people, however is presently used for flushing and secondary usage
(Ref. Nos. 53, 54). The population served by this well obtains potable water from an
alternate. It is not known whether this well was ever used for potable purposes. It was
counted as part of the "Level I" population because it is not closed down and remains
available for potable usage.
>••• On July 31.1987, the Tillet well (Tutu Water Wells) was closed by the VIDPNR to
protect public health due to volatile organic contamination (Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 4, 11, 32,
B-5, B-9; 47, pg. 3; 51, pg. 5). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from August 1990
and March 1991 indicate that this well was not being used (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2. 3, 5;
38, pg. 8). April and May 1991 correspondence with the VIDPNR indicates that this well
is presently not being used, however it serves 200 people when operational (Ref. Nos.
53, 54). A population of 200 was assigned to this well because this was the population
when the well was closed down.
Population Served by
Level I Wells: 243 
Level I Concentrations Factor Value: 2430
36
TUT 
001 
OO47
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Levei II Concentrations
3.3.2.3 Level II Concentrations
Level II Well 
Population 
Reference
Smith* 
12 
46, pg. 19
The Smith Well was closed down or prohibited from being used in July 1987 as evidence
of alternate drinking water supply and its operating status is discussed in the references
(Ref. Nos. 46, pp. 11, 19. 32; 47, pg. 3, 17; 51, pg. 6). A December 1988 Potable
Water Alternatives report prepared by Roy F. Weston, Region 2 TAT indicates that this
well served 12 people (Ref. No. 46, pg. 19). U.S. Geological Survey inventories from
August 1990 and March 1991 indicate that this well was being used for domestic
purposes (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3; 38, pg. 7). April 1991 correspondence with the
VIDPNR indicates that this well presently serves 8 people. In addition, it is not known
whether the well is presently being used for drinking purposes (Ref. Nos. 53, 54). A
population of 12 was assigned to this well because this was the population when the
well was closed down or prohibited from being used.
Population served by
Level II Wells: 12 
Level II Concentrations Factor Value: 12
37
'TUT 
001 
CO 4 8
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Potential Contamination
3.3.2.4 Potential Contamination
Well
N/A
N/A
Bryan #1
Bryan #2
Demitry
N/A
N/A
N/A
Distance
Category
0- 1/4 mile
1/4- 1/2 mile
1/2-1 mile
1/2-1 mile
1/2-1 mile
1 - 2 miles
2 - 3 miles
3-4 miles
Population
0
0
509*
509*
509*
0
0
0
Reference
N/A
N/A
37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13;
43, pp. 93. 94; 45,
PQ. 19; 53; 54; 55
N/A
N/A
N/A
Distance-Weighted
Population Value
0
0
523
N/A
N/A
0
0
0
Between 1987 and the present, wells owned and operated by the Virgin Island Housing
Authority (VIHA) in the Tutu projects were closed. Residents of the projects then attained
their potable water via trucking, bottled water, and water mains from other public supply
wells. The Bryan and Demitry wells are presently two of the suppliers serving the VIHA via
water main. In 1989, 1,528 people at the Tutu VIHA were reportedly being serve potable
water via cistern. It is therefore assumed that the potential population has not changed
and the Bryan and Demitry wells would serve a portion or all of the population at the VIHA.
No information is available on apportionment of water to the VIHA. It is assumed that each
of the three wells serve the VIHA equally (509 people/well) (Ref. Nos. 37, pp. 2, 3, 5, 13;
43, pp. 93, 94; 45. pg. 19; 53; 54; 55).
Sum of Distance-Weighted Population Values: 523
Potential Contamination Factor Value: 52
38
TUT 
001 
0049
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Resources
3.3.3 RESOURCES
Well 
Aouifer 
Resource Use 
Reference
N/A 
N/A 
N/A
Resources Factor Value:
39
TUT' 
001 
0050
02-9102-11-HR
Rev. No. 1
GW-Wellhead Protection Area
3.3.4 
WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA
Area 
Use 
Reference 
Value
There are no known wellhead protection areas within 
0
4 miles of the site.
Wellhead Protection Area Factor Value: 0
40
TUT 
OO1 
GO51
SECTION IVrRQURES
L
.•: ••-•'.
TUT 
001 
COS2
Rev. No. 1
*^^li 
v-^*« :aa*faf
lr-;j;v* \\
TUTU WELLFIELD 
.SS
(APPROXIMATE LOCATION)!
VIRGIN ISLANOS
(QUAD) EASTERN ST. THOMAS, USVI
SITE LOCATION MAP
TUTU WELLF1ELD, ST. THOMAS, USVI
SCALE: r* 2000
FIGURE 1
IMUS
TUT 00.1 
OO5J
Rev. No. i
SITE MAP
TUTU WELLF1ELD
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 2
IMLJE
CXDRFOPATO
TUT 
OO1 
0054
REFERENCE NO.1
TUT 
001 
OO55
12-14-90
Vot 55 
NO. 241
Friday
December 14, 1990
Book 2
II
United States
Government
Printing Office
SUPERINTENDENT
OF DOCUMENTS
Washington. DC 20402
SECOND CLASS NEWSPAPER
PosUg* and Fe«s Paid
US Gov»mm»nt Printing Office
(ISSN 0097-6326I
OFFICIAL BUSINESS
Penalty tor private use. J300
TUT 
001 
O056
TOO 
ini
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
Z -ON 30N3U3d3d
ll
IIIII
1
1
1
1
1
-A
/' J
tt.
S & M CRANCM
SUPERFUND CHEMICAL DATA MATRIX
DATA SOURCES
November 27,1990
TUT 
001 
GO53
REFERENCE NO. 2
SUPERFUND CHEMICAL DATA MATRIX
April, 1991
TUT 
001 
O060
I
I
I
I
REFERENCE NO. 3
"UT 
001 
0061
CDM i cderal Programs Corporacion
September 19, 1968
Ms. Caroline Kwan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
Project: 
EPA Contract No. 68-01-7331
Document No. T648-C02-EP-CJLY-1
Subject: 
Updated Technical Review of Documents
Tutu Wellfield/Supercat Laundromat CERCLA 104(e) Responses
W.A. 648 and W.A. 821
Dear Ms. Kwan:
Enclosed is the updated technical review of nine CERCLA 104(e) responses
submitted by 1) O'Henry Cleaners 2) Ramsay Motors, Inc. 3) Consolidated
Auto Parts Inc. 4) Rodriquez Auto Parts, Inc. 5) Esso Tutu Car Care
Center 6) Texaco Tutu Service Station 7) Jim Tillet, Inc. 8) Caribbean
Jeep and Car Rental and 9) Virgin Island Housing Authority.
It is recommended that further site investigations be conducted as soon as
possible at the above mentioned facilities or other areas of concern to
complete this review, information on potential sources and potential
contaminants of concern may not have been noted in the CERCLA 104(e)
responses.
Please return any comments or suggested changes to me or Robert Goltz.
Sincerely,
CDM Federal Programs Corporation
Scott Grader
Work Assignment Manager
SG:mm
Attachment
cc: Jose Font, CFO
Francine Lang, DPNR
Amy Chester, ORC
NYC File
E. Sayed, CDM FPC - HQ
(SG2/7)
59 John Sam, Eighth ROOT New York, NY 10038 2123934634 
TUT 
001 
0061
(/Henry
Cleaners
Mztors, Inc.
(trtamnant(s)
of Cbncem
-Dry cleaning
(i.e. 
tetrachloroe-
thylene- PCE)
2-butOKyethanol
hexylane glyool
Rjst-GD (IF acid)
-EX-Pedite degreaser
-E^-Cua-it
Process(es)
Recycling of FOB
Use/transfer of PCE
of FCE
volatile solvents)
Dye Stripper
Used oil
Kerosene
-*SEP degreaser (naptha,
solvents
Potent^ 
Source
Leaching pit
Sunp holding tank
Raw naterial storage area
Above ground fuel tank
5 gallon containers of
spent FCE (filter values
or dry) FCE residue
55-gallcn druoB PCE
2000-gallcn aboveground
tank
Potential
Pelease/Rute
Sfrillage of FCE
to grounoVBter/surfaoe veter/
soil/ air (inferred)
Obments (
PCE ray not be the only
dry cleaning fiinH
used, tto other infix-
nation vas available on the
dry cleaning operation
Ajtomotive service
Car engine cleaning
Deposition of oil
IBT (block and nectar tank) IET to grajndwater/goil
Druns 
(inferred)
kerosene to and from
underground storage
tank (LET)
petroleum distillates,
ethoMylated nonyl
>_ - 
% 
_ _ 
>
I m f^fpl 
- I Ml w ^fftf
All grades SfE motor oil
*Godd hand cleaner
(ncnoxynol, petro-
leum distillates)
-*S1P Garb spray (xylene,
butyl oellosolve, un-
specified solvents)
Transmission fiinH
-"Brake cleaner (1,1,1-
trichloroethane, per-
crxiQcmjtJryLsnBy CMTX^I
dioxide propellent)
*Kendall antifreeze and
coolant (ethylene gly-
col
additives)
WMO Lubricant (petro-
leum distillates)
Injector fluid
Radiator flush
Gasoline
1. Contaminant constituents included in parentheses, vten known, fix ocmnercial products listed.
2. "*" indicates that listing of hazardous ingredients is supported by fbterial Safety Data Sheet-? (MSB)
3. "**" indicates that hpogMrfriK ingredients are listed elsewhere in table, based on other respondent's
4. "-" indicates that product probably contains a chlorinated solvent.
-1-
JimTillPtt,
Inc.
Contaninant(s)
of Cbnoem
-Stater-based dyes
(amcniun hydroxide,
mineral spirits)
including Plastioue
Ptccess(es)
Fabric silk screening
aqueous residue is
Gvspootod onto $?FX?
Which is di spread of
Potent/
Source
Runt containers;
raw material storage
area
Potential
teleaae/feute
Cne drain to unknown des-
tination; second drain
to evaporation pit.
Cements
All colors are clflimnrl to be
voter-based.
Silver Pearl No. 1120EL off-site
Marten Thidool NO. 359
Marten Thiokol No. 475
Caribbean Jeep
and Car Rantal
Unleaded gasoline
Consolidated 
Vteste oil
Auto Parts, Inc. Engine Fluids
-"Ch9nical5"(auto)
various grades of
motor oil
Storage and transfer
of product to and from
UST
Autcodtive service
Storage of waste
prcducts in druoos
(unoowered-infierred)
Storage of caw
LET:
gasoline
(JBI^pipes to grounoVater,
surface water, soil
55 gal druns of waste oil
Shallow ditch near the
service bays
Service yard/bays
Drums of products
Drums to gcoundwater/
surface vater/storn drains/
in site runoff noted in
Based on limited knowledge
of tenant; need to oonficm/
expand information with cvnei
(Bsso, St. Unas)
A list of chemicals used/
sold was not provided
Service bays/^erd to storm
drains
Virgin Islands
ftousing
Authority
tydraulic fluid
storage of hydraulic
fliriri inlBT
dealership; 
LET; hydraulic hoists
lines to
graundwater/surface vater/
soil (inferred)
1. Ccntzninant constituents included in parentheses, when known, for oomercial products
2. "*" indicates that listing of hazardous ingredients is sufpxted by Ifeterial Safety Data Sheets (ffitB).
3. "**" indicates that hazacdbus ingredients are listed elsewhere in table, based on other cespondent's M9S.
4. "-" indicates that product probably contains a chlorinated solvent.
Property was used by TtopLca
96 fln
hydraulic hoists, prior to
usebyvniV. YMV official
cevealed p ^ ** ^ ij*i UST
containing hydraulic ^H"d
use to operate hoists.
The UST existence has not
been verified,.
-2-
Ccntantnant(s)
of Concern
Ptooess(es)
Rjtentiaf 
uroe
ttapentiai
Release/Rxite
Rodriguez
Eferts
Oil
Gasoline
Kerosene
Xylene
-Sell sol (low aronatic
Oute spirit/fetcctiard
solvent)
Groase
Ajtonotive service
Storage/transfer of
waste products to
pit and dcuns
Texaco Tutu 
Gasoline
Service Station used oil
*l<totor Flush (xylene,
petcoleun
AJtnnotive service
Storage/transfer of
products to and from
USE;
-**SIP degreaser
-**STPCarb spray
Drive and dean Gasoline
Detergent
Tvo (5000 gad) USls:
Super Premiim and Regular
unleaded
Underground pit used to
collect oil from the
garage collection
(used until 7 or 8 yrs ago) (cement) to
Old car wash drain lines
Gild drain to
sewer
USls/pipes to
groundMater(GW)/soiV
surface voter (SW)
underground pit
(until 1966) to collect
"gray" voter from the
car vash
Drum of product
IFIs - Unleaded/leadad
gasoline
i*» Separator
Car care floor drain
Car care catch basins
Drum storage area
Old car vash drain lines
to O-i/SK/Soil
Oenant cistern to sewer
to
groundwBter/&uirface
vater/toil
Catch basins to sewer
Mr. R>;ii ifjw. nay have
purchased a franchise
from Bssan and wnilf" ri>
an affiliate of Esso.
UStt were removed from service
as follows:
1 (4,000 gals) tank July '80
Out of svce f*^ to g^p»ft*jd
leak (BetrotiteTest);
2 (4,000 gals) tanks July '80
Cut of service due to failing
mechanical integrity test.
The tank installation is not
! with a lining system.
It is indicated that the tank
piping WB6 rpplanaH fiy tO a
pinhole in one of the pipes
(Pipeline test perfiooned).
chemicals were used but
a chemical list was not
provided. VW77 letter
indicated 2242 gals of
premium gasoline loss attri-
buted to pipeline leaks
(other letters
1. Contaminant constituents inckrfed in parentheses, vhen known, for ccmnercial products
2. "*" indicates that listing of hazardaus ingredients is supported by fbterial Safety Data Sheets (M!£).
3. "**" indicates that hazardous ingredients are listed elsewhere in table, based on other respondnet's VEDB.
4. "-" indicates that product probably contains a chlorinated solvent.
Qrtamnant(s)
of Concern
Esso Tutu
Car Care Center
(hale
ited
Gasoline
(feed oil
-Frecn R72
hydc
Antifreeze (ethylene
glyool)
Battery fluid
Rawer steering fluid
-*MXur flush
SIP gas treatment
A.O.K. gas treatnent
-fuel injection cleaner
Pics&l fi^^ QondL
Transmission Seal/xrd.
Wyrns Friction Proof
Wyrre Spitfire trtmnt
Wyms top cylinder oil
Super radiator flush
Water puop lube
Tinjrid radiator sealer
R-6 Bar's Step leak
Super octane trtnEnt
Dry gas treatment
Upholstery cleaner
-Chrcne cleaner
-Magvheel cleaner
-Bug and tar reamer
WhitEvall tire cleaner
-Spoke and wire cleaner
cleaner
Prooe^ s)
Ajtcoctive service
Storage/transer of
products to and/tx
vasteprcdrts to and
fromlBIs
Source
Puoanial
QCmnents
Uileadad/Leaded
gasoline
UST- 2000 gal oil tank
(cistern) in mechanic shop
f>qr care area flcr drain
Mechanic shop floor drain
Drain lines to sever
UBIs/pipss to grcunduater/
surface vater/soil
-**Grake cleaner
Silicon spray
Penetrating oil
Bust Oleutt undercoat
WD40 lube spray
Brake Quiet spray
Ignition dryer spray
White lithiun grease
Bat. term, protector
High tesp. brg. grease
<'ift^i^ oil
powder y^H^t'or' g^^l^f*
numerous car vax products
Brake fluid
A.O.K. Octane Boost
ND ceoords maintained en oil IBT. Results of 7/27-26^87 tank test indicated that tie
structural integrity of the premium unleaded UBT was qjesticned since the petrotite
test was sl»'n*«i <^»» to a p^BgiHiA leak; stand pp» <^»s decreasing.
. CtntanLnant constituents induced in parentheses, vhen kncwi, for oumeiual products listed.
2. "*" indicates that listing of hazarcbus ingredients is supported by ifeterial safety Data Sheets (I6S).
3. "**" indicates that hazardous ingredients are listed elsewhere in table, based on other respondent's HSDS.
4. "-" indicates that product probably contains a chlorinated solvent.
o
It"
I
I
I
r 
. 
. 
• 
• 
, 
...
i
I 
REFERENCE NO. 4
1
I
I
TUT 
001 
006"
00, 7
02-8902-40-PA
REV. NO. 1
FINAL DRAFT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
TUTU TEXACO
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
PREPARED UNDER
TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-8902-40
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346
FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MARCH 31,1989
REVISE DM AY 26.1989
NUS CORPORATION
SUPERFUND DIVISION
SUBMITTED BY:
' / f
,&/>Lr' 
^AjLiJi
DIAftE TRUBE
PROJECT MANAGER
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY:
SEPHWAYO
ITE MANAGER
RONALD M. NAMAN
FIT OFFICE MANAGER
TUT 
001 
OO68
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
PART I: SITE INFORMATION
1.
2.
3
4.
8.
9.
Site Name/Alias Tutu Texaco
Street Route 38 and Route 384
City St. Thomas (Tutu District)
County 
N/A
State U.S. Virgin Islands 
Zip 08002
County Code 
N/A 
Cong. Dist. N/A
ERA ID No. New Site
Latitude 
18°20'34"N.
Longitude 64° 53' t8"W.
USGS Quad. Eastern St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands
Owner Texaco Caribbean
Tel. No. 809-774-1931
Street PO Box 3740
City Charlotte Amalie
Operator Unknown
Street________
City_________
State U.S. Virgin Island 
Zip 00801
Tel. No.________________
State
Type of Ownership
[x] Private
D County 
Q Municipal
Q State
Q Unknown
D Other.
Owner/Operator Notification on File
D RCRA 3001 
Date ______
[xj None 
D Unknown
Permit Information
Permit 
Permit No. 
Date Issued
None __ 
________ 
_______
QCERCLA103C
Date
Expiration Date
Comments
10. 
Site Status
ra Active
11. 
Years of Operation
Inactive
Unknown
Q Unknown
to 
Present
UT 
001 
006C
I
I
I
I
I
1
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
12. 
Identify the types of waste units (e.g.. landfill, surface impoundment, piles, stained soil,
above- or below-ground tanks or containers, land treatment, etc.) on site. Initiate as many
waste unit numbers as needed to identify all waste sources on site.
(a) 
Waste Management Areas
Waste Unit No. 
Waste Unit Type 
Facility Name for Unit
1 
_______Drums________ 
Waste Oil Drums_________
2 
Underground Storage Tanks 
Waste Oil Underground Storage Tanks
(b) 
Other Areas of Concern
Identify any miscellaneous spills, dumping, etc. on site; describe the materials and identify
their locations on site.
No other spiHs. incidents of dumping, etc, were observed on the site during the t^S Corp.
Region 2 FITon-site reconnaissance on 2/15/89.
13. 
Information available from
Contact Amy Bcochu______ 
Aaencv U.S. ERA_______ Tel. No. (201)906-6802
Preoarer Joseph Mavo_____ 
Agency NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Date 03/31/89_____
'TUT 
001 
00'70
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
PART II: 
WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION
For each of the waste units identified in Part I. complete the following six items.
Waste Unit 
1 
- 
____Drums______, 
Waste Oil Drums
1. 
Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit.
There are no known RCRA permits for this waste unit. The age of this waste unit is unknown.
Until June 1986, the Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil and used it for
fuel. A batch of waste oil was found to contain polychlormated biphenyls (PCBs), and WAPA
stopped accepting waste oil. Currently, there is no acceptable method for disposal of waste oil
on St. Thomas. Waste oil generators must store all their oil.
2. 
Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map.
The waste unit is located in the northern corner of the Tutu Texaco property.
3. 
Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g., area or volume of a landfill or surface
impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous
substances in the waste unit.
There are twenty-seven 55-gallon drums in the waste unit. Twenty-five of these drums
contain waste oil generated from automotive repair and servicing operations. The remaining
two drums reportedly contain dirt. There are also three 20-gallon drums and a few 5-gallon
pails containing waste oil on site. The total quantity of waste in this unit is approximately
1420 gallons.
4. 
Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The
physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry,
liquid, or gas.
Twenty-five of the drums contain liquid waste oil. Two of the drums reportedly contain dirt
which is a solid.
5. 
Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit.
Twenty-five of the drums on site contain liquid waste oil from automotive repair and servicing
operations. This oil may contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing
solvents. Sample analyses of waste oil from the Tutu Texaco station reportedly detected the
presence of trichloroethane (TCA). However, the analysis results were invalidated because the
sample holding times were exceeded.
6. 
Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via
groundwater, surface water, and air.
The waste in the unit is contained in drums that are stored on a concrete surface. There are no
berms or curbs to contain the oil in the event of a spill. There is evidence of spills in the
storage area, and the bung on one of the drums was open.
An OVA flame ionization detector noted a reading of 20 ppm from the open drum. There
were no readings above background in the ambient air in the drum storage area.
The lack of containment of the waste unit provides the potential for release to surface water
by runoff from spills and for release to groundwater by runoff and subsequent percolation
through soil.
Ref Nos 1.21.22.24
TUT 
OO1 
O071
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
PART II: 
WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION
For each of the waste units identified in Part I, complete the following six items.
Waste Unit 
2 
- 
Underground Storage Tanks . 
Waste Oil Underground Storage Tanks
1. 
Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit.
There are no known RCRA permits for this waste unit. The age of this waste unit is unknown.
Until June 1986, the Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil and used it for
fuel. A batch of waste oil was found to contain PCBs, and WAPA stopped accepting waste oil
Currently, there is no acceptable method for disposal of waste oil on St. Thomas. Waste oil
generators must store all their oil.
2. 
Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map.
The exact location of the waste unit is unknown as the tanks were not observed during the on-
site reconnaissance conducted by NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT on 2/15/89. A preliminary
investigation conducted by the Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) on
8/5/87 indicated the presence of two underground storage tanks. One tank had a concrete top
and a concrete partition, and the second tank was covered with a square steel plate. The
volume and composition of the tanks were not determined. The material in the tanks is
reported to be waste oil.
3. 
Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g., area or volume of a landfill or surface
impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous
substances in the waste unit.
The capacity of the tanks and the quantity of waste in the unit are unknown.
4. 
Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The
physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry,
liquid, or gas.
The physical state of the waste is liquid.
5. 
Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit.
The waste unit contains automotive waste oil. Substances such as gasoline, kerosene, and
degreasing solvents may be present in the oil. Samples of Tutu Texaco waste oil were reported
to contain TCA. However, the sample analysis results were invalidated because the sample
holding times were exceeded.
6. 
Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via
groundwater, surface water, and air.
The containment of the waste unit is unknown. The tanks are covered, but no other
information concerning the tanks' waste containment properties is available.
Ref Nos. 1.21.22.24______________
("5 **
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
PART III: HAZARD ASSESSMENT
GROUNDWATER ROUTE
1. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the groundwater as follows:
observed, alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and
provide a rationale for attributing the contaminants) to the facility.
The potential exists for wastes on the Tutu Texaco Site to be released to groundwater. There
is evidence (photo No. R3-P10) that spilled oil is staining soil and may be transported to
groundwater. There are no berms or curbs to contain the waste from the drums in the event
of a spill. One of the drums was open.
The drums on site contain automotive waste oil. Air monitoring instrument readings indicate
that organic vapors are present in one of the drums. It is reported that samples of waste oil
collected from the site contained TCA. However, the sample analysis results were invalidated
because the sample holding times were exceeded.
There is insufficient information available to evaluate a release from the underground storage
tank for waste oil as the construction and integrity of this tank are unknown. There are no
reports of spills or leaks from this tank; however, waste oil in the tank is being stored in
violation of U.S. Virgin Islands laws.
Ref. No. 1,22,24
2. 
Describe the aquifer of concern; include information such as depth, thickness, geologic
composition, permeability, overlying strata, confining layers, interconnections,
discontinuities, depth to water table, groundwater flow direction.
The rock units of St. Thomas and St. John are divided into three major groups: The Water
Island Formation, the Virgin Island Group, and an unnamed group made up of one or more
dioritic plutons. The Water Island Formation, which is late lower Cretaceous in age, consists of
keratophyre and spiHates. The Virgin Island Group, which is probably early Cretaceous or
Albian in age, consists of andesitic-pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary formations. The Virgin
Island Group is divided into four formations: the Louisenhoj Formation, which consists of
augite-andesite breccia, tuff, and conglomerate; the Outer Brass Limestone which consists of
partially silicified-tuffaceous-radiolarian-limestone; the Tutu Formation, which consists of
tuffaceous wacke, including megabreccia near the base and limestone near the top; and the
Hans Lollik Formation, which may be Eocene in age, and consists of augite-andesite breccia
and tuff. The final group is made up of one or more dioritic plutons. These unamed dikes and
plugs of quartz - andesine-hornblende porphory are Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in
age. Alluvium deposits are quarternary in age.
The Water Island Formation, which consists of 95 percent volcanic flow breccias, was probably
extruded on a relatively level ocean floor. The absence of terrigenous sediments from this
formation indicates that there were no emergent islands present in the area at the time of
extrusion. Emergent islands would have served as a source of weather sediments or detritus,
whic-fi is not present in this formation. There is evidence that sea floor subsidence occurred
during the greater part of the accumulation of this formation. 
However, the subsidence was
not rapid enough to maintain a constant water level, thereby causing explosive erruptions
near the top of the formation. Regional uplift occurred near the end of Water Island time.
TUT 
OOi
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
The Louisenhoj Formation of the Virgin Island Group unconformably overlies the Water Island
Formation and crops out on about half of the land area on St. Thomas. Pillsbury sound
between St. Thomas and St. John was the origin of this formation. Evidence of this center is
based upon the coarseness of volcanic eject a in the formation in nearby eastern St. Thomas
and western St. John. Material is less coarse and tuffs are more predominant further east and
west away from the pluton. This augite-andesite formation ranges in thickness from 4,000 to
13,000 feet. In certain areas of St. Thomas and St. John conglomerates are interbedded with
andesitic rocks at the base of this formation. The depositional environment of this
conglomerate varies from location to location throughout the formation.
The Outer Brass Formation of the Virgin Island Group is mostly siliceous limestone, which
overlies the Louisenhoj Formation. This limestone formation is an offshore deposit formed by
radiolarian and foraminiferal remains including a minor amount of tuff. Thicknesses are
known to be up to at least 600 feet.
Overlying the Outer Brass Formation is the Tutu Formation. The Tutu Formation is fine- to
coarse-grained volcanic wackes, which are termed flysch. This formation is derived from
eroding sediments from the Louisenhoj andesites. Exposed thicknesses are known to be as
much as 6000 feet. Within this formation, a megabreccia lithofacies with an average thickness
of 30 feet and a limestone member with thickness up to 300 feet are worth mentioning.
The Hans Lollik Formation, which consists of at least 10,000 feet of augite-andesite pyroclastic
rocks, crops out on Little Hans Lollik Island. Oioritic plutons are located in Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St. John; the narrows, between St. John and the British Virgin
Islands; and south of St. Thomas. The exact delineation of these plutons is uncertain.
Throughout the islands isolated dikes of quartz-andesine porphyries, andesine-hornblende
porphyries, lamprophyres, breccias, and pegmatites appear.
Folding occurred after the deposition of the Virgin Island Group. Rocks were tilted to form a
northward-dipping homocline, which is cut by sets of faults trending N 45°W, N 55°E and
north. Well-defined joint sets parallel each of the major fault trends. Dips range from 15° to
90° with the average being 40°. Strike-slip faults have horizontal offsets of less than 1 mile.
Two major strike-slip graben structures or fault systems exist. The first passes through
Redhook, St. Thomas and the eastern tip of Lovango Cay. The second crosses St. John, from
Contact Point on the southwest to Brown's Bay on the northeast.
Most recently. Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial deposits occurred primarily in coastal
embayments. However, a narrow bank of alluvium extends up to Turpentine Run on the east
end of the island. Most of these deposits are composed of silt, clay, and thin, discontinuous
beds of sand and gravel. Maximum thickness of these is 50 feet.
Groundwater movement is limited to openings and joints along fault zones. Regional
geologic information is insufficient to determine whether these fractures and fault zones are
present in all of the above-described formations; however, for this report it is assumed that
the fractures and fault zones are present in all of these formations. The valleys on the island
are the result of weak zones caused by faulting and jointing and are primary recharge areas
for groundwater. Alluvial deposits have a high porosity but low permeability, making this
aquifer unfavorable for groundwater production. In coastal embankments throughout the
island, saltwater intrusion is widespread in alluvial deposits. In most areas, alluvial deposits
are interconnected with bedrock and act to recharge precipitation to the underlying bedrock.
TUT 
001 
0074
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
The direction of groundwater flow in the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer is south-southeast
which is generally along the direction of flow of Turpentine Run. Depth to groundwater in
the aquifer ranges from 5 to 60 feet, arid the altitude of the water level ranges from 1 to 209
feet above mean sea level.
Ref. Nos. 9,11,16
3. 
Is a designated sole source aquifer within 3 miles of the site?
No sole source aquifer, as designated in the Federal Register, is located within 3 miles of the
site.
Ref No. 8
4. 
What is the depth from the lowest point of waste disposal/storage to the highest seasonal
level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern?
Drums are stored on a cement floor at ground level. The lowest point of the waste oil
underground storage tank is unknown but is assumed to be at least 6 feet. Depth to
groundwater in Virgin Island Housing Authority (VIHA) well Nos. 1 and 2, which are located
approximately 500 feet northeast of the site, is reported to be 56 and 60 feet, respectively.
Therefore, the depth from the lowest point of storage to the highest seasonal level of the
saturated zone of the aquifer of concern is approximately 50 feet.
Ref. Nos. 1,2,9
5. 
What is the permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum
between the ground surface and the aquifer of concern?
There are no continuous intervening strata between the ground surface and the bedrock
aquifer. Soils are generally thin in the area around the site. The water-bearing formations in
the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer are composed primarily of fractured and jointed volcanic
rocks. The range of hydraulic conductivities associated with these formations is 10-3 to 10-5
cm/sec.
Ref. Nos. 10, 11, 16
6. 
What is the net precipitation for the area?
Net precipitation is usually calculated by subtracting mean annual lake evaporation (a
surrogate measure for evapotranspiration) from normal annual total precipitation. Mean
annual lake evaporation information was not available for St. Thomas; however,
evapotranspiration data were available. These data indicate that 95.8 percent of the incident
precipitation on St. Thomas is lost through evapotranspiration. The normal annual total
precipitation for St. Thomas is 43.74 inches, but because of orographic effects on the island,
normal annual total precipitation can range from 35 inches to 50 inches over short distances.
In the Turpentine Run Basin, normal annual precipitation is 40 inches. Calculations for net
precipitation are provided below:
40 inches precipitation x 95.8 percent lost to evapotranspiration = 38.32 inches lost to
evapotranspi ration
40 inches precipitation - 38.32 inches lost to evapotranspiration = 1.68 inches net
precipitation
Ref Nos 3, 5, 12, 13
001 
OO75
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
7. 
Identify uses of groundwater within 3 miles of the site (i.e., private drinking source,
municipal source, commercial, industrial, irrigation, unusable).
Groundwater within 3 miles of the site is used as a source of private and municipal drinking
water, and for commercial purposes. There are at least 41 wells within 2 miles of the site.
Thirty-four of these wells are within 1 mile of the site. Sixteen of these wells have been closed
because they are contaminated with volatile organic compounds.
Ref. Nos. 6, 9
What is the distance to and depth of the nearest well that is currently used for drinking or
irrigation purposes?
Distance 500 feet_________ 
Depth 
150 feet__________
The nearest well is the VIHA well No. 2, which is located approximately 500 feet northeast of
Texaco. This well is believed to be used for drinking. A nearby well, VIHA No. 1, was ordered
closed because of contamination with volatile organic compounds. VIHA weM\No. 2 is not
listed as being closed for contamination, and its designated use is for domestic ^jfc05*5-
Ref. Nos. 6,9
9. 
Identify the population served by the aquifer of concern within a 3-mile radius of the site.
It is difficult to estimate the population served by groundwater on St. Thomas as there are few
records available on groundwater withdrawal, sale, and transport. The locations of some
wells in St. Thomas are unknown, and there are reports of illegal drilling on the island. It is
estimated that there are 500 to 600 private wells on St. Thomas. Most of these are used for
nondrinking domestic purposes such as washing and flushing, although some may be used for
drinking. There are a number of wells that are used for commercial purposes. Water from
these wells is trucked to private houses and pumped into cisterns to augment the rainwater
collected from roofs. Groundwater is also bottled and sold in supermarkets.
There are at least 41 wells in the Turpentine Run Basin. Recently 16 of these wells have been
ordered closed because they were found to be contaminated with volatile organic
compounds. One of these wells was a major supplier of water to the eastern end of the island.
Estimates of the population using groundwater as a source of drinking water range from none
to approximately 11,000-the population of the Turpentine Run Basin which is not served by
water from the desalinization plant. The actual population served by groundwater is
probably less than 11,000, as desalinated water and water from wells outside the 3-mile radius
is trucked into the area.
Ref. Nos. 9,13.15, 18,19
SURFACE WATER ROUTE
10. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminants) to surface water as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminants) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility.
A potential exists for contaminants to be transported to surface water. There were some spills
in the drum storage area, and there were no containment structures around the drums to
prevent migration of the spills.
TUT 
001 
007.;
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No. 1
The drums contain waste oil generated from automotive repair and maintenance activities.
Air monitoring instruments indicated the presence of organic vapors in an open drum on site.
Samples of waste oil from the Tutu Texaco Site were reported to contain TCA. However, the
sample analysis results were invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded.
The waste oil may also contain small quantities of substances such as gasoline, kerosene, and
degreasing solvents.
Ref. Nos. 1,22,24
11. 
Identify and locate the nearest downslope surface water. If possible, include a description of
possible surface drainage patterns from the site.
The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon, which is hydraulically
connected to the Caribbean Sea. The distance from the site to the nearest surface water along
the course of Turpentine Run, an intermittent stream that drains the Turpentine Run Basin, is
2.5 miles. There are a number of storm sewers near the site, and it is possible that these sewers
may intercept much of the runoff from the site. It is unknown where the storm sewers
discharge, but it is suspected that they discharge to Turpentine Run as it is the only drainage
pathway from the basin.
Ref. Nos. 2, 4, 5
12. 
What is the facility slope in percent? (Facility slope is measured from the highest point of
deposited hazardous waste to the most downhill point of the waste area or to where
contamination is detected.)
The facility slope is relatively flat with a slight slope toward the south-southwest. Facility slope
is estimated to be 0 to 3 percent.
Ref. Nos. 1,2
13. 
What is the slope of the intervening terrain in percent? (Intervening terrain slope is
measured from the most downhill point of the waste area to the probable point of entry to
surface water.)
The slope of the intervening terrain cannot be calculated, as runoff may discharge to storm
sewers and the path of these sewers is unknown. If runoff follows an overland route, the
slope of the intervening terrain could be as follows:
• 
Elevation of waste area - 200 ft
• 
Elevation at point of entry -Oft
• 
Path length-13000ft
200 ft - 0 ft x 100 = 1.5 percent
13.000
Ref. Nos. 1,2
OO1 
0077
02-8902-40-PA
Rev No. 1
14. 
What is the 1-year 24-hour rainfall?
One-year 24-hour rainfall data were not available for the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, it is
known that rains exceeding 1 inch in 24 hours occur six or seven times a year on St. Thomas. It
has also been reported that it is not uncommon for 24-hour rainfalls to be 2 to 3 inches.
Ref Nos. 4, 6
15. 
What is the distance to the nearest downslope surface water? Measure the distance along a
course that runoff can be expected to follow.
The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon which is hydraulically
connected to the Caribbean Sea. 
The distance from the site to the lagoon is 2.S miles. It
appears that most runoff from the site enters storm drains near the site. Since the point of
discharge and the route of these storm drains are unknown, the distance to the nearest
downslope surface water along the pathway is unknown.
Ref. No. 2
16. 
Identify uses of surface waters within 3 miles downstream of the site (i.e., drinking,
irrigation, recreation, commercial, industrial, not used).
Surface water within 3 miles downstream of the site is used for recreation including
swimming, fishing, and boating. The OPNR has designated the area of the Mangrove Lagoon
for preservation and conservation recreation.
Ref. 
Nos. 2,14
17. 
Describe any wetlands, greater than 5 acres in area, within 2 miles downstream of the site.
Include whether it is a freshwater or coastal wetland.
There are no wetlands greater than 5 acres within 2 miles downstream of the site. However,
there is a coastal mangrove wetland approximately 2.5 miles downstream. The Mangrove
Swamp is designated as a preservation area in the Coastal Zone Management Program of the
DPNR.
Ref. Nos. 2, 14
18. 
Describe any critical habitats of federally listed endangered species within 2 miles of the site
along the migration path.
There are no known critical habitats of federally endangered species within 2 miles of the site.
The Virgin Islands Tree Boa (Epicrates monensis qranti) is an endangered species in the U.S.
Virgin Islands; however, no critical habitat has been identified for this species.
Ref. No. 7
19. 
What is the distance to the nearest sensitive environment along or contiguous to the
migration path (if any exist within 2 miles)?
There are no sensitive environments within 2 miles of the site that lie along or contiguous to
the migration pathway.
Ref Nos 2, 7, 14
TUT 
Out.
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No 1
20. 
Identify the population served or acres of food crops irrigated by surface water intakes
within 3 miles downstream of the site and the distance to the intake(s).
There is no population served or food crops irrigated by surface water intakes within 3 miles
downstream of the site. The nearest surface water is saline. There is a desalinization plant
which uses sea water to supply drinking water, but the intake is greater than 3 miles from the
site.
Ref. Nos 2, 13
21. 
What is the state water quality classification of the water body of concern?
No water quality classification is known to exist for the Mangrove Lagoon or the Caribbean
Sea, although the mangrove swamp surrounding the lagoon is designated as a preservation
area by theDPNR.
Ref. No. 14
22. 
Describe any apparent biota contamination that is attributable to the site.
There was no apparent evidence of biota contamination noted during the on-site
reconnaissance conducted by NUS Corp Region 2 FIT on February 15, 1989.
Ref No. 1
AIR ROUTE
23. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the air as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminant(s) to the facility.
The potential for release of contaminants to the air is very small. Above-background
concentrations of organic vapors were detected in a drum; however, no readings above
background were detected in the ambient air in the drum storage area.
The drums on site contain waste oil from automotive repair and servicing operations. The oil
may contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing solvents. Samples of waste
oil from the facility were reported to contain TCA. 
However, sample analysis results were
invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded.
Ref. Nos. 1,22,24
24. 
What is the population within a 4-mile radius of the site?
Based on the 1980 census, the population within 4 miles of the site is approximately 36,000.
Ref. No. 17
"U'T 
001 
0079
I 
02-8902-40-PA
I 
Rev. No. 1
FIRE AND EXPLOSION
25. 
Describe the potential for a fire or explosion to occur with respect to the hazardous
substance(s) known or suspected to be present on site. Identify the hazardous substance(s)
and the method of storage or containment associated with each.
No significant fire or explosion conditions are known or suspected to be present on the site.
Ref. 
No. 1
26. 
What is the population within a 2-mile radius of the hazardous substance(s) at the facility?
Based on the 1980 
census, the population within 2 miles of the site is approximately 19,000.
Ref. 
No. 17
DIRECT CO NT ACT/ON-SITE EXPOSURE
27. 
Describe the potential for direct contact with hazardous substance{s) stored in any of the
waste units on site or deposited in on-site soils. Identify the hazardous substance(s) and the
accessibility of the waste unit.
There is little potential for direct contact with substances stored in the waste unit. Although
the bungs are open on some of the drums and there are some spills, the drums are not located
in an area that is frequented by customers. Access to the site is not controlled by a fence.
There is potential for workers to come in contact with waste oil in the course of performing
their jobs.
Ref. 
No 1
28. 
How many residents live on a property whose boundaries encompass any part of an area
contaminated by the site?
There is no evidence that any residential areas have been contaminated by the site.
Ref. 
No. 1
29. 
What is the population within a 1-mile radius of the site?
Based on the 1980 
census data, the population within 1 mile of the site is approximately
11,000.
Ref. 
No. 17
TUT 
O01 
0080
._ 
- 
02-8902-40-PA
SC~ 
1 
Rev. No. 1
PART IV: SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Tutu Texaco is an automotive service station located in the Tutu area of St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin
Islands. The primary activities at the site are gasoline sales and automotive repair and maintenance.
The area within approximately 1 mile of the site is densely populated and contains some commercial
properties. There are large housing developments northwest, north, and east of the site. Beyond 1
mile, there are scattered smaller villages and towns. The densely populated and highly commercial
town of Charlotte Amalie is located approximately 2.5 miles west of the site.
On February 15, 1989, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT conducted an on-site reconnaissance of the Tutu
Texaco Site. A total of thirty-one 55-gallon drums were observed on the site. Twenty-five of the
drums contain waste oil, two contain dirt, and four contain water pumped from a tank excavation.
There are three 20-gallon drums and a few 5-gallon pails containing waste oil on site. In addition to
the drums, there are a number of underground storage tanks below the site. An unknown number
of these tank contain gasoline, and two of the tanks contain waste oil. There is evidence that the
gasoline tanks are "not tight" (i.e., may be leaking - Ref. No. 23). The integrity of the waste oil
storage tanks is unknown. The underground gasoline tanks and the drums containing tank
excavation water are not evaluated as they are not considered to be hazardous waste under the
petroleum exclusion of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act(CERCLA).
Samples of waste oil from the site were reported to contain TCA. However, the sample analysis
results were invalidated because the sample holding times were exceeded. The waste oil may also
contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, and degreasing solvents. Until June 1986, the Virgin
Islands Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil generated by marinas, airports, and
auto maintenance facilities. The waste oil was blended with fuel and burned as a source of power.
WAPA stopped accepting waste oil when a batch was found to contain PCBs. The source of the PCBs
is unknown. Currently, there is no permitted method of waste oil disposal on St. Thomas.
Generators must store their waste oil, but the facilities are not inspected or issued permits. These
conditions, combined with drum shortages and poor housekeeping, have resulted in generally poor
waste containment at many of the facilities.
The waste oil drums on the Tutu Texaco Site are not properly stored or contained. There are oil spills
visible on the ground, and oil-stained soil was observed on the Gassett Property adjacent to the
drums. There are no berms to contain the oil in the event of a spill. Underground tanks for waste oil
storage were described in a preliminary investigation completed by the DPNR in August of 1987.
Waste oil was being stored in these tanks in violation of Virgin Islands Law. Based on the above
TUT 
001 
O081
I
I
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No: 1
I 
_ 
considerations, a recommendation of MEDIUM PRIORITY for further action is provided. Because of
I 
the spills, stained soil, and improper waste containment, the potential exists for transport of the
wastes to surface water and groundwater
The owner of the Tutu Texaco Site, Texaco Caribbean Inc., has been identified as one of nine
potentially responsible parties in the contamination of groundwater in the Tutu area. In July and
August 1987, ERA confirmed by sampling that volatile organic compounds were present in a number
of wells in the Tutu area 
Results of sampling conducted in October, 1987 (Ref. No. 24) show the
presence of volatile organic compounds and metals in Tutu area well water. OPNR has issued orders
to close 16 wells in the area. ERA removal action activities in the Tutu area included sampling of
wells and cisterns, removal of contaminated water from cisterns, and supplying clean water on a
regular basis to affected residents. 
s*\t
I
^<>
Locations for the collection of environmental samples at the Tutu Texaco Site are limited. The only
available soil near the drum storage area is on the adjacent Gassett Motors property. A number of
the wells in the vicinity of the site are known to be contaminated with volatile organic compounds.
As a consequence, there may be few wells available that are useful in determining whether
hazardous substances have been released from the facility. Sampling of waste sources on the site is
recommended to determine whether the waste oil contains hazardous substances. Efforts should
also be directed toward further definition of the population using groundwater for drinking and
toward determining the volume, construction, and integrity of the underground oil storage tanks.
Sampling is not recommended if ongoing or planned removal actions or enforcement actions result
in the collection of samples from the site by ERA or DPNR, or by Texaco Caribbean for the
aforementioned agencies.
OO1 
0082
ATTACHMENT A
MAPS AND PHOTOS
.
TUT 
OO1 
0083
02-8902-40-PA
Rev NO. i
TUTU TEXACO
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
CONTENTS
Figure 1 :
Figure 2:
Exhibit A:
Site Location Map
Site Map
Photograph Log
***• -
*£S-
- r-
TUT 00.1 
0084
02 8902-JO-PA
Rev. No. 1
i5TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION
VIRGIN
(QUAD) EASTERN ST. THOMAS, V.I.
SITE LOCATION MAP
TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE 1
NUS
CORPORATION
SCALE: r* 2000'
TUT 
001 
OOG'5
02-S9C2 .40-PA
Rev. 
No._l
DIRT FILLED
DRUMS
20 GLN. DRUM AREA
SITE MAP
TUTU TEXACO, ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS L 1
FIGURE 2
IMUS
( NOT TO SCALE )
TUT 
001 
0086
32-3902-.10-PA
Rev. No. 1
TUTU TEXACO
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FEBRUARY 15, 1989
- PHOTOGRAPH INDEX
ALL PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY DIANE TRUBE
Photo Number 
Description 
Time
R3-P1 
West side-Dirt pile 
1300
R3-P2 
Drums under overhang 
1302
R3-P3 
Tutu Texaco drum storage area. 
1304
R3-P4 
Tutu Texaco excavated dirt pile and pvc-pipe collection 
1308
system.
R3-P10 
Tutu Texaco drums as seen from Gassett Motors. Note stained 1353
soil.
t •
"""•TV
TUT 
O01 O087
IMUS
CORPORAnON
:9V.
JTU "IXACO
R3-P1 
February 15, 1989
West side-Dirt pile.
1300
TUT 
001 
OO8S
"JTU 
"IXACO
JCMAS. ..£. ,;RG:
R3-P2 
February 15, 1989
Drums under overhang.
1302
TUT 
OO1 
OO89
. 
1
"JTU "XACC
•-CM-S
"« O * . i 
. - ta.- ; i u »
R3-P3 
February 15, 1989
Tutu Texaco arum storage area.
1304
'TUT 
001 
0090
IMUS
CORPORATION
JTU 7IX.ACC
. - . £ . . :RG:;, :
R3-P4 
February 15, 1989 
1308
Tutu Texaco excavatea airt pile and pvc-pipe collection system.
TUT 001 0091
3-ev. 
.3. 1
UTU 
TEXACO
•. "HOMAS, j.i. . :RG;:J ISL
R3-P10 
February 15, 1989 
1353
Tutu Texaco drums as seen from Gassett Motors. 
Note stained soil.
TUT 
OO1 
0092
ATTACHMENT B
REFERENCES
TUT OO1 O093
02-8902-40-PA
Rev. No: 1
REFERENCES
1- 
Field Notebook No. 0398, US Virgin Islands Drum Reconnaissance, TOO No. 02-8902-29, NUS
Corp. Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, February 14 to 17, 1989.
2. 
U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Maps, 7.5 minute series,
"Central St. Thomas, Virgin Islands and Eastern St. Thomas, Virgin Islands Quadrangles" 1955,
revised 1982.
3. 
Gomez - Gomez, F. and J.E. Heisel. Summary Appraisals of the Nation's Groundwater
Resources-Caribbean Region. Geological Survey Professional Paper 813-4, 1980.
4. 
Stone, R.G. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, Volume XIX - Part 1,
Meteorology of the Virgin Islands. 1942.
5. 
Climate of Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands, Climatography of the United States No. 60, June
1982 
v*x
't
*--^v>
6. 
Tutu Well Site Potable Water Alternatives Report, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands. Prepared for U.S. EPA Region 2 By Region 2 Technical Assistance Team, Weston/SPER
Division, December, 1989.
7. 
Fish and Wildlife Service List of Endangered and Theatened Wildlife and Plants. 50 CFR 17.11
and 17.12. February, 1985.
8. 
Telecon Note, Telephone conversation between Nancy Schlater, EPA and Diane Trube, NUS
Re: Sole source aquifer in VI, March 3, 1989.
9. 
Graves, R.P. and R. Gonzalez. Potentiometric surface of the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer in
the Tutu Area, Eastern St. Thomas, US. Virgin Islands, September 11, 1987. 
U.S. Geological
Survey Water Resource Investigations Report 88-4131, 1988.
10. 
Uncontrolled hazardous waste site ranking system, A user's manual, 40 CFR, Part 300,
Appendix A, 1986.
11. 
Donnelly, T.W., 
Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, US. Virgin Islands, Caribbean Geological
Investigations, Geological Society of America, Memoir 98. ed. H. H. Hess, 1966.
12. 
Climatological Data Annual Summary, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, 1987.
13. 
Torres - Sierra, H. and R. Dacosta, Estimated Water Use in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, July
1983 to June 1984. 
Caribbean Research Institute, Technical Report No. 21.
14. 
U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Coastal Zone Management
Program, zoning districts and coastal land and water use plan map.
15. 
Memo to Stephen D. Luftig, EPA, from Carlos O'Neill, EPA. Authorization of CERCLA Removal
Action Monies for the Tutu Well Site. January 6, 1988.
16. 
Jordan, D.G and O.J. Cosner, A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands,
US Geological Survey Open File Report, 1973
TUT 
001
0094
I -
REFERENCES (CONT'O)
I
02-8902-40-PA
Rev No 1
17. 
Water Management Plan for the Public Water System, Prepared for the Government of the
Virgin Islands by CH2M Hill. July, 1983.
18. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Fernando Gomez, USGS and Rich Feinberg, NUS Corp.,
on 3/11/89 at 1045 hours. RE: Hydrology and ground water use in St. Thomas.
19. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between D. Goetz of Polycaribe and D. Trube, NUS Corp., on
3/14/89 at 1430 hours. RE: Wells and water use on St. Thomas.
20. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between L. Reed. DPNR, and 0. Trube, NUS Corp., on 3/3/89 at
1640 hours. RE: Permits for site on St. Thomas.
21. 
Record of Communication, Telephone conversation between L. Reed, DPNR, and A. Brochu,
U.S. EPA Region 2, on 1/30/89 at 1400 hours.
22. 
Memo from L. Reed, DPNR, to Texaco file, RE: Texaco Violations, August 5, 1987.
23. 
Records of Petro Site tests performed on Tutu Texaco Service Station underground tanks
Nos. 1 and 3, by J.F. Martinex and Cia., Inc. on July 18 and July 11, 1987, respectively.
24. 
Memo from Arnold Martinez, TAT II, to Carlos O'Neill, U.S. EPA Caribbean Office. January 27,
1988. Subject: Tutu Area sampling results.
TUT 
O01 
OO95
I 
fc 
ff 30)
Ir
i
i
REFERENCE NO. 22
TUT 
001 
O096
. -PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF TEXACO VIOLATIONS
DATE: 05 AUG. "87 
.
TO: TEXACO's FILE 
'
FROM: LEONARD REED
SUBJECT: TEXACO's VIOLATIONS [waste oil, etc.)
On 05 August 1987 at about 07:45 hrs. an inspection was conducted of
the Texaco Tutu facility located at ?? Anna's Retreat. Mr. Vernon
Morgan was contacted for information relative to the inspection. The
inspection revealed that there were several violations of V.I.
Laws/Regulations. The findings are as follows:
1. A large underground container with concrete top that is '
part of the entire surface area was on site. This container had a
concrete partition that may have holes towards the bottom since the
material contained therein was of the exact height in both
compartments. The container was protected with a circular cast iron
cover. The material contained appeared to be waste oil. It was not
possible to determine the construction of the subsurface tank to
include depth, width, length, type of bottom [concrete, dirt, etc.1.
Waste oil is classified as a hazardous waste in 19 R&R ch. 56 sec.
1560-500. Said waste oil was generated in violation of 19 R&R sec.
1560-501. Said waste oil was also stored in the above tank in
violation of sec. 1560-501.
2. There were there (3) service areas, each equipped with
hydraulic hoist and waste oil collection trap that had pipes installed
to transfer the waste to one (1) or more of the waste oil storage
tanks. Each of the three (3) traps contained waste petroleum products
in violation of 1560-501.
3. There was a filled septic tank on the property that will
be in violation of 19 R&R sec. 
1404-73 if further investigations
revealed that there is public sewer available.
4. The soil of the unpaved area along the northern boundary
was saturated with waste petroleum products. There were several
containers of petroleum products stored in said area along with
automotive parts all in violation of 1560-501. The auto tires
contained in the above accumulation are capable of breeding mosquitoes
in violation of 19 VIC section 1563 (5).
TUT 001
O097
TEXACO1s VIOLATIONS 05 AUG. "87 continued 
page 2 of 2
__ 5—-There was a large distinctly circular area with a square
steel plate cover that was also filled with waste oil. It was not
possible to determine the length, depth, width, type of bottom
[concrete, soil, etc.]. Said waste oil was generated and stored in
violation of 1560-501.
6. The storm drain contained waste oil or similar petroleum
products in violation of 19 VIC section 1563 (13) and 19 R&R section
1560-2 (j).
7. There were two additional man holes covered with square
steel covers. It was not possible to determine the contents of said
man holes due to the rear wheels of the most north of three (3) (semi
trailers being on the said covers. These are suspect of containing
petroleum products since the cistern and the septic tank were
identified. FOLLOW UP IS NEEDED!
TUT 001 00Vb
I
I
I
I
i
• 
REFERENCE NO. 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TUT 
OOi 
OO99
I
I
\,
i
I,
I
I
L.U.S.T.
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE
TANK SURVEY
ST. THOMAS, ST. JOHN
AND ST. CROIX
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
'l.
BY
WERNER WERNICKE, P.E.
AND
ALICE SEYMOUR
• 
- 
DONALD L. HAMLIN
I 
CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC.
i 
P.O. BOX 5202
| . 
ST. THOMAS, VIRGIN ISLANDS 00801
' 
FEBRUARY, 1986
This study was supported by the Government of the Virgin
(
Islands Department of Conservation and Cultural Affairs,
Division of Natural Resources Management under Contract No,
-
-
-
PC-CCS-22-86.
TUT 
001 OiOO
I
Ir
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I
SECTION 
PAGE
| 
1.00 INTRODUCTION 
1
2.00 CONCLUSION 
1
|. 
3.00 UNDERGROUND TANK SURVEY 
2
4.00 SOILS/GEOLOGY 
4
! 
5.00 GENERAL OPERATING 
5
PROCEDURE
! 
6.00 GROUND WATER INVESTIGATIONS 
S
7.00 DISCUSSION 
6
REFERENCES 
8
LIST OF TABLES AND 
9
FIGURES
APPENDIX
I
I
I
I
TUT OOi 0101
. 1 - ff
1.00 INTRODUCTION
Many petroleum products, and other chemicals, are stored in
below ground tanks which can corrode, leaking toxic products
into the underground environment.
In order to evaluate the 'occurance of such events the V.I.
Department of Conservation and Cultural Affairs contracted
with Donald L. Ham1in Consulting Engineers, Inc. to perform
a survey of eleven gasoline service stations in the Virgin
Islands ( Leaking Underground Storage Tanks - L.U.S.T.
Contract No. PC-CCA-22-86). 
Information on underground
storage tanks was obtained through visits to the facilities,
interviewing persons having specific information about the
facilities as well as mailing questionnaires to knowledge-
able individuals.
2.00 CONCLUSIONS
*
Ten gasoline retail outlets ( and one bulk plant ) were
surveyed of the approximate 50 service stations on the
islands. Since all stations were not sampled, a degree of
uncertainty exists as to the conditions at the other
locations where pertroleum products or hazardous substances
are stored in underground tanks.
The information was provided on a purely voluntary basis,
and it would be reasonable to assume that a station operator
with a serious tank leakage problem, either presently or in
the past, may be reluctant to provide such information.
Consequently the information obtained during this survey may
have a built in bias.
The finding of the interviews indicates that leaks do occur,
which are apparently terminated fairly rapidly once they are
discovered by taking the tank out of service. 
How much
petroleum product does leak into the ground is not clear,
nor was it possible to determine its effect on ground water
supplies in the area.
Stations which carry the large company brand names, such as
Texaco, Esso, etc., have their tanks installed by those
companies, which also replace any leaking tanks. Thus tank
replacement occurs fairly rapidly once a leaking tank is
confirmed.
The independent stations, i.e., those not carrying the
larger oil company brand names, maintain, install or replace
their own tanks. Only one independent operator was surveyed
on St. Thomas 
and none of his 
tanks had been or were
leaking. Thus, in the case of independent service stations,
it is unclear as to how rapidly damaged tanks are replaced
or the volume of product lost into the ground.
TUT 001 0102
- 2 -
In all cases, some product is lost when a tank begins to
leak. The volume of fluid lost depends on several factors
such as size of the leaking hole, tank size,and content
level, among other factors. The cummulative effects of many
such small leaks on the water quality of an aquifer is not
clear. Comprehensive testing of ground water would be needed
to establish a linkage. The limited groundwater testing
which has been carried out does indicate the presence of
toxic or petroleum substances at some locations.
Most of the owner/operators of service stations interviewed
had very little knowledge of the below ground facilities.
Although this greatly increased the level of effort needed
to get information, it did not appear to have any bearing on
the leakage of tanks. A simple test is used on as regular
basis to determine if tank contents are lost. Whether such
testing method is adequate from a standpoint of protecting
groundwater supplies or the environment in general is not
certain.
Corrosion protection is not uniform for steel tanks, and
corrosion and failure of such tanks does occur. Effective
corrosion protection 
of steel tanks for their operating
life will provide an effective method- to prevent the release
of toxic substances into groundwater supplies and the
general environment.
3.00 
UNDERGROUND TANK SURVEY
3.10 
INTERVIEWS
The investigation into the potential for leaking underground
storage tanks 
(L.U.S.T.) involved 
obtaining 
specific
information on the history of installed underground tanks
from owner/managers of automotive service stations ( one
bulk facility was 
included). In 
complying with 
the
conditions of the contract, a total of eleven sites were
selected on the three main islands, five on St. Thomas ,
five on St. Croix and one on St. John.
Most of the sites were chosen from areas where ground water
exists and is utilized for human consumption. In the event
of a leaking tank, the contents would likely find its way
into the ground water supply. Such an event could adversely
affect the water quality.
Owner/managers of service stations on St. Thomas, St.Croix
and St. John were contacted by telephone and interviews were
scheduled. Questionnaires were developed for use during the
interviews to obtain consistent information ( see Appendix).
For three stations on St. Croix the interview forms /
questionnaires 
were mailed. All efforts were made to
interview owners or 
managers to 
obtain as 
complete
information as possible. The questionnaire was set up
TUT 001 O1O3
- 3 -
to obtain information on storage tank age, size, content
and construction material as well as other information
relevant to this survev. Service stations 
interviewed
included subsidiaries of Esso and Texaco fuel suppliers. One
independent operator was interviews on St. Thomas.
3.20 ST. THOMAS
A total of six (6) service stations were contacted 
by
telephone on St. Thomas, five (5) agreed to an interview and
appointments were scheduled. The process of schedulincr the
interviews was very Lime consuming. 
Interviews had to be
rescheduled a number of times or interviewers waited at the
station because 
of the 
absence of 
service 
station
owner/managers. Due to their lack of knowledge, service
station owner/managers 
had 
difficulty 
answerina 
the
followina questions on the Questionnaire:
15 Deoth below ground
16 Construction material of tanks
17 How long have tanks been installed
This information was eventually provided bv Texaco and Esso
Bulk Plant manaaers.
The results of the survey are found on Table 1.
See Figure 1 and 2 for the locaton of the service stations.
3.30 ST. JOHN
One service station was contacted bv telephone and an
interview scheduled. The station owner was verv cooperative,
however, he had difficultv answerina the followina:
15 Depth below ground
§6 Construction material
These questions were eventualIv provided by the Texaco Bulk
Plant manaaer. The results of the survev are found on Table
2. See Figure 3 for the location of the service station.
3.30 ST. CROIX
The survey task on St. Croix became an exercise 
in
frustration. Over a dozen service stations were contacted by
telephone requesting interviews with manaaers or operators.
Some aareed to be interviewed only to cancel later. The most
freauent response was that the distributor (bulk plant)
should be contacted for the desired information.
Two interviews were carried out and onlv in one case could
all the required information be supplied (airport fuel
facilitv). At the other site only limited information was
TUT 
001 0104
I
- 4 -
I
available and the distributor (Esso) provided the needed
details.
A parallel 
effort was 
carried out 
by sending 
the
questionnaires 
to 
the Texaco distributor 
requesting
completion of the questionnair and return to our office.
Such information could not be provided by telephone (or
interviews) as its release had to be approved by the San
Juan main office. Survey information on three additional
sites was obtained in this manner. It took three months for
the information to be returned to our office. See Table 3
for the summary of the survey and Figures 4 through 7 for
the locations.
4.00 
SOILS/GEOLOGY
This survey of fuel facilities was centered as much as
possible in areas where ground water aquifers are utilized
for public water supplies, namely central St. Croix and the
eastern section of St.Thomas (Jordan, 
1975; Jordan, 1973;
Geraghty-Miller, 1983).
The geology of an area is one of the major factors which
determines the extent and characteristics of aa aquifer.
Deep soils or sedimentary formations are generally favorable
for significant aquifers. Likewise, the presence of such
soil/geology formations, at least in the upper 10 feet, is
favorable for the installation of underground fuel tanks.
Excavation into rock is costly and locations with deep soils
are prefered.
On St. Thomas, four of the five sites surveyed are located
in the Tutu watershed basin and the Bovoni area. Both areas
contain aquifers from which public water supplies are
withdrawn. The Tutu basin contains the largest and most
heavily utilized aquifer on St. Thomas. On St. Croix, most
of the stations surveyed are likewise located over the
island's extensive central plain aquifers. On St. John
significant aquifers are not found in the Cruz Bay area
(Cosner, 1972).
The soils which exist at the survey sites are shown on Table
4. The depth of soil at the Tutu basin (Anna's Retreat)
sites on St. Thomas ranges from 20 to 40 feet (Jordan,
1973). The depth to rock at the other sites is likewise
sufficient for tank installations.
Hydrologic conditions during the wetter parts of the year
will bring the water table in proximity of underground
tanks. The bottom of buried tanks will usually be 8 to 10
feet below the surface. This has two implications.
1. Leaking contents have short pathways to aqifers and
TUT 
OO1 O105
- 5 -
2. the moisture will promote accelerated corrosion of
steel tanks.
5.00 GENERAL OPERATING PROCEDURE
This section gives a brief discussion on the general
procedures used at service stations to check on fuel loss
through leakage or other causes.
Underground storage tanks for gasoline or diesel fuel are
normally owned by the parent oil company. It is the oil
company's responsibility to maintain these tanks. 
However,
it is to the station operators advantage to properly monitor
these tanks on a regular basis to check for loss due to
leakage or theft or for intrusion of water.
The time elements may vary but in general it will
this pattern daily. 
Each pump has a master meter which
keeps a running total of every gallon pumped. This meter is
read dally at start or close of business and checked against
register tapes. On a weekly or daily schedule* the operator
will dip his tanks with a, properly calibrated stick. 
This
tells but how much is in each tank and this will be compared
to the Meter readings. Every second or third week he will
usually add water detecting paste to the lower 6" of the
stick to check for water.
A representative from the parent oil company normally calls
on all his stations once a month. 
At this time he will
stick all the tanks. He then checks his reading against his
record for the previous month, deliveries of fuel during the
month and past and present meter readings. If these figures
do not balance out the oil company resentative will usually
call the station on a weekly basis for a time and the tanks
are monitored closely to determine if they have a leak, a
dishonest employee, .or in a rare case, a faulty master
meter.
Once a leak is suspected the tank level monitoring effort
increases. If a leak is confirmed, the tank is taken out of
service and replaced.
6.00 GROUND WATER INVESTIGATIONS
A survey of ground water conditions was carried out in the
U.S. Virgin Islands during 1982 by the firm of Geraghty and
Miller, Inc., (1983). 
The quantitative and qualitative
characteristics of a number of wells were determined.
Pentane and barium, both chemicals associated with refinery
operations, were detected in water from the Barren Spot
wells at St. Croix's central plain aquifer. The report
further indicates that hydrocarbons, principally from leaded
TUT 001 0106
- 6 -
I
^_ 
gasoline, were detected in a significant area within the
Hess Oil refinery boundaries.
Organic solvents were found in well water samples from the
I
V.I. Housing Authority well in the Tutu, St. Thomas area.
Sources of such organic 
solvents include many 
light
industrial processes, 
dry cleaning 
operations 
and
(
mechanical repair shops which utilize such solvents and
chemicals in their operations. 
Such chemicals may also be
used in household products and could be introduced into the
, 
ground water supply through septic tank and leaching fields
(Geraghty, Miller 1983).
A reconnaissance of ground-water quality in the Virgin
I 
Islands was carried out in 1984 by the U.S. Geological
I 
Survey in cooperation with the College of the Virgin Islands
(Garcia, 1984). Nineteen wells were sampled throughout the
, 
islands. The survey did not find any abnormal concentrations
• ~ 
of the chemicals tested for which included common ions,
trace elements, priority pollutants, purgeable organic,
.' 
base-neutral, and acid extractable compounds, as well as
j 
organochloride insecticides, polychlorinated biphenols and
• 
polychlorinated naphthalenes. 
Pentane, which was found
predominant in the Geraghty-Miller survery, was however not
tested for.
--— 
On the basis of the findings by Geraghty-Miller (1983),
sources of hydrocarbon pollution of the ground water supply
are present and pose a threat to the public water supply.
7.00 DISCUSSION
A number of findings were made based on the survey.
i
1. 
Leakage of tanks does occur and tanks are either
repaired or replaced within a short time .
2. The gas station operators/owners had generally little
knowledge about installation details of the tanks.
3. No apparent standard is used to minnimize corrosion of
steel tanks.
At all stations surveyed, the method used to detect leaks is
fairly consistent and timely. Each fuel tank is dipped once
or twice daily to determine the fluid level and the presence
I
of any water in the tank, adjustments are made for fuel
added or pumped out during that period. If discrepancies
are noted, the frequency of tank dipping increases. If a
leak is determined to be the cause, the fuel in the tank is
I 
used up. 
The empty tank is sealed, removed or otherwise
I 
taken out of service.
I
During the time the tank is emptied by sale of the contents
^^during the normal operations, the tank continues to leak.
The severity of such a leak would depend on a number of
TUT O01 0107
I
I
- 7 -
factors, such as the size of the leaking hole, the tank
content level, the tank size, the presence or absence of
ground water and other factors. Of course, prior 
to
discovery of a leak, some of the contents will have been
absorbed by the surrounding soil. Thus some loss of contents
accompanies all situations where tanks leak.
The survey revealed that gas station owners/operators had
generally little knowledge of the tank installation details.
In most cases the suppliers (bulk plants) had to be called
upon for specific information. 
The result was that much
time was spent: in attemting to locate the persons who had
the needed information. In other instances owners/operators
refused to provide any information. 
The reasons for such
refusal were not clear.
The 
survey effort on St. Thomas/St. John preceded on a
reasonable 
basis 
once 
cooperating 
individuals 
were
identified. On St. Croix, however, with one exception, the
survey proved to be' time consuming task and at times
frustating. Only through the intervention of Ms. Dinah
Johnson of the Division of Natural Resources (DCCA) was the
information finally provided.
Host of the tanks involved in the survey are constructed of
steel. Some are coated with corrosion inhibiting material
while others are not. 
It cannot be 
conclusively
determined, based on the interviews, as to how severe the
corrosion problem is. Too many unknowns are involved, not
the least of which is the probable bias in the sampling. It
is possible that the owner/operators who failed to cooperate
had a history of leaking tanks. Location, depth to ground
water and soils, among other factors, would certainly
influence corrosion attack of the metal.
TUT 001 0108
I
I
I
i:
r
I
I
I
I
- 8 -
REFERENCES
Garcia, R., and Canoy, M., "Reconnaissance of Ground-Water
Quality in the U.S. Virgin Islands," July 1984, U.S.
Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Open-File Data
Report 84-807, prepared in cooperation with the College of
the Virgin Islands, July, 1984.
Geraghty & Miller, Inc., "Report on Current Ground-Water
Conditions in the U.S. Virgin Islands," prepared for the
V.I. Department of Conservation and Cultural Affairs, April
1983.
Rivera, L.H., et al., "Soil Survey-Virgin Islands of the
United States," U.S. Soil Conservation Publication, 1971.
Jordan, D.G., "A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Croix,
Virgin Islands," U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report,
1975.
Jordan D.G., and Cosner O.J., "A Survey of the Hater
Resources of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands," U.S. Geological
Survey Open-File Report, 197.3.
Cosner O.J., "Water in St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands,* U.S.
Geoloaical Survey Open-File Report, 1972.
TJT O01 0109
A- f
U
L.
TABLE 1. 
SUMMARY INFORMATION
LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SURVEY
ST. THOMAS V.I.
'STATION
INTERVIEWED
NUMBER OF TANKS
SIZE OF TANKS
(GALLONS)
TANK CONTENTS
DEPTH BELOW
GROUND (FEET)
CONSTRUCTION
MATERIAL
LEAKS
YEARS SINCE
INSTALLED '
11
2
(A)
5,000
(B)
5,000
: (A)
LEADED, 'Ii
(B)
UNLEADED
2 to 3
ALL
STEEL
(A)
NO
(B)
NO
U)
DON'T
KNOW
# 2
2
(A)
6,000
(B)
6,000
(A)
LEADED
(B)
UNLEADED
2 to 3
ALL
STEEL
(A) ~
NO
(B)
NO
(A)
11 YEARS
(B)
10 YEARS
t 3 /
_ ^'
3
(A)
4,000
(B)
4,000
(0
4,000
(A)
JNLEADED
(B)
JN LEADED
(C)
LEADED
2 to 3
ALL
STEEL
(A)
YES
(B)
NO
(C)
NO
(A)
L6 YEARS
(B)
16 YEARS
' (C)
16 YEARS
f 4
3
(A)
6,000
(B)
6,000
(C)
2,500
(A)
LEADED
(B)
UNLEADED
(C)
OIL
4
ALL
STEEL
(A)
NO
(B)
NO
(0
NO
(A)'
16 YEARS
(B)
16 YEARS
(C)
16YEARS
» 5
3
(A)
6,000
(B)
8,000
(0
6,000
(A)
UNLEADED
(B)
LEADED
(C)
UNLEADED
1+10 in.
ALL
STEEL
•
(A)
NO
(B)
NO
(0
NO
(A)
5 YEARS
(B)
5 YEARS
(C)
5 YEARS
See Figure 152 for Numerical Identification
TUT 001 OHO
Table 4
Geology/SolIs
Gas Station
and Location
Esso Tutu
(Anna's Retreat)
St. Thomas
See Figure 1
Rodriquef Auto
Parts (Esso)
Anna's Retreat
St. Thomas
See Figure 1
Tutu Texaco
Anna's Retreat
St. Thomas
See Figure 1
Bovoni Texaco
fiovoni, "-
St. Thomas
See Figure 1
Gotllieb's
Quickway (Esso)
Contant (Crown
Bay Fill)
St. Thomas
See Figure 2
Texaco,
Cruz Bay
St. John
See Figure 3
Eastern Carib-
bean Airways,
Alexander
Hamilton Air-
port, St. Croix
See Figure 4
Sion Farm Esso,
Castle Coakley,
St. Croix
See Figure 5
Soil Type
(LaB), Lavallee
Gravelly clay
loam, 2 to 5
percent slopes
(LaB), Lavallee
Gravelly clay
loam, 2 to 5
percent slopes
(GyB), Glynn
clay loam, 2
to 5 percent
slopes
(SaA), San Anton
clay loaa, 0 to
3 percent slopes
(Ma) Made
sand dredged
from harbor
(PbC) Parasol
clay loam, 5 to
12 percent slopes
(AgB), Aguilita
gravelly clay
loam, 2-5 per-
cent slope
(ScB), sion
Clay loam
0-5 percent
slopes
Depth to
Rock (ft)
20-40
Seasonal high
water table <ft)
10 +
20-40
10
20-40
10 +
2 (soft
lime stone)
10+
2 (soft lime
stone)
10+
TUT 001 0111
-II-
.••v
."\
it i.
:\:
•s><i>L~i'.
vTN«Y«;" ' - — •>r''2£*
^&
mi
"\;
c/'
" *
24000ft
FIGURE 1.
UNDERGROUND TANK SURVEY LOCATION
ESTATE TUTU 5 BOVONJ
ST. THOMAS, V.J.
TUT 
001 
OH-''
• - • • 
SERVICE STATION ff 3
I 
' 
' 
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK INVENTORY
,^*
I 
OUESTTOXATBF
I 
A. 
Date; Deretnh^r 1 ?, 1985
Person Interviewed: Mr. Vernon Morgan____ Position: 
Owner
' 
B. Location of Facility: TUTU TEXACO
Estate Anna's Retreat
I
at. Thomas. V.I.
2. Kimber of Storage Tanks: 
3
3. Size of Tanks: ( Gallons)
fi) 4 rnnn 
(2) 4.onn 
f3) 4.000 (4).
4. Contents of Tanks: Gasoline
( 1 1 l-+*A*A 
( 2 ) Hn1^aH>.^ 
( 3 1 
Unleaded ( 4 ).
5. Depth below ground:
(O.
6. Construction Materials:
fl) Steel 
f2-) Steel 
f3^ Steel
7. How long have tanks been installed:
( 1 )__]_l_jitaxs_ f 2) 1 1 year* 
(3) 11 years (4).
8. Have there been problems with leaks:
Mn 
f2) 
No 
f3^ 
No 
(4).
Specif/: 
A TeaV ncrured between two tanks in 198S
T^T•»r•n yepaired the problem in three weeks
Interviewer 
Louise Penn
TUT 
OO1 Oil:
I
I
I
I 
REFERENCE NO. 6
I
I
Ir
I
I
I
I
I
I
TUT 
OO1 Oil4
MEMORANDUM
CAMP tsRESSER & McKEE INC.
TO: 
Qr.raL
FROM:
»"tt
PROJECT:
SUBJECT:
.T^. r .^.^ \
^ CM
DATE:
L\r, dor
iffior^
(OM/e.
Tutu
TUT 
001
vy
H 
* 
V'
I
f-T"f
o
X*
o
<D
B 1
J
«^i
V ^ * •* * * *
% _ _M»l ———J, | „, Mmmmmm M •^•tf
-* T -V V » '.» Tl 
r 
li, 
I' 
I
ii
•'
— •——-————- TUT
001
0117
CO
A:
t.i
*
-r
o,i
~V.1
*t
\ 
i
o
•^r
r-
o
i 
i
VST-.V-'iE?'it .^ 19
xJ
}• ••
*
o
•*• 
-c;
0
•5 
-^
3
o
*L-i)c_-r..«u
i
4 ?
xo
A? §i
S v jg
X
B 
H
•
*
rk
tt,
•o
LO
* 
» 
I
I*f.
Hi
*
/>/* Y
1 — I'./Ji
o*v
&*/A
TUT 
001 
0120
r-0
L
I 
i
ON
: ^
*$?
r i
s ,: |
I
'•J
g
00
[
i
I
I 
REFERENCE NO. 7
I
I
L
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TUT 
001 
0122
FIELD NOTES
104(e) SAMPLING NOTES
TUTU VELLFIELD AREA
ST. TBOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Vaste Programs Enforcement
Washington, D.C. 20460
EPA Work Assignment No.
EPA Region
Site No.
Contract No.
COM Federal Programs
Corporation Document No.
Prepared By
Vork Assignment Project Manager
Telephone Number
Primary Contact
Telephone Number
Date Prepared
: 821
: II
: 2P2G
: 68-01-7331
: T821-C02-RT-DAVK-1
: CDM Federal Programs Corporation
: Scott Graber
: (212) 393-9634
: Caroline Kvan
: (212) 264-0151
: March 16, 1989
(VP11/29)
TUT 
00 i 
Oi:
,'•*:#$&*
•pi
1:8
MSTANC81 HK)M MOt,»TAmS fg*. ™OM jgg*%^f
Ml Ml*
jmmq WISH. MM i
ftfl MWl OMOtKt 7 •
if 4 rtM) HA ttw «M***•€* «rrur'
MC* Wt frM BM
^ 
JUOPV VMM 
(Ml) ttttf Ct toft* AIM iMMilV tl MMr **Cvt •?
jZ^FPjTJ^^^^i^™^ »•»» 
fll" Mil MMtf *1 fMI lV>/f MI) vlMoMCt On IWk»
"^3^4,-
*
0i
2
345
6
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
0
.1
7
4
.4
5
.6
.7
J
.9
MstMCt out from Side or SrauMor Steko
0.0
15
3.0
4.5
6.0
7.5
9.0
10.5
12.0
15.0
16.5
110
19.5
21.0
22.5
24.0
255
27.0
215
30.0
315
33.0
•345
36.0
37.5
39.0
405
42.0
435
45.0
415
410
495
51.0
525
54.0
555
57.0
585
60.0
07
1.7
3.2
4.7
6.2
7.7
9.2
10.7
127
13.7
15.2
16.7
112
19.7
217
22.7
24.2
25.7
277
217
307
31.7
337
34.7
367
37.7
397
40.7
427
43.7
457
46.7
412
49.7
517
52.7
547
55.7
577
58.7
60.2
04
1.8
34
4.8
6.3
7.8
9.3
10.8
124
13.8
118
113
19.8
21.3
22.8
244
25.8
274
28J
304
31J
334
34.8
364
37.8
39.3
40.8
424
43.8
454
46.8
413
49.8
514
52.8
544
55.8
574
58.8
604
0.5
2.0
34
5.0
6.5
8.0
95
11.0
12.5
14.0
155
17.0
18.5
20.0
215
23.0
245
26.0
275
29.0
305
32.0
33.5
35.0
365
38.0
395
41.0
42.5
44.0
45.5
47.0
485
50.0
51.5
53.0
545
56.0
575
59.0
60.5
0.6
2.1
3.6
5.1
6.6
8.1
9.6
11.1
12.6
14.1
15.6
17.1
18.6
20.1
21.6
23.1
24.6
26.1
27.6
29.1
§0.6
32.1
33.6
35.1
36.6
38.1
39.6
41.1
42.6
44.1
45.6
47.1
48.6
50.1
51.6
53.1
54.6
56.1
57.6
59.1
60.6
0.8
24
3.8
5.3
6.8
8.3
9.1
114
12.8
144
15.8
17.3
18.8
20.3
21.8
234
24.8
264
27.8.
294
30.8
324
33.8
354
36.8
384
39.8
41.3
42J
44.3
45J
474
418
504
51.8
534
54J
513
57J
594
60.8
0.9
2.4
3.9
5.4
6.9
8.4
9.9
11.4
12.9
14.4
15.9
17.4
18.9
20.4
21.9
23.4
24.9
26.4
27.9
29.4
30.9
32.4
33.9
35.4
36.9
314
39.9
41.4
42.9
44.4
45.9
47.4
419
50.4
51.9
53.4
54.9
56.4
57.9
59.4
60.9
1.1a
5.6
7.1
16
10.1
11.6
13.1
14.6
17.6
19.1
20.6
22.1
235
25.1
216
211
29.6
31.1
32.6
34.1
35.6
37.1
38.6
40.1
41.6
43.1
44.6
46.1
47.6
49.1
50.6
52.1
53.6
55.1
56.6
58.1
59.6
61.1
17
5.7
77
17
107
11.7
13.2
14.7
167
17.7
197
20.7
227
23.7
25.2
217
287
29.7
317
32.7
347
35.7
377
317
407
41.7
437
44.7
412
47.7
497
50.7
527
53.7
557
517
512
59.7
617
1.4a
5.1
7.4
19
10.4
11.9
13.4
14.9
114
17.9
19.4
20.9
22.4
23.9
25.4
26.9
214
29.9
31.4
32.9
34.4
35.9
37.4
38.9
40.4
41.9
43.4
44.9
414
47J
49.4
50.9
52.4
53.9
55.4
519
58.4
59.9
61.4
Si
0i
234
56
78
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
31
39
40
•I }'.l '
•" 4
Tm poptr hi tMs book it 
jL' 
' ''
modi of 100% big trodo rag stock
with • WATER RG9STINQ surfKO sbinf. 
\
KEUFFEL 4 ESSER CO. 
;i ' "•
KEUFFEL ft ESSEN CO.
For Curve Table* too Mid of boot,
I
-iC
H-
f-0
9STO 
TOO
1
——— —————— 1 ———
—— 
i —— i —— i —— 
i —— ! —— i ——
1 
v4
i 
' 
'a^ t-
II 
«a 
/» 
T
i F . 1 f «S —
O
Nj
ta
fit
(v»
J ^-.^
'<?
-itk
cS.
rNfi..
>lu!.f;
nt?
»5-<
J
$-fcL,
H
?Jt
a>
I**./
Ji
;?
C A
7*»
«>&
afiMk
U.1J
*»w
ftt
TUT 
001 
0128
c-t
oot-
!-Lw
<i
(A.
'Ait
or
sm
•
w
tt a
O
H>w
TUT 
001 0132
££TO 
TOO mi
Q
£i
H-
£,
H--w
TUT 
OO1 O135
^xji^bJ
/i?-ft r^rrciB
^
p^ro
^j<K-^*»
^EH
<^^>^j ^jV*r«
Sff^Bt
j>
"b^r
^]eo^i^ ^^'"^IF
|<6^ CtoLtC/
9yA
j^ ujrjy*^ 
<#*rt ''. fvfT*
*^sk>
***
txr^sKpp
~JV
1 '° 
v /
wr&?' ^ ^^f.
'^^—^^\\j^s^ ~ty *h
r*^?^^ v
-^•TH^v
•-0
Ki
T~too
(-
ID
^r V 
" ^
ajp^"1**^ 'tyyjk"
TUT 
OO1 0137
TUT 
001 
013 8
TUT 
001 0140
TOO mi
-^5,w
v^i
TUT 
001 0143
= TUT 001 
0144
TOO
-_ ->— _
* 
— —
9irTO 
TOO IHl
u-£>^j
TUT 
001 0147
TUT 00.1 0148
TOO
ini
OS TO 
T00
I
I
"I
I
I
8 'ON 30N3H3J3H 
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
C O M 
F E D E R A L 
P R O G R A M S 
C O R P O R A T I O N
April 27, 1990
Ms. Caroline Kwan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
Project: 
EPA Contract No: 68-tf 9-0002
Vork Assignment: C02048 - Tutu Veil Field
Document No: 
TES 5 - C02048 - EP - BQBF
Subject: 
Preliminary (unvalidated) CLP Sample 
.,x
Analysis Data Summary of Soils and Vaters 
^J
from the Tutu Texaco Soil Pile, Tutu Esso
Tank Excavation Pit and Soil Pile, and
Second Round 104(e) Letter Response Sampling,
Tutu Vellfield and Supercat Areas,
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Dear Ms. Kvan,
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the preliminary CLP
analysis results from the sampling activities of the week of June 5-10,
1989, 
in the Tutu and Supercat Areas, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. Vhile
this data has been through our in-house validation process, FPC is awaiting
validation by MMB before officially releasing the data. When we receive
that validation we will submit separate formal data summaries to you for
the Tutu Well Field and Supercat Laundromat areas.
The samples analyzed consist of:
Case 12058 - soils and aqueous samples - volatile organ! cs (VOAS),
extractables (semi-VOAs - base/neutral/acids,
pesticides, and pcbs)
Case 4512b - soils and aqueous samples - total petroleum
hydrocarbons (TPH)
Case 4658b - soils and aqueous samples - EP toxicity
Summary tables of these analyses are included as attachments to this
report.
Splits of PRP samples were accepted by FPC during the following oversight
activities:
Texaco soil pile sampling (following soil pile ventilation)
Esso tank excavation (from pit following tank removal activities)
Esso soil pile sampling (excavated soil prior to ventilation).
40 Rector Street. 10th Floor New York. NY 10006 212393-9634
OO1 0151
CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION
FPC samples from 10A(e) Letter Response sites were collected from:
Texaco Tutu Station
Esso Tutu Car Care Station
0'Henry Dry Cleaners
Department of Education Building (formerly LAGA)
Ramsay Motor Company
Supercat Site (locations not differentiated in this report)
The 104(e) Letter Response site sampling represents a second investigation.
These, and additional sites, were originally sampled in the summer of 1988.
Copies of the Sample Analysis Data Summaries submitted for 1988 sampling
and 1989 analysis of oils from 104(e) letter response sites are included as
attachments with this report for easy reference.
A master table of locations split samples accepted by FPC during field
oversight activities is included vith the data tables. It lists the PRP
field number, FPC field numbers, CLP sample numbers and analyses performed.
The data tables list only analytes found above detection limits. We have
included data qualified as estimated (J), tentatively identified (NJ),
estimated and found in blanks (BJ). Analytes qualified as below
detection limits (U) or estimated belov detection limits (UJ) were not
included. Values that were rejected during the validation process due to
problems vith laboratory instrument calibration are listed as rejected (R)
vith no value. Analyses from field blanks and trip blanks are presented
vith the data from each site to indicate vhich analytes may have been
present due to sampling or laboratory contamination.
Brief summaries of the analytical results from each site are presented
belov.
Texaco Soil Pile - Splits from the ventilated soils avaiting disposal at
the Texaco site are relatively clean. VOAs vere collected from the top,
middle and bottom of the pile at each location. 
All other analyses vere
performed on homogenized (top/middle/bottom) samples. The main VGA found
vas methylene chloride, vhich vas also found in a lab blank. Sample
FSP2-022 from the middle of Texaco's location SP-3 contained chlorinated
Lhydrocarbons and xylenes. Tentatively identified hydrocarbons vere also
found in semivolatile analyses from this location. No pesticides or PCBs
vere detected. TPH at the three locations split with FPC ranges from <10
ug/g (ppm) to 91 ug/g. The only metals detected by EP Toxicity analysis
vere cadmium and lead. Cadmium ranged from .35 to 2.8 ug/1; lead ranged
from 1.8 to 31 ug/1.
Esso Excavation Pit - FPC accepted splits from 7 of the 13 locations
sampled by Esso. Of the VOAs detected, xylene and ethylbenzene vere the
most common, being present in all but one sample. Benzene vas detected in
four samples, toluene in tvo. The highest concentrations - 311,000 ug/kg
(ppb) - of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) vere found in
sample TE-X-03. Various benzenes vere tentatively identified in most
samples. No chlorinated hydrocarbons vere identified except 8 ug/kg (ppb)
-2- — <£•£
TUT 001 01*2
I
r
i
CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION
chlorobenzene in sample TE-X-05. Semivolatiles detected included
naphthaline, methylnapthalenes, fluorene, phenathrene,
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and benzene isomers, most of vhich vere found
in five of the samples. No pesticides or PCBs vere detected. TPH in the
pit soils ranged from <10 to 69 ug/g (ppm) in all but location TE-X-03,
vhich contained 2550 ug/g. Barium, cadmium and lead vere detected in
almost all the samples.
Esso Soil Pile - FPC accepted splits from 3 of 7 locations. VOAs vere
collected from the top, middle end bottom of the pile at each location.
All other analyses vere performed on homogenized (top/middle/bottom)
samples. Contaminants found vere similar to those found in the excavation
pit. High values for xylenes and ethylbenzene vere found in all but one
sample. Toluene vas detected in tvo samples. Tentatively identified
compounds in all samples include abundant hydrocarbons and benzenes.
Semivolatiles detected in all samples include naphthalene,
methylnaphthalenes, fluorene, phenathrene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthlate, and
benzene isomers. No pesticides or PCBs vere detected. TPH ranged from 48
to 139 ug/g (ppm). ^Barium, cadmium, and lead vere detected in all samples
and arsenic vas detected in one.
0'Henry Dry Cleaners - Three samples vere collected at the site.
Chlorinated hydrocarbons vere the prinipal VOAs found. Sample e02-02
contained the highest values (20 ug/kg [ppb] 1,2-dichloroethene (DCEJ, 75
ug/kg trichloroethene ITCE] and 180,000 ug/kg tetrachloroethene [PCE]).
Semivolatiles detected include phenol, heptadecane and bis(2-
«thylhexyl)phthalate. No pesticides or PCBs vere found. TPH ranged from
38 ug/g (ppm) to 302 ug/g. Cadmium vas the only metal detected; it vas
present in amounts less than 1 ug/1.
-i/v pP riDepartment of Education (LAGA) - Five (4 soil and 1 vater) samples vere 
I
x-^vV collected. Toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes vere detected in sample 
c^v
W 
-—eL-02-01S. Xylenes vere also detected in eL-02-02S. Heptanes vere 
*' ,j?f >•
tentatively identified in the vater sample. Most of the Semivolatiles 
'
found vere also in sample eL-02-01S. They include phenol, methylphenols, 
i^"
naphthalene, methylnaphthalenes and other hydrocarbons. The only pesticide
detected vas Endosulfan I, also in sample eL-02-01S. TPH ranged from 544
to 3470 ug/g (ppm). Cadmium and lead vere detected in all samples.
Ramsay Motor Company - One soil sample vas collected. Meythylene chloride,
xylenes and tentatively identified benzenes vere detected in the VOA
analysis. Semivolatiles detected included naphthalene, methylnaphthalene,
fluorene, fluoranthene, pyrene, and benzofluorahthenes. No pesticides or
PCBs vere found. TPH vas 23,400 ug/g (ppm). Cadmium and-lead vere
detected at 6.1 and 15 ug/1, respectively.
Supercat Area - Eight samples (six soil and 2 vater) ver« collected from
the area. The discussion of individual locations at the Supercat site vill
be more detailed in the official data summary FPC submits after ve receive
MHB data validation. VOAs found in most samples vere acetone and methylene
chloride (possibly laboratory contaminants). Benzene, methylpentanone and
ethylbenzene vere detected in soil sample eSC-02-06S, as vere tentatively
identified hydrocarbons. Ethylbenzenes and tentatively identified
compounds vere found in eSC-02-05S; xylene vas found in samples eSC-02-Ola
-3- c- iffi
OOl O153
COM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION
I
^_ 
and -04S. It should be noted that the trip blank accompanying the aqueous
I 
samples yielded high BTEX values. The Supercat samples contained fev
semivolatiles, except for sample eSC-02-04S, which had di-n-butylphthalate,
butyl benzylphthalate, aliphatic hydrocarbons and sulfur. The only
I 
pesticides detected were in sample eSC-02-06S, which contained 55 ug/kg
' 
(ppb) 4,4'-ODD. TPB in soils ranged from <10 to 24,500 ug/g (ppm) in
eSC-02-06S and from <1 to 2 mg/1 in waters. Lead, ranging from 1.4 to 978
| 
ug/1 was found in all samples. Barium and cadmium were also detected in
! 
most samples.
This completes all of the sampling activities and receipt of the
corresponding split sample analytical data for the Tutu Veil Field site
(Supercat Laundromat site included) to date. If you have any comments or
questions regarding this data, please contact Sally Odland or me at (212)
393-9634.
Sincerely,
COM Federal Programs Corporation
Scott B. Grai
TES V Regional Manager
SG/sko
-4-
"UT 
OO1 0154
LETTER REPORT
PRELIMINARY (UNVALIDATED CLP SAMPLE ANALYSIS DATA
SUMMARY OF SOILS AND WATER FROM THE TUTU TEXACO
SOIL PILE, TUTU ESSO TANK EXCAVATION PIT AND SOIL
PILE, AND SECOND ROUND 104(E) LETTER RESPONSE SITE
SAMPLING TUTU WELL FIELD AND SUPERCAT AREA
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Vaste Programs Enforcement
Washington, D.C. 20460
EPA Work Assignment No.
EPA Region
Site No.
Contract No.
COM Federal Programs
Corporation Document No.
Prepared By
Work Assignment Project Manager
Telephone Number
Primary Contact
Telephone Number
Date Prepared
(Master 11)
C020A8
II
68-W9-0002
TES5-C02048-LR-BQHD
COM Federal Programs Corporation
Sally Odland
(212) 393-9634
Caroline Kvan
(212) 264-0151
April 27, 1990
TUT 
OO1 0155
tutu Ucllfields, •„.. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
Volatile Organus Analrsis ol Soils in ug/kg and Uatcr in ug/l.
IEUCO SOIL PILE
! 
PRP Location:
1 
Field Saiple Nuttier:
1 
EP» Saiple Nuaber:
! 
nttrii:
Ithloroiethane
IBroioiethine
ivinrl Chloride
ICnloroethane
incthylene Chloride
lAcetone
1 Carton Disultide
U.l-Dichloroethene
11,1-Dichloroethint
Il.:-Dichloroethene (total)
!Chlorofori
!l,2-0ichloroethane
12-Butanont
11,1,1-lricMoroethane
ICarbon Ittrachlondt
IVinrl Acetate
IBroiodichlorotethane
;i,2-0uhloropropane
!cis-l,3-Dtchloropropene
llrichloroethene
! D I broioch 1 oroiet hane
!l,l,2-Trichloroethane
IBenrene
:trans-l,3-Dichloropropenc
IBrotofori
14 nett.rl-2-Pentanone
12-Heianone
llttrtchloroethent
!l.l,2,2-tetrachloroethane
! Toluene
IChlorobenzene
ICthrlbenzene
ISUrene
;X)lene 1 total!
UK's:
I 
None Identified
5P-110P
SP2-011
fll 262
soil
61 6J
SP-iniO
SP2-012
BX 26S
soil
4 J
5P-IB01
SP2-013
BX 266
soil
SP-/OP
SP2-021
BX 261
toll
7 J
SP-&10
SP2-022
BX 267
soil
31 J
1 J
«
5 J
} J
} J
160
1 J
140 J
5P-/60I
5P2-023
81 261
soil
R
J J
2 J
SPv^IOP
SP2-031
IX 264
soil
1 J
SP-/OP
SP2-0310
61 749
soil
61 BJ
SP-lniD
5P2-032
B! 747
soil
SS BJ
SP-i Bul
SP2-033
81 748
soil
67 BJ
Field Hank
SP2-F62
B! 7SI
water
2 J
9'3 TO 
TOO
Tutu Ucllticld, St. Ihotas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Seaivoldtile Organics Anabsls of Soils (in ug/kgl and Uattr (in ug/1)
TEXACO SOIL PILE
: 
POP Location:
! 
Field Satple Nuaber:
;UP 
[Case No. 102581 Nuaber:
! 
natru:
i Phenol
!bis(2-Chloroethrl)ether
!2-Chlorophenol
ll,J-Dichloroben2ene
!l,i-Dichloroben2ene
Henjyl alcohol
11,2-Oichlorobeniene
12-nethvlphenol
:bis[2-Chloroisoprop|fl)ether
IK-Nitroso-di-n-propylaiine
IHeiachloroethane
1 Nitrobenzene
llsophorone
!2-Nitrophenol
;2,4-DiaeIh»lphenol
ilenzoic acid
!bis(2-Chloroethoirliethane
12,4-Oichlorophenol
11,2,4-Trichlorobenjene
! Naphthalene
!t-Chloroaniline
IHeiachlorobutadiene
14-CMoro-J-itthrlPhenol
;2-nettirlnaphthalene
IHeiachlorocirclopentadiene
!2,i,6-Trichlorophenol
12.4, j- Inch lor opfitnol
12-CMoronaphthalene
;2-Nitroaniline
IDiatthrlphthalate
lAcenaphthrlene
!2,6-Dmitrotoluene
!}-Nitroaniline
lAcenaphthene
!2,t-Dinitrophenol
!i-Nitrophenol
IDibenzofuran
12.4-Dinitrotolutne
IbiethrlPhthalate
14-Chlorophenrl-phenrlether
IFluorene
!4-Nitroaniline
!4,6-Olnitro-2-aethiilphenol
!M -Nitrosodiphenrlaiine It)
SP2-010
61 749
soil
sr-i
SP2-011
(I 262
soil
5P2-021
II 26!
soil
5P2-031
IX 2t,4
soil
>
f. .
TOO 
J i'
lulu UellfielJ. St. lno»as. U.S. Virgin Islands
Scuvolatilt Organic} Anal r sis ol Soils lin ug/kgl and U«ter (in ug/1)
TEIACO SOIL PILE
1 
PRP Location:
1 
Field SrtPle Muaber:
1CLP (Cast Nt.lOHt) NjiUir:
1 
llatrii;
!Htiachlorob«n;«nt
IPtntachloropncnol
IPhrnanthrtnc
(Anthracene
;Di-n-Butylphthalat<
IFluoranthene
ihrene
IButrlttnnlPhthalate
!l,3'-Dlchlorobcn<idine
!B«n2ola)anthractne
IChrmne
!biU2-Ethrlheiyl)phthalate
IDi-n-octrlPhthalate
!Ben2olb)fluortnthene
!B(n;o(kl(luoranthene
!lndeno(l,2,}-cd)prrene
!Diben2la,Mtnthracene
!Ben2o(g,h,i)perrlent
UK's:
;t-H»droi»-4 ntthrI-2-pentan
I Aliphatic hydrocarbon
IHeptadtcane
!OctaJecane
INonadecane
SP-/6
SP2-OJO
Bt ?i«
soil
1)
5P-I
SP2-011
B» 2t?
toil
II
120 J
SP-/
SP2-021
Bl 2t)
iOil
41 J
II
110 ]
110 NJ
no :
110 J
sp-7
5P2-OJ1
BI W
mil
It
c
lulu Uclllitld, St. Thoias. U.S. Virgin Islands
Pesticide/PCfl AnaUsis of Soils I in u»/k«l and Uaters (in us/11
1EUCO SOIL PILE
! 
PRP local ion:
1 Field SatPlc Huibtr:
! 
CLP 112058) Nuibfr:
! 
flatrii:
lalpha-BHC
IbMa-BMC
Idelta-BHC
Isaaia-BHC ILindancI
IHeptachlor
lAldrin
IHeptacMor epoiidc
lEndosulfan I
ICHfldrin
:M'-DDE
lEndrin
lEndosulfan II
lEndosulfin sulfatt
14, ('-DPI
Intthoirchlor
lEndrln kttone
lalphi-Chlordane
Igaiii-Chlordine
IToiaphtnt
IArochlor-1016
lArochlor-1221
IArochlor-1232
!Arochlor-12i2
lArochlor-1241
[Arochlor-1254
IArochlor-1260
I10IAL PESI/PCB.
SP-1
SP2-OI1
6X 262
soil
5P2-021
BI 261
soil
NO PESUC1D
SP2-OJ1
BI 264
soil
S OR PCBs D
SP2-0310
BT 749
soil
TECTEO
Tutu UelllielJ, St. Ihoiai, U.S. Virgin hlandi
Total Petroleui HrJrocarbon IIPHI Analr&is
(toil in ua/g, Uattr in ig/!l
TEXACO SOIL PILE
PUP Location:
Field Saiole NuiHer:
CLP ISA5 «512B) Nuiber:
Total Pctroleui Hrdrocarbon
SP-1
5P2-OI
45128-10,11
30'
5P-/
5P2-02
15126-15.14
62'
SP-f
SP2-03
4M2B-16.17
20 J1
SP-i ;Fifld Blank
5P2-OJO : 
SP2-f»2
4M2B-21.22; 
4512B-24
(10 V 1 
(1 ig/1
'Averaged value
Tutu Uelltield. St. Inoijs, U.S. Virgin Islinds
if 
loncitr Analius ot Soil in u«/l
TUACO SOIL PILE
PRP location:
f .eld jsiplt Nuibrr:
CLP ISAS 46546) Nult.tr:
Arstnic
Bariui
Cadiiui
Chroiiui
Lud
Htrcury
Stlfniul
Silver
SP-1
SP2-01
46586-12
R
2.2 S
ft
I.I ]
SP-3
SP?-02
itSSB-lS
R
2.J ]
R
31.0 J
R
5P-5
5P2-OJ
16MB- 11
II
O.Si J
II
R
SP-b
5P2-03 OUP
46516-23
R
0.35 J
R
5.7 J|
Field Blink
SP2-FB2
46586-25
1}
R
lutu UellMeldl
Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
lOUel letter Response Site Saiphng
Volatile Organics Analysis ol Soils in ug/kg and Water in ug/1.
0'HENR» DRY CLEANERS
1 
Field Saiple Nuibfr:
I 
EPA Sdtple Umber:
1 
natru:
iChloroiethane
iflro»o«thant
IVinrl Chloride
IChloroethane
IHethrlene Chloride
lAcetone
ICarbon Disultide
1, 1-Dicnloroethene
!l,l-0ichloroethane
11,2-Dichloroethene Itotal)
ICMorolori
!l.2-0uhloroethane
!2-Butanonr
11,1,1-lrichloroethane
; Carbon Tetrachloride
IVinil Acetate
llrmodichlorotethane
!l,2-Dichloropro»ane
Uis-1, J-DicMoroproctne
:irkhloroethene
tDibroiochloroiethane
:i.l^2-1richloroethane
!Bfn:ene
!trans-l,i-Dichloropropene
IBroiolon
14 neth»l-2-Pentanone
;2-Heianone
lletrachloroetnene 
(
;i.l,2,2-letrachloroethane
lloluene
IChlorobenzene
lEthrlbenzene
IStyrene
Urlene (total)
e02-01
BX 261
soil
170000
e02-02
Bl 259
soil
1H BJ
J4 J
20 J
12 J
75
- - - - - 
—
180000
- —— ——— -t
•
e02-03
BX 258
soil
2 J
1
.___
"" X • .
51 J
e02-FBl
BI 200
vater
lie's:
Pentanr,2-iethoi)-2,l,t-tr
150 NJ
39 TO 
TOO mi
lutu UfllluU, 
Ihotoi, U.S. Virgin Islands
lOUel Utter Response Site Sampling
Organic* Analrsis ol Soils lin ug/kg) and Uater lin ug/1)
O'MCNRr
! 
Field Saiple Nuaber:
;UP 
ICase No. 102511 Nuaber:
I 
natrii:
IPhenol
:bis(2-Chloroeth»llether
12-Cnlorophenol
11.3-Dichlorobenzene
!l,*-0ichloroben:ene
IBenirl akohol
ll,2-0ichloroben;ene
12-nethrlphenol
!bis(2-Chloroisopropylletner
ll-nethdphenol
!N-Nitroso-Oi-n-proprlaaine
IHeiachloroethanc
INitrobenzene
!2-Nitrophenol
:2,(-Onethrlphenol
!8en;oic acid
!bis(2-Chloroethoiir)aethane
!2,i-Dichloropl\enol
;i,2,t-Ir!cMorobfnitne
INapMhalene '
!i-Chloroaniline
iHeiachlorobutadiene
!2-nethrlnaphthalene
iHeiachlorocrclopentadiene
',2,(,6-Irichlorophenol
!2,(.S-lrichloroptienol
!2-Chloronaphthalene
!2-Nitroaniline
IDiaethrlphthalate
lAcenaphthrlene
12,6-Dinitrotoluene
;}-Nitr<>aniline
'.Acenaphthene
!2,(-Dinitrophenol
!(-Nitrophenol
IDibenzoluran
!2,(-Dinitrotoluene
IDiethilpnthalate
1 1 -Ch loropheni I -phenr lether
!f luorene
It-Nltroaniline
!t,6-Dinitrb-2-aet>irlprienol
IN-Nitrosodipnenrlaaine 111
e02-D)
Bl 2SI
soil
59 NJ
e02-Q2
B» 2S9
soil
e02-01
81 261
soil
R
£9 TO 
TOO 
in..I..
lulu UellllMd, Si. IhOUs, U.S. Virgin
104(cl letter Response Site
itilvolatilf Organic s Analysis of Soils (in ug/k«) and Utter (in uj/ll
O
1 HENRY
1 
Field Sa»le Nuibtr;
XL? ICaic No 102581 Nuibtr:
! 
Hatrn:
! i -eroiophenr 1 -phenr lether
IHeitchlorobeniene
IPentachlorophenol
IPnentnthrene
I Anthracene
IDi-n-tutrlphthalatt
!Muoranthent
!P»rene
IButylbenzrlphthalate
Il.i'-Duhlorobeniidine
!Benzola)anthracene
;Chr»sene
Ibisl2 Ethrlheirllphthalate
!Di-n-octrlphthalate
!Ben2olti)fluoranthene
Itenzolkltluoranthene
IBeniolalprrene
! Indeno(l,2,3-cd)prrene
!Diben2(a,h)anlhricent
!B(n2olg,h,i)perirlene
UK's:
lAldol '
iHeptadecane, '2,6-Oiaethrl-
(02-0}
8« 2SI
soil
280 1
ft
(02-02
It 259
soil
J90 :
R
UOO NJ
e02-01
8X 261
soil
MO
R
UOO NJ
lutu Uellfield, it 
Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
lOt(e) letter Response Site Saapling
Pesticide/PCB Analysis of Soils (in ug/kg) and Haters I in ug/ll
O'MENRr DRY CLEANERS
1 Field Saiple Nuibtr:
! 
CLP 112051) Nuibtr:
! 
natrn:
lalpht-BHC
Ibeta-BNC
lilelta-BHC
Igaaia-BHC (Lindanel
iHeptacnlor
lAldrin
iHcptachlor epoude
lEndosultan 1
IDieldrin
;«,4'-DDE
lEndrin
iCndosultan II
Xt'-DDO
lEndosulfan sulfate
K.C-DOI
lltethoircnlor
Itndrin ketone
lalpha-Chlordane
Igaaaa-Chlordane
lloiaphent
!Arochlor-IOI6
IArochtor-1221
!»rochlor-l2J2
;Arochlor-1242
:Arochlor-124i
!Arochlor-12St
IArochlor-1260
IIOIAL PESI/PCBs
e02-01
(I 261
soil
e02-02
11 259
soil
NO PES1ICID
e02-OJ
BI 251
toll
S 0* PCBS D
(02-F61
II 260
water
TCCTED
lutu Uelllield, St. Uious, U.S. Virgin Islands
Second Round 10.k) Saicling
\Ail 
Mroleui Mxdrooarbon (IPHl Analrsii
IJoiU in ug/g; Unttrs in ig/1)
O'HCNIiy DOT ClfANfRS
Field S»plt Nuiber:
CLP (5*5 451261 Nulbcr:
lota! Pttroltui Hrdrocarbon
C02-01
(5126-1.2
302'
' Averaged
e02-02
i512B-4.5
865"
lalue
(02-0)
45121-7,1
51'
e02-FBl
4SI2B-1)
(1 ig/l
lulu Utllfitld. St. Ihotai. U.S. Virgin Islands
Second Round IDUel
E.P. luiuitr Analms of Soil in us/1
0'HENRY W1 CLEANERS
Field :>a>ple NuiDer:
CLP (S*S 465SB) Nuttier:
Arsenic
Bariui
Cidnui
Chronui
Leid
Hercur»
Sdeniui
Silver
e02-01
(6SaB-l
R
O.ii )
R
R
ei)2-02
U5J6-6
R
O.Jt 
)
D
R
e02-03
(6SSB-9
R
.a ]
R
C02-FB1
46SJ6-20
101
R
1.3
Xi
*„•
lulu yellfields. 31. Inotas, U.S. Virgin Islands
lOtle) Letter Response Site Saipling
Volatile Organics Anal/sis of Soils in ug/kg and Uater in ug/1.
OEPI. OF EDUCATION I LAG*I
! 
Field Sdiple Nuaber:
1 
EPA Saiple Nuaber:
! 
Itatru:
!Chloroaethane
IBroaoaethane
IVinyl Chloride
IChloroethane
INelhrlene Chloride
lAcetone
[Carbon Oisullidt
!l,l-Dichloroethene
Il.l-Olchloroethane
11,2-Dichloroethene Itottl)
IChlorolon
!l,2-Dichloroethane
12-Butanont
',1,1,1-Trichloroethane
; Carbon letrachloride
Ivinrl Acetate
IBroaodichloroiethane
11,2-Dichloropropane
Uis-l.J-Oichloropropene
llrichloroethene
IDibroaochloroaethane
:i,-l,2-1richloroethane
;Btn;ent
!trans-l,i-Dichloropropene
ISroaolora
!«-nethrl-2-Pentanone
12-Heianone
lletrachloroethene
11,1,2,2-letrachloroetMne
1 Toluene
IChlorobenzene
lEthrlbenzene
IStrrene
Hrlene (total)
CL-D2-01S
BT 759
toil
R
200 J
(20 J
UOO J
el-02-02S
BV 760
soil
It 00 J
el-02-OJS
BV 761
soil
*
eL-02-045
BX 141
water
12 J
el-02-OSS
BI W
soil
fi
eL-02-FBl
6» 762
uater
eL-02-FB2
BI ^O
uater
eL-02-Tfll
BI 99]
uater
I T l C ' s :
!Bicrclo|l.].l]non-2-en-9-o
1 Phenol
jP«ntdnc.2-itthoir-2,l.4-tr
21 N)
R
R
190 MJ
iHeptane.l.J.S-triaethd
89 TO 
TOO li'll
29 NJ
I Li
lutu Ucllfielbi, 5t. Inoias. U.S. Virjin Islands
10(1(1 Letter Response $it( Saaplms
Volatile Organics Analysis of Soils in ua/kj and Uater in ug/1.
DEN. OF EDUCATION (LAGAI
Field Saiplt Nuibrr:
F.PA Saiplt Nuibtr:
natru:
Heptane, 2, !,6-triiftri»l
el-02-OIS
6T 7S9
soil
eL-02-025
BY 760
soil
eL-02-0«
B> 761
soil
el-02-0»5
BI 991
•ater
29 NJ
eL-02-05S
BI 992
soil
eL-02-FBl
8V 762
yater
eL-02-FB2
BI 990
utter
eL-02-IBl
BX 993
»ater
>'\
•*»»/
n
N.
g
o
§!!
IS> *
1*
o 
o
- s
• I
o
v>
?
s ^
I I
tutu UtllMeld. St. Thoaas. U.S. 
Virgin Islands
lOtle) Letter Response Site Saipling
Ptsticide/PCB Analrsis of Soils lin ug/kgl and Uaters (in ug/ll
OEP1 
OF EOOCAI10N ILAGAl
! Field Saaple Nuioer:
! 
CLP 1120511 Nuioer:
! 
Hatrii:
lalpha-BHC
iBeta-BHC
Idelta-BHC
Igaaia-BHC ILindanel
IHeptachlor
!«ldrin
Ineptachlor epoude
lEndosulfan 1
IDieldrin
!Fndrin
lEndosulfan 11
Xt'-DDD
lEndosultan sulfate
U.t'-DOI
llttthoirchlor
lEndrin ketone
Ijlor.a-Chlordane
Igana-Chlordane
lloiaphene
lArochlor-1016
>rochlor-1221
lArochlor-1232
lArochlor-1242
;»rochlor-12U
:»rochlor-!25*
IArochlor-1260
1IOIAL PESI/PCfls
(L-02-01S
BY 759
soil
92
eL-02-02S
BY W
soil
eL-02-035
BY 761
soil
«L-02-f81
BY 762
vater
lutu Utlltitld. St. Ihoiai, U.S. Virgin Island
Second Round lOtlel Sliding
total Petroleut Hrdrocarbon IIPHl Analrm
(Soils in ug/g; Uattrs in •«/!)
OtPI OF EDUCATION IU&M
Field Saiple Nutber:
CLP (5 AS 451261 »u«6er;
Total PetroUut Hrdrocarbon
el-02-Oli
4SI2B-26
}(70
(L-02-02S
45126-27
1730
el-02-OJj
4S126-2J
S(i
eL-02-FBl
45126-29
(1 ig/1
°f
lulu Uellfield, St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
Second Round lOtUI Stic I ins
E.P.
loiicitt Analrsis of Soil in ug/t
OtPl OF EDUCATION I LAC*I
Field Sskple Nuiber:
CLP (SAS U58B) NuiDef:
Arsenu
Bariui
Cadiiui
Chronui
lead
nercury
Scltniui
Silver
eL-02-Ols
Mil- In
»
2.1 
J
II
11.0 J
«L-02-02i
itSIB-2;
II
0.12 J
5.3 J
el-02-Ols
46S!e-2«
II
2.4 ]
II
8.5 ]
eL-02-FBl
US8B-21)
II
II
lutu Uellfield. St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
lOtlel Letter Response Site Saipling
Seiivolatile Organics Analysis of Soils lin us/kg) and Uater (in ut/1)
DEPI. OF EDUCATION lLAGA)
! 
Field Saiple Nuiber:
ICLP ICese No. 10258) Nuiber:
', 
flatru:
14-Broiophenrl-phenyUlhtr
jHeiachlorobenzene
IPentacMorophenol
IPheninthrene
Anthracene
IDi-n-ButylPhthalite
IFluorinthene
iPrrene
!Butrlben2rlphth>late
13, 3' -Dichloroben;idine
!Ben2o(<)anthrtcene
IChrrscnc
;bis(2-[thylheir!)phthaUte
IDi-n-octrlPhthalite
;6en;olb)lluoranthene
;Ben:o(k)tluor«nthene
Kenzolalprrtne
! Indenol 1 , 2, J-cd)p»rene
;Dibenj(»,h)jnlhracene
;6en;o(s,h,l|perrlene
UK's:
INonane
ICW18 lioitr
lAliphatic hrdrocarbon
IDecane (8CIW1)
:ct-benztnt isoier
IC10H20 isoier
IKjpthelene. dtcahrdro, tra
lUnoecane UCI9CII
;tth»lphenol isoter
^-Octadecenou acid IZI-
!i-Hrdroir-(-iethrl-2-pentan
ICl-beniene liOier
llH-lndtnt, 2,1-dihndro-
ICHHJZ isoaer
IC10H12 isoier
ICS-benzene Isoier
'. 1-Hethylnapthalene
!C2-Naptnalent isoier
H-02-015
BT 759
soil
R
140000 NJ
1SOOOO J
200000 J
710000 NJ
120000 J
160000 J
77000 NJ
110000 NJ
170000 J
650000 NJ
el-02-025
BY 760
soil
20000 J
59000 NJ
SiOOO J
55000 NJ
I
J6000 J
22000 NJ
17000 J
el-02-OJS
BY 761
soil
120 J
II
17/.TO 
TOO 
If LI..
lutu Uelllields, St. Thoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
lOUel letter Response Site SaiPling
Volatile Organics Anabsis at Soil* in ug/kg and U
RAIISA» noTO* co.
Field Saiole Nuiber;
EPA Stiple Nuiber:
Flatrii:
IChloroiethane
Itroioiethane
IVinrl Chloride
ICMoroethgne
inethrlene Chloride
lAcetone
[Carbon Disullide
!l,l-0ichloroethene
11.1-Dichloroethane
11.2-Oichloroetriene (total)
ICMoroton
11.2-Dichloroethane
12-But anont
;i,l,l-Irichloroethane
;Carbon letrachlonde
IVinrl Acetate
!troiodichloro*ethane
11,2-Dichloropropane
!cis-l.i-0ichloropropene
llrichloroethene
IDibroiochloroiethane
11,1,2-lrichloroethane
iBeniene
!trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
IBroiofora
H-neth»l-2-Pentanone
!2-Heianone
lletrachloroethene
11,1,2,2-Ietrachloroethane
llviluene
IChlorobeniene
ICthrlbenzene
IStrrene
Itrlene Itotall
eR-02-OlS
OX 944
soil
200 J
IlC's:
CJHt-Benzene isoier
l,2-Dieth>l benzene
JC4H10 Benzene isoier
11000 BJ
17000 KJ
6000 J
lulu Uelltield, St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
IQtle) letter Response Site Saipling
Sealvolatile urganics Analysis ol Soils (in uj/kgl an
»MISA» iwioft co.
! 
Field Saiple Nuitier:
;cif ICase No.10251) Nurttr:
; 
natrii:
!Phenol
;bis(2-Chloroeth»llether
12-Chlorophenol
;i,3-0ichlorobenzene
;i,i-Dichloroben:ene
!Ben2>l alcohol
!l,2-Duhloroben;ene
;2-nethHphenol
;bisl2-Chloroisoprop»l)ether
;4-nethrlphenol
jM-Nitroso-di-n-proprlaiine
iHeiachloroethane
!Nitrobenzene
llsophorone
',2-Nitrophenol
!2,i-DnethylPhenol
IBenioic acid
!bis(2-Chloroethoiy)*ethane
!2.i-Dichlorophenol
;i,2,4-lrichloroben2ene
Naphthalene
U-CMoroani lint
iHeiachlorobutadiene
l4-Chloro-]-*ethirlphenol
12-flethirlnaphthalene
IHeiachlorocrclopentadlene
!2,4,t-1richlorophenol
i2,t,S-lrichloruptienol
!2-Chloronaphthalene
!2-Nitroaniline
IDiiethrlpnthalate
!*cenaphthrlene
!2,b-Dinitrotoluene
IJ-Nitroaniline
lAcenapnthtne
12,4-Dinitrophenol
',4-Nitrophenol
IDibenzofuran
!2,4-Dinitrotoluene
'.Diethrlphthalate
',4-Chlorophenrl-Phenrlether
IFluorene
!4-Nitroaniline
'i4,b-Uinitro-2-aethi>lPhenol
IN-Nitrosodiphentlaairie 111
tft-02-OlS
BI 9>4
soil
4400
6100
140 J
420 J
)
of
lutu Uellfield, St. Ihous, U.S. Virgin Islands
lOiltl Letter Response Site baiplint
Seiivolatile Organici Analrsis of Soils (in ug/kg) in
«»H5A» noion co.
! 
Field Saiple Nuiber:
ICLP (Case No.l02S8) Nuibtr.
! 
Hdtrii:
U-Broiophtnrl-phenrltthcr
IHeigchlorobcnzene
IPentachlorophfnol
IPhenanthrcne
1 Anthracene
IDi-n-Butrlphthalate
!f luoranthene
IPrrene
!But»lben2irlphthalate
13,)' -Oichlorobeniidine
IBenzolalanthracene
IChrrsene
;bisl2-Ethrlheirl|phthal«te
;0i-n-octrlphthalate
1 Benzol bllluoranthene
IBenioUKluoranthent
!Benjola)prrene
!lndeno(l,2,}-cd)prrene
;Dibeni(a.h)anthracene
IBeniolt.h.ilptrrlene
UK's:
INonane
!C9H1> isoaer
lAliphatic hydrocarbon
Ibecane I8CI9CI)
ICt-benjene -isoaer
IUOH20 isoier
INapthalene, decahrdro, trt
lUndtcane (8C19C1!
lEthrlphenol isoier
;?-Octadecenoic acid IZI-
i(-Hrdroir-(-iethrl-2-pentan
!C)-ben:ene isoier
llH-lndene, 2,3-dihrdro-
1C19H32 isottr
IC10H12 isoier
!CS-btn2ene isoier
Il-Nethrlnapthilene
!C^-Napthalene isoier
eft-02-01S
BX 9tt
soil
7(0 J
2000
iiOO
170 J
770 J
4)0 J
2100 J
4700 J
R
lUOO J
4000 J
JSOO ]
4600 NJ
3800 J
00
lutu Uflllield, St. Thoias, U.S. Virgin Iblands
lOile) letter Response Site Saipling
PestKide/PCB Unalrsis ol Soils lin ug/kgj and Uaters (in ug/l)
i)*ns*y noiOR co.
Field baipU Kuiber:
CLP 112058) Hu.ber:
natrn:
lalpha-BHC
!b(ta-6HC
Idtlta-BMC
igana-BHC Ilindanc)
IHeptachlor
!«ldrin
iHcptachlor epoudt
ICndosuKan 1
IDieldrin
:4,t'-oDe
ICndrin
lEndosullan II
Xt'-DDO
lEndo&uUan sullatt
H.t'-ODt
Inethoiirchlor
ICndrin ketont
lalpha-Chlordanc
Igaiia-Chlordanc
IToiaphcne
;»rocnlor-!OI6
;«rochlor-1221
;*rochlor-!2J2
;Arochlor-12t2
:*rocMcr-12t8
;»rochlor-125t
IArochlor-1260
;iOUL PESt/KBs
eR-02-01S
BX 98i
soil
NO PESTIC10 S OR PCBs DEC1ECUD
Tutu Utlltitld, M 
Ihoiai. U.S. Virgin Islands
Second Round ItUltl Saipling
Total Pflroltua Mrdrocarbon I1PHI Analrsit
(Soils in uj/s; Mattrs in ig/ll
RAHSAY HOI OR CO.
Field Staple Nuater:
CLP (SAS 45128) Mulber:
Total Petroltua Hydrocarbon
(R-02-02S
45126-40
23400
lulu u e l l f i t l d , SI. ThoMi. U.S. Vngm Islands
Second Round lOUel Sampling
It. 
Toiicitr Analrsis of Soil in ug/l
noIOR co.
Fitld Saiplc Nuibtr:
(IP 
15 AS 4658BI Nuttier:
Aritnic
Binui
Cidnui
Chronui
Lead
Hercurr
Seleniut
Silvtr
eR-02-02s
46586-40
1)
6.1
II
15.0 ]
lulu Uellfields. St. Ihoias, U.S. 
Virgin Islands
lOilel Ittttr Response Site SaiPling
Volatile Orginici Analrtit of Soils in ug/kg and Utter in ug/1.
SUPERCAI SHE
Y
CC!
T—)o
: 
Field Saaple NuiOer:
! 
EPA Saaple Nuatier:
; 
hatrii:
ICI.Urotethane
IBroaoitthane
IVinrl Chloride
IChloroelhene
Inethyltne Chloride
lAcetone
1 Carbon Disulfide
Il.l-Dichloroethtne
Il.l-Dichloroethane
;i,2-0ichloroethen« (total!
IChlorofora
',1,2-Dichloroethane
!2-Butanone
11,1,1-lrichloroethane
; Cor Don letrachlonde
IVinyt Acetate
IBroiodichloroiethane
!l,2-0ichloropropane
!cis-l,]-Dichloropropene
llruhloroethene
IDitroaochloroiethane
11,1,2-Irichloroethane
',Ben;ene
:trans-l,}-DichlQropropene
IBroiofon
!4-nethrl-2-Pentanone
!2-Heianone
lletrachloroethene
:i,l,2,2-Ietrachloroethane
lloluene
!Chloroben2ene
lE'hrlbenjene
IStrrene
!Xrlene (total!
eSC-02-Ola
61 994
water
110
eSC-02-02a
BI 99S
water
eSC-02-OiS
BI 997
soil
1) J
) J
IS J
eSC-02-055
BI 99B
soil
27
IS J
CSC-02-06S
BI 976
toil
67 J
7 J
31 1
13 J
20 J
110 J
eSC-02-07i
BX 977
101 1
10 J
eSC-02-09S
BI 971
soil
4) J
CSC-02-10S
BI 913
soil
} ]
(SC-02-03F6
BI 996
water
e$C-02-OSfB
BI 979
water
;
eSC-02-lB
BV 764
water
IUOO ;
\ 
/
f 
\
i J700 )
^_^
1700
.£00
eSC-02-161
BI 9B1
water
4 J
2 J
: 
IlC'i:
!l-Propene,2-itthil-
Idonane
;0<tane,J,5-Dnethxl-
5100 
N]
JOO NJ
SOO NJ
38 TO 
TOO IC'll
— 
• </» 
—
S
o•"
s
5
o
•*
o
«•-*o
•f
0
?
s
Vi
s
•r*
*
2
o*
1
0
I
Q.
^
*
5
,0
OB
<*•
=
•D
CO
ao
oO
S
*
s
i
1
WJ
•*
b.
«
1
2
1
o
kit
1
o
o
•1
9
fc.
3
U.
»
s s g
""* — S
X
o
3
-^ — » -^ — . 
-^
o o 
•-* — «•> o
= = =
o
S-^ 
r = 5 
•;:-£
j £ 
^ ^ - y s - ? i S 7 :
? 1 5 1 I 1 1 -lif--i
v — a v * • c * o i me 
- m
« 
C C -. 
C 4* JZ 
« f > . « r f « l
• 
U W 3 4 > 3 > * . * > V ' 
*f 
>. 
** flO
( ^ • p o o t / i ^ i « i _ * i _ j ^ c ^ ^ i _ t ^ « — '
lutu Uelltield. St. Thoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
IDUe) Letter Response 5ite Saipling
Senvoiatile Orjenics Analrsis of Soils (in ug/kgl and Hater I in u»/l)
SUPERC*! SHE
CO
: 
Field Saiple Nuiber:
ICLP (Case No. 10258) Nuiber:
I 
natrii:
1 Phenol
IbisU-CMoroethHlether
12-Chlorophenol
;i,J-Oichloroben:ene
11,4-tnchlorobenjene
IBtnnl alcohol
!l,2-0ichlorobenjene
! 2 -flethyl phenol
!bisl2-Chloroisoprop»l)ether
n-nethylphenol
IN-Nitroso-di-n-proprlaiine
iHeiachloroethane
iNitrobenzene
llsophorone
',2-Nitrophenol
12.4-tiiaethHphenol
Itenzoic acid
!bis(2-Chloroethoiy)iethane
12,1-Dichlorophenol
11,2,4-Irichlorobenjene
1 Naphthalene
!4-Chloroaniline
!Heiachlorobutadiene
14-Chloro-i-iethrlphenol
!2-Heth>lnaphthalene
IHeiachlorocrclopentadiene
:2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
l2,4,S-1richlorophenol
!2-CMoronaphthalene
!2-Nitroaniline
:oiaeth»lphthalate
lAcenaphthylene
!2,b-Dinitrotoluene
!5-Nitro«niline
!«cenaphthene
12,4-Dinitrophenol
14-Nitrophenol
IDibenioturan
!2.4-Dinitrotoluene
IDiethrlphthalate
! 4 -CMorophenr l-phenr lether
;f luortnt
|4-Nitroaniline
IN-Nltro&odiphenrlaaine 11)
fSC -02-65
61 97t
soil
eSC-02-7s
61 977
soil
e5C-02-9S
(I 971
soil
eSC-02-105
tl 9tl
soil
eSC-02-4S
BI 997
soil
eSC-02-5S
BX 99B
soil
lulu Mellfield, St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
lOUel Letter Response Site Stapling
Senvolatile Organics Analrsis of Soils (in ug/kg) and Utter (in ug/l)
SUPERCM SHE
03
I 
field Saiple Nuibtr:
1CLP (Case NO.I025D) Nuiber
I 
rtatru:
li-BroiOPhenrl-phenrlether
IHeiachlorobtnztnt
!Fentachlorophenol
IPhenanthrene
Anthracene
IDi-n-Butylphthalate
IFluorenthene
IPirene
:6utrlben2ilphthalatt
; J. J' -Dichlorobfnndinf
IBcnzolalanthracene
IChrnstne
!bisl2-Cth)lheirl)phthalate
!Di-n-octrlphthalate
!Benzolb)(luoranthene
iSehzolkltluoranthene
IBenzoltlprrene
llndfnoll.2, J-cJlprrtnt
IDibenzl a, h (anthracene
IBenzoIg.h.ilperrlene
UK's:
:;-Hyilroir-(-*ethrl-2-pentan
^Aliphatic hrdrocarbon
ISulter, iol (Stl
eSC-02-liS
B> 976
soil
R
2300 J
eSC-02-7s
61 977
soil
R
eSC-02-95
BI 971
soil
R
160 BJ
,'
eSC-02-105
BI 911
soil
R
e5C-02-*5
11 997
soil
2100 J
2000 J
10000
R
4900 J
(100 
NJ
e5C-02-55
BX 991
soil
R
lulu Uellfield, St. Thoias. U.S. Virgin Islands
I04(e) Letter Response Site Saiplin«
Pesticide/PCB Anelrsis ol Soils (in us/kg I and Utters I in us/11
SUPEKAI SHE
in
GO
! Field Saiple Nu«btr;
1 
CLP 112051) NuiDer:
1 
natrii:
lalpha-BHC
!beta-BHC
Idelti-BHC
Igaiia-BHC iLindane)
IHePtachlor
IMdrin
iHtptociilor eponde
ICndosuKan 1
IDieldrin
U.i'-OOE
Itndrin
!Endosulfan II
X*'-DOD
lEndosulfan sultate
;t,4'-D01
InethoiycMor
lEndrtn ketone
lalpha-Chlordane
;«aua-Chlordane
lloiaphtnt
lArochlor-1016
;*rochlor-1221
:*rochlor-l2)2
;«rochlor-12t2
;»rochlor-1246
!»rochlor-1254
IArochlor-1260
:tOI»L PESI/PCBs
eSC-02-Ola
BI 99*
uater
eSC-02-02a
61 995
uater
eSC-02-IUS
BI 99?
soil
eSC-02-05S
61 991
toil
eSC-02-Ob$
(I 
97<>
soil
55
eSC-02-07S
61 97?
soil
eSC-02-09S
BI 971
soil
fSC 02-105
61 98!
soil
tSC-02-OJFB
BI 996
vittr
eSC-02-OHFB
BI 979
uater
(I 1
lulu UMlfield, St. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
Stcond Round 10411) Sliding
lolal Petroteui Hydrocarbon ITPH) Analysis
(Soils In ug/g; Utters in ig/1)
SUPERCM SHE
-0
CO
•H
Field Sup If Nuibtr:
CLP (S»5 til 26 1 Nuibtr:
total Pctroltui Hydrocarbon
eSC-02-Ola
45128-10
2 ig/1
(SC-02-02a
45128-J1
(1 ig/1
cSC-02-Ols
4S12B-33
U70
eSC-02-OSs
4512B-34
65iO
(SC-02-06S
4M2B-3S
21500
eSC-02-07s
15126-J6
(10
eSC-02 09s
4512B-J8
1830
«SC-02-03fB «SC-02-0«F6
45121-32 
45126-!?
(1 ig/1 
(1 ig/1
lulu uellfield, St. Ihoits, U.S. Virgin Islands
Second Hound lOilt) Stapling
l.F. loucitr Anibsis of Soil in ug/1
UXACO CARU6EAN, SUPERCAT
fit [<1 Suplf NulDtr:
CIP ISAS 465881 Nulber:
Arsenic
Bsrlui
Cadoui
Chroiiui
Ltid
Nercurr
Seltniut
Silver
eI5C-02-01s
46586-39
R
0.45
R
f '\
> 
a
I'r; «
lutu Uell(iel<J, St. IhoMS, U.S. Virgin Ulindt
Second Round lOilel Siiollng
r f. loncitr »n»hus of Soil in ug/l
SUPERCAT SHE
CD
:~r;
Field Siiple Nuiber:
CLf (SAS 
465881 Nuiber:
Arsenic
Bariut
Cidiiui
Chroiiui
Leid
Her cur r
Seleniui
Silver
eSC-02-02l
46588-31
ft
R
2.J
eSC-02-0«i
465M-JJ
1.0 J
I5S J
36.0 
J
R
978 J
(SC-02-OSt
46586- J4
1560 
]
3.6 J
».0 J
e5C-02-OH
46588-35
1290
12.0
R
40.0 
J
eSC-02-07t
46588-36
R
0.26
2.8 J
tsc-02-cm
4658B-J8
t
l.l J
1.4 J
eSC-02-03FB
46588-32
J9.2
ft
eSC-02-OIFB
465SB-3?
*
C/
lulu Utllfield. St. Ihoidi, U.S. Virgin Islands
Stcond Round IO»UI
lotal Pttruleui Hydrocarbon 11PH) Analysis
(Soils in ug/g. Utttrs in u/ll
KlACO CMItBCAN
Field Suple NuiDtr;
CLP ISAS 45126) Nulbtr:
lotsl Pttroltui Hydrocarbon
(ISC-02-OU
4512B-39
(10
0--
03
Tutu Uelltields. 5t. Thotas. U.S. Virgin Islands
Volatile Organics Analysis of 5oilt in u«/kg and Uater in u«/l.
ESSO SOU PILE
! 
PUP Location;
! 
Held baiple Nuiber:
1 
EPA Saaple Kuiber:
I 
Matrii:
IChlgroaethane
IBroioie thane
IVinrl Chloride
IChloroethane
Iflethrlene Chloride
1 Acetone
ICarbon Disulfide
11,1-Oichloroethene
Il.l-Oichloroethane
11,2-Oichloroethene (total)
IChlorofon
11,2-Dichloroethane
12-Butanone
11,1,1-lruMoroethane
ICarbon letrachloride
IViurl Acetate
IBroioduhloroiethane
11,2'Dichloroprwane
lcis-1 , 3-Oichloroprottne
llrichloroethene
lOibroioihloroiethane
11,1.2-Irichloroethane
Iflenjene
ltrans-l,3-Dichloropropene
IBroiofori
l4-nethrl-2-Pentanone
12-Heianone
IMrachloroethene
11,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
;i fluent
IChlorobenjene
lEthrlbeniene
I5trrene
Urlene (total)
1 
U C ' s :
;Neptane.3,5-di«th,l-
lHeptane.3-«th»l-
I0ctane,2-aethrl
INonane
I0clane.2,3-Diiethrl-
SP-1IOP
E5P-01T
BY 702
soil
7 J
270
210 NJ
230 NJ
500 NJ
300 NJ I
590 NJ !
sp-inio
ESP-oin
BY703
soil
210 J
3300
5100
2100 
NJ
3700 NJ
5P-1BO!
ESP-018
BY 704
soil
460 J
780
2500
1500
2700 NJ
4700 NJ
5200 NJ
5P-210P
ESP-02I
BY 705
soil
R
240 J
3600
2500 NJ
3100 
NJ !
SP-2KID
E5P-02B
BY 707
soil
R
550 J
750 J
13000
4600 NJ
4700 NJ 
I
6000 NJ !
5P-2BOT
E5P-02B
BY 709
soil
R
360 J
15000 J
8joo NJ ;
SP-3TOP
E5P-031
BY 711
soil
R
2100 
J
2100 
NJ
.MOO NJ
3600 NJ !
SPiniD
E5P-OSM
BY 712
soil
R
4tOO
2600 NJ
UOO NJ
5000 NJ !
SP-3BOI
E5P-03B
BY 713
soil
8
1300
1500 
NJ
3200 NJ
2400 NJ I
3700 NJ !
Field Blank
E5P-fB3
BY 701
water
1 J
i
lulu Uellfitlds, 51 tr.ous. U.S. Virgin Islands
Volatile Or«anics *nal»sis ot Soils in ug/k« and Uattr in uj/i.
ESSO SOIL PILE
o--
1 
PRP Location:
1 
Field Saaple Nuaber:
! 
EP» Saaple Nuaber:
! 
flatrii:
i Octant, J-itthrl
tNonane,3 aetliyl-
I Heptane, 2, 4-diaetM-
lEthrlaethylbeniene isoaer
7-neth»rtridecene
Heptane
Benzene, l-ethrl-2-aetnrl
Oecane
Benzene, 1,2,4 -truethrl -
2,3-hepladien-5-rne,2.4-di
Benzene, ll-aethrletn>ll-
Beniene.proprl-
Substituted benzene
Alkane
Heiane,2,S-diaethil
Benzene 1,2.3-tritethrl-
Triiethrl benzene isoaer
Methyl octane isoier
Pentane,2,2,4-tritethrl-
SP-1IOP
E5P-011
BY 702
soil
490 NJ
240 NJ
1200 NJ
1200 NJ
5P-1H10
ESP-01H
BY703
soil
3200 NJ
48000 J
1300 J
1800 J
24000 NJ
SP-1BOI
ESP-01B
BY 704
soil
2000 NJ
53000 NJ
24000 NJ
2300 NJ
8200 NJ
2900 NJ
SP-210P
CSP-02T
BY 70S
soil
2000 NJ
1600 NJ
36000 J
1300 J
SP-2I1IO
ESP-02H
BY 707
soil
62000 J
2SOO NJ
32000 NJ
4100 NJ
4700 NJ
5900 J
SP-2B01
ESP-026
61 709
soil
9800 NJ
40000 J
4500 NJ
t.8000 NJ
4500 NJ
S200 NJ
5P-3IOP
E5P-03I
BY 711
soil
13000 J
6400 J
3300 NJ
3000 NJ
SPJfllD
E5P-03H
BY 712
soil
4600 NJ
33000 J
2200 NJ
34000 J
5P-3BOI
ESP-03B
BY 713
soil
7600 J
1800 NJ
IbOO NJ
10000 NJ
Field Blank
ESP-FBS
BY 701
uater
•r
Tutu Uellfield, St. Thous, U.S. Virgin Islandi
Senvolatile Or gin u 4 Anahsis ol Soils Itn u</Hl and Ualer (in uj/ll
CSSO SOIL PILE
; 
PRP Location:
! 
Field Said It Nuiber:
;CLP (Case Ho. 102581 Nuiber
1 
natrii:
! Phenol
I6isl2-Chloroelhrl)ether
!2-CMorophenol
;i,3-0ichloroben2ene
11,4-Dichlorobenitne
IBen»l alcohol
11,2-Dlchlorobenzene
!2-Hethrlphenol
!bi si 2-Chloroisoproprl lether
14-ntthylphenol
IN Nitroio-di-n-proprl«iine
IHeiachloroethant
INitroberutnt
ilsophorone
12 Nitrophenol
!2,4-Diiethrlphenol
!Ben;oic acid
;bisl2-Chloroethoiy)iethane
12,4-Dichlorophenol
:i,2,4-Irichlorobenjene
INaphthalene
!i-Chloroaniline
IHeiachlorobutadiene
!4-Chloro-3-iethrlphenol
12-Hethrlnaphthalene
iHeiac-hlorocrclopentadiene
12,4,6-lrichlorophenol
!2.;,5-!richlorophtnol
!2-Chloronaphthalene
;2-Nitroanihne
!DnethrlpMhalate
lAcenaphthrlene
!.,i.-Dinitrololuenc
13-Nitroaniline
12,4-Dinitrophenol
!4-Nitrophenol
IDiben^olui an
!2,4-Dinitrotclu(ne
!DiethrlPhthalate
14 Chlorophenjl-phenr lether
'.Fluorene
14-Nitruaniline
!4,ti-Dinitr(i-2-iethi>lphenol
;»-NUroioJiphtnrlo«inr III
5P-I
ESP 01
tr 704
soil
1400
1700
150 J
SP-2
E5P-02
61 710
soil
3100
2SOO
89 J
ISO J
SP-3
esp-os
11 711
soil
2000
2000
310 J
ISO J
r-.j
i>.
•H
Tutu Uelllield. it. ThOMs. U.S. Virgin lilanji
SeiivolatUt Organic* Analnlt of SoiU I In ug/kgl and MaUr lin ug/ll
E5SO SOIL PILE
! 
PUP Location:
! 
Field Saiplt Nuibtr:
;CLP ICasf No. 10:61) Nuibtr:
! 
Halm;
;Htigchlorobrn2en(
IPenUchlorophcnol
!Ph(ntnthr(ne
lAnthractnt
IDi-n-tutrlchthilate
IFluoranthtnt
lP»rtnt
IButribtnnlphthalsIf
ll.J'-OichlorobenZKline
;Ben;o(alanthractnt
IChDsene
:t>lil2-Elh>lh<irllphthalatc
;Di-n-octrlphtr.al«tt
IBenzoltiltluoriintntne
! Bfnzol klfluoranthene
IBtnzololprrtne
MndtnoU,2, J-cd)prrtnt
IDiben/U.hlanthracenc
!8rn{olg,h,i)p(rrltne
;uc's:
U hrdroir-i-itthrl-2-pentan
;C3-Dfn:tn« isoitr
;c*-bfn;tnt isoitr
IC10H12 isoitr
ICS-benjtnt iso«r
ll-fltthylnapthalene
!C2-Napthaltnt isoicr
:CIOM22 isoier
1C9M10 iso«fr
:C2-btn:tnt isoierthrl-l^Cll
Aliphatic hrdrocarcon
:0tcane (8CISC1I
HH-lndtnt, 2,5-dihrdro-
5P-1
ESP-Ol
BY 70(
soil
UO J
2*0 J
R
5000 J
3000 1
1100 J
1600 J
1100 NJ
790 J
SP-:
ESP-02
BY 710
soil
170 ]
95 J
R
1600 J
S200 ]
(200 J
2(00 )
1700 HJ
1600 J
1100 J '
1100 NJ
2100 NJ
SP-J
ESP-OJ
11 711
soil
120 J
200 J
R
9000 J
5300 J
2900 J
1(00 J
UOO NJ
1200 J
1700 J
Cr-
Tutu UfllliflJ. St. [holds, U.S. Virgin Isldnds
Ptstlcidt/PCB Anahsis of Soils lin uu/ljl and uaitrs (in ug/ll
£550 SOIL PILE
1 
PKP Location:
! FielJ Sdftulr Number:
! 
CLP 112058) NuiDcr:
1 
natrii:
lalPha-BHC
;t>fta-BHC
Idflta-BHC
leaMa BHC (Lindantl
IHeptathlor
lAldrin
IHtottchlor tpoiidf
lEndosullin 1
;(,«'-ODE
! [nor in
ifndosullan II
Undoiultan iullate
U.t'-DIil
IflfthoircMor
lEndrin kflonf
lalpha-CMordane
IganarChlordanc
llouphrne
IArochlor-1016
!Arochlor-l221
lArochlor-1212
IArochlor-1242
!Arochlor-l2(t
!Arochlor-125t
:Arochlor-12lO
I10IAL PEST/PCBs
SP-l
E5P-OI
BV 701
soil
SP 2
E5P-02
8T 710
soil
NO PESUCID
5P-J
E5P-OJ
IT 711
toil
S OR PCBs D
Field Blink
E5P-fBJ
X 701
yit*r
TECIED
lutu U c l l l l f l d , St. IhOiii, (l-i. Virgin Island*
lotal Pttrolfui MrJrocarbon IIPHI Analysis
(Soil in ug/g; 
Usttr in ig/ll
ESSO SOIL PILE
PRP Location:
Field SaiD It NuiOfr:
CLP ISAS 4S12B) Nuibcr:
total Pttrolfu« HrJrocarbun
5P-1
ESP-01
45I26-7J
48
5P-2
CSP-02
4M26-74
134
5P-J
E5P-OJ
45126-75
65
Field Hank
E5P-F83
45128-72
U ig/1
Z ^ ^ ^ S S ^ ^
5 2 c S. - " c 3
• -« • • 
^
KJ
E , '-^
b 
^ S
30 
3D
"*
cr
1 Nuibcr;
i
o»
o-V
o*
& 
30
Cf*
• O
£ ?
*»
0 T
•vj 
»vj
0 "^
4
?^
TUT 
OO1 0196
lutu Uelltields, it. Inoaas. U.S. 
Virgin Islands
Volatile Organics Analrsis of Soils in ug/kg and Uater in ug/l.
CSSO 1ANK 
tlCAVAUON
1 
PUP Loci! ion:
1 
Field SatPle Nuaoer:
! 
EPA Saaple Nuaoer:
1 
natrii:
12-Butene
Iflenjene, ll-iethflethrl)-
IBenzene, proprl-
IBenzene. l-propenrl
IDiethtlbenzene isoier
!Ben!<nc,2-ethrl-l,(-dii(th
:Ben2(ri(,l,2,},S-t(triicthr
!Ben2cnc,l,(-ditth>l-
:H«pttn(,2,i-di>cthifl-
;Ben;fnt.l-tthrl-2-ifthrl
!l,4-Crclohciadienc,]-ethnif
iMrnnt. 2-itthr 1
;HfOtant,3,5-diitth»l-
;2,J-Hfptadifn-5-»n*,2,4-di
IBtnjtnt, ll, l-dlitthiltthrl
!lthrldia(thylb(nt(nt isoaf
inttnanr.truhlorotluoro-
IPropant,2-«thoiir-2-«thrl
! B«nzene, 1.2,3- triifthrl-
IBtnicne, 1,2,4-triiethrl-
;iH -indent, 2, J-dih»dro-5-af
;B«nzene,l-«thifl-5-proprl-
ISutistitutcd bcnitnc
;((nztn(,l,2,«-trii(thyl-
iBfnit'nt, 1-tlhtl- J.Vdiatth
;6tn!enf,l2-attNrlpropil)-
indhanc.trichlorofluoro
Benztnt, l-fthrnrl-2-ittHrl
IP-I
K-I-02
11 771
soil
«700 N]
18000 NJ
IP-3
It-I-01
IV 770
toil
150000 NJ
260000 NJ
260000 NJ
1000000 NJ
110000 NJ
210000 J
IP-5
It-I-01
BY 76S
toll
26000 NJ
26000 NJ
12000 NJ
20000 NJ
12000 NJ
13000 NJ
IP-7
Tf-K-OS
BY 773
soil
1100 
NJ
1700 
NJ
1100 
J
1500 
NJ
1100 
NJ
1100 
NJ
IP-»
U-X-06
BT 769
soil
1>0 NJ
190 NJ
100 NJ
11 NJ
IP-il
TC-l-04
BY 772
soil
45 NJ
21 NJ
51 NJ
45 NJ
40 NJ
SI NJ
21 NJ
IP-11
IE-I-040
BY 774
soil
IP-12
IE-X-07
BY 775
toil
22 NJ
61 NJ
21 NJ
22 NJ
4.9 NJ
6.2 NJ
9.9 NJ
7.4 NJ
Fltld Blank
It-FBI
BY 761
uater
24 NJ
Field Blank
IE-FB2
BY 761
vater
11 NJ
Irip Blank
It-111
BY 766
water
270 J
Irip Blank
IE-112
BY 767
water
270 J
tutu uelllitld, St. Ihoaas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Se»lvoletile Orginics Analysis of Soils (in ug/kgl and Hater (in ug/ll
ESSO lAHH EKAVAUOK
; 
PUP Location:
1 
Field SaiPle Nmtier:
'.(.if (Case No. 10251) Kuiber:
! 
Nairn:
IPhenol
IbisU-CMoroethrllether
12-Chlorophenol
!l,3-Dlchloroben2ene
11.4-Oithlorobeniene
!6enirl alcohol
!l,2-Dichloroben2(ne
!2-nethrlphenol
!bi si 2-CMoroisoprop 1 1 let her
!l-nethrlphenol
IN-Nltroso-dl-n-propylaiine
IHeiachloroethane
iNitrobenzene
llsophorone
!2-Nitrophenol
!2,i-Diiethrlphenol
IBenioic acid
:bis(2-Chlorocthoir)iethane
12,4-Oichlorophenol
1 1,2,4 -Irichlorobtn: tne
I Naphthalene
14-Chloroaniline
IHeiachlorobutao'icne
|t-Chloro-)-iethrlPhenol
12-nethHnaphthalene
IHeiachloroirclopentadiene
;2,(,6-Trichlorophenol
!2,O-Irichlorophenol
;2-Chloronaphthalcne
!2-Nitroaniline
IDiiethrlphthalate
lAcenaphthylene
!2,6-Dinitrotoluene
13-Nitroanillne
lAcenaphthene
12,4-Oinitrophenol
14-Nitrophenol
!Diben:oluran
!2,4-Dinitrotoluene
IDiethrlphthalate
l*-Chloropheniil-phenirlelher
!Fluorene
!4-Nitroaniline
i4,6-Oinitro-2-ieth» Iphenol
',N-Nitrosodiphtnrlaiine (1)
|i-lro»ophtnrl-phenrl ether
IP-5
IE-1-01
11 7t5
soil
5700 J
5000
330 J
Field Blank
!C-fB2
BY 761
viler
IP-9
IE-I-06
tl 769
soil
UOO
1600
130 J
IP-J
It-X-03
BT 770
soil
37000 J
27000 J
1100 J
IP-1
1F.-X-02
BY 771
soil
.
1100
1100
14 ]
IP-11
U I Ot
flr 772
soil
IP-7
IE-X-05
BY 773
soil
bOO
940
300
IP-11
IE-I-04D
BY 774
soil
IP-I:
IE-I-07
BY 775
soil
lulu Uellfield, SI. Ihoias, U.S. Virgin Islands
StilvoUlilt Or games Analrsis ot Soils (in ug/nl and Uittr tin ug/ll
0-
ESSO UMH EICAVAIION
I 
PRP Location:
! 
Field Saiple Nuiber:
ICLP (Case No. 10258) Nuiber:
1 
flatm:
iHeiachlorobenzene
IPentachlorophenol
IPhenanthrene
(Anthracene
;Di-n-Butrlphthalate
IFluoranthene
IPrrene
IButrlbenzylphthalate
!3,3'-Okhlorobenzidine
IBenzolilanthracene
!tiisl2-EthrlheiHlphth«late
IDi-n-oct>lphthalate
(Benzolbltluoranthene
! flenzo ( k I ( luoranthene
IBenzolalprrene
; Indenol 1,2, J-cd|p»rene
lOlbenzla.hlanthncene
;Benio(g,h,i)perrlene
!UC's:
!4-Hrdroiy-4-iethrl-2-pentin
!C2-benzene isoier
lAliphatk hydrocarbon
!C3-benj.ene isoier
11 H-Indene, 2,'3-dihrdro
!C4-benzene isoier
1C10H12 uoier
!CS-ben;ene isoier
!l-h>thrlnapthalene
Undent
;C10H14 isoier
IBiphenrl
IC2-napthalene isoier
IP-S
IE-X-01
BY 765
soil
300 J
SO J
R
3400 J
1800 J
5700 J
4200 NJ
9100 J
2200 J
1700 J
2200 NJ
Field Blank
IE-FB2
BY 768
water
3 J
IP-9
IE-K-06
BT 769
soil
R
1900 J
3100 J
1700 J
1400 J
1400 NJ
1200NJ
1600J
IP-3
IE-X-03
BY 770
soil
1100 J
ISO J
260 J
21000 J
8300 J
8500 J
13000 NJ
14000 J
12000 J
9900 )
IP-1
IE-J-02
BY 771
soil
R
1200 J
730 NJ
2300 J
540 J
660 J
660 J
IP-11
IE-11-04
BY 772
soil
45 J
R
IP-7
IE-I-05
BY 773
soil
170
36 J
R
540 J
2100 J
610 J
570 J
570 J
1300 J
540 J
IP-11
IE-1-040
BY 774
soil
R
IP-12
IE-J-07
BY 775
soil
59 J
R
11) ; cannot bt separated froi Diphenrlaiint
lutu UelltielJ. St. Ihoias. U.S. Virgin Islands
Pesticide/PCB Analrsis of Soils tin us/Hi and uaters lin ug/ll
E5SO IANK ElCAVAIION
; 
PRP I0*.4l ICin:
: FielJ iaiple Nuitier:
; 
(LP 1120581 »u»t>er.
I 
natru:
!aUtia-BHC
Ibfla-BMC
Idelta-BHC
!ga*ia-BHC Ilindanel
IHtptachlor
lAldrin
IHeptachlor epoude
lEndosulfan 1
lOieldrin
Xt'-DDE
lEndrin
lEndosullan II
U.t'-DOD
lEndosullan sulfate
Incthoirchlor
!Endrin ketone
laipha-Chlordgne
!idiia-Chlordint
lloiaphene
|Arochlor-l016
IArochlor-1221
lArochlor-1232
IArochlor-12(2
,'Arochior-124«
lArochlor-125*
!ArocMor-1260
1IOIAL PESI/PCBs
IP-1
IE-« 02
BY 771
soil
•
IP-3
IE-X 
03
BY 770
soil
IP-5
IE-X 
01
BY 765
toil
IP-7
It-X 05
BY 773
soil
NO PESIICID
IP-9
IE-X 
06
BY 769
soil
S OS PCBs D
IP-11
! £ - ( 
04
BY 7?i
IECIED
IP-11
IE-1 U.d
BY in
s.ll
IP-12
IE-X 
07
BY 775
soil
I-E-l
BY 761
water
Field Blank
IE-FBI
BY 7t,3
water
Field Blank
IE-FB2
BY 769
water
lutu Uelltield. -A. Ihoias, lutu UellMeld, St. Ihoaas, U.S. Virgin Islands
lots! Petroleui H>jrocarbun lotal Petroleui Hrdrocarbon (IPHl Analysis
(Soil in ug/j; uater in u/ 
lioil in u«/4; U«ttr in ig/1)
ESSO UNK CICAVAIION
PRP location:
Fit Id Sa»lt Nutbtr:
CLP ISAS (M2BI Nuibtr:
lotal Pttroltui Hrdrocarbon
PIP location:
Field Saiplt Nutber:
CLP (SAS 4512BI lluibtr:
lotal PttroUui Hydrocarbon
T-E-1
IC-A-01
45121-60
it it/I
IP-5
H-I-01
45128-61
69
IP-1
IE-I-02
45126-62
6i
IP-3
IE-1-03
4512B-6)
2550
IP-11
lE-I-Oi
(512B-64
II
IP-7
tE-I-05
4512B-6I
63
TP-*
TE-I-06
45I2B-69
39
IP-12
IE-X-07
4512B-70
(10
IP-11
IE-I-04D
45125-71
(10
Field Blank
IE-FBI
45128-65
(1 10/1
Field Blank
IE-FB2
45I2B-67
(1 i«/l
lutu Uellfield, St. IhoMs. U.S. Virgin UUndi
E.P. 
loiicm Anilriii of Soil in us/I
£550 UNK 
EXCAVATION
POP Location:
Field 5aiple NuiDer:
CLP 15*5 46586) Nuiber:
Arsenic
Bariui
Cldilui
Chronui
Lead
nercurir
Seleniua
Silver
I-E-1
IE-A-01
46586-60
I
1100
II
46.0 
J
IP-b
1E-X-01
46586-61
2950 J
4.5 J
II
20.0 
J
II
IP-1
IE-X-02
46586-62
2690 J
l.B J
1
4.4 ]
IP-J
IE-X-OJ
46586-6J
J090 J
J.9 ]
ft
1S.O 
J
IP-11
IE-X-04
4658B-64
2560 J
2.2 J
40 J
IP-7
1E-X-05
46586-68
R
0.60 J
t.l J
IP-9
IE-K-06
46586-69
2590 ]
1.0 J
(.9 J
IP-12
IE-1-07
46588-70
I)
0.36 J
IP-11
lf-1-Ot OUP
46586-71
1950 
J
}.2 I
1.0 J
J.5 J
Field llink
IE-FBI
46586-65
1)
R
Field Blink
IE-FB2
46586-67
R
II
IUIU UELLfltLO
SAMPLE ;unn«R»
LIST Of FPC SPLITS Of PRP iADPlES
APRIL 27, 1990 HEPuRI
CASE |
12058
45126
16)81
1 
DATES
lo/S-10/89
16/5-10/89
16/5-10/89
; nAtmx
ISOIL, AQ
I50IL, AO
150IL, AO
: CIP is
!B(. 61, 6V
I 
45126
! 
46566
! 
ANALYSES
I 
VOA, Ell
1 
IPH
1 
EP 101
IPRPI LOCATION
IEXACO STATION
SOIL PILE
SP-1, top
SP-1, ltd
SP-1, bot
SP-1, COIP
•
*
SP-J, top
SP-J, lid
5P-3, bot
SP-J, COIP
•
SP-5, top
SP-5, nd
SP-5, bot
• SP-5, COIP
•
•
Dup SP-5, top
Dup SP-5, COIP
•
Field Blank
fPC FIELO 1
SP2-OI1
SP2-012
5P2-013
5P2-011
SP2-01
*
5P2-021
5P2-022
SP2-023
5P2-02I
5P2-02
"
SP2 031
5P2-OJ2
SP2-03J
5P2-03I
SP2-03
•
SP2-031D
5P2-03IO
SP2-030
•
SP2-FB2
CLP 1
BX 262
61 265
61 266
61 262
45128-10
45128-11
46586-12
61 263
6X 267
Bl 268
Bl 26}
4512B-1J
45126-14
46586-15
BX 264
BI 747
BI 748
61 264
45128-16
45126-17
4658-18
BT 749
BT 749
45126-21
45126-22
46586-23
81 758
8T 758
45126-24
46586-25
DATE
6/6/89
•
•
•
•
•
6/6/89
•
•
•
•
•
6/6/69
*
*
1
•
*
'
6/6/69
•
•
6/6/89
•
•
MATRIX 
1 
ANALYSES
]
;
SOIL 
IVOA
IVOA
IVOA
IEXTRACIA6LES
IIPH
IIPH
IEP TOI
SOIL 
IVOA
IVOA
IVOA
!E1IIACTA6LES
IIPH
IIPH
IEP TOI
SOIL 
IVOA
IVOA
IVOA
IE1TRACTA6LES
IIPH
IIPH
IEP IOX
SOIL 
IVOA
IEITRACIABLES
IIPH
IIPH
IEP TOI
AO 
IVOA
lEXTRACTABLES
ITPH
IEP TOI
TUTU
SANPLE
HASIER 1151 
OF FPC SPLITS OF PIP SA
APRIL 27, 1990 REPORT
CASE I
DA1ES 
I I1AIRIX
CLP IS
12058 
:6/5-IO/B9 
ISOIL, AO IBI. 6X, BY
4512B 
16/5-10/19 
ISOIL. AO ; 4512B
46588 
16/5-10/89 
ISOIL, AO I 46588
(PUP) 
LOCATION
ESSO STATION
TANK EXCAV PIT
IP-I
•
IP-5
*
'
TP-5
*
1
TP-7
'
'
IP-9
IP-11
•
IP-12
•
•
Oup, 
IP-11
•
•
Field Blank
•
'
FPC FIELD 1
IE-11-02
"
'
1E-X-03
*
TE-X-01
'
*
lt-X-05
•
1E-X-06
*
*
te-i-<K
"
'
TE-X-07
*
'
IE-X-04D
•
•
IE-FBI
•
IE-FB2
•
CLP 1
BY 771
(6126-62
UStB-62
BY 770
4512B-6J
465JB-6J
BY 765
45128-61
46586-61
BY 773
45126-6J
46518-68
BY 769
4512B-69
46588-69
BY 772
45128-64
4658B-64
BY 775
45128-70
46588-70
BY 774
45126-71
46588-71
BY 76J
4S12B-65
46586-65
BY 768
4S12B-67
46588-67
DATE
6/9/89
6/9/89
6/8/89
6/9/B9
6/9/19
6/9/89
6/9/89
6/9/89
6/8/84
6/9/69
nATRU
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
SOIL
AO
AO
ESSO SOIL PILE
5P-1, 
lop
SP-1, 
lid
SP-1, 0(,d
5P-I, 
toip
ESP-01I
ESP-Oin
EiF-OlB
ESP-01
BY 702
BY 70}
BY 704
BY 704
6/10/89
'
.
SOIL
•Wr
f-
1UIU U[UFItl&
SAHPLE suimARr
IIASIER 115! OP fPC SPLITS OF PRP SA
APRIL 27. WO 
DEPORT
CASE I
DATES
CLP is
12058 
16/5-10/89 
ISOIL, AO !(T, BX, Bt
4512B 
16/5-10/89 
ISOIL. AO ! 
4512B
4658B 
I6/5-10/B9 
ISOIL. AO I U586
IPRPI LOCATION
•
SP-2. 
top
5P-2, lid
5P-2, 
bot
SP-2. 
COIP
*
*
SP-J. 
top
5P-J. lid
SP-5. 
Dot
5P-3, 
COIP
•
•
Field Blank
•
•
FPC FIELD 1
•
ESP-02I
ESP-02H
ESP-02B
ESP-02
"
*
ESP-OJT
ESP-03H
ESP-OJ8
ESP-OJ
*
'
ESP-FBJ
•
•
CLP 1
ttSBB-71
BY 70S
BY 707
BT 70)
BV 710
45128-74
U588-74
Br 711
BY 712
Br 71}
BV 711
(S12B-7S
465J6-75
BY 701
45128-72
46586-72
DATE
•
6/10/89
•
•
•
*
•
6/10/89
*
'
*
6/10/89
•
•
IUIRU
•
SOIL
*
'
•
*
*
SOIL
*
*
1
'
AO
•
•
lulu at:iimil
SttnPiE Su
IMSItK LIST OF iHHr-LEb FMift H'4IE| Ltlltfc KEifU.Vc
(4PKU 27, Wo 
ftEFOM
lUUIiUtl
;U HE«h» [til iLEANEkS
; 
under i pile ot
1 
aeons, trlV
'.(inner me sj»e pile
; 01 oeoris, 15'1'4-
d 
bouih 01 lust
: borer.oie location
aoove
; 
Field bunt
ItEPI Ut llHJLAllOft
; 
llrui area
;5 to 12 inches deep
Orui area
; 
brut area
IKroouct in open oru*
; 
FiHa riant
held blar..
Irip hUr,i
:KAni,rt( ndijh LU.
.Ne-t to oasset fence
'ii.ineo soil, ;-i."
iUfthlHl MIC
1 
Fro* nori-^otjQ.t
Ifroi ocijOle t.'tri
CASE 1
Iiu5«
4M.-8
46)66
FK FIELD 1
eO-vI'-ul
*•
eO-u.-u;
•
.0-U2-..3
•
*
eO-u.'-fbl
•
tl-v2-vtS
•
•
eL-l'2-ii^'S
"
,i-«:-*b
*
•
eL-l'2-u4L
ei-u.'-nib
ei-u.-FH
(L-l-i-Fr.1
ti.-o.-m
tH-Vl">\3
'
e;t-". -i la
jt-u;-;.
OAIES
6/)- hi/89
6/)-lfr/89
6/5-1U/B9
CLP 1
bl 261
45128-112
bx :59
45li«-445
bl 256
4M.'f-7»6
465BB-9
8< 26U
4512S-19
BY 759
45lib-26
46588-26
6V 760
45i;<b-27
bi 761
br 761
451 ^-48
46?bb-i6
bl 991
11 992
IM 762
45K'b-29
4658b-29
bl 99ii
bl 99!
br <rj4
4M.f-4u
4c)bf-4o
bi -*i<
4»"Sl
Mlkll
SUk, AO
Suk, Ab
SOU, AO
OKIE
6/5/89
*
b/5/89
•
6/5/U9
•
•
6/5/89
•
6/6/89
•
•
6/6/89
•
6/6/89
•
6/6/69
6/6/89
6/6/69
•
6'0/b9
6/6/69
6/n/oV
•
ail- 'Si
6 ' i 1 Bl
CLP IS 
I 
ANALibtS
bl, 81, br 
1 
VGA. til
45l2b 
1 
!Hi
465Bb 
1 
EP 101
•ftNlkll 
1 
AIDSES
SOU 
IVOA. EllkACliibLES
;IPH
SOU 
IVOH, EIIkAClHbiES
IIPH
SOIL 
IVOA, EilftAClHllLEb
IIPM
IEP 101
AO 
IVOA, EIlkAClAbLEb
1 1PH
SOU 
IVOA, ElldACIAbLES
* 
I TPH
IEP 101
SOU 
IVOA, EllftACIAKEi
lll-H
SOIL 
IVOA
;1PH
:EP lui
AO 
;vo« 
—— 
L
SOU 
IVOA 
:
AO 
IVOA. EllhHiliibLEb
;lPh
IEP lui
AU 
IVOA
AO 
: vbH 
:
iuk 
VUH, EilnHLUcub
:iFh
;EP lui
HU 
IVUrt, t lIK^L UbLt i>
HJ 
:Vct4, cilnrtL Ut iti 
i
CN
c
WOA:
»01 43!
mi:
os
101 43!
101 43!
"Hi:
'WJA: 
nos
101 43!
mi:
'VOA; 
nos
101 43!
'DOA: 
nos
ioi 43:
'WOA: 
nos
101 43!
S3W1DIMIJ 'MA! 1105
IOI 43.'
H4I!
'WOA! 
110?
101 43:
*»///«
4B/Z/9
IS* lit
944
{84 H
Pi4 18
at, m
9/4 18
844 18
ft-88S9»
£44 <8
It-MW
fl^O-M-15*
| IDS
«nna ,q
ubis
(ours «cnq .?!-[
•fjjf panuai aoisu|
/puts «o|aq .(,-;
buii'uifiuo
101 43
113 'VOA
'»<) '11
JIM
n» 'nos
w 'no?
w 'nos
1 •)!]
1 dlJH
48/01-5/9
SI 41D 
IIHIVU
"441 'i
1 3«»3
1SP
nmi
ATTACHMENT 1
Approximate Location of Soil Samples Collected
Esso Tank Excavation
Tutu Wellfield, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
June 8-10,1990
TP-10, TP-10A
Excavation 
X 
Wall
TP-11
X
TE-X-04
TE-X-04D
x
TP-1
TE-X-02
x
jP-2
x
TP-3
TE-X--03 '
Tp_4
x
Excavation Floor
TP-5
TP-5A
x
TE-X-01
TP-6
x
TP-7
TE-X-05
X
Tp-8
X
jP-9
TE-X-06
X
X TE-X-07
X 
TP-V2T
EXCAVATION PIT
SP5 X
sp-2
X
SP-3
X SP-6
Soil samples (except
VOAs) are vertical
composites from top.
middle and base.
middle
base
SOIL PILE
CDM Federal Programs Corporation
TUT 
001 
0203
r
i
rI
I
I
. CEIMIC 
y
CORPORATION
••<-V"^> '•*& •
'•'••' • . . < • • • > ' 
". 
. "'..'-.:. -I'C.;*---:- .'.'•••.' .:". '••"Y'^'V'.V •V';v^.^''-..v'V: . - . • • > - • - -
'"•'•^•'..jV-.';. ,-V;'
:-V ^: ;- J'.?;-!;^'/.'-,<: •'••' - •':':'--:'--;!_-;^::'-"JlK',:'iV^'-''1-'>"'.-'- ••;•''
"-,:'''^:'' 
:':'.' :'. ^:''- ";•*•;&. f^ 
•^&$^^£$*^-'.^-':: r
.^.OSEPA Contract, Lab Program••• ''.'v':^"l^•'••.-•- :'/
'-; Saaule Maniaa.=>in^n-h Of-f ^ ^o'''^.^-'/.'^-'';.-"'-. : ' • ' - . .
:July,,18, 1989
,
: Dear Program'"'Manager:''V^;]|-£-tv^^
 
: ; 
• ' • - ' -' 
••
":'!;> ,w, V- •" ' • ' ; ; . . ' . ;".-'-^;"- !-" -; ^^ix^^vf-:'^.?- ••': ;K^V'.. : v ' 
' . • : . " .: 
-
• V Enclosed please find a data package and one floppy diskette
for each of.the two SDGs.(BT747 and BX978) for the analysis of
thirty, two soil samples.received at CEIMIC from Region II under
Case .#12058 and performe'd."under contract 368D90028.
/. - 
Please call if. you" have any questions regarding the data.
Sincerely,
.Kin S. Chlu
' "' Program Manager
.cc. DSEPA EMSL-LV
USEFA Region II
100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett, R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905
' -,0 yf •tj'yy-':- 
' - •'
 
TUT 
°
01 
°209
CASE NARRATIVE
i
I
I
The enclosed data package is in response to EFA. Case #12053
and performed under Contract $ 6SD90028. These corresponded to 32
VGA, 23 SV and 2S Fest analyses (including the duplicate matrix
spikes) originating from USEFA Region II and received at CEIMIC
on June 13, 1989 via Federal Express. There are 2 SDGs in this
case: ET747 and EX978.
The 
data package included the analysis of samples""'' for SDG
3T747:
EFA ID 
ANALYSIS
-BT747 —— SDG 
VGA
BT74S 
VGA
BT749 
VGA, SV, Fest
cBX262 
VGA, SV , Fest
VGA, SV, Fest
VGA, SV, Feet
—•-8X265 
VGA
^—BX266 
VGA
EX266MS 
VGA
BX266KSD 
VGA
—"EX267 
VGA
^EX263 
' 
VGA
.^5X976 
• VGA, SV, Fest
VGA, SV, Fest
VGA
VGA, SV, Fest
BY759EE 
VGA
BY759MS 
SV, Fest
BY759MSD 
SV, Fest
VGA, SV, Fest
—— Last sample 
VGA, SV, Fest
i
i
i
i
i
i
Tlie submitted data covers the analysis of the Volatile
I
(VGA), Seiaivolatile (SV) and Festicides/FCB (Fest) fractions and
their associated blanks and QA/QC. CEIKIC would like to highlight
the following points pertaining to the analyses performed for
this case:
I 
i < /
^i cf U(33 
/ 
TUT 001. 0210
I
(1) INSTRUMENTATION AND COLUMN IDENTIFICATION
I
The following instruments are used for the analyses:
| 
GC/MS ANALYSIS
a. VOA
S2 :
column
I 
MS2 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 mm ID SP-1000 packed
I 
• 
column
, 
b. SV
I
I
MS3 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 ram ID SP-1000 packed
MSI : HP 5970B GC/MS using 30 m x 0.25 mm ID DB-5
fused silica capillary column
GC ANALYSIS
GC1 : HP 5890 with ECD
GC3 : HP 5890 with ECD
a. Primary column: SP2100
6' x 2 mm ID glass column packed with 3%
i 
SP-2100 on 100/120 Supelcoport (Supelco)
I 
b. Confirnation column: 22502401 (2250/2401)
6' x 4 mm ID glass column packed with 1.5%
. 
SP-2250/1.95 % SP-2401 on 100/120 Supelcoport
I 
(Supelco)
j 
(2) SAMPLE INFORMATION
Duplicate matrix spikes were performed on BX266 for the VOA
I 
fraction, and on BY761 for the SVOA and Pest fractions.
A. Pest Fraction
Surrogate recovery and retention time of several sample extracts
were out of the limits. This is probably due to matrix interferences
* 
as method blanks which were analysed with the sequence were all
* """" 
within limits.
" 
TUT OO1. 
O2.ll
B. VGA Fraction
Sample BY759 was reanalyzed to demonstrate matrix effects,
The VGA reconstructed ion chromatograms are labeled as :
IS-1 
Eroroochloromethane 
IS
IS-2 
1,4-Difluorobensene 
IS
IS-3 
Chlorobensene-d5 
IS
S-l 
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 
SS
S-2 
Toluene-d8 
SS
S-3 
p-Bromofluorobensene 
SS
C. SVGA Fraction:
The SV reconstructed ion chromatograms are labeled as :
»
S-l 
2-Fluorophenol 
SS
S-2 
Fhenol-d5 
SS
IS-1 
l,4-Dichlorobensene-d4 
IS
S-3 
Nitrobensene-d5 
SS
IS-2 
Naphthalene-d8 
IS
S-4 
2-Fluorobiphenyl 
SS
IS-3 
Acenaphthene-dlO 
IS
S-5 
Tribromophenol 
SS
IS-4 
Fhenanthrene-dlO 
IS
S-6 
Terphenyl-dl4 
SS
IS-5 
Chrysene-dl2 
IS
IS-6 
Ferylene-dl2 
IS
IS = Internal standard
SS = Surrogate standard
DEVIATIONS FROM THE SOW
None
TUT 001 0212
terms
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the
and conditions of the contract, both technically and for
completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above.
Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and
in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has
been authorised 
by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as
verified by the following signature.
Kin S. Chiu
Program Manager
"i UT 
OO1 0213
CASE NARRATIVE
I
I
The enclosed data package ie in response to EFA Case » 12058
UOA Pffforned under Contract » 68D90028. These corresponded to 32
VOA, ±9 SV and 28 Pest analyses (including the duplicate matrix
spikes) originating from tlSEPA Region II and received at CEIMIC
°n ™13' 1989 via F«d«ral Express. There are 2 SDGs in this
case: ET747 and BX978.
BT
 
The 
data Pa^age included the analysis of samples for SDG
ID 
ANALYSIS
1
I
I
I
I
BT747 —— SDG 
VGA
I 
. 
BT748 
VGA
I 
BT749 
VGA, SV, Pest
^ 
BX262 
VGA, SV, Pest
• 
BX263 
VGA, SV, Pest
I 
BX264 
VGA, SV, Pest
1 
BX265 
VGA
BX266 
VGA
BX26GMS 
VGA
BX266MSD 
VOA
BX267 
VGA
I 
BX268 
VGA
I 
BX976 
VGA, SV, Pest
BX977 
VGA, SV, Pest
, 
BX992 
VGA
I 
BY759 
VGA, SV, Pest
1 
BY759FE 
VGA
BY759MS 
SV, Pest
I 
BY759MSD 
SV, Pest
1 
BY760 
VGA, SV, Pest
BY761 —— Last sample 
VOA, SV, Pes-t
,„«. 
submitted data covers the analysis of the Volatile
(VGA), Semivolatile (SV) and Festicides/PCB (Pest) fractions and
I 
their associated blanks and QA/QC. CEIMIC would like to highlight
the following points pertaining to the analyses performed for
this caee:
ftl
001 0214
" 
(1) INSTRUMENTATION AND COLUMN IDENTIFICATION
f
i 
The following instruments are used for the analyses:
- 
GC/MS ANALYSIS
a. VGA
MS2 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 mm ID SF-1000 packed
I 
column
MS3 : HP 597OB GC/MS using 6* x 2 mm ID SP-1000 packed
i 
column
b. SV
MSI : HP 5970B GC/MS using 30 m x 0.25 mm ID DB-5
I 
fused silica capillary column
| 
GC ANALYSIS
GC1 : HP 5890 with ECD
| 
GC3 : HP 5890 with ECD
a. Primary column: SP2100
' 
6' x 2 mm ID glass column packed with 3%
SP-2100 on 100/120 Supelcoport (Supelco)
I
b. Confirmation column: 22502401 (2250/2401)
j 
6' x 4 mm ID glass column packed with 1.5%
SP-2250/1.95 % SF-2401 on 100/120 Supelcoport
(Supelco)
(2) SAMPLE INFORMATION
Duplicate matrix spikes were performed on BX266 for the VOA
fraction, and on BY761 for the SVOA and Pest fractions.
A. Peet Fraction
Surrogate recovery and retention time of several sample extracts
were out of the limits. This is probably due to matrix interferences
as method blanks which were analysed with the sequence were all
within limits.
(,(**•• 
...
IUT 
001 O215
I
I
i
B. VGA Fraction
Sample BY759 was reanalyzed to demonstrate matrix effects
The VGA reconstructed ion chromatograms are labeled as :
IS-1 
Eromochlororoethane 
IS
I
IS-2 
1,4-Difluorobensene 
IS
IS-3 
Chlorobensene-d5 
IS
S-l 
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 
SS
§ 
S-2 
Toluene-d8 
SS
I 
S-3 
p-Bromofluorobensene 
SS
I 
C. SVGA Fraction:
The SV reconstructed ion chromatograms are
I 
S-l 
2-Fluorophenol 
SS
S-2 
Phenol-d5 
SS
IS-1 
l,4-Dichlorobensene-d4 
IS
I 
S-3 
Nitrobensene-d5 
SS
• 
IS-2 Naphthalene-d8 
IS
S-4 
2-Fluorobiphenyl 
SS
I 
IS-3 Acenaphthene-dlO 
IS
S-5 
Tribromophenol 
SS
IS-4 
Phenanthrene-dlO 
IS
S-6 
Terphenyl-dl4 
SS
IS-5 
Chrysene-dl2 
IS
IS-6 
Perylene-dl2 
IS
IS = Internal standard
SS = Surrogate standard
I
• 
DEVIATIONS FROM THE SOW
None
I
I
I
I -
.
L 7 ^ M*"5" 
TUT 001 0216
I
t
I
I
I
f
I
I
I
i
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the
terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for
completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above.
Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and
in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has
been authorised by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as
verified by the following signature.
Kin S. Chiu
Program Manager
i
I
I
001 0217
„ — 
(1) INSTRUMENTATION AND COLUMN IDENTIFICATION
1
The following instruments are used for the analyses:
I
* 
GC/MS ANALYSIS 
/'
I
V \
X 
&/ 
' '
a. VOA 
\ 
< , 
<'
MS2 : HP 5970B GC/MS 
using 6' x 2 mm^lD SF-lCfOO pacfc
column 
'VV 
"'^ ""
I
b. SV
•
MS3 : HP 5970B GC/MS using 6' x 2 mm I'D SP^IOOO packed
column 
xs
\.
MSI : HP 597C1B GC/MS using 30 m x 0.25 mm ID DB-5
fueed silica capillary column
I
GC ANALYSIS
| 
GC1 : HP 5S90 with ECD
GC3 : HP 5890 with ECD
I
a. Primary column: SP2100
6' x 2 mm I'D glass column packed with 3%
SF-2100 on 100/120 Supelcoport (Supelco)
b. Confirmaion column: 22502401 (2250/2401)
6' x 4 mm ID glass column packed with 1.5%
SP-2250/1.95 % SF-2401 on 100/120 Supelcoport
(Supelco)
(2) SAMPLE INFORMATION
Duplicate matrix spikes were performed on BX984 for the VOA
fraction, and on BY775 for the SVGA and Pest fractions.
A. Pest Fraction
The surrogate recovery and retention time were out of the
limits for several of the sample extracts. This is probably due
to matrix interferences as the method blanks which were analysed
with the sequence were all within limits.
TUT 001 0218
B. VOA Fraction
The VOA reconstructed ion chronjatograws are labeled A
IS-1 
Browochloromethane 
IS
IS-2 
1,4-Difluorobenzene 
IS
IS-3 
Chlorobensene-d5 
IS
S-l 
l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 
SS
S-2 
Toluene-d8 
SS
S-3 
p-Bromofluorobensene 
SS
C. SVOA Fraction:
The SV reconstructed ion chromatograros are labeled as
S-l 
2-Fluorophenol 
SS
S-2 
Fhenol-d5 
SS
IS-1 
l,4-Dichlorobensene-d4 
IS
S-3 
Nitrobensene-d5 
SS
IS-2 
Naphthalene-d8 
IS
S-4 
2-Fluorobiphenyl 
SS
IS-3 
Acenaphthene-dlO 
IS
S-5 
Tribromophenol 
SS
IS-4 
Phenanthrene-dlO 
IS
S-6 
Terphenyl-dl4 
SS
IS-5 
Chrysene-dl2 
IS
IS-6 
Ferylene-dl2 
IS
IS .= Internal standard
SS = Surrogate standard
DEVIATIONS FROM THE SOW
None
70
/^
TUT 001 0219
1 certify that this data package is in compliance with the
terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and for
completeness, for other than the conditions detailed above.
Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and
in the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has
been authorised by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as
verified by the following signature.
Kin S. Chiu
Program Manager
TUT 001 0220
CEIMIC
CORPORATION
SECOND
REVISED
SDG Cover Sheet
Laboratory Name: Ceimic Corporation
Contract Number: # 68D90028
Sample Analysis Price: $ 737
Case Number: # 12058
SDG Number
BT747 - first sample received
BT748
BT749
BX262
BX263
BX264
BX265
BX266
BX266 MS
BX266 MSD
BX267
BX268
BX976
BX977
BX992
BY759
BY759 MS
BY759 MSD
BY760
BY761 - last sample received
Date of Receipt
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/10/89
6/10/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
6/8/89
H
H
100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett, R.I. 02882 • (401) 
782-8900 • FAX (401) 
782-8905
IT,
153
I
I
CEIMIC
CORPORATION
SECOND
REVISED
SDG Cover Sheet
Laboratory Name: Ceimic Corporation
Contract Number: # 68D90028
Sample Analysis Price: $ 737
Case Number: # 12058
SDG Number
Date of Receipt
BX978 - first sample received 
6/10/89
BX983. 
6/10/89
BX984 
6/10/89
BX997 
6/10/89
BX998 
6/10/89
BY704 
6/13/89
BY710 
6/13/89
BY711 
6/13/89
BY765 
6/12/89
BY769 
6/12/89
BY770 
6/12/89
BY771 
6/12/89
BY772 
6/12/89
BY773 
6/12/89
BY774 
6/12/89
BY775 
6/12/89
BY775 MS 
- 
6/12/89
BY775 MSD - last sample received 
6/12/89
160
TUT 
001 
0222
100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett. R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905
73 £
I
I
I
SOP NO. HW-6
Revision #6
CLP ORGANICS DATA REVIEW
AND PRELIMINARY REVIEW
ODNCURRED BY: 
- / ~-^~ 
Date;
is -B^vilacgua C
Monitoring Management Branch
APPROVED BY: /LpUt*JJr ' 
H^C— 
—_______________ Date:,
Gerard F. McKenna, Chief
Monitoring Management Branch
I
I
TUT 
ooi 
o;
STAMPED OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 3 
of 
36
" Date: March 1989
Revision 6
"PACKAGE COMPLETENESS AND DELTVERABIZS 
CASE NUMBER:.
LAB: 
;
; --
SITE: —•• —• _____________________
1.0 Data Corpleteno^s and Deliverables 
YP^ 
NO 
N/A
1.1 Have any missing deliverables been received and added 
[ -x 1 
__ 
__
to the data package.
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittal of any
missing deliverables. If lab cannot provide them,
note the effect on review of the package under
the "Contract Problens/Non-carpliance" section
of reviewer narrative.
1.2 Was s:.o CCS checklist included with package? 
f • ] 
__ 
__
n n rover Letter/Case Narrative
2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present? 
f ^ 1 
__ 
__
2.2 Are Case Number and/or SAS number contained in the 
/
^ 
Narrative or Cover Letter? 
f * 1 __ 
__
3.0 Data Validation Checklist
The following checklist is divided into three parts. Part A
is filled out if the data package contains any VQA analyses,
Part B for any BNA analyses and Part C for Pesticide/PCBs.
Does this package contain:
VQA data? 
••' 
__
BNA data? 
_^_ 
__
Pesticide/PCB data? 
-: 
__
ACTION: Complete corresponding parts of checklist.
I
I
I
TUT 001 O224
-7 C - I
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Page: 4 
of 
35
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO
PART A: VDA ANALYSES
1.3 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples?
ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copies.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sample receipt, condition of saaples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting
the quality of the data?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
Acno;.': If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more
than 50% water, all data should be rejected.
A7.ru:- 
If both VOA vials for a sample have air bubbles,
flag all positive results "J" and all non
-detects" "R".
N/A
_ _ 
f - I _ _
2.C
Tunes
2.1 Have any VOA holding times, determined from date of
collection to date of analysis, been exceeded?
If unpreserved, aqueous aromatic volatiles must be analyzed
within 7 days of collection and non-aromatic volatiles must
be analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric
acid and stored at 4°C, then both aromatic and non-aromatic
volatiles must be analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain
about preservation, contact the sampler to determine whether
the sasples were preserved.
A ten-day holding time for soil samples is recommended.
Table of H o l n Tme Violations
Sample
Sample
Matrix
Preserved ?
(See Traffic Report)
Date 
Date lab
Sampled 
Received
Date
Analyzed
i- / / •'• i-t-
ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as
estimated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated
("UJ"), and document in the narrative that holding times
were exceeded.
TUT 001
r/
(7
X
r. 
-T,
P.
.
"-I 
: v , "
-o
\
r 
r.
( 
c-
• •o
Cr-
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 5 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
" 
YES 
NO 
N/A
If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding time,
either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer
must use professional judgement to determine the reliability
of the data and the effects of additional storage on the
sample results. The reviewer may determine that non-detect
data are unusable ("R") .
3.0 Surrogate Recovery fFom .
3.1 Are the VQA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water 
[ __ ] __ 
_/
b. Med water 
[ __ ] __ 
J/
c. Low Soil 
[ _ _] 
__ 
__
d. Med Soil 
[ __ ] 
__ 
_^L
3.2 Are all the VOA sarples listed on the appropriate Surrogate
Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water 
[ __ ] __ 
J^L.
b. Med Water 
[ __ ] __ 
_u/
c. Low Soil 
f 
1 
__ 
__
d. Med Soil 
[ __ 3 
__ 
_^
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, document
effect on data under "Conclusions" section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? 
[ •/ ] 
__ 
__
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Was one or more VQA surrogate recovery outside of contract
specifications for any sanple or method blank? 
/_
If yes, were sables reanalyzed? 
r / 1
Were method blanks reanalyzed? 
[ __ ]
ACTION: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but all do not
meet SCW specifications:
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J") .
2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection
— 
limits ("UJ").
•TUT 
OOi 
<-''-
i
OPEEATUG PROCEDURE 
Page: 6 
Of 
36
I 
Date: March 1989
* 
Revision 6
NO 
N/A
If any surrogate has a recovery of <10% :
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. Flag all non-detects as unusable ("R").
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate recoveries
out of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard areas.
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw
data and Form II? 
__ 
[ ./] __
ACTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmitt.al, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
> £.tc;:. .Sfi;kes (Form IIJ)'
4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III)
prrsmt? 
[ _(/_ ]
•i.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water 
[_]
b. Med Water 
[__]
c. Low soil 
[_/J
d. Med soil 
[__]
ACTICN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many \KA spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Hater 
soils
.*.. •'•-r-?'/-7 '-/A out of 10 
-: out of 10
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
:- -7v ' '-'/A OUt Of 5 
O 
OUt Of 5
t^/A- 
l£ 
•.<..--< «•-';':"
ACTICN: If MS and MSD both have lessHchan 10% re-
covery for an analyte, negative results for
that analyte should be rejected, and
positive results should be flagged "J".
me above applies only to the sample used
for the MS/MSD analysis. Use professional 
...... 
,,, ,q
judgement in applying this criterion to.other 
iuf 
ou
camnloc in +'ho rv»r-Varro
SIWSBARD OPE31A3ING PROCEDURE 
Page: 7 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO N/A~
5.0 Blanks (Form IV)
5.1 Is the Method Blank Summary (Form IV) present? 
[ ] 
__
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of
TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil,
medium soil), whichever is more frequent? 
[ v \ 
___
5.3 Has a VCR instrument blank been analyzed at least
once every twelve hours for each OC/MS system used? 
[ •••' ] 
. _.
AClKlv. If any method blank data are missing, call lab
for explanation / resubmittal. If not available,
reject all associated positive data ("R").
j.4 Chrcrratography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms
(RICR), quant reports or data system printouts and spectra.
js ..he chromatographic performance (baseline stability)
for each instrument acceptable for VQfts? 
[ \,' ] 
__
ACnCK: Use professional judgement to determine the
effect on the data.
6.0 Contamination
NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are not used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC) for VCAs? When applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution
Factor. 
y 
I__]
6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive \KA results
(TCL and/or TEC)? 
__ 
[__) _-
ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
I 
NOTE: Oily field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the samples are used to qualify data. Trip
I 
blanks are used to qualify only those samples
I -—' 
with which they were shipped. Blanks may not
be qualified because of contamination in another
blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate,
1 
spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems.
TUT °01
CSSAKICS
9LAXK CO.TAMJNAT1CNJ
CASc: 
- - -
SITE: - ..,r-u.
LAB: . -
FSACriCW:
ANAITTES
1
TCL
4 . 
.
l'.i>\'. .,-.-, -
->' '-»<•
*-',,W.^,; ^
•' | V . , • — " I / ' •
• 
,. 
. _ ' • . - ' •'••-. K*
; 
• i u.'^e^^-*--
TIC
^ ^
1 
:< :•-,
^j. (.- '. i-V<'r ,-t-
1
1
1
1
1
AFFECTED SAMPLES
ME7HCO SL*Hf CCNTAXINAI ICNS
10 ••:<3-;'.' 10 •-- ;-.-
AMOUNT
/ • 
"- '/
\
^-V 
{' i
1 cT" 
.
"^ *• 
x
-:/T<"-
?r/,.:
'— 
. *•' '
AMOUNT
•~
'
$
A.- ,'-
10!-- . » ^
AMOUNT
t0.-v
.
10 't - •'
AMOUNT
-
-
R ,'-••' ''-?
-^r.-7.>
^r-w^:
" * / . * ' , >
L 
k Cv.
NO:,,- .-
AMOUNT
-«i^.
*-**2
NO:
AMOUNT
TRIP BLAS'K CCS'T. - j
NO:
AMOUNT
-
NO: 
|
AMOUNT |
1
1
1
1
1
1
!
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CCNTAMIMATICNS
CASH: . -•-
SITE: - -
LAB: i ; . ; - . - C
FSACTICN:
ANALYTcS
TCL
I-' , •"•;•'.",
<_ /'"• •'• ,~.Kl".'>"i
; 
, cV//..% .>«;a. )lt
^ .'•''- • •
.-.,-..,.——. ,T
; •'l'»---i ->•., ;/ - •'
' .'••fttllfl t i '.' L.' ' M l.^—
,''L'r_ rr^-J~u,rf'\t-
i)''-t"-
•L'i-.Uu'.-v..,..
TIC
/_ '
1
1
1
1
AFFECTED SAMPLES
"ETHCO SU.'iK CCNTAXI NAT IONS
10/V---X-
AMOUNT
-r'
_^
-.
i-,f.
lr.\'
?*>'.>"•'
:\ nc i
i j^
 
;
l^c:-;
^':.^f'4\
io£- '-•''•
AMOLKT
T
'.<;.
1
O
A
o
-;
-^. /
-•• /- '. /T'
to
AMOUNT
10
AMOUNT
-
RINSE BLAKK CCKT.
NO:
AMOUNT
••
NO:
AMOUNT
TRIP BLAWK CCST. 
\
NO:
AMOUNT
— »
NO: 
|
AMOUNT |
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
02-
TUT OO1 O231
* 
STANC&RD OPERATING PROCLDUHi. 
Page: 8 . of 
36
s 
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
t —————.—_—.____________________________________
VES 
NO 
N/A
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
-— 
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
.'Sample cone > CRQL!Sanple cone < CRQL &jSanple cone > CRQL 
'
but < lOx blank 
is < lOx blank value value & >10x blank value
Methylene chloride Flag sanple result,1 Reject sanple result [No qualification
2-butanone '
'
Acetone {with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; 
{is needed
Toluene out 'B' flag 
cross out 'B1 flag
.'Sample cone > CRQL [Sanple cone < CRQL &! Sanple cone > CRQL
[but < 5x blank 
Jis < 5x blank value value & > 5 blank value
Other 
Flag sanple result Reject sanple result No qualification
•"ontarinants with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; 
is needed
out 'B1 flag 
cross out 'B1 flag 
.'•*>
I 
I 
I 
^<-
i____________i______________i_________________i
ACTION: For TIC compounds, if the concentration in the sanple is
less than five tines the concentration in the most con-
taminated associated blank, flag the sanple data "R"
(unusable).
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every
sanple? 
[__] ^ __
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank.
Deception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0 GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration (Form V)
7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass calibration Forms (Form V)
present for Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)? 
[__] __ 
__
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(m/z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve
hour shift? 
[__) 
__ 
__
7.3 Has a tuning performance corpound been analyzed for every
twelve hours of sanple analysis per instrument? 
[ 's 1 
__ 
_.
ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: List date, time, instrument 10, and sanple
analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning
data are available.
TUT 
001 
023i
1MANDARD OPERATING FROCHX'Kh
Page: 9 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO 
N/A
—————
—————
aa^^iiMjiiuiA 
- 
,or»i-i£-j_t, nuu-ini irwj
1
—————————————————————— j ———————————————————————
————————————————————— I ———————————————————————
—————————————————————— 1 ———————————————————————
ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration
interval.
7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been net for each
instrument used?
ACTION: List all data which do not meet ion abundance
criteria (attach a separate sheet) .
ACTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ("R") .
However, if expanded ion criteria are net
(See 1988 Functional Guidelines) , the data
reviewer may accept data with appropriate
qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between
mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but
if errors are found, check more.)
7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors
are found check more values.)
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resutsnittal , make necessary corrections and note
errors under "Conclusions".
7.7 Are the spectra of the pass calibration compound
acceptable?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
whether associated data should be
accepted, qualified, or rejected.
8,1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I VOA)
present with required header information on each
page, for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
c. Blanks
LJJ _ —
'TUT 
OO1 
O2 3.3
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 10 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
" 
YES 
NO 
N/A
8.2 Are the VGA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the
^ 
mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the
data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in
the sample package for each of the following? 
J^
/r
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
[__] ^ 
__
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates 
f •.- 1 
__ 
__
(Mass spectra not required)
c. Blanks 
L_iJ __ 
__
ACTION: If any data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report? 
[__] '•' __
6.4 Is chromatograpnic performance acceptable with
respect to:
Baseline stability 
[ -'] __ 
__
Resolution 
[ -•'.] __ 
__
f 
Peak shape 
f ^ 1 
__ 
__
Full-scale graph (attenuation) 
[_i_] 
__ 
__
' ^ 
Other:_________________
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the
i 
acceptability of the data.
8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the 
''
identified VQA compounds present for each sample? 
[__] _^_
ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above. If Lab does not
generate their own standard spectra, make
note in "Contract Problems/Non-compliance".
8.6 Is the RRT of each reported compound within 0.06 RRT 
/
units of the standard RRT in the continuing calibration? 
f • 1 
__ 
__
8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a
relative intensity greater than 10* also present in the
sample mass spectrum? 
[_;_] 
__ 
__
' 
8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree
within 20%? 
[_^_] __ 
__
I 
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of data. If it is determined
that incorrect identifications were made,
i ^— 
all such data should be rejected, flagged
"N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of
the compound) or changed to not detected (at
the calculated detection limit).
* 
TUT 001 0234
Page: 11 of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
.NO 
N/A
9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I,
Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number
or retention tine, estimated concentration and "J"
qualifier?
9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified
compounds and associated "best match" spectra included
in the sample package for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Blanks
ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N"
qualifier to all identified TIC compounds
on Form I, Part B.
"< T »jre any TCl compounds (frcn any fraction) listed as
•JTC compounds (example: 1,2-dimethylbenzene is xylene—
a VGA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)?
ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.
9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the
sample mass spectrum?
9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities
agree within 20%?
- 
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of TIC identifications. If
it is determined that an incorrect identi-
fication was made, change identification to
"unknown" or to some less specific identi-
fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene")
as appropriate.
10.0 Cmnjuund Q*iar|^itation and Re
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Form I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation
ion, and RRF were used to calculate Form I result.
Were any errors found?
10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions
and, for soils, sample moisture?
(V\,f\u-
i -• yijT 
OO1
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 12 
of 
36
- Date: March 1989
Revision 6
" Y E S N O " N/A
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
- 
resubmittal, cake any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQl£ are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the "E" value on the original Form I and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sample. Specify which Form I is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
II..1) Standards Data fGC/KST
.1.1. ^re the Reconstructed Ion Chronatograjiis, and data
systen printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial
?-nrj continuing calibration? 
f ,."\ 
__ 
__
ACTICN: If any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
I
J
,0 GC/MS Initial Calibration /Form VI)
12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present
and complete for the volatile fraction?
ALTXUH: If any calibration standard forms are
missing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.2 Are response factors stable for volatiles over the 
/
concentration range of the calibration (RSD <30*)? 
[__] 
__*' 
__
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: When RSD >30%, non-detects may be qualified
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag
all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
II policy.)
12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? 
__ 
\v 1 __
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any volatile compound has an average
RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that
compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non-
detects for that compound as unusable ("R").
TUT 001
rnxA_cdJU«c,
U 
OL.
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
jo
12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
the reporting of average response factors (HRF) or
%RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are
found, check more.) 
'
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal , make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions" .
YES
N/A
__ 
r -, 1 
__
13.0 GC/MS
(Form VU)
13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form Vli) present
and conplete for the volatile fraction?
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed
for every twelve hours of sample analysis per
instrument?
ACTION': List below all sanple analyses that were
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
[_ _ ] __ __
[ __ ] __ __
ACTION: If any ferns are missing or no continuing
calibration standard has been analyzed within
twelve hours of every sanple analysis, call lab
for explanation / resubndttal. If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag all
associated sanple data as unusable ("R") .
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard conpounds have
a RRF < 0.05?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any volatile conpound has a HRF < 0.05,
flag positive results for that ccrpound as
estimated ("J") , and flag non-detects for that
compound as unusable ("R") .
*•' 
[ __ ] __
13.4 Do any caipounds have a % difference between initial and
continuing calibration RRF > 25%?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated
sanple data as outlined in the table below:
.
^ 
[ __ ] ——
TUT 001
urxjvu. Apflj trrajt-tuuKt 
Fage: 
14 
or
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I
I
___ 
YES 
NO 
N/A
% DIFFERENCE
25-50 
' 
50-90 
! 
>90
'J1 positive 
'J' positive 'J1 positive
(results, no action results, 'UJ' results, "R"
;for ncn detects 
non detects ' non detects
.1.
13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the
reporting of average response factors (KRF) or difference
(%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at 
/
least two values but if errors are found, check more.) 
__ 
r •' 1
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
t-TIOi:: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors urvte:: "Conclusions". 
;' i
u wsjijpi £-?ndards (Form VTII^
• '.j Are t:.e internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every
sa'TJle a:x3 blank within the upper and lower limits 
/
for •=•.=• ^ continuing calibration? 
[__] 
•/
ACTION: List all the outliers below.
Sample I 
Internal Std 
Area 
Lower Limit 
Upper Limit
'i"! 1C
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or
lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and non-
detects (U values) quantitated with this internal standard.
If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance
i 
exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated non-
I 
detects as unusable ("R").
14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within 
/
I 
30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? 
[^Lj —
ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data if the retention times differ by more than
30 seconds.
TUT 
001 
O238
STANDARD OPERATING FRXEDURE 
Page: 15 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
~ 
" 
YIS 
JW 
N/A
15 . 0 Fisld
15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for VQA analysis?
ACTION: Conpare the reported results for field duplicates
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate
results must be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
confirmed by contacting the sanpler.
* 
TUT 
00 J
90 ,^33 •' "• 
"
DJ.ru•u-Tvrv^' ^rrjvio. .u'ttj r-KiJt-M »IKI- 
rayc. 
j.o 
ui. 
jo
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
" 
YES 
NO N/A~
s_, 
PART B: SNA ANALYSES
1.0 Traffic Reports and Laboratory Narrative
/
1.1 Are the Traffic Report Ferns present for all samples? 
LjL] __ 
__
ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copies.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sample receipt, condition of samples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting
the quality of the data? 
__ 
r '<•' 1 __
ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
ACTION: If any sarple analyzed as a soil contains more
than 50% water, all data should be rejected.
2 '", Holding Tines
2.1 Have any BNA holding tines, determined from date of
collection to date of extraction, been exceeded? 
__ 
[ V '] __
Sarples for BNA analysis, both soils and waters,
must be extracted within seven days of the date of
collection. Extracts must be analyzed within 40
days of the date of extraction.
Table cf Holding Time Violations
(See Traffic Report)
Sample 
Date 
Date lab 
Date 
Date
Sample 
Matrix 
Sampled 
Received 
Extracted Analyzed
ACTION: If holding tires are exceeded, flag all positive results as
estimated ("J") and sample guantitation limits as estimated
("UJ"), and document in the narrative that holding times
were exceeded.
^ . . 
TUT 001 0240
-// '
__.«.___ »,»—.—. —-^ • '•"••» ^' • T"L 
.rdytJi 
j./ 
oi 
jo
* 
Date: March 1S89
* 
Revision 6
I —————————~——————————^—————————————————————————
If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding time,
_ 
either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer
I 
must use professional judgement to determine the reliability
1 
of the data and the effects of additional storage on the
sample results. The reviewer may determine that non-detect
| 
data are unusable ("R").
i
3.0 Surrogate Recovery (Form II}
3.1 Are the ENA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water
b. Med Water
c. low Soil
d. Med Soil
3.2 Are all the BNA samples listed
Recovery Summaries for each of
a. Low Water
b. Med Water
c. Low Soil
d. Med Son
on the appropriate Surrogate
the following matrices:
[_] _
[__3 
_ 
_•/'
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmlttals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, document
effect on data under "Conclusions" section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? 
[_
ACTICW: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Were two or more base-neutral OR acid surrogate recoveries
out of specification for any sample or method blank?
If yes, 
were samples reanalyzed? 
[__] 
__ 
>
Were method blanks reanalyzed? 
[__] 
__
ACTION: If all BNA surrogate recoveries are > 10% but two
within the base-neutral or acid fraction do not
meet SCW specifications, for the affected fraction
only (i.e. 
base-neutral OR acid compounds!;
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection
limits ("UJ").
T 
OO1 0241
STWCPiRD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 18 
of 
36
f 
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I
s-' 
YES 
NO 
N/A
If any base-neutral or acid surrogate has a
recovery of <10% :
. 
1. Flag all positive results for that fraction
(i.e. all acid or base-neutral compounds) "J".
1 
2. Flag all non-detects for that fraction "R".
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate recoveries
out of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard areas.
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw 
/
data and Form II? 
__ 
t •/ ] __
Amen- If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resutmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
ligti i..t Spikes (Form III)
c -1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) 
/
preser^? 
[ __/] 
__
4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water 
[__] 
__
b. Med Water 
[ 1 
__
c. Low Soil 
[_/] 
__ 
__
d. Med Soil 
[_] 
_ 
j/_
ACTION: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many EWk spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
out of 22 
/"-f out of 22
. 
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike
I 
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
•;:>•• M^-wr N>M out of 11 
3 out of 11
I
ACTICN: If MS and MSD both have less than 10% recovery
'^ 
for an analyte, negative results for that
analyte should be rejected, and positive
results should be flagged "J". Ine above
i 
applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD
analysis. Use professional judgement in 
,-— ~{ t « 
r 
Ooi 0242
eamnloc 
'•*• u' 
- 1U' 
'-'"''
STAMPED OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 
19 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
5.0 Blanks (Form IV)
b.l Is the Method Blank Sunmary iroiin iV) present? 
[ v\
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of ENA
TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil,
medium soil), whichever is more frequent? 
[_^_] 
__" 
__
5.3 Chroma tography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms
(RICs) , quant reports or data system printouts and spectra.
Ts *h° rftromatographir performance (baseline stability)
>• n instrument accepc^ble for JOa? 
[ - ]
——
^ '-Ti- Use professional judganent to determine the
effect on the data
ContaiTu nation
MDTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are not used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC) for ETAs? When applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution
Factor. 
•'' 
t __ ] _
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive ETA results
(TCL and/or TIC)? 
__ 
[ __ ]
ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet. )
NOTE: Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks
may not be qualified because of contamination
in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for
surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC
problems.
CSiANlCS
BLANK CCNTAMINATICNI
CASE:
S I T E :
IA8: -" : 
•'
F S A C T J C N : --
• 1
| 
ANALTTES
1
1 
TCL
1|. ..................
I....................
1....................
1
1—— —— —— —— —— ""
1|... ................
!
.....................
1j..... ...............
1
1——————— — —
1.....................
j ———————————
1 
TIC
|-...~- .............
w . .;.... yi < / ••-'.'•
t if - l-t: • •'•- *^ - t^,-U 'l"j<
...... .'.iij-.-'rt......
'— .' 
...,,.-„
1
1
1
1
1
ArrECTEO SAMPLES
IMETHCO BUNK ccNTAxiwAncNs
«o*ir/-
AMOUNT
• e
<-; -i ,'c
.-jt :?"/'
O.C'''.?
-s/' -'•'^
r 
f si
" t -"! •
I^IIM y
10 /•'/:-
ANOLMT
• v "T;
75-
.yvt-<<-
' W> T ) '.^
/"/<• "','/
>?:_>
H74-V
j.'7.;.'c..
r 7/7
.t."2.;.i..,
r77?
^r ~) '/'+
ID
AMOUNT
.
ID
AMOUNT
-
RINSE BLASK CCIiT.
NO:
AMOUNT
«
•
NO:
AMOUNT
TRIP BLAMK CCWT. 
|
NO:
AMOUNT
x.^.
>•-.-
— »
NO: 
|
AMOUNT 
|
I
1
I
1
1
JL. ........
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TUT 
001 
0244
BLA« CCKTAMIWATICHI
CASH: . ' ; s ;
SITE: ',',, v-t,
LAB: 
<: <
ANALTTES
TCL
TIC
' 
"- 
• i_ .. /-; A/ • „- /
1 • ^ , , ,,rc_^
I
1
1
1
1
1
AFFECTED SAMPLES
IKETHCO 3LA« CCWTAMIWATICHS
1 0^/'-<V
AMOUNT
10
AMOUNT
:::
V-x//r
•i; ,-',«;-
•-" * ii.- -
J> i'li'
S/Jt.-«.
!5xfi7L
C<r'/ ?••
jr-7^7
^r-c-r
iir-7^/
10
AMOUNT
10
AMOUNT
•
R1MSE BLANK CCNT.
NO:
AMOUNT
••
NO:
AMOUNT
TRIP B:A« CC-.-T.
NO:
AMOUNT
-»
NO:
AMOUNT
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
\
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TUT 
O01 
0-245
(JfJLKrti jj^u i-WUCLDURE
«ige: m 
or 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
YES
NO 
N/A
Common
Phthalate
Esters
Other
Contarninants
Sample cone > CRQLj
but < iox blank
Flag sample result
with a 'U'; cross
out 'B1 flag
-i ——— . ——————— i
[Sample cone > CRQLj
but < 5x blank
Flag sairple result
with a 'Uf; cross
out 'B1 flag
i 
... 
. 
i
Sanple cone < CRQL &
is < lOx blank value
Reject sample result
and report CRQL;
cross out 'B1 flag
Sanple cone < CRQL &
is < 5x blank value
Reject sample result
and report CRQL;
cross out 'B' flag
: Sanple cone > CRQL
value & >10x blank value
No qualification
is needed
1
j Sanple cone > CRQL
value & > 5 blank value
No qualification
is needed
1
i
ACTION: For TIC corpounds, if the concentration in the sample is
less than five times the concentration in the most con-
taminated associated blank, flag the sample data "R"
(unusable).
Are there field/rinse/eguipment blanks associated with every
sample? 
[__]
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank.
Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0 GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration (Form VI
7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Form V)
present for Decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP)?
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(m/z) listing for the DFTPP provided for each twelve
hour shift?
7.3 Has a tuning performance compound been analyzed for every
twelve hours of.sample analysis per instrument?
ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sample
analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning
data are available.
[_] _ _
?
TUT
OO.1 0246
STANEPiRD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Page: 21 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO 
N/A
ESVTE
TIME
INSTRUMENT
SAMPLE NUMBERS
ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration
interval.
7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each 
/
instrument used? 
[ ./ ]
ACTION: List all data which do not meet ion abundance
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
2CTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ("R").
However, if expanded ion criteria are met
(See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data
reviewer may accept data with appropriate
qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between
mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but
if errors are found, check more.) 
__
7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors
are found check more values.) 
__
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make necessary corrections and note
errors under "Conclusions11.
7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound 
,'
acceptable? 
[ >/ ]
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
whether associated data should be
accepted, qualified, or rejected.
8.0 Target Compound List (T(X) PVTriXytiSR
8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I BftfV)
present with required header information on each
page, for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
^—-)
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates 
[ y_ ]
c. Blanks 
[ J\
t/1
STANDARD OPERATED PROCEDURE 
Page: 22 
of 
36
-Date: March 1989
Revision 6
Y E S N O 
N / A
8.2 Are the ENA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the
mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the
data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in
the sample package for each of the following?
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
f / ] 
__ 
__
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates 
[_k_J __ 
__
(Mass spectra not required)
c. Blanks 
f •/ 1 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report? 
[__] 
• 
__
3.4 Is chromatographic performance acceptable with
respect to:
Baseline stability 
[____] 
__ 
__
Resolution 
[___] __ 
__
Peak shape 
f -- 1 
__ 
__
Full-scale graph (attenuation) 
[ - 1 
__ 
__
Other:________________ 
[__] 
__ 
_^
~^——s
j 
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the
I 
acceptability of the data.
8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the 
/
identified BNA compounds present for each sample? 
[_'_] 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above. If Lab does not
generate their own standard spectra, make
note in "Contract Problems/Non-compliance".
8.6 Is the PRT of each reported compound within 0.06 
PRT
units of the standard PRT in the continuing calibration? 
f / 1 
__ 
__
8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the 
/
sample mass spectrum? 
f J 1 
__ 
——
i 
8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree 
/
within 20%? 
[_/J 
__ 
__
I 
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of data. If it is determined
that incorrect identifications were made,
t
all such data should be rejected, flagged
^ 
"N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of
the compound) or changed to not detected (at
, 
the calculated detection limit).
* 
" ' 
TUT 001 0243
uf£j<A:r.LNG PROCEDUKt; 
Page: 23 
or 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I 
YES 
NO 
N/A
' "> Tentatively Identified Cunmuunds fTIC)
9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I,
Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number
or retention time, estimated concentration and "J" 
/
qualifier? 
[_/_] 
__ 
__
9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified
compounds and associated "best match" spectra included
in the sample package for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
r J1 
__ 
__
b. Blanks 
[_J 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N"
qualifier to all identified TIC compounds
on Form I, Part B.
j 
9. :< Are any TCL compounds (from any fraction) listed as
I 
TIC compounds (example: 1,2-diroethylbenzene is xylene— 
/
a VOA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)? 
__ 
f J 1 __
| 
ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.
9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a
1 
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the
sample mass spectrum? 
[__] 
__ 
__
9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities
agree within 20%? 
[__] __ 
__
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of TIC identifications. If
it is determined that an incorrect identi-
fication was made, change identification to
"unknown" or to some less specific identi-
fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene")
as appropriate.
• 10.0 CoiTound Quant i tat ion and Reported Detection) LJFU'tg
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Form I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation
ion, and RRF were used to calculate Form I result. 
/
I 
Were any errors found? 
- [__] 
__
10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions
I
and, for soils, sample moisture?
^^
TUT ooi °249
..~.o r«JCEDL"RE
Page: 24 
of
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
36
YES
NO
N/A
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
x_ 
resubnittal , make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
ACTION: When a sanple is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sanple analysis) .
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing cut
the "E" value on the original Form I and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sanple. Specify which Form I is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
11.0 Standards Data (GC/WS)
11.1 Arc tlie .Reconstructed Ion Chrorarogrars, and data
system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial
and continuing calibration?
ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
x-'V.
7 *) GC/K5
Calibration (Form
12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present
and ccziplete for the BNA fraction?
ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are
missing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.2 Are response factors stable for ENAs over the
entration range of the calibration (RSD <30%)?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: When RSD >30%, non-detects may be qualified
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag
all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
II policy.)
12.3 Do any conpounds have a RRF < 0.05?
ACTICN: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any BNA conpound has an average
RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that
conpound as estimated ("J"), and flag non-
detects for that conpound as unusable ("R").
__ 
LiU 
__
TUT 
001
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 25 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
Y E S F r o N / A
12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
the it-porting of average response factors (RRF) or
•— 
%RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are
found, check more.) 
__ 
I '.'' 1 __
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
ncte errors under "Conclusions".
13.0 GC/MS Continuing Calibration fForm VIII
13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form VTI) present
and complete for the BNA fraction? 
f -' 1 
__ 
__
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed
for every twelve hours of sample analysis per
instrument? 
f - 1 
__ 
__
ACTION: List below all sarple analyses that were
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACTION: If any forms are missing or no continuing
calibration standard has been analyzed within
twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab
for explanation / resubmittal. If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ("R").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have
a RRF < 0.05? 
__
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any ENA compound has a RRF < 0.05,
flag positive results for that compound as
estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that
compound as unusable ("R").
13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and
continuing calibration RRF > 25%? 
'/ ; [__] 
——
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated
sample data as outlined in the table below:
TUT OO1 O251
Page; 26 
of 
36
Date: March 1°°9
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
% DIFFERENCE
25-50 
' 
50-90 
' 
>90 
!
•J' positive 
j'J' positive [ 'J1 positive
.results, no action results, 'UJ
1 .results, "R1
""
for non detects 
ncn detects' non detects
13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the
reporting of average response factors (RRF) or difference
(%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at 
/
least two values but if errors are found, check more.) 
__ 
f - 1 __
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubnittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
• 11^ • >mal S* '^f^^rr^e. (Forr.
1 ' Are the internal standard areas (Forn VIII) of every
'Tuple and blank within the upper and lower limits
:'-r t!2.ch continuing calibration? 
[__]
ACTICN: List aU the outliers below.
Sample # 
Internal Std 
Area 
Lower Limit 
Upper Limit
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or
lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and non-
detects (U values) quantitated with this internal standard.
If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance
exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated nan-
detects as unusable ("R").
14.2 Are the retention tires of the internal standards within
30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? 
f ^ 1 
__ 
__
ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data if the retention times differ by more than
30 seconds.
rur
OOl
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 27 
of 
36
i 
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I 
Y E S 7 * 5 N / F
15.0 Field Duplicates
I -- 
15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for ENA analysis? 
[j/J __ 
__
ACTION: Coipare the reported results for field duplicates
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate
results must be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
confirmed by contacting the sampler.
I
I
I
TUT 001 0253
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 28 
of 
36
' Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
PART C; PESTICIDE/PCS ANALYSES
}.2 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples? 
f /I 
__ 
__
ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copies.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sample receipt, condition of samples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting
the quality of the data? 
__ 
[_^J __
ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
ACTION: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more
than 50% water, all data should be rejected.
.Tines
s.f Have any PEST/PCB holding times, determined from date of
rr.VtH rim to date of extraction, been exceeded? 
__ 
f 1 __
Samples for PEST/PCB analysis, both soils and waters,
must be extracted within seven days of the date of
^ 
collection. Extracts must be analyzed within 40
days of the date of extraction.
3.0 Surrogate Recovery (Form II)
3.1 Are the PEST/PCB Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II)
present for each of the following matrices:
a. Lew Water 
[__] 
__ 
_kl_
b. Med Water 
[__] 
__ 
_J/
c. Low Soil 
f /_] 
__ 
__
d. Med Soil 
[__] 
__ 
_±_
3.2 Are all the PEST/PCB samples listed on the appropriate
Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following
matrices:
a. Low Water 
[__] 
__ 
_±L
b. Med Water 
[__] 
__ 
._itl
c. Low Soil 
f v/J __ 
——
d. Med Soil 
[__] 
__ 
J/
TUT 001. 0254
STWIRRD (JFtHAHUG PROCEDURE 
Page: 
29 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
ACTICN: Call lab for explanation / resutmittals. If
missing deliverables are Unavailable, document
effect on data under "Conclusions" section of
reviewer narrative.
/
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? 
[ /1 
__ 
__
ACTICN: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Was surrogate (EEC) recovery outside of the contract
specification for any sample or blank? 
^' t__] 
__
ACTIdJ: No qualification is done if surrogates are diluted beyond
detection. If recovery is below contract limit (but above
zero), flag all results for that sample "J". If recovery is
zero, flag positive results "J" and non-detects "R". If
recovery for the blank is zero, flag non-detects for all
associated samples "R". If recovery is above contract
limit, flag all positive results for that sample "J", unless
in the reviewers professional judgement the high recovery
is due to co-eluting interference (check the associated
blank - if recovery is high there also, flag the sample
data).
3.5 Are there any transcript ion/calculation errors between raw
data and Form II? 
__ 
f
ftCTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
4.0 Matrix Spikes (Form III)
4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III)
present? 
[ '/ ]
4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water 
[__]
b. Med Water 
[__ ]
c. Low Soil 
[ ., 1
d. Med Soil 
I_1 
__
ACTICN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many PEST/PCB spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
.,;; 
/'~//i out 
Of 12 
Cr 
OUt Of 12
•_-:<jfc>, f-- 
"••""< ''- ————— 
.
uvp/~ 7 
N-/A- 
''<
I0(f cru|^3 
TUT 001
I/
SIN>£&RD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 30 
Of 
36
Date: March 1989
| . 
Revision 6
I
YES 
NO 
N/A
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
Mater
- _, ,-_ t . "* '^,-. /i/£ out of 6
-Vr/vr *-•'*>
ACTION: If MS and MSD both have less than zero recovery
for an analyte, negative results for that
analyte should be rejected, and positive
results should be flagged "J". The above
applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD
analysis. Use professional judgement in
applying this criterion to other samples.
J
I
5.0 '^anks (Form IV)
.'*>
j • !=• tN> Method Blank Sunmary (Form IV) present? 
[_i_l
J5* 
_ 
_ -
j.i Frtquvn cy oi Analysis: for the analysis of Pesticide
TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been
nalyzM for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, 
/
medium soil), whichever is more frequent? 
[ '/ ] __ 
_
5.3 Chrcnatography: review the blank raw data -
chromatograms , quant reports or data system printouts.
Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability)
for each instrument acceptable for PEST/KBs? 
I 
3 
__ 
__
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the
effect on the data.
6.0 Contamination
NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are not used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results for PEST/PCBs? When applied as described
below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks 
/
are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. 
__ 
t_^_] _
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive PEST/FCB
results?
ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
»
TUT' 00
SlWCftRD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Page: 31 
of
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
36
YES
NOTE: Oily field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks
may not be qualified because of contamination
in another blan1'. Blanks may br qualified for
surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC
problems.
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
NO 
N/A
I Sample cone > CRQL
! but < 5x blank
Sample cone < CRQL &
is < 5x blank value
Sample cone >
& > 5x blank value
"'"•g sanple result
•.Lh a "U"; cross
."1- «B" flag
Reject sanr'e result
and report CRQL;
cross out "B" flag
No qualification
is needed
re t
samp1
field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every
[ __ ]
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank.
Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
- 
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0 Perforation and GC Performance
7.1 Are the following Gas Chromatograms and Data System
Printouts for both Primary and Confirmation
(confirmation standards not required if there
are no positive results above CRQL) column present:
a. Evaluation Standard Mix A
b. Evaluation Standard Mix B
c. Evaluation Standard Mix C
d. Individual Standard Mix A
e. Individual Standard Mix B
f. Multi-component Pesticides Tbxaphene & Chlordane
g. Aroclors 1016/1260
h. Aroclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, and 1254
ACTICN: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above
U J
(03 o
TUT 001 0257
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 32 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
————————————- 
— — — — — - -
7.2 Is FOOT VIII Pest-1 present and ccnplete for each GC
column (primary and ccnf irration) and each 72 hour
sequence of analyses? 
f , ] __
ACTION: If no, take acticn specified in 3.2 above.
7.3 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw
data and Form VTII? 
__ [__]
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
7.4 Has the total breakdown en quantitation or confirmation
column exceeded 20% for DOT? 
__ 
[_J
- for Endrin? 
__ [_^_]
or if Endrin aldehyde and 4,4'-ODD co-elute and there is a
pe^Jc at their retention tine, has the combined DDT and Endrin
b. eakdown exceeded 20%?
ATTCN:
a. If DOT breakdown is greater than 20% on quantitation column
beginning with the sarples following the last in control standard:
1. Flag all positive DOT results "J".
2. If DDT was not detected but DDD and/or DDE are positive,
flag the DDT ncn-detect "R".
3. Flag positive DDD and DDE results "JN".
4. If DDT breakdown is > 20% on confinnation column and DDT
is identified on quantitation column but not on confinnation
column, use professional judgement to determine whether DDT
should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N").
b. If ESidrin breakdown is > 20% on quantitation column, beginning with
the samples following the last in control standard:
1. Flag all positive Endrin results "J".
2. If Endrin was not detected, but Endrin Aldehyde and/or Endrin
Ketone are positive, flag the Endrin non-detect "R".
3. Flag Endrin Ketone positive results "JN".
4. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on confirmation column and
Endrin is identified on quantitation column but not on
confirmation column, use professional judgement to
determine whether Endrin should be reported on Form I
(if reported, flag result "N11).
c. If the combined breakdown is used (it can only be used
if the conditions in 7.4 above are met) and is > 20% on
quantitation column beginning with the last in control
standard, take the actions specified in 7.4 a and b above.
If the combined breakdown is >20% on confinnation column
and Endrin or DDT is identified on quantitation column
but not on confirmation column, use professional judgement
to determine whether Endrin or DDT should be reported on
Form I (if reported, flag result "N").
TUT 001 0258
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 33 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO N/A"
7.5 Is the linearity check PSD of all four calibration factors
<10% for the quantitation column? 
f (/] __ 
__
ACTION: If no, flag positive hits for all pesticide and PCS
analytes "J" for all associated samples. Do not flag
toxaphene or DOT if they are quantified from a 3-point
calibration curve. •
7 . 6 Is the % difference between the EVAL A and each analysis
(quantitation and confirmation) DEC retention time within
QC limits (2% for packed column, 0.3% for capillary [I.D. 
/fr
< 0.32 mm], 1% for megabore [0.32 < I.D. < 2 mnj) ? 
[ __ ] 
/ 
__
ACTION: DBC retention time cannot be evaluated if
DEC is not detected. If it is present and
has a retention tine out of QC limits, then
use professional judgement to determine the
reliability of the analysis and flag results
"R", if appropriate.
'. " Was the proper analytical sequence followed for each 
/
72 hour period of analyses (page PEST D-36 in 8/87 SCW) . 
[ ./] __ 
__
ACTION : If no, use professional judgement to
determine the severity of the effect
on the data and accept or reject it
accordingly. Generally, the effect
is negligible unless the sequence was
grossly altered or the calibration was
also out of limits.
8.0 pp'-crtjcide/PCB
8.1 Is Form IX present and complete for each GC column and
72 hr sequence of analyses?
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
8.2 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between 
/
raw data and Form IX? 
__ 
r -J 1 __
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under •'Conclusions".
8.3 Is DOT retention time for packed columns > 12 min
(except OV-1 and OV-101 columns)? 
[___.] __ 
__
ACTION: If no, check that there is adequate resolution
between individual components. If not, flag
(
results for compounds that interfere with each
other (co-elute) "R".
1
.4 Do all standard retention times fall within the windows 
/
""' established for the first IND A and IND B analyses? 
f •/] __ 
——
no * w 
TUT °01
{
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE . 
Page: 
24 
of 
36
" Date: March 1989
Revision 6
__ 
NO - N/A
ACTION: Beginning with the samples following the
last in control standard, check to see if
the chromatograms contain peaks within an
expanded window surrounding the expected
retention tines. If no peaks are found and,
DEC is visible non-detects are valid. If
peaks are present and cannot be identified
through "pattern recognition" or a consistent
shift in standard retention times, flag all
affected compound results "R".
8.5 Are the continuing calibration standard calibration
factors within 15% (for quantitation column) or
20% (for confirmation column) of the initial (at
beginning of 72 hr sequence) calibration factors? 
r J 1 __ 
__
ACTION: If no, flag all associated positive results
"J". Use professional judgement to determine
whether or not to flag non-detects.
Identification
I
> " I- Fom X corrplete for every sarple in which a
pest jr. He or PCS was detected? 
[ _ ^_] 
__ 
__
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
9.2 Are there any transcription errors between raw
data and Form X?
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
9.3 Are retention timps of sample compounds within the
calculated retention time windows for both quantitation
and confirmation analyses? 
[__] __ 
__
Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required (when 
/
compound concentration is > 10 ug/ml in final extract)? 
[__] __ 
i/
ACTION: Reject ("R") all positive results (meeting
quantitation column criteria, but missing
confirmation by a second column or GC/MS (if
appropriate). Also, reject ("R") all positive
results not meeting retention time window
criteria unless associated standard compounds
are similarly biased (i.e. base on RRT to DEC).
9.4 Check chromatograms for false negatives, especially for
the multiple peak components toxaphene and PCB's. Were 
/
there any false negatives? 
__ 
f y_] __
ACTION: If appropriate PCS standards were not analyzed,
or if the lab performed no confirmation analysis,
flag the appropriate data with an "R".
/// or "$3 
TUT 
001 
026o
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 35 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO N/A"
. 0 Compound Ouantitation and Reorter* Detect]
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Form I results? Check at least two positive values. 
/
Were any errors found? 
__ 
[ v 1 __
NOTE: Sijiple peak pesticide results can be checked for
rough agreement between quantitative results
obtained on the two GC columns. The reviewer
should use professional judgement to decide
whether a much larger concentration obtained
on one column versus the other indicates the
presence of an interfering compound. If an
interfering compound is indicated, the lower
of the two values should be reported and
qualified as presumptively present at an
estimated quantity ("JN"). This necessitates
a determination of an estimated concentration
on the confirmation column. The narrative
should indicate that the presence of interferences
has obscured the attempt at a second column
confirmation.
it)./ Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions
and, for soils, sample moisture? 
/ [__] __
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the "E" value on the original Form I and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sample. Specify which Form I is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
11.0
11.1 Were baselines stable?
11.2 Were any electropositive displacement (negative
peaks) or unusual peaks seen?
11.3 Were early eluting peaks (for early eluting
analytes) resolved to baseline?
ACTION: For 11.1 and 11.2, comment only. For 11.3,
reject ("R") those analytes that are not
sufficiently resolved.
L/J 
__ 
__
__• LiJ 
__
TUT 
OOi 
O261
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 36 
of 
36
; 
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
K 
'
Y
E
S
N
O
N
/
A
12.0 Field Dupl j^t*"5
— 
12.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for PEST/PCB
analysis? 
r - 1 
__ 
__
ACTION: Conpare the reported results for field duplicates
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate
results most be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
confirmed by contacting the sanpler.
I
*
TUT OO1. 026
: - c.? -*:
xs:: 
Jars CSC/
TUT 001 0263
CEIMIC
I 
CORPORATION
\
August 4, 1989
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program
209 Madison Street, Suite 200 
.. -
Alexandria, VA 22314 
;
ATTN: Muhannad Kanaan
Dear Muhannad: 
,- '^^-•'"'
Enclosed is the resubmitted diskette and documentation for
EPA case 12058, SDG BT747 and BX978. 
Please replace the
resubmitted page for that arriving with the original datapack.
This diskette contains the fractions VGA, BNA and Pests. Sample
BY770 will not be reanalyzed.
Thank you for your time in this matter. 
If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Kindest Regards,
'Veronica Moretti
Document Control
Encl.
cc: USEPA EMSL-LV
USEPA Region II
I
100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett, R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905
I
TUT °01 °264
I
SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE
136
TUT 00.1 026!:
f
t
SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE
PAGE
1. Case Narrative 
140
2. Traffic Report 
145
3. Volatiles Data
a. QC Summary 
154
(1) Surrogate Percent Recovery Summary
(Fora 2 VOA)
(2) Matrix Spike/MAtrix Spike Duplicate
Summary (FORM 3 VOA)
(3) Method Blank Summary (FORM 4 VOA)
(4) GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration
(Form 5 VOA)
(5) Internal Standard Area Summary
(FORM 8 VOA)
b. Sample Data 
177
(1) TCL Results - Organic Analysis Data
Sheet (FORM 1 VOA)
(2) Tentatively Identified Compounds
(FORM 1 VOA-TIC)
(3) Reconstructed Total Ion Chromatograms
(RIC) for each sample or extract
c. Standards Data 
325
(1) Initial Calibration Data (FORM 6 VOA)
(2) Continuing Calibration (FORM 7 VOA)
(3) Internal Standard Area Summary
(FORM 8 VOA)
d. Raw QC Data 
372
(1) BFB
a. Bar Graph Spectrum
b. Mass Listing
(2) Blank Data
a. Tabulated Results (FORM 1 VOA)
b. Tentatively Identified Compounds
(FORM 1 VOA-TIC)
c. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and
Quantitation Reports.
d. TCL Spectra with Lab Generated Standards
e. GC/MS Library Search Spectrum for TIC
f . Quantitative Calculation of TIC
(3) Matrix Spike Data
a. Tabulated Results of Nonspiked TCL
Compound
b. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and
Quantitation Reports .
(4) Matrix Spike Duplicate Data
a. Tabulated Results of Nonspiked TCL
Compounds (FORM 1 VOA)
b. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and
Quantitation Reports
//*? *f '33, 
TUT
001
SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE
PAGE
Semi-Volatiles Data
a. QC Summary 
. 
444
(1) Surrogate Percent Recovery Summary
(Form 2 SV)
(2) Matrix Spike/MAtrix Spike Duplicate
Summary (FORM 3 SV)
(3) Method Blank Summary (FORM 4 SV)
(4) GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration
(Form 5 SV)
(5) Internal Standard Area Summary
(FORM 7 SV)
b. Sample Data 
467
(1) TCL Results - Organic Analysis Data
Sheet (FORM 1 SV-l,SV-2)
(2) Tentatively Identified Compounds
(FORM 1 SV-TIC)
(3) Reconstructed Total Ion Chromatograms
(RIC) for each sample or extract
c. Standards Data 
634
(1) Initial Calibration Data (FORM 6 SV-l,SV-2)
(2) Continuing Calibration (FORM 7 SV-l,SV-2)
(3) Internal Standard Area Summary
(FORM 8 SV-l,SV-2)
d. Raw QC Data 
694
(1) DFTPP
a. Bar Graph Spectrum
b. Mass Listing
(2) Blank Data
a. Tabulated Results (FORM 1 SV-l,SV-2)
b. Tentatively Identified Compounds
(FORM 1 SV-TIC)
c. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and
Quantitation Reports.
d. TCL Spectra with Lab Generated Standards
e. GC/MS Library Search Spectrum for TIC
f. Quantitation Calculation of TIC
(3) Matrix Spike Data
a. Tabulated Results of Nonspiked TCL
Compound (FORM 1)
b. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and
Quantitation Reports .
(4) Matrix Spike Duplicate Data
a. Tabulated Results of Nonspiked TCL
Compounds (FORM 1 SV-l,SV-2)
b. Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms and
Quantitation Reports
13*
Itff
TUT 
OO1 
0267
i
SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE
Page
5. 
Pesticide/PCB Data
a. QC Summary 
731
(1) Surrogate Percent Recovery (Forms 2E,F)
(2) Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
Results (Forms 3E,F)
(3) Method Blank Summary (Forms 4C)
b. Sample Data 
736
(1) TCL Results - Organic Analysis Data Sheet
(Form ID)
(2) Copies of Pesticides/PCB chromatograms 
'•**-,
(3) Copies of Pesticides/PCB chromatograms
second GC column confirmation
(4) GC integration report
(5) Manual work sheets
c. Standards Data 
768
(1) Form 8D,E PEST/PCB
1
(2) Form 9 PEST/PCB
(3) Form 10 PEST/PCB
x-" 
(4) Pesticide/PCB standard chromatograms
I 
and data system printouts
d. Raw QC Data 
835
(1) Blank Data
a. Tabulated results
b. Chromatograms and data system printouts
(2) Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Data
a. Tabulated results
b. Chromatograms and data system printouts
TUT 00i °268
I
t
I
I
I
I
CASE KAKRATIVE
I -
I 
t / j n
/to
TUT 
001 
0269
2. TRAFFIC REPORTS
145
/2V iff- V3.J 
TUT 
ooi 
0270
j
u/
u
-ShQ
^*S ^V ^*
A'S^
V
0
Krrl<
So
*$
I
T/.30 
TOO in'-
3?
^
J
r
mi)i6
X
I)
r-
4
LO
/V 
w, 5
^-t{
5U
SOLID
WATER-MIS
LIQUID
NON WATER-
MIS LIQUID
MANAGEMENT OFFICE
5 P.O. BOX 818 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313
o' 
703/557-2490 
F15-557-2490
CASE NO:
SAS NO:
(IF APPLICABLE)
ORGANIC TRAFRC REPORT
(FOR CLP USE ONLY)
OF ACTIVITY (CIRCLE^CWeK-. \s -i- <j)
SUPERFUND—PA SI ESSaiEST'RD "flA €R
.,.,,,,_NPLD O&M OTHER
NON-SUPERFUND— ' 
*' "" 
'pROe'RAM
SAMPUE-tlESCRIPTlOKi'^11*1^
(ENTER IN BOX A)-aii4.-SOIL":LT.:!: UHUUpei
1. SURFACE WATER.!,5. SEDIMENT- -I.-Q',
2. GROUND WATER 
6. OIL"(SAS) 
*^
3. LEACHATE 
D^ 
«7. WASTE (SAS)
PV?)
REGI
NO:-^"'"-'SAMPLING COMPANY ©
ATTM.
SAMPLING DATE:
BEGIN:
DATE REC'O:
LABORATORY CONTRACT NO. 
UNIT PRICE
TRANSFER TO: 
. 
DATE REC'D:
©
'D 8Y:
CONTRACT N07PRICE:
CLP . -
SAMPLE
NUMBER -
(FROM LABELS)
CONCENTRATION ' @
L - IOWMEO H - HIGH (SAS(
O « ;»c. s^c p
- r~'HAS"" '"
;• . ANALYSIS -
N
I
PESTICIDE
/PCB's
':'SPEC'lAJL
HANDLING
'STATION ;
LOCATION c;
SAMPLE
CONDITION
^ CC ON RECEIPT
HIGH CONC.
PHASES
! ^CHECK)
UJO
feO
'
3
\^
X/l
-E
/
.i
$ 
WHITE - SMO COPY
PINK ^- CLIENT COPY
WHITE - LAB COPY FOR RETURN TO SMO
YELLOW — LAB COPY
"° a"ff 
USEPA CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM
^ 
SAMPLE MANAGEMENT OFFICE
-5 
P.O. BOX 818 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313
-- 
/ 
703/557-2490 
FTS-557-2490
CASE NO:
SAS NOr-
(IF APPLICABLE)
ORGANIC TRAFFIC REPORT
(FOR 
CLP USE ONLY)
TYPE OF ACTIVITY (CIRC
1 SUPERFUND— PA SI E
1 
.- 
,.. ..... NPLD C
NON-SUPERFUND—
LEONE
SI RIF5
&M O
.; ..... . ^
> RD RA E
TtJCO
D
R
ILPROGRAM
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION !:>U'6U1
(ENTER IN BOX A)-aJ£*.rSOIL*i.Ct;i uniupei
1. SURFACE WATER, :.-£. SEDIMENT-, c) -,,.,
2. GROUND WATER-^S. OIL^(SAS) " * "
3. LEACHATE 
D^ 
:7. WASTE {SAS)
REGION NO:: l;':1"r-'rSAMPLiNG""cOMPAh
I j3r~:,Z'.'c <J*t~* f^K:.*—?ii
4Y ®
I SAMPLER: <NAME) 0_.i'-: ^-^IC-:'U_- , . -.
CLP .__
"SAMPLE"1
I 
NUMBER- - •
(FROM LABELS)
|— 7£/
^ 
. • •
! 
•'. "'"'
-
":
i
i -
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ©1
(FROM BOX 1) '•- ;,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
^/
ll
CONCENTRATK
L » LWWMEO H -
/.
-
^HIP
A^f" 
—
'S*>
3 ' D^VrfcKfoSS '
^Jt.' T<3-r r »p -3ncf ^
Q> DATE REC'D: 
SDG NO: 
©
v s-~-'
 
:-f
: AvrAo/A'
 c-'
r-"
;-
:'
; c'~T2rT""
>""i 'C/~~
r7
TL- 
io \\o\\ \ 
i^( 
/ M /
K»- -^ '• REC'O BY:**" • ' • • " " -:""" ••• 
'
•^^c* 
I ]JlAarT^jCxJ»i\cr>c>X^
^"^"•^"^ 
--— 
LAgbRATORY CONTRACT NO. 
UNIT PRICE
• '- ...... ,— ,~ ,,,,.. .v 
| V_>^
SAMPLING DATE: £ |£"/$
BEGIN: 
END:
®
Vi/^.D \OQ5-?s 
1^5 1
-
TRANSFER TO: 
DATE REC'D: 
©
f
•SfrSSSl
....ANALYSIS.-.
^ VOLATILE :
*
i;
•
I
1
>c
-'•
PESTICIDE
/PCB's '
^
-
- '
O IT C.'-iXOA *-
---SPECIAL- *~:
, .HANDLING j , .
.,r«,c..
^(L
\
vYA 
s
NJ/^X OyVLfi
tJV\rtl/Ysj>ta
,-
—
..-.,..
.•
ICD< 
O opf"n
<D
~ 
STATION
LOCATION v
, > .-;v c
«£-0*.-t»35
- 
-
^ * lL
Mp*->o \ KrvOTx
V - I yy 
' 
/"
. -.• 
• - • 
•.
--
--• — - ——— — —
BY: 
CONTRACT NOJPRICE:
SAMPLE
CONDITION
:, •-. .ON RECEIPT • - • _ • - r-
,-
.-• 
v. 
.. 
- 
/
S&JL)
• • -
-- — •-- 
- - 
- - 
-
•1*0
5
HIGH CONC
PHASES
: ?- (CHECK)
0
/
V)
Is8
cio
UZ)
88
2*2
•*>
^
. IPA Form 2075-7 (8-87) 
. 
A "* "
WHITE — SMO COPY 
PINK — CLIENT COPY 
WHITE — LAB COPY FOR RETURN TO SMO 
YELLOW — LAB COPY
sj
TJ
SZ.SO 
TOO
r~
*
5s!
-
X
) 5
\
"3 'i 1 ^ <-,•; ".<: •:
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ft
(FROM BOX 1)1 <• , W
2
3
4
5
6
7
CONCENTRATION 
@
L • UMTMED H •> HIOH (SAS)
VOLATILE
BASE/NEUT
/ACID \
PESTICIDE
/PCB's
SOLID
WATER— MIS
LIQUID
WATER-
MIS LIQUID
> '
OT
W
O
0
0
r> §
9V
ini
!! 88
£ ut zo
o
5
M
O
en
a
r
9/.:~'
-co ini
6
J
-
6
W
.
M
-;»
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ®
(FROM BQX 1) • 
1 
•
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6
CONCENTRATION 
; @
L • LOWMEO M ^ HK)H (S*S)
VOLATILE
BASE/NEUT
./ACID
PESTICIDE
/PCB's
SOLID
WATER— MIS
LIQUID
NON WATER-
MIS LIQUID
TJt.
n 2075-7
trre
LLZO
TOO 
mi
\
f
-4WK
t ''
»^ 
t— 
K. 0*MHL
-^4^(FROM
r
3
ft)
San.
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION &
OM BOX 1) 
M 
,
2 
3 
4 
S 
6 
7
CONCENTRATION ' '"@
L . LOWMEa H » MWH(S«i(
VOLATILE
BASE/NEUT
/ACID 
.
PESTICIDE
/PCB's
SOLID
WATER— MIS
LIQUID
NON WATER-
MIS LIQUID
N TJ W C
S b > w
« - > Z
^ 0» Z
O
^
m
'2
hu
, 
OT
>>
I? CO
O
•-•fii'T
«:i
VOIATILES
a. QC Summary
I -
154
'
/X9
! < * - ( - - 
i^*> 
TUT 
001 
027a
3CIL Y T L A T I L E Sl
---.' i
^ 
- 
•
1 
ERA
; SAMPLE NO.
i ============
•:• ! BT747
02 1 BT748
03 ! ET749
C4IBX262
J5 ! 3X263
06IBX264
•;;- ! £V265
'' f~' • p y ^~- /., /.
: ~; • Ev:2£~-
: I: ! !?;:2i:G
: .1 , DX976
12 1 DX'-77
1 .3 : BX°-~
.14 | TV/ 7 59
151FY760
16IJ5Y761
17 1 BX266f;S
IS ! BX26£i';Sri
19: .'ELK 01
20! VBL.KC2
•- -t : ' i—. i • -,-.-:••
._ J I . ^.' !__?•-. _ ..'
22 : '-. "LI : :>"
22 : v:?:...: : 05
::- ;' 'i
r:..;-:o/.:
i 
SI
! (TDDir
- ; ======
! 105
: 104
! 104
! 106
! 106
; 101
: 101
i 104
: 105
: 106
; 115
: 102
: 102
: 113
: 101
! 116
: 103
: 106
! 105
: 104
1 i 02
! 103
! 
°3
! 103
i
52
( BFB ) #
======
96
9-"
95
90
90
90
89
. 
£3
31:
S3
-;.
d rr
95
88
95
81
85
S9
10.0
97
97
95
"i
j.00
i 
£3
: r DCE ; #
: ======
; 
97
; 
98
! 
96
i 
98
1 
99
! 
95
1 
96
; 
95
~ * r
i 
.— /
i 
'::_•
• 
< -.-
; 
j. -. ..-
; 
83
: : 03
:. 
91
i 1.00
: 92
1 
95
: 
92
1 100
! 100
1 
=5
;
 
r'5
i 
^1
- ,-, *-,
.
OTHER ! TOT !
======
O'JT
-==
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
0
0
0
' ;
•j
C
'•-'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
=• TclL,cr,5-cn
= Brcncf luc.rcfcenz
CC LI M I T E
' 91-117)
( 74-121;
( 70-121 '
• 
C::l:;r,ri tr, 
be; usscl t~ 
-fl^.c
" '..'.--. :L.-.C-£; rLitnde cf ccr. tr<r.c t rn-quirec; C'C li.r.its
C G^rrrnr.teE diluted cut
: E-T747
155
TUT 
001
1/37
0279
OS3O 
TOO mi
9ST
;._ •-\.—; s 
III
" C ; ' 
i • • - • — ' -^
,_•-»-i .:....-... i __
T ; 
X-~>^ ••"-'-'...: - ; ' I T ~ 3
£ - r . . ' 7 T 3pT = zv- 
^ 
:.c- i:-- o 
= C . J _
"--T"-:: :;,j ;•- ?:::•--:;.-:; ---:-/, :
:•; :->r.'~'i ;•? 
'_-•.? 
'...; v:/•* 
~ 3-.-,.;• ..v-. add 
P:--^ ,-_!3 •. T:: ::' ' ::.;••;> r ;. ;: .::• ; - :j.-; 
r ; i_:"'::r.2 .;
•_- ;•:-•? 7
23-.
( L- >:/ 5 n;
-•> • .: i >.: -• 5
i 
'—3\J\a .jT
~ '- 
.... ; ; ~" '
~™
• " " • • • * j '
1 -, •* • 
' / 1
: ^21-39 i
i -T / "•• 
; -1 i
1 W i. 
C 
t_> =1 1
: 
• 33d 
:
t Z»-i- i K--I - I
; 
•- ,-n 
i
*
- "
3 '-.rf ^
83T
tf 33d
V. 
i'-sC
SW
• 
• 
•
•• • J.. .-.
T " >.-'-!
*.' w i~
(D-^/Sn)
- r ( •••<\< i ;\imM'">'i
^ i. -L. V ' J ^- 1 < _J -_J 1 4\^-—f
SUi
-'
^ ':
. u
(6>|/5n)
>••-• r i j^-^j ( -.I'l--:- .-r^— i
. . _• u _L. %y •_.,*_ i * _ . wJ i ' i -__• -.J
3 ~" -'! ''-4Q
i '— . rN •« O
J * ' ^j
" 
• 
>
— 
' ^
"T « :""•."•
3 ' 9i
( D^/f:ri;
••~""7.'T "7i.-l
3:.n:d;-j
£* ' ..' I." _I ' J 7; 11 C' -\'— ' '.; "'•
•3' T •" r "' '
S'J.3^-£a-^ [MD-C-^i
3u-j^T3Cj-:'_;--Ta-T' T
'ul'H 1 0 O !''•-•_> i_'
•7 ".' V" V/' 
' 
' ""i 
"•* " . - j ' i ' --•• - 
i_ i 
1-1 
-- 
• - 
H - 
• -.- 
i •-•! -£> • ,
.- .' .-• /••. •_:. 
•• 
- : * 
-• L -' — •- ..... 
..-• -_..;, 
— 
'--- • , • -' ^. 
- • -'• -r - .-;
c.
^. 
l"
L.. 
*- -
'; . 
£_
^
'_ i 
I'-.
i. i 
J
' •
.—
1 
'••'
'-
•i-'
ir'i 
o
i -
i ' '
;_'
L.j
_ j
r .
,- -
; "
_i
1. i
LL
1" .'
1 "!
i -
( 1
»•'
2
t -
L j
; J
n-
t'
(--
*
-;•
C
rJ
i_i
1^
...
•n
j'_
cr
5J"
C J
U'.lO
i." <
T ,
..
•
l"i
"t
HI
[1
IM
L:;
C j
i—i
'V
»--i
I !
L,.
, 1
i_J_
U
f:
•;;
.1
C-l
t- -!
rj
a
-
!j!
J3
1.'"
K .-
r'.!
'.7
1
i.j
...
1 1
C'i
<:f 
I^
•=r 
o 
o
. 
Ci^^
<r
X-.
T3 
tO
a 
ai 
i:
hi 
E
i 1 •--. 
•
:•-. 
:•: 
in
-< 
0 
' 
L:J
l& 
r-l 
. 
_J
i. 
-^ 
U
t'~ 
•• 
T"
.-1 
<l"
Hi 
uJ 
k>
• - 
;>
•'-i 
fj 
tj
U . 
• 
"T
j — 1
" ,"n.j
_ j
LL
LU
J_
f -
C
K-
cri
LJ
0~' 
i- <
CU 
_!
L-
U j 
f!
T -, 
_ ! 
<£
1- ^ 
f "i
<J 
0 
LD 
;;
c 
0:1 i; 
?.
CI. j
i^ 
fj'i
11;
•*-' 
n
'5 
O
'i 
:r
.. 
• . 
•• 
(. -
-L: 
-1 
n 
b;
in 
•-* 
•--< 
j.;
; i 
• '•
(J 
1!
LJ li
LJ r j n
y >• ii
K-" .J 
i: !!•• ^j 
r--.- u-i
t- <1. Ii '•!• f"' t': 
-l
i
;: 
n • • «•: 11 n
•-!' 
il i. i C J H n
i!
i:
:,
ii
o ii
'-< II
iXi 
II
•:\ UJ i:
_j .J 1! <. u, -: r-
>-' 
i; 
L J U i L" U"J
LJ. r !•"! r'i ("' l- '
,. 
.' . , , / , ._ ,
il 1-1 LJ U L,
H
li
i.
i i !i
• '• ii 
•••! Mi'' 1 •=.!-
i! -,,i .\ o •.;•
u'j UJ ii 
; 
! 
i 
"
•;i .J ,i i - i - r - r-
_j LL l! •:,• •'...• C- •:.'
>: !i • i rH TH ,i
<.L ii '::; o c •"
LJ ii 0- C- 0- 0
!| 
LL: CO LJ CO
-- -- . 
- . 
-. -.. --
il
rj n
-:'- 
!'
ii
<- ill ||
11. -.! li
.ij (•_ ;j ''-.(.; f."- TJ
2.. 
il 
,L • - 
-:l 
^i
<:. H f-- f - r- ; i
Lri :! ! • - ! • ! • - :.,:
: : J i • i t-i i" .
. - - - . 
.. 
. . ... __ . _
' i i i • • i
10
h-i 
(-sj
z
Liu
(J)
J! 
U.I 
C! 
4>
J 
J 
. J 
I 'i
'I;
li.
I ./St) E.:..,de i Lr I MI c
L.ab r:.\e ID:
J -VrZJ. 
.•••.!-a i : 1-.-33 i
i",:<ti-i:;; ^sci
• IristrjiT.tcnt IDi
c-..sa No.
-;-: --'.I",: r. t : :.£:;?•: 02 3
£;-;- 
: ' : ^ . i
SGIL
IZ:
!.£3\-el: (Icw/rnea)
;:-.. : r-:T747
t 229
LOW
;'P3 •
HIS METHOD BLANK AF PLIES TH THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, I'S AMD MSD:
0,1
: 
EPA
: SAMPLE rn.
; r- — =: — — i-r :ir — rz • :rr rr =:•
t v V -~^ t T
i ;-• ._•._' .
:pv2:-^
IDX2A-
:FX2/cl.
!£'X2£7
1BX7=^ME
t
LAB
3 AMPLE ID
= - .-• rr - =: ^ — - - — ~ :T =
G':"'' I07-- I ..
r 90 ic ---•:£.
oo •*• •• ••-."'' _ •• -f
S9C:07-OS
S90i07-0c:
S90i-::7-C-£MS
1 
LAP 
!
; 
r-
-iLE
 Tr
! ::: :.:;:; — • rr r- ^ = :: L- r. =-::^-r.
•' 
•'!' 'I T '- 1"
1 CM'367
i C03A4
; r-:-7;-r
c 
r- --, -T ,• r-
•_••-'•.. _ '.;
i C-'-Zi i
i
'I ME
ANALYZED
r., .-- -r — ' :~ ::-. :— r-. " r^
:.'">':-1
: ^ : •:
1 ••' 7 2
4 — • -i e.
_-. - ^ *_
1940
1SOP
; ;:. 3?
...f
158
J./87 .-ev
TUT 
O01 
0282
* I 
T-,-T- —• * "T
i Jo . S^ .r:-T / *t /
06/17/8
: 
. i- 
O - - i", ' .— T — . . . , I » -T ,-. / 1 -T ._ &O
I- -j I. . 
._ _•. i : I f J J. I..' 
^ !_•• • - V r<- t.' '.^ .L .-• 
" J-.
y red:
'' .1212
SOIL
Level :( low/fried )
-t- t : T c
( r : 1 cr
T-. i 
/\ »-. it .•• 
/•* r-( ^, i 
T r- i-» 
-T- o 
T it CT 
rr *~s i i /-, t i T i. i ,— • 
*• • x>. M O ' 
CT ^ 
M
CH—M.NK 
t~i r r L_ x c. ^r 
i U 
she. 
r '_.'i_L\.jv- J. ;vo or-frir i_c.cr- ^ i i
EFA
AMFLE NO.
LAB
SAMPLE ID
• T i ^ 
T r\
I L.t 
» U
TI ME
ANALYZER
3v0107-Oe!1£D i C0773
159
"CRM IV VDA
1/S
TUT 001 O2 83
TOO in.l.
'7! / T
' 
•
I—m A 
/ T 
I.IVI •"* J
»y -_j i i 
iix 
K-H -_j '_• _.
091
16203 ;
TT-^:.7067:
etn
i •—\ *-
- J w
:9i_,v:i , •jO
'9Z.A3 ! 10
3hl Ol 53I"ldd:oJ >ihy~!t{ QCH13U 51 Hi
MQ'l
' 3'-. — f
• L,.-.u 
\'i-..\.'"it : '.. L 11"! 111 CCF\P
C.--l2i g_F. I r-1 T C 
Case No.: 120 58,
;_c,b Filt: ID: 
C03r%9_______
D^te r,.-:alyzcaj
4 A
VOLATILE METHOD FLAN:: ^UHMAPY
_________ 
Contract: 6SD9002S
No. :
EDG lie. : n-:T74:
067 J 9/89
Mstri:;: (soil /i-:a ter ) SOIL
1 Instrument. TDs 
HS3
Lab Sample ID; V20619-31
Ti.T.e Analyzed: 
1355
Level:(low/med)
LOW
"THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES. hS AND KSD;
CTCt ^
EPn
AMPLE NO
LAB
SAMPLE ID
LAB
890107-15
CO 400
TIME 
• !
ANALYZED !
161
FORM IV VOA
/S7 Rev,
TUT OO1 0285
VOLATILE I1E7HOD PLANK SUMMARY
*
L.---b N~,T,C-?: CEIINIC CCRP______________ 
Contract: 63D9002S
• lJ5b Cede: CEIMTC 
Case No.: 1205F) 
SAG No.: _______ 
SDG No.: ET74"
Lab File ID: 
K1&50______ 
Ls.b Ssmple ID: V0619-B1
I Date Analyzed: 
06/19/8?- 
Time Analyzed:
1414
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL 
Level :( low/med) 
LDUJ
' Instrument ID: 
MS2______
THIS METHOD FLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, MS AND MSD:
! 
E
P
A
!
L
A
B
i
L
A
B
i
T
I
M
E
!
! SAMPLE NO.
01 IBX976
SAMPLE ID 
I 
FILE ID 
I ANALYZED
390107-15 
! B1651
» r^ »vt «--i I— v i -j- P--
t - , 11 11^ i * I Z>
I - 
162
page? 1 of 1.
I 
FORM IV VGA 
1/87 Rev,
UT 001 0286
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. BV-6
PAGE 1 OF 10
TOTAL REVIEW
CLP DATA ASSESSMENT
Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analysis
Case No. 12058 SDG No. BT747 & BX978 LABORATORY CEIMIC SITE Tutu
DATA ASSESSMENT:
The current functional guidelines (1988) for evaluating organic data have been
applied.
All data are valid and acceptable except those analytes which have been
qualified with a "J" (estimated), "U" ( non-detects), "R" (unusable), or "JN"
(presumptive evidence for the presence of the material at an estimated value).
All action is detailed on the attached sheets.
Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that the
associated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems
the analysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound
is present or not. 
"R" values should not appear on data tables because they
cannot be relies upon, even as a last resort. 
The second fact to keep in mind
is that no compound concentration, even if it has passed all QC tests, is
guaranteed to be accurate. Strict QC serves to increase confidence in data but
any value potentially contains error.
Reviewer
Signature:
Verified
V_£AX>
Date / t^/> /19 fa
Date
TUT 
OO1 0287
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 2 OP 10
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
1. HOLDING TIME:
The amount of an analyte in a sample can change vith ti»e due to chemical
instability, degradation, volatilization, etc. If the specified holding tine is
exceeded, the data may not be valid. Those analytes detected in the samples
whose holding time has been exceeded vill be qualified as estimated, "J". The
non-detects (sample quantitation limits) vill be flagged as estimated, "J", or
unusable, "R", if the holding times are grossly exceeded.
The following action vas taken in the samples and analytes due to excessive
holding time.
SDG No.- BT747
VOA- All analytes in samples BX976, 977 were flagged J.
All analytes (except methylene chloride) in samples BX992, BY759,
760 and 761 were flagged J.
SDG No.- BX978
VOA- All analytes in samples BX978, 983, 984, 997 and 998 were flagged
J.
/
QE^-^
/3f of (/3± 
TUT 001 0288
I
I
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 3 OP 10
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
2. BLANK CONTAMINATION:
Quality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., method, trip, field, rinse and water blanks
are prepared to identify any contamination which may have been introduced into
the samples during sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure
laboratory contamination. Trip blanks measure cross-contamination of samples
during shipment. Pield blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during
field operations. If the concentration of the analyte is less than 5 times the
blank contaminant level (10 times for the common contaminants), the analytes in
the samples shown were qualified with "If" for these reasons:
it
A) Method blank contamination 
^
SDG No.- BT747
VGA- Acetone was flagged U in samples BT747.749, BX262, 992, BY759,
760 and 761. Methylene Chloride was flagged U in sample BX977.
One TIC was flagged R in Samples BX761 and BY759, two TICs were
flagged R in sample BY760.
BNA- Two TICs were flagged R in samples BT749, BX262, 263, 264, 977
and BY761 and one TIC was flagged R in samples BY760 and BX976.
SDG No.- BX978
VOA- Methylene Chloride was flagged U in sample BX978. Acetone was
flagged U in samples BX984, 997 and 998.
BNA- One TIC was flagged R in samples BX983, 984, 997, 998, BY704,
710, BY711, 765, 769, 771, 773 and 775. Two TICs were flagged R
in samples BX978, BY772 and 774.
Both SDGs: Note that no field or trip blanks are associated with these
samples.
IUT
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 4 OP 10
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
4. CALIBRATION:
Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to ensure that the instrument
is capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. 
An initial calibration
demonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance at
the beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration checks
document that the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.
A) RESPONSE FACTOR:
The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific chemical
compounds. 
The response factor for the Target Compound List (TCL) must be >
0.05 
in both the initial and continuing calibrations. A value < 0.05 indicates
a serious detection and quantitation problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes
detected in the sample will be qualified as estimated, "J". All non-detects for
that compound vill be rejected, "R".
SDG No.- BT747
VOA- 
2-Butanone vas flagged R in sample BX268.
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HV-6
PAGE 5 OF 10
DATA ASSESSMENT:
5. CALIBRATION:
A) PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION (ZRSD) AND PERCENT DIFFERENCE (ZD):
Percent RSD is calculated fro* the initial calibration and is used to indicate
the 
stability of the specific compound response factor over increasing
concentration. 
Percent D compares the response factor of the continuing
calibration 
check to the mean response factor (RRF) fro* the initial
calibration. 
Percent D is a measure of the instrument's daily performance.
Percent RSD mist be <30Z and ZD must be <25Z. A value outside of these Halts
indicates potential .detection and quantitation errors. 
For these reasons, all
positive results are flagged as estimated, "J" and non-detects are flagged "UJ"
(if ZD or RSD >SOZ). 
If there is a gross deviation of ZRSD and ZD, the
non-detects may be rejected, "R".
For 
the PCB/PESTICIDE 
fraction, ZRSD 
for aldrin, endrin, DDT, and
dibutylchlorendate must not exceed 10Z. Percent D must be vithin 15Z on the
quantitation column and 20Z on the confirmation column.
SDG No.- BT747
VOA- cis-l,3-Dichloropropene was flagged J in samples BT747, 748, 749,
BY759, 760, 761, 8X262,263, 264,265, 266, 268, 267 977and 992.
Methylene chloride was flagged J in samples BT747, 748,749,
BX262, 263, 264, 265 and 267. Acetone was flagged J in samples
BX267 and 976. Methylene choride was flagged R in samples BX992,
BY759, 760 and 761.
BNA- Benzyl alcohol was flagged J in sample BX977.
SDG No.- BX978
VOA- cis-l,3-Dichloropropene was outside of QC criteria in samples
BX978, 983, 984, 997 and 998 and methylene chloride in BX983,
984, 997 and 998 no action vas taken because the samples were
previously qualified due to holding time exceedance. Vinyl
acetate vas also outside the QC criteria in samples BX983,
984, 997 and 998, no action vas taken because the samples vere
previously qualified due to holding time exceedance.
BNA- Di-n-Butylphthlate vas flagged J in sample BX997. Benzyl alcohol
vas flagged J in samples BY704, 710, 765, 769, 771 and BX983.
of
TUT 001 O291
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 6 OF 10
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
6. SURROGATES:
All saaples are spiked vith surrogate compounds prior to sample preparation to
evaluate overall laboratory performance and efficiency of the analytical
technique. 
If the Measured surrogate concentrations vere outside contract
specifications, qualifications vere applied to the samples and analytes as shovn
belov.
SDG No.- BX978
VOA- One surrogate spike in sample BX998 vas outside of QC criteria,
no action vas taken because data vas previously qualified for
holding time exceedance.
TUT °01 °292
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 7 OP 10
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
7. INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE
Internal standard (IS) performance criteria ensure that the GC/MS sensitivity
and response are stable during every experimental run. The internal standard
area count mist not vary by «ore than a factor of 2 (-SOZ to +100X) fro* the
associated continuing calibration standard. 
The retention tins of the internal
standard Bust not vary more than +30 seconds from the associated continuing
calibration standard. If the area count is outside the (-50Z to +100Z) range of
the associated standard, all of the positive results for compounds quantitated
using that IS are qualified as estimated, "J", and all non-detects as "UJ" or
"R" if there is a severe loss of sensitivity.
If an internal standard retention time varies by more than 30 seconds, the
reviewer vill use professional Judgment to determine either partial or total
rejection of the data for that sample fraction.
SDG No.- BX978
VGA- 4-Methyl-2-pentanone, 2-hexanone, tetrachloroethene,
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane, toluene, chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene,
styrene and total xylenes in sample BX998 have already been
qualifed due to holding tine exceedance.
BNA- Di-n-octyl phthalate, benzo(B)fluroanthene,
benzo(k)flouranthene, 
benzo(a)pyrene, indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene,
dibenz(a,h)anthracene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene vas flagged J in
sample BX978.
I
i-
TUT 001
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 8 OP 10
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
8. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION:
A) VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE FRACTIONS:
TCL compounds are identified on the GC/MS by using the analyte's relative
retention time (RRT) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained fro* known
standards. For the results to be a positive hit, the sample peak Bust be within
+0.06 RRT units of the standard compound and have an ion spectrum1 which has a
ratio of the primary and secondary m/e intensities within 20Z of that in the
standard compound. 
For the tentatively identified compounds (TIC) the ion
spectra must match accurately. In the cases in which there is not and adequate
ion 
spectrum Amatch, 
the 
laboratory may have 
provided false positive
identification.
B) PESTICIDE FRACTION:
The retention times of reported compounds must fall within the calculated
retention time windows for the two chromatographic columns and a GC/MS
confirmation is required if the concentration exceeds 10 ng/ml in the final
sample extract.
SDG BT747
VOA- Phenol vas rejected as a TIC in samples BY759 and 760 because it
is a BNA TCL compound.
Due to missing spectra the following analytes were flagged N;
carbon tetrachloride and trichloroethene in sample BX267, benzene
and chlorobenzene in sample BX 268, acetone in sample BX976 and
toluene in BY759.
Pest- XD vas outside of QC limits on the primary column for sample
BY759 no action vas taken because XD vas vithin control limits
on the secondary column.
SDG BX978
Pest--All aiialjiu *«-ic flaagtd I\ in cample DXQQ7 utuiuje XD VOB
H*it-jlde QO Li.Ami.iu uu buth tin tuimagy •"«* atcuiiduij lUluuui
XD vas outside of QC limits on the primary column for sample
BX984 no action vas taken because XD vas vithin control limits
on the secondary column.
*A11 TIC compound results (VOA and BNA) are flagged "J" (estimated), and also
"N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) if an identification
is made, to reflect the qualitative and quantitative error inherent in the
analysis of compounds without corresponding calibration standards.
TUT 00.1 0294
I
I
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 9 OF 10
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
9. MATRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/MSD:
The MS/MSD data are generated to determine the long-term precision and accuracy
of the analytical method in various matrices. 
The MS/MSD may be used in
conjunction with other QC criteria for some additional qualification of the
data.
SDG No.- BT747
BNA- 1,4-dichlorobenzene, 4-nitrophenol, 2,4-dinitrotoluene aq4
pentachorophenol were flagged R in sample BY759. 
C.J
SDG No.- BX978
Pest- In sample BY775 gamma-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin
and 4,4-DDT were outside of QC criteria, however no action was
needed,aaiuplt mj piL.iuujlj qualified fet- jun-egata racounnr.
TUT OO1 O29
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 10 OF 10
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
10. OTHER QC DATA OUT OF SPECIFICATION:
SDG BX978
BNA- Naphthalene and 2-MethyInaphthalene results in sample BY770 and
4-methylphenol in BY759 exceeded calibration range but the lab did not
reanalyze (as required by the SOW). Therefore these values were
flagged "J".
11. 
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND OVERALL ASSESSMENT (continued on next page if
necessary):
Lab failed to complete Form IX for secondary column, and the lab also
indicated on all Form IXs (primary and secondary) that both columns
vere used for quantitation.
Reviewer was unable to exactly reproduce reported CRDLs, however
differences were small and no data qualification is required.
12. CONTRACT PROBLEMS / NON-COMPLIANCE:
SDG BT747
VOA- Lab used X as a qualifier but did not define it in the narrative.
Reviewer contacted lab to determine the definition of X (see
attached phone log) as a result, reviewer flagged the positive
Naphthalene results "J" in sample BY765.
No spectrum was supplied to support the identification of
octadecane in BX263.
SDG BX978
BNA- Lab failed to flag internal standard out of QC limits for sample
BX978, reviewer corrected.
Both SDGs-
Lab used qualifier "B" for TICs that were not found in the laboratory
method blanks. These were removed by the reviewer
13. This 
package contains re-extraction, re-analysis or dilution. 
Upon
reviewing the QA results, the following form I(s) are identified to be
used.
Form I's are clearly marked.
001 0296
LABORATORY
DATA USER
DPO: I] ACTION 
[ ] FYI 
Region.
ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA jffEffHEFT 
fl^^M^y
CASE NO. / l£ <"ff___________ 
LABORATORY 
~*~~T'£-/fa/
SDG NO. /67^ 7^7 
»- /?yr 97^
SOW _____J/f^'___________ 
REVIEW COMPLETION DATE
SOIL ____ OTHER
NO. OF SAMPLES ____ WATER
REVIEWER tJESD 
I) ESAT 
[c^OTHER, CX>NTRACT/CX>NTRACrOR
VGA
L HOLDING TIMES
2. OC-US TUNE/ GC PERFORMANCE
3. INITIAL CALIBRATIONS
4. CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS
5. FIELD BLANKS (*F - act applicable)
6. LABORATORY BLANKS
7. SURROGATES
I MATRIX SPIKE/DUPLICATES
9. REGIONAL QC (*F - not applicable)
10. INTERNAL STANDARDS
11. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION
II COMPOUND QUANTTTATION
13. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
14. OVERALL ASSESSMENT
BNA
0
PEST
OTHER
X
6
/
O • No problems or minor problems that do act affect data wabflity.
X m No aore thaa about 5% of the data poiau are qualified as cither catiaated or oansable.
M • More ihaa about 5% of the data poiau are qualified as •adaated.
Z • More taaa about 5% of the data poiau are qualified as •avaable.
PPO ACTION ITEMS:
| 
AREAS OF CONCERN.
TUT 
OO1
In Reference to Case No(s):
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Date of Call:
Laboratory Name:
Lab Contact:
Region:
Regional Contact:
Call Initiated By:
Telephone Record Log
•///>? ho
' 
/
IM /
Laboratory
In reference to data for the following sample number(s):
Iff-A 
•*
VoA
gT ?«/7
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
(•} 
ffCci^^ 
LL&i. 
X
"
3 L'J — ~&£*is^e *
/by
Summary of Resolution:
Signature
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
V>o
Date
TUT 
OO1 
0298
CEIMIC
CORPORATION
DATE: 
*-f// //7 u____ 
FAX!
TO: 
EPA - fircuvn IT 
____
(COMPANY NAME)
(NAME)
FROM: ___
NUMBER OF PAGES 
T 
(INCLUDING COVERSHEET)
RE: ________________
COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS:
• 
I 
* 
yl 
^« I ^ft^K ^^ 
*4 1
' 
A 
^ *
/ 
.1 
r_»x V0n«^yTlkAM
• 
^. o
7^ ji^Kl^fc/ ^\r<
BV2*<?
ijlp ^^v > W 4
v-MO Drtn Knauss Drive, Narragansett. R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-*°™ • BAV
TUT 
OO1 
0299
In Reference to Case No(s):
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Telephone Record Log
0
<*£
3 (L-hm Cvoi)
Date of Call:
Laboratory Name:
Lab Contact:
Region:
Regional Contact:
Call Initiated By: __ Laboratory 
V Region
In reference to data for the following sample numbeKs):
J ^6 6r7V7-
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
6,4
Summary of Resolution:
O
Signature
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
/- ^9-
Date
57
TUT 
001 
0300
CEIMIC
CORPORATION
DATE:
TO:
ATTN:
FROM:
FAXI
EPA
(COMPANY NXME)
(NAME)
NUMBER OF PAGES
RE:
(INCLUDING COVERSHEET)
COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS:
100 Dean Knauss Drive. Narratansett, R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905
of « / - ^ 
UT 001 0301
SOP NO. HW-6
Revision |6
CLP ORGANKS DMA REVIEW
AND PRELIMINARY REVIEW
CONCURRED BY; 
/7\ • fX*.t*JC •**¥*<*———__________ Date:
"iduis -Bevilacgua i——————————————
Monitoring Management Branch
APPROVED BY; W\<yt*' ' «V^C - -'______________ Date:.
Gerard F. McKenna, Chief
Monitoring Management Branch
!UT 
001 
0302
SIANEftRD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 3 
Of 
36
Date: March
Revision 6
COMPLETENESS AND DELIVERABLES 
CASE NUMBER:
LAB:
SITE; ~ru-rt.i
1.0 KtS Ccroletenegs and Deli^ernblftfT 
YF^ 
HO 
N/A
1.1 Have any missing deliverables been received and added 
f </1 
__ 
__
to the data package.
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resuhndttal of any
missing deliverables. If lab cannot provide then,
note the effect on review of the package under
the "Contract Problerns/Non-oorpliance" section
of reviewer narrative.
1 
1.2 Was sn CCS checklist included with package? 
f S\ 
__ 
__
•> n rc^er Jyett.er/Case Narrative
I
2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present?
2.2 Are Case Number and/or SAS number contained in the 
/
Narrative or Cover Letter? 
f s 1 
__ 
__
3.0 Data Validation Checklist
The following checklist is divided into three parts. Part A
is filled out if the data package contains any VGA analyses,
Part B for any SNA analyses and Part C for Pesticide/PCBs.
Does this package contain:
U3A data? 
^ 
S 
__
BNA data? 
t/ 
__
Pesticide/PCB data? 
/ 
__
ACTION: Ccrplete corresponding parts of checklist.
TUT 
00 i O3C>3
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 4 
of 
35
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
PART A: VOA ANALYSES
1.0 Traffic Reports and
3 . 3 Are the Traffic Report Poms present for all samples?
If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copies.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sample receipt, condition of samples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting 
/
the quality of the data? 
__ 
[_./]
ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
ACriON: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more
than 50% water, all data should be rejected.
ACTU.v If both VOA vials for a sample have air bubbles,
flag all positive results "J" and all non
-detects "R".
2.C
2.1 Have any VOA holding times, determined from date of 
/
collection to date of analysis, been exceeded? 
\/
If unpreserved, aqueous aromatic volatiles must be analyzed
within 7 days of collection and non-aromatic volatile* mist
be analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric
acid and stored at 4°C, then both aromatic and non-aromatic
volatiles must be analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain
about preservation, contact the sampler to determine whether
the samples were preserved.
A ten-day holding time for soil samples is recommended.
Table of Holdina Time Violations
(See Traffic Report)
Sample 
Date 
Date Lab 
Data
Sample 
Matrix 
Preserved ? 
Sampled 
Received 
Analyzed
S'iX?-&rv? BY^Ji- 
&.••• / 
A'' C-
6--/7/P5
* 
~irv~.A- 
^.- ; 
>^C 
(,/U/K
L, A
» -_, 
ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as
estimated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated
("UJ") , and document in the narrative that holding tines
were exceeded.
.^S- r ,....
/ss t?r c 3 >
TUT 001 0304
&
7»
x .
_o
Xa,
au
A
-T>
_Ti
t-o
V
OJ
TV
-T,
r
-A
,
•y*•
— Vi
c, ;
r-
'
xJ
r(
* -*>
(/J
V
*
_i>
—i
rp
<\
&
X
_n
•0
V,
n
\
LH
-1
<r._
r-
10 
w
O 
°
r •
»4
*r>
-J^
JS
?-
c\
r i
' c &
T 
^
*£ 
t^ 
^.
c, o \
O
t--
r
V-
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 5 
pf 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
"~~~ 
NO 
"
If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding tine,
either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer
Bust use professional judgement to determine the reliability
of the data and the effects of additional storage on the
sauple results. The reviewer nay determine that non-detect
data are unusable ("R") .
3.1 Are the VQA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Fora U) present
for each of the following matric
a. Low Water 
[__) 
__
b. Med Water 
[__] __ 
tX
c. Low Soil 
f /i 
__ 
__
d. Med Soil 
I__] 
__
3.2 Are all the VQA samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate
Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water
b. Med Water
c. Low Soil 
r i/1 
__ 
__
d. Med Soil
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, doamnnt
effect on data under "Conclusions'1 section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Was one or more VQA surrogate recovery outside of contract
specifications for any sample or method blank?
If yes, were samples reanalyzed?
Were method blanks reanalyzed?
ACTION: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but all do not
meet SOW specifications:
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection
limits ("UJ").
TUT 
001 O3O6
STANDARD OKRACTC PROCEDURE 
Page: 6 
Of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO
If any surrogate has a recovery of <10% :
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. Flag all nan-detects as unusable ("R").
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate recoveries
out of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard areas.
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw 
.
data and Form II? 
__ 
[ /I
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions". 
' -
4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III)
prrsr-nt ?
4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low water 
I_]
b. Med Water 
[__]
c. Low soil 
[_/]
d. Med Soil 
[__]
ACTION: If any matrix spite data-are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many VGA spite recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
7>t, BT^V? 
*VA 
OUt Of 10 
'O 
OUt Of 10
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spite and matrix spite
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
If MS and MSD both have less-«han 10% re-
I -^ 
covery for an analyte, negative results for
1 
that analyte should be rejected, and
positive results should be flagged "J".
i 
The above applies only to the sanple used 
();,()7
• 
for the MS/MSD analysis. Use professional 
m
judgement in applying this criterion to other 
/$"# at
eamrtlac <
OPERATING PHX1UURE 
Page: 7 
Of 
36
I 
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I
YES 
NO 
N/A
5.0 Blanlcs (Form IV)
5.1 Is the Method Blank Suimary (Form IV) present? 
[ >/] 
__
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VTJA
TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, 
/
[JLJ _ _
L/,
medium soil), whichever is more frequent?
5.3 Has a VIA instrument blank been analyzed at least
once every twelve hours for each OC/MS system used?
Ad id*. If any method blank data are missing, call lab
for explanation / resutmittal. If not available,
reject all associated positive data ("R").
i. 4 Chromatograpny: review the blank raw data - chromatograms
(RICs), quant reports or data system printouts and spectra.
J3 i\he chromatographic performance (baseline stability) 
/
for each instrument acceptable for VTJts? 
\.\/1 __ 
_
ACTICU: Use professional judgement to determine the
effect on the data.
: 
6.0 Contamination
NOTE: "Hater blanks'* and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are DQt used
to qualify data. Do not confuse than with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC) for vans? tften applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution
Factor.
/
*/ 
I __ ) _
6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VUV results
(TCL and/or TIC)?
ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
Gnly field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the samples are used to qualify data. Trip
blanks are used to qualify only those samples
J ^. 
with which they were shipped. Blanks may not
be qualified because of contamination in another
blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate,
spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems.
TUT 001 0308
\
C82ANICS
ILA« CCNTAMINATICNl
CASE: / P-C S '"L" 
LAS: C € j f i A > C
SITE: -TuA^. 
FilACTICN: v/~ /4
ANALTTES
TCl
AFFECTED SAMPLES
IMETHCO IUNC CONTAMINATIONS
.........T.........T.......
10 (.' &*L
.................................
AMOUNT 
AMOUNT 
AMOUNT 
AMOUNT 
AMOUNT 
AMOUNT
MN*t-
•eewr.
NO:
i-Y
T R I P tHKt 
CCNT. 
j
NO:
AMOUNT
NO: 
J
AMOUNT |
TUT 
001 
0309
CRSANICS
ItANC CCN7AMINATICWI
CASE: /,2-ti
SITE:
_,
LAB: UfiMi C
FRACTION: t'C ft
I
| ME 7 HO IUNC CCNTAXI NATIONS
ANALTTES
TCL
f '
TIC
A' 7. 9
AMOUNT 
AMCL1IT
10
AMOUNT
RINSE ILAKK CCKT.
ID
AMOUNT
AFFECTED SAMPLES
Ibl
NO:
AMOUNT 
AMOUNT
NO:
T R I P BlA« CCWT.
T
NO:
AMOUNT
NO:
AMOUNT
TUT OO1 031O
STANDARD OPERATING FHOCHJUKL 
Page: 
8 
of 
36
- Date: March 1989
Revision 6
Y E S N O N/A"
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
jSanple cone > CRQL'Sanple cone < CRQL ijSanple cone > CRQL 
'
but < lOx blank 
is < lOx blank value value & >10x blank value
! F1 an ej»TtirO a m« il *•'
Methylene chloride Flag sanple result Reject sanple result
Acetone with a 'U1; cross and report CRQL;
Toluene out 'B' flag 
cross out »B« flag
_____2-butanone_!___________j__________•
No qualification
is needed
j Sample cone > CRQL [Sample cone < CRQL t! Sanple cone > CRQL
jbut < 5x blank 
is < 5x blank value value & > 5 blank value
Other 
F*ag s*11!?16 result Reject sanple result!No qualification
•Tontaminants with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; 
is needed
jout 'B' flag 
cross out 'B' flag
i———————————i————————————.1——————————
ACTION: For TIC compounds, if the concentration in the sample is
less than five times the concentration in the most con-
taminated associated blank, flag the sanple data "R"
(unusable).
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every
sample? 
[__] 
__ 
__
^ 
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank.
Deception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0 GC/MS Tuning and Mass Ca] jfrration (Form V}
7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Fora V) 
/
present for Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)? 
f i^f __ 
__
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(m/z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve 
/
' hour shift? 
f i/1 __ 
_
7.3 Has a tuning performance compound been analyzed for every 
/
twelve hours of sanple analysis per instrument? 
f t/1
ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sample
analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning 
;
data are available.
TUT 
OO1 
O3.ll
SXANCARD OPERATING PROCtlXIKt
Page: 9 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO 
N/A
——
——
JJVSiTUJflCJYJ.
- ————————————————————————
_________________________
aAnrie. nunnuo
ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration
interval.
7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each
instrument used?
ACTION: List all data which do not meet ion abundance
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
ACTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ("R").
However, if expanded ion criteria are met
(See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data
reviewer may accept data with appropriate
qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between
mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but
if errors are found, check more.)
7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors
are found check more values.)
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resufcroittal, make necessary corrections and note
errors under "Conclusions11.
7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound
acceptable?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
whether associated data should be
accepted, qualified, or rejected.
8.0 Target Co
CLl An
8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form Z VQA)
present with required header information on each
page, for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
c. Blanks
L/J
;UT
001 0312
ofU<ATlNG PROCEDURE 
Page: 10 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report?
6.4 Is chrcnatographic performance acceptable with
respect to:
Baseline stability
I 
YES 
NO 
N/A
" 
8.2 Are the VOA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the
mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the
v_ 
data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in
j 
the sample package for each of the following?
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
(Mass spectra not required)
c. Blanks
ACTION: If any data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
Resolution
Peak shape 
f «/! 
__ 
__
Full-scale graph (attenuation) 
L-^J __ 
__/
Other:________________
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the
acceptability of the data.
/ T*
8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the 
/
identified VOA compounds present for each sample? 
f 1 
^
ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above. If Lab does not
generate their own standard spectra, make
note in "Contract Problems/Non-compliance".
8.6 Is the RRT of each reported compound within 0.06 RFT
units of the standard RRT in the oontinuing calibration? 
f *•' 1 
__ 
__
8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a
relative intensity greater than lot also present in the
sample mass spectrum?
8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree
within 20%?
I
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of data. If it is determined
that incorrect identifications were made,
. 
all such data should be rejected, flagged
j -— 
"N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of
the compound) or changed to not detected (at
the calculated detection limit).
•yij-f 
OO1 
031---
Page: 11 of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I 
YES 
NO 
N/A
\0 Tentatively Identified Comnexmds
I 
9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I,
v 
Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number
or retention time, estimated concentration and "J"
| 
qualifier?
9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified
compounds and associated "best match" spectra included
I 
in the sample package for each of the following:
a. Sanples and/or fractions as appropriate 
' '
b. Blanks 
f /
ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N"
qualifier to all identified TIC conpounds
on Form I, Part B.
•> T Are any TCL conpounds (frcn any fraction) listed as
','IC conpounds (exanple: 1,2-dimethylbenzene is xylene—
a VOA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)? 
S [__] __
ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.
9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the 
/
sample mass spectrum? 
r ^
9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities
agree within 201?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of TIC identifications. If
it is determined that an incorrect identi-
fication was made, change identification to
"unknown" or to some less specific identi-
fication (exanple: "C3 substituted benzene")
as appropriate.
10.0 Compound O^flJTtj^S'tlTTl and Reportod Detection Limits
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Form I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation
ion, and KRF were used to calculate Form I result.
Were any errors found?
10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions
and, for soils, saitplc moisture?
__ 
IJLJ —
T \ J T 0 01 
0 314
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Page: 12 
of
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
36
YES
NO 
N/A
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary collections and
note errors under "Conclusions'1.
ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the "E" value on the original Form I and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sample. Specify which Fora I is to be used,
then draw a red nX" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
11-') frtar*3*rttff
(GC/MS)
.1.1 Vre the Reconstructed Ion Chroma tograms, and data
system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial
continuing calibration?
ACTION: if any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
0 GC/MS Initial Calibration fForm VI)
12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present
and complete for the volatile fraction?
ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are
missing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.2 Are response factors stable for volatiles over the
concentration range of the calibration (BSD <30%)?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: When BSD >30%, nan-detects may be qualified
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag
all nan-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
II policy.)
12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any volatile
has an average
RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that
compound as estimated ("J") , and flag non-
detects for that cxunjuund as unusable ("R") .
TUT
XJ 
OI 
jo
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YE 
NO 
N/A
12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
the reporting of average response factors (KRF) or
%RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are 
/
found, check more.) 
__ 
L_kLJ __
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubroittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
13.0 GCVMS C/rn'tijTuiDq CSlifcrrtJpn fFoiin
13.1 Are the continuing Calibration Forms (Fora VII) present 
/
and complete for the volatile fraction? 
Q _ 3 
__ 
__
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed
for every twelve hours of sample analysis per 
,
instrument? 
Lk_J __ 
__
ACTION': List below all sample analyses that were
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACTION: If any forms are missing or no continuing
calibration standard has been analyzed within
twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab
for explanation / resubmittal. If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag all
associated sanple data as unusable ("R").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have 
/
a RRF < 0.05? 
_/_
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any volatile compound has a PRF < 0.05,
flag positive results for that compound as
estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that
rcpound as unusable ("R").
13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and 
/.
I 
continuing calibration RRF > 25%? 
" 
Jl_ [__] 
__
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated
I
sanple data as outlined in the table below:
^
TUT 001 0316
n or
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I
I ~
% DIFFERENCE
j 
25-50 
j 
50-90 
j 
>90
YES 
NO . N/A
13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the
reporting of average response factors (RRF) or differen
(%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at
least two values but if errors are found, check more.)
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
M.gndards (Form VIII)
. j Are tf.e internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every
«rple ard blank within the upper and lower limits 
/
for **ch continuing calibration? 
[__] 
v 
__
ACTION: List all the outliers below.
Sample t 
Internal Std 
Area 
Lower Limit 
Upper Limit
t ?
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or
lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and non-
detects (U values) guantitated with this internal- standard.
If extremely low area counts are reported, or if perf
, 
exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated non-
1-
I 
detects as unusable ("R").
. 
14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within 
/
' 
30 seconds of the associated calibration standard? 
f » 1 
__ 
__
ACTION; Professional judgement should be used to qualify
j -^ 
data if the retention times differ by more than
30 seconds.
TUT 
001 0317
I
I
i
I
Page: 15 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
15.0 Field DunHoit-.** 
^^ 
**° N/A
_ 
15.1 Here any field duplicates submitted for VGA analysis? 
[_/ ] __ __
ACnON: Conpare the reported results for field duplicates
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACHON: Any gross variation between field duplicate
results rust be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
confirmed by contacting the sanpler.
001 0318
O.Lrui»-ruw
I-MLJL _> i i i^j-
ratje. 
xo . Ol 
JO
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
1.0 Traffic Reports and
PART B! BNa. ANALYSES
Narrative
YES
1.1 Are the Traffic Report Ferns present for all samples?
ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copies.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sample receipt, condition of samples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting
the quality of the data?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
ACTION*: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more
than 50% water, all data should be rejected.
NO 
N/A
LJ_] 
__
20 Holdjjig Tines
2.1 Have any BNA holding tires, determined from date of
collection to date of extraction, been exceeded?
~ 
Sanples for ENA analysis, both soils and waters,
oust be extracted within seven days of the date of
collection. Extracts rust be analyzed within 40
days of the date of extraction.
_ u/i _
Sample
T*ble of Holding Tijne Violations
.(See Traffic Report)
Sample 
Date 
Date lab 
Date 
Date
Matrix 
Sampled 
Received 
Detracted Analyzed
ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as
estijnated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated
("UJ"), and document in the narrative that holding tines
were exceeded.
6 f
TUT 001 0319
rrom_tjju«t 
fdge: 
A/ 
OI 
jo
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
NO 
N/A
If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding tine,
either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer
Bust use professional judgement to determine the reliability
of the data and the effects of additional storage on the
sample results. The reviewer nay determine that non-detect
data are unusable ("R") .
3.0 Surrogate Recovery (Form
3.1 Are the BNA Surrogate Recovery Sunmaries (Fora II) present
for each of the following matric
a. Law Water 
[__)
b. Med Water 
[__]
c. low soil
d. Mad Soil 
[__] 
__
3.2 Are all the ENA samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate
Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water 
[__] 
__ 
S
b. Mad Water
c. Low Soil
d. Med Son
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, document
effect on data under "Conclusions" section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Were two or more base-neutral O£ acid surrogate recoveries 
/
out of specification for any sample or method blank? 
' v "•
If yes, were samples reanalyzed? 
[ __ ] 
_ 
is
Were method blanks reanalyzed? 
[ _ ] _ 
_j/
ACTION: If all ENA surrogate recoveries are > 10% but two
within the base-neutral or acid fraction do not
1 
meet SOW specifications, for the affected fraction 
!
I 
oj-^y f j..e. base— neutral OR acid pjiiuj'iAjDJi^t
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J") .
jj ^ 
2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection
limits ("UJ").
TIJT 
("u-'l 0320
SIMCRRD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 18 of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I
NO
If any base-neutral oj acid surrogate has a
recovery of <10% :
1. Flag all positive results for that fraction
(i.e. all acid or base-neutral compounds) "J".
2. Flag all non-detects for that fraction "R".
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate recoveries
out of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard areas.
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw 
/
data and Form II? 
__ 
I / 1 _
ATTICJI- If large errors exist, call- lab for explanation /
resubmittal , make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
-i .
 ;J i ••'*• 1 i i,i Spikes (Form III)
* 3 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) 
/
preserr? 
l_i_J _
I 
4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
-_- 
for each of the following matrices:
I 
a. Low Water 
[ __ ] __ 
j£.
! 
/
b. Med Water 
[ _ 1 _ 
_•_
c. Low Soil 
[_/] __ _
d. Med soil 
t __ 1 
__ 
_i£
fCTKK: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many EN& spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
SDC-j 8T-fr/y l?/A OUt Of 22 
/«/ OUt Of 22
BX'*'?*'' U/A 
°
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike
* 
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
i 
Water 
Soils
out of 11 
J^ out of 11
0
ACTICN: If MS and MSD both have less than 10% recovery
for an analyte, negative results for that
analyte should be rejected, and positive
results should be flagged "J". One above
applies only to the sample used for MS/MS) (70 -f D
analysis. Use professional judgement in 
TUT 001 0321
I
SEtfCftRD OPERATING PRCCmjRE 
Page: 
19 
Of 
36
t 
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
5.0 Blanks (Form TV)
b.l Is the Method Blank Sumnary vronn IV) present? 
[ v\
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of
TCL compounds, has a reagent Aethod blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 sanples
of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil, 
/
medium soil), whichever is more frequent? 
iJL.] _ " _
5.3 Chromatography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms
(RICs) , quant reports or data system printouts and spectra.
TS *ho rhromatographir performance (baseline stability) 
/
- n instrument acceptable for«w«? 
[ / 1 
._
ar VTCr Use professional judgenent to determine the
effect on the data
h.O Contamination
NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are net used
to qualify data. Do not confuse than with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6 . 1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC) for EN&s? When applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution 
/
Factor. 
_L_ [ _ ) _
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive ETA results 
/
(TCL and/or TIC)? 
__ 
I __ 1 jL
ACTION: Prepare a list of the sanples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet. )
NOTE: Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks
may not be qualified because of contamination
in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for
surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC
problems.
I
I
11 -t-c? ^. > s 
TUT 
ool 
03.^,
CSSANICS 
CASE: /^.C'Zil 
LAB: £t 
'A*'C-_
ILA« CONTAMINATION! 
SITE: YU.^*! 
FRACTION: g ^'/4
ANAITTES
TCL
r
r
TIC
r'^"<W-
i ""Z^:*** -**
"/, /'?c',.A.rt<r,-J
1
1
1
1
1
AFFECTED SAMPLES
j METHOD IUMC CCNT AMI NAT IONS
•M/ttf
AMOUNT
,'fC
l/' 5 d'O
/?/'77/
6.,- ^
&W
»>»l/s/
AMOUNT
/t/C't
f.to
l^fc
f^
*'f1 70
3r773
10
AMOUNT
.
ID
AMOUNT
•_
-
RINSE BLANK CCKT.
NO:
AMOUNT
f
NO:
AMOUNT
TRIP BLANK CCNT. 
|
HO:
AMOUNT
^
NO: 
|
AMOUNT 
|
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
Bv—
TUT' 
O01 
03:
C8SANICS
ILANC CONTAMINATION!
CASE:
LAB:
IMETHCO luxe C:NTAXINATIONS
AWAtTTES
TCL
to
to
AXOUNT 
AMOUNT 
AMOUNT
TIC
ArfECTED SAMPLES
10
AMOUNT
E 81AKK CCKT.
NO:
I NO:
AMOUNT 
AMOUNT
TRIP BLA« CCNT.
NO:
AMOUNT
NO:
AMOUNT 
|
TUT 
001 
0324
FMJCLDURE
*age: tu or 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
YES
NO 
N/A
Guuiiun
Jhthalate
Esters
Other
Contaminants
ISample cone > CRQLlSample cone < CRQL &
jbut < lOx blank 
is < lOx blank value
{Flag sample result {Reject sample result
with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL;
out 'B* flag 
cross out >B' flag
{Sample cone > CRQLj Sample cone < CRQL &
jbut < 5x blank 
[is < 5x blank value
Flag sanple result Reject sample result
with a 'U1; cross and report CRQL;
out 'B' flag 
cross out 'B1 flag
1 
_
_
_
!
.
.
_
_
Sample cone > CRQL
value & >10x blank value
No qualification
is needed
Sample cone > CRQL
value & > 5 blank value
No qualification
is needed
>-«v
ACTION: For TIC compounds, if the concentration in the sample is
less than five times the concentration in the most con-
taminated associated blank, flag the sample data "R"
(unusable) .
Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every
sample?
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank.
Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0 GC/M5 Tuning and Mass CRT ^ration (Form VI
7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Form V)
present for Decaf luorotriphenylphosphine (DFTFP)?
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(m/2) listing for the DFTFP provided for each twelve
hour shift?
7.3 Has a tuning performance
been analyzed for every
twelve hours of sample analysis per instrument?
ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sample
analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning
data are available.
TUT O0.1.
CREATING tWJUUURE
Page: 21 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO
N/A
DAIE
TIME
INSTRUMENT
SAMHX NUMHEBS
ACTTCN: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration
interval.
7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each
instrument used?
ACTTCN: List all data which do not meet ion abundance
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
ACTTCN: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ("R").
However, if expanded ion criteria are met
(See 1988 Functional Guidelines) , the data
reviewer may accept data with appropriate
qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between
mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but
if errors are found, check more.)
7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors
are found check more values. )
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal , make necessary corrections and note
errors under "Conclusions".
_/ 
I__1 __
7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration
acceptable?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
whether associated data should be
accepted, qualified, or rejected.
8.0
d List (TCP
8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I
present with required header information on each
page, for each of the following:
a. Sanples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
c. Blanks 
_- __
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 22 
of 
jo
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
NO 
N/A
8.2 Are the BNA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the
mass spectra for the identified conpounds, and the
data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in
the sanple package for each of the following?
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
f ,/1 
__ 
__
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates 
f 1/1 
__ 
__
(Mass spectra not required)
c. Blanks
ACTION: If any data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report?
9.4 Is chnamatographic performance acceptable with
respect to: 
/
Baseline stability 
[_i/] ._ 
__
Resolution
• •!
Peak shape 
r J*\ 
__ 
__
Full-scale graph (attenuation) 
r -A 
__ 
__
Other:________________ 
[__] __ 
c/
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the
acceptability of the data.
8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the 
/
identified BNA conpounds present for each sanple? 
r /I 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above. If lab does not
generate their own standard spectra, make
note in "Contract Problems/Non-conpliance11.
8.6 Is the RRT of each reported conpound within 0.06 RRT 
/
units of the standard RRT in the continuing calibration? 
f / 1 
__ 
__
8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a 
,
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the 
' /
•Arnnl* mass enactmm? 
f / 1
sanple mass spectrum?
8.8 Do sanple and standard relative ion intensities agree 
/
within 20%? 
f /
ACXTGN: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of data. If it is determined
that incorrect identifications were made,
- 
all such data should be rejected, flagged
•W" (presumptive evidence of the presence of
the conpound) or changed to not detected (at
the calculated detection limit).
tKXZDURt 
. 
>fege: 
2J 
or 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
.0 Tentatively Identified Qamounds
9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I,
Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number
or retention time, estimated concentration and "J" 
/
qualifier? 
• 
f J\ 
__ 
__
9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified
—mpounds and associated "best match" spectra included
in the sample package for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
f J ]
b. Blanks 
r J"\
ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTICN: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N"
qualifier to all identified TIC compounds
on Form I, Part B.
I 
9-3 Are any TCL compounds (from any fraction) listed as
1 
TIC compounds (example: 1,2-dimethylbenzene is xylei
a VGA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)?
I .^_ 
ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.
9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the
cample mass spectrum? 
f J 1 
__ 
__
9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities
agree within 20%? 
f i/ 1 
__ 
__
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of TIC identifications. If
it is determined that an incorrect identi-
fication was made, change identification to
"unknown" or to some less specific identi-
fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene")
as appropriate.
• 10.0 QjiiLound QmMT^ltation and Reported Detection Limits
, 
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
J 
Form I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitaticn
ion, and RRF were used to calculate Form I result. 
/
I 
Were any errors found? 
J [__]
I
10.2 Are the CRQIfi adjusted to reflect sample dilutions
and, for soils, sample moisture? 
' 
_^. [__] ——
TUT GO.I 0328
STANDARD OPERATING PBorrmpr 
Page: 24 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions'1.
ACTION: Wien a sanple is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sanple analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the "E" value on the original Form I and substi-
tuting it with data f ran the analysis of diluted
sanple. Specify which Form I is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
11.0 St^r*3*gfls Pjtta (GC/WS)
11.1 Arc the Reconstructed ion Chromatcgrams, and data
system printouts (Quant. Re;
and continuing calibration?
system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial 
/
U/) __ __
ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
I v j GC/MS Initial Calibration fForm VII
•""^—-^ JUbbUK«JBU&JEAM^^^dSBJUH(^JUUlUEUMi^^^JUUi^^^l^A
12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present 
/
1 
and cccplete for the BNA fraction? 
\'J 1
ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are
missing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.2 Are response factors stable for BNAs over the 
/
concentration range of the calibration (RSD <30%)? 
f v ]
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: When RSD >30%, non-detects may be qualified
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results "J". When RSD >90t/ flag
all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
II policy.)
12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? 
__ 
ft/] __
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any BNA conpound has an average
RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that
conpound as estimated ("J"), and flag non-
detects for that compound as unusable ("R").
RJT OOl O329
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 25 
Of 
36
Date: March 19B9
Revision 6
1
1
12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
the reporting of average response factors (RRF) or
%RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are
found, check more.)
YES 
NO
_ u/T
N/A
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If errors are large, call 'lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
13.0 GC/MS Continuing calibration (Form VII)
13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Fora VII) present 
/
and complete for the BNA fraction? 
[jLJ __ 
__
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed
for every twelve hours of sanple analysis per 
/
instrument? 
[_i_] 
__ 
__
ACTION: List below all sanple analyses that were
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACTION: If any forms are missing or no continuing
calibration standard has been analyzed within
twelve hours of every sanple analysis, call lab
for explanation / resubmittal. If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag all
associated sanple data as unusable ("R").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have 
/
a RRF < 0.05? 
f v
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any ENA uunifcjuunj has a RRF < 0.05,
flag positive results for that
estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that
compound as unusable ("R").
13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and 
/
continuing calibration RRF > 25%? 
_i/ • [__] 
——
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated
sanple data as outlined in the table below:
Til "| 
no 1 0330
•"
t-age: 26 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
% DIFFERENCE
25-50 
j 
50-90 
'
•J' positive 
'J' positive~'!"?J;~positive
results, no action results, 'UJ' results, "R"
for non detects 
non detects' non detects
i——.—————————i__________i________
13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the
reporting of average response factors (HRF) or difference
(%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at 
/
least two values but if errors are found, check more.) 
__ 
f / i __
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
if errors are large, call lab for emanation /
resubaittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
Minimal &*'-"•« rify^s (For??.
1 ' Ai« the internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every
---uiplr and blank within the upper and lower limits 
/
:' or £i2ch continuing calibration? 
[ __ ] 
v 
__
ACTION: List all the outliers below.
Sanple I 
Internal Std 
Area 
Lower Limit 
Upper Limit
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or
lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and nan-
detects (U values) quantitated with this internal standard.
If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance
exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated nan-
detects as unusable ("R").
14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within
30 seconds of the associated calibration standard?
ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data if the retention times differ by more than
30 seconds.
TUT 
OO1 O331
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
"Page: 27 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YE 
NO 
N/A~
15.0 Field
15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for ENA analysis? 
f / i 
__ 
__
ACTION: Oorpare the reported results for field duplicates
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate
results must be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
confirmed by contacting the sampler.
,f vj> 
IUT
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 28 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
~ 
Y E S N O N/A"
PART C: PESTICIDE/PCB ANALYSES
2.2 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples? 
[__/) 
__ 
__
ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copies.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sample receipt, condition of samples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting 
/
the quality of the data? 
__ 
f /I __
ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
ACTION: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more
than 50% water, all data should be rejected.
?.i Have any PEST/PCB holding times, determined from date of 
/
I 
rr^Ve tu.-M to date of extraction, been exceeded? 
__ 
f J 1 __
Samples for PEST/PCB analysis, both sons and waters,
I
oust be extracted within seven days of the date of
collection. Extracts oust be analyzed within 40
*~ 
days of the date of extraction.
3.0 Surrogate Recovery fForm III
3.1 Are the PEST/PCB Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II)
present for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water 
__ 
__ 
__
b. Med Water 
[__J __ 
_k:
c. LOW son 
r /I _ 
_
d. Med Son 
[__] __ 
JL.
3.2 Are all the PEST/PCB samples listed on the appropriate
1 
Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following
matrices:
| 
a. Low Water 
[__] __ ^L
b. Med Water 
[__] 
__ 
_jZ
c. Low Soil 
f i/i __ 
——
4 _ 
d. Med Son 
[__] 
__ 
_!/
I 
TUT 
OO1 
Q'W::'-
OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 29 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, document
effect on data under "Conclusions" section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?
ACnOM: Circle all outliers in red.
[_/] _
3.4 Was surrogate (EEC) recovery outside of the contract 
/
specification for any sample or blank? 
J 
I __ 1
ACTJOM: No qualification is done if surrogates are diluted beyond
detection. If recovery is below contract limit (but above
zero) , flag all results for that sample "J". If recovery is
zero, flag positive results "J" and non-detects "Rn. If
recovery for the blank is zero, flag non-detects for all
associated samples "R". If recovery is above contract
limit, flag all positive results for that sample "J", unless
in the reviewers professional judgement the high recovery
is due to co-eluting interference (check the associated
blank - if recovery is high there also, flag the sample
data).
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw
data and Form II? 
_ 
I.
ACTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
| 
resutmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions'1.
4.0 Matrix Spikes (Form III)
4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form IH) 
/
present? 
[ v 1 __ 
—
4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
, 
for each of the following matrices:
I 
/
a. Low water 
[__)
; 
b. Mad Water 
[_)
c. Low soil
I 
d. Med Soil 
I_) 
__ 
±_
ACTION: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
I 
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many PEST/KB spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
I ^
* 
Water 
Soils
,-< ')?? ^/& out of 12 
L- 
out of 12
e,-p-;V7 N-/A- 
I £* 
.. 
.-,-•-'•/i
"' 
• 
- 
"•••! IT 
OOl 
O--'•-• H
OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 30 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
4.4 How many RFD's for matrix spike and matrix spiJce
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
OUt Of 6 
O OUt Of 6
ACTION: if MS and MSD both have less than zero recovery
for an analyte, negative results for that
analyte should be rejected, and positive
results should be flagged "J". The above
applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD
analysis. Use professional judgement in
applying this criterion to other samples.
5.o clanks (Form IV)
r
> - Je tN» Method Blank suimary (Form IV) present? 
[ /] 
_ 
_.
j.2 Fryqu^,~:-y of Analysis: for the analysis of Pesticide
TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been
inalyzad for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil,
medium soil), whichever is more frequent? 
t t/] __ 
_
^ 5.3 Qiromatography: review the blank raw data -
chromatograms , quant reports or data system printouts.
Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability)
for each; instrument acceptable for PEST/PCBs? 
[ /]
ACTICK: Use professional judgement to determine the
effect on the data.
6.0
NDttE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are net used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results for PEST/PCBs? When applied as described
below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks 
/
are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor. 
_ 
l_/J
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive REST/PCS
results? 
__ • [ _ ]
ACTIOJ: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet. )
TUT OOi
SIWCftRD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Page: 31 
of
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
36
NOTE: Cniy field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks
nay not be qualified because of contamination
in another blanV. Blanks may bn qv:alifi«3 for
surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC
problems.
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
YES
NO 
N/A
Sample cone > CRQLi Sample cone < CRQLT
but < 5x blank 
is < 5x blank value
Sample core > CHQLJ
4 > 5x blank value'
-v.g sanple result-
.Lh a "U"; crosr
.*«-. "B" flag
Reject sanr'e result
and report CRQL;
cross out "B" flag
No qualification
is needed
7.0
re Mir-re field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every
sample?
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank.
Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
j brat ion and QC Performance
.1 Are the following Gas Chromatograms and Data System
Printouts for both Primary and Confirmation
(confirmation standards not required if there
are no positive results above CEQL) colixtn present:
a. Evaluation Standard Mix A
b. Evaluation Standard Mix B
c. Evaluation Standard Mix C
d. Individual Standard Mix A
e. Individual Standard Mix B
f . Multi-component Pesticides Toxaphene t Chlordane
g. Aroclors 1016/1260
h. Aroclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, and 1254
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above
[_] Ji _
'3 __
:2 _
^ ~ ~
[ I/I __ 
__
f H^
TUT 
GO! O336
aanrrrrTpF 
Page: 32 
of 
36
rate: Maicn 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
7.2 Is Form VIII Pest-l present and complete for each GC
column (primary and confirmation) and each 72 hour 
/
sequence of analyses?
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
7.3 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw 
/
data and Form VIII? 
__ [j/j __
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for emanation /
resubmittal , make any necessary collections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
7.4 Has the total breakdown on quantitation or confirmation 
/
column exceeded 20% for DOT? 
__ 
[ ,./] __
- for Endrin? 
__ J /] __
-1
or if Endrin aldehyde and 4,4 '-DDD co-elute and there is a
pwk at their retention tine, has the combined DOT and Endrin 
/
breakdown exceeded 20%? 
_ _ 
f /] 
__
I
I
I
i
a. If DOT breakdown is greater than 20% on quantitation column
beginning with the saqples following the last in control standard:
1. Flag all positive DOT results "J".
2. If DOT was not detected but DDD and/or DCE are positive,
flag the DOT non-detect MR".
3. Flag positive DDD and DDE results "JN".
4. If DOT breakdown is > 20% on confirmation column and DOT
is identified on quantitation column but not on confirmation
column, use professional judgement to determine whether DOT
should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N") .
b. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on. quantitation column, beginning with
the samples following the last in control standard:
1. Flag all positive Endrin results "J".
2. If Endrin was not detected, but Endrin Aldehyde and/or Endrin
Ketone are positive, flag the Endrin non-detect "R".
3. Flag Endrin Ketone positive results "JN".
4. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on confirmation column and
Endrin is identified on quantitation column but not on
confirmation column, use professional judgement to
determine whether Endrin should be reported on Form I
(if reported, flag result "N") .
c. If the combined breakdown is used (it can only be used
if the conditions in 7.4 above are met) and is > 20% on
quantitation column beginning with the last in control
standard, take the actions specified in 7.4 a and b above.
If the combined breakdown is >20% on confirmation column
and Endrin or DOT is identified on quantitation column
but not on confirmation column, use professional judgement
to determine whether Endrin or DOT should be reported on
Form I (if reported, flag result "N") .
TUT 
O01 
0337
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 33 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO N/A~
7.5 Is the linearity check PSD of all four calibration factors 
/
<10% for the quantitation column? 
r v\ __ 
__
ACTION: If no, nag positive hits for all pesticide and PCB
analytes "J" for all associated samples. Do not flag
toxaphene or DDT if they are quantified from a 3-point
calibration curve.
7.6 Is the % difference between the EVAL A and each analysis
(quantitation and oonf irmation) DBC retention tint within
QC limits (2% for packed column, 0.3% for capillary [I.D. 
/<F"
< 0.32 mm], 1% for megabore [0.32 < I.D. < 2 an]) ? 
( __ ] 
/ 
__
ACTION: DBC retention tine cannot be evaluated if
DBC is not detected. If it is present and
has a retention tine out of QC limits, then
use professional judgement to determine the
reliability of the analysis and flag results
"R", if appropriate.
'." Was the proper analytical sequence followed for each 
/
72 hour period of analyses (page PEST D-36 in 8/87 SOW) . 
f /I 
__ 
__
ACITON: If no, use professional judgement to
determine the severity of the effect
on the data and accept or reject it
I
accordingly. Generally, the effect
is negligible unless the sequence was
grossly altered or the calibration was
also out of limits.
8.0 ppgticide/PCB Stoiry^*'n|^c Summary
8.1 Is Form IX present and complete for each GC column and
72 hr sequence of analyses?
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
8.2 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between
raw data and Form IX?
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
j 
note errors under "Conclusions".
8.3 Is DOT retention time for packed columns > 12 min 
/
(except OV-l and OV-101 columns)? 
f / 1 __ 
__
ACTION: If no, check that there is adequate resolution
between individual components. If not, flag
I 
results for compounds that interfere with each
» 
other (co-elute) "R".
8.4 Do all standard retention tijnes fall within the windows 
/
J ^ 
established for the first IND A and IND B analyses? 
[_j/J __ 
__
TUT OO1 0338
•• - ' 
(fe-7 cf
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 34 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
ACnCN: Beginning with the samples following the
last in control standard, check to roc if
the chroroatograms contain peaks within an
expanded window surrounding the
retention times, if no peaks are found and,
DBC is visible non-detects are valid. If
peaks are present and cannot be identified
through "pattern recognition" or a consistent
shift in standard retention tines, flag all
affected compound results "R".
8.5 Are the continuing calibration standard calibration
factors within 15% (for quantitation colunn) or
20% (for confirmation column) of the initial (at 
/
beginning of 72 hr sequence) calibration factors? 
f J i __ 
__
ACTION: If no, flag all associated positive results
"J". Use professional judgement to determine
whether or not to flag non-detects.
0 i * /»! iCj.de/FCB Identification
:> ' I.- Form X conplete for every sarple in which a 
,
pestj/v-te or PCS was detected? 
r 71 __ 
__
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
_ 9.2 Are there any transcription errors between raw 
/
data and Form X? 
__ 
f \, 1 __
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
9.3 Are retention times of sample compounds within the
calculated retention tine windows for both quantitation 
/
and confirmation analyses?
Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required (when 
/
compound concentration is > 10 ug/tal in final extract)? 
(__J __ 
_v/_
ACTION: Reject ("R") all positive results (meeting
quantitation column criteria, but missing
confirmation by a second column or GC/MS (if
appropriate). Also, reject ("R") all positive
results not meeting retention tine window
criteria unless associated standard compounds
are similarly biased (i.e. base on RRT to DBC).
9.4 Check chronatograms for false negatives, especially for
the multiple peak components toxaphene and PCB's. Were 
/
there any false negatives? 
__ [_j_3 ——
ACTION: If appropriate PCS standards were not analyzed,
or if the lab performed no confirmation analysis,
flag the appropriate data with an "RH.
TUT 001
0339
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 35 
of 
36
* 
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
* 
Y E S N O N/A~
'0.0 CoTTPOUnd Ouantitatlon and Exported Detection Limits
|
"~ 
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Fora I results? Check at least two positive values. 
/
Were any errors found? 
__ 
f i/1 __
1 
NOTE: Siiiple peak pesticide results can be checked for
rough agreement between quantitative results
obtained on the two GC columns. The reviewer
I 
should use professional judgement to decide
whether a such larger concentration obtained
on one column versus the other indicates the
I
presence of an interfering compound. If an
interfering compound is indicated, the lower
of the two values should be reported and
(
qualified as presumptively present at an
estimated quantity ("JN"). This necessitates
a determination of an estimated concentration
on the confirmation column. The narrative
I 
should indicate that the presence of interferences
' 
has obscured the attenpt at a second column
confirmation.
I
I
10..: Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions 
/
and, for soils, sanple moisture? 
/ [__]
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
ACTION: When a sanple is analyzed at acre than one
dilution, the lowest CRQIs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sanple analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the "E" value on the original Form I and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sanple. Specify which Form I is to be used,
I
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
I II.0 ChromatooTam
11.1 Were baselines stable? 
r /I 
__ 
——
» 
11.2 Were any electropositive displacement (negative 
/
peaks) or unusual peaks seen? 
__ • C_l_] __
I 
11.3 Were early eluting peaks (for early eluting 
/
analytes) resolved to baseline?
i ^_ 
ACTION: For 11.1 and 11.2, comment only. For 11.3,
reject ("R") those analytes that are not
sufficiently resolved.
TUT 001 0340
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE. 
. Page: 36 of 
36
Date: March 1989 -
Revision 6
YB3 
NO~~ 
N/A
2.0 Field Duplicate?
12.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for VEST/KB 
/
analysis?
. 
ACTION: Ocnpare the reported results for field duplicates
l 
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate
I 
results oust be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
I 
confirmed by contacting the saapler.
I
I
I
I _
I
I
I
I
I
•
| 
TUl" 001 034
\C\c <£ O3-
ORGANICS
LABORATORY RESPONSE TO RESULTS OF CCS
J v \ ' j _
SAMPLE
P t
J5AJA
1/cVl
Vc/\
H
li
6
v \
v i
COMMENTS
OO c)
/
-I.
^f
\Ci\
\c\ 1 o
TU
I
; VT 
. V - ( :
> 
t r
||
^ ^
I ..'-:•
"4^
..;(,
'.-VyV;--;/^
• •*•'.* " -'n-.*^
--
: 
i J* .'.- '< - '••". ,
i if.~T «•><'_'»'i i'Mi'ilfri.'» . ^•J'jXTiTl'itV
••» :
•: - -T'-vV:/'£?"
r •• • ^
*•
>_,•
oUMMARY FORM
Type of Review;_
Project:
(No. of Crmponnds/No. of Fractions (Samples)
____________ 
Date; ' V/^3 /f" ^
CUse
Lab Name: 
( ( i ,li t r,
Initials:
fie.
Number of Samples:
Analytes Rejected Due to Exceeding Review Criteria;
Acids (15)
B/N (50)
3V
TOA (3&)
PEST (20)
PCS (7)
TCDO (1)
Surrogates
0
V ^
^^——
Holding Time
O
\
L__
Calibration
0
1J
-/
(0
[ i
~^ —
Cbn tarn i nation
C>
I
la
o
— — _
ID
o
to
7
^^—
Other
x? (Mfj
*:jX
/
c>
V
-^__
Total N Samples
AS
l£
£1^
iS
— — - —— _
Total i Rejected/
Total # in all Samples
<3 A? -7J-
V //2ZQ
/(* _/_±u<-/
26 /£?>d
7 / }7&
— - — _. __ 
_ _
Analytes Estimated Due to Exceeding Review Criteria for;
Acids (15)
o
O
n
0
7<T 
'
B/N (50)
7(73)
AC
VGA C3a)
fc H
" c:
PEST (20)
o
o
ir
OCR
TOTO (1)
| .£
Ji
\>CLSed o»v
G?C
Lrt (suck
CEIMIC
CORPORATION
DATE: 
H-n fllU_____ 
FAX|
TO: 
£PA -
(COMPANY NAME)
ATTN: 
'
(NAME)
l^\
FROM: ___ * 1J/1
»
NUMBER OF PAGES 
*^ 
(INCLUDING COVERSHEET)
RE: _________________
COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS:
V *..-'u.«»> - i'^ V°A
BX 2^-7 
.S p^ct>-?v 
wiisipg -fW
j 
BY 2^ 
u
I
H 
<i
r/>« f
<A 
c
Drtn Knauss Drive, Narragansctt. R.I. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 7
of 
' 
TUT 
ooi 
°345
In Reference to Case No(s):
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Telephone Record Log
Date of Call: 
'//'? 17 O_____________
Laboratory Name: 
C_,f- //*/? /
Lab Contact: 
_
Region: 
______
Regional Contact: 
/-«? .
Call Initiated By: __ 
Laboratory 
* Region
In reference to data for the following sample number(s):
VoA
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
Q 
(%Guhs 
LULL 
X 0
'
^~
Summary of Resolution:
____4£t, T^-
. 
Signature 
Date
I ^
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
I
|UT
CEIMIC
CORPORATION
/
DATE:
TO:
ATTN:
FROM:
729/70
FAX* 
I-2I-2-267-3QS7
JL
(COMPANY NAME)
(NAME)
NUMBER CF PAGES
RE;
(INCLUDING COVERSHEET)
COMMENTS/INSTRUCTIONS:
100 Dean Knauss Drive, Narragansett, R.[. 02882 • (401) 782-8900 • FAX (401) 782-8905
<-V V.3% 
ryi 
001 
0347
In Reference to Case No(s):
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Telephone Record Log
Date of Call:
/
A
Laboratory Name: 
£ ^ ///? /
Lab Contact: 
_
Region: 
_
Regional Contact: _
(¥o l)
Call Initiated By: __ 
Laboratory 
* Region
In reference to data for the following sample numbeKs):
J" 2X-?
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
^A^j^/f,
—— ' / 
0
try 
36G
ft /.,
Summary of Resolution:
Signature
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
/_ ^ 9-
T 
001 
0348
TUT
In Reference to Case No(s):
/ £ (-' 5 j
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Date of Call:
Laboratory Name:
Lab Contact:
Region:
Regional Contact:
Telephone Record Log
i /i1? J c) o
(/-,<<
Call Initiated By: 
__ 
Laboratory 
-^ Region
In reierence to data for the following sample numbeHs):
w11
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
£' £^i 
Lite 
X
Summary of Resolution:
fJ "
Signature
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
i^g <$
-9/17/V cs
Date
nn 
001 0349
*-* _ _ .L. ._ _. ._ J- _
i_._..,t.t a.Cl. J
Case MD.r 1205B
M -I 
r
IvO . ;
— CM , I (J i tr
Ls\'ci i
''. !"iGlE'
Co:. u..T,n
5 . 0 
Cg/mL) G_
Lab Sample 1C: 370107-01
Lab File ID: 
C0354
cure-, ret dec .
S
•'f:ac!.:/csp>) PACK
Date Received: 0.5/08/35,
Date Analyzed: 0671^/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
COMCENTPAT ICN UNITS:
(ug/'L or ug/Kg) US/KG
. 7 • > _ • : • - _ . T-__ ____ . __ _r L.. i r .rn 
£,._ .. _„
' 
/'•! — r_7 — '-. — — — — — — — — — Eii"GftiGiTi& thane
; 
. ? -'.>l-4 — ----- ——— Vir.vl Chloride
: ~r-'I >-7-- — -- —— -ri-.ioroe uhane
1 71-C'"-2-- — — ——— Methylene CMorice
: 
67-- :--i-l ——— - — • —— Acetone
! 7U-.J-0 —— ————— Carbon Di~ulfide
; 75 -,; ~. .-.;---•-• — ——— i , i-DjLc;-ilor set hen e
! 
/5-7^--,::.— ----- - —— ' ,l~D:.ehlcroethanc
; 
540- :-;"._o--— ----- —— 1,2-Dichloroethsne (total)
; (f-y-i !.,--...-._•_- — — -CMcrcf crirj
; i I-7-;: •:.:-"'• — »•-•-• —— i .2-E'ichlorGethane
: 
~" ~ -'. "• -6------------1 , 1 . i -Trie: hi eras thane
: ^c.--::7-:— - ——— ----- Cartcrn Titrr.cM'cr ide
: 
-.: S- ' r: - " - • - - - - - - -----,':.r;\ I Acetate
, ^ - .: 
- -,--- —— •----••E:-c-r.c-dic;-ilc;r.i>iT;~ t!-.ar.£?
I ::G-(i7-7 •-• ———— ----. i H2 -DichlorGpropar.e
lOOii-C J -=•-- — --L-is:-J. „ 7-Dich ] crcpropenc:.
! T-'.-'M-c;.------- — — -r- chlcroethene
! 124-^ B-l ——————— Di troriOC h 1 crcme thane-
; 
7'-' •-.:•:.--=• ------ — -i,i,^-Tric!-.;orc3eth£.ne
; ~! - -7-2-- — ——— -Benzene
; 
.!.•:•:>.. 1-0 2 --6 — - — -Trans-i , 3-Diihloroprcpene ___
! 
7r ,— 2T — 2 — — — — — BromcfGr.Ti
! '.'I'S-l >-l- •• — -- —— -4-Methy 1-2-Pe-n tananc-
! 
5 ••/•!- /S-<£: — — ——— 2-Hexe-.r.one
, 127- 1 3-4-- ——— •— --T-trac-lar-ethene
! 79-7-1--=.- ——————— 1 , 1,2,2-Tetrachlcroethr-ne ____
, 
iO-- :-7--_.---- 
- •-' -T-jiUtrnt:
: 103-~ ;- - 7 - - - - - - - -- —— Chl crcte r-izene
1 1 1 : -;i-^ -•-•- —— ----Ethvl benzene
: i :••:•- -•;:;- = .-—-- —— stvrene
; 
:77 ;-_:>- 7- ---- — -----7jtal X \ l f - n e s
11
.J- O-
•1 
••
1 I
c *=
v^ f )
c
e;
c
11
er.
c-
c:
5
e;
c:
4 
4
5
rr
-J
i i
B ' •
U
U
t_r
U
U
U
U
U
L) '
U
U
U
U
1 1
U
1 1
U
U
U
U
U
L)
U
178
1/S7 Rev,
TUT O01 0350
BT74S
Contract: 6SD90028
L_c- ~
V 
1 li::: •_ i" 1
| i_i:VtI
V. Mc.ii
* CclUiTif
1
1
(
U
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
I ^
•
: _. .. 
r- • — T
. 
.; L. • 
*... ! *. j.
:: f s - - I
5 U t / V D l
: 
( I c
2-cura: r
1-1- 
C:-.£P N'-.; i---.fP 
' 
=^q r-,.: 
T-F N- • F — 47
/;-.'c.-ter; SOIL 
Lib 
Sample 1C: 
S90107-'"»2
i 
5.0 
(-;/A;L) G 
Lat File ID: 
C0355
.•j/nca) 
LOW 
Date Received: 
06/OG/S9
ot dec:. 
9 
Date Analvzed: 
06/15/G9
"i : 
i pack/cap ; 
PACK 
Dilution Factor: 1.0
.—• r r-* 
K • r
'-j l-i O 
i -1 L.
74-83-
75-0°-
7
IT 
4 r_:
67-66-
71 ••-•:. T-
-i. - . j " •
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
COMPOUND 
(L'.g/L cr 
ug/Kg) 
LJG/I-G 
G
-:_. __ ______ -C I"-] cr-:--£;th = r,i=
•::...___.. —— . _ .. 5 r 0 ffl 0 ,, K_, a- ... -; n _
•'. -.... -. ————— .', jir. v/ ] Ch ! or lde
">- — •- — -- — -- Chl oroe thsne
2- — — ——— Methyisne Chloride
^ ....._ ———— — Acetone
- • •- — 
U a t D O i I 
LJ -. 5 U a. i 1 0 e
4- — - ———— i , 1-Dichloroethsne
-_ —— — — _j ^ l-Dichlcrccthane
-0-- — - ———— .1 , 2-Dichlcro£thene ; total }
3- — - ———— Chlorof ore,
_ -^ _ ._ _ _ _ _ . . _ \ 
l~\ r\ .: — i.. i ... 
_ 
;_ i. _ 
_
.1 , ^_ .'-' .^ l_ i i j. __: 1 _' C. TI i . *r\ n cr
-••... .- — —— --2- B.; t£. none
,/.........._ — .. — ... i ^ <_ ^ i-.-r- -[-,] -.rni=i-h,--ne
i- ..... .._. ... __._._ 'c.. r 'Den 
Te t ra c t~. i orid^
.:. _. ...... . ——— -V i n y i 
•"-;,: e t.=-. ts
— rr 
-•' — r 
- 
£. 
_. _ 
,; _• _ j__ -. ___ ___„.-.. |_ _ ^. ,_.
— T f—. 
/n— *
/ o "~ w . —
79-01-
—T rr .___'—. rr _
10S-10
JL .*_ / """ JL LJ
79-34-
10G-9T.
100-4.
1C 0-4 2
*:.•--••- — - — -1 . 2 -Die hi ore pro pane
" 1 5 - - - - - —— ciE-1 , 3-Dichlcropropene
o 
• - •- 
Trichloroethsne
.._! .. _. ————— Dibro.T.-'ChloroiTiethane
1^- ----- 
— ---.i. ,!.-_' i r;.ch I. j roe than r-
2 .-- — ---.. — }:' c- .. r ^ o- r, e
02 6-- — - — -Trans-1 , 3-Dichloroprcpc-ne
2-— -- ——— - — E romo f o r m
_-i_ _...-._.._. — 4-Methyl-2-Per,t£nanrr
_.^._. — — . —— 2-r-:e.-;£,nc-£?
_ 4 . ————— . —— - .... T e '- j.- -, _ j- ^ _ r _ e a. j_, e j_ e
5-- —————— 1 ,1,2, 2-TE trachloroethancr
-.3... _— .— „ -Jcli.. .^nc
.. 7- _._....... —— Cnl orobujn zene
_. .5 .........__. —— E t h y 1 b CT n n: e n e
-;-.—— ———— Styrtne
•:- -7 —— — - -Total X ,-lenes
4 
4
^ _L
•* 
^
11
67
11
=,
5
5
5
•i 
-4
J. JL
cr
-^ JL
5
C
5
ir
w'
cr
rr^
11
11
5
cr.
ifte
; i
U
U
• ii.j
r;
u
L'
u
lj
L!
1 '
1 I
>_•
i •
»..'
u
u -
U
L!
U
U
; t
L!
U
u
u
u
;j
u
u
u
L1
m
FORK I VGA
TUT O01 O351
r 
K>
> 
< 
6 
o 
o-
t 
l 
CO 
CO
c 
h- 
r- 
x
f 
CU 0 
-0 
CO ii-;
(•- 
«• 
o 
K> 
x 
x
P 
• 
Cr- o 
-0 
o
a 
ca 
LJ 
•_•• o
.-' 
~
[IJ
rs 
p 
n 
-o
UJ 
n 
•• 
ill 
iU
P 
> 
N
11! 
i-i 
-,H 
•>.
Cli 
• < 
01 
-i
C J 
11- 
ill 
i J 
113
O 
l~ 
rl 
_I]J j.
cr- 
in 
LL
P 
0) 
QJ
co 
n 
a 
4-t 
.p
H- 
-IJ 
ili 
iTi 
i5 
ij
U 
J 
.J 
P 
|?J
1:1
-r 
4-'
co 
u 
a
'i 
i--
vl 
X.
i- 
+-' 
en
' r 
c 
-rr
t- 
a 
CD
CJ
Cil
1- .
LU 
r
rj
;- 
co
_ J 
L 'i 
X- '..
<C 
C 
.J
'- 
C'i 
t
-'£ 
»••!
U1
Cfi 
-• 
--•
LJ
M 
o
"* 
T'" 
•'"*(
"i 
"' 
.J 
"• 
q-
i. "' 
ij 
t~< u".! 
j£ 
T-I
Ul 
CJ 
D
C! 
113 
CO 
.J
a. 
cj
L' 
L-
-J 
CJ 
L 
— 
ij
^ 
f_! 
Ul 
TJ 
PJ
r - 
4 -! 
IjJ 
TJ
<.: 
LJ 
LJ 
* 
e
_J 
•— ' 
>-' 
3 
x 
-p
u 
i- 
r 
--. 
•• 
2 
n
: - 
f-i 
r i 
r-H 
rH 
G 
^
I'j 
I'J 
•••! 0 
•-*
i. '! 
L.) 
i; 
>
U 
x 
01
•j 
L_
il 
UJ • 
^ 
~i
i:- 
C 
•" 
-P
J;! 
:'J 
•' 
0 
•• 
iji
x- 
a 
tii 
u
a 
j; 
4-. t 
> 
n
\ 
. ; 
'M 
r; 
ai
/ 
. 
i: 
en .j 
;;
'C
^.(
~".
•.H
i
a 
« ii
4J 
CO x
U 
h- CM
>TJ 
i—. "j
LL 
J!!:j ~
C 
0'
o 
z it
4J 
n IJI
-J 
H -J
•^ 
<L
••H 
ct: L.
P 
1- 0
T'
01 -J
LJ -«.
Z ai
a 3
u ~
p
"Z.
~~\a
CLj-
ii 
CJ
u 
u
CL
L-
*-*a
•su
V.
^. 
'
u 
o
fS 
Z
CL
CO
•;£
U
*•
C
."i
r-1
O
l_)
I
,-vj'J t'J CJ CJ KI ~i3 -.0 O <i -0 0 --a rj -0 ~.i CJ •:; 0 -j -0 
C, -O -rs -r; vO C'-J CJ -J <i -0 -4j •-? -0 -0
j, i r~\ T-, T-I -0 
<i 
• ! 
• 
-H -H
•
f
,-i 
i.ti 
CJ
4-1 
III 
!H 
i1!
o 
c 
a 
j:
4-' 
til 
U 
IU 
0 
4-1
— 
c iu 
u 
a. 
oi t: 
L. 
m 
QJ
us 1:3 
i: & o 
i: 'u 
CL 
t: 
o
01 
Oi 01 Ol 
111 
SI .-\ 
j C L 
:lj £. 
0 
O 
L
-j 
c i; c 
c 
4J L 
j: iri a 
j; -P 
L 
t: 
Oi o
H 
Oi ui rj oi 
>s 
ti rj 
-<j a. u 
4-" ii! 
o 
1-5 
c •->
t- 
-Dxrjijj 
j_ 
tjr-< 
u n i, ai QJ Q 
-• 
4-" aix:
111 
0 
-H 4J .4-" 4J 
4-' 
L XT 
i : L ij C K L. 
Jl 
C 
J^ 1 i
iy 
TJ 
--H 
'i- o 01 oi 
0! 
o ij u rj a .- < ii! o o 
u 
oi 
±> a 
oi 
ui
c 0! -H iu j: 
~t o a o 
o 
•-< ID -u L. 'u x: JT v. -< 
•••< 
LL 
in L 
c oi 
oi
ij C L C U 
n '- L l- 
L 
I. 
L. .:• ;J L IJ 4J ;J JI 
P 
! 
0 4-J 
IjJ C 
C
J- Ti C M 
ij 
U 0 0 C 0 111 UP 
P .< U -H 0! r-i U 
1 
CJ PJ ^ ill 
N IU 
ili
ij J^ rH J- Hi 
;-\ r-t r+ •-» L r^ |" -1 li.i i!j jl --1 P D J. 'H 
K! £ ! 
U 0 \- 
\~ H 
r->
IJ 4-' j^ P t 
P i: .J.: i: fj JI :j 1- i - U !J -T- ! L ij L 
'• L -i IJ f< 
!U C 
>-
e ai cj ci oi oi 
u u u i- u r v- 
<i •< u r-j o a i-- o •• i o > c: J- o uj jj m iu x
a K 
o -< r: c -H -H --i Q -H m i c 
u --i ' - - - 1 ^ 1 c ' v x: 10 u » c a 11 u
L 
n rH L. >. U 0 P P P 
L P 4-J r-H Q -H ij P -rH JT J] f J 111 l/l 0 •>•' X 'C CJ U ^- •"• 01 -1
o t; :>. n j: 4-1 xi 
i I o i d •• n >• f= 
i u L •• N r. £ 01 oi L » ;j a > L is
rt ri c --i -i-1 in L H -.-{ rj .-H cj nj *H L c u CJ ui -H n *-t r. <:< u i: :c 4J ,-< r-i r< j: >. i.>
J_ L -H JI 
111 U iU 
'• r. ». x: 
'• 1 
*• i-j ••-! L 
' -H L -H 
•• ijj L. i. 
i 
i 
<•! •• O XI 4-> ^J f j
u a"! > cj r: <i rj TH TH ,-i rj -4 ri T! u :> PJ -H L i- p --i ai K m ^r cj i~ -i H cj UJ a. H-
i i i i i 
i 
i i i i i i 
; i 
i 
i 
t i l l 
i i i i :
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
! 
i 
1 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
! 
1 
1
1 
1 
i 
! 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
i 
! 
1 
1 
1 
1 
i 
i 
I 
1 
' 
I 
1
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
I 
1 
II 
1 
I 
I
I
I
! 
i 
i 
1 
i 
1
1 
1 1 1 1 
1 
1 1 I 
1 ! 
1 
! 
i 
i 
i 
I I I ! 
1 1 1 1 i
1 
i 
i 
! 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
! 
1 
i 
i 
1 
1 
I 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1
I 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
I
I
I
!
!
! 
! 
1 
UJ 
1 
-JJ 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
I 
!
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
I 
> 
1 
t 
! 
I 
1 
1 
! 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
I 
1 t •
1 
1 i 
1 
I 
! 
1 O 
i C J I 
1 
•:* i 
T- 
,-n i 
Cl I --* O «r 
K1 r- <t Ui 
!
r i a- T KI c-j *H o "-t ••"< i n i KI -a uj i «.,- ui ••••> -n 
u; M •..;• rj ii 
uj i i ' i -.:•
i 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 O 
1 O 
! 
1 
1 in 
; 
i 
l CO i 
1 
1 O CO C3 
I'D O • i C-J U
f- K' -H O C- «* a'l u; <.f UJ -Jj O KI u:i t-i • ,- t-- T-- -H ••* *t O KI "4 u"'. -'. r- '- T en Cr- ^ 
•-.- !
en 'o .... •:.• o •# TH KI --. i a i :,- UMN : u v. -o o i o vi --o c-j ! i i K> i i i i •:•.•
i i i 1 i 
i 
i o i r- i i 
uj i 
o 
<r ; 
•'• i co »H r^ i c. c:' o c> t •'••
ff cf u -, L:I in |x u^ ui u~i <1- |-x o OJ 'H U •:.' a'> CO O G- CJ 0- TH ..... tj o Ci- CJ u- O O O O -"i
I ^ 
- . [V 
-. fN. <l TV |-> (x. L'"J -0 ^H r% f-. |ij 
.• J fv f. TI f-. r-\ ?•* f- 
--I f--. -rH Uj 'H T- '4 
.-I ^4 »H i-l
) 
j
0
s ^
LE rTSANICS ANALYSIS T\'-,TA SI-'EET
Contract; ASD9002^
Lab Code: CrTMIC
C&r-e Mo.: 12058 
SAS No.:
^ 
K*l _. 1- ... 4 . , r 
/,— .., J I .' . . _ _L __ ... \ 
r^ *-l T I
| I ivu-. tr j. X : v i" C - 1 / w ei L. E f ) "• ...' 1 L
S-arTi,-_'l t? i-.it/vcl;. 
5 . 0
I Level:
(low/(Tied) LDW
:; Moisture: net dec. __16
Cclj.rr.n: 
(pack-/cap) PACK
CAS r.;C.
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID:
G___ 
Lab File ID:
Date nieceiveds
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Facto
CONCENJRATICN UNITS:
(u g / L o r u a /K g ) L'G/K
ERA SAMPLE NC
BX262
Me.; ST747
39O1Q7-04
• C0357______
06/OG/S9
•'•6/15/S9
r: 1. 0_____
hane
—r r- 
f~ •* 
T 
i i j _ . . n 
r~- L. i _. ._ J «J ^^
. w-"• '•- - — < — —"• — — — — ——.- j. i i y j. u i : J. LJf J. ue
75-0-3-3 —— — -———Cnl oroe thane
'5-09-2 — -—————Methylene Chloride,
' —' / /i 
<
o / — ft 4—1-
retone
5-15-0————————Car ben Disulf ide.
75 -35-4 —— ————— 1,1-Dichloroethene,_______
75-34-3— —————— 1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total ).
67-66-3--———————Chloroform________ 
________
07-06-2———————1,2-Dichlorcethane.
8-93-7-- --————2-Butancne
71-55--6—-——-——i , 1, l-Trichloroethane_
56-2""-^- ———-——Carbcn Tetrach] cride_
' ''""-''.
 r~ - 4—— — — ———— Vinyl Acetate__________
75-2.'-- -—- —— — 9rcr,-.cdichlc;rcf7,sthar-,e.
73-S7-5-------- —— l ., 2-Dichlc!rapropane_
10061- 01- 5 — -——cis- 1 , 3—Dichloropf
79-01-6----————Triehioroethene_
ll'-l-'-'U-v-l — ————DibroiT:ochloromethane__
•--.•..../-..-..'-__.——......—— ^ __ ji ? 2-Trichloroethsne.
71 "•-.'••-2-——-———Benzene . 
___
.0-I'il•1-02-6-—---Trans-1 . 3-Dichloropropene_
r5-25--2--——————Bromororm________ __ _______
103-10-1-—-———4-Ketny1-2-Pentanone
591-73-fc-—————2-Hex
127-12-4————---—Tetrachloroethene________
79-34-5-———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachlorc-e-thane.
108-SE-3-———————Toluene _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____
103-90-7-———————Chlorobenzene.
100-^1-4—————Ethyl benzene J
J-'.-'.
-Styrene_
1 c.30-20-/--————Total X y lenes
6-
fa
A
12
6
6
6
t
6
Q
LJ
!J
B
B
Uu
U
{J
u
u
6 
U
6 
'J
6 
U
6 
L)
6 
U
6 
U
U
LJ
uu
[_1
u
u
u
u
u
FORK I VGA
198
001 035:3
CPA '9Ar--!PLF MO.
• i...».;_ 
••_... . >. v i~>:'•; i '. 
:^ 
I-,i .!• it—
V —— * |— 
• —, -I I f - . • • 
T —. ——T i-i- T |— T i
' £-'•< • *- i J T*r_L. i 
_• i L-.c-i i j r• a i
I Level:
"/: r.oisU;
I 
C CD lu,••.-,;-,
r~- -. ,.. j. ._. _ ._ 4. . 
.• r- t*\ r-i ,-,,•%'-i
i_ s_-! . '.. i CT ' - t. . 
r •_; i_- •: i. '.' J.
( j ^vv/iTieiu ) 
LCw___
:•: n c t d 03 c . 
':, 6
P3.ck/or,p; 
FACi"!
Lab Garnplc; ID: G°O107-04
_^b File ID: 
C03^7
E^.te Rscsiv&d: 06/09/89
Date Analyred: 06/1^/89
-i1at ion Fac tcr: i.0____
r-- n» i r~ r* K i n-1-. .--. T- T r~i K i 
i 11.1 T ~r r~ ,
uUi-ii-.Ln i r P- i IL-'I-.' uiii i s .
•'u.q/L. c:;- uq/Kc) U3/K£
r^ r"- n i-. i—. ( i u i T-- 
» ; ,-» KX r—
^L.'i if 
LJW/.H*.' 
. i"-,i iJl
TUT
001 
0354
I VGA-TIC
H 
_
L 
'i
0 
a
C- 
"^
.*- 
-.-
- X
C
'I-N
1 * 
.-
-C 
ri
u* 
V
*)
_!
C
H
O0
i— *•
o
rjl
cn
( '
f* ! ' t * !• -» K-» ---4 !-• >.n
v-4 O •.:• O O --0 M -0
n-l o ••:;• c:! co i -4 ^-*
••:• i i i i I.--J i i
1 •(-• .ft- -0 OJ 4i t- -4
f .: M )-' O .'0 ! ITj f.'(l
•:•• l 
i 
i 
t '.n i 
i
! in .ii -,| , ,j ! j» rj-
• 4 1 
I 
i 
;
II 
! !
1 
1 
1
1 
1 
1
1 
I 
1
1 
1 
1
! 
1 
!
I 
1 
1
H ui m n H t-* -i M
n rt ,-t rr o * ru I
rt x; -_T i--1 <-> <-•• ft I
?i T < ci f,: •' 
-, ni
»— rn >»' T R t J ?i -
n cr o ri * n f.i
r-': fij m tr m t-j :r n
x- 
rj i? 
l t- D
•- 
N n 
H o " 1
m 
in i-j 
m - m
u 
r: ITI 
rt n
fD 
IT) 3 
1 ID
in 
2 
!' rt
n rr
rr ro
0 iti
i 
-1
0
1!rtrr
"1n
rti
!•-••
C- cr cr- Cr- &- r> o- ^
c t c c L: c c; cr
I-* '-4 !•-
•::• <.n o
O 1 0
i ro cr-
K« rjl i-»
0 
1 1
1 f-.l 0-
M ! i J
! 
1
1 
rr-
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
l> 01 --I
1 T T
:r o pi
ITJ 3 n
rt 0 in
rr -t. i
x' 0 t---
K-. T -.
1 3 i»
t-.l 
I
1 
U
TJ 
H-
in 
n
?• 
rr
ri- 
"--•
D! 
0
n 
T
Cl 
0
n 
n
itl 
-0
D
ro
D
ft!
.
*•*
>••• c- o-
c c: c
-1 -4
^ -0
1 
1
b C'
1 0
1 
1
J ' ni
i
3 H-
•J •••
n i*
j •«
n r-J
i i
Tl • !
T
H-nrr
>-•uT
1.!
r.]ii:.t
PIjn
> i>
.. c
M xj t-» -.4 - j l ' r n
rO -0 O CO rn .-; r-,
^ i •.:• i 
: n l
l o cr tn !J l t.i
J-, ,_L w* -.j v| ,;, ,;.j
CO 
1 
1 
1 
1 '.-I 
!
1 i> o .-n •'- ' i..n
i • 
^ 
i -.-. l
l 
l i i
ri 
1 ' 
i
1 
I I I
1 
i i I
1 
I I I
1 
I I I
1 
1 
1 
1 
!
1 
1 
! 
1 
!
m H n ^ r.ri -.•: n
t-
1- T H- * 
^ I-- !'"
rr H- in rj r.i n T
T n l i 3 •< r:r
n rr r-» t.3 n i-- :.i
^ j-j -^ H- Q. 
II
o Q u n »•• ~t>
n T i :r n n -i
rr u rj •- :/ in m
»-•• ITi !-'• 0 i--1 rt rf-
Ci r»- n "i f PI i
1 rr rr o - rt- r'
o m •-• T] n i;- n
n r.1 o T -.3 
:r
rj n i n ri >-
rt 
O -D ri- 
fi
rr 
TJ r.' rr 
~
pj 
T n :;.' !-••
n 
n ro n 
a
ro 
t
1 
MI 
ra
ron
(Ti
h
cr- c- r> i> rr- :- c
c c c: c u t: ':
;
I
•-.4 -i H- Cr r.n -j -..| -j i> vj j . | | • j
K' GJ O ••-! -?» rjl r.i r.n -.4 rn rn ..1 4i -^
! 
1 - 4 1 
O 
! 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
!
<n -n i cr- i U <.•( i- r> O o o co nj
rn i.-'l O l> tn -•» U1 rjl 4j --0 o H r.| • .J
i ' o- I -n I i i i I i i i i
r '••! i i..-J i i,-) -tJ o i--1 M i i -^ -n '.--I
1 
t.l 
O 
1 ! 
1 1
1 
! 
1 
1 
1
1 
I I I
1 
I I I
1 
I I I
1 
1 1 1
1 
I I I
1 
I I I
! 
I I !
K- 1 1 t- n t- >-» *-* n j,< ii n ••: m n
i •* rr •' •• •' PI n o T H- i • r
Hx I'.' tJ *-• U ^ (-- T (Tl rt •"• n U •-••
- 
<~ i a ! 1 ! cr rt rr n x: =1 o
H rh tl -i U U U O 0 •<• 1 -- 0 1
i HI p- n H- >'• H- n n •"• o 
ri n
H n n ••*. n n n 
m ft rn n p< -i
i Q rr rj rr rr rr u 
n ,-i rr rt rg
(••• J t-J "1 t~- »-J i--1 !-'• 
ID -r H-. -f 
rt
ri m o D a n a in 
pi u a> IT
rr 
~ 
-; - -i r: 
o n T :.-• />
I-- 
p 
no ii >- 
rr m i-j ro n
o 
ro 
m 11 ra -!. i--' 
a 
"i
1 
rt 
rt ri ,t '" 
0 
fli
ri 
rr 
rr rr rr ct 
T
ru 
!!• 
rri EI rn rn 
>
j-
•••!• r! 
n n n 
a
~T 
in 
IT; f[! m 
n
'Tin
III 
rt
0it
n-
K-»
*-,•
!
i
'-' 
h* 
1 * • •> i - ! '
ij- t-1 0- cr o rr- i> i> j.» -i >• !l i-- :-x
c: c n: >_ c: c: c: c c 
c: :; c •::
u 
.• 
r 
in 
;< 
. 
(
c; 
rn 
-y 
f. 
•;. 
i
7C 
< 
-i 
rr 
rr
c 
o 
!ji 
TI 
-'.
"\ 
\>- 
^-• 
i— 
H 
:'!
n 
10 
" 
IT! 
;.; 
r;
ft 
" 
L'L
ri 
tr: 
.? 
rti
l> 
-n 
,-.-
rn 
- - 
in 
-•-.. -.;
T] 
••- 
.- 
-.; 
u
r' 
PI 
•- 
c1 
!-•• n
r i 
n 
:i 
r< 
> - 
K- 
» i
7- 
ci 
5; 
-• 
--, 
:•:
n- 
--. 
r 
' -i
n 
:i 
si 
: )
•-.I 
a. 
m 
,t
n 
(ii 
a 
r-i
^-- 
n 
^.- 
-j
t 
-..^
n
•n 
r 
in 
'!
J> 
o 
c) 
in
n 
n 
'-•• £ 
m 
1-1 HI
ci 
:-- n 
- 
r
-.i. 
o 
-T
Tl 
r:
0c:;;. 
mi •
rj
D 
M
r
-n
rn
ro 
!
( , ;
T)
— n 
vt
c_- n
ID ;r 
;•:
x n 
fi
r n 
:.
n H 
tn 
r i 
i i 
\" 
r
-", TJ 
H. 
r/ 
ii, 
i, 
ij.
I> 
>-• 
ii- 
rt 
IT 
cr
C H 
f 
0 
IB
ID >~« ,t 
"i 
tn
x n 
h'- 
"•> 
-n 
'•• 
r-i
~ Z 
O 
-1 
iTi 
•-' 
?.l
:-n 
r* 
f 
n 
ri 
-M
--- c 
rr i 
» •
;; 
TI 
-. |... 
• < 
fi
»-- n 
HI 
: i 
...- ; i
rrj H 
ri 
n 
iy: 
-• 
n 
i
• , ID 
rt 
^ 
LL 
r..l 
: 1
-r .. 
n 
" 
•• 
-• 
(0
!j'J
• «
:'-;, 
,;-, 
n 
-.j 
IJ
i-- 
r>- 
;•> 
o 
0
X 
•-,. \{ 
^
rr- 
r:j 
, J 
• •• 
v!
-i 
H
n 
co 
m 
i 
-i
-0 
-o 
•::•
,-.T 
-I
•
r
^
I';
fri
:'ln
'- 1
~ 
>".<
» 4 
i ——
1 )
_ |
! 1 
--',
o 
r
,1 
1 1
TJ
t
•J
; 'i
T>
- r
£ -
M
l.'i
T>
• 
T
;;=i
u'in
;:'!
n
1.1 
i i
"' 
H
~ - 
~>
-; 'i
n 
• '
r :"
i.)
i 1
r- 
i
ci
: 1
-0
-,n
:'l
. . 
..
. j
L ,
r,;
'" 
1
7.
ra
i-
-- •
i
n
Hi
3
11n
rt
r.i
Q
in
p;
•n
5'
~*j
f.i
rr
Cla
— ii1
II
;;3
V
H-nrr
:a
3
-.-;
i—t
'u
"•"•I
l-.:.
HI
H'l
1
(
(
H' (JI M UJ t'3 tO
-0 OI -0 0 O O
r-1 
1 '. J ! 
X| IJI
i -i i i,-i i i
?-3 o •: i t ) ::• -43
4> 
i 
-M i 
CO -43
1 
.-i 
1 03 
i 
1
rO 1 r.n 1 0 tO
1 
! 
i 
1 
1
1 
! 
i 
1 
1
! 
i 
i 
1 1
1 
i 
1 
1 
1
1 
1 
1 
i 
1
! 
1 1 i 
1
1 
1 
1 
1 
1
I 
i 
! 
1 1
W rj M m irj rn
i;i ••-••• 3 ft rn nj
3 rr ct 3 3 D
M 01 HI N f-4 N
n 3 3 ci o o
-~. M Cl ~ 
— . -—
•u ^, .-. n, rr Q-
. i), ^ ^ -,, —
rr •- ••• TI TI TI
' 
rr t-.3 •< >•-• r •••
I .. ._.. -j 
-r( r- r;
-- 3> o< ro b 5
TJ 3 i 3 T T
in rt n rti PJ rn
T rr a 
33
-f. ~ -' 
rt rt
i— 9. TJ 
"r T
Hi n •< 
UJ H)
3 0! T 
33
m 3 rri 
mm
01 3m
' 4 04 0-< C4 04 0-J
03 03 CO CO 03 CO
O O O O O O
c: c •:: cr c c
X)
O
h'
M
x|
1ill
J-.
1
l""1!
O
H-
1
3
1
Onrt
X'
1— •
11
rrrtrr
P.'^j
1'rt
m
04
03
O
C
H-
1-'-J
1
03
r.*
\
4
rr
H-
in
x^.
t .1im
n-rr
^<;'
*-J
D"
rn
s,r'
i— •
*_x
TI
rrrtrr
BI»-•
a>rt
Oi
J>
03
r_i
(
to m -o 03 i--1 M m i-- m n ^ !•» C3 in i--* rn xi co i •* t-» >--• rn m -ri
t- r> i-- m to o •£> ro en x| r' o rr- oj o o O -fc to 0-! o M o; >rj
CO 
1 
1 
1 -13 r> 
1 O 
1 
i 03 r* 
1 4'» O 
1 O 
1 f- 
(0 O 
1 
1 
1
I rn -o rr- i i --j j •;;• iji i 
; • - • - ! ! 
I xi r.n r> i i I ;..i u o
O in ^ rn o .t» 4» h-' M ;> -I in o '.n <-* oi I cr- ^ 0- o en •) -ri
M i i i o j* i to i i •-•• <-' i n o \ xi i .fi ja to i i i
I U !"• x| 
1 ! M 
1 Q.I r.n I 
i 0 
I 
1 x| M t .1 1 | 
1 rn -0 j-.j
- O i l ! O O 1 x| l ! i-' * ! ' (•- r> i l | fO -43 -1 I ! i
1 
1 
1 
i 
i 
i 
1 
1 
1 
! 
! 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 '--I 1 
! 
i 
1 
1 
1
1 
1 
! 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
I
I
I
!
1 
i 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
! 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
! 
1 
1 
i 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
! 
! 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
! 
1 
1 
1 
1
J 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
! 
1 
i 
1 
1 
! 
1
! 1 1 ! i 1 1 1 1 i ! ! ! 1 1 ! ! i 1 
I I I !
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
i 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
i 
1 
! 
! 
i 
1
1 
! 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
! 
! 
i 
! 
! 
! 
1 
1 
1 
1 
I
I
!
!
n rji u ifl "i "n rj T> n TJ ;r _r-> 2 .s .(.-, TJ _t> tj ro rj & io 1-- • :i
•T m •* r • :' K- i- • -J -j rii :"; 
i 
1 •• 
! •--• 1 I ••• ' 
!••• 1 •> fi 
|
"i 3 t. J rr 
'i C. 1 rr n 3 : 
i.1.1 ?.* l> 7'. C O HI J-> CT '?. 4* ITi 7*
< r i 
- < "J Ci 3 T 3 rr LI* • -i ui- I <-•• O rr , r 1 Hi i-1- 1 3 • •-
in D 1 >--• 3 -j 1 - B1 ''I si Ci rr o ,-i- i 
•--• ;r tr) 3 rr r-\ in ,t
Oi ^-. ".' rr n.s in w ri n n :r -•; -• »-•• ~ rn 0 xr w- 14 i H- TI i
3 Ci h'- III 
3 C fi rr "T " Ci 0 3 !"| 3 1 i-* 3 Ti P 3 T O
ill ~ n 3 
rt rt iTi rr •-•-' f! TI in I-" U1 OI 0 T! V" -t. T3 H- r>~ pi
j> ;r (•< 
:.r x: 3 -; n -, rr c it 3 
n :r r-t c T . -s u n
3 •- < 
n i- m Oi ~ o rn CL T :-•• 
ir rr T T n.i 'i TJ t-..
rr 0 >•-• 
3 TI 
ri 1 1 rr ri H- rj *-• 
ru ;r O Oi 3 ci ri !-•
T T TI 
it! ;r 
ft! TI r.l -< TJ ! H- 
3 fi. rt 3 O T] 01 H-
T u rr 
rt 
rr n r • rr to 3 
-< K-- o 
t--1 ;r 
3
C> rr r* 
3" 
rn n 
| Oi i fti 
^ <n t-j 
o* 
ffi
n 01 rr 
& 
3 i- r; n :-c 
! n r: 
Z1
m 3 ji 
i-' 
Q r1 rr < Oi 
TJ :a 01 
o
3 u >-•• 
Hi 
(-• 0! PI 
>— • 11 
rr 
3 
»--•
Oi H- ci 
rt 
3 <i< rr 
m 
rrj
a rt 
ra 
-< D •< 
-i
p. |J) 
i-J H HJ 
V
3 
Pi 3 TJ 
^-J
o 
rt HI rr 
Oi
rr 
;Ti 
it
ITI '-•• 3 
rr
-; ! A r.i 
TI
»-• ^-•• 
"I
.
I.A 
h' M 
I--1 i-'
i-l i>4 4 1,4 vJ Ll 'VJ 01 vJ -43 •: J i 1 ' 1 -n -3 01 'I 
i.| OJ OJ -43 --0 '4 -il
Oi ra -4 ro 1.0 ro 03 ro 03 c- M ri ro o o co ru co ci en o o rn o
o o o o o o o o o o •."-• o o o •"•• o o c- o o o ••':• o o
c c: r: c c c c c c c.: r: c: c: c ci c: c: c: c.: c rr c c c
co 
i-i 
;< 
i 
CM 
..•.'. 
i
TJ 
r: 
m 
t 
a. 
n.
n 
rr 
II 
< 
3 
rt 
LT
-i 
0 
rn 
TJ 
~
n 
Cj 
M 
K-- 
>--• »-•• r";
>-• 
n 
in 
I., 
m 
;; 
n
0: 
rt 
ft 
.. 
a
n 
a* 
!-• 
c. 
.E 
m
35 
3 
O 
T 
rr
(.1 
rr: 
3 
0! • 
x. 
in
TI 
" 
" 
—— «" 
0 
|:'1
'::: 
•• 
i- 
o 
p- 
!rn
O 
3 
0 
'-' 
^-l 
»- (
n 
5- 
•• 
x. 
^
rt 
x 
2
•~- 
r/j 
'-i 
ju 
fj
< 
oi 
a 
in 
,t
11 
01 
li 
m
z 
-o n 
^ 
-|
n 
i. j
'?. 
[i 
r- 
i;i 
HI
3 
o 
! •! 
r3 
m
I 'J 
rt 
!•-• T. 
O 
n 
01
LJ 
-x 
4a 
• 
|-
:: 
o'j 
r> 
-•
•'i 
n 
o
CJ 
3
i :: 
n
— 
'.C
r- 
a
TJ 
ill 
13 
iO
T. 
n 
r- 
•;;•
,. 
= 
.^ 
f n
ro
m 
m
n
4
n
!-"• 
:,3
T-
- n 
iji
r ri
ih 
'-^ 
'•"•'
•--. ri 
a
r- n
"' 
•«
u H t.3 a 
u 
o 
r 
r
•| ,Ji 
i-1- fl^ 
& 
ai 
a.' 
in 
-
I- 
»-• 
it 
ft 
rt 
cr 
cr
!/ -i 
rr 
oi 
m 
m
'U n 
rt 
T| 
rrj
--. C3 
H. 
T> 
m 
rri 
! • • • ;ji
— Z 
0 
3 
;•; 
iTi 
i- 
I-
iQ 
3 
pi 
rt 
0 
0! 
Tj
•- c 
H.. 
T 
rr, 
~
•_.- 
TI 
•< 
3.1 
M- 
n 
rn
r: M 
a. 
N 
n 
< 
cj
fji -H 
n 
Oi 
rt 
ra 
•• 
i-t 
rn
••-. r j i 
r
t
a
m
a 
i j 
u
i • .- 
n 
.• 
ci 
•« 
•• 
C3
!'.,:i 
T
o 
o 
o 
T-, n 
r,"
<-- 
-4 
^ 
fj- 
M. 
.11
v 
x 
t3 
O
iT- 
h 
03 
x| 
O 
TI
xl 
H
•' i 
03 
CO 
03 
! 
-1
•0 
-0 
-0 
O 
*"
rji 
-4
r
{
•r',.
QI
Oi
|H 
i 1
n 
rn
ji • i 
ii
i^ * 
_'>.
j-
i1"1 
:;
r 
-
In 
: :.•
in 
H
;ii 
•-^
Tl 
j -h
n
• i
UJ
T-,'r
' — f
- 
T
i J
~.T
7,-,
r -
-.;
rj3
n 
•• <
D 
f!J
3rt 
r.i
rii 
--:
!""' 
_i-:
it
•n
rr 
ni
03 
H
in 
-i
1?x
to
CO
-- -- _.
1
n
m 
--j
:••< 
J^
!0
r,- 
.1
oi 
:o
T
Ti
rn
jC.
CO
, ,- 
....... 
,_. 
_ - _ . ip pT _ ... 
- . , , . . , 
\_,.— rr- 
-.- r.-r .'• 
~'.•TT'T'
• _•;_. ' -. , .1 .... i:. 
... 
.. i -. • - . . _ . . : . 
, • . < I- I L- . -' ... _' 
•••• i'. I n 
... . i ._ .... i
i. •:. b L' c r!;.: : T IT
i ratrix: f <:C.i 1 ,'uatcr ; £
ScA.T.ple ,,t ,' vc 1 r.
Level: 
( 1 a w / «i e ci) 
LDUJ
"/. MeiEtu.r&r not d e c . _1":
(pack/cap; 
PACK
,'g/nL)
GAS MD.
CItPCUND
IPA SMIF'LE
BX264
ZD5 Me ., : E77T
Lab Sample ID: C-010"?-06_
Lab File: ID: 
CC3&T.
Date Received: C(WOC/S9
Date Anslvzeccj: 
v&/l£ .'S°
Dilution Factcr: i .,.•
CDNCENTRATTC:^ L'NITE:
(uq/L c;r ug/Kg)
74--S3 ---—--•— — Bromc^ie rhane ________________ i
— '"_".-' _ ••' _ __ _ „ _ _ 
'• -• : ^ i i 
r~ i... i ._ ... _• _: _ 
i
/ % . . • • . „ * . 
-T 
. ^. , i •-: 1 
s... . . ... •_• , „ Lj ^ _____________________________ .
75-0'; •-3~-----------Chioraot'",,-ne_________________:
75-09-2- -----———Ms thy ler-;e- Chl or ids___________1
67-6A-1-————- — Acetone______________________:
75--11: -'!•——————--Carbcri risL.l fide____________:
75-35-4——————-—1 , l-Dicl-iloroethsne___________i
75-3A-3————- — — ijl-DicMorce-thsne___________!
540-59-C- — -———-1,2-Dichlorcethene ( tat*l ) __I
67-cl:,-3--—-- ——— Chl -z-rcf c:~n____________________!
l'.:7-;:,i - - 2 - ---•-.-.—-i ,::-Oic'-lcroeth?re___________!
7C---7-7- —— --———--Dutanope...__________________'
7i-r75--c.-—- — -----.1 . 1 , 1-Tr.ic!-.] oroathane________!
5^-2"-5-- — •-—---C;,r i-cr Tttrarhlcririe _________'
7
r.:
:< • 27" --4 ••- --..----- Er-;:n.-^:ic
7G-S7-5 - - — --—-1 . 2-"-icMaroprcpsns__________!
j OCA: -01-5----—-c: =•-! . 3-Dichlcrcpr openr:______1
7o._cl._A——-----——Trichlcroethene_____________!
j2-^--8-j.--—-——-Dibromc-chlorcT.e thane________!
7~- •:--i,-,-^-....--......__-_, i, 2"Tr.ichlarciet'-iar,e________!
-•; ._^-._-2 -•—---..-— p - i-zer.K'__ ________ _________'
... C Ool- 02-- =- -----Trr.ns; - j. , 3-Die: hi era pro pens___i
10S-1C-1—-•---——-—r'.ethv 1-2-Fentancns 
i
591-73-6------——-2-Kexancne-___________________!
127-o.S-v-—— —— — TetrachicrGe thene ___________1
79--::.^-:. —— —————-1 ,1,2,2-Tetrschlcrocthanc____!
^;.-3-8P--3-- —————— Toluene______________________!
1;..' i!: - ?'"- - 7 - ———- - -C h 1 o r c h e n z E rie_______________!
100-41 - •-'• •- -- ———£•_ hv 1 Ler- zene-_________________!
1 'I 0 • - -T 2 -• 5 - - - —- - - •• - '£ I", v r e n e. _______________________ i
1T30-2C-7 — — — — T-tal >:/Ter.es______ ________I
. 1
11
••}
6
6
6
6
11
6
' U
6
6
.
(
3
t
6
&
11
6
6
A
t
6
t
6
;u
; L!
\ \ \
; Li
: u
:u
,u
; v :
•~
;. 1 
: L1
:u
iu
:•,'.
;u
; j
i;j
i •_'
:LJ
! U
;u
;u
:u
iL'
:u
:L;
rent-: i VGA-
TUT 
001 
0357
f
i '.--, i 
f- ••- T i i— 
.— r~i c* /•* K i T i—' r^ 
r i t r, \ \ / r-* T t~* 
r- r\ "r-
, -....._*-. i a i_L_ 
'....-• --Oh-if -! j _.-o r .r!i--L_ i -^ i -:J u-f-i i
BX265
,r; ;j;,;:c: rCIMJC CORP
Contract: c-SD?OQ23
SDG Mo.s ET747
I : <rb r.:c-:!-?r ''T. ~ K T C 
Case Mo.; 12058 
SAS No.: _._____
| tfs.tr.-,;;: i sai 1 / *••• s t e r) SOIL 
Lab Sample ID: S90107-07
le ..:t.Vol: 
5.0 
(g/mL) 3___ 
Lab File ID: 
30364
Level:
r r-;. r,ot de-c: .
.'picl.:/csp) PACK
Date Received: 06/08/39
Date Analyzed: 06/16/S9
Di In tier. Factor: 1. 0______
COMPOUND
CCNCEMTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
FORM I VGA
1 of M33
TUT
oo i
0
— 
1
. • I
"* f
. 
"T
— - r-.
.' 
i_"
o .-'
.•• 
,_
— » r^
/ J
~r c
/ -
67
.'.. C
1
•~"~.i
, ......
— r •<
• J.
'„-'• 11'
' -•
;. T-
«, —
. ...
1C
4 
—— ,
-L *_
-r '-
71
^ *
— • cr.
;..•:
= 9
* —
79
< •;
^ !'
' r
i •••
.j. ' .
• —
---;7-7 ----- —— - —— i~:h lore methane
-P7-9— -- —————— Brc.mom& thane
--: I--":- — - ———— Vinyl Chloride
. -' 
-• 
•._ . i I U/ 1 C t. •_ , nr.; i tr
-• - " ~- 
' 
PI 2 i. i i y i tr i t S U J ! J. LJ f i Q G'
-c/4-1--- ——— ——Acetone
I
I
—
- 
f
»
L
_ T ^ ' 
^ ^ * _ 1
•i. •-• '-' 
— 
Lea Don i-iSL.il fide
-35-4-—- — ——— 1 , 1-Dichlcrcethenc
-^i--- 
• 
1,1 
Dicnlt-jroethane
0- '5 ":'-0 ------ ——— i , 2-Dichlorcethene (total ) __
-^c -..-• - • 
Chloroform
7-06-2 —— - ———— 1 ,2-Dichloroethane
-97,. ..-3-- — ———— 2-Butanone
-r-5 6 —— •- ———— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichlorcet.hane
— .-•'.- •-— — — — — — — —— L,arbon 
i s traohlor ide
i -. . -;. -.4 -- - -----Vir.v 1 fVetate
7.T*-'i - - — • - — — - - E'r orncd i c: h 1 crorr.e t har.e
S, •_.- • 
• 1 , 2 -D.ichl orcpropane
C:: I -OJ - 5 -- — --cis-1. , 3-Dichl crcpropene
-•'". '. -6 ----- ——— - —— Trichl oroethene
4- •£.%- i- —— ——— Dibromoc hi or erne thane
-CO- 5 —————— - — i , i ,2-Tr.tchlGrcethana
-•3 -2 ------ — • — B0-nz£-rs
"; .'.^ i 
•"' ~ - 6 •- - —— - - T r a n <=- - i , 3 - D i c h 1 o r n D r o p s n e
-1:^-2 ——— -: ——— Src-o-form
3-iO-l — - ————— 4-Methy 1-2-Fen tsncne
i__. ,5 .-,---- ———— 2-Hexanone
7- !'-: -4-- ————— Tetrac hi oroethene
-3-T-^- - —————— 1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachlcroethane
B-crE-3- — - ——— To 1 Liens
3-9O-7--- — ——— Chlorobonzene
0-4 L -4 ————— — E thy 1 ben r.ene
O--" 2-5 —— ———— Styrene
7:-.-r/-.-7 ._.— .... —— Jr;tal Xylenes
g
j. j..
• L. J..
j ^
.
11
6
6
6
i,
6
6
11
t
6
1 1
A
,
O
• L
o
6
6
C:
L
•h
11
11
A
•i
A
6
A
6
A
, ,
U
'_!
!J
^
w
>.J
U
U
U
•— J
U
,_,!
t 1
i i
_J
'J
I :
LJ
U
U
' 1
U
U
!J
U
U
1..!
! 1
1 1
1 1
U
U
1 1
U
CJ
— r
l i
— l
L-
<f 
"C1
i.r; 
-n
.-r 
X
ij. 
u;i
.- ... -_
LJ
t •;
c
c~
r.'j
LU
i - 
.:!
> 
i
U
p
L''i 
Ui;i
i r 
^
1- 
4J
- 
•-•: 
c
•U 
Q
U
- 
CM
f- i 
^
i. ;
*i'!
".:
. '_ -'
:
!. i
i .
t- -.
.-'j
cr;
! "!
i. .^
i. ~.
L1.
t- 
Li
_J 
C'
i- ' 
U
1 -
••1 
CJ
. J 
' i
L' 
TL
y !
L
L .
' •
ijj
v
J'J
<q
)
0 
Vr 
0-
i 
i 
ro 
co
i- 
r».
uii 
O 
in 
CO 
-JJ
O 
KI
i> 
o 
•<! 
-o 
T-t
_o 
o: 
u 
o 
o
T • 
• «i^
CJ 
•• 
•• 
- 
O
t. 
CJ 
Tl 
ID 
-P
L , 
r-l 
-. 
Ill 
IJJ 
|J
rj 
^ 
-In 
>. 
LL
. H 
i!! 
,-H
si 
nj 
u 
id 
i;
i: 
.-< 
UJ 
u 
IJ
•c
; 
• . 
LT' 
<
r 
-H
UJ 
U. 
-P
UJ 
lil 
-j
Jj 
J 
-P 
4- 
r-<
;j 
ij 
i5 
iTi -.-l
(J 
P 
Q
. i.
-.
; i
_ _
Li!
cT
(V
ITI
CJli;
'-- 
_J
C-I 
:=
- i 
v.
!7'
-^
'"i 
'
:i 
o
|
j__
c"i
U. 
LJ 
I.J 
| 
CL
* 
Ui 
.J 
1 it
LJ
•
L 
•-» 
LJ
ill 
'D 
I'D 
L.
4-' 
111 
U 
':.
C-. 
i'J 
G 
U
t . 
2 
•-- 
4J 
-x
n 
-- 
:* 
o 
.-
r-l 
r-i 
,~i 
IJ 
.; 
|J
1 ; 
H 
ij .... 
,(,
i i! 
O 
;> 
•-•• .. 
u
LI 
•-. 
iii
•• 
••-• -p 
L
CJ 
.; 
Jj
:.j 
•' 
ii 
•• 
Ijl 
C
LJ 
H 
r-l 
rH 
-H 
(£
i- 
11 
ijj 
ij 
.:
XJ 
4J 
G 
> 
v; 
rn
>ci 
it! 
iri 
ID 
o
-j 
i: 
LJ .j .--! 
u
c
CO
** j^_
cn "-.
i- i?
r. ""''
--, x^
...' .°'
D ~
r- I!'
1— -i
U. L
H- 0
"'
LU -J
LJ --
2 D'
O J
U —
CJ2
--jn
CLi;ci
U
•a
„ ,.
cn
<r
r i
.j ::i ::• r1 D n .j :3 ::• -J :j 13 : . ra _; : \ ...
,("-: 
^ 
-r-i -jj T-I ^j -o -0 -0 -JO -0 'H -D -.'; • '
r-l 
T 1 T I T-! 
T-4 
T--1 
-. i
•—»
r-l
:|j
P
II
JJ 
lil
'-s 
l" ill 
i
1 
Hi Ij
!D 
Hi Q lil 
iii 
J- 
-.-i 
i
n 
:: i: i: 
i: 
-*- i.. 
j.
n 
HI HI rr.i Ui 
i;i 
iii l i 
-i
i- 
TJ x: j: a: 
i: 
u r i 
i
ij 
1.1 
r, 4J -P -P 
-P 
L J.I 
!
LI 
IJ 
r-i 
^|- 01 i:l lil 
ID 
f; :J ij 
:
c D -ri ijj x: 
-v o o a 
o 
n .'j ij •.
iT. C L It LJ 
j L L. L 
L 
r 
L •:! :
j: 
iC :j •!• 
ui 1.3 Q o H n ID u -P <
J -
P -C r-f X: 01 
-H '-1 .-I r-l >. r-l f -.-! |]J !j J
di -i-
1 .r 
-I-
1 r 
c; .n x: .c o x: u L h- u ,
H Ui LJ :JJ IU IU 
iJ U U 1-- U C 1- 
<i. ••
U .; 
0 r-i r 
C -rH -n -H ij •.-! iu ! 
!! 
T
L o r-i L >. o o p K o L n .p T-4 i j , i ;
n i.= :- 13 x: -P x; : 
i 
i u ! -i 
• - j • :>• :
r-i L3 L- r-i 4J ii! 
U. "I 
Ti CJ r-i I 
UN -'' 
X. C I
J" L -ri Jl I)J IJ llj 
*' '• ' JH •' i 
* 'ij '• i i
i..i Cij •. u r^ <x f i -H ,H T-I LJ • •* c-
! '•! cj :• c
i 
ii 
i i i i 
i i i i i
i 
it 
i i i i 
i i i i i
1 
II 
I 
1 
1 
1 
i 
1 
! 
1 
1
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
I 
1 
i 
!
1 
II 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
i
1 
1 i 
1 1 1 1 
1 I 
i 
1 1
1 
1 
I 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1
i 
II 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
!
l 
I I 
1 1 1 O 
( • i
l
l
-
'
K.I O '-r K.' C'J -H O '* KJ If' 
i KI -0 u. 
•. <•
: ; . i i 
i i : c> 
-o i ; ;t'
1 , KI ,., ~. i> -in 
L-I <r u'; -!j 
•-.: | i u-j r-.i 
•"'• 1
id i.ij .-. .;. o.. ^!.i r.| | i f. i | ,,i | o- t i i j i (
i 
i i i 
i i i i o i r ••• i > i ai
<i <r LJ i!'j u"j !-•- u~t in m «-r r- o CO --i -J •'.:•• ''
: - r- r- r- t • --o r-- r- i . u> -c -H r- r- '*> *->• t
)
\ .
j :j - :3 :j :j "j "3 :j :j - D :. :3 -.j ::i :i ::,
i -Q -0 O -0 -'J -L -i'i -€ "I -r-l <1 <: -0 -C <! -0 -0
-H -H
*
i'J 
IU
c 
i:
IU 
UJ 
lij
c 
a 
x:
i 
u 
Hi 
IJ 
4'
il 
U. 
UJ C 
!- 
Hi 
CJ
: iii u 
i: "0 Q- i: 
u
5 t: L. 
re x: 
rj 
r:j 
L.
: u a. 
r. 4-> 
L 
L: 
QJ o
•> 
LL I'J 
4-> 0! 
13 
'j 
C rH
J 0 
L. 01 .ii 
IJ 
--, 
4J 
UJ Jt
L. u c i£ L 
j: 
c 
r u
; a. r-l Hi 1": 0 
U 
UJ 
4-' ilj 
lii 
lil
- U .:: JZ L. r-i 
-H 
IX. 
ill L 
c UJ 
iU
j L i 4J o -n: 
cti 
! 
o -P 
c; c 
i:
i 0 -i 
lil r-i u 
! 
f-,1 lii L. UJ 
fj M 
in
: .-i c, o x: -.-! 
K- g i u o i- 
c '•' 
-•
j X. , 
!- U L 
- L rH Q rH 
flj C
i u KI 0 0 h- ijj -.-i 0 > f x: CJ Hi J^ IU ii: x
.1 -H - r-i ; 
j,- i M- r. ui u »• i- o xj r:
1 I'i ' 
a: D ( -1 :j Ul Ij 4J :::: 15 Ci ii L --H t rn
: ' 
i u L 
'- M c r; aj 1^1 L 
r. ;:, o :> !... .rs
j CJ l: 
••-! XJ .-I L '5 13 I! :C -P -,•! rn r, jv ... jJ
_ ' -,- L •* * . ai •- LI 
i ijj •• o .'. 4-' 4-1 n
'! • '• U 1- CJ '-< Cil f- fJj tr M 1- -H 1- CJ U! Ui 1-
i l l 
I I 
! 1 
i 
I I I
i l l 
I I 
1 ! 
1 
I I I
I I I 
i 1 
I I 
1 
I I I
I I I 
I I 
1 i 
1 
I I I
I I I 
l ! 
1 i 
1 
I I I
I I I 
i 1 
I I 
! 
I l l
: uj i 
i -o 
ii 
i 
iii
III 
1 ! 
1 
i 
1 
1 1 N
i TH i T-I 
i c-i 
TJ .o <..- 
r.i r- *•? m i
^ u'j o <; 
i'i c-i •"• IN l l 
u~:. i 
i i ...;.
i i i co : i i 
o ici ;:3 
rj c- 'H u i \
. s .-i — ' >T o i o *T uj T- |-, ,-i ..^- n a- -i -T
t oj -o •-.' i 
•'..• =)• --J i--, i 
i 
i r--i i 
ii 
•-•
i 
•::.• i «r 
; o 
a .H r- , co CD c: <;. KI
"i CO O I'- CJ t"- 'H O UJ O C> CJ C- O •;> O O K'
- t . TH r. T-i r-. r- T-I r- T-I uj T-I i-. -H T-I .-i ^< -,-\
\
/
j
i
u j :
r* .'
O
^j
O
.tr
V—
^<F
•T 
*S4-'
cj 
o
~>
01
-1
".'.'. 
rsl
r:-au.
1A
VOLATILE ORGAN ICS ANALYSIS DATA
SAMPLE NG,
BX2&6MSD
_<b • Name : CEIKIC CORP
Lab Ccide: CEIMIC 
Case No.: 12058
I Matrix: (sail/water 5 SOIL
Contract: <LSD90p28
SAS Me.: ___
No. : BT74:
Sam pie wt/vo1:
5 . 0 
(g/fnL) G_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
" Moisture: not dec.
3.1
(pack/cap) PACK
Lab Sample ID: S90107-08NSD
Lab File ID: 
C0373______
Date Received: Q6/Q8/S9
Date Analyzed: O6/17/99
Dilution Factor: 1. 0______
* A r- k ir->
_|--. ^> 
l'4<-> .
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATI DM UNITS:
(ug/L cr ug Kg) US/KG
-
74-87-3 ———————— Ct. lore-methane
74-33-9 —— ————— Broir.crr.ethsne
75-01-4 — - —————— Vir.vl Chloride
75-00-3 ———— - ——— Ch 1 o roe t han e
75-09-2 ———————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 ———————— Acetone
75-15-0 ———————— Carbon Disulf ide
75-35-4 ———————— 1 . 1-Dichloroethene
75-34-3 ———————— 1.1-Dichloroethane
540-59-0 ——————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3-- ——————— Chloroform
107-O6-2 ——————— 1,2-Dichlorce thane
78-93-3- —————— - — 2— E* ut an one
71-55-6 —— ————— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichlcroethane
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride
103-05-4 ———— - — -Vinyl Acetate
75 27 4 
Bromcdichlorornethane
7S 87-5 
1,2-DichloroDrcoane
10O61-O1-5 ————— cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
79-01-6 ———————— Trichloroethene
124-4S-1 ——————— Dibromochlorome thane
79-00-5 ———————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
71-43-2- ——————— Benzene
10061-O2-6 ————— Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ___
-' ^:~' ^- 
BrornoTorm
108-iO-l ——————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
591-7S-6 ——————— 2-Hexanone
127-18-4 ——————— Tetrachloroethene
/ *r o-t j 
i , j. , -^ , _i Tetrachloroeth-*ne ___
108-88-3: ——————— Toluene
108-90-7 ——————— Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 ——————— Ethyl benzene
100-^2-5 ——————— Styrene
1330-20--7 —————— Total Xylenes
11
11
11
11
10
r-\
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
6
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
I
i
I i i
> LJ
:u
:u
:B
! J
:u
:u
:u
:u
iU
:u
: u
:u
:u
ID
i i i
i *-J
:LI
:u
!U
:u
:u
!U
:u
;u
:u
!U
:u
:u
su 
i
!U
t 1 I
t *_J
i
t
i
141
FORM I VOA
o(
TUT OOi 036O
$ Matrix: .';o.il.\jtter) ECIL
Eanipls wv/volt 
5.0 
(g/mL) G.
I Level: 
(low/meo) LOW
:: Mci a lure: r.ct do:c.
Cclur.'.r, : (pack/cap) PACK
COMPOUND
r.' Y - •:. -7
)_• A j_ <_• /
EA
Lsb Sr.T.ple ID: S90107-07
Date? Received: 06 /OS/89
Date Analyzed; 06/1 £./_59
Dilution Factor
1.0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
Q
----- 
<-., h 1 o r o IT. e t h a r, e
yl Chloride.
-00-3------—————Chlcrca thane
-OT-2——•—————Methylene Ch
- 6 4--1 -----————Acetone
ids
15-0-————••——Carbon Disulfide_________
-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
-3-T-3--—••—-———1,1-Dichloroethane_______
:>-•:'?--•:•--••—-———1,2-Dichloroethcns (tstz.1).
- ('.6-3----——————Chloroform_______________
? ~ 06 ~-2 •-•--••--——1,2-Dichloroeth-.ne ____
71 - . "r-.f;--—--•——-—1 ,1 ,1-Trie hi croc t.h£.p.e_
.'.' 'I Z-'.-C'--4 ———-—Vinyl Acetate________]
7?-27-" -------——BrciT.cdichloromethane.
. 3—y .-*— 5 — — — — — — — — — 1 , 
2—Die h 1 e-rcpropane_
1C 061-01-5—————cis-l,3-Dichlorcprcp=r.e_
79-01--6--——•-———Trichlcrsethcne________
12'1 --12- *. -——————Dibr cmoc h 1 orome thane___
79-00-1 •-— • ———- i ,1,2-Trichloroethane__
— j _ /* -^ -.
.-• x *- _ " — - 
— — — — —
rar.s-i , 3-Dichlcroprcpene_
crm 
__ ___
1 OS-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-
591-73-6————-——2-Hexanone_
127-16-4———•
-Tetrachloroethene
79-34- ?-———————1,1,2,2-Tei.rachloroethane.
i.OS-88-3—-————Toluene
.1 CE-r>0--7——————Chl ore-ten zene.
-00-41-4- —— -——Ethyl benzene_
^7-5—-——•—Styrene_____
- -T "T ,-< *~,,- -r 
_ -r ,^ 4_ _ T 
v . , •} _ __ _ _
.i...-.-_ _ ,_ .' 
.- • - — — - --— j cjuc.i 
/-. /1 critic-
FORM I 'v'DA
ZlO o(
•- i-
S
0
6
6
6
6
6
/
ii
11
160
6
6
140
U
U
X
TUT 001 0361
fe
J»
\T-tl 
/* T T i I— ,— p. r* /\ *. I T r-> r-> 
,-\i-.t.\i \/
- i--L-.li I il—U. 
LJ!~ -Ol-il'i 1 '._,J M'.Mi-lL- i •
T-* A T r'i 
C"* ! 't~
t-'t-i I H til'l tit
r- r-. /\ 
r- At^f-il r- 
i 1 f
^- r t-i o t-i i i r l_ t- 
i -
»_ cl w 
^ _ i_j t.
Case W e . : 1205S
ratr:-;r '..^-i 1/water) SDIL
5arr.pl c t-jt/voli 
5.0 
(g/mL) G_
Leve i : 
(1 cw/n-.ed ) L.CU'
V. Moisture: ncr dec. 
11
Col umh : ( ps.c k / c a p ) PACK
CAS r<;o. 
COMPOUND
Contract: 63D9002S
SAS Mo.:
DX26?
Lab SaiTipic
Lab File ID:
C0374
D^.te Received: 0&/08/S9
Date AnslyzEd: '06/17/39
Dilution Factor: i . 0_____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) U8/K3
Q
I
3--- ——— 
• —— Ch]oromethane
ne
75-01-4 ———————— Vinyl Chloride.
75 -OO-3 ———————— Ch lores than s
-Methylene Chloride.
-Acetone ________
£7-64-1————— 
_________
75-1 ~.-0-———————Carbon Disul fide
-1,1-Dichloroethene.
•1.i-Dichloroethane
540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total )__
67- = £ -3-- ——————Chloroform__________________
' -J"
T— n S—'-" — — — — — — — — 1 ^ — r> • r- H 1 r-i--r-i= +• t- - " ci
a. ••_'; 
*_• o *, 
j_ .1 *. ]_•±. c 111 c/ r c fe u n --% i«tr ___
7B-93-3———————2-E-:utanone___________
71-55-6——————— 1 , i , i—Trichlorcethane-..
51-~3--tr.-——————Carbon Tt:tr = zhloride_
l'I3-05- --—-———Vinyl Acetate________
75-27-4—-——————Bromodichl Dromethane_
7E-B7-5————————1 ,2-Dichlaropropane-_
10061-O1-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene.
79-01-6————————-Trichicrcethene________
124-45-1 ——— ———Dibromochlarome thane
-1,1,2-Trichloroethane_
-Benzene
1O061-O2-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
75-25-2———————-Brofiicf orm ________________
103-10-1————
591 — — P- (...—————
127-18-4————
79-34-5- ———
108-SE-3——— — --Toluene
-4-Methy1-2—Pentancne_
-2-Hexanone _______
Tetrachloroethene________
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
103-90-7———————Chlorobenzene.
100-41-4 —————— -Ethyi benzene_
100-AT-5 — -—-——Styrene______
1330-20-7—-———Total Xylenes
f
11
1 1
li
6
C3
6
6
A
6
11
11
6
6
6
*^i
6
6
6
TUT 001 0:62
I
o Name: CEIMIC CORF'
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS C'ATA SHEET
Contract: 63D90028
ERA SAMPLE NO.
BX976
Lab Code: CEIHIC
Case No.: 12058 ' SAS Mo.:
SD6 No.: BT747
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol : 
5.0 
(g/mL) G_
I Level: 
(low/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec. 
13
1 Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
Lab Sample ID: 890107-15
Lab File ID: 
B1651
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Analyzed: 06/19/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CA3 NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
Q
74-97-3————————Chloromethane____________
74-33-9————————Brcmcmethane____________
75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3——————--Chloroethane____________
75-O9-2————————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1————————Acetone_________________
75-15-O————————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3————————Chloroform______________
107-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
78-93-3————————2-Butanone______________
71-55-6————————1.1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
1O8-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4—————————Bromodichloromethane______
78-37-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_^_
79-01-6————————Trichloroethene__________
124-48-1———————Dibromochlorome thane_____
79-00-5————————1,1,2-Trichloroe thane____
71-43-2—-——————Benzene__________________
10061-O2-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2————————Bromoform________________
108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentsnone_____
591-73-6———————2-Hexanone______________
127J-13-4———————Tetrachloroethene________
79-34-5————————1,1,2,2-Te trachloroethane_
103-83-3———————Toluene_________________
108-90-7———————Chlorobenzene____________
10C-41-4———————Ethyl benzene____________
1CO-42-5———————Styrene__________________
1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes____________
FORM I VGA
11
11
11
11
6
67
7
6
6
6
6
6
33
6
6
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
13
6
6
20
11
6
6
6
6
110
, 6
6
:u
:u
:u
;u
;u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
t
i
:u
:u
;u
:u
!U
:u
:u
:u
:u
;u
;u
:u
:u
:u
ii
:u
!U
TUT OOi 0363
L/87 Rev.
g
LJ
_ j
LL3:c 
r-
ci-i 
r-
0**
•'I
'LL 
CQ
LJ
__ -- _.
CO
IN
O
0
1 
LV,
LJ 
CO
_,_
L' ' 
*•
-p
<I 
U
I-- 
15
i ~ 
^_
•LJ 
4J
C
ti'J 
0
>H 
t j
tfl
':>-
J
::£
A-
,- r
^•' t
•.-i UJ
tJ
rH
i'^
:i
IT'
IT
:""!
LL!
- -: 
;X
r-i 
iX
!- - 
i :
<I 
i j
f
t j
rH
i.l 
LL-
t
1 ' 
;'. J
..
0!
'ii
r
.-t
1
C- 
-4j
r-i" 
v-« 
Ch
r -- 
i 
co
H 
t
CO 
O 
t-j 
0
'T'l 
U J 
*H
O 
IN 
x
L> 
«H 
-O
C 
OJ 
tl 
C
-7
COn 
t:i 
n
en 
n 
•• 
oi
P 
>
QJ 
rH 
-H
rH 
QJ
U. 
01 
U
ii 
rH 
QJ
'•J 
- < 
LL:
CO 
LL
01
n 
n 
-P
i 
n; 
rfl 
03
-J 
-J 
Q
bj.
r.
- ~
CO
e£
CO 
•
CD
CC
u j 
^— «
'-"' 
_j
c •'. 
a
~~*. 
x
!J:
= • 
•_•
•r:
Z 
IT.
J 
»
01 
i"n 
o 
3
W 
O 
K' 
CJ
OS 
CO 
_J
U
~-.
L 
^
Ui 
13
•i- 
0!
C i 
.f 
C
!-•( 
:"• 
\
>
:: 
-", 
- 
2
r-H 
-i 
.-H 
0
LU 
.H 
ID 
rH
C.' 
0 
>
IJI
>• 
-.-.. 
.p
UI 
i
"n 
" 
a 
..
U 
ri 
rH 
rt
L 
C. 
QJ
\ -n 
-P 
e 
>
; >y 
Ki 
is 
ui
-) 
T. 
in 
.1
l> • 0
CO 
CO 
C:i
*• 
"%.
Cl 
C-
-H 
C 1 
O
X 
X 
•
•5 
~s " 
/ •->
•• 
\
L. 
L'J
•O 
•• 
0 
-« i:
ID 
n 
-P 
en x-
4J 
01 
U 
H- CO
u 
N 
ui 
I-H ~!
03 
> 
LL 
;•:
i. 
rH 
13 "
4J 
iB 
C 
O'
:•: 
c 
0 
z v
UJ 
<E ••-! tJ x
Jj 
- __ j 
j-T,
Qi 
at 
3 
l- :3
•P 
-P 
r-i 
<X
'0 
nj 
-H 
Ct i-
Q 
P 
Q 
\~ U
...r
U -J
CJ v-
O 3
CJ
O
U
c5
rjj
i 
••
u 
X
QJ 
a
~D 
Cj
•~- 
i''!
ij 
::.!
c 
c^
D 
CL
u; 
J"
Ci- 
X 
1 i
-->. 
t-' 
1- i
C0 
Z
u
*-
u 
LL 
Z
"1; 
Q. 
X
•>-> ci 
>
CO
-P
 
s— '
n 
o
• <a
UJ 
C 
3 
Cii
L 
IJ 
C 
CC
3 
-i 
!5 
Lj
•t-1 
•!-> Ill
UI 
U 
rH
a 
L
i; 
-P 
f.J
'< 
LL
i 
I'l CO
:~j r? .j D D ro _j D ~i ij
o o o o o o o o o o
•r-i i < -H rH »H rH rH rH rH -I
'-r '•'•? "1" "•!" «f ^1" T 
rJ" C4" *•!"
i
L
IU
j^
-I- '
L. 
LL!
UJ 
-.
j ^ 
rH
-• J 
>•
L!j 
01 QJ 
Oi 
LI
C C 
C 
0
rH 
CJ Ol 
01 
L.
:x 
n N 
N 
a.
-t: 
c c 
c 
o
t-1 .-i 11! Ol r-< 0) — l Ui rH
Si a a £t n n o -i o
o c o o x r o c o c
i- QJ L L O L Oi L QJ
Q T: o o u Q x; o i:
r-< iX^H ^ 
rH rH O. rH C.
j- i"j x: x: <r J7 rn jz rH
L. 
'... U IJ 
U >• CJ >
rH 
! 
f) -.-I -rl rH -,-| JT | JT
0 IN ri Q Q >Q 
4-' fj -i-'
C ••' JC 
N 
Of — • !il
IU Ml tJ t'') ^T C C J H Ui i;
Li 
••>. i 
•• ' 01 '• 
-H 1
U. XJ /i r< r) pj r-i C'J XJ «JT
I I I 
I I
I I I 
I I
I I I 
I I
I I I 
I I
I
I
I 
I
I
I I I 
I
I
i l i 
O 1
i l l 
1 
1 
!
cj M- i »H r- >o 
i J m
i 
! CO 
1 
'-i N <•'.• 1
L' -t i 
j 4] 'H 
ii 
<r
LT -i- 
- r- •; LJ o co 10 -r
1 
! lij 
u" '-t f 
I
CO H 
1 »H -Jj O 
1-0 ^0
O *•' u"i -y o O in IT; C^ O
TH rH l> LO rH rH |> O f" "' ^
.^ -., _, --, -., --, 
-^ ^
O O1 '1. • O O O O . O* O1
*H rH r 
TH rH «H £i rH r-i
«t *t ^ 
-•? f>:' -t O 5f ^t
C^J
Ol 
QJ
L; 
c
-r-i 
|Q
r 
XI
ai 
-P
rH 
IJJ
fl 
--:^
LJ 
r-i 
'X r-i
i. 
0 
x O
U. Ol 
C 
O C
i 
i7 
Ol 
XT QJ
C "J 
•£ 
ij -l-
\ s: 
rH a: 
m a.
•H 4J ID 
o rH 13 o o
Q 0! C 
C > -H L L
1 Q Ol Hi fei £ ij 0 0
n '.- i i : j: -P <r *-H rn
ui u r: 3 a Oi r j;
O rH |Jj - 0 S ij LJ U
L 
C J'j 
j 
t- H -r>, i -r-l
•P u o : -P D u r J a
•.-; iii L 1 -H I N --- 1
Z X 4- "! "' -T - UI C
1 
111 -.-, 1 i 
' iU -H '•
z "r. :••: • -: i. -, c-j cu .u c-j
i i i 
i i 
i i
i l l 
i i 
i i
i i i i i i 
11
I ! I I I I 
! I
I I I I i i 
i I
I 
I ! i I ! 
i I
I I I I I I 
II
i 
I I I I ! 
i i
r- i i i i r . - 
H ci
i --i !••:• - * „ i i c 
i i
•=r i i i i r- 
--i K'
-u r ••; uj o- i. j o in y- co
i -- a 
>-••• - i oi i i
rH ! 
i 
| IP 
'H O
IN t- CO CO iu " UJ --I C-J
<i -0 Cr- T- OJ -H <j -H r-;
"3 T "'
o •:::• o
rH rH H
ef ,^j i.f
QJc
01
r-jc
QJn
0 
QJ
L 
C
C 
-H
rH 
rH
x: 0; -H
u c c
•H il) r(j
L rH !J
H- i:j L
j. a
•U- 
|.J rH
•• x: x;
CJ liCJ
'• ''ii !
rH Z «t
1 
1
1 
!
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
!
i 
!
71 '. w
c'j i' r'-
CO O <t
1 f-!
O 
•JD
C-J r-l O
rH C^ rH
n n
o o
rH rH
cj- tj-
.
rH
0
C
01
oi r
c a
P rH
•H >-
13 x:
ITJ 4J
-P Ol
3 r.
XI 
1
O KI
!.. 
1
0 0
rH L
x: o
U rH
•Ii XI
X CJ
ijj !
I <r
i l
l l
1 
!
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
!
! 
1
; 
;
r -i iv
i 
!
LO 0
•~a in
i
r > o-
co m
--, -3 -)
— 
—
o o o
rH rH rH
<f *f «f
Olc
Ol
•H
D rH
'Ci O
Ol -P C
C C 01
oi oi r
rn a a
03 O O
X: rH j.
-P U 0
X: >- rH
a u 4.
'13 0 U
II L -rt
rH O L
',*-. rH 
) — •
j; x:
•P U -0
Ol '0 
'-
^" X rj-
r oi '•
C i I C J
i i
i iiiiii
1
! 
1
•ij *t C'-J
1 
1
r- r- -i^
in <r ftl
'H N CO
O N CO
_, _j -^ 
--, _
— 
- 
— 
—
O O O O O O
O rH O rH rH r-i
O *r O *r *t <i
C'< 
C J
rH
O
C 
Q)
QJ C 
Ol 
Oi
x: QJ 
-P 
c
a rH 
IB 
QJ
O 'C 
rH 
3
L x: oi .u oi r-,
o -P c x: c o
rH JZ -H 4-1 0) 4-;
X: a rH j- rH Q
U it; -H IL >- L
•H r c 
X -i-:
L 
O Hj rH 4-' H
h- L o •> . r c
I o L x: CL H
LO r-, 4J 4-i rji O
' j; -H 4 c i
«f U Z f= 01 -0
i -r! U 
-
C'-J M ( J a <I IN
iiiiiii 
i
i
('•' UJ C-i
M- h- t 
\ 
lf
u"^ ai
 cV -i o"- c'j
L> u ".; |x 
| 
;
rH tO <l
LrJ rH CO KI O O
D- C- CO -H Cj -0
\/
< '
K1
O
,_4
O
'•-/
1—
'— -j
u-
'
tv^
(m
--jJ
rH
1 
^\^>
~-> 
0
fj\
rH 
.^
\
E 
l 1^
LC'0
LL
!
I
i
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Name: CEIMIC CORF_____________ 
Contract: 63D90028
EPA SAMPLE--NO. -"-
EX 978
Lab Code: CEIMMC
Case Mo.: 12053
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX979
I Matrix: (sail/water) SOIL
Sampls wt/va-Is 
5.0 
(g/mL) G_
I Level: 
C low/med) LDU1
7. Moistarer urait dec. 
22
Lab Sample ID: 890107-1:
Lab File ID: 
C0401
Column: (ps.ck/cap) PACK
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Analyzed: 06/19/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS ,NC.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UB/KG
74-ST—3——————Ch 1 or ome thane_____________
74-S3-9————————Bromome thane_____________
75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-0<Q>-3————————Chloroethane_____________
75-09^-2————————Methylene Chloride_______
67-6*-1————————Acetone_________________
75-15—0————————Carbon Disulfide__________
75-35—4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
75-34V-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-39-0———————1,2-Dicnloroethene (total ).
67-6>&-3————————Chloroform_______________
107-C6-2———————1,2-Dichloroe thane_______
78-93-3————————2-Butanone_______________
71-55-6————————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-?————————Carbon Tetracnlcride______
108-€5-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-2T--*-————————Bromodichlorome thane_____
78-87-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichlorcprcpene___
79-O1—6————————Trichloroethene__________
124-4S-.1———————Dibromochloromethane_____
79-OO-5————————1,1,2-Trichloroe thane____
71-4-3-2————————Benzene_________________
10061—O2—6—————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25'—Z————————Bromof orm_______________
108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Fentanone_____
591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________
127-1S-4———————Tetrachloroethene________
79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
10S-SS-3———————Toluene_________________
lOS-^O-7———————Chlorobenzene____________
100-41—4———————Ethyl benzene____________
100-42—5————•——Styrene 
______________
133O-20-7——————Total Xylenes___________
13
13
13
13
22
43
6
6
6
6
6
6
13
6
6
•t ~r
j.--'
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
13
13
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Q
:u
:u
:u
!U
:u
:u
:u
;u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
t i l
i U
!LJ
iU
!U
:LJ
!'J
;u
!LJ
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
!U
:u
FORM I VGA
TI IT
fUI
OO1 
0365
Rev.
MPLE
'; !',/-.-,-,3: CCr-:TC CCTP
T-. •./ m—r r—.
I. • .-. / / C
CzntrGct: 6SD9002?
I
CaLs? !,o.; .'.2053
—- v /-* —r r-,
1: A V / O_
f 5^f7,p j. ti v'Jt / -.'ol ;
!
,-el: 
( lcw/.T,e:-d) 
LOW
•IsiEture: r.r-t dec. 
21
Cj tr C •
I E.-.tracticn: 
(SepF/Ccn t/Scnc) 
SDNC
3PC Cleanup: 
( Y / N ) y__ 
pH: 
3.6
I
LL-.b 
Si-..T,pIe ID:
Lsb File ID:
D a t e R e c e i v e- d :
D a t c? u. Xv u r o. c "t. — »j
Date Analyzed:
06/10/39
06/12/09
06/30/S7
f~* r"
1 K.-' r% i—. i i
r"
1 K.-' r-i.—, i i Y. l T~.
^- ! ::~ •,....-:'. !_'
CONCENTRATICN UNITS:
fug/L ~-r ug/lvq) L'G/K
- -
--- ——— Acer.a^hthene
51- 2C-- f - —-----—- , 4-Difi i trcpheroi _________
100-O2-7-—-———^-Nitrophencl_____________
132-64-9———————Dioenrofuran______________
121-14-2-——————2,4-Dinitrotcluens_______
34-66-2————————Diethylphthaiate__________
7005-72-3——————4-Chlarophenyl-phenylether.
36-73-7-—-—————F luorene ________________
100-10-6- —————— 4-Mitroaniline__________
534- =2-1--- —— — 4 , 6-Dini t.-o-2-Methy 1 phenc 1.
36-30-6---—-———M-Mitrosadiphenylamine ( 1 ).
101 --55-3—————--4-SrGriOpheny l-phenylet.her_
113-74--1-—•— ----He xschl;; i-c: benzene________
G7-56-5-——-——-P.-r-itc-.-rhlc-rcphencl________
35—0 !••-5 —— — — •- — — — P 'isn^.n threne______________
120-1 2-~--—-——-Anthracene
34-74-2—-————-----^i-n-Futylphthalc-.te______
206-44-0——- ———F1 Licran thene______________
129-00-0———————Pyi-.rne____________________
55-6 3 -- 7 - -—- - --—- B :...(t y I b e n z y i p h thai a t e ______
71-?'"-l ----- ----- •----"; . 7 ' -Dichiarcbsnzidins_____
56-55-3-——-—------!-•=• i-.zcC a) Anthracene________
213-01-9———- — -Chryssne___________________
117-31-7-—————--!:,i5'2-Eth>-lhexyl )Phthalf*te.
117-34-0———————Di-r.-Octyl Phthalste______
205-99-2—-—-——Penro(L)Fluoranthene______
207-03-7-———--—!?«n-of k ) Flucran thene______
50--32-r----——- — £c?nzo ( a '; Py rsne____________
173-35-5---——— Indf:-n---i 1. 2 , 3-cd } Pyrene.
57-70-3—-——---r; Len- '•. a , h } Ar t:-racsne_
191-24-2-—-——9(51-17.0 ( g ., h , i )Pery lene
(1; ~ Canr.r-L L--I- Espai-ated from Diph^ny
FORM I EV-2
4100
340
4100
4100
340
4100
4100
34O
B40
340
54O
340
340
340
34 O
84 0
1700
S40
U
LJ
i I
LJi i
LJ
I l
O
LJ
;u
u
:LJ
B40 
!LJ-
S40 
; LJ
SI40 
; U
£4O 
• 
1 LJ
340 
! L.'
340 
i (•
340 
! LJ.
TUT 001 0366
1/S7
IB
~ fc-* T i i f< f 
.-"»"i- T i r— .-^ r-, ^- A t. i T r^- r-- 
."•. '- i /\ i v /.— •*- r~- 
•--. .*\ -«• r. 
: --\ ,\— <— •*-
: . * / (..:i_i-i : i L__ 
(_r\i_ji-!iM i ocr 
CIJN*-U_ ; ::: -. o 
_. i-, ; t-i :::. .L_I_ t
UFA SAMPLE NO.
Centra-1: .iBD9002E
'•latr.l. ;•; : 
(<..Hwi I./.-jater } SOIL
!-icf.r-iple ,vt/v.-l: 
31 .4 
(q/fnL) G_
.Level: 
(law/n-,ed) 
LQK!
':: Moisture-: r-cfc dec. 
j 8 
dec. _
I Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Scnc) 
fj
GFC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N,_ 
pH: _
C * > f~- 
*• ' — 
r 
p V C? "7 C>
Lab Sample ID: 
890107-13
b File ID:
A 1254
.8
Date Received: 06/10/S9
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: O6/2V/S9
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CCMPC'JND
CCNCENTRATIGN UNITE;
(ug/L or ug/Kc) L'S/K5
i08--v:>-2 ——————— Phenol
111-^-4 ——————— ti=<2-Chloroet!-.yl ) Ether
95-:: 7- 5- ———————— 2-Chlorcphencl
541 -73- 1 ——————— 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-4/6-7 ——————— 1 ,4-Dichlcrobenzene
4. >.•<.' j'-t o 
Fens/* Alcohol
95--5O-1 ———————— 1.2-Dichlcrobenzene
95-4^-T-- ——————— 2 -Ms thy 1 phenol
3963S-32-9 ————— bis (2-Chloroisopropy 1 ) Ether _
106-44-5 ——————— 4-MethvlDhenol
621-64—7 ——————— N— Ni troso-Di-n— Propy 1 amine
67 /2 1 
— Hex ac hi oroe thane
98-95—--. ———————— Nitrobenzene
73-59-i ———————— Isaphcrone
b8-75--5- ——————— 2-Nitrophenol
1'.'5 6, *=? 
-2, 4-Dimethyl phenol
6b E5 •'.) 
Benzole Acid
il 1-91-1 ——————— bis (2-Chlcraethcxy) Me thane __
120 -83- 2-- —————— 2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-SZ-l ——————— 1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
91--j':.s-3 ———————— Naphthalene
106---+7-8 ——————— 4-Chlorcaniline
:•: , -•' '^--- ---——-- Hexachl orobutadiene
59-50-7- ——————— 4-Chloro-3-Methvl phenol
91-5 / -6 ———————— 2-Methvl naphthalene
77-47—4 ———————— Hexachlorocyc Icpen tadiene ___
E8-06— 2- ——————— 2 , 4 , 6— Trichl oropheno 1
95-95-4 —— ————— 2,4.5-TrichlGrcDhcnol
91-TS-7 ———————— 2-Chlcronaphthalene
tS-74-4 ———————— 2-Nitroaniline
131- 1" -3 ——————— Dimethyl Phthalate
'.-CP-'-'f.-'E ——————— Acenaphthylene
f.. -06-2 " .--2 ——————— 2, 6-Dinitro toluene
400
400
4OO
400
400
400
400
4OO
40O
400
400
4OO
•- 0 0
2000
400
40O
4OO
A ,-, .-,
*T '..) I.)
400
400
40O
400
2000
4 <.' O
2000
400
400
4OO
1
i : t
i i i
; U
:u
:u
!U
:u
:u
; U
1 U
U
u
i 1u
u
. u
i L.'
: U
!U
1 1 1
i 1 J
;LJ
;LJ
IU
1 ' I
i i *
;u 
;
FORM I SV-1
2-11
357
1/37 rvf--,
TUT 
OO1 
0367
VOLATILE ORGAN I C3 ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Name: CEIMICCGRP
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BX983
Lab C.ods: CEIKIC 
Case No.: 12053
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol : 
5.0 
(g/mL) G_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec. 17
Column: (pack/cap) PACK
Contract: 63090028 
__________
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG Mo.: BX97S
Lab Sample ID: 890107-18
Lab File ID: 
C0407
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Analyzed: 06/20/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-B7-3————————Chlorome thane____________
74-83-9————————Bromcmethane_____________
75-O1-4————————Vinyl Chloride____________
75-00-3————————Chloroe thane_____________
75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1————————Acetone_________________
75-15-0————————Carbon Distilfids_________
75-35-4————————1, l-Dichloroethene_________
75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-16-3————————Chloroform_______________
107-O6-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
78-93-3————————2-Buitanone______________
71-55-6————————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____
56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachlorlde______
103-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4————————Bromodichlorometnane_____
78-37-5 ———————— 1, 2-Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-O1-6————————Trichlcroetnene__________
124-48-1———————Dibromochlcromethane______
79-00-5————————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2————————Benzene__________________
10061-02-6—————Trans-l,3-Dichlorcpropene_
75-25-2————————Brcmoform________________
108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____
591-73-6———————2-Hexancne_______________
127-13-4———————Tetrachloroethene________
79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
103-88-3———————Toluene__________________
10S-9O-7-——————Chlorofcenzene____________
100-41-4———————Ethyl ben sens_____________
100-42-5———————Sty rare__________________
1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes___________
12
12
12
12
3
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
6
6
i •-
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
:u
!U
:u
'/
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
;u
;u
:u
iu
:u
!U
:u
;u
!U
:u
!U
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
!U
!U
iu
-183
FORM I VCA
TUT 001 O368
_H
I 
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
f Lab Name: CEIMIC CGRP_____
ERA SAMPLE U3.
No. : 1205E
Contract: 6ED7002E 
i__________
SAS No. : ______ 
SDG Mo. : BX97S
I
• i 4 ^ .k . - * . .. 
r 
/ f ^ ~ i_l ' " ' A "*" T 
'] ^^^1
Lab Sample? ID: S9 0107 -1.9
Sample wt/voi
I
5.0 
(g/mL) E_
Lab File ID:
0414
Level:
(low/med) LOW
Moisture: not dec.
17
olumn: (pack/cap) PACK
Date Received: 06/10/67
Date Analyzed: 06/20/89
Dilution Factor: 5.0 _
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-37-3————————Chloromethane____________
74-83-9————————Bromome thane_____________
75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride____________
75-00-3————————Chloroe thane_____________
75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1—-—————Acetone_________________
75-15-0————————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total ).
67-66-3-———————Chloroform_____________
107-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
78-93-3————————2-Butanone_______________
71-55-6————————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
108-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4————————Bromodichlorome thane_____
7E-87-5———————— 1.2-Dichloropropane______
1OC61—Oi — 5—•———cis—1,3—Dicnloropropene
79-01-6————————Trichloroethene__________
124-48-1———————Dibromochlorome thane_____
79-00-5————————1,1.2-Trichloroethsne____
71-43-2————————Benzene_________________
10061-02-6—————Trar,s-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-23-2-———————BrciTiOf orm________________
1 OS-10-i———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____
591-7E-6———————2-Hexanone_______________
127-13-4———————Tetrachlcroethene________
79-34-5————————i,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
10S-ES-3———————Toluene_________________
103-90-7———————Chloro benzene___________
10C-41-4———————Ethyl benzene____________
100-42-5———————Styrene__________________
1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes___________
60
60
60
60
200
30
30
30
30
30
30
60
30
30
60
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
60
60
30
30
30
30
30
30
49O
Q
:u
!L)
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
!'J
:u
:u
:u
!U
:u
!U
;u
:u
!U
:u
:u
;u
!U
;u
:u
!U
;u
:u
:u
I O
'X
FORM I V'OA
~190
./87 Rev,
TUT OO1 O369
'-• _. ._ J- . _ ... .:. . 
, — »•», r— ,-,.-,'•- f^j
C "• ~ 
'- • 
,.
- .-!._• 
!-<:._' . t 
_ _ __________
i fc .
llati i:.: {y.cil/w^.
Sr.r.plz :•;t.•--•.-1 : 
70. 2 
; g/,7,L •
Level : 
.: 1 •::;;/ -.td ) 
LOW
Cu.?" ; n;:-t d s c .
; 
-. ... 
r— J T .. 
i —\ 
/ .1 .—,r~, c:
.-.-, J 
f J. J. L; 
.. ^, I 
r-;.i. ^id-'_______
'...I r~ C .
C;. trsctior- .* 
< SepF/Tcnt/Eonc )
EPC Cleanup: 
(Y/rO N__ 
pH: 
g.5
*?' c\ t G R ft? C t: j. V C d : 
i.' •':• / 1 '..'• /'::! T
p. _ j.. _ 
p ... i. .. ^ _. 4. ^ _i , 
•"V • •'' 1 '-* ••''" '~
*•- ,--n, i —* f— i • — r-. .N -f •' .'•- K i 
i r K -•--•/—
'.._ ;._l, ''i „ i_. i '. . :". i*? 
.1. <._ I •• 
i..1 i : J. 1 C.
/ i 
.
.
.
-
>
.
-
.
— , .
-,::/ i_ ::.- .1;:, »-,.„ ; 
...-...-
y.ll--r 4-<•—•—————•!.is(2--Chl = rr.-sthyl ;E7her______
?5-f 7-8----••• - ——--2--C:-. : cre-phenol______________.
C41-7*7 -1 —-———-1, 3-Dichlorobenzene_________
106--6-7- - -----———1,4-D:; chlcrobenzsne_________
100-21-6——-——Benzyl Alcohol._____________
97-50-1-—————1.2-Cichlorobenzc-ne________
?5-43-"'-—-—————2-Methylphencl_____________
3963--!--32--9—-—— bis ( 2-CMcroisopropy 1 )Ether__
106-44-?,-————4-Methylphenol_____________
621- 64-7-————-! <- Nitraec-Di-n-Frcpyl z.T.ine__
67-72-1—-----——-Hexachloroethane___ ________
^?-=~--7-..——.-——.——MJ.I-C-SF:-,:-£ r^__________________
7 ?-?'"--.". - - - - - - - - - I ^ z p!". c r G r. ^.___________________
i' [-"••• f - - ------—- •:-• - M ;.. t r r r- h c. r c 1 _______________
' C [-/:.-- 7 - -———-—2,. 4 - D i.r.e t h y 1 - !~,,~;-::;; ___________
65- Pv.--0———-——Ps-:::c:i- Arid.________________
11 _.-"•-1 — - -- - -bis (2-1 h 1 c; csthc xy ) Me thane__
120-97 -2 — — ———2.4-Pirh1 crophen = I__________
•• ^ *• •— *- _
j 
_
 
r
-- 
-•-- 
-""" ' 
" 
" - !• '
.'.'- -..'"-"• • ' -:i " - — • - — • -- —... —._ 
_______ ___
£ 7--vZ ""- ----- -—-HexachloroDL't;.'.u;;.^r.e_____
59-50-7————'•———4-Chlora-3-M=thv 1 phenol _
91-: 7--———————2-Methylnaphthalene____
77-47 -^—---———-—HexachlcrccyclopEntaoicn
G8-06-2-——•————2,4,6-Trichlcropher.ol __
95-?':-^———————-2.4,5-Trichlorophenol_
91-55-7---———-2-Chlcrr-,/:-.r.
j-.j--r----,..------- —— 2-\.i tr.'j/j:-,11.1.-
i
". clucr
I/ :::0
1600
1600
1600
ii.-:.-o
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
j 600
1600
1600
16 00
1600
1600
76.00
1600
1600
1600
•1400
1600
1600
1600
6100
1600
1600
7/..00
1600
7600
16 ro
1600
1600
:u
;'j
;u
iu
lu
:u
:u
: u
IU
: :. j
1 U
iu
;LJ
i • i
t V -
.' '
1 U
i u
-364
TUT 001 0370
1C
_______________ 
Ccntrart: 6RD90020
C:PA SAMPLE NO.
Nc,. BX97G
Lab £~f,u:le ID: G90107-19
Lab File ID: 
A12S5_____
:trr,c-
:'C Cleanup:
dec. .___
; SepF/Can t/Ssnc) 
SONG
(Y/N) N__ 
pH: 
3.5
Date Received: C^/lO/39
Date Extracted: 06/12/S9
Date A r; s 1 y z e G : 07/01/S9
Dilution Factor: A. 0_____
f— /-• K ' — r— v ; -r C' •
v_-_Ji i — c. i . i •.. r
(U.-.J/L Cr
- - 3 - N i t. r c- aniline,
- -1
:-. t- G r,.-• c; n t. h e n e ___
•_.. • _. ••.
-14-
--2,4- D i n i t r o p n e n c 1.
--4-N.i trophenc 1 _____
- D i ben r c f u ran __ .
-2,4-Dinitrctrluene,
-Dicthyi phrhalate
70v3-7_J-3-————4-Chloropheny 1-pheny lei
B6-77.-7—•—- ——— F] uorene______________:
100-'.0-6-———-----4-Nitroani 1 ine _
; CJ6-30-6--
--4 , 6-Dinitro-2-*1ethy 1 phenol
-N-!Mi trosodipheny 1 5. mine ( i )
-~ •-Brcffiopl-.c.riy 1 -pheny J E th;_ r_
-—Hex ec hi Ic re benzene_________
- • - F' e- n t a c r, 1 o r o p h e n t; 1 _________
- - F1 h e n a n t h r e r. e _____________
--••Anthracene ___._.
—D i -n -En t y 1 p h t ha 1«t_».
—F1uoranthene_______
—Pyrene _ _____ _
"-^"-7--———-—Butylbenzylphths lists.
—3 , 3 ' -Di^hlcrc,fcenridir:e:-.
—•—Bn-nzo ( a } Anthracene____
—C h "• y s e n e ______________
— bi s(2-E thy1hsxy1)Phtha1 ate.
—Di-n -Oc ty 1 Phtha 1 ate_____'_
—Eer.zo ( b ) Fluoranthens______
— If: e r,:: o n:) F1 u c r f. n t h, e n e _______
—-Bsnzo'a)Pyrene____________
—•-Indcno (1,2, 3-cd ) Pyrene.
—-Di ten z ( a , '.} An thracene__
— l-'enzc. ' g . h . i )Pery lane
7 6 00
_. T' >.'
7 6 0 0
760-' I'
1600
160O
1600
160O -
r. *-\ ,->.
7600
7600
160O
1 600
1600
7 r-.-:";
1600
1 600
1600
74 O
200O
16 CO
— • .•- .-,
1600
1600
54OO
16OO
S70
160O
770
1600
1 6 0 0
•-'30
vJ
•T
,_'
U
u
u
u
LI
U
-»U
LI
LJ
U
!_!
• i
u
t (
l.J
u
»J
-»
>_'
' 1
I I
LI
LI
U
-Io
u
J
'_!
j_
-T
365
epara.ted from Diphenylam^
FORM I EV-2
TUT 001 
O37.1.
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab l-^.m
:RP
EPA-SAMPLE
SX984MS
L^W C3d=: en I!*! 1C
Case No.: 12053
Contract: 65090029 
__________
SAS No. : _______ 
SDG No. : BX973
J Sample wt/vol: 
5.O 
(g/mL) S_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec. 
17
Colurr.n : ( pack/cs.p ) PACK
Lab Sample ID: E90107-19MS
Lab File ID: 
C0415 '_____
Date Received: 06/10/39
Date Analyzed: 06/20/89
Dilution Factor: 5.0______
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
Q
7-2— 97— ~— • ——
T A 
^* "^" 
(— s
-~ rr 
,-, « 
A
75-00-3- —— -
75-09-2 —— -
67—64—1———-
7
1* 
1 = 
f">
-7 c: -T c 
/\
75-34-3 —— -
*^ A A ^ O /~i
D*fU 
_> v '.'
67-66-3 —— -
-7O t?T T-
"71 
»r. c 
l
C /_ *-. -7- c;
103-05-4 —
--£- 
^—— 
T 
A
7S-S7-5 ——
10061-01-5
T O 
l"l * '
XT 
• J -t C
* ~^ n 
'"l *~> ^
—t * 
n-r 
<->
/ J. t _' ^L.
10061-02--6
•7 e 
^n rr ^^
&0 1 -TCI /
127-13-4 —
•TO — n ^
* ,-• [-• 
n i 
n
Jw >_' 4_- ' T A 
"S
•* t~* I': 
f '"^ 
C
————— Chlcro.T.e thane
BrcfTiome thane
- ———— Viftvl Chloride
————— Chlo roe thane
————— Meths-lene Chloride
————— Acetone
————— Carbon Disulfide
————— 1 . 1-Dichlornethene
————— 1 . 1-Dichloroethane
————— 1 ,2-Dichlcroethene ( total ) __
————— Chloroform
————— 1 .2-Dichloroethane
————— 2— Butanone
————— 1 . 1 « 1-Trichloroethane
————— Carbon Tetrachloride
————— Vinvl Acetate
————— Bromodichloruimetha! .e
————— 1 . 2-Dichlcrcpro&ane
- ———— cis-1 .3-Dichlcropropene
————— Trichloroethene
————— Di bromoc hlorome thane
————— 1 . 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
————— Benzene
- ————— Trans-1 , 3-D ichloro pro pens ___
————— Bromof crm
————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
————— 2-He::anone
————— Tetrachloroethene
————— 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ___
————— Toluene
— - ——— Ch lore benzene
—— - —— Ethyl benzene
- ———— Styrene
———— --Total Xylenes
LO
60-
60
6O
20O
43
30
330
30
30
30
30
60
30
30
60
30
30
290
30
30
330
30
30
60
60
30
30
440
340
30
30
390
I
I
i'J
! L!
i 1 i
:u
:BJ
;u
ii
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
!U
;u •
i i t
i LJ
!U
!B
I I |
:u
i
iU
!U
:u
:u
:u
!U
i
i
:u
! J
i
ii
"FORMi VGA
TUT 001 0372
1A
ERA SAMPLE NC.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
BX984KSD
I
i -.*-» p _ - _ » — . 
••" rr T M T r-
L_ ^ L J 
'_* Lj Ui tr • 
'_. L_ X I I j •__•
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
P_____________ 
Contract: foSD9002B 
__
Case No.:. 1205S 
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: 5X979
Sample wt/vcl: 
5.0 
(g/mL) G_
Level: 
(Icw/med) 
LCUJ
'/. Moisture: net dec. 17
I Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
Lab Sample ID: S90107-1.9MSD
Lab File ID: 
C0441_____
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Analyzed: 06/25/89
Dilution Factor: 5.Q_____
I
I
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATICN L'N ITS :
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
/ *T O .
74-83-9-
75-01-4-
/ w v <_• — •-•
75-09-2-
67-64-1-
75-15-0-
75-35-4-
~7 C ^ 1 "^
75-.;>4-o-
w' r »_' 
i_- i 
»_'
^. "T — A A "T
" *" ~*~i"i ^ ^
— m 
Q -T -T
-T •« 
er. c= 
/.
c'£ ">"T — e-
4 i~i Q „ r^ ^ ^
-T r= *-\-r /i
10061-01
"^f"1 
/~ -t 
/_
./ fj~tJ±-.£<-
•4 *~ rt 
/i r— .
-^ r-t *•* /-% 
r=
7
-t 
/» -T 
*~l
10061-02
/ *-• A_ • < »^.
108-10-1
BiO 1 ~7Q 
Z.
4 '-•-y ^ c 
£L
/ » 
•— • T 
-'
4 ,* . t-\ 
C~ ."^ 
T»
j.Ocj— oo— •_••
•1 '"• '^ 
^ !*• "^
4 /"• »"l 
^ t 
A
100-42-5
a. -^ •-• l-' *. •-'
——————— Chlorome thane
-- —————— Bromoiue thane
——————— Vinyl Chloride
——————— Chloroethsne
——————— fiethylene Chloride
——————— Acetone
——————— Carbon Disulfide
——————— 1 , 1-Dichlcroethene
——————— 1 , 1-Dichloroethane
——————— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ( total )
——————— Chloroform
—— - ———— 1 ,2-Dichloroethane
_
——————— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichlaroe thane
——————— Carbon Tetrachloride
——————— Vinyl Acetate
——————— Brc.T.odichlorome thane
« 
r~t r\ • 
l_ 1
-• l,*. Dichloropropane
-f ————— cis-i , 3-Dichloropropene
-Trichlcroe there
Dibromochloronethane
——————— 1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane
——————— Benzene
-6 ————— Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene ___
Br omof orm
——————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2 Hex an one
• ——— 
- ——— Tetrachloroethene
——————— 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachlorcethane ___
----- ———— Toluene
——————— Chlorobenzene
—————— Ethyl benzene
• —————— Styrene ' 
-; ... •
7 —————— Total Xylenes
60
60
60
60
21
6O
30
30
30
3O
30
30
60
3O
30
60
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
60
60
30
30
30
30
30
30
3D
1
1
:u
!U
!U
:u
i T
I U
!U
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
!'J
:u
:u
!U
;u
:u
:u
:u
:u
!U
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
!U
;u
:u
:u
!U
!LJ
TUT 
001 
0373
1A
IPA SAMPLE- NO,
OLATILE ORGAN I CS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Name: CEIMIC CORP
Contract: 63D900:
BX997
Lab Code: crriniC 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX973
1 Matri
Gamp It
| Level
7. Moi«
! Columr
!
I
1
1^
1
1-
•-: : ( soil /water
!• wt/val :
: 
(low/med)
sture: not dec
i: 
(pack/cap)
CA3 NO.
-T n f-)-r T
74-8,:.-9 ————
75-01-4 ————
75-00-3- ————
75-O9-2 ————
67-64-1 ————
75-15-0 ————
T C TT n ~T
/ ^ 
/ / "^
67— 66— -j' — ——— —
1 ('] 7 ("it "? —
~7Q O — —
7< 
e K 
/
-L O w' C
c / 
»-. -T tr.
10S-05-4 ———
75-27-4 —————
10061-01-5—
79-01-6 ————
124-48-1 ———
79-00-5 ————
71-43-2— ——
10061-02-6 —
1 t"lr"1 
* i~l 1
c o 1 ~7C3 i.
*.'V_L / O O
127-^8-4 ———
79-34-5 ————
108-88-3- ———
100— 11-4- ———
100-42-5 ———
1330-20-7 ——
•; SOIL 
Lab Sample ID: 89O1O7-20
5.0 
(a/mL) G 
Lab File ID: 
C0409
LOW 
Date Received: O6/ 10/59
21 
Date Analyzed: 06/20/89
PACK 
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CONCENTRATIC
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or uq,
Chlorome thane
— Bromome thane
— Vinyl Chlorides
——— Chloroe thane
——— Methylene Chloride
— Acetone
——— Carbon Disulfide
— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 . 1-Dichloroe thane
——— 1 ,2-Dichlcroetnene ( total )
——— Chloroform
——— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
——— 2-Butanone
— 1 . 1 . 1-Trichloroethane
——— Carbon Tetrachloride
——— Vinyl Acetate
Brofr.od ic hlorome thane
——— 1 .2-DichloroproDane
——— cis-1 . 3-Dichloropropene
——— Trichloroethene
——— Dibromochlorome thane
——— 1 . 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
— Benzene
——— Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___
— Bromof crm
——— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2 Hexanone
— - — Tetrachloroethene
——— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroe thane ___
i oluene
——— Ch lore benzene
——— Ethyl benzene
Styrene
——— Total Xylenes
]N UNITS:
'KG) UG/KG 
Q
I
l
13 : u C
13 
;u
13 :u
13 
:u
13 
:
6 
!U
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
13 
!U
6 :u
6 :u
13 
:u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
13 
;u
13 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
6 :u
3 
UC
6 :u
15 
it ±
1
•-1
/
-
'
•
-
'
*
• 
. 
- "
203
FORM I VOA
-' 
_l/87 Rev,
TUT 001 0374
.
0
I£
LL!
LL
•'•L 
1 -
L'.! 
0
1 
>. .
ij
'
ri
C 1
C
1
ij-
1 
! J
l,; 
'.O
i;l 
•".
I ' -
l l
i
i . 
;-;
1 , 
0r.j
CM
. (
1 *\
*< I,
i' .
t- 
:
^ :.
;'
,
u
-j 
U-
l'.
r- 
1' i
1 !
" 
•-.
<• • 
...
! 
'.
i 
: 
L J
LJ
' -
'-
•;';'
•
l"'
: 
'...'
r- 
f ! 
t> 
Cr 
f.
1
ff- 
l 
co 
co 
cJ 
r.j
.V 
I'-.
f;. 
o 
r- 
o 
f) 
•-•
. • 
-jj 
T-I 
T.-, 
r .1
•:> 
(j -•'. 
••-. x
U 
T-, 
<l 
-Jj 
-0 
f)
j'j 
J!' 
•:: 
•:.:• •_• 
C
'-- 
f
:J
C'J 
l ' 
• • 
13 
' • 
i.J 
•' ' -> -
CJ 
O 
TI 
!J| 
TI 
4J 
Lr! ••.
!.i.l 
>-• 
- 
0! 
-M 
iH 
U 
I" 
C':
Lj 
.-• 
IJ 
!'! 
'0 
n I-i
ill 
n 
.-i 
'ii 
>- 
LL 
: '
-i 
in 
L 
-H 
-.:i • -
a 
iu 
u 
4> 
'C 
i- 
n-
i; 
.-< 
tu 
x 
c 
a 
u j..
.1; 
-H 
cc: 
ii 
<r. 
-H 
u • .
OJ 
U. 
TJ 
i-- 
IT'
.'i 
in 
iu 
j 
l- TJ
jj 
rj -:-' 
4' 
-T-J ,n
'li 
'li 
"i 
.J 
'5 
-H 
1. !•-
..j 
.1 u 
n 
n 
a 
i •'
• 
' 
f ' ] ~ J
:' 
M ''?
li'' 
1. J -
- 
, 
, "I
1 !
I 
A i
; 
c'J 
co! 
|
c'l
:.] 
,; 
T.
;, 
.. 
ti 
11
! 
' 
-u 
<. i
I.H 
•-- 
M
u 
j
- 
II 
C '
II 
U 
. 
L.
10 
CM 
r
-J 
• 
Ct 
•-. 
C'
u 
»•< -:.. 
:: 
. 
J- 
c.;
i.: 
:'< 
f, 
LJ 
LI
' :i • 
-j 
! 
u- 
id
CJ
..-,
U 
L- 
I*
!l< 
-IT 
i« 
'1
!-; 
i 
u 'U ;,-
i 
r 
•_ 
in
r--. 
.'" 
•: 
-jJ
.-; 
u
r , 
-i 
. < 
:J1 
•; 
i .
1 
: 
1 
0 
-H
u 
i'i 
> 
-- 
- 
•« 
a
iji 
*•-. 
;ii 
;i 
3 
n
4-i 
L 
u 
n 
•: •:
i 
7. 
J 
••< iu 
M
•u 
-iJ 
4J 
:D
M 
-. 
IJ 
"• 
Hi 
U 
r<
CJ 
•" 
' 
• ' 
-i 
'5 
U
L 
11 
ill 
0 
i-
\ JJ 
'-' 
c. 
> 
i: 
H-- u
} •« 
'.• 
.c 
:.u 
;; 
(x
x 
i 
>: 
ii 
-J 
r; 
t'J 
ti
.• ::i D
.;• •:• •".•
•.:• - -i o
,;-, L'-i •:••
-•>. 
•-,'
• -i
U
II
ii 
L:
••! !l! li-
.-- i: rj
•.-i r..: L.
r i: T-
::.i 
i-' 
-1
0 i" L
;. u. -.-*
-:•' Ili Pi
•n \: i
V !l; rr
r'i •-': rj
! 'I
! 
!
i 
!
1 
1
i 
i
i 
!
r i o- J,
i i i
L. 
1 1 l.j
•:• I-'".' i/i
,1 
.t 
1
0- i.O u .
'JJ
•:;.00
•T
.--l
I.II
It.
0
t>
•HIi.
!
1
1
••-.
'
v:J
'
~i
~
-o
o
T - I
0.1
cij
;j
'!-nil
r:
.ij
•H
C!
ff*
i
•o
c'jn
-J
•:;•
—i
CO
iiin
!=
f-ii'i
4.'
L
.; •
•'•i
f^
•.-)
9
r-j'i.
N
fi
1
•=1-
^ ir;
T I
IJ
0
c-
o!
inf
1- i
ITJ
JI
4-;
ii
»• i
;.-.
.C
4-'
III
C
i; ,
1
-U
i
U ~
6 c
CO C'j
L
III
4J
!LI
"*.
i"
IU
1-r
•-.,-
%-ii
J:
Ll.
C 
CJ
i- C.
0 ill
'-< L
Jt c,
U .J.
*"j" 
1 u
i
j
1
1
M
• 
i
f 1 l'-
r - 
*
i ( j
L'l (-
0 
1
£&
)
"i
00
o
r-t
ID
••• 1
.1
. i
l~
i.ip
-;-'
•.-!
?.
±
-0
. ~i
-. •[
100
TH
rj
|
<i
ri
U
C
•ii
11
^•1
,••
Jt
Oi
V
I
1)
1p
4"
•.HIj
-.-(
f.)|
-0
c-
i.
i
1n
L',i
r'.'
U J
~'j
00
CO
'--
T - l
liJc
I:l-j
F--I
CI
IDj.:a
•H
1 1nijip
4J
•Hz
T'
-ij
1
(* -,
1 0I
•JJ
r'i n ;j J:1
•-.-• o •; c-
•"• '- - O '"'
T-I . t .-.:• ••-.
co u ••.;• LT.I
^T
L.
J-
|J
i--i
f 'i:u IJJ .*
tj. 
L'j i"-
i N ij
--i i.: j.
ui i.i iii
c •' |J i:
..': :.- U !-
u o - •: j:
IJ r-l J.I T-1
L JI ij II
0 
LJ J ii!
L 
'I* --' It
ivj :: c Ui
l ii! i'i j.:
-: r n. o..
!i
i
':
\ 'l 
1 i 
,
i 
, •'. u:
u, -1
; 
n 0
T-i L'j | 
i
0 '•! !-• !•:.
.•i 
i 1.0 OJ
,
•
( 
;
"
n '•a. :j :D r-j
C- 0 C.' 0 ...
o o o o ...
T-I >H r-i , < ,-;,
CU C i CO CO U
u
III 
l>
• ' 
'u
=5 
,--.
.-• 
ij
:[j 
•'"
-.' 
'•'•-'.
j.: r-j Ii
a n 
.. <
u -r-i ui
it >j:: 
H
0 4J 4J 
II
U ti II 
Oj
Hi I'i'l i'J i' J;J
i- 
!_ C .-*
JJ H LJ IJ 
>
Ij L ,-•
c --H rn :>, .j
• r <UL u. rn
i
i
l 
,;- 0 i
N 
! !••
1. 1 
cr o 
i
. •-- <-; O ii.i
! 
?'• 1 
-0
0 
- P C - ,
f i <••:•• 0 f J DJ
• •i 13 f J -I (JJ
'.i rj
c o
i '< i *i
••;• T-S
-!J CO
'• -\
iu'
-••;
i oi
••' iJ
iii ij
Jj ii
U L
!... J.I
U iJ
Jt icC
I.! X--.
-.-I .li
u —
: o
- 
r-j
10 C
- ill .
!' ' 
UJI'I !
1
1
1
i
!
1
!
! 
; L
- 1 
J'
: 
! '
f • ' r "i «
,''• 
"i
L
-. i ».;J •»
1.: 
LIJ (
7i 
IJI
0 0 0
D C- C-
jo •:;• co
T-i
.
iii
4-1
-(
ITJ
f-' li!
r. •-'•
L._ 
;i'
rH 
Hi
>. .17
i.i) -fl
JI LL
"v ^H
I: >-
Ill 4J -P
Lt IU IJ
11 ! 0
J! I'J
..- '- LI
_ 
! i'l 
1
I -,-( H
j .n C"j
l l
I i
! i
i i
i i
! 
1
1 
l
1 '": Y
•l T-I •;;•
;• iii cu
1 
1
•ji r- r>
-1 H - 1
1 ,H 
T-I
II
o
ijj
I.Uii
li!
i".
L
H
f i
LL
Jt'
-.».
i'Jii[I
iii
1-1'
1
t ' J
C"c-
U'J
;j
u
cu
uit
ILI
-iJr
ij
r <
L
.- --
_'i
'-'•
U
IJ
£a;
I'.i-i
U'.l
, -',
r;-
C J
i'j
T-i
Co
fll
CIII
L
IX
!u
•-•n
Ni.
i !
i.
)
i.J
H
0
Lij
n
c-
C.J
*ii
L
>•
Ll.
.- ^
i""to
r
r-J
j
T-i
^'
!j
It
U
IJ
;•;
ii
!
j
i
1
i
IT!
i
;;. •
i ~:
f
.-1
-
 :
00
i '.
ca
Lb
L.
!;.
II
l-l
JI
4-'r
''•
-•
i-.
•. -iicij
JJ
• i-j
V
!ii
-
i
*r
(- 
j
r-
l i
u r
-"-'
x
•H
OJ
ij
1
!!!
r-!
iji
6.
.--.
..j
f.
.;;
'•
17'
•••-
Ui;
L
Ui
ft!
ii
1|
ini
rr
f'-'
|'
•H
Cr-
T-l
>
ai
O 
LL'
fe\
T-I
m
-,0
»
I
,
'.
V-
•{«
^ 
J-
c
- 
r-j o
,-H 
-'. 
3"
:-•- 
u, A
in 
H
:JJ 
r ^ 
' U
i:a 
i;
n 
u
L.
e
0
L.
'!-
-a
•ii
-i-'"ii.
fa-il
it:
• ••
"j
.i.-
;•;;
!_
!"
•';i
1 i
i
•
 J
I
1A
U
C -r 
^- • '
•• • -" 
: • - < • _ 
- 
-
•"A- 
' 
' " 
KO
I
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
:EIMIC ccF<F
Contract: 6GD90025
Lab Code: CEIPT.!!
Case No.: 12053 
SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BX998
SDG T4o. : BX978
t Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vals 
5.0 
(g/mL) G_
I Level: 
(iow/med) LOW
Lab Sample ID: 890107-21
Lab File ID: 
CO410
I
7. Moisture: rrat dec.
17
Column: (pack/cap) PACK
Date Received: 06/10/39
Date Analyzed: 06/20/S9
Dilution Factor: i.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-ST—3.————————Chlorome thane____________
74-83-9————————Bromome thane_____________
75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-OO-3————————Chloroethane_____________
75-O<?-2————————Methylene Chloride_______
67-6*r—1————————Acetone_________________
75-15—0————————Carbon Distil fide_________
75-35—4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
75-3*—3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total )
67-66-3————————Chloroform______________
107-O&-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
78-93-3————————2-Btitanone______________
71-55-6————————1,1,1—Trichloroethane____
56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
103-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27—s—————————Bromcdichl orome thane______
73-37-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___
79-O1-6————————Trichloroethene__________
124-4S.—i———————Dibromoc hi orome thane_____
79-OO- -'5 ———————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71 -43-2———•————Benzene_________________
10061—02-6—————Tran=-l,3-Dichlorcpropene_
75-25-2:———————Bromoform_______________
108-1;:-!———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____
591 -73-6———————2—Hexanone_______________
127-1E-4———————Tetrachloroethene________
79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
10S-SS-3———————Toluene_________________
1 OS-9 0-7———————Chlorobenzene____________
100-41-4———————Ethyl benzene____________
100-42—5———————Styrene________________
1330-2:0-7—————Total Xylenes____________
12
12
27
21
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
6
6
1^.
6
6
. 6
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
12
6
6
6
6
85
6
6
FORM I VOA
Q
iU
:u
!U
:u
!U
:u
!U
;u
:u
:u
;u
:u
;u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
;u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
;u
:u
:u
i
!'u v
•u _l
"I LIT
. 1/87 Rev.
001 
0376
1A
•""> t~» f~* *•-. *v i T *'"• r^ 
•-» » i /•-. i 
\ / r^ T (*•* 
T™\ ,~i, T~ /\ 
r^ • t *•
or\OM.M u,a MIMI-II_ i a i b i. f-i I n m-.c
I
EPA SAMPLE NO,
VBLK01
rab Name: CEIMIC CQRP
Lab Cjjde: CEI• 11c 
Case We.: 12055
I Mstri:;: (sail/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vcl: 
5.0 
(g/rr.L.) §_
I Level: 
(Icw/med) LOM
Con tract: 63D9002S 
! _________
SAS No.: 
SDG Ma.: BT747
Sample ID: V030615-B1
Lab File ID: 
C0348______
7. Moisture: not dec.
O
Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
CAS NO.
Date Received: 06/03/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/S9
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
0
74-87-3——— ———— Chloromethane____________
74-63-9————————Bromofne thane_____________
75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3————————Ch lores thane____________
75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1————————Acetone__________________
75-15-0————————Carbon Disulfids_________
75-35-4————————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0————-——1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3————————Chloroform_______________
107-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane________
7S-93-3————————2-Butanone_______________
71-55-6- — ————— 1,1, i-Trichloroethane_____
56-23-5-————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
103-05-4—--————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4 ———————— Bromodichlorome thane______
73-S7-5————————1,2-Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___
79-01-6————————Trichloroethene__________
124-48-1———————Dibromochlorome thane______
79-00-5————————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2————————Benzene_______
10061-02-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloroprop6ne_
75-25-2————————Bromof orm________________
10O-10-1———-———4-ttethyl-2-Pentanone______
591-7S-6———————2-Hexanone_______________
127-1S-4--—————Tetrachloroethene________
79-34-5————————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-83-3———————Toluene__________________
108-90-7-———————Ch lore benzene____________
100-41-4———————Ethyl benzene_____________
100-42-5—-——'•—-Styrene__________________
1330-20-7———--•—Total Xylenes____________
10
10
10
1C
0.
C'•
5
5
5
5
5
e:
^,1
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
:u
:u
;u
:u
:u
: a
:u
:u
!U
:u
!U
:u
:u
!U
!U
1U
:u
!U
:u
:u
:u
iu
:u
!U
:u
iu
:u
!U
!U
:u
:u
!U
:u
iu
FORM I VQA
ruT
001 0377
1A
VOLATILE ORGANIC3 ANALYSIS DATA SMEE'
F.FA SAMPLE NO.
VBLK02
Name: CEIKIC CORP
Lab Cods: CEIMIC
Case N=.: 12058
Contract: 6SD9002S 
!_________
SAS No. : ______ 
SD3 No. : ET747
i
Ka tri:; : ( soi 1 /water ) SOIL
Samp1a wt/vo1:
f 
Level:
5. 0 
(g/mL) G_
(low/mec) LOW
"/. Moisture: net dec. __0
Lab Sample T
Lab File ID:
V3O616-B2
CO361
Column: (pack/cap) PACK
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
Date Received: 06/OS/39
Date Analyzed: 06/16/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
G-
-» n 
P-.-T -T
-T A C'~* 
r~l
7C 
{-* -» 
ft
^' L' -L 't 
™
75-00-3 —— ——
75-09-2 —— ——
67-64-1 —————
"7C. 1 ^ A 
—
-TI= 
-T er 
f\
-7 1= ~T n 
-T
540-59-0 — -—
67-66-3 —— ——
107-06-2 —— —
78-93-3 —————
-T 4 t= e 
/
E
t~\ *- 
C
*_' i_«
"7Q C-"7 «^
10061-01-5 ——
79-01-6 —— — -
124-48-1 — ——
79-00-5 —————
~T 1 
/» ^ 
»"•*
10061-02-6 ——
-7 e 
<-»i= *-*
108-10-1 ————
e o 1 "7O Z,
w'V 1 / O O
127-13-4 ————
79-34-5- ————
•1 f'lO OQ 
T
100-42-5 ————
4 -^" •» j"» 
<~t r*\ T
X •— ' •— • •-' -— .' 
/
• —— C hi orome thane
- —— Bromome thane
—— Vinyl Chloride
-Chlo roe thane
— Methvlene Chloride
—Acetone
—— Carbon Disulfide
—— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1,1 Dichloroethane
—— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
— —Chloroform
—— 1 ,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
—— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichlcroethane
—— Carbon Tetrachloride
—— Vinyl Acetate
—Bromodic hi orome thane
1,2 Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
— Trichloroethene
— DibrotTicc hi orome thane
—— 1 . 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
—— Trans-1 . 3-Dichloropropene
_
— BrotnoTorm
—— 4-Me thy 1 -2-Pen tanone
— II
xi He:-; an one
—— Tetrachloroethene
—— 1 , 1 , 2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
—— Total Xylenes
10
« r\
10
10
5
1O
5
5
5
5
5
10
«=i
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
V.1
5
10
10
5
5
«i
*.'
.
5
5 .
:u
:u
:u
• 1 1
1
 1 1
i * i
1 1 1
i U
' 1 1
i U
1 1 1
i U
' 1 1
i U
i LJ
' 1 1
i U
1 1 1
i U
!U
i | I
:u
i U
1 1 1
> 1 1
i U
1 1 1
i U
i U
1 1 1
1 1 I
I 1 1
:u
i 1 1
i U
1 1 1
1 1 1
: u
i i i
* 1 1
•
• u . 
*
i U 
_ _
• u 3Q
• u o*J
• •
FORM I VOA
TUT 001 0378
IA
VCLATILE CT2AMICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Srab Name: CEIMIC CORP
r~ .-• *j*r, I r- 
t -^
C.:i-i! if Li_ .* J .
Lab Code: CEIMIC
Contract: 63D90028
SAB No.: 
___
VBLK03
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL 
.
Sample wt/vol : 
5.0 
(g/mL) G_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec. __0
Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
Lab Sample ID: V30617-B2
Lab File ID: 
C0372
Date Received: O6/OS/S9
Date Analyzed; 06/3.7/8°
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS MO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRAT I ON UN11TS :
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UG/KG
-Ch 1 orofnetnane
-Vinyl Chloride.
-Ch lores thane __
-Methylene Chloride,
-Acetone_______
74-57-3______
74—83—9————————Brcfr.Qfne thane
75-01-4————
75-00-3———-
75-09-2————
67-64-1———
75-15-0—————
75-35-4—————
75-34-3—~—
540-59-0———
67-66-3————
107-06-2————
78-93-3—————
71-55-6————————1,1, 1-Trichlorcathane
56-23—5————————Carbon Tetrachl cride_
10S-O5-4—————-—Vinyl Acetate________
-Carbon Disulfids
-1 , 1-Dichloroethene
-1 , 1 -Die hloroe thane
-1,2-Dichlcroethene
-Chloroform _______ '
(total).
-1,2-Dichloroethane.
-2-Butanone ____
-Dibromoc hi ore-methane_
-1,1, 2-Tr.ichlcroethane_
-Benzene_______ 
__
75-27-4————————Bro~;odic hi orctre thane___
78-87-5———>————1,2-Dichloropropane____
10061-O1-5—————ciE-1,3-Dichloropropene.
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1———-
79-00-5-----
71-43-2—————
10O61-02-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene.
75-25-2————————Bromoform________________
ioa-io-1——
591-78-6——-
127-18-4———
79-34-5————————1,1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane.
1OS-3S-3———————To 1 uene____________________
108-9O-7———————Chlorcbenzene____________
100-41-4———————Ethyl benzene_____________
100-42-5———————Styrene_________________
1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes______________
-4-Methyl-2-Pentanone.
-2-Hexanone__________
-Tetrachloroethene
10
10
10
10
4
10
5
5
5
5
10
C
5
10
c:
5
5
5
5
5
10
1O
5
FORM I VOA
;u
i J
:u
!U
:u
:u
!U
i i i
i LJ
:u
;u
:u
:u
;u
!U
:u
:u
;u
;u
!U
:u
!U
:u
:u
:u
:u
;u
! J
:u
:u
:u
:u
\/B7 
Rc-v.
TUT OO1 O379
CW
Eanpj.^ i t/vc::". l
Level: 
(low/,ied) 
_
•• Mci^t;.!rr=: --.ct. dec. ___ Q
CZciuir.riS 
( pack/c»f: ) 
PACr!
CCMF'OU^D
G_
Ccn tract: 68D9C02G 
I_________
3AE No.; 
SDG No,: HT747
Lab Sample ID: r:90l07-Q4
Lab File ID: 
C03o£>
Date Received: 06/08/R9
Date Analysed: • "Vj/lg/g?*?
Dilution Frctcr: 1 . 0_____
CONCENTR AT I C!M UN ITE :
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
. n G? _
7 5-01--"- ------ --—— 'in/1 Chloride.
75-00-3———••—-—2h lores th".e
75-09-2—-—————Msthylene Chloride.
67-64-1—————•——Acetone 
_____
5-0————————Carbon Disulfids
'5-35-4————————1 .1-Dichlcroe-thene
540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3———————Chloroform
107-06-2-—————-1,2-Oichlorcethane.
78-^'3-3--— -—-—2-Eiutar.cne
T--27-- 4-—-—•-•—ErrjriodichlorcTi3thane.
73-37'-T- — - —— -—1, 2-D ic!~ lore pro pc.ne_
-----——ci=-l ,3-Dichlorcpropene.
—————Tri -rr. lorcethene________
79-01-6--——————-
124- 40-.1 —••—--——Dibromochlorcmethane_
77-00-5----—-—-——1,1,2-Trichloroethane.
71-43-2—•————Scnzsne___ _________
10061-02-6-—-——Trans-1,3-Di = hlcropropene_
-1 -Ma thy I -2-Pen tar.one.
- 2 - H e ;•; t; none _______
—Tetrach1orcethene
10S-10--1——-
591-73-6——
127-1S-4——— 
________
79-34-5-——-——-—1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane.
108-82-3 — ——-—-Tcluene_ __________
10E-90-7---—————Chlcrobenzene___________
100-41- 4-—————--Ethyl benzene_____________
10 0 - 4 2 - - 5-——————St'-.-' r e n e _________________
1330-20-7——————Total X/lenes
24
o
10
407
FORM I VOA
TUT 001 0380
Rev.
I
I
1A
VOLATILE GRGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SKEE
EF'A SAMPLE NO,
b£b N,
Lab Cc
ttatr.1:
Sample
Level
y. Moic
Columr
-line: r-EIMir CO
Dde: cnriTC
; : ( soil /water
* t-vt/vol :
: 
( Icw/rr.ed 5
Eture: not dec
i : (pack /cap)
CAS NO.
-T n 
^-? 
-*
/ • H 
o /
74.. P~r o
/ ~ 
w •— ' *
75-01-4 — -- —
75-00-3 — ---
75-09-2 —— —
67-64-1 ————
75-35-4 ————
/ »-• •— "*T 
•-'
540-59-0 ———
/ ~T 
/ / 
""^
67-66—0 — — — — —
107-06--' —— -
78-93-3 ————
"7 « c c 
/
/ 4. -..i D C
c i. —,T t:
w W 
*. •_• ^'
1O8-05-4 ————
75-27-4 -----
7S-37-5 ————
1 ri i"» z. 1 t~-i 1
 
=
J-U'-'O-. '.'1 _'
-TO 
/•> 1 A
/ V I.' 1 O
1 ^d 
* C 1
iiin *tD 1
79-00-5 —————
-^ 4 
A -T 
>-\
/ J. ^ _' -L.
10061-02-6 —
o.l.'u I.1.' J.
i-'Va. i o o
J. ^. / * -_r H
79-34-5 ————
1 /"i O 
O *""* "^
lUa /'.' /
100-41 -' —— -
1 00-4^-5- -——
1330-20-7 ——
! VELK05
PP 
Contract: 6SD9002S 
!
Case Nn.: 17O5G 
SAS No.: 
EDG No.: BX97S
) SOIL 
Lab Sample ID: V'20619-Bl
5.0 
(q/mL) 3 
Lab File IDs 
C0399
LOW. 
Date Received: 06/O3/S9
0 
Date Analyzed: O6/ 19/39
PACK 
" 
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CONCENTRATIC
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ug/
Chl orome thane
Bromine thane
—— .-Vinvl Chloride
Chloroe thane
——— Methylene Chloride
——— Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
——— i . i-Dichloroethene
——— 1 . 1-Dichloroethane
——— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene (total)
Chloroform
——— 1 ,2-Dichloroe thane
——— 2-Butanone
——— 1 , 1 . i-Trichloroethane
——— Carbon Tetrachloride
——— Vinyl Acetate
——— Bromodichlcrome thane
1 . ii Dichloroprcpane
——— cis-i ,3-Dichloroprcpene
——— Trichloroethene
——— Dibromochlorome thane
——— 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroe thane
——— Benzene
——— Trans-1 . 3-Dichloropropene
——— Bromoform
——— 4-Methvl-2-Pentanone
——— 2-Hexanone
——— Tetrachloroethene
——— 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
——— Toluene
——— Chlorcbenzene
——— Ethyl benzene
——— Styrene
——— Total Xylenes
3N UNITS:
'Ken UE/KG
10
10
10
10
11
10
*-l
*_
5
5
5^
5
10
X
5
10
5
5
5
5
2
5
5
5
5
10
1O
5
5
5
-f
5
5
5
Q
i t
U
u
u
u
u
J
u
u
u
J
u
u
J
1 t
t_.
u
u
u
u
u
J
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
J
u
(I
u 283
1
1
FORM I VOA
TUT O01 0381
i 
-.t 
4- -i- T i *— 
f—• I— r" /* I i T f- r^ 
•\v;,-Ki \ i r- T r" 
T- -v -i- .- 
•— I >•"- •— •
. '.ji_.i~i i IL.C. uj i . u l-t I '-i i L- o 
I-IIMI-IL- i ;- ± a 
iJr-i i t~\ .;;ri::i::_
VBLK06
Lab Co
I'atri;,'
Level;
: i :v
___ 
Cc,se Mo.; 12053
i/^s.ter'i SOIL
5 . 0 (g/mL) G
( low/.T.i-ci) 
LOUj
i r-i~t dec. _ 0
CQlL.-;r,
•; j:aci.:/csp) 
PAC
COMPOUND
Contract: ^GD90C2g
PAS No.:
Lab Sample ID: VC617-B1
El 6 50
ile ID;
Date Received: 0&/O2/S9
Date Analysed: '''6/19/8°
Dilution Factor: 1 _..0____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(uq/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
-3 —————— - — CnlorofTiethane _
--9 — -• —— -- — B ro.-narr.e t han e
-4 — - —————— Vinyl Chloride
-:;- ———————— Chlorc£2thane
67-
09
64
15
2 ———————— Methylehe Chloride
-i— 
•• —————— .Acetcne
C-
Carbon Disulficie
67-66-
4- ——————— 1 , i-Dichloroethsne _______
3 ————————— 1 , 1-Dichloroethr.nc:' _________
-0 ——————— 1 .2-Dichlcroetnene ( tctal )
7-- — ——— --Chloroform _______________________
6-2 ——————— 1 ,2-n-ichlcroethsr.e
-3- ———— - —— 2-Putanone
-,':-- — - ———— 1,1,1-Trichlorcsthane
-5-- — - ————— Carbon T&trachloride
1'"- • • - - — ----- —— Vinyl Acetate?
i 006 1 -
———————— Bromodichlorome thane
———————— 1 , 2-Dichl orapropane
0 1-5- — ——— c i = - 1 , 3-D i c h 1 o r o p r c pene
6- ——————— Trichloroethene
1,1,2-Tr.ichloroe thane
Benzene
—— —— Trans-1 , 3-Dichlaropropene
Bromoform
108-10-1—
591-73-6
127-13-4-
79-34-5--
lOE-E'S-7
4-Methyl-2-Pent£.none
2-He;-:anone 
_
Tetra.chloroethene
1 .1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
-Chlorobenrene
Ethyl benzene
Styrene
-:--7- —————— Total' Xylenes
10
10
10
t=
5
t;_
5
5
5
•=,
10
10
c
5
c=
>.l
5
5
5
5
U
L!
FORM I VGA
TUT 001 0382
1A
VOLATILE C3RGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
r"pr*./N 
*~ /"•
tr 1-1 oi-i
Name: CEI^IC CORP
VBLK07
Lab Codei CEIMIC 
Case No.: 12053
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 
(g/mL) G_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec. __0
Column:' (pack/cap) PACK
Contract: A3D9002B 
________
SAS No. : ______ 
SDG No. : BX97S
Lab Sample ID: V3O620-B1
Lab File ID: 
C04O6
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Analyzed: 06/20/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
I
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3————————Chlorome thane____________
74-S3-9————————Bromome thane_____________
75-01-4————————Vinyl Chloride______________
75-00-3————————Chloroe thane_____________
75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1————————Acetone_________________
75-15-0————————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4————————1,l-Dichloroethene:______
75-34-3————————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0———————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3————————Chloroform 
_____________
1O7-06-2———————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
7S-93-3————————2-Butanone_______________
71-55-6————————1,1,1-Trichlorcethane____
56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
108-05-4———————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4————————Bromodichlorome thane______
78-87-5————————1, 2-Dichloropropane_______
1O061-01-5—————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___
79-01-6————————Trie hi oroethene__________
124-48-1———————Dibromochlorome thane_____
79-OO-5-———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2————————Benzene •-••~- ••'-•.•'^•'•' •--.____.<*•
10061-02-6—————Trans-1 ,,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2————————Bromoform____• •• 
______
108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______
591-73-6———————2-Hexanone 
~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _
127-13-4———————Tetrachloroethene
79-34-5————————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-S8-3———————Toluene ' 
-• •'_____ -' •'
108-90-7———————Chlorobenzene____________
ICO-*.1.-4———————Ethyl benzene 
____________
1 00-42-5————:——styrene'-^-'^-"••-;-*>'•••- 
• •- -•••-
1330-20-7—————Total Xvlenes ' --^ " • •
1C
10
10
10
5
4
5
5
5
5
10
1
*n
10
e=(
5
5
^l
jL.
5
5
5
5
1
10
10
5
5
5
5.
5
G
:u
!U
:u
!U
:u
; a
!U
:u
:u
:u
; j
: j
:u
; j
: j
:u
:u
:u
;u
: j
;u
!U
:u
:u
: j
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
TUT OO1 0383
:i CFSA; ;•:•;;:- ANALYSIS "":~A CHEF"
.or :
Contract: £8090025
2AE Me . i ______
EFA SAMPLE
i 
PY704
PX97°
SC?IL
Lab S~.-r.ple ID; £90107-30
Lab Fi.le ID: 
A1253
._•_-. t_-..
LGI-J
3FC
•action :
II L'ar.up:
t r!cc . ___ 9_ 
dec. ____
< SecF/Ccn t/Sanc ) 
SCNC
(Y/N) N __ 
pHi
Date Received: 06/13/39
Date Extract-Be!: 06/13,'G?
Date? Analyzed: 
C 6'.-'2 9.'59
Dilution Factor: 1 . 0_____
UMIT<=:
'ug/L cr -.Jc/Ka) U5/KG
:•. S-- = -2———-—Phenol.
_--:-••-^4-^—--————bis(2-Chlci-Get!-,yl )i
- f-5.•-•-• — ----- —— 2-Chlorophenol_______________'.
3 :-l- i -73-1 —— — —— i , 3-D i c h 1 ore ben z en e __________!
106--6-7-—-- ——— 1 , 4-Dichlor obenze?ne__________!
100- = l-6 —— -———Benzyl Alcohol_______________!
9 - - SO-1 - — --———— l , 2-Di c h 1 oroben z sne_________!
?!:-4S-7~———————2-Msthyl phenol_______________!
39t3B-32--9—————bi£(2-Chloroisopropyl ) Ether_!
106-'.-4-5- ——————4-Methyl phenol___________ 
!
621-64-/-— —— —N-Nitrcso-Di-n-Fropylsmir.e__•
67-72-1-————
~^-^-'.—— — - — — T s o p h c i 
_________________
;>.. ---';- ...............—— -.. Nit.rcpnerirji_________________:
;.'! rj--::7
r---- ——...-—._2 , 4-Dinethyl phenol___________;
6r>-£5-0 -- -------Benzcic Acid_________________i
:.ll-c?l-l- — -—~-b.i5(2-rhlorocth--:-;y) Methane__!
120-97-2--- —— -- — 2,4-Dichlcrophenol___________!
:.20-81?-1-————— 1,2., 4-Trichi orobensene______!
.'. '-•--'• :: ••'''- — - - -- ^---Ch 1 r-roa-n iline 
'
-7-;. -c -3- ------- — -Ms xachl o rebut ad iene_____|___!
':.=J-50-7 ———'-— —4-Chloro-3-M6 thy 1 phenol______!
?1- -^7-6 ----- -•-———-2-i -ID thy 1 naphtha Iene___________i
T-.-/ 7-4--.—.———— He xachlorocyclopen tad iene___!
LS->':.--2—- — ---——2 , 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol ________!
0-=.-9-:-i—.-.— --.—2,4 , 5-Trichlcrophencl________i
v:-vr-~————- —— 2-Chloronaphthalene_________1
—-rirr:ii--h\ 1 F'.-thalTte 
~" 
~l
- 2 , 6-D i n i t r o to 1 men e __________ 1
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
360
3iO
360
360
360
36 O
1 GOO
360
360
360
1400
360
360
360
1700
360
360
1SOO
360 •
IS 00
360
360
360
. L!
;u
:u
1U
iLJ
:u
:U
:u
: J
ILJ
!U
;LJ
!U
!U
I SV-i
TUT 
OOl 
0384
1C
rfr-. I VOLATILE ORGANJCS ANALYSTS DATA ?<-!FET
SAMPLE NO.
b Name: LilTf-lC CfjRp
Con t ract: 0&D9002S
I l.a.b Cc.de: C.E:jlIC__ 
Case No.: .1 2059 
SAS Mo.:
Matri:;: ( soi i /vjate-r ) SOIL
I Sample i.'t/'-ol:
30_. 8 
(g/mL) G_
Level: 
(Ic-w/fj.sd; 
I..DU)
''. Moisture: not dec. 
9 
aec.
_____ 
SDG No.: BX97B
Lab Sample ID: 
89Q1Q7-30_
Lab File ]D: 
A1258
Extraction: 
'• SepF/Cont/Sonc} 
SONG
3PC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N__ 
. 
pH: 
9.1
Gate Received: 06/13/89
Date Extracted: 06/13/S9
Date Analvsed: •:'6^2
Dilution Factor: 1.0_
CAS NJ.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
( u a / L o r u a / K q ) U G / K G
Q
•-•- ._(• .-•_-._
51-23-5-
1. OO— 02— 7
I
-T*-** 
, n 
r~»
121-14-2
* — i n 
i • 
r~i
7005- -'2-
36-73-7-
100— 1O— 6
e: T /i KI -— \ 
H
8A-3O-6-
101-55-3
1 i E' — •" — 1
O _.i I.) 1 O
120-12-7
r-. i 
-T n 
—\
*_ '-' '. J 
~T T 
*J
129— O 0—0
85-68-7-
91-94-1-
56-':-5-3-
*-\ + r t i-\ •* 
o
< - -T 
,— , -» 
-?
1 1 ~7 
*"• " 
r~i
J. J. / — c? *t t.'
'~\/~\ c: 
/—i •—% 
-~i
207-OB-9
5O-32-3-
193-39-5
C T 
-? .- 
"?•
..1 . j 
/ '..' _'
191-24-2
- — ———— 3-Ni troe.ni ] me
- — - ——— Acenaphthene
xi , 4 Dinitrophenol
——— — — 4-Ni trophenol
- —————— Dibenzof ura.n
——————— 2 . 4-Dini trotoluene
——————— Diethy 1 phthalate
3- ————— 4-Ch 1 orophenv 1 -pheny 1 e t her
-— — — — — F luorene
— -- ———— 4— Mi troani 1 ine
—— ———— 4, 6-Dinitro-2-Methyl phenol
N Nitrosodi pheny 1 amine 
1) ______
- —— —— -4-Brofficpnenv 1 -pheny 1 ether
— — ——— Hexachl or o benzene
—— ———— Pen tachlorophenol
— — ———— P hen an threne
—— ———— Anthracene
— —————— Di-n-Butyl phthalate
—— ———— Fluoranthene
— —— —— Rvrene
———— —— Butyl benzyl phthalate
----- ———— 3, 3' -Dichlorobenzidine
- ——— ——— Ben 20 ( a ) Anthracene
- —————— bis(2-Ethyihe;;yl ) Phthalate
——————— Di-n-Octvl Phthalate
- —————— Benzo( b JFluoranthene
—— ———— Ben 20 ( k: ) Fluoranthene
Bei izo ( a ) Pvrene
Indeno( 1,2, 3-cd ) Pyrene
—— - ——— Dibenz ( a , h) Anthracene
Ben 20 ( q , h , i )Perylene
1300
360
.A. O1.' .'
360
360
-T l^ /-_
J' O U
360
150
1800
360
360
360
1300
14O
360
360
360
360
360
7 CO
360
•_ o-.'
240
360
-T ft~\
•J'QU
36 O
360
36O
-.' W *./
•_'O».'
: u
i t »
i uJ
:u
!U
i i i
:u
!U
!U
1 I
:u
:u
:u
!U.
:u
:u
: J
!U
:u
1 I 1
ID
1 1 )
!U
!U
:u
; j
1 1 1
:u
:u
i i i
:u
ID
1 1 1
:
be separated from Dipheny 1 amine
FORM I SV-2
TUT O01 0385
.'37 Rev
r— r-. /\ 
,—- f t J r"-« 
r— 
K I ~^
L-_ r 1-1 c: M i • i,-. i. c. T!_! .
— • — M T I I f~< I 
A -T" T I 
I— • 
.— • t— . — • /x I • T f— r- 
f. K i /-i I 
* / r~ ^- r- 
•• 
-% -
.:- — : i j. vLi.-1-i i J.I..E 
u'. -iifi-:ii i i. c. 
i -IIV..-IL. : £ i r. , - r i
T-. ' / -^ -I ,-.
.- i / :• •--•
/ r-. f -, r- .-,.-.
ITi 
c9C'i••'• 7-j 1
I
••veil :
. tr.v.c
•r- r -
• — ••
w L. . i~ Or I 
i i C; 11 
u» d C
ti-r,: (Se-F
ssnup: 
(Y/l'
— -- r~ 
K r-.
•_„ !-•;;• 
1 . V.J .
_ '-• CT 
- 
.._
"T .'. 
*~. 
/ .. ' _ 1 ^ 
r~~ 
1 
L 
r~ ' ^ —— 
~ ^^ r 
r 1 *"* / -~1
-•.-.-. 
^ J,. j.ii_ 1 
iT 
i.--:. w 
i -. J. fci 1 J-' . 
r-:l ^..t'--
L D %' 
D a t e R e c e- i v e d : 0 6 / i Z , ' 3 9
23 
dec. 
Date,- E:;tracted: 06/13/89
.'Cont/Sonc) 
9.C'.IC 
Date Analyzed: 06/29/89
) N 
pH : 
9.0 
r-j 1 u.tion Factor: J.O
CGNCENTRAT I ON UN ITS:
CC.MFC: ^D 
(uc/L -r ua/Ka ) UG/KS 
0
——— F:-enol
11 1-4 4-4 ——————— biE(2-ChloroethvlJ Ether
r-t rr 
c — r 
r-.
5 /1 « 
— '-» 
4
_ T A / •_• 1
106-46-7 - ——
100-51-6 ———
9 <= — 1 ^ "^
4 f~* t 
n, n 
n
e *~> 4 
f f\ 
T
/ — T __ — 7 >-^ __ •( __ 
__ __ _
9G-95-3 ————
F3-75-5- ————
65-85 --0- —— --
111-91-1 ————
1 T' '') t- "' 
1
t-\ H 
*-,,-• 
-T
V JL -- .
106-47-E - ——
87-63-3 ——— —
c- (-. 
r- .-^ -*
91-57-6 ————
77-47-4 ————
SS-06-^ — — -
0 <=: C C=. ... £
7 w* / ^' ~
91-58-7 — ——
oo -7 « 4
tJ U^ 
/ ^' 
1
i 31-1 1-.:-,- ——
*"i »•. r-. o ' <~i
606-10-2- ——
——— 2-Chl oro phenol
- 
i , _:, - D i c h i o r a b t-n z e n e
——— 1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
——— Benzyl Alcohol
——— 1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
——— -2-:icthy 1 phenol
——— bis (2-ChloroisC'propy 1 ) Ether _
^ hethyl phenol
——— N— Ni troso-Di-n-Propyl aiTiine
- - — He x ac h 1 c roe t han e
——— Ni trobenr ene
—— -I so^horone
—— -_-r Ji tropheno 1
———— 7. , 4-Oitr.er.hy 1 phencl
——— Eenzoic Acid
——— bis ( 2-Chlorcethc;:y } Methane
——— 2 , 4-Dichl cro phenol
——— 1 , 2 , 4-Trichlor^be?nzene
——— Naphthalene-
- —— 4-Chloroani 1 ine
- —— He- .; <? c !-i 1 ore bu 1 3d i cne
——— 4-Chloro-3-Methy 1 phenol
——— ^-Mcc-thyl naphthalene
Hexa-_hlcrocyc lopentadiene
——— 2,4 , 6-T rich lor ophenol
——— 2 .4 , 5-Trichlorophenol
——— 2-Chloronaphthalene
2 Nitroaniline
——— Dimethyl Ph thai ate
—— --Acenaphthy lene
—— -? , 6-Dini trotoluene
430 
1 'J
43O 
!U
430 
! U
430 
! L.!
^30 
!L!
430 ! U .
4 30 
i L:
43O 
1 U
430 
I U
A 30 
! D
430 
! U
43O 
! U
430 
!U
43O 
!U
430 
1 U
43O 
I L)
2100 ;u
430 
,'LJ
430 
; U
430 
! U
310O 
!
430 
ID
430 
! L!
430 
! U
2500 !
430 
! U
43O 
I U
2100 ;u
430 
! U
2100 :u
430 
!U
430 
i U
430 
! U
1
1
47
FORM I SV'-l
1/87 Rev,
TUT 
001 
0386
1
*
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1C 
EFA BAMPL2 MO .
i
i 
BY710
::: 
•'• •.-.-;. IVUr.'.'.r: -2PP 
Cor.tracr.: 6S29O022 
I
---•:- 
.;.:;•: '/:::::. 
Cite ;" •:•-•. j J..205R 
. 2AS 
'-!D.: 
SD3 No.: E'X9~^
•<:..'-ri :. ,.::::.i/., a •;•:;;••; SOIL 
Lab Saiv.Gle 12: 
890107-31
?-.n.-lv --I've..!; 
30.2 (G/n-iL) G 
Lab File ID: 
A12iO
Lc-velr 
( low/ir-ed ) LOW 
Date Received: 06/13/99
•/. i':ci=---Lii e: r.ct c!sc . 
23 
dec. 
Date Extracted: 06/13/99
Extr v:::'::.c:r;: 
( SepF/C^n t/Sonc ) 
SCNC 
Date P
SFC 21jai-up: 
(V/H) N __ 
pH : 
9 . 0 
Diluti
CONCEN7PATIC
•-- -•--.. - - ' .- - - - 
- - I'-i •_ e r. a p h t h e n e
5.V- 28-r — — ———— -2, 4-D in it roc he-no i
1 100-02-7------ —— -4 -Nitre: phenol
! ......:.: (_'••--.'"• ----- -ijibenzof uran
i 121 -I— 2- —————— 2, 4-Dinitro toluene
v , 
• G4-/.0-2-— ----- —— Diethvlphthalate
• 
.- •-.'.-.:• ...:•.. 
4 Lhiorcphenyl pheny 1 ether __
> tt 
. . . - - 7 - - - 
- Flu^rciit
i 100-1 ;-::—— ———— 4-Nitraaniline
Ci-3v~6—— - ————— N-Nitr=soc!iphenylaffiine (1}
- : " --- ~-7 -- — —— --•-Brcmcpheny 3. -pheny 1 athcr ____
: 
-.-'"•-•""-'• i-- —— — -Hexachl^robenzenc
'-7-:'. ••'"•-• • -- -— ---rt-rit.?.t::~. Ic.rcrhenol
. 
"•.--• - : •-•- • 
Fhtnanthrene
! : 20- ; :.--••------ —— Anthracene
; 84- -4 -2-— ———— -Di-n-SutylDhthalate
i 206- -"-- -0---- ——— Fluoranthene
•*• •""• r^ 
>"• •* 
* 
r*i . r ._ .^ ,_ ._
i 
.i...
1- 
. ,_.-.-• 
— — - i-yrene
, P:V. ,.,.. .„._.. — — -Patylbenzylphthalate
. c:. -•:.-;..—-.---..-. —— 3,3'-richlor^be-nzidins
. 
I- >-.•>-? -..:-.:- -- 
- 
r.-'fiii-uf a) Anthracene
i 
*•» . j r*. 
,-. t 
/-, 
r- i
••-—-- 
- -- 
t._ ; i ! f r^.- 1.1 PI *:?
; 117-E1-7 ----- — -— bis(2-E*hylhexyl JPhthalate __
; 117-84-:. —— - ——— Di-n-Octvl Phthalate
; 20r:--'--2-- ——— —— BenzQ(b)Flucranthene
l~ ,- -r 
- , • •. 
.— 
i- 
y 1 
\ 1 — 1 
II
i 
,....-. -- -c .••--•• — -— 
t-sinzc ( k ii'- j. i-iufan i. hsnvr
, 3.0-32-8------ — — Benzc ( a ) F'vrene
i 
-• •— . — 
— C" 
r- 
"" 
i 
' •• 
f~^ 
~~" 
• • r-,
1 
j. / .. -• 
w1 
j,rtCj&PiCj^--n^.( -..• tl w / i y ( tH i £r
-T "" '--•• - - - • • • - -----DibenL (a. h; Ari thracer.c
; 
:.. 7 1-;"-"--- 2- ----- -- -^enzc ( q , h , i } F'e-ry lens
^^
ralvzed: 
r"^/2c/S9
en Factor : 1 . O
N L'!-JI73:
:
i
2100 
!U
430 
: J
2100 
!U
2100 
!U
430 
;:_•
430 
: u
430 
: 'J
iso 
;j
2100 
i'J
2100 
:J
430 
I L'
430 U
^30 
' J
2:00 
;j
1 7 '.- 
, •-*
130 
i'J '
- — ,-, 
• i
— -..••_• 
, -.j
430 
I'J
^30 
: U
430 
; LJ
360 
; :j
430 
, J
430 
! U
95 
' J
430 
! U
430 
I LJ
430 
I U
^30 
! LJ
43-:; 
• j
430 
1 LJ
430 
i LJ
I
i
A7
Clarinet ::•::- -i-sparated from Dipheny 1
FGRM I
TUT 
001 
0387
a7 Rev.
• •••
I"A iAMRLE N3.
i- '-1 r- 
^ i _ 
— \/ f--—T I-
w> JL. ^ 
i -: i_, . : 
i /- ; . t
L«b Sample IT; 3-0107-32
(g/.-nL)
"'. .•'.:-:-i~ • urr- ; net 
rcc .
2~ 2 I ! .
Received: Oa/l
Date E:;tr&cte=r 0^/1
•Y/N; w_
rH:
Dilution F^ctcr: 3 . 0
C
~ r- 
t. : — ,
I--... 
I -,_ .
- — ——— 2-Chlcrophcnol ____________
' 541-77-1——-———-1 ,3-Dich'l zrcbcnzcr.e ________
1 lCd-46-7-—-———1.4-Dichlorcbenzcne_______
; 100-31-6-——————Bsnzyl Slcchol___________
, 95-20-j———— --——1 ,2-Dichlorobcr.zene_______
1 75-4E-7———————2-Methylphenol____________
: 3^630-32-9————3is(2-Chlorcisoprozyl )Ether.
! 
_ '..','.; "•• -:T *4 — ^7" ~ — —"— — — — — *% — is £} i*. 11"..-" ji "., "i £ r*^ CD A ___
i 
£.. -^ a "~ *. *•• " / ~~ * 
"" 
"~; \ — • x j. w *~ u.- '1- ^ — »-' * """ Pi 
r i
i 67- 72-1 ———— - — -Hexachlcrcerths.re__________
~~ *~" ~~"" —""~ — .v iii '_• f" i i o r ^ r~i (••
— ~"~"~ —' ™ -—-- __._•"•.'., j. T^ j-"" ~ r • t" r^_ j~, t~~» A
6r.-35-••>---——---Bi=nzoic ^cid______________
, 111-71- 1—- —— -—-biE(2-C hi crz.e the:; y^c thine;.
; 120- S3--2-—-———2,4-Dicnlcrophenol________
; 120--32-1————-1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____
: i-;6-4~--3--------
; ^T-^O-7—----———i-Ch!wro-3-Msthylpher.3i_
: 
cl- 
r.'.7--:'.;---—-- —— 2-Methylri£phth£.l£:-rie_____
! "77-47--"--—-----—i-'cxachlcrozyc Icpen tB.c'.ier.t
. 3~"-Of-2~— -————-2,4,6-Trichlorouhenol __
' 9?-r-T--4 — -—-——2 , 4 ,5-Tric hi croc-hero 1___
. 
?:; 
• •':.2- ~ - -------2-Chlcror,aphthalene_____
33--'---———-——-2-NJ trcsr.iline___________
:.71--- ;--;--— ——— Dimethyl F•'-
: 20E--6-P- -——-——3cen,= phthvlene_
410
.T 
. .*
410
a 1 0
410
" !' I'O
410
410
.'•10
20':-:-
-"-10
4 5 0
2000
4 1 0-
20-:---
410
410
4 1 0
•L'
-rn 
;LJ
•ilO 
!U
410 
;u
410 
;u
ii-o 
:_
••% ^ ,-j 
i ; •
•'1C 
J
2 oo-:
--10
j
L
; 5 05
FCRM ! FV-3
Rev,
TUT 00.1 0388
I
3FA LAr
— '"• "! '-••' T -'
_ 
— •— ~ V-i - r
•- 4— r-.f.
-:.: - 
r"
I",? 3 X.,
-E2-" Nc. i ^y^T
-". - .-,. H 1 •-.: -
: t- / • ' i. J. ;
Le-'t-:: 
; low. /'
:: r':::stu:-e: not.
_~ 0.4 
' G ,' ML ;
L21-;
20 
de::.
._£.L E.-..r.pi£ ::::: c?o.i 07-33..
L5.C Fili? II: 
A12i^
Date Received: •:-&/13/g?
! ^Gp
PC 21t:ar,
Este Anil', zed: 06/30 /
Dilution Factor: 
'.. . 0
C3--32 ?-—•-•————-ir.c c-r.if.hr. hen a.
100-02-" — — — —
132--£4-«= ————-Diber.zcl
121-14-2-
"'003-72 -7————--•-•••?-Chlcrrjphe PI y I -pherv/ ie ther_
£6-73-7---——————FT uorrns__________________
100 -10-6— - - - - --'•>-- M i t r c= a n i : i r, e.________._____
SA-3-:-6— --——-—.- K-NitrcisadiHhsnyi5.,v.:r,s (1)"
: Cl-?'?-3-~- ———•-•/!--Frc-cphG-y] -phenyle-thG:^_
••S;-.T:-______
34-"- -2----------::i-,• •.-r_:Mvip":-,th,:.:Tt.r
12?-:"' "•-•"- ••--—————l- vrf;nc______________
lo-Tr •3--- ———-— P-rrc,^ )^nr.;-
213--01-9 ——-— — 2hry<=er-^______________
1 17-GI--7-————-bis(2-EthyIhe^vi )Phtha]
117-C4-0---———---i-n-O-tyl Phthalate__
205-9? -2-- - —— -—Per -c i b } F1 uz ran thene__
207-08-9-—————-B^r.-^~. ( \-) Flagrant hers__
i'73 • Z'' -'••--•--- ----l:-,de;-.c : 1,1., ~- cd / Py--.--.-.t
-3 .-;-,... 3.. ._..._............ rii.er.:: f ;. _ •.. ; A n t h r_ c .,,.. _
(1) 
- I.^.r.rvr-r. Lo= separatej f,-;^, Diphc:-ny 1 c
i :oo
-UO
3000
2000
410
410
3SO
410
1 f.'I-
2000
200'-:
410
.0. 1 0
-- - .^
— J- .'
— -• .-, --,
-_ ."-• -•
120
410
410
-'10
--10
- :. "
--. — ,-.
...• -_• • .
-110
410
200
410
:u
1 T
iU
i'J
:u
410
A 10 
; L:
410 
ID
4iO 
:L
410 
:LJ
!
TUT 001 0389
1/S7 Rev,
i A
"\ r-.«-»/».(. i T r^r-» 
,-\ K i A i • / r» T r-« 
T~, A. -r r\ 
<™ i 'r
.-1 "-. U M1N J. L~ -_w 
f-t I \ M l_ T O X wl- ^. ri i t-i 
_i t 1
EF'A 
bi-iMPLE MO
!
b Name: CEflMIC CC
Matri :; : i =rai 1 /water
Sam p 1 e w t / vcl :
Level : 
( Icw/med )
7. Moisture: not dec
Column: 
(pack/cap)
CAS NG.
1
: 74-E7-3 —————
i 
— f r 
f~i T- 
r-.
. 
! 75-00-3 ——— —
I 
i ^- e 
*-» Q 
*-*
I 
, / .: 09 
..
1 
! 67-64-1 ————
i -71= < c. 
f-» 
__
1
: 75-35-4 ————
! 75-34-3 ————
! 67-66-3 —— —
! 107-06-2 - ——
! 7S-93-3 ————
1 
-T 1 ._
 rr. "= .- ^. _.
' =6 
ri~T ^ 
-
I 108-05-4 —— -
! 75-27-4 — — -
! 7E-8/-5 ——— -
; 10061-01-5—
i 
/ T 
*-> 1. a
! 124-48-1 —— -
I 
/ .4. -r--' 
«.
1 i'.'VOJ. Ujl O
! 75-25-2 ——— -
BY759
RP 
Contract: fcBDe'0023
Case No.: 
12055 
SA3 No.: 
3DG No.: 
BT747
) SOIL 
Lab Sample ID: 890107-12
5.O 
fa/mL> G 
Lab File ID: 
C0389
LOW 
Date Received: 06/08/59
12 
Date A
PACK 
Diluti
nalyzed: 06/18/89
on Factor: 5.0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
COMPOUND 
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UG/KG 
G
——— Chlorome thane
Bromomethane
——— Vinyl Chlcride
• ——— Chloroe thane
• ——— Methyl ene Chloride
• ——— Acetone
——— Carbon Disulfide
• ——— 1 . 1-Dichloroethene
• ——— 1 . 1-Dichloroethane
• ——— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ( total ) __
• ——— Chloroform
- ——— 1 . 2-Dichlcroe thane
- ——— 2-Bu.tanone
- ——— 1 . 1 . l-Trichloroeth«ne
• ——— Carbcn Tetrachloride
———— Vinyl Acetate
———— Brcmcdichlorome thane
———— 1 ,2-DichloroDroDane
———— cis-1 
.3-Dichloroprcrene
———— Trichlorcethene
———— Dibromochloromethane
———— 1 . 1 .2-Trichloroethane
———— Benzene
———— Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene _____
——— Bromof orm
- — ——— 4— Methvl — "2— Pentanone
! 591-78-6 ——————— 2-Hexanone
I 
I 127-18-4 —— 
-
| 
1 79-34-5 ——— -
i 
4 AO 
CQ 
"*"
! 103-90-7 —— -
1 
I 
« /-• f"t 
/• 4 
/I
i 
i '•-''..' *•:•..-. 
*.<
> 
1 TTf-- ".,-•. -T
i 
JL •_> •_• •-• ^_ U 
.
1 
1
1 ^~^
1
———— Tetrachloroethene
———— 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachlorcethane ___
———— To 1 uene
———— Chlorobenzene
———— Ethyl benzene
———— Styrene
———— Total Xylenes
i
i
57 
! U
es~^ 
t i i
_• / 
i '.J
57 
!U
57 !U — L
57 
I^fC
250 
IfSt/^T
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
!U
57 
!U
28 
!U
28 
! U 
J
57 
!U 
,
28 
! U 
f~*
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
!U
28 
1U
28 
1U
57 
!U
57 
!U
28 
!U
28 
', U
200 : ^
28" !U
420 !
28 • ! U
1400 
\$& _i/j-
11
285
FORM I VOA
••'• "^~.-*'*-^i^ 
TUT 001 0390
<U3
ORGAN IC3 ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
FFA SAMPLE tin
BY 7 5 7
_.._..__________ 
Contract: 68._)9O.O_2_8 __ 
'. _ __'_____
Case Mo.: 12053__ 
SAS No.: ..______ 
3DG No.: BT747
•5 C so i1/wa 
t e ri SOIL_
f ^i/vol: 
3Q.7 
(g/mL) G.
: 
(1 ow/med) L ________
• t "ire : not de?c .
•• ' i on :
1 oanups
Lab Sample TD:
Lab File ID: 
A i 2.7 8.
Date Received:
.15
dec.
(SepF/Cont/Sonc )
(Y/N) N __ 
pM:
9.0
Date Extracted: i.»6_,__!.2_,_89.
Datf? Analysed: 
(r)Z£ti
Dilution Factor: 20O
r.AS
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(uq/L or uq/Kq) UG/l
O
-1.3-Dichlorobenzene
-1, 4-D.ichlorobenzene_
-Benzyl Alcohol __
LO8-95--2———————F~-h«?nol______________ _ _____
1 1.1-44-4———————bis ( 2-Ch 1 oraethy 1 ) E ther ~____
75-57—8————————2—Chlorophenol _________ _____
541-73-1——————-
106-46-7———————
100-51-6———————-
75-5O-1—————
"-ji^_/^g_-j___________
3763B-32-9—————bis( 2-Chloroisopropy 1 )Ether.
1O6-44-5———————4-Me thy 1 phenol______________
621-64-7———————N-Ni tr oso—Di—n-Propy 1 amine_
('j 7-72-1—-——————He ::achloroe thane____________
r'8-95-3———————Nitrobenzene__________ ___
78-59-1————
•1.2-Dichlorobenzene_
-2-Methy1pheno1 _____
IO5-67-9-
65-B5--O—
I 1.1-91-1-
12O-H2-.1-
91-2O-3—
VO6-47-Q-
87-68-3--
- T sophorone _________
-2—Ni trophenol ______
-2,4—DimethyIpheno1_
-E<enzoic Acid __
-bis( 
2-Chloroetho>:y)Methane.
-2,4-Dichlorophenol _________
-1,2.4—Triehiorobenzene
-Naphtha1ene__________
77-47-4——-
nn~o<s-2—-
95-95-4—-
VV-5B-7—-
BH-74-4—-
.131-11-3—
20H-96-8—
/,OA- 
70 2--
-4-Chloroani1ine________
-Hexachlorotautadiene _____
-4-ChIoro-3-Methy1pheno1
-2-Methv1 naphthalene____
——He;:achlorocyc 1 a pen t ad i ene
——2.4,6-Trichlorophenol____
— -2,4,5-Trichlorophenol____
—-2~Chloronaphthalene_____
——2-Ni troani1ine
-Dimethvl Phthalate.
-Acenaphthvlene_____
-2,6-Dinitrotoluene
9OO'.»..)'.»
7BOOO
78OOO
78 (JO'"'
780(.»O
7HOOO
78OOO
3200OO
78OOO
130OOOO
78OOO
7BOOO
78OO'">
42OOO
'80OOO
7BOOO
780OO
78OOO
770O
78OOC)
78OO'.'
78OOO
78OOO
780OO
3800OO
7ROOO
38OOOO
78OOO
7ROOO
78OOO
:u
1 1 I
t I .'
!U
: i j
i
i
;u
!E
:u
:u
:u
MJ
in
: .j
: u
:u
:u
!U
:,i
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
:u
: 11
:u
:u
FORM I SV-1
s-i I / /
TUT OO1 O391
1/B7 \ ••••'-.
IP,
::• "'...•; "::_E 
2'-.CA."_[;Z AliAI.YSIE DATA 7HECT
• i - 
-.- - 
•" T.' " '.•*•*• f~ 
— •- . r~.p.
• '•"-••>'-. ' -. .:-___•_•__. • -- - •..- " I
I L«.b C::^:: ^~.:HI_._ 
C-s
^ :!.;. trj;.: ; -D^ : /.—:- .ver "• 1DIL
2 A m pic; 
i-;*./\cl: 
31 .2 
(g/mL)
L.a-vc? 1 •. 
(1 o w / r.ed ) L.CUI___
X Moisture: net dc-c . 
15 
dec.
: Extraction: 
( = z:pF /Ccnt/Sonc )
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N__ 
pH: 
9.0
__________ 
Contract: 6£D9'"i_02£
Nc.. : 12058 
3AS Mo.: __ __
EFfi ?AMPLE"%3.
BY759MS
Me . : 5T747
I
Lab E«mple ID: 990107-12X2
Lab File ID: 
ftl.279______
Date Received: 06/O8/S9
Bate Extracted: 06/12/39
Date Anslyred: 07/01/39
Dilution Factor: 210_____
CDN'CENTRATICN UNITS;
:rs_c-r-..^_ ....._... —— rr-;-enol
lliw.4-.4-- — —— • — bis(2-CThlcrcethvl JEthsr
9r.- T7-r-> ----- - ——— 2- Chl crasheno 1
54.1-73-1— —— - — 1,3-Dic hi ore benzene
10i,- ^6- 7 ——— • ——— 1 , 4-Dic hi e<ro benzene-
100-51-6- ——————— Benzyl A Ice hoi
~-5-f 0- •:. ————— - — -1. ,2-Bich lore benzene
95-46-7- ——————— z-i1e thy 1 phenol
39c.'3r-72-9~- — - — bis ( 2-Ch lore:. copra py ] ) Ether
lOi— •i4--l5—— ————— -4-MsthvlDhenol
1 2 1 f: -1 ----- — - — M - r „' i. t r c = o - D i - n - F1 r c p y 1 a m i n e __
•::7-72-l ———— -- — He xachlorce thane
<:-• c: _.c^...-._ —— ... ... ... ———— N , 4- f. _ ,. ., n .. _ n ^
75-7-i-'- -;.----.----- — Isophor :?nc-
.-.'-— r . 
-. 
-< 
.. i - i 
. 
,_ _ 
%
'..* L. 
.' 
. 
—— 
1 M J. •_ , 1... P . i i t.' 1 i - — . J.
j;: -._.,. -...o.. —— ._ —— 2,4-Di:v,et.hvlf;hent-l
c-.S-'-F^-O- — — - —— Fenrc ic Acid
l.:.l-?l-l-— — — — bis(2-Chlorcsthox> ) Methane __
: 20-87 - -- -——---. —2 , 4 -n ; c h 1 c re pheno 1
i2:i-f?2-.t —.- — — . -1,2. 4 -Trie hi crobenren*>
'•'.-'I- :-•:----•------ — Naphtha] sne
J-: ::-- • -"I ----- ----- -4-C.L-.l-::rca.nili-'e
c"
: - — t '.:'—_- — — — — — — — — n £, ;.; ^ _; H l c r c f. Li t a d i ci' n e
ir .— > 
T- ,-* ~r 
n 
r-- L. T 
-^ 
^y* x u 
•* 
^ 
T
r., ., 
r — 
— \ 
ivi l ( 
i 
i- 4. 1 
1
77-47--1 -— — - —— --Hexrtc: hlorocye 1 open tsd iene _____
C8-0:--2- — —— • — -2,4,6-Trichlcrophenol
,-r- 
.r ••- ... f ._ . . . ..... _.- 
/•. c .-TJ. , cv, T c f_m^i.. .-^ „ 7
.... 
,- _ 
-. 
._ 
, 
_ _ (. J. 1. _ 1
' 
..•»_• 
>.. 
l_- ; i j i.. t i. • . ; cr i_; i I T_ i tir\ i tr r , uj1
-;-...- .'..-.. .........._... .. .. 2-Ni trcan i 1 ine
:!.:'•-.' ' .' 
----- - r-i.-e-vJiyl Phthal.v.ts
.O; 'T-'":. r 
- •• •• - ••••- --Aner. -rhth vler.c-
i •:/ -" ::-2- 
— •-• — -2,6-r'initrotoluene
7 E-O :>•:•
— T r". .-. /•< -~x
'_. •_•• l.' -'
— * ,—. -•»/•- ••-,
.' \_'Ot.'
 N.
7SOOO
7SOOO
73000
— rr-l - - -
. C -.'*-'*.'
310000
73000
1300000
73000
"3000
7COOO
— -\.-. .-. .-.
• — . •.'».*
37000
-•W4-'1.'' -'
— r c~. r~t t ~\ '-;
•7 r:- i~i •'• r-
.' vjlj >.'•-•
79 000
7300 •:
7 r? oO'i'
7 SO 00
- 7 sooo
"8000
73000
73000
3COOOO
7 SOOO
3GCOOO
73000
— T,— 
,-•> ,'-. .".
. •_. '_' . .
73000
:
I I I 
1
i '_' 
1
: J 
!
t i l 
1
iU 
i
i u 
:
;u
i
i
iE
:u
i
i . i
i 
-. .-
,
•
' 'T
, \j
;u
:u
:u
:u
, u
!U
1 1 1
1 '-J
i ' t
:u
: u
! '• 1
:u
; u
•; 'j
;u
:
FCRil 1 SV-i
723
TUT OO1 O392
-.— i- .' v . T .— r-. 
,- , . ,-M 
/,-- .— 
• ,- -r r, 
,- , l-[——T
..-. - Mi i j..., 
i. 
;-•. :-ii~i_ . .} .. .1' i..: . i-i ,:i"iZ-C. j
ERA SAMPLE NO.
•-•>
k 
' i-^ ••"••::••: CJ-JTriC rc^P 
Crntrpct:
1 :..;-. U C Lee: rE:KIC 
Case h.!o.: 12058 ' SAG No.:
"ist,--:: :rc——,,^-; -,JL
| Level ; 
•' l3i,/med } LOW
'• Mcisturc: net dsc. 
15 
dec.
: E:;trf..e-c:.an: 
(ScpF/Ccnt/Sonc) 
S3NC
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N __ 
pH: 
9.0
CCNCEI.
"•"1 
-~- 
CCKPO'JIJD 
C.iy/L
' 
' •*• - _ r~ cr — 
_ 
_ 
i-. i_ _ _ i
1 
1 111--.4--4 ——— - — J-his(2-CM=rcethyi;=Ether
| 
•' 95-57-2 ———————— 2-Chlorophencl
' 
•-•^-L •••••• -V- 
-l,3-Dn_hl*_,rob3n^sne
! 106- --A-7-- ——— • — 1,4-Dichlorcbenzene
1 
: 100-51-6 —— — • — -Benzyl Alcohol
1 \^ 
i =5-50-1 —————— — 1.2-Dichlo;-cbsnzene
: -5-4-8-7--- ————— 2-Methy}phenol
1
3'f-S- 72-9 - —— --bis(2-Chloroisoprcpyl )E +
: -L-^—l^-s- —————— 4-Mothylphenol
; • •:.:!• 6-;-~ 
——— 
• ——— N-Nitrcsc-Di-n-Propylamj
' 
-- • 
• — 
— 
' ' *_ • c. '„ . i j. LJ i L_- *.; L. ft t\ HI &
- .-.- • . i -- 
-- 
- 
-r-2. trote.-.ztr, if
-• — . 
r: .— 
-; 
— 
L
1 
J. ": '— ' i. j i i '_j j V-' i . C
——— ^, 
——— ——— 
—— 
' " I ) - t • J_ 
' 
1. 
1
• 
-- 
-•' 
^_ 
1 i u w i '...' ,_ . .t- : ; ._ J.
-"- - - 
-- • 
— * r 
i. j_ , 1 1 r. •_ i t r i. ,J i I *._ I t — x
i 
C--5- 55- •:,----- —— -Pen zoic Acid
SY759MSD
fcB:)900::G
^?D3 No. : I5T747
Lab Sample ID: 890107-1 2MSD
Lab File ID: 
A12SO
Date Received: O6/OS/S9
Date Extracted: O6/12/G9
Data Analyzed: 07/01/89
Dilution Factor: 210
TF.ATIDN UNITE:
-r u.g/Kg) L'£/> 
G 
H
1 
TO 00 
i LJ
! 
7SOOO 
! LJ
: 
78 coo 
; ;j
! 
73000 
! U
! 
7EOOO 
! U
! 
73000 
i U
! 
73000 
! U
! 
270000 
!
:her 
! 
78000 
!U
: 
ii ooooo 
:
.r.e 
! 
73000 
1 'J
! 
. 78000 
:U
73000 
: Ll
; 
-'TOO'" 
i u
: 
""SO'r'O 
i '-J
! 
35000 
!J
I 
380000 
: U
i ill-^i-l ——————— t:is(2-Chlorcethcxy)Me-thane ___ ! 
7SOOO 
!U
1 120- 83-2--—— —— 2,4-Dicnlorcshenol 
1 
78000 
IU
: :.-:•'.•--.-,. i 
— - 
— -l ,2,4 - ' ri^hloroben^E-ns
!.— 
• « - • - — • • 
k I 
t 
l_ t 
•*
- 
- 
- 
• rr* P- 1 i r i . .-.. j. t? : ! tz'
, 
:•.'.-•:::-- - • •-(.-: — ------ — -'-^hiorcar.iline
: "7-t E-7-- — - ——— Hexachlcrobutadiene
: -:=..«..-;... ._......_._.. —— 4-Chlore-.i-Methyl phenol
, 9? -:-7-£. —— ————— 2-!1eth-,'lnaphthaler.e
"! — T 
—— 
'1 
|| 
11 
-1 
• 
• •
! C2-Oc-2—— - ————— 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
• T.':_C --._.-...__. —— .._._2.4, 5-7--;.chlQi-ophe;-Dl
. '- 
5..;- 
----- -- 
7 
Lh
1, c-.rcnc-iphtnalenf
: 
- :- : - -- - -.:: - - - - - - -.. - 2-M.i t ro = n i 1 ir. s
-•""I •::- _• -- - - -- -: ir^thvl p'-.tl-.alats-
: 
73000 
: u
: 
7POOO 
i !.J
i . 
7SOCO 
I L:
! 
78000 
! U
i 
' 73000 
JL!
! 
78000 
! U
ie 
1 
"3000 
!Li
! 
78000 
i Ll
! 
330000 
! LJ
; 
7 «ooo 
: '.i
! 
730000 
' 'J
-'SO 00 
' LJ
. ;:?C--'-^- ^-- --------i-cai-.aphthylene 
; 
73000 
i U
^^ 
: - - " 6 - r : -7.- - —— 
- —— -7,L-Dinitrot.Gluene
; 
-eooo 
: u
i 
J
72
FORM 1 SV-1-
TUT 001 O393
!
I
\
1
< *• , 
:- :*• 'v 
*— /\ K*I *-. i r* 
K 1 1— L 
V
J.T. 
c. f- M 
cir-iilr- I_E. iJO. 'x
";?.;•:: '.DLATTLE ^rGANiCG :-\-\^,\ YSIS r.-ATA L-
;-=:F~
! BY 760
•,,5; 
~!~: ";T,:: rr?R~ 
Contract: iE-D9002B 
I
;.•..!&: :.ir::-:T- 
Ca-e Wo.: .12053 
SAS Mo.: 
<^DG ,\'n . : BT747
: 
•=.-:-.: 1 -.,i-(t.erl EOIL 
LaD Sample ID: 890107-13
•~- •'••-••:-} i. 
30.1 
(a/mL) E 
Lab File ID: 
A1282
i 
( low/msri) 
LOW 
. . 
. . • ' ' ' . 
Date Received: 0£/OS/B9
sturc;: ;--t cite. 
16 
dec. 
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
.ctic-n: 
( SeDF/Car, t/Sonc ) 
SDMC 
Date Analyzed; 07/01/8*7
rieanup: 
(Y/N) N 
pH: 
S . 5 
Dilution Factor: 10
r^ r~- 1 i *~- r~ \ • -»••-. A -r T r-
L- O i -,' L. C. i ['•< i ~.r1 ( J. U
i
: .'.:?--[:- 2- —————— -Phenol
! : l ;.-•••',••; -4-— —— - — bis ( 2-Chloroethvl )Ethsr
: '"',-!" 7-3- —— - ——— 2-C.Mcrr. phenol
; 
•=.<;•; --73-1 --- ——— 
-•-! , 3-Di.-h] 6rab*=r,-e-ne
•' 306-46-7- — - —— — 1 ,.4-D.ichlorcbenzene
! iOO-'rl-i--- ————— Benzyl Alcohol
, 95-^0-1- ——————— 1 ,2-Dichlorobenrene
: v «=...- 3 _.v.. ...... —— „ — 2 --Methyl phenol
: 39i33-3"-~ ————— -bis (2-Chloroi.EOpropyl )Tlhc;r _
, 10-/.-44-5 — — - ——— 4-Msthyl Phenol
! 621-.-i->-7 ————— - — M-NitrcsQ-Di-n-Prcr.vla.TO-G
: 67-~"2-l--- — ——— He xachloroe thane
c-_..._r-._ ,..__.._ — — -Mi trcbsnzene
' .•"•::• — *:• .-'- \ - — - — — — — — — i =cphorone
. 
- :.-.- "
r"- - ------ ~---,-r.NJ. trcpnenol
I l ::r.-:ii7 ------- —— --2 , 4-L>imetny 1 phenol
! /-:-r-G":::-o-- — -- —— -Benroic: Acid
i 111-91-i---- ————— bis ( 2-Ch lores the ;:y; Methane
; 12 :>- c-3-1 — ————— 2 , 4-Dichl orophenol
i 
120- "2-1- ———— — i . 2 , 4-Tric hi ore ; ben -ene
91 •-!"•"••:- 3- •——"—— ———Naphtha 1 ene
1 ; C 6-47- 
c---- —— — 4-Chloroani line
i 07-6^-7- -• —————— Hexachlorobutadierie
1 =,^-SO-7 —————— : — 4-Chloro-3-Piethyl phenol
! 91- -z-7- -6 ———————— 2-Methy 1 naphtha 1 ene
i 77-47-4- — ------- — -Heirac h 1 orocyc 1 open tad i ene
: SS-O6-2-- ———— — 2: ,4 , 6-Tric hi ore phenol
1 95-9!?~4— ——————— 2,4,5-Trichlcrophenol
! 91-r^--- ----- ———— 2-Chloronaph thai ene
; 33-74-4 —— •••• ———— 2-N.i trcani 1 ine
! J31-l:i-3 — — - ——— Dimethyl Fhthalate
, 20S-96-S--- — - —— Acenaphthvlene
: 60t- 2 !•• 2 — -- — —— 2 , 6-Dir.i trotoluene
^ \
»•- 1 
1 1 1 , 1 T T f- .
iM LjN 1 i O L
3900 
! L1
3900 ! U
3900 
I U
3900 ! U
3900 
! LI
3900 
1 U
390O 
1 U
390O 
I LI
3900 
i U
3900 
! U
3900 
: L!
3900 
1 U
3^00 
.' U
3900 
i U
19000. !U
39OO 
! U
39 00 
! U
3900 
! U
4100 
!
390O 
! U
3900 ! U
• 3900 
I U
750 
!J-
390O ! U
39OO 
! U
19000 : u
3900 
i U
19000 
! L)
3900 
! U
3900 
! 'J
3900 
! U
; 
" r
FCRM I SV-1
^ 
TUT 001
576
0394
LA 
' '•• -;±,~:- ••'' '•
rs ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
F
::PA SAMPLE NC.
•••»«: CF.II-irc C.'JUT 
Contract: 63D70O28
••;-: 
cLiiur. 
rv<c=r. rin.: .12058 
SAS MO.: 
SDG NO.: BT747
— -.-
: 
( ?--ii . 1 /w.H ••-.?(- ) 30 11. 
l,ab SaiTio.e ID: 
390107-14
• fit/vol: 
5.0 
(u/ml.) G 
LabFilelD: 
CO337
: 
i low/m.pil) 
LOW... ...._._ 
Date Received: 
0.6/1.2/37
•i-iirp; not dec. ..J 'f. 
Date Analysed: 
('6/JB/_nv
-t: 
(pack/cap) 
COCK . _ 
Dilution Factor: .l..J> ______
CONCENTRAT I ON ON I TS :
'"fi" NO. 
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or uq/Kq) UJ3/KG 
Q
* '1 
O "T 
"""*• 
i- - t i 
j_ L
i R 7— . - — — .-- — — •-— ij 
•-,] or 'ome t hr~>nr?
.
T •!••«•: -'? -- — ----•---•• — — Bro mo met hane . 
___ 
_ _ _ __ 
_
", 
oi ..-/!-.-_ ....... — ..... . v j rty 1 Hh'l or idi3
•r) -O'i-3 - •--—-----( Mil oroethane
".... ..,,9-7.... ...... ,__._.._...Mpl t ;hvl(?ne Chloride
A7-/)4-l ----- — - —— Acetone
. 5 J 5 •(.)-• 
-- 
-Carbon Disulfide
^ri-35-4 — —— • —— -l.l-Dichloroethene
7^-34-3--. —————— 1. , i-Dichloroethane?
"•40-59-0 — ----- - -t , 2-Dicfiloroethene ( total ) __
•'-> "' - h A - 3 - —— - - ———— Chloroform
l''7 <>6 ,. - - 
I . 2-Dichloroethane
7Ft-'^3— ."•-— 
— — —— 
-—2— 
But an one
- I --^5 -6 ----- •— - -- 1. , i . 1 - |~r i chloroethane
tt,./,-2T.-r.i- — - ———— Carbon T'^trachloride
1 M«_O<;, -4 — - ——— - — Vinvl Acetate
'•'"3-77-4-— ———— • — Bromod it: hi oromethane ___ 
_ _
/'"?- 87-^ •- — - — - — -i , 2--Dichloropropane
1 M/IA j -oi 
- -5- —— — ci«.-l . 3- Dirhloropropene _______
"?-o 1 _/0..._— ...._ — .._._ frich 1 oroethene
1 •;•• 4 .. /} 9 - j ..__._ ———— n i br omoc h 1 o r ome t ban e
'7--no-ri- — _.—. —— j[ , j_ . 2 -Trichloroethane _______
• t -43-2— ——————— -Benzene
I riO61 -U2-6 ——— — T ran s-l , 3-Dichloropropene ___
' • 75 2 -•• - 
Fsromoform
) , ,:^_ ! ,-,_ i ——— . ——— 4-Methv 1 -2-Pen tanone
v
r? 1 — 78— 6— - — — — — 2— He::anone
1 .V - J f J 4 
-- 
Fet.rachloroet.hene
-.•^ 
'">-- 
~ 1 . 1 , 2 . 2-1 etrachloroethane
I "M-fl!]-3- —————— Toluene
1 1 >p-9o-7 —————— -Chlorobenrenp
i 00-4 1 -4 ————— — -Ethvl benzene
: 
1 OO-42-5- —————— Stvrene?
! 
I •3"-2O-7- — - — — Total Xvlenes
•
1 7 
:M
i :;.: 
: 1 1
t 2 
1 1 J
26 
; n
14 
IB
fi 
!H
6 
:u
6 
! U
6 
i1 II
6 
1 IJ
12 
:u
6 
: u
1.2 
:u
6 
1 I.)
6 
; o
A 
! U
A 
! |J
,'. 
:u
6 
;o
A 
:u
A 
: i )
12 
:u
• 
12 
!IJ
6 
: u
A 
:u
6 
:u
A 
:u
A 
!U
6 
:u
6 
!U
1
FORM I VGA
TUT 001 0395
8t
f:PA SAMPLE Ml*.
"n!.,-ilT|.E ORGANIC':- ANALYSTS DATA SHEET
i FN T AT r VLI ..\ i nr M T T r T ED rnnpnuNDS
r.LU..!S_..r;.!'?6.f;L.____.._......._ __ 
Con trac t: 
6C-
IIM.f.C.. . 
C*se No.: l.:J050 
SAS No.:
OY7/-.1
SDG Mo.: 8T747_
: 
r - / » i l /ua l-p>r ! SnTL
"i>. /veil: 
......._?_...<:
( low/«i»?d ) 
LpW__
: • ,1 .- f nre : riot: dec . 
J.J}
• I • • mr i 
I par 
k /cap) 
r:'A_CL_
..ni-.or 
! ICs 
fr-un.
Lab Sample ID: 
O7Ol'i/ -J4_
''I/ml ) G _. 
Lab File ID: 
CO3!37j _____
Date Received: 'J6_/,l2/a9.
Date Analysed: '-).4
Dilution Factor: 1 ..._O
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or uq/Kg) UG/JKjG
SMDFR
>O«.)O
")i")(")O
»")OO
COMPOUND NAME
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
RT
F3 . 02
29.44
31.79
i- ST. cone.
n. i
1AO
38
Q
DJ
BJ
BJ
FORM I VOA-TIC
1/87 Pr.v.
TUT
001 0396
L-:PA 
SAMPLE
:;!.;. r|{ ;;v%c CCRP
BY761
r i c . :
Mo.: 
V-JT747
L_eve
; : re.;. •./—-. re r) 1CIL
31.-1 
;. g/mL) E_
) LCW
22 
dec. _
L»£ Sample ID: £,90107-1.4
Lab File ID:
.• •../ C 
-1.., £f \- . 
^_ ....'.
;Sepr/Cont/5cjr.c) 
SONG
3FG<Cl5an,.;p: 
(Y/N) N__ 
pH: 
9- . 0
Date Received: . 06/O3/39
Date Extracted: '''6/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/30/89
Dilution Factcr: 2. 1____
,-» r-\ ». t r- I — » : T- f~: *•.-«- T '-ii, '. 
< i i . ' T T" *~
_ ^j 1 M U l_ i '•'. i !". r-i i i v-i i •« 
•_• ! - J. 1 .:.".• .
/ 
... 
, » 
. . ... 
.- i . ._ -. 
i tr" 
- . - - , —
i. ....... t... ... 
. • '. 
.• f-'.-i ' 
• ••" ' r ~
•'.%:;;::
-.-00-02-7-
4 -T •—. _ 
f_ .- _ ^J __
- -— -* 
- .1 
'~,
.:. *:.. .i- 
_•- *r 
j_
34 •-.:••. 6-2—
r?/___"7~*_-7 ._
._• '_.-• 
.• _
lOO-^O-.i--
^.^ 4 --•=.-• i-
«• •* 
c: cr _ -r _
•: . f, 
—— : 
t
._ -. W ' " . *1 " _• "
•-J1 — 
,— j _ ; 
_
l!Sl:£
20i--->4 -0-
1 29-f"' "' -;"'•-
S5--63-7 —
- < _ c: ," ... i _ .
cz / 
f= r
^' \.j 
-..' •.-• -" _• —
213-Ol-=-
117-S1--7-
117-84-0-
205-9 9--2-
207-0.3---
-
1 — — 
-T r . = ._
- r~. ^ 
'-. .- 
^-
----- — -3-Nitrcani.l ine
— — — — — — — M c e n 3. p h t n e n e
----- — -2 , 4-Dini trophenal
——— - — 4-Uitrophenol
— — ._- — Dibenzof uran
-.._ —— — 2 , 4-Dini tro toluene
—— ------Diet hy 1 p h t ha late
.__. ———— 4-Ch 1 crophsny 1 -pheny j e- th^r
_._._..— —— _p i 
LiQ|-ene
_ — — 
•-- ~ .q -- N i t r c a r. i 1 i n e
------- -4, 6- D in itrc-2-Ksthv 1 phenol
------ --M-Ni troEOdi phenv] a.~i re (' 1 }
— --- — ~ 4 -E r C..TO p hen v 1 -p he T: •. • 1 c; t h-s r
------- -!-ie;-'acMc;robfvnz era
- _. - „ _. ... _ 
p 
e p -W- ,- ,- j.- 1 0 | - 
o p h; 
e 
n Q |
— — — — — P hen ^.n t h rene
——— - —— Anthracene
-- ————— Di-n-Butylphthalate
...... ——— -FluGran thene
- ——— — -Pvrene
—— .._. — -Butyl ben zylph thai ate
-•- ——— -3 , 3 ' -Dichlorcbenzidi.- -
----- ———— Benzc ( a ) Anthracene
— ... ——— C h r v c e n e
• —————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl jPhthalate
_._.. ———— D i _n _0c ty i ph t ha 1 a t e
._._ — —— Benzo ( b } Fluor en thene
— • ———— Benzo ( k ) Fluoran thene
----- —— -Ben no ( a ) Py rene
• —————— I ndeno (1,2, 3-cd ) Py rene
-- — - — — Dibenz ( a , h ) Anthracene
• —————— Ppr.zc ( q , h, i ) Pery lens
41OO 
! LJ
T50 
iJ
4100 
IIJ
4100 
1U
350 
! LJ
850 
:L!
350 
! LJ
E50 
!U
550 
:u
4100 
'.'..'>
4ioo ;u
550 
!U
£5-0 
: U
sr.o 
i!
 !
410O 
;U
S5O 
: LJ
350 
ID
350 
', U
850 
!LI
S50 
ilJ
120 
!J
ITOO 
:u'
350 
!U
350 
IL'
350 
; U
850 
!U
S50' 
; LJ
850 
!U
850 
ILJ
850 
ID
850 
•' '.J
350 
I U
:
-- 
/
..:r <= e para ted . from Dipheny lamine
FORM 1 SV-2
606
TUT 001 0397
00
1 1
• 1
-H
'"':i
-j-
i
c
! a
1 Q
i
' '• 
' 
.
•' 
' ".'
-IV 
.,
.: 
i'
-1.1
' 
i
'•'•' 
LO
'
1
1
!
!
!
M
. rr- 
'Ti
1 
1
r-i -,i
!-" Tl
-> '.r
'- rt
•-» 
r
-j ...-;
n 
,•-•
't 
•••;
r> 3
•- -• 
:Tj
f-
'.'••
Ill
•- 1 •, !
-J --1
•.:• 0
r~ i -
I,
3
3 
-
• - Li!
1 •-' u.l
1 - 
1
1 
I
.
' 
. ' -..
• J i
1 
I
i
' 
!
i
i
ii
; : n
H '.;
.1! i-
rt rt
T -;
< 1!
:i
-r: ,-,.
," t -•
ff. ,,.
IT :i
G! m
I.J
rt-ri
1-
) 03
• .1 o
•••• o
f.: c:
o •;!.;
;
M -,-
: 
i
-. 
.;•-
!
1
!
!
i!
:
i i ;'
A "
; • .
"- -' • f
f!
"1 -
 J
[1 -1
iii n
"D 
"T
-' >-•
rt G
ir -,
rn a
»-•• n
|Ti :r
(D in0
!-*
•i ! co
o 5
r " i "
y -.j
0 -,'
i :
v- 4-
f- -,j
i 
:
' 1 ..-.
i
1
!
!
i
!
j
\$
'' 
'.',<
r^ n
i :r
-i ^
-i C
.... 
-,.
n o
:r r:
-- <
o n
o q"
fr ni
m n
2 ''•
0 !!J
r-- a
H-
it!
~1
.^
'1-1 U
-1 -J
0 0
r: c:
•0
V •'-
•
• r
i
1 :•
;
:
!
i
!
!
!
t i
r
ir/
rtlr
-i
a".
Tlrr
:r
pi1...
rti
r 1 1
b
IT' !"1 t ' 
.'1 1 ' K* '- '
0 -1 : ;. >- M }..i i-
• 
1 r- 
-.;. '" i •
. ", ! I . : . M ' 
!
.;. n . . >. • ro M. j
! 
' 
i 
; M i 
1 '
1 . 1 
. J 1
; 
: 
I ' M ^ '
i 
• 
• 
i 
i 
' 
:
1 
•• 
.
 
! 
i
, 
i
 
: 
; i 
; i
• 
' 
' 
• 
i 
;
! 
' 
i 
' 
i 
i
• 
! 
: 
• 
i 
i
1 
! 
i 
: 
i
i 
1 
i 
'• 
1
f- rr. 
•<-. ..: ' • i .1 -
I 
'Ti 
i •'.• •• 
•• 
i-
i'l > : JT: M -^ !li
:r HI .r ir . 
, -.
i-. rr i -• ,-h js r? M
n !'• r; T i :-•• i
-'i » • -; : H ri ; i
i'j M :•, * ' - :r .r
l -. :-: in 
!-•• 
•--• -,-•
Cl ri :; ;: i : n \ •
! rr i- i; - 
-|
:i r' •'- 
>- n ij
!Ti ri I 
0 -I i ;-|
rt P :.i 
-i :r ,r
ir t: in 
t; fu T
< >- 
rr n n
H- nj 
ITJ D :..:
n :i 
1; >-• •<
rr P 
,-i
r.i 
pi 
:.r
D 
rri 
r^
:}i
'i
in
•in
il-J ' i U '-I '.-I U • i
-J ' -1 • • ! • ' ' • i - J -.!
0 <:< .;. -.;• :.-. •::• o
c: f. r:'x: r. c •,:
(
'-- !-• 'i.; j 0 i'.- " 
; ' • 1
' -• •:• ••' \ \'-\ a -.| i j .;... -.1
; 1 1 i 
i 
i 
i i-» i> r;
n 
; 
.1 r, -j i
i
!
;
.
'
, .!-, |
.-... 
. 
• ! • • . ! i - 
, 
• I
; 
:;; 
: 
: -o r n M
; 
; 
: 
i 
i 
. 
;
1 
i 
i i i 
?
! 
' 
! 
' 
i
! 
i 
I I I 
1
i 
i 
! ! 
i
l 
! 
: 
i 
i 
1
! 
1 ' 
i 
i 
!
! 
i 
l 
! 
! 
i 
i
••i t .; i i . i :-: x .". 4-. 'T i
|V ., 
1 M. .... |TJ 
i 
| 
^.
r.i .;, ; : ji rt :; ;.:: :< in •
M 
| I • ij 
"I 
Ol !- - IT! .--. )
Ci i.;l r: 
J M n ri- rr tj ,
' - i- -i i ; i r :r "i IT i '.
n -'! n • n 
•— • u x" ('1 •-
D TI ij ii 1.1 in > • :r »
n rr m in ;;i i i 
;r o :
i-- •- • : i 
: ; n u :-. ^ ,-
r.i > , 
n , i- s =• rj a r
-, , . 
-r 
i r-j ,... (_
;.r 
M .1 ,- in ,
n 
:i i 
o
i.i 
m ;i 
n
f! 
"' 
-i
r? 
0
ri 
n
•—i
Ti
a 
m
!' 
rt
r.i 
rr
* 
m
-j
i
'l 
i-i i ! . J • 1 ,.l •.-! .,J '.J .
:;• 
J 
! 
j - ! 
1 - 1 -J -.1 -
o o • •..:• • • o o o o '
:- L: r.: .; r: c; c c c; t
'
'
i'l 
0 »-' ' !- rn -0 h- -•
n f.n ..%....• ^:, .n . . -.
! 
: o r> i- . ' ; L •• ;i
'• T. 
i 
| m 
1
:•:• o ..i 
>•• -. -.1 . n
i
 
r i-- •: i -i i ; .. '.r-
j '•• . 
; n ; ;
i 
i> 
I-' 
1 - •:. M
' 
' 
i
! 
l
1 
1 
| 
i
; 
i
!
j 
i
i - 
its' - •• l" i : :r
T Hi :i 4s L,I n 1:1 HI
J ! N ; i rr -•- ';
r ^ - : f J 1 ! t • r j Q
r i . i.^ p. ..... r: 
r-
: n 
ii n T n
-• ir j-.- r.r :,- ci _r
r d n n u ;r r'i
i -, n -i -, o •;
i r.i rr n r; M u
i ^r o rr r- f.\ ;•!
- m (.. ni iji i- , ;-
n 
ii :i
ri 
r-i M
"I 
HI m 
i •
r.i 
ii "i
m 
ru iii 
n
IT'
-.r
;';
-'i
•J '1 U '-J M ' ' ' . ! ' '
J -J - | -,| -.j - 1 • | -J
-• 0 O •:> 0 0 
.•;•• •,••
: c: c: c. L; r: i... u
-
•
r.; 
m 
:, 
r" 
!."• .: 
\" ,
i? 
;• 
it; 
M' 
iJi 
r'rf
n 
rt- 
;; 
•;. 
? 
,; 
i x
- 
n 
IT; 
Ti 
-;
f 1 
':> 
\- 
>-. 
i • 
; . 
.1
t • 
j j 
l^i 
•,. 
|1i 
- 
:
ni 
,1 
i- 
: 
M
! 1 
C: 
!'• 
[. 
' 
!'!
1 1 
I . I 
- i 
,
;
.
.
.
,
in 
'" 
:i
ri 
•. 
• 
- - 
• 
L 
:• '
-:-. 
., 
... 
-i 
... 
|- |
1 
Ii 
' . 
-.. 
. 
l. -:
ri 
;.. 
- 
T
ri 
-- 
" 
! ' _ "
-'-: 
K 
< 
?• 
r'i 
j
Ti 
r.. 
n. 
r:
V! 
' ' i 
n
v.-
; ) 
n
r
Ci 
1 
\- 
;•: 
"-
I' 
i.i 
- ' - I 
-'1 
i:!
ri- 
r • 
.v: 
o 
-< 
U
11 
--. lt,1 
• 
f-
• i 
m 
i '
"0 
t: 
n
i.: 
ri
!~1 
It
71 
Or 
-' 
?;
in 
n 
r 
• : . -
.. 
= 
.. 
- n
1 
Ii0 
!-'
feh 
i
--. n 
!.-•
£ 9
••- ri 
. ;
!" m
,;i H o 
t; 
i.; 
r.; r 
r
-; 
;TI 
K.. 
rn 
r- 
HI 
n, 
,,:
T;. 
>•-' ri- 
-•' 
rt 
M 
CT
-: --! 
c 
ID 
iti 
in
i| i 
t H 
rt- 
'] 
: '1
-.. r.i 
•-•- i-. 
n 
-T 
'•• •;,.
V". 2! 
0 
•_-, 
• 
IT: 
>--' 
=•
ni 
11 
!5i 
rt 
• n 
fO 
C!
- - c 
t- 
~. 
m
-••: 
~si 
•< 
:'' 
t- 
•-- 
rn
i" n 
!ii 
M 
n 
.-; 
".i
n --i 
n 
m 
rt 
Q 
•- 
> < 
M
.11 
rt 
u. 
n 
LX 
.':.1 :• 1
~ •' 
0 
., 
ci 
.. 
•- !.r.i
- T
••• ' •:;• 
~ 
;•• 
••" 
-'
t, 
;> 
. j - 
n, 
r... .0
: J -.;•
O 
f.l 
Ci 
•-•'• m 
r-
'?: 
"-: 
> 
' ';i 
.:
••b 
-0 
-o 
i i 
1
: ; 
j.i
r-
!:
->
L~
r-i 
•
t 
•;
•-- -:
' .: 
; j
:"! 
r
r ': 
- -
!
.J 
; .•
; •
1
• -
" .
,
-
-•i
1 r i
1
"
i 1
(; 
' 1
•: t
^
i :
i >-
'i
"
: f - 
' ' 1
!-: 
: I
i..} 
• i
ol
, -!
; !
M
... - . ...
: .!
-:: 
-r?
-J
1
• n
—r
?
D
LU
j;
•~L 
Ul»
in 
<i
c 
>
i- 
i't •
I i
... _ ^ _ .
(
LU
r •6
i>
i - 
t ;
i .J 
IU
i.; 
-j
.":i .', 
"
A>
•:L 
U
! - 
ij
... 
^.
: ; 
4-'
;•
L i 
IJ
i . 
L.!
L j
i
,. r
-—
(••'
LJ
1 C.'
LJ
i *l
"i
<r£
L'.'
r
:' •
i J
..: 
u_
r < 
L -
i 
'.
• 
1 '
1
i , 
r. J
1 -.
" i 
i:
: i 
1 -'
: 
;. J.
..<l
'r
'.:
L '
_
Cj 
c-i
i-- 
(-' 
Cr- 
Cr-
i> 
! 
O.I 
LTJ
N. 
r-
lij 
O 
If; 
C-,1 tO
o 
i-'
i> 
,-i 
<: 
-rj
jj 
C.i 
•:!
r.
Ci - 
" 
T3
M 
f-i 
u 
ai
;..; 
i i 
-- 
Ui 
4->
Q 
> 
U
Lj 
rH 
- i - i 
i.i
r-i 
Jil 
!_
ii. 
iu 
u 
4'
!• 
rH 
11! 
X
is 
-ri 
c: 
LLJ
Ll I 
1 .
Il 
111
ii 
j~l 
4J 
4-J
•! 
'ti 
'•(' 
*U
J 
L.I 
(..i
. •.
;
~ T
L- j
i-;_
i T
;
L'J
c;
•:: 
_i 
u
t < 
Ir 
ii!
U
!T>
. 
•_-
'
c-
1- 
v-i
_J 
. 
f-4
U 
' f 
O 
3 
' vn
!i 
cj 
ro 
a
.J 
t! 
.J
i
i
!. 
'- 
IJ
i'.! 
n 
in
4-
! 
a 
13
IV 
•;.: 
i~
- -. 
li 
--. 
4'
•: 
- . 
• • 
3 
i i
.-, 
-H 
,-H 
o 
i:
L. 
- 1 
U 
-.1
i. .1 
!>
i.il 
• , 
U
4-J 
L
l\i 
-' 
"j
~'! 
••' . -. 
. 
)J
:_. 
••: 
^ 
•-'-< 
^
LL 
& 
U
, o t! 
:| 
£ 
}:
/.!.' 
.1 n 
.1 
::
r.t
CO
V
C
;-J
.'1
.^..
"n
OJ
ti
..."
1— t
•ci;
'"i
Ul
4-1
'0
C'j
LJZ
C
to
*-*.uc0
(J!
V
N
4Jrc
r i
v
L.
a.
a:
LO
"••
• •c: i
• i
1 1
!,_
4-'
*'
UJ
c;
•o
rH
h*
L. 
L_:
ij 
"-.•.
4J 
0! -•-.
U 
I-- L'i
Hi 
*-( - '
u. 
:*
— • -^ -
C 
I.!'
U 
7. ii
•H 
C.i v-
i-' 
rH !.|i
'."i 
\" 
•
r-i 
<!.
••4. 
LC 
i-.
i'i 
i •• 1"!
Z:I
1 1 i 
j
LJ -•'-
;-: u>
CJ -!
L J ^ •
f 4.
CJ
..
Xii
n
"^
— iD
a.i:u
CJ
•-»
X - -
I'l
•-. .
-_.
0
•** 
* ,
IL
U 
C!'..
L! 
tr
iD 
'.-
r-t
LJ
(Jli.
UJ
ID i'j D D :j D D n «-.i 13 :i n
O O •'.• O O O C O •'.:< O O O
o r- •;• o r- r-- i - r • to o o r •
-a i; LJ co r\- t' r-i n to to co n
,-i 
H -I 
'H f !
i_ 
rH ^--
iu 
a in
'"" 
&- ^_-
4-
1 
p]
LJ 
Jl 
fH
-H 
a C
> 
ri •••!
c 
:>- G
m 
:n 
r ai
rH 
C 
H 
4J r-H
O 
U! 01 LL 
ii) 
,>-
i: 
:j 4J 
j; c
IU 
ij) 
rH 111 r-H 
|JJ | 
Ql
t: 
c -i 
u rn ;x 
c n -i:
••\ m a a c •*-' «J c 
-H i LI
r-< 
IT 0 
C 
IT) O JI 
111 
'H 
O '4
.-i li! L 01 L L 4-1 IT 
-r< L. n
L. ^ 4-* n n 4-' j^ a 
i; 4J o
it 4' -H n •<- -i CL o iu '& H ui
o .1.: C O Q C - « L C O C U
L a -H L ri -H > U UI i- -H L
4- IL O 4-1 C LJ j: r< L 4-' a 4J
•H c i •-'. iu 
p x: o 'H i ••-*
z a.' «r z 13 «:r ai u 3 z -o z
I 
!J 
». 1 .H 
•• 'H 
rH I 
,. |
to '-a M «r P rj o «? L- * <r z
i ! i ! 
Ill
i i • i i 
iii
l
i
l
t 
i i i
1 
i 
! 
1 
III
i i : i 
1 1 1
i i i i 
iii
! 
i i i I 
i 
ill
i l l ! 
n 
i i i
, 
i ! r- o- f-\ 
i 
<s .4. i
i ; :: • u'j i i i -:--\ n i-v < i ^j
! 
'( 
1 ^\ ',!' '-? 
h- 
! O IN j_
c 
-'' ; -i 'i 
' : <; LI-J r-- :
 
LI !-•
i ; i o o '-i 
o 
•::• ^ i
n- r; ^ o M ci rf .-. ,Q .;.-. [-. -o
u- i.'.;i D -i .1 -H to r-- u -•< u"j 03
(
^'
-• 
- "1 '- -[ | -. -T 
—— 1 --, 
—— I 
—— , 'I 
--, 
—— * .... 
—— 1 
—— , 
—— 1
_j - • -.! 
J — 1 - ' _J _J .J -J _ 1 — I r J - J _ . — I
o c/ •?' o o o o o •;•••'..• o o o o o o
i - i - o ••.-• i - i - r- i - N m r- r- m r- r- r-
r-'.i •';• LU ci to to r-i i j r. r- i-:. ro 
r:i t-:< to
. i
ui
!_ 
4J
li 
id
J"_ 
rH
4-> 
li! 
1C
Q 
t: 
.c
r-i 
Ui -H 
4J 111 111 lli
> 
ai 
4J n 
j; 4J c L:
|- 
^-' 
rj - i |JJ 
u. iTi Pj ill
CJ 
UJ rH 
iii 
rH 
tS |~ 
.- - rH J~ J^
.C l-' 0 
r-l 
i5 t~ IU 
'H Hi 4J 4J
l i. HI r 
i-j 
j; U u 
> J: c C
i ii nj 
jc 
w n '.(, 
:••: 4J it ui
ri i: i: 
4-< 
j~ t.! !.. 
ui r i. u.
> in ij. ai 
x: oj 
a. L j; 
.c a. o o
[.: -J! ij 
C 
L'i C 
rH 1.1 +i 
r-l 
^ 
^
U; 1.1 L 
l[! CU rH i!| 
>. rH j~ 
>. rH rH rH
j: L. i/j L L >- jc 
r-i a; <f 
r >. LL u..
a o ^ i; ,j 4- 4^ 
c LI •••> (n 4-» 4-1 --x '--
U rH i; iJ ij ii c 
UJ -i '6 L: IU U J3 -^
<-- sr. u r: .T; PJ n GJ rj rj - ai 
o — ~
0 U t ID !- ! L C rH | o UI f 1 1 0 U
L. rrj jj c a" t: D iii >• - 
N > ^ c N >•>
iii - r; u -P i j L 4-' to i: L m 
c r:
1 
li! 
iU 1- C '--I r-l 
>- J 
'- (11 j- 
H -ri 
|]J Iii
-t X Li. LL C Ci LL LL I'ii t-'! t'U U J'J P |Ti CTi
! 
1 1 i 
i 
1 1 i 
i 
i 
i 
i 
i 
i
1 
1 1 1 i 
I 
1 ! 
i 
! 
1 
II
1 
i 
1 
i 
1 
1 
! 
! 
1 
1 
1 
II
1 
! 
1 : 
1 i 
i 
i 
i 
! 
1 
II
1 
! 
1 1 1 i 
1 i 
1 i 
1 
II
1 
i 
1 I 
! 
1 1 I 
! 
i 
i 
1 
! 
1
l 
i 
! 
i 
1 ! 
1 1 1 ! 
i 
i 
1 !
1 
i 
1 1 
i 
! 
1 
! 
i 
! 
1 1 
II
|--'i - H . 
i 
f -. \ 
•"•• O 
! 
: 
I D - - f-. O 
f-l Cr
i 
i ii. LO : r ••! i i r-- --i o i i i i i
IJ "i v! 
i 
I IN 
' ••; O 
1 . 
1 T-I ,-i -H; t. ,;:-.
ui {•- vj --i r-1 '•• '• •.;- •':. ••; u; •.:• I'D CO cr- •':•
i 
i £0 •...'• 
i 
1 ! -U Li ifi 
i 
! 
l
-•i i.! 
: 
o 
• -o i> i i 
i C'j r- r- L-i r-.
o '•! r- Lfj u •=• •:.•• ci L. '••! •-, T-I ,.< ,-< o •-•
T-i i -i Ci i':i ,4 LO (i 
*•! 0; !j 
••; IN •< i • -i IN f'-J
IJ n -j 13
. \ l"l !' -. O
f- r r:- N
i'.i (•> i :• r"!
ui ~ iii
ill U LU
'•.- !ii r:
> U 0!
LL ifj '-i
•— L >-
•u j: L
ai u 4J in
C 
1 C LL
ijj to <r ---
L 
'• -^ -H
>- C ) J7 
'•
LL 
• •'•!:
-•^ ' 1 \\i 
'•
iQ *' 
--•- O'
-' 0 i-J —
o c r. o
N 
111 01 N
c u JJ c
iii L: -H iii
UC >"i l"; ll'i
I I I !
! 
i 
i 
1
: ! i i
i 
! 
1 
1
1 
i 
1 
1
1 
! 
I 
1
: 
i 
- 
1
1 
i 
i 
!
I U' i IN
r-° ,.' 
,': :
IN r"-.i •;, f.;i
i "' 1 i- 
!
i 
f- '! 
; |
.7. c- r . o-
li 1 ' \ Ui. 'H
6 r^
CO
X
T-i 
-rH
,-^;
O
i —b
UJc
•H
i- 
'r i
Tj 
J
r ' 
~,,'
>. 
If;
L"
111 
rH
ra 
E
•'4 
|X
Cl 
0
Li-
e
0L
•)-
T!
U
4-'
"jL
iiia
U!
I'l
!!l
^ \
4J
0
:"i:
i5rj
i
.— .
'••i
\)
I
IB
TLC -F.GANICE AN
SAMPLE
1
1
1
1
j
i
•>
I
I
I
i
<
i
1
1
. " i'j * .,:'.'~if=: : CE I
I
i 
BY769
r-'IC C2F:F' 
Contract: 6SD°002S 
I
: .. I., i—- 
.1 _ 
r" r~ T K>* T f - 
•— « _ _ _ 
K 1 _ 
'»-.*•* e r~i 
f ^ r~> 1 1 _ 
- 
r" f, /-* I t
L...C-I... . . Je: 
•. .:j..:.it_ 
L^tiiEe MO. 1 j »:..•? c:: 
c-.-fo ijfj. I 
-TIJO No. r
I./I .. J. .._ J - r ^ 
.'...... - 1
i , r,\ •_ r — . ; : 
• i; L_ j. i
,- t:ufi.~ j t= ;>.' t ,: vo 1
/v-^tcr: SOIL 
. 
L;.t: Sample ID: :::^0
: 
-0.3 
(a/JiL) G 
Lib File ID: 
A12
Lsvti : 
( law /med ) LOW 
Date Received: 06/
7. Moisture: n
EN" t ruction :
3FC Cleanup:
<- ^. r^ no
•._ r". ^.* 
i '^ —
f . ,— 
t—. C=
1 _ 1. ' -t -1
•7 en . ... r- -T ._
t; .« < 
—— !•
i 
•* .-• / 
i /
i 
0?" 
5r") —
v ^ 
• O "^ * 
r^
! 3963E-
J 106-44
; 62i--b4
• 
/. -T -T ^
i 
r-\ •-% 
/— , r
-* cr _. ^ -T- _
p ^ _"-..
i 
/ r- 
r-. rr
. 
i:- ^.-- • t_ _» ~~
i 
•• ~.--- 
p-r
* 
4 '•T ,-^ __ •"? J"
t 
•' .", -• 
.' •"!
-L .-*--• " *- '
! 
1^ 1 
-.-• -'
: 
', .1 --5.'-
! ,7-4/~
^- U- 
- ^_
; 
c: 1 . f-.: •
; 20'?---?>
; oO6-2C
Dt dec. 
17 
dec. 
Date? Extracted: CA/
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SDNC 
D^.tc f-
iv/N) N 
PH: 
0.8 
Diluti
nalvzeri: 06/
_—. 
r~ - — A- — ,- - 
•<
Oil 
f'Cli-L.' 1 • — .
CCNCENTRAT I CN 
LJ
!^ I TS ;
COMPOUND 
(UG/L cr uc /Kc } UG/KG
-2- ———— - — Phenol
n 
v _ 4 - _ / ' ^ f^ »•- ^ ^ .^. — _ 4 - u - i l * ' — 4-1- _ ...
1- 
"IS 
( i.— Li i - iji ije t: iV 1 .' !-_ _! itrf
c--- — - ——— 2-Chlorcpher,ol
--1 — — •— —— i , 3-Dichloro benzene
-7- — - — —— i , 4-Dich lorobenzer.e
-A ——————— Benrvl Alcohol
1- ——————— 1 , 2-Dichlorofcenzerie
7 ———— — — 2 -Methyl phenol
32-9 ————— bis(2-Chloroiscprv_pyl ) Ether _
-1:. ——————— 4-Me thy 1 cheno 1
- 
-N-NitruSC-Di-n-Proi-jylafnints
1 
Hexachloroeth^.ne
3 — ——— —— Nitrobenzene
1 —— —— - — Isophorsne
= _..._._. — — -2-Ni trophenci
-^ — —— —— 2 , 4-DjLf.-.e thy 1 phena 1
;;._..._. _. —— — Eenzoic Acid
-. —— - ——— bis(2-Chloroetho:,-y)Methane __
-2 ——————— 2,4-Dichlorophenol
'- i ——— - ——— i ,2, 4-Trichlorobenzerie
--...__.__ —— Naphthalene
•-3- — .. —— -4-Chlorco.niline
...... ...... —— — HexachlcrobutCidiene
•7 
<--Chloro-o— hethy Ichenc 1
_ . ———— . ——— 2-Me t. hy 1 n a p h t ha 1 en e
-4 
Hexachlorocycl open tad iene ___
__. —— ..._ —— 2 ,4,6- . richli_»rophei.t_il
4 ———————— 2,4,5-Trichlc.rc.pherol
~-- —— — — 2-Chlcronephthalene
.^ ......_ —— -----2-Ni troani 1 ine
-7 — - ————— Dimethyl Phthalate
>-3--- ——— -Acenaphthvlene
•-2- — •- ——— 2, 6-Dinitro toluene
400
.a 00
•=•00
-'.DO
400
400
40O
40O
400
40 O
4 CO
400
4OO
40!;;
-T '_ O
1900
400
400
400
1£OO
4CO
40O
400
1500
400
400
190O
4OO
1900
400
40O
400
pyr.-r-j
4 ,"-. -r 
—• —T
.i _-• .- ' -_ ..'
56
12/G9
13/B9
29/89
0
.—.
•_-.
i
i • i 
.
i i i
i '— '
."J
!U
:u ..
;LJu
;u
;U
; u
::j
i i i
: -_J
i i i
. J
i j
i ij
;u
;u
i
;u
!U
:u
: j
:u
,'U
:u
!L!
!U
!U
1
r _
FORM I SV-1
TUT 001 0400
(
r -
""
1
f ';
0:
~i-•
(i
i-r
rr
••
li'i
(!!
TJ
T
rr
Hia
.(,
~
f.:
•-i
i.J 
13
TJ 
J--
T.T 
Xi-p
*- •* 
rrj3
f.O 
<
,-- 
^
! 
Oi
rj 
='
(.,.
rr;
-H
CH
0
O
H-
o
1 ' 4>
x 0
CD 
H-
Ois
/
r- ' 1 | • ' P I j
M] ?.J ,o O O
'- 
I \A i 
1
i 
• j 
1 ,-,i 
;
r) ";• i i t.l O
.*> ' v"! : ill
1 ' '< I n 
!
' r ) 
' - i -0
i 
i 
i 
!
i 
i 
! 
!
t 
| 
! 
l
i 
i i l
! 
• 
! 
i
! 
! 
! 
1
: 
i 
! i
! 
I 
! 
1 
1
:ji ri -,.t rrt rp
iTi i
 :- 3 rn ro
3 rr a 3 3
1-4 
,"> 
12 
N 
t-J
o :' 3 r.i a
„,. M O .~, ^
in ••"• ••••-• 91 T*
•, 
•".; (.j. -..,• ....
T - - 
-I.-! Tl
•* 
:.r t,-!-,: •-•
!-• - ' '•• "1 C
-•• J> i J fil 
11
TJ 3 ; M -i
m rr i"! rti QJ
•1 rr C. 
3
< "i - - 
rt
r- 9l Tl 
T
ITJ n x- 
fj|
3 fil - 
3
m 3 in 
ITJ
!Tj 3
Ji |i J-. Ja .0
6 o o o 6
; : c: c: r: c
H v- K» r.) rn o CO r-' rO M H' CO r:i 
• '- CO
rji N| ^J 01 i 
! '! '-3 Q* i '-1 
! 
' fO >"* 1
! 
1 1 ! '.n ..'i ir- 
! 
! 
-.; i O '•> 1 i 
>:-J
o ro rj.1 o f.'i -i. M ••:• •?> j. " ••- .'-• -i 'i •->
-0 .fi n !-> i 
i 
i •;:• •'' i f J i 
-, rn i
i 
r : :••! r- -j i 
i f.;i : ro '.
n ; 
0--
f-,1 O ' i 0 ' 
I 
i O O ! -J i 
i :• U !
i 
1 
i 
1 
1 1 
! 
: 
1 
! 
i 
' 
I 
1 
!
i 
! i I i 1 I ! i ! i i 
i ! i
1 
1 
i 
! 
i 
! 
1 
1 
! 
1 
! 
i 
1 
1 
1
1 
1 i 
1 ! 
i 
1 1 i 
1 i 
' 
! 
1 !
' 
1 I 
i 
I 
1 1 ! 
1 I 
1 i 
! 
1 !
! 
! 
I 
! 
! 
! 
1 1 1 1 i 
: 
! 
! 
1
i 
1 
1 
1 
! 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 
! 
! 
1 
i 
!
1 
1 
! 
! 
i 
1 
1 
1 
i 
1 
1 
1 
1 
! 
1
?i.' ri rr n m t..-i w TJ TI u '& TI -11 T; & z
n 
1— I-1- "T ITi •- 
r 
••*." >••• (••• 3 
T 
Ti iTi 
i 
1
3 
T> T 3 i | rr -i r-l ; rr rr, 3 :, rri •?_
N 3 ••-• -.-• !•'• • ••:.' ITi f! 3 3" 3 it 
51 -i 
h-
n 
M in n i !-• 3 i ! ". {!•• i' n n ri-
•- O 1 rti --• i.J rr rti »• :.TI U1 3 r: ir '< -
cr n m 3 rn >- TI 
3 c n rr rr >-• n o
~ rt tt m -' n 3 
rt rr rri .T >•••• f! TJ Ul
TI -; 3 
j> -j r i 
ir >< 3 - rj -^ :j o
>-J (-• -< 
3 
--••->•' 
Itl i-- ITJ fii "i 
Ci l7l Ci.
r 
n 
r+ n •-• 
3 Tl 
3 0 rr 3 (•'•
0 TI ;r 
3- -; T:I 
rri -- 
rr: TT m •< ~a
T 3" rri 
~i n :r 
rr 
:r 3 •• -_r
ai rr •< 
9> Q" n 
zr- 
ni N ' in
n 3- -< 
n in -j- 
PI 
3 m n 3
rt PI '-j 
rfi 3 B.I 
>•- 
0 3 ir •<:.
3" •-• -•' 
-' 
1-4 ( •' 
3' 
>-• Hi ?S i--1
p| pj "11 
(Jl (.1 £i 
,-(- 
3 
111
3 ^ 3 " 
U rt 
rp, 
< 3
m rti rt 
i •• rn 
*•• I-'-
T 3 
r t i 3
* 
I'i 
rt (T)
»-• 
;r
5.1 
rn ^-.
rt 
-i M
m
h»
ji ^ r> .;> is rn :* ^ 
'-•> ^ 4> 4^ -n ;. ;•> .r-,
o o o •;:• o • :• • > o •:"• o w •:;• ••> •::• •::• o
o o o o o o o o •.:• o o o o o o o
r: c: c. r: r... c: c c.: c r: c: c: c: c: r: c:
rn I--
i.-J 0
\ "''
r j o
i i
i ••'• o--
! 
1
i 
j
i i
1 
!
i i
i i
! 
1
4* -i*
'* 
\
O 7.
! i-
O rr
p. -T
P 0
u*. ni
rt 3
•1 h-
O !-•
1 
K-
tJ 3
i m
-i
mrtrr
•><
>•••
Tl
3'
III3
0
h' M
•o -n
o •":•
:: r:
/
V
01 -j ro M i-1 h' r.n c,i o
c- o -£•> n i.-J o >•» i.J o
O 
l-' t-.l O 
1 j 
!
J rn !> 
i 
! 
1 M i- 
'
• 1 i 
rr- 
.* 0-. .-;, rn 
f ) .;-i
i •-. l -i.i J^ :-.i i 
i 
i
-•J W -11 
: 
i < n -.1;; r j
i 
1 
t 1 -0 --J ' 
1 
i
! f.-i 
: i i i i i
i 
1 ! 
I 
1 i 
1
i 
1 
! 
1 i 
I 
l 
1
1 
! 
1 
1 
1 
I 
!
! 
! 
i 
! 
1 1 1
! 
! 
! 
1 1 I 
I
1 
1 
I 
1 
1 
! 
1
1 
i 
1 
i 
I 
1 
1 
1
Tl .'-. r;5 i\ r_1 4^ t-.l 1> •..)
f_ | H. ., H- | - n 1
c n m j» rr ~t ^ :r. i;.
0 3" rr i rti v,. i 3 p.
-i >•-• T rj :i ,t O Hi ri
IT! 0 •< i-" M 1 !J-T1 -'i
3 -i >--• 3 n o 3 :r o
(T) Q Tl |-j. -J, -j-j H- ,-f. 31
Ti 3" rr r_ -j rr 3- 1'
3" rt 1 :'!i fn ", itl '-••
rn 3" 0 O.i 3 D 3 i-'
3 fit ,-t 3 C.I TJ ITI !-"
*«•'- ^-^ o 
i. • ~ r 
"1
-., 
l_t 
r' 
_ ' 
— '
i-j BI !••• 
rri 
rrj
1 rt r 
3
T3 <0 IE 
O
3 - 3 
• - -
ITI 
iTi
3
x^
t-^
rnrr:r
m
h* t- 
; • '
>' J> Ji .{i .h ,/j -n 1., -..'I
.•i '...• •,.• • ,• v.
1 i. .• •„• '.;• '..,'
._• O O O O O O •'"• O
•-- c: c: c.! f. c L: c: r:
ro
n
n
rti
;].• 
3
i ^ 
c
TJ
; T 
••
i ii
-•*..<v
2!
^-
s*
no
Tl
-3j;
-..-
T
ij
TJ
X
••
£
— 11
" CT
*n ^r
• - n
r m
n H r-,i
1 T> 
H-
H^ 
*~*
r H 
c
u'i »~i 
rt
--.. n 
H
T T: 
a
Ul 
3
-- c:
' '* 
Ti
1 " i'H 
"l
i'-i' H 
n
--. rn 
rt
-- .. 
a
ITi 
~i
*•
*•*
C1
rj
m ;-.: 
! 
r.j 
;r 
;- x
,-r 
:T 
•:.' 
r.l 
rr 
U
-i 
n 
in 
TI 
•;
:'i 
in 
•• 
ro 
;: 
',
rt- 
r-r 
.. 
IL
H- 
r 
;- 
ri
rj 
'I 
rr
3 
Hi 
••- 
ill
< 
C, 
• ••
h- 
n 
> - • • 
.M
3 
a 
'- 
•<••> • ••
n 
E 
•• 
•_, 
:c
01 
a" 
ii 
'1
IT! 
Ci- 
fR 
r*-
-c 
re 
o 
r,
TI 
n
*•. 
• 
.. .•
ri 
1. 1
a 
r~
 
r: ' 
P
3 
rj 
L-J n 
t:i
rt 
i-* 
S 
O 
n 
PI
NI 
r"
en 
r--J 
;:
o 
L:
3n~ 
in
CL 
x
ra 
n 
M
n 
r 
...;•
r 
^ 
H
ro
01 
ro
r.lHri
i ,1
i?
rn
~
D
•"
o a a r 
f
pi 
ai 
BI 
BI 
<••>
rt 
rt- 
rr 
r_r 
cr
m 
ro 
fti
Tl 
LO
i> 
m 
TI 
i- 
p.
3 
x 
m 
»• 
i<
pj 
rt 
,n 
re 
in
t— 
1 
ITJ 
K-1
< 
PI 
•••• 
t-i 
rti
i-i 
n 
< 
u
IT; 
rt 
|TJ 
•• 
>--i 
Ul
LI 
rn 
n. 
i--i 
TJ
a. 
.. 
•• 
01
••
* .
o 
• '...• 
o :];• 
c:: 
o
r> 
r 
L- 
i- 
-4.1
x 
to 
o
M 
t-' 
1— 
rn 
i-i
•-•1 
i-j 
M 
n- 
•';• D:'
• -j 
?<
01 
01 
ro 
i 
-o
-0 
-0 
-0 
1 ) 
'-I
u 
rn
'-'.
iri
•; ; 
: .
n 
PI
14 
* 1
1 x 
v '
l-H 
' I
n 
"ir
n 
:>
n 
- 1
":i 
r"
'1
r 1
XI
fTi
T>
', r
: !
(• T i j
L i
.";.-•
.. _
"i>
'"
-.-'
rn
1 1 
• •
U 
i)
nrt 
^i
~~j 
"T :<
,-i 
-H
! 1 
~i>
rr
n
r:
; r- 
: 11
,1.1 
;i
CJ 
• I
-0
,
:;']
! 1
LO
-- -•- -•
n
o.J 
"Ti
o 
7>
rr- 
m
•0 
?••
_{
~nrrn
o
•
IS
I ' :,-nc : OZIMIC C3PP
.TI^IC 
C*.i.-e No.: 1705? 
' SAG Me. :
2PA SAMPLE NC
*i\ .'-7 —r *"•.
•* X •' -•' '•-•'
: B::7~3
•_ •: ^ ' ; :-•_ — p- ..- "1 CJ«-' T '
(g/fr.L) S_
L-!:: E<?.,r.pi£ ID: 
89010/--24.
Level .-
CTFC
-;-j.- r.-,sd ) 
LO','J
Sate Received: 06/12/89
^: r--± dec. __11. 
dec. ___
i. 
(SoDr/Cont/Bcnc) 
SCNC
p: 
(Y/!\!) K__ 
pH: 
3.9
I-ate Extracted: 05/ IT/89
Dste Analyzea; 
07/0 1/S9
Dilution Factcr: 4 . Q ____
'-• *"•v. i r~ r— x i T- i—. r-, ~ T r~ 1.1 i 11» i T T~ £-• ,
L, UIM L- EI \ I T. !-i ! i w I M <_' N 1 i b J
i i :.
i:: /• t
*-* -r JL
•* i~-. ;
1 C 0
396
~. . '.j
67 -
, i-
4 — % ,-
.. j ...
"! .' " ••"-
o • _
V.* .'
T? - ...
-r-t
, / —
.— ^
- - - _1
-95
C7-
~" / -'
- 4 6
n 4
.. • CJ ~'
f* f<
— ^i _..
- ••- 1
r~: r= _
_ ,— . *~
_pr«
.'. C; _
t-'l ~' --
f: 7 
-
(— r~.
_ CJ
. <
• ,-.
— 2 —— —— — r'henoi
-4 ——————— :bis(2-Chlaroethvi iEther
3 — • —————— "^-Chlorophenol
-1 ——————— i , 3-Dichlorobenrene
7 
1.4 Dichlorobenzu-ne
- o 
Benzyl Alcohol
1- ——————— i ,2-Dichlorobenzene
7 ———————— 2-Methylchanol
"2-9 ————— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl )Ether _
•~* 
•"•• ! i fc^ t it y 1 p M s n o 1
-~7- ------- N— Ni trcso-Di-n-Prou-y 1 S.T. ir.e
j. 
Hexachloroethar.e
7---- — — — Nitrobenzene
1- 
isophcrone
-••- —— - ——— 2--!JitroDhenol
...p.. ——— . —— 2.4-Dimethvlchencl
'•— —— — — — — — Eifin zoic Mcid
-- ------- tie (2-Chloroethoxv )^e throne
-2 — - — —— 2 , 4-Dichlorophenol
-1- ————— --1 , 2, 4-Trichlcrcbenzene
-.-. _.. — ..... — |,; -, -.j-jt ha i ene
• T ——————— -1-Chi -roa.-.il ine
3 — ————— -Hexachlorobutadiene
... ———— .. — 4-Chlora-3-Me thy 1 phenol
>- 
-' Methyl naphthalene
4 —————— — Hexachlaracvclcpent = diene
2- —————— -2, 4, 6-Trichloropneno.]
4. ——————— 2,4,5-TrichloroDhencl
7- — • ———— 2-Chlc re-naphthalene
4 -- —————— 2-Ni troan i 1 ine
_.-- ——— .. —— Dime thy 1 F Iithaiats-
...r:__ — ._.. — Acenaphthy lene
_•-•.-_ _ ———— - ^ 6— Dini trotoluer.e
i 50':>
1500
1500
1 50O
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1 500
150O
1500
1500
1500
7200
1500
1500
1500
7 7 COO
1500
1500
1500
27000
1500
1 500
7200
1500
7200
1500
1500
1 500
1
:u
. 4 1
1 VJ
!LJ
:u
:u
!U
:u
:u
:u
;U
;u
!U
t *~ 
•• *
• i t
t «— i
ID
:u
:LJ
:u
:u
!U
:u
:u
I SV'-l
TUT 001 O402
133.
/B7
I
V
BY770
•" b '"• r r! e-: ~ ^ " M T '"
Case No. : :2 '^9
3X97C
i;;: 
•.' =•-! 1 /'is^tcr } gGIL
l£- wt/\-Dl: 
30.2
i_- a U 
'.:_. £1 iTi pat 
i U i
Lab File ID:
A1251
,1 Level: 
( lo'.-v/miid ) LOW
1 7. Moisture.; not dec. U
dec .
' Hxtractiar,: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc)
3F'C Cleanup: 
(V/N) N
pH:
Dite Received: . 06/12/89
Date Extracted: QA/JT/gr
Date Analysed: 07 ,'01/59
Diluticn Factor: ^.0
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITE:
'. ••.ic/L ".r us/Kg) U3/i--:^x-
'
99—09-2 — — ————3
9
T» 
-T —, r-, 
_ 
__ __ _ _
_•"" _ _*" ~ — — — — — _-— — —
51-2S-5————————2,-1-Dinitrcphenol
100-02-7———————4-Nitrcphenol___
132-6--9—————--DibenzoTu.ran______________
121-14-2———————2,4-Dinitrctalu.ena________
B4-66-2————————Eiethy i p htha 1 ate__________
7003-72-3——————4-Chlorcphenyi-pheny1ether.
86-73--7————————-Flucrene__________________
100-1C—6————•
-4-Nitroani1ine
534-52-1———————4,6-Dinitro-2-r1ethy] prenol.
S6-30-6-———————N-Ni trosod i pheny 1 ami^e ( 1 *
101—55-3———————4—BrGQOpheny 1-phery le-ther_
IIS-"7^-!----————Hcx^.chr. era benzene_________
T7 2£-5————--——-FentanM
85-01- 8————— -—Phenantnrer,e_._
.orephenol
3/L_7.-._2---——————-Di-n-Butylphthals.te.
2 06--14 -0———————F1 uoran thene_______
129-00-O———————Pyrsne_____________
Bf.- 60-7- —— ———— - 7a.it y '• benn
. 
'7J.--T-':-
! 5i-55-
210-01-9-
117-P1-7-
117-34-0-
205-99-2-
-Bsnzo ( a "; Anthracene.
-Chrysene
————bic(2-Ethylhe;:vl )Phthai ate
————Di-n-Octyl Phthalats_____\
—----SenZD(b)Fluoranthene______
207-08-°———————Benza( k ) Fluoranthene______
50-32- 8 ——— —— —-Benso ( a j Pyrene____________
193-3?-5 ——————— Indeno (1,2, 3-cd )Pyrer:e____
53-70-3---- — -——Dibtjnr ( a .. h } Anthracene_____
191-24-2- —————Benzc(g,h.i)Pcrylene______
1500
7 2 '••-• '-•
7200
1500
15 CO
1 f OO
1500
1500
ilC 0
1500
1500
< =,->.-.
.L »..' •_« •-.'
150
1 500
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
-i C *•'% (-»
J, W--' -'
1500
Ci-nn-'L
separated
frc.T,
TUT 001 0403
FORM I SV-2
Rev.
I
I
I
IB
r,3:
^;i:7'X 2C
•'
?G/,nL. ;
L ,
I c^r..p, e- wt/ vol :
Level; 
(law/meo) LOW
% Mcisture: not dec. 
1 •'•'. dsc. ___
(Extraction: 
(SepF/Cunt/Gsnc) 
92NC
!..i.L, Sample 12 : 
C
:.;.b Fil
ID;
.' .L:.T.~
1
Date Pezeivcd: 
06/12/r?9
Date ~:;tr
I
EFC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N__
pH : 
9.4
"ate Analyzed: 06/29/9^
Dilution Fatter; 1.0
CAS r''J.
3 2 'IP1?'. -!-;:;
CCNCZr.'TRATICN LT.'7"S:
'-..;g,'L -.:;- ; ^.'Kgj L^/'-'E
' 108-??-2-—————-F"- = rol_ __________________:
: lli--'-4-4——•—— — t i s f 2-c:-,l = rcethyl ;Etr.=?r_____I
I 541-73-1-—-———-1,3-Dichlorobenzene_________I
I 100-51-6——————Penzyl Alcohol 
~\
\ 95-50-1———-———1,2-Di = hlorobenzene________'
; 37638-32-9—————bis(2-Chlorcisopropv] ' Ethc^r_'•
: 
106-44-5———————fl-Meth\
I 621-64-7-—--——
; 98-95-3-————-—;-.!j. t.rcbc--=---.e_
. 
C3-7r.-5—----———•":-:•:: t rophe-.c 1
i 65-85-0-————•—-! 
_________________
I 111-91-1 —— -----—fc;.s'. 2~C:hlor-ethe:•;>•;. Methare___i
I 120-83-2————-—2,4-Dichlorophencl__________I
i ^: - 20--3- —— - -——Nf.ph t %a 1 e:\o__________ 
I
I 106-•-'•--3-- ---------•-'•; r-.lcrcani line______________!
I 59-50-7 — —-————4-CMcro-3-Methvl=her.al 
I
, 71-57-6-—-——-—2-Methylnaphthalene________I
! 77-47-4-——————Hoxacniorocyclcpentadiene____!
! 83-06-2———•———2,4 ,6-Trichlorcphencl_______I
I 95--95-Z- — — ———2 , 4 , 5-^
I 9j- TC- 7- -—-——-2-Chlnrcnsphthalene
; SS-74-4---—— — 2-Kitr=::-.r,ilir.s____
I 131-; 1- 3-—-—•-.--DifrctS-.v: P:-;th&lat^_
I 203-9/..-8—-—-—-Ac<=naphthyiene____
1 60/::-r>-2~~———--2, c-":.-, it rctoluene
73RM I EV-]
T20 
: J
330
3 SO
330
3 SO
3SO
3SO
3 BO
39.O
330
7SO
:u
: j
33 0
" ,~ "'
330
:: 900
3 1 0
3SO
380
* •; .-,.-.
330
3SO
330
llOO
3 GO
3SO
1900
-T -•- ,-•,
1900
— - .-•.
•.
390
320
;u
1 C.
; u
TUT 001 0404
II
• 
,--i-»! •— r-. p i— ft i, i T ^-. r^ 
,• . i r- i 
\/-f~- T r-- 
- - -r
— n I J ,-.,^. 
_«i l.;i—.!•-*! •_-;.• 
;-! *"-!*•» L- t CI- * C»' .. i-l .
: 3V771
:CRP
-
:£ Tip -E
30.1
•E2T002S
I- 
Q - -r- — "• r-
i.. 
Oi--. .llf- J. W.
_ab File IDi
I,, tract
GPC CIe
ion
-.r.up:
I
CAB '-r.
: dec. 14 
dec.
EepF/Cant/Sonc)
(Y/N) N__ 
PH:
COMPOUND
3.4
Date Receivec: O6/12/S9
Date Extracted: 06/13/39
Date Analyzed: 0&/29/S9
Dilution Factor: 1 ._Q_____
^MTI-.!T'AT T O*.« I 'K.:TT^ '
Jl «*t_C.i '•< I 1 '--I-! I A k^l ^ 
L..J V i. I »_• •
,„/( 
_ .._ . .
y/ l_ :-'t .-l
»
99-: <7 -1 ———————— 3-Nitrrsr.il ine
!.J3-._ ' - 9 ———————— Acensphtf-.ene
:-,!- -^ 
'-:• ————— 2,^-Dinitrcchenci
iuo-.-. 2--/- —————— 4-Nitroohencl
132-c:4-9 ——————— Dibcnrcfuran
'2-J-14-2-- —————— 2,4-DinitrGtoluene
34- -ii-2 ———————— Diethylptithalate
/U-03-72-3 —————— 4-Chloraphenyl-phenylether __
Gc.-73 7'-- ——————— Fl Liorene
100- :. 0-6 ——————— 4-Nitroaniline
-3-;-'-l-i ——————— a ,6-Din: tro-2-tlethyl phenol __
E-6-3 : -A- —— ———— ni-Nitrasociiphsriyl£iTiine ( 1 } _ __
j 01 - = f -3 ——————— 4-BroTiCDphsn v 1 -p hen v let he: r
1 li?-"T4- • ------ —— Hexschlorccenzene
Gv-'i--!:- ——— —— — ric-nts.chlcrcphenal
oj.- !. .:.--,_•-• 
- 
Plienanthrene
12 :.: - 12-7 ——————— Anthracene
C:4-7-^-2 — - ————— Di-n-Butvlchth.slo.te
206--4-0 ——————— Fluor an thene
129-00-r ——————— Fyrene
t; r -;'- c--: - -—---.. ——— -B,.I t y 1 ber, r v 1 p h t ha 1 a te
c- •
 r"-- -^-••- — -- —— -3 . 3 ' -Dichlcrcbenzidins
-^ 15-3 
-Sense (a) Anthracene
2iE-Oi-9~ ——— - —— Chrysene
:.;. 7-R1-/-- —————— bis(2-Ethy:hexyi )Phthalate __
ii7".1-4-0 ——————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
205--c?-2 ——————— Benzc(b)Flucranthene
207-- JP-9 ——————— BeriZGdOFlucrs.nthene
:: :-.>- 32- B- ——————— Benzc ( a )Pyrene
1T3-39.-5-- ——— —— I "den 3 (1,2, 3-cd 5 Pvrene
- - - •_:•-.: • -- —— — - — Diber.z (», h ) An thr scene
j.9i -2 ' -2~ —————— B»n zo ( q , h , i ) Pery 1 ene
1900
380
1900
1900
3BO
T»r~. ^
-•i-'O
7PO
3SO
= 9
1900
1900
330
320
3SO
IT'OO
-T- 
,—— \ ,"•>.
J t>*J
•__' *-» \-J
•^or.
380
3SO
770
3 SO
3SO
•^PO
-_' W ".'
330
380
3SO
380 
•
3SO
7 GO
3SO
1 1
•. _
1 1
:-_•
1 1
u
1 «
1 1
u
t «
v_-
U
J
. |
W
i i
u_-
U
U
. '
-J
•J
U
U
U
* 1
U
U
t 1
UJ
U
U
U
L!
U
o
L:
w
*J
!J
L Lit: ^eparated froir, Diphenyiar.-,.ine
FORM I EV-2
636
TUT 001 0405
(
i..*
...,
I."J'ilri
3n
;• k
rr
ni
in
iBn
PI•^
inrt
IBa
-»,-o3
CO. 
fj
~J1 ' 
!_,.
i-i 
n
SUM 
J
W> 
3
y\ 03 
•<
* <C 
t-'
0 
1 
HI
-r, t J 
=<
_£• 
r<
WN 
'^
VkJ
VJNJ
H
CH
O
U*.
O
0
r>
r
\
•* rn
-0 i'.J
M !
! 
4
!J O
.in
1 
' J
j-./i
Y
i
1
1
1
1
1
ifj ^
(7! H
i) rr
M HI
0 3
.— . M
UJ '--
•« 
Hi
"r *
-'' rr
i.,. ,_•
-•— • 1>
TJ 3
IB rt
T rr
-< 1
m ri
ri m
IB 3
m
r..j \_.-i
•-13 -43
O 0
C C.
O5
__
CD
K- i n
•-0 O
ij
i W
i.'J lO
-0
! 
CM
r..n
i i
1
1
I
1
1
1
K4 Ml
3 IT!
a 3
Sis n
a o
a —
•-- ii
i~» •— •
. -n
to •<
i.j rn
'l 3
n rti
a
—— •
2
-^ili
IT!
C-l U
-0 -0
0 0
C C
to
-"j
.-.illi
•c
I
tJ1
IB
rj
C)
.-..
7T
x...
T]
(.^
c:
Ci
Hi
3
rt:r
iB3
IB
i-J
-43
O
c:
»j i--
O f •
ui ~-j
o cn
-9 
r-,
! 
I
to o
1
1 
1
1
1
1
!
1
1rn trt
rb~ t-
3
M 3
0 I
cr n
"~'° rt"
3J
X'
r
6 t!
i rr
0* rt
3 rr
rt pi
T »-•
rn si
3 rt
m ID
c-i •: i
o o
0 0
c c
^
r*
-J
r.b
i-»
••4
FTf-
in
^-. x,
t J i
l r
m :
rr f
rr
-<;
>—.rr
(ll
:•.'
•<
J— '
Tl
3"
rt
-r
D.'
i—
1
a'rt
m
il
4* -j
oi •:
U L
M i.n
• O
Ll3
:• ' "n
P-A 
1
N
0
i
•3 w
T rr
T 3
x 
W
n 0
n "-
3 1'
B —
3rtrr-I1'n
ro
3
ra
4 C J
0 -J3
:• o
: c
*
-;1 C3 M ^J C''i ' * 0"! : 
! • t -
: * ( ^ K1 O 4ifJi.il 
J ^A C
i 
! 
VQ O 
j ..J. 
; ij i ^*
• • fr- 
l ^ - i •'"•• !":"i i 
!
p.i '..' 
i 
'j 
j .-.' i 
i
fj ii'; •-• ^ .ji -' i • C'- -.J i.n
! 
•'• 4* ; M 
i 
f> i.n
i-' ~J i 
! i ! rn ' n ; :
i 
! O O 
1 -- 
• <"• ' J
! 
i ! 
i ! !
! 
! 
1 
1 i 
!
: 
; 
i l l
1 
1 
i l l
l 
: 
i l l
l 
l 
i l l
l 
l 
ill
i 
J i 
ill
H n~ TI TI n !:• TJ n ;c •'•*
• r x' f i- 3 T ro m i
(••J r»- T C 
1 rt in ."J ;:: Ml
• < ra o 3 rr n rt n> "i
l >-•• 3 -i IT 
.1.1 r' n n
!.-•> r.T m PJ rn p.! 3 n rr 3
>- rn 
3 c n ^ rr t- u
ii 3 
,-r rt ra rr >j o TI
rr r-4 
rr •< n ^ o ~i rr
>• j --"x 
ro ^ j ri iti ~"i n o
o i- 
3 n 
rj n HT 3
"1 TI 
IB ;T 
IB
 T> i"J "••:
o rr 
rt 
rr n >-••
(T rt 
rr 
rn n 
i
rj rr 
BI 
3 rr: T.I
3 DI 
»-• 
0 3 rr
N |--1 
DI 
'•-' rf! rn
1" P! 
ft 
3
a rr 
ro 
<
M III 
>•-•
:i 
m
in 
rtrr
ill
T
i »
- -J CI (,-J C--J W vJ i'A -0 ' -1 vt
QJ --0 -43-0-43 -0 -0 O -0 -0
O O O O O O O O O 0
c: c: c c c c c c c c
03
0-
1
o
rr-
?r
_r
\-.
rt
T
Uin
0
LX
H-
13
rr
IB3
<
^-*
DIa
K
3
iB
X-,
hi
X.X
L'J
^3
O
t:
(
'.n ;- ro -j
!',•! ••;• o .:'••
t> •:> l •::•
f 
L.I
M 
> ". 
' .!
- J M
M o- : l
i 
''i
l 
l
l 
i
l 
l
1 
i
l 
II
l 
i l
4» 4i T) 4^.
.. 
| ^ |
r> z c n
i t- o rr
•.'' rt "i ^-'
!-•• -, fil 0
n rj 3 -r
^
J• (3j IB 0
rr 3 
TJ
"i H- 
rr
f'l H- 
iB
1 h" 
3
tO 3 
•<
1 III 
•-
3 
1
IB 
T'i
rr 
-r
_r 
ra
< 
3
t— * 
%r"
Tl 
•--
rr 
iji
.Tl 
rr
3 
rr
Cl 
IB
t-j 
"T
I-" h*
•o >i3 LI u
O O --0 -0
o o o o
c: ci c: c;
CO
4i
n-.
to
U
H-
m
,-»•
rr
~<
•-<
Tlrrrt"r
in
»•-•
D'rr
IB
i'-j
-0
O
c:
.j t*
tJ 
''••!
r1 t J
1 
!
.,'i ----
rO -'3
i
tO M
- 
H-
j'a rr
ru
0 3
H. ri
3 0
t- -h
rt c:
"1 "i
O "'
ri- 3
Cl
c:
m3
IB
1. 1 •- 1
-0 -1
0 0
c c:
r*
,••-,
O
1
to
i-J
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
_t»i
-.*
H'.
rt
->0
Tl'r
IB3
171
I--'
)-'
-0
O0
c:
ui 1:0 M
t-* Ll -!3
! 
i 
!
t o i'; c
03 tj -0
1 
. 
!
r.n ri •.')
1 
! 
•
! 
1 
1
! 
i 
1
1 
! 
1
i 
1 
1
1 
i 
!
1 
l 
!
i i i
i i :
to j. u
•- 
r-i 
!
4> IB Z
i :: i '•
U :). , i-
1 '• Tl 
"1
3 -r f!
»'• rt "'
ft rr 3
~ rri "
0 :: 
•-••
•n 
m »•••
: r 
3
m 
rn
30
*••*
..w 
| *
-0 U -0
. '• '.;-) . "•
.;:• o .-•
U C '•-'.
03
-n
C3
Cl
r.i
! 1 
<ll
-.-> 
3
n 
r:
TJ
T 
••
;' j
,
--X
-<
"V.
Z
•^x
;;
r :
(3
"i
:"i
(•-
^ r
t.J
Tl
~Ji..
?D
*
.... 
f j
- r 3
ih *'n
r n
- y
C! H 
O
-i "I 
•-
J> 
•-•
:'.: 
-H 
C.
U ! M 
ft
-•- n 
>•••
• - ;: 
o
i/'l 
3
.... - r~
.-: 
"n
1! " t-i 
1l
: 1 -•) 
f'l
".. rn 
rt
.-•: .• 
n
: 1 
"i
f «
* *
•
£3
n 
x 
f 
n 
:t 
r • /'
" 
IT! 
U 
r' 
1:i V
ft 
1C 
< 
•-• 
rr 
tr
~ 
ri 
ra 
TI 
"i
pi 
»••• 
>-.. > • 
t • 
i :i
ri 
in 
..: 
r,i 
: 
i •
rl 
r; 
r 
-• 
£ -
n 
S 
^- 
-• 
••
:.i 
IP 
--. 
in
-: 
n 
n
•••• 
o 
H- 
n
:i 
o 
>-• -j 
-(
0 
v 
.. 
-.. 
T
rr 
•••. 
'. 
' '
U3 
£i 
3i 
I l
Hi 
CL 
(ii 
rt
Tl 
m 
CL 
!Ti
TI 
n 
-• 
--;
ri 
i .1
n 
r 
in 
<•••
3 
o 
''.J O 
?n
rt 
s-» i; 
O 
n 
Ii
rn 
• 
r~
03 
tO 
Z
0 
Ci
h
x~- 
itl 
•
a 
% 
•••
m 
? 
' .1
ri 
r
• 
. ,• 
i ni
fO 
'':3
g
n
[0
"3
i!i
Li
'•
',) 
t-j 
u 
f" 
r~
PI 
fll 
Ol 
C: 
i;l
rr 
rr 
rt 
r;r 
rj
IB 
ru 
re
~;~\ 
fj1)
i> 
n 
31 
^- 
ni
3 
:•: 
IB 
^ 
3
•U 
rr 
n 
III 
Tl
!•••• 
"i 
(Ti 
'••'
ni 
jj. 
n 
ffi
M 
n 
< 
w
HI 
rt 
fli 
v 
'-I 
f'3
o. 
ni 
a 
a 
^
*<• 
Cl 
•• 
•• 
f;~)
• •
o 
•::• 
o 
i> 
03 
b"
n- •";- 
o^ 
H- 
-n 
•
\ 
to o
tO 
I--1 !-' 
I'-J 
H-
J 
•>! 
t-.3 0 
O 
W
•, 
'"•*. '*x 
'-J 
•M'
03 
1:3 
C3 
i 
-0
-0 
-0 
-JJ 
rO 
4
Cr- 
-a
•
i. i
.-;
li
r'.
i "i 
L !
n 
r'i
'",.' 
••'•
i- 1 
~
i. J
 
:"3' "
t "i 
j -"
i'3 
H
..-1 
;j
v 
'
.'!
n
"•
!'0
T-,
r*
1 ^ri
i' "j
V.
1 ,
r-
-;-
; 1
f3 
^
il 
(0
3
rr 
:. 1
">•
-.i 
i
M 
.;•
; t
• •• 
'i
'i^
i '• 
"il
s::. 
n
rj 
I
•.-i
O
to
03
- . . -
n
Ml 
"il
••' 
1^
-i
•-.! 
03
to 
:>
*" 
T!
~m
\ 
-.Td
I
t
I
' »• I T r~ f~- 
r-. ¥. i /•* i * . r~ T r-- 
r* •-. T- ,-, 
r- i : r- r— -r
-iHiL-c- t-MMi-tL '. ^-1 S 
A.— i h. Lr-.r:.L i
C _ _ 4. .... _. „ 4, B 
.• r-. T". r-v,--, .'iT?
______________ 
wj i i L. r c.-v u. L. " 
•_. '11^-^^K.^u '."•
"PA SAMPLE ND.
•„&. : 2 7 '1 : C _ 
Ci,£e
. 
. . _ , . _ t / 
-4- .. . \ 
/T-l T I
-. . 
V -: ... - j. / v.i- v_-_ : j 
Oi-.' A L
E2G !\!o. : 5X979
(g/mL) E_
Lab S^npie ID; L;'-?01O7-27
Lab File I"j 
A1268
(Irw/med) 
LOUJ
: net d^c. __U
dec.
GF-C
-actioni 
(SepF/Cont/Sanc) 
5DNC
Cleanup: 
(Y/W) N__ 
pH: 
9.;
Date Received: OA/12/S9
Date Extracted: QA/13/C0
Date Analysed: 06/30/39
Dilution Factor: 1. 0____
I
I
C 2 M POL'NT-
CONCENTRATION UNITS;
(uc/L 
r:r ug/Kr) L'"/KG
- 08-9?--2- ———— — Phenol
111--4--4 ———— — — bi=(2-Chloroethyl ) Ether
~. IT 
tr —**•-• 
«-v r~ • i_ ^ 
_ ^ i_ 
._ ... ••
• ./ -,-o 
^i Lnlci ophenc.i
541-77-1 ——————— 1,3-Dichlorobensene
106-4t— 7 ——————— 1 , 4-Bichlorobennene
100-31-6 ——————— Benzyl Alcohol
O K, „_ ^ ("v . -\ 
A 
*~f TT ^ _- t ^ _ ._ __ L .. , , _ ,- ,, __
95-4 S-7- ——————— 2-Me thy 1 phenol
39c:3S-32-9 ————— bis (2-Chloroisopropy 1 ) Ether _
106-44-5 ——————— 4-Me thy 1 phenol
c-21-64-7- —— ——— N— Ni troso-Di— n— Procy lamine
67-^2- 1- ——————— Hexachlcroethsne
9S-c'3--3 ———————— Nitrobenzene
7S-59-1 ———————— Iscphorcne
B3---7':- -5- ——— ——— 2-NitrcDhenol
105-67-9 ——————— 2, 4-Dimethvl phenol
65-85-0 ———————— Ben zoic Acid
lll-r-l-l ——————— bi=(2-Chlaroethoxy) Me thane
120-83-2 ——— ——— 2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-82-1 ——————— i , 2 ,4-Trich lorobenzene
7.1. -20-7 - - - ————— Nap htha 1 ene
106-- ••- 7 -•";- — - —— — 4-Chlcroani line
37- -'F -3 ———— —— -Hexachlorcbutadie-ne
59-50-,- ———————— 4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol
91-C7-6-- —————— 2~Me thy 1 naphthalene
77--r • — i ———————— Hexachl orocyc lopen tadiens
f!.3 .i.-2 ——— — -- — 2, 4, fe-7ric hi ore-phenol
(73-95-4 — • —————— 2,4,5-TrichloroDhenol
9 1-i C'!-7 ———— ——— 2-Chloronaph thai ene
G3-74-4 ——— - ———— 2-N'itroaniline
.' 31 -11- 3- ------ — Dimethyl Phthslate
20 c. - ^ •-. ~<z - —— - - —— Ac en a p h t hy 1 ene
60 6- ?•...-- 2- —— ——— 2 , 6-Dinitrotoluene
————————————————————————————————————————————— ___
37O
-r ••? f"\
370
370
370
37O
370
370
37O
370
370
370
-_ .' ••„••
37O
1800
370
370
£-.00
37 C
370
370
940
370
370
IE 00
370
1 f* • "* f"'-
lo'-'O
^T"7?"1
37O
370
' i
-_"
U
U
U
i t0
t 1
•_'
1 1
*_J
i;
1 1o
1 1
•J
Li
1 1
\«f
i *
LJ
'J
U
U
U
IJ
U
U
U
L:
!J
U
U
LJ
' 1
i_l
|u e^i
i
FORM I SV-i
TUT OO.1 O4O7
I
I
I
•c
SEMI VOLATILE ORGAN ICS ANALYSIS E'ATA '\.HEET
ERA EfMPL
NO.
I -b Name:
± '<F:P
Lab Code: CEIMIC
Case No,: 12053
Matr i;;: t soi 1 /Hater ) SOIL
Sample rit/vol : 
3i.
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
(q/mL) G
"/. Moisture: not dec. n 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
1SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SQNC
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N__ 
pH: .9.1
CAS NO.
C on tr Bcr: 63090023___ 
!_
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX97S
Lab Sample ID: 890107-27___
_ 
Lab File IIJ: 
A1268____
Date Received: 06/12v_89
_ 
Date Extracted: O6/13/39
Date Analv;:ed: O6/30/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CGNCENTPATI ON UNITS:
(uq/L or i.g/Ka) UG/KG
I
I
I
99-09-2———--—3-Nit rcani line____________._
83-32-9———-- —-Ac en 5 phthene_____________
51-23-5————————2.4-Danitrophenol ______ ____
100-02-7———————4-N.itrophenol____J_____'__1__
132-64-9———————Diben20furan _________'_'______
121-14-2———————2,4-DinitrotolLiene_______________
84-66-2-———————Diethylphthalate________________
7005-72-3——————4-Chloropheny1-phenylether__
86—73—7——————-—Fluorene______________________
1OO-1O-6————--—4-Nitroan.iline______________
534-52-1—————•—4, 6-Dd nitro-2-hethyl phenol__
36-30-6—————-——N-Nitrosodiphenv] amine ( 1) __
101-55-3—— —
118-74-1———
87-86-5————
85-01-3———-
120-12-7————
S4-74-2————
206-44-O———
129-OO-0-----
85-6S-7——— —
91-94-1 —— ——
56-55-3——- —
213-01-9————
117-31-7———
117-34-0 —— —
205-99-2———
207-03-9——-
50-32-8———
193-39-5———————Indenot 1 ,2,3-cd )Pyrene__
53-7O-3————————Dibenz ( a , h ) Anthracene__
191-24-2————
-4-BrciTiopheny 1-pheny 1 ether_
-He x ac h 1 o r o b en z en e __________
-Pentachlorophenol „__________
-Phenanthrene _____________
-Anthracene
-Di-r,-Butylphthalate._
-F1uoran thene_______
-F'yrene._____________
-Euty1 benzylphthai ate__
-3.3'-Dichlorobenzidine.
-Benzo(a)Anthracene_____
-Chrysene__ __ _____
-bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate.
-Di-n-Octyl Phthalate_______
-Benzot b)Fluoranthene_____
-Benzo(k)Fluoranthene_____
-Benzo(a)Pyrene 
____ __
-Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene__
1 £00
"r. "/ J~>
180J
1SOO
370
37O
370
37O
30O
1300
1800
370
370
370
1SOO
170
37O
370
370
370
370
710
370
370
36
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
: J
;u
,'U
!U
!U
I t
i U
:u
:u
!U
:u
; u
:u
:u
!U
!U
:u
!U
:u
:u
;:i
iLI
:u
:u
iij
;u
:u
:u
I
(1) -- Can nor be separated from Dip hen y la mine
FORM
TUT 001 04OS
I
I
I
r*'— *•?* T ', : r~ ' •"•-»-•!• i ^- 
/—v r", /T*( r- *• » T r— / • 
,-\ K » /^ e \ .• f^-_ f r-- ^^. •-• -^ /•» 
.—-1. | tT" fT T
Contract: 6EC90028
3Y775
I
- ^ .-
Level :
7. MOIH
Extrac
r- r~, r* 
«-• •*
t^-I L, 1_ ^
:
i 
i
i
i 
i
i
i 
i
! 
:
I 
!
1 
i
1 
!
i
1
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— : ______________ 
X 
———————————————————————————————————— 
... 
....... ——————
: -i'^cil /-.-;•-- r) r"~L 
!_«b S^inple ID; G70107-29
i-;t/v,. 1: 
30.6 
fq/mL) E 
L^b File ID: 
A1233
tlow/med) L^W 
Date Received: 06/12/39
ture; rot dec. 
12 
dec. 
Date Extracted; O6/13/89
ti,_ni 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
5CNC 
Date f-
tsnut: 
(Y/N5 N 
pH: 
S.9 
Diluti
CCNCENTRATIC
~n3 !-'C- . 
COMPOUND 
(uc/L or ug/
•v T-09-2 ———————— 3-K'it re-aniline
Hr-32-9 ———————— McenapJ-.thene
31 22-3- ——— ——— 2,4-Dinitrcphenol
100-02-7- ——————— 4-Nitraphenal
«T»^-. 
• * • ! - » 
• T-V • i_ ^^ . • r- •* 
— rv
j- •_' *L. t- T 
> 
: _• •! 1— 
: G 1^ ^.- D 1 LI 1 Cl M
121-14-2 ——————— 2.4-Dinitrotoluene
84— t.fs-2 ———————— Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3- ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-Dhenvlether
S6-77-7- — ————— Fluorene
100-10-6 ——————— 4-Mitroaniline
334-52-1 ——————— 4, 6-Dinitro-2-Methyl phenol __
S6-3 " -<b ———————— N-Nitrosodipheny lamine ( 1 )
101-1.3-3- ————— -i-Bro,TiC.phenyl-phenvlether
1 1C--7-'--- 1- - ———— -—'exachl Cjrcbenzsne
:. /-c ._•;.- - ————— r-'enter.chlcrrpheno]
._ _• -O; -;------ --------Phsnai- threne
1 20- i 2- 7- - - — -- — Anthracene
o 2. -7. >•:-.- -::-—-• —— - —— Di-n-Butylp!-.thalats
206--~ 4-C- ———— — Fl uoran thene
12?-SI C:-0 ——————— P'vrene
r~-6-:-7- — •- —— — -^utyi benzyl phtha late
"1- -94-1 — — •— ——— 7.3* -Dichlarobenridine
5i- 55-3- — ————— Fsnso ( a } Anthracene
218-01-9 ——————— Chrvsene
217-E1-7-- —————— Li5(2-Ethylhexyl )Phthalate __
117-24-0- ——————— Di-n-Qctyl Ph thai ate
205-99-2 ——————— 3enzc(b)Fluoranthene
207-CE-9 ——————— Benzc(k)Fluoranthe-ne
50--32- C-- —— -•- — - T enzo(a)Pyrene
19...-37-rJi— - — • — — Ir.deno ( 1 . 2, 3-cd ) Pyrcr.e
5_ - . -...- - - —— --- -I :.; benz ( a , h ; Anthracene
J.vi-^4- 2- ----- — -Ben 20 ( Q , h, i )Perylene
nalyred: 06/27/89
on Factor: 1.0
:N UNITS:
Kn) UC/KG,.»x 
0
^J
i
1800 
! U
4 *"•• »"* ."» 
1 1 '
j. w ••.' *.' 
• '— '
1300 
! U
370 
! U
370 
! U
370 
! U
370 
! U
370 
', U
isoo :u
1SOO 
iU
370 
! U
370 
: U
370 
: U
37 O 
; U
370 
I U
370 
! U
37O 
! U
370 
I U
370 
! U
730 
1 U
370 
! U
370 
! U
59 
! J
37-0 
! U
370 
', U
370 
! U
37 O 
i U
370 
! U
370 
! J
370 
I U
i 
:
i 
... -- 
'
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
1
i
i
1
i
1
•
i
i
i
1
i
I
i
1
i
t
i
i
i
i
I
t
1
i
'I _-.•...-.-rt ::•-- CEIO £.rated from Diphen-ylarr.ine
FORM I SV-2
TUT 
001 
0409
1/87 
Rev.
1 ^
J. '_
Ccntra-ct: freP^CC^G
^so Me. i JJ205P 
rAS Mo.: _____
IT-PA SAMPLE MO.
BY775I1S
:•'..; ti-i.c: : re il /water) 22-I
Sample ID: 390107-2^:^
Pile ID: 
A 123 4 _______
Level:
(lo;-;/.-ed) 
L.CUJ
Date Received: 06/12/39
dec.
'I Mc:,i?;.-:-i;rr>: ^cz C3C. 
12
E?.:tr,7-ctirr. : 
( SepF/Con t/Scnc ) 
SDNC
GPC C:cr,.-L;p: 
(Y/t^) N __ 
pH: 
8.9
ate Extracted: 0&/13/S0
Date Anal y red: 
06/27/39
Dilution Factcrt 1 . 0
I
CCNCEMTRA7ICM UNITS:
(ug/L rr 
ug/Kc) L'2/KG
•- ° - •'- -.' - - 
... N' i t r c a n i 1 i n e
ri-28-f ———— ——— 2,4-Dinitrochenol
lvu-02-7 ——————— 4-NitrcBhenol
....:• 2 £.- , - - - Di benzof u.ran
j.--~j.~- "^ 
——— 2 . 4-Dinitrotcluene
£.4-36-2-- ————— —— Die thy! ph thai ate
70 05-72-3 —————— 4-Chlorcphenyl-phenyl ether __
"A- 73-7- ——————— Fluorene
100-10-6 ——————— 4-rUtroaniline
t"7-".-52-l— - —— — 4, 6-Dinitro-2-Meths 1 phenol
26 ....:.; 6 
- 
N Ni trasudipheny lamine (1) __
- 01-55-3- ——— - — 4-ErofTiQphenyl-pnenvlether
- 13-74-1 ———— —— He- x*c hi era benzene
^ 
r*-r- —— ———— t-'entachl-jroohenol
G5-01 -S-- — ———— Phenanthrene
1 *-• '•• 
-' — 
— f 
/N 
J_ l_
— — - — -*- ' 
t—ti»i_r~iictu.t?pie
G4-74-2 ———————— Di -n -Butyl ph thai a te
206-44-0 ——————— Fluoranthene
129-OO-0 ——————— Pyrene
S5-te-7-— -— - —— Butvlbenzylphthalate
'•'...-- 4- i — - —————— 3 , 3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine
56-55 -3- —————— -Be.-zo ( a } Anthracene
v. _.-..j '.'j. / 
-—hr ysene
117-B1-7 ——————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl )Ph thai ate __
117-S4-0 ——————— Di-n-Octvl Ph thai ate
JC 5 99 
••• 
• 
EtenzcC b)Fluoranthene
I.*.., -'Jc— 9 ——————— E-ienzo (k ) Fluoranthene
'f '• 32- S- —— ————— Eer-zo ( a ) Pvrer.e
93-3?-5- ——— ——— Indeno(l,2,3-cd)Pyrene
5,.. - ."".--3 —————— r — DJ benz (a, h) An thracene
:. 9 1-24-2 —— ———— Benzo (q , h, i )Fery lene
1S'0'~>
370
1BOO
1SOO
370
370
370 .
370
1300
1800
370
370
370
1300
370
370
37O
370
370
370
750
370
370
54
370
•_•• / O
370
TT*-»
•_.' / *•_'
370
370
i
i
:u
!U
:u
:u
su
:u
:u
:u
!U
;U
i i i
i U
:u
:u
;u
:u
1 1 1
i < i
!U
:u
;u
:u
:u
:u
i i
;u
;u
:u
:u
:u
:u
! U 
Of
• 
o<
- C^.-;nc.t be separated frcm Dipheny iamine
FORK I GV-2
TUT 001 04.10
1/S7 
Rn-v.
I
I
EFA r;,-.MPLE NO.
;, Me.
C ;,•-.;
3FC
1
.-
... i.
Cl
-e; 1EJMI2 :;i":P 
Csr:zract:
. .. . .._•; ,, ; - 
;.,, 
. , r . _ s 
:I,. = D 
^5 
N0- :
. :;. = il.',.;;.t.-r) S-GIL
i v t / . c J L 
30.G (g/fr.L; E ___
Mc«/,7,Ed) 
LOV
tu,.^ 
;,I:.T .... 
12 
dec>
•ticn: 
-rSepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONG
c?on:lp: 
(Y/N1) N __ 
PH: 
3.9
ccr-jcc?
»
9o_ =: - 2-—— ———— 3-"Nitrcar.ilir.3
0 - ... - -• _ •- 
_. . . ... _. -. 
. ,- ,_ ,-. n .- ,- : - J- V- c _ f_-
*- . 
-.- *_. v 
fc i. f 
i. ' a. Pi I ll i C1 ^J . i O I t L-1 j.
lO:>-02-7- —————— -4-Nitrcch6ncl
i32-/:4-9- —————— Dibenzo-furan
12:- : ^-2 ——————— 2,4-Dinitrstcluene
n -',•--£• -2 —— ~ ——— CiethvlPhthalate
. 005 .-7_-3-~~- ——— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyleth
-; .£. --3... 7. __..__._ ——— Fluorene
10--.10-0— ---- ——— -1-Nitrcaniline
rt--/* 
rr. <~ 
J 
^ 
/ 
|^- 
^ 0 _ _ ^ . 
-^. 
* w « _ j _ | m , ^ _ i _ . __
06 
^..— 6— — -- 
N-Nitrasodiphenylamine <
iO-1 - r"3-7-- -•- ----- --- — •S--Bi-omop!-e?ny 1-pheny lethe
:. 12-7-V--1 — -- ———— Htxschlcrobenzene
:"-7-- . .:'..--:'•.- ------ — --Ptrvc^cr.lcro v.:.hs~ol
K^ 
' ' 1-S —— -•- ———— Phens.n threne
12:- •:-'-7 --— ——— Anthracene
54-74-2— ——• ——— Di-n-Butvlohthalate
206- 4/'-0 —— — • — -Fluoranthene
129-'I'0-0 —— ———— Fyrene
?3-£S-7- — - - ——— Botvlben^vlphthalate
'•1-^- -1- ————— ---3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine
:-/:--r =-.:-.- 
----- -^snzo (,:,; Anthracene
'— •' .—, 
.-» 4 
— \ 
f- l._ 
_
._j-..- 
-..'.•. 
. - — -— — u-iTrysent;
1:7-51-7 ——————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl )Fhthalc
1 17-S4-0 —— - ——— Di-n-Octyl Phths.late
205- ^9-2 ————— — Eenzc(b)Fluoranthene
207-03-9-—— ——— Penza (k)Fluoranthene
3-0-- -32-3- — ——— — Fe-nzo ( a ) Pyrene
173-37-5 — • --- —— IndenoU,2,3-cd)Pyrene
L3 7--3 —— — - ——— E-ibenz ( a, h ) Anthracene
19 1-24-2——-- ——— Penza ( -3 , h , i > F'ervl ene
•
1} - ^Si-ret Mo separated from Diphenyla.T.
sn,r,,=B
•-:-.
L^.i: 
Scmpls 12
' ;-b File 12:
Date Received
2ete 
Z.-c tracts
Dste Analyzed
Dilution Fact
'7FATION UNITS
-"" -?. -'!<=; 
LJ2/
:
i
i
i
!
1I
I
.er ___ !
?
j
T 
!
•
I
I
I
:
i
:
ii
tte __ 1
1
1
I
1
1
i
i
:
-ne
:
; 
i
-; 
.._ 
, 
OVO- E
. 
390i07-.2«=*ED
A12T?'
: 
06/12/89
d; 06/13/89
: 
Oi./ 27 ,'89
cr: i.O
.
* 
<
i 
i
4 — . .- -. 
it. 
i
_ :.. .. ••.' 
. i j 
.
370 
: :j 
;
1200 
; LJ 
1
1300 
I U 
!
370 
: LJ 
:
370 
ILJ 
1
370 
', U 
1
370 
; u 
:
370 
1 LJ 
1
isoo 
;u 
i
IEOO 
;LJ 
:
370 
1 U 
1
770 
:u 
:
-T -T ,-v 
I t ' . 
»
•_• / '.' 
1 •_' 
I
- -7" •' *. 
• ' ' 
;
370 
1 U 
I
370 
i LJ 
!
370 
! U 
!
370 
I U 
I
370 
i U 
1
370 
! U 
1
750 
;LJ 
1
370 
1 U 
1
370 
! U 
i
67 
i J 
i
370 
! U 
1
370 
1 U 
:
370 
1 U 
!
370 ' ILJ 
!
370 
1 U 
i
370 
i U 
i
370 
1 U 
!
QQQ —— !
Oou
I
TDRM I SV-2
TUT OO1 0411
CHRP
2c.ciF.li ,..::/•, ci :. 
. 30.. C 
:q/mL; G
Level: 
( 1 :;w/:nec} 
LOW
/; /*" oi-zt.L-.ro>: ,-,ot dec. __0
Extraction: 
(SspF/Cont/Sanc)
GPC C:ear.i_'p: 
(Y/!'^ N__
dec.
T^y97 =
*^*—'l\!r
SuNl
'.0
Date Received:. 06/08/39
Date Extracted: 06/12/59
Date Analysed: 06/19/G9
D i 1 •_•, t i c n F a c t c• r E 1 . 00
I
I
I
I
JOR-9r.-::-——————--'henol ____________
11,-, 4^-^——--—-i:is(2-Chl=rcet:hyl ',&
^^-!;7-r--—————2-Chl CM"phenol_____
541-73-1-——-——i,3-Dichiorcbsnzene.
106-4i.'.-7-— ————— .1 , 4-Dichlorobenrer.e.
.1.00-51-6———————Benzyl Alcohol.
•-:':.- 50-1- — - — ——-1 ,2-Dicnlorobenzene
95-4S-7————————2-nethy] phenol.
-bis(2-Chlcroisopropy1>Ether_
lCt-44-5--—————4-Me thy 1 phenol____________
621-64-7-——————N'-Nitrcso-Di-n-Propylf.iTine.
67-72-1 ———————He xachloroe thane__________
98-95-3--——————Witrctenzcne______________
j. •-',; ~ .: .• • • • " • — — ——— —— — ^;, -v- iji ,iife •;-. hy i phenc .
il 1-9l-l---——--• -bis (2--Chlaroethoxy }Met!
120-S3-2-- ———— --2, 4-rich let—phenol____
120-32-1-———-1,2.4-Tricnlcrobenzene
-'•I -2 >- — •—-——— Naphthalsr,K___________\
1C6-47-3-——- ——4-Chl jroa-iline.
37--6LJ-3---- •-•—— -i-
1;- sac hi CJTO butadiene______
59 —5 •'.'•— 7—— ——- •—— ——4—Ch 1 ore—3—Me thy 1 pheno i 
_
91-57-f.————————2-Methyl naphthalene______
77-47-4 - -—-——-Hex-r.c h 1 Grc-cyc 1 open tad iene
eD-Ct-2—-——-——2,4,6-Trichi.orophencl____\
95-9?.--4 ———————2 , 4 , 5-Trichlcrophenol____
t- -' 
f<~ 
~» 
_ 
*~• 
" ! _ T _ . _ _ . _ _ _ — U - i . L _ _ T _ ,_ __
T ... — ... v.: • - / — — — — 
— — — _ _ — „ . j. L. i i_n=i(-i. t^ns i <±rie______
r-. r^ 
— ', 
- 
_ 
_ 
_ —. _ I- i j a. ._ _ _ ^ • •• ; _ _
OO . *-.'" - - - - - — - 
- 
^ 
.-Jj.._f ..jc... i j. i IT! ti___________________
* — / _ •* •: 
-? 
_ 
_ _ _ „ _. r'~ - — - 4- I-. . . - 
p, 1~ J_ L_ _ 1 _ o_ _.
j- -•• J 
- - —-: — — — — — —— i/j.:. it: T L i ^ > i 
I- i : i_rict j. c-, utf__________
2;!'G-';;: .f;—o —— — — — ——Ac:en?.p!"ithv lene___________
•2• ----- — — — 2 , ;'_-E :I.",i trotol uene
FOF'M I PV-1
Q
330 
; U
370 
!U
33O 
i U
330 
i U
330 
! U
730 
: U
330 
! U
33O 
! U
1600 
!U
160O 
: i..!
33'? 
: U
330 
1 J
370 
; J
TUT OOi 0412
1C
:FMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
EBLKOi
i - ' K i... „. -. « o T T t"' T r* r^ n E:- c-
u_ v. 
• -i -A tiitr • 
-... i— 1 i i j^'— 
u, '_•?"* n
__ ___________________ 
Contract: 6SD90025 
!__________
ab Code: CFI1*IC 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BT747
riatrix; (soil/water) SOIL
I ample wt/vol: 
30.0 
(g/mL) G___
level: 
(law/med) LOW
"/' Moisture: net dec. __0 
dec. ____
jxtraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SQNC
3FC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N__ 
pH: 
7.O
Lab Sample ID: S0612-B1
Lab File ID: 
A1129
Date Received: O6/OS/89
Date Extracted: 06/.12/89
Date Analysed: 06/19/89
Dilution Factor: 1.OO
I
:AG ?-'n.
COMPOUND
(uq/L or uq/Kq) UE/K5
99-09-"7' ———————— 3-Nitroani 1 ine
83-32-9 ———————— AcenaDhther.e
51-28-5 ———————— 2, 4-Dinitro phenol
100-02-7 ——————— 4-Nitrophenol
132—64-9 ——————— Dibenzof uran
121-14-2 ——————— 2.4-Dinitrctcluene
34-66-2 ———————— Diethvlph thai ate
7005-72-3 —————— 4-Chlorqphenyl-phenylether __
86-73-7 ———————— Fluorene
100-10-6 ——————— 4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1 —— - ———— 4.6-Dinitro-2-Methylchenol
86—30—6 ———————— W-Ni trosodipheny lamine ( 1 )
1 0 i - 5 5-3 ——————— 4-Bromophen y 1 -phen v 1 e t her
1 1 G-74-i ——————— hexachlcrobenzene
G7- F-::--
1:-- — ——— — —Pen t af hi or a phen ci
S5-O1-5 ———————— Phenanthrene
84-74-^ ———————— Di-n-Butvlphthalate
206-44-O ——————— Fluoranthene
129-00-0 ——————— Pyrene
85-63-7- ———— —— Bu tv 1 ben zylph thai ate
'?: -9--1 
- ————— • —— -3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3 —— -• ———— Eenzo(a) Anthracene
218-01-9 ——————— Chrysene
117-81-7- —————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl )Fh thai ate __
117-84-0 ——————— Di-n-Octvl Ph thai ate
205-99-2 ——— - ——— Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
207-OS-9 ——————— Benzo( k )Fluoranthene
50-32-8- ——————— Benzo (a ) Pyrene
1^3-39-5 ——————— Indenod, 2, 3-cd) Pyrene
!;3- / . -;.-- —————— Di ben z ( a , h ) An thracene
191 -~~4-'T' ——————— E;f=nzo ( a , h , i )Pervlene
1600
330
160O
1600
330
33O
330
330
330
1.600
160O
330
330
330
1600
33O
330
330
330
330
33O
660
33O
33O
330
330
330
33O
330
330
330
:u
:u
!U
:u
I L>
:u
;u
:u
:u
:u
i i i
i i.-i
i t •
i •— '
1 i i
t t»>
:u
!U
:u
:u
!U
!U
!U
:u
:u
•u
i
716
;...nnc.t be separated from Diphenylamine
FORK I SV-2
2-
TUT 001 0413
T V T i i *-i; 
r -r - i r- 
r-\<r-• r*- r *-. \ •* r- r-- 
,--. i, t /•, i -. / r- r r*~ 
T^ ^ -T- A 
r--1 i r~ |— •—
. i I t v ..JL-f-i I j U.I..1 
•_'!-*.. _3f-; ••; .1 L_-_» 
!" I-4 ML.. T O J. :2 
L. I-! i M 
CD I'.!_ L- i
SPA SAMPLE NO.
SBLKOI
I h Name: C1IMIC CCRP
L&b Cods: CCIMK
Case No.: 12053
Contract: 68590028 
!_________
SAG No.s ______ 
SDG. No.: DT747
Matrix: (soil/water) SCTL
Sample wt/val: 
30,0 (g/ml_) G___
Level: 
(low/ned) LCW
% Moisture: not dec. __0_ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Scnc) 
SCNC
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N__ 
pH: __.7«_0_
CAS rc.
Lab Sample ID: S0612-B1
Lab File ID: 
A1129
Date Received: O6/08/89
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analysed: 06/19/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
I
CONCENTRATION UNITS;
(ug/L =r ug/Kg) UG/K3
^_-l— 
• ?. ^
111-44-4 — -
541-73-1 — -
106-46-7 — •
100-51-6 — •
95-48-7 —— •
39633-32-9-
106-44-5 — •
621- 64-7- —
67-72-1 — -
105-67-9 —
65-E5-C ——
JL _ .*. 
/ j. 
j.
120-83-2 —
120-82-1 —
1C6-47-S —
87-68-3 ——
-?-T 
f!^ 
/*
// *+, ^
88-06-2 ——
————— Phenol
———— Tbis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether
———— 2-Chlorophenol
————— l,3-3ichiorobenzene
1,4 Dit_hlorcbenzene
————— Benzyl Alcohol
————— 1,2-Dichlcrobenzene
————— 2-Methvlohenol
————— bi=(2-Chloroisopropy])Ether _
"^ ' » %z '* ,# y ^ ^ t * =^r i : O i
————— N-Nitros = -Di-n-Prcpylar.iinE
——— — Hexi-.chlcroethane
5^ ^ ^ _ ^ ^ # _ = = ^ 
__ _ ^
—— _ — Isz-shsrone
- ———— 2-^itrop-enol
————— 2,^-Dir.ethylphenol
- ———— Psnzoic Acid
————— bis(2-Chlorosthcxv)Methane
————— 2.4-Dichlorophenol
————— l,2,4-Tri.-hlorobenzene
————— r^azhthalene
— . —— -4-Chlcrcsr.ilir:e
————— Hcxachlcrobutadiene
————— 4-Chlcro-3-Methylphenol
- ———— 2-Mzthyjnaphthalene
Hexachlcr^cyclopentadi^ne
—— . —— 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4 ———————— 2,4,5-Tri.chlorophenol
91-58-7 ——
88-74-4 ——
131-M-3—
606-20-2 —
————— 2-Chloronaphthalene
————— 2-:Vitrcar,iline
_ _ _ 
T^^_^j_^..T 
^. l*j.&_*1_*.^
—— — — — - ^ . .. C; v i i \ i r i i 1.1 :«.& j. &• *_u;
— - ——— Accr.&^hthylene
—— —— -2*fr-2initrctoluene
330
330
3-J..U
330
330
330
330
330
330
33 U
330
J" J* - *
330
J\7\O
•_• !• L'
330
1600
330
330
33O
330
330
530
330
330
330
330
1600
330
1600
730
230
330
i — r-*"n T f^i. 
^
rCifM. i 3.— 1.
*
IU
I I I
1 LJ
i i .
i L.'
:u
IU
:u
IU
:y
IU
t LJ
:u
IU
: u
: * *
!U
I'J
t t-f
:u
IU
:u
:u
:u
:U
:u
i * *
: *J
:u
IU
i i *
i **
IU
* i *
: w?
•IU 
'^15
^A1 0414
of
TUT
? /N M C' I IT 
n r-*
< Hi ir l_t. i<t_i .
r~. r~. r—• /-- i- i T r-- r* 
r. i. i A I
»_-rvor-:IMJ S_-O 
nl*<|-ll
GBLKOl
*... t- 4- n- - — •*- «
- CD 11 •_ f o. L_ .1
ase No.: 120=8
30.O 
(g/n^L) G
i^-fcure: r^ct: dec.
i_
?D3 r-'o. : EX97S
ID: S0612-B1
A1129
dec . _____
Extraction; 
(SepF/Cont/Sanc) 
SGNC
GPC Cleanup: 
CY/.N) N__ 
pH: 
7.0
CAS \'C-. 
COMPOUND
Date Received: OA/08/39
Date Extracted: 06/12XB9
Cate Analyzed: 06/19/89
Dilution Fs.ctcr: 1.00 .
CONCENTRATION UNITS;
(uq/L cr ug/Kc) US/K5
Q
T--OV-.- ———————— 3— Nit ream line
23-32-? ——— - ———— Acenaphthene
51-^2 5- — 
2, 4-£initrophenQl
1C 0-02-7 ——————— 4-Nitrophenol
132-64—9 —————— — Dibenro-furan
121-1-^-2 ——————— 2,4— Dinitro toluene
S4-66-2 ———————— Diethylphthalate
700 = -72-.i —————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phsnyl ether
E't- 73-7 — —————— Fluorene
•00-1O-6 ——————— 4-Ni troani line
r-74-52-1 —— -- ——— 4,6-Dinitro-2-rt5thylphGriol __
C6 
.:•'.• h 
N Nitrosodiphenvl smine (1)
iOl j-s -• 
- 
4 Bromuphenyl—pheny] ether
1 13-74".-. -- —— —— He xac hi aro benzene
D7-?:/.- -^ ———— ——— Pen tact".], orophenol
o^.-01-S ———————— Phensnthrene .
120-12-7 ——————— Anthracene
34-74-2- ——————— Di-n-Butvlchthalate
206- 44— O — - ———— Fluoran tnene
129-CO-O ——————— Pyrene
S3-- 63-7- —— -- ———— Butyl benzyl ph thai ate
? .1-94 -I ———————— 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
?6-S::.— 3 ———————— Benzo(a) Anthracene
2 IS- 01-*? ————
 : —— Chrysene
il7-cl-7 ——————— bis ( 2-Ethyl hexy 1 }Ph thai ate __
117--' 4-0 ——————— Di-n-Octvl Phthalate
20^—99-2 ——————— Een2o(b)FlLioranther.e
207-03— *=? ——————— Ben so ( If. ) Fluoran thene
?'-.:-•.. ,..:- £ ——— ———— Benzo ( a ) Pyrene
l?...-3v-!:. — - ———— Indeno(1.2.3-cd)Pvrene
f-Z- •"0-3- •—- ———— Diben2< a, h) Anthracene
l':"l-2-T-2- —— — —— Benzo (.q , h , i ) Pery lene
: 
it oo
730
i£00
It 00
330
330
330
330
1600
Id 00
330
330
330
liOO
3 3 O
330
330
330
330
330
66O
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
33>.>
!U
i i i
• '_*
;u
!'J
:u
:u
:u
• I I
1 W
1 1 1
1 A—'
:u
:u
;u
!U
:u
: j
:u
< i i
i w
:u
!U
iU
!U
!'J
!U
!U
:u
:u
;-j
!U
:u
:u
;u
:u
i
(1) - 'Iar.-ct te separated from Dipheny lamine
FORM I EV-2
TUT 
001 
0415
f
I
;..AT:LET ::"^'.r- — - -:'.:r-L.vr:r r
 V,"A -I-TET
•-•:-'•! !•••-•'
-.' *_- i— i . -• rf
. r
;;. ; /...v.'ir.-r ; 
L- 2 I ;..
":
e >-,t/\ c;'.
"0-0 
'. .;/.iiL)
. Live:
\ ' 
I.X .
Lab Fi le ID: 
{HULL
Date Received:
PC r.
net dec. .__0 
dec.
(SepF/Cont/Sc-c.)
leanup: 
(Y/N) N__ 
pH:
Date Extracted: -:•£/13/39
D a t e A n s i y zed: 
06/23/t39
Diluticn F.;.c:tor: .1 ,0"-
CCNCEUTRATICN UNITS:
(!.;q/L cr ug/Kq;
I
1
•
t
:
:
!
!
i
:
i
i
•
'•
•
<
>
'.
i
»
:
i1
••
i1
;
i
»
i
t
:
i
i
1
;
;
;
;
1 -:.S-9=--2 ——— — - — F ^ (=r>c. i
^ 11-,; .'.-..:-- ———— ••— bis(2-3hlcr-c~thvl iEther
r>'3- = 7 E;-- — — -•-— 2~Ch]crcr h-nol
r>41-73--l- —————— i,3-n-icr.3crcber.2er:e
l-.:o--s6-/ ———— - —— A , 4 -Die h;s re benzene
ICO-^l-t — -- ———— Benzyl Alcohol
95--50-1— — ————— l,2-DichlGrrb&nrene
95-^-7- ——— — •— 2 -Methyl phenol
3-9633-32-9 — - —— fcis(2-tTh:oroisoprcpyl ) Ether
106-^^-5— — - —— 4-Me thy 1 phenol
621-4:^-7 — ————— N-N:..troEC-Di-r:"P;-opylo..T,i-e __
67-72-1 ————— - —— -'Hexschloraethsns
-G -7 5- 3— 
-• —————— ivitrrben-c-s
7E-1:-;-!--- —— -- - -I ^opharcnG
S3-----V- — — • — ----- -N; trr-l-^nc]
ICT.-;:---^--- -•-— -----2, -"-3i.7iethvl^h£--r.;:,
65-85-0----- ——— --Eenncic -cid
li 1-^1-1- —— - —— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Me thane __
120-G3-2 —————— -2.4-Dichjcrcrhencl
120-32-1—- — —— l,2,4-Trichlsr=ber,2cr.e
91--2>-3— — —— — -Uaphthalene
i06-i"-r-.--— ••— -4-Chl=rca,-,iline
37 -61— 3- — — ----- — •H::.;c.chlcr-cSut£.diGne
59-50--- ———— —— 4-C hi oro-3-Me thy l phenol
91-=. -i ———————— 7-Methvl-a.i=hthale?ne
77-47 -/:-- — - —— -Hsxachlorocyc la pen tsdier-e ___
SE-06--2-- ——————— 2,4,6-Trichlorcphenol
95-r~5— r —————— -—2.4, 5-Trichloraphencl
QI--C- 7- ----- -- — T-Chlc-c-nphthGle-e
i-"— 
. — 
*• 
.,.- i ! j. •..: _ i., ! j. ~ .-i :(-:
13'.-:.: -3—- —— - — ri.T.Tthyl ^hths-.l? t=-
20G--9,1--S- ——— ----- Act-r-^phtrv,- l.^ne
606-::i: -2- ------ -2, 6--I-i.-,i trctoluer.E
t
!
:
.
I
1
l
!
I
l
1
i
1
'.
:
:
!
:
i
!
i
T
;
;
!
!
f
i
!
;
!
i
l
!
1
,
;
!
,
i
;
t
:
330
.. -_' '.'
~ — .-.
330
330
330
330
330
330 '
330
-T-T,-,
—— T- .-.
•- •-• -'
_- •_• .-
-T-T -
.-• _• -
33':
330
:. L oo
_•'_-
330
_ _••..•
T-Tf-j
330
T T, •-•
•_• _' -'
3..0
330
330
1600
330
1600
330
T -* »"-.
-..•-' •-'
730
. 
t 
•
1 '—
' - J
: : l
; «..;
: -.j
i _
:L;
i'J
:u
::j
:u
!U
:u
•LJ
: 1 •
;u
! L!
:u
!U
i LJ
!U
: J
:u
1 LJ
:u
:u
:u
:u
:U
1 !
. i-J
:u
5U
;U
;
I
FORM I •'.'-:.
TUT OO1 0416
rist: 651:90029
' -
r— r~. A 
r" <• i-.: r*. i 
r~ 
h • r^
nr M Sr-irir i-IT NO .
i
! 
E5LKC2
f~- T^- r*» 
i : _ 
. 
T-. •-.* f1. ~m
£' *_•' IT 
i ;LJ • I 
*-' /-. . •• i-'1
ID; 
SO&13-D1_____
Lab File ID:
Late Received:
'•: !"!c-isturc:-: ~.Dt rite.
Q
dec.
-;tractior,j 
(SepF/Cent/Senc) 
SGNC
'•C Clesr.upi 
(Y/N) N__ 
pH: 
7.0
Date Extracted: Cfc/13/
Analysed: O^/23/
Diluticn Factsrr: 1 . 00
I
CGNCENTRATICN U^TTS:
(ug/L DT ug/Kc) !.JG/i
rnr_
b'.-'
c ••
>..' J.
^_ • N. i
-L— i
2^ —
700
3c-
1 0 0
r. -T ^»
36-
1 '.' i
•3 5 -
120
f\ f\
•_ *••• ~
Z' •"- •'
129
^-. —
c? •*
IT f
21C
4 4 - 7
a ^- /
-i. .* /
-; 0 5
-v-)7
^"- r « ...
... 7 -_
3'~-'-
:-. •.'!
". •;•- 2 -- ——————— 3- Mi trcani i ine
•2-r —————— — A-er.aphthene
22- - = -. --- ———— 2, fl-Tiinitrsphencl
-02-7 ——————— 4-Nitrophenol
-£,4-n;._.- ————— Dibenrc-furan
- 1 4-2- —————— 2 , A-Dinitrotcluene
-.6-2- ———————— Diethylptrthals-te
3-72-3- ————— 4-Chlorephenvl-enenvlether
77 -.y — ._._-.. ——— Fluor ene
---..-.'--6- —————— 4-Ni troaniline
-52-1- ———— — 4 , 6-Dini tro-2-Methy 1 phencl
.-••-• e 
- 
N Nitrcsodiphenylamine ^1) __ ._
- T 3-3--- ————— 4-Bromcphenyl— phenylether ___
-74 ••• 1 - —————— He x ac h 1 oroben zene
: ;: ~ - —————————— h'-iH tEC.-.l OTCpfiSnO 1
'." 1—3- — — ——— — Phen s.n tr.rene
- 12 -7-- — -•• ——— Anthracene
7C-2- ———————— Di-n-ButvlBhthslste
-4^-0- —————— Fluorsntnene
-00- 0- —————— Pyrene
f cL-7 - - - - — - —— Buty I ber. z y 1 p 1~. t ha 1 a te
74-1 — -__.__ — - 
(3> -Dichlorcbsr, zidine
13-3- - — •-- ——— Benro( a) Anthracene
-01-9 —— ---' ——— Chrysene
...21-7- — - —— -Dis(2-Ethyihexyl }Phthalate
-54-0- — - ——— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
-99- 2- —— ——— Ben ~o ( b ) F 1 ucran t hene
-OS-9 ———— - —— 5enzc(k )Fluoranthene
32- - —— -- ——— DenzD< a ) Pyrene
-o9-5 ——————— Indenc( 1 , 2,3-cd ) Pyrene
. '. -._.- — - ----- —— Jibcnr (a s hJwnthracEne
-2 - - "'• ----- ——— Benzc ( q . h,i )Perylene
1600
~T("^;^-_
< ^ r» ^-.
_^ *_• . _•
1600
330
330
33O
330
330
1600
1600
330
330
330
1 L 0 0
~\"\:~»
33 y
33O
330
330
T 7 •'"'
660
330
330
330
330
330
330
33O •
..30
330
330
i J
i i 1
1 1 !
; 'J
< « f
• «_j
i <_i
vj
:u
:u
:u
i i i
!U
:u .
! U
! 'J
! J
:u
;u
!LJ
t * t
i'J
: J
:u
!U
1U
!LS
;u
!U
:u
i t t
1 W
! U
;
frcm Diphenyiamine
FORM T BV-2
TUT 00.1. 0417
1/87 Rev.
I \^ 
ATTACHMENT 1
I 
SOP NO. BW-6 
PAGE OP
TOTAL REVIEW
<
CLP DATA ASSESSMENT
i 
•
Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organic Analysis
1 
Case No. 12058 SDG No. BX258 & BX260 LABORATORY COHPUCHEHN SITE TUTU
<
\ 
DATA ASSESSMENT:
The current functional guidelines (1988) for evaluating organic data have been
• 
applied.
All data are valid and acceptable except those analytes which have been
qualified vith a "J" (estimated), "U" ( non-detects), "R" (unusable), or "JN"
I
(presumptive evidence for the presence of the material at an estimated value).
All action is detailed on the attached sheets.
^ 
Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that the
I 
associated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems
I 
the analysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound
• 
is present or not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they
cannot be relies upon, even as a last resort. 
The second fact to keep in mind
] 
is that no compound concentration, even if it has passed all QC tests, is
j 
guaranteed to be accurate. Strict QC serves to increase confidence in data but
any value potentially contains error.
Reviewer's 
tf.'.'.v .// ^ / i /
/ V/7"
Signature:___
~ -• - 
f 
'
* ,-Z-/19^
Verified By: 
/ "^ i ~^a5C/<-' 
Date
I
I
I
I
1
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 
OF
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
4. CALIBRATION:
Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to ensure that the instrument
is capable •£ producing acceptable quantitative data. 
An initial calibration
demonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance at
the beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration checks
document that the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.
A) RESPONSE FACTOR:
The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific chemical
compounds. 
The response factor for the Target Compound List (TCL) must be >
0.05 in both the initial and continuing calibrations. A value < 0.05 indicates
a serious detection and quantitation problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes
detected in the sample vill be qualified as estimated, "J". All non-detects for
that compound vill be rejected, "R".
2-Butanone was rejected in samples BY705, BY707, BY709, BY711, BY712,
and BY713.
TUT 001 0419
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 
OF
SOP NO. HW-6 
—— "
DATA ASSESSMENT:
5. CALIBRATION:
A) PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION (ZRSD) AND PERCENT DIFFERENCE (ZD):
Percent RSD is calculated from the initial calibration and is used to indicate
the 
stability of the specific compound response factor over increasing
concentration. 
Percent D compares the response factor of the continuing
calibration 
check to the mean response factor (RRF) from the initial
calibration. 
Percent D is a measure of the instrument's daily performance.
Percent RSD most be OOZ and ZD must be <25Z. A value outside of/*«se limits
indicates potential detection and quantitation errors. 
For these --.*asons, all
positive results are flagged as estimated, "J" and non-detects are flagged "UJ"
(if ZD or RSD >SOZ). 
If there is a cross deviation of ZRSD and ZD, the
non-detects may be rejected, *R*.
For 
the PCB/PESTICIDB 
fraction, ZRSD 
for aldrin, 
endrin, DOT, and
dibutylchlorendate must not exceed 10Z. Percent D must be vithia 1SZ on the
quantitation column and 20Z on the confirmation column.
VOA
The following analytes vere qualified for high ZD results:
1,1,2 Trichloroethane vas rejected in sample BX258, and qualified "UJ"
in samples BY772, BY773, and BY775.
Chloroethane vas qualified "UJ" in samples BY769, BX994, BX979, BX981,
and BY774.
Chloromethane vas qualified "UJ" in samples BY772, BY773, BY775,
BX994, BX979, 3X981.
Tetrachloroethene vas qualified "J" in sample BZ258, and "UJ" in
samples BY769, BY774, BY772, BY773, and BY775.
Bromofora vas qualified "UJ" in'samples BY772, BY773, and BY775.
Acetone vas qualified "J" in samples BY772, and BY775; "UJ" in samples
BY774, and BT769; and rejected in sample BY773.
Acetone in samples BY701, BY763, BY768, and BX259 vere qualified "J"
due to high ZD results. Acetone in sample BY769 vas also qualified
"u" for method blank contamination. ZD values vere high for 4 Methyl
2 Pentanone but this vas previously qualified for surrogate
recoveries.
Methylene Chloride in sample BX259 vas flagged "J" due to RSD values.
Acetone in BY768 did not meet QC requirement for ZD but vas already
qualified due to high RSD results in sample fBX991.
BNA
The following analytes are qualified for high ZD results:
3,3 Dichlorobenzldine was flagged "OJ" in samples BX260, BX979, BY758,
BY762, and BY261.
4 Nitrophenol vas flagged "UJ" in samples BX994, BY75B, BY762, and
TUT 001 0420
17
REFERENCE NO. 8
CONTINUED
flJT 
OOl 
O421
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BY261.
Diethylphthalate vas flagged "UJ" in samples BX995RE, BY763, BY768,
and BY761.
Bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether vas rejected in samples BY701, BY762,
BY758 and BY261.
Benzoic Acid vas flagged "UJ" in samples BY701, BY761, BY763, and
BY768.
3 Nitroaniline vas rejected in sample BX994. 
.
Bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether vas flagged "UJ" in sample BY701.
N-Nitroso Di-n-Propylamine vas flagged "UJ" in sample BY701.
Hexachlorobenzene vas flagged "UJ* in sample BY758, BY762 and BY261.
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate vas flagged "J" in samples BY761t BY768,
BY258, and BY2S9.
Benzoic Acid in sample tBX995RE also failed QC requirements but vas
previously rejected for surrogate recovery.
PAGE 
OP
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
6. SURROGATES:
All samples are spiked with surrogate compounds prior to sample preparation to
evaluate overall laboratory performance and efficiency of the analytical
technique. 
If the measured surrogate concentrations vere outside contract
specifications, qualifications vere applied to the samples and analytes as shovn
belov.
BNA
The acid fraction in sample BX995RE vas rejected.
VOA
4Methyl-2-Pentanone vas qualified as "J" estimated, and all the other
analytes qualified as "UJ" in sample BX991.
3"> 
TUT 001
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 
OF
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
7. INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE
r
Internal standard (IS) performance criteria ensure that the GC/MS sensitivity
and response are stable during every experimental run. The internal standard
area count Bust not vary by more than a factor of 2 (-50Z to +100Z) fro* the
associated continuing calibration standard. 
The retention time of the internal
standard mist not vary more than +30 seconds from the associated continuing
calibration standard. If the area count is outside the (-50Z to +100Z) range of
the associated standard, all of the positive results for compounds quantitated
using that IS are qualified as estimated, "J", and all non-detects as "UJ" or
"R* if there is a severe loss of sensitivity.
»
If an internal standard retention time varies by more than 30 seconds, the
reviewer will use professional judgnent to determine either partial or total
rejection of the data for that sample fraction.
VGA
2 Hexanone, 4 Methyl-2-Pentanone, Tetrachloroethene,
1,1,2,2,Tetrachloroethane, Toluene, Chlorobenzene, Ethylbenzene,
Styrene, and Xylene the internal standard area count falls outside the
QC range, no action was taken because these analytes were previously
qualified for poor surrogate recoveries in sample BX991.
431. 
™T °01 °423
I
I
i
I
I
1
L
I
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE__OF
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
8. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION:
A) VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE FRACTIONS:
TCL compounds are identified on the GC/MS by using the analyte's relative
retention time (RRT) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained fro* known
standards. For the results to be a positive hit, the sample peak mist be within
±0.06 RRT units of the standard compound and have an ion spectrum which has a
ratio of the primary and secondary n/e intensities within 20Z of that in the
standard compound. 
For the tentatively identified compounds (TIC) the ion
spectra must match accurately. In the cases in which there is not and adequate
ion 
spectrum ^match, 
the 
laboratory may have 
provided false positive
identification.
B) PESTICIDE FRACTION:
The retention times of reported compounds must fall within the calculated
(
retention time windows for the two chromatographic columns and a GC/MS
confirmation is required if the concentration exceeds 10 ng/ml in the final
sample extract.
BNA
Phenol in sample BX258 was flagged "JN" due to inadequate spectral
match.
The aldol products (TIC) in samples BX258, BX259, BX261 were rejected.
Two VOA TCL identified as TIC's were rejected in sample BXC761.
All TIC compound results (VOA and BNA) are flagged "J" (estimated), and also
"N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) if an identification
is made, to reflect the qualitative and quantitative error inherent in the
analysis of compounds without corresponding calibration standards.
Tu'>' 
on* 
-°424
I
t
I
1
1
I
i
I
1
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 
OP
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
9. MATRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/MSD:
The MS/MSD data are generated to determine the long-term precision and accuracy
of the analytical method in various matrices. 
The MS/MSD may be used in
conjunction vith other QC criteria for some additional qualification of the
data.
VGA
Poor matrix spike recoveries vere obtained for the VGA fraction. The
matrix spike sample (BX259), was diluted by a factor of 6.7.
43i 
TUT 001 0425
I
ATTACHHEHT 1 
PACK 
OP
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
2. BLANK CONTAMINATION:
Quality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., nethod, trip, field, rinse and water blanks
are prepared to identify any contamination vhich oay have been introduced into
the samples during sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure
laboratory contamination. Trip blanks measure cross-contamination of samples
during shipment. Field blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during
field operations. If the concentration of the analyte is less than 5 times the
blank contaminant level (10 times for the common contaminants), the analytes in
the samples shovn vere qualified vith "U" for these reasons:
A) Method blank contamination
VOA
Acetone in samples BX258, BY702, BY769, BY774.
Chloroform in samples BY769, BY772, BY774, BY775.
Methylene Chloride in samples BY705,BY707, BY709, BY711, BY712, BY713,
BY769, BY772, BY773, BY774, BY775, and BX258.
Acetone in sample BY773 vas flagged "J" for field blank contamination,
this flag vas superceded by rejection due to calibration results.
I 
BNA
Tvo TIC's vere rejected in sample BX258 due to method blank
contamination.
1
B) 
Field or rinse blank contamination ("vater blanks" or "distilled vater
blanks" are validated like any other sample)
VOA
Acetone and Methylene Chloride in sample BY764 vas qualified "u".
Acetone in samples BY769, and BY774 vere already qualified for method
blank contamination. Methylene Chloride in samples BY772, BY773,
BY775, and BY774 also failed QC for field blank, but vas previously
qualified for method blank contamination.
There vere several field blanks not associated vith any samples.
C) Trip blank contamination
TUT 001 0426
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT 1 
PACE 
OP
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
10. OTHER QC DATA OUT OF SPECIFICATION:
Sample #764 was received but not listed on Chain of Custody or Traffic
Report. Sample #BY761 was listed but not received. Sample 1775 was
received with samples collected on 6/9/89 but not listed on the
traffic report. The BNA portion of sample By765 was not received by
the lab, therefore the analysis was not performed.
11. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND OVERALL ASSESSMENT (continued on next page if
necessary):
12. CONTRACT PROBLEMS / HOH-COMPLIANCE:
Relative response factors for 2-Butanone were calculated using
Bromochloromethane as the internal standard instead of 1,4
Dichlorobenzene. No qualifications were required since the retention
time for 2-Butanone was closer to the Bromochloromethane standard.
13. This 
package contains re-extraction, re-analysis or dilution. 
Upon
revieving the QA results, the following for* I(s) are identified to be
used.
SEE FORM I's.
TUT O01 0427
CASE NO.
SDG NO. _
sow__
5 *T
REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
___ 
LABORATORY 
"" 
"
•1___ 
DATA USER 
( ^ W
________ 
REVIEW COMPLETION DATE 
^ " 30-
NO. OF SAMPLES 
''I 
WATER 
^P 
SOIL 
____ 
OTHER 
JSc^S, // //?0-f
REVIEWER (]ESD 
I]£SAT 
[] OTHER, CONTRACT/CONTRACTOR
-
1. HOLDING TIMES
2. OC4C TUNE/CC PERFORMANCE
3L JNTTIAL CALIBRATIONS
4. CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS
5. FIELD BLANKS (TP • am applicable)
& LABORATORY BLANKS
7. SURROGATES
t. MATRIX SPJKEA)UPLICAT£S
& REGIONAL QC (-F - am applicable)
ia INTERNAL STANDARDS
1L COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION
12. COMPOUND QUANTJTATJDN
13. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
14. OVERALL ASSESSMENT
BNA
OTHER
\J
O • No problems or mioor problems thai do aot affect data vsabilitjr.
X • No more than about 5% of the data poiats are qualified as either estimated or urasable.
M « More thaa about 5% of the data points are qualified as estimated.
Z • More thao about 5% of the data poiats are qualified as oavsable.
DPO ACTION ITEMS:
AREAS OF CONCERN:
276
TUT 
001 
0428
"•"'• 
7"
>S! 
V
H
-fa
1-0
-0
I
In Reference to Case No(s):
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Telephone Record Log
Date of Call:
Laboratory Name:
lab Contact:
Contact:
CalJ Initiated By: 
___ Laboratory 
" Region
————— 
' 
—————
lp reierence to data for the iolJowing sample number(s):
Surmnary of Questions /Issues Discussed:
(D 'PaCkjX*.. 
/$ /t//T?//tg, ^?y/n J
Summary of Resolution:
.T
g)
Signature
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
*h*n£>
Date
TUT
I
GOMPUCHEM
LABORATORIES, INC.
03/01/90
Ms. Margo Rezado
COM Federal Program Office
40 Rector Street 10th Floor
New York. New York 10006
Dear Ms. Rezado;
\
i 
The attached is missing data you requested for Case 12058.
'• 
SDG# BX258
Form VI and missing raw data on Inst. 10 - VOA (PAGES 847A - 847S).
\ 
SDG# BX260
I
TIC missing for Sample BY761 (PAGE 1069A).
\^ 
j-
Incorrect page in your package for Inst. 06 on 05/01/89 for SSTD160
I
(PAGE 897) Please replace this page and the response factors
will caculate to the ones given on Form VI.
} 
If I can be of further assistance, please call 919-248-6478.
Sincerely;
Alice Evans
Contract Compliance Coordinator
cc: SMO
Region II
EMSULV
TUT 
OO1 O431
I
SOP NO. HW-6
Revision 16
CLP ORGANIC DATA REVIEW
AND PREUMBttRy REVIEW
-B^vilacqua C
Monitoring Management
APPROVED BY;
Gerard F. McKenna, Qiicf
Monitoring Management Branch
Date;
TUT 001 0432
I
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
3 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
PACKAGE COMPLETENESS AND EELTVERABIZS
CASE NUMBER:.
IAB:____
5 05^
ST1E:
1.0 pata CcrDletfin*?*! and De] j
/
1.1 Have any missing deliverables been received
to the data package.
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittal of any
vissing deliverables. If lab cannot provide then,
note the effect on review of the package under
the "Contract Problens/Oton-ccrpliance11 section
of reviewer narrative.
i ' -i.. SJD CCS checklist included with package?
2.0 Cover T>tter/C3se Narrative
2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present?
2.2 Are Case Number and/or SAS number contained in the
—• 
Narrative or Cover Letter?
3.0 Data Validation Checklist
The following' checklist is divided into three parts. Part A
is filled out if the data package contains any VQA analyses,
Part B for any SNA analyses and Part C for Pesticide/PCBs.
Does this package contain:
VQA data?
EWA data?
Pesticide/FCB data?
ACTION: Ccnplete corresponding parts of checklist.
NO
N/A
w<
TUT 
001 
0433
I 
SiANUARD OPERATING PROCEDURE: 
Page: 4 
of 
35
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
NO 
N/A
PART A: VDA
•'"v/
1.0 Traffic Report^ andlgborattyv Narrative
1.1 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples?
ACTICN: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copies.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sample receipt, condition of samples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting
the quality of the data?
ACTICN: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
»ff»-fc on the quality of the data.
ACTICNi If any sanple analyzed as a soil contains more
than 50* water, all data should be rejected.
?cr[v> 
if both VQA vials for a sample have air .buhhles,
flag all positive results "J" and all nan
-detects "R".
-'.0 Holding Tunes
^ 
2.1 Have any VQA holding times, determined from date of
~" 
collection to date of analysis, been exceeded?
If unpreserved, aqueous aromatic volatiles must be analyzed
within 7 days of collection and non-arcnatic volatiles mist
be analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric
acid and stored at 4°C, then both aromatic and non-aromatic
volatiles must be analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain
about preservation, contact the sampler to determine whether
the samples were preserved.
A ten-day holding tire for soil samples is xm.a tiniinnded.
T?Hle of Holding Time "ViolirtiynS
(See Traffic Report)
Sanple 
Date 
Date Lab 
Date
Sample 
Matrix 
Preserved ? 
Sampled 
Received 
Analyzed
ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as
estimated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated
("UT"), and document in the narrative that holding tiu*~
were exceeded.
TUT UO1 O434
I 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 5 
of ~ 36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding tine,
either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer
oust use professional judgement to determine the reliability
of the data and the effects of additional storage on the
sample results. Ihe reviewer may determine that non-detect
data are unusable ("R") .
3.0 Surrogate Recovery fForm
3.1 Are the VGA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water 
ftXl 
__ 
__
b. Med Water 
[ __ 3
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil 
FvXl 
__ 
__
j.l' Are all the VOA samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate
Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices:
a. 
Tr-fj water
b. Med Water
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, document
effect on data under "Conclusions" section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? 
[±IJ __ 
__
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Was one or more VGA surrogate recovery outside of contract
specifications for any sample or method blank?
If yes, were samples reanalyzed? '•'•
Were method blanks reanalyzed?
ACTION: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but all do not
meet SOW specifications:
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J") .
2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection
limits ("UJ").
TUT 
OO1 
0435
«
I
SIW3ERRD CREMATING PROCEHJRE 
Page: 
6 
Of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
If any surrogate has a recovery of <10% 
:
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. Flag all nan-detects as unusable ("R").
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate recoveries
out of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard areas.
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw
data and Form II? 
__ 
__
AcnCK: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
*
Matrix Strikes (Form III)
4.1 is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III) 
/*
I±_3 
— 
—
1
4.2 Here matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices:
I 
a. Low Water
b. Med Water 
[__1 __
! 
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil
ACTICN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many VCA spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Sails
3 
out Of lOftG&JicO 
0 out Of 10
[ \/\ 
__ 
__
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike 
p$
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits? 
^
Water 
Soils
o 
out of 5(s>fcafco) 
V out of sftftf 
Sj>6*&) '• c/6
ACTICN: If MS and MSD both have less than 10% re-
covery for an analyte, negative results for
that analyte should be rejected, and
positive results should be flagged "J".
Hie above applies only to the sample used 
TUT 001 0436
for the MS/MSD analysis. Use professional
judgement in applying this criterion to other
earrw-iloc <
I
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 
7 . Of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO N/A~
5.0 Blanks (Form IV)
5.1 Is the Method Blank Summary (Form IV) present?
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VGA
TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, med water, low soil,
medium soil), whichever is more frequent? 
[ W<l 
__
5.3 Has a VGA instrument blank been analyzed at least 
/^^
once every twelve hours for each GC/WS system used? 
\Y 1 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any method blank data are missing, call lab
for explanation / resutmittal. If not available,
reject all associated positive data ("R").
5.4 Chromatography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms
(Rirs), quant reports or data system printouts and spectra.
Is the chromatographic performance (baseline stability)
for each instrument acceptable for VGAs?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the
effect on the data.
6.0 Contamination
NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are not used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC) for VGAs? When applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution
Factor. 
^_ 
I__1 __
6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VGA results
(TCL and/or TIC)?
ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
NOTE: Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the samples are used to qualify data. Trip
blanks are used to qualify only those samples
^ 
with which they were shipped. Blanks may not
be qualified because of contamination in another
blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate,
spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems.
TUT 001 0437
CISAHICS
BLANC CCNTAMIHATICNt
SITE:
LAB: - 
•;';,.
FRACTION: I'd'A"
ANAITTES
TCL
Mf-Cl-
&UOU.
?\ *.
^t**(.'Si; y^\ '^ 1^
v/
TIC
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
AFFECTED SAMPLES
(HETHC9 SLAHC CONTAMINATIONS
&L< K'1
AMOUNT
^r^
* X ^ & i.
**•**••»
•
V^/c
v / r ;•
AMOUNT
^^C- 
*' i
*^f
. — ...
10 
___ ,
AMOUNT
.- .,. /'*>/
1 ? . i.* '''
^•?:-7^
...1:1."
........
-r
.v>
v
^V;-
AMOUNT
. J» J/^,
,
•
ftfro?
........
«+W»e BLANK CCUT.
«:. ^ ^
AMOUNT
/ *-> *7j^.
6JC?^.•
NO:
AMOUNT
,'[ **>lk
\0'1>
?<ni
z
"77?
tfttP- BLANC CCNT. 
|
NO:
AMOUNT
7^i
r »T ''l/
J I 1 1
J 
im/
f^^ ' t
-
6/77?
u*
NO: 
_ j
AMOUNT 
|
I^/L\
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TUT 
OO1 
O43S
CSSAH1CS
ILAHS CtHTAMINATICNS
cut*
LAB: tt"***1
«ACTIC«: ' «-'*'*'
IMETKCD >UNC CCNTA/
ANALTT£S
TCL
10
AMOUNT
AMOLKT
AMOUNT
AMOUItT
8IMSE BLANK CCNT.
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
tut* BLANK CCNT. 
j
AMOUNT
AMOUNT |
'%
3 0%
J
M // I
TIC
Z 4 .-• T>. •«,<•«-. -
AfFECTED SAMPLES
.?.?£.
^
u.i.
.7.°.7.
-7/
•43
TUT
01 
0440
0
a «i
ar: 5
i i
c-j
57
v l
IU HI
35
H
"H
•• jI i
Si
V
:> J
i
8
i/; >»^»
O I
•• I
s;i
if
i T<
d-
j
-. j ~j—4—. ___L
«*:
kr
V^l, j c, 
i
_ , _ i _ ; __ -U
I 
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDUKh; 
Page: 8 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
{Sample cone > CRQLjSample cone < CRQL &jSample cone > CRQL
but < lOx blank 
is < lOx blank value value & >10x blank value
Methylene chloride Flag sanple result Reject sanple result No qualification
I 
Acetone with a 'U1; cross and report CRQL; 
is needed
Toluene out 'B' flag 
cross out 'B' flag
_____2-butanone_!____________!_____________!___________
{Sanple cone > CRQLjSaaple cone < CRQL 6!Sanple cone > CRQL
but < 5x blank 
jis < 5x blank value value 6 > 5 blank value
Other 
JFlag sample result!Reject sanple result No qualification
Contaminants with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; 
is needed
out 'B' flag 
cross out 'B1 flag
i ____________ i _____________ i
ACTION: For TIC canpounds, if the concentration in the sanple is
less than five tunes the concentration in the most con-
taminated associated blank, flag the sample data "R"
(unusable) .
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every
sasple?
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated f ield/rinse/equipment blank.
•Deception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0 GC/K5 Tuning and frfa^s f^literation (Form V)
7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Form V)
present for Bromofluorobenzene (BFB)?
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(m/z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve
' hour shift?
7.3 Has a tuning performance compound been analyzed for every
twelve hours of sample analysis per instrument? 
. r ^1 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sanple
analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning
data are available.
TUT OO1 O441
I
SIANDARD OPERATING EROCLUUKfc
Page: 9 . of . 36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
ND 
N/A
———
--
- -
-.
ALM'ICW: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration
interval.
7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been met for each
instrument used?
ACTICN: List all data which do not meet ion abunda
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
ACTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ("R").
However, if expanded Ion criteria are met
(See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data
reviewer may accept data with appropriate
qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between
mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but
if eirurs are found, check more.)
7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors
are found check more values.)
ACIICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make necessary con actions and note
errors under "Conclusions".
7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound
acceptable?
ACTICN: Use professional judgement to determine
whether associated data should be
8.0
accepted, qualified, or rejected.
jrri List frm Arwlvtes
8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I VGA)
present with required header information on each
page, for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike rtiiplicatfs
c. Blanks
2 op <= 133
TUT 001 0442
1
Ir
i
i
i
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
8.2 Are the VGA Reconstructed Ion Chroma tograms, the
mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the
data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in
the sample package for each of the following?
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
(Mass spectra not required)
c. Blanks
ACTION: If any data are missing, take action
soecified in 3.2 above.
Page: 10 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
f^.r _ _
t±j" __ __
i
I
8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report?
8.4 Is chromatographic performance acceptable with
respect to:
Baseline stability 
L_klJ 
_ 
__
Resolution
Peak shape
Full-scale graph (attenuation) 
Lk^J 
__ 
__
Other:______
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the
acceptability of the data.
8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the 
./
identified VGA conpounds present for each sample? 
Q^J 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above. If lab does not
generate their own standard spectra, make
note in "Contract Probleros/Non-compliance'1.
8.6 Is the RRT of each reported compound within 0.06 RRT 
/
units of the standard RRT in the continuing calibration? 
T 1/1 
__ 
__
8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the
sample mass spectrum?
8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree 
/
within 20%? 
r ixf 
__ 
__
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of data. If it is determined
that incorrect identifications were made,
all such data should be rejected, flagged
"N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of
the compound) or changed to not detected (at
the calculated detection limit).
r 
TUT 001 0443
erf 
IUT
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE • 
- Page: 11 
of 
36
Date: March 1989 -
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
.0 Tentatively Identifig'j Concoury^g fTIC)
9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Fora I,
Part B) present; and do listed TICS include scan number
or retention time, estimated concentration and "J" 
^
qualifier? 
f Un 
__ 
__
9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified
compounds and *ce/'y'iat**1 "best natch" spectra included
in the sample package for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
f v^l 
__ 
__
b. Blanks 
\ tXl 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N"
qualifier to all identified TIC compounds
on Form I, Part B.
j.. Are any TCL compounds (fren any fraction) listed as
TIC compounds (example: 1,2-dijnethyUbenzene is xylene —
a VQA TCL— and should not be reported as a TIC)?
ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.
9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the
sample mass spectrum?
9.5 Do TIC and "best match'1 standard relative ion intensities
agree within 20%?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of TIC identifications. If
it is determined that an incorrect identi-
fication was made, change identification to
"unknown" or to some less specific identi-
fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene")
as appropriate.
10.0 Cotinjound Ou^TTfci+'^tion and Report^ Detection Limit*!?
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Form I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation
ion, and RRF were used to calculate Fora I result.
Were any errors found?
10.2 Are the CRQIs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions
^ 
and, for soils, sample moisture? 
* 
[ __ ] ——
<£ 
TUT 001 0444
I
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Page: 12 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO 
N/A
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions11.
ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the "E" value on the original Form I and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sample. Specify which Form I is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
il.-j Standards Data
U.1 Are the Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, and data
system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial
and continuing calibration?
ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
GC/MS Initial Calibration (Form VT)
12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present
and complete for the volatile fraction?
ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are
missing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.2 Are response factors stable for volatiles over the
concentration range of the calibration (RSD <30%)?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: When RSD >30%, nan-detects may be qualified
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results "J". 
When RSD >90%, 
flag
all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
II policy.)
12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any volatile compound has an average
RRF < 0.05, 
flag positive results for that
compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non-
detects for that cuin-omiJ as unusable ("R").
~'1/
*» <: / ce, . _
•
TUT 001 0445
J~> 
OI 
JO
Date: March 1989
ReV.sior 5
NO 
N/A
12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
1
^-- 
the reporting of average response factors (RRF) or
%RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are 
^.^
found, check more.) 
^ 
[__) __
J 
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
| 
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
•« 
note errors under "Conclusions".
j 13.0 GC/MS
 <^P
TT^"UTiliiJT
eT ^"^bration (Form VTH
i
13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form VH) present
and complete for the volatile fraction?
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed
for every twelve hours of sample analysis per
-i 
instrument?
ACTION: List below all sample analyses that were
I
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACITCN: If any forms are missing or no continuing
calibration standard has been analyzed within
twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab
for explanation / resubmittal. If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ("R").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have
a ERF < 0.05? 
\S
ACTION: circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any volatile compound has a RRF < 0.05,
flag positive results for that compound as
estimated ("J"), and flag nan-detects for that
compound as unusable ("R").
13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and 
.^
continuing calibration RRF > 25%? 
\s [__] ——
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated
sample data as outlined in the table below:
TUT 001 0446
1
1r
i
oj-fuiuttiMj wruv^Lj_i*j FT* *, f,\ fl inr. 
^age: 
±4 
or 
Jt>
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
% DIFFERENCE
i
f
bjT
1 J
25-50
positive
results, no action
for
f
non detects
ii|.j.
50-90
positive
results. 'UJ'
non detects'*
ii
j-j.
>90
positive
{results. "R"
jnon detects
• •
.
I
13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the
reporting of average response factors (ERF) or difference
(%D) between initial and continuing RRFs? (Check at
least two values but if errors are found, check more.) 
__ 
f V^l
ACTION: circle errors in zed.
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make &••/ necessary corrections and
Jiote errors under "Conclusions".
(Fcnr. Vim
14.1 Are the internal standard areas (Form VIII) of every
sarple and blank within the upper and lower limits
fcr each continuing calibration?
ACTION: List all the outliers below.
Sample f 
Internal Std 
Area 
Lower Limit 
Upper Limit
111600
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or
lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and non-
detects (U values) guantitated with this internal standard.
If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance
exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all associated
detects as unusable
14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within
30 seconds of the associated calibration standard?
ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify
i 
data if the retention times differ by more than
j^ 
30 seconds.
TIJT 001 0447
STANDARD OESttUNG HOCZDURE 
Page: 15 
of - 36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
i
i
NO 
N/A
15.1 Were any field *"r'Hf"a')''>c «i>™i->-t-ari for VDA analysis? 
{ __ J
ACTICN: Conpare the reported results for field *v»
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACTICN: Any gross variation between field duplicate
results most be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
of fiyUri fl'ipl j«^»*'«g should bp
the saooler.
TUT 001 O448
1
• 
OU-VUl-fT-'Vi.' wrLJVrti JJ'Aj WflJLJLUUWC.
1
PAST B: BNA ANALYSES
h
1.0 Traffic Reoorts a1^ Lj^Ta*iTv N^yrrative
-
roye. J.D ui 
jo
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
*
J 
l.i Are the Traffic Report Fcrfcs present for all samples? 
f _Vj 
__ 
__
I 
ACTION: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
'i 
or illegible copies.
s
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sanple receipt, condition of sanples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting
the quality of the data?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
ACTION: If any sanple analyzed as a soil contains more
than 50% water, all data should be rejected.
:.C, HolduTQ Tinea
2.1 Have any BNA holding rines, determined from date of
collection to date of extraction, been exceeded?
Samples for BNA analysis, both soils and waters,
must be extracted within seven days of the date of
collection. Extracts must be analyzed within 40
days of the date of extraction.
Tghle of Holding Time Violations
(See Traffic Report)
Sample 
Date 
Date Lab 
Date 
Date
Sample 
Matrix 
Sanpled 
Received 
Extracted Analyzed
ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag all positive results as
estimated ("J") and sample quantitation limits as estimated
("UJ11), and document in the narrative that holding times
were exceeded.
TUT
001 0449
rage: i/ 
01
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
> 
' 
YES 
HO 
N/A
If analyses were done more than 14 days beyond holding time,
either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, the reviewer
must use professional judgement to determine the reliability
of the data and the effects of additional storage on the
sample results. The reviewer may determine that non-detect
data are unusable ("R").
[__] __ 
_£
3.0 Surrogate Recovery fForm
3.1 Are the BNA Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II) present
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water
b. Had Water
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil
-.2 Are all the BNA sarples listed on the appropriate Surrogate
Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water
b. Med Water 
[__]
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil 
[__] 
__
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, document
effect on data under "Conclusions" section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? 
Lk3
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Were two or more base-neutral ££ acid surrogate recoveries
out of specification for any sample or method blank? 
\/ [__] 
__
If yes, were samples reanalyzed?
Were method blanks reanalyzed?
ACTION: If all BNA surrogate recoveries are > 10% but two
within the base-neutral or acid fraction do not
meet SOW specifications, for the affected fraction
^ 
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. Flag all non-detects as estimated detection
limits ("UJ").
TUT OO1 O45O
SIBNEftRD OFIKAinJG PROCEDURE
Page: 18 
Of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO 
N/A
If any base-neutral or acid surrogate has a
recovery of <10% :
1. F3ag all positive results for that fraction
(i.e. all acid or. base-neutral compounds) nJ".
2. Flag all nan-detects for that fraction "R".
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate recoveries
out of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard areas.
3.5 Are there any trdnscrlption/raImlation errors between raw
data and FOOT H?
ACTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resuimittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
Matrix SpiKes fForm TU)
t.l j.5 "Jit MeLrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III)
}« ?s»ent?
4.2 Were matrix spikes *«'u«iypwi at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water
b. Med Water
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil
ACTION: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many EN\ spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
. 
Soils
/Sfcfe^fcO) 
.
out Of 22 
( 0 
out Of 22 SbG £J
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
out o 11
i o out of u
If MS and MSD both nave less than 101 recovery
for an analyte, negative results for that
analyte should be rejected, and positive
results should be flagged "J". The above
applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD
analysis. Use professional judgement in
arrVUrinr* +*nc /-r-i«-er-inr» f-r> o»-haw eamrtloe
[V_]
[ _ ]
liXl
I __ ]
UT 001 0451
SIWCftRD OPERATING PRQCmjRE 
Page: 
19 
Of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO
Blanks (Form IV)
-.1 Is the Method Blank Suntnary (Form IV) present? 
[ ^H
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of
TCL compounds, has a reagent /Method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, ned water, low soil, 
/
medium soil) , whichever is more frequent? 
[ VXl _ 
_
5.3 Chromatography: review the blank raw data - chromatograms
(RICs) , quant reports or data system printouts and spectra.
Is the ?:hronatographic perf orrarr ;. (vaseline stability)
for each instrument acceptable fo
^
Use professional judgement to determine the
effect on the data.
i contamination
NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are act used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any nethod/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC) for BAs? When applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution
Factor.
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive H& results
(TCL and/or TIC)? 
^_ 
t__] __
Prepare a list of the samples associated St>QK?~ ^"?b^-"/lo0^cc.
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
NOTE: Oily field/rinse blanks taken the same day 
-z>y7L>-z
as the samples are used to qualify data. Blanks 
T\ £
may not be qualified because of contamination
in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for
surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC
problems. 
^ ft
TUT 001 0452
mJCLDURE
iJU 
or - 36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
YES
NO 
N/A
Common
Fhthalate
Esters
Other
Contaminants
j Sample cone > CRQLj Sanple cone < CRQL &j Sanple cone > CRQL
but < lOx blank 
is < lOx blank value value 6 >10x blank value
Flag sanple result Reject sample result No qualification
with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; 
is needed
out 'B' flag 
cross out 'B' flag
! Sanple cone > CPQLj Sample cone < CRQL t! Sample cone > CRQL
but < 5x blank 
jis < 5x blank value value t > 5 blank value
Flag sanple result Reject sanple result No qualification
{with a «U«; cross and report CRQL; 
is needed
out 'B' flag 
cross out «B' flag
ACTION: For TIC compounds, if the concentration in the sanple is
less than five tir.es the concentration in the most con-
taminated associated blank, flag the sample data "R"
(unusable).
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated with every
sanple?
w-^'
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated field/rinse/eguipment blank.
Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0 GC/K5 Tuning and Mass f^illhration fForm V)
7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Forms (Form V)
present for Decafluorotriphenylphosphine (DFTPP)?
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(m/z) 
listing for the DFTPP provided for each twelve
hour shift?
7.3 Has a tuning performance compound been analyzed for every
twelve hours of sanple analysis per instrument?
ACTION: If any tuning data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: List date, time, instrument ID, and sample
analyses for which no associated GC/MS tuning
data are available.
tJ/J 
__ 
——
TUT
oo i
O453
SIMEftRD OPERATHG PROCEDURE
Page: 21 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO 
N/A
DATE
1TME
INSTRUMENT
SAMPLE NUMBERS
ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration
interval.
7.4 Have the ion abundance criteria been net for each
instrument used?
ACTION: List all data which do not -meet ion abundance
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
ACTION- If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ( "R" ) .
However, if expanded ion criteria are met
(See 1988 Functional Guidelines) , the data
reviewer may accept data with appropriate
qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors between
mass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least two values but
if errors are found, check more. )
7.6 Have the appropriate number of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors
are found check more values. )
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal , make necessary corrections and note
errors under "Conclusions".
7.7 Are the spectra of the mass calibration compound
acceptable?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
whether associated data should be
accepted, qualified, or rejected.
[_^J 
__ 
__
8.0
Concound List
I
8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I
present with required header information on each
page, for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
c. Blanks
TUT O01 O454
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Page: 22 of ' 36
'Date: March 1989
Revision 6
8.2 Are the ENA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, the
mass spectra for the identified compounds, and the
data system printouts (Quant Reports) included in
the sample package for each of the following?
a. Sar^ie= and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
{Mass spectra not required)
c. Blanks
ACTION: If any data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
8.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Report?
3.4 Is chromatographic performance acceptable with
respect to:
Baseline stabilityv-^
YES
NO 
N/A
Resolution
Peak shape
Full-scale graph (attenuation)
Other:_______________
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine the
acceptability of the data.
8.5 Are the lab-generated standard mass spectra of the
identified ENA compounds present for each, sample?
ACTION: If any mass spectra are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above. If lab does not
generate their own standard spectra, make
note in "Contract Problems/Non-compliance".
impound within 0.06 RRT
units of the standard RRT in the continuing calibration?
8.6 Is the RRT of each reported
8.7 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum at a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the
sample mass spectrum?
8.8 Do sample and standard relative ion intensities agree
within 20%?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of data. If it is determined
that incorrect identifications were made,
all such data should be rejected, flagged
"N" (presumptive evidence of the presence of
the compound) or changed to not detected (at
the calculated detection limit).
[_3
I_3 _ —
t±L3 __ —
TUT 001 0455
page: 2J 
or - 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO 
N/A
Tentatively Identified Compounds
9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified compound Forms (Form I,
Part B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number
or retention tine, estimated concentration and "J"
qualifier?
9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified
compounds and associated "best match" spectra included
in the sample package for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Blanks
ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if missing and "N"
qualifier to all identified TIC compounds
on Form I, Part B.
• Are any TCL compounds (from any fraction) listed as
TIC compounds (example: 1,2-dimethylbenzene is xylene—
a VQA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)?
-- 
ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.
9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the
sample mass spectrum?
9.5 Do TIC and "best match" standard relative ion intensities
agree within 20%?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
acceptability of TIC identifications. If
it is determined that an incorrect identi-
fication was made, change identification to
"unknown" or to some less specific identi-
fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene")
as appropriate.
10.0 Cuiiujuund Co*r|'*'i'fo'tion and Reported Detecti^ LlrU'Vg
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Form I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation
ion, and RRF were used to calculate Form I result.
Were any errors found?
10.2 Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions
~-s 
and, for soils, sample moisture?
LSLJ _ _
LL/3 _ _
J _
.] 
__ 
__
TUT 001 0456
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 24 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resutnittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
ACTION: When a sample is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing cut
the "E" value on the original Form I and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sample. Specify which Form I is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
Cata
11 Are the Reconstructed Ion Chronatograms, and data
system printouts (Quant. Reports)' present for initial
and continuing calibration?
ACTION: If any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
^""12.0 GC/K5 Initial Calibration fFora VI)
12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Forms (Form VI) present
and complete for the ENA fraction? 
f0^ 1
ACTION: If any calibration standard forms are
missing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.2 Are response factors stable for -ENAs over the
concentration range of the calibration (RSD <30%)? 
[__] 
V 
——
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: When RSD >30%, non-detects may be qualified
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results "J". When RSD >90%, flag
all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
U policy.)
12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05? 
\/ [——3 ——
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
1 
ACTION: If any ENA compound has an average
RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that
t, 
compound as estimated ("J"), and flag non-
' 
detects for that compound as unusable ("R").
iUT OO1 0457
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
' 
Page: 25 
of ~ 36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO 
N/A
12.4 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
the reporting of average response factors (RRF) or
*RSD? (Check at least two values but if errors are
found, check acre. )
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any. necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
/
13.0 GC/MS ContJiT^^ip^f ft* "I ^ration fFuim
13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Forms (Form VU) present 
./
and complete for the BNA fraction? 
LL^J 
__ 
__
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed
for every twelve hours of sample analysis per
instrument? 
\ ^ 1 __ 
__
ACTION List below all sample analyses that were
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACTION: If any forms are missing or no continuing
calibration standard has been analyzed within
twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab
for explanation / resutssittal. If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag all
associated sample data as unusable ("R").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have
a RRF < 0.05?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any BNA compound has a RRF < 0.05,
flag positive results for that compound as
estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that
compound as unusable ("R").
13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and
continuing calibration RRF > 25%? 
\s ; [__] 
__
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated
sample data as outlined in the table below:
TUT 001 0458
STANDARD OFn&TING PROCEDURE 
Page: 26 'of- 36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
j 
25-50
' 'J1 positive
rfcauiti, no action
for ncn detects
i
\ DlF'tLRhNCE
j 
50-90
'J1 positive
results, 'UJ1
non detects -
j
in i • it < ~*r* t r*^^i
5CES 
NO 
N/A
>90 
j
'J1 positive 
j
results, "R" 
. • ' . . _
non detects 
j 
- 
. 
•
—— ^_ —— r_^' 
•• 
• 
•
-.ilm4--?nn .-.»-». . — i i -i-rl -4-tn*
reporting of average response factors (RRF) or diff<
(%D) between initial and continuing RRTs? (Check at
least two values but if enurb are found, check more.)
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If en.uii» are large, call lab for explanation /
r« isubmittal, uvake any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
.v-^rncl. S La: darns fTorrn TIU'i
' i Are thf- internal standard areas (Form VHI) of every
3a.T7.dx and blank within the upper and lower limits
lor each continuing calibration?
ACTION: List an the outliers below.
Sanple # 
Internal Std 
Area 
Lower Limit 
Upper Limit
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper or
lower limit, flag with "J" an positive results and non-
detects (U values) quantitated with this internal- standard.
If extremely low area counts are reported, or if performance
exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag an associated nan-
detects as unusable ("R").
14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within
30 seconds of the associated calibration standard?
ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data if the retention tines differ by more than
30
TUT 001 O459
tOANLftr<L> O^i_-(Aj..LNti iWCEJURE 
Page: 
27 
of , 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
N/A
15.0 Field
15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for SNA analysis? 
[ __ ] 
__
ACTION: Corpare the reported results for field duplicates
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate
results oust be addresser! in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
confirmed by contacting the sanpler.
TUT 001 0460
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Page: 
28 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
PART C:
1.0 Traffic
and
1.2 Are the Traffic Report Fonns present for all sanples?
ACITCK: If no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copies.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
problems with sample receipt, condition of samples,
analytical problems or special notations affecting
the ifiality of the data?
ACITCK: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
ACTION: If any sample analyzed as a soil contains more
than 501 water, all data should be rejected.
X&SS
2-3- Have any PEST/PCB holding times, determined from date of
collection to date of extraction, beer, exceeded?
Samples for PEST/PCB analysis, both soils and waters,
— 
must be extracted within seven days of the date of
collection. Extracts must be analyzed within 40
days of the date of extraction.
3.0 Surrccate Recovery fForn HJ
3.1 Are the PEST/PCB Surrogate Recovery Summaries (Form II)
presenc for each of the following matrices:
a. IWWater
b. Med Water
c. Law Son
d. Med Son
3.2 Are all trie PEST/PCB samples listed on the appropriate
Surrogate Recovery Summaries for each of the following
matrices:
a. Lev Water
b. Med Water
c. Low Soil
**s
d. Med SoU
YES
NO 
N/A
f \ / j 
__
__ 
fi XI 
__
Id"
«**"$
[__)^
I 
^
^
[_3
TUT
001
0461
SIMJCftRD OFEKMTNG PROCEDURE 
Page: 
29 
Of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO N/A~
ACTICU: Call lab for explanation / resutmittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, document
effect on data under "Conclusions" section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? 
[__1 
_ 
¥L
ACnCN: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Was surrogate (DBC) recovery outside of the contract 
/
specification for any sample or blank? 
__ 
I V \
ACTICN: No qualification is done if surrogates are diluted beyond
detection. If recovery is below contract limit (but above
zero), flag all results for that sample "J". If recovery is
zero, flag positive results "J" and nan-detects "R". If
recovery for the blank is zero, flag nan-detects for all
associated samples "R". If recovery is above contract
limit, flag all positive result-s for that sample "J", unless
in the reviewers professional judgement the high recovery
is due to co-eluting interference (check the associated
blank - if recovery is high there also, flag the sample
data).
3.5 Are there any transcript ion/calculation errors between raw
data and Form II?
ACTICN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resutmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
4.0 Matrix Spikes (Form HI)
4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Form (Form III)
present?
4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices:
a. Low Water
b. Msd Water 
[__] 
__
c. Low Soil 
tjt^J 
__
d. Mad Soil 
[_] 
_
ftCHCN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many PEST/PCB spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
OUt Of 12 
0 
OUt Of 12 
TUT 001 
0462
OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 30 
Of 
36
Hate:. March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
ND 
N/A
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spite and matrix spike
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
Water 
Soils
I 
out of 6 
0 out of 6
ACTICN; if MS and M5D both have less than zero recovery
for an analyte, negative results for that
analyte should be rejected, and positive
results should be flagged "J". Tne above
applies only to the sample used for MS/MSD
analysis. Use professional judgement in
applying this criterion to other samples.
'•*\
8iarJts (Form IV)
• J Is the Method Blank Sannary (Form IT) present? 
11^3 _ 
_
.;. Frequency of analysis: foi the analysis of Pesticide
TCL compounds, has a reagent/method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, ned water, low soil,
radium soil), whichever is more frequent?
5.3 Chromatograpny: review the blank raw data -
chromatograns, quant reports or data system printouts.
Is the chroTBtographic performance jbasej-ine stability)
for each instrument acceptable for PEST/FCBs? 
\\/ ] 
__
7O1CN: Use professional judgement to determine the
effect on the data.
6.0
NOTE: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are Dflt used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any method/instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results for PEST/FCBs? When applied as described
below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks
are multiplied by the sample Dilution Factor.
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive PEST/PCB
results?
aCTICN: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
TUT O01 O46
STMEftRD OPERAHN3 PROCEDURE
N3IE:
Page: 31 
of
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
36
YES
Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the sanpies are used to qualify data. Blanks
nay not be qualified because of contamination
in another blank. Blanks Tray be qualified for
surrogate, spectral, tuning I.T calibration QC
problems.
: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
NO 
N/A
Sample cone > CRQL
but < 5x blank
Sample cone < CBQL &
is < 5x blank value
Reject sample result
and report CFQL;
cross out "B" flag
Sample cone > O*QL
fc > 5x blank value
Flag sample result
wit-n a "U"; cross
ou-r "B" flag
No qualification
is needed
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipmertt blanks associated with every
sample?
ACTICTJ: For low level samples, note in data assessment that
there is no associated field/rinse/equipment blank.
Exception: samples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0
7.1 Are the following Gas Chromatograms and Data System
Printouts for both Primary and Confirmation
(confirmation standards not required if there
are no positive results above CBQL) column present:
a. Evaluation standard Mix A
b. Evaluation standard Mix B
c. Evaluation Standard Mix C
d. Individual standard Mix A
e. Individual standard Mix B
f. Multi-component Pesticides Ibxaphene t Chlordane
g. Aroclors 1016/1260 (\to(o$)
h. Aroclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, and 1254
ACnCN: if no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
ud'
[_!/]
$
TUT 001 0464
t
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 32 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
| 
Revision 6
" 
" 
Y E S N O
7.2 Is Fonn VIII Pest-1 present and crnplete for each GC
column (primary and confinnation) and each 72 hour
sequence of analyses?
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
7.3 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw
data and Form VUT?
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
7.4 Has the total breakdown on quantitation or confirmation 
/
column exceeded 20% for DOT? 
__ 
f V\ 
.
- for Endrin? 
__ [ J,/] __
or if Endrin aldehyde and 4,4'-DDD oo-elute and there is a
peak at their retention tine, has the combined DOT and Endrin 
/
breakdov-. exceeded 20%? 
__ 
Q/j 
__
If DOT breakdown is greater than 20% on quantitation column
beginning with the sarples following the last in control standard:
1* Flag all positive DOT results "J".
2. If DOT was not detected but DDD and/or DDE are positive,
flag the DOT ncn-detect "R".
3. Flag positive DDD and DDE results "JN".
4. If DDT breakdown is > 20% on confinnation column and DOT
is identified on quantitation column but not on confirmation
column, use professional judgement to determine whether DDT
should be reported on Form I (if reported, flag result "N").
b. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on quantitation column, beginning with
the samples following the last in control standard:
1. Flag all positive Endrin results "J".
2. If Endrin was not detected, but Endrin Aldehyde and/or Endrin
Ketone are positive, flag the Endrin non-detect "R".
3. Flag Endrin Ketone positive results "JN".
4. If Endrin breakdown is > 20% on confirmation column and
Endrin is identified on quantitation column but not on
confinnation column, use professional judgement to
determine whether Endrin should be reported on Form I
(if reported, flag result "N").
c. If the combined breakdown is used (it can only be used
if the conditions in 7.4 above are met) and is > 20% on
quantitation column beginning with the last in control
standard, take the actions specified in 7.4 a and b above.
If the combined breakdown is >20% on confinnation column
and Endrin or DDT is identified on quantitation column
but not on confinnation column, use professional judgement
to determine whether Endrin or DDT should be reported on
Form I (if reported, flag result "N"). 
TUT 
O01 O465
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 33 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
NO
7.5 Is the linearity check RSD of all four calibration factors 
/"
<10% for the quantitation column? 
fv 1 __ 
__
ACTION: If no, flag positive hits for all pesticide and PCS
analytes "J" for ail associated samples. Do not flag
toxaphene or DOT if they are quantified from a 3-point
calibration curve.
7.6 Is the % difference between the EVAL A and each analysis
(quantitation and confirmation) DBC retention tip** within
QC limits (2% for packed column, 0.3% for capillary [I.D.
< 0.32 on], yt for aegabore [0.32 < Z.O. < 2 on]) ?
ACTION: DBC retention tine cannot be evaluated if
DBC is not detected. If it is present and
has a retention time out of QC limits, then
use professional judgement to determine the
reliability of the analysis and flag results
"R", if appropriate.
: . Wdss the proper analytical sequence^ followed for each 
/'
72 hour period of analyses (page FEST D-36 in 8/87 SOW) . 
[\s ] __ 
__
ACTION: If no, use professional judgement to
determine the severity of the effect
on the data and accept or reject it
accordingly. Generally, the effect
is negligible unless the sequence was
grossly altered or the calibration was
also cut of limits.
8.0 pp-gticide/PCB Sty^***^ fiTITBTY
8.1 Is Form IX present and complete for each GC column and 
/
72 hr sequence of analyses? 
riX] __ 
__
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
8.2 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between
raw data and Form DC? 
_
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
8.3 Is DOT retention time for packed columns > 12 min 
/"
(except OV-l and OV-101 columns)? 
f Vl 
__ 
——
ACTION: If no, check that there is adequate resolution
between individual components. If not, flag
results for compounds that interfere with each
^ 
other (co-elute) "R". 
0
8.4 Do all standard retention times fall within the windows
I 
established for the first IND A and IND B analyses?
TUT' 
001 0466
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 34 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
NO 
N/
ACTION: Beginning with the samples following the
last in control standard, check to see if
the chrcnatograms contain peaks within an
expanded window surrounding the expected
retention tunes. If no peaks are found and,
DBC is visible nan-detects are valid. If
peaks are present and cannot be identified
through "pattern recognition" or a consistent
shift in standard retention tines, flag all
affected compound results "R".
8.5 Are the continuing calibration standard calibration
factors within 15% (for quantitation column) or
20% (for confirmation column} of the initial (at
beginning of 72 hr sequence) calibration factors?
ACTION: If no, flag all associated positive results
"J". 
Use professional judgement to determine
whether or^ot to flag non-detects.
r«»fc.t.cide/PCS Identification
Is Form X ccrplete for every sarple in which a
or PCB was detected?
ACTION: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
9.2 Are there any transcription errors between raw
data and Fora X?
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
9.3 Are retention tines of sample compounds within the
calculated retention tine windows for both quantitation 
^^
and confirmation analyses? 
r 
"*
Was GC/M5 confirmation provided when required (when
compound concentration is > 10 ug/ml in final extract)?
ACTION: Reject ("R") all positive results (meeting
quantitation column criteria, but missing
confirmation by a second column or GC/MS (if
appropriate). Also, reject ("R") all positive
results not meeting retention tine window
criteria unless associated standard compounds
are similarly biased (i.e. base on RRT to DBC).
9.4 Check chromatograms for false negatives, especially for
the multiple peak components toxaphene and FCB's. Were
there any false negatives?
ACTION: If appropriate PCB standards were not analyzed,
or if the lab performed no confirmation analysis,
flag the appropriate data with an "R".
TUT 001 0467
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 35 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
—————————————————————————————————————ygj;————————————JJQ 
N/A
OUATl^i^atT on Jtrv3 t?£»rv^y^^^ Fta+'^'^irvs T ^w**J^e
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Form I results? Check at least two positive values.
Were any errors found? 
__ [__]
NOTE: Sisple peak pesticide results can be checked for
rough agreement between quantitative results
obtained on the two GC columns. The reviewer
should use professional judgement to decide
whether a ouch larger concentration obtained
on one column versus the other indicates the
presence of an interfering compound. If an
interfering compound is indicated, the lower
of the two values should be reported and
qualified as presumptively present at an
estimated quantity ("JN") . This necessitates
a determination of an estimated concentration
on the confirmation column. The narrative
should indicate that the presence of interferences
has obscured the attaint at a second column
confirmation.
Are the CRQLs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions 
. ^/
and, for soils, sample moisture? 
1>X7 
[ __ ] __
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary collections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
ACTION: When a sanple is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQLs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis) .
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing cut
the "E" value on the original Fonn I and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sanple. Specify which Form I is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the summary package.
U.I Were baselines stable?
11.2 Were any electropositive displacement (negative
peaks) or unusual peaks seen?
11.3 Were early eluting peaks (for early eluting
analytes) resolved to baseline? 
( __ ] . _ 
J/.
ACITCN: For 11.1 and 11.2, cement only. For 11.3,
reject ("R") those analytes that are not
sufficiently resolved.
,..,.,< 046B
TUT uo1
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 36 of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
" 
" 
' 
" 
YES 
NO 
N/A
12.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for PEST/PCB
analysis? 
[ __ ]
ACTION: Compare the reported results for field
and f^iraii^t^ the relative percent difference.
ACTION: Any gross variation between field duplicate
results must be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
confirmed by contacting the sanpler.
TUT OO1 O469
1. CASE
-s
, shipment and/or analyt elf 22EI"10" °f •"> qu<li'y control.
s reported 1n the data pacUas? 
wcountered in proeeiting tne
e n 
,h,n
re-analy$is to be 61l1able. and If $0^ JtJ! * ' tthfr 1t "n>'"r$ the
resalytlon. 
' 
> 
corrective actions ta*er.t and tne
SQHPLE DOTf9 PQCKOBE 
_ 
181
TUT 
(>01 
O47O
I GOMPUCHEM
LABORATORIES
EPA CASE NARRATIVE—CASE! 12058
Contract No. 68-D9-0032 SOGl BX260
CompuChem Laboratories, Inc.
Sample Numbers: BX260 BX979 BX981 BX990 BX991 BX993
BX994 BX995 BX996 BY701 BY758 BY761
BY762 BY763 BY764 BY766 BY767 BY768
This portion of Case 
if 12058 consisted of 10 water samples for
volatile, semivolatile, and pesticide analysis, 7 water samples for
volatile only analysis, and 1 water sample for semivolatile and
pesticide only analysis. The samples were received on 6-7-89, 6-9-
89, 6-10-89, 6-12-89, and 6-14-89 in properly sealed shipping
containers via USPS Express Mail. Several discrepancies were noted
during the receipt of the samples. SMO was notified and CompuChem
was instructed to proceed with the analysis of the samples and note
discrepancies on the traffic reports. 
The traffic report for
sample BX260 did not required a pesticide analysis although one was
required. One VOA each for samples BX995 and BX996 were received
broken due to poor packaging. Sample BY764 was not listed on the
traffic report or chain-of-custody documents; however, two VOAs
were received for it on 6-12-89. 
Sample BY761 was missing two
VOAs. 
Sample BY763 was missing one 80 oz. amber bottle. Sample
BY768 was missing one 80 oz. amber bottle. Thirteen of the samples
were designated as either field blanks or trip blanks.
VOLATILES:
All volatile fractions were analyzed within holding time require-
ments. 
Nine of the seventeen samples requiring volatile analysis
contained TCL compounds. 
Samples BX260, BX979, BX990, BX993,
BX996, BY762, and BY767 (all designated as field or trip blanks)
did not contain any TCL compounds. 
Each sample did contain a
tentatively identified compound at significant levels. 
This TIC
could not be attributed to laboratory contamination or sample
carryover and was considered to be an actual constituent of the
samples. 
A qualifier was included with each sample. 
Samples
BX981, BY701, and BY766 (also designated as field or trip blanks)
each contained low levels of methylene chloride and/or acetone
along with the tentatively identified compound mentioned above.
Qualifiers were also included with these samples. 
Sample BY758,
which was designated as a field blank contained a below CRQL level
of chlorobenzene and no tentatively, identified compounds. 
The
chlorobenzene could not be attributed to laboratory contamination
or sample carryover and was considered to be an actual constituent
of the sample. A qualifier was included with the data. Sample
BY763, which was designated as a field blank, required a dilution
due to the high level of acetone present. 
It also contained
methylene 
chloride and 
a 
tentatively 
identified compound,
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES,INC. P.O. Box 12652 3308Chap«Hril/NelsonHigrtway fteMrcti TriangtoPark.NC27709 (919)549-8263
TUT 
OO1 0471
5| pOMPUCHEM
£3 lABOF&TORIES
trichlorofluororaethane. The presence of these compounds could not
be attributed to laboratory contamination or sample carryover and.
were considered to be actual constituents of the sample. 
A
qualifier was included with the data. Sample BY768, designated as
a field blank, contained methylene chloride, acetone, carbon
disulfide, and one tentatively identified compound, trichloro-
fluoromethane. 
The presence of these compounds could not be
attributed to laboratory contamination or sample carryover and were
considered to be actual constituents of the sample. 
A qualifier
was included with the data. Sample BY764 required a dilution due
to the high levels of TCL compounds present including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes and also contained many tentatively identified
compounds. 
Sample BX994 contained xylenes and three tentatively
identified compounds. 
Sample BX995 did not contain any TCL or
tentatively identified compounds. Sample BX991 contained 4-methyl-
2-pentanone and many tentatively identified compounds. 
The D5-
chlorobenzene internal standard fell below QC limits in the sample
along with the bromofluorobenzene surrogate. 
The DS-toluene
surrogate recovery exceeded QC limits. 
These failures were
attributed to the actual sample matrix and were confirmed when the
same trends were seen in BX991MS/MSD. 
The associated blank spike
was reported which met all QC criteria and qualifiers were included
with the original and spike data. All surrogate recovery criteria
were met except those mentioned above. 
The matrix spike/matrix
spike duplicate 
results were acceptable. 
The recovery of
trichloroethene exceeded QC limits in the MS and the recoveries of
toluene exceeded QC limits in the MS/MSD. These failures may have
resulted from the observed sample matrix effect mentioned above.
SEMIVOLATILES:
All seiniyolatile fractions were extracted and analyzed within
holding time requirements. 
TCL compounds were present in three of
the 11 samples requiring semivolatile analysis. 
Sample BY76S
contained only a below CRQL level of bis(2-ethyIhexy1)phthalate.
Tentatively identified compounds were present in only five of the
samples. 
Two analyses of sample BX995 were reported and billed.
In the initial analysis, 2-fluorophenol and D5-phenol surrogate
recoveries fell below QC limits. 
The sample was reextracted and
reanalyzed and the same recovery trends for the two surrogates were
present. 
It was concluded that the surrogate failures resulted
from the actual sample matrix and both analyses were reported with
a qualifier. 
Two analyses of sample BY761 were reported and
billed. In the initial analysis, the levels of naphthalene and 2-
methylnaphthalene exceeded QC limits. The sample was reanalyzed at
a dilution and both analyses were reported due to the loss of some
compounds in the dilution. 
In sample BY761, the recovery of D5-
nitrobenzene exceeded QC limits. 
In sample BY762, the recovery of
2,4,6-tribromophenol exceeded QC limits. 
All other surrogate
recovery criteria were met. The QC matrix spike/matrix spike
duplicate results were acceptable.
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. PO. Box 12652 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway Research Triangle Park. NC 27709 (919)549-8263
/Bio
TUT 
O01 
O472
f
. 
—B GOMPUCHEM
1 
2SS 
LABORATORIES
I
PESTICIDES:
All pesticide fractions were extracted and analyzed within holding
time requirements. 
None of the samples contained any reportable
levels of TCL compounds. Only 300ml of sample BX260 were available
for extraction due to low volume. 
This resulted in slightly
elevated detection limits. 
All surrogate recovery criteria were
met. 
The QC matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate results were
acceptable. 
The recoveries of gamma-BHC, endrin, and 4,4'-DOT
exceeded QC limits in the MSD. The RPD value for endrin exceeded
QC limits in the MS/MSD.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms
and conditions 
of the 
contract, both 
technically and for
completeness, for other 
than the conditions detailed above.
Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in
the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been
authorized by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified
by the following signature.
Note: This report was paginated for reference and accountability
in decreasing numerical sequence.
C . 
u/lfcK.. fr/kv A?
.Jtmet C. Garrett 
6-26-89
Technical Reviewer
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. PO. Box 12652 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway Research Triangle Park. NC 27709 (919)549-8263
It
TUT 001 0473
GOMPUCHEM
lABORMORlES
QUALITY ASSURANCE NOTICB
With the advent of the new organics Statement of Work (SOW
2/88, Revision: 
9/88) participants in EPA's Contract
Laboratory Program (CLP) are required to provide hard copy
and diskette deliverables. CompuChem employs the Finnigan
QA Formaster Program 
(Format A) to generate these
requirements 
using 
data 
files 
from 
our 
analytical
instrumentation. Currently, and independently, quantitation
reports are generated by the instruments and are used with
CompuChem-developed software to calculate results. The GC
and GC/MS quantitation routines employ the convention of
carrying at least one extra significant figure until the
mathematical computations are completed. 
Then, the
quantitative results are rounded to the SOW-required number
of significant figures for reporting. 
In addition, the
algorithm used by the Formaster Program is slightly
different than that employed in Compuchem's software
routines. Therefore, results presented in the supportive
data supplied with our deliverables packages may be slightly
different than those which appear on the hard copy forms
generated via Formaster.
This notice serves to alert the end users of these data
yes as to the reason why slight differences may be
Robert E. Meierer
Director of Quality Assurance
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC POBo« 12652 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway He»e«rcn Triangle Park. NC 27709 (919)549-8263
-SIMPLE DQTB PfUXmeeT 
- ..-.. 180
TUT
001 
0474
LABORATORY HOTICE
On June 15, 1985 ConpuChen Laboratories began adding D3-2,4-01n1trophenol to
•11 standards and samples. The purpose of this addition 1s to enable the
laboratory to have higher and more consistent analytical sensitivity for the
native 2,4-D1n1trophenol. The peak corresponding to the deuterated analog 1s
clearly labeled on each RJC at 03*1 and will not be searched and reported as a
tentatively Identified compound (TIC). This compound 1s not being used as an
Internal or surrogate standard.
_. TTcnaraTTynn,
Development Chemist
Fierer,
Director of Quality Assurance
SOHPLE DOT a PttCKBBE
TUT 
OO1 
O475
DETECTION LIMIT CALCULATION CLARIFICATION
To protect our K columns from unntetssary contamination, soil samplts
prtpartd according to Caucus Protocol mtthods art routlntly dlluttd 5:1.
Through a strlts of tiptHmtnts vt havt determined that our Instrumtnt
Otttctlon Limit for ptstlcldts Is SX lowtr than tht EPA Contract Rtqulrtd
QuantUatlon Limit (CRQL). Me, thtrtfort. only adjust our dtttctlon limits
If tht dilution ntctssary to analyzt tht samplt Is grtattr than 5:1. If
tht samplt 1s dlluttd by a factor of X tht dtttctlon limit Is adjusted by
X Insttad of X.
Bob Meierer
Director, Quality Assurance
SBMPLE oara PBCKBBE
IS 06
TUT OO1 0476
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS ________
Lab Coda: CQMPP 
case No.: 12QS8
Matrix: (soil/watar) SOIL
Sanpla wt/vol: 
30. Q (g/mL) fi __
Laval: 
(lov/mad) LOW
% Moisture: not dac, _ 21 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SapF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONG
GPC cleanup: 
(Y/N) H__ 
pH:
BX261
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX2S8
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 266349____
Lab File ID: 
G2J66349A04
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitroaniline
83-32-9 ——————— Acenaphthene
51-28-5 ——————— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol
100-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9 ——— —— Dibenzofuran
121-14-2 —————— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __
86-73-7 ——————— Fluorene
100-01-6 —————— 4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1 —————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methyiphenol
86-30-6 —————— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ( 1) __
101-55-3 ————— •4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ___
118-74-1 —————— Hexachlorobenzene
87-86-5 —————— Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8 ——————— Phenanthrene
120-12-7 —————— Anthracene
84-74-2 ——————— Di-n-Butylphthalate
206-44-0 —————— Fluoranthene
129-00-0 —————— Pvrene
85-68-7 ——————— Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1 ——————— 3 . 3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3 — - ——— >-Benzo fa) Anthracene
2 18-01-9 —————— Chrysene 
-
117-81-7 ————— bis (2-Bthylhexyl) Phthalate __
117-84-0 —————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
205-99-2 —————— Benzo (b) Fluoranthene
207-08-9 —————— Benzo (k) Fluoranthene .
50-32-8 ——————— Benzol a) Pyrene
193-39-5 —————— Indeno(1.2.3-cd)Pyrene 
. „
53-70-3 ——————— Dibenzo (a f h) Anthracene
191-24-2 —————— Benzo(q-.hr i) Perylene
2000
420
2000
2000
420
420
420
420
420
2000
2000
420
420
420
2000
420
420
420
420
420
420
840
420
420
510
420
420
420
420
. 420
420
420
U
U
U
y- //**^^
*f U J
Uuuuuuuuu
uuuuuuu
&(ff
uu
uuuuuuu
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
\V^^:-;--~VFORM i sv-2 
- -,T,: 
---
.-.' "•-•'-".."";.--.:-..-;£££&'~^~/^^!^^^^^1^^^^:^^J^^y^^:-'
•^k -:V::;±;i^^uiliffiS^^^^^SaMP/' f GROTTO "eScmaf-^
1/87 
Rev.
ETP^XSsS
TU r
U4//
QUALITY ASSURANCE NOTICE
Specific guidelines arc presented in tha EPA CLP Organic Statement of Work for
tha positive qualitative idantlflcation of compounds through mass apactral
intarpratation. 
Applying these guidelines abtolutaly nay not ba poaiibla whan
tha natura of tha sample ia laaa than pura rafaranca materiel. Vhara tha mass
apactral pattarn of a compound to ba idantlfiad demonetrates intarfaraneaa or
coalutlon from ona or more additional compound*, althar unknowna. Intamal
atandardt. or aurrogata atandarda. tha '+* aign la addad to tha top of tha dual
apactra paga.
Robert E. Haiarar
Vice Praaldant. Quality Assurance
I ^ —
SfWPLE Off TO POCKQBE
1305
TUT 
O01 
0478
2. TRAFFIC R-P3STS
oara
TUT 
001 
0479
DETECTION LIMIT CALCULATION CLARIFICATION
To protact our K columns from unnecessary contamination, soil samplas
praparad according to Caucus Protocol methods art routinely dllutad 5:1.
Through a series of axparlmants we hive determined that our Instrument
Oatactlon Limit for pesticides 1s 5X lower than tha EPA Contract Required
Quantltatlon Limit (CRQL). Ha, therefore, only adjust our detection Units
if tha dilution ntcassary to analyla tha simple Is graatar thai) 5:1. If
tha simple Is dllutad by a factor of X th% detection limit 1s adjusted by
X Instead of X.
5
lob Nfiarar
Olractor, Quality Assuranca
Sf»HPL E
TUT 
OO1 
0480
^^^^^ 
-'^^£:
LABORATORY NOTICE
On June 15, 1985 CompuChta Laboratorlts began adding 03-2,4-01nltrophtnol to
•11 standards and samplts. Tht purpose of this addition Is to tnabl* the
laboratory to have hlghtr and «ore conslsttnt analytical ttnt1t1v1ty for th*
native 2,4-01n1troph*nol. Tht ptak corrtspondlng to tht dtuttrattd analog Is
eltarly labtltd on tach RIC as 0311 and Mill not bt starchtd and rtporttd as a
ttntatlvtly Idtntlfltd compound (TIC). This compound 1s not btlng ustd as an
Internal or surrogatt standard.
L. Ri(
Ricnaro Flynn,
Otvtlopntnt Chtnlst
006
Director of Quality Assuranct
SAMPLE DP TO PPCKaeE
t a-
TUT OOl
GOMPUCHEM
lABORSTORJES
QUALITY ABBTOAMCE NOTICE
With the advent of the new organic* Statement of Work (SOW
2/88, .Revision: 
9/88) participants in EPA's Contract
Laboratory Program (CLP) are required to provide hard copy
and diskette deliverable*. CompuChem employs the F^nnigan
QA Formaster Program (Format A) to generate.^,/ these
requirements using 
data 
files 
from 
our 
analytical
instrumentation. Currently, and independently, quantitation
reports are generated by the instruments and are used with
CompuChem-developed software to calculate results. The GC
and GC/MS quantitation routines employ the convention of
carrying at least one extra significant figure until the
mathematical computations are completed. 
Then, the
quantitative results are rounded to the SOW-required number
of significant figures for reporting. 
In addition, the
algorithm used by the Formaster Program is slightly
different than that employed in Compuchem's software
routines. Therefore, results presented in the supportive
data supplied with our deliverable* packages may be slightly
different than those which appear on the hard copy forms
generated via Formaster.
This notice serves to alert the end users of these data
packages as to the reason why slight differences may be
ob*/
Robert E. Neierer
Director of Quality Assurance
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. PO. Box 12652 33WCttap«HM/N«wn Highway RMMrchTrlangtoPvt NC 27709 <»19)54»-M63
SRMPLE DPT a PPCKPBE
QUALITY ASSURANCE NOTICE
Specific guidelines ere presented in the EPA CLP Organic Statement of Work for
the positive qualitative identification of compounds through ness spectral
interpretation. 
Applying these guideline* absolutely nay not be possible when
the nature of the sanple is less than pure reference Materiel. Uhere the ness
spectral pattern of e compound to be identified demonstrates interferences er
coelution from one or wore additional conpeunds. either unknowns, internal
standards, or surrogate standards, the •+• eign is added to the top of the dual
spectre pege.
Robert E. Meierer
Vice President. Ouelity Assurance
530
SAMPLE DPTa
TUT 
O01 
O483
GOMPUCHEM
lABOR&TORES
EPA CASE NARRATIVE — CASE 12058
SDG NO. BX258
Contract NO. 68-D9-0032
Compuchem Laboratories, Inc.
Samples: BX258, BX259, BX261
PESTICIDES
The pesticide fractions were extracted and analyzed within
the proper holding time requirements. 
There were no
reportable 
levels of EPA Target Compound Lists (TCL)
compounds present in any of the samples. There were several
outliers present in the %D column of the Form VIlls of the
sequences 
included in this SDG. 
All outliers were
associated with either hexane blanks or samples not included
in this SDG.
In the pesticide fractions, all recovery and RPD values
passed QC limits. 
There were no reportable levels of TCL
compounds found in the matrix spike, BX261MS, the matrix
spike duplicate, BX261MSD, or the associated method blanks.
Surrogate recovery values for the samples, blanks, and the
MS/MSD passed contract required QC limits. All other data
generated from the MS/MSD met QC acceptance criteria.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the
terms and conditions of the contract, both technically and
for completeness, for other than the conditions detailed
above. 
Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data
package and in the computer readable data submitted on
floppy diskette has been authorized by the Laboratory
Manager or his designee, as verified by the following
signature:
jjfln
Cyntha E.
Technical Reviewer"
21 June 1989
Note: This report is paginated for reference and
' accountability in decreasing numerical sequence.
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. P.O. Box 12652 330B Chap* HIM/Nalson Highway Research Triangto Park. NC 27709 (919)549-8263
,,;•--".- ' T U T 
001 
O484
GOMPUCHEM
IABORMOR1ES
dilution requirement that one analyte must be in the upper half of
its analytical range. 
To protect the instrumentation and/or
prevent detector saturation, the sample was not reanalyzed at a
lesser dilution. 
A qualifier was included with the data. 
Two
analyses of sample BX259 were reported and billed. In the initial
low level 1 gram analysis, the level of tetrachloroethene exceeded
the multipoint range. 
The sample was reanalyzed as a medium level
at a 6.7:1 dilution which met dilution requirements. Both analyses
were reported due to the loss of some compounds in the dilution.
Surrogate recovery data were not available for BX259DL due to the
dilution. Two analyses of sample BY773 were reported and billed.
In the initial 5 gram low level analysis, the levels of ethyl-
benzene and xylenes exceeded the multipoint range and indicated
that a medium level analysis was required. 
The sample was
reanalyzed as a medium level which was an acceptable dilution;
however, the xylene levels did not compare well between the two
analyses. 
It was concluded that the differences were due to a
combination of sample inhomogeneity and the difference between the
low level purge and trap and the medium level extraction procedure.
Both analyses were reported with a qualifier. Surrogate and spike
recovery data were not available for the medium level spikes,
BX259DLMS/MSD due to the required dilution. 
The associated blank
spike was reported which met all QC criteria. 
All surrogate
recovery criteria were met except those mentioned above. The low
level MS/MSD results were acceptable. 
All method blanks met QC
criteria.
SEMIVOLATILES:
All semivolatile fractions were extracted and analyzed within
holding time requirements. 
Each sample contained low levels of
bis ( 2-ethylhexy 1) phthalate. 
Sample BX25S also contained a low
level of phenol. 
Each sample contained several tentatively
identified compounds, some of which were attributable to blank
contaminants or aldol 
condensation. 
All surrogate recovery
criteria were met. The QC matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate
results were acceptable.
I certify that this data package is in compliance with the terms
and conditions 
of the 
contract, both 
technically and for
completeness, for other 
than the conditions detailed above.
Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in
the computer-readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been
authorized by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified
by the following signature.
Note: This report was paginated for reference and accountability
in decreasing numerical sequence.
C .
Janet C. Garrett 6-29-89
Technical Reviewer
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. P.O. Box 12652 3308 Chapel Hill/Nelson Highway Research Triangle Park, N' TUT 
001 
0485
GOMPUCHEM
LABORATORIES
EPA CASE NARRATIVE—CASEl 12058
Contract No. 68-D9-0032 SDGI BX258
CompuChem Laboratories, Inc.
Sample Numbers: BX258 BX259 BX261 BY702 BY703 BY704
BY705 BY707 BY709 BY711 BY712 BY713
BY765 BY769 BY770 BY771 BY772 BY773
BY774 BY775
This portion of Case 112058 consisted of 3 soil samples for
volatile, semivolatile, and pesticide analysis and 17 soil samples
for volatile only analysis. The samples were received on 6-7-89,
6-12-89, and 6-14-89 via USPS Express Mail in properly sealed
shipping containers with traffic reports. 
Several discrepancies
were noted upon receipt of the samples. Samples BX258, BX259, and
BX261 did not require full analysis according to the traffic
reports. SMO was contacted and the samples were put on hold until
6-8-89 when CompuChem was notified that the samples required full
analysis; therefore, the receipt date on Forms I for these three
samples was 6-8-89. 
Two soil VOAs were received for sample BY775
which were not listed on the traffic report or chain-of-custody
document. 
Sample BY765 was 
missing 2-BOoz. amber liters.
CompuChem was instructed by SMO to note the discrepancies on the
traffic reports and proceed with the analysis of the samples,
volume permitting. 
The pH values of the samples were within the
range specified in EPA protocols. Moisture content of the samples
ranged from 11% to 24%. The remaining portion of this narrative
pertains only to the volatile and semivolatile sections of the
case.
VOLATILES:
All volatile fractions were analyzed within holding time require-
ments. 
All samples contained TCL compounds at various levels.
Tentatively identified compounds were present in most of the
samples at very high levels. Samples BY703, BY704, BY705, BY707,
BY709, BY711, BY712, BY713, BY765, and BY771 each were analyzed as
medium level soils, some at dilutions. None of these analyses met
the dilution requirement that at least one analyte be present in
the upper half 
of its analytical range. 
To protect the
instrumentation and/or prevent detector saturation, the samples
were not reanalyzed at a lesser dilution. Qualifiers were included
with each sample. Sample BX261 required a medium level analysis at
a dilution due to the high level of tetrachloroethene present.
Surrogate recovery data were not available due to the dilution.
Sample BY770 required a medium level analysis at a dilution due to
the high level of xylenes present. Surrogate recovery data were
not available due to the dilution. Sample BY702 was analyzed as a
low level using only 1 gram. 
This analysis did not meet the
,.
COMPUCHEM LABORATORIES. INC. P.O. Box 12652 3306 Chaprt HID/Nelson Highway R«March Triangle Park.
' - U ' - - - : 
: - " • • - -2* 
TUT 
O01 
0486
' ' • 
~
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM TABS________._
Lab Code: COMPD 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) (
Level: 
(low/mad) LOW
% Moisture: not dec.
BX258
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 266347____
Lab File ID: 
GHQ66347A18
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Analyzed: 06/10/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG
74-87-3——•————Chloromethane____________
74-83-9—•——•———Bromomethane_______________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane____________
75-09-2——*———Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1———————Acetone_________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3-———:—--Chloroform______________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-9 3-3———————2 -Butanone_______________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate___________
75-27-4-——————Bromodichloromethane_______
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane________
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene___________
124-48-1—————Dibromochlorome thane______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2———————Benzene_________________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2——————Bromoform______________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______
591-78-6—————-2-Hexanone_______________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3——————Toluene_________________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene___________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________
100-42-5—————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes___________
11
11
11
11
27
80
6
6
6
6
2
6
11
6
6
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
11
58
6
6
6
66
6
FORM I VOA
"" 
SOHPLE OffTff 
PPCKQBE
Us
1/87 Rev.
ss^^'
001
0487
IB
SEHIVOIATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_______
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12056 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
30.0 (g/mL) fi__
Level: 
(low/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. _H 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONG
GPC Cleanups 
(Y/H) .H_ 
pH:
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BX258
SDG NO.: BX2S8
Lab Sample ID: 266347____
Lab File ID: 
GH066347B04
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Extracted: Q6/O9/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/09/89
Dilution Factor: i.oo
CAS NO.
CONCENTRATION
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UG/KG' •)
108-95-2 ———
111-44-4 ———
95-57-8 -----
541-73-1 —— -
106-46-7 -——
100-51-6 ———
95-50-1 —— ~
95-48-7 -----
39638-32-9 —
106-44-5 —— -
621-64-7 —— -
67-72-1 -----
98-95-3 —— —
78-59-1 —— —
88-75-5 -----
105-67-9 —— -
65-85-0 -----
111-91-1 —— -
120-83-2 —— -
120-82-1 —— -
91-20-3 -----
106-47-8 ———
87-68-3 ————
59-50-7 ————
88-06-2 -----
95-95-4 —— —
91-58-7 -----
88-74-4 -----
131-11-3 ———
606-20-2 ———
——— Phenol
——— bisf2-Chloroethyl)Ether
——— 2 -Chlorophenol
——— 1.4-Dichlorobenzene
—— Benzyl Alcohol
——— 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene
——— 2-Methylphanol
—— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether _
——— 4-Methylphenol
—— -N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
——— 
2f 4-Dimethylphanol 
.. .., ,. ,
- —— Benzoic Acid
——— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __
——— 1 . 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene
—— Naohthalene
——— 4-Chloroaniline
——— Hexachlorobutadiene .
——— 4-Chloro-3 -Methylohenol
——— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
—— 2-Nitroaniline
——— Dimethyl Phthalat*
• — •— Acenaphthylene
——— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene
39
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
1800
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
370
1800
370
1800
370
370
370
^t f*"J
U
Uuuuuuouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuau
a - -
uu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 
Rev.
-^•
:-^&:-:^^^?*-!3K*^ ~-~
: -'• - •-
sfiHPLE OPTP PPCKQBE
*&&?& -'- 
J^^f3«^S££5^^^*- ::
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BX258
Lab Code: CQMPO 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
30.0 (g/mL) fi__
Level: 
(low/mad) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. _U, 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONG
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N._ 
pH:
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 266347____
Lab File ID: 
GH066347B04
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/09/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
99-09-2 ——————— 3 -Nitroanil ine
83-32 -9 ——————— Acenaphthene
51-28-5 ——————— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol
100-02 -7 —————— 4 -Nitrophenol
132-64-9 —————— Dibenzofuran
121-14-2 —————— 2 P 4-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalate 
.. _
7005-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __
86-73-7 —————— Fluorene 
„.
100-01-6 —————— 4 -Nitroanil ine
534-52 - 1 —————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2 -Methy iphenol
86-30-6 —————— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __
101-55-3 —————— 4 -Bromopheny 1 -pheny lether ___
118-74-1 —————— Hexachlorobenzene 
.
120-12-7 ——————— Anthracene
84-7 4-2 ——————— Di-n-Buty Iphthalate
206-44-0—— ——— -Fluoranthene
129-00-0 —————— Pyrene ., .... ,.
85-68-7 ——————— Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1 ——————— 3 , 3 ' -Dichlorohenz id ine
56-55-3 ——————— Benzo (a) Anthracene 
,, .... ., ._.
218-01-9 ————— — Chrysene
117-81-7 ————— bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
117-84-0 —————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 
_ _ , . . _
205-99-2 —————— Benzo (b) Pluoranthene
207-08-9 —————— Benzo (x) Fluoranthene
50-32-8 ——————— Benzo (a) Pyrene
19 3-39-5 —————— Indeno ( 1 , 2 
f 3 -cd ) Pyrene
53-70-3 ——————— Dibenzo (a fh) Anthracene _
191-24-2 ——————— Benzo(qfhri)Perylene
1800
370
1800
1800
370
370
370
370
370
1800
1800
370
370
370
1800
370
370
370
370
370
370
740
370
370
280
370
. 
370
370
370
370
370
- 
•- *• *7/\
u
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu^
•^T^
J**!
uuuuuuu
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Coda: COMPO 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 11
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BX258MS
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS NO.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 266437_____
Lab File ID: 
GR066437C10
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9———•••—Bromome thane__________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone____;__________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————1.1-Dichloroethane
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform_____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3--—————•2-Butanone____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———•———Trichloroethene_________
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2———•—Benzene______________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bromof orm______________
108-10-1——————4 -Methyl-2 -Pentanone____
591-78 -6—————2 -Hexanone___________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5<——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3--————-Toluene_______________
108-90-7——-———Chlorobenzene_____________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene_____________
100-42-5——————Styrene__________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
11
11
11
11
19
11
6
6
6
6
2
6
11
6
6
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
11
17
6
6
6
6
6
6
U
U
U
U
B
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE DPTa PRCKBGE
JUT 001 0490
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) $
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec.
BX258MSD
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX25JL
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 266438_____
Lab File ID: 
GRQ66438C1Q
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3———————Chloroe thane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone______________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_________
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———•———Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-93-3—•————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4-——————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1——•—•——Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-4 3-2———————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2-——-——Bromoforn____________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone___________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene______________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————Styrene________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes______________
11
11
11
11
12
116
66
6
6
6
11
6
6
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
11
11
19
6
6
6
6
6
6
U
U
U
U
B
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SPMPLE ~DRTP PBCKB8E
-
 
TUT
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM
Lab Code: COMPO 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
l.Q (g/mL) J
Level: 
(lov/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 
19
Column: (pack/ cap) CAP
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BX259
SAS No.
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 266348____
Lab File ID: 
GRQ66348C1Q
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION OMITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) PC/KG
74-87-3 ————— —Chl or one thane __________ •
74-83-9 —————— Bromonethane _______________
75-01-4 —————— Vinyl Chloride ___________
75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane ______________
75-09-2 —————— Methylene Chloride ________
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone ___________________
75-15-0 —————— Carbon Disulfide _________
75-35-4 —————— 1, 1-Dichloroethene ________
75-34-3 ——————— 1, 1-Dichloroethane ________
540-59-0 ————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
67-66-3 —————— Chloroform ______________
107-06-2 ————— 1,2-Dichloroethane ________
78-93-3 —————— 2-Butanone ______________
71-55-6 —————— 1,1, l-Trichloroethane ______
56-23-5 —————— Carbon Tetrachloride ______
108-05-4 ————— Vinyl Acetate ___________
75-27-4 —— • ——— Bromodichloromethane _______
78-87-5— — — — — 1, 2-Dichloropropane _______
10061-01-5 ———— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene _____
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene ___________
124-48-1 —————— Dibromochlorome thane _______
79-00-5 ——————— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane ______
71-43-2 ——————— Benzene _______________
10061-02-6—— ——Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___
75-25-2 ——————— Bromoform _______________
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone _______
591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone _______________
127-18-4 ————— Tetrachloroethene
79-34-5 ——————— 1.1. 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3 —————— Toluene
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 ————— Ethylbenzene
100-42-5 —————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes__ ___________
62
62
62
62
150
84
31
31
31
20
12
31
62
31
31
62
31
31
31
75
3 1
31
31
3 1
31
62
62
31
31
31
31
31
31
FORM I VOA
'•TV- "*-»* *>>~
U ••-
U".
U .
J T
J.T
U -.•
U '
Uu:
U
U «
U
U
U
U <
U
U "
U
U
o ••/
U
U
U ?
u .•
1/87 
Rev.
PPCKPSE
TUT 
001 
049
'
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPTJCHEM LABS
Contract: 68-D9-Q032
BX259
Lab Cod*: CQMPU
Case No.: 12058
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX258
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
30.0 (g/mL)
Level: 
(lov/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 19 
dec.
pH:
COMPOUND
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc)
SONG
GPC Cleanup:
(Y/H)
Lab Sample ID: 266348____
Lab File ID: 
GJQ66348B04
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/09/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO.
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
99-09-2 ————
83-32-9 ————
51-28-5 —— --
100-02-7 ———
132-64-9 ———
121-14-2 ———
84-66-2 ————
7005-72-3 ——
86-73-7 ————
100-01-6 ———
534-52-1 ———
86-30-6 ————
101-55-3 ———
118-74-1 ———
87-86-5 ————
85-01-8 ————
120-12-7 ———
84-74-2 ————
206-44-0 ———
129-00-0 ———
85-68-7 ————
56-55-3 ————
117-81-7 ———
117-84-0 ———
205-99-2 ———
207-08-9 ———
50-32-8 ————
193-39-5 ———
191-24-2 ———
——— 3-Nitroaniline
——— Acenaphthene
——— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol
—— 4-Nitrophenol
——— Dibenzofuran
——— 2 . 4 -Dinitro toluene ,
—— »4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __
——— 4 -Nitroanil ine
—— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
—— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __
— — Hexachlorobenzene
——Anthracene
——— Butylbenzylphthalate 
,
——— Benzo fa) Anthracene
—— -bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __
——— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
——— Benzo fbiFluoranthene 
. ,
— — Benzo (It) Fluoranthene
——— Indeno(lr2.3-cd)Pyrene , _,, ...
. ——— Dibenzo (a r h) Anthracene
——— Benzo fq.h,i)Perylene
2000
410
2000
2000
410
410
410
410
410
2000
20OO
410
410
410
2000
410
410
410
410
410
410
820
410
410
390
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
U 
l
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
uauuuuu
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
,^-:-~' '• .-.~:'~I---.— » '-•--V~?^.** :".«.
FORM I SV-2
.1/87 Rev.
:*K'- -•-
" 
* 
^-'-'S- •
. 
-•. :--,-. - .:,»*•••-..-, 
•:-'-• •:- :•-,— ^':-/-"'^-V?-xJ^8*j5Sj5
PPCKBBE 
t T1IT
£&&3$ rUT
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
______ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_______
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
30.0 (g/nL) fi__
Level: 
(low/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 
19 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONG
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ 
pH:
BX259MS
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 266434____
Lab File ID: 
GJQ66434AQ4
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Extracted: Q6/O9/89
Date Analyzed: Qfi/io/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG;^
108-95-2——————Phenol____________________
111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether____
95-57-8——————2-Chlorophenol___________
541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______
106-46-7———•—-1,4-Dichlorobenzene________
100-51-6——•——Benzyl Alcohol___________
95-50-1——————1,2-Dichlorobenzene________
95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol____________
39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_
106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol___________
621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__
67-72 -1——————Hexachl oroe thane_________
98-9 5-3 ——————Nitrobenzene____________
78-59-1———————Isophorone_______________
88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol_____________
105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________
65-85-0————•——Benzoic Acid____________
111-91-1——————bis (2-ChlQroethoxy) Methane__
120-83-2——————•£, 4 -Dichlorophenol________
120-82-1—————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____
91-20-3——————Naphthalene_____________
106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline__________
87-68-3 ——————Hexachlorobut adiene_______
59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol____
91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene_______
77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene___
88-06-2———————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______
95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______
91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthalene_______
88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline___________
131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate________
208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene___________
606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene________
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
43
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
2000
410
2000
410
410
410
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I SV-1
-• ."" -.. 
. 
, - v -
:^s=."-"- ^ r; 
'— "•-'•-
ra
1/87 Rev.
TUT 001 0494
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPPCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: CQMPO 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
30.0 (g/mL) Q.__
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. _12 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONC
GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) H_ 
pH:
BX259MS
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 266434____
Lab File ID: 
GJ066434A04
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/10/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
;. 
:-fci^^z-;^
^.^^^
•r: 
" -— - - ^ii'k. '
<-•'•:••*" -'•*~-:zZ~***.'
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
99-09-2 ———
83-32-9 ———
E ^ ** O E
100-02-7 ——
132-64-9 ——
191 — 1 4_9___
84-66-2 ———
7005-72-3 —
86-73-7 ———
100-01-6 ——
534-52-1 ——
86-30-6 ———
101-55-3 ——
118-74-1 ——
87-86-5 ———
85-01-8 ———
120-12-7 ——
84-74-2 ———
——— 3-Nitroaniline
——— Acenaphthene
——— 2.4-Dinitrophenol
——— 4-Nitrophenol
——— Dibenzo furan
———— 2r4-Dinitrotoluene
———— Diethylphthalate
———— 4 -Nitroanil ine
——— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol __
——— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __
———— Di-n-ButvlDhthalate
206-44-0 —————— Fluoranthene
129-00-0 ——
85-68-7 ———
91-94-1 ———
56-55-3 ———
218-01-9 ——
117-81-7 ——
117-84-0 ——
205-99-2 ——
207-08-9 ——
50-32-8 ———
193-39-5 ——
53-70-3 ———
191-24-2 ——
——— Pvrene
———— Butvlbenzvlphthalate
----- 3 , 3 ' -Dichlorobenz idine 
_
—— —Benzo (a) Anthracene 
_
——— Chrysene
——— bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __
———— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
———— Benzo (b) Fluoranthene
———— Benzo ( Jc) Fluoranthene
~ —— Benzo ( a ) Pyrene
———— Indeno(lP2f3-cd)Pyrene 
„ .,
———— Dibenzo (a. . h) Anthracene
——— Benzo(qrhri)Perylene .
2000
410
2000
2000
410
410
410
410
410
2000
2000
410
410
410
2000
410
410
49
410
410
410
820
410
410
420
410
410
410
410
. 
410
410
86
Uu
UuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuauu
uuuuuuJ
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
TUT 001 0495
IB
SEMTVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BX259MSO
Lab Name: COMPPCHEM TABS_________ 
Contract: 6B-D9-0032
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058 
SAS No.: _____ 
SDG No.: BX258
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
3Q.Q (g/»L) fi__
Levels 
(lov/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. _13. 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONG
GPC Cleanup: 
fv/N) J|_ 
pH:
Lab Sample ID: 266435____
Lab File ID: 
G3J66435A04
Date Received: 06/08/89
Bate Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/11/B9
Dilution Factor: 1.00
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
108-95-2——————Phenol_________________
111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether____
95-57-8——•————2-Chlorophenol____________
541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene________
106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene________
100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol___________
95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______
95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol_______________
39638-32-9————bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether_
106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol___________
621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__
67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane__________
98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene_____________
78-59-1———————Xsophorone______________•_
88-75-5———————2-Kitrophenol___________
105-67-9—————2,4-Dimethylphenol________
65-85-O——————Benzoic Acid____________
111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__
120-83-2—————2,4-Dichlorophenol________
120-82-1—————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____
91-2 0-3 ——————Naphthalene_____________
106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline__________
87-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene_______
59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol____
91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene_______
77-47-4———————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene___
88-06-2-—————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______
95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______
91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene________
88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline___________
131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate________
208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene___________
606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene________
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
2000
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
410
2000
410
2000
410
410
410
FORM I SV-1
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Rev.
001 0496
"--T"*S5?i; *£>' -•".---..*38S
.-—rr^r js^T;^... i_=-.-^^?
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
30.0 (g/mL) fi__
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 19 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONG
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ 
pH:
BX2S9MSD
Contract: 68-D9-Q032
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX2S8
Lab Sample ID: 266435____
Lab File ID: 
C3J6643SA04
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Extracted: Q6/09/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/H/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitroaniline
83-32-9 ——————— Acenaphthene
51-28-5 ——————— 2r4-Dinitrophenol
100-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9 —————— Dibenzofuran ,.,.
121-14-2 —————— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalate . .
7005-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __
100-01-6 —————— 4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1 —————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol __
86-30-6 —————— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __
101-55-3 ————— 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ___
118-74-1 —————— Hexachlorobenzene
120-12-7 —————— Anthracene
84-74-2 ——————— Di-n-Buty Iphthalate
206-44-0 —————— Fluoranthene
129-00-0 —————— Pyrene
85-68-7 ——————— Butylbenzylphthalate , , . , . _ „ .
91-94-1 ——————— 3,3'-Dichlorob«nzidine
218-01-9 —————— Chrysene
117-81-7 ————— bi»(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate __
117-84-0 —————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
205-99-2 —————— Benzo(b)Fluoranthene . . . .
207-08-9 —————— Benzo(k)Fluoranthene . ,_ „ ,
50-32-8 ——————— Benzo(a) Pyrene
193-39-5 —————— Indeno ( 1 f 2 e 3-cd) Pyrene
53-70-3 ——————— Dibenzo( a. h) Anthracene
191-24-2 —————— Benzo(g.h.i)Perylene 
.
2000
410
2000
2000
410
410
410
410
410
2000
2000
410
410
410
2000
410
410
83
410
410
410
820
410
410
510
410
410
410
410
410
410
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuuuu
uuuuuaJ
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylanine
1/87 Rev.
'•
-. 
•-"•' ~v"^^yv-»"" ,V- ft1. . 
•" 
•- -*•*•- - 
- - • > • . . - - - •
SAMPLE DPTP PPCKP6E
•'•>.... ~~-,..• i1^-«-*
1*i3i£-'•/»-•'--?-•••-:£& ,=»•••?",:!?""~fc«a ~-?s™ '. ** -rr*i~nrwK: 
TUT 
O01 
O497
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
______ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol:
Level: 
(low/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 
19
Column: 
(pack/cap) 
CAP
BX259DLMS
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX2S8
Lab Sample ID: 26fiaa3
Lab File ID: 
CR066883C23
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 6.7_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UC/KG
74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________'
74-83-9——————Bromomethane_____________
75-01-4——————vinyl Chloride____________________
75-00-3 ——————Chloroethane_____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide____________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3-——-——Chloroform___________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-93-3———————2-Butanone__________________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate___________
75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_________
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane____________
10061-01-5--——cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_______________
124-48-1—•—-—Dibromochloromethane__________
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-4 3-2——————Benzene________________________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2——————Bromoform_________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_____________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3—•———-Toluene________________________
108-90-7 ——•—-—Chlorobenzene___________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________
100-42-5—————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________-
10000
10000
10000
10000
2300
10000
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
10000
5100
5100
10000
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
10000
10000
180000
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
U
U
U
U
BDJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
D
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
DPT ft PPCKQ6E
• i'-/- iv.~ 
•-.»—iSVX-rrV-._--^- '-;•.. — ''tvi"-;' --~-J»-:V"--'.".- j-*"•:.-*
Si^S^^^ISM^^K^
1/87 Rev.
TUT 001 O49S
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPOCHEM LABS________r
Lab Coda: COMTO 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/Bed) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 
19
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BX259DLMSD
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 266884____
Lab File ID: 
CRO66884C23
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 6.7____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethana
74-83 -9 ——————— Bromome thane
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride
75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane
75-09-2 —— r ——— Methvlene Chloride
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide
75-35-4 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethene,
75-34-3 ——————— 1. 1-Dichloroethane
540-59-0 —————— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __
107-06-2 —————— 1.2-Dichloroethane
71-55-6 ——————— 1.1. 1-Trichloroethane
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4 ——————— Bromodichloromethane
10061-01-5 ————— cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene ,
124-48-1 —————— Diluroaochloromethane
79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 
_ _
71-43-2 ——————— Benzene
10061-02-6 ———— Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene____
75— 25— 2"™— — ••— — — HronoC on
591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanona__. _
127-18-4 ————— -Tetrachloroethene 
..,_. ._ .,_
79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ___
108-88-3 -————-Toluene
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene
100-42-5 —————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenea
10000
10000
10000
10000
2500
10000 ,
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
10000
5100
5100
10000
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
10000
10000
170000
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100
5100,
uuuu
BDJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Uuuuuuuuuuuuu
Duuuuuu
FORM I VGA
•jf'Vs t,-'*.'.\ :^J^;'^ •••'
1/87 Rev.
..__. .SPMPLE :OPTP PPCKPQE 
± 
0499
^v^:-C;,.^-^^ggg^^^^s^:-^;': -:,.--- v-- !U1
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE N
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPIT 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BX260
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS NO.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266346____
Lab File ID: 
CN066346A10
Date Received: Q6/Q7/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: l.Q____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethane
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride
75-00-3 —— - ——— Chloroethane
75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide
75-35-4 ——————— lrl-Dichloroethene
75-34-3 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethane 
. .
540-59-0 ——— • —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
107-06-2 —————— 1.2-Dichloroethane
71-55-6 ———————— lTlTl-Trichloroethan«
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride . .
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4- — —— —— Bromodichloromethane
78-87-5 ——————— 1.2-Dichloropropane 
j: 
. _
10061-01-5 ————— cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene
79-OO-5 ——————— 1 f 1 f 2-Trichloroethane
75-25-2—— —— —— Bromoform
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone
127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene
79-34-5 ——————— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3 —————— Toluene 
. , ,
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene
100-42-5 —————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes
10
10
10
-•% 
10
^-*-v 
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
55
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
U
U
Uauuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Re-
- . SBHPLE DQTP
osoo
IB 
•
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
/*
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS
Contract: 68-D9-Q032
BX260
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
IQQQ 
(g/nL) ML_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) fi_ 
pH: ____
SDG NO.: BX26Q
Lab Sample ID: 266346____
Lab File ID: 
GHQ66346A20
Date Received: 06/07/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UC/L
108-95-2 ——
111-44-4 ——
95-57-8 ———
541-73-1 ——
106-46-7 ——
100-51-6 ——
95-50-1 ———
95-48-7 ———
39638-32-9-
106-44-5 ——
621-64-7 ——
67-72-1 ———
78-59-1 ———
88-75-5 ———
105-67-9 ——
65-85-0 ———
111-91-1 ——
120-83-2 ——
120-82-1 ——
91-20-3 ———
106-47-8 ——
87-68-3 ———
59-50-7 —— •
91-57-6 ———
77-47-4 —— -
88-06-2 —— -
95-95-4 —— •
91-58-7 ———
88-74-4 —— •
131-11-3 — •
208-96-8 — -
606-20-2 — •
——— Phenol
———— bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether ,
——— 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 
, .
——— 1. 2-Dichlorobenzene
——— 2-Methvlphenol
——— b is (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether _
——— 4 -Me thy Iphenol
——— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
——— Hexachloroe thane
——— Isophorone
——— 2-Nitrophenol
• ——— 2 . 4-Dimethylphenol
• ——— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __
• ——— 2 , 4-Dichlorophenol
— ——— Hexachlorobutadiene
• ——— 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol . , „
• ——— 2 -Methylnaphthalene
• ——— Rexachlorocyclopentadiene ___
• ——— 2 . 4 . 6-Trichlorophenol
• ——— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol
• ——— 2-Chloronaphthalene
— —— —2-Mitroanil ine
———— Diaethyl Phtnalat*
———— Acenaohthylene
• —— « — 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu -
uuuuu
u ,
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
SPMPLE DQTP PBCKQBE
' - TUT 
OO1 0501
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ 
Contract: 68-D9-OQ32
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1QQO (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(lov/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SapF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) fi_ 
pH: ____
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BX260
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266346____
Lab File ID: 
CHQ66346A2Q
Date Received: 06/07/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline___________
83-32-9——-————Acenaphthene____________
51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_________
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol____________
132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran____________
121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene________
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether__
86-73 -7——————Fluorene___\___________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline___________
534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol__
86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)__
101-55-3——•—•—4-Bromophenyl-phenylether___
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_________
87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol_________
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene____________
120-12-7—————Anthracene______________
84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_______
206-44 -o—————Fluoranthene____________
129-00-0—————Pyrane_________________
85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate______
91-94-1——————3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine_____
56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene________
218-01-9——•——-Chrysene____;________•
117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate__
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate_______
205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene______
207-08-9——————Benzo (Jc) Fluoranthene_______
50-32-8—————-Benzo (a) Pyrene___________
193-39-5——————Indeno(l, 2,3-cd) Pyrene_____
53-70-3———————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene_____
191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene______
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamina
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab N
: COMPUCHEM LABS
Lab Cod*: COMPU 
Case Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/Bed) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 
2j.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BX261
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS NO.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX2S8
Lab Sample ID: 266349____
Lab File ID: 
C2R66349C23
Date Received: 06/08/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 6.7____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-37-3——————Chloromethane___________
74 -8 3 -9——————Bronomathane____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3——-———Chloroethane___________________
75-09-2——————Mathylana Chloride________
67-64-1——————Acetone__________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
£7-66-3——.———Chloroform_____________________
107-06-2—————1,2 -Dichloroethane________
7€-9 3 -3 ————•——2 -Butanone___________________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______
5€-2 3 -5——————Carbon Tetrachloride__________
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane______
78-8 7-5——————1,2 -Dichloropropane________
10O61-01-5--——>-cis-l,3-Dichloropropene____
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene__________
124-48-1—————DibroDochloromethane______
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_______
71-43-2 ——————Benzene_____________________
1OO61-02-6-———»Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_____
75-25-2——————Brovoxorai_____________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone________
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_____________________
127 -18 -4 —————Tetrachl oroet hene_________
79-34-5——————lf 1,2,2-Tetra Chloroethane___
1O8-88-3——————Toluene_________________
108 -90-7 ————Chloroben z ene____________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________
100-42-5——————Styrene_________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________
11000
11000
11000
11000
5300
11000
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
11000
5300
5300
11000
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
11000
•11000
170000
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
5300
Uu
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuuu
FORM I VGA
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABg_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/nL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
BX991MSD
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: 
• 
SDG No.: BX26Q
Lab Sample ID: 266429_____
Lab File ID: 
CN066429A10
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 1.Q_____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________
74-83 -9——————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——-———Chloroform___________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————l, 2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___
71-43-2 ———————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————styrene_______
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
3
31
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Uu
UuJ
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
TUT 
001 
0504
SBMPLE DOTa PBCK06E
1 3^
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
_______ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
BX991MS
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266428
Lab File ID: 
CN066428A10
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 1.6_____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 
Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________
74-83 -9——————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4————-—Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————-Chloroe thane____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone___________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane_____
79-00-5——————l, l, 2-Trichloroethane___
71-4 3-2——————Benzene______________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2-——————Bromoform_____________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5——————Styrene________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
2
29
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SAMPLE DflTQ PBCKPGE
"UT 
001 
05O5
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABff_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
500 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) M_ 
pH: ___
BX994MS
contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266722____
Lab File ID: 
GH066722BQ6
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 0.50
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
111-44-4 ————
541-73-1 ————
106-46-7 ————
100-51-6 ————
95-50-1 —————
106-44-5 ————
621-64-7 ————
67-72-1 —————
105-67-9 ————
65-85-0 —————
111-91-1 ————
120-83-2 ————
120-82-1 ————
91-20-3 —————
106-47-8 ————
59-50-7 —————
91-57-6 ———— -
77-47-4 —————
88-06-2 ———— -
95-95-4 ———— -
91-58-7 ———— -
88-74-4 ———— -
131-11-3 ——— -
606-20-2 ——— •
—— Phenol
—— bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether
—— 2 -Chlorophenol
—— 1, 3-Dichlorobenzene
—— 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
—— Benzyl Alcohol
—— 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene
—— 2-Methylphenol
—— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
—— 4 -Methylphenol
—— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine. __
—— Hexachloroethane
—— Nitrobenzene
—— Isophorone
—— 2-Nitroohenol
—— 2 . 4-Dimethylphenol
—— Benzoic Acid
• —— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __
• —— 2 . 4-Dichlorophenol
• —— 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene
• —— Naph thai ene
• —— 2-Methylnaphthalene
• —— 2 . 4 . 6-Trichlorophenol
• —— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol
- —— 2 -Nitroani 1 ine
- —— Dimethyl Phthalate
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
4
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
SQMPLE D0TP PPCK0GE
TUT
001 
0506
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE
Lab Name: COMPOCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
500 
(9/nL) ML
Level: 
(low/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ 
pH: ____
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BX994MS
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 
266722______
Lab File ID: 
GH066722B06
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 0.50
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
-3-Nitroaniline.
-Acenaphthene_
-2,4-Dinitrophenol.
-4-Nitrophenol___
-Dibenzofuran____
-2,4-Dinitrotoluene
-Diethylphthalate.
•4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_
-Fluorene_____________
99-09-2—————
83-32-9————
51-28-5————
100-02-7———
132-64-9————
121-14-2———-
84-66-2————
7005-72-3———
86-73-7————
100-01-6———-
534-52-1———-
86-30-6————-
101-55-3———•
118-74-1———-
87-86-5————-
85-01-8————•
120-12-7———-
84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_______
206-44-0—————-Fluoranthene_____________
129-00-0——————Pyrene________________
85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3--—————Benzo(a)Anthracene______
218-01-9——————Chrysene______________
117-81-7——————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate_
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____
205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene_____
2O7-08-9—————Benzo(k) Fluoranthene_____
50-32-8——•———• Benzo (a) Pyrene__________
193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene___
191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene____
-4-Nitroaniline____________
-4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol.
-N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1).
-4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_
-Hexachlorobenzene_______
-Pentachloropheno1_______
-Phenanthrene___________
-Anthracene_____________
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
.FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
SOMPLE OPTP
PPCKPGE
TUT
CO i-
05 07
IB
SEMIVOIATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NC
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
500 
(g/nL) ML
Level: 
(low/Bed) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) H_ 
pH: ___
BX994MSO
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266723____
Lab File ID: 
GH066723B06
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 0.50
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2——————Phenol
111-44-4—————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether
95-57-8——————2-Chlorophenol
541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol
95-50-1—————1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol
39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether
106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol
621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__
67-72-1———————Hexachloroethane_________
98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene____________
78-59-1———————Isophorone______________
88-75-5——————2-Nitrophenol___________
105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol_______
65-85-0——————Benzoic Acid
111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__
120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______
120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____
91-20-3 ——————Naphthalene____________
106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline_________
•7-68-3———————Hexachlorobutadiene________
59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___
91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene______
77-47-4-—————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__
86-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol____
95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol____
91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthalene______
88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline___________
131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______
2,03-96-8—————Acenaphthylene_________
606-20-2—————2,6-Dinitrotoluene______
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
4
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
SO
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuJuuuauuuuuuuuuuuuu
PORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
POCKPGE 
TU1 
(-"-
)J'- 
O5OQ
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BX994MSO
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
500 
(9/mL) ML
Level: 
(lov/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) fl_ 
pH: ___.
Lab Sample ID: 266723____
Lab File ID: 
GH066723B06
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: O.SO
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
99-09-2 ———
83-32-9 ———
51-28-5 ———
100-02-7 ——
132-64-9 ——
121-14-2 ——
84-66-2 ——— •
7005-72-3 —
86-73-7 ———
100-01-6 ——
534-52-1 ——
86-30-6 ———
101-55-3 ——
118-74-1 ——
87-86-5 ———
——— 3-Nitroaniline
———— Acenaphthene
———— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol
———— 4 -Nitrophenol
——— Dibehzofuran
———— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene
———— Diethylphthalate
——— 4-Chl oropheny 1 -pheny le ther __
——— 4 -Nitroanil ine
——— 4, 6-Dinitro-2-Methylph«nol __
——— W-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __
• ——— 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ___
• ——— Hexachlorobenzene
• ——— Pentachloroohenol
85-0 1-8- —————— Phenan threne
120-12-7 ——
84-74-2 ———
206-44-0 ——
129-00-0 ——
85-68-7 —— -
91-94-1 —— -
218-01-9 — -
117-81-7 — -
117-84-0 — •
205-99-2——
207-08-9 — •
50-32-8 —— •
193-39-5 — •
53-70-3 —— •
191-24-2 — •
— - —— Di-n-Butylphthalate
• ———— Fluoranthene
• ——— Pyrene
• ——— Benzo (a) Anthracene
• ——— Chrysene
———— bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
• ——— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
———— Benzofb) Fluoranthene
———— Indeno ( 1 . 2 . 3-cd) Pyrene
———— Dibenzof a. h) Anthracene
———— Benzo(g.h.i)Perylene
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE DBTP P8CKB6E 
TUT 
001 
O5O9
1C
SEMIVOIATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 (g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ 
pH: ___
BX994
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 266725
Lab File ID: 
GJ066725A22
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/18/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline_________
83-32 -9 ——————Acenaphthene___________
51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol____________
132-64-9—•————Dibenzofuran___________
121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_
86-73-7-—————Fluorene_________________________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________
534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_
101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______
87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene___________
120-12-7——————Anthracene_____________
84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate______
206-44-0——————Fluoranthene___________
129-00-0——————Pyrene________________
85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1——————3,3 '-Dichlorobenzidine______
56-55-3———•——Benzo (a) Anthracene_____________
218-01-9-————Chrysene______________
117-81-7—————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate_
117-84-0—————Di-n-octyl Phthalate____
205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene_____
207-08-9——————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene_____
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________
193-39-5——————Indeno( 1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene___
191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene____
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
SAMPLE 0/977?
^ TUT 001 
0510
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
S,EpF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) Ii_ 
pH: ___
BX995RE
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SIX! No.: BX260
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 266726______
Lab File ID: 
GRJ66726C16
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/16/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2————-~ 3-Nitroaniline__________
83-32-9———————Acenaphthene_______________
51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______
100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol__________
132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________
121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate________
7005-72-3————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_
86-73-7———————Fluorene___________________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________
534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_
101-55-3—————4-Bronophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______
87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________
120-12-7—————Anthracene____________
84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______
206-44-0——————Fluoranthene_____________
129-00-0——————Pyrene________________
85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1——————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3———————Benzo (a) Anthracene______
218-01-9-—————Chrysene_____________________
117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____
205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene
207-08-9—————Benzo(k)Fluoranthene____
50-32-8———————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________
193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene___
191-24-2——————Benzofcr.h.ilPervlene
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
u
uuu
v-R
uuu
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
-•'FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE :Sara PBCKQGE
.-•-::_*
^v '~^
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) M_ 
pH: ___
BX996
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SD6 No.: BX26Q^
Lab .Sample ID: 266781____
Lab File ID: 
GJ066781A06
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Extracted: 06/13/89
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2——————Phenol__________________
111-44-4——————bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether____
95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________
541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene________
106-46-7—————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______
100-51-6——————Benzyl Alcohol___________
95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene______
95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol___________
39638-32-9————bi»(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_
106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol____________
621-64-7——————N-Nitro«o-Di-n-Propylamine__
67-72-1——————Hexachloroethane_________
98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene____________
78-59-1—•————Isophorone______________
88-75-5——————2-Nitrophenol____________
105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________
65-85-0———————Benzoic Acid_____________
111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__
120-8 3-2 ——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________
120-82-1————-1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____
91-20-3——————Naphthalene_____________
106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline__________
87-68-3———•——Hexachlorobutadiene_______
59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol____
91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene_______
77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene___
88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______
95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol______
91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthalene_______
88-74-4——————2 -Ni troanil ine___________
131-11-3——————Dimethyl Phthalate________
208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene___________
606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene________
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
FORM I SV-1
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
u-uuuuuuuuuuuu
e-uuu
1/87 Rev.
T
iS.-: •; :-^W'-.-'T ••:•-- 
lui
. 
,
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE ?r
BX979
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ 'Contract: 68-D9-OQ32
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX26Q
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL)
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Lab Sample ID: 266721_____
Lab File ID: 
CNQ66721A19
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3—-—————Chloromethane____________
74-83 -9—-————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroe thane_____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1——————Acetone_______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_________
540-59-0——————i,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
78-93-3——————2-Butanone___________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————carbon Tetrachloride_____
108-05-4——.———Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4-—-——•—Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———•———Trichloroethene________
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2———-———Benzene______________
10061-02-6-———Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——--——Bromoform_________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pent anone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________
127-18-4-————Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3—————Toluene______________
108-90-7———•——Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5——————Styrene____________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Uu
U"
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuauuuu
lf\ If,
FORM I VQA
1/87 Rev
SPMPLE DPTP
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) E_ 
pH:
BX979
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266721____
Lab File ID: 
GH066721BQ6
Date Received: Q6/1Q/89
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: l.Q____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
FORM I SV-1
108-95-2 ————
111-44-4 ————
541-73-1 ————
106-46-7 ————
100-51-6 ————
95-50-1 —————
95-48-7 —————
106-44-5 ————
621-64-7 ————
67-72-1 —————
98-95-3 —————
88-75-5 —————
105-67-9 ————
65-85-0 —————
111-91-1 ————
120-83-2 ————
120-82-1 ————
91-20-3 —————
106-47-8 ————
87-68-3 ————
91-57-6 ————
77-47-4 —————
88-06-2 —————
95-95-4 ———— -
88-74-4 ———— -
131-11-3 ——— -
606-20-2 ——— -
—— -Phenol
—— bis ( 2 -Chloroethy 1 ) Ether
—— 2 -Chlorophenol
—— 1.3 -Dichl orobenzene
—— 1 . 4-Dichlorobenzene
—— Benzyl Alcohol
— — 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene
—— 2 -Methy Iphenol
—— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
—— 4 -Methy Iphenol
—— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
—— Hexachl or oethane
—— Nitrobenzene
—— Isophorone
—— 2 -Nitrophenol
—— 2,4-Dimethvlphenol
—— Benzoic Acid
—— bis ( 2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __
—— 2 . 4-Dichlorophenol
—— 1 . 2 
f 4-Trichlorobenzene
• —— Naphthalene . .
• —— 4-Chloroaniline „
• —— Hexachlorobutadiene 
, 
_ , , , „
• —— 4 -Chloro-3 -Methy Iphenol . . ,
• —— 2-Methylnaphthalene
• —— 2 . 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol
• —— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol
• —— 2-Chloronaphthalene 
. , .
- —— 2-Nitroaniline
- —— Dimethyl Phthalate
• —— Acenaphthylene
• —— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
u •
uuuuuuuuuuuu
u-v
uuu
.1/87 Rev.
TUT 001 05.14
1C
SEMI VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS ________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/rol: 
1000 (g/fflL) ML
Level: 
(lov/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup : (Y/H) H _ 
pH:
BX979
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266721____
Lab File ID: 
GH066721B06
Date Received: 06/10/89 .
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitroaniline
8 3 -32-9 — • —— • ——— Acenaphthene
51-28-5 ——————— 2 . 4-Dinitrophenol
10O-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophenol
132-6 4 -9—— — ——Dibenzo furan
121-14-2 —————— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalata
70O5-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether __
86-73-7 ——————— Fluorene
100-01-6 —————— 4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1 ————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol __
86-30-6 ——————— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) __
101-55-3 —————— 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether ___
118-74-1 ————— — Hexachlorobenzene
87 -86-5- —— - ——— Pentachlorophenol
120-12-7 ———— - — Anthracene
«4-74-2 ——————— Di-n-Butylphthalate
206-44-0 —————— Fluoranthene
129-00-0 —————— Pyrene . , .
85-68-7 ——————— Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1 ——————— 3 , 3 '-Dichlorobenzidine
218-01-9 —————— Chrysene .
117-81-7 ————— bis ( 2 -Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __
117-84-0 —————— Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
205-99-2 —————— Benzo (b) Fluoranthene
2OT-O8-9 —————— Benzo (Jc) Fluoranthene
50-32-8 ——————— Benzo (a) Pyrene
193-39-5 —————— Indeno ( 1 f 2 , 3-cd) Pyrene . ,
53-70-3 ——————— Dibenzo (a fh) Anthracene . „ „ „
191-24-2 —————— Benzo(gfhri)Perylene
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Uuuuuuuuu
U ' •
uuuuuuuuuu
vttf
uuuuuuuuuu
1/87 Rev.
SBHPLE Dara PBCKPBE 
'; TUT 001 0515
/!_/ .4., .^fcL,-
1A 
>--t«-
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS'DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BX981
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS NO.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 266720_____
Lab File ID: 
CMQ66720A19
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 
C
74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9——————Bromomethane____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64*1——————Acetone_______________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform___________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3——————2-Butanone________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4-—•—•———Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5—•——cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene 
_______
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___
71-43 -2 —————-Benzene______________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2—————-Bronoform_____________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4———•—-Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3———•—-Toluene__________________
108-90-7-————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethvlbenzene 
__________
100-42-5—————Styrene___________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
4
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
ktw
u
JJuuuuuuuuauuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuua
FORM I VOA
1/87 Re
SAMPLE
PPCKB TUT 001 
0516
- *-*-»-••».-~- •••••*—•-«:. -• - •
•tS^-j-^;.:",:
;r^^^i^^^?^.^
: -j;-:_,rtS-«^
--"?-J-*iv-J _
-- -«^'.'--?
"-; :f:^^fe^^\
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE N.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case Mo.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 fg/nL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: 
(pacJc/cap) 
CAP
'Contract: 68-D9-0032
BX990
SDG Ho.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266497____
Lab File ID: 
CN066497A1Q
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0___
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND 
(Ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 
Q
74-87-3——————Chlorone thane__________
74-83-9—————— Bromonethane________•
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone_______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3—————•—Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3—————- 2-Butanone____________
71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4——————Broaodichlorome thane____
78-87-5——————•!, 2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————ci«-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———-——Trichloroethene________
124-48-1————— Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2———————Benzene______________
10061-02-6————Tran«-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2—————Bromoform____________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone___________
127-18-4-—•———Tetrachloroethene_______
79-3 4 -5——————1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene______________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5—————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Uu
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuau
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev
SBMPLE OPT ft POCKP6E
TUT
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE :
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12O58
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
S.Q (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/Bed) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BX991
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266498______
Lab File ID: 
. C4R66496C10
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND 
(uq/L or ug/Kg) UC/L 
Qr
74-87-3———————Chloronethane____________
74 -83 -9 ——-———Bronone thane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1———————Acetone___________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3—•——-——Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2 -Dichloroethane______
78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4------——-BroModichloronethane____
78 -97 -5—•————1, 2-Dichloropr opane______
10061-01-5————ci«-l, 3-Dichloropropene___
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_________
12 4-48-1 —————DibroaochloroM thane_____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2———————Benzene______________
10061-02-6———-TraiM-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bra-oform________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Bexanone____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethan«_
108-88-3—————Toluene______________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4—————Bthylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
32
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
tfJit;
'/:;
VitJ
u eT
FORM I VOA
1/87 Re
SPMPLE
PBCKPGE
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML .
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BX993
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266499_______
Lab File ID: 
CN066499A10
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: l.O_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________
74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone________________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———————Chloroform______________
107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone______________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4———————Bromodichlorotne thane____
78-87-5———————1, 2-Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_______
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2——————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2———————Bronofonn___________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene_________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5——————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Uy
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE
PPCKQBF
TUT
001
0519
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPO 
Case No.: 12QS8
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BX994
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS NO.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266725______
Lab File ID: 
CR066725B19
Date Received: 06/10/89
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_______
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3 —————— -Chloronethane
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride
75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane
75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide
75-35-4 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethene
75-34-3 —————— ~1 . 1-Dichloroethane
540-59-0 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
67-66-3— — 
•. ———— Chloroform
107-06-2 ——————— l-2-Dichloroethan«
78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanone
71-55-6 ——————— lflfl-Trichloroethane _ 
.
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4 ——————— Broaodichloromethane 
.
78-87-5 ——————— 1 . 2-Dichloropropane
10061-01-5 ————— cis-1 . 3 -Dichloropropene
79-01-6 —————— Trichloroethene
124-48-1 —————— Dibromochloromethane 
.
79-00-5 ——————— 1.1.2-Trichloroethane
71-43-2 ——————— Benzene
10061-02-6 ———— Trans-l , 3 -Dichloropropene ___
75-25-2 —————— Bromoform
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone
127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene
79-34-5 —————— i ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane ___
108-88-3 —————— Toluene
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene
100-42-5 —————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes
10
x--»v 
10
v J, 
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
110
«-W5"
uu-w-^r
u
U
U
U
U
U
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SffMPLE DPTP PPCKPB
'»._._,-i?l£i-. :*••<•'•.
~k&.3£'
~"-.rr*,"••"-• " '*•
TUT 001
0520
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NC
Lab Name: COMPCCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(lov/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BX996
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266781 ____
File ID: 
CNQ66781B19
Date Received: Q6/10/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/13/89
Dilution Factor: l.Q
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
74-87-3———•———Chloromethane__________
74-83 -9 —•—--—Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3-———•—-Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone_______________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3-——--——Chloroform______________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3 ——————2-Butanone___________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4-——•——-Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5————~ 1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5———cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1————— Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___
71-4 3-2——————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Broaofom____________________
108-10-1—————t-Methyl-2-Pentanone______
591-78 -6——————2-Hexanone___________•
127-18-4——--—-Tetrachloroethene______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3——————Toluene_______________
108-90-7—————-Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————Styrene_____________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
auuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev
SAMPLE oata
~> 
.•'^i?''-'^•*-•"•• -"-" "•"
:j---'^r:'V-,r:«j«g^*£.-'- "T -.-
.-Ai./.-iV;--.~".i:--vif.-.-s.-TE:?:-.« 
'"-;.-•.. "
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
______ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab coda: COMPU 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
i.Q (g/«L)
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 15
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY702
SAS No.
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 2^7_L_5______
Lab File ID: 
G3R6719SA19
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/21/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS HO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) TTG/KG
74-87-3 —•——••—Chloromethane____________
74-83-9——————Bromoaethane__________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3 ——————Chloroethane__________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone__________•
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene__________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_________
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform_____________________
107-06-2——————l,2-Di«hloroethane_______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4————•—Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————•!, 2-Dichloropropane_____
10O61-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2——————Benzene________;______
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bromofon_>_____________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_____________•
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3 —————Toluene______________________
108-90-7—•————Chlorobenzene______________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————Styrene_______________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________
59
59
59
59
190
89
29
29
29
29
7
29
59
29
29
59
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
59
59
29
29
29
29
29
29
270
FORM I VOA
uuuu
At
uuuuJuuuuuuuuuuu
0uuuuuuuuuu
1/87 Rev.
:— - SBMPLE Of)T0 PBCKOBi
TUT 
OO1 
052
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 
(g/mL) $
Level: 
(low/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 11
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY703
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX2S8
Lab Sample ID: 267196______
Lab File ID: 
CR067196B23
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/19/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0______
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3——————Chloromethane_________
74-83-9——————Bromomethane_______________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane__________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone_______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
€7-66-3——————Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56 -2 3 -5——————Carbon Tetrachl oride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4———————Bromod ichl orome thane________
78-87-5———————l, 2-Dichloropropane_____
1OO61-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1——————Dlbromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2———-———Benzene_______________
1O061-02-6——-—Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bromoforra______________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone__________
127-18-4——————Tetrachl or oethene_______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene_______________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________
LOO-42-5——————Stvrene 
____________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes________
1400
1400
1400
1400
280
1400
700
700
700
700
700
700
1400
700
700
1400
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
1400
1400
700
700
700
700
3300
700
5100
Uu
UuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
u
FORM I VOA
37
Sf9liPLE
1/87 Rev.
. 
-- 
- - 
-..-••^r-ST'Sr,
PQCKO6E 
TUT 001 
0523
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS______________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case Ho.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL) _
Level: 
(low/Bed) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 
18
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY704
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: 
BX2S8
Lab Sanple ID: 267197____
Lab File ID: 
CR067197B23
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/19/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
7 4 -87-3 ———————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3-—————Chloroethane__________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———————Chloroform_______________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____
79-01-6—————Tr ichlor oethene_________
124-48-1—-———Dibromochloromethane______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_____
71-43-2 ——-———Benzene_______________________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bromoform__________________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_________________
127-18-4 ——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene______________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_____________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5—————Styrene_____________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________
1500
1500
1500
1500
460
1500
760
760
760
760
760
760
1500
760
760
1500
760
760
760
760
760
760
760
760
760
1500
1500
760
760
780
760
2500
760
8500
U
U
U
U
J
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VGA
1/87 
Rev.
...-*-!= *-r
•-"!»
SPMPLE DQTP PaCKPBE TUT 001 
0524
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/nL) J
Level: 
(lov/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. _21
column: 
(pack/cap) 
CAP
BY705
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 267198_____
Lab File ID: 
C2R67198C23
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/20/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____ i
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3——————Chloromethane____________
74-83-9——————Bromomethane_____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3—•————Chloroethane_______________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1——————Acetone_________________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene__________
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane__________
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3———————Chloroforn_____________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_________
78-93-3——————2-Butanone________________
71-55-6———————1,1, l-Trichloroe thane______
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4——•———Bronodichloronethane_______
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane________
10061-01-5——-—cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene___________
124-48-1—————-Dlbronochlorone thane_______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2———————Benz ene_________________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2——————Bronoforn_______________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone________
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone________________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3——————Toluene____________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene____________
100-41-4 ——————Ethylbenzene_____________
100-42-5—————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
820
820
820
820
820
820
1600
820
820
1600
820
820
820
820
820
820
820
820
820
1600
1600
820
820
820
820
240
820
3600
uuuu
9ff
Uuuuuuu
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SPHPLE oara POCKOBE
TUT 001
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BY707
Lab Code: COMPU
Case No.: 12058
SAS No.
SOG No.: BX258
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.D (g/mL)
Level: 
(low/ved) MED
% Moisture: not dec.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 267199 ___
Lab File ID: 
C2R67199C23
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/21/89
Dilution Factor: i.Q
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) SZSZE£,.<»v
FORM I VOA
7 4 -87-3 ——————— Chloroanthane
74-83-9 ——————— Bromome thane
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride
75_00-3— — • — • —— Chloroe thane
75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 — —————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide
75-35-4 ——————— 1T 1-Dichloroethene
75-34-3 ——————— lf 1-Dichloroethane
54 0-59-0 —————— 1 ,2-Dichloroethene ( total ) __
67-66-3 ——————— Chloroform
107-06-2 —————— -1 . 2-Dichloroethane
78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanone
71-55-6 ——————— 1,1,1-Trichloroethane .
56-23-5 —————— —Carbon Tetrachloride
108-05-4 — - — —— Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4 ——————— Bromodichloromethane
78-87-5 ———— ' —— 1 . 2-Dichloropropane
10061-01-5 ———— cis-1 . 3-Dj.chloropropene
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene
79-00-5 ——————— 1.1.2-Trichloroethane
71-43-2 ——————— Benzene
10061-02-6—— —— Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene ___
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
108-88-3 —————— Toluene . .
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene
100-42-5 —————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes
1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
790
790
790
790
790
790
1600
790
790
1600
790
790
790
790
790
790
790
790
790
1600
1600
790
790
550
790
750
790
13000
U
Uuu
uuuu0u
u '••
uuuu
u /
uuuuuu ~
u •-
uu
U 
"'
Ju .'
J - ;
u 
,,.
r - •
Rev.
SAMPLE iwTa^PBCKaee 
Jm" °01 °526
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: CQMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.Q (g/nL)
Level: 
(low/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 16
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY709
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX2SB
Lab Sample ID: 2672Q1
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
C2R672Q1C23
06/14/89
06/21/89
Dilution Factor: l.O
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG
74-87-3——————Chloromethane____________
74-83-9—•—————Bromonethane__________________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1 ——————-Acetone_________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3——————Chloroform_________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-93-3——————2-Butanone______________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4—————-Bromodichlorooethane______
78-87-5———•——•1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene________
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________________
124-48-1—————Dlbromochloromethane_____•
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2———-——Benzene_________________
10061-02-6-———Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_____
75-25-2——————Bromoform__________________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone__________
591-78-6-—————2-Hexanone___________________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene___________
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3——————Toluene___________________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_______________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene___________________
100-42-5—————Styrene________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________•
1500
1500
1500
1500
4-W
1500
740
740
740
740
740
740
1500
740
740
1500
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
1500
1500
740
740
740
740
360
740
15000
Ufa*
uuuu
u •
uuuuuuv
u
u •
U '
u .
uu
J"i
u -j
FORM I VOA
_rv_s-••:- -..; --'
•': JT*> ' .- - •- *
1/87 Rev.
SPMPLE DffTff ppCKaee 
TLIT °01 
052?
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM IABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.C
Level: 
(lov/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 16
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY711
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
(g/mL)
Lab Sample ID: 267202____
Lab File ID: 
CR0672Q3C23
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/21/89
Dilution Factor: l.O___
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
74-87-3————•——Chloromethane____________
74-83-9-———•——Bromomethane_____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane_____________________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1———————Acetone_________________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0——-———1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3——————Chloroform______________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
73-93-3—————:—2-Butanone________________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4—-—-——Bromodichloromethane______
78-87-5——•———1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene_____
79 -01-6——————Tr ichloroethene__________
124-48-1——•———Dlbromochloromethane_______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_________
71-43 -2 ——————Benzene__________________
10061-02-6————Tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2——————Bromoform_____________________
108-10-1——————4 -Methyl -2 -Pentanone_______
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone________________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3——————Toluene_________________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene____________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene_____________
100-4 2 -5—————S tyrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________________
1500
1500
1500
1500
1500
740
740
740
740
740
740
1500
740
740
1500
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
1500
1500
740
740
740
740
740
740
2100
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
\J
•At*
i, -
»'"
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
•-*-.
S8MPLE DPTB PBCKOBE 
TUT 001 
0528
__._ 
. . - 
-
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM
Lab Code: CQMPU 
case Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec.
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BY712
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX258
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 267203____
Lab File ID: 
CR067203A23
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/21/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3—•—————Chloromethane__________
74-83 -9——————Bromomethane__________
75-01-4——————vinyl Chloride________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———————Chloroform_________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_______
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate_______________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____
7 8-87-5———————1,2 -Dichloropropane________
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6————•——Trichloroethene________
124-48-1-——•—— Dibromochloromethane_______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2 —«————Benzene_____________________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__
75-25-2——————Bromoform____________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2 -Hexanone_________________
12 7-18 -4—————Tetrachloroethene______
79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene___________•
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes___________
1400
1400
1400
1400
710 2**-
1400
720
720
720
720
720
720
1400
720
720
1400
720
720
720
720
720
720
720
720
720
1400
1400
720
720
720
720
720
720
4800
Uu
Uu
«*•£(.
uuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
DPTP PPCKfiee TUT 001 
0529
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
______ 
Contract: 68-D9-Q032
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPP 
case Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL)
Level: 
(low/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec.
BY713
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX258
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 267204_____
Lab File ID: 
CR067204A23
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/21/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0___
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3 ——————Chloromethane__________
74-83 -9———————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3—•————-Chloroethane__________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone_______________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3—~———Chloroform__________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3——————-2-Butanone____________
71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane___
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————vinyl Acetate________________
75-27-4 —•—•——-Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5-—•——cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________
124-48-1-—•———Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————i, i, 2-Trichloroethane_____
71-43-2--—————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————BroBOform_________________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——•————Toluene_______________
108-90-7———-Chlorobenzene_________________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____________
100-42-5—————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
1500
1500
1500
1500
-»ee-
1500
740
740
740
740
740
740
1500
740
740
1500
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
740
1500
1500
740
740
740
740
740
740
1300
FORM I VGA
1/87 Rev.
TLIT 001 0530
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM
Lab Coda: COMPtl 
Casa Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/watar) WATER
Sampla wt/vol: 
§.o (g/mL)
Leval: 
(low/mad) LOW
% Moistura: not dac. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Contract: 68-D9-0032r'r
BY701
SAS No.
SOG No.: BX260
Lab Sanpla ID: 267194
Fila ID: 
CM067194B12
Data Racaivad: 06/14/89
Data Analyzed: O6/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
74-87-3 ——————— ChloroBathana
74-83-9 ——————— BroBomathana
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chlarida
75-00-3——— —— -- Cnloroathana
75-09-2 ——————— Mathylana Chloride
67-64-1 —————— Acatona
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaul*id«
75-35-4 ——————— lrl-Dichloro_th«n«
75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-DlchloMMtaan*
540-59-0 —————— l,2-Dichloro«thaJM (total)
67-66-3 ——————— Cfeloroforn
107-06-2 ——————— 1 1 2-Dichloro-thana 
. 
.,_ .
78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanona
71-55-6 ——————— 1. 1. 1-Trichloroathana
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tatrachlorida 
_
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acatata
75-27-4 ——————— BrOBOdichloromathana
78-87-5 ——————— 1 . 2-Dichloropropana
10061-01-5 ————— cia-lf 3-Dichloroprop«na 
._ _
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroathana .
124-48-1 —————— Dibronochloromathana
79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,.2-Trichloroathan* ,. ...
71-43-2 ——————— B*nz«na
10061-02-6 ———— Tran«-l,3-Dichloroprop«n«_ ___
75-25-2 ——————— BrOBOfon
108-10-1 —————— 4-Mathvl-2-Pentanona
127-18-4 —————— Tatraehloroathana
79-34-5 —————— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tatrachloroathana_ __
108-88-3 ——————— Toluana
108-90-7^ —————— Chlorobanzana
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbanzana
100-42-5 —————— Styrana
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylanas
10
10
10
10
S
8
5
5
5
S '
5
5 .
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
. 5
5
10
10
S 
-
:..s ,
55
S
5 -
.',-5 •
U
U
U
U
U^
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rav
>? • . '.- /:•*-. .-
DQTP P/9CKA TUT 001 O531
/, 4
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BY701
Lab Name: coMPOCHEM LABS________ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
Lab Coda: COMPU 
Case Mo.: 12058 
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
looo 
(g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(lov/aed) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/H) u_ 
pH: ___
Lab Sample ID: 267194_____
Lab File ID: 
ffHO67194A15
Date Received: 06/14/89
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
108-95-2—————Phenol____________________
111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether____
95-57-8———!--—2-Chlorophenol___________
541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______
106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene________
10O-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol______________
95-50-1——-———1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______
95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol___________
39638-32-9-———-bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_
106-4 4 -5——————4-Methy Iphenol___________
621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__
67-72-1——————Hexachloroethane__________
98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene___________
78-59-1——————Isophorone______________
88-7 5-5——————2 -Nitrophenol____________
105-67-9——————2,4 -Dimethy Iphenol________
65-85-0———————Benzoic Acid________________
111-91-1——r——bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane_
120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol________
120-82-1—————1,2,4-Tri'chlorobenzene____
91-20-3——————Naphthalene____________
106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline___________
87-6 8-3 ——————Hexachlorobutad iene_________
59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methyl phenol___
91-57-6———————2-Methvlnaohthalene
77-4 7-4 —————Hexachlorocyclopentad iene__
88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol______
95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____
91-58-7———————2-Chloronaphthalene_______
88-74-4———————2-Nitroaniline____________
131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______
208-96-8———•—-Acenaph thy Iene____________
606-20-2—————2,6-Dinitrotoluene_______
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
so
10
50
10
10
10
u
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
^
'
SBMPLE DQTR PQCKQB£ 
TUT 001 
0532
J*v-.-- -I-ii:.f
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BY758
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 120SB 
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Saaple wt/vol: 
1000 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(lov/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ 
pH: ___
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 26650Q
Lab Pile ID: 
CHQ66SQQAQ4
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/H/89
Dilution Factor: i.Q___
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
108-95-2 ——— •
111-44-4 ——— -
95-57-8 ———— -
541-73-1 ——— -
106-46-7 ——— •
100-51-6 ——— •
95-50-1 ———— -
95-48-7 ———— •
39638-32-9 — •
106-44-5 ——— •
621-64-7 ——— •
67-72-1 ———— •
98-95-3 -----
78-59-1 —— ~
88-75-5 ———— •
105-67-9 —— -
65-85-0 -----
111-91-1 — —
120-83-2 —— -
120-82-1 —— -
91-20-3 ————
106-47-8 ———
87-68-3 -----
59-50-7 ————
91-57-6 ————
77-47-4 ————
88-06-2 ————
95-95-4 -----
91-58-7 ————
88-74-4 ————
131-11-3 ———
208-96-8 -——
606-20-2 ———
—— Phenol
. —— bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether „
—— Benzyl Alcohol
—— 1.2-Dichlorobenzene 
,,., .. .,
—— 2-Methylphenol
——— 4-Methylphenol
—— Nitrobenzene
—— 2 f 4-Dimethylphenol
—— bis ( 2-Chloroethoxy ) Methane __
——— Ir2.4-Trichlorobenzene ,.
——— 4-Chloroaniline
——— Hexachlorobutadiene
——— 2-Methylnaphthalene
—— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___
— • — 2 r 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol . ,..,.,
——— 2-Nitroaniline
——— Dimethyl Phthalate
——— Acenaphthylene „
——— 2 r 6-Dinitrotoluene .
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
"10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuu..— /?
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuau
U '
u •
auauu
FORM I SV-1
DPT ft PPCKBGE
IJT OO1 0533
1A 
-"/_-(,'~^v'>
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: CQMPtl 
case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not d»c. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BY758
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266500
Lab File ID:
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1..0 ____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
74-87-3——————Chlorome thane____________
74-83-9--—————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4—————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroe thane____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone_______________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide____________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_________
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4———•———Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_____•
124-48-1——————Dibromochlorome thane____
79-00-5——————l, 1,2-Trichloroethane___
71-43 -2——————Benzene_________________
10061-02-6—————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2—————Bromoform____________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——-----2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene_______________
108-90-7——•——Chlorobenzene_________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene____;_________
100-42-5—————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5"
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
2
5
5
5
U0
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
FORM I VOX
1/87 Rev.
SOMPLE
Jiafc.-.
-.?*w~<-^-
TUT
001 °534
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BY758
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
Lab Code: CQMPO 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
IQQQ 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) H_ 
pH: ____
Lab Sample ID: 266500____
Lab File ID: 
GHQ665OOA04
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0___
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline____________
83-32 -9 ——————Acenaphthene___________
51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________
100-02-7—————4-Hitrophenol__________
132-64-9--——«—Dibenzofuran___________
121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7——————Fluorene_______________
100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline__________
534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_
86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_
101-55-3—————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_
118 -7 4 -1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______
87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene____________
120-12-7——————Anthracene_______
84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______
206-44-0—————Fluoranthene____________
129-00-0——————Pyrene________________
85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1——————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______
218-01-9—————Chrysene_______________
117-81-7——————bis (2-Ethylhexyl )Phthalate
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____
2 05 -9 9 -2 —————Benz o (b) Fluoranthene______
207-08-9—————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene____
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________
193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene_____
191-24-2——————Benzo (g,h, i) Perylene_____
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuu
ftftf-7
uuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-2
•.- SBHPL£ DPTQ PBCKQBE ,y,
•-•• •-^-A-jM^~.^^^-^-;-^^^*^^^^ii°^TO3^^^:. ---^.: - _.
^J^S^^^^fe^^^^^^-i—^v- ^^^^^^^5^^:r^--«^-
1/87 Rev.
001
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 (g/nL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/M) M_ 
pH: ___
BY761
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 267127____
Lab File ID: 
GH067127B16
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Extracted; 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: i.o___
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UG/L
111-44-4 —— —
95-57-8 ———— -
541-73-1 ——— -
106-46-7 ————
100-51-6 ——— -
95-50-1 ———— -
^QJCIfi 1^ Q
106-44-5 ——— -
621-64-7 ——— -
67-72-1 ———— •
98-95-3 ———— •
78-59-1 ———— •
88-75-5 ———— •
105-67-9 ——— •
65-85-0 ———— •
111-91-1 ——— •
120-83-2 ——— •
120-82-1 ——— •
91-20-3 ————
106-47-8 ———
87-68-3 ————
59-50-7 ————
91-57-6 ————
77-47-4 ————
88-06-2 ————
95-95-4 ————
91-58-7 ————
88-74-4 ————
131-11-3 ———
208-96-8 ———
606-20-2 ———
• —— Phenol
• —— 2-Chlorophenol
• —— 1. 3-Dichlorobenzene
• —— 1 f 4-Dichlorobenzene
• —— Benzyl Alcohol
• —— 1.2-Dichlorobenzene
- —— 2-Methylphenol
- —— 4-Methylphenol
— — N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
—— Hexachloroethane
—— Nitrobenzene
—— 2-NitroDhenol
- —— 2 . 4-Dimethylphenol
—— 2 f 4-Dichlorophenol
- —— 1.2 f 4-Trichlorobenzene
—— Naphthalene
—— 4-Chloroaniline
——— Hexachlorobutadiene
——— 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
—— 2-Methylnaphthalene
—— Hexachlorocy cl opentadi ene ___
——— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol
——— 2-Chloronaphthalene
——— 2 -Nitroanil ine
10
10
10
10
10
17
10
27
10
41
10
10
10
10
10
31
50
10
10
10
__tf /x/jTi ^«<%
10
10
10
\/ —S^t\ 4MfrA_
•Jp**" rf ^ \j y^f^j-
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
Uuuuu
u
u
uuuuu
«*•// ^y
~o i^
uuu
-Bb
uuuJb
uuuuuuuu
Rev.
?£:j^:
SRHPLe DOT* PPCKQ6E 
. TUT 
001 
0536
*&&%m.:^;- --L-- ---^^^^^^.^^^sm^^^^
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BY761
Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS_________ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
Lab Code: COMPP 
case No.: 12058 
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1QQQ (g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPP
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) H_ 
pH: ____
Lab Sample ID: 267127_____
Lab File ID: 
GH067127B16
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline__________
83-32-9—•—————Acenaphthene____________
51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________
132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________
121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-7 3 -7 -——————Fluorene__________________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________
534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
86-30-6———•——N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_
101-55-3—————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1—•————Hexachlorobenzene_______
87-86-5-—————Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8-————Phenanthrene______________
120-12-7—————Anthracene____________
84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_____
206-44-0———•——Fluoranthene____________
129-00-0—————Pyrene_______________
85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3-—————Benzo (a) Anthracene________
218-01-9——————Chrysene______________
117-81-7——————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____
205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene______
207-08-9——————Benzo(k)Fluoranthene_____
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________
193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3—————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene_____
191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h, i) Perylene______
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
21
50
50
10
10
10
17
13
3
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
80
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
u
uuuuuJ
JuuuuuuuT
uuuuuaa
FORM I SV-2
^PRCKtiBE
'• ••£• -i'-_ 
' 
_-- • - •-.
TUT
,..1/87 Rev.
0537
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BY762
lab Name: COMPPCHEM LABS_______ contract: 68-09-0032
Lab Coda: COMTO 
casa No.: 12058 
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/mad) LOW
% Moisture: not dac. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Lab Sample ID: 266501____
Lab File ID: 
CNQ66501B10
Data Received: 06/09/89
Data Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3 —— —— -— Chlorome thane
74-83 -9— ————— Bromome thane
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride
75-00-3 — — —— — Chloroathane
75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaulfide
75-35-4 ——————— 1. 1-Diehloroethene
75-34-3 ——————— lrl-Dichloroathane
540-59-0 ———— --1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
67-66-3 — ~ —— —Chloroform
107-06-2 ——————— If2-Dichloroethane ... 
_
78-9 3-3 —————— -i-Butanone
71-55-6 ——————— lfafl-Trichloroethane .
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachlorida
108-05-4 ————— Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4 ——————— Bromodichloromethane
78-87-5 ——————— -1,2-Dichloropropane
10061-01-5 ——— ~ci»-l , 3-Dichloropropane
79-01-6 ——————— Trlchloroethene
124-48-1 —— • —— —— Dibromochloromethana
79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethana
71-43-2 ——————— Benxena
10061-O2-6—— —— Trana-1 , 3-Dichloropropena ___
75-25-2 ——————— Broaoform
108-10-1 —————— 4-Mathyl-2-Pentanona
591-78-6 —————— 2-Haxanona
79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ___
108-88-3 —————— Toluene
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzena
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbanzene
100-42-5 —————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenea
10
10
,*\ 
10
> 
10
^ «
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Uu
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SAMPLE OOTO
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) M_ 
pH: ___
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BY762
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266501_____
Lab File ID: 
GHQ66501X04
Date Received: 06/09/89
Date Extracted: o«/Q9/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: _____
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2 ————
111-44-4 ————
95-57-8 —— ——
541-73-1 ————
106-46-7 -----
100-51-6 -----
95-50-1 —— ——
95-48-7 —— ——
106-44-5 -----
621-64-7 —— ~
67-72-1 —————
78-59-1 —— ——
88-75-5 —— ——
105-67-9 —— —
65-85-0 —— ——
111-91-1 -----
120-83-2 —— —
120-82-1 —— —
91-20-3 —— ——
106-47-8 —— —
87-68-3 —— ——
59-50-7 —— ——
91-57-6 —————
77-47-4 —————
88-06-2 —————
91-58-7 —— ——
88-74-4 —— ——
131-11-3 —— —
208-96-8 —— —
606-20-2 ————
—— Phenol
—— bis f 2-Chloroethyl) Ether
—— 2 -Chl oropheno 1
—— 1. 3-Dichlorobenzene
- — 1.4-Dichlorobenzene
- — Benzyl Alcohol
——1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene
—— 2 -Methylphenol
—— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
—— 4 -Methylphenol
—— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
—— Hexachl or oethane
— -Ni trobenz ene
—— Isophorone
—— 2-Nitrophenol
——2 . 4-Diaethylphenol
—— Benzoic Acid
—— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __
— -2 . 4-Dichlorophenol
——1 . 2 . 4-Trichlorobenzene
—— Naphthalene
—— Hexachlorobutadiene
• —— 2-Methylnaphthalene 
, _
• —— Hexachlor ocyc 1 opentad iene
• —— 2-Nitroaniline
• —— Dimethyl Phthalate
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuu
»-/?
*r K.
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
U'
uuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE OPTP
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/Bed) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) fl_ 
pH: ___
BY762
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 266501_____
Lab File ID: 
gno6650iA04
Date Received: Q6/Q9/89
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0______
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline_________
83-32-9——————Acenaphthene_____________
51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______
100-02^-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________
132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran____________
121-14 -»2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_______
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_
86-73-7——————Fluorene______________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________
534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_
86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylanine (1)_
101-55-3—————4-Bronophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1————Hexachlorobenzene________
87-86-5———-——Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene___________
120-12-7—————Anthracene____________
84-7 4-2——————Di-n-Buty lphthalate________
206-44-0—————-Fluoranthene__________
129-00-0—————Pyrene_________________
85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1——————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______
218-01-9--————Chry sene_____________
117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate.
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____
205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene_____
207-08-9--————Benzo(k)Fluoranthene_____
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene________
193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3 ——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene_____
191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene____
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
u
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev
S(9HPLE DBTP
-•" « *•
;-*r
.,_". •%i^;:J»". ,_ ..- '.:_.. -_-.-.^.r..'^-.-^A,.-y*.- '^ 
•
-S*^^'^;^"^^^^i^:^
'^•^^^•^-^•-^©^i^-
:W^
oo i-
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
i si
y-^-,y_/EPA SAMFJ
Lab Name: CQMPncHEM LABS_______
Lab Cod*: COMPO 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
2.5 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(lov/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY763
Contract: 68-D9-Q032
SAS No.: _____ SD6 No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 267128____
Lab File ID: 
CR067128B12
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: l.O____ ,
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UC/L 
Q
74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethane . ,
74-83-9 ——————— Bromomethane
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride
75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane
75-09-2 ——————— Methvlene Chloride
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone
75-15-0 ———————— Carbon Diaulfide
75-35-4 ——————— lfl-Dichloroethene
75-34-3 ——————— 1 
f 1-Dichloroethane
540-59-0 ————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
67-66-3 ————— ——Chloroform
107-06-2 —————— 1 r 2-Dichloroethane
71-55-6 ——————— 1 r 1, 1-Trichloroethane
56-23-5—— ———— Carbon Tetrachlorida
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate
78-87-5 ——————— 1.2-Dichloropropane
10061-01-5—— — -ci«-l , 3-Dichloropropene
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene
79-00-5 ——————— lf lr 2-Trichloroethane
71-4 3-2 ——————— Benzene
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone .
591-78-6—— — —— 2-Hexanone
127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene ., , .
79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3 —————— Toluene
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene
100-42-5 —————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenee
20
20
20
20
6
320
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuu
BJ
8fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 
Re\
SBHPLE DPTP
•TUT
oo i
o
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12068
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) H_ 
pH: ___
EPA SAMPLE NO:
BY763
Contract: 68-D9-Q032 |_______
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 267128_______
Lab File ID: 
GHQ67128B16
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: i.Q
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2——————Phenol_________________
111-44-4—————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether___
95-57-8————— 2-Chlorophenol____;_____
541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene______
106-46-7—————— 1,4-Dichlorobenzene____.
100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol_________
95-50-1——————1,2-Dichlorobenzene______
95-48-7——————2-Methyl phenol___________
39638-32-9————bi«(2-Chloroi«opropyl)Ether_
106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol___________
621-64-7——————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine__
67-72-1——————Rexachloroe thane________
98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene___________
78-59-1———•——Isophorone____________
8 8-75-5———————2 -Nitrophenol___________
105-67-9—————2,4-Dimethylphenol_______
65-85-0——————Benzoic Acid___________
111-91-1—————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__
120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______
120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene_____
91-20-3——————Naphthalene____________
106-47-8——————4-Chloroaniline_________
87-68-3———•—Hexachlorobutadiene______
59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___
91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene______
77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene_
88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol_____
95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____
91-58-7-—•———-2-Chloronaphthalene______
88-7 4-4——————2 -Ni troanil ine_________
131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______
208-96-8 —————Acenaphthy 1 ene_______________
606-20-2—————2,6-Dinitrotoluene______
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
so
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
'.<?
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
SPHPLE 
DftTB
05A2
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE ...
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/mad) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) H_ 
pH: ___
BY763
Contract: 68-D9-Q032
SAS No.: _____ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 267128____
Lab File ID: 
GHQ67128B16
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline
83-32-9——————Acenaphthene
51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol___________
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9—•——•—Dibenzofuran
121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate____________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7————-Fluorene
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline
534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)
101-55-3—————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene
87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene
120-12-7—————Anthracene
84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate
206-44 -0——————Fluoranthene
129-00-0—————Pyrene
85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate
91-94-1———————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine
56-55-3————•——Benzo( a) Anthracene
218-01-9—-——Chrysene
117-81-7—————bi»(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate
117-84-0—————Di-n-octyl Phthalate
205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene
207-08-9—————Benzo (Je) Fluoranthene
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene
193-39-5——————Indeno(l, 2,3-cd) Pyrene
53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene______
191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene________
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
SRMPLE DBTP PQCKf96£
TUT 
001 
0543
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab tt
: COMPUCHEM LABS
Contract: 68-D9-Q032
SBLK08
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/M) M_ 
pH: ____
SDG No.: BX26Q
Lab Sample ID: SBLKQ8____
Lab File ID: 
GH067362A1S
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/1S/B9
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2 —————
111-44-4 —————
95-57-8 ——————
341-73-1 —————
106-46-7 —————
10O-51-6 —————
95-50-1 ——————
95-48-7 ——————
39638-32-9 ———
1O6-44-5 —————
621-64-7 —————
67-72-1 ——————
81-75-5 ——————
105-67-9 —————
65-85-0 ——————
111-91-1 —————
120-83-2 —————
120-82-1 — - ——
91-20-3 ——————
106-47-8 —————
87-68-3 ——————
91-57-6 ——————
77-47-4 ——————
30-06-2 ——————
95-95-4 —————
91-58-7 —————
88-74-4 ——————
131-11-3 —————
208-96-8 ————
6O6-20-2 —————
--Phenol
—bis ( 2-Chloroethyl ) Ether
— 2-Chlorophenol
— 1 . 3-Dichlorobenzene
— 1. 4-Dichlorobenzene
—Benzyl Alcohol
— 1 , 2— Dichlorobenzene
—2 -Methy Iphenol
— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
~4 -Methy Iphenol . .
— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
— Hexachloroethane
— Nitrobenzene _.
— Isophorone
— 2-Nitrophenol
— 2 . 4 -Dinethy Iphenol
— Benzoic Acid . ..
— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __
— — 2 , 4— Dichlorophenol
— 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene
— Naphthalene
— 4-Chloroaniline ... 
..
— Hexachlorobutadiene
— 4 -Chloro-3 -Methy Iphenol ...
— 2 -Methy Inaphthalene
— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___
——2 , 4 , 6— Trichlorophenol
— — 2 , 4 r 5— Trichlorophenol
— 2 — Chloronaphthalene
— 2-Nitroaniline
— Dimethyl Phthalate
— Acenaphthylene
— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene . _
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
OOTQ PBCKP6E 
TUT 001 
0544
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/nL) ML_
Level: 
(low/mad) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SapF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) H_ 
pH: ___
SBLK08
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX_60_
Lab Sample ID: SBLKQ8____
Lab File ID: 
GH067362A15
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline__________
83-32-9———————Acenaphthene_____\_______
51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________
132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________
121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene_______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalata__________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_
86-73-7———————Fluorena______________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________
534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_
86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_
101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_________
87-86-5—•————Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8———————Phenanthrene___________
120-12-7——————Anthracene_____________
84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_____
206-44-0——————Fluoranthene___________
129-00-0—————Pyrene______________________
85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate____
91-94-1———————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3——————Benzo( a) Anthracene______
218-01-9——————Chrysene___________________
117-81-7——————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalata____
205-99-2——————Benzo(b) Fluoranthene_____
207-08-9—————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene____
50-32-8———————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________
193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3———————Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene___
191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h, i) Perylene____
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
50
10
50
50
10
10
1.0
^0
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuauuu
FORM I SV-2
SftMPLE DQTP POCKQBE
1/87 
Rev.
TUT 
OO1 
O54
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
IQQQ 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) fi_ 
pH: ____
EPA SAMPLE MO.
SBLK80
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: SBLK8Q______
Lab File ID: 
GJ066466A20
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/H/89
Dilution Factor: l.O
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
108-95-2 ——————
111-44-4 ————— -
95-57-8 —————— -
541-73-1 ————— -
106-46-7 ————— -
100-51-6 ————— -
95-50-1 ———— •<—
95-48-7 —————— •
39638-32-9 ——— •
106-44-5 ————— •
621-64-7 ————— •
67-72-1 —————— •
98-95-3 —————— •
78-59-1 —————— •
88-75-5 —————— •
105-67-9 ————— •
65-85-0 —————— •
111-91-1 ————— •
120-83-2 ————— •
120-82-1 —— ——
91-20-3 —————— •
106-47-8 —————
87-68-3 ——————
59-50-7 ——————
91-57-6 ——————
77-47-4 ——————
88-06-2 ——————
95-95-4-- ————
91-58-7 ——————
88-74-4 ——————
131-11-3 —————
208-96-8 —————
606-20-2 —————
—Phenol
— bia / 2-Chloroethvl > Ether
— 2-Chlorophenol 
__.,_, _
—1 f 3-Dichlorobenzene
— 1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
—Benzyl Alcohol
— 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene
—2 -Methy Iphenol
— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
—4 -Methy Iphenol
— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
— Hexachl or oethane
—Nitrobenzene
— Isophorone
—2 -Ni trophenol
— 2 . 4 -Dime thy Iphenol
— Benzoic Acid .. .
— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane __
—2 . 4-Dichlorophenol
—1 . 2 . 4-Trichlorobenzene
—Naphthalene
— 4-Chloroaniline
— Hexachlorobutadiene
— 4 -Chloro-3 -Methy Iphenol
--2-Methylnaphthalene
— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___
— 2 . 4 . 6-Trichlorophenol
— 2 . 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol 
,. ,_.
— 2-Chloronaphthalene
— 2-Nitroaniline
— Dimethyl Phthalate
— Acenaphthylene
— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 
Rev.
SBMPLE DffTff
-•-.>-. ..-- . . ,'n- .
TUT O01 O546
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Coda: COMPU 
Caaa Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/watar) WATER
Sanpla wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/nL) ML
Laval: 
(low/mad) LOW
% Moistura: not dac. ___ 
dac. ___
Extraction: 
(SapP/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Claanup: 
(Y/M) N._ 
pH: ___
SBLK80
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS Mo.: ______ 
SDG Mo.: BX260
Lab Sanpla ID: SBLKSO
Lab Fila ID: 
GJ066466A20
Data Racaivad: _____
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Data Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0___
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline__________
83-32-9———————Acenaphthene____________
51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______
100-02-7——————4-Nitrophenol__________
132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran__________
121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalata________
7005-72-3————4-Chlorophenyl-pheny lather,
86-73-7--—————Fluorene_____________
100-01-6—————4-Mitroaniline_________
534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
86-30-6———————N-Nitroaodiphanylanine (1)_
101-55-3—————4-Broaophenyl-pheny lather_
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______
87-86-5-—•———Pentachlorophanol_______
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________
120-12-7—————Anthracene____________
84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______
206-44-0—————Fluoranthene___________
129-00-0—————Pyrene__________
85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate____
91-94-1——————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______
218-01-9—————Chryaene_____________
117-81-7—————bia (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate.
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____
205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene____
207-08-9————-Benzo (Jc) Fluoranthene____
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrane_________
193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene___
191-24-2—————Benzo(g,h,i)Perylene____
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamina
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu*
uuuuuuu
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE DQTB PBCKP6E
•,- TUT 
001 
0547
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
30.0 
(g/nL) Q__
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SONG
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) H_ 
pH: ___
SBLK83
Contract: 68-D9-Q032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: SBLK83____
Lab File ID: 
GJ066463B04
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: 06/09/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
108-95-2 ——
111-44-4 ——
95-57-8 ———
541-73-1 ——
106-46-7 ——
100-51-6 ——
95-50-1 ———
O K_ A O •*
4AJP«%A ^ «t A
106-44-5 ——
621-64-7 ——
67-72-1 ———
OO_^R_P
105-67-9 ——
65-85-0 ———
111-91-1 ——
120-83-2 ——
120-82-1 ——
106-47-8 ——
87-68-3 ———
59-50-7 ———
91-57-6 ———
77-47-4 ———
88-06-2= ———
95-95-4 ———
91-58-7 ———
88-74-4 ———
131-11-3 ——
ono— oc.a. _ _
606-20-2 ——
——— bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether
——— -1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
——— •! f 4-Dichlorobenzene
——— Benzyl Alcohol
——— 1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene
_ ——— 2-Methylphenol
——— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
———— 4-Methylphenol
——— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
——— Hexachloroethane
——— Nitrobenzene
———— 2-Mitrophenol
- —— -bis ( 2 -Chloroethoxy ) Methane __
——— Naphthalene
——— 2-Methylnaphthalene
——— 2-Nitroaniline
——— Dimethyl Phthalate
——— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1600
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
1600
330
1600
330
330
330
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Uau
Uuuuu
FORM I SV-1
SBMPLE DffTP PPCKPGE
.
1/87 
Rev.
TUT 
001 
0548
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Coda: COMPU 
Casa Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL'
Sanple wt/vol: 
30.0 (g/mL) S__
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SOMC
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/H) fl_ 
pH: ___
SBLK83
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS NO.: ______ 
SDC NO.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: SBLKB3______
Lab File ID: 
GJQ66463B04
Date Received: _____
Date Extracted: 06/09/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/09/89
Dilution Factor: l.QO
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
99-09-2 -----
83-32-9 —— —
51-28-5 —— ~
100-02-7 —— -
132-64-9 —— -
121-14-2 ———
84-66-2 -----
7005-72-3 ——
86-73-7 —— ~
100-01-6 —— -
534-52-1 —— -
86-30-6 ————
101-55-3 —— -
118-74-1 —— -
87-86-5 —— —
85-01-8 -----
120-12-7 —— -
84-74-2 ————
206-44-0 ———
129-00-0 ———
85-68-7 -----
56-55-3 — ——
218-01-9 —— -
117-81-7 ———
117-84-0 —— -
205-99-2 —— -
207-08-9 — —
50-32-8 ————
193-39-5 —— -
53-70-3 ————
191-24-2 ———
——— 3 -Nitroanil ine
——— 2 . 4-Dinitrophanol
——— 4-Nitrophenol
——— Dibenzofuran
——— 2 . 4-Dinitrotoluene
——— Diathylphthalata
——— 4 -Ni troani 1 ine
—— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
—— N-Nitrosodiphenylamina (1) __
——— Hexachlorobanzene , .
——— Pentachlorophenol ,
—— - Anthracene ,.. .
——— Dl-n-Butylphthalate .
—— — Pyrena
——— Butylbenzylphthalate .
—— — Chryaene
—— bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate __
——— Dl-n-Octyl Phthalate
——— Benzo(b)Pluoranthene
——— Benzo(k)Fluoranthene ,_.
——— Benzo(a)Pyrene _ .. ...
—— Indenofl.2.3-cd)Pyrene .
——— Benzo<q.h.i)Perylene ...
1600
330
1600
1600
330
330
330
330
330
1600
1600
330
330
330
1600
330
330
330
330
330
330
660
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
330
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
-,-_.*•'
SBHPLE DPTP PBCKBGE
1/87 Rev.
TUT OO1 O549
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/M) fi_ 
pH: ___
SBLK86
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: SBLK86
Lab File ID: 
GH067149B16
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: l.O____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2——————Phenol_________________
111-44-4—————bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether___
95-57-8——————2-Chlorophenol__________
541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene______
106-46-7-——-—1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______
100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol__________
95-50-1———————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______
95-48-7——————2-Methylphenol__________
39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_
106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol__________
621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine_
67-72-1———————Hexachl or oe thane_________
98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene___________
78-59-1——————Isophorone_____________
88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol___________
105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol________
65-85-0—————r— Benzoic Acid____________
111-91-1—————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__
120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______
120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____
91-20-3——————Naphthalene____________
106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline_________
87-68-3——————Hexachlorobutadiene______
59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___
91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene______
77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene_
88-06-2—————-2,4,6-Trichlorophenol____
95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____
91-58-7———————2 -Chloronaphthalene______
88-74-4——————2-Nitroanil ine__________
131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______
208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene__________
606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene_______
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE DPTff PPCKP6E
TUT 
001 
0550
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Nam«: COMPUCHEM LABS____________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
looo 
(g/mL) ML
Level: 
(lov/aed) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) fi_ 
pH: ___
SBLK86
Contract: 6B-D9-0032
SAS NO.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: SBLK86_______
Lab File ID: 
CHQ67149B16
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: i.o
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2———————3-Nitroaniline__________
83-32 -9 ———————Acenaphthene___________
51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol_______________
132-64-9——-——Dibenzofuran___________
121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate__________
7005-72-3—•——-4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73 -7——————Fluorene_____________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________
534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
86-30-6——————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 
(1)_
101-55-3—————4-BroBophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______
87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________
120-12-7—————Anthracene____________
84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______
206-44-0—————Fluoranthene__________
129-00-0—————Pyrene______________
85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1———————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______
218-01-9—————Chrysene_____________
117-81-7—————bi»(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate______
205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene____
207-08-9—————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene_____
50-32-8———————Benzo (a) Pyrene___________
193-39-5——————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3——————Dibenzo (a, h) Anthracene___
191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene____
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylanine
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
SIMPLE 
DPTB PBCKflBE
TUT 
001 0551
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/M) N._ 
pH: ___
SBLK90
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: SBLK90_____
Lab File ID: 
GJQ66751AQ6
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2 ————
111-44-4 ————
95-57-8 —————
541-73-1 ————
106-46-7 ————
100-51-6 ————
95-50-1 —————
106-44-5 -----
621-64-7 ————
67-72-1— ———
78-59-1 —— ——
88-75-5 —— ——
105-67-9 ————
65-85-0 —— ——
111-91-1 —— —
120-83-2 — ——
120-82-1 — ——
91-20-3 —————
106-47-8 ————
59-50-7 —————
91-57-6 —————
77-47-4 —————
95-95-4 —— ——
91-58-7 —— ——
88-74-4 —— ——
131-11-3 ————
606-20-2 ————
—— Phenol
—— bis (2 -Chloroethy 1) Ether _
—— 2-Chlorophenol
—— 1.3-Dichlorobenzene 
.
— — 1 . 4-Dichlorobenzene
—— Benzyl Alcohol
——1 . 2-Dichlorobenzene
—— 2-Methvlphenol
—— bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether _
—— 4 -Methy Iphenol
—— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine __
—— Hexachloroethane
—— Nitrobenzene
—— Isophorone
—— 2-Nitrophenol
—— 2 . 4-Dimethylohenol
—— Benzoic Acid
—— bis ( 2-Chloroethoxy ) Methane __
—— 2 . 4-Dichlorophenol
—— 1 . 2 f 4-Trichlorobenzene
——Naphthalene
—— 4-Chloroaniline
—— Hexachlorobutadiene
—— 4 -Chloro-3 -Methy Iphenol
• —— 2-Methylnaphthalene
• —— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ___
—— 2 . 4 . 6-Trichlorophenol
• —— 2 , 4 . 5-Trichlorophenol
• —— 2-Chloronaphthalene
• —— 2-Nitroaniline
• —— Dimethyl Phthalate
• —— Acenaphthy 1 ene
• —— 2 . 6-Dinitrotoluene
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
SPMPL £ DP TP ~PPCKPGE
1/87 Rev.
TUT 
001 
055
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample vrt/vol: 
IQQQ 
(g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/M) H_ 
pH: ___
SBLK90
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS NO.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: SBLK9Q
Lab File ID: 
GJ066751A06
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: Q6/12/B9
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline_________
83-32-9 ——————Acenaphthene___________
51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________
132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________
121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_
86-73-7--—•———Fluorene______________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________
534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
86-30-6——————N-Nitro-odiphenylamine (1)_
101-55-3—————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1——-——Hexachlorobenzene_______
87-86-5——————Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8——•———Phenanthrene__________
120-12 -7—————Anthracene____________
84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_____
206-44 -0—————Fluoranthene________________
129-00-0——————Pyrene________________
85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate____
91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine_____
56-55-3——————Benzo (a) Anthracene______
218-01-9—————Chrysene_____________
117-81-7—————bis(2-Bthylhexyl)Phthalate.
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____
205-99-2——--——Benzo (b) Fluoranthene______
207-08-9—————Benzo(k) Fluoranthene____
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________
193-39-5—————Indeno( 1,2,3-cd) Pyrene_____
53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene___
191-24-2——————Benzo (g,h, i) Perylene_____
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
SO
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
5PMPLE DQTP PPCKPGE
TUT
OO1 
0553
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab N<
: COMPUCHEM LABS
SBLK99
Lab Code: COMPO 
Case Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
IQQQ 
(g/mL)
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/H) H_ 
pH: ___
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SIX! No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: SBLK99____
Lab File ID: 
CHQ66857A06
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: Q6/13/89
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: l^JJ____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2——————Phenol_________________
111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether___
95-57-8——————2-Chlorophenol__________
541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_______
106-46-7——————1,4-Dichlorobenzene_______
100-51-6——————Benzyl Alcohol___________
95-50-1————-1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______
95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol___________
39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_
106-44-5——————4-Methylphenol___________
621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine_
67-72-1——————Hexachloroethane________
98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene____________
78-59-1———-———Isophorone________________
88-75-5———————2-Nitrophenol____________
105-67-9—————2,4-Dimethylphenol_______
65-85-0———————Benzoic Acid____________
111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__
120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______
120-82-1——————1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____
91-20-3——————Naphthalene___________________
106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline_________
87-68-3 ——•———Hexachl orobutadiene___'
59-50-7——————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___
91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene______
77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__
88-06-2———————2,4,6-TrichloroDhenol
95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____
91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthalene______
88-74-4——————2-Nitroaniline__________
131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate_______
208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene_________
606-20-2——————2,6-Dinitrotoluene_______
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
- V*^-1-'-"
SBMPLE DffTP
• =;*»•:.: - 
- 
•- 
-• 
~ .'
~ 
v:,;.,-;—^ - :"•-. --. -*L'-. '- - 
-
TUT O01 O554
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COKPUCHEM LABS__________
Lab Code: COMPP 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(lov/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/H) H_ 
pH: ___
SBLK99
Contract: 68-09-0033
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: SBLK99_____
Lab File ID: 
GH066857A06
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/13/89
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline___________________
83-32-9———————Acenaphthene___________
51-28-5——————2,4-Dinitrophenol_______
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________
132-64-9————--Dibenzofuran_______________
121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2——————Diethylphthalate_________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7———————Fluorene_______________
100-01-6—————4-Nitroaniline_________
534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylanine (1)_
101-55-3—————4-Broaophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_________
87-86-5———-—-Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________
120-12-7—————Anthracene________________
84-74-2———————Di-n-Butylphthalate______
206-44-0—————Fluoranthene__________
129-00-0—————Pyrene___________________
85-68-7——————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1———————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3——•———Benzo (a) Anthracene________
218-01-9—————Chrysene_____________
117-81-7—————bis (2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate____
205-99-2—————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene____
207-08-9——————Benzo (k) Fluoranthene_______
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________
193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3 -cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene_____
191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene____
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rev.
TUT OO1 O555
'^^^^.••:,^&^iSR^
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO
Lab Nan«: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: CQMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
1000 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(lov/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) H_ 
pH: ___
BY768
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
267129
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
GH067129B16
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: Q6/1S/89
Dilution Factor: i.o
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2 —————— Phenol
111-44-4 ————— bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether
95-57-8 ——————— 2-Chlorophenol . . .
541-73-1 —————— 1. 3-Dichlorobenzene
95-48-7 ——————— 2-M.thYlph.no! .
39638-32-9 ———— bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
106-44-5 —————— 4-Methylphenol ..
621-64-7 ————— N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylanine
98-95-3 ——————— Nitrobenzene „ . , ...
78-59-1 ——————— Isophorone , ,._, ,.. . _ „.
88-75-5 ——————— 2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9 ——————— 2 
P 4-Dinethylphenol
65-85-0 ——————— Benzoic Acid
111-91-1 ————— bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane
120-83-2 ——————— 2r4-Dichlorophenol „.,._ _.. ,.,
120-82-1 ——————— 1 f 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzene
91-20-3 ——————— Naphthalene _ . . . .. .
106-47-8 ——————— 4-Chloroaniline ,,. 
. ..
87-68-3 —————— >Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7 ——————— 4-Ghloro-3-Methylphenol
77-47-4 —————— Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2 ——————— 2f4f6-Trichlorophenol_. . .....
95-95-4 ——————— 2r4r5-Trlchlorophenol .. __ _., .
91-58-7—— — —— -2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4 ——————— 2-Nitroanil ine
131-11-3 ——————— Di-M.thyl Ph thai at. 
_ , ._,. _ .,
606-20-2 ——————— 2,6-Dinitrotoluene... _ 
__.,,,.
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu*#T
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rex
SOMPLE DPT0 POCKQBE
.-. - ".:"•*•---
001 0556
979
I;;-.;*'
i~--
^"IS
: _i^-:?:*'&•'''"'- - .-'•--.".''•"
: r^-;..-.:'•:••.•.•.}.;- 
•••••••«•?•:•>= --.-
1A
V
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
s.Q (g/mL)
Level: 
(low/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY768
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 267129
Lab File ID: 
CN067129B12
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
74-87-3——————Chloromethane___________
74-83-9——————Broaomethane____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride____________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1——————Acetone________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroe thane________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3——————Chloroform____________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane__________
78-93-3———————2-Butanone________________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____
56-23-5—•————-Carbon Tetrachloride_____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4—————-Bromod ichl orome thane_________
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene___
79-01-6 ——————Tr ichloroethene_________
124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane_______
79-00-5—————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2——————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6——•—Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bromoforn__________________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_________________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3—————Toluene_________________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4 —————Ethylbenzene_______________
100-42-5—————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes___________
10
10
10
10
3
16
21
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
BJ
u
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
'
. 
. 
.
SAMPLE DPTP PBCKBGE
- 
- 
-
OO1 
0557
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.Q (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/ned) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY767
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG NO.: BX26Q
Lab Sample ID: ;____1__2_____
Lab File ID: 
CN067132B12
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 
Q
74-87-3——————Chloromethane___________
74-83-9-——————Bromomethane____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride__________
75-00-3———————Chl or oe thane____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1———————Acetone________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3—•—•——Chloroform_____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
78-93-3——————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4———————Bromodichlorome thane______
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5-———cis-1,3-Dichloropropene___
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_________
124-48-1——————Dibronochloromethane_______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_____
71-43-2——————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bromofona_____________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_____________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5—————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_____________
FORM I VOA
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Ua
U
U
U
U
1/87 Rev.
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Coda: COMPU 
Cas« No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(lov/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
BY766
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: 267131______
Lab File ID: 
CNQ67131B12
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: l.Q_____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
74-87-3——————Chl or ome thane__________
74-83-9-——————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_____________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform___________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23 -5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4———————Bromodichlorome thane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1————— Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——-———1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2——————Benzene______________
10061-02-6—•——Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75—25—2——————Broaoform
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone________
591-78 -6——————2 -Rexanone____________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3—————Toluene______________
108-90-7-—————Chlorobenzene_________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————styrene__________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
101
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
BJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SPMPLE DPTR
TUT 
001 
0559
IB
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
IQQQ 
(g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(lov/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) H__ 
pH: ___
SBLK07
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: _____ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: SBLK07_______
Lab Pile ID: 
GJ067163C16
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/16/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2——————Phenol__________________
111-44-4——————bis (2-Chloroethyl) Ether____
95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol___________
541-73-1—————1,3-Dichlorobenzene___________
106-46-7———~i, 4-Dichlorobenzene____________
100-51-6—————Benzyl Alcohol_________________
95-50-1——————1,2-Dichlorobenzene_______
95-48-7———————2-Methyl phenol___________
39638-32-9————bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)Ether_
106-44-5—————4-Methylphenol___________
621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-Di-n-Propylanine__
67-72-1——————Hexachloroethane_________
98-95-3——————Nitrobenzene____________
78-59-1———-——Isophorone_________________
88-75-5——————2-Nitrophenol___________
105-67-9——————2,4-Dinethylphenol________
65-85-0——————Benzoic Acid_______________
111-91-1——————bis (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane__
120-83-2——————2,4-Dichlorophenol_______
120-82-1-——-—1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene____
91-20-3——————Naphthalene____________
106-47-8—————4-Chloroaniline_________
87-68-3-——•——Hexachlorobutadiene___________
59-50-7—————4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol___
91-57-6——————2-Methylnaphthalene______
77-47-4——————Hexachlorocyclopentadiene__
88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichlorophenol________
95-95-4——————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol____
91-58-7 ~———-2-Chloronaphthalene___________
88-74-4——————2 -Nitroaniline_________
131-11-3—————Dimethyl Phthalate__________
208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene______________
606-20-2—————2,6-Dinitrotoluene___________
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
50
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I SV-1
1/87 Rev.
\ =-
SRHPLE
TUT 001 056O
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: coMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058 
SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
IQQQ 
(g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 
___ 
dec. ___
Extraction: 
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Cleanup: 
(Y/N) N._ 
pH: ____
Contract: 66-D9-QQ32
SBLK07
SDG No.: BX260
Lab sample ID: SBLKQ?
Lab File ID: 
GJ067163C16
Date Received: ______
Date Extracted: 06/14/89
Date Analyzed: 06/16/89
Dilution Factor: l.o
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2——————3-Nitroaniline_________
83-32-9———————Acenaphthene____________
51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________
100-02-7—————4-Nitrophenol__________
132-64-9—————Dibenzofuran___________
121-14-2—————2,4-Dinitrotoluene______
84-66-2———————DiethvlDhthalate _____
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_
86-73-7———•——Fluorene______________
100-01-6—————4-Hitroaniline_________
534-52-1—————4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol_
86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylanine (1)_
101-55-3—————4-Bronophenyl-phenylether_
118-74-1—————Hexachlorobenzene_______
87-86-5——————-Pentachlorophenol_______
85-01-8——————Phenanthrene__________
120-12-7——————Anthracene___________________
84-74-2——————Di-n-Butylphthalate_____
206-44-0—————Fluoranthene__________
129-00-0—————Pyrene______________
85-68-7———————Butylbenzylphthalate_____
91-94-1——————3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine___
56-55-3-—————-Benzo (a) Anthracene____ ..
218-01-9—————Chrysene_____________
117-81-7—————bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate.
117-84-0—————Di-n-Octyl Phthalate______
205-99-2——————Benzo (b) Fluoranthene
207-08-9—————Benzo(k) Fluoranthene____
50-32-8——————Benzo (a) Pyrene_________
193-39-5—————Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene___
53-70-3——————Dibenzo( a, h) Anthracene___
191-24-2—————Benzo (g,h,i)Perylene______
50
10
so
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
1/87 
Rev.
SPMPLE oara PPCKPBE
TUT OO1 0561
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 
14
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Contract: 68-D9-0032
BY774
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX2S8
Lab Sample ID: 267125____
Lab File ID: 
GHQ6712SC18
Date Received: Q6/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
74-87-3——————Chloronethane__________
74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_____________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane__________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone_______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4———.———1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3 ——-———Chloroform______________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane_________
78-93-3——•—-—2-Butanone__________________
71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane___
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-2 7-4—————-Bromodichlor one thane____
78-87-5—•————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5-———cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79_Ol-6—————-Trichloroethene________
124-48-1—————Ddbromochloromethane_____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-4 3-2———-———Benzene__________________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2-—————Bromoform____________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______
591-78 -6-——•——'2 -Hexanone_______________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene_______________
108-90-7-——-——Chlorobenzene_____________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
12
12
12
12
14
64
6
6
6
6*
6
12
6
6
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 
Rev.
sanpLE
'
•
•
r
'
'
"
'
-
' 
'
TUT
ooi
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Cod*: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.C
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 19
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY775
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258_
(g/mL)
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 267126_____
Lab File ID: 
GH067126A18
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3——————Chl or one thane____________
74-83-9——————Bromome thane____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_________
67-64-1——————Acetone______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Dimulfide_________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3——————Chloroform______________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-93-3-—•————2-Butanone_______________
71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroetharie______
56-23 -5——————Carbon Tetrachlorid«______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4-—————-Bromodichloromethane______
78-87-5--———-1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____
79-01-6 ———•——Trichloroethene__________
124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane_______
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2——————Benzene________________
10061-02-6———-Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2 ——————Bromof orm______________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________
127-18-4 ————~ Tetrachlor oethene_________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3--———-Toluene________________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene____________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________
100-42-5—————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
12
12
12
12
15
220
6
6
6
6
7
6
6
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
Uuu•H
uJuuuuuuuu
-U
FORM I VGA
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE DPTQ PBCKQBE
TUT 001 0563
-;.--..,-. *:-•
:„•.:....•$•
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS____________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) j
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 
18
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY773
Contract: 68-D9-OQ32
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX_58_
Lab Sample ID: 267124_____
Lab File ID: 
GH067124A18
Date Received: 06/12/8?
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0______
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3——————Chloromethane___________
74-83-9——————Bromomethane____________
75-01-4——————vinyl Chloride__________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1——————Acetone_______________
75-15-0-—————Carbon Disulfide____________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane_______
540-59-0—————1,2-Dlchloroethene (total)__
67-66-3——————-Chloroform______________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
78-93-3——————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane_____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate___________
75-27-4-——————Bromodichloromethane_____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_________
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene_____
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene___________
124-48-1——————>Dibromochloromethane______
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43 -2 ————•——Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene__
75-25-2—————Bromoform___________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene______________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane__
108-8 8-3 ——————Toluene_______________
108-90-7——•———Chlorobenzene___________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene______________
100-42-5—————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7————Total xylenes__________
12
12
12
12
11
130
6
6
6
6
6
6
12
6
6
12
6
6
6
6
6
6
43
6
6
12
12
6
6
8
6
4*0-
irtfT
uu
u
ut
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SRMPLE DP TO PPCKPBE
TUT OO1 0564
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE MO.
Lab Name: CQMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case Mo.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) t
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. 20
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY772
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 267123____
Lab File ID: 
GH067123A18
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3———————Chloronethane____________
74-83-9——————Bromonethane_____________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3—•———-Chloroethane_____________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1———————Acetone_________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3——————Chloroform____________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_________
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_________________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride________
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate________________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane______
78-87-5————•—-1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____
79-01-6—————'—Trichloroethene___________
124-48-1—•———Dibromochloromethane______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43 -2——————Benzene___________________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2—————-Bromofora____________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______
591-78-6——————2-Rexanone______________
127-18-4—-———Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3—————Toluene________________
108-90-7——-——-Chlorobenzene___________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________
100-42-5—————Styrene__________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________
13
13
13
13
16
230
6
6
6
6
6
9
6
6
13
6
6
6
6
6
6
60
6
6
13
13
6
6
6
6
45
6
6
uuuu
-WO*
uJuuuuuuu
v-trf
u
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SQHPLE DOT*
f L I T 
O01 
056'
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/med) MED
BY771
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
% Moisture: not dec. 18
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Lab Sample ID: 267122____
Lab File ID: 
C2R67122B23
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/18/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0___
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
74-87-3——————Chloromethane_________
74-83 -9-—————Bromomethane__________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3———•——Chloroe thane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone___________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-9 3-3———————2 -Butanone____________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5-——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6—•—•————Trichloroethene_______
12 4 - 4 8 -1—————Dibromochlor omethane____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43 -2——————Benzene_____________
10061-02-6———-Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bronoform ___________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone___________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3—————Toluene_______________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene_________
100-41-4 —————Ethylbenzene_________
100-42-5—————Styrene____________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
1500
1500
1500
1500
760
1500
760
760
760
760
760
760
1500
760
760
1500
760
760
760
760
760
760
760
760
760
1500
1500
760
760
760
760
670
760
890
Uu
UuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
DBTB PPCKOGE
TUT OO1 0566
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
12058_
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case Ho. ___
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/oL)
Level: 
(low/Bed) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 14
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY770
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: _______ 
SDG No. : BX258
Lab Sample ID: 267121____
Lab File ID: 
C2R67121A23
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/16/89
Dilution Factor: 7.1
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG
74-87-3 ——————chloromethane___________
74-83-9——————Bromonethane________________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3———•——-Chloroethane_____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1———————Acetone_________________
75-15-0——————carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3——————l,l-Dichloroethane____________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3-——•——Chloroform__________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane___________
78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______
56-23-5——————carbon Tetrachloride______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-27-4——•—•——Bromodichloromethane__________
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5————ci»-l,3-Dichloropropene______
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene_____________
124-48-1——-----Dibromochloromethane______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-4 3-2———————Benzene______________________
10061-02-6-———Tran»-l,3-Dichloropropene_____
75-25-2——————Broaoform
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_________
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone_________________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_____._____
79-34-5'——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_____
108-88-3—————Toluene______________________
108-90-7————Chlorobenzene_________________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene_________________
100-42-5—————styrene______________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________
10000
10000
10000
10000
5200
10000
5200
5200
5200
5200
5200
5200
10000
5200
5200
10000
5200
5200
5200
5200
5200
5200
2000
5200
5200
10000
10000
5200
5200
52000
5200
37000
5200
220000
Uu
UuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuJuuuuuu
u
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SAMPLE DPTf)
UT O0.1 O567
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS____________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol:
Level: 
(low/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. 16
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY765
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 267116_____
Lab File ID: 
C3R67116A23
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/19/89 
^ j
Dilution Factor: 3.3
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG 
Q
74-87-3 —————— Chloromethane ___________________
74-83-9 —————— Bromomethane ____________
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride ___________
75-00-3 —————— Chloroethane ____________
75-09-2 —————— Methylene Chloride ________
67-64-1 —————— Acetone ________________
75-15-0 —————— Carbon Disulfide _________
75-35-4 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethene ________
75-34-3 ——————— 1,1-Dichloroethane ________
540-59-0 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
67-66-3 —————— Chloroform ______________
107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane ________
78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanone ________ ; ______
71-55-6 —————— 1, 1, l-Trichloroethane ______
56-23-5 —————— Carbon Tetrachloride ______
108-05-4 ————— Vinyl Acetate __________________
75-27-4 —————— Bromodichloromethane __________
78-87-5 —————— 1 , 2-Dichloropropane _______
10061-01-5 ———— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ____
79-0 1-6 ——————— Tr ichloroe thene ___________
124-48-1 —————— Dibromochl or one thane _______
79-00-5 —————— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane ______
71-43-2———— —— Benzene ________________
10061-02-6— —— Trana-l,3-Dichloropropene ___
75-25-2 ——————— Bromofon _____________________
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_ __________
591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone _______________
127-18-4 ————— Tetrachloroethene ________
79-34-5 ——————— 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ___
108-88-3 —— • ———— Toluene ___________________
108-90-7-- — - — -Chlorobenzene _____________________
100-41-4 ————— Ethylbenzene ____________
100-42-5 ————— Styrene ________________
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenes ____________
5000
5000
5000
5000
2500
5000
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
5000
2500
2500
5000
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
2500
5000
5000
2500
2500
2500
2500
8900
2500
2200
Uu
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
UJ
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
S0HPLE DPTP PBCKOee 
TUT 
001 
O568
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Code: CQMPU 
case No.: 12QSB
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
Q.2Q (g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(lov/n«d) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY764
Contract: 68-D9-QQ32
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260_
Lab Sample ID: 267130_____
Lab File ID: 
CR067130B12
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/L
74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride__________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane__________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3—————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform_________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_________
78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4——————Bromodichlorome thane____
78-87-5--—•——1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1—————Dibromochlorome thane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___
71-43-2——————Benzene______________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2———————BroaoCorm______________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene______
79-34-5——————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3—————Toluene______________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5—————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenea__________
250
250
250
250
31
190
130
130
130
130
130
130
250
130
130
250
130
130
130
130
130
130
4400
130
130
250
250
130
130
3700
130
1700
130
4200
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuuu
u
u
f?i>-'
1 o^
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SftHPLE DPT ft
TUT 001 0569
w- :,••„»•-'':--~. ^•£>v'-1*j&Tf'
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
VBLKA2
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: VBLKA2____
Lab File ID: 
GH06B680A19
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/21/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3 ——————Chl oromethane__________;
74-83-9——————-Bromomethane______________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————-Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_______
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_____
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform___________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroe thane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4——————Bromod ichl oromethane____
78-87-5————-—1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________
124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2——————Benzene_________________
10061-02-6————Tran»-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bronofora_______________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3—————Toluene___________________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene___________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————Styrene____________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
7
30
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SPHPLE DffTff PPCKase 
TUT 001 
0570
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS___________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKAD
contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: VBLKAD_____
Lab File ID: 
CB890611A10
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/11/89
Dilution Factor: 1. Q_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3——————Chlororaethane__________
74-83 -9——————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroe thane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———————Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3 ———————2 -Butanone____________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene___________
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2———————Benzene______________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2———————Bronoform_____________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3———————Toluene________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5——————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_____________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SOHPLE DBTP POCKPeE
TUT 
001 
O57.1.
I
i
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE HO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKJL
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: VBLKJL
Lab File ID: 
CB890614B12
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 
Q
74-87-3———————Chlorome thane__________
74-83 -9 ———-——Bromomethane____________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride______•
75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1——————Acetone_______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_____
75-34-3——————1, l-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform 
_________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3——————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6———————1, l, l-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2———————Benzene 
______________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2—————-Bronoform_________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6—————2-Hexanone___________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene_____________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5——————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_______
10
10
10
10
1
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SPMPLE DBTQ PQCKReE
TUT 001 0572
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SJ.MPLE HO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML_
Level: 
(low/Bed) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKMR
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: VBLKMR
Lab File ID: 
CC890613B19
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________
74-83-9-—•—————Bromome thane____________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1———————Acetone________________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————l,l-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0-——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———————Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone______________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________
124-48-1—————-Dibromochloromethane_____
79-00-5———————1,1, 2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2———————Benzene________________
10061-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5———————l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3———————Toluene__________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5——————Styrene_________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SQMPLE OffTP PPCK06E
OO1
O
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM IABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKQ7
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: VBLKQ7_____
Lab File ID: 
GH066712C10
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________________
74-83-9——————•Bromomethane_____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane_____________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3———————Chloroform______________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_______________
71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane______
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_____________
75-27-4———————Bromodicnloromethane_______
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_____________
124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane_______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2———————Benzene______________________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2————•——Bromoforn____________________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_______
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene____-
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3——————Toluene_______________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene______________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________
100-42-5——————Styrene__________
1330-20-7—————Total Xvlenes 
________
10
10
10
10
6
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
' 5
5
5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SAMPLE DPTQ POCKBQl
TUT 
001 
0574
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE MO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code;'CQMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKPA
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: VBLKPA,_____
Lab File ID: 
CC890612C10
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/12/89
Dilution Factor: i.o___
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 
Q
74-87-3--—————•Chloromethane__________
74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone_______________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———————Chloroform_________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6——————1,1, l-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43-2———————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2——————Bromoform____________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pen tanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5——————l ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene______________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________
100-42-5——————Styrene________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VGA
1/87 Rev.
SPMPLE DPTP PPCKBBE
TUT 
001
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPOCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPP 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) j
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKP9
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: VBLKP9_____
Lab File ID: 
GH0665Q2A18
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: Q6/1Q/B9
Dilution Factor: 1.0_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG
74 -87-3 ———————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——•———Chloroethane___________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______
«7-64-l———————Acetone_______________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide___________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3———————Chloroform___________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4-—•————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6———————Tr ichloroethene__________
124-48-1——————Dlbromochl or ome thane_______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-4 3 -2———————Benzene_______________
10O61-02-6-—•——Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78 -6————-2 -Hexanone____________
127-18-4———•——Tetrachloroethene_________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene________________
108-90-7——•———Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5——————Styrene______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
6
15
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Uu
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE DPTB PBCKBQE
TUT 001 05 76
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
______ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL)
Level: 
(lov/ned) MED
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKR8
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: VBLKRS_____
Lab File ID: 
CN066B86A23
Date Received: _____
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0______
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) uc/KG
75-01-4 ——————— Vinvl Chloride
75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane
75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone. _
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaulfide _ „
75-35-4 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethene 
,„.,.. .., ,.„
75-34-3 ——————— lfl-Dichloroethane
540-59-0 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
67-66-3 ——————— Chloroform
107-06-2 —————— If2-Dichloroethane _,.,. _ ,..
78-93-3 ——————— 2 -Butanone
71-55-6 ——————— lflrl-Trichloroethane .
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride 
, ,
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate
10061-01-5 ————— ci«-lf 3-Dichloropropene _ 
.
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene
79-00-5 ——————— 1 . 1 . 2-Trichloroethane
71-43-2 ——————— Benzene
10061-02-6 ———— Tran»-l,3-Dichloropropene ___
^ |P ^ (5 «* 
VfcMlMMM V*M|W«
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone _
127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene , ..... ,
79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ___
108-88-3 —————— Toluene
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene 
, . , . . , .
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene
100-42-5 —————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylenea
1300
1300
1300
1300
440
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
630
630
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
Uu
UuJuauuua0uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuaauu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SPMPLE DffTff
TUT
O577
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Nana: COMPUCHEM LABS________
Lab Coda: COMPU 
casa No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/watar) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 
(g/mL) J
Leval: 
(low/mad) MED
% Moistura: not dac. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKR9
Contract: 68-D9-QQ32
SAS No.: _____ SDG NO.: BX25EL
Lab Sanpla ID: VBLKR9____
Lab Fila ID: 
CNQ66aa7C23
Data Racaived: ______
Data Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3 —— • ————— Chloromathana
74-83-9 ——————— Bronomethane
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chlorida
75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethana
75-09-2 ——————— Mathylena Chlorida
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaulfida
75-35-4- —— - ——— 1 . 1-Dichloroathana
75-34-3 ——————— lf 1-Dichloroathana
540-59-0 ————— i, 2-Dichloroathana (total) __
107-06-2 —————— 1 f 2-Dichloroathana
78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanona
71-55-6 ——————— lrlfl-Trichloroethane
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tatrachlorida . . ,
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acatata
78-87-5 ——————— 1.2-Dichloropropane
10061-01-5 ———— cis-l,3-Dichloropropana _
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroathana
79-00-5 ——————— 1,1,2-Trichloroethane,
71-43-2 ——————— Banzana
10061-02-6—— — —Trana-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___
75-25-2 —— • ———— Bromof orm .,
108-10-1 —————— 4-Mathyl-2-Pentanona 
. . .
591-78-6 —————— 2 -Haxanona
127-18-4 —— • ———— Tatrachloroathana
79-34-5; —————— 1 ,1,2, 2-Tatrachloroathana ___
108-88-3 —————— Toluene
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 —————— Ethylbanzane
100-42-5 —————— Styrana ,.
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xylanea
1300
1300
1300
1300
470
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
630
630
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
Uu
UuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
S0MPLE DPTff
TUT 001 0578
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_______
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) S
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
VBLKS1
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX2S8
Lab Sample ID: VBLKS1_____
Lab File ID: 
GH067175A1B
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/14/89
Dilution Factor: i.o_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9——————•Bronomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone_______________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3———————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3--—————Chloroform_____________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride_______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_____________
75-27-4——————Bronodichloromethane____
78-87-5--——-——1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-l,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1—————Dibromochlorome thane_____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-43 -2——————Benzene_______________
10061-02-6————Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2--—————Bro-oform______________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4 —————Tetrachloroethene______
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3—————Toluene_________________
108-90-7-————-Chlorobenzene____________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————Styrene_____________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________
10
10
10
10
11
10
5
5
5
5
2
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
FORM I VGA
1/87 Rev.
DOTP
001 OS79
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS_________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) {
Level: 
(low/Bed) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
Contract: 68-D9-OQ32
VBLKS2
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: VBLKS2____
Lab Pile ID: 
GH067176C18
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: JjJZ______
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9——————Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride______________
75-00-3-——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride______
67-64-1———————Acetone_____________________
75-15-0——————-Carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane___
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_________
75-27-4——————Bromodichl oromethane____
78-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6————•—-Trichloroethene_________
124-48-1—-—•——Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5——————1,1,2-Trichloroethane_____
71-43-2——————Benzene___________________
10061-02-6—•——Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2———————Bromoform___________________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene_____.
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene____________________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene__________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene______________
100-42-5——————Styrene_______________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes__________
10
10
10
10
7
27
5
5
5
5
2
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
U
U
U
UJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Uau
U
U
U
U
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SBHPLE DP TO PQCKBSE 
TUT ooi 
osso
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS______
Lab Code: COMPU 
Case No.: 120S8
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample vrt/vol: 
5.0 
(g/fflL) ML._
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
CAS HO. 
COMPOUND
VBLKSM
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX260
Lab Sample ID: VBLKSM_____
Lab File ID: 
CB890613A19
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/13/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0______
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3——————Chloromethane__________
74-83-9—————-Bromomethane___________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane___________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1——————Acetone_______________
75-15-0——————carbon Disulfide________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene______
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
67-66-3——————Chloroform__________________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone______________
71-55-6——————i, i, l-Trichloroethane____
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride____
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4——————Bromodichloromethane____
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropane_____
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene__
79-01-6——————Trichloroethene________
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane___
71-43-2——————Benzene____________
10061-02-6--——Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________
108-10-1——-———4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______
79-34-5———————1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3——————Toluene_____________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________
100-42-5—————Styrene___________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes_________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Uu
Uuuuuuuuuuuuu
uuuuu
uuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SttffPLE DPTP PQCKQBE
TU
ooj.
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM IABS________
Lab Code: COMTO 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Contract: 6B-D9-OQ32
VBLKT7
SAS No.
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: VBLKT7____
Lab Pile ID: 
CNQ6739QA23
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/16/89
Dilution Factor: l.Q_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3———————Chloromethane_____________
74-83-9——————Bromomethane____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride_______________
75-00-3--——-——Chloroethane____________________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1——————Acetone_____________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene_____________
75-34-3——————1, l-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3——————Chloroform________________________
107-06-2—————1,2-Dichloroethane____________
78-93-3———-——2-Butanone______________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_______
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_________
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate_______________
75-27-4————•——-Bromodichloromethane________
78-87-5—————— 1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5————cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene___________
124-48-1——-———Dlbromochloromethane_________
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2——————Benzene________________
10061-02-6————-Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2———————Bromoform__________________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pent anone_______
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________
127-18-4 —————Tetrachloroethene________
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3——————Toluene_______________________
108-90-7-—•———Chlorobenzene______________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________
100-42-5—————Styrene_____________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylenes____________
1300
1300
1300
1300
630
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
630
630
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
Uu
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Ua
Uau
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SPHPLE DPTP PBCKfteE~ TUT
OOi 
0582
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: COMPUCHEM LABS;________
Lab Cod«: COMPU 
case No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(lov/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Contract: 68-D9-0032
VBLKT8
SAS No.:
SDG No.: BX2S_8_
Lab Sample ID: VBLKT8____
Lab File ID: 
CN067391B23
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/18/89
Dilution Factor: l.o___
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-87-3-——————Chloronethane____________
74-83-9———————Bronomethane_____________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3——————Chloroethane_____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride__________
67-64-1——————Acetone___________________
75-15-0——————Carbon Disulfide_________
75-35-4——————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3—————Chloroform______________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_______________
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______
108-05-4—————Vinyl Acetate___________
75-27-4--—————Bromodichloromethane______
78-87-5-——•———1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10061-01-5———-cia-l,3-Dichloroprop«n«____
79-01-6-—•———Tr ichloroethene__________
124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane_______
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2——————Benzene________________
10061-02-6——-—"Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene___
75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________________________
108-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_______________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene________
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
108-88-3——————Toluene_________________
108-90-7—————Chlorobenzene____________
100-41-4—————Ethylbenzene____________
100-42-5——————Styrene_________________
1330-20-7—————Total xylenes______________
1300
1300
1300
1300
630
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
630
630
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
Uu
Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
._.SAMPLE t>ara
TUT 
001 058:
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: CQMPOCHEM LABS________
Lab Code: COMPU 
Gas* No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4.0 (g/mL) J
Level: 
(low/med) MED
% Moisture: not dec. ___
ColuBiir 
(pack/cap) 
CAP
VBLKZ6
Contract: 68-D9-0032
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: VBLKZq____
Lab Pile ID: 
C2R68295C23
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed: 06/21/89
Dilution Factor: l.o___
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
74-a 7-3 —————Chl oroaethane_______
74 -B 3 -9————-—»Bromomethane______________
75-01-4——————Vinyl Chloride___________
75 -0 0 - 3 ——————Chloroethane_____________
75-09-2——————Methylene Chloride________
67-64-1———————Acetone_________________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide__________
75-35-4——•————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3——————1,1-Dichloroethane________
5*0-59-0——r———1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
67-66-3 ——————•Chloroform____________________
1O7-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane________
78-93-3———————2-Butanone_______________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane______
56-23-5——————Carbon Tetrachloride______
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate____________
75-2 7 -4——————Bromodichloromethane_______
73-87-5——————1,2-Dichloropropane_______
10O61-01-5-—•——-cis-1,3-Dichloropropene____
79—01-6———————Trichloroethene___________
124-48-1—————Dibromochloromethane___________
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane______
71-43-2——————Benzene_________________
10O61-02-6————Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene___
75 —2 5—2 ——>—>———Bromo form
1O8-10-1—————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone______
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone______________
127-18-4—————Tetrachloroethene________
7»-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane___
1O8-88-3——————Toluene___________________________
1O8-90-7—————Chlorobenzene___________
1OO-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_____________
10O-42-5—————Styrene______________________
1330-20-7—————Total Xylanes____________
1300
1300
1300
1300
350
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
630
630
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
1300
1300
630
630
630
630
630
630
630
Uu
UuJuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SPHPLE DBT0 PPCKQBE
TUT 001
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Nan«: COMPUCHEM LABS
Lab Coda: COMPU 
Casa No.: 12058
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample vt/vol: 
5.0 (g/mL) j
Level: 
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec. _12.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
BY769
Contract: 68-D9-OQ32
SAS No.: ______ 
SDG No.: BX258
Lab Sample ID: 267120____
Lab File ID: 
GH067120C18
Date Received: 06/12/89
Date Analyzed: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
GAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/KG
75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride
75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 ——————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Diaulfida ... _
75-35-4 ——————— lfl-Dichloroethene . _
75-34-3 ——————— 1.1-Dichloroethane . ,,. . ,
S40-59-0 ————— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __
67-66-3 ——————— Chloroform , , , ,
1O7-06-2 —————— 1 f 2-Dichloroethane
78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanona
71-55-6 ——————— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
S«-2 3 -5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4——- ———— Bromodichloromethane
78-87-5 ——————— 1 . 2-Dichloropropane
J.0061-01-5-- —— ~cis-l 1 3-Dichloropropene
79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene
124-48-1 —————— Dibromochl orome thane . _ _
79-00-5 ——————— 1. lr 2-Trichloroethane
10061-02-6 ———— Trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene ___
75— 2 5-2 — •—— —— -Bromof orm
lt»-10-l —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
KOt • 7a«4hM«.._«...^_tfA'Kr**mnA
127-18-4 —————— Tetrachloroethene
79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane ___
1M-88-3 —————— Toluene
108-90-7 — - — •—— Chlorobenzene
1OO-41-4 —————— Ethylbenzene
100-42-5 ————— Styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Total Xvlenes
11
11
11
11
48
60
6
6
6
6
6 -2-
6
11
6
6
11
6
6
6
6
6
6
21
6
6
11
11
66
256
130
6
280
Uu
utri/<r
B*
B-tfT
U
U
U
U
BS-U.
U
U
U
Uuuuuuuu
uuuu
•H- UT
u
u
u1
FORM I VOA
1/87 Rev.
SBMPLE
TUT 
OO1 
0585
1C
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE 80.
BY768
Lab Nama: COMPCCHEM IABS________ 
Contract: 68-D9-0032
Lab Coda: CQMPP 
Caaa No.: 12058 
SAS No.: _____ SDG No.: BX26Q
Matrix: (soil/watar) WATER
Sanpla wt/vol: 
looo 
(g/nL) Ml.
Laval: 
(low/nad) LOW
% Moistura: not dac. ___ 
dac. ___
Extraction: 
(SapP/Cont/Sonc) 
SEPF
GPC Claanup: (Y/H) M_ 
pH: ____
Lab Sanpla ID: 2*7129_____
Lab Fila ID: 
CHO67129B16
Data Racaivad: Q6/12/89
Data Extracted: 06/14/89
Data Analyzad: 06/15/89
Dilution Factor: 1.0
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2 ——————— 3 -Nltroanil ina
51-28-5 ——————— 2,4-Dinitrophanol _ . __
100-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophanol ,
132-64-9 ——————— Dibanzofuran
121-14-2 ——————— 2r4-DinitrotoluaM .... ,..._
84-66-2 ——————— Diathylphthalata
86-73-7 - ——— —— Fluorana
100-01-6 —————— 4-Nitroanilina , .
534-52-1 ————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-Mathylphanol __
86-30-6 —————— H-Nitroaodiphanylaaina ( 1) __
101-55-3 ————— 4 -Bronophany 1 -phany lathar __
118-74-1 ————— -Haxachlorobanzana
120-12-7 —————— Anthracana
84-74-2 ——————— Di-n-Butylphthalata
206-44 -0 —————— Fluoranthana
129-00-0 —————— Pyrana
85-68-7 ——————— Butylbanzylphthalata ,
91-94-1 ——————— 3r3'-Dichlorobanzidina
56-55-3-- ————— Banzo (a ) Anthracana ,,. _„ _
218-01-9 —————— Chryaana
117-81-7 ————— bis (2-Ethylhaxyl) Phthalata __
117-84-0 —————— Dl-n-Octyl Phthalata
205-99-2-- — —— -Banzo (b) Fluoranthana _ , _ _ ..
207-08-9 —————— Banzo (k) Fluoranthana _ _ .
50-32-8 ——————— Banzo(a)Pyrana _
193-39-5 ——————— Indano ( 1 , 2 r 3-cd> Pyrana.
53-70-3 ——————— Dibanzo (a rh) Anthracana
191-24-2 —————— Banzo(qrhr i) Parylana
1) - Cannot ba aaparatad froa Diphanylamina
50
10
50
50
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
3
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
- . -
auuuuu4h^T
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu^7
uuuuuuu
FORM I SV-2
1/87 Rav.
SPHPLE DffTP PBCKOBE
'.^^«-i,-..
,^y*§£££-'--.'- :-.-
II
I
I
I
REFERENCE NO. 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
TUT 
OOi 
O587
CL.J Federal Programs Coi ^ration
March 31, 1989
Ms. Caroline Kwan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
Project:
Document No:
Subject:
EPA Contract No: 68-01-7331
T648-C02-EP-CZUU-1
CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of
the 104(e) Letter Response Sampling
Tutu Wellfield Area
Work Assignment 648
Dear Ms. Kwan,
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the balance of the
CLP analysis results for the 104(e) letter response samples collected
in the Tutu Wellfield Area, St Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands from
September 8 through September 15, 1988. The results of three samples,
two which were collected at the Tutu Esso Service Station and one at
the Tutu Texaco Service Station, were submitted to you in a report
dated March 30, 1989. The identification and location of all other
104(e) letter response samples are given below:
Sample Number
e-01
e-02
e-03
e-04
eR-07s
eR-08s
eC-09s
eC-lOs
eC-lla
eC-12a
eC-13a
eTT-14
eTT-15
eT-Olw
eT-02s
eT-02sd
eT-03t
648 WB
Sample Location
O'Henry Cleaners
Ramsay Motor Center
trip blank
field blank
Ramsay Motor Center
Ramsay Motor Center
Consolidated Auto Parts
Consolidated Auto Parts
Consolidated Auto Parts
field blank
trip blank
Tillet Gardens
Tillet Gardens
Texaco Service Station (cistern)
Texaco Service' Station
Texaco Service Station (duplicate)
trip blank
Water blank
Sample Matrix
Soil 
*^ 
.,
Groundwater \s
DI water
DI water
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Surface water
DI water
DI water
Soil
Soil
Water
Soil
Soil
DI water
DI water
WP12/12
40 React Sum. 10th Floor New Yak, NY 10006 2U39M634
TUT 
001 
0588
'CDM 
Federal Programs Corporation
Ms. Rwan
Page 2
In the attached table we have taken the liberty to limit tht list of
compounds to include benzenes, substituted benzenes, chlorinated
hydrocarbons, toluene, xylene and any other organic compounds found
above detection liaits. These compounds (BTBC and chlorinated
hydrocarbons) were identified as groundwater contaminants in past EPA
sampling events conducted in the Tutu Wellfield Area.
Should you have any questions regarding these data, please do not
hesitate to call me at (212) 393-9634.
Sincerely,
CDH Federal Programs Corporation
Grater
III Regional Manager
Attachment
cc: Joe Claypoole
NYC File
Document Control
WP12/12
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DUTECitU IN 104(e) LETTER RESPONSE SAMPLES
TUTU HELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS____________________e-01 
e-02 
e-03 
e-04
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 
3J
ACETONE 
16J
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM 
9 
9
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 
6 
7
DIBROMOCHLCRCMETHANE 
9 
9J
BROMOFORM 
9 
9
4-METHYL-2-PENTANCNE
2-HEXANCNE
TOLUENE
XYLENE
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE
TETRACHLOROETHANE 
440,000 
11
TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANONE (A Cn)
HEXANE
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (methyl ester)
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
3 METHYLPENTANE
2 ETHYLPENTANE
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
( all values reported in UG/KG )
TL|T 
001 0590
TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN 104(e) LETTER RESPONSE SAMPLES • /<(/<>
TUTU HELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS 
D.Q'** 
/• _*
,**& 
- '
COMPOUNDS____________________eR-07s 
eR-08s 
eC-09s 
eC-lOs
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON pISULTIDE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
BROMOPORM
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 
8 
33J
2-HEXANONE 
55
2 
560J 
1300
1 
7 
'-a$PO - 
5600
6 
^^ 
4J
18 
-tino 2100
6
2 BUTANONE
TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE 
70JN 
10JN
2 METHOXy 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 
100JN 
50JN
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANQNE (A Cn)
HEXANE
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (methyl ester)
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
3 METHYLPENTANE
2 ETHYLPENTANE
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
( all values reported in UG/KG )
TUT OOl 0591
TABLE 1 (continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN 104(e) LETTER RESPONSE SAMPLES
TUTU WELLFIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS____________________eC-lla 
eC-12af eTT-14 
eTT-15
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE 
4J
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM 
7
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 
6
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 
8
BROMOFORM 
9
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
2-HEXANONE
TOLUENE 
10
XYLENE 
13 
11J
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE 
3
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE 
20JN
2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE 
10JN
PENTANONE (A Cn) 
10JN
HEXANE 
6 ON
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 
300JN 
200OJN
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 
1000JN 
3000JN
ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 
30JN
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
3 METHYLPENTANE 
20JN
2 ETHYLPENTANE
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
( all values reported in UG/KG )
T'UT OO1 O592
l (continued) 
j
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN 104(e) LETTER RESPONSE SAMPLES
TUTU WELLTIELD AREA, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS___________;__________eT-Olw 
eT-03t 
648 KB
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 
1J
ACETONE 
17 
5J
CARBON DISULFIDE 
2J
CHLOROFORM 
9 
8
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 
2J
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 
6
DIBROMOGHLOftOHETHANE 
9 
8
BROMOFORM 
8 
10
4-METRYL-2-PENTANONE
2-HEXANONE
TOLUENE
XYLENE
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE
TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANONE (A Cn)
HEXANE 
___
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETRYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (nethyl ester)
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
3 METHYLPENTANE
2 ETHYLPENTANE
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
( all values reported in UG/KG )
TUT 001 0593
t?6SO 
TOO 1(1.1
(OiOJL)
I saoiow
i 
- 
AVSWVU.
••'•"'&-&' *'--«}.u5-.'.*-
••:4&3s?i§te
::$SK$g%£?
.»
^.v.::.;:.^\':v •,.
-- .*f .
.u-^r TUT
3)m
Tlm9
mzom
#•••£
•Of- 
'
: ••&>••
CLJI Federal Programs Corporation
March 31, 1989
Ms. Caroline Rwan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10276
Project: 
EPA Contract No: 68-01-7331
Document No: T648-C02-LR-DBXF-1
Subject: 
CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of the
Tutu Texaco Service Station Tank Excavation
Tutu Wellfield Area, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Dear Ms. Rwan,
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the CLP analysis
results for the split samples collected during the Tutu Texaco Service
Station tank excavation in the Tutu Wellfield Area, St Thomas, U.S.
Virgin Islands from September 12 through September 15, 1988.
in the attached table we have taken the liberty to limit the list of
compounds to include benzenes, substituted benzenes, chlorinated
hydrocarbons, toluene, xylene and any other organic compounds found
above detection limits. These compounds (BTEX and chlorinated
hydrocarbons) were identified as groundwater contaminants in past EPA
sampling events conducted in the Tutu Wellfield Area. The
nomenclature of the samples listed in the above referenced table
reflect the sample locations as follows:
o Samples with the prefix "EX" were collected from the excavation pit.
o Samples with the prefix "TP" were collected from the test holes located
at the pit perimeter,
o Samples with the prefix "PW were collected from the water pumped from
the pit.
o Samples with the prefix "SP" were collected from the soil piles.
Should you have any questions regarding these data, please do not hesitate to
call me at (212) 393-9634.
Sincerely,
COM Federal Programs Corporation
Graberf/
TES III Regional Manager
Attachment
cc: 
NYC File
Document Control
———————————————~——— TUT 
(">("> t 
O597
« Rector Socet, 10th Floor New YoA, NY 10006 212 39W634
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION
TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA,
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS 
TP-01 
TP-02 
TP-03 
TFB-011
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE 
18000BJ 
5J
CARBON pISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM 
13J
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 
6
BROHODICHLOROMETHANE
DIBROMOCHLQROMETHANE
BROMOFORf
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 
-2700
2-HEXANONE 
14000J
TOLUENE 
4800 
13J
XYLENE 
-45000 
22000
BENZENE 
• 1400 
87J
ETHYLBENZENE 
5000 
13000 170J
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE 
2300J 
6J
TETRACHLOROETHANE
TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
2 METBOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE 
600JN
2 METHYLHEXANE 
2000JN
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANONE (A Cn)
HEXANE
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (methyl ester)
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
2 METHYLETHYLBENZENE 
6000JN
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
1 - denotes field blank
2 - denotes trip blank
- denotes duplicate sample
( all values reported in UG/KG )
TUT
001 0598
I
TABLE 1 (continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION
TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA,
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS 
EX-01 
EX-02 
EX-03 
EX-03d3
I
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
I
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 
10
I
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
BROMOFORM
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE 
6200J 
49000J 
30000J
I 
2-HEXANONE 
24000J
I 
TOLUENE 
14000J 
"*900 
3600 
11000
XYLENE 
31000J 
56000 8100 25000
1
BENZENE 
1200J 
4600 
280J
ETHYLBENZENE 
16000J 
59000 
<4000 
11000
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE 
2600J
TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANONE (A Cn)
HEXANE
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (methyl ester)
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
2 METHYLPENTANE 
5000JN
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
1 - denotes field blank
2 - denotes trip blank
3 - denotes duplicate sample
( all values reported in UG/KG )
TUT OO.1 0599
TABLE.1 (continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION
TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA,
ST. TBCMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS______________________TFB-021 
EX-04 
TFB-031 
PW-02
METHYLENE CHLORIDE 
4J
ACETONE 
5J 
13
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
BROMOOICHLOROMETHANE
DIBRONOCHLOROKETHANE
BROnOFORH
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
2-HEXANONE
TOLUENE 
280J
XYLENE 
10 
2000B 
2J
BENZENE 
24J
ETHYLBENZENE 
34B 
1400
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE
TETRACHLOROETHANE
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANONE (A On)
HEXANE
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (methyl ester)
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
2 METHYLPENTANE
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
1 - denotes field blank
- denotes trip blank
- denotes duplicate sample
( all values reported in UG/KG )
UT °°i 0600
I
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABU 1 (continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION
TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA,
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS 
SP-1T SP-2T 
SP-3T 
SP-3DT3
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
DIBRCMOCHLOROMETHANE
BROMOFORM
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
2-HEXANONE 
17000J 
7000
TOLUENE 
670J
XYLENE 
720J 
720J 
5600 1900
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE 
-*90 
'920 
. 3200 
1400
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE
TETRACHLOROETHANE
TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANCNE
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANONE (A On)
HEXANE
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (methyl ester)
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
2 METHYLPENTANE
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
- denotes field blank
- denotes trip blank
- denotes duplicate sample
( all values reported in UG/KG )
TUT 00.1 
0601
(continued)
ORGANIC CONFOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION
TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA,
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
CONFOUNDS_______________________SP-2M 
SP-3DK3 
SP-4T2 
SP-FB-59*
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE 
4500J 
12
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 
2 J
BROKODICHLOROHETHANE
DIBRONOCHLOROHETHANE
BRONOFORM
4-HETHYL-2-PENTANONE
2-HEXANONE 
7900J 
12000J
TOLUENE 
520J 
280J 
240J
XYLENE 
1700 
1300 1900
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE 
1400 
1700 
M300
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE
TETRACHLOROETHANE
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED CONFOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
2 NETHQXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANONE (A Cn)
HEXANE
2 ETHYL-1,3 DINETHYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DINETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (methyl ester) 
4000JN
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
2 HETHYLPENTANE
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
1 - denotes field blank
2 - denotes trip blank
3 - denotes duplicate sample
( all values reported in UG/KG )
TUT urn 0602
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1 (continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN TUTU TEXACO SERVICE STATION
TANK EXCAVATION SPLIT SAMPLES, TUTU WELLFIELD AREA,
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS_______________________SP-T-602 
SP-T-61* 
648-MB
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE 
10 
26J 
5J
CARBON DISULFIDE
CHLOROFORM ___ 
8
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 
2J
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 
6
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 
6
BROMOPORM 
10
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
2-HEXANONE
TOLUENE
XYLENE
ETHYLBENZENE
STYRENE
2 BUTANONE
TETRACHLOROETHANE
TENTATIVELY IDENTAFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
2 METHOXY 2,4,4 TRIPENTANONE
2 METHYLHEXANE
2 METHYLBUTANE
PENTANONE (A Cn)
HEXANE
2 ETHYL-1,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1 ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
ACETIC ACID (nethy1 ester)
1,4 DIETHYLBENZENE
2 METHYLPENTANE
J - Estimated value
N - Presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
- denotes field blank
2 - denotes trip blank
- denotes duplicate sample
( all values reported in UG/KG )
(water blank)
TUT
1/090 
TOO mi
I
J
J
~]
1
I
.11 'ON 30N3d3d3b 
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
COM Federal Programs Corporation
February 2, 1990
Ms. Caroline Kvan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
Nev York, Nev York 10278
Project: 
EPA Contract No:68-V9-0002
Document No: 
TES V - C02048 - LR - BHVG
Subject: 
Work Assignment C02048
CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary of Oils
from the Tutu Texaco Station, Tutu Esso Station,
Ramsay Motor Center, and Consolidated Auto Parts,
Tutu Vellfield Area, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Dear Ms. Kvan,
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the CLP analysis results
for volatile organic compounds in 12 oils collected on July 8, 1989, during
the resampling of 104(e) sites in the Tutu Vellfield Area, St. Thomas, U.S.
Virgin Islands.
Table 1 lists the compounds found above detection limits, including
benzenes, substituted benzenes, chlorinated hydrocarbons, toluene, xylene
and other organic compounds. However, detection limits for a given
compound are not constant, but increase vith increasing cample dilution.
Some of the analyzed samples were heavily diluted; they nay contain
undetected compounds that would have been discovered at a lover dilution
factor vhere their detection limits would have been lover. To show you
which samples may contain undetected compounds, a list of sample dilution
factors used for each sample and detection limits for all analyzed
compounds at those dilutions is included as Table 2.
The prefixes of the samples listed reflect the sample locations as follows:
o eR - Ramsay Motor Center
o eT - Tutu Texaco Station
o eC - Consolidated Auto Parts
o eE - Tutu Esso Station
Volatile holding times are often used for litigation support. They are set
primarily to minimize compound losses due to volatization and
biodegradation. These processes generally result in reduction of the
compound concentration. Thus, although holding times were exceeded in all
cases, causing the values to be qualified as estimates (J), these numbers
can be conservatively regarded as minimum values.
-1- o
.IOth Floor New Yo*. NY W006 2I2S9W634 
riJT 
w± 
0605
CDM Fedenl Programs Corporation
Tvo samples, eT-02-03a and eC-Q2-01a, vere mistakenly analyzed as vater by
the lab. Consequently, almost all data from these Maples vere rejected
(R).
All values for tentatively identified compounds are qualified vith the
letter N (presumptive evidence of the presence of the Mterial). This
merely reflects the fact that the compound identification vas tentative.
The analyses show detectable levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons in sample
eT-02-6af collected from the Tutu Texaco station and in eE-02-Ola, -02a,
and -03a, from the Tutu Esso station.
Should you have any questions regarding these data, please do not hesitate
to call me or Sally Odland at (212) 393-9634.
Sincerely,
COM federal Programs Corporation
Scott Grat
TES V Regional Manager
TUT OO1 O606
s
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS
SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
(ug/k«)
COMPOUNDS_______________eR-02-Ola____eT-02-Ola_____«T-02-02a
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
2-HEXANONE 
180,000 J
TOLUENE 
450,000 J 
340,000 J 
76,000 J
XYLENE 
1,200,000 J 
1,600,000 J 
190,000 J
BENZENE 
64,000 J 
7,000 J
ETHYLBENZENE 
130,000 J 
190,000 J 
35,000 J
TETRACHLOROETHENE
1,1,1-TRICHLORETHANE
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE 
120,000 JN
l-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE
2-METHYLBUTANE 
68,000 JN
2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE 
23,000 JN
3-METHYLPENTANE
METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE 
- 
37,000 JN
HEXANE (DOT)
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHOX7-2-METBYLPROPANE
J- estimated value
N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
-3- erfi,
' 
IUT OO1 0607
TABLE 1 (Continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS
SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
2-HEXANONE
TOLUENE
XYLENE
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
1,1, 1-TR1CHLORETHANE
(ug/kg)
eT-02-03a*
2,400 J
300 J
,
eT-02-04a
59,000 J
490,000 J
900,000 J
46,000 J
140,000 J
eT-02-05a
130,000 J
330,000 J
11,000 J
49,000 J
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
l-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYL-BENZENE
1,2,3-TRIHETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE
2-METHYLBUTANE
2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE
3-METHYLPENTANE
METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE
HEXANE (DOT)
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHOXY-2-METHYLPROPANE
57,000 JN
33,000 JN
31,000 JN
6,600 JN
8,000 JN
J- estimated value
N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
*Sample mistakenly analyzed as vater. All other values are flagged as "R"
(rejected).
-4-
TUT 001 06O3
I
I
TABLE 1 (Continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS
SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
COMPOUNDS
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
2-HEXANONE
TOLUENE
XYLENE
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
1,1, 1-TRICHLORETHANE
(ug/kg)
eT-02-06a
110,000 J
88,000 J
4,000 J
61,000 J
3,900 J
eT-02-07a
3,800 J
24,000 J
120,000 J
13,000 J
eC-02-Ola*
13 J
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
l-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE 
5,400 JN
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 
55,000 JN
1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE
2-METHYLBUTANE
2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE
3-METHYLPENTANE
METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE
HEXANE (DOT)
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHOXY-2-METHYLPROPANE
J- estinated value
N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
-5- ^ 0Q
•UT 
OOl 0609
I
TABLE 1 (Continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS
SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
(ug/kg) .
COMPOUNDS_______________eE-02-Ola____«E-02-02a____eE-02-03a
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
2-HEXANONE
TOLUENE 
91,000 J 
57,000 J 
92,000 J
XYLENE 
28,000 J 
150,000 J 
230,000 J
BENZENE 
12,000 J
ETHYLBENZENE 
32,000 J 
19,000 J
TETRACHLOROETHENE 
30,000 J 
63,000 J 
91,000 J
1,1,1-TRICHLORETHANE 
25,000 J 
42,000 J
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
' 
PROPYLBENZENE
1-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
I 
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 
140,000 JN
' 
1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE 
16,000 JN
2-METHYLBUTANE
> 
2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE
3-METHYLPENTANE 
7,900 JN
METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE
HEXANE (DOT)
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHOXY-2-METHYLPROPANE 
25,000 JN
J- estimated value
N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
* Sample mistakenly analyzed as vater. All other values are flagged as "R"
(rejected).
-6- f
TUT 001 O610
TABLE 1 (Continued)
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN OILS
SECOND ROUND OF 104(E) SAMPLING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
(ug/k£)
COMPOUNDS 
eE-02-03a
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
2-HEXANONE
TOLUENE 
92,000 J
XYLENE 
230,000 J
BENZENE
ETHYLBENZENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE 
91,000 J
1,1,1-TRICHLORETHANE
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PROPYLBENZENE
1-ETHYL-2,3 DIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,3-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
1,2,4 TRIMETHYLBENZENE
2-METHYLBUTANE
2,3-DIMETHYLBUTANE
3-METHYLPENTANE
METHYL-CYCLOPENTANE
HEXANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHOXY-2-METHYLPROPANE
J- estimated value
N- presumptive evidence of the presence of the material
-7-
IT IT 001 0611
TABLE 2
DETECTION LIMITS FOR VARIOUS VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
AT DIFFERENT DILUTION LEVELS
Sanple dilutions were as follows:
Sample
eR-02-Ola
eT-02-Ola
«T-02-02a
eT-02-04a
eT-02-05a
Dilution
55x
50x
lOx
40x
20x
Sample
eT-02-06a
eT-02-07a
eE-02-Ola
eE-02-02a
eE-02-03a
Dilution
TSx
lOx
lOx
lOx
200x
Samples eT-02-03a and eC-02-Ola vere mistakenly analyzed as vaters.
Results were rejected. Dilution rates are irrelevant.
Detection limits for the analyzed VOCs at the relevant dilutions fall into
three groups:
Dilution Factor (UC/KG)
Compounds 
200x 
50x 
40x 
20x 
lOx
Group i 
17300,000 
US,ooo 555,000 155,000 6"57ooo
Group 2 
250,000 
63,000 50,000 
25,000 13,000
Group 3 
130,000 
31,000 
25,000 
13,000 
6,300
Group 1 Compounds
trans -1,3-Dichloropropene
Group 2 Compounds
Chloromethane, Bromomethane, Vinyl Chloride, Chloroethane, Acetone,
2-Butanone, Vinyl Acetate, 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone, 2-Hexanone
Group 3 Compounds
Group 3 Compo
Hethylene Chl
lylene Chloride, Carbon Disulfide, 1,1-Dichloroethene,
1.1-Dichloroethane, 1,2-Dichloroethene (total), Chloroform,
1.2-Dichloroethane, 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, Carbon Tetrachloride,
Bromodichloromenthane, 1,2-Dichloropropane, cis-1,3-Dichloropropene,
Trichloroethene, Dibromochloromethane, 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, Benzene,
Bromoform, Tetrachloroethene, 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, Toluene,
Chlorobenzene, Ethylbenzene, Styrene, Total Xylenes.
-8-
TUT 001 O6.i:
MEMORANDUM
TO: 
Docuaent Control
FROM: 
Margo Rosato 
i
SUBJECTS Validated Data
DATE: 
January 3, 1990
DCN: 
TES5-C02001-DV-BLVN
»«««K«n»«im«iii>«ai>«««>
Enclosed please find
sites:
SITE
Rosen
North Sea
Tutu
Mannheia
t»*mmmmmmmmm
tvo copies
CASE MO.
39001
10925
10925
42081
42081
10851
12163
12163
12057
12057
4512B
12684
4835B
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••a
of validated data for the following
ANALYSIS
Set 41 
Organic
Inorganic
Organic
Set 5 
Inorganic
Set 6 
Inorganic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Inorganic
Organic
Organic
Inorganic
Organic
Please fill each case accordingly. Should you have any questions 
r
please do not hesitate to call ae. 
/
• 
MR/md
Enclosure
CC: P. Billis
S. Graber
J. Litwin
I
' ^ 
(TV16/62)
I
T of 90 
TUT 001 06131
RECORD OF
COMMUNICATION
TOT
George Karraa
QPNONICAU. QOWCUMION
QCONMHINCS
Ronald W. Scarka
09/19/89
0930
_______CLP Organic Data Packages For Quality Aaaurance Review
•AHT OF COMMUNICATION 
~~————"~~~~~———————————————————
SITE
The Following CLP Organic Data are being aent to MMB for review
CASE */ 
LABORATORY 
ANALYSIS/ 
NUMBER OF 
BLANK 
DUPLICATE
SAS I 
MATRIX 
SAMPLES 
NUMBER(S) 
NUMBER(S
Industrial Latex 12610
R3/RI/FS
Compuchem 
Organic 
Water 
06
Soil 
08
BAR-20(TB)
BAR-18(FB)
BAR-2KRB)
BAR-19(FB)
BAR-14(FB)
NONE
TUTU Super Cat 4512B
TES III
Denhard Property 12630
CDH/R1/FS
Veraar
Organic Water 
07
Soil 
05
Cursio
COH/TesV
12434 
Coapuchea 
Organic Hater
02
BAW-05(TB)
BAW-OS(RB)
BY-901
BY-903
BAU12
BAU11
None
.USIONS. ACTION TAKIM O«
INPOAMATtON CQHU
TO:
V -
File and Data Package
TUT 001 O61'1
<7.7J)
MM* MMI
UWTIL
APPENDIX A.0
REJECTION SUMMARY FORM
(No. of Cqnpoiinds/No. of Fractions (Samples)
Type of Review; "To lVl______:__________ 
D»te:.
Project; 
/^A/if J o £*£><=> ^ m
in
Owe *:
Lab Nme:
Reviewer's Initials: 
/? 
(2x
Number of Samples:= 
/3
Analytes Rejected Due to Exceeding Review Criteria;
Acids (15)
B/H (SO)
Surrogates Holding Time Calibration Contamination
ID
Other
*-
Total ft Samph
Total » Rejected/
Total 0 in all Samples
TOA
0
o
/Lf
79
PEST (20)
n
PCB (7)
TCDD (1)
Analytes EstUnated Due to Encecding Review Criteria for;
Acids (15)
B/N (50)
VOA
O
o
o
o
o
PEST (20)
PCB (7)
TCDO (1)
oi\
-TO
\
J
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. IV-6 
PAGE 1 OF 9
TOTAL IBYIEV
CLP DATA
Functional Guideline* for Evaluating Orfanic Analysis
Cue Ho. 4512B SDC Ho. 
i 
LABORATORY VERSAR SITE TUTU/SUPERCAT
DATA ASSESSMENTS
The current functional guidelines (1988) for evaluating organic data hare
applied.
All data are valid and acceptable except thoae analytea which
qualified with a M" (e»tinated)t *U* ( non-detects), 1" (unusable), or "JN*
(presumptive evidence for the presence of the Material at an estimated value).
All action is detailed on the attached sheets.
Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the ••• flag asens that the
associated value is unusable. In other vords, due to significant QC problens
the analysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the coapound
is present or not. *1" values should not appearon data tables because they
cannot be relied-upon, even as a last resort. 
The second fact to keep ia Bind
is that no coapound concentration, even if it has passed all QC tests, is
guaranteed to be accurate. Strict QC serves to increase confidence in data but
any value potentially contains error.
TtSe! *K
Date /I / V/19 ffi
Verified Byt
fctaafch_________________Date Ig. / *f /19 !_•)
TUT 
OOi 
0616
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 2 OP 9
SOP NO. lff-6
DATA ASSESSMENT!
1. BOLDING TIME:
The anount of an analyte in a aanple can change vith tine due to rhenlrsl
instability, degradation, volatilisation, etc. If the specified holding tine is
exceeded, the data nay not 'be valid. Those analytea detected in the nannies
vhose holding tine has been exceeded vill be qualified aa estiaated, M". The
non-detects (aanple quantitation liaits) vill be flagged as estiaated, "J"v or
unusable, "1", if the holding tines are grossly
The following action vas taken in the sanples and analytea due to excessive
holding tine.
All coapounds vere qualified J in saaples 4512B-41, 42, 43, 44, -
46, 47, 48, 49, - 51, 52 and 53 due to excessive holding tiaes. The
non-detects in these sanples vere not rejected since volatilisation,
biodegradation, etc.^are inhibited in an oil natrix. The nediun level
analysis raised the detection Units and the data user Bust understand
that the "J" flag indicates detection liaits nay be higher.
The 3
were. <^A\;^^ 4+ 4«»enb«J 1*1 *******
001 0617
ATTACHMBfT 1 
pAfig 3 OP 9
SOP HO. Hi-6
DATA ASSESSMENTS
2. BLANK OONTAimiATIOXt
totality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., aethod, trip, field, rinse and vater bleaks
are prepared to identify any contaaination vhich aay have been introduced into
the saaples during saaple preparation or field activity. Method blanks aessmri
laboratory contaaination. Trip blanks aeasure rross tontealnation of saaples
during shipment. Pield blanks aeasure cross-contealnation of saaples during
field operations. If the concentration of the aaalyte is leas than 5 tiaes the
blank contaminant level (10 times for the common contaainants), the analytes la
the samples shovn vere qualified vith IP for these
A) Method blank contaaination
Nethylene chloride and acetone vere flagged U in saaple
(Dilution factor for aediua level analysis and 200 fold dilution vere
taken into account). The laboratory analysed aetbod blanks (VBLJU1,
VBLK95 and VBLK29) as lov level vaters vhen they should have been
analyzed as aedlua level soils.
B) 
Pield or rinse blank contaaination (•vater blanks* or "distilled vater
blanks" are validated like any other saaple)
C) Trip blank contaaination
r „ 
TUT °°i 0618
\ °10
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 4 OF 9
SOP MO. IV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT!
4. CALIBRATIONS
Satisfactory instrument calibration la established to ensure that the instrument
is capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibration
denonstrates that the instrument is capable of firing acceptable performance at
the beginning of an experiaental sequence. The continuing calibration checks
document that the Instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.
A) RESPONSE FACTORS
The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific chemical
compounds. 
The response factor for the Target Compound List (TO.) must be >
0.05 in both the initial and continuing calibrations. A value < 0.05 indicates
a serious detection and quant1tatIon problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes
detected in the sample vill be qualified as estimated, *J*. : All non-detects for
that compound vill be rejected, "1". 
^ 
^.
2-Butanone vas rejected in samples 4312B- 42, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50,
51 and 52 because the calibration response factor vas belov 0.05.
AM uuitft 
In «***U.* jriX-a-**" **J *° **»«• W«n
10.
001 061?
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 5 OF 9
SOP NO. EV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
5. CALIBRATIONS
A) PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION (ZRSD) AND PERCENT DIFFERENCE (XD)t
Percent RSD ia calculated fro* the initial calibration and la uaad to indicate
the 
alability of the apecific conpound response factor over increasiaf
concentration. 
Percent D conpares the response factor of the continuing;
calibration 
check to the nean response factor (ERF) fron the initial
calibration. 
Percent D ia a aeasnre of the instrument's daily performance.
Percent RSD mist be OOZ and ZD must be <25Z. A valve outside of these llnits
indicates potential detection and quantitation errors. 
For these reasons, all
positive results are flagged as estimated, *J" and non-detects are flagged *OJ"
(if ZD or RSD >50X). 
If there la a groas deviation of ZRSD and XD, the
non-detects nay be rejected, *R".
For 
the PCB/PEST1C1UK 
fraction, ZRSD 
for aldrln, endrin, DOT, and
dibutylchlorendate must not exceed 10Z. Percent D must be vithia 1SX on the
quantitation column and 20Z on the confirmation column.
Acetone did not meet continuing calibration QC criteria in samples
4512B-41 *4-*(<S- 
but vas qualified as estimated previously, due to
holding tine exceedancej t*d *4nu- •& *» d«+6*«'W«i i* »*6*i»n 40.
TUT OO1 06;
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 6 Of 9
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
6. SURROGATES:
All saaplas ara spiked vlth surrogate compounds prior to saapla praparatioo to
evaluate overall laboratory perforaance and efficiency of the analytical
technique. 
If the Measured surrogate concentrations vare outside contract
•pecificationst qualifications were appliad to the saaples and analytes as shown
below.
Surrogate recovery was high in sanple 4S12B-48. Data was previously
qualified as estimated due to holding tine exceedance and further
qualification is not required. 
'
\
\ -
I 
TUT 
001 0621
n <?
ATTACHMENT 1 
PACE 7 OF 9
SOP MO. RV-6
DATA ASSESSMENTS
8. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION:
A) VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE FRACTIONS:
TCL compounds are identified on the OC/NS by using the analyte's relative
retention time (BET) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained from known
standards. Por the results to be a positive hit, the sample peak must be within
+0.06 BET units of the standard compound and have an ion spectrum which has a
ratio of the primary and secondary m/e intensities within 20Z of that in the
standard compound. 
Por the tentatively identified compounds (TIC) the ion
spectra must match accurately. In the cases in which there is not and adequate
ion 
spectrum ^match, 
the 
laboratory may have 
provided false positive
identification.
B) PESTICIDE FRACTION:
The retention times of reported compounds most fall within the calculated
retention time windows for the two chromatographic columns and a OC/MS
confirmation is required if the concentration exceeds 10 ng/ml in the final
sample extract.
^ctal Mylenet to—•laplet 4512B ^5 48, 49 and M 
«as qualified
Four TIC's in sample 4512B-41, and 51, two TIC's in sample 4512B-46,
three TIC's in saaple 4512B-47, one TIC 
in samples 4512-48 and 49
vere flagged JN.
*A11 TIC compound results (VOA and ERA) are flagged "J" (estimated), and also
"IP (presumptive evidence of the presence of the compound) if an identification
is made, to reflect the qualitative and quantitative error inherent in the
analysis of compounds without corresponding calibration
TUT 001 0622
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 8 OP 9
SOP MO. HV-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
9. MATRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/USD:
The MS/MSD data are generated to determine the long-ten preciaioo and accuracy
of the analytical Method in various aatrice*. 
The MS/MSD Bay be uaed in
conjunction vith other QC criteria for sea* additional qualification of the
data.
Toluene recovery in 4512B-49 MSD vas high, data was qualified *J" due
to holding tine exceedance, further qualification is not required.
The lab analyzed tvo oil staples as lov level vaters but did not
perfora lov level MS/MSO analysis. 
Staples vee actually oils and a
aediua level oil MS/MSD vas analysed. Data has been fejetffet- due to
•&k\ts~-QC,- csi4*.ri&*-. and further qualification due to the lack of a
lov level MS/MSD is not required. **'« +****•*
TUT 
001 
O {-.?
ATTACHMENT 1 
PAGE 9 OP 9
SOP NO. HV-6
DATA ASSBSSNERTt
10. OTHER OC DATA OUT OP SPBCIPICATXOMs
The laboratory incorrectly labeled Maples vith SASff 4685B when the
SAS packing liata clearly indicates the sample numbers befin vith
4512B. Reviewer corrected (see phone lof).
The laboratory Incorrectly identified the matrix for samples 4512B- 45
and 50 as water and analysed As ***** (.K&.^htnt loqfi-*"1tittc
n*t hw teen o m t f l a>
7b»i4we
11. 
STSTBM PERFORMANCE AMD OVERALL ASSESSMENT (continued on next page if
necessary)s
12. CONTRACT PROBLEMS / MOM-COMPLIAMCEs
. Lab did not provide fora VI for initial Calibration performed on
7/12/89 and 8/19/89.
.Lab did not provide Porn VII for continuinff calibration performed on
7/19/89 at 9i51 and 23:25, 7/20/89, 8/19/89, 8/21/89 and 8/23/89.
Hovtver, the lab did provide the rav data for the above calibrations.
13. This 
package contains re-extraction, re-analysis or dilution. 
Upon
reviewing the OA results, the following fora I(s) are identified to he
TUT 001 0624
DPO: IJ ACTION 
[J FYI
CASE NO.
SOW
Refioo.
T\ATA
stnniA
LABORATORY
DATA USER _
REVIEW COMPLETION DATE
)3 
OTHER 
(<?» U)
NO. OF SAMPLES ____ WATER ____ SOIL
REVIEWER HESD 
I ] ESAT 
It^OTHER, CONTRACT/CONTRACTOR
L HOLDING TIMES
Z OC-MS TUNE/ OC FERFORMANCE
A INITIAL CALIBRATIONS
4. CONTINUING CALIBRATIONS
5. FIELD BLANKS fF - aot applicable)
6. LABORATORY BLANKS
7. SURROGATES
S. MATRIX SPIKE/DUPLICATES
9. REGIONAL QC ("P - ,aot appUeable)
ALf^<d. *•« f**J*fy ******
BNA
M/>
11. COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION
12. COMPOUND QUANTITATION
U. SYSTEM FERFORMANCE
14. OVERALL ASSESSMENT
O • No problems or a^nor problems that do sot affect data waMttiy.
X • No more tfeaa about 5% of the dau poiats are qualified as either animated or
M * More ibaa tbout 5% of the data poiats art qoaUfied af animated.
Z » More taaa fbotu 5% of the data poiats art foalifled as ntsable.
DFO ACTION ITEMS:
AREAS OF CONCERN:
TUT 
001
062;
In Reference to Case NO(I)I
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Telephone Record Log
Date of Call:
Laboratory Name:
Lab Contact:
Region:
Regional Contact:
Call Initiated By:
++***+
Laboratory
/Reei
Region
In reference TO data for the following sample numberis):
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
' G)
G)
Summary of Resolution:
(L H
u
Sinature £/
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
Oate
TUT' 
001 
0626
In Reference to Case No(s)x
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Date of Call:
Laboratory Name:
Lab Contact:
Region:
Regional Contact:
Telephone Record Log
I I/A 7
C7o 3)
Call Initiated By: __ Laboratory 
__jX"Region
In reference to data for the following sample numbeKs):
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
' vo A - G-<rvltj\,Yw/ fa^Jfr^^JL
Vtf
Summary of Resolution:
Signature
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
TUT 
O01 
0627
I
HEHOIANDUH
Tot 
Rhenda Carter
Fro*i 
Linda I. look
OC/Hf Data Quality Manager
Da4-.*! 
Moveaber 2ft, 1M9
Tour call to Charlie Carter regarding tAB 4B12B
For BAB 45121, there vaa one eet of QC perfcreed for the oil
aaaplea. There were no water eaaplee in thie SAB.
For the oaleulationo of CRfiLe, tho level of aediua autoaatieally
iapiioo that a 129 dilution factor waa uoed. 
Any further
dilution appear• aa the dilution factor on the For* ZA. 
For
exaople, eaaple 4«SeB41, page 19M29 ia a aediua level ooil with
a dilution factor of M. 
Thia would »aan that the total dilution
performed on thie aaaple ia 125 tiaee So, or §29o, vhleh would
then be vultipliee by th« CftOL. 
Bounding would bring tha value
to two oignifioant figure*.
Aa for the BAB nuabera, the »aoking Liot (page IBMtft) haa both
4B12B end 445*1. 
Binoe 4*BBB appeared on the VOA bottlee, thia
waa the nuaber uaed by the aaalyoto for their data*
•leaae oontaet ae at <7o3>73t-3Mo out 74B if you require further
aaaiatanoa.
U
OO1
I 
I
••»—— -i
i i
o
.jo.
u-A
il
J!
o
3
•3 
5
c
-S~ i-J—1-2
--I--
<!
_
O
ir
SOP NO. H»-6
Revision f6
OP CRSMfZGS DAT* REVIEW
AND fSEUKDAKY REVIEW
GONCURRED BY:
APPROVED BY:
TUT 
001 
0630
J 
Of 
36
Data: March 1989
Revision 6
CCKPXEHNESS AND CEUVERABIfS 
CASE MEMBER: 
*-/ S~ I
IAB:___
SHE; "72*
l.o Data Qeml^t^n^s and Delivgrablas 
YIS 
NO 
N/A
1.1 Hava any missing deliverable* baan received and addad
to the data package.
ACTION: Call lab for explanation / resutoittal of any
sd*sing deliverable*. If lab cannot provide then,
note the effect on review of the package under
the "Contract Problew/Non-ceapliance" eection
of reviewer narrative.
1.2 Was sn CCS checklist included with package?
"• o rnu&r j^tti*r/Case Narrative
2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present? 
f t/\ m _ 
_ _
2.2 Are Case Nunber and/or SAS nunber contained in the 
/
Narrative or Cover Latter? 
t (A 
__ 
__
3.0 Data Validation Checklist
Ihe following checklist is divided into three parts. Part A
is filled out if the data package contains any VQK. analyses,
Part B for any ENA analyses and Fart C for Pasticida/PCBa.
this package contain:
VGA data?
BNAdata?
Pasticide/PCB data?
ACTION: Cooplete corresponding parts of checklist.
063.1
SIANLKRD OPERATING FRDOEURt
* 
Of 
35
Data: March 1989
Revision 6
EftRT A: VGA AN&LVSES
YES
HO 
M/A
1.3 Are the Traffic Report Tarn* present for all samples?
ACTION: If no, contact lab for raplacaosnt of nissing
or illegible capias.
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or lab Narrative Indicata any
problens with sanpla receipt, condition of fT^r*.
analytical problem or special notations affecting
the quality of the data?
ACnCN: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
affect on the quality of the data.
ACTION: If any sanple analyzed as a soil contains son
than 50* water, all data should be rejected.
Acru.v if both VQA vials for a sanpla have air bubblas,
flag all positive results "J" and all non
-detects "R".
2.C Holding Tures
2.1 Have any VGA holding tiaes, detamined fron data of
collection to data of analysis, bean
If unprasarvad, aqueous aromatic volatilas' aust ba analyzed
within 7 days of collection and non-aroastic volatilas Bust
ba analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric
acid and stored at 4*C, than both aroaatic and IMII aiisnl li
volatilas aust ba analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain
about piasarvation, contact the sanplar to detaxaine whethaz
•the saaplas
A tan-day holding tine for soil sanples is
(Sea Traffic Report)
Data 
Data lab
Sanpla 
Matrix 
Preserved ? 
Saapled 
Received 
Analyzed
l/iljh
H fa
ACriCN: If holding tins are axoeedert, nag an positive results as
astiBvtad ("J") and aanpla quantitation limits as
, and docuusait in the narrative that holding
TUT 
001
O63
*iMn
1
1
1
%
••V
f
I
1s
•v '
W- J
«mm*
•^mmm
1
'
1
I^MHMl
t
MM
1
» 
•••••• 
HHMMkt 
••••» ^K M^MW 
^£^^^V< J^ 
^^^^V 
^/ ^^•^•r 
^^^ff.
^ ^ ^T ^ ^ *
 ; £ t 
?
^ ^ Q a ^ * " ^ ^ 
1 
(
S a w S » » » 5 S ! ,» i
^ ^ S O ^ ^ ^ - ^ ^ i 
: 
i
1 
'
I ! ? ^ 
J
ir 
7" 
^
It ——————— - ——————————————— £- 
^
; 
," , 
; 
° 
1 
I
1
1
' 
• 
: 
^
i 
I 
' 
: 
> $ 
d 
^
< —— 1 ——————— ——— ' ——————— ' ——————— Z) 
i 
IS 
r«K 
t.
; 
^ 
, 
^xx^ ' 
\*\ 
p* 
^^
i 
-° 
i 
j
' 
'
 
; 
i 
•
, 
1 
: 
i 
1
 
: 
. 
!
i 
i
<. « , ! o ^ M <^ 
'f ?
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page: 5 
of 
36
Data: March 1989
Revision 6
NO
If analyaas were dona sore than 14 days bayond holding tin,
aithar on tha first analysis or upon reanalysis, tha reviewer
aust usa profassional judganant to datarnina tha raliability
of tha data and tha af facts of additional storage on tha
saaple result*. The reviewer nay determine that nan-detect
data ara unusable ("R") .
3.0 ftnrpnflta P^^"yerv_ fPonn
3.1 Ara tha VGA Surrogate nacovaiy Sunnaries (Form ZZ)
for each of the following aatrioas:
a. low Water 
Lj^J 
__ 
__
b. Nad Water 
[ __ ]
c. leu Soil 
[ __ ,
d. Mad Soil 
r -/\
3.2 Are all the VQ& samples listed on the appropriate Surrogate
Recovery Stannaries for each of tha following aatrioas:
a. Low Water
b. Med Water 
[ __ ]
c. IflwSoil 
L. .
d. Nad Soil 
f \/l
ACIZCN: Can lab for explanation / rasubmittals. If
missing dalivarablas ara unavailable, rtunsjaiii
af f act on data under "Conclusions* section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers Barked correctly with an astarisk?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Mas one or sore Wk surrogate recovery outside of contract 
/
if ications for any sanple or sethod blank? 
ts [__] _
If yes, ware sanples reanalyzed? 
(__] 
ts _
Naze •ethod blanks reanalyzed? 
I__) 
^X _
ACTION: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but all do not
SOW specifications:
1. Flag all positive results as estiaatad ("J")
2. Flag all nan-detects as estiaatad detection
limits ("ID").
TUT O01 0634
of
SINOWD OPERATING HVXHJURE 
Page: 
6 
Of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
ND
If any surrogate has a recovery of <10\ :
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. Flag all nan-detects as unusable <"R").
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate recoveries
out of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard areas.
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation errors between raw 
./
data and Form EC? 
_ 
{ _ 1
If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resutmittal , make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Forn (Forn III)
/
_^LJ _ _
4.2 Mere matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices: 
,
a. Low Water 
(ta^ a/wi^ae*/ 2 til 
^—^ — 
—
b. MBd water
c. low soil
d. Med Soil
: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many \Ot spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
out of 10 
/ 
out of 10
4.4 How many RTO's for Matrix spike and matrix spike
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
out of 5 
-5 out of 5
If MS and MSD both have less than 10% re-
covery for an analyte, negative results for
that analyte should be rejected, and
positive results should be flagged "J".
One above applies only to the sample used
for the MS/MS) analysis. Use professional 
,T 
.;
judgement in applying this criterion to other
I 
SIANEARD CHEATING PROCEZURE 
Page: 7 
of 
36
* 
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
I 
————————————————————. 
— _ 
_ _
5.0 Blanks (Form IV)
I 
5.1 Is the Method Blank Sunmary (Form IV) present? 
[ iXl _
1
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VGA
TCL confounds, has a reagent/method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, mad water, low soil, 
s
I 
medium soil), whichever is more frequent? U»*»«*«r 
t tA 
_ 
_
• 
IA k ,*A+sri.Lf,. 
&&II«UM.SJ bijjilLc ML .....J*^ i»<J-«&l »f- uUiJ . IftU
|
5.3 Has a VIA instrument blank been analyzed at least **"» **" ••' "**£"*- ***
I 
once every twelve hours for each GC/MS system used? 
[ l/\ .._. _
ACTltfc. If any method blank data are missing, call lab
I
for explanation / resutmittal. If not available,
reject all associated positive data ("R").
i. 4 Chranatography: review the blank raw data - chrcmatograms
I 
, 
(RIC.<;), quant reports or data system printouts and spectra.
js iJve chrcmatographic performance (baseline stability) 
/
I 
for each instrument acceptable for VCAs? 
[ t/\ _ 
_
Use professional judgement to determine the
• 
effect on the data.
6.0 finrrt-*pfnation
I
NDIE: "Hater blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are DQK used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
• 
other QC blanks discussed below.
6.1 Do any imtthod/instjunent/reagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC) for VCAs? ftien applied as
I 
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution 
/
Factor. 
' 
" 
*/ [ _ J _
6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive VCA results
(TCL and/or TIC)? 
_ 
[ _ ]
JOICM: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet. )
' 
NOTE: only field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the samples are used to qualify data. Trip
blanks are used to qualify only those samples
with which they were shipped. Blanks may not
be qualified because of contamination in another
blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate,
spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. 
ruT
CtSAHlcS
•LANK CCNTAMIMATIONS
CASE:
SITES
FIACTICN:
IHETHCD BLANC KNTAHIHATIONS
I1NSE SLANIC CCUT.
•lANC CONT. 
|
001
STANDARD OPERATING FHXELUKL 
rtge: 8 
of 
36
Data: March 1989
Revision 6
NO 
N/A
ACTION: Follow the directions in the table below to Qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all tha associated blanks.
jSatple oonc > CRQLjSanple oonc < CRQL tjSanple oonc > CRQL
but < lOx blank 
is < lOx blank value | value 6 >10x blank value
Methylene chloride Flag sanple result
Acetone with a 'U'; cross
Toluene out 'B' flag
____2-butanone '
•_i.
Reject aample result No Qualification
and report CRQL; 
jis naartad
cross out 'B' flag
Other
Oontaminants
Sanple oonc > C8QL
but < Sx blank
Flag sanple result
with a 'U1; cross
out 'B1 flag
Sanple oonc < CRQL ({Sanple oonc > CRQL
is < Sx blank vmlue value ft > 5 blank value
Reject aample result]No qualification
and report CRQL; 
is needed
cross out 'B' flag
ACTION: For TIC confounds, if the concentration in the sample is
less than five times the concentration in the nosl
taminated associated blank, flag the sanple data "R"
(unusable).
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipmant blanks associated with every
ACTION: For low leva! sasples, note in data asaaaaasnt that
there is no associated f ield/rinse/equipBsnt blank.
Beception: sanples taken fron a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.0
7.1 Are the OC/M5 Tuning and Mass calibration Foras (Form V)
for BroBofluorobancana (BFB)?
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(K/Z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve 
/
hour shift? 
f i/l
7.3 Has a tuning performance compound bean analyzed for every 
/
twelve hours of sample analysis par instrument? 
r<^ 1
I 
ACTKU: Zf any tuning data are sussing, take action
I 
specified in 3.2 above.
ACXZCN: list data, tiae, instrument ID, and sample
| 
analyses for which no assnrl atari GC/MS tuning
' 
data are available.
TUT 001 0638
34
I
SIAMQARD OPERATING TOOUUKt
9 
Of 
36
Gate: March 1989
Revision 6
YES
MO
—
————
———
. .•-.-. . r. Tfff, |
——————————————————————————
aMYV<LCi HUnOUO
I 
7.4
ACTION: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
generated outside an acceptable twelve hour calibration
interval.
Have the ion abundance criteria been Bet for each
instrument used?
ACTION:
ACTION:
List all data which do not meet ion abundanc
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sanple data as unusable ("R").
However, if expanded ion criteria are set
(See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data
reviewer nay accept data with appropriate
qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors
BBSS lists and Fora vs? (Check at least two values taut
if errors are found, check. Bore.)
7.6 Have the appropriate nunber of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors
are found check Bore values.)
ACTON: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal. Bake necessary con
errors under "Conclusions11.
^t__> __
7.7 Are the spectra of the
able?
calibration
ACTON: Use professional judgement to deternine
whether assopiatetl data should be
ted, qualified, or rejected.
8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Fora I
pieeent with required header information on each
page, for each of the foil
a.
___ , .
or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes end natrix spike duplicates
c. Blanks
TUT O01 0639
STANDARD OPERATING
" 10 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
8.2 An tha TO* Reconstructed Ion
nectn for tha idantifiad
, tha
YES
NO 
N/A
itxunda, and tha
data ayatan printouts (Quant Reporta) includad in
the aaopla padcaga for aach of tha following?
a. Sanples and/or fractions aa appropriate
b. Matrix apikas and aatrix apDca duplicataa
(Mass apactra not raquirad)
c. Blanks
ACTZGN
8.3 Ara tha
Zf any data ax* misaing, taJoa action
ifiad in 3.2 abov».
factors shown in the Quant Report?
ible with
Baseline stability
Resolution
Peak shape
lull-scale graph (attenuation)
Other:_______________
AdZON: Oaa professional judganant to detezaine tha
acoaptability of tha data.
8.5 Are the lab-generated atandazd
idantif iad VGA compounds
of tha
for aach sanpla?
ACTZGN: Zf any BBSS spautia ara Biasing, take action
specified in 3.2 above. Zf Lab doss not
generate their own standard spectra,
note in "Contract RroblaaeVMan-ccaplii
8.6 Is the FRT Of
nd within 0.06 FKT
units of tha standard RRT in tha continuing calibration?
8.7 Are all ions piaaant in tha standard BBSS spectrun at a
relative intensity greater than lot also pxeaeiiL in the
BUS spectra?
8.8 Do sample and atandazd ralativa ion intanaitiaa
within 20%?
ACTION: Dee pzofaaaional judgsnant to determine
acceptability of data. Zf it ia detazni
that inoozzact idantif icati
all such data should be rejected, nagged
"N" (prasmptiva avidanoa of tha praaaiiaa of
tha conpound) or changed to not detected (at
t^^*
^^L^^n
the calcu
liait).
TUT 
OO.1 
0640
11 of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
MO
tt.O Tentatively I**n*'ifi 
Cfap**"*1? 
TTCl
9.1 An all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Form I,
tart B) present; and do listed TICs include scan number
or retention tine, estimated concentration and "J"
qualifier?
9.2 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified
nds and it*norinted "best Batch" spectra included
. /
f 1/1 
__ 
__
in the sample package for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
r (A 
__ 
__
b. Blanks 
r «X 
__ 
__
ACTION: If any TIC data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTION: Add "J" qualifier if nissing and "N"
qualifier to all identified TIC compounds
on Porn I, tart B.
t Are any TCL confounds (frca any fraction) listed as
TIC confounds (example: 1,2-dinethylbenzene is >c
a VQA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)?
ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.
TIC confounds (example: 1,2-dijnethylbenzene is xylene— 
/
V I
9.4 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also jjiesaiit in the
9.5 Do TIC and •best match" standard relative ion intensities
within 20%?
ACTION: Use professional judgement to
ability of TIC identifications. If
it is determined that an incorrect identi-
fication was Bade, change identification to
"unknown" or to seme less specific identi-
fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene")
20.0 Pi
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Fora I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the outiect internal standard, quantitation 
. -
ion, and ERF were used to calculate Form I result. 
. . 
/
Were any errors found? 
• '
10.2 Are the CBQEs adjusted to reflect sample dilutions 
/
and, for soils, sample moisture? (So\\ morlrV ('Wed 
. 
V
on
0-1
TUT 001 
O6 41
STANDARD OFDWZNG FKX3HJRE
12 
Of 
36
Date: Much 1989
Revision 6
YES
NO 
N/A
11.')
ACTION: Zf errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubnittal, oaks any necessary correction* and
note errors under "Conclusions11.
ACTION: Vhen a sample is analyzed at more than one
dilution, the lowest CRQXs are used (unless
a QC exceedance dictates the use of the higher
CRQL data from the diluted sample analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the "£" value en the original Form Z and substi-
tuting it with data from the analysis of diluted
sample. Specify uhich Form Z is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form I'» that should not be used, including
any in the sumnary package.
Data rGC/MSI
*r» the Reconstructed Ion Chrcnatograns, and data
system printouts (Quant. Reports) present for initial
continuing calibration?
ACTION: Zf any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.0 OC/MS
alibration (Torn vn
12.1 Are the Initial Calibration
and ccnplete for the volatile
ion?
VZ)
ACIICN: Zf any calibration standard
Bissing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
d-d arxfde.
-
12.2 Are response factors stable for volatile*
concentration range of tha calibration (RSD OOt)?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in tad.
ACnCN: ttoan RSD >30%, non-detacts say be qualified
using professional judgement, flag all
positive results "J". Mttn RSD >90%, flag
all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
ZZ policy.)
12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05?
ACTION: Circle all outliars in red.
ACXTGN: Zf any volatile
has an
RKF < 0.05, flag positive results for that
compound as estiaatad ("J"), and flag non-
detects for that ccopound as unusable ("R").
-2,4
TUT OO1 0642
wrcrvu..u«* rruuujunc. 
*age: ij 
or 
jo
Data: March 1989
Revision 6
12.4 Art than any transcription / calculation azrors in
the reporting of average rasponsa factors (RRF) or
%BSO? (Chack at laast two values but if errors are
found, check more.) 
_ _
ACTION: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubnittal, aake any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Omrl us i cms
11 ,
13.0 GC/MS Onr** IffliliTCfCBTlb'ratipn fFonn VU)
13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration FOOTS (Fora VH) yieaaiit 
/
and ccnplete for the volatile fraction? 
' '
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed
for every twelve hours of sample analysis per 
-
instrument? 
f A 
__ '"">
List below all sample analyses that were
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACXICN: If any forms are nissing or no continuing
calibration standard has been analyzed within
twelve hours of every sample analysis, call lab
for explanation / resubnittal. If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag an
associated saople data as unusable ("R").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard ccqxunds have 
/
a RRF < 0.05? 
_i£ I__] __
ACHCN: Circle all outliers in red.
If any volatile compound has a RRF < 0.05,
flag positive results for that coapound as
estimated ("J"), and flag nan-detects for that
as unusable ("R").
13.4 Do any compounds have a % difference between initial and
continuing calibration RRF > 25%?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red and qualify associated
sample data as outlined in the table below:
TUT 001 064:,
9'
*MJI_UJU*U.
0.4 
or 
jo
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
| 
25-50 
j 50-90
!'J' positive 
j'J' positive
results, no action results, 'UT
for non detects 
non detects*
i ——————————— i ————————
*• 
i
'J' positive ]
results, "R" !
non detects
————————— i
'4.<> ii
13.5 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in the
reporting of average response factors (FRF) or difference
(%D) between initial and continuing SRFv? (Check at
least two values but if errors are found, check aore.)
ACTION: Cirri e errors in red.
ATICN: If errors are large, call lab for explanation /
resubmittal, make any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
MO
. 3 Are the internal standard areas (Fora VHI) of every
sample and blank within the upper and lower limits
fur *»ch continuing calibration?
ACTION: List all the outliers below.
Sanple I 
Internal Std 
Area 
Lower Liait 
Upper Liait
(Attach
if
ACXICtf: If the intaznal standard area count is outside tha upper or
lover liait, flag with "J" all positive results and ncn-
datacts (U values) quantitatad with this intaznal standard.
If extremely low area counts are reported, or if
exhibits a aajor abrupt drop off, flag all
(•*")•
14.2 Are the retention tiaas of tha internal standards within
30 seconds of the associated calibration standard?
ACXXCtf: Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data if the retention tiaes differ by sore than
30
Tin-
001 0644
uftKAl'.lN5 HCCEDURE 
Page: 15 
of 
36
Date: March 1989
Revision 6
YES 
NO
15.0
15.1 Here any field duplicates submitted for VQA analysis? [__]
ACTION: Cdmpare the reported results for field duplicates
and calculate the relative percent difference.
ACTICN: Any gross variation between field delicate
results gust be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field duplicates should be
confirmed by contacting the sanpler.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I _
TUT 001 0645
5-7
»
ANALYTICAL DATA PACKAGE
Volatile Organic Analyai*
VoluM I of 1.
EPA CAM* Number
SDG Nuaber
D.t.
V»r««r
TUT
GDI 0646
Vtrxan.
k ""•" 
' 
PELIVEBABLES. INPE3C — VGA ANALYSES ONLY
I
I
I. 
CASE HABBATZV1
A. The narrative contain*i caae and contract nuabera,
euaeary of OC analyeea, dieeueaion of any analytical
probleaa, and doeuaentatloa of all.corrective actiona
•. Copy of Saaple Traffic Beporta.
ZZ. 
OC SUHHABT
!
A. Surrogate Percent Beeovery Suaaary (For* ID
B. Matrix Spike/Hatrix Spike Duplicate Suaaary (Fora ZZZ)
C. Bathed Blank Suaaary (Fora IV)
1 
D. OC/HS Tuning and Calibration Standard (Fora V)
I 
ZZZ. 
SAMPLE DATA
A. Organic Analyaia Data Sheet (Fore. I>
, 
B. Tentatively Zdeatified Coapounda (TZC)
< 
C. Bav Data for the Volatile Saaple Fraction
1. Beeonetrueted Zen Chroaatograa (e>
2. Ouantltatlon Bapart
3. Bav BSL aaee epactra and background eubtraet BSL
^ 
aaee epeetra vith lab generated BSL etaadard epeetri
^" 
4. OC/HS library eeareh epeetra for each TZC
Betes Saaplee arranged in alpha-auaerle eequenee.
ZV. STAMDABDS DATA
A. Initial Calibration Data (Fora VI) in order if
than one inetruaeat ia ueed.
•. VOA etandard(e) raeonatruetad ion ohroaatograaa and
quaatitatlon report* for the initial oalibratloata).
C. Continuing Calibration <Fora VZZ) ia order by
D» TOA ataadard(a) raeonatruetad ion enroaatograaa and
ouantltatlon report* for the continuing ealibratloa<c)
C. Znternal Standard Data (Fora VIII).
V. BAV OC DATA
A. BFB (For each 12-hour period* for each OC/HS eyatea>
1. Bar graph epeetrua
2« Haaa lle^itHO 
'"".
UT 001 0647
Iferiar.
V. 
RAW OC DATA (COMT'D)
Reagent Rlaak Data
1. Organic Analyaia Data Sheet (Fora I)
2. Tentatively Identified Coapounda (TIC)
3. Rav Data
sonatrueted ion ehroaatograafa) and quaatitatlon
report (a).
b. RSL apeetra vith lab generated ataadard
i. law RSL eoapound apaotra
I
ii. Kahaaeed or background •ubtraeted
iii. 
Laboratory generated ML atandard
iv. OC/RS library eearoh apaotra for •aoh TIC
. 
v. Ouaatitatioa/ealeulatioa of eaeh TIC
eonoentration
1 
C. Matrix Spike/Ratrix Spike Duplicate Data
1. Tabulated reeulta (Fora I) of non-apiked RSL
2. •eoonatrueted ion ehroaatograaa and quaatitatlon
VI. SAMPLE PRCPAJUTZOM .
A. Faraaeter Requeet Sheet
I. Saaple Receiving Log-In Information
C. *OA Saaple Coaaenta
D. Inatruaent Injection Loga
C. Field Chain of Cuatody
F. Copy (a) of Federal fjcpreaa Airbilla
TUT Q01 O648
c( 4
TOO
30 *II
Saptaabar 8, 1989
Marrativa - Volatile Organic Analyaia
Organic SAS 4S12B
CPA Region II
Control 744
Thia raport contain* tha CLP analytical data for tha volatila
organic analyaia of thirtaan oil aaaplaa raoaivad in conjunction
vith SAS 4912B. Tha aaaplaa liatad balov vara racaivad at Varaar
on July 5, 1989.
SABCLE USI
46S8B41 
4698B48
4658B42 
4638B49
4698B43 
4638838
4658B44 
4658B91
4698B49 
4698B52
4698B46 
4698B93
4698B47
8AS RCiUIBEBEHS
Raport dua data la forty daya af tar VTSR
All SAS
Saapla Matrix la oil
OC/HS Inatruaaat eallbratlona uaing BFB aat aathod apaciflad
eritarla for volatila organic analyaia. 
SPCC and CCC oritaria
vara aat for tha initial calibration eurvaa and tha continuing
calibration 
ehaek atandarda. 
Saapla analyaia for volatila
organica occurred vithin tha tvalva hour pariod following daily
inatruaent calibration. 
Due to the very ooaplex nature of the
aaaplaa, analyaea vara not eoapleted prior to expiration of
aaaple holding tiae oritaria.
Internal atandard areaa and aaaoeiatad retention tiaaa did
not deviate outaide apacifled vlndova.
Volatile aurrogate atandard recovery valuea aet apeolfled
criteria for aoat aaaplea. Surrogate recovery criteria uaad for
theaa aaaplea vaa developed for the aoil Matrix. Recovery of
aurrogata atandarda la tha oil Matrix May not be eoaparable vith
the aoil raoovary Unite. 
One aat of MS/BSD quality control
•aaplea vaa analysed. 
Boat reooveriee aet apeeified criteria.
Relative percent difference <RPD> valuea did not aeet •peeifled
iteria. Thia May be the reault of the aaaple Matrix.
Target ooapounda that did not Meet contract apeeified mmmm
•peetral identification criteria ware flagged vith an *X* vhieh
Indicate* the praaenoa of tha ooapound ia auapeeted.
TUT 001 O6SO
Narrative - Pag* 2
SAS 4S12B
Please contact Larry Pollack, OC/HS Quality Control Manager,
or •*, 
ahould you require any additional information or have any
questions pertaining to the volatile organic analysis of these
oil sasples.
Releaee of the data contained in this hardcopy data package hmm
been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or hi* deeignee, as
verified by the following signature.
September 8, 1989
.ipda E. Bock
GC/HS Data Quality Manager
Laboratory Operations
Narrative Reviewed Bys
GC/HS
>ael Bucftana
Section Chief
TUT 
001
51
Data Qualifier Flag*
For Target Coapoundai 
Thia flag la uaad whan aaaa
I
epeetral data indlcatee the praaanoa of a eoapouad but
tha raault la laaa than tha apacif lad dataotioa Halt
but atlll graatar than zaro.
I 
For ten Target Coepoundat Thla flag iadieatea that the
• 
concentration la an eetiaated value, aaaualng a 1 to 1
reeponea vith the internal atandard.
• 
Thla flag la uaed vhen the analvte la found la the
i 
blank 
'mm veil mm in the eaaple. 
Xt indleatea
I 
poaaible/probable contamination and varna the data uaar
to take appropriate action.
I 
u 
Thla flag atatea that the compound vaa analyzed for but
vae not detected. The number la the minimum attainable
i 
detection limit for the aaaple.
X or T 
Thla flag atatea that the aaaa apeotrum doea not
KPA CLP criteria for confirmation, 
but 
compound
praeenee la etrongly euepeeted.
E 
Thla flag la uaed to indicate that the quantitatlon of
the analyte la outaide the linear calibration of the
curve and that dilution vaa required la order to
properly quaatitate.
D 
Thia flag la uaed to indicate the value for the target
analyte vaa calculated from a dilution <eee •£• flag
above).
Thla flag la uaad vhen a matrix apike compound la alee
irmed preeent la the unapiked aample.
Plage excerpted from and eatabliahed by the
l» KPA Contract Lab Prograa (CLP) protocol.
TUT OO1 O652
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
. . .b Nam*i ygRSeB-It-Ci.___________ 
Contract! ________ 
I_______
Lab Codes V.EB36B- 
c**» No- • 4-22-16 
SAS No. i __51SB._ 
SDO No. s !___.
I Matrix s <»oil/_at*r> 8Mte.._?' i- 
Lab Sa-pl* IDi 
JIkl_U-___
Sanpl* Mt/vols 
_1..2 <g/»L> Q__ 
Lab Fil* IDi 
UZ2fia_...
I L*v*ls 
UoM/-*d> 
BEE___ 
Dat* R*c*iv*di 
fiZl-SlfiS
Moi»tur*s not d*c. ____
Columns 
(pack/cap) 
EflCIS._
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Dat* Analyzedi
Dilution Factori 5fi
CONCENTRATION UNITSI
(ug/L or ug/Kg> UfilKfi
74-87-3 ----- ~
74-63-9 —— —— -
75-01-4 —— —— -
75-00-3 —— —— -
75-09-E ----- ~
67-64-1 — -----
75-15-0 —— —— -
75-35-4 -—— ——
75-35-3 —— —— -
54O-59-0 —— ——
67-66-3 -—— ——
107-06-E —— ——
78-93-3 ——————
_- __ _
56-E3-5 —— —— -
1O8-05-4 —— ——
75-87-4 —— — ~
78-67-5 — —— ~
100610-1-5 -——
79-01-6 — —— ~
1E4-46-1 —— ——
79-00-5 —— —— -
71-43-E —— —— -
1O061-OE-6 —— -
75-E5-E —— ———
108-10-1 ------
591-76-6 — -——
1B7-16-4 ------
79-34-5 — — — -
106-66-3 —— ——
106-90-7 —————
100-41-4 —————
100-4E-5 —————
1330-80-7 —— —
— Ch 1 or OM*th an*
— BroMOMthan* 
__
— Vinyl Chlorid*
— Ch 1 oro*th an*
— M*thyl*n* Chlorid* __ .._.____.
— Ac*ton*
— Carbon Dimulfid* __________
— 1, l-Dichloro*th*n* 
... _ .
— 1,1-Dichl or o* th an* 
__
— l,B-Dichloro*th*n* (total) __
— Ch lor of or*, 
_.
— 1, E-Dichloro*than* ______ . __
— E-Butanon* 
__ _
— 1, 1, l-Trichloro*than*_ ____ . _
— Carbon Tvtrachlorid* ____ ...
— Vinyl Ac* tat* __________
— — Bronod ich loron*than*
— lTB-Dichloropropan* ______ _.
— ci«-lf 3-Dichloroprop*n* . ..
— Tr i ch 1 oro*th*n* _ . ______ ..
— Dibro«ochloroa*than* ____
— 1 , 1 , E-Tr ich 1 or o* than* 
. _ ..
— B*ni*n* 
. .
~tran»-l, 3-Dichloroprop*n*___
— Broaofora 
_ . ___________ _.
— 4-M*thyl-fi-P*ntanon*
— B-H*xanon* 
... __ . _ . _ .
~T*trach loro*th*n*_..__.___^..^.
— 1 ,1,8, E-T*trachloro*than* __ ..
— Toluvn* 
»..^_
— Chlorob*nz*n*.. ________ ..
— Ethyl b*nz*n*_._.. ___ ._
-— Styrwn*......^.... _ 
....... ——A
Total Xyl*n*» ______ _i_^M_i_-.Viw-
63000
63000
63000
63000
31000
63000
31OOO
310OO
310OO
31000
31000
31OOO
63OOO
31000
31000
630OO
31OOO
31000
31000
31000
31000
31000
64OOO
310000
31000
63000
160000
B7OOO
31000
45OOOO
J1000
4___MMM>
31OOO
^ *__i _i ^ _i _fc _i
leooooo
I
iuu
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
tu
IU
IU
IU
1
IU
IU
IU <
1
IJ
IU
1
IU
1IU>
1 -.
,.l...
f
_»^p^
'.» .
JFORH I VGA
TUT 
OO1 
O653
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
• Lab Namet__VERSAR.
I Lab Codei_VERSAR___
Matrix* (soil/Mate
I Sample wt/voli
__ 
Contract i.
L»v«lt
(low/mvd)
Ca»« No. i430 16
BfL £> i u
4 _(g/nl)S
MED
* Moi«tur*t not d»c.
EPA SAMPLE NO.
-;_ A.- ^ - 0 I a
SAS No. I4512B 
SD6 No. i
Lab Sample IDi .76162
Lab File IDi _U7903
Date Received! __07/05/69
Date Analyzedi __07/19/69
Dilution Factori
Number TIC» foundt _
6
CONCENTRATION UNITSi
(UO/L or UB/KG)_UG/Kg
CAS NUMBER
15. __________
BUTANE, 2-
UNKNOWN
CYCLOPENTANE, METHYL-
BUTANE, 2,3-DIMETHYL-
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
BENZENE, PROPYL-
27.
COMPOUND NAME
•THYL-
EBT. 
CONC.
37i
2.
11
1
I
I
• I'
IJIN/
IJ
UN
IJ/V
IJ
IJ
IJ
UK/
FORM X VOA-TIC
TUT 001 O654
So
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
._________ 
Contracts _.
EPA SAMPLE NO.
*' ! C - ; j - • ,
I 4«68*4£
I .d-N-Mi yER§AR_ItlCi.————————————
Lab Code i yiR§AR_ 
Came No.t 43.0._lfe 
SAS No.i 45.__1__ 
SD6 No.i i
jlatrixi (toil/water) SSft.filU 
Lab Sanple ZDi Z6163
Sample Ht/volt 
__4«.C 
<g/«L> Q__ 
Lab film IDi 
Uft5Z5
Levels 
<low/_ed> B_B__ 
Date Received!
E: Moisturei not dec. _____
Coluani 
(pack/cap) ESC&_
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Date Analyzedi
Dilution Factors
CONCENTRATION UNITSi
(ug/L or ug/Kg) U84&Q
74-87-3 -----
74-83-9 —— ~
75-01-4 —— ~
75-00-3 -----
75-09-E -----
67-64-1 —— —
75-15-0 —— —
75-35-4 — — -
75-35-3 -----
540-59-0 -——
67-66-3 -----
107-06-E —— -
78-93-3 -----
' 71-55-6 —— ~
v 56-E3-5 -----
108-05-4 ———
100610-1-5 —
79-01-6 -----
1E4-48-1 —— -
79-00-5 —— ~
71-43-E -----
10061 -OS-6 —
75-E5-E —— ~
108-10-1 -——
591-78-6 ———
1E7-18-4 -——
79-34-5 -----
106-88-3 —— -
106-90-7 —— -
100-41-4 —— -
100-4E-5 —— -
1330-EO-7 ——
——— Ch lor one thane 
_
——— Vinyl Chloride
— • — Acetone
——— Carbon Ditulfide _ _ _ __
——— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __
——— Ch 1 oro f ore.
——— l,E-Dichloroethane 
_
——— E-Butanone 
_ 
_ _ __
——— Vinyl Acetate
——— Bro»odichloro«ethane__ _ __
— —— cim-1, 3-Dichloropropene
——— Trichloroethene 
_ _ _ _
——— lf l,E-Trichloroethane ______
——— Benzene 
_ _ _ _ __
——— tr anm- 1 , 3-D i ch 1 oropr opene ___
——— E-Hexanone _ _ _ _ ______
——— 1 f i f Ef E-Tetrach loroethane-._-_
——— Toluene. _______ . _____ _, _
— — — — Ch lorobenzene
——— Ethyl benzene __ . ________ _ _
——— 8tyrene_ ________________
——— Total Xylenes _ „ _ _ 
_ x __
1
63000 IUT
63000 1 U
63000 1 U
63000 1 U
31000 IU
63000 1 U
31000 IU
31000 IU
31000 IU
31000 IU
31000 IU
31000 \U\/ JL
63000 iire-"rT
31000 IU." 1
31000 IU
63000 1 U
3JOOO 
IU
31000 IU
31000 IU
31000 IU
31000 IU
31000 IU
31000 IU
310000 IU
31000 IU
63000 1 U
63000 1 U
31000 IU
31000 IU
91000 1
31OOO IU
eiooo i j
31OOO 
1 U
580000 1 it
1 ___
r
FORM I VOA
TUT
1/87 Rev.
001 O655
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
- -"•;. - •)- 
>
I 
4--?»:-2> 
~
I
Name
Contracts
Lab Codei VgRiBB. 
Came No. i 42Q_16 
SAS No.i ±5128_ 
SDO No.t \_____
I Matrixs <»oil/water> SOTtl^/^
Sample Mt/voli 
4tQ 
(g/mL> Q _
I , 
,
| Levels 
(low/med) 
BEft___
. % Moistures not dec. _.__
' Column 
(pack/cap)
I
Number TIC« founds _.2
Lab S*»pl» IDt Z6162___.
Lab Fil« IDi 
UflSZS___
Date Receivedi
Date Analxz'dt
Dilution Factor i 5fi_
CONCENTRATION UNITSi
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
I 
I
I 
CAS NUMBER 
I
I m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m | 
,
I 
I
I
I
I
COMPOUND NAME
RT
I EST. CONC. I
FORM I VOA-TIC
1/B7 Rev.
TUT 001 0656
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Na-es
Contracti
Lab Codes V_R§AR_ 
Case No. s 43.___g 
SAS No. s
I Matrixi (moil/water) Sfitfe_Q/u-
Sample wt/vols 
___g <g/mL> Q__
I Levels 
(loM/sied> 
fl____
j % Moimturei not dec. ____
Columns 
(pack/cap) E8CK_
SDO No.i
Lab Saaple IDs
Lab File IDs 
UfiSZZ__.
Date Receiveds 
_Z_23_ft2
Date Analyzed s O.fl__9.__2
Dilution Factors 50
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITSs
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ-l&fi
74-87-3 ————
74-83-9 -----
75-01-4 ~——
75-00-3 ————
67-64-1 ————
75-15-0 ————
75-35-4 —— —
75-35-3 -----
540-59-0 —— -
67-66-3 -----
107-06-2 ———
71-55-6 —— ~
56-23-5 -----
108-05-4 —— -
•75-27-4 —— --
78-87-5 -----
100610-1-5 —
79-01-6 — ——
124-48-1 —— -
79-00-5 -----
71-43-2 -----
10061-02-6 —
75-25-2 -----
108-10-1 —— -
591-78-6 ———
127-18-4 —— -
79-34-5 —— —
108-88-3 ———
1O8-90-7 —— -
100-41-4 ———
100-42-5 ———
1330-20-7 ——
——— Chloromethane 
_
——— Bro»one thane
——— Vinyl Chloride
——— Ch 1 or oe thane 
_
——— Acetone
——— Carbon Disulfide 
_
——— 1, 1-Dichloroethane
——— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
——— 1,2-Dichloroethane
——— 2-Butanone _
——— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane _____ ._
——— Vinyl Acetate ___ 
_ 
___
——— -ci»-l, 3-Dichloropropene
——— Trichl or oe thene ______ g ___
——— Di broaoch lor one thane. ______
—— -1, 1, 2-Tri eh loroe thane
——— Benzene 
___
——— 2-Hexanone
——— Tetrachloroethene _ __ _, _ .._
——— 1 , 1,2, 2-Tetrach loroethane 
^
——— Toluene 
jf
——— E th y 1 benzene. _ . _______ „.»/--
——— Styrene _ . ______ 
__ —>•-
——— Total Xylene« ____ 
_ ___
63000
63000
63000
63000
31000
63000
31000
31000
31000
31000
31000
31000
63000
31OOO
31000
63000
31OOO
31000
31000
31000
31000
31000
31000
310000
31000
63000
63000
310OO
310OO
3AOOOO
ejr-v v^r ^ •~r
21000
^_* ._m_&. 4v _v _v
«soooo
11000
160OOOO
1
IU ^
1*1 ,.
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU ,
1 **
1 JS 
1•
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IUr
IU
1
ID
1
r
7
>
t
FORM I VOA
63
It!'!
l/a7 Rev.
OO1 0657
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name i __ VERSAR
Contract i.
I La
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I-4&38B43
I
b Cod«i_VERSAR__ Cas* No. i430_16 
SAS No. I4518B 
8D6 No. i
Matrixi <»oil/*at»r)fiOIL O/L. 
Lab Sample IDi .76184
Sample wt/voli 
4 _<g/ml)G 
Lab File IDi _UB577
*
L»v«ls 
<low/m«d> 
MED 
Data R»c«iv«dt __07/05/89
* Moi«tur«i not dec._____ 
Date Analyzed! __08/19/89
Dilution Factori _
Numbvr TICm founds
CONCENTRATION UNITSI
(U6/L or UG/KG)_UG/Kg
COS NUMBER
1. ___________
2-
3.
4.
5.
6. ___________
7.
a.
9. ______
10.
11.
18.
13. _ ___ _
14.
15. _
16.
17. 
__
18. ___ _ _
19. 
_. _ __
80.
81.
22.
S3. _ _ ____
84. J ___ r^
23. 
. . - - - -
86. 
__
27. 
,
28. 
_ ^ 
T_
29. . _
30.
COMPOUND NAME
^^^ii\NOWni
___ _
•
'
.
RT
27.3333
-FORM I VOA-TIC
TUT 001 0658
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Na.«i
Contract i
' Lab Cod*t VERiAR_ 
Ca»* No. t 43.Q_lfc
I Matrix i <»oil/wat*r> -Sftit j^J U
Sample wt/vols 
_ 4±Q 
<g/*L> g__
Level i 
<loM/*ed> 
HEP. __
< Moisture i not dec. __ „_
Columns 
(pack/cap) PAQ|< _
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
SAS No. i i512I_. 
SDO No. I 1
Lab Sa»pl* IDs Z&lftS
Lab File ID i 
yfl522
Date Received i
Date Analyzed s
Dilution Factor i
CONCENTRATION UNITSi
(UQ/L or UQ/KQ) U8££fi
74-87-3—
74-83-9—
75-01-4—
75-00-3—
75-09-2—
67-64-1—
75-15-0—
75-35-4—
75-35-3—
540-59-0-
67-66-3—
107-06-2-
78-93-3—
71-55-6—
56-23-5—
-Ch 1 or o*e thane______________
-Bro*o*eth an*_____________
-Vinyl Chlorid*____________
-Ch 1 oro*th an*_______________
-Hethylene Chloride_________
-Acetone_____„___.___.______
-Carbon Disulfide__________
-1, i-Dichloroethene_________
-1,1-Dichloroethane___________
-1,2-Dichloroethene (total)__
-Chlorofor«______________.___
-1,2-Dichloroethane___________
-2-Butanone__.__.________.___
-1,lv1-Trichloroethane______
-Carbon Tetrachloride
108-05-4————-
75-27-4————————Bronod ich loro»*thane____.___
78-87-5———————1,2-Dichloropropan*__________
100610-1-5—————ci*-lf3-Dichloroprop*n*______
79-01-6———————Trichloro*th*n*___________
124-48-1 ——————Di bro-och lor on* than*_________
79-00-5———————l,l,2-Trichloro*than*______
71-43-2——————B*nz*n*________________.--J^-
1OO61-02-6———~tran»-l, 3-Dichloroprop*n*____
75-25-2———————Broaofor*_________________
108-10-1———————4-H*thyl-2-P*ntanon*_________
591 -78-6——————2-H* x anon*________________
127-18-4——————T*trachloro*th*n*_______,__
79-34-5———————Ivlf2,2-T*trachloro*than*___
108-88-3——————Tolu*n*________________f_
106-90-7——————Ch 1 or o b*n z ene___________._
1OO-41-4——————Ethyl benzene.
100-42-5——————8t y r ene______
1330-20-7——————Total Xylenes
13000
13000
13000
13000
6300
13000
6300
6300
6300
6300
.6300
6300
13000
6300
6300
13000
630O
6300
6300
6300
6300
6300
7000
63000
6300
13000
13000
6300
6300
76000
6300
35000
6300
19OOOO
I
IUj
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1*4
1C
IUJ
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
I "
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
I
IU
I
IU
I
.1—
FORM I VOA
1/67 Rev.
TUT O01 O659
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Names
4658044
VERSAR
I Lab Codes_VERSAR__ Ca»e No. s430.16
Matrix s <«oi 1 /water)8G*fc O \L-
' Sample wt/volt 
4 _(g/ml)B
I Levels 
(low/med) MED
* Moi-tures not dec.______
Number TIC» founds _
Cont r act s ________ 
I ____________
SAS No.i451SB 
SDG No.s1 
v
r'
Lab Sample IDs .76185
Lab File IDs _U8579
Date Receiveds __07/05/89
Date Analyzeds __08/19/89
Dilution Factors _ 
10
CONCENTRATION UNITSI
(UG/L or UG/K8)_UG/Kg
CAS NUMBER
1. ___________
2. 
_____
3.
4.
5.
6. _ _____
7. 
___
a. __
9. 
__
10.
11.
12.
13. 
_____
14.
15.
16.
17.
18. 
__
19. 
___
20.
21. 
_ ___
22. 
_____
23.
24. 
...
25. ^ ^
26.
27.
28. 
.,,.,,..
29.
30.
COMPOUND NAME
UNKNOWN
/
.
RT
14.8666
EST. CONC.
22000
J
.
•»•
^•M
TUT 001 O660
cr- Q J
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
s 
, 1 •*
'7<
Na»«s
Contract i
Lab Codes VEBSBB- 
Case No. i 43.Q_1£ 
SAS No. s ^SlSi.. 
8DO No. i 1.
Matrixi (soil/water)
Sample wt/vols
Le ve 11 
(1 ow/aed >
% Moiiturei not dec. ___
Columni 
(pack/cap) E8££_
<g/«L)
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Lab Sampl* IDi 2S1S6
Lab File ID i 
Uft&lfi
Date R«c»iv»di
Date Analyzeda
Dilution Factor i 5fi___..__
CONCENTRATION UNITSI
(ug/L or up/Kg> UQ£L. 
Q
74-87-3 —————
74-83-9 ———— -
75-01-4 —— ——
75-00-3 —— ——
75-09-2 —————
67-64-1 ———— -
75-15-0 ———— -
75-35-4 ———— -
75-35-3 ———— -
540-59-0 ——— -
67-66-3 ———— -
107-06-2 ——— -
78-93-3 ———— -
71-55-6 ———— -
56-23-5 ———— -
108-05-4 ——— -
75-27-4 ———— -
78-87-5 ———— -
100610-1-5 — •
79-O1 -6 ———— -
124-48-1 ——— -
79-00-5 ———— -
71-43-2 ———— •
10061-02-6 — -
75-25-2 ———— -
108-10-1 ——— •
591-78-6 ——— -
187-18-4 ——— -
79-34-5 ———— •
108-88-3 ——— •
108-90-7 ——— •
1OO-41-4 ——— •
100-48-5 ——— •
1330-80-7 —— •
—*—— Broaoaethane
- —— Vinyl Chloride 
__
• —— Methylene Chloride 
__
—— Acetone
—— Carbon Dimulfide
—— lv 1-Dichloroethene
• —— 1,1-Dichloroethane 
_...
• —— 1,8-Dichloroethene (total) __
—— Ch 1 or o fora 
_
— — 1, 2-Dichloroethane
—— 2-Butanone 
_ 
__
—— Carbon Tetrachloride _ _
——— Br oaod i ch 1 or oae th ane ____ ____
—— 1, 2-Diehloropropane ____ __
—— ci»-lf 3-Dichloropropene 
„ _
—— Di broaoch loroaethane _______
—— - trans-if 3-Dichloropropene____
—— Broaofora 
_
—— 4-Heth y 1 -2-Pent anone _ . __ . _
——— 2-Hex anone 
__ __ ..
—— -Tetrachloroethene
——— 1, Iv2f 8-Tet r achl or oe thane ___
— —— Toluene 
_ __
—— Chlorobenzene 
_____ __
——— Ethyl benzene 
_ „ «»»-
——— Styrene
—— Total Xylene* _____________
1
5OO 
II/C.
***^^» • ^m 
| 
^
500 
1 tf
500 IV
500 
(If
850 
1 tf > '
8400 IT
O*C/\ 
it* A
C0w 
1 49 i*V
850 
IV
850 
Itt
850 
itf
850 
IV
850 
IV
500 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
500 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
850 IX
850 
IV*
500 
IJ*
500 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
850 
IV
~ 850 
IV
-. 
850 
IV
850 
IV 1L
" 3OO 
IX^
1
TORM 2 VOA
TUT
_1/87 F»v.
O01 0661
§
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
* . .b Na««s yEgSAR_INC«.
L*b Cod* I VERSAR 
Cat* No. i
I 
" 
. ___
| Matrix i (toil/water) *mf6ft_O/L.
SampI* wt/voli 
_ 5i.Q 
(g/«L) ML
»OBOB45
I•
•
'
Lvv»ls 
<IoM/M»d>
X Moi«tur»i not dec. ___
Column 
(pack/cap) 
BfiCIS _
Numbvr TICm founds _ Q
Contract: _________ 
I
SAS No. i 45igg 
SDG No. i 1
" 
""
Lab Saapl* IDi 
Zfelfife
Lab Fil* IDs
Date R»c«iv«di
Dat» Anal/zeds 
fifi/21^62
Dilution Factor i Jfi
CONCENTRATION UNITS s
<ug/L or ug/Kg>
I
I 
CAS 
NUMBER 
I
COMPOUND NAME
I
I 
RT 
I EST. CONC. I 
0 
I
I
I
I
FORM J WOA-TIC
TUT
l/«7
001 0662
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO,
_
.b Nam«:
46
Contract i
I
Lab Coder VERSAR_ 
Ca»* No. i 43.Q_lfc
I Matrixs («oil/«at«r> -gSft.O'L.
_ 4t2 
<g/«L> g
(low/M*d> BED. __
Sampl* wt/vols
• Lvvcli
SAS No. i 45.1gg _ 
SDG No. s i
Lab Sanpl* IDi 
ZfilfiZ
Lab File IDi 
UZ213
Date R«c*iv»dt
I1oi*tur«i not d*c. __._
Column i (pack/cap) E8C!S_-
•-..»*-.
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
Dat* Analyzedi
Dilution Factor i 4.Q
CONCENTRATION UNITSI
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
-.-—..«*"^
Q
74-87-3 —— ——
74-83-9 —— ——
75-01-4 —————
75-00-3 —— ——
75-09-2 —————
67-64-1 —————
75-15-0 —— ——
75-35-4 —— ——
75-35-3 —————
540-59-0 -----
67-66-3 —————
107-06-2 ————
71-55-6 ———— -
56-23-5 —— ——
108-05-4 ————
75-27-4 ———— -
78-87-5 ———— -
100610-1-5 — -
79-01-6 ———— -
124-48-1 ——— -
79-00-5 ———— -
71-43-2 ———— -
10061-02-6 — -
75-25-2 ———— -
108-10-1 ——— -
591-78-6 ——— -
187-18-4 ——— •
79-34-5 ———— -
106-88-3 ——— -
108-90-7 ——— -
100-41-4 ——— -
100-4S-5 ——— •
1330-80-7 —— •
• —— Ch 1 or o**th an*
• —— BroMon*than*
• —— Vinyl Chloride
• —— Chloro*than* 
_ _ 
___
• —— H*thyl*n* Chlorid*
• —— Ac*ton* 
__
• —— Carbon Disulfid* _ _ ____
• —— 1, l-Dichloro*th*n*
• —— l,l-Dichloro*than* 
_
• —— 1, 2-Dichloro*th*n* (total) __
• —— Ch 1 orof OTm
• —— Iv2-Dichloro*than* _ 
_
• —— 1, 1, l-Trichloro*than* _____ _
• —— Carbon T*trachlorid*
mr • wvlMt^W A W • I A Vv t •£•§• wf I Wk 9 IW ^^ ^^ ^»^»^» ^m ^m ^w ^»
——— Trichloro*th*n* 
___
—— 1, l,2-Trichloro*than* . ___ ,_
—— 1, 1, 8, 8-T*trachl or o«th an* .._..„.
—— To 1 u*n* ___________ _ __ „ jfci.
"— — — Ch lorob*nz*n*
—— Ethyl b*nz*n* ____ .. ___ . __ _^,
—— 8tyr*n* _ ___ .._«„_. _ .__..__.
——— Total Xyl*n*»^___^ __ ^ ^^..J^^
'
1
50000 IUX
50000 1 U
50000 IU
50000 1 U
85000 1 U
50000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
' 50000 IU
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
50000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 1 U
85000 IU
85000 IU
46000 1
850000 1 U
8500O 
1 U
50000 1 U
59000 1
85000 1 U
85000 IU
49OOOO 
1
' C50OO IU
140000 1
. 85OOO 
IU
-9OOOOO 
1 2 c.
TUT
. 1/A7 Jtev.
001 0663
~- r-
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Names__VERSAR___________ 
Contracts________ 
I__________.
Lab Codes_VERSAR__ Case No.s430.16 
SAS No.s45126 
SD6 No.t1
MatriMs (»oi1/water)6etL 0/u 
Lab Sample IDs _76187
Sample wt/vols 
4 _<g/ml)G 
Lab File IDs _U7913
Levels 
(low/wed) MED 
Date Receiveds __07/05/89
* Moisturei not dec._____
Number TIC* foundt
Date Analyzeds __07/20/89
Dilution Factors _ 
40
CONCENTRATION UNITSt
(U6/L or UQ/KB)_UG/Kg
CAS NUMBER
1.96-14-0
2.
3. 103-65-1
4.
5.
6. ________ __
7.
a. _
9.
10.
11. _
12. _ __
13. ___
14. _
15.
16.
17. _
18.
19.
20.
21-, ... , ..... „
22.
23.
24. ___
25.
26. __ . , _ ^
27.
28.
29.
30.
1
1 
COMPOUND NAME
IPENTANE, 3-METHYL-
IUNK ETHYL METHYL BENZENE
BENZENE, PROPYL-
•
_
___
.
•
RT
19.8333
22.9166
34.4166
_
EST. CONC.
33000
38000
57000
1
1 
Q
UA/
IJ
JtJ
————
^ 
•>
.x:.»-.--.».-
I -VOA-TJC
OO1 O664
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
. ^ NJ
Lab Cc
Matrii
Sample
L.v.l i
% iioii
ColUBT
i
i
I
i
i -
!
%
IB*: 
VE,R§AR_JNC,
>d*i VgRSAR.
EI (•oil/wat*r)
t Mt/VOlS
(low/B*d>
iturvt not d*c.
>i 
(pack/cap)
CAS NO.
74-87-3 —————
r^ OO *
75-01-4 —————
75-00-3 —— ——
75-09-2 —————
67-64-1 —— ——
75-15-0 —————
75-35-4 —————
75-35-3 —————
540-59-0 —— —
67-66-3 —————
107-06-2 ————
78-93-3 —— ——
71-55-6 —————
56-23-5 —————
1O8-05-4 —— —
75-27-4 —————
78-87-5 —— ——
100610-1-5 ——
79-01-6 —————
124-48-1 -----
79-00-5 —— ——
71-43-2 —— ——
10061-02-6 ——
75-25-2 —— ——
108-10-1 ————
127-18-4 —— —
79-34-5 —— ——
108-88-3 -----
108-90-7 -----
100-41-4 — ——
100-42-5 —— —
1330-20-7 —— -
1 
JOB8D47 
1
t 
Contracts 
1 
1
Ca«* No. i 43.0._ife 
SAS No. i 4S.lgf
€iik.&u 
Lab Sj
_ itfi <g/BL> fi __ 
Lab Fi
BEB __ 
Dat* F
___ 
Dat* t
BBCK _ 
Diluti
CONCENTRATIC
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ugy
—— Ch 1 or OB* th an*
—— BroBOB*than*
—— Vinyl Chlorid*
—— Ch 1 or o* than*
—— M*thyl*n* Chlorid*
— -Ac*ton*_ 
_
—— Carbon Disulfid*
—— 1, l-Dichloro*th*n* __ „
- — 1, l-Dichloro*than*
—— l,2-Dichloro*th*n* (total) __
—— Ch lorof ora
—— l,E-Dichloro*than* 
_ 
__
—— 2-Butanon*
• —— 1, 1, l-Trichloro*than*
—— Carbon T*trachlorid* _ 
_
• —— Vinyl Ac.tat*
—— BroBod ich loroB*than*____<-.__— _
• —— 1,2-Dichloropropan* ______
• —— 'C i m- 1 f 3-D i ch 1 oropr o p*n*__— _„_
• —— Tr i ch 1 oro*th*n*
• —— D i broBOch 1 or OB* th an* 
_
• —— 1, 1, 2-Trichloro*than* _____ ,/!
• —— 2-H*xanon* ___ _ ____ __ „
• —— T*trachloro*th*n* 
_
• —— 1,1,2, 2-T*tr ach 1 oro* th an*.....,
• —— Tolu*n* 
_^
"""""Ethyl b*nz*n* 
— — _ 
J!^»«
• —— Tota 1 Xy 1 *n*« ___ . ______ «/ _
t 
SDQ No. i i
iBpl* IDi 26ififi__._,
l* ID i 
U22I8 __ .
(*c*iv*dt &2^fi3£ft2
tnalyz*dt Q2^2fi^fi2
on Factor i gfi _____
IN UNITSs
'Kg) UB4SQ 
0
25000 
1 U Jj
25000 1 U
25000 1 U
25000 1 U
13000 IU
25000 1 U
13000 IU
13000 IU
13000 IU
13000 IU
13000 IU
13000 1 U
25000 IU
13000 IU
13000 1 U
25000 1 U
130OO 
IU
13000 IU
13OOO 
IU
13OOO IU
13000 1 U
13000 IU
11000 \f
130000 IU
13000 IU
25000 1 U
25000 1 U
13000 IU
13000 IU
13000O 
1"
13OOO IU
49OOO 
1
13000 1 U
330000 1 *
1 _.
r
c
FORM I VGA 
l/«7 R*v.
TUT 001 
0<b65
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
.. r - -j. _ 
} .;X
I
I46MB47
Lab Nam»t__VERSAR___________ 
Contract:________ 
_____________
Lab Cod»i_VERSAR__ Ca»« No. 1430.16 
SAS No. 1451 SB 
SO6 No. 11
Matrixi <«oil/wat»r)8ett &>L 
Lab Sample XDi .76186
Sample wt/vols 
4 _(g/ml)G 
Lab File IDi _U7912
Levels 
(low/med) MED 
Date Received* __07/05/69
* Moisturei not dec._____ 
Dat* Analyzvdi __07/20/69
Dilution Factors _ 
20
Number TIC» foundi _
CONCENTRATION UNXTSi
<UG/L or UG/KQ)_UG/Kg
1
CAS NUMBER 
1
1.110-54-3 
1
2. 569-34-4 
1
3. 103-65-1
4.
5. _____ 
___
6.
7.
6.
9.
10. 
_ __
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. 
____
16. ___ 
_____
17.
16. 
__
19. __________
20.
21. 
____
22. ____ 
_ _
23.
24.
25.
26. ______ _
27.
26.
29.
30.
.
COMPOUND NAME
HEXANE (DOT)
HEXANE, 3-METHYL-
BENZENE, PROPYL
_
*T
19.6666
23.25
34.45
EST. CONC.
31000
JfJ
J
J
IV
i
FORM X VOA-TIC.
\o\, b
TUT OO1 O666
VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: VER5AR INC.
Contract:
Code: VERSAR 
Case No. : 43O 1A 
SAS No. : 4S12B 
SDC No. :
Matrii: (toil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
Level: 
(low/eied)
X Moisture: not dec. _____
Coluem: 
(pack/cap) PACK
Lab Saaplo ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
76189
Y6877
Q7/QS/B9
Date Analuied: O7/19/B9
Dilution Factor: 1O
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UO/KQ
0
74— RT— *?—__—
74-83—9———
79-01-4 ———
73-OO-3 ———
73-O9-2 ———
67-64-1 ———
73-13-O ———
7D— 3D— ^————
73-34-3 ———
34O-39-O ——
67-66-3 ———
107-O6-2 ——
78-93-3 ———
71-33-6 ———
36-23-3 ———
1O8-O3-4 ——
73-27-4 ———
78—87—3————
1O061-O1-3—
. 79-O1-6 ————
124-48-1 ———
79-OO- 3 ———
71-43-2 ———
1O061-O2-6—
•;«_,o— u.^
108-10-1 ———
391-78-6 ———
127-18-4 ———
7^~ ^^^V" mt • ™ •
1OB-B8-3 ———
X08-9O-7 ———
1OO-41-4 ———
1OO-42-3 ———
1330-20-7 ——
•-•".. __~- ..""
—- —— Ch lor o«e thane
——— Broe>o«ethana_
——— Vinul Chloride
—— — Chloroethane^,
———— Hethulene Chlarida
——— -Acetone
——— Carbon Disulfide
— • —— 1. 1-Dichloroethene
——— -I. l-Dichloro«thane
1.2-Dlchloroethene (total) __
— —Ch lor of ore), ,.
——— -1« 2-Dichloroe thane
——— •2-Butanone
———— if 1. l-Trichloroeth-m»._. ___ __
——— Carbon Tetrachlorid*
——— Vinyl Acetate
——— Broaod ich loroMth_m»
— — — 1« 2-Dichloroiroeane
—— — ei»-i» 3-Dichloropropene
——— -Trichloroethene
——— Dibroa)ochloro*)ethAn«
———— 1* 1.2-Trlchloroethane
— • — -Bent ana _. 
•>
——— Tran«-i« 3-Dichloropropene ___
——— -Broaofora) 
_
———— 4H1eth«l-2-f>ent«non. 
_ _ _
— — -2-Heianone
— —— Tetrachloroethene
——— 1» i» 2« 2-Tetrachloroethane ___
—— —Toluene
— — — Chlorobenzene
— — -Ethulbenieno_.
— — -Btyrene , , ,.,
———Total Xylenec 
^
... . -^ .._-.._ ..-,— -. - .
1 -,
13000 lUvT
13000 IU
13000 IU
13OOO IU
63OO IU
130OO IU
6300 IU
6300 IU
6300 IU
6300 IU
6300 IU
6300 IU\k
13000 I*T_R I
3900 UTU" \
6300 lUf
13000 IU
63OO IU
6300 IU
6300 IU
6300 IU
6300 IU
630O IU.
4000 U^
6300 IU
6300 IU
13OOO IU
13000 IU
6300 IU
13OOO IU
110OOO 
1
6300 IU
61OOO 
1 I
4300 IU*
leooo wrr
I VGA
1/87 Rev.
-LIT 
OO1
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name:__VERSAR_____________
Lab Cod«z_VERSAR__ Ca«« No. s430_16
Matrixi <»oil/wat»r^SOIL O/L,
Sample wt/voli 
4 _(g/ml)G
Lev*It 
(low/Hied) MED
* Moimturvi not dec.______
HOBOD48
Cont ract i ________. 
I ________
SAS No. I4512B 
SDG No. tl
Lab Sample IDi _76159
Lab File IDi _Y6677
Date Received! __07/05/69
Date Analyzed! __07/19/69
Dilution Factors _ 
10
CONCENTRATION UNITSi
Number TIC» founds _ 
1 
(UG/L or UG/KG) __UG/Kg
CAS NUMBER
1 . 526-73-6
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14. __ __
15.
16.
17.
18. ____ _ 
_
19.
20.
21. _ 
___
22.
23. _ ___
24.
25.
26. _ _ _ _
. 27. ____ 
__
26.
29. _
30.
COMPOUND NAME
BENZENE. 1 f 2, 3-TRIMETHYL-
——————————————————————————
. ——————————————————————————
__________________________
RT
28. 0633
_
_______
_______
> ______ _
_______
__ _ __ _
EST. CONC.
SfMMttfll
, __ ,_
.
___ _
—————————
—————————
Q
JA/
————
in
FORM I VOA-TIC
TUT 00.1 0668
VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
NO.
Lab Name: VERSAR INC
Cod»: VERSAR
__________ 
Contract:
Cast No. : 430 1A 
SAS No. :
Matrix: <toil/water>
Sample wt/vol: 
4. 0 
(g/ad.)
Level: 
(lou/mtd) MED
X Moisture: not dac. ___
Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
SDO No.
Lab Sample ID: 7619O
Lab Fila ID:
Date Rccvivad:
¥6876
07/OS/B9
Datt Analyiad: O7/19/B9
Dilution Factor: 1O
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS
(og/L or ug/Kg>
1
74-87-3 ——
74-83-9 ——
79-01-4 ——
79-OO-3 ——
79-O9-2 ——
67-64-1 ——
79-19-O ——
79-39-4 ——
79-34-3 ——
940-99-O—
67-66—3——
^F 9 
VW* 
VV
107-O6-2—
78-93-3 ——
71-99-6 ——
96-23-9 ——
1 WO— U3^^
79-27-4 ——
78-87-9 ——
1OO61-O1-9
79-O1 -6 ——
124-48-1 —
79-OO- 9 ——
71-43-2 ——
10O61-O2-6
1O8-1O-1 —
991-78-6 —
127-18-4 —
79-34-9 ——
108-88-3—
1O8-9O-7 —
10O-41-4 —
1OO-42-9 —
4 ****/% **^%— ^
\ 33O— ZO— 7—
- . —
———— -Chloro*tthan«
• ———— Broaiontthan*
————— Vingl Chlorid.
————— Chl or o« titan*
————— Mathylan* Chlorid*
————— Ac* ton*
———— Carbon Disulfid*
———— -1. 1-Dichloroathana
————— 1* 1-DichloroathMM 
_ , _
————— 1.2-Dichloro*thtn« C total!
————— Chlorofora)
————— 1.2-Dichloroathjin« 
. „_
———— 2-Butanon*
————— 1. 1. l-Triehlor>a*th«n*
————— Carbon Tatrachlorid* .
————— Vin^jl Acatat*
————— Broaodicllloroa*th«n*
————— l.S-Dichloroprap«fiB
———— -ci»-lf 9-DichlaraprBp*n«
————— Trichloro«th*n* 
. _ 
.,
————— DibraaiochloroM«th«n« _,
—— •! —— 1. l.S-Trlchloro»th*n«
————— Banzana
———— Tran»-l» S-Diehloropropana^^,^
————— Broaoforai
—————— 4-tlBthvl-2-P*nt«nan*|
———— -2-Ha i anona
— ———— Tatrachloroathana
———— -1. l«2<2-Tatracbloro*thana_ __
————— Taluana. 
_ 
<<
———— -Chlorob«nz*nc
———— -Ethylbanian* 
»/
————— Btyrana..
- —— —Total Xulana* 
J
-• ———— r -A::!«-'
13OOO
13OOO
13000
13OOO
3800
13OOO
6300
63OO
63OO
6300
630O
6300
13OOO
63OO
6300
13OOO
43OO
6300
6300
63OO
6300
6300
63OO
6300
63OO
13OOO
13000
6300
13OOO
24000
6300
13000
4300
120OOO
• o^i. .
•— - - - 
• - —
1 .
!U,
IJU
IU
IU
IX
tu
tu
IU
IU
IU
IU
IV\
tr
iu:
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1
IU
1
IU>
ur:
w
1 _
r
L 1
(A
^
^^^•M
FORM i VOA
1/87 R»v.
TUT 001 0669
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name:__VERSAR.
L.
I
Contract t
13>
I46S6B49
I
b Codes.VERSAR__ Ca»e No. 1430.16
Matrix! <»oil/water>eett. O i_-
Sample Mt/volt
I Levels 
Uow/med)
4 _(Q/ml)6
MED
I
Moisturei not dec.
Number TIC» found!
SAS No. 1451SB 
SDG No. il
Lab Sample IDs .76190
Lab File IDi _Y6676
Date Receivedi __07/05/89
Date Analyzed! __07/19/69
Dilution Factort 
10
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
<UG/L or UG/KG)_UG/Kg
CAS NUMBER
1.933-98-8
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
9.
10.
11.
12. ___________
13. 
_ _
14.
15- _ - — -
16. 
_ __
17.
16.
19. _ 
_______
20.
21. 
__ ___
22. __________
23.
24. 
_ ___
25.
26. _ „ __ _
27. 
„ ___
26. __________
C9.
30.
1 
COMPOUND NAME
1 BENZENE, 1 -ETHYL-2, 3-DIMETHY
UNKNOWN
____________________
________________
_ 
__ __ _ _ _ _
________ 
___ _
____________ _
,
..
RT
23.4
32
_
_
EST. CONC.
5400
7500
____________
______
___ „ . -
_
Q
JV
J
___
I
I
TUT 001 0670
FORM I VOA-TIC
i
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
i V-lb Nane:
Lab Code: VgRSAR
1 Matrix: (soil/water) MflTgB_£/ L.
Sample wt/vol: 
_5tfi (g/mL) ML._
I Level: 
(1 ow/Med > L.Qg__
i X Moisture: not dec. _.__
Columnt 
(pack/cap) PAQK_
Contract: _________ I______
Case No.: 430_i§ 
SAS No.: 4512§_ 
SDO No.: i___
Lab Sample ID: Zfil21_!__
Lab File ID: 
US&53__
Date Received: 2Z/Q5/62
Date Analyzed: e§/24/§2
Dilution Factor:
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(UQ/L or UQ/KQ) Ufi/l._
FORfl I VOA
74-B7-3 ————
74-83-9 ————
75-01-4 ————
75-00-3 ————
67-64-1 ————
75-15-0 ————
75-35-4 ————
75-35-3 ————
540-59-0 ———
67-66-3 ————
107-06-2 ———
78-93-3 ————
71-55-6 ————
56-23-5 ————
108-05-4 ———
75-S7-4 ————
c O O r «J
100610-1-5 —
79-01-6 ————
79-00-5 ————
71-43-2 ————
1O06 1-02-6 —
75-25-2 ————
108-10-1 ———
591-78-6 ———
1B7-18-4 ———
79-34-5 ————
108-88-3 ———
108-90-7 ———
100-41-4 ———
100-42-5 ———
1330-20-7 ——
——— Ch 1 oroavth an*
——— Br o«o*»t h an*
——— Vinyl Chloride
——— Chloro»than»_ _ _
——— M»thyl»n» Chloride
——— Acetone 
^
——— Carbon Diaulfide
——— 1, 1-Dichloroethene
——— 1, 1-Dichloroethane
——— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
——— Ch lorof or«
——— 1,2-Dichloroethane 
_
——— 2-Butanone
——— 1, 1, 1-Trich lor oe thane _ _ _
——— Vinyl Acetate
——— BroHOdichloro»ethane _____ . _
——— 1, 2-Dichloropropane
——— ci»-lf 3-Dichloropropene _____
— - — -1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
——— tran«-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___
——— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 
_ _
——— 2-Hexanone _ . _ _ _ ____
——— Toluene 
_ ____
—— -Chloro benzene 
_ __
——— Ethyl benzene 
___
——— Styrene ________________ .._
——— Total Xylene* 
. _____
10
10
10
10
5
13
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
S
53
5
5
5
nfl
114
irf
1 D
IU
101
•T
\*
if
1 14
III
\\f
\\l
\\f
IU
Itf
• JO
IU
IV
I MlM5
1 U
If*
111
iir
\v
IU
IU
in
"U
IW
IU'
\*
**,
ll/
IM^
•Vi5
i
*<
i.
K
£_
1/87 Rev.
T OOi O671
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
i .,b Names ygRSAR.ItJQ.._______
Lab Codes ygRSAR_ 
Case No.s
I Matrixs (soil/water) 'WSTIB.D/^
Sample wt/vols 
_5tQ (g/mL> ML_
I Levels 
(low/med) L.QW__
i X Moistures not dec. ____
Column 
(pack/cap) P.A.C.K
I
Number TIC* founds _Q
I -4666*60
Contracts _____m___ 
l______
SAS No.s 451ie_ 
SDO No. i 1.
Lab Sample IDs Z6121.
Lab File IDs 
Uft6S3.
Date Received!
Date Analyzeds QS/24/S2
Dilution Factors
CONCENTRATION UNITSs
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg>
I
I 
CAS NUMBER
I
I
COMPOUND NAME
RT
1 
I.
I
EST. CONC. I
mmmmmmmmmmm\
r_ ^ORM I VOA-TIC
1/67 Rev.
TUT OO1 O672
VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Nam*. VER5AR INC.
Contract:
Jb Code: VERSAR 
Cat* No. : 43Q la 
SAS No. : 4312B 
SDG No. :
Matrii: <»oil/uatar) -«mr OtL- 
Lab Sample XD: 76192
Sample ut/vol: 
4.0 
(g/«L) fi__ 
Lab Fila ID: 
Y6B73
Laval: 
(lou/mad) HEP 
Data Racaivad: Q7/O3/B9
X Moittura: not dac. ___ 
Data Analgzad: Q7/19/89
Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK 
Dilution Factor: Ifl_____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg> UQ/KQ
*T4 _a*T_*3_—_~^__.
74-83-9 ———— ——
75-01-4 ———— ——
75-OO-3 ——————
^^_/\B_"T________
67-64-1 ————— —
75-15-0 ——— ———
75-35-4 ——————
75-34-3 ——— — —
54O-59-O —————
67-66—3—— — — -
107-06-2
• ^^ r 
+^^f BM
78-93-3 —————— -
71-35-6 —— ————
36-23-5 ———————
108-05-4 —— ———
75-27-4 ——————
78-87-5 — ———— -
1O061-O1-S ————
79-0 1 -6 ————— —
1 24—48— 1 •- -• •
a> Mb • ^** *
79-OO-S ——————
71-43-2 ——— ———
1OO61-O2-6 ————
T^—*^^—.** 
—
1O8-1O-1 —————
591-78-6 —————
127-18-4 ——————
79-34-5 ——— ——
108-88-3 —————
1O8-9O-7 — ————
1OO-41-4 ——————
1OO-42-5 — • —— —
• ^v^r 
~wmm ^
1330-20-7 — ———
- '•:•"----•.!::-
— Chloromathana
— Broaioaathana
— Vinul Chlorida
— Ch lor o» than*
— Mathylana Chlarid* 
. . „ . __
— Acatona
—Carbon Ditulfid*
— 1. 1-Dichloroathana
— 1* 1-Dicfiloroathana 
_, .
— 1.2-Dichloroathana (total)__
— Chlarofora)
— 1.2-Dichloroathana 
.... .
— 2-Butanona
— 1. 1< l-Triehloro«th«n» .. 
*/
—Carbon Tatrachlarii!* ,._„„.
-Vinyl Acatata
— BroAodichloroaathana _. _ 
„_
—1. 2-Dichloropropana
— eim-li 3-Dlehloraprap»na
— Trichloroathan*
— DibroaochloroaathAna ,„.._,„
— 1, 1, a-TrlchlOfaath«n*.__ ._ .
— Ban x ana 
*
— Tran»-l» 3-Dichloropropana __ _
— BroBaforai , ...
-4-«. t h v 1-2-Pantmnan.
— S-Haianona
— Tatrachloroathan* 
. _. - _.
— 1. l»2*2-Tatrachloroathana __ „
— Taluana 
•
—Ch lor ob an tana
— Ethylbanzana 
S
—fiturana
—Total Xylanam 
</
:.^ . r •-.« '
... .. .. 
. . 
. .. .. 
. 
,
13000 luTT"
a> vv^v^rvr 
• ^^^^F
13000 IU
1<VW) 
III
A«JWw 
I V
13OOO IU
6300 IU
13000 IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
6300 IU
63OO IU
43OO IU
63OO IU V y
13OOO 
IKF. f
2SOOO 1 :~
63OO IU
13000 IU
t f^f^f* 
III
43OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
A3OO 
IU 1
6300 IU
63OO IU
12OOO 
1
6300 IU
6300 IU
13OOO IU
a> MM M w 
• mf
13OOO IU
f^f\f\f\f\ 
•
3OOOO 1
13OOO IU
a* h* w M w 
• *f
91OOO 
1
63OO IU
92000 1
63OO IJU
• 
^fv-w*mr 
»«r
latftooo 
i *t-
\ j-
1
1/87 K«v.
TUT OOi 0673
o
IE
VOLATILE ORGAN I CS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
, r_ 
,-
i
i
Lab Nam»i __ VERSAR ___________ 
Contract i ___
Lab Cod* i _ VERSAR __ Case No. :438_16 
SAS No. i4512B
Matrix* <»oi l/wat»r> 96-ft Gfc
Sampl* Mt/voli 
4 _<g/ml)G
L»v» It 
(1 ow/mvd > 
MED
% Moi»tur«i not time.
I_______I
SDG No.i1
Lab Sampl* IDs _76192
Lab Fil» IDt _Y6875
Dat* R»c«iv»di __07/05/89
Dat* Analyzedi __07/19/89
Dilution Factors _ 
10
Number TICm foundi
CONCENTRATION UNITSi
(U6/L or UG/KG)_UG/Kg
CAS NUMBER
1.
a. 1634-04-4
3.96-14-0
4._
, 3. ______
6. 95-63-6
7. 526-73-8
a.
9. __ ______
10. _
11. ________
IS.
13.
14.
15. ____ __
16.
17.
18. _ . _ __
19._ 
______
20.
21.
22. 
__ __
£3. _ ____
2*. 
-,.. . ,
8S- .^ 
JL_
26- __^^
87.
28.
29- 
.
30.
1
1 
COMPOUND NAME
1 UNKNOWN
PROPANE, 2-METHOXY-2-HETHYL-
IPENTANE, 3-METHYL-
UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON
1 UNKNOWN
BENZENE, 1,2, 4-TR I METHYL-
BENZENE, 1,2, 3-TRIMETHYL-
_
__
RT
18. 6833
14.45
17. 8833
19.8333
22.9666
27.8666
33.9166
__
_
EST. CONC.
19000
85000
7900
8000
S900
16000
140000
___
.
1
1 
0
...
J
JNl
IJW
J
IJ
JK>
J**
^M^VI^
FORM I VOA-TIC
-71? 
<-• C
TUT 001 0674
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Name: VERSAR.INC.
Contract:
I 4£5d9G3
I
Lab Code: VERSAR_ 
Ca»e No.: 43.0_i§ 
SAS No.i 4512g_ 
SDG No.:
Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol: 
_ 4..0 
(g/mL) g __
I Level: 
(low/Med) MED __
X Moisture i not dec. ___
I ColuMn: 
(pack/cap) PAgK _
Lab Sample IDi Z6124__.
Lab File ID: 
UZ23§__.
Date Received: 0.7/S5/6.2
Date Analyzed: 
fiZ£gO./fi2
Dilution Factor: gO.0___.
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(uQ/L or UQ/KQ) gg/Kg
74-83-9 —————
75-01-4 —————
75-00-3 —————
75-09-? —————
67-64-1 —————
75-15-0 —————
75-35-4 ———— -
75-35-3 —————
O^V a^«~v
67-66-3 —————
107-06-2 ————
78-93-3 —————
71-55-6 —————
56-23-5 —————
108-05-4 ————
75-27-4 —————
76-87-5 ———— -
100610-1-5 ——
79-01-6 —————
1C^ ^O A — «—— -
79-00-5 ———— -
71-43-2 ———— -
10061-02-6 — -
108-10-1 ——— -
591-78-6 ——— -
127-18-4 ——— -
79-34-5 ———— -
108-86-3 ——— -
108-90-7 ——— -
100-41-4 ——— -
100-42-5 ——— -
1330-20-7 —— -
• —— Chloronethane
• —— Brononethane
• —— Vinyl Chloride
• —— Chloroethane
• —— Methylene Chloride
• —— Acetone
• —— Carbon Disulfide 
_
• —— 1, 1-Dichloroethene
• —— 1, 1-Dichloroethane
• —— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
• —— Chloroform
• —— 1, 2-Dichloroethane
• —— 2-Butanone
• —— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
• —— Carbon Tetrachloride
• —— Vinyl Acetate _
• —— Bro«odichloroaethane_
• —— 1,2-Dichloropropane
• —— ci»-lf 3-Dichloropropene
• —— Trichloroethene ___ _______
—— DibroMOChloroaethane_ 
_ .
—— 1 v 1 , 2-Tr ich loroethane
—— -Benzene
——— tran«-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___
—— Broaofore, _ 
_ 
__
——— 2-Hexanone
—— Tetrachloroethene 
_ ^
— — - 1,1*2, 2-Te t r ach 1 or oe th ane^.....
——— Toluene 
__ 
_ 
___ _ j._
— — Ch lor o benzene 
_
——— Ethylbenzene 
_ 
_.f«._
—— Styrene 
_
——— Total Xylene* _ _ ______ ^_
250000
250000
250000
250000
300000
34 0000
130000
130000
130000
130000
130000
130000
250000
130000
130000
250000
130000
130000
130000
130000
130000
130000
130000
1300000
130000
250000
250000
91000
130000
92000
130000
130000
130000
230000
1iu:
IU
IU
lUv
K§
IU*
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
14^
IU
\jr
IU
IU
IU
1 J
:f
&
FORM Z VOA
TUT
1/67 Rev.
O01 0675
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I
. .b Na»ei VERSAR.INC.. _________ 
contracts _______ i
L*b Codes yERSAR_ 
Case No. \ 430_i6 
SAS No. s 4S1HB _ 
SDG No. i
I Matrix s (soil/water. SQI8.-O/L.
Sample wt/vol: 
_4tO <g/mL> Q__
Levels 
<low/med> 
ME.fi__
X Moistures not dec. ___
Column 
(pack/cap) E9CIS_
Number TICs founds __fi
Lab Sample IDs 7&194
Lab File IDs
Date Receiveds
Date Anal/zeds
Dilution Factors gQO
CONCENTRATION UNITS I
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
I
I 
CAS NUMBER
I mmm-mmmmmmmm
COMPOUND NAME
RT
I
EST. CONC. I 
Q 
I
mmmmmmmmmmm | mmmmm \
I
I
FORM I VOA-TIC
Rev.
TUT 001. O676
1A
VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: VERSAR INC
ab Code: VERSAR
j___________. 
Contract:
Cat* No. : 430 1A 
SAS No. :
Matrijt: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
Level: 
(lou/med) MED
X Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
(g/mL)
8DC No. : 1_
Lab Sample ID: 76193
Lab File ZD:
Date Received:
Y6B74
07/Q5/B9
Date Analyzed: O7/19/89
Dilution Factor: 1O
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/KQ
f
• 7at— PT— 3————
74-83-9 ——
75-O1 -4 ——
75-OO-3 ——
75-09-2 ——
67-64-1 ——
75-15-O ——
75-35-4 ——
75-34-3 ——
540-59-O —
67-66-3 ——
107-06-2—
78-93-3 ——
71-55-6 ——
56-23-5 ——
108-O5-4 —
75-27-4 ——
78-87-5 ——
10O61-O1-5
79-01-6 ——
124-48-1 —
79-OO-S ——
71-43-2 ——
1OO61-O2-6
75-25-2 ——
1O8-1O-1 —
591-78-6 —
127-18-4 —
79-34-5 ——
108-88-3 —
1O8-9O-7 —
1OO-41-4 ——
100-42-5 —
1330-2O-7-
- — ' "" *
'.-.>„,
•a----- *•"• * .-t*fr-ir • i'jf*,.*"*!'
""*. 
4^. 
** '
»-*^fc- * *--**•»* • <. m*"m* > —
— —— Chloromethane
————— Bromome thane
———— Vingl Chloride
————— Chloroethane_
————— Methul*ne Chloride
————— Acetone
————— Carbon Disulfide
————— !• 1-Dichloroethene
————— 1. 1-Dichloroethane
1.2-Dichloroethene (total) __
- 
---Chloroform
———— 1» 2-Dichloroethan*
———— »2-Butanone
————— •!• 1* l-Trichloroe'th'an» 
«/
———— Carbon Tatrachlorld*
———— Vinul Acetate
———— BromodichlorometiiM*
——— — It 2— Dichlorooropane
———— elm— i» 3— Dichlorepropene ____
———— Trichloroethene
———— -Dibromochloromethan*
————— It l«2-Trlchloroethan*
———— Benz»ne_ 
^
———— Tran«-l. 3-Dichloroprop«ne_ __
- —— -Bromoform
———— 4-Methul-2-Pentanon>
———— 2-Heianone
———— -Tetrachloroethene 
*
———— 1« 1. 2« 2-Te trach lor oettiane ___
— —— -Toluene ___ _, 
j
— - — -Chlorobenzene
——— -Ethulbenzene 
%/
——— — 8tvrene__
——— —Total Xulvnet 
«/
- — ~r —.*. ~f t
|
nm i VOA
_j^--^ss^*:^:-^' - ..
• £.- .._. *?zr ^a&^f'f&f-'- -^ "'*^> :'— T-
T 
v
13OOO
13OOO
13000
13OOO
63OO
13000
63OO
63OO
63OO
63OO
6300
63OO
13000
42000
6300
13OOO
63OO
63OO
63OO
63OO
63OO
6300
63OO
6300
6300
1300O
13000
63000
13OOO
97000
4300
19OOO
4300
190000
«3L.
TUT 
C
*'
K'
1 .
tu.
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU>
IX
1 >
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1
IU
1
IJU
1MK
i*a
1
J
01 
!
r
r
»
^/1
J
787
»67;
tor
^-O-
n^
i*h
Rev.
;••
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO
Lab Namt: VERSAR INC.
430
ab Cod*: VERSAR 
Cat* No. ____
Matrii: <toil/wat*r> -6G«r & IU
Sampl* wt/vol: 
4. 0 
(g/mL>
L*v»l: 
Uou/m*d) MED
X Moittur*: not d*c. ____
Column 
(pack/cap) PACK
Number TJC» found: _Q.
Contract:
II
SAS No. : 4512B 
SDG No
Lab Sampl* ID:
Lab Filt ID:
Date R*c«iv*d:
Y&874
Date Analgzvd: O7/19/B9
Dilution Factor: 1O____
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/KQ
FORM X VOA-TIC
1/87 R«v.
TUT 001 0673
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Name: VERSAR_INC...
Contract
EPA SAMPLE NO.
1
1 
VBLK95
1
Lab Code: VERSAR_ 
Case No.s 430.16 
SAS No.: 4512B_ 
SDG No.:
I Matrixs (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol: 
_5tO <g/mL> ML._
I Levels
(loM/med) L.OU__
% Moistures not dec. ___
Column: 
<pack/cap) P6CK_
Lab Sample IDs VBLK9.5
Lab File IDs 
UZS2S__.
Date Receiveds 
________
Date Analyzed: QZ/12/§§
Dilution Factors la.fi.
CAS NO.
74-87-3 ———
75-01-4 ———
75-00-3 ———
75-09-2 ———
67-64-1 ———
75-15-0 ———
75-35-4 ———
75-35-3 ———
540-59-0 ——
67-66-3 ———
107-06-2 ——
71-55-6 ———
56-23-5 ———
108-05-4 ——
75-27-4 ———
76-67-5 —— -
100610-1-5-
79-01-6 —— -
79-00-5 —— -
71-43-2 —— -
10061-02-6-
75-25-2 —— -
106-10-1 — -
591-78-6 — -
1E7-16-4——
79-34-5 —— -
106-68-3 — -
106-90-7 — -
1OO-41-4 — -
100-42-5 — -
1330-20-7—
CONCENTRATION UNITS s
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/U_
• ———— Chloromethane
• ———— Bromomethane
• ———— Vinyl Chloride
• ———— Chloroethane
• ———— Methylene Chloride 
_____
• ———— Acetone
• ———— Carbon Disulfide
• ———— 1, 1-Dichloroethene
• ———— 1, 1-Dichloroethane
• ———— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total) __
• ———— Ch lorof orm
• ———— 1, 2-Dichloroethane
• ———— 2-Butanone
• ———— Carbon Tetrachloride
- ———— Vinyl Acetate 
____
———— Bromodichloromethane
———— 1, 2-Dich lore pro pane
———— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ____
—— • — Tr i ch 1 oroethene
———— 1T 1, E-Trichloroethane ____
_
———— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene ___
———— Bromoform
— • ——— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 
____
———— Tetrachl oroethene 
____
———— Toluene 
____
———— Ethyl benzene. 
___
———— Styrene ______ __ _____
- ———— Total Xylenem ___ 
_______
10
10
10
10
5
1O
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
S
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
•5
•555
Q
1
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1
•
-
TU
00! 0,79
I
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name:__VERSAR_____________
f Lab Code:_VERSAR__ Case No. :430_16
Matrix: <»oi1/water)WATER
Sample wt/vol: 
5 _<g/ml)ML
I Level: 
(low/med) LOW
* Moisture: not dec.______
IVBLK95
I
Number TIC* founds
Contract:__________
SAS No.:4512B 
SDG No.il
Lab Sample ID: _VBLK95
Lab File ID: _U7895
Date Received: _________
Date Analyzed: __07/19/89
Dilution Factort 
1
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(UG/L or UG/KG)_UG/L
1
CAS NUMBER
1.124-38-9 
1
2. _ _ 
__ 
1
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22. 
___
23.
24. 
___
25. _ ________
26. 
__
27. _ ___ __
28. 
_ __ _ ___
29. 
__
30. 
___
COMPOUND NAME
CARBON DIOXIDE (ACN)
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON
___________ _ __________
_
__________________________
____
_ ___ _ 
__ _ 
_ _
RT
1.7
32.5
33. 1166
33. 8666
EST. CONC.
7
2
3
4
'
1
Q
J
J
J
J
TUT 001 
O68O
FORM I VOA-TIC
-^ /. „ C-
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO
I 
VBLK11
Name: VERSAR INC.
Contract: 
I
Lab Code: VERSAR_ 
Case No.: 430_16 
SAS No.: 4512B_ 
SDG No.: !____
Hatrixi (soil/water) WATER. 
Lab Sample IDi VBLK11___
Sample wt/vol: 
_5tg 
<g/mL) ML._ 
Lab File ID: 
UZ2I1___
Level i 
(low/med) L.QW__ 
Date Received:
* Moisturei not dec. ___ 
Date Analyzed: 07/20/89
Column: (pack/cap) PACK_ 
Dilution Factor t 1..Q___
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) US/I
74-87-3 —————
"7 A A ^ Q
f ^ O W i7
75-01-4 —————
75-00-3 —————
75-09-2 —————
67-64-1 —————
75-15-0 —————
75-35-4 —————
75-35-3 —————
540-59-0 ————
67-66-3 —————
107-06-2 ————
71-55-6 —————
56-23-5 —————
108-05-4 ————
75-27-4 —————
78-87-5 —————
100610-1-5 ——
79-01-6 —————
79-00-5 —————
71-43-2 —————
10061-02-6 ——
108-10-1 ——— -
591-78-6 ————
127-18-4 ————
79-34-5 —————
108-68-3 ————
108-90-7 ————
100-41-4 ————
100-42-5 ————
1330-20-7 ———
—— Ch lor ome thane
—— Bromomethane
—— Vinyl Chloride
—— Chloroethane
—— Hethylene Chloride
—— Acetone
—— Carbon Disulfide
—— 1, 1-Dichloroethene
—— lf 1-Dichloroethane
—— 1, 2-Dichloroethene < total) __
—— Chloroform
—— 1,2-Dichloroethane
—— 2-Butanone
—— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
—— Carbon Tetrachloride
—— Vinyl Acetate
— — — Bromod ich lor ome thane
—— 1, 2-Dichloropropane
—— ci»-l, 3-Dichloropropene
—— Trichloroethene
—— Dibromochloromethane
—— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane
—— Benzene
—— tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___
—— Bromoform
—— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
—— 2-Hexanone
—— Tetrachloroethene
—— 1 « 1 « 2f 2-Tetrach loroeth ane ___
—— Toluene
—— Chlorobenzene
—— Ethyl benzene
—— Styrene
—— Total Xylenes
10
10
10
10
4
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
IU
IU
IU
IU
IBJ
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1
FOKI1 1 VGA
1/87 Rev.
TUT OO1 O6S1
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
. .0 Name: VERSAR_INC...
Contract:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I
I 
VBLK11
I
Lab Cod*: VERSAR
Case No.: 430_16 
SAS No.: 4512B _ 
SDG No. s 1.
Matrix t (soil/water) UATgR_
Sample wt/vol: 
_5..Q <g/»L> Ml._
Level: 
(low/wed) LOW__
% Moisture: not dec. _____
Colunn 
(pack/cap) PAQK_
Number TIC* found: _2
Lab Sanple ID: VIL.KU___
Lab File ID: 
y22il__.
Date Received: _______
Date Analyzed: Q7/2fi/fi2
Dilution Factor: l_fi_.__.
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
<ug/L or ug/Kg>
I 
I 
CAS NUMBER
I
COMPOUND NAME
I
I 
I
I
I 
RT 
I EST. CONC. I 
Q 
I
I
I
I
'„ ^FDRH X VOA-TXC._
001 0682
57 Rev.
1A
VOLATILE ORGftNICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
.^, Name: ygRSAR_INC.._____________ 
Contract:
Lab Code: yERSAR_ 
Case No.: 430_16 
SAS No.: 4512B
4512B
1 
1
1 
VBLK29 
. 
1
1 
1
SDG No. : 1
Matrix: (soil/water) UATER_
Sample wt/vol: 
_5tO (g/mL) Ml._
Level: 
(low/med) L.OW__
< Moisture: not dec. _..._
Column: (pack/cap) PACK_
Lab Sample IDi yBLK.29^_____
Lab File ID: 
U7929_____
Date Received: ________
Date Analyzed: 07/20/69
Dilution Factor: 1-.0.
CAS NO.
74-87-3 —————
r ** 0*9 7
75-01-4 —————
75-OO-3 —————
75-09-2 —————
67-64-1 —————
75-15-0 —————
75-35-3 —————
54O-59-0 ————
67-66-3 —————
107-06-2 ————
78-93-3 —————
71-55-6 —————
56-23-5 —————
108-05-4 ————
75-27-4 —————
100610-1-5 ——
79-01-6 —————
79-00-5 —————
71-43-2 —————
10061-02-6 ——
75-25-2 —————
1O8-10-1 ————
591-78-6 ————
127-18-4 ————
79-34-5 —————
106-68-3 ————
108-90-7 ————
100-41-4 ————
100-42-5 ————
1330-20-7 ———
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
COMPOUND 
<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L_
—— Chloromethane
—— Bromome thane
—— Vinyl Chloride
—— Chloroethane
—— Methylene Chloride
—— Acetone
—— Carbon Dimulfide
—— 1, 1-Dichloroethene
—— 1, 1— Dichloroethane
—— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
—— Chloroform
—— 1, 2-Dichloroethane
—— 2-Butanone
—— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
—— Carbon Tetrachloride
—— Vinyl Acetate
—— -Bromodichloronethane
—— 1, 2-Diehloropropane
—— cim-lf 3-Dichloropropene
—— Tr i ch 1 oroethene
—— Dibromochloromethane 
_
—— 1, lf 2-Trichloroethane
—— Benzene
—— tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene_. __
—— Bromo fora
—— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
—— 2-Hexanone
—— Tetrachl oroethene
—— lf 1T 2f 2-Tetrachloroethane ___
—— Toluene
—— -Chlorobenzene
— -Ethyl benzene
—— Styrene __ 
_ _ _________
—— Total Xylenei 
_ _
10
10
1O
1O
3
14
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Q
1
IU
IU
IU
IU
IBJ
IB
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1 _
FORM I VOA
TUT 001 0683
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I 
VBLK29
. .b Name: VERSAR_INC..____________ 
Contract: _________ 
I
Lab Code: VERSAR_ 
Case No.: A30_i& 
SAS No.t 4512B_ 
SDG No.:
I Matrix: (soil/water) UAJER_
Sample wt/vol : 
_ §tO 
<g/»L> ML _
I Level: 
< low/wed) L.QW __
* Moisture: not dec. ___
Column 
(pack/cap) PAQK; _
Number TICs found: _ 0
Lab Sample IDi yBLKg9__.
Lab File IDi 
UZ229__.
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzed! Q7/22/6?
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) gfi/U_
I 
I
I 
CAS 
NUMBER 
I
I »»»«»«.«»».«« I,
I 
I
I
I
I
COMPOUND NAME
RT
I 
EST. CONC. 
I
FORM I VOA-TZC
1/B7 
Rev.
TUT
1ft
VOLATILE ORGflNICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAHPLE NO.
>^o Name: VERSAR INC
Lab Code: VERSAR
Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample Mt/vol:
Level: 
(low/med)
% Moisture: not dec.
Column: (pack/cap)
CAS NO.
74-87-3 —————
74-83-9 —————
75-01-4 —————
75-00-3 —————
67-64-1 —————
75-15-0 —————
75-35-4 —————
>*^ 
75-35-3 —————
540-59-0 ————
67-66-3 —————
107-06-2 ————
78-93-3 —————
71-55-6 —————
56-23-5 —————
1O8-05-4 ————
75-27-4 —————
10O610-1-5 ——
79-01-6 —————
79-OO-5 —————
10061-02-6 ——
75-25-2 —————
108-10-1 ——— -
79-34-5 —————
108-88-3 ————
108-90-7 ————
100-41-4 ————
100-42-5 ————
1330-20-7 ———
1 
1
1 
VBLK71 
1
Contract: 
1 
|
Case No.: 430 16 
SAS No.: 
SDG No.: 1
SOIL _ 
Lab Sample ID: VBLK71
5.0 
(g/mL> G 
Lab File ID: 
U8571
MED __ 
Date F
___ 
Date f
PACK 
Diluti
deceived :
Inalyzed: Q8/19/89
on Factor: 1.3
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ug/Kg) U.G./K.G. 
Q
—— Chlorome thane
—— Bromomethane
—— Vinyl Chloride
—— Chloroethane
—— Methylene Chloride
—— Acetone
—— Carbon Di«ulfide
—— 1, 1-Dichloroethene
—— 1, 1-Dichloroethane
—— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
—— Chloroform
—— 1, 2-Dichloroethane
—— •2-Butanone
—— 1, lf l-Triehloro«thane
—— Carbon Tetrachloride
—— Vinyl Acetate
—— 1, 2-Dichloropropane
—— ci»-lf 3-Dichloropropene
—— Tr i eh 1 oroe then*
—— D i bromoch 1 or ome tn ane
—— 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane
—— Benzene
—— tran»-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___
—— Bromoform 
_ _
—— 4-Hethyl-2-Pentanone
—— 2-Hexanone
—— Tetrachloroethene
—— 1 f 1 f 2, 2-Tetr ACh loroethane ___
• — — Chlorobenxene
• —— Ethyl benzene
— ~~ Styrene — 
— 
_ — — —
• —— Total Xylene* _ 
_ _
1
1300 
IU
1300 
IU
1300 
IU
130O 
IU
630 
IU
1300 
IU
630 
IU
63O 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
1300 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
1300 
IU
63O 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
6300 
1 U
630 
IU
1300 
IU
1300 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
1 U
630 
IU
630 
IU
1
•
FORM I VGA
TUT OO1 O6S5
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
. .b Name: yERSAR_INC..______________
I Lab Code: VERSAR_ 
Case No.: 430_1_>
• Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL._
Sample wt/vol: 
_5..0 
(g/mL) G__
I Levels 
(low/med) MED__
I
I 
VBLK71
I
I
% Moisture: not dec. ___
Coluwn 
(pack/cap) E9QK.
Contract: _________ 
I__________
SAS No. : ______ 
SDG No. : !____
Lab Sanple IDi _?§_.K71__.
Lab File IDi 
US52I__.
Date Received: ______
Date Anal/zed: Q§/19/fi§
Dilution Factori 1_.3___
Number TIC» found: _Q
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L 
or ug/Kg>
I
I 
CAS NUMBER
I-«-»»»-««.->.
COMPOUND NAME
I 
I 
I
I 
RT 
I EST. CONC. I 
Q
. I
I
FORH I VOA-TIC
C
' O
1/67 Rev.
TUT 001 0686
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
.^ Name: VERSAR_INC.._____________ 
Contract: ____.
Lab Code: VERSAR_ 
Case No.: 430_i6 
SAS No.: 4518B.
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I
I 
VBLK01
I
SDG No.
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER_
Sample wt/vol: 
_5..Q 
Cg/mL) ML_
Levels 
(low/med) LOW__
X Moisture: not dec. ___
Column: 
(pack/cap) 
PACK_
Lab Sawple IDi yBLKOi^_.
Lab File ID« 
y8601__.
Date Received: ______
Date Anal/zed: 08/81/52
Dilution Factori
CAS NO.
74-87-3 ———
74-83-9 ———
75-01-4 ———
75-00-3 ———
75-09-8 ———
67-64-1 ———
75-15-0 ———
75-35-4 ———
75-35-3 ———
540-59-0 ——
67-66-3 ———
107-06-8 ——
71-55-6 ———
56-83-5 ———
108-05-4 ——
75-87-4 ———
V8-87-5 ———
100610-1-5-
79-01-6 ———
79-00-5 ———
71-43-8 ———
10061-08-6-
75-85-8 ———
108-10-1 ——
591-78-6 ——
1E7-18-4 ——
79-34-5 ———
106-66-3 ——
I 106-90-7 ——
I 100-41-4 ——
1 100-48-5 ——
1 1330-80-7—
J 
_ 
__
- \. w
'*•*
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
COMPOUND 
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/L.
———— Chloronethane
——— Bromomethane
———— Vinyl Chloride
———— Ch 1 or oe thane
———— Methylene Chloride
———— Acetone
———— Carbon Di»ulfide
———— 1, 1-Dichloroethene
———— 1, 1-Dichloroethane
———— 1, 8-Dichloroethene (total) __
———— Ch lore fora
———— 1,8-Dichloroethane 
_
———— 8-Butanone
———— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
———— Carbon Tetrachloride 
_ _
———— Vinyl Acetate
• ———— BroMod 1 ch lor one thane
• ———— 1, 8-Dichloropropane
• ———— ei«-lf 3-Dichloropropene
• ———— Tr ich loroethene
• ———— Dibroaochloronethane
• ———— 1, 1, 8-Trichloroethane
• ——— Benzene
• ———— BroMofore.
• ———— 4-Hethyl-8-Pentanone 
_ _
• ———— 8-He x anone
• ———— Tetrach loroethene 
_ ___
• ———— 1 , 1,8, 8-Tetrach loroethane ___ .
• ———— Toluene 
_ __ ___ ______
*— — —— Styrene , „_ _.^- „ _ _ _ _ . 
_,.____
• ———— Total Xylei>e» _____________
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
5
5
• 
' 5
.5
-, . S
isSlillilf^ ?
: S "„, •
>'- /• 3
0
1
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1
0687
R»v.
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I
I 
VBLK01
i
. .o Name: yERSAR_INC..____________ 
Contracti _________ I_____
Lab Code: yERSAR_ 
Case No. i A30_lfe 
SAS No.: 4512B_ 
SDG No.: 1.
• Matrix: (soil/water) WATER_
* Sample wt/vol: 
_5..0 <g/mL> ML_
I Level 
(low/med) LOU__
% Moisture: not dec. ___
| Column 
(pack/cap) PACK_
I Number TZCs founds _0
Lab Sample IDi VBL.!<01___
Lab File IDi 
yS6Q!____
Date Received! ______
Date Analyzedi Q8/2i/§9
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS I
(ug/L or ug/Kg)
I
I 
CAS NUMBER
I ««»»..»»•
I
COMPOUND NAME
I 
I 
I
I 
RT 
I EST. CONC. I 
Q
I
I
FORM Z VOA-TIC
1/87 Rev.
TUT 001 0688
1A
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
1
1
1
1
VBLK52 
. 
I
1
^_j Name: VERSAR_INC..____________ 
Contract:
Lab Code: yERSAR_ 
Case No.: 430_i§ 
SAS No.: 4512B_ 
SDG No.t 1.
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER.
Sample wt/vol: 
____ (g/mL) ML_
Levels 
<low/wed) LOW__
* Moistures not dec. ___
Column: (pack/cap) PACK_
Lab Sample IDs UBLK5.2__.
Lab File IDs 
US652__.
Date Received: ______
Date Analyzeds Q8/g3/g9
Dilution Factors
CAS NO.
74-87-3 ———
75-01-4 ———
75-00-3 ———
67-64-1 —— -
75-15-0 ———
75-35-4 ———
75-35-3 ———
540-59-0 ——
67-66-3 ———
107-06-8 ——
78-93-3 ———
71-55-6 ———
56-23-5 ———
108-05-4 ——
75-27-4 ———
78-87-5 ———
100610-1-5-
79-01-6 ———
124-48-1 ——
79-00-5 ———
71-43-2 ———
1OO61-02-6-
/ 3 C 3 C
108-10-1 ——
591-78-6 ——
1E7-1B-4 ——
79-34-5 ———
108-88-3 ——
108-90-7 ——
1OO-41-4 ——
100-42-5 ——
1330-20-7 —
CONCENTRATION UNITS t
COMPOUND 
<ug/L or ug/Kg> Ufi/L_
——— Ch loronethane
———— BromoMethane
———— Vinyl Chloride
———— Chloroethane
———— tlethylene Chloride
———— Acetone
———— Carbon Dieulfide
———— 1, 1-Dichloroethene
———— 1, l-Diehloroeth*ne
———— 1, E-Diehloroethene (total) __
———— Chloroform
———— 1, 2-Dichloroeth*ne
———— 2-But«none
———— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
———— Carbon Tetrachloride
———— Vinyl Acetate
———— Bromodichloroaethane
———— 1,2-Dichloropropane
———— cim-1, 3-Dichloropropene
———— Triehloroethene
———— D i broaoch 1 or one th ane
———— 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
———— Benzene
——— -tran«-l, 3-Dichloropropene ___
———— BroMO fora
———— 4-Hethyl-B-Pentanone
———— 1 , 1 , 2 f 2-Te t r ach 1 or oe t h ane ___
———— Toluene
———— Chloro benzene
———— Ethyl benzene
— - — Total Xylene*
>__ 
i
10
10
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
10
595
. 5959
Q
1
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1/A7
TUT
0689
IE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I
I 
VBLK5S
I
.b Name: VERSAR_INC
Contract: 
I
Lab Code: VERSAR. 
Case No.: 430_16 
SAS No.: 451g§_ 
SDG No.i 1_____
Matrix: (soil/water) UATgR_ 
Lab Sample ID: 
ViJ_K5g_____.
Sample wt/vol: 
____ <g/mL) ML_ 
Lab File ID: 
ya§52______
Level: 
(low/med) tQW__ 
Date Received: _____m_
% Moisture: not dec. ___ 
Date Analyzed: Q8/g2/82
Column 
(pack/cap) PAQSS_ 
Dilution Factor* i______
Number TIC* found: _2
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(UQ/L or ujj/Kg)
I
I 
CAS NUMBER
I
COMPOUND NAME
I 
I 
I
I 
RT 
I EST. CONC. I
I
I
FORM X VOA-TIC
1/67 Rev.
TUT 001 069O
VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: VERSAR INC.
VBLK73
)b Code: VERSAR
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
_4
Level: 
(low/med) HEP
_______________ 
Contract:
Case No. : 430 16 
SAS No. :
(g/mL)
SOG No.
Lab Sample ID: VBLK73
Lab File 10:
Date Received:
Y6B73
X Moisture: not dec. ____
Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
Date Analgred: O7/19/89
Dilution Factor: 1. Q
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UO/KO
:
74-B7-3 ——————— Chloromethane
74-83-9 ——————— BromoMe thane
75-01-4 —————
^^_ rt/t_ •»—
75-O9-2 —————
67-64-1 —————
75-15-O —————
75-33-4 —————
T*f— 1A--1— _____
540-59-O ————
67-66-3 —————
1 n7_nA_9— ___
78-93-3 —————
71-55-6 —————
• *__•*•* _ •
108-05-4 ————
75-27-4 —————
7o_e*r_^______
10061-O1-S ——
79-01-6 —————
124-48-1 ————
^o_nn_— i
71-43-2 —————
1OO61-O2-6 ——
»?« •%« ^
/ &— 2 a— Z—— •• • -
1 no— 1 o— t — — — — M-
591-78-6 ————
127-18-4 ————
79-34-5 ——— —
108-88-3 ————
108-9O-7 ————
1OO-41-4 ————
1OO-42-5 ————
133O— 2O—7
• v^WW Bfcw f
1 33O-2O-7 ———
—— Vin^l Chloride
—— Chloroethane
—— Methulene Chloride
—— Acetone
—— Carbon Disulfide
—— 1. 1-Dlchloroethene
—— 1. 1-Dichloroethane
—— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total) __
• — -Chlorof or«
—— 1. 2-Dichloroethane
—— 2-Butanone
—— 1* 1. 1-Trichloroethan*
—— Carbon Tetrachloride
—— Vinyl Acetate
—— Bro«odichloroaethan»
—— li 2-Dichlorooropane
— -ei»-l» 3-Dichloropropene
—— Tr ich loroethene
—— Dibro«ochloroaethan*
—— 1. l,2-Trichloro.th_n. ...
— -Benzene
—— Tr«n»-l« 3-Dichloropropene ___
—— Bro«of or«__ .,
—— 4-Hethul-2-Pent_non.
—— 2-Heianone __
—— Tetrachloroethene
—— 1> if 2> 2-Tetrachloro«th"ane
—— Toluene
—— Chlorobenzene
—— Eth^lbenxene
—— Sturene
• — -Total Xulcne*
•••• -Xylene ,_
1
13OO 
IU
1300 IU
1300 IU
13OO 
IU
63O 
IU
13OO 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
63O 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
13OO 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
130O IU
63O 
IU
63O 
IU
630 
IU
63O 
IU
630 
IU
63O 
IU
630 
IU
630 
IU
63O 
IU
130O IU
1300 IU
630 
IU
13OO 
IU
630 
IU
63O 
IU
430 
IU
"430 IU
430 IU
• ' 430 
IU
RDRM I VGA
1/87 Rev.
"LIT 
(OOi 0691
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: VERSAR INC.
Contract:
VBLK73
ab Cod*. VERSAR 
Cast No. : 430 16 
SAS No. : 4512B 
SDC No
Matrii: (toil/water) SOIL 
Lab Sample ID: VBLK73
Sample wt/vol: 
4. 0 
(g/mL)
(low/med)
Y6873
Level: 
(low/med) MED
7. Moisture: not dec. ___
Column 
(pack/cap) PACK
Number TIC* found: _0
Lab File ID: 
______
Date Received: ______
Date Analgted: O7/19/B9
Dilution Factor: 1.Q
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/KQ
CAS NUMBER
COMPOUND NAME
FORM X VOA-TIC
1/87 Rev.
TlT
001
0692
VOLATILfc UKGANiCb ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: VERSAR INC.
ab Code: VERSAR 
Case No. : 430 16
Matrii: (toil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 
4. Q (g/mL) fc_
Level: 
(low/med) MED
X Moiiture: notfdec. ___
Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
Contract:
4658B49MS
SAS No. : 4512B 
SDC No. : 1
Lab Sample ID: 7619Q
Lab File ID: 
Y6B79
Date Received: O7/OS/89
Date Analyzed: Q7/gQ/B9
Dilution Factor: 10____
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or og/Kg) UQ/KO
!
! 74-87-3 ———
74-83-9 
-
73-01-4 ———
73-00-3 ———
73-O9-2 —— -
67-64-1 ———
73-13-0 ———
73-33-4 ———
75-34-3 ———
mjtf\ BO_/*
34O— jy— O-— —
67-66-3- —— -
107-O6-2—
A w r 
^^«tf Bk
7O_eOi— f*
71-33-6 ———
^4t_9*3_4* ____
1O8-03-4 ——
73-27-4 ———
78-97-3 ———
10061-OI-3-
79-O1-6 ———
1 1A — AO 
1 .. __
79-OO-3 ———
71-43-2 ———
1OO61-O2-6-
T^— 3^— 9— ——— .
/ y «w «
! 108-1O-1 ——
! 391-78-6 ——
I 127-18-4 ——
J 79-34-3 ———
1 108-88-3 ——
1 1O8-9O-7 ——
I 1OO-41-4 ——
1 1OO-42-3 ——
1 1330-20-7—
1
1
———— Chloronethane
—— Bronoete thane
———— Vinyl Chlorid*
———— Chloroethane
———— Methglene Chlarid*
———— Acetone
———— Carbon Disulfide
———— 1. 1-Dichloroethena
———— 1. 1-Dichloroethane
———— 1'2-Dichloroethene (total) __
— —- — -Ch 1 or of or*
• ———— 1. 2-Dichloroethan*
———— 2-Butanone
———— 1, l» 1 -Tr ictil or oe thane
———— Carbon Tetrachlaride
———— Vinul Acetate
———— BromodichloroMthane _
———— li 2-Dichlorooropane
———— c i»-l • 3-Dich loropropene ____
———— Trichloroethena
———— DibroaochloroABthana
———— 1. l«2-TriChloraethan»
———— Bentene
———— Tran«-l* 3-Dich loropropene
———— Broaoforei
———— 4-Methul-2-Pent«non» ... ,
—— — — — z— neianone, _
———— Tetrachloroethene
———— 1. It 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane
———— To 1 uene . ,. __
— • —— Chlorobenzene
—— —— Ethyl benzene
....... -Btyrene .
1 • ••• Total Xulenec
. _
J
130OO IU
13000 IU
13000 IU
13000 IU
63OO IU
I3OOO 
IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
6300 IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
1 3000 IU
630O IU
630O IU
13OOO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
63OO IU
13OOO IU
130OO IU
63OO IU
130OO IU
«y
6300 IU
9<?OOO 
1
, ...... 
,
r i^ooop i
1
FORM X VOA
1/87 Rev.
oo:
0693
VOLATILE ORCANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
NU.
Lab Name: VERSAR INC.
ab Cod*. VERSAR
Cat* No.
Contract:
SAS No. :
I
469BB49HSD
Matrii: (»oil/water) SOIL
Sample ut/vol: 
4. Q 
(g/«L)
L*v*l: 
(low/aad) HEP
X floittur*: not d*c. ___
Column: 
(pack/cap) PACK
SDO No. :
Lab Sampl* ID: 7619O
Lab Fill ID: 
Y6B80
Data Received: Q7/OS/B9
Data Analyzed: O7/gQ/B9
Dilution Factor: 10
CA8 NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UQ/KQ
74-87-3 ——— ———
74-83-9 ————— —
79-01-4 ——————
7 3— Oy— 3——— — — — — •
79-O9-2 ———— ——
67-64-1 — —— ——
79-19-0 ——————
79-39-4 ——————
79-34-3 ————— —
94O-99-O ——— ——
67-66-3 —— ——
** r 
hvfe^ •*
107-06-2 —————
78-93-3 ——— —— -
71-99-6 ——————
96-23-9 —— - ———
1OB-O9-4 —————
79-27-4 ——— - ——
78-87-9 ———— - —
1OO61-O1-9 ————
79-01-6 ———————
1 24-48- 1 -----
<*> •*> 9 ^** 
at
79-00-9 ——————
7 i -43-2 ———————
1OO61-O2-6 ————
79-29-2 ——————
108-10-1 ——————
991-78-6 ——— — -
127-18-4 ——— ——
79-34-9 ——— ———
ioe-se-3 ———
108-9O-7 ——— ———
100-41-4 ——— ——
ioo-42-g
1330-20-7 —————
• ..-»•-«_.— — --•
— Ch lor o«* than*
— Bro«oa)*than*
—Vinul Cblorida
— Chloro*than*
— H*tbul*n* Chlarlda
—Ac* tan*
—Carbon Dlsulfid*
— 1. l-Dichloro*thana
— 1. l-Dichloro*thana
— 1.2-Dichloro*th*n* (total) __
— Chloro'ora) ,.,
— 1* 2-Dichloro*than»
— 2-Butanon*
— 1* 1* l-TrlcbloraathAna.__.
—Carbon Totrachlarirf*
—Vinul Ac*tate
— Broaod icb loroaatiiAn*^
— 1.2-Dichloroerap«n» 
,..._„
— ci«-l. 3-Dicbloroprop*n* ____
— Trieblorootbana
-Dibra*)ochloro**tk«n. 
_ _ 
__
— 1« 1.2-Tricbloraathana
— Banian*
— Tranm-l« 3— Diehlaraat>n**na
— Broaiafor*
-4-Ha t bu l-2-Pe« tmnnn.
— 2-H*«anon*_,. _,
— Tatracblorootltana
—If If 2«2-T*trachloro*than* ___
— Taluana. _
-Cb 1 or ob *n i *n*
-Etbulb*ni*n*
-fituran*
-Total X«l*n*c
-e - --S •>*"-—., . 
----- —^
_... _._ ^
13OOO
13OOO
13000
13OOO
6300
I3OOO
43OO
4300
4300
4300
43OO
4300
13000
43OO
4300
13000
43OO
4300
4300
43OO
43OO
4300
43OO
^BIWW
4300
43OO
13OOO
13000
4300
13000
4300
jitilooo
^f * "^tk^ftO
.-HiteobQ
•I*^-*J^-^ _
1
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IV
IU
1
IU
1
I 
1
I VOA
1/87 R*v.
p*^«-^:t- •>*)•»• •.••.-.f- —»-.-.«.•-.-. j." .^i
-"• 
. • '.'- '• ' _-i£:'' 
*•.!•»-'•;•..?"•-
O694
REFERENCE NO. 12
"UT 
001 
06 9 b
CDM Federal Programs Corporation
June 27, 1989
Ms. Caroline Kwan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
Contract No: 68-01-7331
Document No: T648-C02-LR-DKKP-1
Subject: Overview of 104(e) Letter Response Sampling in the Tutu
Wellfield Area and Supercat Laundromat Area,
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Dear Ms. Kwan:
From June 5, 1989 through June 9, 1989, CDM Federal Programs Corporation
(CDM FPC) conducted a second round of 104(e) letter response sampling
activities at the following facilities in the Tutu Wellfield Area: O'Henry
Dry Cleaners, Ramsay Motors, Consolidated Auto Parts (now Gasset Motors),
Esso Tutu Car Care Center, Texaco Tutu Service Station, and the Laga
Building. During the same time interval, CDM FPC conducted 104(e) letter
response sampling in the Supercat Laundromat Area at the following
facilities: Supercat Laundromat, Caribbean Jeep Rental, and the Texaco
Station. The sampling was done in an attempt to reveal potential sources
of chlorinated hydrocarbon contamination found in area ground water.
Permission to enter the facilities to be sampled was obtained by Gregory
Rhymer from the St. Thomas Department of Planning and Natural Resources
(DPNR). Mr. Rhymer also obtained and arranged for the disposal of the
decontamination solvents which were used by CDM FPC during the sampling
activities.
The following is a summary of the 104(e) letter response sampling by
facility:
TUTU WELLFIELD AREA
O'Henry Dry Cleaning Facility; A total of 3 soil samples were
collected from this facility using hand augers during the second
round of 104(e) sampling. Two of the samples were collected from a
single boring location located directly under a pile of debris,
which includes discarded filters used in dry cleaning processes.
These samples were composited from soil 6-15 inches and 15-24 inches
below the ground surface. During the sampling activities, sustained
HNu readings exceeding 90 ppm (benzene equivalents) were detected in
the borehole. The third soil sample was collected approximately 8
feet south of the first borehole. No sustained HNu readings above
background (0.2 ppm) were detected in this second borehole.
TUT 
001 
0696
40 Rector Sow, 
10th Floor New York, NY 10006 2U 393-9634
COM Federal Programs Corporation
Ms. Kwan
Page 2
Laga Building; Several samples were collected in an area containing
abandoned drums adjacent to the Laga Building. A preliminary
assessment of the area indicated 9 empty 55 gallon drums which are
corroded and/or rusty, 16 sealed 55 gallon drums containing unknown
product, 1 unsealed 55 gallon drum containing unknown product, 3
plastic drums, and 2 empty 35 gallon drums. Three soil samples were
collected from the drum area. During the soil sampling, the HNu
readings ranged from background to 40 ppm above background in the
boreholes. One aqueous sample was collected from the open drum
containing product, however no HNu readings above background were
determined in the drum. One additional sample of a dry, white
powdery material was collected from the bottom of one of the empty
drums.
Ramsay Motors Facility; Upon re-inspection of this facility, COM
FPC personnel observed a stained region with stressed vegetation
adjacent to the fence separating the Ramsay Hotors and Consolidated
facilities. The oily material causing the stain apparently
originated from the Consolidated Auto Parts Facility, which is
topographically upgradient of the Ramsay Hotors Facility. One soil
sample was collected directly below the stained and stressed
vegetation. During the sampling, HNu readings were detected up to 3
ppm above background in the borehole. One oil sample was also
collected from the waste oil UST located in the auto mechanic shop
at the facility.
Consolidated Hotors Facility; COM FPC personnel collected one grab
sample of the oily material in the drainage ditch on the northern
perimeter of the Consolidated Hotors Facility.
Esso Tutu Car Care Center; Two oil samples were collected from this
facility.One was collected from the inoperable oil/water
separator, and the other from the waste oil holding tank. The
capacity and integrity of the holding tank is unknown, however, it
should be noted that the tank contained approximately 3 inches of
material during this sampling round, and the waste oil level was at
least 2 feet higher during the first 104(e) sampling round
(September 1988).
Texaco Tutu Service Station: A total of 7 oil samples were
collected from this facility. One of the oil samples was collected
from the oil/water separator, one was collected from the floor drain
of the middle work bay, and 5 oil samples were collected from drums
containing waste oil located behind the facility.
TUT 
O01
COM Federal Programs Lx>rporation
Ms. Kwan
Page 3
SUPERCAT LAUNDROMAT AREA
Supercat Laundromat! Two water samples were collected from the
Supercat Laundromat. One was collected from the potable cistern and
one from the non-potable cistern. An attempt was made to collect a
sample from the well located at the facility, but a leak in the
discharge pipe made it impossible to purge the well and obtain the
sample. One sediment sample was also collected from the drain
originating behind the facility.
Caribbean Jeep Rental: A total of 5 soil samples were collected in
the vicinity of this facility. Two of the samples were collected
adjacent to the fence bordering the western side of the facility.
BNu readings in the boreholes of these samples reached up to 10 ppm.
Two soil samples were collected inside the fenced area. The final
soil sample was collected adjacent to the Texaco Station sign,
located adjacent to the gate of the Caribbean Jeep Rental facility.
During the collection of the latter three soil samples, HNu
readings substantially above background were not encountered. One
aqueous sample was collected from an UST of unknown contents located
approximately 20 feet west of the Caribbean Jeep Rental fence. The
material was black and oily in nature, and readings exceeding 3 ppm
above background were detected in the tank during sampling.
The oil samples, aqueous drum sample, and the powdery drum sample were
collected for volatile organic analysis only, all other samples were
collected for full TCL organic analyses, as well as EP toxicity metals and
total petroleum hydrocarbons. The validated sample results and conclusions
about the data will be delivered to you as soon as they are available.
Should you have any questions regarding the 104(e) letter response
sampling, please do not hesitate to call me at (212) 393-9634.
Sincerely,
GDM federal Programs Corporation
t B. Grabe;
III Project Manager
cc: 
Jose Fonte 
EPA-CFO
Gceg Rhymer 
DPNR-St. Thomas
Amy Chester 
ORC
COM FPC 
Document Control
COM FPC 
NYC File
(WP14/30)
TUT 001 O69S
II
I
I
I
' 
REFERENCE NO. 13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TUT 
001 
0699
I
I
FINAL
REPORT ON RESULTS OF SOIL GAS SURVEY,
TUTU, ST. THOMAS, U. S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
December 18. 1987
Prepared for:
TEXACO CARIBBEAN. INC.
III
Prepared by:
GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS, LTD.
HEADQUARTERS
500 Copper Avenue. NW
Suite 200
Albuquerque. New Mexico 87102
(505) 842-0001
FAX (505) 842-0595
WESTERN REGION OFFICE 
EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
5000 Birch Street 
1109 Spring Street
West Tower. Suite 3000 
Suite 706
Newport Beach. CA 92660 
Silver Spring. Maryland 20910
(714) 476-3650 
(301) 587-2088
FAX (301) 587-2086
TUT 
001 
0700
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................... 
1
2.0 LOCATION AND HVDROGEOLOGIC BACKGROUND ............. 
3
2.1 LOCATION AND PURPOSE OF STUDY .............. 
3
2.2 REGIONAL GEOLOGY ..................... 
6
2.3 REGIONAL HYDROLOGY .................... 
6
3.0 METHODS OF STUDY ....................... 
8
3.1 SOIL GAS SURVEY ..................... 
8
3.2 AUXILIARY HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES ............. 11
4.0 RESULTS OF SOIL GAS SURVEY .................. 12
4.1 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS .................. 12
4.1.1 
Service Station Site ............... 16
4.1.2 
Other Areas With Hydrocarbon Concentration Above
Background Levels ................. 16
4.2 CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS ................. 21
5.0 PROBABLE MIGRATION PATHWAYS .................. 25
5.1 GROUND-WATER DATA .................... 25
5.2 BEDROCK FRACTURE SYSTEMS ................. 25
6.0 CONCLUSIONS .......................... 28
7.0 REFERENCES CITED ....................... 30
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 2-1 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF TUTU
SERVICE STATION, ST. THOMAS .............. 
4
FIGURE 2-2 MAP OF CENTRAL TUTU AREA, ST. THOMAS, SHOWING
TUTU SERVICE STATION AND NEARBY FACILITIES ....... 
5
FIGURE 4-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN
SOIL GAS ON TUTU SERVICE STATION SITE ......... 17
FIGURE 4-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN
SOIL GAS IN THE TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE
RUN BASIN ....................... 18
FIGURE 4-3 CONTOURS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON
CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL GAS, TUTU AREA,
UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN ............... 19
FIGURE 4-4 CONCENTRATIONS OF PCE IN SOIL GAS IN THE
TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN ......... 22
FIGURE 5-1 ORIENTATIONS OF MAJOR FRACTURE SYSTEMS IN THE
TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN ......... 27
TUT
OOi O7O.1
1.1
r •
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 4-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN
f 
SOIL GAS, TUTU AREA ................... 
13
I . 
TABLE 4-2 CONCENTRATIONS OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS
IN SOIL GAS, TUTU AREA ................. 23
' r* 
LIST OF APPENDICES
I ,, 
APPENDIX A TRACER RESEARCH CORPORATION REPORT OF ANALYTICAL
RESULTS
! 
APPENDIX B FIELD SYSTEM QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT OF OPERATIONAL
PROCEDURES
• '-" 
001 
07O2
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During November 1987, Geosclence Consultants, Ltd. (GCL) conducted a soil
gas Investigation In the vicinity of the Tutu service station of Texaco
Caribbean, Inc., In St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands. The survey results
show a zone of significantly elevated total hydrocarbon concentrations
(up to 690,000 mlcrograms per liter [ug/1] as benzene) In soil gas
beneath the southwestern part of the service station site and beneath
adjacent roadways west and south of the station. These values Indicate
the presence of hydrocarbons within the unsaturated soil zone. Another
zone of moderately high soil gas total hydrocarbon values (up to 2,600
ug/1) was found 300 to 800 feet southwest of the station, within a
topographic low beneath the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping
Center parking lot. Moderately elevated total hydro-carbon values (up to
r' 
3,000 ug/1) were also found adjacent to an Esso service station near the
southern end of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot. Soil gas
' 
hydrocarbons In these areas are probably a result of vaporization from
i 
hydrocarbons present In ground water.
r •**—'
' 
A topographically high area around Tlllett Gardens, an area of small
shops, In which a relatively great depth to ground water (about 25 feet)
and shallow depth to bedrock (about 5 feet) prevented adequate soil gas
analysis, lies between the two mapped zones of elevated hydrocarbon
values. Based on the soil gas analysis alone, It Is therefore Impossible
to determine with certainty whether the two zones are parts of a single
hydrocarbon plume or constitute two separate plumes. The presence of
benzene, toluene and other hydrocarbons In the Tlllett water well, which
Is located between the two zones, Indicates that these compounds are
; 
present In ground water 1n at least part of the area where soil gas
mapping was not feasible.
r •
GCL also performed analyses for chlorinated compounds In soil gas at
•'•' 
selected points in the vicinity of the Tutu service station and Tlllett
Gardens. 
Measurable concentrations of tetrachloroethylenef (PCJE) were
found at all points sampled for chlorinated compounds, with the highest
i. 
concentrations In soil gas near the LAGA building northeast of the Tutu
1
i •'
4- 
TUT 001
V i
service station. The LAGA building, where PCE Is known to have been used
extensively In the past, Is a possible source of the chlorinated hydro-
carbons.
TUT O0.1 07O4
— 
2.0 LOCATION AND HYDR06EOLOGIC MOCfittUND
2.1 LOCATION AND PURPOSE OF STUDY
During November 1987, 
Geosclence Consultants LTD. 
(CCL) 
conducted a soil
gas survey In the vicinity of the Tutu service station of Texaco Carib-
bean, Inc. 
The purpose of the survey was to determine the range and
spatial distribution of hydrocarbons present In the soil gas at the
service station site, and to Mp the approximate extent of any hydrocar-
bon pi we that Might be encountered during the survey.
r—
The Tutu service station Is located at 18*20'3r North, 64*53'14* West,
In Anna's Retreat Estate, St. Thews, U. S. Virgin Islands (Figure 2-1).
The station Is on the northeast corner of the Intersection of Highway 38
and Highway 384, on the eastern slope of the upper Turpentine Run basin.
Nearby facilities Include an auto parts store and garage north of the
station, a fire station and the LAGA building (formerly a cloth Manufac-
turing plant, now a public schools Maintenance facility) uphill to the
northeast of the station, and Illicit Gardens, a courtyard of snail shops
'- 
and a restaurant, south of the station (Figure 2-2). The Four Hinds
1 
Shopping Center lies In a topographically low area along the axis of the
upper Turpentine Run basin, west of the Tutu service station and Tlllett
Gardens.
* .
Elevated concentrations of hydrocarbons, Including benzene, toluene, and
several chlorinated compounds, have been detected in water wells in the
upper Turpentine Run basin (Geraghty and Miller, 1983, p. 73-74). The
highest reported concentrations of benzene and toluene have been found in
water froM the Tlllett well, located 250 feet south of the Texaco station
and 300 feet northeast of an Esso service station (Figure 2-2). In
,. 
August 1987, water samples from the Tlllett well contained 1300 
to 1400
parts per billion (ppb) of benzene and approximately 33 to 56 ppb of
toluene (C. Oolan, EPA Region II, written communication). 
High con-
centrations of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 
and other chlorinated compounds
have also been found In the Tlllett well.
T '
i
TUT O01 O7OS
64*54'W
64*53'W
L .
SSSSv.V -
!Jg£t-TUTU SERVICE STATION
>JB «r». i.x.
WMifP
-18*21'
18*20'l
-18*19'N
Base from USGS Eastern St.Thomas 7.5 minute quadrangle.
TUT OOi 07O6
FIGURE 2-1
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF TUTU SERVICE STATION, ST.THOMAS.
--.*>?•
RAMSAY
MOTORS
AUTO REPAIR
GARA6ES
RETAINING WALL
FENCE LINE (APPRO!)
FOUR
WINDS
SHOPPING
CENTER
TILLETT
GARDENS
AND
SMALL
SHOPS
©TILIETT WELL
(SMALL BUSINESSES AND
HOUSING IN THIS
AREA NOT SHOWN)
(TELEPHONE
COMPANY)
SERVICE STATION
AND AUTO REPAIR
L
FIGURE 2-2
MAP OF CENTRAL TUTU AREA. ST.THOMAS.
SHOWING TEXACO TUTU SERVICE STATION AND NEARBY FACILITIES.
TUT 
GOI 
O7O7
2.2 REGIONAL 6EOL06Y
The llthology of the Virgin Islands consists domlnantly of volcanic
rocks, Including splines (albltlzed basalts), ktratophyras (extrusive
Igneous rocks containing alblte and Mflc Minerals), andesites, and vol-
canic breccias and conglomerates derived fro* the Igneous rocks. The
Loulsenhoj Formation, which comprises the bedrock Material throughout the
upper Turpentine Run basin, consists domlnantly of auglte andeslte tuff
and associated volcanic breccias (Donnelly, 1966). 
The Loulsenhoj
Formation Is tentatively dated as Alblan (late Early Cretaceous) In age
(Donnelly, 1966). The Loulsenhoj Formation rocks In the vicinity of Tutu
have been extensively deformed and fractured by tectonic activity during
Late Cretaceous and Tertiary time.
2.3 REGIONAL HYDROLOGY
The upper Turpentine Run basin contains one of the most productive and
heavily used aquifers on the Island of St. Thomas. Stevens and others
(1981) list 26 water wells In the Tutu area, and new wells have been
completed since their report was prepared. In 1983, Geraghty and Miller
estimated that 'current pumpage 1n the upper basin my approach or exceed
the estimated safe yield of 300,000 gpd [gallons per day] calculated by
the USGS [U. S. Geological Survey]' (p. 68).
Ground water pumped from the upper Turpentine Run basin Is derived
primarily from fracture zones In the underlying Loulsenhoj bedrock. To
assure adequate supply, wells In the basin are commly drilled to depths
of 100 feet or more, although the water table Is generally no more than
20 to 30 feet deep In the central part of the basin. 
Significant
drawdowns occur In many wells due to pumping and seasonal water table
fluctuations.
Ground water 1n the upper Turpentine Run basin contains total dissolved
solids (TOS) of 700 to 1,800 milligrams per liter (mg/1), consisting
domlnantly of bicarbonate, sodium and chloride (Geraghty and Miller,
•- 
1983, p. 73, 76). 
Limited data from deep wells suggests that TOS
;. 
concentration tends to Increase with depth 1n the aquifer (Geraghty and
r • 
&
; 
TUT 
001 
U708
i ..
I'
Miller, 1983). 
Geraghty and M1ll,r also report nitrate crantratlons In
excess of 10 «g/l (as nitrogen) fro. Virgin Islands Housing Authority
(VIHA) wells 1 and 2, which are located approximately 800 feet northeast
of the Tutu station, and elevated levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons In
well VIHA-1.
i
»
!
TUT 
001 
O709
I r
i
i:
3.0 METHODS OF STUDY
I 
Work performed by CCL at the Tutu service station site to date has
Included a preliminary site Investigation, a soil gas survey, and limited
hydrogeologlc studies as judged appropriate for Interpretation of the
soil gas data. The results of the preliminary site Investigation were
reported In Section 3.3 of the Work Plan for Soil Gas Survey, Texaco
Service Station, Tutu, St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin Islands, and were used In
preparation of that work plan. The methods and results of the soil gas
survey and associated hydrogeologlc studies are described 1n this report.
3.1 SOIL GAS SURVEY
The soil gas survey at the Tutu site was conducted during November 2-
18, 1987. This task consisted of soil gas sampling at points on the
service station site and 1n nearby areas, and on-site analysis of the
soil gas for selected hydrocarbons using a gas chromatograph (GC) owned
and operated by Tracer Research Corporation (Tracer) of Tucson, Arizona.
The gas chromatograph was equipped with detectors capable of Identifying
total and aromatic hydrocarbons and halogenated compounds, using flame
lonlzatlon detector (FID) and electron capture detector (ECO) techniques.
Soil gas sampling and analysis were performed as described In the Work
Plan for Soil Gas Survey and Quality Assurance Project Plan for Soil Gas
t
Survey dated October 1987, as approved by and with amendments requested
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II (USEPA) and the
' 
Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) during
'- 
discussions In the field.
• •
The sampling and analysis were conducted In accordance with standardized
^ 
procedures which have been used by GCL and Tracer at numerous sites.
Soil gas samples were collected by driving a 2-cm diameter hollow
galvanized steel probe to the sampling depth and evacuating 5 to 10
* *
liters of soil gas from Immediately above the drive point with a vacuum
" 
pump. A syringe was Inserted through the slUcone evacuation line to
collect a 10-mHliliter gas sample for Immediate on-slte analysis.
" 
Withdrawal of the sample from the evacuation line and Us Injection and
l- 
analysis In the GC were performed by an experienced Tracer chemist.
I • 
TUT 
001 0710
The Initial soil gas sampling grid consisted of 20 points located on the
service station property, and 3 points located north and east of the
station which were selected In order to define background hydrocarbon
values. Staples at each point were taken fro* a depth of 5 feet below
the ground surface and fro* the greatest depth achievable by hand
driving of the probe, If greater than 5 feet. Staples were analyzed for
total hydrocarbons, excluding Methane. Since the Methane peak on the
chromatogram nonully Includes the peaks of ethane and propane as well,
the resulting "total hydrocarbon" values thus Include only concentrations
of Molecules containing 4 or more carbon atoms, which typically comprise
the «ajor constituents of commercial gasoline and similar petroleum
products. Additionally, an effort was made to quantify the amounts of
benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) In the soil gas;
however, it was found that the OY-101 column employed for the FID work
failed In most cases to distinguish the Individual BTEX constituents.
The OV-101 column has been used by 6CL and Tracer In numerous soil gas
Investigations, and In previous cases has adequately defined all BTEX
constituents.
Because a zone of high hydrocarbon values was Identified In the south*
western portion of the station site, the sampling grid was extended to
the west and south In order to determine the extent of the hydrocarbon
plume. Due to the need to avoid water lines, sewer lines, underground
electrical lines, and other cultural features, the points of the extended
grid were not spaced as regularly as had been anticipated in the work
plan. Probes were driven to the greatest depth attainable, which was
generally about 5 feet, and a single sample was taken from the maximum
depth achieved at each point. The sampling grid was extended southward
and westward to the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping Center
parking lot (see Section 4.1.2 of this report). Samples were analyzed
for total hydrocarbons and BTEX using the OV-101 column.
During the last few days of the hydrocarbon survey, the USEPA representa-
tlve at the site requested that another column be employed In an attempt
to better quantify individual BTEX constituents in the soil gas. Texaco
9
' 
-JUT 
001 0711
Caribbean concurred with the request, and discussions were held with
chemists fro* Tracer and fro* Caap Dresser and NcKoe Federal Programs
Corporation (COM-FPC) to Identify an appropriate colon. The Carbopak
AT-1000 coluan, a much slowed coluan than the OV-101, was selected.
During calibration of the system, It became apparent that the full-length
AT-1000 col urn was unsuitable for field use because of Us excessive
retention time. 
The AT-1000 column required as much as an hour to
analyze one sample, as compared with about 5 minutes for the OV-101.
After a few attests, the coluan was cut to a length of 1.5 feet (fro*
Its original 6-foot length), which shortened the run tiat to about 15
•Inutes, and was used to analyze a single staple taken froa the vicinity
of the underground storage tanks (USTs) at the Tutu service station. The
column proved capable of quantifying benzene at this location, but
toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene, If present, were still undeterminable
due to Interference by other peaks on the chroaatograa. Due to the
excessive run times required to obtain results that were little better
than those obtained with the OV-101, no further atteepts were aide to use
the AT-1000 coluan. The soil gas survey 1$ Intended as a preliminary
screening tool to define the approximate extent of any hydrocarbons
Identified In the soil zone. The use of total hydrocarbon values Is
adequate to perform that task.
Although chlorinated compounds in significant quantities were considered
unlikely to have resulted from activities at the Tutu service station,
their presence In ground water is a matter of concern. GCL therefore
conducted a limited soil gas sampling program which was Intended to
determine whether these compounds could have come from the Texaco
station. 
Sampling for 6 chlorinated hydrocarbons was performed at 9
points near the Tutu station and upgradient from the Tlllett water well,
1n which some of the compounds have been detected. 
Analyses were
performed using the electron capture detector. 
The soil gas sample
collection procedure was 
identical to that used In sampling for
petroleum components.
10
001 0712
3.2 AUXILIARY HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES
During the soil gas survey, GCL also conducted H.1Ud Investigations
into the local hydrogeologic setting in order to better define potential
flow paths of hydrocarbons In the subsurface. 
GCL hydrogeologlsts
•easured static water level In wells close to the Tutu site, determined
•Jor fracture orientations In nearby exposures of bedrock, and recorded
other topographic and geologic data relevant to potential migration
pathways.
11
TUT OOl O713
4.0 RESULTS OF SOIL GAS SURVEY
4.1 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
The results of FID analyses for petroleum hydrocarbons for each soil gas
point analyzed are presented In Table 4-1. Copies of all results, as
recorded and supplied by the on-site chemist, are Included 1n Appendix A
of this report. Copies of chromatograms annotated by the en-site chemist
will be Bade available, as required, In a supplement to this report.
Background concentrations were established based on analyses at three
points (Background 1, Background 2, and the Drift Point) located north
and northeast of the station. 
These points were 1n areas considered
unlikely to be affected by any hydrocarbons which Bight have resulted
froB activities at the station. 
Total hydrocarbon concentrations In
these locations ranged from <0.01 ug/1 to 0.9 ug/1. At the Drift Point,
repeat samples were taken dally by Inserting separate soil gas probes
within an area of less than 100 square feet, to determine whether soil
gas values varied significantly over time. Dally samples taken at the
Drift Point varied between 0.1 and 0.9 ug/1, with the highest value
recorded at a depth of 4 feet, which was achieved on only one day. For
drift samples taken at depths of 2 to 2.S feet, total hydrocarbon
concentrations varied from 0.1 to 0.4 ug/1, Indicating temporal variation
by up to a factor of 4 In soil gas hydrocarbon values.
The soil gas survey Identified three zones In which concentrations of
total hydrocarbons (excluding methane) were significantly In excess of
background concentrations. These were:
• the southwestern portion of the Tutu station site and the
adjacent roadways
• the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot
• adjacent to the Esso service station at the southern end of the
Four Winds parking lot
It was not possible to verify with certainty whether these three zones 1n
fact represent portions of the same hydrocarbon plume, or whether they
12
TUT 001 0714
TABLE 4-1
—-"-—«•«•• in*™* wr rciNUUHJI
(All concentration v
LOCATION 
OCPTH 
DATE 
•f»mf
Oaekground 1 
S 
11/08/87
Background 2 
4 
11/08/87
A'! 
5 
11/04/87
A-2
A-2
A-2A
A-2A
A-3
A-3.5
A-4
A-4
B-l
8-2
8-2 
|
B-3
8-3
B-3.S
8-4
B-4-C
B-4-C
B-4-C
C-l
C-2
C-3
C-4
C-4
0-1 
4
0-2 
t
0-3
0-4
F-l 
4
F-l
F-2 
4
F-3 
6
F-4 
S
S 
11/04/07
11/04/07
ll/OS/07
ll/OS/87
ll/OS/07
ll/OS/07
11/05/87
ll/OS/87
11/04/07
11/04/87
11/04/87
11/04/07
11/04/87
11/04/87
11/04/07
11/05/87
11/08/07
11/06/87
11/05/07
ll/OS/87
11/05/87
11/04/07
11/04/07
11/05/07
11/05/87
ll/OS/07
11/04/87
11/10/87
11/10/87
11/10/87
11/10/87
11/10/87
«0.01
«0.01
«230
1
1
«0.01III
«0.01III
1
1I
1
•0.02
«0.01
<0.01
•0.01I
1
1
<0.00
<0.0
<0.01
1
<0.01
<0.09
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
M NTDRQ
•JUMbll
IQUfK
«0.01
«0.01
«288II
<8.81
«13
«13
«13
«0.01
«0.3
«S10II
1I
<28
<0.02
<0.01
«O.OI
•0.01
«I30
<130
<o.s
<A 1
*»•!
<1
<0.01
«o.s
«0.01
0.5
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
CARBON!
Mcwogrsjn
cnm.
BCIZEJK
«fl nf
*9»9€
«• A>
%V.VC
«200
<tM
^*4iWf
«2M
«0.01
•14
«14
«14
<0.01
<0.3
•570
<280
•280
<200
4.000
^§1WHP
<28
•0.03
«0.01
<0.02
<0.02
<130
<140
<0.6
<A 1
^w«4
«1
<0.01
<0.6
«0.01
<0.1
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
tMSOIL
»P4WBt«
moc$
«t.M
«0.0l
«no
«MO
«MO
4.01
«13
«U
«U
<• •!
"••••
<«.3
<S30
f-mfm
*no
«260
<280
«no
<27
««.03
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<130
<130
<o.s
<0.1
«1
<0.01
<o.s
<0.01
• •
<0.1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
I • Interference with adjacent peaks
TOTAL
(WITHOUT CM)
0.2
<0.01
30.000
110.000
800,000
<0.01
7.800
4.000
3.800
«0.01
88
610.000
280.000
220.000
35.000
120.000
6.400
«0.02
0.1
<0.01
O.S
130.000
72.000
1.000
<0.09
1.700
0
1.000
<0.01
4
0.06
<0.02
0.07
0.4
0.2
TEXC\TABLE4-1.PIW
13
001 071!
20-0
2
S
>'0
C
01
ro
ot
20-0>
20'_0»
0*0
ocz
20'0>
20'0>
20'0>
tO'0»
roi
02
OOO'I
2'0
cc
It»
OOO'C
£
0»
021
000'2
20'0>
2C'C>
20'0>
20'0>
20'0>
20'0>
WO*
20'0>
20*0>
20*0»
W0>
ro>
20'0>
io-o»
£0'0>
C0'0>
WO*
f»
co-o>
SS'0»
to-o>
cro>
n»
20'0»
rt»
S'0>
t»
20'0»
C0*0>
to*o>
zo*o>
wo>
Z0'0>
wo>
wo>
10'0>
(NOJAOMIM)
1V101
OO1U
20'0»
20'0>
10'0>
C0'0>
C0'0>
C0'0»
t»
wo»
C0'0>
to-o*
C0'0»
M»
»'0>
ro>
n-o»
»'0>
co*o»
C0'0>
C0'0»
anzm
•UHU
w'0> 
£0/21/11
»'0» 
£0/21/11
W0> 
£0/60/11
W'0> 
£0/60/11
»'0> 
£0/60/11
W0> 
£0/60/11
»'0> 
£0/00/11
»'0> 
£0/60/11
»'0> 
£0/00/11
»'0> 
£0/00/11
»'0> 
£0/00/11
*'0> 
£0/00/11
»'0> 
£0/60/11
10'0»
C0'0>
S*
£0*0
WO*
20'0»
ro»
S'0>
0*
20'0»
n-o>
C0'0»
I0'0»
20-0>
wo>
20'0»
I
2o-o>
I
20-0
>'0
I
I
zro»
/l/M/It
M/N/1I
/t/M/tl
rt/CI/U
CT/C1/I1
£0/21/11
£0/21/11
£0/11/11
£0/11/11
/o/ti/n
«/OT/tI
£t/B1/11
£1/01/11
S't
S'S
s>
s c
s
c
2
s s
s
S I
£
S
£
S
0
0
0
s
S'C
s
0
S'2
2
S S
S C
»
S 5
2
0
S C
0
S'S
S I
UVO 
HW30
SI-1
H-l
tl-1
21-1
11-1
01-1
0-1
£-1
£-1
0-1
S-l
e-i
2-1
2-1
1-1
1-1
22-J
12-J
02-d
6I-d
Ot-J
£1-J
•l-J
S1-J
M-J
CI-J
21-J
11-d
01-J
6-J
t-i
£-J
0-J
S-J
wiiraoi
(ptnu"u°0) fc» 3W1
limtfpt iflt«
w 
«» 
9. 
iT 
, 
ww" 
* 
»•«*
000-21 
„> 
^ 
,£ 
/f/U/" 
$ 
«-Z
000-R 
»S> 
S 
2! 
f 
Wtl/It 
• 
»-Z
000> 
JT 
^ 
T 
! 
CT/If/tl « 
2-2
~ 
»'; 
CT^ • JSK •
si r 
K K sss s,; K
J'! 
Si 
2^ "<0> 
»•* «wi« • 
J-!
- 
K K K X X V
••• 
- s-: 2:: K --,. ;;:;
<—M —---*-.«„„,, —
are entirely separate, because llthologlc and hydrologlc conditions In
the Intervening area prevented adequate soil gas analysis (stt Section
4.1.2).
' 
4.1.1 Service Station Site
Soil gas hydrocarbon values Measured on and Immediately adjacent to the
Tutu service station site are shown In Figure 4-1. In cases where a hole
was sampled at two different depths, both concentration values are shown,
but the value fro* the greater depth was used In Moping the concentra-
tion contours. 
In all holes except B-2, the deeper point yielded the
higher value; 1n B-2 the values determined at 5 feet and 6.5 feet were
similar.
A zone of hydrocarbon concentrations significantly higher than background
levels Is centered southwest of the underground storage tanks and extends
southward and westward beneath the highways adjacent to the station
property (Figure 4-2; Zone I, Figure 4-3). 
Elevated hydrocarbon con-
centrations were found consistently at depths of about 5 feet and at
depths of about 8 feet (maximum depth of probe penetration) In the
central part of this area; however, at some points along the station
*
boundaries (A-4, A-2A, C-4) hydrocarbon concentrations appear to Increase
significantly with depth between 4 feet and 8 feet.
There was no evidence of significant hydrocarbon presence along the
northern and eastern boundaries of the station site. The value of 1,700
ug/1 recorded In hole C-4 near the north boundary of the station Is
probably a result of hydrocarbon vapors migrating fro* the adjacent oil
separator pit. Movement of hydrocarbons east of the station area would
be Inhibited by the steep southwestward topographic and water table
gradients.
4.1.2 Other Areas VIth Hydrocarbon Concentration Above
Background Levels
An attempt was made to trace the zone of elevated hydrocarbon concentra-
tlons to the south across Highway 38 from the Tutu station. However, no
16
• 
TUT 
001 O718
XOIL SEPARATOR
(4.5X0.01
(5.5) 68
(4) 0.09
(7) 1,700
5) 3,600
OFFICES]?! 
0-3
(5) 0.01
C-30J5) 1.000/09
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
(2.5) 1.000
POMP ISLAND
D-1
/©(4.5) 8.0
(5) 130.000
HIGHWAY 38
/ (5) 4.000
2-1©
(5)
220,000
TUT
- SAMPLE POINT
- DEPTH (FEET)
- TOTAL HYDROCARBONS IN
ug/1 AS BENZENE
001 0719
FIGURE 4-1
CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL GAS ON TUTU SFRVltF
I.
RAMSAY
MOTORS
*^ AUTO REPAIR
CARACCS
•DRJFT POINT
0.1-0.1
LINE (APPROK)
FOUR
WINDS
SHOPPING
CENTER
VETERINARY
CLINIC
TILLETT
GARDENS
TILLETT WELL
43 F-10»
2.600
(SMALL BUSINESSES AND
HOUSING IN THIS
AREA NOT SHOWN)
VITELCO
(TELEPHONE
COMPANY)
ESSO
SERVICE STATION 3,000
SAMPLE POINT AND TOTAL HYDROCARBON VALUE.
VALUES LESS THAN 0.1 NOT SHOWN EXCEPT AT
BACKGROUND POINTS FOR POINTS ON TEXACO
SERVICE STATION SITE SEE FIGURE 4-1
FIGURE 4-2
CONCENTRATIONS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SOIL GAS IN THE TUTU AREA, UPPER
TURPENTINE RUN BASIN. ALL CONCENTRATIONS IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER, REPORTED AS BENZENE.
18
RAMSAY
MOTORS
RCMIR
GARA6ES
FENCE LINC (APPRO*)
FOUR
WINDS
SHOPPING
CENTER
(SHALL BUSINESSES AND
HOUSING IN THIS
AREA NOT SHOWN)
^VITELCO
(TELEPHONE
COMPANY)
SAMPLE POINT.FOR IDENTIFICATION
SEE FIGURE 4-2
APPROXIMATE CONTOUR OF EQUAL
CONCENTRATION. VALUES IN MICROGRAMS
PER LITER. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1
ORDER OF MAGNITUDE
(l.t.. A FACTOR OF 10). CONTOURS
DASHED WHERE POORLY CONSTRAINED
BY DATA.
ESSO
SERVICE STATION
AND AUTO REPAIR
FIGURE 4-3
CONTOURS OF TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATIONS
IN SOIL GAS, TUTU AREA,UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN
values of hydrocarbons In excess of background levels wtrt detected 1n
the area between the Tlllett well and the north boundary of the Tlllett
property at Highway 36, except at points under the sidewalk and under a
traffic Island (points T-3 and T-7, Figure 4-2). Topographically, the
1 
northern part of the Tlllett property, southeast of the retaining wall
shown 1n Figure 2-2, Is 10 to 15 feet higher than the land surface at the
r
7 
service station, and 1t was not possible to achieve depths greater than
about 5 feet In placing the soil gas probes because of the presence of
r- 
bedrock at that depth. Ground water 1s at a depth of about 25 to 30
.' 
feet beneath the Tlllett property, and thus Is 20 feet or more below the
greatest depth of probe penetration. Therefore, the possible presence of
petrol em hydrocarbons at depths too great to be sampled beneath the
Tlllett property could not be determined.
f •
South of the Tlllett well, detectable concentrations of hydrocarbons ware
found 1n the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot,
1 
near the Csso station and locally along the east side of Highway 38
, 
(Zones II and III, Figure 4*3). 
Although most of the constituents
i 
Identified appear to be petroleum components, there was some admixture of
other compounds (up to about 5 ug/1 as benzene In some holes) which
appear to have a different origin. 
Since significant concentrations of
» .
halogenated compounds were found In holes near this area, It Is possible
that the unidentified constituents Identified by the FID represent some
'' 
of the halogenated compounds.
r «
- 
It was possible to Identify and map Zones II and III 
southwestward to and
r. 
beyond the Esso service station at the south end of the Four Winds
parking lot, even though bedrock In much of the area prevented probe
penetration to depths greater than about 5 feet (Figure 4-3). 
South and
west of the Esso station, Increased soil gas hydrocarbon concentrations
j 
were found, relative to those which were found Immediately north of the
station. 
The soil gas survey was terminated at this location, because of
u
i
r: 
20
TUT 
001
Ir
I
, i.
r •
the presence of Increased hydrocarbon concentrations probably attribut-
able to a different source. Tracing of any soil gas pluae not potential-
ly attributable to the Texaco station was outside the scope of the work
plan.
4.2 CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS
Because chlorinated hydrocarbons have been Identified In water samples
from the TWett well and other wells In the Tutu area, a Halted number
of soil gas points were stapled and analyzed for chlorinated compounds.
These points were located In the vicinity of the Tlllett well, on and
adjacent to the Texaco service station, and near the LAGA building
(Figure 4-4). Samples were analyzed for:
• nethylene chloride (dlchloromethane)
• chloroform (trlchloromethane)
r~
[ 
• trlchloroethane (TCA)
• carbon tetrachlorlde (tetrachloromethane)
1 
trlchloroethylene (TCE)
• tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
•
r-
Results of the chlorinated hydrocarbon analyses are listed In Table 4-2.
i- ' 
• 
No significant concentration of any chlorinated compound was Identified
,. 
In hole H-9, located on the Texaco station, In the center of the known
petroleum hydrocarbon plume. Nethylene chloride (6 ug/1) was Identified
In soil gas beneath the property north of the Texaco service station,
and TCA was Identified at several locations, with the largest value (10
ug/1) being recorded in hole H-6, south of the Tlllett well.
i *~ 
PCE was detected 1n all nine of the holes sampled for chlorinated com-
pounds. The lowest PCE concentration (0.02 ug/1) was found at the Texaco
station; the highest (170 ug/1) was found adjacent to the loading dock at
» .. 
the LAGA building. PCE was also Identified at points near the Tlllett
» 
well, although benzene and toluene, known to exist 1n the well water, had
• r
J • 
T'UT 
O01
I
1 -L
r -
4 .
r •/L
RAMSAY
MOTORS
AUTO REPAIR
GARACCS
M-9
0.02
TANKS* J
RETAINING WALL
VETERINARY
FENCE LINE (APPRO*)
FOUR
MINOS
SHOPPING
CENTER
TILLETT
GARDENS
© TILLETT WELL
(SHALL BUSINESSES AND
HOUSING IN THIS
AREA NOT SHOWN)
^VITELCO
(TELEPHONE
COMPANY)
SAMPLE POINT SHOWING
IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND PCE
CONCENTRATION IN MICROGRAMS
PER LITER
CSSO
SERVICE STATION
AND AUTO REPAIR
FIGURE 4-4
CONCENTRATIONS OF PCE IN SOIL GAS IN THE TUTU AREA. UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN.
22
I f-
TABLE 4-2
CONCENTRATIONS OF CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS « SOIL GAS. TUTU AREA
(AM eonc«rtrttlon vti UM In mtefogram. p«r
NETMTlEJtf
«•« 
»TH 
DATE 
OUMK 
CNLOROFORK 
TCA ,0^,., 
TC£ 
„
r*
H-l
H-Z
H-3
M-4
H-5
H-6
H-7
M-8
N-»
3
3.5
4
3.5
4
4.5
5
5
5.5
11/17/87
11/17/87
11/17/87
11/17/87
11/17/87
11/17/87
11/17/87
11/17/87
11/17/87
•0.0
•0.8
•O.OB
•0.09
•0.2
•30
•0.0
8
•0.09
•0.008
•0.008
•0.0008
•0.0008
•0.001
•0.2
•0.008
•0.006
•0.0006
0.02
0.05
•0.0002
0.005
•0.0004
10
0.04
•0.002
•0.0002
•0.0005
•0.0005
•0.00005
•0.00005
•0.0001
•0.02
•0.0005
•0.0005
•0.00005
•0.004
0.5
•0.0004
•0.0004
0.05
•0.1
0.6
0.3
•0.0004
1
42
0.4
0.8
6
16
170
1
0.02
r
TEXC\M8LC4-2.«i
! 1 .
r
23
IT
' 
• 
TUT 
001 
07:
r
i
i.
r -
not been detectable at the sane points. The greater volatility of the
chlorinated compounds relative to the petroleum components explains the
comparative ease with which they can be traced In soil gas, assuring both
are present In ground water.
No attempt was Mde to delineate the boundaries of any chlorinated
hydrocarbon plume, which Is likely to be a really extensive. PCE has been
found In water from a Virgin Islands Housing Authority well approximately
600 feet northeast of the LAGA building, as well as 1n the Tlllett well
and one of the Four Hinds water wells (Geraghty and Miller, 1983, p. 74;
C. Oolan, ERA Region II, written communication). A possible source of
the PCE Is the LAGA building, presently used as a public schools office
and service facility. The LAGA building formerly boused a cloth factory,
closed about 1981, In which tetrachloroethylene (also known as perchloro-
ethylene, or "perk") 1$ reported to have been used extensively. Unsub-
stantiated verbal reports of local residents Indicate that the 'perk' my
have been disposed of to the ground surface near the building.
24 
TUT OOi 0726
i _
_- 
S.O PROBABLE MIGRATION PATHWAYS
5.1 GROUND-MATER DATA
The water table In the upper Turpentine Run basin Is generally within 30
feet or less of the ground surface, and is Influenced by the local
topography.
During November 1987 the static water levels were measured by 6CL In the
Tillett well and the eastern Four Winds well. The western Four Hinds
r- 
well was not Measurable because It lacked an adequate port for Insertion
'" 
of the water level probe. Water levels were 23.2 feet below top of
casing In the Tillett well, and 14.0 feet In the eastern Four Winds well.
Taking into account the difference 1n well head elevations (approximately
28 feet), this Indicates a difference of about 19 feet In water-table
'' 
elevations at the two wells, and a water-table gradient of about 0.076,
If the Four Winds well 1s assumed to be directly downgradlent from the
' 
Tillett well. The gradient along the valley axis aay be less than this
i 
figure, whereas that on the eastern slope My be greater. It Is not
f ._ 
known whether the Tillett and Four Winds wells Intersect the same
[ 
fracture zone, or zones which are hydraullcally connected.
f 
5.2 BEDROCK FRACTURE SYSTEMS
Most ground water in the upper Turpentine Run basin Is contained within
'" 
fracture systems of the Louisenhoj bedrock. 
Only minimal flow Is
expected in the matrix of this fine-grained volcanic unit. Observations
r- 
of the soil profile, where It Is exposed In road cuts and construction
excavations, Indicated that the zone of significant weathering extends to
only about 6 feet below the surface In most areas, with fractured bedrock
; 
below that level. These observations were confirmed by the difficulty
encountered in driving soil gas probes deeper than about 5 or 6 feet in
*
most of the study area. 
Consequently, the direction of local ground-
I* 
water flow will be strongly influenced by the orientation of the bedrock
fracture systems through which the water is moving.
• u r 
001
25
.
r
r *
•
i.
Bedrock fracture orientations are not consistent throughout the upper
Turpentine Run basin. Orientations aeasured on outcrops exposed west of
the Four Winds Shopping center (west side of valley) and east of the
Seventh-Day Advent 1$t Church and School (east side of valley) are shown
schematically In Figure 5-1. There are Major fracture systeas striking
north-northeast on both sides of the valley; however, those on the west
side of the valley dip to the southeast, while these on the east side dip
to the northwest. Consequently, these two systees differ by about 60* In
actual fracture orientation. It Is not known whether there Is an abrupt
transition along a defined boundary between these two system at sow
point within the valley, or whether the orientation of the fractures
rotates gradually fro* one position to the other as one aoves across the
valley.
, • 
26
L
T'~"' 001 0728
MOTORS/
^ AUTO REPAIR
GARAGES
RETAINING WALL
VETERINARY
FOUR
WINDS
SHOPPING
CENTER
TIUETT WELL
(SHALL BUSINESSES AND
MOUSING IN THIS
AREA NOT SHOWN)
STRIKE AND DIP OF MAJOR FRACTURE
SYSTEM
VITELCO
(TELEPHONE
COMPANY)
STRIKE AND DIP OF SUBSIDIARY
FRACTURE SYSTEM
STRIKE OF VERTICAL FRACTURE
SYSTEM
ERVICE STATION
AND AUTO REPAIR
ROUTE OF STORM SEWER DRAINING
CENTRAL PART OF VALLEY
I .
FIGURE 5-1
• ORIENTATIONS OF MAJOR FRACTURE SYSTEMS
IN THE TUTU AREA, UPPER TURPENTINE RUN BASIN.
27
r
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
The soil gas survey conducted by Texaco Caribbean, Inc., aad GCL In the
Tutu area of St. Thaws Identified a zone of elevated petroltui hydrocar-
bon values 1n the subsurface on the southwestern part of the Texaco Tutu
service station site (Zone I). The very high soil gas hydrocarbon values
In this area (up to 690,000 ug/1) indicate the probability that hydrocar-
bons have Migrated through the unsaturated soil zone, leaving large
residual concentrations. The source of the hydrocarbons appears to be
the USTs at the Texaco station.
Elevated hydrocarbon values were traced southward to the south side of
Highway 38 and westward to the center of Highway 384. Polits located on
the west side of Highway 384 Indicate no significant hydrocaibun presence
r' 
In that area. Due to elevated bedrock and greater depth to water (25 to
l' 
30 feet), it was not possible to determine the extent of petroleum
hydrocarbon presence In the vicinity of the Tlllett well, in which the
' 
presence of benzene and toluene has been reported In ground water. "The
. 
saae constraints Halted coaplete mapping of the hydrocarbon plume on the
[ 
south side of Highway 38 across froa the Texaco service station.
r* 
- 
_
Moderately elevated concentrations of hydrocarbons were found In soil gas
beneath the southern part of the Four Winds Shopping Center parking lot
' 
(Zone II) and adjacent to the Esso station (Zone III), 300 to 800 feet
L' 
downgradient froa the Texaco station. The hydrocarbons encountered In
r- 
soil gas in this zone are probably derived by volatilization from a plume
• - 
of hydrocarbons moving with the ground water in the upper Turpentine Run
,. 
aquifer. However, based on the soil gas data, It was not possible to
i. 
determine with certainty whether Zones I, II and HI are discontinuous or
whether they In fact represent parts of a single pTuse. 
It is not
1 
possible to delineate such a plume by soil gas methods beneath the
bedrock high which underlies the Tlllett property. Other direct methods
'' 
of sampling ground water and vadoze zone will be required to define the
L* 
relationship between the two areas of elevated soil gas concentrations.
r-
i
i.
j' 
28
i.
»,
I.
c
r
r
L
r
Irt:
Elevated levels of PCE were found 1n MCh 
of the study trta, and other
chlorinated hydrocarbons were found In SOM locations. The source of
these compounds appears to be northeast of the Texaco service station,
and 1s possibly the LA6A building, where PCE Is known to have been used
extensively In the past.
L 
- 
TUT 
001 0731
f-r
APPENDIX A
TRACER RESEARCH CORPORATION REPORT OF
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
001
(
GCOSCIENCE CONSULTftNTS/TEXftCO/TUTU. VIRGIN ISLANDS
S*Apl»
S6-R1
Cft.»O^
-&o~n*
S6-R2
S6-R2R
S6-R2H
S6-03
SS-R3.S
S6-R4
S6-R4
S6-B1
E6-B2
S6-B2
S6-B3
S6-B3
S6-B3. S
' S6-B4
. S6-B4C
SS-B4C
S6-B4C
S6-BG1
S6-BS2
S6-C1
S6-C2
S6-C3
S6-C*
S6-C4
S6-01
S6-D2
S6-D3
S6-04
SSF-01
S6F-01
S6F-02
S6F-03
S6F-04
B*nr*n* Tolu*n«
Depth D*t* Cug/l> 
fog/I)
S' 11/04 <230~~
*«.5* 11/O4 
I
8.5* 11/04 
I
1.5" 11/OS O.01
7' 11/05 
1
5* 11/05 
I
' 
5* 11/05 
I
•4.5' 11/O5 <0.01
5.5' 11/05 
1
5' 1 1/04 
I
S1 11/04 
I
8.5' 11/04 
I
5' 11/04 
I
8' 11/04 
I
5' 11/05 
I
5' 11/04 <0.02
5' 11/05 <0.01
5* 11/06 <0.01
?* 11/06 <0.01
5' 11/06 <0.01
-»' 11/06 <0.01
5' 11/05 
I
5* 11/05 
I
5* 11/05 
I
•*• 11/04 <0.09
7' 11/04 <0.9
-1.5' 11/O5 <0.01
2.5* 11/05 
l
5' 11/05 <0.01
«• 11/04 <0.09
•4-S* 11/1O <O.O2
6P 11/10 <0.02
^•5' 11/1O <O.O2
6.5* li/io 
<O.O2
6.5» 11/1O <O.O2
<260
I
I
<0.01
<ia
<13
<13
<O.O1
<0.3
<510
I
I
I
I
<26
0.02
<O.O1
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<O.O1
<130
<iao
<o.s
<0. 1
<i
<O.O1
<O.5
<O.O1
O.S
<O.O2
<O.O2
<O.O2
<O.O2
<0.02
Ethyl
» B*nr»n
Cug/l)
<280
<28O
<2BO
<0.01
<14
<14
<14
<O.O1
<0.3
<570
<280
<280
<280
4. OOO
<28
<0.03
<0.01
<O.O2
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<190
<140
<0.6
<0. 1
<1
<0.01
<O.6
<0.01
<O. 1
<O.O3
<o.oa
<o.oa
<o.oa
<o.oa
(
Tet«l
* Xgl*n*« Hydroe.u/o CM4
<ug/l> 
(09/1 >
<260
<26O
<26O
<0.0t
<ia
<13
<ia
<o.oi
<o.a
<530
<260
<26O
<260
<110
<27
<o.oa
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<O.O1
<190
<iao
<o.s
<O. 1
<i
<0.01
O.S
<O.O1
<O.l
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
38 .OOO
110.000
690.000
O.01
7
^ f^f^
. 6OO
^.6OO .
a. 600
0.01
68
610.000
280.000
220.000
85.000
120.000
6.4OO
O.02
0.1
0.01
O.S
0.2
0.01
190.000
72.000
1.000
0.09
1.700
8
1.000
O.O1
4
0.06
0.02
O.O7
0.4
0.2
7.1
1
flr»*lgz*d by M.
bg M.
6EOSCIENCE CONSULTAHTS/TEKACO/TUTU, VIHOIN ISLANDS
Ethyl
B»rtz»n« Toluene B#r»t»n» Xy)
S»<i.pl» 
D*pth D*t» 
Cug/l> 
(ug/1 > 
tug/1) 
(ug/l>
Total
Hydroe.u/o CH4
S6F-04
SGF-O5
SGF-06
SGF-07
SGF-08
SGF-09
S6F-10
SGF-ll
SGF-l 2
SGF-l 3
SGF-l 4
SGF-l 5
SGF-l 6
SGF-l 7
SGF-l 8
SGF-l 9
SGF-20
SGF-21
SGF-22
S6T-01
SGT-01
S6T-02
SGT-02
SGT-03
SGT-OS
SGT-06
SGT-O7
SGT-07
SGT-Q8
SGT-10
SGT-li
SGT-12
SGT-13
S6T-14
SGT-15
9.5* 11/10
5.5' U/io
6* 11/1O
3.5' 11/11
6* 11/11
2* 11/12
5.5' 11/12
*• 11/12
3.5" 11/12
5.5' 11/12
2' 11/12
2.5" 11/13
6f 11/13
5' 11/14
3-5' 11/14
5' 11/14
6* 11/14
6* 11/14
6* 11/14
5* 11/09
7' 1 1/09
5' 11/O9
7' 11/09
«' 11/09
«' 11/06
2.5* 11/O9
5* 11/09
5.5* 11/O9
2* 11/09
3" 11/O9
5' 11/09
3- 5" 11/09
«.»• 11/09
5.5' 11/12
3-5' 11/12
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
I
I
0.4
0.02
I
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
I
<0.02
<O.O2
<O.O2
<O.O1
<0.02
<O.O2
<O.O2
<0.2
<0.01
<0.02
<0.02
<O.O2
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<O.02
<0.02
<O.03
<O.O3
<0.02
<6
<O.S
<0.1
<0.02
<12
<O.O2
<0.02
<o.ot
0.07
<5
<O.03
<O.03
<0.03
<0.01
<0.02
<O.O2
<0.02
<0.2
<O.Ol
<0.02
<O.O2
<0.02
<0.02
<O.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.03
<O.O3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<o.oa
<7
<0.5
<0. 1
<O.03
<14
<O.O3
<0.03
<0.03
<O.O3
<6
<0.03
<O.O3
<0.03
<0.01
<O.O2
<0.02
<0.02
<O.»
<0.02
<0.02
<O.O2
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<O.02
<O.O2
<0.02
<O.O9
<o.oa
<O.O2
<O.02
<0.02
<O.O3
<O.O3
<0.02
<6
<0.5
<0. 1
<0.02
<13
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<6
<O.O3
<0.03
<o.oa
<O.01
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<o.a
<O.O1
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02 '
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<O.02
0.3
0.2
O.4
1026
2.6OO
120
4O
7
3. OOO
43
11
93
0.2
1,800
26
1
0.2
<0.01
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
290.
0.6
<0.02
<0.02
1O
0.9
10
' 9
0.4
S
2
O.O2
li
'
Ar»alyz»d by M. Kreienberg
Ch»el'*d bg n. *( 
»rib<»rg
r~3
GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS/TEXACO/TUTU, VIRGIN ISLANDS
Ethgl
Benzene Toluene Benzene Kgli
Sample 
D*pth Date (ug/l> 
<ug/l> 
Cug/l> 
<ug/l>
Total
Hydroo.u/o CH4
SGT-16
S6T-17
SGT-1?
SGT-19
SGT-19
SGT-19
SGT-20
SG2-01
SGZ-02
SG2-O4
SGZ-03
Drift 1
Drift 2
Drift 3
Drift H
Drift 5
Drift &
Drift 6
Drift 7
5.5'
6*
6"
5.5'
6'
lo-
in-
s'
3.5'
6'
5*
4'
2.5'
2'
2'
2.5'
2!
2'
2*
11/13
11/13
11/14
11/13
11/13
11/13
11/14
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/04
11 /OS
11/06
11/O9
11/11
11/12
11/13
11/14
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<O.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
I
I
I
I
<0.02
<O.O1
<0.01
<0.01
<O.O2
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<O.O2
<0.02
<0.03
<0.02
<O.O2
<O.O2
<0.03
<7
<S2
<26
<5
<O.O2
<O.O1
<O.O1
<0.01
<O.O3
<0.02
<O.O2
<O.O3
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<O.03
<0.03
<O.03
<7
<58
<29
<6
<0.03
<O.01
<0.02
<0.01
<0.03
<O.03
<0.03
<0.03
<0.03
<O.O3
<O.O3
<0.03
<o.oa
<O.03
<O.03
<?
<54
<26
<5
<0.03
<O.O1
<0.01
<0.01
<o.oa
<0.02
<O.O3
<0.03
0.4
0.2
<0.02
0.4
0.2
2
0.2
4.OOO
28.000
12.OOO
860
0.9
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.4
/.
Notations:
wlth
mi
Analyzed bg H. Krotettberg
Checked by M. Krotenberg
GEOSCIENCE CONSULTANTS/TEKACO/TUTU. VIRGIN ISLANDS
Sart.pl*
SGH-01
SSH-Q2
SSH-03
SGH-O*
SGH-05
SGH-O6
SGH-O7
SGH-Oe
SGH-O9
0*pth Oat*
Ch2C12
CHC19
3*
3.5'
3.5'
5*
5.5'
11/17
11/17
11/17
11/17
11/17
11/17
11/17
11/17
11/17
<0.9
<0.9
<0.09
<0.09
<0.2
OO
<0.9
6
<0.09
<O.OO6
<0.006
<0.0006
<O.OO06
<O.OO1
<0.2
<O.OO6
<0.006
<0.0006
TCfl 
CCM
<ug/l> 
Cog/1>
0.02 
<O.OO05
O. OS 
<0.OOOS
<0.0002 <0.00005
TCE
(ug/1)
<O.OO4
0.5
<0.0004
Tracer R«»«*rch Cerpor«tl*n
O.OO3 <O.OOOOS <O.OOCM
<O.OOO-4 <O.OOO1 O.OS
1O 
<O.O2 
<0. 1
O.O4 
<O.OOOS
<0.OO2 
<0.OOOS
<0.0002 <0.00005
0.6
o.a
PCE
/
1
<42
0.4
0.6
6
16
170
1
O.O2
1
Notations i
ulth
«.
H.
r
I
I
! r
4.
APPENDIX B
[ 
FIELD SYSTEM QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT
OF OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
i:
T *
L
GCL
FIELD SYSTEM AUDIT OF
OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES, SOIL GAS INVESTIGATION
AT TEXACO TUTU SERVICE STATIOH,
TUTU, ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
On November 6, 1987, a Field SystM Audit of the work bting conducted by
Geosclence Consultants, Ltd. (GCL) and Tracer Research Corporation (TRC)
at the Tutu service station of Texaco Caribbean, Inc., on the Island of
St. Thomas, was performed by the GCL Quality Assurance (QA) Officer,
Randall T. Hicks. The Field SystM Audit Mas conducted on the third day
of soil gas sampling and analysis conducted by GCL and TRC at the Tutu
site. 
Observations, recommendations, and corrective actions performed
during the Field System Audit are described In this report.
Project History and Procedures
Texaco Caribbean, Inc. has contracted with GCL to conduct a soil gas
Investigation at the Tutu site 1n St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. The
Tutu survey Is designed to determine the levels of hydrocarbons which are
found In soil gas from the areas surrounding underground storage tanks at
the facility, to determine If a release has occurred from the tanks, and
to assist In the definition of any soil or ground water contamination
plumes.
Soil gas hydrocarbon values are determined by Inserting a steel probe
Into the soil, withdrawing soil gas by use of a vacuum pump, and analyz-
ing the gas for hydrocarbons using an on-slte gas chromatograph (GC).
Detailed descriptions for sampling and analytical procedures are 1n
GCL's Work Plan and Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Tutu site
(October 1987).
TUT 001. 0733
I
I
i
I
! .
GCL
i;
Field sampling and analytical procedures commenced at the Tutu site on
November 3, 1987.
Purpose of F1
The Field Syste» Audit was conducted to verify that procedures described
In the Work Plan (VP) and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) were
being adhered to In the field at the Tutu site, to determine whether any
procedures required «od1f1 cation based on experience in the field, and to
recommend any other procedural changes In field activities that Might be
necessary or desirable to Improve the final work product.
Field Observations
No major technical problems were found with the work performed at the
,- 
Tutu site. It was determined that significant difficulty exists using
the current column and detector (OV-101 Column, Flame lonlzatlon Detec-
tor) 1n the GC, as called for In the approved Work Plan and QAPP, to
quantify benzene and toluene In soil gas. This could be the result of
one of two situations:
r •
l* 
• 
Benzene and toluene have selectively been flushed or bio-
degraded In the vadose zone, even 1n areas with significant
'" 
total hydrocarbons as detected by the FID.
4. .
• Benzene and toluene are obscured by Interference peak(s) and
therefore not quantifiable with the presently used column 1n
t 
the GC.
[ 
In order to resolve this problem and to quantify the presence or absence
of benzene and toluene 1n soil gas It was recommended, based on discus-
sions between GCL, TRC, EPA and CDM-FPC (J. Appel - GCL; A.A. Gutlerrez
- GCL; Dan Evans - TRC; John Mlhallch - CDM-FPC; Jim Ockallnl-
r- 
COM - Boston), that a Carbopak 1000 column that will have a much longer
< 
retention time and allow a clean determination of the presence or
B-2
TUT 001 0739
GCL
absence of benzene and toluene be used at the Tutu site. It was agreed
by all concerned that If this procedure failed to Identify and quantify
benzene and toluene, these constituents would be considered absent 1n
soil gas. It Bust be noted, however, that this can be the case even
though these constituents auy be present In ground water, due to the
blodegradatlon and flushing of the vadose zone and restriction of ground
water to fractured bedrock. Furthermore It exist be noted that, although
the Individual constituents have not been detected, the pluaw mapping
using total hydrocarbons and detectable halocarbons on the electron
capture detector (ECO) has been extremely successful over the majority of
the site.
The principal technical problems were not encountered with the site work,
T 
but Instead, with the site Work Plan and QAPP. Portions of the plans are
not appropriate for actual site conditions. Other portions of the plans
do not significantly add to accomplishing the goals of the project or
1 
were not being done routinely by TRC, and we recommended deletion of
,. 
these practices from the QAPP and Work Plan. These recommended changes
are summarized In Table 1.
r
I:
Conclusions and Recommendations
r •
The Field System Audit Indicated that not all the procedures described In
'- 
the UP and QAPP are followed exactly as planned previously due to site-
i 
specific conditions. 
The reasons for these discrepancies are valid and
r. 
summarized In Table 1. 
Since the proposed changes to the Work Plan and
[ 
QAPP tend to Improve the quality and/or speed at which data can be
collected during the project, It Is recommended that the revised proce-
dures, presently In use, be continued during further sampling and
| 
analysis and be Incorporated Into the Work Plan and QAPP for the Tutu
f 
site.
001 
0740
iI.
f 
B-3
I -
* f
r
I-.
r
ii.
r*
M
t;
I,
GCL
GCL 1s confident that the procedural revisions to the QAPP described In
this report win result In 1 .proved data quality and a better final work
product.
074.1
B-4
T '•L
r
"I:I.
i:
TABLE 1
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES TO WORK PLAN AND QAPP
Remove RUM Erbas from TRC.
Do not employ PIO Detectors h the
Gas Chromatograph to contain with
practice.
• Carbopack 1000 column on
should
toNBS
The purpose of the
should be stated ti
that •praiminary*
of data Is conducted hi
th* field.
1Mb* • 'one-pee*' CUbnflon
for the OC. not a thrw poM
eybradOHM dMcrtMd Ju«%
ttw adequacy of this fiaBmrtlon
which It prwanty baing u«ad In
ttMfWd.
The taxi addrasting sampla spMs
should ba ra-wnllan for danty.
Appandte A should ba ntMad to
raad Tracar Rasaareh Corporation
Methods of Operation for Sol Gas
Analyses Using TOG'S MoMa
Laboratory and Probe Driver.
Appendb B should ba modified
throughout to reflect Actual Site
Procedures.
Delete references to a second
sample for each point to conform to
actual practice.
•Observations* should be made by
GCL staff not TRC.
JUSTF1CATIOM FOB T>g
AJ^»|A^W ^«»«d ult^A M^
acnieysr ana m> wai
TRC.
coupled we* high levels of
nyd
rtMnswfJ martin
(doudng the window).
BTEX ooncanMiona ware not
pursuant to procedures
P-5-
fl.
N was unclear to field pereomeL Th* control
poM Is utltzad to teat tor veriabtty h
analysia due to factors not mated to any
contamination (e.g, weather conditions.
etc.)
Any statistical teats. <
oofrafstton of sol gas data wth other hydro-
geologic features wl be conducted after afl
data are assembled Into a logical format
The on+pcirrt eafibratJon is appropriate tor
sol gaS surveys.
Only ojjf sample Is taken from each point
10 samples, a selected pee* Is repeated,
sampled and analyzed.
The Me may suggest that the methods dfe-
cussed wtJ be used at Tutu. Most of the
specific methods were modHied to suit this
remote location.
Although this could not be My anticipated
sle condttions dictated special methods not
described in the appandbc (e.g.. driving probes
by hand, refrigeration of the standards).
It It not done and Is not necessary.
GCL staff Is in a better position and II is
GCL's responsbffity to describe the site
conditions for each sample point
1(0)
Floumt-1 (O)
2(0)
Appandbi B, pJ (0)
3(0)
0(0)
(Q)
7(0)
AppendhA(0)
Appendix B (0)
TI.J1
Appendix B. p.1 (O)
Appendbt B. pJ (0)
OO1 
0742
R-5
TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
r *
ObMn QA data on Cham Services he
FOR THP CMAMfY
Oeule Md standards should ba
The water used to prepare the
should ba analyzed daly.
Primary standards may ba kapt at
ttw ate to oontonn wth
The ayringa blank procedure should
System blanks may ba run daly to
oontonn wtth actual practice.
Syringes and other equipment may be
baked tor 1/2 hour at 80'C rather
than overnight at 70* to conform
wlh actual practice.
No data an provided.
During fWd work variation of tha
skjnlloant whan not nMgsratad.
water torn
fcwnd to oontaln hydr
IfDQftS Of MlOCeVwOfset flt
^•— ft^M^ufeb^kl a^^fcAJMft fc^ 
^M^HM^KA Mat^^
NO Mcnraov reason inr Koepng sucn
off aKa was prasantad by aMa parsonnaL
FWd method Is equivalent A 10 irt syringe Is
fll^tffl nJth BJHawM^e* 4 
**-—— m •ee^wwk* eM^eWte*
•CO Vrwl nwvQeWi eC* IIMR • 
IfVUU 
•yVWpyv
Is used to obtah a aampla from the 1st syringe.
the smaser sampta la analyzed.
System blanks after every 10 •amplsa Is CNces-
sive and not necessary to assume qualry of
analytical resutts.
Tha level of •Cleaning' Is sufficient
Appandk B. oJ (Q)
Appandk B. pJB <O)
Appendk B. pJ (0)
Appandk B. p.7 (O)
Appandk B. P-8, P-12
(0)
Appandh B. pA p.14
(0)
Appandh B. pJ. p.12
(0)
note (Q) - QAPP
(WP) • Work Plan
r
B-6
00 i
0743
I
•H//.0 
T,-,,, 
•
''-"-' mi 
. 
I
I
I
I
I
I
'ON 30N3U3d3d
ex
T A T - C 2 - F - 0 4 3 9 3
S U M M A R Y OF L A B O R A T O R Y RESULTS
FOR OIL AND WATER SAMPLES
COLLECTED FROM TANKS, STORM DRAI
AND SUMPS AT GASOLINE STATIONS
AND AL'TO BODY SHOPS IN
TUTU, ST. THOMAS,
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
ON AUGUST 17, 1987
P r e p a r e d F o r :
C a r l o s O ' N e l l l
B r u c e S p r a g u e
R e s p o n s e a n d P r e v e n t i o n B r a n c h
U.S. E P A , R e g i o n II
E d i s o n , N e w J e r s e y 08837
r
:
P r e p a r e d B y :
I s a b e l l e A l l g o o d , TAT II PM
C r i s D ' O n o f r i o , TAT II QC
R e g i o n II T e c h n i c a l A s s i s t a n c e Team
W e s t o n / S P E R D i v i s i o n
E d i s o n , N e w J e r s e y 08837
/ \
U
\ Q
' . "Y- '
! V 
i V 
•
» .' *' 
'»
I '
F e b r u a r y 2 3 , 1988
001 0745
t
I
SUGARY OF L A B O R A T O R Y RESULTS
FOR OIL AND WATER SAMPLES
COLLECTED F R O M T A N K S , STORM D R A I N S
AND SUMPS AT G A S O L I N E STATIONS
AND AUTO BODY SHOPS IN
TUTU, ST. THOMAS,
U.S. V I R G I N ISLANDS
OS AUGUST 17, 1987
Personnel froo the R e g i o n II Technical Assistance Team (TAT)
and the St. Thomas D e p a r t m e n t of Planning and Natural Resources
(DPNR) c o l l e c t e d eleven oil and water samples on August 17,
1987, 
from v a r i o u s s t o r a g e tanks, storm d r a i n s and sumps at
gasoline s t a t i o n s and auto body shops in Tutu, St. Thomas, as
d i r e c t e d by TDD Numbers 02-8708-16 and 02-8708-32. 
Table I
p r o v i d e s d e s c r i p t i o n s of all samples.
The Tutu oil s a m p l e s were taken from waste oil storage tanks,
sumps and storm d r a i n s . 
Sample numbers one through eleven
were a n a l y z e d for po1ychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and numbers
twelve through twenty-two were analyzed for v o l a t i l e organic
compounds (VOCs). 
Split samples were provided for Tutu Texaco
and Tu t u E s s o.
VOC a n a l y s i s was performed in an a t t e m p t to natch the VOCs
found in the c o n t a m i n a t e d Tutu Wells with those found in
these s a r. pies. 
Note that sample numbers one through eleven
correspond to ssrcple numbers twelve through twenty-two.
The sanples were shipped on August 26, 1987 to S-Cubed L a b o r a t o r i e s
in San Diego, C a l i f o r n i a . 
The samples were detained in
customs and not received by the laboratory until September
15, 1987. The sample analysis was conducted through the
C o n t r a c t Laboratory Program (CLP).
The CLP designated holding times for VOCs were exceeded,
and the samples were warn upon a r r i v a l at the laboratory,~
The PCB samples, however, do not require preservation and did
not exceed t h e i r d e s i g n a t e d holding times. 
The PCB data
meets the EPA q u a l i t y assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
requirements and is acceptable. 
The results indicate that
all samples analyzed for PCBs were below the method detection
l i m i t s of 80 and 160 ug/kg.
Table II i l l u s t r a t e s the v o l a t i l e organic compounds (VOCs)
i d e n t i f i e d in the samples. 
Some samples show very high
levels of VOCs typical for samples c o l l e c t e d from gasoline
stations and auto body shops. 
In a d d i t i o n to those compounds
found in Table II, several unknowns were d e t e c t e d as t e n t a t i v e l y
i d e n t i f i e d compounds.
A t t a c h m e n t s
H9APT
:ABLZ
u r b e r 
D e s c r l o t i o n
3239i-l. ............. ...Bay 11 sump, Tutu Texaco
32393-2. ................ Bay 92 suap, Tutu Texaco 
/
3239B-3................. Bay #3 suap, Tutu Texaco 
'
32393-4 ................. Oil and water s e p a r a t o r , Tutu Texaco
32393-5. ................Waste oil tank, Tutu Texaco"———
3239B-6................. Storm drain, Tutu Texaco
.32393-7 ................ .Gutter , Consolidated Auto Parts
(32393-8 .................Storm drain, Consolidated Auto Parts
3239B-9 .................Waste oil storage tank, Ramsey Motor
I 32393-10................Virgin Islands Housing Authority (VIHA)
*>— 
.................waste oil Underground Storage Tank (UST)
3 2 3 9 B-11 ................Oil and water separator, Tutu Esso
3239~B-T^ ................ Bay 0 1 suap, Tutu Texaco
32393-13................ Bay 02 sump, Tutu Texaco
3239B-li................3a7 '73 suap, Tutu Texaco
32393-15................Oil and water separator, Tutu Texaco
32393-16. ...............Waste oil tank, Tutu Texaco
-_3_2. 3_i B- 1 7 ..._._. ..i..————._^Storm drain, Tutu Texaco
32393-1 8 .."............. .Gut ter , Consolidated Auto Parts
32393-19................Storo drain Consolidated Auto Parts
3239B-20................Waste oil storage tank, Rassey Motor
3239B-21. .............. .VIHA waste oil UST
32393-22 ................ 01 1 and water s e p a r a t o r , Tutu Esso
DRAFT
TUT 
001 
O747
: ii
\
\
\>
x
rt- $
SAHPLE NUMBER *tW * 
v
CONCENTRATION
' •
1(V
•ILE
IIC COMPOUND
>ne
•none
•ne
•ne
benzene .
xylenet
ofor»
Trirhloroe thane
chloroethenr
(anted Value
3239B-12
1400 '
3000
'V
3239B-13
1500
3100
270
2300
1300
9100
3239B-I4
2200
4100
«70
960
7000
260^
c_
f7^
3239B-15
5300
2800
43000
14000
1)0000
2400 \/
___
]
3239B-16
1900
6300
1000
9300
^ ^")
~^
\
3239B-17
2200
4000
1100 •
660
4400
V
3239B-1B
2100
4200
7BO
390
2600
Vv
32398-19
2600
100.1
3239-20
1 50000
210000
1 400000
290000
1 700000
3239R-2!
97000
9HOOO
500000
2900000
^^'
59onn
970000
?oonno
1200000
./
•jPOfUT, ]f
1 1 rwjo K^
- — — —
fx
-p.
CO
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
MMKT*. MS-rc' rs *c;s:» « ut-c* a
rarjcer.ral Services Divisio
«C:JCN. MW .HUT tier
TUT 
O01 
0749
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
-.Te-.tal Serviets Division
IttlCN. NIW
S.-« tl
N.ct
Ollf'^'i** •'
! -T7V
t**-
0*if 11
&
lt-l» t
*.•»••
JJ^
l*iSL
&^'&4*-.
*rr\
On*
Itr CX«*(i tl Cvi>»<r
To
Tl.l
Pr*
-If
KitUn Itr CKfnft •( Cvl'tfr
tin •«< lyi
tflf
(••it* <»r Ck«ii|* •'
tlr.
tt*i«>
TUT 
001 
O750
CLP 5a-?.'e U^age-re--: Off.ce
P.O. Box 818 - Aiexancna, Virginia 22313
Phone: 
703/557-2^9C 
- 
FTS/557-2J-90
SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVI
PACKING LIST
Sampling Office: 
Sampling Date(s): 
Ship To:
I 
/ 
I 
'
Sampling Contact: 
Date Shipped: 
36" 5 Hf-Af*
fa i
1.
2.
3.
(name)
Site Name/Code:
— 
-*- 
1 
C~
(phone) 
6/SV-r, S-fw^S 
£/?£ f
I j"! |3 3 
S AS Number 
^
CE
For Lab Use OnJy
l/»l£L. A/TT.^-"^. 
Date Samples Rec'd:
4U/ol/ 
Received By:
ln^6A/-
Cp£B '5/-ivVi£S ")
Sample 
^- 
Sample Description 
Sample Condition on
Numbers 
i.e., AnaJysis, Matrix, Concentration 
Receipt at Lab
j — «n v —— I ———— 
' ' r> ) ——— 
— ^ — LJ*AJ /*-Ac C7 VA/_ ———————————— 
u
\ 
'
«. 3^34 6-4 
&fr, A ^ - . / ,/ . i M_ JL,WA/
5.
6.
7.
8. 
•
9.
10. '
11.
12.
3 5- ^9 fi> " 5" 
PC 6^ 
<^/L ,' 
/A//x/.^/JAJ
•i^^fft-6 
P^^?' 
/Onf^2J ^AJ^/VI^UJ
^•^-^6-7 
CbP' tOAr3' 
^KA'A^A/
2,-xvift-?? 
?CG;; (Jftr/^.
7- 
UMk^o^ooxj
7-i^^5—— 7 
P<T£' ^/> ^5!*^^^ . ^v/^fcL
^a^PSStf 
(Vp' /)/t - 
L^A/fOOAjJ
^^-"^TO" l( 
PdfS ' £\t—/H> C \ 
I } Af/r f) i!~LCAJ
rw.i y 
/H.u ) t^w/vfcH,Ai
N-*
k-U3Xf
v /^
13.
10.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19. 
-
20.
For Lab Use OnJy
White - 5MO Copy, Yellow - Region Copy, Pink - Lab Copy for return to SM< TUT 
OO1 O7bl
3. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
XrLP Sample Manage^e".: Oii.ce
| 
P.O. B c x S l S - Alexandria, V.rgr.ia 22313
I 
Phone: 
703/557-2^90 - FTS/557-2^90
: . J ^\C-
t^ ^
SAS Number
SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE
PACKING LIST
Sampling Office:
Sampling Contact:
name)
(phone)
Sampling Date(s):
Date Shipped:
Site Name/Code:
Ship To:
Attn:
For Lab Use Only
Da'te Samples Rec'd:
Received By:
1.
^
3.
<f.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
i^
20.
Sample
Numbers
-n_
imple Description
i.e., Analysis, Matrix, Concentration
VCA\ 
iJAfc*-/^ $
Sample Condition on
Receipt at Lab
VA
r
7
t-*-
/L-U"/:
UcA'
.A T.SJL '. 
L/
i-
A/
• / J A/ J
yL/
For Lab Use Only
White - SMO Copy, Yellow - Region Copy, Pink - Lab Copy for return to SMC TUT 001 
0752
S-CUBED
A OtoMon ofMvaeell Utbormtorlcs, Inc.
September 25,1987
NARRATIVE CASE SAS 3239B
S-CUBED CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7261
Volume 1 of 1
//
/
This case consists of 11 water, oil/water, and oil samples for VOA analysis, and 11
water, oil/water, and oil samples for PCB analysis. The VOA analyses were performed
using the EPA CLP method for medium level soil samples. The PCB analyses were
done after cleanup according to the EPA method 600/4-81-045 for determination of
PCBs in transformer fluid and waste oils.
No PCBs were found in the samples. Sample weight for waters was 1.0 g and for oil
samples 0.1 g. For laboratory bank, 10 mL of hexane was utilized. The SAS packing
list specified water as matrix for Samples 3239B-3, 3239B-6, and 3239B-7. However,
the samples consisted of oil and thus sample weight of 0.1 g was used.
The volatile samples were analyzed using sample weight of 4 g which was extracted by
10 mL of methanol. A 250 pL aliquot was then analyzed for most samples by GC/MS.
However, the methanol aliquot volume for 3239B-15 was 60 /iL, for 3239B-20 and
3239B-22 it was 2 ftL and for 3239B-21 it was 1 /iL The dilutions were required due to
high concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes. Alkyl substituted benzenes
were found as TICs in most samples.
All surrogate recoveries and MS/MSD results were found within QC limits, and analyses
.were straight forward.
Annina Lukiuii-Johnsbn
Acting Project Manager
TUT 
OOi 
075:;
P.O. Box 1620, La Jofa, Cdfrmia 93038-1610 
339$ Cam* Mount* Rood, Sen Dtag* Catfarna 92121-1096
Telephone (619) 4534060 
TWX: 910J37-12S3 
Telecopier (619) 7SHM74
f
SOIL SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY SUMMARY
S-CUBEO
~(
Contract Laboratory
MadhM__k
!•**»«
VOLATILE
Mi-nn
<r«-uu
joi.
ITIUM-M
Jfl9_
MTM-
t-tLutmo-
MMHTL
IM-IMt
Contract No.
68-01 -~>Jtil
SEMI-VOLATILE
U4-IIW
11*- It II
«.«.« I
rao
H
IOJ
IQt
V
107
/1 2.
IO2
3JX-I7
12344-lf
too
tOT
IO£
106
101
Id 2
IOI
99
3231A -12.
IOO
99
(0
(A)
97
97
9?
/of
103
97
ISPVO3I
103
6
/0.2,
99
fdl
• VALUES ARE OUTSIDE OF CONTRACT REQUIREO OC LIMITS
••ADVISORY LIMITS ONLY
LAB
Vatatibw
PMticUMI
.out of
.outef
ju&A j*{
Wt VI
| OUtMfe Of OQ
, MtaUt of QC IMU
\ wt«M* of QC IMt«
7/66
FORM*
SOIL MATRIX SPIKE /MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
1
Contract No.
Low
M«dlu«i L4>v«l
FHACTION
VOA
SMO
««1M.|£,
8AI
SMO
SAMPLE NO.
A/A
ACID
SMO
SAMPLE NO.
Af A
PEST
SMO
SAMPLE NO.
COMPOUND
l.t-OkHotofMlwtw
CMorobwiiwM
Tolwww
»-- — -
1 .2.4.T(khlorobtniMM
AC9ffBpVllralfM
2.4 OMlroioliMfM}
Pyfsjiit
N-NMretodi-n-PfomrtMiiiM
« A ^t_*-«— -*-_— — _ -
PwNMMeroplMnol
•S»AA4kl
rnsjviDi
2-CMoroptMnol
4-CMoro-3-MtlhyMMnol
4-Nttrophtnol
UmtoiM
HiptacMor
AMrln
OicMrlM
Endrta
4.4'ODT
CONC SPIKE
ADDED |u|/K«l
9.90G
9tOQ
SAoo
2Aoo
.^^ttoo
"^-v^
"***
^•^s^
"^•x^
"V
igsftf
O
p
o«
o
.^
"^^s.^
^1
-<^-
• \
"S,
CONC.
3OOO
2iQO
£Aoo
4fflO
£Aoo
^Vvl
TV
^v^
^X
»v
*E*C
107
too
IOO
toff
too
A•i9r
^6v»-
"V
CONg.
JOOO
2.AfiO
£4OO
£?dO
fi/r7??
•^^s^
"*•
^
"V ^s
*tc
101
l/tn
IOQ
k)5
loo
s^
"**x
V
X
X\
MfD
oo
o
Q
Q
^**«^
VA
\\
-Bwff
Hru
22
24
21
21
2|
23
19
47
36
38
27
47
35
50
33
50
50
31
43
36
45
SO
* 1 IMITC *
'hilcflfonv
59172
62-137
60-133
69-139
66-142
38107
31 137
28-89
35-142
41-126
28-104
17-109
26-90
25-102
26-103
1 1-114
46-127
35-130
34-132
31-134
42-139
23134
*ASTEftlSKEO VALUES AME OUTSIDE QC LIMITS.
->
UPD: 
VOA»_Q——
i/N—MA_o«t
ACID 
It* 
out of
PEST _fl^_ out of
QUttllM OC
owltidc OC Nmlli
outiid* OC NmlU
outtkte OCHmM(
MECOVEMV:
VOA*_£_ out
« 10 :
oulddt OC NmiM
owtihto OC Nmili
outtkto OC llmiit
OC Nmiti
FORM III
a/as
c
r
• • r
MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE RECOVERY
Cat* N«.
3313,9
Contractor
S-CUKD
Contract No.
CONC.MKI
AOOIO|«tA4
MS
ale
nra
loo
o
FORUM
•/•ft
v>
o
METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Region.
S-CUKD
Contract Me.
«MIMI
Milt
sit.v/on
V04
3
f
I1SVI02)
3n
fr*-a
t
A-
18*3-3
10
'&d Vr.
a*
FORM IV
7/85
t
I
QC/MS TUNING AND MASS CALJBRA1 ION
•roinofluorobwtttiw (BFB)
57,
V&t
No
^J *^y
I
I
179
17*
ITS
tn
m
174
(fit)1
AWUIS tO THt POUOmNO
174
FOAM V
TUT 
O01 
O75S
OC/MS TUNING AND MASS CALJBRA1 ION
Bromof!uorob«n2tn« (BFB)
7*41
Comr»ct No
68-01
10
•v:
OHTtHU
MIlATTVt AMJNOANCI
in
174
in
U» ««.
100
no
3.76
SK9-
THtS pf MOMMAMCt TUNt U9\M TO TNt f OU0NIN8
«%
«%
174
17C
OATt Of ANAUrStt
TIMt OF ANALYSIS
i.^gw-
'^M^
TUT 
001 
0759
QC/MS TUNINQ AND MASS CALIBRATION
Bromof1uorob«nzon« (BFB)
\i
C^r^Np 
68-01-M44
Lib 10
Om lltltH^ Authoriwd §y:
M^ 
ION AlUNOANd OIITIIIIA
MILATtVS AtUNOANCS
179
174
in
17t
m
«SL0% *
. H
Stflft «»•»•»
174
24.5 ^
5S 1
ICO
no
50,3
3.S&-
wo;
3.45
I Pf MOKMANCt TUNC APPUU TQ TMt FOLLOWING
SAMfUS. SLANKS ANO STAMOAI
* VMM
M « mm 17S.
OATt Of ANALYSIS I TMM Of ANALYSIS
7/iS
TUT 
001 
O76O
QC/MS TUNING AND MASS CALIBRATION
Bromofluorobtnztn* (BFB)
CBmractor
s-ono
Contract No
OM ItafeMtj, Authoring ty: .
AtUrmnTt OrrtHIA 
UliATIVt AtUNOANCt
173
174
in
17f
in
MM IUK M *• «W 101 J» •! MB 174
20.7
ICO
no
-^ ''•
3.16
TMtS HMOKMAMCf TUMf
TMC
OATI Of AMALVtt
tfM&if'xy
'f u r
IT*.
TIMi 09 AMALYSIS
001 
0/61
QC/MS TUNING AND MASS CAUUHA I
Bromofluorobonzono (BFB)
10+ &-
Cemria No
CftlTIJItA
179
174
171
17t
17T
«M HO*. M iw MM 101 4ft * mm 174
100
no
57.0
56.5
3.83
TMS PINPONMANCI TUM
1*3
TOTMi
SAMPUS. HANKS ANO SVANOANOt.
174.
OATt OP
TtMl OP ANALYSIS
TUT 00.1 
07
U7A
PROTECTION AGENCY
Office
Alexandria, Virginia 22313
- FTS/W7-2490
SAS Number
SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE
PACKING LIST
Sampling Office:
foj f litotf1" j *"*•'
Stmpling Contact:
1.
2._S
3.
4.
3.
6.
7.
S.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
16.
17.
IS.
19.
20.
Site Name/Code:
S /
ShipTo:
^T-
35 ft
Attn:
Por Lab Use Only
Date Samples Redds
Received By:
Sample Description
Lav, Analysis, Matrix, Concentration
-y
- J(
Sample Condition on
Receipt at Lab
B^
For Lab Use Only
-SMOCopy, Yellow - Region Copy, Pink - Lab Copy for return to SMO, Gold-Lab Copy
TUT 
001 
O763
I
AGENCY
SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE
PACKING LIST
Sampling Office:
Sapling Contact:
r
C*
J.
7.
S.
10.
11.
12.
13.
1*.
15.
16.
17.
IS.
19.
20.
c
Sampling Date(s):
Date Shi
Ship To:
Numbers
V6A
I/O A.
*-
Analysis, Matrix, Concentration
VA
t/nA • 
i/i/AfA 0 •
/fit 
/L
V 5^.
SAS Number
3«23«?c?
For Lab Use Only
Date Samples Rec'd:
Sample Condition on
Receipt at Lab
For Lab Use Only
•SMO Copy, Yellow - Region Copy, Pink - Lab Copy for return to SMO, 
Gold-Lab Copy
TUT 
OCU 
0764
IDENTIFICATION
Of NAMES OF INTERNAL STANDARD (IS) AND
SURROGATES (SURR) ON R1C SHEET
151
152
153
SURR1
SURR2
SURR3
•RONOCHLORONETNANE
1.4-DIFLUOROBENZENE
DS-CNLOROKNZENE
DO-TOLUENE
D4-1.2-OICHLOROETNANE
RMNOFLUOROKNZENE
S»I-VOLATILE
151
152
153
154
155
IS*
SURR3
SURR2
SURR1
SURR4
SURRS
SURR6
M-DICNLOROIENZENE
M-NAFMTMALENE
DIO-ACENAMTNCNE
D10-PNENANTNRENE
D12-CHRTSENC
D12-PERYLENE
DS-NITROBENZENE
05-fHCNOL
2-FLUOROFNENOL
2-FLUOROBIF1KNYL
2,4.S-TRIDRONOPHENOL
D14-TERPNENVL
001 O7 6 5
ANALYSIS
(Patt 1)
DATA 
SHEET
Satplt Natbtr:
32391-12 i
S-CUIED
Cast Not 
SAS32398
BC Rtport Hoi 
N.R
Contract fei 
68-01-7261
Date Sattlt Received: 
09-15-87
VOLATILE
CoKcentratiMi LM CjjtdiBytarclt DM)
Date Eitracted/Prtpartij 
09-16-87
B«te AnalyitdJ 
09-16-87
Conc/Bil Factor! 
2.6 
pHi N.R
Percent Itoiiturt (Not DKanttd)! 
N.R f
TH7-J
THH
75-J3-4
TJ-J4-J
j]6-6«-5
1I7-06-2
7MJ-3
7I-SS-6
54-23-S
IOMW
7J-274
CHLOROKTHMC
INMHETHME
VIMYL CHLORIDE
CMLOROETMNE
(fTHYLOE CHLORIK
MXTONE
CARMN IISULFIBE
1,1-UQUROETICNE
1.1-DICHLOROETHMf
TI(MB-l,2-BICHUWOrr«K
OtORBFORfl
1.2-DICNUMOETHME
2-BUTAMNE
CM
CMNN TETRMHLORIK
VIHYL ACETATE
BMMODIC&OfHMETHNC
1400
240 U
240 U
240 U
240 U
240 U
240 U
3000
240 U
240 U
490 U
240 U
78-17-5 
1,2-DIOWWPROPANE
10061-02-6 TRAMS-1,3-DlCHLOWPROftie
79-01-6 
TRICHLOROETHENE
124-48-1 
DIBROflOCHLOROKTHANE
79-00-5 
1,1,2-TRiaUROETHANE
71-43-2 
BENZENE
10061-01-5 CIS-1,3-01CHLOMPMPBIE
110-75-8 
2-OWMIETim.VINYLETHER
75-25-2 
MOMFORX
591-7S-6 
2-HEIANONE
108-10-1 
4-fCTHYL-2-PENTAHNE
127-18-4 
TETRACHLOROETHENE
79-34-5 
1,1,2,2-TETMCIlOROETHANE
108-81-3 
TOLUENE
108-90-7 
CHLOROBENZEIE
100-41-4 
ETHYLBBUENE
100-42-5 
STYRENE
TOTAL IYLENES
Data Rttortin« Qualifitri
For reporting rttnlti to EPA, tht follow! 19 rmltl qualifier art nut. AMitional flafi or fottnotM
nilaning rtultt art t*covagtd.HtMvtr,Uit dtfinitiot of tach flag Mtt at nplicit.
» tht rttalt it a valvt frtat* than or ttul to tht
dttKtion litit,rattrt tht valw.
V Micitit cotpound MI aMlyttt* for hit not detected. Rtport
tkt aiiiwo dtttctioR litit for thi ittplt itth tht U (tf.lOU)
liitd M iKHiiry concMtratin/MlitiM action, (thii is
wt wcniarily tht iittmmt MtctiM liiit.JTlit footnotn
rttdilKonpoMtf Mt atalyztf for hit not dtttcttf.Tht
it tht liniiit attainait dttKtion litit for tht latplt.
Micatti an ntitattd valuiThii flaf ii vttd tithtr riito
ntiattini a concmtration for ttntativtly idtntifitd cotttindt
*"* '1:1 rtipoftti it attutf or iriitn tht ta» tptctral data
iHkitrt tht prtunct of a conpowf that mti tht idtntification
crittria but tht rtnlt ii lt*t than tht iptcifitd dtttction litit
M ftriatir than ztro (to. 10J) .If litit of dtttction it 10 ua/L and
< toncMtration of 3ug/L ii calculattd,rtport at 3J.
Thii flag applit* to pttticidt parattttri «ttrt
tht idtntification hai httn confirttd ay 6C/W.Si»|l«
cotponttt pttticidM > or • 10 nt/il in tkt final
ntract should ht coif irttd by K/M.
This flM is ntd •hit analytt is found in tnt blank
as Mil as sattlt. It indicatn postihlt/prtbahlt
blank cottatiMtitn aid Mrns tht data «str to tatt
appropriate action.
Hatrii spiktd co
(») No Percent Noisturt Rttuired.
TUT 
<
0766
g s - «. . - JJ
a »»• ?*• 
•• »- n «b
fs" «rsi5
OR6ANICS ANALYSIS 
DATA 
SHEET
(Pagt 1)
S-CUBEO
Satplt Nuobtr:
32391-14 :
ftuthoriifd By:
Cm No: 
SAS3239B
DC Rtport No: 
N.R
Contract No: 
68-01-7261
Datt Sattlt Rtctivtd: 09-15-87
TV*
•j+l
r
I**
VOLATILE
Cmcmtratioii: LonQtdiid (Circlt Hot)
Datt Eitracttd/Prtparttr 
09-17-87
Dati fcialyitd: 
09-17-87
Cooc/Dil Factor: 
2.6 
pHi N.R
Ptrctnt Hoiiturt (Not Dtcaattd): 
N.R*
CNLORONETHME
NONOKTHMC
VINYL CHLORIDE
OUROETHANE
NETHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARNN BISULFIDE
1,1-»IOUROETHENE
1.1-DICHLOROnHME
TRANS-1,2-01CHLOROETNENE
CHLOROFOtfl
1.2-tICHLOROETHMK
2-BUTNIONE
1,1,1-TRlCHLOMEDMNE
CMBON TETRACHLORIOE
VINYL KET»TE
BWBOOlCHLOWMETHMe
Data Rtportinf fcalifitrf
For rtportiig rtultt to EP*,, tbt follontg rtnitfl tfulHitr art ustd. Mditiotal flaa« or fooUotti
npltnin; rtwltt art tKOuragtd.NoMvtr,tM dtfiaitioa of Hcb flag avflt bt nilicit.
ut/1 or^g/kQ
(Circlt mr*
490 U
490 U
490 U
490 U
>M4* 1
. 2200
240 U
240 U
240 U
240 U
2M
240 U
4100
240 U
240 U
490 U
240 U
CAS
Nubtr
78-87-3 
1,2-DICHLOROPROPME
10061-02-t TMN3-1,3-OICMU)ROPROPENE
79-01-4 
TRICHLOROETHENE
124-41-1 
DIlMHOCHLOnKTHMC
79HM-S 
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHMK
71-43-2 
BENZENE
10M1-01-3 CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
110-75-1 
2-CHLOROETHYIVINYLETHE8
73-25-2 
BMMOFORN
391-71-4 2-ffIMttC
109-10-1 
4-HETHYL-2-PENTMIONE
127-11-4 
TETR«CHLOROETHENE
79-34-5 
1,1,2,2-TETRACKLOROETNMIE
108-88-3 
TOLUENE
108-90-7 
QiOROBENZENE
100H1-4 
ETHYLBEUENE
100-42-5 
STYRENE
. 
TOTnl IYLENES
ug/1 or^a/kg
(Circlt M>t-
240 U
240 U
240 U
240 U
240 U
240 U
240 U
490 U
240 U
490 U
490 U
240 U
240 U
870
240 U
9M
240 U
7000
f
1
Uw \( tit rtwlt it a valHt f/Mttr tka* or tqul to tbt
Martin litit.rttort tbt valM.
i Miutn coftomd Mt analyztd for bit not dtttcttd.Rofort
ttt uniMH ditKtion litit for tkt taatli nitb tbt U (tf.lOU)
turi oa Mctffary coocMtratiM/dilotiot actiot.ttbif if
wt WHMrily tbt iMtruiMt dtttctioi li«it.)Tfct footnotN
**!< rtad:li-Cotpoand MI analyztd for btt not dtttcttd.Tnt
*** ii tkt tiaiMM attaiuolt dtttctiot litit for tbt tatplt.
J Uiutn at ntitattd valuttTbia flat >» «wd tithtr *tn
a coicMtratiot fx tntativtly idtntifitd cottoudt
i lil rnponft if attuttd or riiM tht oaft tttctral data
tkt prime* of a cottound tbat mtt tbt tdMtificatiM
itru but thi rnult if 1m tbat tbt aptcifitd dtttetim lioit
put* tkan ttro (tq 1W) .If litit of dttKtiot it 10 ua/L and
< cvcmtritioB of 3uj/L if calculattd,report it U.
Tbit f]af applitf to ptfticidt paraatttrt Hbtrt
tht idtotification has bttn coafirttd by BC/HS.Sinflt
cotooMft ptfticidtf > or • 10 ig/ul in tbt final
ntract should bt confirttd by GC/NS.
Tbif fla« if mad riw* analytt it fowid it tbt blank
at Mil at fatplt. It indicattt •otfiblt/probablt
blank contaainatiot aid varM tbt data utr to takt
appropmtt action.
Natrii tpiktd contoond.
(») No Ptrctnt Hoiitart Rtqoirtd.
001 
O76S
I
ORGANICS 
AMAUSIS 
DATA 
SHEET
« 
Saoplt NuMcr:
32391-IS :
i.
0iu
Catt Not 
SASJ239B
K Rtport Noi 
N.R
Contract Noi 
68-01-7261
Oatt built Rtctivtdt 
09-15-87
VOLATILE COIMiaS
ConcantratiMi LM (MiitJlCirclt Ont>
bti Eitracttd/rrtpartoT-^ 09-14-17
liti Atalyirti 
09-14-17
Conc/Bil Factor: 
0.41 
pHi N.R
Prrctnt Hoiiturt (Not KCMttdli N.R*
•S-M-J
n**
J»HH
JM7-4
CUORDNETHME
MOOCTHMf
VINYL OLORIK
CMJMETHME
(ETHTLENE CHLMIK
MXTK
CMKN IISULFIDE
1,1-»ICNLOROETNENE
1.1-IICNLOUETNME
TMN8-1,2-II010ROETICME
OUMFOm
1.2-lICHLOMETIMNE
2HUTM0K
l.t.l-TRICNlOMCTIWC
DKUM TETIMCHLOftlBE
VUYL ACETATE
HCHUMOIETHANE
2000 U
1000U
1000 U
1000 U
1000 U
1000 U
1000 U
9300
2400
1000 U
20*0 U
1000 U
CAS
fetfttr
7M7-3 
1,2-OIOUMmPANE
100*1-02-* TRMS-l.^lIOUROmPEN
79-01-* 
TRICHLHOETHEK
124-41-1 
BIMOMOCMLMaCTHANE
79-00-5 
1,1,2-TRICHLOMETHME
71-43-2 
KNZEIK
10041-01-9 CIS-1, 3-fiaUJWrWOE
110-75-1
75-25-2
591-70-*
101-10-1
127-iM
79-34-9
100-90-3
108-90-7
100-41-4
100-42-9
2-OUWETmVIIIYL£THEfi
MOMFflM
2-HEIMME
4-HETm-2-fHITAMlI
1,1,2, 2-TnRACHL»Q£THA«
TOUJEJC
CNUMOKMIOC
ETHYUOCM
STYHOE
TBT*L IYLEHTS
1
lata Rtportitf
For rttortiia rtwlti to EPA, tkt follMriog rtwlti culifitr art utd. AdditiMal flagt or footntttt
nplaniMj rttalti art Mcooraftd.HoMrtrttkt dtfiaition of tack flag nut kt nplicit.
C Tkit flag applin to ptiticidt paraattart Mtrt
tkt idMtificatiM hat ktM CMfirctd fcy BC/flS.SiMlt
coopMMt pMticidH > or • 10 M/ol in tkt final
wtract tkovid kt cMf irotd ky OC/M.
I Tkii flag ii utd MM analytt ii foMd in tkt klwk
**t rtadilKMpoMd MI analyiod for Mt not dttKttd.Tkt 
ai Mil ai unplt. It tadicattt iMiikli/prataklt
•*• ii tkt adnioM attaiaaklt dtttctiM licit for tkt lanplt. 
klank contaciMtiM and narn tkt data twr to takt
« ntinattd valMtTkii flag ii Mtd titktr MM 
aptropriatt actiM.
a cotCMtratiM for tMtativtly idMtifitdtcoMOMdi
* til rttamtt ii aiwotd or MM tkt MM ittctral data
tkt prtMnct tf a cotpOMd tkat Mtti tkt idMtificatiM
W tkt rtMlt ii IMI than tkt Mtcifitd dtttctiM litit
« Vttttr tku :tro (tf 10J) .If lint of dtttctiM it 10 uj/L and
contrition of 3««/L it calculattd.rtport ai M.
man H tkt rmlt it a valw rtattr tka» or ttul tt tkt
Mactiat liait.rtptrt tkt valot.
I MutH eaoatwd MI awIyiMl for ktt not dtttcttd.Rtiort
tk aiaitM dttoctioi licit for tkt tMtli «tk tkt U (M.10U)
« atnuary CMC«rtratiM/«l«ti« actiM. (tail ii
Mcmarily tkt introooat dtttrtion lint.JTkt footnotM
i
lUtrii Miktd ci
it) No PtrcMt Htiiturt teokirtd.
00.1 
0769
3?
K> 
v* I
8 
?S
K 
3
OC 
M
«• I
*J
«I»1
g-y
S
I
vlrl
•>•—*—* ^
II?5
•^ 
^v
" I
I
l.i
?
i i
A->
«*{
--SS
v
S?
•» sI!
III?ii
sis
"«?I;
J*s
•^ ^^ ^^
s i
i*
giii
ISn
15 i
Iff
s:f
-I*
S M
a> •»*
rl
|fl
:«i
Sl5?
i- ra -
•882^
;s
?1
b
J . 
o . 3 e S
•x «< 
«< 
it u
•" *** 
B ^
•32 
.5 '3 S •*
|o 1113
11
»•«
[?
•«•s-s
I?
li
-51? ;i:^
is il
Sr5 1
»f iT f
* fl a -. - s
•S -a 5 •« « —
u2
• «•
i
•a
•*«
• «5S2 8"I* 81'2**'
I ?|I^l-ffl^|
s .^a-ssiKrsJ*-*-.??
H«iiji>;i;ij;|
sii ;a*iifHiitJsi
•* = > It?1|]s3l«l-:r-
is :l:=l^*:55l=?*
2 C 
« S
If Hi
•- 5 . s "
:Usi*ii2!:i|s,3
-?-?? ~* II a 8 * s *fc
- c
r I * i
^— •• 
fc« ••
M 
**
*•
n!i|f I-
5 t
I i
a> 
nfl
Hff
sf
.»i{ ! III
:ti?|! i H!
«l!f!f c if
f
»~ &
5. ff[|
»«•
. ?;
s s js< 
JTs
t -*!11 y i
-lit «f
«• C S S 
R- &
•.if 
X. 4.
S J , ? r^
*
33i
E i -
g
IS
1
• i
i
¥A\
» a « f
U!
SHi1
°
SI *****9
»
*~
1
Q
II
JN
1.-:
"I
.3
a
i -
a.2
** «
• 8
fi •••
•
i.i
-8
* "
.3 •
u .2
* •
•« - 5 S
s *^ ***••• ! *
5 
S
§•
I ?
2
•
+*
1
ft
1
3
•!*"
*ll
*•« —
M- .
s.5
*••••
*• <• «^
u • 
_ « .„
*••«•*• _ s»
Ii
w — - *= •• 
•- -^
|s53«3;i
* 'B tl a * ^ a -p
? "hi
£li
1*1
rZ
•ft L
If
fill
liii
-lis
* • 5 3
ilaJa"^
« ? * . - =
h
i*.
8 -•&
•r« _ «*
2
•T-i
11 111*
f 
2.tf
^ n •— •»
i|«i
- 
ft *• t "
* 
o S-ci s
| I ^Ll
J 
Jii
i 8ill
s
f=
r^ff«
S f f
V
r»
If
: • i
, «« iI
l|ll i
•
ill
Z . t
!
n?i
=5 «Jf! lil* \ I
If 
S*f= **** - *
ft — 
y 2* 5 • 
*
2 S1
i p l|p Pil i :
- 
ST ( 5 5 S B 
J = S S * 2 5
SJbiSliS^iZl^-^
• <••»***>.'•(• 
•• B o B •»-••-• a
Z> _ 
• • C K a i - M ^ 
S. 
.u
^lil«13f hllr^s
|JT i;|ilf2;vifHJj!
?1 *l?S*Jlrf;zf^*I
•as z ** .5 
*
illiiilliifiliilii
lillifiifj/
r
0 * £ £ f f | T f f * f f * * 
•
fiiWpifilff i
„».- If
iiiifiiffi B.
lllflW? I?:
=st||f!ll
il
;IBR 
"
>sl li ^1 * i ?
? g s s ff
S S 5S R
|si?!
ISIJI
55*|*
I f
J ^ V r .
•* K •— ^* n
?|-s
Is
I"
I
I
^ :
V
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CLP Sample Management Office
P.O. Box 111 - Alexandria, Virginia 22313
Phone: 703/357-2**) - FTS/357-2*90
SAS Number
SPECIAL ANALYTICAL SERVICES
Client Request
I_I 
Regional Transmittal 
j_j
Telephone Request
A. 
EPA Region/Client:
B. 
RSCC Representative:
C. 
Telephone Number: 
(SCI) 3?J -
D. 
Date of Request:_^
£.. 
Site Name:
Please provide below description of your request for Special Analytical Services under
the Contract Laboratory Program. 
In order to most efficiently obtain laboratory
capability for your request, please address the following considerations, if applicable.
Incomplete or erroneous information may result In a delay in the processing of your
request. 
Please continue response on additional sheets, or attach supplementary
information as needed.
1. 
General description of analytical service requested:
fi \ i ^
Definition and number of work units involved (specify whether whole samples or
fractions; whether organics or inorganics; whether aqueous or soil and sediments;
and whether low, medium or high concentration):
Purpose of analysis (specify whether Super fund (enforcement or remedial action),
RCRA, NPDES, etc.)^.
'Sf*Uf.
TUT
*. 
Estimated date(s) of collection: 
5 IV '6
5. 
Estimated date(s) and method of shipment:
I 
f 
•-
KcuifrJ h;
6. 
Number of days analysis and data required after laboratory receipt of samples:
3 1 rllL\<x .
7. 
Analytical protocol required (attach copy if other than a protocol currently used in
this program): __________________________________^____
ft
v\
8. . Special technical instructions Of outside protocol requirements, specify compound
names, CAS numbers, detection limits, etc.): _____ ______________
9. 
Analytical results required (if known, specify format for data sheets, QA/QC
reports, Chain-of-Custody documentation, etc.) If not completed, format of results
wUl be left to program discretion.
£j jp
10. Other (use additional sheets or attach supplementary information, as needed):
-: cJJ(
11. 
Name of sampling/shipping contacti 1~)\tr&*<. 
M?vY£TK~~
Phone:
TUT 
OO1 
O778
12. 
Date Requirements
Parameter
/
thcri-
13. 
QC Requirements
Audits Required
Detection Limit
Frequency of Audits
^ Precision Desired
(-% or Concentration)
Umits
(Percent or Concentration)
1*. 
Action Required if Limits are Exceeded
Please return this request to the Sample Management Office as soon as possible to
expedite processing of your request for special analytical services* Should you have any
questions or need any assistance, please contact your Regional representative at the
Sample Management Office.
TUT
00 j.
RECORD OF
COMMUNICATION
QOTMt*
(Rtcord of item checked above)
TO:
Leon Lazarus
MOM:
Regina Odubo-Sullivan
suwca? Inorganic Data Packages for
DATE! 0/20/57
8:3U A.M.
Quality Assurance Review
Attached are the following CLP Inorganic Data Packages to be reviewed for Quality
Assurance:
SITE
CASE #/ 
LABORATORY 
ANALYSIS/ 
NUMBER OF
BLANK
DUPLICATE
SAS *
MATRIX
SAMPLES 
NUMBER(S) 
NUMBER(S)
bers Pub.Well 7948/ 
Weyerhaeuser 
SAS-TDS
R3/Oversite 3255B
Water
None
322 SB-002
3225B-002A
CIC
R3/RI
3175B
EMSI
SAS-Pest.
Air 
12* 
3175B-31KFB) None
*Total of 13 samples sent. 3175B-312(FB)
1 sample used for MS/MSD 
3175B-313(FB)
Myers
R2/RI
3022B
Cenref
SAS-Pest/PCBs
Fish 
32*
*33 samples sent. Sample
f 15 lost during extraction.
None
S-Area LF. 3266B
Fleming/Enf .
Triangle
SAS-TCDD'S
Water
3022B-26
30226-31
3022B-27
3022B-32
3022B-29
30226-33
3266B-1
3266B-2
•Hene——
USIONS. ACTION TAKKN OM MKQUIftlO
.CONCL
ossett LF. 3086B
SAI
Atterberg
Soil
SAS-Soil Gas
VGA's Only
Soil
wels T923/
IAT/ER 
3239B
S-Cubed
SAS-PCB's/VOA's
Water
None
(FB) 
3086B-4
3086B-5
None
11
• PA
:c» t»* MO rom* (too-* WHICH MAY •• w*«e UNTIL
I* IBMAUSTKO.
001 
0780
Title:
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
APPENDIX A - CHECK LIST AND REPORT FORM,
Dace:
S^T
Revision:
A.I This Section MUSt be completed by the Surveillance anri .Mrmifrgring fttetjnn.-
A. 1.1 Project Name/Site: ______ \ ^H\/ 
I Ju' P II <> _____________
A. 1.2 Contract No. b 5" " D / -~7i> 6 /Case No.
A.I. 3 Objective of Study (Specify data used)
jp«*.
A. 1.4 Name of Analytical Laboratory 1:
A. 1.4.1 Sanpie Matrix: Water ^^
Other (Describe)
SoiVSedinent _
Q J
A.1.4.2 Concentration Requested: Low
A.I.4.3 Sample Nos.: ____2
Medium
A.I.5 Name of Analytical Laboratory 2:
A.I.5.1 Sample Matrix: *hter_____
Other (Describe) \______
iI/Sediment
A. 1.5. 2 Concentration RequestBed: Low
A. 1.5. 3 Sample Nos.t ____________
Medium
A.I.6 Name of Laboratory 3:
A.I.6.1 Sample Matrix: Wa
Other (Describe)
A. 1.6.2 Concentration
A.1.6.3 Sample Nos.:
\
SoiVSediwent
\
sted: Low
\
Medium
TUT O01 O781
•f
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page 
-4———uf 
31
^ ' - 
_ 
_ — 
Date:
* 
Number: 
HW-4
Title: Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist 
Revision: >^ 
*
^ 
(GC and GC/MS Analyses)
| —————————————————————————————————
SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING BRANCH REVIEW
~7?23/Sftf3i-3<7£
5,
Project Name/Site:
Number;
Type Investigation (Circle One): 
Remedial 
Site 
Other I A~7~/
Contract No»;_ ^ d^''~'<0/ —
Laboratory:__
Sample Identification Numbers:
,: 32
r ,
Super fund Account No.:_
Comments: 
___
TUT 
OO1 O/82
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page
Date:
Number: 
HW-4
Title: Attachment 2 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist (CC and 
Revision:
GC/MS Analysis) - MMt REVIEW
HMk
MONITORING MANAGEMENT BRANCH REVIEW
PART I: 
•mwmm*se*mmm***vtmmmmm*9Mm«*«v
1.0 Data Completeness and Deliverables 
<* <~ * ^ •* 0 0L 
YES 
NO 
N/A
>AS> t>^?i& 
— 
~~7 —
1.1 Are any deliverables missing? 
/* * / \f/)A^ 
f
1.2 Was SMO CCS checklist Included with
CONTRACTOR ACTION: If Incomplete, list any missing
on the Missing Data Tracking Form
(Attachment 5), and request missing
information from laboratory by phone.
I. COVER LETTER/NARRATIVE
2.0 Cover Letter/Case Narrative
2.1 Is the Narrative or Cover Letter present?
2.2 Are the following items contained in the Narrative
or Cover Letter:
a. Case Number and/or SAS Number
b. Contract Number
II. QC SUMMARY
3.0 Surrogate Percent Recovery Summaries (Form II)
3.1 Are the Surrogate Percent Recovery Summaries present
for each of the following matrix:
a. Water
3.2 Are all the samples listed on the Surrogate Percent
Recovery Summaries for each of the following matrix:
a. Water
'X 
i_i
TUT 
O01 
078.?
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page
Date:
Date:
Title: Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist 
Number: HW-4
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) Part I: 
Revision:
REVIEW
YES* 
NO 
N/A
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk? 
[ __ J 
__ 
^
CONTRACTOR ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Were two or more BN surrogates outside of contract specifications
(or one surrogate less than 10Z recovery) for any samples? 
__ 
[
Blanks?
If yes, were samples reanalyzed?
Were blanks reanalyzed?
MMB ACTION; If Initial analysis and re analysis both have 2
or more surrogate recoveries less than contract QC requirements
(or one surrogate less than 10Z) red-line all the detection
limits (u's) and flag all positive data (hits) with a J.
If initial analysis and reanalysis both have two
or more surrogate recoveries above contract QC requirements do
not red-line detection limits (u's) but flag all positive values
with a J.
When two or more surrogates for the blank are below
contract QC requirements red-line all positive values, but not
detection limits, for the associated samples, if sample surrogates
are within or above QC limits; but if two or more sample
surrogates are below contract QC limits, red-lined all sample data
(Detection limits and positive data)*
When two or more surrogates for the blank exceed
contract QC requirements, validate sample data considering •ample
surrogate recoveries alone.
3.5 Were two or more acid surrogates outside of contract specifications
(or one surrogate less than 10Z recovery) for any samples? 
__ 
[ __ ]
Blanks? 
__ [__] __r
If yes, were samples reanalyzed? 
[ 1 
__
Were blanks reanalyzed? 
[__J __ 
_^
MMB ACTION; If initial analysis and reanalysis both have 2
or more surrogate recoveries less than contract QC requirements
(or one surrogate less than 10Z) red-line all the detection
limits (u's) and flag all positive data (hits) with a J.
If initial analysis and reanalysis both have two
or more surrogate recoveries above contract QC requirements do
not red-line detection limits (u's) but flag all positive values
with a J.
TUT OOi O7S4
STANDARD OPERATING PBOCEOUIE 
Page
Ti tie: Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist 
Number:
_— _ __ _ ——— _ .___ ___ _v v 
numwvf a, * 
n
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) Part I: 
Revlalon: 2
HW-4
REVIEW
When two or more surrogates for the blank are 
""
below contract QC requirements red-line all positive values,
but not detection limits, for the associated samples. If aample
surrogates are within or above QC limits; but if two or more
sample surrogates are below contract QC limits, red-lined sll
sample data (Detection limits and positive data).
When two or more surrogates for the blank exceed
contract QC requirements, validate sample dsts considering
sample surrogate recoveries alone.
YES 
NO 
N/A
3.6 Was one or more VOA surrogates outside of contract
specifications for any samples? 
__ 
_
Blanks? 
__ 
{ *^]
If yes, were samples reanalysed? 
(_J 
__
Were blanks reanalysed? 
[ ] 
__
MiB ACTION; If initial analysis and reanalysls both have
one or more surrogate recoveries below contract QC requirement*
red-line all detection limits (u's) and flag all positive
values (hits) with a J.
If initial analysis and reanalysls both have
one or more eurrogate recoveries above contract QC requirements
do not red-line detection limits but flag all poeltlve value*
with a J.
When on* or more surrogate recoveries for the
blank are below contract QC requirement* red-line all positive
valuea but not the detection limit* for the aaaoclatad samples
if sample surrogatee are within or above contract QC limit*;
but if one or more sampl* surrogate recoveries are below qC
limits red-line all data (Detection limits and poeitlve value*).
When one or more surrogste recoveries for the
blank exceed contract requirement validate data for the associated
samples considering sample eurrogate recoverlea ale
3.7 Was peeticldee/PCB surrogate outside of contract apecifl- 
^
cations for any aamplee? 
. 
I 
J 
_^
Blank*? 
__ [__} ^
MtB ACTION: If recoverlea are below contract requirement flag
all associated positive results with a J and red-line all
detection limit*. If the recoveries are above contract
requirement do not red-line the detection limits but flag all
brJied^Sermf^^
Interferences.
TUT 
OO1
Title: 
Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist
(GC and CC/MS Analysis) Part I:
REVIEW
5.0 Blanks
5.1 Is the Reagent Blank Summary present? (Fora IV)
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: 
for the analysis of VOA
USL compounds, has an reagent/method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (e.g. - water, low soil,
medium soil, etc.),, whichever is more frequent?
5.3 For VOA's, has an instrument blank been analyzed
at least once every 12 hours'for each GC/MS
system used?
5.4 For B/H/A's and Pestlcides/PCB's, has a method
blank been extracted and analyzed for each set
of samples or every 20 samples of similar matrix
and similar extraction technique?
B/M/A»«
Pestlcides/PCB's
5.5 Has the method blank for B/M/As and Pestlcldes/PCBs
been run on the same GC/MS or GC system as the
samples?
6.0 Contamination (Reagent Blank Summary - Form IV)
6*1. Do any method /instrument/reagent blanks have positive
results for: H£L +n,7~iC 
VOA's?
B/N?
Acids?
Pesticides?
PCBs?
6.2 Do any field/trip blanks have positive results for:
B/N?
Acids?
Pesticides?
PCBs?
uate:
Number: 
HW-4
Revision: 2 
,_ C
YES
NO
N/A
i_i _ _
!"UT
001 
0786
1
I
IUC and GC/KS Analysis) Part I:
DA ^sm 
REVIEW
1* UHS. W 1> •
Revision:
YES
• —
aw— •»
2
. .
1
NO
\ 
/*•*
1 *? S"2-
N/A
—— 
_7
i_i 
_
CONTRACTOR ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated and/or
missing method blanks (attach a separate
sheet).
MMB ACTION: For commonjlgSr blank contaminants found (e.g.,
methylene chloride, acetone, toluene and 2-butanone)
reject (red-line) all associated positive results
present at leas than 10 times the blank contami-
nant levels; for all other contaminants reject
(red-line) when all associated positive results
are present at less than 5 times the blank conta-
minant levels. Do nor reject any values reported
with a "IT (detection limit values).
Ill SAMPLE DATA
9.0 Are the Traffic Report Forms present for all samples?
CONTRACTOR ACTION: List missing Traffic Reports on Missing
Data Tracking Form. (See 1.1)
10.0 Organic Analysis Data
10.1 Are the four (4) Organic Analysis Data Sheets (VOA,
SNA, 
Pesticides and Tentatively Identified Compounds)
with completed header Information required on each page
of Form I, present for each of the following.
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate 
(
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates 
[
c. Blanks 
I
CONTRACTOR ACTION: List Missing or incomplete Data Sheets on
missing Data Tracking Form. (See 1.1)
10.2 Are the VOA/BHA Reconstructed Ion Chromatograma for
each sample, the mass spectra for the identified
compounds, and the Data System Printouts (Quant,
list) Included in the sample package for each
of the following?
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
(Mass spectra not required)
c. Blanks
I
TUT 001 078;
I
LU/ _ —
i _l / _ _
i ri _ _
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Title: 
Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) Part I:
&R •••L REVIEW
^
Page -id-
Date:
Number:
Revision:
1 4 of ST.
- — ut 31
HW-4
2
10.3 Are the response factors shown in the Quant Lists?
CONTRACTOR ACTION: List Missing or incomplete Reconstructed
Ion Chromatograms, mass spectra and
Data System printouts on the
Missing Data Tracking Form (See 1.1).
10.4 Are the Tentatively Identified Compounds (Form I,
Part B) present and include scan number and
estimated concentration?
CONTRACTOR ACTION: List missing TICs, Form I on Missing
Data Tracking Form (See 1.1).
10.5 Are the lab generated standard mass spectra of the
identified compounds for each sample present?
a. Volatile standard spectra
b. Semi-volatile standard spectra
OONTRACTOR ACTION: List missing mass spectra on Missing
Data Tracking Form (See 1.1).
11.0 GC/MS Evaluation
11.1 Are the mass spectra for the tentatively identified
compounds and associated "best match" spectra In-
cluded in the sample package for each of the following.
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Blanks
CONTRACTOR ACTION: If no, list the missing numbers on
the Missing Data Tracking Font (Sec 1.1)
12.0 Holding Times
12.1 Have any holding times from date of collection been exceeded
a. Volatlles
Aqueous: 10 days* from time the lab receives the sample
with 24 hours allowed from time of collection
to lab receipt.
I __ ]
for:
NO / N/A
I_1 _ ^L
_ U/L _
0788
Tide: Attachment 1 -
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CLP Data Assessment Checklist
(GC and CC/MS Analysis) Part I;
REVIEW
Page
Date:
Number: HU-4
Revision: 2
YES - NO
N/A
10 days from time the lab receives the 
__
sample with 24 hours allowed from time
of collection to lab receipt.
M4 days 1C preserved with HCI (pH<2).
b. NVOA's and Pestlcides/PCBs:
Aqueous (5 days from time of lab receipt to extraction, 
. 
[ ^1 
\S
40 days after extraction)
(10 days from-time of lab receipt to
extraction, 40 days after extraction) 
__
Allow 24 hours from time of collection to lab receipt*
CONTRACTOR ACTION: List the samples and their respective
fractions with exceedances below.
(Attach additional sheets If necessary.)
Table of Holding Time Exceedances
Sample
Sample
Matrix
Practlon(s)
(See 
Traffic Report)
Date 
Date Lab
Sampled 
Received
(See 
For. I
(See 
torn I) 
4 Form V)
Date 
Date
Extracted 
Analysed
MHB ACTION: If these holding times are exceeded, red-
line detection limits and flag all positive
values with a J.
13.0 Standards Data (GC/MS)
13.1 Are the Reconstructed Ion Chromatograms, Data System
Printouts (Quant. Hat), 
and work sheet calculations
I 
present for the following:
a. Semi-volatile* (Initial and continuing calibrations)
i 
b. Volatile* (initial and continuing calibrations)
001
0789
iicie: Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) Part I
Number: HW-4
Revision: 2
REVIEW
13.2 Are the response factors also present in the Quan List?
CONTKACTOR ACTION: List missing or Incomplete RICs, Quant.
lists and work sheet calculation* on
Missing Data Tracking Form (See 1.1).
YES
NO 
N/A
15.4 Internal Standard Area Summary (Form VIII)
15.4.1 Are the internal standard summary sheets (Form VIII) present
and complete with all the required information?
VOA
BNA
CONTRACTOR: List missing or incomplete summary *heet*
on missing tracking form (see 1.1).
15.4.2 Are the Internal standard area* within the upper and lower
limit* for each sample and blank analyzed under a givan
continuing calibration?
VOA
L_J
I__J
l-J
CONTRACTOR: List fll the outliers.
Sample t 
Internal Std 
Area
Lower Limit
Uppar Limit
(Attach additional sheets if nece**ary.)
MMB ACTION: 
U*e professional judgement to determine effect on
data. Acceptance or rejection chould not be baaed
•olely on the internal standard area* but •hould
be determined in conjunction with other QA/QC data*
TUT 001 0790
Title: Attachment 1 -
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CLP Data Assessment Checklist
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) 
Part I:
18.0 GC Evaluation (Jam X-KST)
Page
HI of
«— — of
Date:
Number: 
UW-4
Revlaion: 2
YES
18.1 Pestlcld*7PCB,Xaentif*catlon - Are retention times of standard
and samd^e^ompounda within the calculated retention time
windows for the:
Quantltation Column?
Confirmation Column?
CONTRACTOR ACTION: Circle all outllnera In red.
MO 
N/A
/
L^J 
s__ 
__
19.0 Package Copies
19.1 Are all the xeroxing of readable quality?
CONTRACTOR ACTION: If not, Hat appropriate page numbera
on Mlaaing Data Tracking Form (See
1.1).
[ t/j 
__ 
__
II QC SmtlAP RESULTS
3.0 Surrogate Splkea
' 
~ ^"
3.1 Were any tranacrlptlon/calculatlon errora found
between raw data and Surrogate Per Gent Recovery
Form?
HHB ACTION: Make any neceaaary correctlona, and
note errora under Conclualona.
5.0 Blank*
5.1 Chromatography - review the blank raw data - chromato-
grama, RICa, quan reporta or data ay a tern print outa and
apectra. la chromatographlc performance for each
instrument acceptable for:
VOA'a?
B/N *
Pea
OOl 
O791
Title: 
Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) P£
PAKE II: 
HMB Review - 1MB. REVIEW
Date:
Number: 
UW-4
Revision: 2
YES
NO 
N/A
10.0 GC/MS Evaluation
10.1 HSL Compounds
10.1.1 IB the RRT of reported compounds within 0.06 RRT
units of the standard RRT?
10.1.2 Are all ions present in the standard mass spectrum
at a relative intensity greater than 10Z also
present In the sample mass spectrum?
10.1.3 Are all Ions present in the sample, but not present
in the standard accounted for?
10.1.4 Do relative intensities specified above agree with-
in 20Z between the sample and standard spectra?
MMB ACTION: Use professional judgment to determine
acceptability of data: if it is
determined that Incorrect ID'S were made,
all such data should be red-lined and
changed to a*-»e**«B**4.4^-^«B«4%<
tten limit. Ions greater than 10Z in
the sample spectrum but not present in
the standard spectrum must be considered
. and accounted for.
10.1.5 Check at least 2 of all positive values. Mere any
errors found in: 
Transcriptions?
Calculations?
MMB ACTION: Make any necessary corrections and
note errors under Conclusions.
10.2 Tentative ID - Non-HSL Compounds
10.2.1 Are all ions present in the reference mass spectrum
with a relative intensity greater than 10Z present
in the sample mass spectrum?
10.2.2 Do relative intensities specified above agree with-
in 20Z between the sample and reference spectra?
10.2.3 Are molecular ions present in reference spectrum
present in sample spectrum?
TIT
001 
0792
i
1
i
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
Title: Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) PA
PART II: 
MMB Review - ^Iml REVIEW
<-{C( 
of- 
<S~L-
Page -4? ——— of — JT~
Date:
Number: 
Htf-4 
-^
Revision: 
2
YES 
NO 
N/A
10.2.4 Are all non-HSL compounds classified as tentatively
identified reported with estimated quantitatlon
and detection limits?
MMB ACTION: 
Use professional judgment to determine
acceptability of data. If data is
considered to be unacceptable, the
tentative ID should be changed to
"unknown".
11.0 
Holding Times
11.1 
Have all associated sample data which have exceeded
holding times been red-lined ou the data sheet (In-
cluding detection limits) indicating rejection? 
[__] __ 
^
MMB ACTION: 
Make any necessary corrections.
12.0 
CC Evaluation
12.1 
Do chromatograms and data system printouts confirm
retention times, retention time windows, and re-
ported values (Forms 1X-PEST 1 and X-PEST 2)? 
I__J ^ __ 
^
12.2 
Do positive identifications have proper dissimilar
column analysis?
12.3 
Are retention times of standard and sample compounds within
the calculated retention times windows for the:
Quantltatlon Column?
Confirmation Column?
12.4 
If concentration Is sufficient, is GC/MS confirmation 
_j
provided? 
* C >/Of**]fa£*~1lA 
tfG+iJ) I__] 
__ 
J/
MMB ACTION: Reject (red-line) all positive results (meeting
quantitatlon column criteria, but missing
confirmation by a second column or GC/MS
(if appropriate). Also reject (red-line)
all positive results not meeting reten-
tion time windows unless associated
standard compounds are similarly biased.
TUT 
001
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page
Date:
"itle: 
Attachment 1 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist 
Number: 
HW-4
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) Dft 
Revision: 
2
PART II: 
MMB Review - *mmm\ REVIEW
1
1
12.5 Check 10% of all positive values. Were any errors
found in:
Transcriptions?
Calculations?
YES" 
NO
I __ 1>
__ 
IJJ
N/A
S
/——
__
MMB ACTION: Make any necessary corrections and
note errora under Conclusions.
Ill SAMPLE DATA PACKAGE
8.0 Traffic Report
8.1 Do the Traffic Reports indicate any problems with
sample receipt, condition of samples or special
notations affecting the quality of the data?
MMB ACTION: Use professional Judgment in
evaluating any affect on the quality
of the data.
TUT 
001 
0794
94
• • 
• 
5\ 
of
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page -90———Of—J
Date:
Number: HW-4
Title: Attachment 2 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist 
Revision: 2
(GC and GC/MS Analysis) &D
PART II: HMB Review - aRflmt REVIEW
CASE I 7923/SAS3239B 
LAB 
SrCUBED__________ 
SITE Tutu WelH
( 19.0 Conclusions: (NOTE: Reviewers mist red-line unacceptable data on sample data
(FORM I) sheet*; red-line data does not Imply the compound is not present).
Only the MMB reviewer has the authority to red-line unacceptable data. The 
j
(
letter J indicates an estimated value. In addition to the two definitions stated 
!
in the contract it also implies that the analyte is present but the quantitative 
I
value contains an unspecified degree of error. If an accurate quantity is desired, 
(
r»«amplingl*meiysis/> is. recommended. 
•
19.1 Data Assessment 
Method blank measures laboratory contamination caused by 
|
dirty glassware, etcTin order to.be valid, the concentration of an analyte in a
sample must be at least 5 or 10 times (depending on the analyte) the concenration
of that analyte present In the method blank. The following compounds were red-
11ned as method blank contamination: methylene chloride In 3239B-12 thru 3239B-22;
acetone in 3Z39B-Z1 and Z-butanone In 3Z39B-Z1 thru 3Z39B-ZZ.
___^_________Identification of compounds are made by comparison of the
suspected mass spectrum to -the mass spectrum of a standard or the suspected ~ 
*
compound. A mass spectrum 1s a fingerprint of a compound which shows the mass
of the compound and the masses of pieces (Ions) from It.compounds reported to be
present by the laboratory 1n which the relative Intensities of major Ions are not 
-•—'
within plus or minus 20% between standard and sample spectra are red-lined as false 
I
positive 1dent1f1cat1on(e.g. For an ton abundance of 50X In the standard spectrum,-' 
f
t he corresponding sample 1on abundance must be between 30 and 70 percent). Red-11ned 
'
toluene In 3239B-16 as false positive I d e n t i f i c a t i o n . _ _ _ _ _ _
PCB/o1l matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries 
f
were low, 76% and 71.7%. No PCB data was re.iected.______________.
19.2 Contract Problems/Non-compliance
• Reviewer'* Signature: We^^g- rt<*'l/tJL&—:______Date:.
Verified By: y£ft^~ *&i. ^—"______________ 
Dat>»
TUT 
001 
0795
APPENDIX\
Type of Review:
ProJ ect:____
(No. of Compounds/No
REJECTION SUMMARJ 
JRM
pounds/No, of Fraction
tions (Samples)
Lab Name:
S-
Reviewer's Initials:
Nuriber of Samples:
JL
Analyt s Rejected Due to Exceeding Review Criteria;
Acids (15)
B/N (50)
VGA (35)
PEST (20)
PCB (7)
TCDD (1)
Surrogates
A*A -
/U f\
A/ A -
IV /i^
/I/A
/I//T ——
>M*
/IM -^>
/U*/T -^^
Holding Time
o/
YO
*/
/»
Calibration
<S>//o
H£tMtiM
Oootamination
13/fD
*//o
ID
/,
^
Other
/UA
M
Total ft Samples
//
//
Total * Rejected/
Total * in all Samples
«?>
r-^
<y/3*s-
——— 
"-»
/^
947
<•
Analytes Estimated Due to Exceeding Review Criteria for;
v
96Z.O 
TOO mi
IIr
i
i
i
I 
REFERENCE NO. 15
I 
:: "*'.-..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TUT 
001 
0797
COM Federal Programs Corporation
i
I
October 31, 1988
Ms. Caroline Kwan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
Contract No.: 68-01-7331
Document No.: T648-C02-EP-CRFX-1
Subject: Overview of the Tutu Texaco Service Station Tank Excavation
Dear Ms. Kwan:
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with our comments on the
tank excavation, at the Tutu Texaco service station, St. Thomas, Virgin
Islands.
As part of the remodeling operations being performed at the service
station, three 4,000 gallon steel underground storage tanks, once
containing motor fuel, were excavated from the south end of the station.
Three new double-walled steel tanks (two 10,000 and one 6,000 gallon)
equipped with leak detection systems were installed at the west end o
station. Upon removal of the old tanks, samples were taken from the
underlying soil to determine the extent of contamination on the Texaco
station premises.
Based on the results of a soil gas survey conducted at the Texaco station
during November 1987, the soil was believed to be extensively contaminated
by petroleum hydrocarbons as well as some chlorinated hydrocarbons. Due to
this contamination, Texaco chose to treat the soil excavated from both the
old and new tank areas using a forced ventilation system to rid the soil of
volatile compounds. This is accomplished by piling the excavated soil on
top of slotted PVC pipe and withdrawing air through the pipe via a high
vacuum pump. Samples from the piles were taken prior to start-up of the
ventilation system. The system will be monitored weekly using a HNu
photoionization detector at selected points. Upon completion of the
treatment according to the Texaco Action Plan cleanup standards, the piles
will again be sampled to determine if the soil will be disposed as
hazardous waste.
All soil sampling operations conducted at the Texaco station were performed
by Lebron Associates, Inc. (Lebron). Construction and operation of the
soil venting system was conducted by Groundwater Technology, Inc. and
excavation and installation operations was performed by local contractors.
All of the contractors were contracted by Texaco. Field work was done on
September 7-16, 1988, with 100% field oversight by COM Federal Programs
Corporation (CDM-FPC).
The removal of the three underground tanks from the south end of the
station began on Sept. 7, 1988 and was completed by Sept. 9, 1988. Air
monitoring was performed continuously during the intrusive activities. The
(JJMl/22) 
59 John Sam. E*hA Floor New York, NY 10038 212 393-9634
001 
0798
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COM Federal Programs Corporation
highest readings were obtained when soil surrounding the sides of the tanks
was being removed. HNu readings taken at the excavation were 20-30 ppm
with peaks as high as 80 ppro at shoulder height during peak intrusive
activity. HNu background readings were 0.2 to 1.0 ppm. Benzene levels
were also monitored with Draeger tubes. The levels were as high as 1-2 ppm
during the peak activity. During excavation, strong odors of petroleum
hydrocarbons were detected throughout the site. However, readings were
generally at background levels within the clean zones surrounding the
exclusion zone. The levels of protection were level D in the clean zone
and level C in the exclusion zone during intrusive activities. Level 0 was
observed during non-intrusive activities.
As the soil was being removed from the excavation, it was deposited on top
of polyethylene sheeting along the eastern boundry of the site where
concurrently the soil ventilation system was being constructed. HNu
readings obtained directly above the soil pile surface ranged from 80-150
ppm. Breathing zone readings ranged from 5 to 10 ppm.
Prior to removal of the tanks from the pit, the tanks were first degassed
using carbon dioxide. This procedure was done to avoid possible ignition
of vapors within the tank during removal operations. The three tanks were
removed and placed on flat bed trucks and transported to the Texaco
terminal outside of Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas. The entire removal and
transportation of the tanks were monitored by the U.S. Virgin Islands
Department of Planning and Natural Resourses (DPNR). Initial investigation
of the excavated tanks revealed large holes in one of the tanks (Tank T2).
Holes in the remaining two tanks were not readily visible however further
investigation is warranted.
Sampling of the excavation was to have commenced on Sept. 9, 1988.
|
aon%>J.ing ox tne excavation was to nave coronencea on aept. 9, J.7OO.
However, a storm passed through the island on the evening of Sept. 8 and
lasted through the next day. Heavy downpours during the storm caused
massive flooding in the area. The heavy drainage from the mountainside had
entered the site and eventually filled the entire excavation pit with water
overnight. Efforts to divert the drainage away from the excavation via
soil be cms built around the pit were insufficient. The soil piles had been
covered with the plastic sheeting and weathered the storm without any
significant damage. Texaco was informed by CDM-FPC that the water
contained in the pit had to be pumped out immediately to avoid infiltration
through the excavation walls into the groundwater system thus further
spreading contamination. CDM-FPC also requested that samples be taken from
the pit water prior to its removal. This was agreed to by Texaxo.
Texaco could not get a tanker to the site until Sept. 10. By this time the
water level within the pit had dropped approximately 3 feet (total
excavation depth was approximately 6.5 feet). Two 55 gallon drums, claimed
to be clean by Texaco, were filled with water from the pit to await later
sampling. By mid-day, a tanker truck (approximately 4,000 gallons) had
arrived from the Texaco terminal and was filled with the pit water.
Activity during the day was complicated by the fact that a hurricane
warning (Hurricane Gilbert) was in effect for the evening. Due to the
increasing severity of the weather, operations were shut down and
preparations were made for the storm. The excavation was heavily
barracaded, tarped, and termed.
Activity began again on Sept. 12, 1988. There was considerable damage to
TUT OO.1. O/99
(JJMl/22)
COM Federal Programs Corporation
the site due to high winds, however the storm dropped little rain. The
site was cleaned up and a third 55 gallon drum was filled with the pit
water for later sampling. Two additional tankers were filled, thus
emptying the pit. To be conservative due to pit flooding, CDM-FPC
requested that soil samples be taken downgradient a minimum of 10 feet from
the excavation. Three holes were drilled in the concrete at the south to
southwest portion of the excavation which is in the direction of the
contaminate plume (downstream) based on the result of the prior soil gas
survey.
On September 13-14, soil samples were taken from the excavation pit, three
soil samples from downstream locations, four samples from the pit floor at
each courner (about a foot of mud was removed from each location prior to
sampling) and four samples from the center of each wall face. Also, on
September 14, the three drums of pit water were sampled.
The excavation at the new tank area began on September 14. The first 4
feet of soil removed from the new excavation area was used to backfill the
old tank area. The remaining excavated soil from the new tank area was
piled at the eastern and northern boundries of the station.
Two soil venting piles were sampled on September 15. A three point
composite sample (top, middle, and bottom) was taken at each sampling
location. Separate vials were filled from each composite point for
volatile organics analysis. The sampling plan was originally based on two
soil piles along the eastern boundry as indicated during the startup
meeting with Texaco. Three samples would be taken from each pile for a
total of six samples.
Following the first pile sampling (three samples), it became apparent to
Texaco that a third pile would be needed due to the unanticipated quantity
of soil removed. CDM-FPC requested that this additional pile also be
sampled. Since Lebron only had enough sample bottles for the original six
soil pile samples (two piles), CDM-FPC agreed that two of the three
remaining samples would be taken from the second pile situated along the
eastern boundry of the station which originated from the southeast portion
of the new tank area (nearest the old tank area). This area consequently
had shown higher concentrations dm ing the soil gas survey. The last
sample would be taken from the pile along the northern boundry originating
from the northwest end of the new tank area.
Two samples were taken from the second pile on the same day as the first
pile. However, the sample from the third soil pile was not taken until the
following week. On September 15 the three new. tanks were installed.
Texaco had inquired about the use of the soil piled at the north (third
pile) as backfill for the new tanks, but due to readings of 10-15 ppm on
the HNu, Texaco was not able to use the soil. According to the original
work plan, clean fill was to be used and this is what was followed.
On September 16, 1988, some of the soil excavated from the new tank area
was piled between the two piles along the eastern boundry, thus creating
one long pile. Prior to this, there were three distinct piles, two along
the eastern boundry and one along the northern boundry. At present, there
are two piles with the following dimensions: eastern pile - 105 feet x 17
feet x 5.5 feet, northern pile - 61 feet x 17 feet x 6.5 feet.
(3) er </ 
JUT 001 
O800
(JJM1/22)
COM Federal Programs Corporation
I
Groundwater Technology had planned to use chemicals such as sodium 
""*
. 
tripolyphosphate and ammonium chloride as nutrients to enhance natural
I 
biodegradation in the soil piles. Since this was not part of the EPA
1 
approved work plan, Goundwater Technology could not use the nutrients until
CDM-FPC received a full chemical breakdown of the nutrient powders and a
full process description. At present, they will only vent the piles as
agreed to in the approved work plan. The piles will be monitored weekly by
Texaco using an HNu until a stable point has been reached (as agreed in the
Texaco Action Plan and a letter from DPNR to Texaco). The soil venting is
estimated to take 10 weeks. A weekly report will be submitted to the DPNR
regarding progress of the soil pile ventilation. When the stable point has
been reached, soil samples will be taken and sent to an outside laboratory
for analysis to determine the piles ultimate disposal requirements.
I
In conclusion, based on visual and olfactory observations, it
apparent that the Tutu Texaco station is a source of the local petroleum
contamination and a potential source of groundwater contamination. The
sampling results will be available within the next few weeks to better
evaluate this site.
Sincerely,
CDfyFederal.Programs Corporation
,,
Scott Graber
TES III Work Assignment Manager
cc: Robert D.Goltz
Amy Chester, ORC
Francine Lang, DPNR-St. Croix
Jose Font, EPA-CFO
CON PTC Document Control
(DM FPC NYC File
(4) cry 
IUT °01 °801
(JJM1/22)
Ii
i
ri
I
ii
REFERENCE NO. 16
TUT 
OO.t OS02
CDM Federal Programs Corporation
March 6, 1989
Ms. Caroline Kvan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
New York, Nev York 10278
Project: 
EPA Contract No. 68-01-7331
Document No: T648-C02-EP-CZUU-1
Subject: 
CLP Sample Analysis Data Summary
Case No. 3900 I Ser 25
Tutu Vellfield Area
Vork Assignment 648
Dear Ms. Kvan:
Enclosed please find the summary CLP analyses results for samples
taken in the Tutu Vellfield Area, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands on
September 12 and IS, 1988. The samples vere analyzed by Cenref Labs
Brighton, Colorado. The identification and location of the three
samples are given belov:
Sample I 
Sample Location
eT-62 . 
Tutu Texaco Service Station - oil/vater separator
eE-63 
Tutu Esso Service Station 
- holding tank
eE-64 
Tutu Esso Service Station x - oil/vater separator
Ve have taken the liberty to limit the list of compounds to include
benzenes, substituted benzenes, dichloroethane, dichloroethene,
trichloroethane, trichloroethene, tetrachloroethane, tetrachloroethene
compounds, toluene, xylene and any other compounds found above
detection limits. These compounds (BTEX and chlorinated hydrocarbons)
vere Identified as groundvater contaminants in past EPA sampling
events conducted in the Tutu Vellfield Area. Alkanes and related
compounds vere not included.
It can be seen from the results that toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene
vere found in all three samples. A number of benzene-containing
volatile and extractable compounds vere tentatively identified in all
three samples. Sample eE-64 from the Esso oil/vater separator also
contained detectable levels of methylene chloride, 2-butanone, 1,1,1 -
trichloroethane, tetrachloroethene and benzene. Copies of the
laboratory analysis data sheets for the three samples are attached.
TU;
0803
40lUcnrSmB, 10thRoar NtwYak,NY 10006 212*M6M
Federal Programs Corporatio
Ms. C. Rvan
Page Two
All three of these sampling locations will be resampled later this
•onth due to a break in the chain-of-custody during the original
sample shipment.
Should you have any questions regarding these data, please do not
hesitate to call me at (212) 393-9634.
Sincerely,
COM Federal Programs Corporation
tt Graber
III Regional Manager
SG/rv
Attachment
cc: P. Fischetti
J. Claypoole
NTC File
Document Control
(VP8M7)NY-GMO
TUT OO1 O8O4
LAB ANALYSIS DATA SHEETS
CENREF LABS
SAS No. 39001, Set 25
TUT 001 0805
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (»gAg)
CoBpound:
•ethylene chloride
1,1-dichloroethene
1.1-dichlorethane
1.2-dichloroethene (total)
1,2-dichloroethane
2-butanone
1.1.1-trichloroethane
trichloroethene
1.1.2-trichloroethane
tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
benzene
toluene
ethylbenzene
xylene (total)
eT-62
25u
25u
25u
25u
25u
50u
25u
25u
25u
25u
25u
25u
140
400
160
eE-63
250u
250u
250u
250u
250u
SOOu
250u
250u
250u
250u
250u
250u
1800
230
1600
•T-64
57
25u
25u
25u
25u
62
100
25u
25u
65
25u
29
2900*
4500*
1900*
Tentatively identified compounds;
propyl benzene
ethyl wthyl benzene 
860J
C3 substituted benzene
C3 substituted benzene
trioethyl benzene 
370J
ethyl nethyl benzene
trinethyl benzene 
1300J
triaethyl benzene 
390J
•ethyl propyl benzene 
470J
•ethyl methyl ethyl benzene 
550J
C4 substituted benzene 
280J
C4 substituted benzene
C4 substituted benezene
ethyl dinethyl benzene 
44CJ
tetranethyl benzene
ethyl •ethyl benzene
tetraaethyl benzene 
400J
1200J
6000J
2200J
1800J
8000J
1700J
1400J
2000J
1200J
950J
890J
1600J
1000J
940J
1900J
1000J
1000J
1100J
760J
680J
940J
u - below the detection liait
J - estimated value
* - value from analysis of a diluted aliquot of this sample
FH/52
oo i
0806
»
1
EDCTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (ug/kg)
Tentatively identified compounds; 
eT-62 
eE-63 
eT-64
C4 substituted benzene 
220J 
930J 
1400J
C4 substituted benzene 
- 
620J
ethyl dimethyl benzene 
- 
690J 
780J
lHDethyl-3-(l-»ethyl ethyl)-benzene 
- 
720J 
1600J
tetramethyl benzene 
- 
540J 
360J
tetramethyl benzene 
- 
71OJ 410J
•ethyl-propyl benzene 
- 
- 
720J
dihydroHWthyl benzene 
260J
dinethyl-(nethyl ethyl)-benzene 
260J
•ethyl naphthalene 
- 
990J
substituted methyl naphthalene 
390J 
- 
290J
dimethyl naphthalene 
250J
dihydro-methyl-indene 
- 
690J 
490J
dihydro-dimethyl-indene 
- 
- 
270J
J - estimated concentration
i
TUT OOi 0807
I
€•»»•••?• "ssr ? • "• \r ~ a«^T^"2?
. .A.-wA.*_ wr_.'_^..>« r.lwv^V ..-.I.
title: 
A::a:hr*r.: 2 - C.? Zi
S.ior:
i Aastsszs-t c>.»:'*lis:
>rs (CC/XS Ar.alyYts)
3a:<:
Nusitr:
A??.
O
KV-3
i
TCVSILIASCS ASD MCSITCXI.SG B?JLNCH
Cise Nu=ber:
y?e Invessigitiaa (Circle One):
Si:* 
Oth«r TX5 
I £tf"\ \
Contract h'o.:
Laboratory:
Musbcrs
Aqueou, :
Soil/S*diaenc:
Superfuad Account Ho.:
Coeaencs:
lu'l' 
OOl. 0808
REJECTION SUMMARY FORM
(No. of Compounds/No, of Fractions (Samples)
Type of Review:
Project:
Date:
Case #:
Lah Name:
r-
Reviewer's Initials:
CD
Nunber of Samples:
Analytes Rejected Due to Exceeding Review Criteria:
Acids (15)
B/N (50)
3V
VDA (-35}
3£>
PEST pet
PCB (7)
TCDD (1)
Surrogates Holding Time Calibration
3 /3
&~/H>K
Contamination
i 
/i
ID
Other
•
#•
Total ft Samples
0
0
?
3
3
0
Total # Rejected/
Total # in all Samples
- —— -
——— 
,
( //0i-
3 /30i
<2>/Z\
—
Analytes Estimated Due to Exceeding Review Criteria for;
Acids (15)
B/N (50)
VGA (,33)
PEST (20)
PCB (7)
TCDD (1)
V
0
3
-3
3
<2>
— 
•
• — 
•
Q> (I&-L-
3/30
toli-i
* — .
G?C
^ (suck -s
Title: 
Atcachoent 2 -
STANDARD OPERATING PROCLD'JR£
CLP Data Assessment Checklist
(GC and GC/MS Analysis)
PART II: 
MMB Review - TOTAL REVIEW
Page
Date: 
Nov. 6,
Number: 
HW-
Revision: 
3
CASE t SkS 
s<rr
LAB
SITE Tfr
19.0 Conclusions: 
(NOTE: Reviewers must 
R 
unacceptable data on sample data
(FORM I) sheets; *$' 
data does not imply the compound is not present)*
The
letter J Indicates an estimated value. In addition to the two definitions stated
in the contract it also implies that the analyte is present but the quantitative
•value contains an unspecified degree of error. If an accurate quantity is desired,
resampling/analysis is recommended.
19.1 Data Assessment "fll lc
rtr*.f<<r4=S 
Q*f
Of
19 .2 Contract Problems/Non-compliance
Eeviewer'a Sign.tur.:
Verif l.d ly:
<S
• * I // 3
TUT 
OO1 081.0
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page
/
^ 
Dace: Nov. 6, 19b7
Nuaber: HW-4
I 
Title: Attachment 2 - CLP Data Assessment Checklist 
Revision: 3
(GC and GC/MS Analysis)
PART II: MMB Review - TOTAL REVIEW
CASE f-S 
5c*T 3-jT" LAB CfcJ>r^e"'P'___________ SITE
19.0 Conclusions: 
(NOTE: 
Reviewers Bust " f^" 
unacceptable data on saaple data
(FORM I) sheets; 
*R" 
data does not iaply the compound is not present).
. 
The
letter J indicates an estimated value. In addition to the two definitions stated
In the contract it also implies that the analyte is present but the quantitative
value contains an unspecified degree of error. If an accurate quantity Is desired,
resampling/analysis is recommended.
19.1 Data Assessment
*)
is
*\ 
fa M
l
Reviewer's Signature:
iy. 
A 
, 
. 
. 
D.t.,
(
TUT 
OO1 
OB11
10
In Reference to Caw No(s)t
Contract Laboratory Program
REGIONAL/LABORATORY COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Telephone Record Log
Date of Call:
Laboratory Name:
Lab Contact:
Region:
Regional Contact:
Call Initiated By: __ 
Laboratory 
ft Region
In reference to data for the following sample numbers):
(*cribSfi-0t17
Summary of Questions/Issues Discussed:
Summary oi Resolution:
r^3^
signature
Distribution: (1) Lab Copy, (2) Region Copy, (3) SMO Copy
Date
TUT 
OO1 
OS1
Region
ORGANIC REGIONAL DATA ASSESSMENT
CASE NO. S/hS
SITE
*TU
LABORATORY
SDG *
SOW*
NO. OF SAMPLES/ 
-
MATRIX ___ 3 6)
REVIEWER (IF NOT ESD)
NAME
DPO: ACTION
FYI
COMPLETION DATE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
HOLDING TIMES
GC/MS TUNE/INSTR. PERFORM.
CALIBRATIONS
BLANKS
SURROGATES
MATRIX SPIKE/BW"
OTHER QC
INTERNAL STANDARDS
COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
DATA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
VGA 
BNA
V A
PEST
HER
O>
O
O
O
O « Data had no problems/or qualified due to minor problems.
M - Data qualified due to major problems.
Z - Data unacceptable.
X - Problems, but do not affect data.
ACTION ITEMS:
AREAS OF CONCERN:
NOTABLE PERFORMANCE:
"LIT 
OOi 
O8.t"i!
695 North Seventh Street 
I ~)
Brighton. Colorado 80601-1559 
' ^
Telephone 303 659-O497
Labs
Analytical Chemistry Laboratories
001
October 25. 1988
Case Narrative
SAS 
: 3900I-Set25,All SAS
SDG No. : 8AA097
Region : II
Contract: 68-01-7465
Samples: BAA097.BAA098 ,BAA0980L .BAA099,CMS—High Concentration Samples
for Uolatiles Analysis.
BAA097,BAA098,BAA099,CMS2I—High Concentration Samples for
Extractable Analysis(Pesticides Only).
BAA097,BAA098,BAA099,CMSU~High Concentration Samples for
Arochlor/Toxaphene Analysis.
General
Three high concentration samples were analyzed for Volatiles. Three
high concentration samples were analyzed for Extractables and Arochlor/
Toxaphene. All the samples were determined to consist of one phase
only, a MIL phase.
Sample Receiving/Chain of Custody
1. All samples were received in good condition September 22, 1988.
The cooler was opened by the U.S. Postal Inspector because the ice
had melted. The samples uere still sealed and in good condition.
VOAs
1. There is no analytical or contractuaL holding time for the
Volatile analysis (see SMO Memorandum).
2. 8AA099 had a low recovery for Toluene-d8. All other surrogate
recoveries were inside the advisory Q.C. Limits. 
f
3. The recoveries for the CMS uere all inside the Q.C. Limit'
4. All Internal Standard Areas uere inside Q.C. Limits.
002
Case Narrative 
Page 2
VOAs
5. Screening for the volatile analysis was performed on the 6C/MS.
This generally gives a much better indication of the required dilution
than SC/FID screening.
G. Sample BAA098 was analyzed at two different dilutions.
The data from both dilutions has been enclosed.
7. The Hewlett-Packard data system does not report spectrum matches for
TIC's when the probability of a match is less than one percent. All
possible matches have been reported.
Extractables
1. There is no analytical or contractual holding time for the
Extractable analysis (see SMO Memorandum).
2. All surrogate recoveries were inside the Q.C. Limits.
3. The recovery of Oieldrln was low, the recovery for Heptachlor was
inside the Q.C. Limits.
4. All Internal Standard Areas were inside O.C. Limits.
5. The samples were analyzed for Pesticides only, as requested. The
Semivolatile standards were run and used to quantitate the
surrogates. These standards have been included in the data
package. The internal standard recoveries were calculated
against the Semivolatile standard.
6. The Hewlett-Packard data system does not report spectrum matches for
TIC's when the probability of.a match is less than one percent. All
possible matches have been reported.
7. The chromatograms from the 6C/FIO screens have been enclosed at
the end of the extractables standards package.
TUT 001 O815
i
•f>3
003
Case Narrative 
Page 3
Aroc1 ors/Toxaphene
1. There is no analytical or contractual holding time for Aroclors/
Toxaphene.
2. All surrogate recoveries were inside Q.C. Limits.
3. The CMS recovery for Aroclor 1254 was I07X.
4. The method and instrument blanks contained no compounds of interest.
5. The Oiol cartridge check was inside the O.C. Limits.
6. There were no nrociors/Toxaphene detected in any of the samples.
There were a number of unidentified peaks in some of the samples.
Pattern comparison chromatograms have been included with these
samples for ease of interpretation.
7. The quantitation column was the SPB-5, there was no confirmation
required.
8. The Toxaphene was the only multicomponent standard that did not
show linearity. The continuing calibrations for Toxaphene were
compared to the standard of the same concentration, not an average
calibration factor for this reason.
"Release of the data contained in this hardcopy data package and in the
computer—readable data submitted on floppy diskette has been authorized
by the Laboratory Manager or his designee, as verified by the following
signature."
/ftflA//X-x^ lA^rf^OLVrA - 
(10-25-88)
Karen Kuoppala, Organic Section Supervisor
004
Case Narrative 
Page 4
Optional Flags used for Reporting GC/MS Data
A - Aldol condensation product. This flag is used for tentatively
identified compounds in soil samples when the compound is
suspected aldol condensation byproduct of the extraction
technique.
fl - ftnalyte has not met the identification criteria, but, in the opinion
of the Mass Spectral Interpretation Specialist, the identification
is correct.
This flag is used when the mass spectrum of the target anaiyte does
not meet all of the criteria in the contract Task III, but the
Mass Spectral Interpretation Specialist feels that the compound is
actually present.
Sp- Spike compound.
This flag is used for Matrix Spike results to indicate that the compound
was spiked into the sample before analysis.
OL- Diluted
This flag is used for samples analyzed at a secondary dilution.
E- Exceeds calibration range
This flag is used to flag compounds that are present outside the linear
calibration range.
TUT OO1 0817
"3
•no
in
•ll
t
3
-O
'£
U
m 
u^
<^
O 2 w
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION (g
(FROM BOX 1)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CONCENTRATION 
C
L > UMWMEO H - MtOH |S*S|
VOLATILE
BASE/NEUT
WCID
PESTICIDE
/PCBs
SOLID
WATER— MIS
LIQUID
ON WATER-
dlS LIQUID
w
CO
e
i*
2>
©
ii
8
O
5o
?)i
\
-#:
- , 
. 
• 
- 
*•• '
:•••*•••• 
- -
-
REFERENCE NO. 17
• '• ' - 
- ••
I! 
;
" 
'
TUT 
001 0819
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ^-~<X 
- -. ^. 
j /\
Contract Laboratory Program 
""? 
• / I / / •' / -r/,
' 
it \ t • _i_.jr J
SAMPLE MANAGEMENT OFFICE ' 
/ ~
MEMORANDUM
006
DATE: 
July 14, 1988
TO: 
Labs Analyzing Samples Under SAS No. 3900-1
FROM: 
Lynn Riddick, SMO ASG
SUBJECT: 
Questions and Answers On SAS No. 3900-1
Several questions have recently been raised regarding specific items within the Scope of
Work for this project. 
Listed below is a summary of those questions and the answers
provided. 
If 
you 
have 
further 
questions 
regarding 
these 
answers 
or 
other
discrepancies/clarifications with the method, please do not hesitate to contact me. 
Your
questions are extremely helpful in correcting deficiencies within the Scope of Work.
Q: Are there any contractual or analytical holding times?
A: No.
Q: Page "EXT D-ll" of the SOW, Section 9.1.2.1 refers to a " calibration solution
specified in 2.2.3.1", but that Section does not exist.
A: It should refer to a calibration solution specified in Section 8.3.1.
Q: What solvent is to be used for this solution?
A: The solvent used should be methylene chloride.
Q: We tried to use methylene chloride, but we had trouble getting Sulfur to dissolve.
What should we do?
A: 
You should either pre-dissolve the Sulfur or use a smaller amount in solution.
Please note it in the narrative if you had to perform either of these steps.
Q: May we use a packed column for the pesticide analysis or must we use the wide
bore capillary column?
A: 
You must use the wide bore capillary column. The method has been written
specifically for these columns.
Q: Is Di-N-Butyl (Phthalate) a matrix spike compound? Page "EXT D-5" indicates
that it is, however it is not listed on the forms or indicated on page "EXT E-38".
A: No. 
Di-N-Butyl (Phthalate) is not a matrix spike compound and should not be
referenced on page "EXT D-5".
Q: What is the appropriate concentration for the continuing calibration standard? The
forms indicate 50 nanagrams, but page "EXT E-31" indicates 80 nanograms.
TUT 
OOi 
OS?(")
P.O. Box 818. Alexandria. Virginia 22313. Phone: (703) 557-2490/FTS-8-557-2490
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 
007
Contract Laboratory Program
SAMPLE MANAGEMENT OFFICE
A: The correct concentration is 50 nanograms.
Q: Are BNAs and PCBs required in the same run or separate runs for the calibration
standards (i.e. may we mix them)?
A: It is up to the lab. You may inject the PCBs separately from the other compounds,
but please note it in the narrative if you choose to do so.
Oj Does the Set Number have to go on all the computer printouts?
A: 
No. 
We only require that the Set Number and the SAS Number be clearly
designated on the Cover Letter of the data package.
Q: Why is the GC FID Screen mandatory?
A: The screen is required to verify that the samples are indeed high concentration. If
they screen low or medium, contact SMO immediately, so that we may reschedule them under
your RAS contracts.
Q: Should the Control Matrix Spike (CMS) be run per Set or per phase within a Set?
A: The CMS should be run per 20 single phase units within a set, regardless of phase
type.
Q: Should blanks be run per phase or per Set?
A: One blank should be run per extraction episode or per 20 single phase units if all
20 are run at once. Again, the type and number of phases is of no significance.
TUT 
001 
OS21
P.O. BoxSlS. Alexandria. Virginia 22313. Phone: (703) 557-2490/FTS-8-557-2490
oO
O
X-
i
i
i
iii!
r*
• Y
 
1
;'o.v-
^
H
ifii
j!i1
i
9ii
9 ~
U I
83j*
ISIf
CD
2HA
HIGH CONCEMTRATZON VOLATILE SURROGATE RECOVERY
009
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
{/Case No.
SOG No.:
| 
EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
on 
VBlkli
021 
NjfttKZ.
031 \;eMtL3
041 
cms
051
061 6AAOQH
071 "^AAO^
081 TSA^oqM
091
101 bftWO^? bL
111
121
131
141
151
161
171
181
191
201
211
221
231
241
251
261
271
281
291
301
SI
(TOL) f
%
H3
<n
It*
\oz
101
UQ*
10^
S2
(BFB) I
s^1?
<}£
=10
q-i
1M-
12
11
S3
(DCE)f
\\°i
ll«
101
RO
I l l o
tot,
SM-
RO-
"^™
OTHER
TOT|
OOT|
O
O
C,
O
Oo
1
0
QC LIMITS
51 (TOL) • Toluene-d8 
(50-160)
52 (BFB) - Bromofluorobenzene 
(50-160)
53 (DCE) - l,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (50-160)
I Column to be used to flag recovery values
O Surrogates diluted out
Method blanks are required to meet the QC limits. For samples
and control matrix spikes, the QC limits are advisory.
page ,_ of _
001 0823
FORM IZ HCV
:i o\-
3HA 
010
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE CONTROL MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERY
Contract;
SAS No.:
f
Law Name:_______
' 
Lab Code: C^nn? T
Case No.:
SDG No.:
I
1
1| COMPOUND
1 1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 Trichloroethene
| Benzene
1 Toluene
1 Chlorobenzene
I
SPIKE
ADDED
(mg/Kg)
2*>
•L^
•z*==>
2.-=-*
CMS
CONCENTRATION
(mg/Kg)
2.2.
£2.
2ft
1*4
3£>
CMS
%
REC f
8ft
&A
112^
^6?
IZO
. QC. |
LIMITS |
REC. |
60-1501
60-150)
60-1501
60-1501
60-1501
1
I Column to be used to flag recovery values with an asterisk
* Values outside of QC limits
Spike Recovery; A 
out of j^ 
outside limits
COWENTS:
TUT OO1 O824
FORM III HCV
1/88
4 HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Oil
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Instrument ID:
case No. :
Y6 Ik. I
Contract:
SAS No. :
SDG No.
Date Analyzed:
Time Analyzed:
THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, AND CMS
| 
EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
01| 
C/>7S
02 1 
J?/?x7/59^
03|
04 |
05|
06|
07|
08|
09|
10|
HI
12|
13|
14|
15|
16|
17|
18|
191
20|
211
22|
23|
24|
251
261
27|
28|
291
301
LAB
SAMPLE ID
LAB
FILE ID
>/?//3<3
>rt//32
TIME
ANALYZED
ft:o</
/7.'vV
COMMENTS:
page
FORM IV HCV
0825
4 HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
012
Lab Name; C.s(\re.(-
Lab Code:
n re_(-
Case No.:
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 
7fl \\?TV
Iristrament ID:
1 A
Contract:
SAS No.:
,=b SDG No.:
Date Analyzed: jn_
Tine Analyzed: 
\[ ;Q"V
THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, AND CMS;
| EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
01|T»,AftoqC(
02| (\AA 63 <&-D/_
03|
04|
05|
06|
07|
08|
09 |
10|
HI
121
131
141
15|
16|
17|
18|
191
20|
211
22|
23|
241
251
26|
271
281
291
30|
LAB
SAMPLE ID
LAB
FILE ID
^A If2»<i
•>A|l«4 O
TIME
ANALYZED
ia:M*
l^>-. ^«k
COMMENTS;
OOi OS26
page I of 
)
FORM IV HCV
1/88
4KA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Lab Name:
Lab- Code:
Case No.:
Lab Sanple ID:
Lab File ID:
Instrument ID:
Contract :
SAS No.:
SDG No.:
Date Analyzed:
Time Analyzed:
013
THIS METHOD BLANK APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, AND CXS
I 
EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
oii^AfihorT"
02|
03|
04|
05|
06|
07|
08|
09|
10|
HI
121
13|
14|
15|
16|
17|
181
19!
20|
211
22|
231
24|
251
261
271
281
29!
301
LAB
SAMPLE ID
LAB
FILE ID
>*?5&
TIME
ANALYZED
/3 :off
COMMENTS:
I page \ of I
TU"!
oo:
FORM IV HCV
1/88
5HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE GC/MS TUNING AND MASS
CALIBRATION - BROMOFLUOROBENZENE (BFB)
014
lab Kaae: C.jr\rr(-
Lab Code:
Case No.:
Lab File ID: 
> P>|IZ\
Instrument ID: 
•*
fl
Contract;
SAS No.;
SDG No. :
BFB Injection Date;
BFB Injection Tiae:
\ |<o
m/e
50
/ 3
95
96
173
174
175
176
177
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
15.0 - 40.0% of mass 95 
-
30.0 - 60.0% of mass 95
Base peak, 100% relative abundance
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
Less than 2.0% of mass 174
Greater than 50.0% of mass 95
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
Greater than 95.0%, but less than 101.0% of mass 174
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
% RELATIVE
ABUNDANCE
24. L>
t=Ct, "3
inn
f^
\pt ~J
0 ( 0 )
(a.Z ( ?.2_ )
*>i3 (*•** 
1
!
1
!
)
1U
H
l|
2|
1
l-Value is % mass 174
2-Value is % mass 176
THIS TOSZ APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, CMS, BLANKS, AND STANDARDS:
I 
EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
01 I \A-STTI 1/V^
02(M?>TTM^ie>
OSIvATOlrtO
04 IVfkTT^O^SO
OS|u*,Tr^e7.C>
06)
07|
08 |
091
101
111
121
131
141
15!
161
171
181
191
201
211
22!
LAB
SAMPLE ID
LAB
FILE ID
> A H-2.-2.
>A IX7.i
>ftH2«-l
•jrtlll'S
•>Oil2.(a
DATE
ANALYZED
.0/4 /1>S
»o/-H/-i^
IO/-4/**
10 /^/ /*,%
1O/* /^.^
TIME 
j
ANALYZED |
Ife'.Sl
(/„: 4L,
i^:2>*4
1ft'. 2^
( C f l l i
i
page
of 
/
TUT 001 0328
FORM V HCV
5 HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE GC/MS TUNING AND MASS
CALZBRATZON - BROMOFLUOROBENZENE (BFB)
015
lab Name:
Lab Code:
Case No.:
Lab File ID:
Instrument ID:
SDG No
BFB Injection Data:
BFB Injection Time:
m/e
50
75
95
96
173
174
175
176
177
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
15.0 - 40.0% of mass 95
30.0 - 60.0% of mass 95
Base p«aJc, 100% relative abundance
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
Lass than 2.0% of mass 174
Greater than 50.0% of mass 95
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
Greater than 95.0%, but less than 101.0% of mass 174
5.0 - 9.0% of aass 176
% RELATIVE |
ABUNDANCE |
J3.0 
!
.57. y 
1
/OO 
I
7. / 
1
G 
( a 
)ll
J>7.? 
1
9. J ( P.J. ill
ffi? ( soo )1|
*./ ( t-9 )2I
1
1-Value xs %
174
2-Value is % mass 176
THIS TUNE APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, CMS, BLANKS, AND STANDARDS:
I 
EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
Oil 
VSThOSO
021 
MKIK.I
03 1 
C/KS
04 1 ~riAftAQ#
051
061
071
081
091
101
111
121
131
141
151
161
171
181
191
201
211
221
LAB
SAMPLE ZD
\/&t&
LAB
FILE ZD
>#//!.¥
-r/t//3l
?A//3O
-yfr//3±
'
DATE
ANALYZED
'<)&/*?
/*/r/fS
siSS-Slf
/dss-sfr
TZME
ANALYZED
//'5V
/£/£*/
/L/*y
/9;V<S
'
page
of 
I
TUT O01 O829
FORM V HCV
Of.
». .1
1/88
016
5HA
HXGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE GC/MS TUNING AND MASS
CALIBRATION - BROMOFLUOROBENZENE (BFB)
lab Name: Q,JJ
Lab Cede:
Case No.:
Contract;
SAS No.:
SDG
Lab File ID:
Instrument ID
1A
BFB Injection Date;
BFB Injection Time;
n/e
50
/ 3
95
96
173
174
175
176
177
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
15.0 - 40.0% of mass 95
30.0 - 60.0% of mass 95
Base peak, 100% relative aoundance
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
Less than 2.0% of mass 174
Greater than 50.0% of mass 95
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
Greater than 95.0%, but less than 101.0% of mass 174
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
* RELATIVE |
ABUNDANCE |
Z2.* 
1
4Q.-?, 
1
1 00 
1
«.f 
I
0 (0 
)ll
%Z.I 
1
«>.* 
0-0 
)ll
EZ.fc (lOO.fc )1|
-*.<% (*.«, )2I
1-Value is % mass 174
2-Value is % mass 176
HIS TUNE APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, CMS, .BLANKS, AND STANDARDS:
| 
EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
Oil VSTOO-S.O
021 ue>i.yc.2L
03| T^AAO^
041 T^Aacaft-DL.
051
061
071
081
091
101
111
121
131
141
151
161
171
181
191
201
211
221
LAB
SAMPLE ID
V&1.K.Z
LAB
FILE ID
>ftll"a»(fl
>Al\^3-
>A\lict
>A I14C>
DATE
ANALYZED
>ftUk%
mial%%
lofq-ltfk
ir>I^I^Ss
'
.
TIME
ANALYZED
IA-. 1^
ir.oi-
li-.M^V
i7>:5»«
page
-L
TUT
O01 0830
FORM V HCV
1/88
017
5HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE GC/MS TUNING AND MASS
CALIBRATION - BRaMOFLUOROBENZENE (BFB)
Lab Nana:
Lab Coda:
.Lab Fila IO:
Instruaant 10:
No.:
BFB Injaction Data;
BFB Injaction Tina;
»/.
50
75
95
96
173
174
175
176
177
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
15.0 - 40.0% of mass 95
30.0 - 60.0% of mass 95
Basa paaJc, 100% ralativa abundanca
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
Lass than 2.0% of mass 174
Graatar than 50.0% of mass 95
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
Graatar than 95.0%, but lass than 101.0% of mass 174
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
1-Valua is % mass 174 
2-Valua is % mi
* RELATIVE |
ABUNDANCE |
v/.y 
i
(00. 0 
|
r.? 
i
0.0 (0.0 )ll
9*9. •? 
1
£.f ( 7,& ) 1 1
&f 
(6.3 121
1
iSS 176
THIS TUNE APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, CMS, BLANKS, AND STANDARDS:
| 
EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
Oil 
VSTbilOO
021 VS.TIM50
031 
l/S>TCi \OQ
041 
VSrtNOBO
051 
VSrfS 020
061
071
081
091
101
111
121
131
141
131
161
171
111
191
201
211
221
LAB
SAMPLE ID
LAB
FILE ID
>-£/**£
>•>?/-» y-7
>^x.a*<P
*>>? /A</9
^/<? /AfTtS
.'•
.
DATE
ANALYZED
^/JX^f//
/
X
——————— 
TU
TIME
ANALYZED
/*3.'/X
S&S1S3.
//.•/J
//'•VY
/J.v '£
'
i
T 
GUI 
083
paga
of
FORM V HCV
1/88
018
5HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE GC/MS TUNING AND MASS
CALIBRATION - BROMOFLUOROBENZENE (BFB)
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
.Lab File ID:
Instrument ID:
AS&r~SDG No.:
_ BFB Injection Date:_
BFB Injection Time:_
m/e
50
75
95
96
173
174
175
176
177
ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
15.0 - 40.0% of mass 95
30.0 - 60.0% of mass 95
Base peak, 100% relative abundance
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 95
Less than 2.0% of mass 174
Greater than 50.0% of mass 95
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 174
Greater than 95.0%, but less than 101.0% of mass 174
5.0 - 9.0% of mass 176
* RELATIVE
ABUNDANCE
j/.y
Vf.t
/oo.o
7,&"
4*0 ( 0.0 \
&7. /
y.ji ( &.&- }
£^T-f ( 7C.O )
**V ( f.? )
\
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
11
2|
1
1-Value is % mass 174
2-Value is % mass 176
THIS TUNE APPLIES TO THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES, CMS, BLANKS, AND STANDARDS:
| 
EPA
| SAMPLE NO.
Oil VSThOS~O
021 v&it:?,
03| "^VhQ-09'7
041
051
061
071
081
091
101
111
121
131
141
151
161
171
181
191
201
211
221
LAB
SAMPLE ID
LAB
FILE ID
P
>
.'.
-
DATE
ANALYZED
/*/'9/jy
/
y fl j 
1 (J 1
TIME
ANALYZED
<P/«?7
//:^3<S
/3/0J?
001. 
U8J.2
page lof L
FORM V HCV
'^iK
1HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
019 . ~
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Nace:
Lab Code:
I
UCase No.
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
0
UOZL
Contract;
S
SAS No.:
i 
SDC No.;
Final Extract Volume:
Aliquot Volume: 
IQQ
Conversion Factor:
CAS NO.
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated:
Date Analyzed:
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(mg/Kg)
—Chloromethane_
—Bromomethane_^_
—Vinyl Chloride,
—Chloroethane
-Methylene Chloride_
-Acetone
74-87-3—
74-83-9—
75-01-4—
75-00-3—
75-09-2—
67-64-1—
75-15-0—
75-35-4—————-
75-34-3—————-
540-59-0————-
67-66-3—————- 
__________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane
78-93-3 ——————2 -Butanone________
71-55-6——————1,1,1-Trichloroethane
56-23-5——————Carbon T«trachlorid« "
108-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4—
78-87-5—
———Carbon Disulfide
——1,l-Dichloroethene_
———1,1-Dichloroethane"
—1,2-Dicnloroethene (total)_
—Chloroform
10061-01-5-
79-01-6———
124-48-1——
79-00-5———
71-43-2———
Bromodichloroaethane
1,2-Diehloropropane
•cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
-Tricbloroethene_____
———Dibromochloroaethane__
———1,1,2 -Trichloroethane_
———Benzene
10061-02-6-
75-25-2———
108-10-1——
591-78-6——
127-18-4——
79-34-5———
108-88-3——
108-90-7——•
100-41-4——•
-trans-1,3-Dichloropropene.,
•Bromofom
—-4 -Methyl-2-Pentanone_
—2-Hexanone
-Tetrachloroethene
—1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
—Toluene
—Chlorobenzene_
—Ethylbenzene_J
100-42-5——————Styrene
1330-20-7—————Xylene (total).
•500
Soo>
u.
&S6
-3CT9
/c
Jfo
/too
u.
FORM I HCV
OB 3 3
1/88
Si
1HE
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
L«b Name:
Lab Code:
Case No.:
020
EPA SAMPLE NO.
(g)
Phase Type: _
Phase weight:
Final Extract Volume: /O-O (mL)
Aliquot Volume: 
/0O (uL)
Conversion Factor: 
SO_____
Number TICs found: /O
No
Lab Sample ID: _
Lab File ID: 
_
Date Received: __
Date Separated:_
Date Analyzed:
CAS NUMBER
2.
3."
4."
5."
6."
7."
8."
9."
10."
11."
12."
13."
14."
15."
16."
17."
18."
19."
20."
21."
22."
23."
24."
25."
26."
27."
28."
29."
30."
COMPOUND NAME
RT
sf.*/
EST. CONC.
(mg/Kg)
6,000
3300
TUT 00.1 
08- "'.4
FORM I HCV-TIC
ot-
x:
1/88
1HB
HIGH CONCENTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
220
EPA SAMPLE N5*T
Lab Name;
Contract:
Lab Code: CEti!L£F
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
Case No.:
I . /
Final Extract Volume:
Injection Volume: 
/
Conversion Factor:
PK: 7 .U
CAS NO.
lt>O
COMPOUND
SAS No . : 3*C£>r-$ ^25" SDC No.: 3fiAt><i7
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received: 
f-?l-
Date Separated; 
——
Date Extracted ; It - 6 - S 8*
Date Analyzed: I&-
CONCENTRATION
(ing/Kg)
103-95-2 ——
111-44-4 ——
95-57-8 —— -
541-73-1 ——
106-46-7 ——
100-51-6 ——
95-50-1 ———
95-48-7 ———
108-60-1 ——
106-44-5 ——
621-64-7 ——
67-72-1 ———
93-95-3 ———
78-59-1 ———
88-75-5 ———
105-67-9 ——
65-85-0 ———
111-91-1 ——
120-83-2 ——
120-82-1 ——
91-20-3 ———
106-47-8 ——
87-68-3 ———
59-50-7 ———
91-57-6 ———
77-47-4 ———
88-06-2 ———
95-95-4 ——— •
91-58-7 ——— •
88-74-4 —— s-
131-11-3 ———
208-96-8 —— •
606-20-2 —— •
——— bis ( 2 -Chlcroechyl) ether
——— 2-Chlorochenol
——— 1, 3-Dichlorobenzene
——— 1,4-Dichlorobensene
——— 2-Methylphenol
—— —bis ( 2-Chloroisbprbpy 1 ) ether
——— 4 -Kethy Iphenol
—— • — N-Nitroso-di-n-prcpylamine
——— -Hexachloroethane
——— Ni trobenz ene
——— -Isophorone
— — 2-Nitroph«nol
— —— 2 , 4 -Dimethy Iphenol
— ——Benzole acid
~ —— bis (2-Chloroethbxy) methane
— « — -2 , 4 -Dichlorophenol
—— — 1 ,2,4 -Trichlorobenzene
——— Naphthalene
-----4-Chloroaniiine
— —— Hexachlorobutad'i'ene
• —— -4 -Chloro-3 -methylphenol
—— — 2-Methylnaphthal«ne
— —— Hexachlorocycl opentadlene
- — —2 , 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol
——— 2 -Chloronaphthalene
——— 2-Nitroaniline
——— Dimethylphthalate
——— Acena phthy 1 ene
———2 , 6-Dinitrotolviene
'
i
. 
1 IJ 1 
OOi 
/ 1^-( '. t~
FORM I HCE-1
1/8
<;?
1HC
HIGH CONCENTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
221
EPA SAMPLE NO.
r
Lab Nane:
La*j Code: £ £>Jl£ F Case No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
Contract:
SAS No . :
SDG No.:
I.
(9)
Final Extract Volune:
Injection Voluae: 
< (uL)
Conversion Factor: 
2-0
ID
(mL)
pH:
Lab Saaple ID: ______
Lab File ID: 
>£/1 GO
Date Received: 
f-7/' f j
Date Separated:___"~
Date Extracted: 
/#'& ~i
Date Analyzed: 
Ib~II
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(eg/Kg)
99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitroaniline___
83-3 2-9 ———————Acenachthene_____
51-2S-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol_
100-02 -7——————4 -Mi trophenol____
132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran_____
121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate_J_______
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7————————Fluorene_____
100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline___________
534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-aethylphenol_
86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)_
101-55-3——————4-Broaophenyl-phenylether 
_______
319-84-6———————alpha-BHC______________" 
3£>Q
118-74-1——————Hexachlorobenzene
319-S5-7———————beta-BHC________~_________ 
JCp
87-86-5—«———--Pentachlorophenol_
58-89-9——•————gaana-BHC (Lindane)_______ 
O.CD
85-01-8———•———Phenanthrene______
120-12-7—————Anthracene_______
319-86-8———————delta-BHC_________
76-44 -8~—————Heptachlor_______
309-00-2—————Aldrin__________
84-74-2——————Di-n-butylphthalate_
206-44-0——-———-Fluoranthene 
" 
___
1024-57-3—————Heptachlor epoxide________ 
«2Z?0"
27323-18-8————Monochlorobiphenyl_______ 
t pop
2051-60-7————— Dichlorobiphenyl_________ 
to op
2051-61-8—————Trichlorobiphenyl_
2051-62-9—^r———Tetrachlorobiphenyl_______ 
\QQQ
129-00-0——————Pyrene__________ 
__
5103-74-2—————gaana-Chlordane__________ 
jip/\ I
(1)- Cannot be separated froa Diphenylaaine
FORM I HCE-2f
cc
1/88
1HD
HIGH CONCENTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
222*
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: 
Ct* 0,t t.e.bl '
Lab Cede: 
CetidtP 
Case No
Contract;
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
/•
(g)
Final Extract Volune: 
j. 0 (mL)
Injection Volume: 
/ (uL)
Conversion Factor: 
•<-
SAS No . : 3<tt^r-<l riY SDC No.:
Lab Sample ID: __ 
__
Lab File ID: 
>CI I&0
Date Received:
Date Separated: —___
Date Extracted: /d-£-g£
Date Analyzed: 
ij. •//•£#
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(me/Kg)
959-9S-S —————— Endcsulfan I
5103-71-9 ————— alpha-Chlordane
25429-2 9-2 ———— Pentachlorobipheny i
72-55-9 ———————— 4 , 4 f -DDE
60-57-1 ——————— Dieldrin
26601-64-9 ———— Hexachlorobiphenyl
72-2 0-8 ——————— Endrin
33213-65-9 ————— Endosuifan II
72-54-8 ———————— 4, 4 '-ODD 
s
28655-71-2 ———— Heptachlorobiiphenyl
85-68-7 ——————— Butyitoenzylphthalate
1031-07-8 ————— Endosulfan sulfate
50-29-3 ———————— 4, 4 '-DOT
53494-70-5 ———— Endrin ketone
56-55-3 ——————— Benzo (a) anthracene
72-43-5 —————— Methoxychlor
218-01-9 ————— Chrysene
55722-26-4 ———— Octachloroblph'enyl
91-94-1 —————— 3 , 3 • -Dichiorob«nzid!£iie
117-81-7 ————— bis(2-Ethylh«xyl)phtnaTaI5 —
53742-07-7 ———— rHonachlorobiphenyl
2051-24-3 ————— Decachlorobipnenyi
117-84-0 ————— Di-n-octylphthalat«
205-99-2 ————— -Benzo(b) fluoranthene
207-08-9 —— • —— -Benzo (k) fluoranthene
50-32-8—— —— - — Benzo (a) pyrene
193-39-5 —————— Indeno (1,2, 3 -cd) pyrene
53-70-3 ——————— Dibenz (a ,h) anthracene
191-24-2 — • ——— Benzo (g,h,i)perylene
^
3GG
3&Q
\coc
.'JOG
3OT>
\ OGO
Joo
ODD
3OO
iCfOD
3OC
3.0 C
3&C
^>00
3OOO
• 
3 GOO
• •
U
M.
K-
U.
U.
U.
txv
^r
' L A
u.
u
u.
u.
u
u.
c«-
U,
FORM I HCE-3
1/88
;
I
1HF
HIGH CONCE2TTRATTON EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract;
223
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Name:
I-ah Code:
Case No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
1 .1 
(g)
Final Extract Volume:
Injection Voluae: 
/
Conversion Factor:
pH: ?.g
Number TICs found:
(mL)
(uL)
SAS No . ; 3*4"r-<;-t'2£ SDG No.:
tjta Sample ID:
Lab File ID: . >
Data Received: 
?'«?/•
Date Separated:
Date Extracted : /
Date Analyzed: /£ -//-g%
CAS NUKEES
1.
2.'
3.'
4.'
5.'
6.'
7.'
8.'
9.'
10."
11.'
12.'
13.'
14.'
15.'
16."
17."
18."
19."
20."
21."
22."
23."
24."
25."
26.'
27."
28."
29."
30."
COMPOU1TO NAME
5" '<!«*•• -•'-••''
H l>i
M
A t f ^
RT
/AS"?
£2
JS.S7
, v/
EST. CONC
OOl 0838
FORM I HCE-TIC
1/88
(A
1HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Luto Naae: C 0 ^rp \-
048
I
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Code:
A
Case No.:
Phase Type: 
VOX L
Phase weight:
• D
Final Extract Voluae: 
IQ.Q (aL)
Aliquot Voluae: 
IQ 
(uL)
Contract; ^ -Di-lHteS |
SAS No. : faH-2.^ ''SDG No. :
Lab Saaple ID: __
Lab File ID: 
?A I
Date Received:
Date Separated:
Conversion Factor:
CAS NO.
Date Analyzed: 
lO
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(ag/Kg)
74-67-3———————Chlcrcaethane____
7 4-S3-9 ——————— = rc.-c=ethane_____
75-01-4———————Vir.yi Chloride__,
75-00-3———————Chlcrcethane_____
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride
67-64-1———————Acetone
75-15-0————
75-35-4------
75-34-3————— 
_________
540-59-0—————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)_
•Carbon Disulfide
•1,1-Dichloroethene
•1,1-Dichloroethane
•Chlorefora
•1,2-Dichloroethane
•2-Sutanone
67-66-3———-
107-06-2——-
73-93-3———•
71-55-6———-
56-23-5———-
108-05-4——-
75-27-4———-
78-87-5———-
10061-01-5—
79-01-6———- 
____
124-48 -1——————Dibroaochloronethajie_
79-00-5——————l. l, 2-Trichloroethane
71-43-2-—————Benzene______________
10061-02 -6——•—trans-1,3 -Dichloropropene
75-25-2——————Broaofom____________'
108-10 -1——————4 -Methyl -2 -Pentanone
591-78-6——————2-Hexanone
——1,1,1-Trichloroethane
——Carbon Tetrachloride
—Vinyl Acetate_____
——3roaodichloroaethane
—1,2-Dichloropropane___
—cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
—Trichloroethene
127-18-4—————-Tetrachloroethene_____
79-34-5——————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3——————Toluene
108-90-7———
100-41-4———
100-42-5———
—Chlorobenzene
—Ethylbenzene
•Styrene
1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)
r .
L ••- - •
r
FORM
049
1HE
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Kase:
*-
Lab Code: (°j) r\ rg f 
Case No.: __
Phase Type: 
VOILL-
Phase weight: 
| ,Q (g)
Final Extract Voluae: \C.O (aL)
Alicuot Volune: 
\ D (uL)
Contract: to^-O\-l-4lctS I
3*1001:
SAS No.: ^42.^ SDG No.;
Conversion Factor:
Nuraber TICs found:
-O
10
Lab Saaple ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated:
Date Analyzed:
CAS NUM2ZH
1.
2.'
3."
4 ."
5."
6."
7."
8."
9."
10."
11."
12."
13."
14."
15."
16."
17."
18."
19."
20."
21."
22."
23."
24."
25."
26."
27."
28."
29."
30."
CM **J
COMPOUND KAMI
/v L
or
RT
24.010
EST. CONC.
(mo/Kg)
9 WO
MOD
001 
0840
FORM I KCV-TIC
1/86
1KB
HIGH CONCENTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
265 .
EPA SAMPLE NO.
lab None: £ *o £* f
Lab Code: £f/Qgf F
uH
Case No.:
Contract:
SAS No.:
SDG No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
. 0 
(g)
Final Extract Volune:
Injection Volune: 
/
Conversion Factor:
-0
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
pH:
Date Separated ; 
—
Date Extracted; 16-6.
Date Analyzed: /£-//
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(ng/Kg)
111-44-4 ———
95-57-8 ———
541-73-1 ——
106-46-7 ——
100-51-6 ——
95-50-1 ———
95-48-7 ———
108-60-1 ——
106-44-5 ——
621-64-7 ——
67-72-1 ———
98-95-3 ———
78-59-1 ———
88-75-5 —— -
105-67-9 ——
65-85-0 ———
111-91-1 ——
120-83-2 ——
120-82-1 ——
91-20-3 ———
106-47-8 ——
e *r_ JCB _^__—
B /— OB— J — ^^
59-50-7 ———
91-57-6 ———
77-47-4 ———
88-06-2 ———
95-95-4 ———
91-58-7 ———
88-74-4 —— «T
131-11-3 ——
208-96-8 ——
606-20-2 ——
——— Phenol
———— bis (2-Chlcroethyl) ether
——— 2-Chlorophenol
——— 1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
——— 1, 4-Dichlorobenzene
— —— Benzyl alcohol
———— 1, 2-Dichlorobehzene
——— 2 -Methy Iphenol
——— -bis ( 2-Chloroisopropyl ) ether
——— 4-Methylphenol 
*
—— • — N-Nitroso-di-n-prbpylamine
——— Kexachloroethane
——— Ni trobenz ene
— • — — I sophorone
——— 2-Nitroph«rioi
—— — 2 , 4-Dinethylph«nol
- ——— Benzole acid
—— —bis ( 2-ChloroethoxyJ methane
- — —2 , 4 -Dichlorophenol
—— — 1 , 2 , 4-Trichlorobenzen"e
——— Naphthalene
— — -4 -Chl oroaniiine
—--- -Hexach-iorobutadiene
— —— -4 -Chlor o-3 -nethyl phenol
——— 2-Methylnaphthalene
—— — Hexachlorocyclopentadlene
———2 , 4 , 6-Trichlorophenol
——— 2 , 4 , 5-Trichlorophenol
—— — 2-Chloronaphthalene
——— 2-Nitroaniline
——— Diaethylphthalate
——— Acena phthylene
— ——2 , 6 -Dinitro toluene
!Ul 
(^>i 
Oft
FORM I HCE-1
1/86
1HC
HIGH CONCENTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
266
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Na=e:
Code:
(u
Contra ct :
'0 1-
£"<L'££ r"
Case No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
I • 0
Final Extract Voluae:
Injection Volune: 
>
Conversion Factor:
PH: U?
CAS NO.
(g)
/. ft (mL)
(uL)
>£
2.0
SAS No . ; J^r-C ^25" SDG No.:
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
~~~. 
Date Received:
Date Separated;
Date Extracted ;
Date Analyzed:
/ &'
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(mg/Kg)
99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitrcaniline___________
83-3 2-9 ———————Acenaphthene____________
51-28-5———————2,4-Dinitrophenol________
100-02-7——————4-Nitrcphenol___________
132-64-9——————Dibenzofuran____________
121-14-2——————2,4-Dinitrotoluene_______
84-66-2———————Diethylphthalate_________
7005-72-3—————4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7———————Fluorene______________~
100-01-6——————4-Nitroaniline___________
534-52-1——————4,6-Dinitro-2-aethylphenol_
86-30-6———————N-Nitrosodiphenylanine (1)_
101-55-3——————4-Bromophenyl-phenylether__
319-84-6——————alpha-BHC
118-74 -1——————Hexachlorobenzene_______
319-85-7———————beta-BHC
87-86-5———————Pentachlorophenol____'
58-89-9———————ganma-BHC (Lindane)_______ 
3GO
85-01-8———————Phenanthrene____________ .
120-12-7—————Anthracene____________
319-86-8-——————delta-BBC_________*
76-44-8—•——«——-Heptachlor______________ 
200
309-00-2——————Aldrin
84-74-2——————Di-n-butylphthalate______
206-44-0——————Fluorantfaene 
________
1024-57-3—————-Heptachlor epoxide
27323-18-8 ————Monochlorobipheny 1_______ 
I OOP
2051-60-7————Dichlorobiphenyl_________ 
(Q op
2051-61-8—————Trichlorobiphenyl
2051-62-9—-4:———Tetrachlorobiphenyl
129-00-0——————Pyrene________________
5103-74-2—————gaauna-Chlordane
c
f-O
(1) - Cannot be separated from Diphenylamine
FORM I HCr-2f
1/88
HIGH CONCE^TFATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSES DATA SHEET
267 "
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Nace:
Lab Code:
Case No.:
Contract:
SAS No.:
Z
-St rZZSDG No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weicht:
1.0
(g)
Final Extract Voluae:
Injection Voluze: _ /_
Conversion Factor:
(uL)
3.D
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 
>C//C/
Date Received:
Date Separated:_
Date Extracted:_
Date Analyzed:
/£
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(me/Kg)
959-98-S—•
5103-71-9—
25429-29-2-
72-55-9——•
60-57-1——-
•Endosulfan I______
•alpha-Chlordane___
•Pentachlorobiphenyl
• 4 , 4 ' -DDE_________"
•Dieldrin
26601-64-9————Kexachlorobiphenyl
72-20-8———————Endrin
33213-65-9——
72-54-8————
•Endosulfan II
•4,4' -ODD____"
•4, 4'-DOT
28655-71-2————Heptachlorobiphenyl__
85-68-7———————3utylbenzylphthalate
1031-07-8—————Endosulfan sulfate
50-29-3———————
53494-70-5————- 
_____
56-55-3———————Benzo (a) anthracene
72-43-5———————Methoxychlor____'_
218-01-9—————Chrysene_____
55722-26-4—
•Endrin Jcetone
•-Octachlorobiphenyl
91-94-1——————3,3' -Dichlorobenzidin*
117-81-7——————bis(2-Ethylh«xyl)ph£haIati
53742-07-7————Nonachlorobiphenyl_______
2051-24-3 ————-Decachlorobiphenyl
117-84-0————-
205-99-2—————
207-08-9—————Benzo (k) f luoranthvn*
50-32-8—————~Benzo(a)pyr«n«
193-39-5————
53-70-3—————
191-24-2————
•Di-n-octylphthalat«__
•Benz o(b)fluoranthene
•Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyren«_
•Dibenz (a, h) anthracene_J
•Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
JCD
ICOD
I COO
300
I ODD
a OP
3GOO
/.
\±s
*&k
FORM I HCE-3
1/88
3JXF
HIGH CONCENTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
268
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab N^ne;
LaJb Cede:
Hf(
Case No
Contract:
SAS No.:
SDG No
Phase Type:
Piiase weight:
Ul*-
/. 0 (g)
Final Extract Voluae:
Injection Volviae: 
/ 
(uL)
Conversion Factor: 
jLG
pH: 
1.0
Nunfcer TICs found: 
I6>
(mL)
Lab -Sample ID: _______
Lab Fil* ID: 
>£//<?/
Date Received:
Date Separated:_
Date Extracted:_
Date Analyzed:
CAS NUMBES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.'
11.'
12.'
13.'
14.'
15.'
16.'
17.'
18.'
19.'
20.'
21.'
22."
23."
24."
25."
26."
27."
28."
29."
30."
COMPOUND NAME
sf1'/
U.nt'n .-ti
<TuJv<4-A,LVrl 
Vvvtf'tL.I A
Ui.
'-c 
K , ,
RT
16.11
IO.M,
J?. //
EST. 
CONC.
(ag/Kg) ,
ItttiG
•416
(,<?£)
300
not
IS60
FORM I HCE-TIC
1/88
IRA
KICK CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
113
EPA SAMPLE NO"!
Lab Na=e:_f
Contract::
Lab Cede: Cfr\Cc(r 
Case No.:
No.:
34001.
SDG No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
1.0
Final Extract Voluae:
Aliquot Voluse: 
|Q
(g)
IP-D
Lab Sanple ID:
Lab File ID:
(uL)
Date Received: °l 111 1%%
Date Separated:______
Conversion Factor: t5 O
Date Analyzed: \Q\
i
I
CAS NO. 
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(mg/Kg)
1 
— ^ J 
!——.<—• 
—— i
74-33-9 —— —
i 75-01-4 ————
75-00-3 —— —
75-09-2 —— —
67-64-1 — ——
75-15-0 -----
75-35-4 —— —
75-34-3 -----
540-59-0 —— -
67-66-3 —— —
107-06-2 — —
73-93-3 ————
71-55-6 —— —
56-23-5 --——
108-05-4 ———
75-27-4 —— ~
78-87-5 ————
10061-01-5 —
79-01-6 -----
124-48-1 ———
79-00-5 ————
71-43-2 ————
10061-02-6 —
75-25-2 — ——
108-10-1 ———
591-78-6 — —
127-18-4 — —
79-34-5 ————
108-88-3 — —
108-90-7 — 
~
100-41-4 ———
100-42-5 -——
1330-20-7 ——
• ——— 5rc-c=ethane
• ——— Vinyl Chloride 
•
• ——— Chloroethane
• ——— Methylene Chloride
——— Acetone
——— Carbon Disulfide
——— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene
——— 1 , 1-Dichloroethane
——— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
——— Chlorofora
——— 1,2-Dichloroethane 
%
——— 2 -Butanone
——— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
——— carbon Tetrachloride
——— vinyl Acetate
——— Bromodichl oronethane
——— 1,2-Dichloropropane
——— cis-l , 3-Dichloropropene
——— Trichloroethene
—— DibroBochloronethane
——— i, i, 2-Trichloroethanie
- —— Benzene
— —— trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
- —— Br ono tons
—— - 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
——-2 -Hexanone
——— Tetrachloroetheiie
—— i ,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroe thane
——— Chl orobenz ene
—— Styrene
——— Xylene (total)
1
So \ LL
SO | (^
«,e» I u_
Sp 1 LA^.
I =3 | j^_
Sol u__-
2^> 1 u^
1^ \ i^
2SI u^_
2SI i>^
2.51 |^
^t*> 1 L>^_
2C, 
| i^
2.^3 | IJL_
i& 1 L>^_
yr |
TJC 1
^C, 
| LJ^_
2-^*1 
LJ_
2.^1 LJ
i-5 1 CA—
it 
\ ^
' ' 
2.^3 \ J_A_ 
J
Z*J 
1 LJL
5 P 1 L^l
«>t!>l (^
i^> 1 L*^
^£«5> | CA __
iH O 
1
2*5 
1 _*__
*4OO 
\
ft 
\ 3
iCoO 
1
1
FORM I HCV
1HE
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TTNTATIYILY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
114
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I
Lob None ; C £
-
r 
P
Lab Code: Lg.;Vg.T 
Case No. :
Phase Type: 
VOX 1—
Phase weight: 
l.Q 
(g)
Final Extract Vclu=e:
Alicruot Volume: 
\ Q
(uL)
Conversion Factor:
Nurnber TICs found:
5.0
Contract: (j%-Q\-l4(cc^ I
3qoOT.
SAS No.: g>eV2.g3 SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated:,
Date Analyzed:
| 
CAS NUM2ER
1.
2.'
3.
4 ."
5."
6."
7."
8.'
9."
10."
11."
12."
13."
14."
15."
16."
17."
18."
19."
20."
21."
22."
23."
24."
25."
26."
27."
28.'
29."
30."
COMPOUND NAME
4-r!
left^i
vil
.1C-
RT
21.23-
22.
. IT.
EST. CONC
(BO/ Kg)
-JHD
L>
FORM I -HCV-TIC
1/88
1KB
HIGH CONCEJTTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
30^
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Naze: £.
Lab Code:
Case No.:
Contract:
SAS No.:
SDC No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
I .0
Final Extract Volune:
Injection Voluae: 
/
Conversion Factor:
pH: 
(j 0
CAS NO.
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated:
- 2/-
Date Extracted; 16-j, -
Date Analyzed: /^-//
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(ing/Kg)
108-95-2——————Phenol_____________
111-44-4——————bis (2-Chicroetiiyl) ether
95-57-8———————2-Chlorophenol_____
541-73-1——————1,3-Dichlorobenzene_
106-46-7——————l,4-Dichlorob«nzene___
100-51-6——————Benzyl alcohol_____
95-50-1————-—1,2-Dichlorobenzene_
95-48-7———————2-Methylphenol____________
108-60-1———-——bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) ether_
106-44-5—————4-Methylph«nol__________
621-64-7—————N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine_
67-72-1———————Hexachloroe thane___
98-95-3———————Nitrobenzene______
78-59-1———————Isophorone________
88-75-5——————2-Nitroph«nol_____
105-67-9——————2,4-Dimethylphenol__
65-85-0———————Benzoic acid_____________
111-91-1—————-bis(2-Cbloro«thoxy)Bethane_
120-83-2—————2,4-Dichloroph«nol___
120-82 -1—————-1,2,4 -Trichlorob«nz ene
91-2 0-3 ——————Naphthalene^____*
106-47-8—————4-Chloroanilln>
87-68-3—————-Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7———————4-Chloro-3-methylphe3fio7
91-57-6———————2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4———-——Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2——————2,4,6-Trichloroph«nol_____
95-95-4———————2,4,5-Trichlorophenol_____
.91-58-7——————2-Chloronaphthal«ne______
88-74-4——-———2-Nitroaniline__________
131-11-3—————Diaethylphthalate______________________
208-96-8—————Acenaphthylene___________
606-20-2——————2.6-Dinitrotoluene_______
FORM I HCE-1
1/8S
1HC
HIGH CONCENTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
307
EPA SAMPLE NO
Lab Na=e:
La^j Code: 
C EtMJi r 
Case No.: __
Phase Type: 
UlL
Phase weight: 
I .O 
(g)
Final Extract Volume: 
j. ft (mL)
Injection Volume: 
I 
(uL)
Conversion Factor: 
"2-0
PH: 
(l-D
Contract; frg-fl/-7Vfc5 
|_
SAS No.: Jfar-Cf 25" SDG No.:
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(mg/Kg)
99-09-2 ——————— 3-Nitroaniline
83-32-9 ——————— Acenaphthene
5 1-2 8 -S ——————— 2 . 4 -Dinitrophenol
100-02-7 —————— 4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9 —————— Dibenzofuran
121-14-2 —————— 2 , 4-Dinitrotoluene
84-66-2 ——————— Diethylphthalate
7005-72-3 ————— 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
86-73-7 ——————— Fluorene
100-01-6 ————— 4-Nitroanifine
534-52-1 —————— 4 , 6-Dinitro-2-methyiphenol
86-30-6 ———— « —— N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)
101-55-3 —————— 4-Broaophenyl-phenylether
319-84-6 ——————— alpha-BHC
118-74-1 ————— -Hexachlorobenzene
319-85-7 ——————— beta-BHC
87-86-5 —————— — Pentachlorophenol
58-89-9 ——————— ganma-BHC (Lindane)
85-01-8—— — -—— Phenanthrene
120-12-7 ————— Anthracene
319-86-8--- • •-- -delta-BBC 
"
76-44-8 —— ———— Heptachlor
309-00-2 ————— Aldrin
84-74 -2 —————— Di-n-buty IphtJaalate
206-44-0 — -— —— Fluoranthene
1024-57-3 — • ——— -Heptachlor epo'xlde
27323-18-8 ———— Monochlorobiphenyl
2051-60-7 ————— Dichlorobiphenyl
2051-61-8 ————— Trichlorobiphenyl
2051-62-9--.- ——— Tetrachlorobiphenyi
129-OO-0 —————— Pyrene
5103-74-2 ————— gamna-Cfalordane
3&0
JCb
ad>
:
nao
300
^oo
JDD
IOOD
1000
ID on
iGOD
3on 
\
\
tc
(X
V-
LL
U.
(^_
U_
u.
u.
u.
< J
u.
^ - ,
(1) - cannot be separated from Dxpnenylamine
FORM I HCE-2
1/88
1HD
KICK CONCENTRATION EXTSACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
308
EPA SAKPLZ NO."
Lab Kaae: fi*Q.l I L. b 6
Lab Code: f crjfl.fi. ? Case No.:
Phase Type: 
UM^
Phase weight: 
/ • 
(g)
Contract:
SAS No. :
27 SDG No.:
Final Extract Voluse:
Injection Volune: 
/
Conversion Factcr:
pH: (f-0
CAS NO.
Lab Sample ID: _____
Lab File ID: 
>Cf 16\
Date Received: 
3~2I
Date Separated; 
"""
Date Extracted; /£-£•£
Date Analyzed:
/£ •
CSXFCUND
CONCENTRATION
(.ng/Kg)
5103-71-9 ————— alpha-Chloriane
25429-29 -2 ————— Pentachlorobiphenyl
72-55-9 ———————— 4 , 4 ' -DDE
60-57-1 ——————— Dieldrin
26601-64-9 ———— Hexachlorobiphenyl
72-20-8 ——————— Endrin
33213-65-9 ———— Endosulfan II
72-54-8 ———————— 4 , 4 • -ODD
28655-71-2 ———— Heptachlorobiphenyl 
•»•
85-68-7 ——————— 3utylbenzylphthalate
1031-07-8 ————— Endosulfan sulfate
50-29-3 ———————— 4 , 4 ' -DOT
53494-70-5 ———— Endrin ketorie
56-55-3 ——————— Benzo (a) anthracene
72-43-5 ——————— Methoxychlor
218-01-9 —— • ——— Chrysene
55722-26-4 ———— Octachlorbb'iphinyl
91-94-1 —————— 3 . 3 ' -Dichlorobenzidine
117-81-7 ————— bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phtbaIat«
53742-07-7 ———— Nonachlorobiphenyl
2051-24-3 ———— -Decachloroblphenyl
117-84-0 ————— Di-n-octylphthalate
205-99-2 —— — ——— Benzo (b) f luoranthene
207-08-9 ————— Benzo (k) f luoranthene
50-32-8 —————— -Benzo (a) pyrene
193-39-5 —————— Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyr«n«
53-70-3 ——————— Dibenz( a, h) anthracene
191-24-2 ————— Benzo (g,h.i)perylene
—
M rs/1
JOQ
3GG
IQCO
.'JCD
3OO
1 COO
Jco
300
300
\tJOO
3OO
20£>
J&0
J0£>
3GD£>
300O
3000
• .
U
t-t
K
u.
u
c<
^-X
,K 
1
/^u |
UL
uuu.
u
bk
•
L*.
U.
^-^^^^—
o:
FORM I HCE-3
1/88
1HF
HIGH CONCENTRATION EXTRACTABLE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
309
EPA SAMPLE NO.
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 
|
Lab Niae: 
^ c,i "t^f L.^h^ 
Contract: (/%-£/-'7V(/$ 
\ 
&rltf£9e]
Lab Cede: 
C£.V£cr 
Case No.: 
SAS No . : 3Wf-£+2S SDG No.: 
E^/^9 •?
Phase Type: 
UK
Phase weight: 
1.0 
(<3)
Final Extract Volume: 
/ 
(mL)
Injection Volume:
Conversion Factor
/ 
fuL)
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 
. > £//0.2
Date Received: 
?'•?/- &5
Date Separated: 
"
: 
20 
Date Extracted: /^-^'fi7?
pK: 
L>.0 
Date Analyzed: /£-//-gg
\
\
\ ^
1
Nunber TICs found
i
CAS N'UMBER
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. (f2f7^7
7.
O •
Q 
/ ^*K^ ^^^
10. 
l/jf<X
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
: -T£
COMPOUND NAME
C-v .<t^i-«-.-^W >6.«-2e-/^
/^ . K^, xi '/• - »VL, -t* ..,/. ~^f*-y~r>_.
A^r^i^ 
1- / l^,^..\ s-tA^I*- ~%jn-r +m
<^fc<*-'>— i-i-rJ 
r^^.^flj, 
/,..-,kUx l-^s
d-if^fU 
( ^'f.nk^keLlf^, 
Mf-£/2J//3
Hr n4-s"^ff^i\f^
Cfc»\ f r»/n _n k . . J rPPa rhc n
Urvi/o'c-n 
ftll/e.n± 
fi*F- C.I%H^.4
r^ ~ C\ £* tiff's, 
f* t
P ! f /^ </S.fVJ
tLv^J'fN^-rv 
H.J ^ (-.-<•>.. --A/-^
yji i-ir* r ft t"*t i ^ 
<^/ ^^^i^A f(^&^^
Lv~.tf<run 
Al^*w 
MF.-^."2I HUU
L^ C r « ( y r ^IJ'u^e-
U^^rru.M 
Olt^.^r
Uwtn/<Lt.^
U^neLt* 
AlKx.^^
(^J'j^i^/i 
Al^,/v^
Lc^rr-'LfX 
/Altc./W
iL^tnri^ 
Alf<^^
RT
/<?.^/
M. JC
yj.^»?
/?.^v
/,>./</
-^. w
^^.5"V
J3A <?.«?
_j^. j^-
JV.57
JtS ^'6>
J51SV
JS'.fi'J
^^,. 3«/.
^^-^^?
J/..!CJ
j>7. vr
3S'.J5^r
«?^. £7
3/9.7O
EST. 
CONC.
(mg/Kg)
2_20
2.t*G
JtsO
•we
J^-^j
^ft?
_?5£>
_?§^
99^
5/30
5"V/f
?/$£
^/0/>
£"7C
IOCO
Slfl
1206
9O6
SM
,
• Q
^=
•^~
^T
^—
~"r"^
FORM I HCE-TIC 
^ 
1/1
1HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
186
EPA SAMPLE NO-
Lab Name:
Lab .Cede:
Contract:
Case No.:
ssocl.
SAS No.: Zu VZ=S 
SDG No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
..O
(g)
Final Extract Volume: 
;r .Q (n>L)
Aliquot Volume: IDC) (uL)
Conversion Factor: C-^2
Lab Sample ID: V ft L V<J
Lab File ID: 
7 A \\2(i
Date Received: ______
Date Separated:______
Date Analyzed:
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(mg/Kg)
74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethane
74-83 -9 ——————— Bromomethane
75-01-4 —————— vinyl Chloride
75-OO-3 —————— Chloroe thane
75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 —————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon D'isul'fi'de
75-35-4 ——————— l . 1-Dichloroethene
75-34-3 —————— 1 . 1-Dichloroethane
540-59-0 —————— 1, 2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3 —————— Chloroform
107-06-2 —————— 1 . 2-Dichloroethane
7 8 -93-3 —————— 2-Butanone
71-55-6 —————— 1. 1. i-Trichloroethane
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachloride
108-05-4 —————— Vinvl Acetate
78-87-5 —————— • 1 . 2 -Dichl or opr opane
10061-01-5 —— • —— -cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
79-0 1-6 —————— -Trichloroethene
79-00-5 —————— 1. 1. 2-Trichloroethane
71-43 -2 ——— — —— 'Benzene
10061-02-6 ———— trans-1 
1 3-oIchloropropene
75— 25— 2——— —— —— Bromof orm
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone
127-18-4 ———— — Tetrachloroethene
79-34-5 —————— 1.1.2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3 ————— -Toluene
108-90-7 —————— Chlorobenzene
100-41-4 —————— Ethvlbenzene
100-42-5 —————— styrene
1330-20-7 ————— Xvlene (total)
55
•5
•5z
r>iz
2.
2.Z
2.
Z"i
2.
7-
2.
2.
2.
2.Z
2.
i.
2-
2-
L
^3
^,
2.Z
Z
2.
———— £
2.
• ^"^
_____
FORM I HCV
CD
oc
1/83
*•«
i
1HE
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name:
Lab Code:
Case No.:
Contract:
SAS No.:
-01
18
EPA SAMPLE NO.
——
v/6/L!
SDG No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
1-0
(9)
0. Q (mL)
Final Extract Volume;
Aliquot Volume: 
[QQ. 0 (uL)
Conversion Factor: _
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated:
Date Analyzed:
\J&\
> A-
CAS NUMBER
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.'
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
' 30.
COMPOUND NAME
/Jo \/a-<jdtuL rfryxJanLLwdL^ WfljI^Z.
T
RT
EST. CONC.
(mg/Kg)
.
Q
CO
r-J
FORM I HCV-TIC
1/88
1HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
193
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lao Name:__
Lab Cede: fr
Contract:;
I 
\1
Case No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
_______
(g)
Final Extract Volume: 10 . Q (mL)
Aliquot Volume: 
iPO (uL)
Conversion Factor: C • ^D ___
SAS No.: SeV2--=^ SDG No.:
Lab Sample ID: 
_
Lab File ID: 
7 A \\31-
Date Received: 
•
Date Separated:______
Date Analyzed:
CAS NO.
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(ing/Kg)
74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________
74-33 -9—————Bromomethane______________
75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride___________
75-00-3———————Chloroethane________
75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_______
67-64-1—"—————Acetone________________
75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________
75-3 5-4———————1,1-Dichloroethene________
75-34-3———————l, l-Dichloroethane 
______
540-59-0——————1,2-Dichloroethene (total)_
67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________
107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane_______
78-93-3———————2-Butanone______________ 
2.0
71-55-6———————1,1,1-Trichloroethane_____
56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride_____
103-05-4——————Vinyl Acetate__________
75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane_______
78-8 7-5———————1,2 -Dichloropropane______
10061-01-5————c is-1,3-Dichl or opropene___
79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________
12 4-48-1——————Dibr omochl orome thane_____
79-00-5———————1,1,2-Trichloroethane____
71-4 3-2 ———————Benzene________________
10061-02-6————trans-1,3-Dichloropropene_
75-2 5-2 ———————Brontof onn______________
108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone________
5 91 - 7 8 - 6——————2 -Hexanone_____________
127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene___________
79-34-5———————1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane_
108-88-3———————Toluene_________________
108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________
100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_______________
100-42 -5——————Styrene________________
| 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)__________
I__________________:__________________
FORM I HCV
Jl*
1HE
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
194
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Name: ^ ^ \~<P 'u 
•_- A b _S
Contract: ^
Lab Cede:
Case No.:
SAS No.:3*100
SDG No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
Final Extract Volune:
Aliquot Volume: 
\ QQ
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated:
A il?>l-
Conversion Factor:
Number TICs found:
n.
Date Analyzed: )Q j
CAS NUMBER
1.
2.
3 .
4 .
5 f
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15;
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
COMPOUND NAME
IA(\ ¥.r\(~)uOCi 
AlilAl^^
i AA tPOuOo 
A \ I^_A \r\ f-
RT
^ /_? i *r^ i^*
EST. CONC.
(mg/Kg)
F>
H
Q
-^
FORM I HCV-TIC
1/88
1HA
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
204
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name:
Lab Cede:
Case No <:
Contract:
<
SAS No.^
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
Final Extract Volume:
Aliquot Volume:
Conversion Factor:
CAS NO.
SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: __
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated:
Date Analyzed:
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(ing/Kg)
74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethane
74-83-9 ——————— Bromomethane
75-01-4 —————— Vinyl Chloride
75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane
75-09-2 ——————— Methylene Chloride
67-64-1 —————— Acetone
75-15-0 ——————— Carbon olsiilfide
75-35-4 ——————— 1 , 1-Dichloroethene
540-59-0 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3 ——————— Chloroform
107-06-2 —————— 1,2-Dichloroethane
71-55-6 ——————— 1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Tetrachl or ide
108-05-4 —————— Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4 ——————— -Bromodichloromethane
78-87-5 —————— -1,2-Oichloropropane
10061-01-5 — — —— cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
79-01-6 ———— • — -Trichloroethene
124— 48-1— — ——— DibroBochlorometnane
79-00-5 —————— 1 . 1. 2 -Tri Chloroethane
71— 43— 2——— —•—Benzene
10061-02-6— ——— trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
75— 25-2— — ——— — Bromoform
108-10-1 —————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
591-78-6 ——— —— 2-Hexanone
127-18-4 ———— — -Tetrachloroethene
79-34-5 —————— 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3 —————— Toluene
108-90-7 ——— —— Chlorobenzene
1330-20-7 ————— Xylene (total)
^T^
5~
^^
,%_
.*!-
J2.
^2
«3^
^
^
-^2.5
A
^^2
-r
j?
^^
3L£
A
3.^
<2
a.
£"
iT
^
AA
' X2
c5l
2_
(A~
U
t*~
*.
U-
U
4
-ti-
^
U.
(*-
6t
(A
\ n 1
FORM I HCV
1/88
205
1HE 
„
HIGH CONCENTRATION VOLATILE ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO
!>>b Name:
Lab Code:
Case No.:
Phase Type:
Phase weight:
Final Extract Volume:
Aliquot Volume:
(uL)
Conversion Factor:
Number TICs found:
SDG No.:
Lab Sample ID: __
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
Date Separated:
Date Analyzed:
CAS NUMBER
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
I 29.
1 30.
COMPOUND NAME
A/0 Ve/a-f:/*. Cff^^^^oJ^A.J
'
RT
EST. CONC.
(mg/Kg)
f I
Q
CO
Oi
Cr-
FORM I HCV-TIC
1/88
m
•nmam
. 
zo
r.». ni
• . ;i*>
•:-*- 
Z
•** 
O
•t,.
CO
>.*&;
ft*
02-8902-43-PA
REV. NO. 1
FINAL DRAFT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
TUTU ESSO
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
PREPARED UNDER
TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-8902-43
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346
FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MARCH 24,1989
NUS CORPORATION
SUPERFUND DIVISION
SUBMITTED BY:
DIANE TRUBE
PROJECT MANAGER
M#VO
MANAGER
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY:
RONALD M.NAMAN^, 
1
FIT OFFICE MANAGER
1
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No 1
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
PART I: SITE INFORMATION
1. 
Site Name/Alias Tutu Essg___________
2.
3
4.
Street 
Route 384 (Tutu District)
City St. Thomas________
County NA
State U.S Virgin Islands 
Zip08002
County Code NA
Cong. Dist. NA
EPA10 No. New Site
Latitude 18°20'25"N
Longitude 
64053'18"W
USGS Quad. 
Eastern St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands
Owner 
Esso VI Inc.
Tel. No.(809) 792-2920
Street GPO Box 4269
City 
San Juan
Operator 
Danill Bayard
State Puerto Rico
Tel. No. 809-775-2360
Zip 00936
Street PP. Box 7441
City St. Thomas
State U.S. Virgin Islands 
Zip 00801
Type of Ownership
(x] Private 
D Federal 
Q State
D County 
n Municipal 
D Unknown
Owner/Operator Notification on File
D RCRA 3001 
Date ______ 
Q CERCLA 103c
(x] None 
Q Unknown
Other
Date
9. 
Permit Information
Permit 
Permit No.
None 
_______
Date Issued
Expiration Date
Comments
10. 
Site Status
[x] Active
11. 
Years of Operation
1969
to
Unknown
Present
TUT 
OO1 
OS59
I
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No 1
12. 
Identify the types of waste units (e.g., landfill, surface impoundment, piles, stained soil,
above- or below-ground tanks or containers, land treatment, etc.) on site. Initiate as many
waste unit numbers as needed to identify all waste sources on site.
(a) 
Waste Management Areas
Waste Unit No. 
Waste Unit Type 
Facility Name for Unit
1 
Underground Storage Tanks 
Waste Oil Underground Storage Tanks
(b) 
Other Areas of Concern
Identify any miscellaneous spills, dumping, etc. on site; describe the materials and identify
their locations on site.
Mo miscellaneous spills, incidents of dumping, etc, were observed on the site during the NUS
Corp Region 2 FIT on-site reconnaissance. It should be noted, however, that an underground
gasoline tank has been suspected of leaking on site.________________________
13. 
Information available from
Contact Amy Brochu______ 
Agency 
U.S. EPA________ 
Tel. No. (201)906-6802
Preparer Joseph Mavo______ 
Agency NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Date 3/24/89_____
001 
0860
a*~ /£ 
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No. 1
PART II: WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION
For each of the waste units identified in Part I, complete the following six items.
Waste Unit 
1 
- 
Underground Storage Tanks. 
Waste Oil Underground Storage Tanks
1. 
Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit.
There is no known RCRA permit for the underground storage tanks for waste oil 
The
manager indicated that the tanks were installed in 1969
2. 
Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map.
The waste units are located underground below a tire rack inside the garage
3. 
Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g., area or volume of a landfill or surface
impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous
substances in the waste unit.
The volume of the storage tanks is unknown.
4. 
Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The
physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry,
liquid, or gas.
The physical state of the waste oil in the tanks is liquid.
5. 
Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit.
The waste units contain waste oil from automotive repair and servicing activities 
The
manager indicated that only waste oil was put in the tanks. Solvents and cleaners are not
disposed of in the tanks. Tank sampling, conducted by Cenref Labs and Belgodere and
Associates Inc., indicates the presence of toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene m wastes stored
there.
6. 
Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via
groundwater, surface water, and air.
The waste is contained in underground storage tanks There is no information that indicates
that the tanks are leaking; therefore, there is little potential for contaminant migration to air,
groundwater, or surface water. The manager indicated that the tanks are periodically
emptied by ESSO Corp and the waste is shipped off St. Thomas for disposal.
Ref. Nos. 
1. 18. 19.20.21.22
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No 1
PART III: HAZARD ASSESSMENT
GROUNDWATER ROUTE
1- 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the groundwater as follows,
observed, alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and
provide a rationale for attributing the contaminant(s) to the facility.
There is a potential for contaminants to be released from the waste oil storage tanks to
groundwater. The manager of the facility indicated that only waste oil was stored in the
tanks. Cleaners and solvents are not put into the tanks Small quantities of contaminants may
have been introduced into the oil in the normal course of its use as motor oil. Tank sampling
<• 
indicates the presence of toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene in wastes stored on site* in the
tanks; however, these results are questionable due to chain-of-custody problems. A soil gas
vapor study also confirmed chlorinated hydrocarbons on site.
Ref Nos. 1,21,22
2. 
Describe the aquifer of concern; include information such as depth, thickness, geologic
composition, permeability, overlying strata, confining layers, interconnections,
discontinuities, depth to water table, groundwater flow direction.
The rock units of St. Thomas and St. John are divided into three major groups: the Water
Island Formation, the Virgin Island Group, and an unnamed group of dioritic plutons 
The
Water Island Formation, which is late lower Cretaceous in age, consists of keratophyre and
spillates. The Virgin Island Group, which is probably early Cretaceous or Albian in age, consists
of andesitic-pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary formations. The Virgin Island Group is divided
into four formations: the Louisenhoj Formation, which consists of augite-andesite breccia,
tuff, and conglomerate; the Outer Brass Limestone, which consists of partially silicified-
tuffaceous-radiolarian-limestone; the Tutu Formation, which consists of tuffaceous wacke,
including megabreccia near the base and limestone near the top; and the Hans Lollik
Formation, which may be Eocene in age and consists of augite-andesite breccia and tuff. The
final group is made up of one or more dioritic plutons. These unnamed dikes and plugs of
quartz-andesine-hornblende porphyry are Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in age
Alluvian deposits are quarternary in age
The Water Island Formation, which consists of 95 percent volcanic flow breccias, was probably
extruded on a relatively level ocean floor The absence of terrigenous sediments from this
formation indicates that there were no emergent islands present in the area at the time of
extrusion. Emergent islands would have served as a source of weather sediments or detritus.
which are not present in this formation. There is evidence that sea floor subsidence occurred
during the greater part of the accumulation of this formation. 
However, the subsidence was
not rapid enough to maintain a constant water level, thereby causing explosive eruptions near
the top of the formation. Regional uplift occurred near the end of the Water Island time.
The Louisenhoj Formation of the Virgin Island Group unconformably overlies the Water Island
Formation and crops out on about half of the land area on St. Thomas. Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St. John was the origin of this formation. Evidence of this center is
based upon the coarseness of volcanic eject a in the formation in nearby eastern St. Thomas
and western St. John. Material is less coarse and tuffs are more predominant as one moves
further east and west away from the center or origin. This augite-andesite formation ranges
in thickness from 4,000 to 13,000 feet 
In certain areas of St. Thomas and St. John
conglomerates are inter bedded with andesitic rocks at the base of this formation. The
depositional environment of this conglomerate varies from location to location throughout
this formation.
I 
The Outer Brass Formation of the Virgin Island Group is mostly siliceous limestone which
overlies the Louisenhoj Formation This limestone formation is an offshore deposit formed by
radiolarian and foraminiferal remains including a minor amount of tuff. Thicknesses are
I 
known to be at least 600 feet
I
I
I
I
02-8902-43-PA
Rev. No I
Overlying the Outer Brass Formation is the Tutu Formation. The Tutu Formation is fine- to
coarse-grained volcanic wackes, which are termed flysch. This formation is derived from
eroding sediments from the Louisenhoj andesites. Exposed thicknesses are known to be as
much as 6000 feet. Within this formation are a megabreccia lithofaoes with an average
thickness of 30 feet and a limestone member with a thickness up to 300 feet.
The Hans Lollik Formation,"which consists of at least 10,000 feet of augite-andesite pyroclastic
rocks, crops out on Little Hans Lollik Island. Diontic plutons are located m Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St. John, in the narrows, between St. John and the British Virgin
islands; and south of St. Thomas. The exact delineation of these plutons is uncertain.
Throughout the islands isolated dikes of quartz-andesine porphyries, andesme-hornblende
v 
porphyries, lamprophyres, breccias, and pegmatites appear
Folding occurred after the deposition of the Virgin Island Group. Rocks were tilted to form a
northward-dipping homocline, which is cut by sets of faults trending N 45^, N 55°E, and
north. Well-defined joint sets parallel each of the major fault trends. Dips range from 15* to
90" with the average being 40° Strike-slip faults have horizontal offsets of less than 1 mile
Two major strike-slip graben structures or fault systems exist. The first passes through
Redhook, St. Thomas and the eastern tip of Lovango Cay. 
The second crosses St. John, from
Contact Point on the southwest to Brown's Bay on the northeast.
j 
Most recent Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial deposits occurred primarily in coastal
embayments. However, a narrow bank of alluvium extends up to Turpentine Run on the east
end of the island. Most of these deposits are composed of silt, clay, and thin, discontinuous
I 
beds of sand and gravel. Maximum thickness of these is 50 feet.
Groundwater movement is limited to openings and joints along fault zones. Regional
• 
geologic information is insufficient to determine whether these fractures and fault zones are
I 
^-' 
present in all of the above formations; however, for this report it is assumed that the fractures
and fault zones are present in all of the formations. The valleys on the island are the result of
weak zones caused by faulting and jointing and are primary recharge areas for groundwater
I
Alluvial deposits have a high porosity but low permeability, making this aquifer unfavorable
for groundwater production. In coastal embankments throughout the island, saltwater
intrusion is widespread in alluvial deposits. In most areas, alluvial deposits are interconnected
with bedrock and act to recharge precipitation to the underlying bedrock.
The direction of groundwater flow in the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer is south-southeast
which is generally along the direction of flow of Turpentine Run Depth to groundwater m
the aquifer ranges from S to 60 feet, and the altitude of the water levels ranges from 1 to 209
feet above mean sea level.
Ref Nos. 8, 10, 14
3. 
Is a designated sole source aquifer within 3 miles of the site?
No sole source aquifer, as designated in the Federal Register, is located within 3 miles of the
site.
Ref. 
No. 7
4. 
What is the depth from the lowest point of waste disposal/storage to the highest seasonal
i 
level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern?
The lowest point of the waste oil storage tank is unknown. It is assumed that the bottom of
^, 
the tank is at least 6 feet below the ground surface. Depth to groundwater in Four Winds
| 
Shopping Plaza Well Nos. 1 and 2 is 13 feet and 9 feet, respectively. The Four Winds Shopping
Plaza wells are located approximately 400 feet from the Tutu Esso facility. The depth from the
lowest point of waste storage (6 feet) to the highest seasonal level of the saturated zone (9
feet) is 3 feet 
• 
""L ,.T.
'UT 
OO1 
086.Z
Ref. 
Nos 1 , 2 , 8
I 
• S er /€
" 
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No 1
s-
5. 
What is the permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum
between the ground surface and the aquifer of concern?
I 
There are no continuous intervening strata between the ground surface and the bedrock
aquifer. Soils are generally thin in the area around the site. The water-bearing formations m
the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer are composed primarily of fractured and jointed volcanic
I
rocks. The range of hydraulic conductivities associated with these formations is 10J to 10'
cm/sec.
Ref. Nos. 9, 10, 14
v 6. 
What is the net precipitation for the area?
Net precipitation is usually calculated by subtracting mean annual lake evaporation (a
surrogate measure for evapotranspiration) from normal annual total precipitation 
Mean
annual lake evaporation information was not available for St. Thomas; however,
evapotranspi ration data were available. These data indicate that 95.8 percent of the incident
precipitation on St. Thomas is lost through evapotranspiration. The normal annual total
precipitation for St. Thomas is 43.74 inches, but because of orographic effects on the Island,
normal annual total precipitation can range from 35 inches to 50 inches over short distances.
in the Turpentine Run Basin, normal annual precipitation is 40 inches. Calculations for net
precipitation are provided below:
40 inches precipitation x 95.8 percent lost to evapotranspiration = 38.32 inches lost to
I 
evapotranspiration
40 inches precipitation • 38.32 inches lost to evapotranspiration = 1.68 inches net
I
precipitation.
Ref. Nos. 3, 5, 11, 12
| 
7. 
Identify uses of groundwater within 3 miles of the site (i.e., private drinking source,
municipal source, commercial, industrial, irrigation, unusable).
Groundwater within 3 miles of the site is used as a source of private and municipal drinking
water, and for commercial purposes. There are at least 41 wells within 2 miles of the site
Thirty-six of these wells are within 1 mile of the site. Sixteen of these wells have been ordered
closed because of contamination with volatile organic compounds.
Ref Nos. 6, 8
8. 
What is the distance to and depth of the nearest well that is currently used for drinking or
irrigation purposes?
Distance 1100 feet_________ 
Depth Unknown__________
The nearest well that is used for domestic purposes is the Francois Laplace well. It is uncertain
whether this well is used for drinking. A number of wells in the vicinity of the Francois well
have been closed because of contamination with volatile organic compounds.
Ref. Nos. 6, 8
9. 
Identify the population served by the aquifer of concern within a 3-mile radius of the site.
It is difficult to estimate the population served by groundwater on St. Thomas, as there are
few records available on groundwater withdrawal, sale, and transport. The locations of some
wells in St. Thomas are unknown, and there are reports of illegal drilling on the island, it is
estimated that there are 500 to 600 private wells on St. Thomas. Most of these are used for
nondrinking domestic uses such as washing and flushing, although some may be used for
i 
drinking. There are a number of'wells that are used for commercial purposes. Water from
» 
these wells is trucked to private houses and pumped into cisterns to augment the rainwater
collected from roofs Groundwater is also bottled and sold in supermarkets
02-8902-43-PA
• 
Rev No 
1
There are at least 41 wells in the Turpentine Run Basm. Recently 16 of these wells have been
ordered closed because they were found to be contaminated with volatile organic
compounds. One of these wells was a major supplier of water to the eastern end of the island
Estimates of the population using groundwater as a source of drinking water range from none
to approximately 11,000-the population of the Turpentine Run Basin which is not served by
water from the desalinization plant. The actual population served by groundwater is
probably less than 11,000, as desalinated water and water from wells outside the 3-mile radius
is trucked into the area.
Ref. Nos. 8, 12, 13, 16. 17
>. 
•
SURFACE WATER ROUTE
10. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to surface water as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility.
No potential exists for wastes to the released to surface water. 
Waste oil is stored in an
underground storage tank. The tank is located under the garage, and no incidents of leaks or
spills have been reported.
Ref. No. 1
11. 
Identify and locate the nearest downslope surface water. If possible, include a description of
. 
possible surface drainage patterns from the site.
I 
^"^ 
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water
Ref. No. 1
I
12. 
What is the facility slope in percent? (Facility slope is measured from the highest point of
(
deposited hazardous waste to the most downhill point of the waste area or to where
contamination is detected.)
Not applicable Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water.
' 
Ref No. 1
13. 
What is the slope of the intervening terrain in percent? (Intervening terrain slope is
measured from the most downhill point of the waste area to the probable point of entry to
surface water.)
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water
Ref. No. 1
' 
14. 
What is the 1-year 24-hour rainfall?
Not applicable Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water
I 
Ref. No. 1
I
15. 
What is the distance to the nearest downslope surface water? Measure the distance along a
course that runoff can be expected to follow.
• 
Not applicable Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water
Ref. No 1
8 cr/€ 
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No i
16. 
Identify uses of surface waters within 3 miles downstream of the site (i.e.. drinking.
(
irrigation, recreation, commercial, industrial, not used).
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water.
Ref. No. 1
17. 
Describe any wetlands, greater than 5 acres in area, within 2 miles downstream of the site.
Include whether it is a freshwater or coastal wetland.
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water .
Ref. No. 1
18. 
Describe any critical habitats of federally listed endangered species within 2 miles of the site
along the migration path.
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water.
Ref. No 1
19. 
What is the distance to the nearest sensitive environment along or contiguous to the
migration path (if any exist within 2 miles)?
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water.
Ref. No. 1
20. 
Identify the population served or acres of food crops irrigated by surface water intakes
within 3 miles downstream of the site and the distance to the intake(s).
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water
Ref. No. 1
21. 
What is the state water quality classification of the water body of concern?
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water.
Ref. No. 1
22. 
Describe any apparent biota contamination that is attributable to the site.
Not applicable. Containment of the waste unit precludes any release to surface water.
Ref. No. 1
AIR ROUTE
23. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the air as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, none. Identify the contaminants) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminant(s) to the facility.
There is a potential for contaminants to be released to the air. Waste oil is contained in
underground storage tanks There are no reports of any spills, and the wastes are not known
to contain volatile compounds, however, volatile compounds have been detected in soil gas
vapor screening surveys
Ref Nos 1,22
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No 1
24. 
What is the population within a 4-mile radius of the site?
Based on the 1980 census, the population within 4 miles of the site is approximately 36,000
Ref. No. 15
FIRE AND EXPLOSION
25. 
Describe the potential for a fire or explosion to occur with respect to the hazardous
substance(s) known or suspected to be present on site. Identify the hazardous substance(s)
and the method of storage or containment associated with each.
Wastes on site are stored m an underground storage tank; however, due to their volatile
nature, there is a potential for fire or explosion conditions present on the site.
Ref. Nos. 1,22
26. 
What is the population within a 2-mile radius of the hazardous substance(s) at the facility?
Based on the 1980 census, the population within 2 miles of the site is approximately 19,000.
Ref. No. 15
DIRECT CONTACT/ON-SITE EXPOSURE
27. 
Describe the potential for direct contact with hazardous substance(s) stored in any of the
waste units on site or deposited in on-site soils. Identify the hazardous substances) and the
accessibility of the waste unit.
There is no potential for direct contact with hazardous substances. The waste is stored in an
underground storage tank under a garage. The area of the storage tank is accessible only to
workers.
Ref. No. 1
28. 
How many residents live on a property whose boundaries encompass any part of an area
contaminated by the site?
There is no evidence that any residential areas have been contaminated by the site.
Ref. No. 1
29. 
What is the population within a 1-mile radius of the site?
Based on 1980 census data, the population within 1 mile of the site is approximately 11,000.
Ref. No. 15
TUT 
OO1 
O867
02-8902-43-PA
Rev. No. 1
PART IV: 
SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Tutu Esso is an automotive service station located in the Tutu area of St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
The primary activities at the site are gasoline sales and automotive repair and maintenance. The
area within approximately 1 mile of the site is densely populated and contains some commercial
properties. The Four Winds Plaza shopping center is located just west of the site. There are large
housing developments northwest, north, and east of the site. Beyond 1 mile, there are scattered
smaller villages and towns. The densely populated and highly commercial town of Charlotte Amalie
is located approximately 2.5 miles west of the site.
Waste oil at the Tutu Esso gas station is contained in underground tanks. The tanks reportedly hold
only waste oil which is periodically disposed of by Esso Corporation. There is no direct evidence that
the tanks are unsound or that there were any spills or releases to the environment. Based on the
waste containment, there is no potential for contamination of surface waters or air, and there is no
potential for fire and explosion or exposure by direct contact. However, results of soil gas vapor
sampling in the vicinity of the site indicate the presence of chlorinated hydrocarbons at two
locations. Although, chlorinated hydrocarbons are not known to be associated with wastes on the
site, the soil gas vapor study results indicate that the facility may be a source of these contaminants.
On the basis of the above information, a recommendation of MEDIUM PRIORITY is provided.
There were no known enforcement actions taken against Tutu Esso in the past. However, the
owners of the Tutu Esso Site have been identified as one of nine potentially responsible parties in the
contamination of groundwater in the Tutu area. In July and August of 1987, ERA confirmed by
sampling that volatile organic compounds were present in a number of wells in the Tutu area. One
of the wells was a major source of commercially provided potable water for the eastern end of the
island. Additional sampling of wastes on site indicated the presence of toluene, ethylbenzene, and
xylene; however, these results are suspect due to problems with regard to chain-of-custody integrity.
ERA removal action activities in the Tutu area included sampling of wells and cisterns, removal of
contaminated water from cisterns, cleaning of cisterns, and supplying of clean water on a regular
basis to affected residents.
Additional sampling procedures are recommended to ascertain the extent, if any, of contamination
associated with this site.
TIJT 
001 
0368
ATTACHMENT A
PKFS AND PHOTOS
TUT 
OO1 0869
*No Photos were taken as the waste unit was below ground.
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No i
I 
TUTU ESSO
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
CONTENTS
|.
,. 
Figure 1: 
Site Location Map
TUT' 
OOl 
O870
C2-8902-43-PA
Rev. No. 1
unn
i 
-v*^</ 
* ^"~"/
M: WSi-
Erydendah •' '.JJ^T/X*'-' *
'.WIntberg _l^.._•.-•.
• «.- .Wntberg ^.-^J^Ssa^^ •-, - , « - ^ . _ pH.-.-'.v'.-S^'
-^^'-^^^^JS^^r^^^^ai
^-;'^"^ ^^^f^;im^
s 
^ ^ 
'^/l-^^feB^il-^x-V !N ^^^i
-'^-•''•-•->. • 1?t^|v^N..^^
j ., **?>'f••'+£;£*
^^, 
c- ~~. --s^1^ ii -. . ^s-'-vT-^r:>i
>h E W
__ 
TUTU ESSO
^T-^ SERVICE STATION
• •»•"
^ ^*"^J^
r-.3=7.^:.
i.. 
^^T*".T^»-
iphurre
.joe
+*m
1-. •
->>
,'U4
J?'i.4.."
|^^^^^'=^l^fe^^^^^
. 
.
' '. ''. '••;. I>g.» i .'.»• '••"—i'*-*^ ~
(QUAD) EASTERN ST. THOMAS, V.I.
SITE LOCATION MAP
TUTU ESSO SERVICE STATION
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE 1
MUS
_ CORRDRXXT1OSJ
ATTACWCNT B
REFERENCES
I
I
fUT 
001 
087
I
-"" 
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No. 1
REFERENCES
1 
Field Notebook No. 0398, U.S. Virgin Islands Drum Reconnaissance, TOO No. 02-8902-29, NUS
Corp. Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, February 14 to 17, 1989.
2. 
U.S. Department of the interior. Geological Survey Topographic Maps, 75 minute series,
"Central St. Thomas, Virgin Islands and Eastern St. Thomas, Virgin Islands Quadrangle" 1955,
revised 1982.
3. 
Gomez-Gomez, F and J.E. Heisel. 
Summary Appraisals of the Nation's Groundwater
Resources-Caribbean Region. Geological Survey Professional Paper 813-4, 1980.
4. 
Stone, R.G. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, Volume XIX - Part 1.
Meteorology of the Virgin Islands. 1942.
5. 
Climate of Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands, Climatography of the United States No. 60, June
1982.
6. 
Tutu Well Site Potable Water Alternatives Report, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
islands. Prepared for US. EPA Region 2 By Region 2 Technical Assistance Team, Western/SPER
Division, December 1989.
7. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Nancy Schlater, EPA, and Diane Trube, NUS Corp.. Re:
Sole source aquifer in VI. March 3, 1989.
8. 
Graves, R.P. and R. Gonzalez. Potentiometric surface of the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer in
the Tutu Area, Eastern St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, September 11, 1987. U.S. Geological
Survey Water Resource Investigations Report 88-4131, 1988.
9 
Uncontrolled hazardous waste site ranking system, A user's manual, 40 CFR, Part 300,
Appendix A, 1986.
10. 
Donnelly, T.W., Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, In Caribbean
Geological Investigations, Geological Society of America, Memoir 98. ed. H. H. Hess, 1966
11. 
Climatological Data Annual Summary, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, 1987.
12. 
Torres-Sierra, H. and R. Dacosta, Estimated Water Use in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, July
1983 to June 1984. Caribbean Research Institute, Technical Report No. 21.
13. 
Memo to Stephen D. Luftig, EPA, from Carlos O'Neill, EPA. Authorization of CERCLA Removal
Action Monies for the Tutu Well Site. January 6, 1988.
.^
14. 
Jordan, D.G. and 0 J. Cosner, A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands,
U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 1973.
15. 
Water Management Plan for the Public Water System, Prepared for the Government of the
Virgin Islands by CH2M HILL July 1983.
TUT 
001 
O873
02-8902-43-PA
Rev No 1
REFERENCES(cont'd)
16 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Fernando Gomez, USGS, and Rich Feinberg, NUS Corp
on 3/11/89 at 1045 hours. Re: Hydrology and groundwater use in St. Thomas.
17. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between D. Goetz of Polycanbe and 0 Trube, NUS Corp., on
3/14/89 at 1430 hours. Re: Wells and water use on St. Thomas.
18. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between L. Reed, DPNR, and D Trube, NUS Corp. on 3/3/89 at
1640 hours. Re: Permits for site on St. Thomas.
19. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between T. Gutshall, Tutu Esso Manager, and J. Mayo, NUS Corp.,
on 3/15/89 1510 hours. RE: Background information for Tutu Esso.
20. 
Record of Communication, telephone conversation between Leonard Reid.DPNR, and A.
Brochu, U.S. EPA Region 2, Jan. 30, 1989, 1400 hours.
21 
Tutu Wellfield Area Sample Analysis Data Summary, Tutu Esso Service Station, St. Thomas, U.S.
Virgin Islands. Prepared for US. EPA Region 2 by Cenref Labs, COM, Federal Programs
Corporation, March 6, 1989
22. 
Esso Tutu Service Station Soil Gas Vapor Screening Survey Report, St. Thomas, US. Virgin
Islands. Prepared for Esso Standard Oil S.A. LTD, by Belgodere and Associates Inc., August
1988
TUT 
001 
OS74
I
I
, 
, >„
[ 
REFERENCE NO. 19
I
Iri
i
i
i
i
i
i
OO1 
0875
IIII
[ 
REFERENCE NO. 20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I\
I ~
TUT 
OO1 
0876
ESSO STANDARD OIL S. A. LIMITED
(PUERTO RICO)
Q.P.O. Ban 4269 • San Ju«n. P.R. 00936 • 4269
F
February 22, 1988
CDM-FPC, NYC.
Ms. Francine Lang
Director Department of Planning
and Natural Resources
Altona and Welgunst No. 179
St. Thomas, USVI 
00802
Re* Esso Tutu Service Station
U. S. Virgin Islands
Dear Ms. Lang:
Esso Standard Oil S. A. Limited (Esso), submits herewith
its amended work plan for the Esso Service Station located at
Road 38, in the Tutu neighborhood of St. Thomas, U. S. Virgin
Islands, pursuant to the first amended order issued by Hon. Alan
D. Smith, dated September 17, 1987.
As you can note that the date of project initiation is
April 4, 1988. Please let us know the date and time for the
start-up meeting.
• 
••
If you have any question and/or comments in relation to
this matter, do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Sincerely yours,
Ana Gloria Ramos, P. E.
Environmental Coordinator
AGR/mpt/0813O
pc* Ms. Caroline Kwan, Eng. (EPA-New York)
Mr. Andrew Praschack, Esq. (EPA-Caribbean Field Office)
Mr. Jose Font, Eng. (EPA Caribbean Field Office)
Mr. Scott Graber - CDM - FPC
Mr. Gregory Rhymer - DPNR - USVI
TUT
OO1 
OS77
TcMfono (809) 792-2920
TMw 385-7033
Cabin FSSOTAP
•
_^ - ^ .^v. 
Second Revision
,_ 
Jan. 11,
CDM-FPC, N fC
ESSO TUTU SERVICE STATION
SOIL VAPOR INVESTIGATION PLAN
Prepared for:
Department of Planning & Natural Resources, USVI.
Environmental Protection "Agency - Region II, N.Y.
December 28, 1987
Submitted by
Esso Standard Oil S.Ai Ltd.
(LtL
Car 1 os M. tselgotiere, belgodere & Associates Inc.
Project Coordinator.
TUT 
001 
O878
I
Ana Gloria Ramos, P.E., ESSO Standard Oil SA LTD.
Project Manager
I 
Anended on February 22, 1988
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
l.O 
Introduction .............................................. j.
I 
1.1 Background. .......................................... i
1.2 
Hydrogeologic Setting
1.3 Purpose and Methodology of Soil Vapor Investigation.. 3
2.0 Statement of Work ......................................... 6
3.0 Technical Approach. .......................................7
3.1 Task 01 Site History ................................. 9
3.2 Task 02 Work Plan Development ........................ 11
3.3 Task 03 Management and Coordination. ................. 11
3.4 Task 04 Preliminary Site Investigation. ............. .12
3.5 Task 05 Preparation of QA/QC Plan. ................... 13
3.6 Task 06 Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis. ............. .13
*
3.7 Task 07 Data Analysis and Interpretation. ............ 19
3.8 Task OS Preparation of Technical Report. ............. 19
3.9 Task 09 Quality Assurance and Quality Control ....... .20
4.0 Performance Schedule and Schedule of Deliverables. ....... .20
LIST OF FIGURES
t-igure 1.3.1 
Illustration Showing Subsurface Vapor and
Hydrocarbons Resulting from a Product Release. 4
Figure 3.6.1 
Soil Vapor Extraction Procedure. ............. .15
Figure 3.6.2 (a) Phase I Soil Gas Sampling Point Locations. .... 17
TUT OO1 O879
Fiqure 3.6.2 (b) Phase I ft II Soil Vapor Sampling Pcints
Location......................................iB
Figure 4.0.1 
Site Investigation Schedule...................21
Fiaure 4.0.2 
Deliverable Schedule..........................22
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A 
Resumes of Staff for Esso Service Station
Soil Vapor Study Survey
Appendix B 
Petro-Tite tank results
ii
TUT 
001 O
1.0 Description of Work
1.1 Background
A number of water wells have been shut down by the Depart-
ment of Planning and Natural Resources of the USVI (DFNR) and the
Environmental Protection Agency Region II, New York (EF'A) as a
result of reported ground water contamination in the Tutu area of
St. Thomas, USVI. DPNR/EPA believe that among the possible
sources of hydrocarbon contamination found in the ground water
may be one or more of the various gasoline service stations which
operate or had operated in the Tutu area. Esso Standard Oil S. A.
Ltd. (ESSO) is the owner of the gasoline service station located
in the Four Winds Shopping Center at the Tutu Area of St. Thomas.
In consideration thereof, DF'NR has ordered ESSO to submit an
I 
investigation plan to assess the potential seepage of product
I 
into the underlying soil of the above referred Service Station.
ESSO 
has requested Belgodere & Associates Inc. (BAI) 
to
perform the above mentioned investigation ordered by DPNR.
Pursuant to DPNR Administrative Order of September 17, 1987, the
plan 
contained 
herein has been developed to 
effectively
characterize the contaminants, if any, at the soils beneath the
i
Service Station.
I 
1 he study will encompass an assessment of the possibility of
motor fuel releases from underground storage tanks/pipelines and
I 
potential migration pathways at the Esso Service Station by
. 
performing a soil vapor survey. If as a result of the soil vapor
investigation it is determined that the Esso Service Station is
| 
not the source nor has contributed to the contamination of the
TUT OO.1 O881
local aquifers, adequate releases in agreement with DPNR/EPA will
be sought by Esso Standard Oil 5.A. Ltd.
ESSO. and BAI Representatives have met with EPA Project
Manager, Ms. Caroline K.wan, DPNR Representative, Ms. Francine
Lang, and the Project Officer at Camp, Dresser 6 Mckee Federal
l-rograms Corporation (CDM-FPC) Mr. Scott b. Graber. DPNR, EPA,
and 
CDM-FPC have discussed the principles for the technical
approach and work schedule presented in this Work Plan. 
It is
our understanding that all parties are in agreement with the
concepts and schedule presented herein.
1.2 Hydrogeologic Setting
The Esso Service Station is located in St. Thomas U.S.V.I.,
on 
the- West Side of Rd #38 in the Tutu area, at the Four Winds
Shopping Center Parking Lot.
According to information obtained from "Soil Survey Virgin
Islands of the US, 1970 Soil Conservation Service Report", issued
in August 1970, the area is described as a network of terraces
and alluvial fans sloping gently to moderately toward the south.
Soil deposits consist of stratified sands, gravels and clays with
a permeability of 0.20 to 0.63 in./hr. 
Soil strata thickness
around site location varies from bare rock on slope side of hills
-^
to over 2O ft. on alluvial deposits.
Based on topographic and structural information obtained
from "Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands" by
Thomas W. Donnelly (NSF, 
B-1144O7) the local water table should
generally slope to the south. Direction of local ground water
flow is controlled by volcanic bedrock fractures underlying the
2 
• 
TUT 001 0882
v-' 
Based on discussion with local water well drillers 
(F'oly
Caribe) depth, of ground water at the Four 
Winds 
Shopping
Center well, located 25 ft. north of the Service Station and the
Tillett Water well, located 250 ft. north east, is reported to
be 
between 
15 ana 
20 ft. during the rainy seasons where
water table is high and pumping of commercial and residential
water wells is low. The local aquifer water table has been
previously observed beyond BO ft. as a result of high water
extraction during extended drought periods.
1.3 Purpose and Methodology of Soil Vapor Survey.
The purpose of the proposed soil vapor survey is to
determine 
whether there has been a leak or a spill from the
^^ 
Service Station underground storage tanks and/or pipelines that
may have contributed to the local aquifer contamination and, if
leaks and/or spills from the Service Station are identified, to
determine their areal extent.
In theory, when an underground motor fuel tank or pipeline
experience 
mechanical 
integrity 
failure 
and 
release
occurs, hydrocarbons are expected to move downward in 
the
direction of the water table and then carried in the upper part
j 
of the shallowest aquifer in the direction of ground water flow,
therefore, contaminating soils along its pathway due to capillary
' 
action of soil matrix (figure 1.3.1). boils containing motor fuel
, 
components will yield 
when analyzed high values of 
total
hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, ethyl—benzene and xylenes when
| >""' 
soil vapor is extracted from soils stratas underneath and around
TUT 001 0883
So3 Containing
Residual Product
Vapor Movement from zones of soil and
ground water containing hydrocarbons
SCHEMATIC ILLUSTRATION SHOWING SUBSURFACE VAPOR AND
HYDROCARBONS RESULTING FROM A PRODUCT RELEASE
(Adapted From: Underground Storage Tank Corrective
Action Technologies.EPA/625/6-87-015. January 1987)
Figure 1.3.1
TUT 
CC\
? " 
suspected 
point 
sources. 
Relatively 
high 
hydrocarbon
. 
concentration in soil vapor from the zone above the hydrocarbon
plume 
will often allow for efficient mapping of plume origin and
| 
extend by systematically obtaining soil vapor samples 
and
analyzing them for hydrocarbons content.
The 
proposed soil vapor extraction and analysis to be
performed in the Esso Service Station area will:
o 
Detect the presence, if any, of total hydrocarbons,
benzene, 
toluene, 
ethyl-benzene, 
xylenes,
trichloroethylene, 
tetrachloroethylene, 
and
dichlcrcethylene con ^animation in soils.
o 
If contamination in soils is present, it will identify
and define its nature and extent.
""•^ 
Soil vapor contaminant investigation refers to a method
*
revived by Thomas M. Spittler (EPA Region I Laboratory) from the
Oil and Gas Exploration Industry for investigating underground
contamination by means of detecting organic vapors. The method
involves pumping a small amount of soil vapor out of the ground
through a hollow probe driven to a desired depth and analyzing
the vapor for the presence of volatile contaminants. The soil
vapor analysis is performed in the field so that samples do not
have to be packed or shipped also, analytical results are availa-
ble immediately and can be used to help direct the investigation.
j 
The investigation is usually carried out by analyzing soil vapors
in 50'-100' center trancets across the suspected contaminated
area 
until boundaries are well defined. The 
Soil 
Vapor
i ^-^ 
Investigation Plan has been prepared in consonance with "Spittler
TUT 00.1 0884
.Method". Please refer to section 2.3 of the QA/QC Plan for
I
description of the Sampling Network Design and Rationale.
| 
2.0 Statement of Work
In order to determine the range, and spatial distribution of
motor fuel 
that may oe present in the soil at the Esso Tutu
I 
Service Station, ESSO will implement a two-phase approach which
includes the following:
Phase I
The 
first phast. 
,-viii consist of soil vapor sampling and
analysis on a. grid encompassing the Esso Service Station property
to determine the presence, if any, of motor fuel contamination in
I 
the underlying soils. An extension of Phase I sampling grid will
be carried out beyond the Esso Service-Station boundaries to
I 
determine, if any, the nature of the hydrocarbon plume.
I 
Phase n.
This phase of the investigation will be conducted only if
I
' 
significant hydrocarbon concentrations are found at and around
the Tutu station during Phase I. 
Significant hydrocarbon
t
concentrations will be considered to exist if any of the samples
I 
taken exceeds those found in background locations in a factor of
three or more.
Additional locations may be sampled based on field judgement
and the results of phase I.
The soil vapor sampling program will be terminated at the
end of Phase I if it is determined in agreement with USEPA and
j 
'iUT 
C01 
OtJBS
^ 
Department of Planning and Natural Resources(DPNR) that there is
no evidence of motor fuel at the soils underneath the Service
Station, or at the end of Phase II if it is determined that motor
fuel contamination found on site inmigrated from other sources
outside the Eeso Service Station property.
The work which ESSO proposes to perform is described in
Section 3 of this work Plan. The results of Phase I will trigger
and influence the need for the other phases of this investigation.
3.0 Technical Approach
The technical approach for this project has been developed
with 
licnificant 
input 
from EPA and CDM-FPC and various site
visits performed by ESSO and BAI Representatives during the
v_^ September-December 1987 period. The proposed study is divided
into various tasks in order to provide check paints at wnich
I 
progress 'and findings will 
be examined. therefore, allowing
| 
flexibility 
for 
field 
decisions 
as 
to 
necessity 
for
implementation of subsequent task phases.
The technical approach has been divided into nine tasks.
Through these tasks a Work Plan has been developed to conduct a
soil vapor sampling grid. Soil vapor samples will be analyzed on
; 
-?. t-.e for the following parameters:
o 
Total Hydrocarbons
o 
Benzene
I 
o 
Toluene
o 
Ethyl-benzene
i 
o 
Xylene
7 
TljT 001 0886
a 
Tnchloroethy lene
I 
D 
Tetrachloroethylene
Q 
Dichloroethylene
I
I 
The three chlorinated hydrocarbon compounds, although not
typically 
found on motor fuels, will 
be analyzed 
following
I 
suugesLions from DPNR and EPA. Based 
on results from previous
i 
phases of the program, further soil vapor samples and analysis
for the same parameters may be conducted as needed. 
A final
report will be prepared describing and illustrating the results
of the study.
I
i 
The tasks to 
be performed under the Work Plan do not
encompass 
permit 
requirements 
under . federal 
and 
local
«
I 
environmental 
laws and regulations. There are 
no requirements
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
i 
viability Act (CERCLA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Ac.- 
(RCRA), or any other environmental law o regulation, either
federal or local, applicable to the endeavors covered under the
Work Plan.
Occupational Safety and Health Standards found in 29 CFR
I 
1010 are aopl icable to this project. 
The? Health and Safety Plan
submitted herewith addresses the minimum safety procedures that
will be followed during the performance of all the tasks involved
001 0887
*— 
in this Work Plan. The nine tasks are presented below:
Task 01 
Site History (completed)
Task O2 
Work Plan Development (completed)
Task 03 
Management Coordination (on going)
Task 04 
Preliminary Site Investigation (completed)
f<=>.=4 05 
Duality Assurance Project Plan Preparation
(completed)
Task O6 
Soil Vapor Sampling and Analysis
Task 07 
Data Analysis and Interpretation
Tc;Ek OS 
Preparation of Illustrations and Technical Report
Task 09 
Duality Assurance/Quality Control
To succesfully carry out this Work Plan within the estimated
^~^ 
scheduled time frame, the Esso Project Manager, the BAI Project
*
Officer, and DPNR/EPA designated Field Representatives will
maintain the necessary communication to assure that efforts are
coordinated and each task is completed according to the Work
Plan. 
Any necessary field changes or corrections in strategies
will 
be examined carefully, 
and 
will 
be documented 
and
coordinated 
with 
ESSO 
and approved 
by 
DPNR/EPA 
Field
Representatives.
3.J. 
Task Oi Site History
I 
1 he Esso Service Station located at the parking lot of 
the
Four Winds Shopping Center, Road 38 in the Tutu neighborhood of
I 
Sit. 
Thomas, U.S. 
Virgin Islands, initiated operations during
197O. 
The Service Station is equipped with two (2) underground
f 
fuel storage tanks of 6,000 gallon each. The Service Station, as
TUT 001 
0838
-•£ii -.=: -:ne rcrresssrv equipr = -:t *-!O e r. K'-:'" t-?-,ance= ^or its 
cn=ra-
tion, such as the underground tanks and the gasoline pumps. are
owned 
by Esso Standard Oil S.A. Limited, a Bahama corporation
organized under the laws of Bahamas.
Mr. Robert Duns, the Service Station first dealer, operated
the station from 1970 through 1971, when Mr. Daniel Bayard toot
over its operation as Esso's new dealer and lessee. 
Daniel D.
Bayard, Jr., the service station current dealer, assumed 
full
iiianaoe.Tierit responsibility of the Esso Service Station in March
1976 when his father, the previous dealer, went into retirement.
Of the maintenance activities that have been conducted at
the 
Service Station throughout the years, 
only two (2),
the replacement of piping and an integrity test, may have a
bearing on the project.
*
The 2" pipes connecting the dispensing units to 
the
underground storage tanks were replaced 
from galvanized to
tiberglass during 1VB5-1987. 
The replacement job was conducted
by Mr. Eugenio de Arce, Esso's St. Thomas maintenance contractor.
One of the two underground storage tanks was emptied and
removed 
from service on July 27, 1987, after the results of a
Petro-Tite 
tank 
test performed by Roque Schmidt Corp.(see
appendix B for test results) caused Esso to question the
j 
structural integrity of the tank. 
The tank has remained empty
ever since, pursuant to an order issued by the Department of
i 
Planning and Natural Resources of the U.S. Virgin Islands dated
August 21, 1987. A physical examination of the tank has been
i
TUT 001 0889
10
V- 
-..".£ si e to De performec pending DPNR authorization.
| 
3.2 Task 02 Work Plan Development
"i t-.e proposed Work Plan has been developed from:
I
o 
tenes of meetings between ESSO and BAI Representatives
I 
at 
the 
site to evaluate physical condition 
that may
restrain the technical approach.
i
I
o 
f-1«?t'i:ing.s and telephone conversations between ESSO, BAI,
DPNR, EPA, and CDM-FPC personnel to establish the basic
guidelines and objectives for the proposed study.
The deliverable for Task Ol is this Work Plan. The WorK Plan
!
I
j 
may be adjusted 
as appropriate at the end of each phase with
I
cocurrence and approval by DPNR and EPA pending its outcome.
~
3.3 Task 03 Management and Coordination
I 
The BAI Project Officer will coordinate the technical e;:ecu-
I 
tion of work tasks described on this Work Plan. The overall
Prrject Management will be performed by Esso Project Manager.
The following is a list of activities to be performed under
this task:
o 
Provide assurance that team staff and resources are
provided so that each task is completed on schedule,
o 
initiate 
approved chances to the Work 
Plan 
as
j 
necessary,
o 
ensure that Quality Lcntrol and Quality Assurance
» 
measures are monitored and implemented.
>~"' 
o 
provide assurance that field personnel will adhere to
i
Health and Safety Plan.
IU1 
COI OS9O
11
3.4 Task 04 Preliminary Site Investigation
A 
preliminary site investigation has been performed during
the months of September tnru December 1987 to allow for optimisa-
tion of resources during son vapor extraction and testing opera-
tion 
by identifying in advance the limitation imposed 
by 
local
conditions, le. topographic, geologic, construction, structures.
This work plan is partially based on site specific requirements
based on the results of the preliminary site investigation, as
f ol lows :
o 
The area is mostly covered with concrete or asphalt and
fill material above rocky soil which may limit the soil
probe depth of penetration .
o 
Establishment of the sampling grid is affected by
numerous existing structures. , 'Offset of grid points
may be necessary to provide areal coverage. 
Sampling
grid may be extended based on field judgment.
o 
Access 
authorisation from 
third parties will 
be
required to establish sampling points outside the
Service Station, if necessary.
TUT 001 0891
12
3.5 
Task O5 Preparation of Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Plan
The attached QA/QC Plan is a documentary record 
detailing
the sampling methodology, OA/QC procedures, data presentation and
evaluation techniques to be followed during the field data
collection, analysis and report preparation phases of this Work
Plo.n. The QA/QC is 
Daseci on the requirements outlined 
in the
interim guidelines and specifications for preparing Quality
Assurance 
Project 
Plans 
EPA-60O/4-83-004, 
February 1983
publication.
3.6 
Soil Vapor Sampling and Analysis
The proposed soil vapor sampling and analysis program
consists of a two-phase approach were the need for subsequent
work 
i-'i 11 ba established by the results* of phase 1 and 
field
j udgment.
Soil 
vapor samples will be collected by driving a 5/8 
inch
diameter hollow stainless steel probe to the appropriate depth by
hand or with a pneumatic driver. 
After desired depth is
achieved, 5 to 10 liters of soil vapor from around the shield
point 
will be extracted with the use of a 500cc/min battery
operated vacuum 
pump attached to the probe with a. vacuum g^uge
and a septum sampling port via a teflon hose. 
A gas 
tight
syringe will be inserted through the septum port to collect a 2
•TIT croqrams to 1O milliliters vapor sample for immediate on site
analysis (see figure 3.6.1).
TUT 001 089:
13
During all phases of work, soil vapor samples will be
analyzed 
using gas chromatographs owned and operated 
by BAI
(See 
section t> and 7 of AU/OC Plan). Two gas chromatographs
equipped with flame ionisation detectors (FID) will be used to
identify 
total hydrocarbons and chlorinated 
hydrocarbons.
Analysis to be made at each sample point will consist of:
o 
Total hydrocarbons
o 
Benzene
o 
Toluene
o 
Ethyl-Benzene
o 
Xylene
o 
Trichloroethylene
«
p 
Tetrachloroethylene
o 
Dichloroethylene
The two proposed phases of work to be conducted at the
Esso Service Station area are as follows:
Phase I
Phase I consists of soil vapor sampling on the Fsso Service
Station property. Sampling points will be spaced in a grid
14
V
'SCRECN
WIELD POINT
WELL POINT SAMPLING
rIGURE 3,6,1
SOIL VAPDR
SAMPLING PROCEDURE
BELGDDERE I ASSOCIATED
ENVJPOtUOUAL-ffD CONSUL UNr?
!0 
TOO ini
pattern approximately bu ft centers (figures 3.6.2 a, a.
Additionally, at least two background sample points based on
field judgement 
will be taken upgradaent or downgradient. ^
natural drift point should be established 
based on fielo
judgement 
to note any sianificant change in soil vapor values or.
a day to day basis.
The- second phase of this investigation will be conducted 
if
the 
following criteria is met during the first 
phase:
o 
values of hydrocarbons detected on the station property
exceed those found in background locations by a factor
of three or more, or based on field judgement.
If Phase 
II is required. Phase II will extend 
the grid
pattern on a 50, 100, or 200 ft. center as.considered appropriate
to determine if hydrocarbon contamination generated at the site
or inmigra.tea from other sources. 
Intermediate points in the
grid 
will be established as necessary for adequated plume
definition based on field judgement.
Phase II
If soil contamination is found to have orginated at the
Service Station, a further extension of the sampling grid will be
in
4->
.
£ 
==
o 
2T
d.
^
K
s.
o
rt 1 ~
"-* c.- 
Y 
VJ
i si 
\ 
g:
-^— 
_- *• 
\ 
^^
i i C £ 
\
tt £5 
\
L"-1 ^
-J <
<
<
SHOPPING CENTER
<
.<
r
-.
— — i
UJ
2 
1
«* '
*0
<
i
3
^N
«
1
. SHOPPING CENTER
i
•4
H
UJ
LJ
Lu
••
<]
/
3
<I
d
<3-
•
IS
•
«
(MSOLIFC
9I$PCNSER5
IEI
O
•
£ f
M
* 5
^
<
4
<
•
^
:
f
3
d
<3
PARKING LDT
J 
' 
<i
^
<!
00
00
.
a
21 <i
5 
o
> 
<r
C 
^*4—
8 a
QL'
<
<
^ 1
LJ
1-£g^
ton«
•B
£u
a
Ca
_j
LJ
ffl
E
>—
<
f»i
>-i
g
o
§
£
UJ$
1
4*J
C
>— i
gi
*-
Q
& t/j
u u
u o
t~- 
•
• a
» 
<r
a >
LJ
t^ _l
ft
gS
M «
LU' LJ
Mi
ca
sD
ro
LJ
or3
t~+
L_
NORTH
100
800
FEET
A Phase I
D Phase II
FIGURE 3.6.2 <b>
ESSO SERVICE STATION
PHASE I II SOIL VAPOR SAMPLING GRID
BCLGDDERE & ASSOCIATES
ENVlPONNENTAL-GCn CONSULTANTS
carried 
cut to 
define the areal extent of 
motor 
fuel
contamination plume in soils above, ground water.
The soil 
vapor sampling program 
will 
be terminatec 
in
<?g reamer, t with 
DFNK 
end UBEFA at the end of f-'nase I if 
it 
is
determined that there is no evidence of motor fuel at the soils
underneath the Service Station, or at the end of Phase 11 if it
is determined 
that motor fuel contamination found on site
inmigrated 
from other sources outside the Esso Service Station
property.
3./ Task O7 Data Analysis and Interpretation
Oats 
analysis 
and interpretation will 
De 
performed
^simultaneously with the field work to allow changes in field work
to properly orientate, extend or reduce the sampling grid based
.upon results of previously sampling and "analysis. Initial data
reduction and 
mapping of soil vapor concentration 
will 
be
performed at BAI, St.Thomas office.
3.8 Task O8 Preparations and Illustrations of Technical Report
After completion of the site investigation described under
task 03 through 07, BAI will prepare a final report discussing
the results of the investigation. The final report will include,
.=•.£ c-. minimum, a tabular presents cion of the soil vapor analysis
values encountered during the course of the investigation (ie.
\
total hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene, ethyl-benzene, xylenes,
trichloroethylene, 
tetrachloroethylene, and dichloroethylene)
-•^
illustrating the spacial orientation of measured values.
19
Specific items to be included in the report are:
o 
Base map showing distribution of soil vapor sampling
paints:
o 
contour 
maps of hydrocarbon values to 
delineate
4
hydrocarbon plumes and possible trajectory;
o 
tables 
listing all soil vapor 
hydrocarbon values
encountered during the course of this investigation;
o 
maps showing relationship cf hydrocarbons values in
soil vapors to estimate ground water flow direction on
local geology;
c 
uC Chromatograms;
c 
conclusions and recommendations.
3.9 Task 09 Quality Assurance and Quality Control
QA Officer for this project, Eng. Omar Munir has reviewed
this work plan for QA requirements and will maintain QA oversight
through the duration of this project. 
BAI work on 
this
assignment will be conducted in accordance with project specific
QA/QC which is being submitted with this Work Plan.
4.0 
Performance Schedule and Schedule of Deliverable
A site investigation plan schedule is shown in figure 4.0.1
*r<* the deliverable date schedule is included o~ figure 4.0.2.
The project schedule depends upon initiation of field work
on April 4, 1988. Approval of the Work Plan and Quality
Assurance, Quality Control Plan one week before that date will be
necessary to assure timely completion of the project.
TUT 001
Ficure 4.0.1
SITE INVESTIGATION SCHEDULE
Work Plan Development..................Dec. 2 to Dec. 28, 1987
Review Approval ........................Jan. 25 to Feb. 1, 198S
^
Soil Vapor/Field Investigation........... Apr. 4 to May 4, 1988
*
Data Evaluation..........................May 4 to May 18, 1988
Final Report............................ May 15 to Jun. 1, 1?SS
TUT 001
Figure 4.0.2
DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE
Project
Deliverable
1. Work Plan
2. QA/QC
Initial
Te::t to
DPNR/EPA
12/28/87
12/28/87
3. Health *< Safety
Plan 
12/28/87
4. Final Report
fe/OI/88
Receipt of
Technical
Comments
1/25/88
1/25/88
1/25/88
N/A
Final
2/1/88
2/1/88
2/1/88
N/A
II
1
3
I
j 
REFERENCE NO. 22
I
I
I
1
i
I
1
I
. 
IUJ 
OO1 
0902
I
I N D E X
Property >
Address
Telephone
633
This Book is manufactured of a High Grade
50% Rag Paper having a Water Resisting Surface,
and is sewed with Nylon Waterproof Thread.
;.?fia
&fe
t-
H
! 
I
3
I 
I
Wf^M^^^^ff^^^^-^^^ 
•
• .>";•:$.&j ''^^K^;^}v''^^f^',^.; •,.•,-•,,•.-:,.
•
:; '
;-^S%'--
;-'S
X2^^x"'.'^^^'^'^^^'"'""'"
-. •' 
•••• •
•_•....:....
.
:^re&*jg
c
o
>0o
.V- ':•
: 
y.-
..j: ..••'.•.«
-K-
o
H-
o
i 
— . , - ' • 
t 
.".• - 
>
\w^%%** ^--^^
:-<$$••:•••
———
J___
H
H
8
0
>c
>V :-.
.:'.* '..
,/.'-,*• 
.' 
/•• .
.'••.'*'= •'•,-.
-c
TOO
-I———
1
3
'.;•.•-
'&!
I-C3
8
r^
q
<-*t>
*,
•,«••.
f,^,
•• •-•>..••>.
• • • • • • - 
• • • • 
..•'. ."•• -;'.
.». . 
... 
I
•r".
Hc
8
o
-0
M
m
-^.,\V
"' .• 
i •
•--;•/•
- 
•'•
•
:- VrM
'W
•&&.
>•*.*•;,'#*<•••*
••-•4-.' •:. -
r
\. • 
<. . 
.
. . .'• ^.' ,' 
' .'• r
.-
,••• 'H'j
.<•.*"'•.••••'•* '•-:•-
' -i 
• 
' 
.
•mas,
.*>•••
TOO
i
HJ
i~i
CO
.>* * • . -
•. .•- 
. . »'
t. 
' 
• ':.••"
>*. 
•" • •• 
: • > • ' ' . ' ' ' .
: * • *
-'<>•*? -.'
' • .'.•'!» \-~ •
M
ITS 
: ^
I I
-i
C
§
"I
II
.:; :/.&
-ifl
KT+-
i
~ 
•
'••••^^•« 
.,-;j'r::*V^^/;-.v\.
, • 
J" * 'i.- „*.:
.•* ** •' -*..
*tt£&&Zt
I . _ .
m
i&a:
I A-.,
*&v*-CXr'.
|t*X 
Jv-:
REFERENCE NO. 21
TUT 
001 
0927
COM Federal Programs Corporation
April 24, 1989
Ms. Caroline Kwan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 Federal Plaza
New York, New York 10278
Contract No.: 68-01-7331
Document No.: T648-C02-LR-ODLC-1
SUBJECT: Summary of 104(e) Letter Responses and Facility Inspections
Relating to Underground Storage Tanks in the
Tutu Wellfield Area, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands,
work Assignment 648
Dear Ms. Rwan:
The purpose of this letter is to summarize the findings of the 104(e)
letters and informal facility inspections relating to the underground
storage tanks (USTs) at the Tutu Esso Service Station, and Ramsay Motors
facility.
Esso Standard Oil S.A. Limited (Esso Standard Oil) indicated in their
December 15, 1967 response to an EPA Information Request Letter that the
results of a Petro Tite test questioned the structural integrity of one of
their gasoline storage tanks, the 104(e) letter response also indicated
that this tank was emptied on July 27, 1987 pending further investigation
of its integrity.
COM Federal Programs Corporation (COM FPC) performed an informal inspection
of the Tutu Esso Car Care Center in September 1988. During this
inspection, the manager of the facility disclosed the following
information:
The tank which Esso Standard Oil stated was empty and out of
service on July 27, 1987 contained 1105 gallons of product when
measured on August 17, 1987.
When measured again on Febuary 17, 1988, the tank reportedly
contained 1015 gallons of product.
TUT OO1 0928
I
Federal Programs Corporation
Ms. Rwan
Page 2
Ramsay Motors, Inc. indicated in their response to the EPA Request For
Information that one waste motor oil underground storage tank exists within
their facility. Ihe integrity of the Ramsay UST is unknown. CDH FPC plans
to sample its contents in the second round of the Tutu Mellfield Area
104(e) Letter Response Sampling planned for May 1989.
If you have any questions about this information please call me at (212)
393-9634.
Very truly yours,
CDH Federal Programs Corporation
Scojt B. Grabe
TES III Work Assignment Manager
JMC
cc: 
Jose Fonte 
EPA-CFO
Francene Lang 
DPNR-St. Croix
Greg Rhymer 
DPNR-St. Thomas
Amy Chester 
ORC
COM FPC 
Document Control (2 copies)
COM FPC 
NYC File
OOl O929
0£60 
TOO 
ini
f
CZ 'ON 30N3U3J3H 
[
1
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I 
ISOIL TECH
LABORATORY ANALYSES
OF SOIL
AT
TUTU ESSO CAR CARE CENTER
] 
TUTU, ST. THOMAS,
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
' 
FOR
I 
ESSO STANDARD OIL CO.
Prepared by
Soil Tech Corp.
Amur Street Corner Duina
Reparto Landrau
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico 00927
Job No. 88364
j
^ 
January 11, 1989
093.1.
!
!
I
I
SOIL TECH
TABLE OF CONTENT
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION ————————————————————————————————————— 
1
1.1 BACKGROUND ———————————————————————————————————————— 
3
2.0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL SETTING ——————————————————————————— 
7
3.0 SOIL SAMPLING AND TESTING ———————————————————————— 
9
4.0 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES ————————————————————— 
13
5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS ———————————————— 
18
FIGURE NO. 1 - PROJECT LOCATION ———————————————————— 
3
FIGURE NO. 1A- SITE ACCESS PLAN ———————————————————— 
3
FIGURE NO. 2 - SERVICE STATION LAYOUT ——————————————— 
4
FIGURE NO. 3 - TANK PIT SAMPLING POINTS -———————————— 
5
FIGURE NO. 3A- SOIL PILE SAMPLING POINTS ———————————— 
5
FIGURE NO. 4 - SOIL PIT -BENZENE CONTOURS ——————————— 
13
FIGURE NO. 5 - SOIL PIT -TOLUENE CONTOURS ——————————— 
13
FIGURE NO. 6 - SOIL PIT -ETHYLBENZENE CONTOURS ——————— 
13
FIGURE NO. 7 - SOIL PIT -TOTAL XYLENE CONTOURS ——————— 
13
FIGURE NO. 8 - SOIL PIT - PETROLEUM H'CARBON CONTOURS - 
14
APPENDIX NO. 1 - SUMMARY OF DATACHEM LABORATORY RESULTS
TUT OO1 0932
I
SOIL TECH
I SOI
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report contains the results of the tank removal activity
conducted, on June 4, 1989, at the Esso Tutu Car Care Station, St.
Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. 
The report includes the following
information:
o 
Background information;
o 
Hydrogeological setting;
o 
All soil results in table format as well as contour
maps of sampling locations; and
o 
Conclusions and recommendations of method of disposal
for the soil in the site.
Esso Standard Oil Company retained the services of Soil Tech
Corporation to prepare this report. 
The main objective of this
report is to present a summary of the chemical results obtained
from soil and liquid samples collected during the removal of the
two (2) existing underground tanks and recommendations for the
disposal of the excavated soil. It also include field observations
on the tanks surface condition.
The work at this site was conducted according to the "Work
Plan for the Removal and Installation of Two Underground Storage
Tanks at Tutu Esso Car Care Center, Tutu, St. Thomas, USVT" (Dated
December 1988/Revised May 1989), prepared by Sharetech.
TUT OO1 O933
I
SOIL TECH
Subsections below presents the results of the data-collection
activities conducted during tank removal and recommendations for
the disposal of the existing soil pile.
UT OO1 
09/U].
I
SOIL TECH
1 
1.1 
BACKGROUND
The Tutu Esso Car Care Center is located within the parking
I 
lot of the Four Winds Shopping Center at the Tutu Area of Saint
Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. The facility is bounded to the
southeast by State Highway No. 38 and the ramaining sides by the
parking lot of the Four Winds Shopping Center. Figure No. 1 -
•Location Map" shows the location of the project on a topographic
nap of the U.S. Geological Survey corresponding to the East St.
Thomas Quadrangle (scale 1:20,000). Figure No. 1-A indicates more
detail on site access.
i
For the performance of the work, Esso Standard Oil Company
i 
contracted the services of the following companies:
l 
o 
Eugenio de Arce: Excavation and tank replacement, and
preparation of soil pile,
o 
Soil Tech 
s Soil sampling; pile soil venting
system installation and operation.
o 
Datachem 
: (Utah, USA) Laboratory Analyses
o 
Sharetech (OMA): Quality Assurance 
and 
Quality
i
Control, and Health and Safety.
I 
The on-site project manager and coordinator was Mrs. Ana
I 
Gloria Ramos from Esso. 
The work at site was observed and
supervised by EPA through their consultants, CDM.
| 
The field work at the service station began on June 4, 1989
with the establishment of the working zones and the performance of
TUT 
OOi O935
FIGURE No. 1
LDCATIDN PLAN
SOIL TECH
"n
i—i
en
m
iP
i
cr
m -i
mnx
FOUR WINDS
SHOPPING MALL
L 
». i
o 
iw
GRAPHIC SCALE
I
SOIL TECH
an initial air monitoring. 
This monitoring was conducted using a
portable explosimeter, an organic vapor analyzer (HNU), and
Benzene draeger tubes. All results were below detection limit.
Air monitoring was performed, by the Safety Officer, during all
field activities obtaining below detection limit results.
Before uncovering the tanks, the content was pumped out using
a small hand activated pump. All liquid residues from this
operation were stored in a 55 gallon drum (DOT approved) at site.
Following these activities, the concrete slab was removed and
the concrete debri stockpiled at site until screened with the
portable OVA (HNU). 
The screening results were below detection
limit and EPA representatives accepted Esso's proposal to dispose
of the material at the Bovoni Landfill in St. Thomas.
At the completion of the concrete slab removal, excavation of
tanks backfill began. At the same time, the area proposed for the
soil stockpiling was being prepared with a wood fence and plastic
liner. 
All soil excavated*was Initially stockpiled adjacent to
the excavation and then hauled with a small front loader (trench
digger) to the stockpiling area located at the North section of
the station. 
As the soil piling progressed, all necessary pipes
and connections for the soil venting system were installed.
Figure No. 2 - "Service Station Layout" shows the location of the
main structures in the service station and soil pile location.
After the backfill soil was excavated, the tanks were lifted
and placed above ground over wood supports for surficial clean-up
i UT 
O01 
O938
FOUR VINO
PARKING LOT
FIGURE NO,3
JDB # 89364
FOUR WIND PARKING LOT
NORTH
oon
FOUR VINO PARKING LOT
TANK PIT SAMPLING LDCATIDN
SDILTECH
NOT TD SCALE
FOUR WIND
PARKING LOT
FIGURE ND.3A
JOB # 89364
FOUR WIND PARKING LOT
FOUR WIND PARKING LOT
COo
>
NORTH
SP » SDIL PILE SAMPLING
SDIL PILE SAMPLING POINT
^sT^B^SDILTECH
NOT TO SCALE
T
FOUR WIND
PARKING LOT
FIGURE ND, 2
JDB tt 89364
FOUR VINO PARKING LOT
FOUR VINO PARKING LOT
SERVICE STATIDN LAY-DUT
NORTH
SDILTECH
NOT TO SCALE
I
SOIL TECH
and inspection. Personnel from CDM, Esso, and Soil Tech examined
the tanks finding no physical evidence of perforations in the
steel shells.
Following the tanks removal, a sheen of product was observed
on the former location of the East tank. This sheen was removed
using hydrocarbon absorbent material. 
Then, the ramaining
backfill soil, at the tank pit bottom, was removed and placed in
the stockpile.
Subsequent to this activity, the pit soil sampling began. A
total of thirteen soil samples were collected from the tank pit
area. 
Figure No. 3 presents the location of each sample taken.
Following this activity, seven (7) composite soil samples were
collected from the soil pile. These were taken by mixing equal
amounts of soil obtained from the top, middle, and bottom part of
the pile. Discrete grab samples, for VGA analysis, were collected
prior to compositing from each sampling depths and point. A total
of 21 grab samples were collected. 
Figure No. 3-A shows the
location of each sample collected at the soil pile. 
Split
samples, from selected location at the tank pit and soil pile,
were obtained as requested by EPA representatives, CDM. The
sampling activity was completed by June 12, 1989.
Upon 
completion 
of soil sampling in the 
excavation,
approximately two (2) additional feet of soil were excavated to
reach new tanks invert elevation. 
At this time, a trickle of
'TUT 
OOi 0942
SOIL TECH
I SOU
water was observed on the southwest corner of the pit which could
be considered a manifestation of the ground water. 
No liquid
phase hydrocarbons were observed in the tank pit area. 
Then, the
new jacketed tanks were installed in the tank pit and backfilled
with clean material. Also, the vacuum pump was connected to the
soil venting pipes and the venting system started.
TUT
001 0943
Ot.
SOIL TECH
i SOI
2.0 HYDROGEOLOGICAL SETTING
The project La located as shown on Figure No. 1. 
This
corresponds to the hydrologic watershed of the Turpentine Run.
This watershed drains an area of 3.4 square miles described as a
dendritic system typical of volcanic terrain. About two thirds of
the drainage basin lies in the interior of the Island and is
surrounded by high hills. The main surface stream consist of an
intermittent creek known as the Turpentine Run which discharges
through a narrow valley. Surface runoff is concentrated in a
narrow corridor probably due to gee-morphological controls such a
steep topographic gradients and geo-structural conditions.
The water table has been found to be, locally, a subdued
manifestation of the surface topography. 
For instances the depth
to water table under non-pumping conditions is reported at 13 to
15 feet below grade at the Four Winds f 1 and #2 wells located some
50 to 100 feet north of the* Service Station. 
Depth to water in
the wells nearby range between and 15 and 20 feet below grade.
But near the ridges it has been reported at as much as 120 feet
below grade.
The 
excavation 
exposed 
a mixed 
face 
with 
recent
unconsolldated material above the sedimentary, volcanic, and
metavolcanic material found at site. 
The overburden was very
shallow from 1 to 2 feet at one side to the total excavation
TUT 
GUI O944
1 SOIL TECH
depth. This was composed of weathered volcaniclastic material and
I
I
I
I
I
I 
volcanic material. 
Part of the exposed excavation consisted of a
| 
fractured siltstone with a relatively steep bedding. 
This forced
1 
the relocation of sampling point No. 12 to a corner were soil was
• 
exposed.
The bottom of the excavation was at about 12 feet below
grade. 
At this depth a trickle of water was noted and was
considered to be a manifestation of the ground water at site. 
No
: 
liquid phase hydrocarbons were observed on this water.
j 
' 
TUT O0.1 0945
SOIL TECH
1 SOI
3.0 SOIL SAMPLING AND TESTING
Soil samples were collected from the pit area after the fill
material around the tanks was excavated and the tanks were
removed. 
Location of the sampling points is indicated on Figure
No. 3 - "Tank Pit Sampling Points*. A total of thirteen (13) grab
samples were collected from the pit area.
Soil samples collected from the soil venting pile were
composites, except for VGA's analysis where grab samples were
taken. Sampling locations are indicated on Figure No. 3-A - "Soil
Pile Sampling Points".
A total of seven (7) composite soil samples, plus one
duplicate, were obtained from the soil venting pile at specific
sampling points. 
Each sample was prepared by mixing equal amount
of soil from the top, center and bottom part of each point in the
soil pile. 
Grab samples, to be analyzed for VGA's, were obtained
•directly from each depth at all sampling locations, for a total of
21 samples plus duplicates.
Split samples were collected from some of the sampling
locations, as requested by COM personnel, for their own analyses.
Soil samples were analyzed by Datachem for the following
parameters z
OOi 
OS5 4 6
i SOI
SOIL TECH
Area
Tank Pit
Soil Pile
Parameters
Lead, Chromium, VGA,
TPH, Pesticides, and
PCBs
Lead, Chromium, VQA,
TPH, Pesticides, PCBs,
and Ignitability
Laboratory analyses were conducted by Datachem of 
960
West Levoy Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84123. Methods used in the
analyses of soil samples were as follows:
Parameter
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon
(TPH)
VQA
Method
Pretreat as per oil and grease
method EPA/CE-81-1, p 3-284, IR
option, followed by Method 418.1
starting 
with 
paragraph 
7.7
(Three (3) grams of silica gel
per every 100 ml of extract).
Analytical methods for analysis
will conform to "Statement of
Work for Organic Analysis, Multi-
Concentration", USEPA Contract
Laboratory Program as 
revised
2/88.
001 0947
I
SOIL TECH
Parameter
Lead
Ignitability
Chromium
Pesticides/PCBs
Method
"Test 
Methods for 
Evaluating
Solid Waste (SW-846)", November
1986. 
USEPA Method 3050 for
extraction and DSEPA Method 7420
for analysis.
USEPA 
Method 1010 (Pensky-
Martens, close-cup).
"Test 
Methods for 
Evaluating
Solid Waste (SW-846)", November
1986. 
USEPA Method 3050 for
extraction and Method 7190 or
7191 for analysis.
"Method 8080, Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846)",
November 1986.
Decontamination water and field blanks were analyzed for the
same parameters as those for soil samples as follows t
Parameter 
Method
TPH 
Method 48.1, Methods for Chemical
Analysis of Water and Wastes,
March 1983.
TUT 001 0948
SOIL TECH
isoi
Parameter
VGA
Lead
Lead
Ignitability
Chromium
Pesticides/PCB'e
Method
Analytical Methods to Conform to
"Statement of Work for Organic
Analysis, Multi-Concentration",
USEPA Contract Laboratory Program
as revised 2/88.
Aqueous 
sample matrix - "Test
Methods 
for Evaluating 
Solid
Waste (SW-846)", November 1986.
USEPA Method 3010 for extraction
and 
USEPA 
Method 
7420 
for
analysis. 
Mo pretreatment is
required.
USEPA Method 1010, Pensky-Martens
closed cup method.
•Test 
Methods for 
Evaluating
Solid Waste (SW-846)", November
1986, USEPA Method 7190.
"Method 8080, Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste (SW-846)"
November 1986.
Reportedly, the complete QA/QC documentation for Datachem is
on file with USEPA.
TUT OOi 0949
t
SOIL TECH
4.0 RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
Tables No. 1 through No. 7 summarizes the parameters that
were found on each soil sample from the tank pit area.
These tables are subdivided as followst
Table 
Content
No. 1 - Pit area volatile organics
No. 2 - Pit 
area volatile organics 
(Tentatively
Identified)
No. 3 - Pit area semi-volatile organics
No. 4 - Pit area semi-volatile organics (Tentatively
Identified)
No. 5 - Pit area Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
No. 6 - Pit area metals
Chlorinated hydrocarbons, pesticides and PCB's were not found
in the pit area.
Laboratory data on benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total
xylenes found within the pit floor area is shown on contour format
as Figures No. 4 through No. 7.
The »**fmM|H BTEX concentrations found within the tank pit
were as follows:
TUT 001 
O9SO
I SOI
SOIL TECH
(D
Contours
in
ug/kg or ppb
* Sampling Points
FIGURE 4 - 
BENZENE CONTOURS PIT FLOOR
TUT 
OGi
Ison
SOIL TECH
CD
Concentration in
ppb or ug/kg
* Sampling Points
FIGURE 5 - TOLUENE CONTOURS PIT FLOOR
TUT 
OO1
Isoi
SOIL TECH
0)
Concentration in
ppb or ug/kg
* Sampling Points
FIGURE 6 - 
ETHYLBENZENE PIT FLOOR
TUT 
OO1 
O953
I
SOIL TECH
(D
Concentration in
ppb or ug/kg
Sampling Points
FIGURE 7 - XYLENE CONTOURS PIT FLOOR
"UT 
001 
09 54
1 
™ SOIL TECH
Compound 
Sampling Point 
Concentration (mq/Kq)
Benzene 
5 
1.1
Toluene 
6 
180
Zylene (t) 
6 
540
Ethylbenzene 
6 
55
The only soil samples obtained from the tank pit walls that
exhibited BTEX concentrations were those of sampling points
corresponding to location No. 10 and No. 10-A. These samples
revealed concentrations of benzene and ethylbenzene ranging from 9
to 16 ug/Kg.
Figure No. 8 shows Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in contour
format in the tank pit floor area. The only positive value of TPH
on the walls of the excavation was at sampling point No. 12 with a
concentration of 9 ug/Kg.
In addition to the above listed parameters, the following
compounds were reported by Datachem as semi-volatile organics in
the pit area:
Compound 
Sampling Points
Naphtalene 
TP-3 DL, -5, -5A, -6DL, and 8
2-Methylnaphtalene 
TP-3 DL, -5, -5A, -6DL, 7,
and 8
Fluorene 
TP-3, and -6
Phenanthrene 
TP-3, and -6
;i IT OOl 
09 bb
I
SOIL TECH
(D
o
CN
8
Concentration mg/kg
* Sampling Points
FIGURE 8 - 
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON PIT
TUT 
OO1 
09S6
SOIL TECH
These are of the functional group of the polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons.
Concentrations of BTEX and those of other semi-volatile
organics (the above listed polynuclear hydrocarbons), are related
to unleaded gasoline.
Only soil samples No. TP-3 and TP-6, from the pit area,
showed chromium concentrations of 0.2 and 0.1 ug/Kg, respectively.
The laboratory data from the tank pit area did not indicate
the 
presence of chlorinated hydrocarbon compounds. 
The only
chlorinated compound registered in the analyses corresponds to
methylene chloride which was found in a field blank. 
This
compound is probably the result of cross contamination in the
laboratory.
Acetone was registered in different soil samples, and field
and trip blanks. Concentrations of acetone in soil samples are in
the same range as those found in the field and trip blanks.
Acetone is one of the compounds used for the decontamination
process of the field sampling equipment. Therefore, the residues
found in the soil and field blanks could be attributed to this
activity. 
The fact of finding acetone concentrations in the trip
blanks may be indicative of laboratory cross contamination.
Results of soil samples from the soil pile area are listed on
Tables No. 7 through No. 13 as followss
TUT
SOIL TECH
I SOI
Table 
Content
No. 7 - Soil File area volatile organics
No. 8 - Soil Pile area volatile organics (Tentatively
Identified)
No. 9 - Soil Pile area semi-volatile organics
No. 10- Soil 
Pile 
area 
semi-volatile 
organics
(Tentatively Identified)
No. 11- Soil Pile area Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
No. 12- Soil Pile area metals
No. 13- Soil Pile Ignitability
Chlorinated hydrocarbons, pesticides, and PCB's were not
found in samples taken from the soil pile.
Laboratory data from the soil pile on benzene content
indicated non-detectable values. This compound which was found in
low concentrations (1.1 PPM) at the tank pit, probably vaporized
during transportation of the excavated soil to the soil pile.
Data on toluene, benzene, and total xylenes in the soil pile
indicated only their presence in the following pointst
Maximum
Compound 
Sampling Point 
Concentration (mq/Kg)
Toluene 
SP-3 Top 
1.6
Zylene 
SP-3 Top 
20.0
Ethylbenzene 
SP-3 Top 
1.4
TUT 001 0958
SOIL TECH
APPENDIX NO. 1
SUMMARY OF DATACHEM LABORATORY RESULTS
TUT 
OO1 09S9
I
SOIL TECH
Table
Closure Criteria
Lead < 5 ppm
TPH < 150 ppm
BTEZ <, 10 ppm
PAHs <_ 10 ppm
o
Ignitability (Flash point > 140 F)
I i IJ OO.1 09&O
— SOIL TECH
Semi-volatile 
organics 
were 
found 
on 
samples SP-2
(naphtalene) and SP-2, SP-3 and SP-5 (2-methylnaphtalene).
Values of petroleum hydrocarbons varied from 12 to 24 mg/Kg
for the composite samples.
Values of chlorinated hydrocarbons, metals, pesticides, FCBs,
and ignitability, were found to be non-detectable and non-
ignitable in samples from the soil pile.
Results of laboratory analyses on liquid samples obtained as
field and trip blanks are included as part of Appendix No. 1. The
results of field blanks indicated the presence of acetone, and
methylene chloride. 
Acetone was used during the decontamination
of sampling tools. 
One trip blank indicated the presence of
acetone while carbon disulfide was found in one of the field
blanks. The presence of carbon disulfide and methylene chloride
may be related to laboratory work or cross contamination.
TUT 
OO1 O961
SOIL TECH
5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The chemical results reported by the laboratory indicated the
following:
(1) No chlorinated hydrocarbons were detected in any of
the soil samples obtained from the tank pit or soil
pile.
(2) No metals, pesticides, or PCB's were found in any of
the soil samples obtained. 
Ignitability values were
below proposed limit (140°).
(3) Concentration of BTEX were found in soil samples from
the tank pit and soil pile. 
These concentrations
range from Non-Detectable to not more than 540 mg/Xg.
(4) During the field visual tank inspection, performed by
EPA representatives (CDM) and Soil Tech personnel,
no evidence of corrosion pits were observed.
(5) Based on the fact that no liquid phase hydrocarbons
were observed in the tank pit, the low BTEX
concentrations found in soil samples may be related
to typical service station operations.
The soil pile venting system has been monitored for the last
six months. 
Vapor samples has been below detection limit during
this period. 
Sample analysis has been performed using an HNU,
OVM, and Draeger tubes.
VUT O01 0962
I
SOIL TECH
Based on the low BTEZ concentrations found originally in the
soil samples obtained from the tank pit and soil pile, the
monitoring results of the venting system, and closure criteria
established in the Work Plan (see enclosed table), we recommend
that the soil pile material be released from any further venting
requirements and be allowed to be disposed off at the Bovonis
Landfill in St. Thomas. 
Before final disposal of the soil is
conducted, a soil pile sampling and chemical analysis shall be
performed to verify that the closure criteria established in the
Work Plan has been satisfied. The chemical parameters recommended
for analysis shall be PAH's and BTEX. 
The rationale behind this
recommendation 
is that the initial values for 
chlorinated
hydrocarbons, lead, TPH, and ignitability were below closure
levels.
Respectfully submitted,
Consenting Engineer
JCA/lvl/c:88364B
Appendix No. 1 - Summary of Datachem Laboratory Results
TUT OO1 O963
SOIL TECH
i SOI
SOIL SAMPLES
CHEMICAL RESULTS
T'U'i 
001 0964
f
SOIL TECH
Definition of Terms
Soil Samples
TP 
Tank pit sample
SP 
Soil pile sample
B 
The analyte was found in the method blank. 
The
reported results have been adjusted for the quantity
found in the blank.
E 
The reported concentration is on estimate only. 
The
response factor was assumed to be 1.000 relative to
an internal standard.
J 
Indicated an estimated concentration below the Method
Detection Limit.
K 
The isometer is unknown.
N 
Analytical 
standard were not analyzed for this
compound.
U 
Not detected with the corresponding Method Detection
Limit. 
The value presented on the table correspond
to the Method Detection Limit.
RE 
Replicate
DUP 
Duplicate
MS 
Matrix spike
MSD 
Matrix spike duplicate
DL 
Diluted
TUT OO.1. 
O96b
SOIL TECH
i SOI
TABLE Do. 1
PIT AIEA (VOLATILE OBGAHiCS AIAITSIS) - OG/IG
..
ACET08E
2-BOTAH08E
BEHZERE
TOLOENE
iTITLBEXZEIE
TOTAL IYLSRES
.
TP-1
12 0
120
60
6 0
6 0
6 0
TP-2
57 0
57 0
280
280
280
1600 E
TP-3
1400 0
400 BJ
230 J
5200
21G3
31000 :
TP-4
14
11 0
2 J
60
5 J
60
TP-5
1400 D
3600 B
1100
720 0
7000
720 0
TP-5A
14000
4400 B
870
7200
14000
720 0
TP-5ABS
1400 0
4000 B
720 0
T200
15000
7200
TP-5ASSD
14000
4500 B
T200
7200
iscao
7200
Tp-s :
470GC 5!
1900C ••;:
23002 j!
1BOCDG i
550:: :
5400:3 :
FIT ABEA (VOLATILE ORGASICS AHALTSIS) - OG/IG
ACETONE
2-BOT4HOSE
BEDZEHE
TOLGEME
ETETLBEDZiiiE
TOTAL I7LE5ES
7P-7
29
12 0
60
60
5 J
300 E
TP-8
57 0
57 0
93
290
520
220
T?-3
5 J
123
63
60
63
69
TP-lfl
120
5 J
3 J
60
ft
60
TP-10A
53
4 J
13
60
16
60
TP-10EE
32
120
9
60
14
60
TP-11
12 0
12 0
60
60
6?
60
"Oil
If-lt
120
12 C
60
60
6 0
60
TF-13 
.
lie :
4 i '
. 6 U :
65 :
6 ' '
6 ; '
TUT 001 
09&<
i SOI
SOIL TECH
TABLE Ho. 2
Pi? ABEA (VOLATILE OSGASICS A1ALTSIS1 - OG/IG
-7EN7A7IVEIT IDilTIFIID COSPOOKDS-
1
2-H&TEOIT-2-HETHTI PBOPAKE
1,4-DIOXU!
C2-SOBS7I7D7SD BEIZEgE
C3-SOBSTITOTED BEXZENE
C5-OIT BTDIOCABBOB
C6-DSSA70RA7ED ITDBOCA-1BCS
C6-BTDiOCABBOX
C6-ETDSCCABBCN
C6-BTEBOCAHBON
C?-?HSA?ORA7&D HTDfiOCABBOli
C7-HTDKCiEBCH
CT-BYDFCCAFBOS
C7-BTDECCAEBOH
C8-HTDSOC4.8BOJ
Ca-BTIEOCASEOH
C8-BIDFOCARBON
C9-ITDRCC1BBCI
7P-1
19 J
570 J
18 J
8 J-
TP-2
4100 J
270 J
430 J
390 J
1000 J
790 J
66G J
453 J
1400 J
920 J
7P-3
1100 J
750 J
1159 J
3C33 J
H t -I f\ 1
J;jU 
**
« « A n T
it-C it
2:39 J
TP-4
330 BJ
53 J
TP-5
9000 BJ
2603 J
.•
8100 J
1400 J
20009 J
16900 J
43000 J
11000 J
9500 J
17000 J
TP-5A
6300 BJ
3600 J
SOOO J
13000 J
6900 J
32000 J
26000 J
56000 J
16000 J
16000 J
TP-6
24000 BJ
25000 J
26000 J
110000 J
100000 J
80000 J
TUT 001 0967
i SOI
SOIL TECH
TABLE So. 2 (Cont'd)
FIT ABEA (VOLATILE OEGiHICS ANALYSIS) • OG/IG
-TEHTATIVEIT IDENTIFIED COIPODIDS-
2-HETHOIY-2-BETBYL PROFASE
1,4-DIOXAHE
C2-SDBSTITCTED BESZESE
C3-SOBSTITUTSD BENZENE
C5-OIT HYDBOCABBOH
C6-OHSATORATED SYDRCCAFE08
C6-HTDHOCABBOS
C6-HYDR3CARBON
C6-B!DBOCABBO!t
C7-ONSATOHATED BTD80CAPBON
C7-BIDBCC43BOH
C7-BIDRCCAPB9S
C7-BYDBOCABBCN
C8-BYDROCAF3CS
C3-BYD80CABBOS
C8-BYD5CCABBON
C9-BYDEOCABB08
TP-7
1400 J
23 J
26 J
57 J
57 J
190 J
140 J
190 J
60 J
180 J
TP-8
3600 J
310 J
290 J
610 J
413 J
1500 J
1200 J
400 J
4600 J
870 J
TP-3
12 J
26 BJ
13 J
8.5 J
21J
14 J
47 J
27 J
67 J
82 J
TP-lfl .
1200 BJ
30 J
27 J
TP-lflA
860 BJ
13 J
12 J
TP-10BE
1100 J
26 J
5.8 J
TP-11
160 BJ
35 J
16 J
TP-12
32 J
7.2 J
15 J
Tr-13
4: J
:: j
i
TUT 00.1 O968
SOIL TECH
•hC'Ll !<C .
i TP-I : T?-: ; "-:
k* *C'L(** ' " ' r * '~ 
i 
i 
. * » . . «
Khrhihht£.»c 
i 
I 
I rf^vO J
2-nETKYLfWFnTKALEKE 
I 110 ; ! 630 J ! 4:JOO E
ACcNAr-HTnENE 
i 
! 
! 40C J
D.'tThYLPrtTKALATE 
! 
! 
!
FLUCFENE 
! 
; 180 J ! 14CO
PHENASTH-ENE 
! 
i 120 J I i!CO
t 
> 
t
AMnnACENE 
! 
! 
! 13i J
rLUCSA(.7-ENE 
! 
! 
! HJ.j
PYf.EM 
1 
! 
! i; j J
• : f , » - | I T V f ^ " ' * " ^ l > ^ P 
1 
l f t » * 
• 
1
j>-ii-3Ui TurnmrLnic 
! 
OT Cw • 
!
:'.-7
1:LPE;iIVL?h7i-:;LATE 
I 
1 
i
bi=-::-£7HYLKE<TLi FH7HALA7E; 130 E.' - 
! 400 iJ
7f-3I'l
«000
41000
liOJ j
1200 1
Tf-4
7?-4DUP I TF-!
! '000
! 
9600
't
11
1
! 370 J
1
'
!
!
: ::o eJ
T-!.;
75M
11000
iJv 
w
STJ ;
4*) :
»•) J
:oo H
•ooo
2-j rJ
"-: 
! 'f-eli
4!::^E; fj;oo
:::;: E; 4:0::
:
!
:':: ; :oco :
:::: : if.?o ;
;
.:! .: !
• t - • i
i
'
":' '-'. ',
T4ELJ No. 3 (Confd)
RAPBTBALEHE
2-XITBTLNAPETBALENE
ACINAPETBEXE
DIETBTLPBTEALATE
FLD05EHI
PBENAITEEENE
JSTBHiCE.lE
FL0084HTSESE
PT1E8E
DI-i-BOTILPBTBALAII
BDTTLBENZTLFBTBALATE
biB-(2-ETETLBEITl) PBTBALAT1
TP-7
300 J
1100
290 J
160 J
PIT AIEA
TP-8
HOO
2000
290 J
110 J
(SHI701A
7P-S
140 J
63 BJ
Till OI6A
IP-10
190 J
ISO J
. ....
94 BJ
310 J
360 BJ
DIGS ANAL
TP-10A
130 BJ
TSIS) - 0
TP-IOHS
53 BJ
21 J
G/1G
TP-10HSD
140 BJ
IP-11
••c
SOIL TECH
TABLE Do. 4
ALDOL CONDENSATION PRODUCT
ETETL HETBTL BENZENE
ITBTL HETBTL BENZENE
ITSTL-DUETBTL BENZENE
ETBTL-DIHETBTL BENZENE
ETETL-DIHETBTL BENZENE
DIHETBTL ETETL BENZENE
DIHE7E7L ETETL BENZENE
8ETETL-HETETLETBTL BENZENE
8ETETL ETBTL BENZENE
RE72TL ETBTL BENZENE
TP-1
730 ABJ
370 J
PIT ABEA
TP-2
1200 J
1400 J
(SiBIVOU
TENTATI7I
TP-3
91000 J
94000 J
26000 J
52000 J
35000 J
90000 J
TILE OBGi
LT IDENTI
TP-3DI
520000 J
32000 J
140000 J
44000 J
150000 J
NICS ANAL
FIED COUP
TP-4
630 ABJ
TSIS) - t
ODNDS-
TP-4DDP
710 ABJ
G/IG
TP-5
4500 J
14000 J
5200 J
9700 J
TP-5A
660 ABJ
9600 J
4300 J
3800 J
TOOO J
4000 J
63000 J
11000 J
TP-6
230000 J
77300 J
20000 J
54030 J
55000 J
81530 J
13SGOO J
TP-6DI
470000 J
140000 J
30000 J
80000 J
97000 J
69000 J
130000 J
TiBLI Ho. 4 (Confd)
ALDCL CONDENSATION PBODOCT
ETETL 8ETETL BENZENE
ETSTL KETBTL BENZENE
ETBTL-DIHETBTL BENZENE
ETJTL-DIHE7STL BENZENE
ETETL-DIHETBTL BENZENE
DI»ITE!L ETBTL BENZENE
DIHETETL ETBTL BENZENE
HETBTL-KETBTLETBTL BENZENE
8ETETL ETBTL BENZENE
HETETL ETETL BENZENE
TP-7
640 ABJ
2000 J
680 J
1400 J
1200 J
1900 J
2200 J
PIT A3EA
TP-8
1200 J
2700 J
1900 J
(SIKTOIJ
THI1I1II
TP-9
740 ABJ
TILE 03G1
LT IDENTI
IP- 10
830 ABJ
NICS ANAL
FIED COOP
TP-10A
820 ABJ
TSIS) - [
ODNDS-
TP-11
780 ABJ
G/IG
TP-12
830 ABJ
IP-13
650 ABJ
Is
SOIL TECH
TABLE So. 4 (Coofd)
PIT AREA (SSSI7CUTILE OiGAXICS AHAITSIS) - OG/IG 
(COKT.)
-TWATIVEIT IDENTIFIED COHPODiDS-
C5 SOBST. BESZENE
cs SDBST. mim
CS SDBST. BEIZEK
C5 SDBST. BENZESE/ORINOHII
C6 SDBST. mim
mum SOBST. mim
CIO ETDROCAfiBOX
CIO BTDEOCABBOS/CTCLOBTSSCCA
8IIZD SPSCTBA-SOEST. BESZISI
1-HETETL NAPETEALEHE
5-METE!L-l(3B)ISC3E!IZOFOEASO
DIETiSO-DIHETBTL ISDEUE
OISE7HTI lAFETBtLEKE
DI-iTETL HAPBTEiLESE
i,r-Bi?E:m
OITBTDROCiBBOS
CTCLCHiDECCiBEON
CTCLOBTDSOCAEBON
CTCLOBTDBOCABBON
DECAHi
DODECiHl
CABBOIILIC ACID TTPI
TP-1
650 J
530 J
390 J
TP-2
1100 J
3200 J
1400 J
990 J
1300 J
1800 J
TP-3
45000 J
32000 J
27000 J
15000 J
2390CO J
350000 J
47000 J
TP-3DI
60000 J
26000 J
27000 J
32000 J
100000 J
TP-4
TP-4DOP
TP-S
S500 J
2900 J
6000 J
3100 J
4300 J
TP-5A
7700 J
5300 J
3900 J
6400 J
3100 J
3SCO J
4100 J
• • *
If.
33c:; j
163:-) J
m:: J
21;:: J
TP-6DL
57000 J
24000 J
30000 J
100COO J
TUT 
OO1 
O97i
SOIL TECH
TABLE Do. 4 (Confd)
IETITL FBOPYL BENZENE
UETBYl PSOPTL BENZENE
IETETL PEOPTl BERZEXE
BOTTL-BENZEXE
PiOPTL BEXZEXE
DIUETBYl BENZENE
TRIHETBYl BEXZEXE
TRIHET8TL BEXZENE
TRIHETBTi BENZENE
TRIBETHYL BENZENE ISOHER
TIIIETBTL BENZINE I SOBER
TBIHETBYL BENZENE ISOHER
TETRAHETETL BEXZENE
TETRABETEYL BEHZENE
D1ETEYL EENZSNE
2-ETBTL-l,4DIBETBTL-BENZE!iI
DIBETBYL-BEXZcXE HETBAKOL
C3 SDBST. BEXZENE
C3 SDBST. BSNZENi
C3 SDBST. BEXZEXE
C3 SDBST. BEXZEXE
C3 OISAT. SDBST. BENZENE
C4 SDBST. BEXZEXE
C4 SDBST. BEXZENE
C4 SDBST. BEXZEXE
C4 SDBST. BEKZEXE/DXIXOXN
IP-1
340 J
PIT AREA
TP-2
160 J
910 J
—
2800 J
1000 J
2700 J
3300 J
900 J
940 J
3400 J
1500 J
2900 J
1400 J
(SiXiVOLA
TEXTATI?E
TP-3
30000 J
130000 J
46000 J
140000 J
66:00 J
1233CO J
52000 J
TILE ORGA
LT 1DSSTI
TP-3DL
170000 J
110000 J
45000 J
110000 J
240000 J
650000 J
220000 J
84000 J
S9000 J
63000 J
XICS ANAL
FIED COUP
TP-4
TSISI - 0
ODXDS-
TP-4DOP
G/U (CO
TP-5
15000 J
37000 J
11000 J
7200 J
11000 J
4600 J
4800 J
5200 i
(900 J
14000 J
IT.)
TP-5A
4900 J
5700 J
2500 J
561)0 1
11000 J
7200 J
9900 J
TP-6
94000 J
27000 J
120000 J
2K20 J
5JCOO J
110290 J
290SOO J
62COO J
IP-Bin
160000 J
41000 J
200000 J
28000
8900C
220000 J
590000 J
59000 J
97000 J
SOIL TECH
I SOI
TABLE No. 4 (CoDt'd)
PIT UEA (SEBITCIATILE OBGANICS ANALYSIS) - D&/I6 (CONT.)
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COBPOONDS-
C5 SOBST. BENZENE
C5 SOBST. BENZESE
C5 SDBST. BENZENE
CS SDBST. BENZENE/ONHOHN
C6 SDEST. BENZENE
ONHOiiS SOBST. BEHZEHE *
CIO BTDEOCiSBON
CIO BTDSOCABBOS/CTCLOBYDXCCi
SIIZD SPSC7BA-SUEST. BHZESt
1-KTETt NAPE7SALEKE
5-ISTE!L-l(3B}ISOBnZOFDUS&
DIirDSO-DIBETHTL IliDEKE
DIHE7BTL NAPE7BALESE
DISETHTL NAFETBALESE
l.l'-BIFHESTL
OITETIHOCABBOII
CTCLOBTDSOCABEON
CTCLOHTDiOCAEBON
CTCLOBTDIOCABEON
DECANE
DODECAN!
CAEBOIILIC ACID TTFE
IP-1
650 J
530 J
390 J
TP-2
1100 J
3200 J
1400 J
990 J
1300 J
1800 J
TP-3
45000 J
32000 J
27000 J
15000 J
230000 i
350000 J
47000 J
IP- 3111
60000 J
26000 J
27000 J
32000 J
100000 J
i .
IP-4
TP-4BOP
1
TP-5
6500 J
2900 J
6000 J
3100 J
4300 J
TP-5A
7700 J
5300 J
3900 J
6400 J
3100 J
33S3 J
4130 J
7?-:
3s;:; J
16:;; J
H::J J
•H " " ' *
•21... *
TP-6DL
57000 J
24000 J
30000 J
100500 J
TUT OO1 0973
SOIL TECH
TABLE No. 4 (Confd)
I TP-7
C5 SUBST. BENZENE
CS SUBST. BENZENE
C5 SUBST. BENZENE
C5 SUBST. BENZENE/UNKNONN
C6 SUBST. BENZENE
UNKNOWN SUBST. BENZENE
CIO HYDROCARBON
CIO HYCR3CARBON/CYCLOHYDROM
HIIED 5FECTRA-SUBST. BENZENE
1-flETHYL NAPHTHALENE
5-rETKYL-ll3H)lSCBENZOFURAM)
D1HY0RO-DIHETHYL INDENE
DirETHYL NAPHTHALENE
DIKETHYL NAPHTHALENE
l.l'-BIPHENYL
OIYHYDROCAR83N
CYCLOHYDROCnRBON
CYCLOHYDROCARBON
CYCLOHYDROCARBON
DECANE
DOOECANE
CAREOI1LIC ACID TYPE
1100 J
640 )
760 J
730 J
880 J
700 J
630 J
23CO J
PIT AREA
TP-8
1500 J
710 J
1800 J
1000 J
1500 J
1200 J
1100 J
1600 J
2300 J
1800 J
1400 J
ISEKIVOLATILE ORGA
TENTATIVELY IDENTI
TP-9 
I TP-10
480 J 1
420 J !
1
330 J !
340 J 1
!
:
5co j :
:
___ „ •__ .. .N^
i
:
i
i
i
i
•
700 J :
N1CS ANAL
FIED COUP
TP-10A
YSIS) - UG/KG (CO
OUNDS-
TP-11 
! TP-12
NT.)
TP-13
TUT 
OO1 
0974
I so
SOIL TECH
TABLE So. 4 (Coif d)
FIT ABEA (SiilTOUTILS OBGARICS ARALTSIS) • OG/IG 
(CORT.)
-THTIIIWLT IDERTIFIED COHPODRDS-
BZTBTl PBOFTL BERZERE
IETETL PBOFTL BERZERE
IHETL PBOFTL BERZERE
BDTTl-BERZERE
FBOPTL BERZERE
DIHETITL BERZERE
TBIHETHTL BERZERE
TBIHET8TL BENZENE
TSIHETHTL BENZERE
TIIHETBTL BENZEHE ISOBER
TJIBETBTL BENZENE ISOHER
TRIHETBTL BERZEHE ISOBER
TETBAHETETL BENZENE
TETBAHETBTL BENZENE
DIETBTL EERZENE
2-iIi?L-l,4DIHETHTl-BEHB3
DIHETBIL-Eili'Ni HETEANOL
C3 SDBST BiHZERE
C3 SDBST. BERZENE
C3 SDBST. BIRZERE
C3 SDBST. BERZERE
C3 DRSAT. SDBST. BERZERE
C4 SDBST. BERZEHE
C4 SUBST. BERZERE
C4 SDBST. BERZERE
C4 SDBST. BERZE8E/DNIROKR
TP-7
1300 J
1400 J
1500 J
1500 J
2500 J
2400 J
TP-«
1000 J
1800 J
2600 J
1400 J
2400 J
3900 J
TP-9
4(0 J
46IT J
960 J
360 J
1200 J
T10 J
520 J
1100 J
TP-10
320 J
TP-10A
IP- 11
•
TP-12
IP-13
TUT 
OOi 
0975
' I SOIL TECH
1 1
1
f
•
i
j
•
,
,
i
TABLE No.
PIT AREA
SAMPLE
TP-1
TP-2
TP-3
TP-4
TP-5
TP-5A
TP-6
TP-7
TP-8
TP-9
TP-10
TP-10A
TP-11
TP-12
TP-13
5
(PETROLEOUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS)
PETROLEOUM HYDROCARBONS
(MG/KG)
ND
15
40
ND
10
11
40
6
23
7
ND
ND
ND
9
ND
ND - PARAMETER NOT DETECTED
TUT 001 0976
SOIL TECH
TABLE No. 6
PIT AREA (METAL ANALYSIS)
SAMPLE
TP-1
TP-2
TP-3
TP-4
TP-5
TP-5A
TP-6
TP-7
TP-3
TP-9
TP-10
TP-10A
TP-11
TP-12
TP-13
LEAD
UG/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ARSENIC
UG/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ntf
ND
CHROMIDM
UG/L
ND
ND
0.2
ND
ND
ND
0.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SELENIUM
UG/L
- ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = NOT DETECTED
TUT 
OO1 
O977
P
OIL TECH
TABLE Nc. 7
KETHYLEliE CKLORIZE
ACETONE
2-iUTANONE
VJHYL ACETATE
BENZENE
TOLUENE
ETHYLBEN2ENE
TOTAL IYLENES
SOIL PILE (VOLATILE Of.EAHICS ANALYSIS) - U6/KG
ISP-i-TOF!£P-HI!DISP-l-80TlSF-c-TOPISP-2-NIDISP-2-307l£P-3-70PISF-3-HIDISP-3-E07i
3 J 1
6 J 1
11 U 1
.•.. .» 
. 1
11 U 1
1
5 U 1
5 U 1
5 U 1
! 46 1
5 U 
5 U
11 U 
11 U
11 U 
11 U
11 U 
11 U
5U 
5 U 1
511 
511
51) 
27
5 U 
140
14 U 
690 U
2E II 
14CO U
29 1) 
32GO B
28 U 
1400 U
14 U 
33 J
14 U 
690 U
25 
830
923 E 
16COO
28 U
56 U
56 U
56 U
28 U
23 U
28 U
580
1 
1
690 U 
4 J 
6 U 1
1400 U 
7 J 
11 U 1
3600 B 
111) 311
210 J 
11 U 
11 U 1
1
690 U 
6 U 
6 U 1
I
1600 
6 U 
6 U 1
1400 
6 U 
3 J 1
20000 
73 
140 1
1 S?-4-ToP 1 SF-4-DU-T 1 SP-4-BID I Er-4-DU-H 1 SP-4-BOT 1 SP-4-DU-B 1 SP4DUFM3 1 SP4DUPHHS 1 E?-5-TOs !
RETHYLESE CHLORIDE
ACET2HE
2-3'JTAKCSE
VINYL ACETATE
BENZENE
TOL'JESE
ETHYLJE.'iZESE
TOTAL FLEXES
5 U 1
11 U 1
11 U 1
11 U 
I
5 U 1
5 U 1
5 U 1
5 U 1
5U 
6 U
11 U 
11 U
11 U 
11 U
11 U 
11 U
5 U 
6 U
5 U 
6 U
5 U 
6 U
5 U 
61)
l£?-5-!1!D!Er-5-S37IEP-3-TOP
fiETKYLESE CKLDRIDE
ACETiNE
2-rUTASME
VIKYL ACETATE
BENZENE
TOLUENE
ETHYLEEHZENE
TOTAL IYLENES
— — — ,
6 U 1
1
11 U i
———— 1
11 U 1
11 li 1
— .--I
6 U 1
6 U 1
........ 1
6 U 1
46 
1
I
6 1) 1 6 U 1
11 U 1 13 U
........ j. .......
Ill) 
13 U
11 U 1 13 U
6 U I 6 U
6 U 1 6 U
a U 1 6 U
6 U 1 6 U
i
i U 
51)
11 1! 
5 J
11 U 
11 U
11 I' 
11 a
61' 
5 U
i :i 
C tt
3 t* 
*t u
i u 
5 a
6 U ) 5 U
5 U
11 U
11 U
11 U
5 U
5 U
5 U
5 U
6 U 
1 6 U 
5 U 1
i: u 
11 u 
11 u i
i
1! U 
11 U 
21 'J 1
11 u 
u u 
u a i
6 U 
61) 
5 U !
6 U 
6 U 
5 'J i
6 U 
6 U 
5 a !
j
6 U 
6 U 
5 U 1
Er-s-!!I8 i SP-6-EGT 1 SP-7-TOP i Sr-7-r.I D 1 EP-7--OT 1
i 
< 
I
6 U 
6 U
11 U 
11 U
11 U 
11 U
1! U 
11 U
6 U 
6 U
6 !J 
6 U
6 U 
6 U
6 U 
9
I
690 U
1400 U
2900 B
1400 U
690 U
690 U
690 U
7000
3 J 
1 J 1
56 
9 J
61 
1! U
11 U 
Hi)
61) 
51)
6 U 
5U
6 U 
51)
... 
.. TU" 
00 J
6 U 
ic
SOIL TECH
TAELE Nc. B
SOIL PILE (VOLATILE OR6ANIC5 ANALYSIS) - US/KB (CDNT.I
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED CONPOUM5-
ISP-l-TO?ISP-l-HIOISP-l-BOTI5P-2-TO?ISP-E-r.IDISP-2-30TiSP-3-TDPISr-3-mDIS?-3-BOTI
1
2-HETHOIY-2H1ETHYL PROPANE!
PENTANE
1,4-OIOIAME
C2-SUBSTITUTED BENZENE
C3-SUBSTITUTEB BENZENE
Ci-SL'BSTITUTEE- BENZENE
CS-OIT HYDROCARBON
Ci-UNSATlJSATED HYDROCARBON
Ci-tiYMOCARBCN
C6-HYDRCCARBCN
Cs-HYDROCAKBCN
C6-HYDSOCftRBC!)
C7-HYIROCARBCK
C7-KYIROCARBOH
C7-HYIROCAREON
C7-HYIRC:A?.80H
C2-'JN£ATiiRATED HYDRCCARECN
C6-HYKCCSRBON
C6-HY2R3CARBON
C8-HYSRGCARBOH
C8-HYSRCCAREON
C8-KYDRCCAP.BCN
C9-UNSATURATED HYDROCARBON
C9-«YCROCARrON
UNKNOWN
25] 
1
1......
1
1
———— 1 ————
1
1
———— 1 ————
1
1
1 22 J
1
1
....... 1 .•.•.
1
1
———— j.i ———
1
6.7 31 6.7 J
30 J 1
22 J 1
37 J 1
1
9.5 J 1 6.B J
22 J 1 10 J
———— 1 ————
66 ] 1
40 J 1
———— 1 ————
1
———— i ————
1 23 J
1
1
————
————
20]
22]
110 ]
ISO ]
5BO J
470 J
520 J
260 J
————
750J
————
————
92 J
54 J
————
————
57 J
71 J
170 :
2£3 J
230 ]
liO 3
650 ]
620 J
1 * .....
430]
————
————
————
1200 J
————
————
740 J
2500 ]
3200 J
2400 3
9030 J
7100 ]
21 COO ]
5700 J
————
5800]
————
— . ——
————
————
280 ]
34 J
62 ]
72 J
67 J
230 J
160 ]
510 I
240 ]
330 J
————
————
2100 ]
————
————
1200 ]
2&00 I
4500 ]
5100 ]
4300 ]
15000 J
12000 J
22000 J
13000 ]
————
————
————
20J
————
————
59]
60 ]
74 3
2c) J
610 ]
180 ]
————
400 ]
230 ]
————
540 ]
————
————
350 ]
————
13 ]
————
19 J
19 J
92 3
76 3
73 J
150 J
————
97 J
330]
————
————
TUT 
OO1 
O979
I so
SOIL TECH
TABLE KB. 6 (Ccnt'd)
SOIL PILE (VOLATILE OREANICS ANALYSIS) - US/KG (CENT.)
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED CCNPOUNDS-
ISF-4-TflrIEP-4-DU-TiSF-4-HID13F-4-2U-HISP-4-30T ISF-4-D'J-BI SP-5-TCF ISP-5-HID ISF-5-tCTi
1
2-SETHOIY-2-NETHYL PROPANE 1
PENTANE
1,4-DiOWNE
C2-SU3STITUTED BEHZEKE
C3-SU6STITUTED BENZENE
C4-SlJ5sTITUTED BENZENE
C2-OIY HYDROCARBON
Cs-MsAT'JfiATES HYDROCARBON
C6-HYDRCCAREON
C6-HYDR3CARBCN
C6-HYDRO:ARSON
' C6-HYD30CARBCN
C7-HYSR3:AR30N
C7-HyDRC:ARB2H
C7-KYCRCCARBON
C7-KYIF.SCAR3GN
CB-MsMTliHATED HYDROCARBON
Cfl-HYDF,0:ARECN
CS-HYIRCCfiSBDN
CB-HYSRSCfiRBON
CS-HYDRCCfiR3GN
C8-KYCR3CAREON
C9-LNSATURATED HYDROCARBON
C9-HYDRCCARBON
UNKNOVN
————
————
9.1 J
27 J
EO J
-------
25 J
E.7 J
22 J
65 J
43 J
60 J
62 J
1
1
1 23 BJ
1
1
1
1
1 U J
1
————— i ————
6.9 J 1
1
1
1
1
12 I 1 8.2 J
15 J 1 20 J
CH J 
I IE J
1
1
24 3 1 23 J
16 I 1 22 I
36 I 1 48 I
———— j ————
24 J 1 3! I
1
1 60 J
————— I—- ——
33 J !
* 
-»- 1 • .» »-•
1
1
————
19 J
—————
54 J
240 I
7.4 J
6.6 J
11 J
26 J
IS J
2! J
42 I
31 J
=
13 J
——
mm m m m ^m _ _
7.6 J
8.5 J
27 J
23 I
71 J
14 I
33 J
?1 J
58 J
91 J
6.2 I
12 J
12 I
29 J
121
431
291
i
« 
w»«— 
|
1
i
1
1
1
1
14 J !
1
!
22 J i
1i
42 J i
ISO J :
120 : :
270 J 1
80 J i
330 J !
270 J !
1
1
11
2SO J 1
———— 1
TUT OO1 0930
I so
I^H T*CI c
SOIL TECH
TABLE Ni>. B (Cont'd) 
SOIL PILE (VOLATILE DR6ANICS ANALYSIS) - US/KG (CONT.
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIES CONFOUNDS-
ISP-6-TOPISP-6-HIDISP-4-80TISP-7-TCFISP-7-KIDISP-7-BOTI
E-ffiTKOIY-M-ETHYL PROPANE!
PENTAJiE
1,4-EiDIAME
C2-SUBSTITUTE3 BENZENE
C3-SUBST1TUTD BEM2ENE
H-SUBSTirjTES BEN2EKE
E-OIY HYISOCftRBON
CeH'hSATURATED HYDRCCARECS
C6-HYDR;:«BO!I
C4-HYDRCCARBON
Ci-HiPr.DCARBCX
C7-HYDF.uAf!BON
C'-HYIRjCARBGN
C7-HYDR:CASBON
Cr-KiiT-uL^BCii
CS-JSSATURATE:' HYDROCHRBON
UD "tl i L*f>b • riRBJn
pa _ uy^S*." 'Cfinu
U0"nl vr>wwrti\0UH
CB-HYCRDCnRBON
C8-HYDRICARBON
CB-HYDROCARBON
C9-IJNSATURATED HYDROCARBON
C9-HYDSDCARBON
UNKNDiiN
.
23 J
41 J
————
V 
.M. 
*
1
1*.. ...
1
1
9.3 J
17 J
^^
1- . «
49 J
. 
*—
13 J
9.1 J
9.4 J
23 J
IS 1
12 J
i .......
1
1100 J
1300 J
1100 J
4400 J
3600 J
4700 J
1300 J
2900 J
6700 J
4400 I
110 I
————
————
1
11 J i
40 J
221
16 J
._.____
TUT 
OOJL O981
SOIL TECH
TASLE Mo. 9
NAPHTHALENE
2-KETHYLNAFKTHALENE
FLU2RENE
PHENANTKREKE
DI-n-BUTYLFHTHALATE
SP-!
IBO I
160 J
150 I
48 BI
-(E-ETKYLHEIYL) PHTHALATEI 140 BJ
i
SOIL PILE (HHIVOLATILE OF.GAN1CS ANALYSIS) - US/KS
SP-2
2600
5200
330 J
2301
130 BJ
SP-3
320 I
1700
260 ]
220 J
110 BJ
SP-4 ISP-4BUP
E5 J
93 BJ
130 BJ
82 J
100 BJ
SP-5
160 J
BiO
160 J
120 J
45 BJ
SP-6 
1 SP-6NS
————
100 BJ
TABLE No. 10 
SOIL FILE (SEMIVCLATiLE DR5ANICS ANALYSIS) - US/KG
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIES CDHPO'JNDS-
AIJCL CONDENSATION PRODUCT
ETHYL fETHYL BENZENE
ETHYL flETHYL BENZENE
ETHYL-DISETHYL BENZENE
E:niL-Dif!ETHYL BENZENE
ETHYL-DIRETHYL BENZENE
BETHYL PF.CFYL BENZENE
KTHYL FROrYL BENZENE
HETHYL PROFYL BENZENE
TRIXETKYL BENZENE
TRIHETHYL BENZENE
TRI HETHYL BENZENE
TETRAHETKYL BENZENE
TETRAJJETHYL BENZENE
PENTAKETHVL BENZENE
SF-1
2200 J
• KM ••
1700 J
2100 J
2200 J
BOO J
SF-H
5900 J
3100 J
4700 J
*600 I
>_ 
•••
3500 J
2000 I
6400 I
7000 J
MOO J
5500 J
SF-3
3200 J
1900 J
9300 J
3500 J
• - •••
*700 J
5300 J
4700 J
5200 J
SP-* ISF-4DUP 1 SP-5
530 AJ
___^— 
__
1
600 ABJ1
13CO J
3500 J
1200 J
1100 J
3200 J
26CO J
3100 J
SP-6
920 ABJ
• ___ 
—
SP-7
730 AEJ
2600 J
6200 J
36CO J
2000 J
2500 J
5100 J
6700 J
6100 J
6700 J
T
OOi
SOIL TECH
TABLE No. 10 (Ccnt'd) 
SOIL PILE (SEKIVOLATILE CR3ANICS AitALYSIS) - UE/K
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COHPOUNDS-
DIETHYL BEKZENE
C3 SUEST. BENZENE
M S'JBST. BENZENE
C1 SUBST. BENZENE
C<t SUBST. BENZENE
C*-C5 SUBST. BENZENE
C5 EL'JST. BENZENE
C5 S'Jr:T. EENZES:
C5 SUBST. BEHZENE
CS S-JEST. FENZENE
C5 SU5ST. BENZENE
C5 SUES*. BENZENE
LI SUBST. BESZENt/UNKKDHN
CJC S-JBET. sEHZENE/ClO HYDRD
cio KY:SC-:ARBCN
SP-l
6EO J
2800 J
3900 J
1100 J
Blv J
HOC J
770 J
VSO J
850 J
640 I
CIO ALKALANE/C3 SlieST BEHZENI
II 1 HYBRCCARBM/C* SUBST BENI
Cll ALKALANE
CIS BRANCHED ALKALANE
til BRANCKE3 ALKALANE
CE7 BRANCHES ALKALANE
I-HETHYL NAPHTHALENE
DUETHYL NAPHTHALENE
DIMETHYL NfirKTHALENE
i-PROPYl-HEPTANE
8*0 J
BM J
1500 3
SP-2 1 SP-3
6300 J
3*00 J
5»00 J
3300 J
1600 I
3600 J
2600 I
1300 I
1600 J
4800 J
2000 J
6000 J
2900 J
1900 J
2100 J
etOO J
2BOO J
2200 J
1900 J
SF-* ISP-WP
350 J
'
370 J
370 J
«0 J
UO J
430 J
1100 J
1100 J
350 J
3M J
SF-5
2200 I
3100 I
3*00 J
1600 J
1000 I
1100 J
710 J
1200 I
SP
SP-7 
I
——— I
6900 J
5500 J
3500 J
1600 ]
2300 I
1500 I
1500 J
ECOO J
1900 J
3500 J
1900 J
IIJ! 
O01 
OS* 8 3
SOIL TECH
FAELE Nc. 10 (Cont'd) 
SOIL PILE (SEHVOLATILE ORBANICS ANALYSIS) - UE/KG (CCXT.)
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIES COflPOUNDS-
PNA
PCLYCYCLOHYSROCARBON
CYCLOHYEROCARBCN
CYCLCHYJRuCARBON
CECANE
UNDECANE
DS2ELANE
TR1DECANE
TETRADECANE
HEIA2ECANE
HEFTABECANE
CCTAEECSNE
NONADECANE
EIC3SAKE
HENEiCDSANE
TET?.AC3sA!JE
PENTACO!PHE
SF-1
550 J
640 I
— — —
SP-2
1300 1
SP-3
2300 I
2500 J
SP-4 
ISF-4DUP
360 I
360 J
360 J
410 J
410 J
«0 J
400 J
470 I
510 J
360 J
400 J
360 J
473 J
360 J
290 J
320 J
————
2SO J
270 J
SP-5 
1 SP-6 1 SP-7
600 J
1400 J
1300 J
TUT 
OO1 
O984
SOIL TECH
TABLE No. 11
SOIL PILE (PETROLEOUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS)
SAMPLE
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4
SP-4DUP
SP-5
SP-6
SP-7
PETROLEOUM HYDROCARBONS
(MG/KG)
18
24
21
20
14
19
12
12
O01
SOIL TECH
TABLE No. 10 (Cent'dI
SOIL PILE (SEniVOLATILE OS3ANICS ANALYSIS) - US/KS (CCNT.)
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COHPOUNDS-
DIETHYL BENZENE
C3 5UE3T. EENZENE
C4 5UE5T. BENZENE
C4 SUBS*. BENZENE
C4 SUB3T. BENZENE
C4-C5 3UB3T. BENZENE
C5 SUF3T. EENZEKE
C5 SUrST. EENZENE
C5 SUEST. BENZENE
C5 SilBST. EENZENE
C3 SUSST. EEHZEHE
C5 SUES!. BENZENE
C5 !U3ST. BENZENE/UNKNOWN
C!0 SUSST. EENZEKE/C10 HYDRO
CIO KYDrCCAEEGN
C'.O ALKflLfiNE;C3 SUSST EENZES
C:l HYDRCCARBCS.'C* SUEST BEN
Cll ALKALANE
CIS BRANCHED ALKALANE
C19 BRANCHES ALKALANE
CE7 BRANCHED ALKALANE
METHYL NAPHTHALENE
DIKETHYL KSPHTHALENE
DIMETHYL NAPHTHALENE
^-PRCPYL-HEPTANE
SP-l
6£0 I
26001
2900 J
1100 1
310 J
1100 J
770 J
950 J
850 J
W J
8*0 J
660 J
1500 J
SP-2
6300 J
3M)0 J
5400 J
3300 J
1BOO J
3EOO J
2600 J
1300 J
1600 J
SP-3
4BOO J
2000 J
6000 J
2900 J
1900 J
2100 J
e*00 J
2BOO J
2200 J
1800 J
1
1 _ 
__
SF-4 
1
350 J
-
370 I
370 J
«0 J
440 J
430 I
1100 J
1100 J
SP-4DUP
3501
340 J
SP-5
2200 I
3100 I
3*00 1
1600 I
1000 I
1100 J
710 J
1200 J
SP-6
SF-7
6900 J
5500 1
3500 J
1600 J
2300 J
1500 J
1500 J
EOOO J
1900 J
3500 J
1900 J
TUT
001 0986
SOIL TECH
TABLE He. 10 (Cont'd) 
SOIL PILE (SES1VOLA7ILE ORE AMI CS ANALYSIS) - UE/K6 (CCHT.)
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIES) CONPOUNDS-
PNA
PCLYCYCISHY5ROCARBON
CYCLQHYMCCARBCN
CYCICHYHGCARBON
CECAXE
L'MDECAKE
D3DiLA.'iE
TRIDECANE
TETSADECASE
K-IAZECANE
HEFTACECAKE
DCTAIECANE
NONADEiANE
SP-1
550 J
8*0 I
EIC3SSKE 
1
HENEJC2SAKE
TETr.ACOS«SE
PENTAC3EAHE
sp-e
1300 J
SP-3
2300 J
2500 J
1
.
SP-* ISF-W
360 J
360 I
3iO I
MO J
MO I
«0 J
too J
*/0 J
510 J
2iC I
*00 J
3:0 1
*70 J
360 I
290 I
320 J
280 J
270 J
SP-5
600 J
1400 J
1300]
SP-6 
1 SP-7
1
TUT 
OO1 
0987
' j SOIL TECH_____
I 1—————
J 
TABLE No. 11
SOIL PILE (PETROLEOUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS)
I 
PETROLEOUM HYDROCARBONS
SAMPLE 
(MG/KG)
SP-1 
18
. 
SP-2 
24
SP-3 
21
' 
SP-4 
20
SP-4DUP 
14
I 
SP-5 
19
1 
SP-6 
12
SP-7 
12
TUT 
GUI O988
SOIL TECH
TABLE No. 12
SOIL PILE (METAL ANALYSIS)
SAMPLE
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4
SP-4DUP
SP-5
SP-6
SP-7
LEAD
UG/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ARSENIC
UG/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CHROMIUM J
UG/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5ELEN]
UG/I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = NOT DETECTED
UT 
001 
0989
~ SOIL TECH
I I so
TABLE No. 13
SOIL PILE (IGNITABILITY ANALYSIS)
IGNIABILITY 
IGNIABILITY
TORCH
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
NOTE: 
FLASHPOINT >60 C-DEGREES DEFINES SAMPLE
AS NONIGITABLE
N-I = NONIGNITABLE WHEN TESTED WITH TORCH
SAMPLE
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4
SP-4DUP
SP-5
SP-6
SP-7
C-DEGR]
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
TUT OO1 O9VO
i SOIL TECH
LIQUID SAMPLES
CHEMICAL RESULTS
TUT 001. 0991
i S
SOIL TECH
Definition of Terms
i 
Liquid Samples
1
T-E-1 
Tank Extraction Sample; 
This sample was collected
from a 55 gallons drum which stored liquid residues
pumped out from tanks at site.
DH 
Decontamination Water: 
Sample collected from a 30-
gal. 
drum which stored all decontamination liquid
resulting from this activity.
FB 
Field Blanksi 
The 
sampling 
equipment 
was
decontaminated, deionized water was poured over the
equipment and a sample collected. One per day.
TB 
Trip Blanks; Were sent by the laboratory in a 40 ml
vial. 
These vials are not opened in the field and
they were a check on sample contamination originally
from sample transport, shipping, and site conditions.
One per shipment.
WB 
Water Blank; 
Water 
samples collected from 
the
deionized water.
TUT 001 0992
I so
SOIL TECH
Z-HETHO.'i-.-rtETHVL PROFANE
TRiD_,CR,FLUQRCi€TKA«E
FENTAUE
1,4-DIOXANE
C.-r_Es7;T_T_D BENZENE
C3-s_t£7irjTED BENZENE
C4-UN5ATURATE3 HYDROCARBON
C4-£___7:7UTED BENZBJE
C5-C:n HYEfiCCARECN
Ci-UNsmwWTED HYDRCCAREON
Lw~7? i L r\wLnr _rl_i>i
CT-nrlRCCAREON
CS-t^i^'ATI. KtlRCCAREOf^
CE-HrTRCCARECH
CE-JftlRDCARBCN
C.-ffiTrDCARECN
Cs-tTr-RCCASECN
CS-h'tlfOCARECN
C?-U<=AriiRAT_. HYDRDCARECN
C=-*iV:ROCAFi:CN
LW.NCiiN
HATER EAHFtlS (VOL
-TtHTATIV
DU-1 
! FB-1
130000 EJ!
i .. .. . 
. '
i
II
i
II
I
I
1
;
!
II
it
i
i
i
i
:
ii
ii
!
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
i
i
.ATILE CR;
ELY I:EM
FE-:
——
——
——
——
——
——
H'JICS A?tf
IrlEJ CC!"
Fp-3
————
————
————
————
- - - - 
T~
_:£IS! - I
Ti-6-3-S°
—————
—————
—————
—————
—————
-_ _
5/kfi (CON
TB-c-9-89
—————
—————
—————
—————
- - — 
'
T.i
Tc-4-Ki-S9
______
______
»_T-|
nwco E;
— . ——
———
———
——— . TUT 
OO1 
O9V3
SOIL TECH
MATER 5KufL£5 (VOLATILE Z'F.c-MCS Xi*.
fiE7n:!£NE DLCRILE
ACETfflX
KRICN DIEULFiCE
VIKYL ACETnTE
EENZDC
icuse
tTrfilitfuEfit
TCTi XYLEtCS
WB-1
.
————
VOA-w-f-SIVCA-K-fS
16*
M4
————
1300
"<Xi
i:Ei£) - U3.43
TUT 
001 
U994
I so
SOIL TECH
Tg.j.-a.esrTi.j,;.;-;:; j.r.-
TH-'LE^E :-L:RI:E
ACt'EKE
VINYL ALETTE
Jt'-CENE
T-.I MCLC
ErHVLEEME/iE
"Til PLE-iE:
,ISOCCO B • H-v E i 
:'. 
\
I
I 
. <•« 
•i
I 
: 
1 5 =
17 
1
{ _____„.—— J .
! 
!
TUT 
001 
0995
I so
SOIL TECH
7. EA.1FLES (VOLATILE PANICS A?«.:EIS! - U3,kS 
(CON7.!
-TENTATIVELY IIENTIFIE- C-Jf-j-NDS-
"*~i1ETr'3''i*"'i"iE*HiL FRCFANE
TRI^:r.UDRC,1E^
FENTftff
1.4-riOKATC
C--s_M7:T_T_D BEilZE'Z
C3-£-r£7I7UTED EEJIPC
C4-Wi5AT.RATE- HYDRCCAREKJ
C4-£L'£;7:7JT_i) EEfilEIZ
C5-CSV HiEf.CCAF.ECM
Ct-vMsATwWTED HVDRCCAftBOfJ
Ci-n-ffOWEB.
w£~ni L'^uwHiSc— N
Lc~r* i LnLLnhb L> t
::-
;j?jEA:j?^T£i- HY:FGC;F.ECN
C7-n::?CCARECN
c:-r.MaR_a
..-ni.r.-rtP.tL,!
C.-nu.-_t>6u<
C5H.'j£ArL.'ATE H'tlRCCARECiN
CS-Krl'RCCAFftJN
CS-rMROCARBCN
C--W
::F.CCflRECN
Ci-niTfGCARE'CN
. 
CS-tfiKCCARKN
C?-_N:ATi'RiiTt_ HVDRCCARECN
C?-Hr:nCCflRBCN
mroM
EW-l
130000 EJ
.
—————
Fe-1
_____
Fr-1 ! FE-3 ;Ti-s-S-S°
1 
1
1 
1
t 
1
1 
1
1 
t
t
1 
1
1 
1
1 
t
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
; 
i
: 
:
•
————— : ————— : — ————
• 
'
1 
I
i 
•
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1
1 
t
1 
1 
'
1 
f 
1
Tt>c-«-S9
______
ic-s-10-5?
_____
7-£~ 1 i
iiocco E;;
:
i
i
•
i
!
•
;
<
•
_____
!
i
i
1
!
!
f
!
1
1
1
1
TUT 
i
SOIL TECH
HATER 3W.E5 (VOLATILE S.c^ICS i^ferEis) - US>i:3
lETmlBC CKLORICE
ftCETCf«
KRtCN OIE'JLFIDE
:-EUTWCf£
VIKYL ACETATE
ES^ZEfJE
TCLL'ENE
ETrfiUENiei
TCTi XYLEMES
HB-1
.
VQA-iHIj
UOO
*6<X>
V3HH1E!
i
ii
i
i
ii
:
i
1300 :
4400 :
TUT 
OO1 
O997
SOIL TECH
ATtn s^rFLEa (VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS) - UG/KG OJT.)
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMFOUNDS-
UE-1 
HB-2
TRIDaiHuFLUOROfETHAiNE
FQ47ANE
1,4-DIQXANE
C2-5S*TITUTED BENEE
C3-£:jrSTITu7ED BENZENE
CVUSVTJRATED HYDSOCAREON
C4-:L33TI7u7ED EPiZti'Z
C-OXY HYDROCARBON
viTED HYCRGCnRBON
Co-ntTOuCARBCW
Cfrr/IRCCHFeON
L7TiYIF.uCAn.cON
CT-rfftnOCARBCN
3 KrTREARBQN
("HiYKi3CfiR20N
CS-tf/WOCARBON
CS-rf/DROCARBDN
CS-tT/HaiCARPON
CS-h'fi-RXARBON
ATUFj;Tn! KfDROCARBON
C9-nrtfiOCARBON
O01 
0998
F
SOIL TECH
WATER SAWLE5 (SEW VOLATILE OrSWICS ANALYSIS) - U6/K3
PHENOL
KNI'rt. ALCCKOL
2-flETKYLFHENCL
4-ttTKiLF>iE?«L
tMFHTririLE?£
2-f£THYUWFHTriALeiE
ACOttFHTiES
B:ETHYLFKTH.tH7E
FLUORSJE
FHENW.THSL1*
ANrt*.i^Er£
FLUORANThE,!
PYREJS
OI-i-JUrilFHTH^TE
BU7,lSBCVL*H7rW7E
bis-'-Z-TrfiLHE;'^, FHTriALATE
MM 
! Fc-1
20 
!
41 
!
t
1
67 
:
31 
:
i
:
4 J !
5 J :
1
1
1
1
1
1
G4 
;
FB-2
FB-3
HE-1 !
HB-2
TE-1
150
28
36
670 E
440 E
15
9 J
46
TE-lttS
430 E
240
12
5 J
35
TE-ltSD
410 E
13
7 J
34 J
TE-ii-_
I* •
»• J
?:.:•
3=0
»j
12 J
C 
•
<J .•
4r
TUT 
OO1 
09V9
¥
SOIL TECH
WTER 5A«FtE£ (StHIVQLATILE CF-^NIZS ANALYSIEi - UG/KG
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED eSIPQUNDa-
fiLMK. CCNDENSATIW PRODUCT
. ETHYL METHYL SHIM.
ETHYL METHYL SENZENE
ETrriWJIMETrffL SEN2ENE
ETHYL-DIMETniL BENZENE
E7rf-L-3IHETHYL EENZENE
DlfiTHVL ETHrl ScNZENE
DIMETHYL ETKfL itNZEfJE
KE7riiL-?lETHVLETKrL EENZBJE
hETr/L ETHNL :E?iIEf€
ME7n:'u ETHVl iGJiBC 
.
fiETHilFROFrt. £E?)ZENE
f£TK:l FRCfrl tSiZEfiE
HETn;L FfturiL '
MtL-tEMENE
Tfu'STHYL rr.IS
TRiflEThVL tcf«B£
TRIf£7n"fL B3iZ_« I50KER
TRlJETnrt. EENZE*£ ISCMER
TRIffTn/L BErJZE?£ I30MER
TRIKtm EEfiZ2£ 1E01ER
TF:If£7n'.l EE.7E?£ IsOMER
TEmAtiETtfil. .2u2£ ISOflER
TETWWETrfYL KNZE* IS01ER
DW-1
240 J
91 J
B6 J
320 J
140 J
43 J
84 J
FB-1
F5-2
Ft-*
HB-1
WB-2
(CONT.)
TE -1 
TE-1KS TE-1HS3
230 J
340 J
2300 J
1200 J
1100 J
2900 J
1300 J
74i) J
520 J
2700 J !
1300 j :
1000 j :
3600 J !
1400 J i
74);:
310 j:
I so
SOIL TECH
1
1
j
TETiWCTiYL BENZ3* ISOfCR
TE7KJE7WL BtNZE?£ ISOJtR
TETrAKETtirl EENZEJJE
TETRWeTniL BENZENE
' 
TRiriTHiL HEXDI ISOMER
METHYL EPJZENE
i
, 
DIETmL BENZINE ISOHER
2-ETnil-l , 4DI HtThrl-EENZENE
DI^'rri'L-EEfJZE?! flETHAfJCL
i 
f_ 
^
C3 EIJES7. EL'IZEIiE
^ 5'JS57. ct'.ZEliE
C3 E'JcsT. EENIEti
C-.- b'jtS i • Ec^ZE^iE
C
^ ! • » • • » 
~ : • •• 
w« l^pi :p
C- EJB57. ZEMENE
C4 SUK7. EEJZE
f£
; 
C4 3L1S7. BENZEIi'UNKN&iN
. 
C SJB57. BDJZEr€
i
C EUBS7. EEJiZENE
' 
C5 5JKT. BEJiZEJC
K S3S7. EGiZENE/mJICHN
HATER SAtfVES (SO
-TENTATIVE
DW-1 
! FB-1
98 J
800 J
————
530 J
————
IVQLATILE CRciNICS aKLiSIS) - U6/KE
1Y IEQ1TIFIEI 03f CUNCs-
FB-2 ! Fc-3 ! WE-1 ! ME-2
.
————
————
I
1
I
1
I
iI
I
i
i
I
i
———— ; ————
:
i
i
:
i
i
ii
i
t
it
ii
ii
———
——— -
———
> 
(CQNT.)
TE-1
390 J
410 J
720 J
————
640 J
260 J
710 J
TE-lrtS
————
————
TE-1M5D
————
————
TE-;:<_
tio;
350 J
i"«* 
T
————————
————
————
t.". J
————
TUT 
OOi 
1O01
SOIL TECH
WATER SAMPLES (SEMIVCLATILE ORSANICS ftNALYSISl - UG/KG 
(CONT.)
-TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED CBPGJNDS-
Ca SUEST. IQZENE
UNttttM SUBST. BENZENE
CiO HYDROCARBON
CIO KyiRCCARESN/CiTLCHflffiOCA
C16 IJSATURATIC HYWCCARBQN
C20 ^SATURATED HYXCCAREON
C22 HYDROCAFKN
C:; OA'fflfTRC-^RBON
C26 HYDROCAR-W
MIXE E?ECTRA-£U5ST. EENZBiE
1-*E7HYL NAFHTrvLEME
S-«ETn:l-l (3H) lEC-BZCFURAfJO
Dirr.Trl-II^.ETKiL IliEENE
DI^-THYL Hr-hiHALLNE
Dl^ml N^HTHnLEfC
OXWilRKAfciN
FCLraCLIC
D'CLCWCP.OCARBCfJ
DECtfJE
DOCECANE
DU-1
B9 J
3"J J
92 J
180 J
270 J
92 J
87 J
FB-1
FB-2 
! FS-3
NB-1
WE-2
TE-1
190 J
7700 J
870 J
410 J
320 j
TE-1KS
TE-1MSD 
TE-1DL 1
noo;:;
870 J :
ii
260 J !
400;;
TUT 
001 
.1O02
IsSOIL TECH
WATER SAMPLES (PETROLEOUMS HYDROCARBON ANALYSIS)
PETROLEOUh HYDROCARBONS
SAMPLE 
(MG/KG)
T-E-1 
7.5
FB-1 
ND
FB-2 
ND
FB-3 
ND
WB-1 
ND
WB-2 
ND
DW-1 
RINSE 
39
NOTE: ND - PARAMETER NOT DETECTED
TUT O01 1003
I 
I
SOIL TECH
WATER SAMPLES (IGNITABILITY ANALYSIS)
IGNIABILITY
SAMPLE
T-E-1
FB-1
FB-2
FB-3
WB-1 
,
WB-2
DW-1
C-DEGRI
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
IGNIABILITY
TORCH
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
N-I
NOTE: FLASHPOINT >60 C-DEGREES DEFINE SAMPLE
AS NONIGNITAELE
N-I = NONIGNITABLE WHEN TESTED WITH TORCH
TUT 001 1O04
I
f
REFERENCE NO. 24
02-9102-11-HR
REV. NO. 0
FINAL DRAFT
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION
TUTUWELLFIELD
ST. THOMAS, USVI
VOLUME 3 OF 5
PREPARED UNDER
TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-9102-11
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346
FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
JUNE 5.1991
NUS CORPORATION
SUPERFUND DIVISION
TUT 
00.1
02-8902-42-PA
REV. NO. 1
FINAL DRAFT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
PREPARED UNDER
TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-8902-42
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346
FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MARCH 24,1989
NUS CORPORATION
SUPERFUND DIVISION
SUBMITTED BY:
DIANE TRUBE
PROJECT MANAGER
JOSEPH MAYO
5 ^ f E MANAGER
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY:
M W\ /V
RONALD M. NAMAN
FIT OFFICE MANAGER
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. 
No. 1
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
PART I: SITE INFORMATION
1.
2.
3
4.
8.
9.
Site Name/Alias Ramsev Motors
Street Route 384________
City Tutu District. St. Thomas
County N/A
State U.S. Virgin Islands 
Zip 08002
County Code 
N/A 
Cong. Dist. N/A
EPA ID No. New Site
Latitude 18° 20' 41
Longitude 64° 53' 20'
USGS Quad. Eastern St. Thomas. US. Virgin Islands
Owner Rita Ramsev
Tel. No. 
(8091 775-4900
Street Route 384, Tutu District
City St. Thomas
Operator Same as above
State U.S. Virgin Islands 
Zip 08002
Tel. No. 
N/A___________
Street 
N/A
City 
N/A
State 
N/A
Zip N/A
Type of Ownership
[x] Private 
Q Federal 
L~H State
[] County 
£] Municipal 
O Unknown
D Other.
Owner/Operator Notification on File
D RCRA 3001 
Date _____
(xj None 
Q Unknown
OCERCLA103c
Date
Permit Information
Permit
None____
Permit No.
Date Issued
Expiration Date
Comments
10. 
Site Status
[x] Active 
n'nactivc 
D Unknown
11. 
Years of Operation 
Unknown 
to 
Present
TUT 
001 
10 OS
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
12. 
Identify the types of waste units (e.g., landfill, surface impoundment, piles, stained soil.
above- or below-ground tanks or containers, land treatment, etc.) on site. Initiate as many
waste unit numbers as needed to identify all waste sources on site.
(a) 
Waste Management Areas
Waste Unit No. 
Waste Unit Type 
Facility Name for Unit
1 
Drums_______________i 
Waste Oil Drums____________
2 
Underground Storage Tank___ 
Waste Oil Underground Storage Tank
(b) 
Other Areas of Concern
Identify any miscellaneous spills, dumping, etc. on site; describe the materials and identify
their locations on site.
Waste oil was discharqinq onto the Ramsev Motors property from the adjacent Gassen Motors
property___________________________________________:______
13. 
Information available from
Contact 
Amy Brochu__________ 
Agency US. ERA_______ 
Tel. No. (201)906-6802
Preparer Joseph Mavo______ 
Agency NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Date 03/24/89______
TUT 
001 1009
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
s_ 
PART II: 
WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION
I 
For each of the waste units identified in Part I, complete the following six items.
Waste Unit 
1 
- 
____Drums______, 
Waste Oil Drums_____
1. 
Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit.
(
There are no known current or previous RCRA permits for the Ramsey Motors Site. The age of
the waste unit is unknown. The Water and Power Authority (WAPA) stopped accepting waste
oil, which it used for fuel, in 1986 when it was found to contain PCBs. Since that time nearly all
I 
waste oil on St. Thomas has been stored, as there is no acceptable method of disposal.
1
2. 
Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map.
The waste unit is located inside an overhang garage in the northeast corner of the Ramsey
Motors property.
3. 
Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g., area or volume of a landfill or surface
impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous
] 
substances in the waste unit.
Twenty-five 55-gallon drums of waste oil are stored along the inside perimeter of an
automotive repair garage.
4. 
Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The
physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry,
liquid, or gas.
The drums on site contain automotive waste oil, which is a liquid.
5. 
Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit.
The waste units contain automotive waste oil. Readings ranging from 10 to 90 ppm and 60 to
300 ppm were detected on the HNu photoionization detector and OVA flame ionization
detector, respectively, m open drums in the garage. Substances such as gasoline, kerosene,
and degreasing solvents may also be present in the drums. Soil sampling indicates the
presence of toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene on site.
6. 
Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via
groundwater, surface water, and air.
The waste oil drums are located inside a garage on a cement floor. Some of the drums were
open, and there were spills on the floor of the garage. Small quantities of oil apppeared to be
leaking out of the garage onto the soil.
Ref. Nos. 1,20.21.23
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
PART II: 
WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION
For each of the waste units identified in Part I, complete the following six items.
Waste Unit 
2 
- 
Underground Storage Tank . 
Waste Oil Underground Storage Tank
1. 
Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit.
There is no known RCRA permit for the underground storage tank for waste oil. The age of
this waste unit is unknown.
2. 
Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map.
The waste unit is located underground below the workshop area near Estate Road.
3. 
Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g.. area or volume of a landfill or surface
impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous
substances in the waste unit.
The volume of the storage tank is unknown.
4. 
Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The
physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry,
liquid, or gas.
The physical state of the waste oil in the tank is liquid.
5. 
Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit.
The waste unit contains waste oil from automotive repair and servicing activities. On-site
sampling indicates the presence of tetrachloroethane, ethylbenzene, and xylene in the
groundwater. Ethylbenzene, xylene, 2-hexane, and toluene have been detected in soil
samples analyzed by Cenref Labs, it should be noted, however, that the groundwater in the
entire area is contaminated, and therefore, the tetrachloroethane may or may not be
associated with this site.
6. 
Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via
groundwater, surface water, and air.
The waste is contained in an underground storage tank. There is no information that
indicates that the tank is leaking; therefore, there is little potential for contaminant migration
to air, groundwater, or surface water.
Ref. Nos. 1.22.23
TUT 
OOi 1011
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
PART III: HAZARD ASSESSMENT
GROUNOWATER ROUTE
1. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the groundwater as follows:
observed, alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminants) detected or suspected, and
provide a rationale for attributing the contaminants) to the facility.
The likelihood of a release of contaminants to the groundwater from the waste unit on site is
small. Although some of the drums were not properly closed, all the drums were stored inside
on a cement floor. There are no berms or curbs to contain the waste in the event of a spill.
The drums contain automotive waste oil. Air monitoring instrument readings inside the
drums ranged from 10 to 300 ppm. This suggested that the drums may contain volatile
components, possibly gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing solvents. These substances are
typically associated with automotive facilities.
Additionally, an underground storage tank exists on site; however, there is no indication of
any leaking.
Groundwater sampling on site has found the presence of tetrachlorbethane. The entire area,
however, has contaminated groundwater which may or may not have been associated with
this site.
Ref. Nos. 1,22,23
2. 
Describe the aquifer of concern; include information such as depth, thickness, geologic
composition, permeability, overlying strata, confining layers, interconnections,
discontinuities, depth to water table, groundwater flow direction.
The rock units of St. Thomas and St. John are divided into three major groups. The Water
Island Formation, which is late lower Cretaceous in age, consists of keratophyre and spiHates.
The Virgin Island Group, which is probably early Cretaceous or Albian in age, consists of
andesitic-pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary formations. The Virgin Island Group is divided
into four formations: the Louisenhoj Formation, which consists of augite-andesite breccia,
tuff, and conglomerate; the Outer Brass Limestone which consists of partially silicified-
tuffaceous-radiolarian-limestone; the Tutu Formation, which consists of tuffaceous wacke.
including megabreccia near the base and limestone near the top; the Hans Lollik Formation,
which may be Eocene in age, consists of augite-andesite breccia and tuff. The final group is
made up of one or more dioritic plutons. These unnamed dikes and plugs of quartz-andesine
hornblende-porphyry are Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in age. Alluvian deposits are
quaternary in age.
The Water Island Formation, which consists of 95 percent volcanic flow breccias, was probably
extruded on a relatively level ocean floor. The absence of terrigenous sediments from this
formation indicates that there were no emergent islands present in the area at the time of
extrusion. Emergent islands would have served as a source of weather sediments or detritus,
which is not present in this formation. There is evidence that sea floor subsidence occurred
during the greater part of the accumulation of this formation. 
However, the subsidence was
not rapid enough to maintain a constant water level thereby causing explosive erruptions
near the top of the formation. Regional uplift occurred near the end of the Water Island.
The Louisenhoj Formation of the Virgin Island Group unconformably overlies the Water Island
Formation and crops out on about half of the land area on St. Thomas. Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St John was the origin of this formation. Evidence of this center is
based upon the coarseness of volcanic ejecta in the formation in nearby eastern St. Thomas
and western St. John. Material is less coarse and tuffs are more predominant as you move
further east and west away from the center or origin. This augite-andesite formation ranges
in thickness from 4,000 to 13,000 feet. In certain areas of St. Thomas and St. John,
conglomerates are interbedded witn andesitic rocks at the base of this formation. The
depositional environment of this conglomerate varies from location to location throughout
the formation.
00.1. 
1O12
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
The Outer Brass Formation of the Virgin Island Group is mostly siliceous limestone which
overlies the Louisenhoj Formation. This limestone formation is an offshore deposit formed by
radiolarian and foraminiferal remains including a minor amount of tuff. Thicknesses are
known to be up to at least 600 feet.
Overlying the Outer Brass Formation is the Tutu Formation. The Tutu Formation is fine- to
coarse-grained volcanic wackes, which are termed flysch. This formation is derived from
eroding sediments from the Louisenhoj andesites. Exposed thicknesses are known to be as
much as 6000 feet. Within this formation, a megabreccia lithofacies with an average thickness
of 30 feet and a limestone member with a thickness up to 300 feet is worth mentioning.
The Hans Lollik Formation, which consists of at least 10,000 feet of augite-andesite pyroclastic
rocks, crops out on Little Hans Lollik Island. Dioritic plutons are located in Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St. John; in the narrows, between St. John and the British Virgin
Islands; and south of St. Thomas. 
The exact delineation of these plutons is uncertain.
Throughout the islands isolated dikes of quartz-andesine porphyries, andesine-hornblende
porphyries, lamprophyres, breccias, and pegmatites appear.
Folding occurred after the deposition of the Virgin Island Group. Rocks were tilted to form a
northward-dipping homocline, which is cut by sets of faults trending N 45°W, N 55°E and
north. Well-defined joint sets parallel each of the major fault trends. ;Dips range from 15° to
90" with the average being 40°. Strike-slip faults have horizontal offsets of less than 1 mile.
Two major strike-slip graben structures or fault systems exist. The first passes through
Redhook, St. Thomas and the eastern edge of Lovango Cay. The second crosses St. John, from
Contact Point on the southwest to Brown's Bay on the northeast.
Most recently. Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial deposits occurred primarily in coastal
embayments. However, a narrow bank of alluvium extends up to Turpentine Run on the east
end of the island. Most of these deposits are composed of silt, clay, and thin, discontinuous
beds of sand and gravel. Maximum thickness of these is SO feet.
Groundwater movement is limited to openings and joints along fault zones. Regional
geologic information is insufficient to determine whether these fractures and fault zones are
present in all of the above-described formations; however, for this report it is assumed that
the fractures and fault zones are present in all of these formations. The valleys on the island
are the result of weak zones caused by faulting and jointing and are primary recharge areas
for groundwater. Alluvial deposits have a high porosity but low permeability, making this
aquifer unfavorable for groundwater production. In coastal embankments throughout the
island, saltwater intrusion is widespread in alluvial deposits. In most areas, alluvial deposits
are interconnected with bedrock and act to recharge precipitation to the underlying bedrock.
The direction of groundwater flow in the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer is south-southeast
which is generally along the direction of flow of Turpentine Run. Depth to groundwater in
the aquifer ranges from 5 to 60 feet, and the altitude of the water levels ranges from 1 to 209
feet above mean sea level.
Ref. Nos. 11,16
3. 
Is a designated sole source aquifer within 3 miles of the site?
No sole source aquifer, as designated in the Federal Register, is located within 3 miles of the
site.
Ref. No. 8
TUT 
001 
1O13
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
4. 
What is the depth from the lowest point of waste disposal/storage to the highest seasonal
level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern?
Drums in the waste unit were stored on a cement floor at ground level. The underground
tank is assumed to be 6 feet underground. Depth to groundwater in Virgin Island Housing
Authority (VIHA) well Nos. 
1 and 2 was reported to be 56 and 60 feet, respectively. The VIHA
wells are located about 900 feet southeast of Ramsey Motors. There is a well on the Ramsey
Motors property that is used for washing cars. The well is approximately 100 feet deep, but
the depth to water in the well is unknown.
Ref. 
Nos. 
1,2,9, 22
5. 
What is the permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum
between the ground surface and the aquifer of concern?
There are no continuous intervening strata between the ground surface and the bedrock
aquifer. Soils are generally thin in the area around the site. The water-bearing formations in
the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer are composed primarily of fractured and jointed volcanic
rocks. The range of hydraulic conductivities associated with these formations is 10-3 to 10-5
cm/sec.
Ref. 
Nos. 
10,11, 16
6. 
What is the net precipitation for the area?
Net precipitation is usually calculated by subtracting mean annual lake evaporation (a
surrogate measure for evapotranspiration) from normal annual total precipitation. Mean
annual lake evaporation information was not available for St. Thomas; however,
evapotranspiration data were available. These data indicate that 95.8 percent of the incident
precipitation on St. Thomas is lost through evapotranspiration. The normal annual total
precipitation for St. Thomas is 43.74 inches, but because of orographic effects on the Island,
normal annual total precipitation can range from 35 inches to 50 inches over short distances.
In the Turpentine Run Basin, normal annual precipitation is 40 inches. Calculations for net
precipitation are provided below:
40 inches precipitation x 95.8 
percent lost to evapotranspiration = 38.32 inches lost to
evapotranspiration
40 inches precipitation - 38.32 inches lost to evapotranspiration = 
1.68 
inches net
precipitation.
Ref. 
Nos. 
3, 5, 12, 13
7. 
Identify uses of groundwater within 3 miles of the site (i.e., private drinking source,
municipal source, commercial, industrial, irrigation, unusable).
Groundwater within 3 miles of the site is used as a source of private and municipal drinking
water, and for commercial purposes. There are at least 41 wells within 2 miles of the site.
Thirty-four of these wells are within 1 mile of the site. Sixteen of these wells have been closed
because they are contaminated with volatile organic compounds.
Ref. 
Nos. 
6,9
8. 
What is the distance to and depth of the nearest well that is currently used for drinking or
irrigation purposes?
Distance 
780 feet________ 
Depth 
150 feet_________
Nearest well is the VIHA well No. 2, which is located approximately 780 feet southeast of
Ramsey Motors. This well is believed to be used for drinking. A nearby well, VIHA No. 1, was
ordered closed because of contamination with volatile organic compounds. VIHA well No. 2 is
not listed as being closed for contamination, and its designated use is for domestic purposes.
Ref. Nos 6, 9
TUT 001. 101.4
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
9. 
Identify the population served by the aquifer of concern within a 3-mile radius of the site.
It is difficult to estimate the population served by groundwater on St. Thomas as there are few
records available on groundwater withdrawal, sale, and transport. The locations of some
wells in St. Thomas are unknown, and there are reports of illegal drilling on the island. It is
estimated that there are 500 to 600 private wells on St. Thomas. Most of these are used for
nondrinking domestic purposes such as washing and flushing, although some may be used for
drinking. There are a number of wells that are used for commercial purposes. Water from
these wells is trucked to private houses and pumped into cisterns to augment the rainwater
collected from roofs. Groundwater is also bottled and sold in supermarkets.
There are at least 41 wells in the Turpentine Run Basin. Recently 16 of these wells have been
ordered closed because they were found to be contaminated with volatile organic
compounds. One of these wells was a major supplier of water to the eastern end of the island.
Estimates of the population using groundwater as a source of drinking water range from none
to approximately 11,000-the population of the Turpentine Run Basin which is not served by
water from the desalinization plant. The actual population served by groundwater is
probably less than 11,000, as desalinated water and water from wells outside the 3-mile radius
is trucked into the area.
Ref. Nos. 9, 13, 15, 18, 19
SURFACE WATER ROUTE
10. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to surface water as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility.
A very small potential exists for contaminants to be transported to surface water. The waste
oil drums are stored inside a garage on a cement floor. There were some minor spills in the
area, and there were no containment structures around the drums to prevent migration of
spills.
The drums contain waste oil generated from automotive repair and maintenance activities.
Air monitoring instruments indicated the presence of organic vapors in the open drums.
Substances such as gasoline, kerosene, and degreasing solvents may also be present in the
drums.
Waste oil was draining from a ditch on the adjacent Gassett Motors Site onto the Ramsey
Motors Site.
Ref. Nos. 1,2
11. 
Identify and locate the nearest downslope surface water. If possible, include a description of
possible surface drainage patterns from the site.
The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon, which is hydraulically
connected to. the Caribbean Sea. The distance from the site to the nearest surface water along
the course of Turpentine Run is 2.5 miles. There are a number of storm sewers on the site, and
it is possible that these sewers may intercept much of the runoff from the site. It is unknown
where the storm sewers discharge, but it is suspected that they discharge to Turpentine Run as
it is the only drainage pathway from the basin.
Ref. Nos. 2, 4, 5
12. 
What is the facility slope in percent? (Facility slope is measured from the highest point of
deposited hazardous waste to the most downhill point of the waste area or to where
contamination is detected.)
The facility is relatively flat with a slight slope toward the south-southeast. Facility slope is
estimated to be 0 to 3 percent.
Ref. Nos. 1,2
TUT 00.1 1015
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
13. 
What is the slope of the intervening terrain in percent? (Intervening terrain slope is
measured from the most downhill point of the waste area to the probable point of entry to
surface water.)
The slope of the intervening terrain is as follows:
• 
Elevation of waste area - 240 ft
• 
Elevation at point of entry - 0 ft
• 
Path length-13,200ft
240 ft - 0 ft x 100 = 1.8% slope
13.200ft
Ref. Nos. 1.2
14. 
What is the 1-year 24-hour rainfall?
One-year 24-hour rainfall data were not available for the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, it is
known that rains exceeding 1 inch in 24 hours occur six or seven times a year on St. Thomas.
Two-year 48-hour rainfalls range from 4 to 15 inches. It has also been reported that it is not
uncommon for 24-hour rainfalls to be 2 to 3 inches.
Ref. Nos. 4, 6
15. 
What is the distance to the nearest downslope surface water? Measure the distance along a
course that runoff can be expected to follow.
The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon which is hydraulically
connected to the Caribbean Sea. The distance from the site to the lagoon is 2.5 miles. It
appears that most runoff from the site enters storm drains near the site. Since the point of
discharge and the route of these storm drains are unknown, the distance to the nearest
downslope surface water along the pathway is unknown.
Ref. No. 2
16. 
Identify uses of surface waters within 3 miles downstream of the site (i.e.. drinking,
irrigation, recreation, commercial, industrial, not used).
Surface water within 3 miles downstream of the site is used for recreation including
swimming, fishing, and boating. The OPNR has designated the area of the Mangrove Lagoon
for preservation and conservation recreation
Ref. Nos. 2, 14
17. 
Describe any wetlands, greater than 5 acres in area, within 2 miles downstream of the site.
Include whether it is a freshwater or coastal wetland.
There are no wetlands greater than 5 acres within 2 miles downstream of the site. However,
there is a coastal mangrove wetland approximately 2.5 miles downstream. The Mangrove
Swamp is designated as a preservation area in the Coastal Zone Management Program of the
DPNR.
Ref. Nos. 2, 14
18. 
Describe any critical habitats of federally listed endangered species within 2 miles of the site
along the migration path.
There are no known critical habitats of federally endangered species within 2 miles of the site.
The Virgin Islands Tree Boa (Epicrates monensis qranti) is an endangered species in the U.S.
Virgin Islands; however, no critical habitat has been identified for this species.
Ref. No 7
TUT 
00 i 
1.016
- 
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
19. 
What is the distance to the nearest sensitive environment along or contiguous to the
migration path (if any exist within 2 miles)?
There are no sensitive environments within 2 miles of the site that lie along or contiguous to
the migration pathway.
Ref. Nos. 2, 7, 14
20. 
Identify the population served or acres of food crops irrigated by surface water intakes
within 3 miles downstream of the site and the distance to the intake(s).
There is no population served or food crops irrigated by surface water intakes within 3 miles
downstream of the site. The nearest surface water is saline. There is a desalinization plant
which uses sea water to supply drinking water, but the intake is greater than 3 miles from the
site.
Ref. Nos. 2. 13
21. 
What is the state water quality classification of the water body of concern?
No water quality classification is known to exist for the Mangrove Lagoon or the Caribbean
Sea, although the mangrove swamp surrounding the lagoon is designated as a preservation
area by the DPNR.
Ref. No. 14
22. 
Describe any apparent biota contamination that is attributable to the site.
No apparent biota contamination was observed during the on-site reconnaissance conducted
by NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT on February 15, 1989.
Ref. No. 1
AIR ROUTE
23. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the air as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, none. Identify the contaminants) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminant(s) to the facility.
The potential for release of contaminants to the air is very small. An OVA and HNu detected
above-background concentrations of organic vapors in drums; however, no readings above
background were detected in the ambient air in the drum storage areas.
The drums on site contain waste oil from automotive repair and servicing operations. The
drums may also contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing solvents.
Ref. Nos. 1,2
24. 
What is the population within a 4-mile radius of the site?
Based on the 1980 census, the population within 4 miles of the site is approximately 36,000.
Ref. No. 17
FIRE AND EXPLOSION
25. 
Describe the potential for a fire or explosion to occur with respect to the hazardous
substance(s) known or suspected to be present on site. Identify the hazardous substance(s)
and the method of storage or containment associated with each.
No significant fire or explosion conditions are known or suspected to be present on the site.
Ref. No 1
TUT 
001 
1017
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
26. 
What is the population within a 2-mile radius of the hazardous substance(s) at the facility?
Based on the 1980 census, the population within 2 miles of the site is approximately 19,000.
Ref. No. 17
DIRECT CONTACT/ON-SITE EXPOSURE
27. 
Describe the potential for direct contact with hazardous substance(s) stored in any of the
waste units on site or deposited in on-site soils. Identify the hazardous substance(s) and the
accessibility of the waste unit.
There is little potential for direct contact with substances stored in the waste unit. Although
the bungs are open on some of the drums and there are some spills, the drums are not located
in an area that is frequented by customers. Access to the site is controlled by a fence. There is
potential for workers to come in contact with waste oil in the course of performing their jobs.
Ref. No. 1
28. 
How many residents live on a property whose boundaries encompass any part of an area
contaminated by the site?
There is no evidence that any residential areas have been contaminated by the site.
Ref. No. 1
29. 
What is the population within a 1-mile radius of the site?
Based on the 1980 census data, the population within 1 mile of the site is approximately
11,000.
Ref. No. 17
TUT 
001 
1018
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. 
No. 1
PART IV: SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Ramsey Motors Site is located in the Tutu area of St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Ramsey Motors
is engaged in the sale, maintenance, and repair of automobiles. The area within approximately 1
mile of the site is densely populated and contains some commercial properties. There are large
housing developments northeast, southeast, and west of the site. The nearest residence is
approximately 400 feet southwest of the site. The densely populated and highly commercial town of
Charlotte Amalie, which is the capital of St Thomas, is located 2.3 miles east of the site.
There are twenty-five 55-gallon drums of waste oil stored on a concrete floor along the inside
perimeter of the Ramsey Motors automotive garage. Some of the drums were open, and there were
spills on the garage floor during the on-site reconnaissance conducted by NUS Corp. on February 15,
1989. Readings ranging from 10 to 90 ppm and 60 to 300 ppm were detected on the HNu
photoionization detector and the OVA flame ionization detector, respectively, during the
reconnaissance. Waste oil was noted discharging from a pool on the adjacent Gassett Motors
Property into a drainage ditch on the Ramsey Motors Site. Additionally, an underground storage
tank is located under the workshop area on site.
Until June 1986, the Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil generated
by marinas, airports, and auto maintenance facilities. The waste oil was blended with fuel and
burned as a source of power. WAPA stopped accepting waste oil when a batch was found to contain
PCBs. The source of the PCBs is unknown. Since 1986, there has been no permitted method of waste
oil disposal on St. Thomas. Generators must store their waste oil, but the facilities are not inspected
or issued storage permits. These conditions combined with drum shortages and poor housekeeping
have resulted in generally poor waste containment at many of the facilities.
As mentioned previously, the waste oil drums on the Ramsey Motors property are not properly
stored or contained. Many of the drums are open and there is oil pooled on the floor. The garage
where the drums are stored has a concrete floor and an overhang roof, but the walls are not
continuous and small quantities of oil appeared to be leaking into the soil in a few areas. There are
no berms to contain the oil in the event of a spill. Sampling indicates the presence of ethylbenzene,
xylene, 2-hexane, and toluene in soils associated with this site. Whereas there is no indication of any
leaks associated with the underground tank, recent groundwater sampling has determined the
presence of tetrachloroethane. However, the entire area's groundwater is contaminated, and the
origin of this contamination remains unknown. Due to groundwater and soil contamination, a
recommendation of MEDIUM PRIORITY for further action is provided.
Any potential for release of the oil to the environment could be significantly reduced if the drums
are properly stored and contained, and the spilled oil is cleaned up 
It is recommended that the
responsible local or federal department ensure that the waste is properly stored and contained
Also, the tank should be tested to ensure that it is sound and not leaking. 
TUT 
001 
1019
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. 
No. 1
No enforcement actions have been taken against Ramsey Motors in the past. The owners of the
Ramsey Motors property have been identified as one of nine potentially responsible parties in the
contamination of groundwater in the Tutu area. In July and August of 1987, 
EPA confirmed by
sampling that volatile organic compounds were present in a number of wells in the Tutu area. OPNR
has issued orders to close 16 wells in the area. EPA removal action activities in the Tutu area included
sampling of wells and cisterns, removal of contaminated water from cisterns, and supplying clean
water on a regular basis to affected residents. Additional sampling is also recommended to ascertain
the extent of contamination associated with this site.
TUT 
O01 1020
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
CONTENTS
Figure 1: 
Site Location Map
Figure 2: 
Site Map
Exhibit A: Photograph Log
TUT 
OO1 1021
02-8902-42-PA
Re\u_flo. 1
- - _ - 
-. 
Mandal. ~
RAMSEY MOTORS
/ 
- 
^ 
— I 
- x
: ZJ^^C
\ ( 
.'^^ 
,>^?:
(QUAD) EASTERN ST. THOMAS. V.I.
SITE LOCATION MAP
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE 1
rjus
_ ODRPORATON
SMALL 20-GALLON
DRUMS, PAILS
I 
O
WELL
WATER
TOWER
8i
oiL STAIN
« w.
OVERHANG
GARAGE
CONCRETE LOT
BUILDING SAWS:-
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. i
GRASS/DIRT
OIL-FILLED
DRAINAGE DITCH
OIL STAINS,
POOLS
GASSETT
PROPERTY
GRATE
ROUTE 
384
LEGEND
OOPEN DRUM
• CLOSED DRUM
SITE MAP
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
NOT TO SCALE
f 
—
FIGURE 2
IMUS
CORPORATION
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. 
No.l
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FEBRUARY 15, 1989
PHOTOGRAPH INDEX
ALL PHOTOGRPAHS TAKEN BY DIANE TRUBE
Photo Number 
Description 
Time
R3-P13 
Ramsey Motors waste oil drums inside garage. 
1426
R3-P14 
Small 20-gallon drums in garage. 
1431
R3-P15 
Ramsey Motors. Pooled oil from drainage ditch at Gassett 1436
Motors.
"R3-P16 
Groundwater supply well and water storage tank. 
1447
TUT 001 1024
IMUS
02-8902-42-PA
TTON 
Rev. No. 1
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
,T
R3-P13 
February 15, 1989 
1426
Ramsey Motors waste oil drums inside garage.
JT O01 1025
NUS
CORPORATION
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P14
February 15 , 1989
Small 20-galIon drums in garage.
1431
rUT 00.1. 1026
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P15 
February 15, 1989 
1436
Ramsey Motors. 
Pooled oil from drainage ditch at Gassett Motors.
i|JT 
001 I027
I
IMUS
TON
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. i
RAMSEY MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P16 
February 15, 1989 
1447
Groundwater supply well and water storage tank.
TUT' 
GO 2
02-8902-42-PA
Rev No. 1
REFERENCES
1. 
Field Notebook No. 0398, US Virgin Islands Drum Reconnaissance, TDO No. 02-8902-29, NUS
Corp. Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, February 14 to 17,1989.
2. 
US. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Maps, 7.5 minute series,
"Central St. Thomas, Virgin Islands and Eastern St. Thomas, Virgin Islands Quadrangles" 1955,
revised 1982.
3. 
Gomez - Gomez, F. and J.E. Heise1 
Summary Appraisals of the Nation's Groundwater
Resources-Caribbean Region. Geolo^.cal Survey Professional Paper 813-4, 1980.
4. 
Stone, R.G. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, Volume XIX - Part 1,
Meteorology of the Virgin Islands. 1942.
5. 
Climate of Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands, Climatography of the United States No. 60, June
1982.
6. 
Tutu Well Site Potable Water Alternatives Report, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands. Prepared for U.S. EPA Region 2 by Region 2 Technical Assistance Team, Weston/SPER
Division, December, 1989.
7. 
Fish and Wildlife Service List of Endangered and Theatened Wildlife and Plants. SO CFR 17.11
and 17 12. February 1985.
8. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Nancy Schlater, EPA, and Diane Trube, NUS, Re: Sole
source aquifer in VI, March 3,1989.
9. 
Graves, R.P. and R. Gonzalez. Potentiometric surface of the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer in
the Tutu Area, Eastern St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, September 11, 1987. U.S. Geological
Survey Water Resource Investigations Report 88-4131, 1988.
10. 
Uncontrolled hazardous waste site ranking system, A user's manual, 40 CFR, Part 300,
Appendix A, 1986.
11. 
Donnelly, T.W., Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, In Caribbean
Geological Investigations, Geological Society of America, Memoir 98. ed. H. H. Hess, 1966
12. 
Climatological Data Annual Summary, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, 1987.
13. 
Torres - Sierra, H. and R. Dacosta, Estimated Water Use in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, July
1983 to June 1984. Caribbean Research Institute, Technical Report No. 21.
14. 
U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Coastal Zone Management
Program. Zoning Districts and Coastal Land and Water Use Plan Map.
15. 
Memo to Stephen D. Luftig, EPA, from Carlos O'Neill, EPA. Authorization of CERCLA Removal
Action Monies for the Tutu Well Site. January 6, 1988.
16. 
Jordan, D G. and O.J. Cosner, A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands,
U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 1973.
17. 
Water Management Plan for the Public Water System, Prepared for the Government of the
Virgin Islands by CH2M HILL July 1983
T 
001. 1029
02-8902-42-PA
Rev. No. 1
REFERENCES(CONrO)
18. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Fernando Gomez, USGS, and Rich Feinberg, NUS Corp.,
on 3/11/89 at 1045 hours. Re: Hydrology and groundwater use in St. Thomas.
19. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between D. Goetz of Polycaribe and D. Trube, NUS Corp., on
3/14/89 at 1430 hours. Re: Wells and water use on St. Thomas.
20. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between L. Reed, DPNR, and 0. Trube, NUS Corp., on 3/3/89 at
1640 hours. RE: Permits for site on St. Thomas.
21. 
Record of Communication, Telephone conversation between L. Reid, DPNR, and A. Brochu,
U.S. EPA Region 2, on 1/30/89 at 1400 hours.
22. 
Layout of Ramsey Motors including tank location, July 11, 1978.
23. 
Tutu Well Field Area Sample Analysis Data Summary, Ramsey Motors, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands. Prepared for U.S. EPA Region 2 by Cenref, CDM Federal Programs Corporation,
March 31, 1989.
TUT 
001 
1030
T20T
93 "ON 3ON3U3d3d
1
02-9102-11-HR
REV. NO. 0
FINAL DRAFT
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION
TUTUWELLFIELD
ST. THOMAS, USVI
VOLUME 4 OF 5
PREPARED UNDER
TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-9102-11
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346
FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
JUNE 5,1991
NUS CORPORATION
SUPERFUND DIVISION
TUT 
00i 
1032
02-8902-44-PA
REV. NO. 0
FINAL DRAFT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
LAGA BUILDING/VIRGIN ISLANDS
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
PREPARED UNDER
TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-8902-44
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346
FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MARCH 24,1989
NUS CORPORATION
SUPERFUND DIVISION
SUBMITTED BY:
/
OIANE TRUBE
PROJECT MANAGER
JOSEPH MAYO
SITE MANAGER
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY:
RONALD M. NAMAN
FIT OFFICE MANAGER
TUT 
O01 
1.033
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
PART I: SITE INFORMATION
1. 
Site Name/Alias Laga Building/Virgin Islands Department of Education
Street 
Route 38. Tutu District__________
City Tutu District________________ 
State U.S.V.I._____ 
Zip 00802
2. 
County NA___________________ 
County Code NA 
Cono. Dist. NA
3 
EPAIDNo. New Site______________
4. 
Latitude 18"20'37" N.____________ 
Longitude 
64'53'10"W.__________
USGS Quad. 
Eastern St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands________\______________
5. 
Owner Virgin Islands Dept. of Education 
Tel. No. 809-774-2183________________
Street Route 38. Tutu District_____________
City St. Thomas_________________ 
State U.S. Virgin Islands 
Zip 00802
6. 
Operator 
Same as above__________ 
Tel. No.__________________
Street_____________________
City______________________ 
State_________ 
Zip______
7. 
Type of Ownership
Q Private 
Q Federal 
D State
n County 
n Municipal 
Q Unknown 
txl Other U.S.V.I. Dept of
Education
8. 
Owner/Operator Notification on File
QRCRA3001 
Date______ 
QCERCLAIOSc 
Date_________
(xj None 
Q Unknown
9. 
Permit Information
Permit 
Permit No. 
Date Issued 
Expiration Date 
Comments
None 
_______ 
________ 
_________ 
_______
10. 
Site Status
[xj Active 
Q Inactive 
n Unknown
11. 
Years of Operation 
Unknown 
to 
Present
TUT 
O01 
1034
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
12. 
Identify the types of waste units (e.g., landfill, surface impoundment, piles, stained soil,
above- or below-ground tanks or containers, land treatment, etc.) on site. Initiate as many
waste unit numbers as needed to identify all waste sources on site.
(a) 
Waste Management Areas
Waste Unit No. 
Waste Unit Type 
Facility Name for Unit
1 
Drums_____________ 
Drums behind Laoa Building_____
(b) 
Other Areas of Concern
Identify any miscellaneous spills, dumping, etc. on site; describe the materials and identify
their locations on site.
No other spills, incidents of dumping, etc, were observed on the site during the NUS Corp.
Region 2 FIT on-site reconnaissance on 2/15/89.__________________________
13. 
Information available from
Contact Amy Brochu______ 
Agency U.S. EPA________ 
Tel. No. (201)906-6802
Preoarer Joseph Mavo______ 
Agency NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Date 3/31/89________
TUT 
OO1 1035
- 
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
PART II: WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION
For each of the waste units identified in Part I, complete the following six items.
Waste Unit 
1 
- 
____Drums_____, 
Drums behind Laoa Building___
1. 
Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit.
There are no known current or previous RCRA permits for the Laga.Building site. The age of
the waste unit is unknown.
2. 
Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map.
The drums are located less than 100 feet northwest of the northwest corner of the Laga
Building.
3. 
Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g., area or volume of a landfill or surface
impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous
substances in the waste unit.
Twenty-two drums were visible in the brush behind the Laga Building. The area where the
drums are located is overgrown with thick brush. The drums were deposited in an
uncontrolled manner; some were on their sides, and some were corroded and empty. At least
one was full. Twenty-one of the drums were steel and one was plastic. All of the drums in the
disposal area had capacities of 55 gallons each.
4. 
Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The
physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry,
liquid, or gas.
At least one of the drums in the waste unit contained liquid. The physical state of the waste in
the remaining drums is unknown.
•
5. 
Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit.
No specific hazardous substances are known to be present in the waste unit. The Virgin Islands
Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) indicated that prior to ownership by
the Department of Education, the Laga Building was a textile facility which used solvents in
textile processing.
6. 
Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via
groundwater, surface water, and air.
There is essentially no containment of the waste unit. Drums are deposited in a haphazard
manner; some are on their sides and some are badly corroded. There are no containment
structures associated with the drums; therefore, the potential exists for waste in the
unmaintained and corroding drums to be released to the environment and transported to
groundwater and surface water.
Ref. 
Nos. 1.20________ ____
TUT' 
OO1 1036
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. 
No. 0
PART III: 
HAZARD ASSESSMENT
GROUNOWATER ROUTE
1. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the groundwater as follows:
observed, alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminants) detected or suspected, and
provide a rationale for attributing the contaminant(s) to the facility.
The potential exists for contaminants to be released to groundwater. The drums are
deposited in a haphazard manner, and some are corroded through. There are no
containment structures surrounding the drums to prevent a release of the contents to the
environment. The drums have not been sampled and there is no historical information that
indicates what their contents were. The OPNR indicated that the Laga Building was a former
textile processing facility that used solvents in its processes.
Ref. 
No. 1
2. 
Describe the aquifer of concern; include information such as depth, thickness, geologic
composition, permeability, overlying strata, confining layers, interconnections,
discontinuities, depth to water table, groundwater flow direction.
The rock units of St. Thomas and St. John are divided into three major groups: the Water
Island Formation, the Virgin Island Group, and an unnamed group of dioritic piutons. The
Water Island Formation, which is late lower Cretaceous in age, consists of keratophyre and
spillates. The Virgin Island Group, which is probably early Cretaceous or Albian in age, consists
of andesitic-pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary formations. The Virgin Island Group is divided
into four formations: the Louisenhoj Formation, which consists of augite-andesite breccia,
tuff, and conglomerate; the Outer Brass Limestone, which consists of partially silicified-
tuffaceous-radiolarian-limestone; the Tutu Formation, which consists of tuffaceous wacke,
including megabreccia near the base and limestone near the top; the Hans Lollik Formation,
which may be Eocene in age and consists of augite-andesite breccia and tuff. The final group
is made up of one or more dioritic pi u tons. These unamed dikes and plugs of quartz-andesine
hornblende porphory are Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in age. Alluvian deposits are
quarternary in age.
The Water Island Formation, which consists of 95 percent volcanic flow breccias, was probably
extruded on a relatively level ocean floor The absence of terrigenous sediments from this
formation indicates that there were no emergent islands present in the area at the time of
extrusion. Emergent islands would have served as a source of weather sediments or detritus,
which are not present in this formation. There is evidence that sea floor subsidence occurred
during the greater part of the accumulation of this formation. 
However, the subsidence was
not rapid enough to maintain a constant water level, thereby causing explosive eruptions near
the top of the formation. Regional uplift occurred near the end of the Water Island.
The Louisenhoj Formation of the Virgin Island Group unconformably overlies the Water Island
Formation and crops out on about half of the land area on St. Thomas. Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St. John was the origin of this formation. Evidence of this center is
based upon the coarseness of volcanic eject a in the formation in nearby eastern St. Thomas
and western St. John. Material is less coarse and tuffs are more predominant as one moves
further east and west away from the center or origin. This augite-andesite formation ranges
in thickness from 4,000 to 13,000 feet. In certain areas of St. Thomas and St. John
conglomerates are interbedded with andesitic rocks at the base of this formation. The
depositional environment of this conglomerate varies from location to location throughout
this formation.
The Outer Brass Formation of the Virgin Island Group is mostly siliceous limestone which
overlies the Louisenhoj Formation. This limestone formation is an offshore deposit formed by
radiolarian and foraminiferal remains including a minor amount of tuff. Thicknesses are
known to be at least 600 feet
TUT 
OO1 
1037
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
Overlying the Outer Brass Formation is the Tutu Formation. The Tutu Formation is fine- to
coarse-grained volcanic wackes, which are termed flysch. This formation is derived from
eroding sediments from the Louisenhoj andesites. Exposed thicknesses are known to be as
much as 6000 feet. Within this formation is a megabreccia lithofacies with an average
thickness of 30 feet, and a limestone member with thickness up to 300 feet.
The Hans Lollik Formation, which consists of at least 10,000 feet of augite-andesite pyroclastic
rocks, crops out on Little Hans Lollik Island. Dioritic plutons are located in Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St. John; in the narrows, between St. John and the British Virgin
Islands; and south of St. Thomas. 
The exact delineation of these plutons is uncertain.
Throughout the islands isolated dikes of quartz-andesine porphyries, andesine-hornblende
porphyries, lamprophyres, breccias, and pegmatites appear.
Folding occurred after the deposition of the Virgin Island Group. Rocks were tilted to form a
northward-dipping homocline, which is cut by sets of faults trending N 45°W, N 5S°E, and
north. Well-defined joint sets parallel each of the major fault trends. Dips range from 15° to
90° with the average being 40°. Strike-slip faults have horizontal offsets of less than 1 mile.
Two major strike-slip graben structures or fault systems exist. -The first passes through
Redhook, St. Thomas, and the eastern tip of Lovango Cay. The second crosses St. John, from
Contact Point on the southwest to Brown's Bay on the northeast.
Most recent Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial deposits occurred primarily in coastal
embayments. However, a narrow bank of alluvium extends up to Turpentine Run on the east
end of the island. Most of these deposits are composed of silt, clay, and thin, discontinuous
beds of sand and gravel. Maximum thickness of these is 50 feet.
Groundwater movement is limited to openings and joints along fault zones. Regional
geologic information is insufficient to determine whether these fractures and fault zones are
present in all of the above-described formations; however, for this report it is assumed that
the fractures and fault zones are present in all of these formations. The valleys on the island
are the result of weak zones caused by faulting and jointing and are primary recharge areas
for groundwater. Alluvial deposits have a high porosity but low permeability, making this
aquifer unfavorable for groundwater production. In coastal embankments throughout the
island, saltwater intrusion is widespread in alluvial deposits. In most areas, alluvial deposits
are interconnected with bedrock and act to recharge precipitation to the underlying bedrock.
The direction of groundwater flow in the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer is south-southeast
which is generally along the direction of flow of Turpentine Run. Depth to groundwater in
the aquifer ranges from 5 to 60 feet, and the altitude of the water levels ranges from 1 to 209
feet above mean sea level.
Ref. Nos. 11,16
3. 
Is a designated sole source aquifer within 3 miles of the site?
There are no sole source aquifers, as designated in the Federal Register, within 3 miles of the
site.
Ref. No. 8
4. 
What is the depth from the lowest point of waste disposal/storage to the highest seasonal
level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern?
Drums in the waste unit were deposited on the ground surface. Depth to groundwater in
Virgin Island Housing Authority (VIHA) Well Nos. 1 and 2 was reported to be 56 and 60 feet,
respectively. VIHA well Nos. 1 and 2 are located approximately 175 feet west of the Laga
Building.
Ref. Nos 1,9
'TUT 
OO1 10:38
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. 
No. 0
5. 
What is the permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum
between the ground surface and the aquifer of concern?
There are no continuous intervening strata between the ground surface and the bedrock
aquifer. Soils are generally thin in the area around the site. The water-bearing formations in
the Turpentine Run Basin are composed primarily of fractured and jointed volcanic rocks. The
range of hydraulic conductivities associated with these formations is 10' to 10s cm/sec.
Ref. 
Nos. 10, 11,16
6. 
What is the net precipitation for the area?
Net precipitation is usually calculated by subtracting mean annual lake evaporation (a
surrogate measure for evapotranspiration) from normal annual total precipitation. Mean
annual lake evaporation was not available for St. Thomas; however, evapotranspiration data
were available. These data indicate that 95.8 percent of the incident precipitation on St.
Thomas is lost through evapotranspiration. The normal annual total precipitation for St.
Thomas is 43.74 inches, but because of orographic effects on the Island, normal annual total
precipitation can range from 35 inches to 50 inches over short distances. In the Turpentine
Run Basin, normal annual precipitation is 40 inches. Calculations for net precipitation are
provided below:
40 inches precipitation x 95.8 percent lost to evapotranspiration = 38.32 inches lost to
e vapotra nspi rati on
40 inches precipitation - 38.32 inches lost to evapotranspiration = 1.68 inches net
precipitation.
Ref. 
Nos. 3, 5, 12, 13
7. 
Identify uses of groundwater within 3 miles of the site (i.e.. private drinking source,
municipal source, commercial, industrial, irrigation, unusable).
Groundwater within 3 miles of the site is used as a source of private and municipal drinking
water, and for commercial purposes. There are at least 41 wells within 2 miles of the site.
Thirty-five of these wells are within 1 mile of the site.
Ref. 
Nos. 6,9
8. 
What is the distance to and depth of the nearest well that is currently used for drinking or
irrigation purposes?
Distance 
175 feet________ 
Depth 
150 feet_________
The nearest well is the VIHA well No. 2, which is located approximately 175 feet west of the
Laga building. This well is believed to be used for drinking. A nearby well, VIHA No. 1, was
ordered closed because of contamination with volatile organic compounds. VIHA well No. 2 is
not listed as being closed due to contamination, and its designated use is for domestic
purposes.
Ref. 
Nos. 6,9
9. 
Identify the population served by the aquifer of concern within a 3-mile radius of the site.
It is difficult to estimate the population served by groundwater on St. Thomas as there are few
records available on groundwater withdrawal, sale, and transport. The locations of some
wells in St. Thomas are unknown, and there are reports of illegal drilling on the island. It is
estimated that there are 500 to 600 private wells on St. Thomas. Most of these are used for
nondrinking domestic uses such as washing and flushing, although some may be used for
drinking. There are a number of wells that are used for commercial purposes. Water from
these wells is trucked to private houses and pumped into cisterns to augment the rainwater
collected from roofs Groundwater is also bottled and sold in supermarkets.
TUT 
001
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
There are at least 41 wells in the Turpentine Run Basin. Recently, 16 of these wells have been
ordered closed because they were found to be contaminated with volatile organic
compounds. One of these wells was a major supplier of water to the eastern end of the island.
Estimates of the population using ground water as a source of drinking water range from none
to approximately 11.000-the population of the Turpentine Run Basin which is not served by
water from a desalinization plant. The actual population served by groundwater is probably
less than 11,000, as desalinated water and water from wells outside the 3-mile radius is
trucked into the area.
Ref. Nos.9,13,15, 18,19
SURFACE WATER ROUTE
10. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to surface water as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminants) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility.
A potential exists for contaminants to be released to surface water. The location of the drums
is at the top of a steep hill, and at the base of the hill is a tributary to Turpentine Run - an .
intermittent stream which drains the Tutu area and discharges to the Caribbean Sea. The
drums have not been sampled, and there is no historical information that indicates what their
contents are. The DPNR indicated that the Laga Building was a former textile processing
facility which used solvents in its processes.
Ref. Nos. 1,2
11. 
Identify and locate the nearest downslope surface water. If possible, include a description of
possible surface drainage patterns from the site.
The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon which is hydraulically
connected to the Caribbean Sea. Turpentine Run is an intermittent stream that drains the
Turpentine Run Basin. The distance from the site to the nearest surface water, along the
course of Turpentine Run, is 2.4 miles. It should be noted that because of the steeply sloping
nature of the topography on St. Thomas (35-percent slopes are not uncommon), there are no
natural perennial streams on the island. On St. Thomas orographic effects produce frequent,
brief rainstorms. Runoff from these rainstorms can be significant, and therefore, short-term
flow rates of the intermittent streams can be high.
Ref. Nos. 2.4, 5
12. 
What is the facility slope in percent? (Facility slope is measured from the highest point of
deposited hazardous waste to the most downhill point of the waste area or to where
contamination is detected.)
The drum area is relatively flat with a slight slope toward the north and east. Near the margin
of the drum area there is a steep slope to the northeast. Facility slope is estimated to be
between 0 and 3 percent.
Ref. Nos. 1,2
13. 
What is the slope of the intervening terrain in percent? (Intervening terrain slope is
measured from the most downhill point of the waste area to the probable point of entry to
surface water.)
The slope of the intervening terrain is as follows:
• 
Elevation of waste area - 240 ft
• 
Elevation at point of entry-Oft
• 
Path length-12,700ft
TUT 
00.1 1.040
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
240 ft - 0 ft x 100= 1.9% slope
12,700ft
Ref. Nos. 1.2
14. 
What is the 1-year 24-hour rainfall?
One-year 24-hour rainfall data were not available for the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, it is
known that rains exceeding 1 inch in 24 hours occur six or seven times a year on St. Thomas.
Two-year 48-hour rainfalls range from 4 to 15 inches. It has also been reported that it is not
uncommon for 24-hour rainfalls to be 2 to 3 inches.
Ref. Nos. 4, 6
15. 
What is the distance to the nearest downslope surface water? Measure the distance along a
course that runoff can be expected to follow.
The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon, which is hydraulically
connected to the Caribbean Sea. The distance from the site to the above surface water is 2.4
miles.
Ref. No. 2
16. 
Identify uses of surface waters within 3 miles downstream of the site (i.e.. drinking,
irrigation, recreation, commercial, industrial, not used).
Surface water within 3 miles downstream of the site is used for recreation including
swimming, fishing, and boating. The DPNR has designated the area of the Mangrove Lagoon
for preservation.
Ref. Nos. 2, 14
17. 
Describe any wetlands, greater than 5 acre* in area, within 2 miles downstream of the site.
Include whether it is a freshwater or coastal wetland.
There are no wetlands greater than 5 acres within 2 miles downstream of the site. However,
there is a coastal mangrove wetland approximately 2.4 miles downstream. The Mangrove
Swamp is designated as a preservation area in the Coastal Zone Management Program of the
DPNR.
Ref. Nos. 2, 14
18. 
Describe any critical habitats of federally listed endangered species within 2 miles of the site
along the migration path.
There are no known critical habitats of federally endangered species within 2 miles of the site.
The Virgin Islands Tree Boa (epicrates monensis qranti) is an endangered species in the U.S.
Virgin Islands; however, no critical habitat has been identified for this species.
Ref. No. 7
19. 
What is the distance to the nearest sensitive environment along or contiguous to the
migration path (if any exist within 2 miles)?
There are no sensitive environments within 2 miles of the site that lie along or contiguous to
the migration pathway.
Ref. Nos. 2,7,14
TUT 
OO1 1041
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
20. 
Identify the population served or acres of food crops irrigated by surface water intakes
within 3 miles downstream of the site and the distance to the intake(s).
There is no population served and there are no food crops irrigated by surface water intakes
within 3 miles downstream of the site. The nearest surface water is saline. There is a
desalinization plant which uses seawater to supply drinking water, but the intake is greater
than 3 miles from the site.
Ref. Nos. 2. 13
21. 
What is the state water quality classification of the water body of concern?
No water quality classification is known to exist for the Mangrove Lagoon or the Caribbean
Sea, although the mangrove swamp surrounding the lagoon is designated as a preservation
I 
areabytheOPNR.
Ref. Nos. 14
22. 
Describe any apparent biota contamination that is attributable to the site.
No apparent biota contamiantion was observed during the on-site reconnaissance conducted
by NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT on February 15,1989.
Ref. No. 1
AIR ROUTE
1
23. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the air as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, none. Identify the contaminants) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminants) to the facility.
I 
^_ 
A slight potential exists for release of contaminants to the air. If corroded and uncontained
' 
^ 
drums rupture, the potential exists for a release to the atmosphere. The type of wastes in the
drums is unknown; however, prior to ownership by the Department of Education, the
I 
building housed a textile processing facility that is reported to have used solvents.
' 
No readings above background were detected on the OVA flame ionization detector or the
HNu photoionization detector during the on-site reconnaissance of the drum area conducted
1 
by NUS Region 2 FIT on February 15, 1989.
Ref No. 1
1
24. 
What is the population within a 4-mile radius of the site?
Based on the 1980 census, the population within 4 miles of the site is approximately 36,000.
Ref. No. 17
i
I
*
FIRE AND EXPLOSION
25. 
Describe the potential for a fire or explosion to occur with respect to the hazardous
substance(s) known or suspected to be present on site. Identify the hazardous substance(s)
and the method of storage or containment associated with each.
A small potential exists for fire or explosion to occur at the site. Solvents were reportedly used
in the textile processing that took place in the Laga Building. If these solvents are contained in
the drums, there is a potential for fire or explosion. Drums on the site were in poor condition,
and there were no containment structures around the drums.
Ref. No. 1
26. 
What is the population within a 2-mile radius of the hazardous substance(s) at the facility?
Based on 1980 census data, the population within 2 miles of the site is approximately 19,000.
Ref. No 17
TUT 
001 
1042
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
DIRECT CONTACT/ON-SITE EXPOSURE
27. 
Describe the potential for direct contact with hazardous substances) stored in any of the
waste units on site or deposited in on-site soils. Identify the hazardous substance(s) and the
accessibility of the waste unit.
The potential exists for direct contact with hazardous substances at the facility. The drums are
uncontained and were deposited in an uncontrolled manner. It is not known whether the
drums contain hazardous substances; however, solvents have been associated with this site in
the past. The waste is not surrounded by a fence, and children were observed near the drum
area. There are residences 230 feet east and downhill from the drum area.
Ref. Nos. 1,2
28. 
How many residents live on a property whose boundaries encompass any part of an area
contaminated by the site?
It is not known whether any area has been contaminated by the site.
29. 
What is the population within a 1-mile radius of the site?
Based on 1980 census data, the population within 1 mile of the site is approximately 11,000.
Ref. No. 17
TUT 
001 
1043
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
PART IV: 
SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Laga Building Site is located in the Tutu area of St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands. The Laga
Building was formerly the site of a textile manufacturing facility and is currently occupied by the
Virgin Islands Board of Education. The area within approximately 1 mile of the site is densely
populated, and includes some commercial properties. There are large housing developments north,
northwest, and southeast of the site. The nearest residence is 320 feet east of the site. Beyond 1
mile, there are scattered smaller villages and towns. The densely populated and highly commercial
town of Charlotte Amalie, which is the capital of St. Thomas, is located 2.5 miles west of the site.
On February 15, 1988, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT conducted an on-site reconnaissance of the Laga
Building Site. Twenty-two 55-gallon drums were found behind the building. The drums were
deposited in an uncontrolled manner, and most of them were in poor condition. Some of the drums
were rusted, some were perforated, some were deposited on their sides, some were empty, and at
least one was full. Vegetation has grown around most of the drums, and a few were nearly
completely overgrown. There were no discernible labels on the drums. No stains were noted near
the drums, and no readings above background were detected on the OVA flame ionization detector
or the HNu photoionization detector. There are no containment structures surrounding the drums,
and the DPNR indicated that solvents were used by the textile processing facility that previously
occupied the building.
The above conditions indicate that there is a potential for contaminants to be released to the
environment from the drum area behind the Laga Building Site. A tributary of Turpentine Run is
located downhill and approximately 250 feet east of the drum area. Turpentine Run is an
intermittent stream that drains the Turpentine Run Basin and discharges to the Mangrove Lagoon,
which is hydraulically connected to the Caribbean Sea. If hazardous substances are released from the
drums, the potential exists for them to be transported to the Mangrove Lagoon via Turpentine Run.
The DPNR has designated the mangrove wetlands for preservation.
There is also concern that hazardous substances that may be in the drums will be released to
groundwater. The site is atop the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer, which is the most productive
aquifer on St. Thomas. There are numerous wells in the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer, and
collectively they are permitted to draw up to 1 million gallons per day from the aquifer. Some of
these wells draw water for drinking purposes. Currently, the water main from a public water supply
desalinization plant does not extend to the Tutu area.
There is also a potential for fire and/or explosion, direct contact, and air contamination from the
drums. The drums may contain solvents that may be flammable or explosive. Direct contact is
TUT 
OO1 .1044
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
possible if hazardous substances are present in the drums. The nearest residence is 235 feet east of
the site, and children have been observed walking near the drums. The potential for air
contamination exists if volatile compounds are released from the drums.
The previous owners of the Laga Building have been identified as one of nine potentially responsible
parties in the contamination of groundwater in the Tutu area. In July and August of 1987, EPA
confirmed by sampling that volatile organic compounds were present in a number of wells in the
Tutu area. OPNR has issued orders to close 16 wells in the area. One of the wells was a major source
of commercially provided potable water for the eastern end of the island. Removal action activities
in the Tutu area included sampling of wells and cisterns, removal of contaminated water from
cisterns, cleaning of cisterns, and supplying clean water on a regular basis to affected residents.
The Laga Building Site is given a MEDIUM PRIORITY for further action for the following reasons:
• 
Waste containment is poor as evidenced by perforated and corroding drums.
• 
Groundwater in the vicinity of the site is used for domestic purposes, and the water main from
the desalinization plant does not currently extend to the Tutu area.
• 
The potential exists for runoff from the site to reach the Mangrove Lagoon via Turpentine
Run.
• 
The waste area is accessible, and there are homes 230 feet east and downhill of the drum area.
Further efforts should focus on determining whether there are hazardous substances in the drums.
Efforts should also be directed toward determining whether any hazardous substances have been
released to the environment. Drum sampling and soil sampling in the vicinity of the drums and soil
sampling in the drainage pathway to Turpentine Run are recommended. Sampling of wells in the
vicinity of the site is also recommended. It should be noted that a number of the wells are
contaminated with volatile organic compounds; therefore, judgement should be used to select
appropriate wells for sampling.
TUT 
OO1 
1O45
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
LAGA BUILDING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
CONTENTS
Figure 1: 
Site Location Map
Figure 2: 
Site Map
Exhibit A: Photograph Log
TUT 
001 
1046
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. 
No. 0
UkR-V^^.
'
VIRGIN iiUU.CS
(QUAD) EASTERN ST. THOMAS. V.I.
SITE LOCATION MAP
LAGA BUILDING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. 
VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE 1
IMUS
CORPORATOM
SCALE: 1'- 2000*
INTERMITTENT
STREAM
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. 
No. 0
o
HOUSES
\\
\
SITE MAP
LAGA BUILDING.
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 2
IMUS
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
I 
LAGA BUILDING
1 
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FEBRUARY 15, 1989
I 
PHOTOGRAPH INDEX
I 
ALL PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN BY DIANE TRUBE.
Photo Number 
Description 
Time
I 
R3-P17 
Drums behind Laga building. 
1525
R3-P18 
Drums behind Laga building. 
1525
I 
R3-P19 
Drums behind Laga building. 
1525
TUT O01 1049
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. Ho. 0
LAGA BUILDING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P17 
February 15, 1989
Drums behind Laga building.
1525
TUT 
O01 1050
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. 
No. 0
LAGA BUILDING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P18 
February 15, 1989
Drums behind Laga building.
1525
TUT 
001 1051
02-8902-44-PA
Rev. No. 0
REFERENCES
1. 
Field Notebook No. 0398, U.S. Virgin Islands Drum Reconnaissance, TDD No. 02-8902-29, NUS
Corp. Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, February 14 to 17,1989.
2. 
U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Maps, 7.5 minute series,
"Central St. Thomas, Virgin Islands and Eastern St Thomas, Virgin Islands Quadrangles'* 1955,
revised 1982.
3. 
Gomez-Gomez, F. and J.E. Heisel. Summary Appraisals of the Nation's Groundwater
Resources-Caribbean Region. Geological Survey Professional Paper 813-4, 1980.
4. 
Stone, R.G. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, Volume XIX - Part 1,
Meteorology of the Virgin Islands. 1942.
5. 
Climate of Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands, Climatography of the. United States No. 60, June
1982.
6. 
Tutu Well Site Potable Water Alternatives Report, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands. Prepared for U.S. EPA Region 2 By Region 2 Technical Assistance Team, Weston/SPER
Division, December 1989.
7. 
Fish and Wildlife Service List of Endangered and Theatened Wildlife and Plants. 50 CFR 17.11
and 17.12. February 1985.
8. 
Telecon Note. Conversation between Nancy Schlater, EPA, and Diane Trube, NUS Re: Sole
source aquifer in VI, March 3,1989.
9. 
Graves, R.P. and R. Gonzalez. Potentiometric surface of the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer in
the Tutu Area, Eastern St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, September 11, 1987. U.S. Geological
Survey Water Resource Investigations Report 88-4131, 1988. 
.
10. 
Uncontrolled hazardous waste site ranking system, A user's manual, 40 CFR, Part 300,
Appendix A, 1986.
11. 
Donnelly, T.W., Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, In Caribbean
Geological Investigations, Geological Society of America, Memoir 98. ed. H. H. Hess, 1966.
12. 
Climatological Data Annual Summary, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, 1987.
13. 
Torres-Sierra, H. and R. Dacosta, Estimated Water Use in St. Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands, July
1983 to June 1984. Caribbean Research Institute, Technical Report No. 21.
14. 
U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Coastal Zone Management
Program, zoning districts and coastal land and water use plan map.
15. 
Memo to Stephen D. Luftig, EPA, from Carlos O'Neill, EPA. Authorization of CERCLA Removal
Action Monies for the Tutu Well Site. January 6,1988.
16. 
Jordan, D.G. and O.J. Cosner, A Survey of the Water Resources of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands,
U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 1973.
17. 
Water Management Plan for the Public Water System, Prepared for the Government of the
Virgin Islands by CH2M HILL July 1983
TUT 
OO1 1052
Rev. No. Q
REFERENCES (CONrD)
18. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Fernando Gomez. USGS and Rich Fcinbcra NUS Com
on 3/11/89 at 1045 hours. RE: Hydrology and groundwater use in St. Thomas.
19. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between D. Goetz of Polycaribe and D. Trube NUS Corn on
3/14/89at1430hours. RE: Wells and water use on St. Thomas. 
P>
20. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between L Reed. DPNR. and D. Trube. NUS Corp on 3/3/89 at
1640 hours. RE: Permits for site on St. Thomas.
I"UT 
001 
1053
02-8902-41-PA
REV. 
NO. 0
FINAL DRAFT
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
PREPARED UNDER
TECHNICAL DIRECTIVE DOCUMENT NO. 02-8902-41
CONTRACT NO. 68-01-7346
FOR THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
U.S. 
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
MARCH 24,1989
NUS CORPORATION
SUPERFUND DIVISION
SUBMITTED BY:
DIANETRUBE
PROJECT MANAGER
JOSETOMAYO
SIT&MANAGER
REVIEWED/APPROVED BY:
RONALD M. NAMAN
FIT OFFICE MANAGER
02-8902-41-PA
Rev. No. 0
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT
PART I: SITE INFORMATION
1. 
Site Name/Alias Gassett Motors_________
Street Route 384. Tutu District_________
City St. Thomas____________________ 
State 
U.S. Virgin Islands 
Zip 08002
2. 
County N/A____________________ 
County Code 
N/A 
Cong. Dist. 
N/A
3 
ERA ID No. New Site 
____
4. 
Latitude 18020'38"N______________ 
Longitude 
64°53'19'<W
USGSQuad. Eastern St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands_______________
5. 
Owner Unknown_________________ 
Tel. No. 
N/A_____________.___
Street Unknown___________________
City Unknown__________________ 
State N/A_______ 
Zip N/A
6. 
Operator Tom Gassett_______________ 
Tel. No. 
(809) 776-4600_________
Street Route 384. Tutu District_______________
City St. Thomas_________________ 
State U.S. Virgin Islands 
Zip 08002
7. 
Type of Ownership
(x] Private 
Q Federal 
[__ State
n County 
n Municipal 
fj Unknown 
Q Other_______
8. 
Owner/Operator Notification on File
QRCRA3001 
Date 
DCERCLA103c 
Date_______
[x] None 
n Unknown
9. 
Permit Information
Permit 
Permit No. 
Date Issued 
Expiration Date 
Comments
None___ 
_______ 
______ 
_________ 
________
10. 
Site Status
[x] Active 
ninact've 
Q Unknown
11. 
Years of Operation 
Unknown________ to 
Present_____
12. 
Identify the types of waste units (e.g., landfill, surface impoundment, piles, stained soil,
above- or below-ground tanks or containers, land treatment, etc.) on site. Initiate as many
waste unit numbers as needed to identify all waste sources on site.
(a) 
Waste Management Areas
Waste Unit No. 
Waste Unit Type 
Facility Name for Unit
1 
Drums____;_________ 
Waste Oil Drums 
T j ! T ii(vs 
i
1-rM
Rev. No. 0
(b) 
Other Areas of Concern
Identify any miscellaneous spills, dumping, etc. on site; describe the materials and identify
their locations on site.
Waste oil from a drainage ditch on the Gassett Motors Site is discharging onto the adjacent
Ramsey Motors property ________________________________________
13. 
Information available from
Contact 
Amy Brochu_______ 
Agency U.S. EPA________ 
Tel. No. (201)906-6802
Preparer 
Joseph Mavo_____ 
Agency NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT Date 3/24/89_______
TUT 
001 
1056
Rev. No. 0
PART II: WASTE SOURCE INFORMATION
For each of the waste units identified in Part I. complete the following six items.
Waste Unit 
1 
- 
Drums 
Waste Oil Drums
1. 
Identify the RCRA status and permit history, if applicable, and the age of the waste unit.
The site does not have a RCRA Permit. The age of the waste unit is unknown, but Mr. Gassett
indicated that the drums were present when he leased the property in May of 1988.
Until June 1986, the Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil and used it for
fuel. A batch of waste oil was found to contain PCBs, and WAPA stopped accepting waste oil.
Currently, there is no acceptable method for disposal of waste oil on St. Thomas. Waste oil
generators must store all their oil.
2. 
Describe the location of the waste unit and identify clearly on the site map.
The waste unit is located behind the main building adjacent to an overhang garage.
3. 
Identify the size or quantity of the waste unit (e.g., area or volume of a landfill or surface
impoundment, number and capacity of drums or tanks). Specify the quantity of hazardous
substances in the waste unit.
There are four 55-gallon drums and three 20-gallon drums located in the northwest corner of
the property.
4. 
Identify the physical state(s) of the waste type(s) as disposed of in the waste unit. The
physical state(s) should be categorized as follows: solid, powder or fines, sludge, slurry,
liquid, or gas.
The drums contain liquid waste oil from automotive repair and servicing operations.
5. 
Identify specific hazardous substance(s) known or suspected to be present in the waste unit.
The drums on site contain liquid waste oil from automotive repair and servicing operations.
The drums may also contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing solvents.
6. 
Describe the containment of the waste unit as it relates to contaminant migration via
groundwater, surface water, and air.
The waste is not properly contained. There were numerous spills in the area, and there was a
large pool of oil in the northwest corner of the property where the drums are located. A
drainage ditch containing waste oil originates along the northern perimeter of the property
and proceeds westward to the northwest corner of the property, where it turns
southwestward onto the Ramsey Motors property. An oil-stained area was observed on the
Ramsey Motors property at the point where the drainage ditch left the Gassett Motors site. A
larger ditch on the Ramsey property drains the stained area and discharges to a storm sewer.
Given the above conditions, the potential exists for waste migration to surface water and
groundwater.
Ref. Nos 
1.20,21
Rev. No. 0
PART III: HAZARD ASSESSMENT
GROUNDWATER ROUTE
1. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the ground water as follows:
observed, alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and
provide a rationale for attributing the contaminants) to the facility.
The potential exists for contaminants to be released to groundwater. Pooled waste oil was
observed in the drum storage area, and a small ditch containing waste oil was dug in the soil
around the garage area. In addition to the waste oil the drums may contain small quantities
of gasoline, kerosene, and degreasing solvents.
Ref. No. 1
2. 
Describe the aquifer of concern; include information such as depth, thickness, geologic
composition, permeability, overlying strata, confining layers, interconnections,
discontinuities, depth to water table, groundwater flow direction.
The rock units of St. Thomas and St. John are divided into three major groups: the Water
Island Formation, the Virgin Island Group, and an unnamed group of dioritic plutons. The
Water Island Formation, which is late lower Cretaceous in age, consists of keratophyre and
spillates. The Virgin Island Group, which is probably early Cretaceous or Albian in age, consists
of andesitic-pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary formations. The Virgin Island Group is divided
into four formations: the Louisenhoj Formation, which consists of augite-andesite breccia,
tuff, and conglomerate; the Outer Brass Limestone, which consists of partially silicified-
tuffaceous-radiolarian limestone; the Tutu Formation, which consists of tuffaceouS wacke,
including megabreccia near the base and limestone near the top; the Hans Lollik Formation,
which may be Eocene in age and consists of augite-andesite breccia and tuff. The final group
is made up of one or more dioritic plutons. These unnamed dikes and plugs of quartz-
andesine-hornblende porphory are Upper Cretaceous and Lower Tertiary in age. 
Alluvian
deposits are quaternary in age.
The Water Island Formation, which consists of 95 percent volcanic flow breccias was probably
extruded on a relatively level ocean floor. The absence of terrigenous sediments from this
formation indicates that there were no emergent islands present in the area at the time of
extrusion. Emergent islands would have served as a source of weather sediments or detritus,
which are not present in this formation. There is evidence that sea floor subsidence occurred
during the greater part of the accumulation of this formation. However, the subsidence was
not rapid enough to maintain a constant water level, thereby causing explosive eruptions
near the top of the formation. Regional uplift occurred near the end of the Water Island time.
The Louisenhoj Formation of the Virgin Island Group unconformably overlies the Water Island
Formation and crops out on about half of the land area on St. Thomas. Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St. John was the origin of this formation. Evidence of this center is
based upon the coarseness of volcanic ejecta in the formation in nearby eastern St. Thomas
and western St. John. Material is less coarse and tuffs are more predominant as one moves
further east and west away from the center or origin. This augite-andesite formation ranges
in thickness from 4,000 to 13,000 feet. In certain areas of St. Thomas and St. John
conglomerates are interbedded with andesitic rocks at the base of this formation. The
depositional environment of this conglomerate varies from location to location throughout
this formation.
The Outer Brass Formation of the Virgin Island Group is mostly siliceous limestone which
overlies the Louisenhoj Formation. The limestone formation is an offshore deposit formed by
radiolarian and foraminiferal remains including a minor amount of tuff. Thicknesses are
known to be at least 600 feet.
Overlying the Outer Brass Formation is the Tutu Formation. The Tutu Formation is fine- to
coarse-grained volcanic wackes, which are termed flysch. This formation is derived from
eroding sediments from the Louisenhoj andesites. Exposed thicknesses are known to be as
much as 6000 feet. Within this formation is a megabreccia lithofacies with an average
thickness of 30 feet and a limestone member with a thickness up to 300 feet.
TUT 
001 
iObS
Rev. No. 0
The Hans Lollik Formation, which consists of at least 10,000 feet of augite-andesite pyroclastic
rod**, crops out on Little Hans Lollik Island. Dioritic plutons are located in Pillsbury Sound
between St. Thomas and St. John; in the narrows, between St. John and the British Virgin
Islands; and south of St. Thomas. The exact delineation of these plutons is uncertain.
Throughout the islands isolated dikes of quartz-andesine porphyries, andesine-hornblende
porphyries, lamprophyres, breccias, and pegmaties appear.
Folding occurred after the deposition of the Virgin Island Group. Rocks were tilted to form a
northward-dipping homocline, which is cut by sets of faults trending N 45°W, N 55°E, and
north. Well-defined joint sets parallel each of the major fault trends. Dips range from 15° to
90° with the average being 40°. Strike-slip faults have horizontal offsets of less than 1 mile.
Two-major strike-slip graben structures or fault systems exist. The first passes through
Redhook, St. Thomas, and the eastern tip of Lovango Cay. The second crosses St. John, from
Contact Point on the southwest to Brown's Bay on the northeast.
Most recent Pleistocene to Holocene alluvial deposits occurred primarily in coastal
en*»ayments. However, a narrow bank of alluvium extends up to Turpentine Run on the east
end of the island. Most of these deposits are composed of silt, clay, and thin, discontinuous
bed*of sand and gravel. Maximum thickness of these is SO feet.
Groundwater movement is limited to openings and joints along fault zones. Regional
geologic information is insufficient to determine whether these fractures and fault zones are
present in all of the above-described formations; however, for this report it is assumed that
the fractures and fault zones are present in all of these formations. The valleys on the island
are tine result of weak zones caused by faulting and jointing and are primary recharge areas
for groundwater. Alluvial deposits have a high porosity but low permeability, making this
acptufer unfavorable for groundwater production. In coastal embankments throughout the
istarrer, saltwater intrusion is widespread in alluvial deposits. In most areas, alluvial deposits
areirrrterconnected with bedrock and act to recharge precipitation to the underlying bedrock.
The direction of groundwater flow in the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer is south-southeast
which is generally along the direction of flow of Turpentine Run. Depth to groundwater in
the aquifer ranges from 5 to 60 feet, and the altitude of the water levels ranges from 1 to 209
feet above mean sea level.
Ret Nos. 9, 11.16
3. 
Isaocsignated sole source aquifer within 3 miles of the site?
There are no sole source aquifers, as designated in the Federal Register, within 3 miles of the
srte.
Re*. Mo. 8
4. 
What is the depth from the lowest point of waste disposal/storage to the highest seasonal
level of the saturated zone of the aquifer of concern?
Dnuons in the waste unit were deposited on the ground surface. Depth to groundwater in
Virgin Islands Housing Authority VIHA well Nos. 1 and 2 was reported to be 56 and 60 feet,
respectively. VIHA well Nos. 1 and 2 are located approximately 630 feet southeast of the
Gassett Motors Property.
Ref.Wos. 1.2.9
5. 
What is the permeability value of the least permeable continuous intervening stratum
between the ground surface and the aquifer of concern?
Theme are no continuous intervening strata between the ground surface and the bedrock
aqtuifer. Soils are generally thin in the area around the site. The water-bearing formations in
the Turpentine Run Basin are composed primarily of fractured and jointed volcanic rocks. The
range of hydraulic conductivities associated with these formations is 103 to 10s cm/sec.
Ref. Nos. 10,11, 16
TUT 
OO1 10S9
Rev. No. 0
6. 
What is the net precipitation for the area?
Net precipitation is usually calculated by subtracting mean annual lake evaporation (a
surrogate measure for evapotranspiration) from normal annual total precipitation. Mean
annual lake evaporation information was not available for St. Thomas; however,
evapotranspiration data were available. These data indicate that 95.8 percent of the incident
precipitation on St. Thomas is lost through evapotranspiration. The normal annual total
precipitation for St. Thomas is 43.74 inches, but because of orographic effects on the island,
normal annual total precipitation can range from 35 inches to 50 inches over short distances.
In the Turpentine Run Basin, normal annual precipitation is 40 inches. Calculations for net
precipitation are provided below:
40 inches precipitation x 95.8 percent lost to evapotranspiration = 38.32 inches lost to
evapotranspiration
40 inches precipitation - 38.32 inches lost to evapotranspiration = 1.68 inches net
precipitation.
Ref. Nos. 3, 5, 12, 13
7. 
Identify uses of groundwater within 3 miles of the site (i.e., private drinking source,
municipal source, commercial, industrial, irrigation, unusable).
Groundwater within 3 miles of the site is used as a source of private and municipal drinking
water, and for commercial purposes. There are at least 41 wells within 2 miles of the site.
Thirty-four of the wells are within 1 mile of the site. Sixteen of these wells have been closed
because they are contaminated with volatile organic compounds.
Ref. Nos. 6, 9
8. 
What is the distance to and depth of the nearest well that is currently used for drinking or
irrigation purposes?
Distance 
630 feet_________ 
Depth 150 feet____________
The nearest well is the VIHA well No. 2, which is located approximately 630 feet southeast of
Gassett Motors. This well is believed to be used for drinking. A nearby well, VIHA No. 1, was
ordered closed because of contamination with volatile organic compounds. VIHA well No. 2 is
not listed as being closed for contamination, and its designated use is for domestic purposes.
Ref. Nos. 6, 9
9. 
Identify the population served by the aquifer of concern within a 3-mile radius of the site.
It is difficult to estimate the population served by groundwater on St. Thomas as there are few
records available on groundwater withdrawal, sale, and transport. The locations of some
wells in St. Thomas are unknown, and there are reports of illegal drilling on the island. It is
estimated that there are 500 to 600 private wells on St. Thomas. Most of these are used for
nondrinking domestic uses such as washing and flushing, although some may be used for
drinking. There are a number of wells that are used for commercial purposes. Water from
these wells is trucked to private houses and pumped into cisterns to augment the rainwater
collected from roofs. Groundwater is also bottled and sold in supermarkets.
There are at least 41 wells in the Turpentine Run Basin. Recently 16 of these wells have been
ordered closed because they were found to be contaminated with volatile organic
compounds. One of these wells was a major supplier of water to the eastern end of the island.
Estimates of the population using groundwater as a source of drinking water range from none
to approximately 11,000 - the population of the Turpentine Run Basin which is not served by
water from the desalinization plant. The actual population served by groundwater is
probably less than 11,000, as desalinated water and water from wells outside the 3-mile radius
is trucked into the area
Ref. Nos 9, 13, 15, 18, 19
001 
1060
Rev. 
No. 0
SURFACE WATER ROUTE
10. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to surface water as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, or none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminants to the facility.
The potential exists for wastes on the site to be released to surface water. There is a large pool
of oil on the ground in the drum storage area, and there is a drainage ditch, which contains
waste oil, that runs along the northern border of the property and discharges to a drainage
ditch on the adjacent Ramsey Motors property. The ditch discharges to a storm sewer. It is
unknown where the storm sewer discharges, but it is likely that it discharges to Turpentine
Run as this intermittent stream drains the entire Turpentine Run Basin.
The drums on site contain waste oil from automotive repair and maintenance activities. Small
quantitaties of gasoline, kerosene, and degreasing solvents may also be present in the drums.
Ref. Nos. 1,2
11. 
Identify and locate the nearest downslope surface water. If possible, include a description of
possible surface drainage patterns from the site.
The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon-which is hydraulically
connected to the Caribbean Sea. The distance from the site to the nearest surface water along
the course of Turpentine Run is 2.5 miles However, the site slope is such that runoff flows
south-southwest to storm sewers on the property. It is unknown where the storm sewers
discharge, but it is suspected that they discharge to Turpentine Run as it is the only drainage
pathway from the Turpentine Run Basin.
Ref. 
Nos. 2, 4, 5, 14
12. 
What is the facility slope in percent? (Facility slope is measured from the highest point of
deposited hazardous waste to the most downhill point of the waste area or to where
contamination is detected.)
The facility is relatively flat with an overall slope toward the south-southwest. Facility slope is
estimated to be 0-3 percent.
Ref. 
Nos. 1,2
13. 
What is the slope of the intervening terrain in percent? (Intervening terrain slope is
measured from the most downhill point of the waste area to the probable point of entry to
surface water.)
The slope of the intervening terrain can not be calculated as runoff discharges to storm sewers
and the path of these sewers is unknown. If runoff were to follow an overland route, the
slope of the intervening terrain would be as follows:
• 
Elevation of waste areas - 240 ft
• 
Elevation at point of entry - 0 ft
• 
Path length - 13,200
240 ft-Oft x100 = 1.8%
13,200ft
Ref. 
Nos. 1, 2
14. 
What is the 1-year 24-hour rainfall?
One-year 24-hour rainfall data were not available for the U.S. Virgin Islands. However, it is
known that rains exceeding 1 inch in 24 hours occur six or seven times a year on St. Thomas.
Two-year 48-hour rainfalls range from 4 to 15 inches It has also been reported that it is not
uncommon for 24-hour rainfalls to be 2 to 3 inches
Ref Nos. 4, 6
UT 
OO1
02-8902-41-PA
Rev. No. 0
15. 
What is the distance to the nearest downslope surface water? Measure the distance along a
course that runoff can be expected to follow.
The nearest downslope surface water is the Mangrove Lagoon which is hydraulically
connected to the Caribbean Sea. The distance from the site to the above surface water is
approximately 2.5 miles as measured along Turpentine Run. It appears that most runoff from
the site enters the storm drains near the site. Since the point of discharge and the route of
these storm drains are not known, the distance to the nearest downslope surface water along
this pathway is unknown.
Ref. Nos.2,14
16. 
Identify uses of surface waters within 3 miles downstream of the site (i.e., drinking,
irrigation, recreation, commercial, industrial, not used).
Surface water within 3 miles downstream of the site is used for recreation including
swimming, fishing, and boating. The DPNR has designated the area of the Mangrove Lagoon
for preservation.
Ref. Nos.2, 14
17. 
Describe any wetlands, greater than 5 acres in area, within 2 miles downstream of the site.
Include whether it is a freshwater or coastal wetland.
There are no wetlands greater than 5 acres within 2 miles downstream of the site. However,
there is a coastal mangrove wetland approximately 2.5 miles downstream. The Mangrove
Swamp is designated as a preservation area in the Coastal Zone Management Program of the
DPNR.
Ref. Nos.2, 14
18. 
Describe any critical habitats of federally listed endangered species within 2 miles of the site
along the migration path.
There are no known critical habitats of federally endangered species within 2 miles of the site.
The Virgin Islands Tree Boa (epicrates monensis qranti) is an endangered species in the U.S.
Virgin Islands; however, no critical habitat has been identified for this species.
Ref. No. 7
19. 
What is the distance to the nearest sensitive environment along or contiguous to the
migration path (if any exist within 2 miles)?
There are no sensitive environments within 2 miles of the site that lie along or contiguous to
the migration pathway.
Ref. Nos. 2, 7, 14
20. 
Identify the population served or acres of food crops irrigated by surface water intakes
within 3 miles downstream of the site and the distance to the intake(s).
There is no population served and there are no food crops irrigated by surface water intakes
within 3 miles downstream of the site. The nearest surface water is saline. There is a
desalinization plant that uses seawater to supply drinking water, but the intake is greater
than 3 miles from the site.
Ref. Nos. 2, 13
21. 
What is the state water quality classification of the water body of concern?
No water quality classification is known to exist for the Mangrove Lagoon or the Caribbean
Sea, although the mangrove swamp surrounding the lagoon is designed as a preservation area
by the DPNR.
Ref. No 14
22. 
Describe any apparent biota contamination that is attributable to the site.
A patch of oil stained vegetation was observed during the on-site reconnaissance conducted
by NUS Corp Region 2 FIT on February 15, 1989
No 1 
TUT 
001 
1062
Rev. No. 0
AIR ROUTE
23. 
Describe the likelihood of a release of contaminant(s) to the air as follows: observed,
alleged, potential, none. Identify the contaminant(s) detected or suspected, and provide a
rationale for attributing the contaminant(s) to the facility.
No potential exists for the release of any significant quantities of contaminants to the air. No
readings above background were detected on the OVA flame ionization detector or the HNu
photoionization detector during the on-site reconnaissance of the drum area conducted by
NUSCorp. Region 2 FIT on February 15, 1989.
Ref. No. 1
24. 
What is the population within a 4-mile radius of the site?
Based on the 1980 census, the population within 4 miles of the site is approximately 36,000.
Ref. No. 17
FIRE AND EXPLOSION
25. 
Describe the potential for a fire or explosion to occur with respect to the hazardous
substance(s) known or suspected to be present on site. Identify the hazardous substance(s)
and the method of storage or containment associated with each.
Although the waste oil was not properly contained, the site does not pose a significant fire
and explosion threat. No readings above background were detected on the OVA flame
ionization detector or the HNu photoionization detector during the on-site reconnaissance of
the drum area conducted by NUS Corp., Region 2 FIT on February 15, 1989.
Ref. No. 1
26. 
What is the population within a 2-mile radius of the hazardous substance(s) at the facility?
Based on 1980 census data, the population within 2 miles of the site is approximately 19,000.
Ref. No. 17
DIRECT CONTACT/ON-SITE EXPOSURE
27. 
Describe the potential for direct contact with hazardous substance(s) stored in any of the
waste units on site or deposited in-on-site soils. Identify the hazardous substance(s) and the
accessibility of the waste unit.
The potential exists for direct contact with waste oil at the facility. The oil was not properly
contained, and there was a pool of oil on the ground near the drums. The area is not
accessible to the public as a fence surrounds the facility. There is a potential for workers to
come in contact with waste oil on the site.
Ref. No. 1
28. 
How many residents live on a property whose boundaries encompass any part of an area
contaminated by the site?
There is no evidence that any residential areas have been contaminated by the site.
Ref. No. 1
29. 
What is the population within a 1-mile radius of the site?
Based on 1980 census data, the population within 1 mile of the site is approximately 11,000.
Ref. No. 17
TUT 
OO1 
J063
Rev. No. 0
PART IV: 
SITE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Gassett Motors Site is located in the Tutu area of St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. Gassett Motors
is in automobile sales establishment. The site was formerly occupied by consolidated auto parts. Mr.
Gassett leased the property in May of 1988 and has occupied the facility since that time. The owner
of the property is unknown.
The area within approximately 1 mile of the site is densely populated and contains some commercial
properties. The site is bordered on the northeast by Ramsey Motors and on the southeast by Tutu
Texaco. There are large housing developments north, southeast, and west of the site. The nearest
residence is located approximately 200 feet west of the site. Beyond a 1-mile radius of the site there
are scattered smaller villages and towns. The densely populated and highly commercial town of
Charlotte Amalie is located 2.5 miles west of the site.
On February 15, 1989, NUS Corp. Region 2 FIT conducted an on-site reconnaissance of the Gassett
Motors Site. There are four 55-gallon drums and three 20-gallon drums located in the northwest
corner of the property. There is a pool of oil around the drums, and a drainage ditch containing
waste oil originates along the northern perimeter of the property and drains toward the northwest
corner of the property, where it turns onto the Ramsey Motors property. Once on the Ramsey
Motors property, the oil enters a large drainage ditch which drains toward a storm sewer. Mr.
Gassett indicated that the site was in the condition described above when he leased it in May of
1988. No readings above background were detected on the OVA flame ionization detector or on the
HNu photoionization detector in the drum area.
Until June 1986, the Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority (WAPA) accepted waste oil generated
by marinas, airports, and auto maintenance facilities. The waste oil was blended with fuel and
burned as a source of power. WAPA stopped accepting waste oil when a batch of oil was found to
contain PCBs. The source of the PCBs is unknown. Currently there is no permitted method of waste
oil disposal on St. Thomas. Generators must store all their waste oil, but the facilities are not
inspected or issued storage permits. These conditions, combined with drum shortages and poor
housekeeping, have resulted in generally poor waste containment at many facilities.
There is concern that contaminants possibly present in the waste oil will enter groundwater and
surface water. There is a pool of oil that may percolate through the soil and enter groundwater. Oil
is draining from the Gassett Motors Site toward a storm sewer on the Ramsey Motors Property.
Groundwater in the vicinity of the site is used for domestic purposes. The nearest surface water, the
Mangrove Lagoon, is surrounded by mangrove swamps that are designated for preservation by
DPNR.
TUT 
001 
1064
-H I-
Rev. No. 0
Based on the above considerations, the Gassett Motors Site is given a MEDIUM PRIORITY for further
action. Sampling activities should focus on determining whether the oil contains hazardous
substances and whether those substances are migrating to the storm sewer on the Ramsey Motors
property. Nearby wells should also be sampled. It sould be noted that a number of these wells were
found to be contaminated with volatile organic compounds; therefore, judgement should be used in
selecting appropriate wells for sampling. Further efforts should also be directed towards better
definition of the population using groundwater for drinking.
No enforcement actions have been taken against Gassett Motors in the past. The owners of the
property have been identified as one of nine potentially responsible patties in the contamination of
groundwater in the Tutu area. In July and August of 1987, 
ERA confirmed by sampling that volatile
organic compounds were present in a number of wells in the Tutu area. DPNR issued orders to close
16 of the wells. ERA removal action activities in the Tutu area included sampling of wells and
cisterns, removal of contaminated water from cisterns, and supplying of clean water on a regular
basis to affected residents.
TUT 
00 j. 
1OA:
Rev. No. 0
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS. U.S.VIRGIN ISLANDS
CONTENTS
Figure 1: 
Site Location Map
Figure 2: 
Site Map
Exhibit A: 
Photograph Log
TUT 
OO1 1066
Rev. No. 0
VIRGIN ISLANDS
(QUAD) EASTERN ST. THOMAS, V.I.
SITE LOCATION MAP
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE 1
IMUS
CXDRPORATKDN
SCALE: r- 2000' 
TUT 
001
>
Htr
CC
Q.
CCo
Ho2
>ui
V)2
DRAINAGE
DITCH
FENCE
OVERHANG
'o o 
5 55-GALLON
o oo'*-——DRUMS
SEWER
GRATE
GASSETT MOTORS
Rev. No. 0
LOW WALL
MANHOLE
(OPEN)\
;:?r--STAINED
* 
VEGETATION
PAVED
•GRATE
PARKING LOT
( PAVED)
ROUTE 
384
SITE MAP
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE 2
IMUS
CORPCDRAnON
NOT TO SCALE
ut-ujut.-Tj.-rn
Rev. No. 0
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FEBRUARY 15, 1989
~ 
PHOTOGRAPH INDEX
ALL PHnTOSBARHS TAKEN BY DIANE TRUBE.
Photo Number 
Description 
Time
R3-P5 
Grate in front of building. 
1344
R3-P6 
Grate under fence. 
1346
R3-P7 
Drum and oil pool in corner. 
1349
R3-P8 
Northwest corner of propertyi showing oil pool near drums. 1351
R3-P9 
Origin of oil-filled drainage ditch at north.end of property.1352
R3-P11 
Oil-stained vegetation. 
1356
R3-P12 
Sewer manhole. Tutu Texaco in background. 
1400
02-8902-
Rev. 
io.
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P5
February 15, 1989
Grate in front of building.
1344
TUT 
001 
1O7O
CCRPCRATOM
02-8902— I-?.-
Rev. :io. 0
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P6
February 15, 1989
Grate under fence.
1346
TUT 
OO1 
JLO71
CCRPGRATCN
Rev. :;o. 0
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P7
February 15, 1989
Drum and oil 
pool in corner.
1349
TUT 
001 
1072
CCRFCRATOM
32-8902-41-PA
Rev. ,'Jo. 0
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P8
February 15, 1989 
1351
Northwest corner of property, showing oil pool near drums.
02-8902--I-PA
Rev. 
,','o. 0
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U:S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P9
February 15, 1989 
1352
Origin of oil-filled drainage ditch at north end of property.
TIT 
001 
1074
G2-8902--;i-rA
Rev. ;io. 0
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. 
THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P11
February 15, 1989
Oil-stained vegetation.
1356
TUT 
O01 1075
02-8902-41-PA
Rev. "o. 0
GASSETT MOTORS
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
R3-P12
February 15, 1989 
1400
Sewer manhole. Tutu Texaco in background.
Rev. No. 0
REFERENCES
1. 
Field Notebook No. 0398, U.S. Virgin Islands Drum Reconnaissance, TOO No. 02-8902-29, NUS
Corp. Region 2 FIT, Edison, New Jersey, February 14 to 17,1989.
2. 
U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey Topographic Maps, 7.5 minute series,
"Central St. Thomas, Virgin Islands and Eastern St. Thomas, Virgin Islands Quadrangles" 1955,
revised 1982.
3. 
Gomez-Gomez, F. and J.E. Heisel. Summary Appraisals of the Nation's Groundwater
Resources-Caribbean Region. Geological Survey Professional Paper 813-4, 1980.
4. 
Stone, R.G. Scientific Survey of Porto Rico and the Virgin Islands, Volume XIX - Part 1,
Meteorology of the Virgin Islands. 1942.
5. 
Climate of Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands, Climatography of the United States No 60. June
1982.
6. 
Tutu Well Site Potable Water Alternatives Report, Anna's Retreat, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands. Prepared for U.S. EPA Region 2 By Region 2 Technical Assistance Team, Weston/SPER
Division, December 1989.
7. 
Fish and Wildlife Service List of Endangered and Theatened Wildlife and Plants 50 CFR 17.11
and 17.12. February 1985.
8. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Nancy Schlater, EPA, and Diane Trube, NUS Re: Sole
source aquifer in VI, March 3, 1989.
9. 
Graves, R.P. and R. Gonzalez. Potentiometric surface of the Turpentine Run Basin Aquifer in
the Tutu Area, Eastern St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, September 11, 1987. U.S. Geological
Survey Water Resource Investigations Report 88-4131, 1988.
10. 
Uncontrolled hazardous waste site ranking system, A user's manual, 40 CFR, Part 300,
Appendix A, 1986.
11. 
Donnelly, T.W., Geology of St. Thomas and St. John, U.S. Virgin Islands, In Caribbean
Geological Investigations, Geological Society of America, Memoir 98. ed. H. H. Hess, 1966.
12. 
Climatological Data Annual Summary, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, 1987.
13. 
Torres-Sierra, H. and R. Dacosta, Estimated Water Use in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, July
1983 
to June 1984. Caribbean Research Institute, Technical Report No. 21.
14. 
U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Coastal Zone Management
Program, zoning districts and coastal land and water use plan map.
15. 
Memo to Stephen D. Luftig, EPA, from Carlos O'Neill, EPA. Authorization of CERCLA Removal
Action Monies for the Tutu Well Site January 6, 1988.
16. 
Jordan, D.G. and O.J Cosner, A Survey of the Water Resources of St Thomas, Virgin Islands,
U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 1973.
17. 
Water Management Plan fof the Public Water System, Prepared for the Government of the
Virgin Islands by CH7V1 H , 
July 1981
TUT
Rev. No. 0
REFERENCES(CONT'D)
18. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between Fernando Gomez, USGS and Rich Peinberg, NUS Corp.,
on 3/11/89 at 1045 hours. RE: Hydrology and groundwater use in St. Thomas.
19. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between D. Goetz of Polycaribe and D. Trube, NUS Corp., on
3/14/89 at 1430 hours. RE: Wells and water use on St. Thomas.
20. 
Telecon Note: Conversation between L. Reed, DPNR, and D. Trube, NUS Corp., on 3/3/89 at
1640 hours. RE: Permits for site on St. Thomas.
21. 
Recordof communication, telephone conversation between L. Reid, DPNR, and A. Brochu, U.S.
EPA Region 2, on 01/30/89 at 1400 hours.
TUT
I
I
J
J
SZ 'ON 3ON3d3d3H 
i
- • 
J.
-• • •••••.,'
ii
j
J
•
j
PEDRO PANZARDI &
PROCESS A ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS
125O 
PONCE OE LEON AVE. • BANCO OE PONCE BLDG.. FIFTH FLOOR • SANTURCE. P.R.
P.O. BOX 2291 . HATO REV. P.R. OO919-2291 . (8O9) 722-3671 / 722-3664 / FAX: 725-9O65
P R E L I M I N A R Y S I T E
A S S E S S M E N T R E P O R T
L ' H E N R Y , I N C .
S T. T H O M A S, U. S. V. X.
P P & A P R O J E C T 8 9 9 8
O C T O B E R 1 9 8 9
36
Project 8998
L'Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pedro Panzardi and Associates (PP&A) performed a preliminary site
assessment of L1 Henry, Inc. , in the Tutu Area of Eastern St.
Thomas to determine potential soil and ground water contamination
with tetrachloroethylene, (Perchloroethylene or PCE).
The total amount of PCE disposed of by L'Henry does not exceed 22
gallons per year. They started operation in 1982. Based on the
the small quantity of tetrachloethylene (PCE) waste generated and
the nature of their operations, we believe that L,Henry, Inc., has
not contributed to the contamination of the Turpentine Run Basin
aquifer.
This report supports the above statement and provides guidance to
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in dealing with this
site. 
It also recommends additional work to be performed by
L*Henry, Inc. to assess the contamination of the soil at their site
and take remedial action for this, if necessary.
1081
Project 8998
L1Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
L' HENRY, INC.
Preliminary site Assessment Report
Executive Summary 
Page
1 . 0 Introduction ..................................... 1
1.1 Authorization of this Report ................ 1
1 . 2 Objectives of this Report ................... 1
2 . 0 Protocols Used During Operation .................. 2
2 . 1 Dry-Cleaning Operation ...................... 2
2 . 2 Filter Changing Operation ................... 4
3 . 0 Historical PCE Purchases ......................... 6
4.0 Historical Background and Actions
Taken by L1 Henry, Inc. ........................... 8
5.0 Discussion and Actions to be Taken .............. 10
6 . 0 Appendix Section. ................................. 11
Appendix I: 
Invoices of PCE Purchases from 1983-1989.
Appendix II: 
Chain of Custody and Laboratory Results.
Appendix 
III Material 
Safety 
Data 
Sheet 
for
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) .
001 1082
H
Project 8998
L'Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Authorization of this Report
This report was requested from Pedro Panzardi &
Associates (PP&A) by Mr. Leo T. Barbel, President
of L1Henry, Inc., in telephone conversation of
August 8, 1989, and documented in letter dated
August 21, 1989.
1.2 Objectives
The objectives of this report is to establish the
following:
Present a clear view of the overall
operations of a dry cleaning business;
and, of the small quantity of hazardous
waste generated by it.
A preliminary site assessment concerning
potential contamination of the soil and
the turpentine Run Basin aquifer by
L1Henry, Inc.
The degree of PCE contamination, if any,
contributed by L1Henry, Inc.
Present a preliminary action plan to
investigate further the findings discussed
in this report.
Project 8998
L1Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
2.0 Protocols Used Purina Operation
L1Henry, Inc., cleaners owns and operates one (1) dry
cleaning unit (Marvel CP-45 Model), and one (1)
industrial size washing machine and dryer. The only
hazardous waste generating activity is the filter-
changing operation of the dry-cleaning unit. 
The
following subsections describe both the overall dry
cleaning process and filter-changing operation.
2.1 Dry Cleaning Operation
The dry-cleaning unit operates as follows
(see Figure 11):
2.1.1 
The reservoir of machine II was originally
filled to the operations level with virgin PCE
from drums.
2.1.2 
The dry cleaning operation is a relatively
closed circuit. A make-up of virgin solvent
(PCE) is only added to the machine to maintain
the 
required 
operating 
levels; 
thus
compensating for the evaporation losses, the
residue left on clothes, and the PCE residue
lost during the filter changing operation (see
section 2.2).
2.1.3 
The clothes are put into machine 11 (see Figure
II). Here, they are impregnated with PCE.
2.1.4 
When machine II is in operation, the PCE is
continuously being cleaned. 
It is recycled
through two (2) cylinders containing twelve
(12) filters in series (six (6) each) and then
returned to machine II's reservoir.
2.1.5 
Once the clothes are impregnated with PCE, they
are transferred to machine |2, the dryer.
2.1.6 
In the dryer, most of the PCE is evaporated
from the clothes and returned to machine II's
i U i
FIGURE *l
DRY-CLEANING UNIT OPERATION
* 2
PCE
RECYCLING
LINE
FILTERS
FILTERS
PCE
RECERVOIR
1
Project 8998
I
L'Henry site Assessment
October 31, 1989
reservoir.
2.1.7 
Once most of the PCE is evaporated from the
clothes, these are removed from the dryer.
They are pressed, wrapped, and given to the
client.
2.2 Filter Changing Operation
The twelve (12) filters are contained in two (2)
cylinders. Each cylinder contains six (6) filters (see
Figure f1). These are changed every 6-8 weeks. The time
span depends on the volume of operations.
The following steps are taken when the filters are
changed:
2.2.1 
A five (5) gallon empty container is placed
under the cylinders.
2.2.2 
The bottom cylinder cover is unscrewed.
2.2.3 
The PCE that is contained inside the cylinder
at this time is displaced into the five(5)
gallon container as the filters and filter
separators are removed. The PCE, as well as
the filter contain a lot of lint.
2.2.4 
The dirty filters and filter separators are
drained to the 5 gallon container. Once they
are free of free liquid, they are put in drums
or on a concrete pad outside.
2.2.5 
The cylinder is scraped to remove the remaining
lint and the PCE residue or sludge. This is
put into the 5 gallon container together with
the waste PCE.
2.2.6 
The above procedure is repeated with the top
cylinder.
2.2.7 
Approximately 1-1.5 gallons of PCE residue,
lint and waste PCE is collected in the
f 36
Project 8998
L1Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
container, of which less than half are free
liquids.
2.2.8 
The five (5) gallon container and the filters
are put outside to dry. Most of the PCE is
evaporated. The filters and the PCE sludge and
lint have been traditionally disposed of at a
local dump site.
2.2.9 
Presently, arrangements are being made with
Safety-Kleen Envirosystems of PR to dispose of
the above wastes.
9 ci- 3-
Project 8998
L1Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
3.0 Historical PCE Purchases
L'Henry, Inc., 
began operations in January 2, 1982. 
One
of the co-owners of this cleaners is also co-owner of
another cleaners located St. Thomas. PCE is purchased
jointly by both cleaners. The virgin PCE was divided
equally among the two (2) cleaners until six (6) months
ago, 
when, the other cleaners bought a new, 
extremely
efficient dry to dry machine, which reduces the use of
PCE.
Table 1 lists the record of PCE purchases for both
cleaners from 1983 
through 1989. 
Previous records are
not available. 
Refer to Appendix I for purchase
invoices.
Approximately 35-40 drums of PCE are purchased per year
or 3-3.5 
drums per month. 
Therefore, L1Henry, uses
approximately 1.5 to 1.75 
gallons per month. As stated
in section 2.0, 
this is used as make-up to replenish that
lost through evaporation, residue left on clothes, and
the filter changing operation.
,'c
Project 8998
L1Henry site Assessment
October 31, 1989
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF PCE PURCHASES FROM 1983-1989
ivoice Date
7-11-83
1-11-84
7-18-84
2-08-85
6-06-85
1-16-86
6-04-86
1-08-87
7-09-87
12-01-87
4-25-88
10-18-88
4-12-89
Invoice Number
47896
54106
61717
69112
73587
80995
86520
94736
102907
109307
115372
122414
128865
No. Of Dx"Wn? Purchased
15
20
20
15
20
15
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Project 8998
L'Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
4.0 Historical Background and Actions Taken by L'Henrv. Inc.
L'Henry, Inc., has historically disposed of the dried filters
and PCE residue in the local landfill. 
At one time, an
operator improperly disposed of the PCE residue, and possibly
the waste PCE, on site. Figure 12 shows the location of this
area, which is approximately thirty six square feet (36ft2)
and was clearly demarcated since it had a lot of black lint
residues (from the filters when they were changed).
In June, 1989, an inspector visited the facility and took soil
samples in the area where the lint residues where located.
This inspection prompted the following actions to be taken by
L'Henry, Inc.
The top soil of the above mentioned 
area was
removed and placed in two (2) containers.
PP&A personnel took two (2) composite soil samples,
one (1) of each container.
These samples were transported by PP&A personnel to
a laboratory in Puerto Rico to be analyzed for PCE.
Appendix II shows the chain of custody of these
samples.
Laboratory 
results 
indicate 
that 
the
tetrachloroethylene (PCE) concentration in both soil
samples is less than 0.03 mg/kg. (see Appendix II).
8
JSEPTIC TANK
8 LEACHING PIT
\J
rrf
^>
WAREHOUSE
!36FT.»
(AREA
ABOVEGROUND
FUEL TANK
FIGURE *2
SITE 
PLAN
Project 8998
L1Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
5.0 Discussion and Action to be Taken
Due to the following facts PP&A believe that the site's
contamination, if any, is very limited and definitely did not
cause the concentration of PCE found in the aquifer.
Assuming a worse-case scenario, the quantity of
waste PCE (including PCE sludge and clothes lint)
derived from both cylinders and the preliminary
dripping of the twelve (12) filters is 2.5 gallons
every six (6) weeks about 22 gallons per year.
The result of the analyzed soil samples show that
the concentration in the top soil (where PCE
residuals were found) is less than 0.03mg/kg.
Even though, some of the wells around the facility
are contaminated with PCE. They are also
contaminated with other solvents such as
Trichloroethylene (TCE) and Methylene Chloride.
L1Henry Inc., only uses PCE.
Based on the data presented above, the following investigative
actions will be taken:
Soil borings will be drilled to a depth of ten (10)
feet or above sea level (whichever comes first).
This will be done in various locations of L'Henry's
facilities. 
Split spoon samples will be taken.
These will be analyzed for PCE.
Results for the above work will be submitted to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) once the work
is completed.
10
Project 8998
L1Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
6.0 APPENDIX SECTION
11
Project 8998
L'Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
Appendix I
Invoices of PCE Purchases from 1983-1989
12
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC.
eon
. FUEATO flICO 00«M
CALLS r: sso 220
a INOCSTAIAL COJNTRt C.UB
CMOLHXA f UERTO AiCO
CABLE AOMCSS:
SOLD TO
TO ••• :
:i '
^00337 
L HENRI, INC
BOX 232
ST. THOMAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS
008O1
004789
S/0 ; 1O4OO5I
:OWOyC«l»0. 
Sit»H,-- ..." CUSTOMS* f.O NO.
WOf ft OATI
«HIMCDVU
TtWUS
0010920
•n\
LEVINS
07/07/83
OCEAN
O7> 11/83
JNET 30 DAYS
j -'.COOC .*..;
0 
OR
-/
"^* f
046-O003
33OO. 00
MERCHANDISE . --
IA-UCN
U-*0(MOC
U-tOJIfS
PEftCHLOROETHYLENE -70O LBS
VIA ISLAND EXPRESS
FREIGHT C O L L E C T
' OL-OAU.9NI
MS-KMU
. .- DM -MUM*
._--•_» -TCtW 
.'
-i .. .i: <"«T cooe
•\
— i- ,~ 
_': . .m»0*1utt . .
AMOUNT
220.00
CUSTOMER COPY
3300. OO
3300. OO
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC.
TELi
CAAOLiSA »ufRTO a.JJ
CAI.E A23RCSS. MAVAUJ
SC^D TO
SHIPPED TO
INVOIC
774-20£3
cisOwCiwo 
SI.MN 
c.£TCM£<< P c nc 
o»os« DATE 
smwtc VIA 
INVOICE DATE 
WMS
?C1i3Ci 
V2 .' 
I 01/10/84 
I 
EXPRESS 
! Ol/ 11/84 
NF7 2w T
tT^i' 
wfrUx^> 
<A'T 
CODE 
DESCRIPTION 
UWT pft.ce 
AMOUN
20 
! 
0 
OR
1
1I
i
t
1
i 
i
1
i
! 
:
f 
f
1 
'
i 
;
-<7-:c -;•:
ue*c<H».-;i it 
I
J/VO-CC02
•-•- (CUKOS
M-SOUI
PErtCHLGHOETHYLsNE
•
T —TON!
-700 LQS
f 
V>^
>^X
J iin'J
O/pYI'
'
22 5. 00 
4700.
;
•—
ii
j
I
UNIT COOf CS»IA*ATIOM 
• 
rPEKIHT
4700. 0
OTM«»« 
^^^ 
^
[
.MMATMTt 
. MMHTMIT 
*==:S^
..• - !•*• ». C! 3 Cr.' .««CM^*; 
**WM».tft3 *• -.*» *'-*»-.4 AKO 6vt te'l 
L^ 
———
- .. .-.».•."«.• >i»«..»i •«;•.»•: j-. «•€«-. i _»':c.t i-.-~;.o> :3-«»»-.'.'. 
^« ...«j-- 1; — • -«>;i c> »••» 4* f «• 5<* :*cri?&> 
INVOICE
ORIGINAL
OOl.
V -
NO.
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC.
» o sox MOC 
CAUC :?2 csc. ao
CAROLINA. PUERTO RICO 3063C 
bM 
INDOSTHJAL COONTHY CUJt
?EL£ ;*Dv) TW4C»» • Mt« • *C4S 
CARDclNA. ^UCMTO RICO
CASLC ABORESS.
SOi.0 TO
TO
' IW.'CJCE «•
0000337
L HENRI, INC
BOX 232
ST. THOMAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS
VIRGIN ISLANDS
00001
0061*
S/0 : 1092;
CCNOUCC KG. • 
. 
SLMM
Ct/STOVEfi t.C. NO.
OKU 
04TC
VIA
• 0023800
92
VERBAL
07/17/84
OUR TRUCK
07/18/84
NET 30 D<
cooe
• UNIT MICC
.AMCUNT
20
f
046-0003
peRCHLOROeTHYLENE -70O LBS
ISLAND EXPRESS
FRIEGHT COLLECT
LW
470O. C
4700.00
—— M£«e*A*o.ti —————
———— ""CXAK0.8I ————— __|
l-M-*CM«« •' 
•
:" 
' 
•' • M-Mxa 
';..":
. - .„• ^ .-. M-OOIIN* . . _ .
. ' .'• •^-•', I»<T COOt tU
VV— U UUPH
• . *°-I*M 
. ••••: . .. -. ,'
^•,T^!>w» _"•..•_'".'...!•"..":
1AMATWN ... 
* " . 
•;• .
- 
meoMT 
-. . - •
OTHER
4700. O
,-«r«^ ••>«!•«»>« I___TOTAL
»«e»vi»» a >^»» » ^« • ««»» am nTj»
»C</> m •!•• »M<I
w> *~n w if »• on*
..^.^_
INVOICE
CUSTOMER COPY
ri-*HHHHH—l « II IH
OOOO337
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC.
MM 
CALLS 27} {SO tK
- - 
I *ICC 90630 
UAC INOUSTSIAt COUNTRY CLUS
TELSUOt. 7tt-«t*i . «06S • 606* 
CAA3LINA »L)£B
CABLE AO3MU>
SHIPPED TO.-.
INVOICE
L HENRI, INC
DOX 232
ST. 
THOMAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS 
00301
0069
S/0 : 1038:
put* f ,0. & B3lt9BX£i(*
0030473 
92 I 
LEVINE
02/O7/85
VIA ^.t
OATC ..',;t • ^ ;-|
OCEAN
02/08/05' NET 30
O*!? J \pn1f.
PERCHLOROETHYLENE -7OO LBS
ORM-A 
UM4*1897
250. 00 
! 37&0. C
ORIGINAL
I- .
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC
• 3 BOX M3« 
* 
CAU.E 2TJ S$C «2
CAKO.'NA. PoCATO A.CC «*JO
TEL2 :«0«) ?«».«C«i • 40*S
.
OPB IMOJSTSIAL COUNTKr CtJB
lNA ^UCMTO KlCO
ADDRESS MAVAUE
TO
MUOICE
0000307 
L HcM&I, INC
DOX 232
ST. THOMAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS OOOO1
0073:
S/O :
0034475
92] 
MR UEVINE
Oi/OS/33
OCEAN
O6/O6/85
NET 30 Tii
PKRCHLOROE'THYLENE -700 LBS
OKM--A 
UN<tl897
'« XKt »a «*•:• 
P— 
_._•.__
I -u'INVOICE {'
ORIGINAL
CtSTOMEA Nt
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC.
' O iOX ]«0«
CA*CL.-> ; .€«TOPICSooese
'E..5 '804' ;e»DCfS • 60*! • t£6
SOLD TO
OOO0307 
L HENR1, INC
BOX 232
ST. THOMAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS 00301
SH.PP6D TO
INVO.
OOt
S/0 :
CONDUCE NO
SLMN.
CUSTOMER f. O NO.
o«sen OATS
SHJWED VIA
INVOICE BATE
-riw.
O041137
92
LEVINE
01/13/86
OCEAN
01/16/86
NET 30
ORIGINAL
p.-
~<^^L
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC.
;: esa
CUSTOM£fl NO.
INVCIC
0000337 
L HENRI, INC
BOX 232
ST. THOMAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS 00301
008
S/0 : 107
CONDUCE NO 
SLM\ CUSTOM6R P. C. MO. 
O«DM DATE 
SHIPPED VIA 
V 
INVOICi CATS 
•» 
TIHMS
0046184
92
LEVJNEJ
06/02/86
OCEAN
06/O4/86
NET 30 I
DESCRIPTION
unrrrm-.es
AMOU>
'
!'-'i' 
001 1101
I M
II
I I I
I ' l
I'lnn
' n
/000337 
I. HENS-U, 
IMC
nox 23;.?
ST. rnr.n
_ _ _ _ _ _ ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
CCN'SU'CE -NO 'i^;.S!.
. 
___ 
___ 
___ 
_____ 
_ ___
-HO MI.-.
•sun TRUCK.
JUT -•(} D
L:
'KRCHLOF<QfITHVLENfT -7OO LB£
DRM-rt 
UN(fiS97
COI..I.ECT 
ONLY.
ISLAND EXPRESS
00
ORIGINAL
MANUEL
P.O
IEV DE^VALILE;^ 
.' J
*. .'•-.>• >**-'. /•;'"/•: . v ••'• ••'/•••
L HEhKI/ 
INC
BOX
ST. 
THOMAS
CONDUCE N.O . -j.SLMN.
,.;;,-/V~',v :-.-;.:-, .^:-^;^^.';
^^••£-^&*m;<#'^b
/ ^'.:^-"'»
v .-•. . .
• 
• • / >
'%
M
-'• v^: 
• -'..
*• 
•.• 
•
•• v 7&ffiW#fcVfff7Wtf%f£x
.. \!:\.OtiK,*:W^'jh^&£!L;
.. • . - - • :. •:-"•'-'v .•
:-"--ji---
:-.-,v.r •'-;:-. V-'-^M-'^''-- ffo.'A 
\
_ 
. • - . - . • • ••*•••<> 
^- 
•. •. -.-.^ -.-.. • .•.<..•. ^ 
_.__; .....T ••
«?
•< t>v'v
f$&
.; ->;.•:•-./
- •/:.
.v.'^J
SZySSSB^^^J/.
-••;--^-.*'. \:-^.C-7v.v.-y-K;v:^Vj;,s;y.:..;.:^.^wyoM^cx)>y^^^^^^^ 
• 
-^
FUT 
0 0 1
I.' : . E^F'*" i IC_r r-i^!-c^t-ifc-^»-"ih-i-JMh-
MANUEL DEL VALLE, IIMC.
SiMVOSCE
P C SOX 3806
CAROLINA. PR. o«:s-wo6
Til ;tt9>7
L HEN31, INC
UOX £:),->
SI. 
THOMAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS 00301
^. >: 'SHIPPtP VIA
oo/ro/oo !
01 / P. 3 / 03
OO7P441
NET 3O 0
T'tiRCHLOKFTMYLENE
700 
LDS3
FREIGHT C H L I. F C
BBkH f Jg' gVX^ ^ ^i'
•*• 
~
l TM< *
41-' to
ORIGINAL
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC.
f»0 BOX 3527-TOA 8AJA PUERTO RICO 00759-2663
<M 20 HM S—SO. CAMOEcARIA. TOA tAJA, * > 00759
TEL. (809)740-5410
0000307
L HENRI, INC
25A DRQNNINGENS GAUE
ST. THOMAS
VIRGIN ISLANDS 00804
ST. THOMAS
S/0 : 1106
10/18/88 IWET 30 D
PERCHLORETHYLENe
700 LDS
VIA ISLAND EXPRESS
FREIGHT COLLECT
. •ACtwAA tf.it ; U, M Cut CMvl'iCM • MVIMAJU l«T|lf f (| Ai ktAAAlUOAAI.*. M*».IXO 
I l« S :*ve-C> ItCj^i iO CAri^D^^^lj W "•*•«« *£0 «Hl •< tUl^K1 Tf tfHIHIi' *I
ORIGINAL
MANUEL DEL VALLE, INC.
P 0 BOX 2S27 — TOA 8AJA PUERTO RiCO 00759-3663
k.M.20 MM 5—BC CAN'D£'_*6lA. YO* 8JU.A. P R. 00758
TEL. (809)740-5410
0000337 
L HEN*I,.INC
25A ORONNINCENS GADE
ST. THOMAS
_____ 
VIRGIN ISLANDS 00804
012S8
S/0 : 111:
EXEMPTION »
^^ix^sSiilSSS^
OO84323 ! 43' 
LEAH
04/04/89 
OCEAN
O4/12/89 INET 3O E
PERCHt-ORETHYLENE
700 LBS
1 OCEAN FREIGHT C O L L E C T
ORIGINAL
Project 8998
L1Henry Site Assessment
October 31, 1989
Appendix II
Chain of Custody and Laboratory Results
13
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
SJR^
SAMPLERS:
SUnO" 
;
O*
i
8«iinqwhh«C by:
Received by:
oie/Time
Relinquished by: i
Received by: t
i«/Ti«t
Relinquished by:
Received by: fl».«..n/
Oa re /Time
Rciiftquiar.ed by: :
j Received by taobrie loborotory 'or fieid
; ono'ytis: :t*~*
Dote/Time
Oi$po:cn«d By:
| Date/Time J-Reeeivtd 'or Lo
1 Date/Time
Mernod of Shipme.tr:
LABORATORY TEST REPORT
L'HEKKY, INC.
P.O. BOX 232
• 
CT. THOMAS, VI OOS04
• 
ATTN: .4*. LEO T. BARBEL
Date: October 5, 1989
Peo« 
of
1 
l
EG LAB
W.O.*: 
635-01-01
D.S «: 
893874
Date Sample Co«ect*d/8MKiMtt 8/25/89
CLIENT
Facility. St. Thonas, VI
P.O.r
Data Sample CoM«ct«d:
Sample *: 
Source:
See B«low 
Station
Description
Soil Grab
SQL SAMPLE NO.
44601
44002
SOURCE
Station I 1
Station I 2
TBTRAGBbOROETHYLENE
<0.03
<0.03
rur 
001 
1.1.10
Reported by: i=o*^^>^^^ 
Re*eeeedby: Hlllia- Samara
THIe: 
lAuckoato^tna^e^, 
TWe:^fffr 
General Xanaycx
acip 
n '»
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY LAiORATOWEt, INC.. BOXl14MrSANTURC&HCIffOMOO00910>14W.TSlS.73»«>».78«47W
-4
TELECOPY COVES PAGE*****
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES:
(including cover page)
PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION TO:
NAME:
O
LOCATION:
COMPANY:
TELECOPY SENT FROM:
NAME 
Elba Luz Martinez Co sine
TELECOPIER NUMBER 724-3110
NOTE: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL US AT 725-5:
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
Project 8998
L1Henry site Assessment
October 31, 1989
Appendix III
Material Safety Data Sheet for Perchloroethylene (PCE)
14
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administt«tion
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
Farm Aoorevva
OMS No. 44-R13I7
Required under USDL Safety and Health Regulations for Ship Repairing,
Shipbuilding, and Shipbreaking (29 CFR 1915. 1916. 1917)
SECTION 1
MANUFACTURER'S NAME
Vulcan Materials Company, Chemicals Division
EMERGENCY TELEPHONE NO.
316-524-5751
ADDRESS (Number Strttt. dry. Suit . trut ZIP Code)
P. 0. Box 7689, Birmingham, Alabama 35223
CHEMICAL NAME AND SYNONYMS
Tetrrachloroethylene
CHEMICAl, FAMILY
Chlorinated hydrocarbon •
TRADE NAME AND SYNONYMS
" Perchloroethylene
FORMULA
CC12 - CC12
SECTION II - HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS
PAINTS. PRESERVATIVES, t SOLVENTS
PIGMENTS
CATALYST
VEHICLE
SOLVENTS
ADDITIVES
OTHERS
X
TLV
(Unto)
ALLOYS AND METALLIC COATINGS
BASE METAL
ALLOYS
METALLIC COATINOS
FILLER METAL
PLUS COATING OR CORE FV.UX
OTHERS
. 
. 
' . ' . - . -;'.• '
HAZARDOUS MIXTURES OF OTHER LIQUIDS. SOLIDS, OR OASES
L. . 
"
. .--4 — •:_.-. . . . . '_._ —
.... .... —— .. — .......... ......
.. 
- 
.... 
—— .-• ——— ^. 
... ... —
x
%
-
TLV
(Umal
TLV
(Unco*
-
SECTION III - PHYSICAL DATA 
. .
SOILING POINT f"F.)
VAPOR PRESSURE (mm Hj.J @20°C
VAPOR DENSITY (AIR'1)
SOLUBILITY IN WATER
250
13
'•• 
i ———————————— .
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (H)O-1)
PERCENT. VOLATILE
•Y VOLUME (%)
EVAPORATION RATE
( 
etlier 
.„
Negligible
1.6
100
0.09
APPEARANCE AND OOOR 
Colorless clear liquid, mildly sweet
SECTION IV - FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA
FLASH POINT (Mctnod
None
(tag closed cuo)
FLAMMABLE LIMITS
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA Not applicable
_CIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES
Self-contained breathing equipment should be used by firemen in building where
perchloroethylene is stored. Keep container cool.
AND
U^p>oYsr'c'a^"T^aignTteSrFynfrrgh energy ignition source. 
Decomposes with fire or
hot surfaces to acidic gases and other highly toxic substance. 
__________
SECTION V - HEALTH HAZARD DATA
THRESHOLO LIMIT VALUE
100 ppm (As listed in Part 1910.1000 of CTR, Title 29)
EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE
Qverexposure can cause vomiting, nausea, drowsiness, unconsciousness and even
death in extreme cases.
EMERGENCY ANO FIRST AID PROCEDURES
Move to fresh air. Remove contaminated clothing. If breathing has stopped,
administer artificial respiration. Keep warm and quiet. Call physician.
Eye contact—wash with copious amounts of water. Never administer adrenaline.
SECTION VI - REACTIVITY DATA
STABILITY
UNSTABLE
STABLE
XX
CONDITIONS TO AVOID
Contact with open flame, hot surfaces or
emissions from welding are.
INCOMPATABILITV (Maitnolt to rrotaj
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS
Hydrogen chloride, phosgene and other highly toxic substance.
HAZARDOUS
POLYMERIZATION
MAV OCCUR
WILL NOT OCCUR
XX
CONDITIONS TO AVOID
SECTION VII - SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES
STEPS TO BC TAKEN IN CASE MATERIAL IS RELEASED OR SPILLED
Evacuate the area, ventilate, avoid breathing vapor or coming in
liquid. 
Clean uo area (wear protective clothing) contain spill,
contact with
transfer by
mopping or with absorbent material to storage container.
WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD
Consult manufacturer or local pollution control aeencv.
SECTION VIII • SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION (SptClfy tyft)
None reauired when used with adequate ventilation.
VENTILATION
LOCAL EXHAUST
Sufficient to maintain below TLV
MECHANICAL (GtHtrwl)
PROTECTIVE CLOVES
Neoorene, viton, P.V.C. coated
SPECIAL
OTH8H
EYE PROTECTION
Chemical safety goggles
OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Protective headgear and aoron when solashing is a* problem
SECTION IX - SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS
PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING ANO STORING
Avoid contact with skin and avoid vapors.
vents outdoors.
Store in pool.
dry ventilated area.
OTHER PRECAUTIONS
Prevent moist air from entering storage. No smoking in presence of vapors.
PAGE (2)
• PO 114.110
Form OSHA-20
R*«. Mty 72
AV-.2
^^^^^^B^^^H
Chemical Formula
Molecular Weight
Freezing Point
Boiling Point (At 1 ATM.)
Steam Distillation Point (At 1 ATM.)
Ratio of Solvent/Water, by wt.
Latent Haaf of Vaporization at b. pt.
Specific Heat, Liquid @ 20*C
Vapor (1 atm., JOO'C)
Critical Temperature
_. 
i f 
j ^t- -t 
i • 
• j /*-\ on»/-
c,a«
165.85
22.22'C; -8*F
121.2"C; 250'F
87.7*C; 190*F
5.U2/1
^aflralVg; 91.4 Btu/lb.
0.205 cah/g/'C
O.J46 calVg/*C
548.6'C; o59J*F
- -__- „ 
,, jr ,,*.-,,
Specific Gravity of Liquid 25/25*C
Pounds/Gdton @ 25*C
Ave. Coeff. of Cubical Expmnon.
_- liquid, l/'C,
Vapor Density @ b. pt. & 1 «tm.
Sp. Gr. of Vapor @ ! atm. A c. jjt.
(Air «= 1)
Vhcosity, liquid @ 20'C
Vapor @ 60*C
Solubility @ 25'C
Peichloi tn Water 
(
Water in PerchJor
Diffusivity in Air @ 25 *C 1 «tm.
fief*Kfiv» Index n 
Liquid @ 20*C
D Vapor @ O'C
1.620
13.47 ttaVgaL
0.00102, (O to -25*Q
5.W a/1.; 0.320 Ibycu. ft.
5.72
0.88 cp
0.0099 cp.
0.01 5 9/1 00 g water
0.0105 g/100 g perchlor
0^167 sq. cm./sec
1^044
1.00201
!"UT 
001 
1.115
1
Temperalure
*F.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
II
Density
14.03
14.02
14.01
13.99
13.98
13.96
13.95
13.94
13.92
13.91
13.89
13.88
13.86
13.85
13.83
13.81 i
13.60 '
13.79
13.77
13.76
13.74
13.73
13.71
13.70
13.68
13.66
III
Gallons to Make
700 Ib.
49.89
49.93
50.00
50.04
50.07
50.14
50.18
50.22
50.29
50.33
50.40
50.44
50.50
50.55
50.61
50.68
50.72
50.77
50.83
50.87
50.95
50.99
51.06
51.10
51.17
51.24
1
Temperalure
°F.
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
II
Deniiiy
Ibi./Gol.
13.65
13.63 
•
13.62
13.61
13.59
13.58
13.57
13.56
13.55
13.53
13.52
13.50
13.48
13.47
13.45
13.44
13.42
13.41
13.39
13.37
13.36
13.34
13.32
13.31
13.30
13.29
III
Gallon! to Make
700 Ib.
51.29
51.36
51.40
51.44
51.50
51.55
51.58
51.62
51.66
51.73
51.78
51.85
51.93
51.97
52.04
52.08
52.15
52.20
52.27
52.36
52.40
52.47
52.55
52.59
52.63
52.67
Surface Tension in Air @ 20*C
Power Factor (1000 cycles)
Dielectric Constant, Liquid @ 25*C
Specific Resistance
Heat of Formation, Liquid
Vapor
Vapor Pressure
Density of Liquid
Flash Point
Explosion Point
Evaporation Rate (Ether = 100)
Azeotropic Mixtures
Component
Water
Methanol
Ethanol
Propanol
Isopropanol
Butanol
Isoburyl Carbinol
Allyl Alcohol
Glycol
Formic Acid
Acetic Acid
Propionic Acid
Isobutyric Acid
Triethyl Borate
Acetamide
Isoburyl Acetate
Nitromethane
».
32.32 dynes/cm.
0.02%
2.365
1 .8 x 1011 ohm$/cm. cube
-j- 3 kg cal./mol.
— 6 kg. cal./mol.
See Fig. 1
See Fig. 2
None
None
9
f, @ 7*0 mm
•c
87.7
63.7
76.7
94.0
81.7
108.9
116.1
93.4
119.1
88.1
107.4
119.2
120.5
117.5
120.4
115.5
95.0
Wl. %
P«rcM»f
84.2
36.5
37
52
30
71
80
54
94
50
61.5
91.5
97
48
97.4
47
80
111
I
I
1
I
1
LZ 'ON 30N3d3d3U 
I
1
I
I
' ' . - - , 
. 
• •
I
1 \ 
*-
I
o • 
i
NUS CORPORATION
II
0398
10
&
VWGIH ISLANDS ORUH RECOH.
02-8901-29
TDD HGR.- D. TRUBE
LOGBOOK 10398
FEBRUARY 2, 1989
TUT
OOi
;O
$3-
o 
<*
I
I*
•* 
- *
1 .ri r 
" o^v
01
.t ^
• .p
V
9
t.
*
\><J
f\ -"c
rt 
^
07.
°)*V
vv
fNO
Osj»
al
I
-Ni'o
-p-
CO
-_t o
" 1
f-Dt-
1
/^\ 
x' \_*>
'JM 
* \
"73 
=* 
^ 
! 
^
**! 1 
•.'.;,* I •**
\i 
? 
|:-^, ^ i 
W
^X 
^ 
.;. -,' * V 
^ 
\
. d 
, 
/ M 
v« .< 
1
^ 
"~("^ " ^*T^ 
' 
1
|K| 
; 1 ?'rt* x 
^
V y 
tr 
' — ' 
f^
1 
^ IP' 
^
1 
H c 
__ 
s
I 
,« 
"C. 
- —
\ 
ki 4^ 
*t 
1
\ 
JuL /» 
^ 
/
\ 
^r J^ /* 
& 
I
\lSP 
r- 
1
*" 
ftr
) 
0
"?^ 
s
\ 
X 
^J
-- V> 
16 
'cP '
( 
^^l 
i 
^ 
——_
'" 
'<\l°P.^
; 1^^
1 
^ 
\ 
A - - >
' " — " " )
p •— - 1
1 i 1
LI/ *e
tit/
\ '
:y^
rO
1
^ 
S
^'•>
f^A. \
G>
4*
2-S
IS
(331
or
Of
r^
• 
mr
K>
n
u,
r
rl-
OOK
TUT 
001 
1124
r
spr* 1-
llm
o
|401
/
' C '"i
*"7
' -fi
.-(o
AT: ceai
O
^'
__
— - - 
. tT~
_
-w
-?Afo-
16
y,ea>r
I^ • 
("
-&/jO -k» Pirate* .
'CO1
^ N
&
3
oQ
-a
c
LL
o
fsc
_ 
3
O -f
^c
c,
-•>
<*
^r
1
U '
^ ft 1
0
v- 
-o
t o
OL
i»^
o r s
\ vorc.
s
-TTV»^ <C
As.
I
^- . 2 "2-
GUr
C^rry
J* , ^-
sorn«
, c )'•=
Qc
t'c ;
t
O-lso
\Afi,f
>Oc?o
Our
Sd.v^t c (•
OS a 
"~t) ^ R_ of-Pice
as
TUT 
001 1128
I
I
I
I
I
I 
: 
•
| 
REFERENCE NO. 28
i 
. '"•"":";
f 
' 
, ;
riiiiii
>: 
TUT 
001 
112'
» ;
I
Suite 201, 
1090 King Georges Post Road,
Edison, NJ 08837 • (201) 
225-6116
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTION
EPA CONTRACT 68-01-7367
T O :
CFO
FROM : ^^ 
tfv t^ , TTVf -2- 1
SUBJECT: 
D o c u m e n t it 1 on of T r a n s a i c t a l
SITE:
T D D f :
DATE:
The p u r p o s e of t h i s aeno is to docuacat the t r a n s a i c c a l of
C h e f o l l o w i n g :
_______ L e c t « r R e p o r t DCN#__________
OSC R e p o r t D r a f t / F i n a l DCS*__
P h o t o g r a p h s
A n a l y t i c a l Data
POLREP
S a f e t y Plan DCN*_______
C o m m u n i t y R e l a t i o n s Plan DCNl
X 
S a m p l i n g Plan DCN*
S a m p l i n g Report DCNf
Action Memorandum 
DCN/_
SPCC Report
X 
Site Maps
X__ 
Other
cc: 
TAT PM
TDD File
Roy F. West on, Inc.
SPILL PREVENTION A EMERGENCY RESPONSE DIVISION
In Association with ICF Technology, Inc., CC Johnson A Malhotra, P.C, Resource Applications, Inc.
Geo/Resource Consultants, Inc., and Environmental Toxicology International, Inc.
TAPLE 1. LI5T OF WELLS SAMF'LED AND THEIR LOCATION
NC. 
WELL NAME 
. L O C A T I O N
1 
t r ' _. Ad ; 
Conoe 
1 Ot 
C
- 
Ronria'->er 
C h a r l o t t e Afnalie Estate # •
~'j : - • • - • . 
. t : <? , , ; t t «• Afn .-< 1 : t- £ .» t <S I >".• <*
- r ^ . E . i , ^ ' ' 
i] l", c% r 1 ,; , t t ,- A f n a l l e - E L t j t «• «
e - S t ^ t ' l - 
C f'i a t I •:• t t f- 
AIM 3 l i e - 
E £ t a t r.- **
5 
Haf.*.. '= 
Anna's Pt-treat «5c
t 
Stc-t-l--'s 
Anr-ia's F'e-t r eat #5a
7 
M a t h i ^ ' s 
Charlotte- Amalur E s t a t e
B 
5rni t h ' c 
Charlotte Amalie Estatt-
•J 
F r a n c o i s 
Anna's Pe-treat #335
10 
T:l l e t ' s 
Anna's Petreat #1I:6
11 
Fr.fM = v y ' 3 
Anna's Retreat #405
11 
4 winds 1 
Anna's r e t r e a t #39.''
13.1 
VIHA 2 
Anna's Retreat #337
13. 1 
VIHA l 
Anna's retreat #387
14 
A Ion ? Leonard 
Anna's F'etreat #ll"3-^5
15 
D e n i i t r i 
Anna's Retreat #J15
16 
Dencf-, 
Mariendahl #10
17.1 
Dtv.rc.f, 1 
Mariendahl #11
17.J 
Devcon 3 
Mariendahl #11
18 
Decu ' r. 
Mariendahl
TUT 
001 
1131.
TABLE 2. 
PHOTOVAC SAMPLING RESULTS, 1^67. ALL CONCE NT PAT IONS IN UG L
_L'ENCH* 4 
JUL
E-EN
T|J:
f 'IE
T C E
:•>: E
RAMSEY 
JUL
PEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
H. CRUSHER 
JUL
PEN 
o.O
TOL 
5. 7
PCE 
102.o
TCE 
7.o
DCE 
O.o
H.&Af ERY* 
JUL
~~ 
PEN 
O.O
TOL 
6. 2
P C E 
2 . 9
TCE 
O.O
I'CE 
o.O
H. ESTATE* 
JUL
PEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
LEONARD 
JUL
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
AUG
0 . C1
ij . o
0 . 0
0 . 0
1 1 
f '
AUG
0 . (")
0 . 0
7.0
0 . 0
1 . 0
AUG
O.o
O.o
2£.o
3. o
12.0
AUG
0 . 0
0 . ' >
3 . o
O.o
1 . '
AUG
< > . 0
o.O
. 0
o.O
o.O
AUG
0 . 0
0 . 0
1.0
0 . O
O . O
SEP
o. 0
o.o
o.o
0 . 0
0. 0
SEP
0 . 0
0 . 0
7.5
< 1
0 . 0
SEP
>j . IJ
0 . 0
1 4 . < J
1 . 0
1
SEP
i J . 0
C' . 0
1 . 0
1
0. (J
SEP
0 . ' J
0 . (J
O.o
O.o
O.o
SEP
o.O
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
• O C T
0 . 0
0 . 0
'.'. ' )
''' . o
l.o
OC T
4. 5
< J . < J
. 50
0 . (J
2.7
OCT
5. 0
'!' . (j
29. 5
0 . ' J
4.O
OCT
1
0 . O
1 j . 0
1
1
OCT
0 . 0
1 . (j
c-
~ . _J
0 . O
0. O
OCT
O.O
0 . 0
i j . O
< j . O
0 . O
NOV
0 . ( j
o . 0
o.O
O . o
o. l.i
NO','
0 . 0
0 . ( J
1 & . 0
< 1
i j . 0
NOV
' j . 0
0 . 0
5.0
7.0
0 . (J
NOV
t j . 0
0. ij
0 . 0
1
0. 0
NOV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOV
0 . 0
o.o
o.O
O. 0
o.o
DEC
o. (j
o. •;>
o.O
o . O
C'. 1.'
DEC
(j . C>
o . «;
4. 0
(j . 0
0 . 0
DEC
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . ij
0 . 0
DEC
0. o
0 . ' J
'j. 0
0 . 0
*.' . '.
DEC
'j . 0
< J . 0
(j . < j
( j . 0
0 . 0
DEC
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
(j . 0
0 . 0
TAt-LE I M: ON" IN'JED
PHOTOVAC SAMPLING RESULTS, ir-87.
f P A'; I G I 2
JJL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NCV
DFC
DEM I
BEN
TOL
PCE
f C K!
DC £
TP 13
0 . <"> 
0 . C'
O.O 
1.0
120.0 
ie!'.0
2E. •'.< 
_ 1 . 0
14-: .0 
5. o
JUL 
AUG 
SEP
0 . 0
0 . 0
50
70. 0
2.£
OCT
O. 0 
' ! > . < '
1 ' . 0 
(') _ [')
30.'! 
2 5 . 0
fc.' ' ' • ' ' 
/ 
i i
2.0 
1 . •!•
"JC'V 
DEC
BEIN
TOL
PCE
THE
DUE
DEDC 
JLIL
BEN
TOL
PCE
T i. E
DCE
DEVCON #1 
JUL
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCF.
DCE
Df'.'CON *3 
JUL
&EN
TOL
PC E
TCE
DCE
VI HA #1 
JUL
BEN 
15.3
TOL 
6.0
PCE 
35.7
TCE 
9.4
DCE 
0.0
0 . 0
0. 'J
2 . 0
O . O
0 . 0
AUG
( i . 0
' >. O
< '. O
o.O
i •' . 0
AUG
0 . 'I'
'I1 . 0.
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
AUG
0 . < >
< " ' . > '
0 . ( >
O.o
0 . o
AUG
O.o
1.0
10."
3. o
12.<i
O.o 
1
0 . ' i 
0 . 0
0 . o 
< 1
O.o 
1
0 . 0 
••: 1
SEP 
OCT
0.0 
-. 1
o. •:> 
o. o
0. 0 
O. 0
0. O 
1
O. 0- 
1 . 0
SEP 
OCT
'."> . 0 
o.o
< - . 0 
o . o
' ' . 0 
o . ( i
o.O 
0. 0
o.o 
• 1
SEP 
OCT
1 ' . 0 
a . a
o . ( j 
( ) . < >
o.O 
o.o
O.o 
o.o
0 . 0 
< 1
SEP 
OCT
0 . O 
0 . 0
0 . 0 
0 . 0
i4.o 
s . <:»
1 
0 . 0
o . <:> 
2 . 3
0 . 0
'.' . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
NO1.'
o.O
1 ' . 1."'
> > . 0
o.O
o.O
NOV
< j . 0
0 . 0
0 . '."'
1
1
NO'/1
O.o
<!' . o
O.o
(j . 1 )
0 . O
NOV
0 . 0
o . <:>
2.0
• 1
0 . 0
i !' . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . <!)
DLL
0 . 0
0 . ' '
0 . 0
0 . i.
0 . 0
DEC
0 . 0
0. «;
0 . i J
0. 0
<!' . 0
DEC
o. (.•
0. 0
(!' . 0
0 . o
(!) . 0
DEC
0 . 0
0 . 0
1 .0
0 . (!)
0 . (!)
TA:-LE
:OIMT INUED). 
PHOTOVAC SAMPLING RESULTS, 
r=>87.
V I HA
AUG
SEF
OCT
MOV
BEN 
i
TOL
r c F 
(
TIE 
(
D'T
*LIN *:
i.O 
i > . (.''
1 . < '.> 
' ' . 0 
0 .
'. •"> 
O. O 
1 .
>.0 
1 
1.
" . 0 
"• . <.•
-.Lie 
SF r 
GC
1 
'.'. 0 
0 . ' •
0 
0 . 0 
2 . 5
(': 
("' . r 
i i . i i
0 
1 
'.'). 0
T 
'J1"!1. 
PL '
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
i. o
60. 0
10
•x5
0. O
0. O
104. O
26.0
4.5
'.i.'.'
0. 0
25.0
1 0. C'
2.0
14.0
e. o
1.3
EGLIN *2
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
JL
3.
»J •
57.
16.
0.
L
1
•5
6
5
0
AL
0.
0.
43.
13.
74.
G 
SEF
0 
0 . <
0 
!
0 
4 0 . <
0 
1 0 . <
o 
:
:' 
OC
> 
o.
j 
0 .
' 
62.
) 
21 .
i 
4.
T
o
0
r>
8
5
NO
0.
0.
._" - 
a
12.
2-
V
0
C)
o
c>
o
D
o
o
8
eri
EC
. 0
. 0
.6
.8
.4
EGLIN *3
JUL
AU6
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
SM
= =
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
ITH
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
C" . 0
0 . 0
57.0
1 1 . 0
£,£. 0
JUL 
AUC
0 . 0
1 . 0
120. 0
1 7 . 0
81.0
0 . 0
1 . 0
105.0
20
c
SEF
i > . 0
o . O
1 ""*C' r'\
1 O_l, U
1 1 » . 0
- ct
0 . 0
O . ' >
10-4. "
30.5
•^ 
C1
. _J
O C T
'> . 0
0 . 0
, soo
7O. 0
3.6
0 . 0
'"' . '"'
5f'. '"'
20. '."'
1 . 0
NOV
0 . 0
0 . 0
50 . 0
3.0
1
0 . 0
0 . 0
24. 0
~i. 2
1 . -
DEC
0. 0
O. 0
•EJ.6
1 .4
ND
TILLET
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
6950. 0
492.0
2040.0
711.0
327.0
1400.0
33.0
120.0
36.0
620. 0
25O.O
0.0
475.0
75.0
, 1 0
46. O
0.0
>500
110. 0
13.0
> 1 000
30.0
350.0
200 . 0
45.0
• 500
18O.O
85.0
0 . 0
0 . O
00.1
0 ' 0 
0 ' 7
8*7 
0 ' f T
0*S£ 
0*33
O * 0 
0 ' 0
0 " 0 
0 ' 0
I'3d 
AON
VN 
0 " 0
VN. 
I
VN 
0 ' 0
yr-j 
0 ' 0
VN 
'j " 0
:>3<a 
AON
1 " 0 
0 ' 0
0 • 0 
.T
0 * 0 
0 * «
0 " 0 
0 ' i '
IGd 
AON
0 ' 0 
T
0 " OS 
(i " < if
OoS 
' "'.'• • I
0 • 0 
( I ' o
0 " 0 
ii* 0
J3d 
AON
3*0 
I
9 * f I 
0 * 7 1
•'' "OT.I 
o *OOG:
O ' O 
0 * 0
0 " (J 
0 * 0
:.3Q
..» • b
. ; . • • ; > 
<VG
i .1 " \ 
i , ' i j
I 
I 
n'€.
o * o 
o * £ 
< > * f
8 * L \ 
0 ' 8 T I 
( ) * 99
0 ' O 
0 ' 0 
t > * I
0 " 0 
0 * 0 
ii" 0
IDO 
d3s 
^nv 
~inr
0 * i > 
0 * O 
O " 0
i j * 1 1 
o ' o 
o • 1 1
i j ' 1 1 
O " < i 
O * ( i
0 ' 1 1 
i j ' 1 1 
o ' 1 1
o •( i 
> : • " ' ' 
'j "' i
ijo 
d35 
':>nv inr
T 
* " 
' i " i"
o * o 
•:• * o 
o ' o
<;< • o 
r-i • ;, 
'-) • i
0 ' 0 
0 ' 0 
0 * 'J
0 ' 0 
'J " <!* 
O " 0
no 
d3S 
9nv 
• 
inr
i ) * f l 
0 * 2 
0*9S
ii*07 
0*27 
0 * 1 9
i MJI^ 
o<;ii"> I 
O ' O09.i
1 1 ' ij 
<j ' 0 
<;> ' I
< i " 0 
0 * '"' 
0 " 0
ix) 
J35 
iirw 
inr
9*1 
S .- 
0 * 1 9
0 " £ 7 
' ) " • € . 
0*07
0 "0 
'i *0 
<J "'!'
ijo 
,35 
-nv
•'.• 'a*. 
^ I 
'!' * I 7 
-r ' 5 '.
1 ' " '.' 
'.' * 7 
0 ' 1 
"r " ~i
0''^ 
•!• '•'.' 
0 '7 
.. ' 3
301
30d
101
N33
SVIHltfUl
3IH
101 
-
Nv^a
3 Jl
3 Jd
N38
zansidaod
3 I'd
3J1
N38
OAdVH
3Jd
3J1
3 Jd
101
313315
1 '.'A
101
U3-3
.-Id
IJO
J3S
'ABLE 2.
VA.: SAMPLING RESULTS, 1986. ALL 'I ONC ENTF AT I 'M£ 
IN
DF.'JC
1 -582
HM 
JA*J 
FEP 
MAy
BEN 
o . 0 
("i. o 
o . i.i
'-•- 
. ' • . • ' 
'-• . '.- 
• < . o
AUG 
NOV
1 
O.o
1
1 
O.o
i •:• . i .
F-
H. C
DTE:
AMSE :
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
FUSHLT
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCP-;
DCE
^ 
1
JAN 
FEB
0 . 0 
0 . 0
0 . o 
0 . 0
£/ . o 
4.0
1.0 
: 1
NF' 
0.0
JAN 
FEB
0 . O 
0 . 'J
0 . O 
O.o
4 . 0 
3.0
i . o 
:• . o
NF 
1
NP
MA'f
0
20. o
154. o
46. o
NP
MAY
O.o
"TC 
( I
OO . * '
1 20. o
46. o
NP
NF
AUG
0 . (I1
0 . 0
1 7 . 0
1 . 0
NF
AUG
<!' . 0
0 . 0
1 (J . O
1 . O
NF--
NF
MO',1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NF
NOV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NF
H. BAt EFY*
JAN
FEB
MAY
AUC-
NOV
BF.N 
•: . •: 
D.I
TOL 
1 1 . o 
D.I
PC E 
• • . ' 
• .. . i
"ME 
o.o 
' j
L"1L 
NF 
0..
H. ESTATE* 
JAN 
FE!
BEN 
0.0 
o.t
TOL 
0. 0 
o. (
PC E 
0.0 
o. i
TCE 
0.0 
o.i
DCE 
NP 
o.<
1 
1 
O.O 
o.
i 
32.o 4 . O 
o .
1 
0. D 
1 
o.
= i 
1
—!• 
±
NF- 
NF-' 
N
:< 
MAY 
AUG 
NO
1 
O.o 
N
i 
O.o 
O.o 
N
I1 . < ' 
O.o 
N
i 
< j . o 
ij . 0 
N
) 
NP 
NP 
N
f 1
( )
1 ,
1
p
V
*-!
A
A
A
F'
LEONAF'D
JAN
FEB
MAY
AUG
NOV
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
0 . 0 
i
0 . o 
<
0 . o 
i
0 .0 
i
NF' 
t
». 0
). 0
). 0
>. 0
>. 0
0 . O
1.0
3. 0
0 . i J
NP
0 . 0
( J . 0
0 . 0
< 1
NF:
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
NP
TUT' 
001 
1.136
'AE'LE :
: HL'T OVA'1 EAMF'L
F E 5 U l _ T E , 
1 r-St
"EE-
NO'
Nf-
L'EriiTF ; -:
JAr.
F£F:
1 . 0
-*••'. 
'.'
NP
ALJij
i '. ' ' .
NF
NO'.'
BEN
TOL
PCE
T C E
DEDE
NP
2. '.'
NP
i„ i •'
i >. i")
NP
JAN
MAY
A Lib
(."'. 0
NP
NOV
Be.' -4 
i
T'JL 
<
F'C£ 
•'
ret:
DCE
1 . ' ' 
0.0 
i
>. •" 
O. 0 
<
' . 
' ' • ' ' 
'
'.'.' 
". !.• 
I
NP 
0.0
) . O 
1
•. 0 
1
:.0 
1
1 . '1' 
1
NF 
NP
0. 0
>: . o
I/ . i ,
T
NF'
DEVCON #1
JAN
TEB
MAY
DEVCON *~
JAN
FEB
NAV
VI HA t»l
JAN
TEE
MAY
VI HA *3
JAN
FEB
MAY
AUG>
NOV
BEN
TOL
F"E 
<
TCE
D'TE
,.,;, 
,;,.,
1 * 0 
0 . <
1 • ' 
'.' • '
•. '.> 
(.'.
r.
1'" 
;.' . (
,
i 
i
> 
*
• 
i
1
'.•:• 
i 
<
i . •'_} 
("• . 0 
i
' . 0 
0 . 0
'. " 
1
NF 
NP
) . >j
> . v
t . •.»
1
NF
AUG
NO'.'
BEN 
O.i;-
TUL 
0. 0 
<
PCE 
0.0
TCE 
...•:• 
i
DCE 
NF 
i
i. •
'. i
) (
i . i
i.<
\ 
't
I 
t
) 
(
1 
1
)
i . n
' . O
> . 0
'. 0
NP
1
1
1
1
NP
1
1
0 . 0
1
NP
AUG
NOV
BEN 
i
TOL 
'
PCE 
:
TCE
DCE
). 0
' . 0 '
:.o
>. 0
NF
o.<
0. (
1 . (
0. (
o.<
) 
0 . 0
> 
0 . O
> 
1 0 . 0
) 
1
) 
NF'
:i
< i
20.0
3.0
NP
:========—
0 . 0
0 . 0
8. 0
7. 0
NP
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
AUG
NOV
BEN 
0.'
TOL 
0.'
PC E 
0.(
TCE 
0.<
DCE 
NF
<:> . i
1 
O.i
i 
0 . '
i 
0 . <
0 . i
1 
{ >. (
1 
(I. (
) 
-:. i
1 
< 3
> 
NF
i 
c
i 
(
L 
<
) . 0
>. 0
>. 0
>. 0
NP
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
NP
UT 
001 1137
Ai" SAMPLING
HAF v£
FEE-
HA
AUb
£*•-"• 
. 0 
'.' • 0 
0 . 0 
0 . '".
: !_•_ 
'_" . ('1 
' . 'j 
(j _ t~> 
(j . 0
"'-•"- 
'- 
' . . ' ' . 
.''.'-.'. 
1 000
T'- E- 
r " . 
'z1 . -.' 
It '.' . 0 
17. 0
£ •- r. 
NF 
2 . '' 
NF' 
NF
FT^.II:: 
j,v. F£E: MA > 
AUI'D
NA
NA
NA
NA
NF
fiOV
&EN 
(
TOL
PC E 
(
TCE 
(
i . 0 
i.'i . 0 
(
i . i
». (
i. i
' 
0 . u 
<
i 
<j . ij 
<
> 
0 . 0 
(
'.0 
'
' . O 
<
, . o 
i
' . 0 
i
• . 0 
'."' . '
i.O 
" . <
1 . 0 
1 1 . i
1
)
)
> . i .> 
0 . 0
DCE 
NP 
0.0 
NP 
NP 
NP
&PYAN 
JAN* 
FE& 
MAY 
AUG 
NO.V
BEN
TOL
PiIE
TCE
DCE
MATH I AS
0. i
0. i
0. i
0. (
NF
' 
0 . 0 
0 . 0 
<
1 
0 . 0 
0 . 0 
i
' 
0 . 0 
0 . 0 
<
» 
(j . « j 
0 . O
0 . 0 
NP ,
>. t
1. 1
I. '
- 3
NF
i 
i
i 
i
i 
i
L
'. 0
'. 0
i. 0
- 1
NP
JAN
FEE-
MAY
AUG.
NOV
&EN 
H.I
TC.'L- 
< i . '
PCL" 
10".'
TCE 
5!
DC I 
NT
'.') . •
c. . ,
4 ':» . '
L 
-1 . <
j
0 . 0
i 
0 . '.'
> ' 
243.0
i L . 0
NF-
0 . O
0 . O
25 . 0
2. 0
NP
NA
NA
NA
NA
NP
FHOTOVAC SAMPLING FESULTS, 1
ElbLlN *!
AUb
NOV
r. r r- ;
TOL
t '. I
TI" E
DC L
i 'j^I'J tr_
Pfc n
TOL
FCE
THE
DCE
EGLlrj *2
PEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
SMITH
BEN
TUL
r-c E:
TCE
DCE
TILLET
BEN
TOL
RCE
TCE
DCE
•4 WINDS
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
STEELE
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
NA
"j,;
' -A
"JA
r 4,
j A r j
NA
NA
rjA
NA
NA
JAIJ
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
JAN
0 . 0
0 . 'J
c 
• y
c 
.-,
-I • '.
NP-
JAN
NA
NA
NA
NA
IN A
JAN
O.o
0 . o
450. o
1 OO . < '
NR
JAN
0 . 0
0 . 0
5OO . 0
1 00 . <!>
NR
'"' . i'
p
'"' . ' J
A- fc • '
1 1 . 0
"^ 
i "i.
rEL
' ' , t '
*." . 0
25.0
1 4 . <:»
3.0
FEB
0 . C'
0 . 0
4 1 . 0
20 . o
2 . C'
FEB
0 . < '
0 . < i
2-e . ' -
5 . < >
1
FEB
4-5.0
O.o
254 . ' i
12.o
3.o
FEB
0 . 0
O.o
159.o
56. o
3.o
FEB
0 . 0
<!> . 0
4 9.0
11.0
1 . ij
< ' . 0
' ' . 0
45' •. •"•
3O< ) . 0
rip
N!M'T
'!•. o
o . O
760. C.
404 . 0
NR
MAY
0. i)
i p . i >
50< i.i'
168.1)
NR
MAY
1 . 0
0 . '.'
1 000
1 30 . •:•
NP
MAY
1 < "i" '
i >. 1 1
1 ' >'!" )
42i'. i"
NP
MAY
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MAY
0. 0
0 . 1 1
1 00< '
160. n
NR
0. i >
0 . 1 1
H":? . ' '
22. i '
NP-
AUb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AUb
O.o
O.o
12.D
4.O
NR
AUb
0 . ' i
O.i'
35.0
2. o
NF
AUG*
1 OO'J
110. 0
1 0 . 0
30. 0
NP
AUG
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AUG
0 . o
O.o
41.0
5. o
NR
1
'."> . 0
t. 0
53. C
NR
NGV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NR
NOV
0 . 0
0 . 0
•=f . 0
36 . 0
NR
NOV
0 . 0
0 . 0
: 7 . o
£.0
NR
NOV
NA
NA
NA
NA
NP
NOV
0.0
0. 0
30 . 0
1 OO . 0
NP
NOV
0 . 0
0 . 0
105.0
42.0
NR
1139
i RESULTS, 1=»6'?. 
ALL C ONCENTP AT ION;
uG/L
H
H
•*•
H
DENC MM
BEN
' JL
F' " E
• ~c r
r«:c
F A M 5 E v
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
. CRUSHER
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
. BA^ ERY*
BEN
TOL
F<:E
TCE
DCE
.EbTA^E*
• BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
LEONARD
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
- ..H-
:>. :.
.
1
^ , < '
TEB
;'). (')
''.' . ' '
~ 7 
i i
2 . ' '
0 . < )
FEB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FEB
NA
NA
1-4 A
NA
NA
FEB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
FEB
o.O
o . 0
o.O
1
o.O
1 1-6 ^
MAY
<: . •:•
i
0. 0
2. ''.'
MA,
(.1 . 0
0 . 0
?. 0
£.0
0 . 0
MAY
NA
IMA
NA
NA
NA
MAY
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MAY
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MAY
0 . 0
0.0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
AUG
15.v
••_
0 . o
1 . 0
i . •:•
AUG
0 . 0
0 . 0
30. 0
1.4
0 . O
AUG
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AUG
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AUG
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AUG
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
• 1
1.0
DEC
1 . 0
1
0 . 0
0 . '"'
0 . 0
DEC
0 . 0
0 . 0
2. 0
1 .O
0 . 0
DEC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DEC
O.o
O.o
0. < <
0.''
DEC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DEC
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
0 . 0
TUT OOi 1.140
CHOTOVA>: SAMF-L. INC? FESULTi, i
F F
DL
A . . •;. : s
E-L N
"!"'"••..
- ' i
"• 1-.
r, - t
r I T : • T -.
PEN
TOL
F'CE
TCE
DCE
TEE
NA
NA
"JA
» . •
' . /-
~l~ f.
i'i. 
O
0 . '!'
1
1
0 . 0
MA,
NA
NA
r 
,-_,
NA
N,
"IA ,
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AUb
NA
NA
NA 
•
NA
NA
AUC-j
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
C C < .
NA
NA
'JA
rjA
N.-.
I.'f .
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DEDil
FEE-
MA
A U'":,
DEC
DEVC
BEN 
o.'
TOL 
O.i
H: E 
o.i
TCL
DCE 
0.«
ON *1 
FE1
i 
i
i 
i
i
<
i 
<
'•
 
f
' . <!' 
o . 0
i . O 
o . (.:
> . O 
1 1 . 0
) . 0 
1
' . 0 
1.4
1AY 
AUG
o. 0
o,0
o . 0
o.O
0 . i.i
DEC
t •" N
TO:.
FCE
THE
L'C E
DEVCON *?
IE:..
TOL
F'CE
THE
DCE
VI HA *1
BEN
TOL
FCE
THE
DCE
0 . 0 
0 . 0
0 . 0 
0 . 0
'".• . .' 
"' . 0
i 
•:• . •!'
o. o 
•:•. ''•
FEE-' 
MAr
' . •'.' 
'.' . 0
< i . 0 
0 . 0
o . o 
T) . t;>
1 ' . '."' 
0 . O
0 . 0 
'."> . 0
FEB 
MAV
0 . 0 
0 . 0
0 . 0 
0 . 0
33.0 
TV...
7 . O 
9 . 0
1 
0 . 0
2.0
O.o
0 . • '
1 . 2
' 1
AU'J
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AUG
O . O
O.o
Jlfc.n
SO . ( >
O . o
0. 0
0 . 0
1 . 
1 1
' . 0
' • . 0
DEC
'"'. '"'
o.O
< ) . O
o.O
o.O
DEC
0 . 0
0 . 0
11.0
5. 0
0 . 0
114.1.
TAf^E 4
-HOTQVAi. £ A^f1 L
.•: HA
MAY
AUG
FEE-
I
s v.
DEC
BEN
TOL
PCE
THE
DCE
EGLIN *1
73.0
86. 0
'•). 0
FEB
I'. 1.'
, m ['l
34. 0
i. ''
NA
NA
NA
NA
MAY
AUG
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
DEC
EGL
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
IN #3
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
0 . O
0. O
17.0
34.0
1. 0
FEB
0 . O
>"> , l~>
3t . 0
45. O
1 . 0
0. 0
0. O
13.0
14.0
1 . 0
MAY
0 . O
O. 0
1 03 . 0
1S.O
Z . '"*
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
AUG
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NP
DEC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SMITH
FEE*
MAY
AUG
DEC
EEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
TILLET
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
o . o
0 . -0
1 10. 0
IS.1!1
1
FEB
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
I'.- . O
0 . 0
337. 0
1 1 . (!)
2 . 0
MAY
&8O . ( )
24 . (.)
88. «
62. 0
87 . 0
• Ci . i"i
0 . 0
181 .0
71.0
0 . 0
AUG
: 1000
0 . 0
13.0
135.0
0. 0
<: . o
0 . 0
113. 0
1 7 . 0
: 1
DEC
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
001
t>
0 '9
0 ' 6
0 ' 0
0 ' 0
J3Q
VN
VN
VN
VN
*N
J3Q
M " >
'"'• * j
( 
" ' )
0 ' "'
(j ' (j
030
™
VN
VN
*N
J3d
0 ' 7
0 "OS
0 ' T 3
i'i " i'i
0 "O
0*8t>
0 '<)7£
0 " ( >
0 ' i >
9HV
C) T"
I
0 " "
,-, • ( )
'
:'''
9HV
» • T
T
t'l * t"l
0 "0
(j ' (j
*n*
VN
VN
VN
VN
9HV
1 1 * ( j
o 0(;iB7
i >00 I
l". *l'>
0 '0 
I 
3 DO
o'z. 
o"s 
3:a
< ' "33 
0 * 3L 
3 I'd
o"0 
.0*0 101
0*0 
0*0 
N38
AVW 
>^3J 
SVIH1VW
o"" 
o"0 
3JG
>)"S 
'>•;;. 
3Ji
')•(> 
• > - . ; , 
3;,d
(I'M 
( i " 0 
"10 1'
-.' ' 0 
''">.• 
rJ3"3
AVUJ 
^3J 
\VAd^
•:•••:> 
<:'••:• 
HJG
0 " 0 
T 
3 1'l
','
! "•!' 
'!' '0 
3 Jd
:.'• ' .'' 
'."' ' % 
""01
0*0 
0-0 
N3-3
AVW 
83 J 
Z3D9IdaOd
VN 
VN 
3 i i
VN 
VN 
3 Jd
VN 
VN 
101
VN 
VN 
.'-38
AVUI 
rJ3j 
\3AdVH
'•"3 
"'7 
3JQ
: i • ~£. 
i i
 -gg 
3 jj.
:''^3^ 
'»"^T7 
3jd
'.) ' 0 
• ' 0 
101
**"*£. r c
: «MF i
r r M,; ~ * i
MAY
BE:^ 
0. 0
TOL 
0.0
PC E 
8.0
TCE 
1
DCE 
1
H.CRUSHEF 
FEE 
MAY
PEN 
NA
TOL 
NA
PC E 
NA
TCE 
NA
DCE 
NA
H.BAKERY* 
FEB 
MAY
" 
rtN 
rjA
TOL 
NA
PC FT 
NA
TCE 
NA
D'! fcl 
NA
H.EETATE* 
FEE- MAY
BEN 
NA
TOL 
NA
PC E 
NA
TCE 
NA
DC E 
NA
~ ~ ~ 
S ~ 
~ 2T — 
~ 
~ 
~ r^ ^ ^Z ^ ~ 
« ^ 
^ 
^ ~ T^ ~ ^ 
^ 
^ ~
LEONARD 
FEB 
MAY
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
d.O
o.O
>. 0
^Or
VN
VN
VN
VN
VN
3 HI
3 I'd
101
N38
AVW 
83J 
I* VHIA
: = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ==: = ==: = = = = = = =
VN 
3I'G
x*rj 
n;ii
VN 
3 I'd
VN 
"101 '
AVW 
>33J 
L'» WOI'ASQ
1' " '•' 
3 j G
> ' • • • 
1 J l
( I ' l l 
3 I'd
.'' " (j 
"01
T 
N38
AVW 
33J 
T* NOHA3Q
0 ' 0 
3 I'd
<) ' O 
3 HI
(> ' 0 
3 I'd
< > • < : > 
101
o'O 
N3>3
AVW 
83J 
3Q3Q
VN 
31'Q
VN 
3 HI
VN 
? Jd
..-a
TABuE 5
CHOTOVAC SAMPLING PE5ULT5,
FEE
MAY
I
t EN 
..:..;,
T'j!_ 
'' . M
P'~ L
I 
T'^ 
'!
I 
._.:.r_:?_..__;j::..... _ _ _ _ _ _
E'LLIM <* i 
FEiF- 
MAr
' 
BEN 
.;•.<:•
TOL 
0.0
I
PCE 
4 6 . 0
TCE 
13.0
DCE 
2.0
j 
EGLIN ttl 
FEB 
MAY
BEN 
0.0
TOL 
0.0
' 
PCE 
58.0
TCE 
15.0
: 
DCE 
i
j 
==========================
EGLIN #3 
FEB 
MAY
j 
^, 
BEN 
O.
TOL 
o.
PCE 
&:.
1 
TiIE 
I7.
« 
DC E 
1
\ 
SMITH 
FEE- MAY
BEN 
1
j 
TOL 
O.o
j 
PC E
TCE
DCE 
1
^ ^ s " ^ iz ^ ~ ^ rr i^ ^ ^ zz — ~ zr ~ tz ~ — ~ — ~ — — —
TILLET 
FEB 
MAY
BEN
TOL
PCE
TCE
DCE
37. 0
0.0
89. 0
21.0
8.0
I
TUT 001
- r -1 11 7 ~
HAh"'.T."- 
P" :F- 
MA
NA
f j A
FEB 
MAY
E-r-:r:
MA-
TOL
FiIE
DCLr
MATH I AS 
FEB 
MAY
BEN 
1.0
TQL 
O.O
PCE 
58.0
TCE 
-».0
DC E 
1
ooi
I
VII
I
[ 
REFERENCE NO. 29
I
001 
1149
R.E. Sarnera Associates
1610 Ponce De Lcon Avenue, P.O. Box 11095
Santurce, Puerto Rico 00910 • (809) 723-8466 • FAX (809) 725-0863
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TEAM FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE REMOVAL AND PREVENTION
EPA CONTRACT 68-01-7367
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM
Luis E. Santos, OSC
EPA, Caribbean Field Office
Ivan Garcia, TAT 21, PM-«9vP\
Arnarldo Martinez, TAT 21, Q
SUBJECT: Results of the February 1990 quarterly sampling of
Tutu wells site, St. Thomas, USVI.
DATE:
April 12, i990
Attached are the Photovac analyses results of the 15
samples collected on February 20-22, 1990.
water
All concentrations for the detected parameters were within
their historical ranges. 
However, a notable finding of this
sampling was 
the detection of an 
unknown contaminant at
concentrations ranging from 3 to 38 ug/L relative to benzene.
This contaminant was detected in the following six wells:
Steele, Smith, Eglin II, Eglin f2, Eglin 13 and Dench.
These results only show potential exposure and do not
necessarily represent 
the concentrations in the aquifer itself.
This is due to the type of well used 
for sampling 
(regular
production wells) and to the sampling technique used.
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
MAJOR PROGRAMS DIVISION
In Association with ICF Technology, Inc., C.C. Johnson & Malhotra, P.C., Resource Applications, Inc.,
and R.E. Sarriera Associates
1J.,149
Data Summary:
Samples from Turpentine Run Acquifer. VI
Collected: 
Faburary 21, 1990
Analyzed: 
I**** <^Z&**L. 
Approved:
~Z? 
/ 
(/
SN
P-1000
P-1001
P-1013
P-10U
P-1013
P-1010
P-1011
P-1012
Name
Travel
Blank
Bryana *
Steeles *
Smith
Francois
Matniaa
Eflin #1*
Eglin #2**
Eflln #3*
Harthman
Bakery
Harthman
Estate
DCE
<i J
N.D,
2 J
<1 J
Not
<1 J
3 J
<1 J
<1 J
Not
DOC
Benzene
H.D.
M.D.
N.D.
<1
Avtll*blt
2
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
Av*ll»bl«
Available
TCE
<1
N.D.
54
16
for
4
13
IS
17
for
for
Toluene
5
<1
N.D.
N.D.
Analyst*.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
Analysis.
Aaalytia.
PCE
N.D.
N.D.
95
300
58
46
58
83
JJ Eftloattd du* to interference
*s Unknown contaalnant alao de etc tad at contaaination betvetn 3 and 38 ppb ralatlva s
CO OtDJUie. 
\/r
( continued)
SN 
Name
P-1008
P-1009
p-ioifl
P-1002
P-1017
P-1004
P-1016
P-1006
Ramsey *
4 Winds #1
TlUet
Devcon #1*
Devcon #3
Rodriguez
Harthznan
Cruahep
Dede *
A. Leonard
Dench **
VIHA #1
VIHA 13
Demltria
Harveya
DCE
<i J
8 J
K.D.
Not
N.D.
Not
N.D,
N.D.
V.D.
Net
K.D.
Net
Net
Benzene
N.D.
37 J
<1
AvtiUblt
M.D.
AvtiUblt
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
Av«il»bl«
N.D.
Availiblt
AvaiUbl*
TCE
O
21
N.D.
for
N.D.
for
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
for
<l
for
for
Toluene
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
Antlyali.
N.D.
A&ilyiis.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
Analysis.
N.D.
Analysis.
Analysis.
PCE
a
89
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
\/
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
enoH MINCV • IUWM H
IMMN. «IW Ml*** OM17
T2
3
2
0
3
flM
IfOO •N*
Au.
•••*«.
1
TUT 
O01 
1152
::9TT 
TOO J.ili
I VIM AJtMIT MJN MOtlOt
•OlfttM UOWDIt 1UMMNQMMNI
OfttOT BOUatiOlM 1VMINNOMMMI
lw.1
CHAIN OP CUSTODY RECORD
**Mm~~"~—i —n-immf inmnr nna* •
fttflMHMCMIM. M*VKM M¥»aM
•0«ON.«KW JtMIYOMI ?
T2
TUT 
00.1 1154
OC 'ON 30N3d3d3d
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
__ .
1
1
1
iti
j
ii
•
t
i
1
i
1
'
f
\
<
t*
%
•
\»
1
> • *.
^
t
i
X*
«i
•«
X
z
ft-«a
t»
ea
M«
'-
.
i
•
u
a*
;
i
i
*>i
*•cII
C••
|
•
1
i
j
!
1
i
,
i
j
i
*i
tt
>
«
c
fc
\
1
1
1
3i«a
w•
*•
M
Vo4
tae
M
%l
••a
aa:
f
:
a
w:
•
M
»<
\
«
i
1»
> •
V
*:
-i
a
3
1 
X
»•
•K•III.
H
41
a
IH
1
^
IU 1
•^ w
^
« HI
»:
.
•j a
>»-
m u
!21
.»-n
:ra
-•«
s,
•« •
* *.* «
?:!
^:
* -
"> «
i
^,
ft.
ec :
MJ>
k_
« <
Ik 1
V •
«» 1
•L• <
O
* Iii
Ul
3!
>|
«
_/ ^
^m
1
i
1
i-3:
' U u
Si:
^Si
W C. UJ
» -1 41 tU
t-c.
>» Ul fr-
*• o
«« M X
t, w»-
0 X«D
w «B
-t 
r<
•< Ml Mk
Z k*
O Mf V
*3i
1- « 2
A -1
O •«
x m +•
>nnt v
.
|
o »f r>
1
! 
-! 
• I 
j-
1 
1 
1
1 
1
1 
1 
' 
.
: i 
'
! 
' 
i
1 
;
1 
'
t
•
I
t 
;
1 
i
1
1
1
« 
i
•f 
*
^ 
T
3 
"* 
. 
*«
O 
M 
' 
M
9 
O f 
. ^
»• 
W M
.< 
1JX 
Z
»• 
u. • 
< 
«^ 0 
t.
•t • 
Jl • 
»- «0 •« 
«
<« 
i 
o • 
z a 
t-
•- t- 
! 
I- wi 
7 M* 
vt
2 •« 
O •> M| Ml 
»- 
1 !«• 
O cn
o 
o •* i o 
UJ3^ 
x
o«fi 
^-oal 
X . M J U * » -
a« 
uq v> 
>> 
MZHIO
•• •» 
-. 
«J x 
» »J » x « o' «>
Alt 
. 
O«l>» 
ki»X»««9 
^«
ac » 
: 
aa 
i» 3 Ha «e»- _j«i
•in 
« T »< o 
o oc>{ o« ixi-
0 
• J 3 J I « T I | « . I U i . »
«- < 
r v>o 
o 
«-ji- ja»:w
o 
Jt 
.i*U&& 
a. jio J 
•.
«^ 
A 
&.J 
VtW* 
«t»4t« 
^^fl^
*JJ 
H-l4 
»- 
i d t O . « &
«.* 
a 
*»i<«aa •- I *- jr •_ « r "«
uj 
• 
a 
&xu 
iu 
oJ «. <>- n. o 11
0 
4 
«.»-•• Z 2 
<kZ«i.a^3«iuO
« ••
e •- 
,
»» 
j
"* "*
P 
i 
•
i
•• » 
: 
U|
0 If 
3 
,
' -"•* 
i 
'
• 
41 
M«« 
OO 
*ni«\JtfaiKO.O^
i 
' 
: 
;
' 
. 1 
1
• 
i 
•
j 
1 
: 
i 
i
i
1 
! 
: 
;
i 
' 
, 
' 
;
i 
' 
' 
'
! 
I 
i i
< 
1
i
1 
i
j
i
i
j
i
1
i
j
i
ii
i
-1 
J
& 
ft. 
(U
r 
• 
_i
•« 
-« Ul A.
^» 
a..
•-!«».> 
|
£a<; 
i
•E 1» 0 « X
ft- « ft- M«.ft-
ooto o o
1
] 
'
1!
| 
!
j
j 
;
' 
I
!•»
T - 0
91T-
1*101
i/on
i/an
IT'
n
~T*irr-
1*131
1*101
1»101
1*101
TTTBI-
1*101
"ITOTr
i/sn
i/in
i/sn
l/BO
ttt»C
1NJ7I»H1N* OZZtC
'is»»r
I-* «»9tf
'«
•> W i 
Biaj^iHH-
-»^M^ 
AHfl^^ 
IHHHVi
»»
* 
( 
,tc, ( , jp 09 •
• 
CQNPLETPD AMALT4M RCPaiT
* 
PROJECT NOt 2*2 
PROJECT 9AMEI TUIPINTXNt RUN
DATE 
TINE
STATION NO 
PROM 
OP 
LASNO 
PARVO
• 
TO 
DAT
PARANETE* NAME
r '
4
'JNTTS 
CH«"1ST»Y 
VALUE t 
PENARK
h
• 
000012 J**6t
3*1 ?fl
34526
• 
. 
34*41
. • 
34*03
'
.
.
.
.
.
. 
3424T
• 
3*521
34631
34*11
___ 
. 
34.34*
• 
3*210
^ tU«P.»JN 
17/10/0* 
1209
• ftSCRIPTIONt LAl ILANK SECOND BATCl
* 
• 
000022 3*50*
0 
3*49*
- - 
— - - — . 
34696
3*401
* 
i*4»2
O 
34»JT
•• f 
3*6*6
3*371
• 
• '*3»6
3*JJ1
————————————————— ...... ... 
. . 
J«»»6
342TI
0 
34491
"I 
3***?
*
PTRENE
CMRVStUt
1,2-BrNtANTHRACEH;
4j-tNL9R.PPH£NH AllENTi tt....
INDENO(lt2,3-C,0> PT«5i,f
• £N10XAJ^JRtli--._. -
1»12-BEN20PE«TLEN!
J,3'-DKHLOP.OBENIIOE4*
2f4-I>INIT»OT3LU«N!
ltZ=J>IPHc.1TLItTailIINt
2-CNLOR3PMI-NOL
PHENOL
2|4-OtCHLT9.7»>1cN3L
2t*«»-T4tCflLOPOPt*ffOL
P-CHLORO-1-:<!$CL
4t6-OIN!T»0-3-LRE5CL
4.HIT«OPdFN"L
lt9-OIC*LORC**NtENf
l,2t»-T»ICHLO»08E>(ZFie
tIS<2-CHLOROETHTL> tf.
I50PH3ONE
UC/L
M'r^L
UC/L
uC/L
-US/I __ .
UC/L
US/L
UG/L
Ufi/L-
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
UB/L
U^/L
U-5/L
U5/L
J1/L
v»/t- -
ki J/L
UB/l
Ur-/L
U3/L
UC/L
Ul/L
ue/t
US/L
UC/L
U5/L
T C T A L
T O T A L
T O T A L
TOTAL
T.-TAL
T O T A L
I2T4L 
_ 
.. ..
TOTAL
TOUL 
. -
T O T A L
Tftm ——————————
T O T A L
TrTtL
1CTAL
TffTAL -
T f T A L
TOTAL
T«T»L
T 3 T A L
TOTAL
T C T A L
T«T«L
T C T A L
T t y T A L
TC»AL-
T O T A L
T O T A L
TBTIL .- ———— ' ———— ——
TOTAL
u 
'
- 
«
u
0 
•
s 
•
,1 
»
" 
«
u
0 
•
U
" 
<
u 
H
.. -r 
f
r- — €
u
u
u 
«
v --• ——— i
0 
JHJ <
" S
 
€
u 
«
V 
———— -- 
•"
• 
«
-. 
I
Ec
»-
£fl!
I
t. o
"
o o
S3
h
. 0
~~
—
o
r> c-
"
t' f.3
r r
»*
» 0
J O
C 3
M
t
C r.
C S
C
c-
r IT i
r-
-
tr
p r.
"1ii
,,;„
h o C j !
1
• 3 » 0±) 3
! 
,
: I i : J_ I'L J
> 3
^ c
U -I J
* W «l
»•»-»-
tf Ci O
X X
• & * > < *
> a a
£
*
J
41
f
?! »t? 
i
~E 
! 
j-
-i r> 
^
ot » 
' 
*
•C fcl !•* 
. 
It* *J
• ». ». -j 
i » r
t ob « 
! no.
I 
I
. V _l T • 
~ 
« »J«-« •- X
:»-<_>»- C 
I z -< 
r •» T 
ru
. O >• X «- u< I •; V -^ 
t- 1.0. ^ •*. t «
• at p ». ;j z 
« « r 
x £ & » 
wi
» « u 3 9 o • i
• T K - l ^ l t Z O i l O T
< « u ». ii z
> Otl « »• IU
j *r z k r
j *r
T C
*- ^-
> r r
. Cl ». I ». _/ ; »-»/.-«-•-
:-<O>-u>- j ^ « u •< z
i« wta r c z
:
1<J5
^•41 • u r & - O O O O ^ « i a
X X l o k - O t ' W a C Z ^ M
r * « t * < ^ t l « i r X « . tr-
;2«n
• « « M A M ^ ^ I « t t f \ O « i M l f k ^ t « « « f n A I ^
<r««««< * « « « « « 4 « « « « « - f 4
i if
?;:
. O j
I OC
I O. I
a on
i-a
II
OFSCRt^TlONt L»B (LINK
OATH »l/l.2/22_
PROJECT N«NC TUMENTINt RUN
"UNITS '
070032 34641 4-
3*403 IMOFNOCltZ.I-CfD)
34521
3«»j»
34631
;*4J*
34611 2i*-dtNTT«OTOLUf M?
~
3423U J,4-B«
3424i
J«5»l
J46J* •h.-NOL
3*43o
344J2 P-
34416 J,4-;
J4457 *,«-3
39T8I
3427J
342T1 BT3C2-CHLOROETMCXT) 1'TM.
3440*
344(T H
34»2t H-NlTtOSOOl-^-CaJPTH^." i.
"3143.* H-WI Tf JSUD^'Wf *i'TLTI^l rt* 
]
FT.
Ui/L
JJ'L
JG/L
I'VL
U.-/L
UJ/l
U'./L
UG/l
U-./L
U'»/L
U'T/L
u
u
u
-JL.
u
T"TAL
TP|«L
T I T t L
T?TII
rrTit
TdTlt
T O T A L
TfT»L
TPTtL
T O T 4 L
T H T A L
' C T A L
I'
u
u
ii "
u
-IT"
u
II
II
C
n
* 
' 
C9NPLFTEO ANALYSIS M»0«T
. ,,| 
Mf.JfCT N3I 262 
• 
»»rjfCT K«M.t TJPPENTI>|£ RUN
% 
J«T( TINE
STATION NO 
PR01 OP 
LAINO 
PARNO 
PARAMETER NA"l
TO 
OAT
___ 
___ _ 
_ ____ _ __ 
_ __ 
0033*.: 3*306 Hf XACNLORDCrCLOPE<<T.A;>!S«<_;
3*.ZDQ-Aii-»t«e«T»lTLfl*I 
...........
3«2PJ ACEN*PHTH?Nf
• 
3*3*1 'LOUSE*.
""* 
' 
' 
3*636 J-t'S^'Nt'u'"'^ 'T.
3*z:« *"TMII^;rj««
3*?»1 Df'THTi. »HTH«L«rf
• 
3*3'6 OIETrtrL PfTfALATt
3S110 
OI-N-SOTTLPPHTHAL»Tf
3*2«2 SUTTL atNlTL PHTiAL»T?
A 
J*>f6 OI**I-OCTTL ' N T n A L A T F
• 
.'«»*. PYBftf
' • 
3*i23 CH*Tjrn;
__ . _ . _ . _ 
3*5C6 1.2-ZSNIAfTMRaCM*
3*2*7 9£NiC<4)^»»p:>ir
• 
...._... .. 
. 
3*SZI l»I*-«gMSri"ft£1S '
3*J*o 1 ti-DIPNJIf Li* J»»tlf f
• 
_ 
3*234 3»*-liFi»ZOFLUO^»t*f HJN-
,, • 
3*i*i 1 1 1 li-if MZOPLJC." IMTHiV
tip* .•Hi. _ ..•?/>.}<!* 
1 20 a
• 
3EPfh> 0006 
Su5ST«ITei (TjEQL'i
ICSCRIPTION: LAS BLANK
C X T D A C T t C N D*fF iJ/l*/H7
• 
O O O C 5 2 3*3*6 2-lHLCItrPHe\OL
3*S*1 2-NtTROP>«6N?L
_.__..__._...._. . 
' 
3*6»* PHENOL
• 
3*606 !t*-DIH£THTLPrlf.NOL
3*^01 i(»-j?KHl38- '
M_feN3L
•• l"" 
'". ~'
9
MllL.
%',*
Mi/L
uC/L
Ui'L
U5/L
Ui/L
li'.'L
U;/L
UC/L
UJ/L
II'./L
UJ.'L
JS/L
I/C/L
u;"L_
•J'./L
U1/L
L.:/1-
Ul/l
ur./L
RFPOAT
C.lfHISTRr
T5TAL 
,..
T O T A L
T?T1L
TCTAL
T J T 4 L
*3T«L
T 3 T A L
1 '• T A »
urtL
70TAL
TCTAL .
Tf'T'L
If TIL
T C T A L
T..IAL
TOTiL
T n f A L
trti*L
13TAL
T O f « L
T7TJL
O A T € t ST/I2/22
VALJF L AiNARl
__.. _ U _
UII
u
u
II
U
u
.. . _u
0.1 
M
-U-
u
u
J ..
J
a .
'j
y
u
. u. ...
u
j
ui
•J. .
',i
u
-.1
. . .. . .... -U.
u
•
*
_ _ _ _ _ •
11
0
1 •
«
n
*
_ __„_ . •
w
" ~ 4»
... •
W
..._. *
»
—_ I
c
f HM>^ f TiV 
AAJ.
OAT*!
jSSffl
iisa
4
: 'f: r
».*iffi;
llfel
-m "•
** i'« ' •«• .'•
» - Y V - ' v
• •*• . v 
• *
••'fr J
!-{O'.;l
• J* . " 
-
; •*<"•':'
^,
* •,.
V-iii'.
•Jr 
"*
fe
^T;i
jib
ll
•''M .«''
B«
§1
mm
:'-.».
.-frjft
?'*i M
^:1
•.^•<fl
!:^:1
^1
J
^ fl
J M
;4' 1ill
' * '• '^1
^•1tl
]
H 1:l
^^1 
* 
••pJ»rT u^t |f.} 
PROJfCT NANtt TURMNTINE RUN
^1 
* 
STATION NO 
*«an 
Of 
LAINO 
PARHO 
•ARAMETE* VAMI
•• 
rn 
n*v
•• 
003052 34S21 1, 1 2-3ENZ1»MVLFN:
^H 
* 
34»J1 3t S'-niCNl JROf.cNJ IOEN*
1^1 
344*4 2l4-3IhITROTQLUI*{
1 ' '• 
• 
Ji^S J'Y-ll"'l'"""«l''l"''-r
^H 
% TURP.RU* 
iT/io/ot 
looa
^1 
DiSCRmiONI FIfLO BLANI
^H 
• 
0«'1TT6 J*»ll MCThTL 
r«LO«I'-C
^H 
* 
?9i?s »TNYL e-LnRii6
^H 
* 
—— —— .._ - 
34*91 1,1-JICHt J«r,£TM»tf Nf
^H 
....... 
J4&44 1,2-TCAI>S jtC"tOflPtTH»tt-N'
^^1 
34SOA l»l»l-T»IC-il .1*C"TH*1t
^^1 
- 
^4>41 l»2«wICHLOR3PRJ*AVii
^H 
340)0 SfMcNc
^H 
- • 
12194 iRUMA^Ofl
^H 
J4516 lil f2t2-TFTR*ChL3} jrrHkHc
^B 
—————————————— 
. . 
. . . . 
34A21 .{•U*CMt6aait«*L<N«
^H 
J491C TSLtElt
^B 
* 
- 
34331 CHkOROAtNZtNc
^H 
34371 EThTLBflFSF
HK 
- 
i4SJ* 2'CMLOROR^iNOL
•? 
* 
341)1 2-«tT<0»-1f «.?L
•Pi 
....... 
.... — 
. 
. . . . 
.... 344»fc MiNut
1 :•-•:...-:.:
1^°
JNIT5
UG/L
OS/L
•J5/L
vi/L
uS/L
Oi/L
O'.^L
Jt/t
IcJ'L
uC/L
U j/i.
jr/-_
Ui/L
Oi/t
ur./L
U'./l
UC/L
Ui/L
Ui/L-
CHBM1STRT
TOTAL
T O T A L
T J T A L
T ; T A L
t D T A L
»ftf J.
T01AL
T3T*L
TOT4i
T O T A L
TOTAL
T.1TAL
TCTA L
1»T*L
T^TJL
tOJtfc - . 
-
r«T»L
TOTAL
T ' T A L
T ' T S L
T C T A k
Tr T»L
VALL'E e REMAP*
u
u
u
u
. ... ._„___..
u
u
... ——— ——— «J ———
u
u
_., 
. 
-4J. ___ - 
JL-.
u
J
If
I'
u
1.'
I'
If
V
(I
(.'n
1.'
II
%
•
If
*
0
*,
H
•
_ _ «
*•
~ " *
*
*
jr
•
II
II
99 TT 
TOO in.i
i
,
i
i
i
•i
; ".
i 
i
1 
!
1 
'
1
1 
1
i 
t
i 
1
i 
i
i
.
'
.
1
i
i
1
1
'
1 
: 
'
i 
i
OO -4
! »|3£
j 7l~c.
-4<0 Z
i *P
i 
\ 
m
1 
•»*» -4
t 
»•** o
i 
'» O
mi^
r~^«
•C o
»o
oc
* V-
(A
»
Xo
I
1
•
1
1
1
1
i
J
;
1
1
i
1
i
1
| : ;
1 
i
I 
' 
j
1
! 
i
1 
:
1
i
1i
!
1 1 1 1 1 1 |l fc -4 Z
etc c c c- 1 c e e
>.-. r. c- ..*.,>-* i..... i->
•t ry T3 J O 
J O O 'J O
r r r r r r r r r r
\
\
\ 
\
\
\
1
1 
;
*«it:cercLcic =
i 
* 
•
! 
.
i
-
r> X
r e
0 0
cc
1
w w
r- o
*
*
o•*
c c
o o
fr
1
1
1
i
;c
*
I
i
f
\*
^
3
e c
*3 O
^
b c
1i
r x
•»u
> o
e-
c ••
1» X
-4
m
C. C
O '3
rr-
t c
.
o
« 0
c o
LJ
D
V-
r
I
M
i
3 O
: c
•3 0
0 0
tfw -4
C C
O 0
j
1
1
1
: c
«
oo
Is
c. c
on
r- i-
O -3
i
'
j
r c
*
i
i
i
uu.-u.iuu
• Z »Z X
Z O n--4 -H
a •• to o
f- u iO U
e » oc c
X X f"4 ^ n*
x r z
E"
r c c t- cr. c
'•• rrrr
22223^
rrrfr
. •
i c ; c :c
»»
M «
<-» 1
5S
» m
oxsi
M Z
Pit to
X f»
m ni
Z
m
C c
O O
rr
\
Uo
i
: c
f Z
> o
m »
•je "
>• ^
•» *
ni w
^ m
s
c c
0 .1
r r-
O 1
r *~
,
'i
: c
i»
o
J
J
» ^
10 0
•• X
z r-
•0 0
^ X
•• or|
i •<
o •*
^ A
rW
•• z
» r-
M
z r»
m -«
C C
r ^
o a
f"
I
r c
*
»4
O
Z
e
•»
o e*
?o
-
J
5o
»z0
Xn
-4
at
c.z
=
X
^ 2
: s
i
<
, • cra
•*
V
a5
n
o»
IV
-•
M
m
.'
|
|
^
19
3
mn
*a
w
N»
»a
*
-4
'
|;
£
J
E
|
'
oaa
^
i
r--«
M
•4:
?
5 i
*
^
10
•4
3
<H
**
•4 
>
\ |
*>» 
•
j 
M
W 
P*
«uJ
*•*T
'rl
PROJECT NOt 2»t 
PROJECT M*El TURPtMTINE RUN
• 
DAT! 
TINE
•i.rfTATIJW NO 
»RO* 
OP 
LAINO 
PAINO 
PARAMJU* NAME
r 
TO OAT
O t O T T T 3441k NfTMTL ChLORIPE
• 
fl»OTTT 34*11 MtTH»L IfGtIJf
3«irt VINTL CMLORME
14111 
CriLOIOETNANF
• 
344?3 NETHVLENE CHLORIDE
3*!0l 1.1-DICMLOROf ThTLfMt
344*6 l.l-OICML3ROeTMANf
• 
J414A l,J-TRAMf IiICMLPirUTHrLfMf
. j§ 
321C* CHLOK3F3R1
32103 1.2-OICHLOROtTHAME
• 
3*506 lilil-TRICHL3*OETHANE
32102 CARSC* T f T R A C N L O t T C f
32191 DItMLC4nsRC13*£Tri*NF
• 
3*1*1 li2-OtCNLOROP*QPAHE
3*161 
1,3-OICHL'ROPIOPfLfNt
i91tO IklCMLOgETMTLCNi
• 
3*0*0 ttHltMi
3*511 1,1.2-TDICnLDOf FHiXt
• 
32P* etOtOPOtN
, ^| 
i*514 l,l t2,2-TET»ACHl3»orTH*WE
* 
3*0*0 TOLUfN*
3*331 C**L3(?i«FNZC1:
3*371 rThYHf SJCXF
• 
_ 
3*i3» 2-CHL^I»lPiHiJL
J»b9i 2-MTRQPNFNOL
3*6«* P1INOL
3*)*1! ^» *- JlCHLOROPr<;N3L
3*621 2«*t tt-TRIChL?1CPHFNf!L
• 
_ ... 
.......... 
3***2 P-CMLORO-N-CRESCL
, ,• 
3*616 2t*-ClMtTROP-4cMn
*__. 
_ ._... _. ___ 
3*»»T » t*-OtHTTRO-9-CPSSeL
3*6*0 ".-NITROPHCNOu
3*166 lt>-OtCNL3R1^(N2E4E
• 
3*»T1 If 4-OfCHL9R3aEtiIE'«E
3413* lt2-OtCHL3RPlFMtENl
_ . . . . . _ 
J*3»6 «t)l»CMLO*3ETH4NE
* 
3*702 rtFX«CMLO«OaUr»CIf "if
UNIT$
UC/L
1JS/L
U6/L
UC/U
Uli't
ui/L
05/L
UC/L
OC/L
... UQ/L
Ul'L
l/G/L
U(VL
UJ/L
d'.'L
-U6/t. .
UC/L
UC/L
UVL
Oi/L
u-a
U'./L
U:VL
U'./L
L-'./L
Uc'i
US/L
U.-./L
U'/L
CHEMISTRf
TOTAL
T21TAL
T O T A L
TtfTJL
TOTAL
TCTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOIAL.
TOTAL
TOTAL. -
T C T A L
TDIAL
Tr T*L
j * I AL
TPTAL
T?T«t
TCTlL
TCTIL
T7TAL
T T T A L
T?T«L
T O T A L
T 9 H L
T? T *C
TCT»L
T O T A L
TOTAL
TOTtU
tPTJL
T O T A L
VALU* t 
V c ^ A R K
U
U
U^
U
u
u
'J
L
U--
U
U
... .JL_
U
......Jl-
2.4 
M
... . ... . 
U-
J
J
J.Vu
u
u
IIli
u
u.
J
'J.
1
1
.. ... ——
«
It
c
CONPLtTfO ANALYSIS RMORT
RtPORT OATfl
* 
MOJiCf NOl 2*2 
MOjfd, 
.Nil TURPINTINf RUN
* 
9ATi 
rim
% 
STATION MO 
MO" 
Of 
LAINO 
PA I MO 
»»»AH|TIR NAHI
• | 
TO DAT
%
346*6 NAMT«ALENE
342TI «r$(2-CMLO»P_TMO«T) -JTM.
* 
3444T NITRotENZ-«e
% 
jjjjj J^JJ.^'JilJJJIJl!;1!!™' ff
• • '• 
• . 
. 
3431* H*XACMLOROCYCLOP-VTA3TrN.
* 
34200 ACEN-FNTiTLENE
343(1 PLQURtfcF'
3463* 4--HONCPHENYL ^MtMtl. »T.
* 
34220 AtTHff «C«N«
..... . 
-4i*l JIUfTHTL *HTf«ALAT(
34336 OICTdVL ^MTMALATJ
* 
- - 
- .- - 
- 
39110 Ot-N-IUTrL»Vi4TH4L4Tf
| 
342?2 »UTYL S'NIYL PMTllL»TF
* 
• 
3»100 ttSd-ETHYLneXTL) F^T-<*L.
34*»9 ^T»?NF
• 
.— - 
- ..- 
3*320 Crt*rs_KE
* 
344C3 rNa.»Otl,?,3-C,OJ »THCl._"
* 
_ — — 
445S* ItititA'OItcUZAttTMItACtNf
• | 
3*611 3, J'-OICHLCKr'1.!*. J05NE
——— — - — • 
-• -- 
J>4*2* 2>*-OIKITt(iT3LO'1f
?4,11 2 t *-OINITROTDLU?MF
——— — 
- - — 
34242 llrl2«i_NZOFLUU**>ITH«Nc
3t3io ILORIK
.-.--. .... 
,»3IO -I.LJ-IN
UJ.U&
UC/L
U5/L
UC/L
U6/L-
UC/l
UC/L
05/L
Ui/L
UC/L
US/L
1^ * V A
U-/L
U4/L
U"./L
Ut/L
'J./L
11 • y 1
.&/t.
y"/L
UC/L
UG'L
ui/l-
UC/L
utf'l
o"/L
U'/L
U./L
. tflMf CTBI .
TCTtL
- 
TOTAL- .
T O T A L
- TOTAL-
TOTAL
TOTAL
T->TAL
TOTAL-
TTTAk
TOTAL
TOT-L
TOTAL
TOTAL
T r T A L
T01AL
T3T41
T 3 T A t
T'TAL
T O T A L
ITTAL
T O T A L
I3IAL
T O T A L
IDT«L
T O T A L
I P T A L
T O T A L
TOTAL
10TAL
TOT-l
1-TAL
1
VALUf C RCIIA^It
u
u
u
u
u
._ .- _.. - —— «; _____
u
——————————— V —————
u
u
u
u
u
f
W '—^—l
J
It
II 
. __^.
u
u
H 
-—
t1
Jl ..
u
u
u
1* 
-
1
t
._*
_ —
if
IkI|
H»
T\"
( jui J.
i 4 • 4 •> <
o o o Id < i
^ •• f if- «-
is
I
' 
I
-i^-ia-ia-iJ-i^-'-^-'-'-'-'
. _>j_»j-j.i->j-i_i_ii_i_/-jj-i^-jj-<-<
* 
V X V % V ' 
^ . X X X V X K X V V X » 4 X ^ X V
4. i? t> «.* 10 i* t± n t^ i** «^ vs tf- if »h *^ i^ i^ & «^ o o &•
*
»*«
o
sar
»• i»
o•I
o
&
•- <• o *c •
O 4 L> 4 z .
?.f?
> a ^ z > >
• wo i
I «• -4 «
I »- » Z
• « » - M Z < K » « I I
a a •. « a. > x j K ti*> t
x i »• + ^ • «nio«4c>t
<u « x « « i ^ a >-•.&<
et*4 r* «
I I I I
»« A «•
-•
ts '^ i.' »1 ^ U ' • O 1* *.1 *5 U *3
"
,^-3
«- J J
• « CJ 
W u. Cl
: r -i 3-3 J
• »- X 
M or x
i MI o 
MI o
z r z c x e
•jo «t «->J«-
o o >• «r a -*
I I 101
-. .4 N J * ~
•* •* •* o H •*
>« •» -a -4 f
I «* « o n o
! 
I
001 1169
MOJICT NOI Itt
MOJCCT NAMI TUMIMTINI RUN
0V-
1
B*T| 
TIN(
v STiTiBM no —— Ptw ——— Of ———————————————— cr
TO 
o»r
' .1 
'
. — .. — ._._ ..... —— __.... .. ....._ 
...
*
—— .... ——— ... . . . 
... 
... ._. .
.*-- -
*
1
. _ . . . . . . . . .
in
(
3779 3*541 1,2-OICHlOftOPtaMMt *
3»5&1 lt3-OICNLO«OP«3PYHMe
3*030 aCNICNE
3*514 ltlt2»2-TETMCHL3ROf MANC
3*010 TOLUtH*
3*351 CMLOHO&Ex: Enc
3OT1 ETHtLBEMENf
»»««» TFRT-^UTTLMPT-m'THEi
3*M6 2-CHLOflOPMttiL
34*9* PMtNOL
3*421 Zftii-TfttCHLJPCP-IFNrL
i!™* llft-OI-TrSo-D-CPESOL
3"»0?2 PC h7ACHLO*8P HfMt'L
3*6*6 *-NlT»OP«'-NOl
3*>*6 It 3-CtCMi.<M;33F(iZc'*t
3*571 l.»-OICHL3t,13«12ri<t
3*535" l,2-3TCML(n7'5"KIeWr
3*S<1 l,2,»-T»t;MLD» J'-M:F <I
3*tqe ((IPHTHaLENt
3*/73 »Ii(2-UHLri-3t.Tf »t) Ft.
?«Z78 BfSCZ-CHLtR?fTHOI(r) "*!TK;
3**1> ISPPMPRONE
3*4*7 NITR3(>EN2E«r
3**?k N-NIT«0$C11- -. -^e JPTL»11'it
342S3 !llS(2-CHLCK' 
:**3PVL> T.
)*><! 
2-CM(.0»0(4»PMl-(ALt Ni
3*200 ICCNtPHTHTLEM'
uni J S
l/5/l
UG/L
Utt'L
Ut/L
JC/L
"OC/V
oG/L
JC/L
b'./L
ol'L
J'./L
n-,/1"
Uri/L
Ui/l
u'./L
L'/L
».-a/L
U',/L
u ; /i
U."/'.
IJ'I/L
t-'L
U1/L
UJ/L
J'./L
Oi/L
Ui/L
DJ/L
U'./L
" '
TCTil :
TOT»L
TOTAL
TOTAL
T C I A L
T O T A L
T'.'TiL
TyT AL
TOT 1 L
torn
TOML
t-?T«L
T O T A L
T ' T A t
T O T A L
T 3 T A L
T T T A t
T ? T A t
T ^Ti L
T C T J L
T3T*L
T ? T » L
T C T A L
TTTIL
TTT1L
TCML
TC-TAL
T S T A L
T5TTT' • • • - - • •
73TAL
(
U
U
U
ii~
u
u
u
u
u
u
471 
J
U
U
U
U
U
•J
u
IIII
u
u
u
u
0.7 
M
U
'J
i
L*
i
T'
f!
, 
——— 
*
'
~~ n'
0
0
0
_ n
*
---.
•
_ 
n
.... 
m
0,
If"
. ———— ^
•
.. . 
,
•
o ei
r!
;3sssts
r <a»>«- e *- »
> a o o » -v r x
VI 
O C C- -* -v »• *» *• I- m o • «• t* *• » X w ^ > ' i - * z , O o r w » V G * " | -^ I
-4 -4 » » O »» X » » « T r~ a •- I I I « "^ « * » f c « r * r « x i ^ : r t i c > * % . r ^ 2
xr- 
r z r r o j o i - * * 
n. x « z ic •* HI **« » *- MX j 
* "• o v e
cj *» r* 
»» o c • 
"* 
t- ci n. -* «
« 
O 2 u « ? 3 
••* H Jf » J
t« 
e v- 
o r- -c t- «
x -*j» » o r
•4 X » X: X S
r* ^o -Jo r
x •
• > 
->
«.-•»-
I 11 •• Z x » 
O \* 1
-< i x i:«. ^
rf i. « •» o i* »« x <n 
rt- n
-» 01 ^- 
Z C* r- 
-OX
~ s e 
'«• ••« *•: 
•< •* 
. 
T « »
'»• n in 
at n* 
« |-
^ 
fi nt 
n
. 
XI*
-»
X «» » ni
"* 
"• 1
4. 
m 
1
e r c i c c c c r -
o T j T -i i .j rj
cS;.-.-.c-«=c =
i 
,
i 
i
i 
. 
•
re c- r-. c c-
r .- r- r-r-q
—————————
1 
j
1 
'
l ^ 1
f <- n c
•} •• O-J
o
=. c.c x
I
i
C C
O t.J
c c
.r c c c
u *-j o • »
"
c c j c c
1
!!
1
t
C C.
° 1
C. C
c c
c e
u c
o ->
c c
c c
o u"
c e
c c
kl 0
O *J
c c
c c c ci
o o o c*
a o o a
|
,
1
c c
O ' » 
]
?c
.M
**
C . C 
, 4
, 
1
I 
t
i
^
r
JL
*
t •
*[
k^
r
'
z3
M
»
C
L
,
1
1
t
1
b
-
•-*
^
•Ja
»
*•
T
a
i
M
•
0
*
0
*
•1
« IL
to
o ft.
e*
M
M
4
!
•
1
1^«a
o
d
i
_i
o
-I
3
1«
X
10
»-f
o
„
3 =
_l -
C C
2S
* 1
« X
(
1
1
"1
1
1
_, J
c u
19 «a
1
:
O MA
1 X
•- «'
1
1
D =
'
i
j _j
oa
-j -J
13 O
D J
« ^4
•• *4
1 
1
AV,
= :
l
J
F^
!
O C
i
„„
"*
i i
s.
,'
(
r
_j _j
r>n
3 T>
1 1
3
i
_j
CJ
v>
•o
1
«1^
pt•I
c\
*l
»«
J
•1
4•
mf
i
.
-*
-
3
s;
H' M
<
m o
»- m
«r 2
» a
•aa
o a
o o
lo ^
7 
&
•- t.
' IW IU
O CI
1
;
a
u
3
o,
M
J
•K
O
X
£
»*1
r-
a
o
j
r^ z
OCJ
•>3
« J
X ^>
1
(
i
•s :
1
I
c 2
3 J
ul
^
u X
>- Z
IUD.1
01
i
,
r
i
j 
:
• 
i
33J 
- • d s r s r l s n 
a
i 
'
o 
' 
' 
• 
.
" 
" '
i
i
i
[
I
i^^:f^^i
c u t- cj r» o o oo o c- r
.j -. j i-. J_,-i-. j j j
= ™"J^-- =
Z
to.J
X 
tfl 
ul
l*j 
»• 
f It Ut 
^
i
i
•
1
 
>i
! 
I 
i
I 
' 
i 
i
m
i
-. ^ J
r»
•
c- t* o • j c r*
*
-*
tu 
*-
u; x 
•**
C5 * ^. » ** ^1
1
;
'
1 
i
1
„
i
h
I
J
-J
O
1
**4
l*f
w:
«
mj
.
1 
:
t
' 
]
i 
j
'
j
1
i
i
.'
•
.
,
1
' m
i
( 
i
•r
\
L
,
i 
1
, 
i
| 
:
;
: 
:
i
1
• 
i
i 
i
TUT
Oo 1
MO'-" 
HOI
T HA 
U*M
: «U'
(Hi
B*T|
STATION HO 
FROM 
0* 
HIND 
MlMD 
PAIAM1T1R NA1E
TO 
OAT
"V* 
OtOTTI J4S7L UJHLtlHlltlt
• 
»*»»» TERT-tUTTLHETMTlEThEt
4*114 
3-CH1 OIOPHENQL
3«»1J 2-NlTROPrfENCL
• 
3 4k *4 PHENOL
34*0* 1.4-OWTMHPMENOl.
* 
iltJi il*;JowiS!IciEinLlN;)L
• 
14iST 4,t-DIMITIQ-a-CtCfH
J4t4* 4-NItrJPHENfL
44571 i>4-OIC1L9iQACN2£|iiC
• 
. 
- 
- 
... 
34J»* HEMCMLOIOETHm
39702 HEXICHLOROIUTtutEVE
3453J li j|4-TRICHL3*ggEN4(1E
• 
3»e»4 NAPNTH1LENE
J42TJ 4IS(2-CHl,0«atTHY-) Ef.
_ . . _ . _ _ . . . . 
344JK W-HITPCSOOJ-'I-^P JPTM1IT
'• 
344JJ N-hTTRJfjOI°-lFl«rLei>IVr
343S» M«jr»CHLD»OCTCLC»£NT« JIES:
• 
J445J 2-C"L1»PN»rHf M*l cNc
j4200 •Cc>.«rMT«TLf •«?
3420} »CEN»^«THFN
C
'• 
' 
3*3*: Fl>lU»fSf
34A36 4-»RONQPhC **TL ^r*^*4TL 
CT*
in| 
J4220 A M T H f t A C F V E
34341 DIMFTHTL PHT41L4TF
** 
34330 3IETHVL ?MTH»L»Ti
'* 
. 
345»6 OI-N-OL»IL •"•Tr«»L4T!
«
»
'••1
«
«
jNITi 
C
Ufi/U
. UG/L ..
Ji/L
OC./L
. U£/L
UC/L
Jji/L
uO/L
U5/L
U&/L.
US/L
US/t
Ui'l
J5/-L
Ui/L
U3/L
UC/L
,5/L
JI/L
05/1
U'i/L
JG/L
U'/L
o'./L
jr-/L
UC/L
JG/L
UC/L
U',/L
riENISTIT 
viLiir
T2TAL
TOTIL
TDT»L...
TCT«L
TCTit.
TRT1L
TDTIL
T3T*U
T C T J L
TOTAL
TOT»l
TITtL
TOTAL
TCIAL .
TOTIL
TOT41
T3HL
TCT«t
T ^Tit
T?r*t
T C F A L
rcrti
TCTIL
T't«t
T^T«l
TPUl
irT*t
, IfMftf
u.
»f 
J
u
. _. J
u
J
11
u
u
u
u
u.
u
0
J
IJ
...... U.-
{.'
.. li.
II
(1*
u
«
1!
.u
»*;. i>
;
1
... _. .. .
N
--
n
—
n
Jfl
(v *•••«•
If
BIT* 
TIMI
• 
STATION HO 
'RON OP 
LAINO 
PARNO 
PARAHfTfR NAMf
TB 
DA*
•
,tif<RP. RUN 
IT/10/01 
ISO)
•DESCRIPTION! ELGIN ttCLL *3
- 
OtOTlO 34*1| NETMTL CHLORIC
• 
————————— ————————————————— _._. —— _ _. .... 
. . 
»4*4»-«*TM»L-MOMia»
3»m 
VINYL CMLORTD.
• — " 
ftA&4i C'1LOROiTH4MC
* 
3»»2l HETMtLENE CHLlPIJS
. 
34*16 It i-OlCHLO«OETM*NE
•4 
32104 CMLOAOPOR*
——————————————————————————— -- 
X2X8J l,J'»ICNLd«OiTH»«*
• 
__ __ _ _ . . _. _ _ _ _ _
lASjA i.i, I-T«KHLQ«JETH*NC
—————————— ——— - 
—— . —-..—. 
»210i C4i»»N TtTRA^MLOAI&f
V 
37101 
9ICHL<?R?dtOMO>*ETHANF
A 
3»»S1 l(3-DlC«LOKnPtOPfLC*:
» _.. — ._ 
J9UO T«ICHLO»OfTM»HMl
ii *f 
340'.0 JEMZEUr
._ —— _ 
JjlOl CXLO«OOUaOH3N.TNlUF
W 
3*511 l,I,2-T»IC-lL3»Of tH»NE
——————————— ——— -.. ——— ..... 
. 
12104. 4ftOMJ*0«K
- 
3*51* l,lti.i-TfTr«CHLJ»Of THiHt
V 
- 
444TS TITBACHLOtliETriTLEUt
i*01C TCLUtNC
. . 
34391 CHLORQDlNlhf.t
* 
S*iTl €THTL'SNlfl«r
- 
- 
.. 
. 
.. 
.9«SiS_TElIrEuTIUiEfHILLIhEi
3*5»t 2-CHL3«CPH£SJL
• 
— - 
J»591 2-H1TKOPNENOL
• f 
3*4«4 PHENOL
m -•-- 
4*40* 2t -OIMETHTL'MclCL
W 
14431 2, -OICML(UOPHtN]L
————————————————— .._.-_. — . . - . . . . . . . . 
. 
J4&21 2. ,»-T81ChL3JU)PHt»04.
3»»SI P- HLe»0-*-C(t«iT.
W 
- 
34*14. 2* •bINITtOPH'NOL
344ST *t 
-OI«ltT»G-3-C«c$CL
31332 PENTACHLJROPrtENQL
• 
3»4*» *-NlTR3P-<«i(OL
. 
. 
_ J4.JA4- uaTaicsaaeautMZin; ....
_ 
14ST1 1,4-OICILPPOE.EHJetl 
'
• 
. - - _ 
345S» l^-OICHLaP'JSENZENi
f 
1*3*4 HMACHLlROtTntNF
9
• . . . .
•
___
UNITS
OG/L
U*/fc-
UC/L
US/L
W"»' L
U;/L
Ui/L
ur./L
04/1
U -. / L
UC/L
Ci/L
UC/L
uC/L
Ui/L
Ui/L
U5/L
Oi/'.
U>/L
Ui/L
U'>/1
J../L
u:/i
Ui/L
UC/L
L:/L
ua/L
Uv/L
b'~i/L
'JC/L
UC/L
Ci/L
U;/L
UU/l
4<C/L
UJ/l
U6/L
O'./L
^__>_
CME"I$T«»
T O T A L
ro»»k
TOTAL
T^T«L
•T '? * » C
T O T A L
TM-AL
T O T A L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL-
T ^ T A L
l«»*t—
TOTAL
TOTAL
TITAL
T3TAL
T3ML
t:»At-
1CTAL
f C t A L
TPT»>.
TOTAL
TOT«L
laTAi. 
_-
ini«L
T O T A L
T HAL
T J T A L
TPflL
taiAL
T O T A L
rortL
T'.'TAL
T O T A L
T H T I L
IJIAL
T:-T»L
T O T A L
T ' T A L
-_^w, 
_„ ^_ 
_ __ m
tj*cf
VALUE I REMARK
U
U
u
— - —— - ———— » ———
u
u
u
u
— . ——————— tf ———
u
•.4- 
._:_ — ——
u
. U 
——
'i
u
to 
• .... ... ——
u
0-
o
** 1 * 
J
'j
. uu
U . —
0
- 
_ .U_- - ——
1.1
U 
- -
u
;i
U
'I
•i
(•
^
(•*
^7
n
n
— -
N
- -
It
01
c-I
• 
STATION NO 
PRON 
OP 
LAINO 
PARttO 
PARAMETER NAME
_ 
ID 
DAT
'"I
0»DT«0 3*792 MEXACHLOAOBUTiOIENe
• 
3»»»» NAPHTHALENE
' ' 
"" 
J42TJ STJfZ-CHLOAOETMfO FT.
34271 »IS(2-CHLO«OtTMO«T) HETM.
• 
344DI ISOPdORflN*
J4**7 NITR06ENIENF
. -' 
. 
1*213 IIS(Z-:ML9R01SOP«3PT,.> FT.
• 
3*511 2-CHLtROMA?HTMALENE
3*200 ACfNAPMThTLfN?
• 
3*381 PLOURFNf
— - - • - • -• -•• 
.. 
... 
11700 HfXAC1»L"P"3F,l<7t«l:
• 
- - 
' 
34*41 PtENIifTHREUF
3*220 ANTHRACENE
3*1*1 DIHCTMYL 
3MTM4L*fE
• 
3*3?6 DIETHTL PHTM*L»TE
._._ 
3*Ilfl OI-N'ftuTVLr'HTHALATF
' ' 
3*272 aUTTL »J*m ?HT1«L'te
• 
~" 
345«« Ot-N-CCTTL PHTHILAT'
3*100 BIS(2-eT^TL^c»Tl) PMT-«4L.
J4526 1, 2-aElJZ*'<T'*(( JCF X»
• 
3*4*1 4>CHL"R?PHF,i|VL PI^NVL f c T .
34403 INOENOCI,:,:--C,: ) PTR?NE
3*T*7 »TKT3TI>PYRfli'r
• 
i*S21 
il2-«EHJ9^tJYLFHF
J^»6?l 
1 3 '•PICHL OR OP £N 2 IDE N?
^ 
3*426 
• 4*DINYTROT3LCE '4*
3*iU 
,*-OINlTRoTilLUE*F
• 
3*210 3t*-S!N20PLUr*ANTHENc
342*2 llfl2-StNrOPLUCP.AtTHENE
3*310 »LORl««
*
...f-
^
UNITS
ur,/L
US/L
UG^L
UG'L
UG/L
U5/L
U5/L
jG/L
Ui'l
•JU/L
Uf./L
UG/l
•jr./L
JVt
U'./L
O'/L
U"'/L
JVL
U5/L"
Ui/L
UG/L
oi/r
uG/L
U'J/L
yi/L
OT/L
U",/L
U;/L
US'L
«»PO»I
CHEH1STRT
T O T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
WAL'~
TOTAL
' TrT«t~
T O T A L
T3TAL "
T P T A L
TcML
T -TAL
T 3 T A L 
'
T P T A L
T r T A L
T'jTA L
T O T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
TCTiL
I O T A L
Tit AL
T-TlL " ""••
TOTAL
I O T A t
T O T A L
T3TAT -
TOTAL
T O T A L
TflTAL
TOTAL
- ———————————— (
VALUE I REMARK
u
u
u
u
•j
uu
u
uu
u
•J
u
U
u
u
y
uu
I.I
u
u
u
u
1"
•J
II
T
1
uir
II
- 
- Tf
•j
Ij
I)
I'
u
u
•J
J
•
i
1
11
<
4
4
n
«
4
«
H
m
n
I
K
1' 
'••
Br - ..
mrtti
Mf'^
F«?;l
JMk >•'*
'.(%
•ate
11
•• • w*.
,lb-i.
•1 •« IV-
'•i-qR-V
**» 
•
IW*«.
i^p^
iy|'.>,
'.HRW-''--
^L
'iaS**3
,qg»a?a
>m*'<
."M^HK!
«^
ipd
''ffB^wi
'tTOflH^
-Wi
'ait -3
F
K*
t^l.
x;
Ni
Ht^^^l » 
——— PHUJELI HUI Hi ——
BaJi^^H .1^. 
"Tl 
Il"E
ElS>^^H 
T«TATI3N HO 
PRON 
3P
'i . -v,. 
H ^^•^•^^^^^••^••^^fe i >••••• •!% AIHHH^H^^^^^^^^H
'•» 4- 
B^B^^BMBBmmHBBBBBUi
m^m •
r T'^H
Er ^H ^
H':^B •
;> M^l
r l 
'4^^H ^
[ 
rH <•«
" • fl • ———————— - - ••
:~fl
,,,|. _._..._. ...
• 4 fl •
•V-fcM ..n
ft>. -'K^H 
™
^•^H • 
— - • • - ••
,'->•. "•
^ ~^M
If ,'.;^ ^H 
• TURP. RUN IT/lO/J* 
l$?i
•v ^H 
DESCRIPTIONS ElilN KELL *2
-' 
•• :^H 
« 
- - 
-
>v '-m
ft'.- ,1'!. H 
A
6'" (? • * -
[M.'-B "••
fc tB • - •-
t"K : I^B
:i. ' • • •
'>-.:'••
'""•• * " """
!*•i •
i * -
•» •
—————— PROJ'IT •fTWET
LABNO 
PARNO
0»07IC 39380
3^350
39JOO
Jtl26
•HTS1
34346
"1«0
3«3(«
39410
3f 470
39337
3931fl
34m
J9400
34&T1
39»Ro
31H2
39^96
39500
i ^ < A *
3 9 $33
0 •? 0 7 8 1 3 4 1 1 R
?^^| 3
SSITS
iilli
3*>01
J**»»
3»J»*
3210*
32153
3»5»»
32102
TUIMIITIHt «U»i
PARAKETtP NI*E
OIELORIN
C^LOtBtkf
».»'-OOT
ttf-^n
»,»'-ooc
Alll'HA ENDOSULF*AN
•FTA ENDOSULPAII
ENORIN
EMORIN »L3£MTCc
NEPTACLOP
HtPTICMLO' ?PO*J(T3?
ALPHA. SH:
tfTf-SHC
OELTt-IHC
P^ B™ 1 01 *
PCS-1221
PCb-1232
'Cb~l ?4 J
pCd*l 249
PCH-1254
?C C™ 1 257
HETMTL OLOH't
HHTHTL BRC*T3*
VINYL C^LOKIjr
^PVMCUK'lULOPi'jf
lil-iILHLT«3£THT.fNf.
ltl*dICHL}*DEThliiC
1,2-TPANS CICILCJOETHrL'N-
C-ILOAO'ngq
l!ltl-T*ICHLO«OFTHANt
CAkBQ!! TETKACHL^DIC'E
UNITS
OC/L
J5/L
UC/L
Ui/L
Ui/L
UO/L
Ui/L
UWL
Ul/L
05 n
JC/L
U'./L
U-./L
U ^ ^L
jrt/L
lil/L
ul/L
•JI/l
U'./L
Ul/l
U'./L
M • p*V
U:/L
(J*H
JU/L
U'./L
J'./L
UG/L
^!/L
V-I/L
MEHIST
T O T A L
T C T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
T C T A t
" T6f»L
T O T A L
TOT«L
T O T A L
T3TAL
T " T « L
T^TiC
TDIAL
TVlL
T 3 T A L
T O T A L
T 3 T « L
"TOTAL
T3T»L
TTTAL
T T T A L
T?TIL
TTAL
T^TIC
T O T A L
T^TB t
Tf T»L
Trf It
T O T A L
T ,T«l
T ? T * L
T : T « L
THTAL
T r T > L
REPORt DATES RT/1Z/2Z 
»
>« 
' 
VALJ? t 'E«i«»n.
u
0
a
u
u
u
_ __ y_ _
u
u
u
y
'j
u
u
"u"ju
u
L'
J
y~ — — —
u
uu
u
- r - - -
ul:
_ T
1 1
•1
'*-
.
»»j: 
is
MOJICT NOI lit 
PROJJCt RANtl TURPENTINE RUN
DATI 
Tint 
/
' STATION NO 
PRON 
0' 
LARNO 
P»R( PARAMETER Nt*E
w 
TB 
B4Y
•
| 
010191 32101 DICMLOROSP.OMJHETIANe
. ... 
. 
3*5*1 l.i^OXCMLOROPRORAJk
9 
3*5*1 1,3-OICHLORgPftOPvLENE
3*0)0 BENZENE
9 
3210$ CHLOROOI AROMOMf TMAHI
3*511 1«1»2-TRKHLOR9ETHANE
»i»n^ f*n«fllQ»«
3*010 TJLUtNt
* 
M.Ii U2T-«""UF 
E H
* 
"*" HSn«op-'-jLl
J469* PHfNOL
.... 
. 
... 
... 
_ 
. 
34*21 2»*>4«Til.ICrtLJROP4EM3L-
3 4 & 5 T 4i«-OINIT«0-a-CftiSOL
9 
3*i»o *-hITIICPi4CN3t
J4J9e rtFXACMLdROcT^ihf
• 
.. 
. 
39T32 HtX»C1LOR3dUT101INi
34511 l,2>4-T«Kr<L'.J*0*ENi':1-
J4i»t «APHTH*LtNE
" 
34.173 bliC^-CHtJROf.TMTu) Ef.
34*36 IS'JPHORON1
* . 
J4447 NITRJScNiEV
m . . . . . . . 
34433 H-l.ITROSOOiPlil.Yi.4MIN:
* 
342«J JIKi-CHLT'OISCPSrPYk) FT.
»
4
UMtS
UG/L
ua/L
UG/L
U6/L
JfL
UC/L
JC./L
UU/l
UK'L
UC/L
U VL
U./L
UC-/L
b'-'L
J-./L
J;,/L
ui/t -
ui/L
JO/L
US/L
U'i/l
Ub/U
Ui/t
Uf/L
ji/L
UC/L
CHEMISTRY
TOT»L
TCtAC.
T O T 4 L
TOTAL
TOF4L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
T?T»L
Tal AL
T O T A L
ItttXL
TCT»L
T O T A L
TOT»L
T K T A t
T O T A L
irr«i
j n T ^ L
TO T4*.
T O T A L
T C T A L
T3TAL
TCT«L
TOTAL
TTT1L
T O T A L
TOTAL
*-^"^\ »i ..
VALUE 1 PE«*R^ 
jfl
U
U 
^
0
_tf_ 
-. 
•
u 
n
.._ — v ———
u 
•
u
u
169 
-J —— 
-
U 
•
0
~o" 
~"«
u 
*
U 
-
u
. u 
_ . —
•J 
•
I-
. 4.. .... —— .„ •
• 
. 
|| 
M
o 
*
11 
.
V 
_
.41 
. •
I'
J 
^
H"
*
N
OAii 
Ji 
.. 
._
I -
D'TI 
TTMf
• 
STATION NO 
PROM 
Of 
LAINO 
PA|NO 
PARAMETER HAM
f A 
A_v
»
.<'.| 
otoni 34200 ACENAPHTMTLiN!
v 
3*3ii PLOURENF
0 
14616 A-.ROMOPHENTL PMFNTL ST.
34220 ANTHRACfNF
_ 
.. 
... 
1*14.1 (UMTMU RHTHALAtE
W 
143)6 OICTHTL PHTHALATE
_ 
142*2 iUTTL S«H7YL PHTMALATE
J4JT4 f LUORANTrtEttE
* 
J446» PT«EHf
J4J2VJ CMRVSIfc-
_ 
34»Z* 1>2-(EN7AMTHK*CF»*
3440) lN3ENO(l»2i!l-C,D) PT^EN^
* 
34S21 1,12-eEHlCPCRrLFNf
.
.
.
.
. 
36.SSA- l»2l».A.OU£*]AMIMRACi*i
_ 
——— ... —— _ ... 
34344 1.2-DIMEII«L4rbRA2lNE
193?3 C-tLOk^tME
- 
. ... 
39303 4»4'-OCT
* 
39320 4 f*'-0t*
343*1 ALPHA £>'ttt$ULr«»
• 
—— ...... 
. 
34356 3ETA ENOOSULFih
f 
' 
34391 ENOOSUL*A<t S J L F * T >
m 
----- - 
3*3*0 ENORIU
* 
34366 ENjRlN JLOii^'M
- .. _ . 
3*610 HEPTACLOR
^ 
3»4?0 HEfTiCrtL-^ V-HlJfc
."
9
UNITS
UC/L
U5/L
- 
• U6/L-
US/L
U1/-L
UO/L
UJ/L
Ui/L
AlH /L
U"./L
Ui/L
Ur./L
U6/L
UJ'L
Ui/L
UC/L
J5/L
UO/L-
U'-'l
Ui/L
J.-./L
Ui/L
L'i/L
U-i/L
Ui/L
UG/L
UO/L-
0'-/L
CNIMISTRT 
VALUC
TCTAL
lOJAt- - — -
TT T *L
TOTAL
T3T4L
TOTAL
T O T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
TOTAt 
———
T O T A L
f OT J1L
T O T A L
TCTAL
T O T A L
T C T A L
TOTAL
T'.'TtL
TOTAL
T3T«'.
T O T A L
T: T»L
T1T1L
T O T A L 
•
T O T A L
T O T A L
T D T t L
TCTAL
1TTAL
T O T 4 L
TSTAt
T C T A L
TOIAU- 
- - -.
t1T«L
t REMARK '
U
y
u
u
. 
— U ——— .._
u
u
———— it ———
u
u
u
————— M ————
U
u
u
————————— y ———————
U
— u _____
u
u
u
- *}—
\J
-U-
u
u
-U. _ —
u
• 1
1
M
n
i
i
--— 
,
____»
M
i
1
I
HI
N.
^
*^
•
*s
1
.
e
3
«
j
*
>
f
E
"
1
T
1
1
<:i
iiiii
3
t
t
i
,
1
1
3
««
V
:
«
1•
4
1
«
;«i
K 1
«"•«
>•
VI
»> 1
« 1
ai
41
3tt
1
4
•
•
r
r
»
«)
1
t
\•
p
>
*
i
'•
tr
E
\t
•
t
:
i
:
:
.
f
^
t
i
i
t
, to-
i «o
'O
:»»
i
i
i
:
i
•
•
f
i
!
,
!
ic»
i
4
%
I
<,:
•
<
i
**
tti
*t»<
^
> 
£
4I 
«
»
J 
€
J 
j*
9 
4
( *
<
i: 
4
t 
•
v 
•
- 
<
* 
*
; i
•
D
•
i*
>
•i
) O
i j ,
O i
* V
I 3
O 1
> x :
X 4
it « 1
1 O 1
9 0 '
1 •* i
t
j
1
1 J.
" ^ 1
50 C
Jt;
»S:
x 1
' W 
«
;:j
;ss
'0 «
' O P
^B
> 3i
i
- *• <
a o 1
> = ;
ft
« «« 4
^i
:s;
> r>
i •*
» 0
4 **• <
n * •
J O *
k *. 4
•4 * 1
^ » <
,
i
i
i
'
!
l «• •
5 O C
> O «
a ^ :
• ^ f
>• M i
t i
> <j «
. A. «
' * 1
i O 4
1
* _ !
r
•.
a
a
r>
j
t»
»
•
i
on
Wl
0
o
•«
N
+-
m
z
*
•
*,
•r^
1
1
t
t
t
»
i -J
»«
J
i «*
M
*0
I**
*t
IM
: 
i
1 
, 
i
.l-i... .... -.-
:-
I
1 
;
:
*.• 
• 
* 
•
** 
• 
— 
i
. 
• 
:
:
> • « • « & « • • « « • » • « « « <
o O c. c c i ti r- ti < i c c. t t . o <-< « . t <
-•j-.^-,w-.-J-. -J-i-.-.-j-.j^
»•
IkCtafC) 
• T » « « : * 7 ^ 
4
x r ^ S x f ? T £ i Iftx'i 
f «j ™ <
sj^ss^j^^^r^J^^s:
•^ 
i
^
£
!
i 
'
| 
i
!
1 
!
! 
i
' 
i 
!
i
; 
,
;
i 
• 
>
i 
-
, 
;
j 
i
1 
:
•i
3 -»
J -J
- •—
^ Cf
' fc.
u o
% o
9 X
> 
1
: *j
t.
J -J
3 I
t
gt
E
'
i
!
r
i
i
»x
(
•-'
s 
'
r>
-J-J 
J
- o 4
ll\
r».
c
n i
j^:
is:
km
r,oj
"*J
!
!
1
1
i
1 
i 
!
1
 
:
i 
j
' 
'
1
!
1
i
J
r
i
i
>
.
r
!;
3
*,
»
i
i
-
:
ii
i
,
> 
i
i
: 
i
i
;
i
1
1
i 
1
'
! 
i
m
•
i
i
,
,
_ 
———— own ——— TTttt —— - • 
' 
• 
, . . . . . , _ .... . .... ,.... .. ... ..-.
STATION NO 
MON 
OP 
1*1*0 P»»NO 
P»t«*lTM N«1«
V 
————————————— n ____ HH —————————————————————————————————— - —————————————————————
•• 1 
. 
0)0712 J*JT1 ITHVLRENtPNP
*»»»* Z-CMLOP.QPi1fN3l
0 
i*&** PMtNOL
3*491 2,4-OICHLOHPPHcN3L
———————————————————— — ...._.. — . .... 
x>T«-ri*-PTiitTiren';*OL —— —
0 
i»H7 *.6-aTNTT*0-3-C«ESCI.
^ 
• 
- 
• --- 
-- - 
JIOJT penT»ei»iotoFnriiOL
1 " 
. 
3*6*6 *-HITf OPN?NOL
0 
- - 
- - 
- 
- 
]*5S6 1.3-OtCHLOtO»F»tt1t
0 
3*19! SEX»"LO*"T"N""
3*5f»l l!i?»3T«ICHL3»oSsi*M*
* 
J»*7° MS{2-CHLO»"tTM»(.) :f.
^ 
J**34 ISOPlOKO"!
0 
~" — - ~ 
S»»SS f»-«TT»OS90T»nfllTUI«Tiy
3*100 «Ct«»«MTHYLf.Hf
I*2C5 *CtN»rHTHf«f
3*7CO rtf «eCHL3»Oof^Je"t
0 
3**»1 KHfN«NTH««N€
- 
3*«0 MfHMfMf
• • 
2*1*1 CIMfTHTL »MT-HL*T'
0 
~ 
- 
3*J?» OlfTlTt PHTM11ITC
0 
!*$»» PI-N-OCTri PHTC»L'-T«
• *
0
jNirs i
US/L
UG'L
-\nrt —
Uli'L
U'./L
JC./L
UG/L
U^/L
U;/L
Uu/L
U-i/L
DC/X '
U3/L
r«. 
OG'L
UC'L
I'.f 
OC/L
L'?'1.
U'./'-
UO/L
t'r./L
I'./L
'. 
MS'f
ur/t
Ui/l
trt^t-
L»eNlST«Y
T3T«l
TPT«L -
1C t *L
TCT«L
TBT»L
TPT»L
THTIL
TOML
IPT«L
TrTIL
TOT«L
THT«L
TTTT«l
T'Ttl
irriL
TOTIl "•
T3T It ——
TPT»L
T:T«L
Tr.TSL
TOTIL
T«T«l
TOTIL
TOTIL
T T T » L
TnTti
T O T » L
T-T«L
T5T«t
VM.UI t MH..«
U
?70 
'-- ~J
a
u
J
U
"IT
U
J
u
U
u
uu
utr-
u
u
U
U
U
'J
J
-w
u
•j
0
1 u
J
P.I 
'H
u
. - . . 
- ... n-
I
•
II
- —
n
II
c
':BTT 
TOO iru
1
; 
i
i 
i
; 
i
< 
i
•
i
I
*• 
* 
»
1 
i 
i 
1 
i 
' 
! 
! 
1
i 
' 
[ 1 
' 
: 
i 
1
1 
i 
! 
• 
; 
i
1 
i 
' 
i 
1
' 
t 
! 
1
: 
: 
i 
- 
' 
i
 
: 
i
i 
'
i
, 
'
(
i 
'
' 
' 
i 
'
:
i
i 
:
I 
;
i
j
1
t
j
1
A
1
. i
1
iI
i
!
1
'
*
i
] >
< 1
1 1
<
1
1 O
O 1 I -4
• ' •"
0 
-4
» < I *«
•« • i am
'
;
e
01o
zo
M
£
] 
1
j
1
! 
' 
°
; , 
i 
1
i 
' 
•
i 
' 
: 
"•
J V ' j a o i Q 
' M •• • 4
•» 
t 
Utt- C
•» 
< 
U •» 1-
<» 
J 
«" » H
X 
i* 
•• ? u
: 
i 
£ 
5 
*
, 
:
.
i
1__^_ r.__ r___, r.
•
i ^ :
> j»r
or* -«Q u c
-PC r-5 -• •
f- ei a c.
1 O Q
c * * r-r- -a
o » oc c r
• » -
•— rt
2 3
r» n
;*»
1
1 * 4
1 *«*
Z
1 *rt
cn
3
1
.
- o >
«i •»*
a -<N :
J m 4 
:
» X t 
1
•« -.1 n
f* 
«'
i 3 .
3
; 
5
>«*••»
.« 3 » i
c ' z »
53
r- 
»
1
j
» 
. *
9 
' ^
n 
»4
•• 
' z
l* 
. m
Z f 
~ 
»
ni X 
JB 
c.
r » 
S i
' 
M
1 
•<
1 
f*
• 
Vf
i 3t
•* 
. 
»
' 
•
r*
^r
i 
J 3 a •> '» o j :j r» j o j » 3 <» 'i '3 J 3 o i» -J q o <3 > o o •
! 
i 
•
1 
' 
•
i 
i 
| 
;
i 
'
1
' 
'
1 
! 
; 
1
1 
i 
,
i
t 
' 
"
fc • » » • » •
r rf r- q f r
i
t
i 
. 
i
: 
i
 
: 
! 
.
1 
! 
.
1
|
: 
! 
' 1
. 1 
i 
'•
c c C C
*•
i 
' 
'
i 
'.
O C
r- r
J O 1 U 3 t
f- r* r r1 r r
' 
;
1
j
c a
•
i 
i
t
cc ee CC
0 3 0 ?
• 9 " *
r r[ r r
i
j 
|i
c e C C
j
4
1 
.
I
"* 
i
rt 
;
a 
i
•1
2 '
1
^li
§
«
•i
4
3
.
1
i
r«
O '
r*
m
i
1
v>
•A
» j
a 
•
M
m
O
^
a
m
•4
X
>--V
>
• •
4 v
28 TI 
TOO 
l.n..l
tt 
<t
1 
;
i
: 
1
r 
i
I 
1
1 
:
1
i 
'
i
I
,
i
!
1*^ ^"W 1 1 " J
lit 1,5-OU
>tt lt«-«IC
!*« ItJ-OTC
!»• tttmffl
•* oaa :
X X XX
1
i
ii
*n*«*O1tr*' 
•« 
-€ t 
c
•VMM** 
O V .1 O •« X £ 
r- 
i- r-
f 
o 
i-. 
i> i
r~ 
» 
-• 
r
• i 
, 
X
• if
1 -4
1 3.
* 5
1 n»
i
i
i
^ i
nj
rt
^ 
w w ^ 
tft
1 
'"* 
*
1
i
i
,
i
|
t
t
ii
'
1 •» 1 r
I X '
11 
1 »
- 1 e «;
c e
i 0
•
• i ut • i
C i » 1 i
• i » < »
r » «•
' SJ
m
0 '
C i
vt '
I
23
c*f
wi » 
o 4 * r » x 4 v c
^ *4 O r*
* 3 ** ""
f*. at o ^
ni •* 2
' 
r
i» 
o H-« -«
1
"" S '5
j. •
i
1
x ;
c c c c q c c c . ( T c a c - c u cc c c c C T r r c c C C c c c c c c c c c e c c c c c 
i
•
J 0 -J tl •
r- r r r r
i
c
Ci 
.3
i 
i 
i
~. . ", •: i:
r
j
i
> 
1
r -i •- a ^ rj z t: ^ -i <_ c, i. .: 
a :r •:
I
i
i 
j
! 
' 
. 
I
: 
• 
= 
1 
9
» OO
h-
*
cd 
c
ii
:
^|sf
r r r r
I
;
1
c c t- .
'f^r^rlrr^^rrl
Ii
! :
I
• i 
••
• > 
»
; • 
o
: : 
m
t ' 
r*
"**
• i o 
••
O 1 ^ 
»<
t
°t"
t * XI"
i
1
1
!
1
ID
S
O
>4
X
.X
ig
fN
; *
, *
*e
5
!
• 
!
;
s 
;
M
I
O
"t• 
:
*
"I 
'
I 
•
' 
! 
<
o
4j
1 
' 
i
1
;
,^cj 
c
1
1
j 
1
B
c dec e c
i
C
i
J
a 
i
jfl
1
I
nu
I
1
i
m
V
O I
9 
t
^
0
IT
g)
•4
X
1^
X
ft*
^*
•* 
fc t
X O I
» I* I
f 
'
1/8 TT
ft
~ 
*•* 
. 
-• . ^^^
" ^ifSiljSg^SWra
...iiji^j^gSjCES
TOO mi l^l^^^l
• 
W
i 
i 
! 
! 
!
i 
: 
•
i 
' 
1 
.
1 
;
1 
,
;
j
'
i
:
i
1 
•
1 
'
i 
1
; 
!
' 
:
(
I 
issr27S?sr??S
1 
.
gnMrtfgfitatfg?iir^^<£p^^
l^f^^^^^^^^^^lSS^Mi^^H
g^tfrSmf'f- '-•
:i?^- r"-jgtfSJ^^BM^^B.
.
•
; 
i 
1
!
'
! 
'•
| 
j
' 
' 
1
!
: 
' 
:
i
 
!
*
!
i
1
i
• 
1
1
;
•
,
.
!
ii
•
j
'
1
i 
?
-•*
1 '. 1
• 1 
•»
J ' 
••
V i 
fy
*o
• i a 
i ••
-ti »
at -« ••
3 •• 
*>
0 j ^ .
;
! 
1
'
1
J
: 
' 
* 
$
• 
1 O
; 
f 
i
' M •««»»>» i* 
•* n * Jt 
n -*r n r- x 
» ,n .^ o 
m 4 » o o < 7 O ' * m <
a r « o oo B 
ic • ir ^ 
2r* 
^ "• -• 
z at *• zr-»rtxi»iiz 
i
•» C r- -4 -« » •" 
m w x x 
i * •* r- -m x 
-n^n •• >• x •« a « i ^ 
e
: r a a. o a i* <c 
.-- i -» » 
rax i » 
rrz 
x -• rl .- _t _ 
i
a •» O C C r* v 
. 
n 
- 4 X X Z » 
••> f» 
t Q O X - v 
3
-«m i-< 
qjr 
•»»• 
-»-4^^ 
^ 
n - 4 - « x ^ 
s
xzs 
t" 
-4 •« 
x-"i»-n 
r" 
• -< ^ r-
rr !• m 
X o 
m r~
; 
, z 
*» m 
r«
rv> 
» -4•
5 C C C . C . J C C C C C C
- » x x x X x ^ x x x x x - *
3 0 o - j .^ o u •-"* o o o cj i
1
i
1 
1
1 
. 
j
1 
. 
•!•- -.• =••-. J--'- - S-- •-
i
1
1
' 
' ' ' • - ' 
'
i M i
10 i ->
!l 
TUKPfMTIN
rttO 
MRtttfT
u * -» 
' 
«
»•» X 
1 
*
a 
r- 
x 
c
o 
<J 
» 
z
-4 
3V
z 
a
r- 
. «•.
.7 2
•* 
^ 
c j r " Z * 
4 ^ 
&
5
i 
* 
4 
3 „ " '^ 
3 * " 
! 
:
• 
' 
m -i 
rt 
«.
!
.
• X % X > X ? i % X N X ^ > - » X x X >
'
-^>?^>>3
. 
j
f ' > O o j o -^ -.t ri j "l w7 ITS o J o <3 i "t o r> n M a T *a tj -3 a
1
' 
J
• 
1
f ? r r ? r q n ^ P S
j
v 
;
J
1
1
1 
: 
•
r- <j •'- « c '4 c -a c: -4 - cj -; -S c r •= c
1 
' 
1
! 
i 
i 
•
I i.i 
i
cc c c
1
1
c c c d
i
M
0
^
3 ;
ii
»? .
m 
1
•
H
^
1
1
^N
Si
* •
»^
•4«
O
».
M
W*
i
m . 
'
•»o*
1
i
i
•»»0
m
M
•«
^N)
(5J
•'ft
COMPLETED ANALTSIS REPORT
T 
————————————————————————————— —————————————————————————————————————————
% 
MOJICT NO! 2*2 
PROJECT NAKEI TUAMKT1NE *V1
•"I 
OATE 
TINS
m 
1TAMOM NB ——— •*•* ———— B»—— —— — - 
- - - • - - • - -- 
LMNO 
PltHO 
PAtMtTtt N«ft -
TO 
0*T
3*310 CHlOOANf
39 J20 *f «• *-?OF.
- 
. . . . . . . 
J»J»« BETA tlOOSUlMII
S*3»6 ENCR1N ILOEHTDE
, . 
. . . . . . ... 
.,^r,e.),ryTtcltnr 
..........
' 
3»33T «LPM«-BHC
3*331 AETA-eilC
0 
... 
1*3*0 6«HP)f-IMC
342S9 JCLTA-BHC
T^$DO TOJlJlPtlWB
4p 
3*»T1 PCH-1014
——— ———— — .-.--..- 
j,t|, »C!-122T
' • 
3«»'2 PCo-1232
0 
—— — —— "' " 
3*»»« PCB-12*!!
J'iCO PCj-12"
LOCATION C9P<I 3700 
$JtiT««TU AOUCOUS
^ OF»CRIPT!9Mt »|H* nOUSIN4 4ELL *1
0 
3**13 H'TNTL SKOIIOf
i»iT5 »THTL CHLIRT;'
'• 
3*311 C-4LO(OtTH|N>
3*501 It l-OlCNLn*?ETHTLE
0 
3*5*6 l,^-t»i«i 3TC>1LC<n
J21C2 C1980>J TETRtlHLOKI
•l"
0
UNITS 
c
UC/L
OC/L
JG/L
JC/L
U5/L
O'./L
Oi/L
0?Jl
Ul/L
OG/L
U5/L
Oi/L
'JS/L
U'./L
US/I
ji/L
\l',f\.
N? 
UJ/U
tTH»L?Nf 
OS/I
U6/L
C'r 
U'/L
.ffo.r
:Hr«iST«r
Tern
TOTIL
T<-T»L
TOTIL
TOTIL
TCT»L
TOTIL
T T T * L
TIT If 
- - ' '
TOT»L
T5TIL
TCflL
TTTIL
T-5TJL
TTTIL
T O T » L
TCf»t — -
fUL
T?T»L
rnrii.
TPT:L
PAG! 
IB 4
DATE! IT/12/22
VILUc t RTWin—
' IT -
U
.... TJ_.
U
u
u
U
U
uu
u
-rj
u
•rj-
u
u
u•j—
u
TJ - -
U
U
U
- U'
u '
• 1
•r
"
™1 
,
*
II
n
4
4
4
»
_ _. .- 
. 
^
4
ni
<
\
BI
?8T"t 
TOO
* ft
iss
* X »
$ OS
i —r*
X V *
r» -»r»
>« X 4
* xf
»o
m m
m
: 
*
» j
w v
«% •«
i
r»
r-
j^o
IAo
r*
:**
• »•*
3 a
sl
O •*
74i•«
•• »
a <•
•»«
•3 1
»r>
z r
*o
•4>
•«
X
f •
w»
»» X
1 X
0 »
f" n
o
^
X
f-
r
^ ^ » * 4 * # * > ^ * > » « - ^ 4 * » »
^•f«(^»»*»»M«4O»rj*«»'4*
• • » 1 1 1 •»-« 1 IT* 1 IZ
i xxHtp«Mj«rk*«»^ofM»«r >
•Hf*foo<~. oxar* 39 ^r* A
> " » J o r - r ^ A o ^ ^ i «• ^ ^
r'c^oo.^iO'Vi ^nr*or*
.•• k» » i» rr. • 
' « I ' V < « I « C 4
O O ^ Z V . T 
vnatAr»'^m
<i. « 
rvn.ro 
i- t.t r- r ^ w v»
^* •• 
rv n fr 
o 
x
n > 
f a
f 
r~
m r
«•»
x X
» O
3
Jt
a •*
a ™
?3 r
i-
• •• i
sz
-40C
rf 0 1
«V c. r
M Z
13
#* ** *•»
j»» *
»• X
i* p>* c;
U. f»* O
t;-t «
UH
rv 4
.£ '•»
-« i
•- r*
porr-un.'
DC
ss;
>.».<!
"fa
MS;
;s^
M O
r*S
i «
c» »>•
• z
ii
r°
Is
£
o
^*
f
n»z
*> » M
*• *• t*
Y 7*2
o o r*
*• •* Q
O r> *
4 X 0
r* r «•
» » o
o o a
X J" »
o o ••
•• « -t
r*
*3cc:cccCcccc:c:»3 c c c * c cCc.(^cc*-cir:cc c:c d r - t : c c t c t 4 c c c c
.» e» .1 »"» %n hi cf .» «> *i o ci vt ^* 1.1 k> «i «.> ci «i .t '. • .> «i bi .• .1 > vi o ci «^ ct o ci ct ^ o o tn o
x x x 
^ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X V X X N X X X X X N X X X > X ^ N X X X
q*-r-r-«-r-rTr-r-r-r-r«-*i-r-r-r ii-r-rr-f-r*i-r if-'r-r-r-r-r'r-r-*-f-r-rrr-i-f-r-
11 .1 •:» o Q 'J -
a n --j u <* a •! <i ^i 3 J > • > -> •> o > o T o « L: 
J --T "a -'• "^ a u '3 o rj
i s
I 
1-4
I 3
d c e i
I
*
• '»
/ 8 T T 
TOO mi
I 
!
o I -« :
» b -. '
?;:
•» 0»
5«» z
•*•» c
•*-«»
« » »
e »«•
oo-l
»o»
»•* + •»•*
•» 0 00 0
3 » • » f
• • • o
a r- 
f» x i* ci o M »
r- IB 
•* a « o •• -4 a
o » t—
* o
f» 
X
3 ~
y
• 0
c
C/l^
;*
.5
t> 
i»
b»e
5
* •
0 B« I*
HI 49 Z •
r- 9 '"+
« 
00
z 
<•
n *•
P- O
tj •»
c«
*I
n
A
ut «* u- M» w w
««»*'•»
0 « 1- <» •- *
1 1 « 1 •••
««
n
r"c
»z
2"iiz
Z *"•
•« Xn l
o o — u>
•< ^ • '•
t- l*c> •<
C ar" »
•• ^ za
» ^ * » « i » » « / «
a o n »
M •« 4
0 z g
-rf >* y
» o rr
o «
» ••>« i •» 
<»
ji -«r-« 9
J J* JBC VI |
•4 m O ^ <
v» z » »si i
JI 
zn. r
1 
-< -i -
i^Ul U*
*• 4) *>
c 3 1-1
l- 1 X
« t: i-
•» -t
* t ••
a i~ • •« •• •<
1 I »«-•» i
U (^
•» **
M X
*x
4-
f* mr
*
V* U* rf .W **
» »• 4 » »
Jn1•
a*
an
• Mem
* » c z
o n IB •
°^ * *
.n 3 
-•
z • a
^ -t •» -* r- •* 
M
-< a 2 a » r-
^ • ^ M ^ •
M
r » 
•• * 
•» -<
r" • 
-« ^ 
• 
x -X
x •* 
Mr1 
-^
••••« 
-^ 
I 
A
* 
* m 
»
r -«
ft
J3
fr r*
; £
• .^
•
c c
.1 0
^ '-.
-1 -«
i
r?0
J
-4
cceee-t:<.-c
^ A •.) it »• <*» S> .1
•» O'* >0 «» C1 t»
1
C CTC
0 »»..•
1
.1 • 0
c c c c c. c c
.» : i c» c i .> o --I
•» T U J 3 J >T
rr^^r-
c c c c c c i r - c c c ^ t :
.1 .1 o ci ki ui k> ci o o .• :i
•-i 'j ra rj -j o o -3 i tj o 't
r......^.^..
C CC Gt
**> h> «.> ri
i
O O 0 3
"^
C
fc>
0
Jl
n
cj»
o
s
o
a
•4
vf
oa
I 
I
•; r. •- - : c a c -4 w <5 <-. ex d c
a c a
I 
r-
i 
c-
!8TT 
TOO J..H1
m^:^- ^mm^fmmmtif^Hmm
I 
-•: 
, 
» 
- 
• 
* 
So?
| 
, 
; 
. 
. 
, 
, 
. 
. 
. , „ , ,
: 
i 
• 
-. 
, 
• 
1 — ••
• 
. 
. 
• 
t. 1 M 
1 1
1 1 O <
' 
- 1 z ;
! 
. 
»
! 
' 
r. «1
. 0
i 
! 
• 
. 
• 
:;?!!
i 
i 
. 
::-$
i 
• 
i 
i 
: 
• st
1 
> 
. 
: o +
; 
», • 
^
! 
< 
1
• 
i 
V>M
! 
: 
** t ,
3 si
. 
. 
! -«4
1 
1 
« *• <»
1 
. 
•» »
i 
f* -*
i 
;
 
: 
: 
'"S 
'
' 
' 
i 
o 
:
! 
C
14
• 
• 
oe
! 
»'
:
i
1
*
! 
-«
•»
w
' ^ * » « > ' s l * * u » d » » N » i \ * » N * M * > * » » r ^ * ' » 
* ^
0 C » • X - 0 ». 0 1 1 X l«. 
1 -3 1 1 1 X 0 -« X X 
II
n> 
o -< 
xu 
-< » ». o *. J )• 
c » » n : r * z o
X 
m * 
f * f 
x O . 3 4 » f - 7 
x j o x - m - o - i *
•» 
-4 » 
O O 
^ •• ^ O *> U tW 
r» »• If l~ 
Cl C.* M
^ <r O if* 
it* o r. m r c X 
f X X 3* 
1
f •" 
f-4 
i- •» • -4 0 K e- 
O 3 -4 -4
9 * 
4 » 
f* * * *4 x n» LJ .* .n 14
. . • • j i 
* 
-» .4 » 
-«m
X 
, 
•<
*• 
• 
r-
X 
• 
n
. - 
m 
f
, 
' 
p 
. 
.
i c c c e c d c c c c c c c r c c - c r . R c c c c c a 
c.r
. ' 
• 
i 
' 
' 
<
; 
'
! 
. 
• 
' 
'
t 
:
1 
' 
> 
' 
'
| 
. 
! 
j 
: 
. 
. 
.
. 
- ^ rr .. . 
. . i. . ., t r c. d c .1 /r .. _ 
= , "- ^ 
j - «•
; 
! 
• 
! 
1 
i 
! 
1
, 
< ' 
: 
! 
i 
i 
i
1 
i
 
: 
. 
• 
• 
i
* Bl 
^B ' 
' 
' ^B 
^B '
1
F
1
t
^
•« • • * » - » •
« t« o> fl» * >
i l l I I I
t r^ f* M P« 0 :
k * * w M •- r
r
C U C G f C
? X C X X 5
1 -* -H -* H -• -
13 •» 0 -a 1 "
|r- f r~ r r- r
i
t 
>
!
1
1
(
*
1
i • <* \
•f X n t
I c c <r e
."• CT ^1 CT
f ^ ^ ^ ^
o ci a 3
f- r- r- r-
1
c a c <3
! 
\
ti
i
^
> 
MOJICT NOI ttl 
PROJECT HI
| 
DATE 
Tine
fc S4+*ia«-«4 ——— «WH»- 
- 
ft* - - - - - 
LAINO 
1
r 
TO 
OAf
x
' m
•H
C
•»
m
• z
c
9
G
X
•
Cia
r»
C
r*
4
srtt 
viitrr t ?r»«*ir 
- ——
^
!
0
43•
•»
r*
m
mo
•«
w»
•4
w»
J*
HI
•* 
i
O 
'
m 
'
-• ii
ii
*«•«a
m
•4
0»
-4«
*
•4
X
»*
,M
V
•1
9 
9
9 
f
V
1
i
,
i 
•
«
g
•rlu
; 
fc
P
tt
1
- 1 
'
1 
I
' 
^ie
; 
&r
*•
*•
-
r
x 
«
3 
«
hi
t•«
?
*.
! =
j 
|
« i . >•
»- 
a
M i :
*• < > o
4 4 : ^
e i .
I i
: r
i i
i •
i »
: 
1
t
Lu
i
1
\
U Ot3 O 1
+L \. \. ^
a i" o •» >
i
rt .j 
i
' ff '
<L r 
i
o * _j
j >- j
X HZ
" « * » '
5S?J
:
i
i
i 
i
3 3 9 3 3 3
,
'
1
1
J -4 J -* ^ ^ |
3 L O r fa t
i. X X X V X
3 3 3 3 3 3
0 
-1
e x *. o p « i
u ill O wi V u I
• T * «.' ** ti
L •, onr r r>:
J 0 J w » II
• * r i o o
r r,or IT* •
^SdtS
> n «_> o o
s--«,4,^
1
1
i
1
*
!
1
,44,
i
1
J-,^J
....£«
^ X V X V X
«r *•«
t
tu w •. *•
-i <n <a « r
i w o c; n o
» •- o o oo
,
1
i
1
1
: 
i 
^ • 
• 
'
i 
- • 
,
1 
;
3 3 fc 3 C3 3 J r 3 3 b 3 fc ~ = - t -• L -. ti w L .- t
: 
' 
! 
ii
: 
' 
1
(
i 
:
!
^ J U ^ ^ J J - J ^ ^ ^ J ^ J J ^ L J ^ J J ^ M
& 3 D j » 3 . T 3 3 O 3 r ) 3 t > 3 3 o r * ^ r » o 3 3 3 r > n
•U 
41 
•
^ 
• 
-J 
!
•» 
• 
P-. 
t 
•- 
?
I k i * 
^^< 
^ 
v j ^ l f X
P V # ^ 
* • £ 
2 
X 
V J « « V
- » 
»• 
a »- 
_i 
^ r 
* » - « » - « *j
> o x 
B. « 
« 
ji » 
_< • r c r ^
-r> «•. 
xzi 
>- X 
r J 
r i r 
r 4.
1
; 
'
i 
'
i 
;
1 
' 
i
l
1
; 
i
, 
! 
'
i 
!
: 
. 
i
• 
• 
'••
1 
'
1 
• 
•
i 
, 
i
i 
' 
! 
I 
i 
;
m 
9> 
m
J>-M.
ANALYSIS «E»3rT
0 « t E » IT/I
MOJICT HOI !•*
FtOjeCT DAME| TJlffNTIMC RUN
•f 
OAT( 
TIM
STATION N»——N»»«———•*—
TO 
OAT
343*4
3**6* PTM1F
**jt« -ei»»»ieir^
3«S2«
3*t»T
3*>2l
3*i»6
3»4U 3,3'-
-5*«t« 06-?
3*611
343*6
3*2^0
, 3-C.O)
»9994 1EN20IC A C I D
99199 2-i .
•LOtIN
OIELCVIN
J9300 *i*'-Oc)T
39310 *.**-ocn
3A3M
3*356
39390 ENOOIN
3*366
39*20
393JT
«9J?»
393*U wl
54-44*
39*00
3*AT1
39*11 »:a-1221
pcit-m?
»9*»8 PCB-it«<
M.M
L'<UL
Ui'L
l'3/l
v'C/L
"*j(j^t~~~
UG/L
'J-J'L
US/I
OC/t
U'./L
Ut/L
UG/L
U-/L
U'/L
U'./L
yj/t
L'i/L
US/L
I.T./L
S
UC/L
•J5 /L
UJ/L
U'./t
l/J/L
U1-/L
U'-./L
U1/L
uC/L
3»«/l
'J j/L
y»/L
or 't
Jl/L
-Trt^t
fi»e*HTtr-
TOTAL-
TOTAL
TCT«L— • -
T O T A L
TOT»t 
""
T ^ T A L
T"Tit
TtTtl
T:T«L
- fTAL —————
T"T«L
TOTAL
T O T A L
TCT«L
T O T A L
TCTIt --— —
T O T A L
TOTIL
rCT»L
TCTtL
T O T A L
TCTtf 
-
TTTJL
TflAL
T"T*L
T O T A L
TtJTAf" -
T 7 T A L
T C T A L
T 3 T A L
TfTAL
T P T A L
T«JTAV •
» O T A w
TflTAL
T O T A L
TOTAL
•TWTAt ——— 
-
YALor t »««»ir —— • — -
— - — o— — - — • - • -
u 
II
- . 
. .- ——— JJ ————— 
_...
u
u
U
-- 
- 
————— 
JJ —————— 
—
u
u
u
U
'I 
~n
u - " — "~ —
- - r.r 
j — •-
3.1 
J 
,
tf- 
—— - -
uv - ------ (
n
• • • • - - • 
T J
• 
v- ---- - '
U 
•
p 
--- 
— ,
1'
•-- 
• 
..-——.- -.) — — - ————
U 
|
I-
il
'.' 
— ' 
- 
(
,.
- - - - - 
—n —— — • ———
\' 
t
fj 
- — — 
—
. " . . . . . 
W
'J
4
i
t
€
•
t
i
*
0
0
B
•
•
0
•
•
•
t,
•
t
1
1
•I
8fl
._ . — r.
na
'
Tlli-i
IllCi
_ __T^^4il
1*101
TfiJl
1*101
1*131
Iflbl
idbi
Ull.1
JUiSl
l*i:i
1*101
l*ljl
Hill
1*101
11101
1*101
lilul
i/tn
ix S"
IX Sf
ix-.n
i/m
i/vn
i/ir.
T/.jT
Vf'l
l/'^.l
i/'jn
i/rn
i/in
-1/iQ
ixtr.
i/in
ixin
«»«»£
' tM tit»t
«C«9ICCdJT»-3 CLUt
1AMIA (1UC
UMliU tl«»c
. ..) »»MA»»4 moudimtac
snojno» iiiviistns 
cozt 13003 HCH»OOI
—**^«+x-<t>- - Hn»»d»ni'
sunn
A»0
01
ll*C
-»«^
ION
fl/ZT/lk IllfO
SIS11VN*
f^9^o~««
r
I
i
1
!
i
*
:D
or
***
t-*
*•*
HI
*.
•1
3
^
*«
X
^
O
u*
O
•c
«L
M*
N
O
ib
o
•r
hk
{
h
•
k
>•
fr
**
t
Ik,
*
t-
]
•
Z«1
•»»u1I
4•
C
1
«•
J
• d
r<
s!
3
ai
•
•
*
•
• 
ii
J
. i
<
:
i
E
>
p
i
•
j
> «
>Of
i
S
c
1
•
!
lhi«•
«
3
4«
P«
4
> = !
> 0 1
; = ]
:
, 
9
; 
t
i 
<
O 1
:?i
-«. a
1 »- 4
• M
E 2 1
J I
* •* 4
1 •* <
>
>
3
>
5 3
1 0 j
1
t 7
: x '
< Ul 
1
D ^ i
K C 1
F Z
B n <
M,
* *
*~\
•
1
9 S 1
J c. 4
,„
E5J
1 Z «
: ^ J
» U' •
«
!
i
|
>»li
3 t> C
B = -
u»
HI
ET;
M f
1S
||
» r>
i
i
- -1
-=• |
>->:
i
Jl
s:f j
?I
L 
1
3 3 3 J> |
,
1
- o r c. <
• 
'U
s
* 
•:
-1 I
j 
• ;
: 
a. ;
U 
73
p> 
• »* 
1 (
1 OC « <
Z-Vi,
I
3 3
'•!
9 C. 1
^
^~
• **
r j
-4 *•
::
E 0
r *^
^s;
: 
, 
•' 
' 
' 
' 
i 
J
• 
: 
' 
, 
' 
' 
: 
,
1 
! 
! 
i 
i 
1 
,
• 
I 
i 
'
• 
' 
i 
i
s a p s p - 5 5i.r.rji-=krbn»o :• a ^. i t> r t-
! 
, 
; 
•
I
*' 
1
C,
;
t
i 
. |
^--.^u^.-.^-.-, ^..-^ 
i
:. c. r o ci ur> o e o t< o (• e. c- r b c: t- 1< t r c r- «•
• 
• 
• 
'
• 
*J 
*» ** 
kr
+- 
« 
••* r 
« •
•1 
«, 
T 
W 
«/J>
*• 
»- 
! J •>• 
5J F
^ 
« * ^ c 
' » - » . 
- I '
«* 
7T 
^ ^- •» ^. « j 
•«&.€« 
«jrJr
t 
-b «k 
-J « C X Z ^ 
U 
• « J < 4 '
» * - X 
7.1 
r •« r 
T 4, 
«r »- 1 7 «r 7 ^
RssAssssssssSsssssSsssssi
'
!
t
•
;
' 
:
!
1
i 
' 
i 
: 
•
! 
'' 
. 
: 
1 
' 
!
1 
' 
: 
'
i 
; 
• 
. 
i 
: 
i 
:
^ , M _ i 
- 
.
.
.
-
»
.
.
* 
CSMLETO ANALYSIS »t«»T
v ————————————————————————————————————————————————————
£ 
MOJECT NOI 2*2 
MOJICT NANil TutMNTlNE BUN
•• f 
DATE 
TINE
0 
STBYHN »0 ——— Mtt* ———— «* —— ——— - 
— - 
•-- 
t*BNO 
MtNO 
M»A«8Tf» ftAMC
TO 
OAT
•
4 
- 
. 
- 
- ._. 
- 
- 
3*j»« ii2-or*we»Tt.'«»c»irTinr
- — 
-- 
— - 
- 
-3*t«2— ittifBVwtoFL'.ntf'rTNri
•'•« 
. 
39110 ChLOHOANf
3^320 4t*V* BDOC
3*351 EMOOSULFAN 5UlflTC
3»5»* £NJ*IH lL05Mfrt
0 
3>4?0 NI^TACNLOR fPCXI3^
' • 
3)33i 
4CTA-SHC
0 
———— 
"- 
3*3*0 CAHHA»BMC
3*2*7 0€|.T4-9«C
0 
3*STl PCa-1016
3««"i PCB-1Z3?
J9530 ff.9-11-.*
i*>0-4 *C4— 123*
A 
39JO- FCt-l?iC
— ^ 
«••>
TWITS 
c
1
trrn
U"/L
tG/l
ir 
um
Ur,/L
01 /L
US/l
OG/L
071
U-./L
UC/L
Ui/L
tf ^* 'U
y (J /L
uC'L
us/i
U-./L
UG/'_
Uil/L
L3/L
i^-/L
•••
M'OIT
IflSTtT
T?T«L
T O T » t
TCTlt 
- "
TOT «L
-rrrn. - 
-
T O T 4 L
TDTIL
TPTIl'
TOT»L
T O T A k
TOTAL
T C T 4 L
T3TAL
THTtt
TCTIt 
-
r-i:t
T-T:L
T T T t L
.^^l^— , . ***^"™' 
^
»•«« S| o^e^
OATH 4T/12/22 
' *
^
VA1UF t BcHITfK 
" 
— ' 0
^
u 
M<'
u 
* ' •
u
u 
•
D
U
0
u
_..|l_ ..__.»*
•j
u
u 
•
u,J. 
———— 
. .. ^
u
II- 
0
n _ _. —— --
u 
W
•J- - 
- - 
- 0
u
J
amo/or 
u»o
C33Ei JTOO
3*41! 
"STdTL
}«1T» 
V I M Y L CHL9AIO*
34311
34501
JC-/L
Ul/t
U'./L
OS/L
U1/L
r ,•> T t ±
T P T 4 L
n
- u
n
Of
C
k^p 
--
% • •
T 
———————————————————————————— ——
% 
PROJECT NOt 2*2
'"I 
OAT! 
TIME
TO 
0*T
• . ———— . _ _ _ . „ _ 
_ . . . . . .
*
%
«
*
•
• 
————————— - — — — — . . - 
-
• 
——— — - --• •
» 
•
%"-
•
• 
• - • • " • • 
• ' - - -
•
• 1
• 
• • • • " • • ' 
• • • '
«
COMPUTER 
ALTSIS «PORT
HCJECT NAME! TURPENTINE RUN
IA8NO 
PARNO 
PARAVfTCR N*»e
34146 1>2-TRANS OICxLO«OETl» LENE
S?l«e eittORO^flR*- 
- - - - - -
32102 CAROON TETR«;HlORIDt
j»l«0 TaiCHlOPOFTHTLENE
— - - — — . - — 
- • • -j**t<»-5Mrttirt---—— - - - - - -
345U l,Jit-T»ICHlOt8«tM.Hf
J2134 BRCMOPORN
i*47i TET»4CMLORCrT-TLE1t
34S«1 2-NITtOrHft'L
34694 PHENOL
34iS/ It6-CIMtrRO-0-C»«iCl
J*6^6 4-»tIT40PhESGL
34SJ6 l»3-OICHLP»r:*E»ff »f
34SS1 li2t»-T«lCr«Liif i.;Pt'«if •*'
3»2T> BiS(2-CHLOROtTHTl> .FT.
14271 Hl(2-tHl<)R««TnOl(T) H'tH.
34436 IfGP.'tORPfcF
JNttJ 
C
oo^t-
01/1
UC/L
U&/L
wC/L
Ot/t
Ul/l
Ol/t
Ui/L
U'./f
J'i/L
U'.'L
U'./L
or./t
uG/L
ITS/I
U'-'l
U<!/1
JC'S.
u-./j.
Ji/L
trtn.
JO/t
Ul/L
CC/L
uc/u
U *»/L
ce't
REPORT
Hfi'HTtT
T T T A L
-TTTIl ' '
TOML
T«T»L
TOT it
TCT»L
T C T 4 L
TPTtt
T C T t t
Tf T»L
trTiL
TCTIL
t JT*L
T-T1L
T5T«l '
tPT«t
TCTIt
1nT«l
T3TIL
TPTIL
T'.-TAt
TOT«V-
TCTtt
T01»C
Trr»L
roi«i
PACK 
3«O^ ^6^*
' 
* •
OATEI «T/lt// 
**
Wt^m-~ -.
-T""'V
u
If
U 
0
ii
U
U
u 
•
u 
m
TT - - - - - - A
0.1 
<•
" 
•
U
'•' 
•
U 
__ H
u
. 
. . _ . . , , . 
B . 
. . 
._
u
u 
- 
- • 4fc'
'.' 
«"
•f
....... .j. 
. .
1
•
If
C3N»llTEO A N A L T S X f 'EPOM
f 
PIOJCCT NQt 24Z 
MOjeCT NANEt 
TURPENTINE RUN
• f 
OATI 
TIN:
m 
o»y
0
3**J3 N-NITtOJaOIPHrhYLAIMf
O 
....... — 
... 
- ..... 
3*213 sijcr-cm.tnnmoPHjpTty FT.
« 
!JIoo JceNiS"?"'?!^1"1"
' '" 
3*H1 FLOU««.'<!
3*436 «-«R010>rtFNTL PH£Y¥L '!•
£ 
3*270 AVTHtACENE
3*316 OIETHTL MT«AL*T£
0 
———— ——— -- ———— ' 
- - - . . - - - - - 
MllO Or-N-SOTTtrFXplALAT?
J42*2 S'JITL BEklTl PHT.-IALiTF
|k 
3*100 «TS(2-ET«TLMJITI ) *Mr-HL.
0 
— - 
J»S?0 CHRTJFNt
——————————— — 
— •• 
- 
3***1 •-CHte*f»Ht«lfl. »•«•*»». »T.
i*!»T Jf tIO<4>l'TKFN''
3*>21 ltl2-P;Nl')PF«rLFN'
1«»*6 l.^-OtF-HeNlflliTttlMN?
I 
3*<:10 3t*-6fNZO«LLO3JNrHil i
m 
~~ " 
3*2*2 llf K-e'N'OFtL'OFIITMEV.1
39310 »LC»I',
3%$?^ OlfLC^tN
• 
?'J»C CHLP«0*Nf
3»190 4t«'-f»0»
|J> 
' 
StllO 4,*'«t»00
343S1 AL'HA E"iDa4ULc«N
I
0
UBtTJ 
(
UJ/l
US/I
U5/L
U3/L
- trsn -
Ui'L
U5/L
Ui/L
05'L
UC/L
UU/L
U1/L
UC/t
05'L
US/I
US'L
US^L
UO/L
-irt/t
Cl'L
U'.'L
U'j/L
Jf./L
ur/.
rff^IJTI
TCTAL
T O T A L
-Ttmr
TOTAL
T"TAl
T O T A L
TOTAL
TTTIl
T O T A L
TOTAL
TCTAL
TrTIL
TOTAL
rmr
T f T A L
T-TJL
r - T A L
TPTAt -
TCTtL
TOTiL
T 3 T A L
T-TIL
T7TAL
T1IAL
TPT»L
T T T l L
PACE 
4* 
,
IEP3aT OATCI 17/12/22
|T~ •- 
V3Llif" '. fFWITK "'
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Un
0.1 
»
0
11
UIT --
U
(J-
...... . 
... 
,J -
J
V
(1
1
>)
li
T 
•
n
li
it
I' '
flvey*
r 
i
it
1
•
if
4
4
-_ _. 
^
4
It
4
4
4
4
If
" ' 
4
4
,
01
96 TT 
TOO mi
'.«. 
, 
•»; 
#*3 
,
i 
1 
. 
M •£»
1 
i 
| r> •*•• 
1
i 
. 
• 
• 
m $•
M i» 
,
: 
« c
i 
• 
-•$*
»•> *
1 
' 
• 
• 
' 
o*
! 
: ' 
-\ 
i
• 
: « » * • * 
J
, 
' 
. 
i 
' 
1 
i ?SJi 
! 
'
1 
• 
'. 
i 
i 
f* • <*o 
. 
j
j 
. 
1 
i 
i 
*• -»X 
j 
'
| 
• »i • o 
| 
i
> 
i* if •* 
\ 
• 
'
">f
1 
! 
'-I
1 
; 
•
»
»
€
»
,
•
• 
c e«
i 
i « . * • ' '
: 
: 
on
i 
' 
•• 
i 
°
|
:
> 
« C 
'
: 
* «/• 
;
' 
5 
i
: 
: 
• 
" 
'
(
1
:
; 
- 
;
| 
!
i
I 
0
i 
• 
*.•
t 
~
, 
w
.-»
! 
*j
:
. 
( • Y * * * * « * « v * * . x « * « m x * i * ' V > " * 
o i r* o rt o *
' 
* O * * < * » I I X t » « I O | I I X t » - « X X 
1 1 1 1 1 1 'I
. i (Dzr~*4i4iO4<i»«ii*»-«*«r*Q 
rr- 
*• ** i« *« *» M c
<••« 
* l t O - l « J C ^ i t X - * X * - » 
.3 * '* fw M ** *
o j» ; f i o > j « < * o a £ r)'? 
* j v* f~
*- » x u o « » r a -«o a r »•-*»*•*
• O e 
•«•«•» f »> J r* 
o -» T I- 
uvi»-»
.om 
fti o a <r i- c. x r » a » 
r-
rt» -4 
X V Y -^O *H » 
r).*^^
, 
' J » 
r * 4 » M i » 
^ n < ft t*i
»* 
ntr»ro» 
n- 
a*
s m 
x 
n"**r 
-4 .*
1 
»». 
m 
c^ 
j
•+
r*f*
X
: 
•»
1
: c c c c c < l c r . c c c c c c e c t : c c 
c c c c c c c
2 '» U 1 1 J L j -.1 o f9 ^i J *J '» 1 ^ - J '* * > 
4 J -1 "* O O C
i 
i r ~ t * r r ' r r * r r > r - t ~ f r * r r m r r ~ r r t r ~ 
r*r*r*^^r-r
1 
: 
•:
 
: 
• 
!
i 
i
| 
• 
= 
- 
!
' 
i
i 
i 
- . 
i
, 
* 
t
•
!' 
' 
' ' 
i 
1
: 
« i C i C r 5 ; c w « e . - : c a c s a - . : w j : i 
. 
.:ct^r:cec
: 
; 
1 
i
1 
: 
j 
' 
: 
; 
• 1
! 
i 
,
 
: 
\ 
!
. 
! 
| 
j 
, 
| 
' 
: 
j
A
j
i 
!
i
1
i 1
! 
i
,
: i
. 
i
-
!
W I* Ul U* W (
0 »««<«.
* *• M M Ul 4
f
-* 9 r><* *• :
O fll » •» *" "
x r » -« « •
.525T5;
I « i » l r
m r» *-i 
f t
1
•^
i
M
r
1 c c c c c c
i r. .-> <r> n <r< c
1 n ^\ i u .3
1 -< -^ -«-<-<-
'
t
t
1 
'
i 
; 
!
!
i
c qc c ce
1
i
1
1
1
II
I
i
1
1
1 
•
! 
j
i 
!
i 
:
i 
•
t
i
j
,
-
0*»4
•m
> W Uf W u*
1 « » • »
• » W 0. U>
S 3 i* m tr
«• 4 * *
' •• 3 o o
!-«»•«
.0 4 X C
^ i r
s? :
1 3 «
1 
4 
«•
• 
•» 
C
I 
-J 
f-
1 t 
t
t 
»
1 
: 
3
•
ic c c c
n ^» ci o
i
1 o <j n t»
1 •<-<-< •<
1
i
.
!
i
i
1
C ^ C ^
1 
1!j
i
_ . 1
tft
• t
1 '
• 1II 
^
1 I 
m
i : 
ab.
: : 
m
< P 
n^
«
o
• 10 
—
-«] 1 »
O< 1 •< 
M
: in »
M
0 i -«
•>*••
•* ?*r ^
^
!
1
. ii
: 
!
• 
!
t
• *
T 
' °
*• 
; «-
; o
« i
X
: :
5 :
c
» 
. »
» 
• «
* 
m
J 
5
1* 
M
•• 
*
n 
at
* ,
* 
' C
• 
i x
4 
1
j
c
: 
xM
-«
u»
r»
3^*4
M
-t» 
.
+ 
1
1 
'
^ 
!
1 " 
!
1 
c
1 
»•
1 » 
i
4 
;
m
M
m
m
.! i
j -
1
|
j
j
!
iii
' i
?-;
ij
i
i
1
i
1
1iiiii
i
•
•m
•»a
m-t
rj*
•+m
•*
m
•4
%*.n
**
*»~N
J
rt
ft 
•**
«
• P-sS
O 
X
< t •»
ft. •
o
j ^
•r
i ^
t
O
ft
«i
: 
ft
; *i
; v>
i *•
i _*
i ;
«
«u
' J
' A.
X
• 
O
i *-*
STRT 
V3LUF t *e*Iinr - ——
*
T
LA|
Z
X
»-2
tel
ft 
<
«
^>
m
m<
X
>-
vj
"»
C 
-1
•C
I
i
t> 0 D 0
Mlz4r
KJ
0 «l
« r
-i «j
= E
c k.
itoi«ortr*i»
lilt2i2-TfT
r?T»tcitto»o
rOLUiNt
outset 3?io«
j«»i«
S««TS
3*010
, 
! 
, 
" ' 
•
1 
i 
: 
' 
. 
.
1 
'• 
!
1 
i 
: 
' 
' 
, 
•
' 
' 
; 
' 
• 
i
1
i 
i 
i
j
i 
! 
• 
' 
j
3 3 3 3 3 S 3 J > 3 3 3 3 3 U - > 3 ^ S 3 3 0 3 J 3 3 3 3 O J 3 3 3 3 3 T J !
•
* 
* 
*: * 
•
»- 
y 
«u 
*-
fcj 
««i< 
J 
;< • <r\ *-. 
lu
€.'• 
*J 
«i 
«J 
^ »«* »• -o 
J
2 
O 
tfj k.- -A« 
tt *l 
^s 
»• ^ ft. fr- lu 
»-
^ W O f l 2 L » 2 
2 2 J t r ^ C * 
CX 
ft ^ O n u 
410. ,
•"fc-x 
» ^ . - i ^ i ^ » - i . > r j ^ j « c v i - > 4 i j ^ _ j X ^ O v i ^ i a c x r c 
«c T * r
i
UT 
OO1 1197
»
**
**«
Xf«
•4
Vr-
m
(W
•»«
O
1-«
0
•L
«««
i
i
1
i
i
1i
re
i »
, wi:
• »«
: wf
. »>
: _»
i «
' z«
i 2
1 ^*
1 ***i
1 •*
1 °i
1
1
!
i
!
.1
=
•c
•u*
M
t-
•4«
M
O•
^o
w^e
«.
1
!_
1!
•
h
*
•
>
1
j
I
J
1
1i
t
»
»
J
•1
55
••
m i
>- <
« <
0 1
i
:
<•i
«ii
i
irj
E
•
J
3Jt
»
.
1
*
tucJ
n
•4
E
D
;so
10
1 •-
1
i
1
1
1
i
ii
:
i
!
»
<
1
«1
»
J
i
!
4
2
S;
«
'1i
> 3 i
4 J
' 0 4
- »» i
9 0
S3
i
4
•' 4
^
^ 3
- « .
t X
• Z
I •.
' *.
r -»
L ^
J 3
• •.'
r i
- m
» i
* M
> 0 1
» o
r »
i *t
*
>*«
F»
»
1
3 3
0 r.
f t-
is tsi
B 31
.
4
M
k 
1
• *b!
*•- 
>
i^
i*;
r t
-» *
>- 
,
ft 3
P O 1
o
h« 1
- X
K 1 1
3ta«
» <3 4
M «« <
r * «
r> m »
1
1
1 
1
3=p3b =
I r
1 
1
; 
;
!
i
:
E.£t"£SI
^^c-c1
S IS 11 0 I- 11 1
a a o :> 3
• 
•
J 
*• i
i 
oj
r 
i
-j i
: 
vi
L 
X '
U •:
» 
« T •
S 
L*'
f* 
55^
J Z 
«» HI
• iu 
r r J
c z 
« a
J « 
St * « 1
1 « •< tw b C1 i
<«*•««/_<
'€>•<>• 1 X
B 3 * <* *i U
. J V T . .
> •. A U x « 1
B « *> 0 0 -« 1
* ^ * * * -* '
» «»> *\ m *\ « «
. 
'
i
! 
,
i 
i
ii !
i i
! 
1
1 
i
j
! iIj
"I
!
A =>p 3 p 3
| 
|
i 
;
; 
.
j in i «_, t: e i
j u %r 13 f» i' i
n il 3 -3 S =>
u
r 
z
»: 
1* fc>
> 
1.1 *
C
+ •!
•at a
• < T •• K/ 1
^ 
K *- M a?
^ 
&i ^ k IK
• 
J •* X 3
i * * ^ 0 rj <
n IV II «J *r ^.
. K «. • O O
M »- O M ^ •!
» A. M O Z *-
>> « «J 4> M Z
>>. •• .C *• I
tot <f> i o I
bM M •• 4 |
a z •• M *i ••
r M • » • •
••«•«-*« rj
* *» »« « *^ •«
R -* « « « -t
*: *i n »» *r
; 
:
i
1
i
i
i
1
! 
' 
! 
' 
i 
' 
!
i 
I 
' i 
!
! 
! 
• 
' 
' 
i
1 ' 
! ! i :
->3p->b-'t<r>hib = h^1br. rr k -- t> ^ D a
; 
! 
i
! - 
1 
' 
)
• 
' 
1 
• 
: . 
' 
:
j
! 
' 
;
i
t
t 
! 
i 
t
, 
( 
,
ii**********^*^***^
2t«uoot:|'ict'?c o c t o o o — cot»ot»r*e>r-t
-•• t- ir 11 1» ••> i- « o e v> «s o <•' 11 u o «-• 4? »- t- «- «•> >•> c
3 = 3 - S 3 3 3 ^ ^ - 3 3 3 3 - > 3 o r > 3 6 r > 5 3 a r > t
ill
* 
«
W IU l><
* Z T
*« »J *-
M *» x a 
*- 
••
r « t- * 
*_ 
o
U * ^ Or 
T 
• 
«-•
> O « O 
«t fc 4. 
«JM
j »- c- r- 
* j -j 
x. c:
LJ f C -1 
J "A tJ 
>• 
•-
h-Jl>u 
r: _i *•» 1 
•
> ^ ^ n 
y* n 
«•
» r a . M 
n w r r * 
*
> .u o Jt 
»* 
on* 
_i <v o o 
t^vitu
e a. c t> M « o r » o « f 2 « j 
JT*IT*J*^.U *<*>**
M ^ t t f i v » c > r » r » c < ib 9 z * <. o t •< i i r o <>• 4
i o •» m M o %• i i i « n»-«**««^ |*«*»*-*-
1 1 | p « * w O » * » t * « J « r f c » - * - X < « r * - ^ ( 1 |
r <M * » o MJ w * t f « « . » - d o o a « . & t > K « J > ' « d 4
t» • »<^i ^ M r. » * « ^ i ^ r 7 V M / « » ^ « > « « i c o t « «
ri«4nwM«ou««« « i i * * i w m * r r * * o r t ^ ^ A ^
M*OOr'4nO«000*4«M9«OO^i»0»0*««Bl«
R - « * « « » « - » « » » « ^ « V » « » » » 7 0 » * V * ^ 4
i^mmM.'nwtmfnm m .**»*» *n «*» »•» «n ** m *iK>n«nrt
!
1
i
;.
!
i
iii
i 
|
i
1
! 
!
1
1 
• 
! 
(
1 i
 
;
1 
1
L! 
' • 
>J
Q 
MOJCCT NOI 242 
MOj
•• 1 
J»T( 
TIPU
f 
STATION M9 ——— M*f» —— --»*-- —— -- • - - - 
t«
TO 
0*T
—— ——————— - 
———— ..__....._- 
. 
- 
- 91
*
£ 3CPTHI 0000 
SUISTRtTtl IQUtOUS
••'• 
Nl»R IJTO Rt»«tR MORKS
V
«
*
*,—— 
- ---
* -
I
t 
...... ._ .........
•
•
• 
' 
- - -- '
•
IDNPLCTfO/1 
'.»$!$ «£»0»T
IfCT lUtttl TURPEHTINt RUN
. ,..,. ....-„„ ,.„
11)02 
«94*« »CB-12«2
!«)00 
PCe-12.8
j9S09 ^Ck*1269
34*13 MfTMfL fR3Ml3r
3*311 
CKLCMCETHtNE
34*13 HfT«Ttt»»! C»*L9tj;«
3*toi if i-DlCHLl»fif TMTI.SN'
***•)« lt 1-OICILORCf TH»1f
32103 1 I2-OTCHLOROE TH«1F
3 J J 0 2 C«C83^ Tf T ^•CHL'HrLF
3*5»l U 2-CICMLO»PPRO»>S1<t
s«»si i»*-MiH-.3Rr»»of rieitt
3»a«u *f»it»«fc
32115 
CHL?430Ii*3HC*C^^*lt.c
3*Ml 1 1 1 ti-T*iCr«L 3<iif fH»m;
i211* 
t'OMCFC'N
3«*1» 1 •! »t •^-T(fT»«Cnl3»Of T^»"t
3*013 T3lUtN!
J*JT1 eT>«TL»SNI"Hr
3*5«ft 2-CMlQROPNttjOl
J*»»l f-1« f»CW«f««t»t-
3*40« <»4-b!M«tMVt*NFit9t.
3*101 
2,*-3ICML3*Q»i»i«(DL
3**S^ >-CMtO«0-S-CkcSOl.
> 
•
RFPCRT OtTft IT/12/1^
UNIT? 
C
US^l
J'./L
• •- U'.'l
UI/L
Ui/L
U-./L
U'J/L
UG'L
t 
UO/L
• 
U5/C-
U3'1.
US 'I
U5/L
0',/t
Ul/L
urvi
UC'L
o'./t
UC-/L
U3/L
L'i'l
U*-/L
U'i/L
ur,/L
UO/L
UC'L
U;/L
fCHrSTITT 
VSLU? t »E*«K
T3T«L
TOT41
TOTIt
T3T»t
T?TIL
TOT»L
TPTIt" - - 
- 
-
T C T « L
T3T«t
TPTIV
TOT1L
Tf T»L
tr TAL
Tr T*t
T O T « l
T3T»t
T O T » t
T-T«L
TOT1L
TPTtL
T?T«L
rrt»L
T?TH
T71IL
T D T A L
TTTIL
TTTIL
TfiTtL
TT
U
"IT
U
- 
IT
U
U
U
- 
-rp
U
"D"
6.3
u
u
utr
u
•j
rr
llI'
u
. .. _. ..^J.
•J
•Jn
1.'
1 •
•
4
II-•
0
•
0
II•
----- •
^
M
... .... •
»
II"
•
•
•
II
.-•IV
pr
Bt
Pi-'
It*''*;
•
9 
PROJECT NOI 2*2
1 
OATl 
Tint
« • *• • -*»* »-^ ________ »»^^ 
^^
^k 
* T w» A IfH 
Ww —— " —— ~lTw™ " • • - - ^w 
- - -
TO 
D*Y
• ._..;„_....___....
•
0*•
• • ...__.__.. .........
• — ---- — ••— - - - -•
»
.'
•
•
•
• i•
•
• ~- • ••••"•-
• i
• 
- • • - - - - - -
9
COKPLETE3 ANALYSIS RePORT
PROJECT NANEI TURPENTINE RUN
LAINO 
P*R10 
PAfAMCTft NA*t
346IT 4.o-iltNirRO-9-CRESOL
34 »M t-JlTROpSfNTr*'""'
34571 li'-OICHLofoimEN!
343)6 Mf X»CMLntnt H«Nf
3*551 l'2!'-T»If*LO«o"3:t<'
342T3 ali(£-CHL3»0£TMTL) ET.
3444T tIT*04CNif!(>
3*42fl K-NlTPOSCOI-N-PP^PYLA^l^i
J4JOO ACeMPHTMTL!*:
39TOO M*X»C'IUC«0'>f lft':i
344(1 PMcMNTHKf Nr
3*220 A<tT^*AC'N*
j*j*l OtHTIMTL 'HTHlllI?
34212 luTTL 8'KfTt ^hTi«t«TI
3»100 BT$C2-ETHTIMJ»TL) PHT^l.
3*320 CH«Y5fN'
34641 4-CML?RrPHE.'4tl OI'rNYi. i. T .
3424T 3E*2.J4A)PTIiE«*
L'lttTS
JJ/L
U&'L
U;'L
UC/L
oC/L
U » / L
•ll'L
Ji- /(.
t '/L
U'/L
Ul/t.
U',/t
O.'L
UC/t
•JC/t
•JG/L
u ;/L
tr-.n.
RE
CHJ»IST»T
TCTtL
T3TIL
TOTAL
-Trrm
T O T A L
T ; n i.
TOT«L
TOTIL
t C T » L
TCT«L
TCT«L
T~T>1
TOML
TPTtL
TOTAL
TCT»t
TOI«L
T T T A t
TfTIL
T"3T*l
T7TIL
T T T k L
TOTIL
T O f J L
Trrst
T C T f l
T.TTst
TtTIt
-• *• v r
PORT OATEI IT/12/22
»ALUE t »et«»H""
U
U
w
u
TT 
-
U
TT
U
U
"0 ———— ~
U
•ri —— • ——
U
U
J
I!
V\l 
• --
II
•- 
tr
•j
i;j
V
" • ».
i1
u
AC
^
1
n
—
•>
-
n
(
i
K
I
TOO 
mi
• 
*-» O ^ ^m 
U
, ™ 
limn 
. 
i 
I
1 > V * 
i
< • - « » , 
' 
I
us-* 
. • 
j
• ' 
c 
. 
!
• 1 0 » 
I
i . o 
' 
' 
!
• > o
i 
|S2 
! 
:
JSS
.»• »0
' »* 
; 
i
*"* 
! 
'
"|"s
* 0 *
<£ "i
! 
f
C
rr 
i
' 
§ 
i
*
Oi
o*
» 
1- 
"» 
O 
T L* cj
. T O 
r n 
C *
f 
<* 
/ i 
T 
W r «7
' r» 
M 
m 
11 x »
r* 
*» 
JT
'_' 
^
C C C C 
C C C t t C w ' C C C C I C . Q C ' C C C j e e c C C C
.i u «j -j 
. j :» • -p o > o «> 'J J •> «J --: > u 1 o o o a o -
; 
' 
1 
!
'• 
' 
' 
:
1 
i 
; 
: 
: 
;
.
I 
'
, 
.
1 
. 
i
1
: 
: 
: 
• 
, 
•
j 
i 
' 
i 
,
t
. 
r ^ c s 
c c ^ c c « r - ^ c c c « | C ^ e e c « j c c e c
1 
' 
' 
' 
1
, 
i 
i 
i 
!
i 
• 
' 
! 
' 
i
1 
_ 
' 
m • 
1 
' 
'.
M
i
i
i
\
\ 
'•
',
:552;^2
T 
X O K
or -
•n c r
r- o .
n » i
vi *
m ^ v
4* £
3z a
iH r* «
HI
jc cc ese c
i?^^^? ;
[ 'j a o a o c
t
1
1 
:
!
;
i
cc c c c c
i
:
i
i
i 
'
\
»
i»
u*
Eu> >4 w u-
;^ri
0 O 1 V*
•-••«-> |
-«-« X CT
? o 3 a •
-t -4 » 19
O O CJ 4
i-r- .1 *
e e IT J
-»4 x a
' " s iZ c*
i 
*
'
1
c el c G
Ci .1 0 vt
S^o "*
i
i
'
cc^cfl
^ :
^
• 1
1 >
» i 
-v
« 1 
IV
j : 
o
1 ! 
fll
C 1 
O
•x0
- 1 0 
*•
-« 1 1 »
O < » -* 
M
: m »
1
o t -* !
* 9 **
nt
j
I
,.
/
•x.
C
X
1
i
1-4
V*
«-*
M
a
i
; 
^ 
i
5
*i
r.
^ 
}
m
fc
3 
• -
i
>
0
;
'-v
X
<
1
,
»
r
i
t.
C .
»AGC 
»T
COMPLETED »N»im$ »ICO«T
MOJICT NOI 2*1
DATC
-•»•-
TO
0»T
MOJfCT NAMfi TuRMNTlNt RUN
1*1*0 
MRao 
PAIUMtTf* H*""*
0»Tfl DT/12/22
BUTT* CHJUISTtT
TILUf
3*S01
3*5*6 1..
->f »•»• -CtttORP'^t*
32103 1 , 2 - O I C H L O K
i»lil-T*ICnt9«6*THtHf
3 « l f C
3*>tl
3*475
3*010
3*::i
3«J'l •
3*606
i«»>2 »-CMt«fft-»-Ct«J?t
J*M» 2i«-C
3*6)7 *,»-C
3*Jfl
i*S36
Mf HtC-LOtOtTrtlN?
3*6*6
Ufi/L
UC/L
UC^t
UC/L
15/1
Ut/L
Ul'L
UC-/L
O'./t
U:-/L
uo/-.
J'.'L
U'»fl
J'-'L
U'./L
UJ/L
U7/L
TPT«t-
T3T»L
»r
JG/L
Of/L
US/L
TOTItr-
ror«L
T1t»L
ICTIL
TfTSL
TOT»l
TOT«t
TOTIL
T-rr»V
Tt'TU
TOUL
ICTfL
t!
iJO
U
U
rr •-
u
U
J
T?It t
irrtL
T^T»L-
T3Ttt
TPTll.
ftti.
TCTU
T T T t L
fCUL
1.0
y- 
— -•
i Tt -
l<
It
rout
-T-T»T-
II'
4
BI
PAGE 
*l
COMPLETE: < 
YJIS »SPO»T
«E»O*T OATEI 17/12/2;
PROJECT N0> I»l 
PROJECT SAME! TURPENTlNf RU«
I 
OATt 
TIME
TO 
DAY
34*08 ISOPrtORIM*
—————————————————————— — ———— 
— 
- - 
3«»»T »I»*fl«*rEHf 
' — -
————————————————————— ——— .-....-._.. .-.. - -5«,^y *-Trrtfonn>tPtf>»T.«HHc~ -'— -
3-. ' : ltS(2-Cr1L3ftOI<OP*OPYL> rT.
3420& ACE N*P*»TM?Nt
3,9700 Nt XACHL*406E ^?e*' r
—— _.. ....._... —— . — 
- 
34i1» «-B»OH3»»f NYL P»MYL fT.
J4*'l 
P>*( NANTHtfNE
_-......_...... 
3*2»2 SUTYt 4P1ZYC »HY^»J.«tF
j't't H!nJIf1T!IJ5;F
t'
TL> PHT"U'
:*jro CH.Y.'N-;
i46*l *-C-L"«JPH(£k»L ••tFNYL tt.
3 4 5 5 6 1 ( ^!i t&-3IoE V ' A X T > 4 K ' - C r . i E
34631 3( ? •-^IC1lO•?*^l«t Iff *'
1 
34»2c Ztt-riNIT^OTiUOEN!:
— 
-
-
-
-
•
• 
34611 2,4-9IntTt:tT:iUfY.
34346 1 , i-JI^MeNYLHrC»'IlHC
.... —— ....... ... -. 
39.30 >LO*I«
313*0 CIEL1«I«I
•JHTTS 
1
Ol'L
UC/L
1.--./L
Ui/L
U5/1
US/L
.G/L
un/i
oG/L
UI/L
U'./L
J3/L
Li/'.
I'G/L
-I/I
sT. /I
U'./L
u":/l
.r./!.
O^'t.
U-./L
U5/L
TCTIL
Y1T»L
T7TIL 
"
r?tu
T O T « L
TCTIL
T P T A L
tcm
f C T « L
Ttrrnr •
T.'TIU
mm
T-JT1L
T T T 4 L
T"TIL"
T - T A L
TCTtf
T T T I L
T".TiL
1 >• 1 1 >.
r-'T'.L
YCT-l
roTit
Tifet - •
TT - 
- -
U 
1
U
u
u
u
- -_— 
- -•- —
u
•Jr ~"~'i
cr— 
- • - —
'j
U
u
".i 
M
U
(I
J
u 
M
w
u
- ... 
y 
———————————
U
J
J
Tt 
•
J 
1
r 
.
II «
II
•«C( 
4*
ill
ill
11 1I
5 1
COMPLETED ANALYSIS REPORT
^ 
PROJECT NOI 2*2 
PROJECT NANCI TURPENTINE (UN
' | 
5ATI 
TINS
A 
ITA4IOW-N8 —— *MM- - »P - 
- 
L»«HO 
PARNO 
PAR««TER wA»f 
MKtTI 
C
W 
TO 
0*Y
- - - - - - 
- 
»»!}»* J»}t» «t«*-009 
" 
uC/t
3*34t ALP** tNOosui.''* 
b', /L
» 
- ——— — -_ 
. —— . — _ 
........ 
)*346 iff A f MOOStnf «fc 
UC'L
3*3?1 tMOOSULPil SULFirf 
UG/L
0 
3*3A» ENbHIN ALOCH'^E 
UG/l
'
•
«
»
•
—
•
• 
M
W
V
39318 »fTA-*HC 
jG/t
0 
3*259 orLTA-*HC 
j-J'L
jltri rcs-ioi"* 
U?/L
* 
]'!*! "»."K 
oi/t
' • 
31S08 »>:8-12«..'1 
U'./L
OCPTN: oooo 
SU*STK«T.
C: »:ufuus
J*»l? "O-'TMYL "BrHT.r 
UG<1
A 
3»1T* VII»Yl ChL3*13" 
U5/L
?*311 ;iLO*0£THJNF 
Ui"/l
£ 
J»S31 1« l-GIC«lO»3f-TMY»FNf' 
U&'L
' 
1 
3 * 5 * 4 1,2-TxANS CIC "Lr S1ET 1TL Fut 
J'. /I.
0 
JJ1»O CMLO(P'Ot1 
UC'L
32103 1,2-DKHLOftPtTHANF 
O G / L
^ 
12192 CARSON T(TRtCHLP«IUF 
» > / L
~ 
32181 BtCHt(»ROS»U"3'«tTt«»l« 
'JS/L
3*5*1 1 , 2-DIC"Li)*OP»CPiNt 
L-'L
0 
~ 
S*)Sl 1> J-OTtrtlJMHO^TLEW? 
t'1'1
J91J3 TRICMLORJf I*"LeN5 
oi'l
"1
• 
. - - - . -
REPORT OATEl
tf"HTfY 
VilU*
TPT«L
T^TAL ' ' - 
-
T "Tfcu
T TT*L
T:T»L
Tirst
T-Tf v
Trm
llttt
T O T t L
T1TJL
TnT«L
t JT«L
T1T1L
I2t«L
T-T«t 
- 
- 
-
TCT*I.
rrr;..
IT/12/22
E »c<nr»r 
—— •-
. 
p —
u
uu
(1
u
uu
u
u 
M
0
u
1J 
"
I' 
__ _
J
• :.;:;->
^
>
*j•)
j 
«
r
<
<
~~ 
<
i»I^
s
m
O«
•.
' 
]
I
'
1
»
.T/U/1|(
•I
41
«o
^
•ro
ft.
IU
^
•co
ft
IV
•e
v»
m
^
e
Ml^
•IJ1
n
i>
t
K*
u
taJ
i 
m
I 
*
i
L
M
K
IAt.
I 
"-
,
K
=1
•(
tt» 
1
X '
K 
;
X
mti
2
•*
X
4 
A.
X
0 
X
Ml 
«1
^ 
»
o 
^
•r*
1
'
«• d >•
*• ; °
i 
•
M* 
MI:
** 
^ 1 1 O
* 1 t *-
•. 
ei .
oz
^
O 
4 1
in 
; :
^
o 
; E
•c 
< i
*. 
1 1
i •
i •
* i
i
j
a a L a 1
1
!
i
! 
i
o o p c-. i
>- •- C>- J
,
IU
U. * 
1
t <*
• *
r »-
u> D
X •
O O 
4
X 
_> 
1
0 JC 
1
5 « r J
" * or
•; 0 t- 01
X Cl 4 «. J
;-r:r
«\e
»»
^«
;
» 
p a a =*
i
c. |
o '
: "o" S?l
f
r
K
L r
1 «U
• *- 
tu 
ra ,
k u* 
X *> Z i
- o 
ui k w.
U « 
•* »• T I
-a 
z M ft.
-1 
«. * 0 <
K T %* tf V * 1
• u F r. •> o i
- *- j -j r o ;
i 
;
* 
'
; 
;
ii
i
,
i
i
i 
i 
' 
' 
'
1 
1 
; 
• 
•
I 
i 
! 
! 
! 
i
BS,3L,s,,,L,,3Lia,-.L^^----.
1 
: 
' 
* 
7"
i 
' 
i
; 
i
i 
j
• 
*
• 
• 
i
!
 
! 
! 
i
•) c* t o O C.T t e • C1 C1 i_ j 4_ t *" -"j C- Ci C *- t i" o r* o c o o f c~. f
•
• 
j- 
^ «i(
t 
w 
•*. * 
t
*• 
•-. 
** 
•-
u 
• U 
X * . ^ ^ * ^ 
•
j 
Z f c - r 
•» JP -* o
Ci 
_ * 
u u 
^ * M > « 
* J
I ft- u- l^ « u 
• tT 4. ^. > o 
»- ». 
( • • ^ w T H 
(^
O u »• *• «r % Hi oc Or, r o « o o « u o « - o p * > - » 
O «
z i r c t ^ - w o r x T r f - u j x i o T « ^ * n T e c ^ * - ^ c *
t 
,
,
i 
;
i
.
1
I
', 
',
: 
i 
;
' 
' 
' 
1 
'
1 
i
> 
1
1 
.
1 
.
1
1 
! 
. 
.
Tur
I ••
II
.1 -
c.
I
r
.1
_. -r. .-
41
r,
II
n
n
n
- -—14141 ---
n
.a
n.a
lli.l
1MC.1
i/'.n
- - »*3l.rfM01 >»»»f
}M»-fH«lV ««»£
> otctc
>CC-.>'t OZCof
i<ij-. »•» OCfif
OiCtf
ooitf
*lfl«tO+l4 11130-N-H) »»<»f
iiir.9
i/sn
-T/tA
i/sn
iiMjMia i»f»s
' ']
I > <
XAJkJt 1
SllNA
*»0 
01
live
»<n« |NUN14«(U
into**
(*i ION mroiu
rz/it/ii iiito
1»0<>« SISAKN* 0]1}14MO]
1C
OO 
ini
« o 
4
•* 
, *•
! 
t 
[ 
j 
.
1 
,
1 
j
II
!
.
!
iii
i 
'
i
1
!
i 
i
, 
i
1 
i
!
j
1
l X > - * X - 4 < 3 C * - » X « O" 
<"» * 1 X ** » 101 
t II X Q -« X
cj
t
rii
4
:
«
ji
r
i
• ii
(
• 
i
c
'
^
IX
1 .
1
*
1 &
» *»
1
.
***
1
1
a
-
o ,
•
1
i
j
1
•
i
• i
! »
• f
• » 
V
1 1 
*
II 
0
1 
°
a « -t 
M
. m 
0
i "
* ? ** )
»••
1
!
, *
o 
• 
r 
o
i
»
— ; 
« »4 « .* a
m 
>M f « » rtui
* 
» • • • * • « • • < .
-41 
a ,D »* o> a f»
X 
• 
> 1 » 1 
1 1
r- 
r* f j ^ l\» r«f rj
* * 1 _» « !T
n 
i a i" sf •»« 
r-1 * 
x > o « » ^ -3 
t-»njT'np-«»-»5u
« 
-^a 
o/r 
* r- o •? »• c •* 
r at a »
** o 
»» » 
*»i :r :r '.» » 
'*i 
a
11 
*f n 
2 
***;? 
•* 
m
•^ 
*« 
o 
ti 
a
x 
•<
-T 
^
'•' 
2
1
d c c_ CT CT c <. r t ^ c r* * j t c ^ c c * ' ^ c c i t _ / ^ t _ c ; c c* c. c
« :
i
'
"*•
m'
mc
A
,
c- 
c r c q c c c c
«. 
: 
ct ,TI «.| c» o c> t»
I
i 
j
i
i
• 
• 
•
H 
<»
I 
i 
!
c ^ e s . - . J i • c e e 4 e « ^ U c ^ < S c : s d e c
' 
^
 
l 
\ 
1 
=
i 
! 
'
: 
! 
i 
i
 
: 
; 
i 
i 
•
,a 
i 
. .,: 
I ,
cc),,
1
1
s
^ 
r
.
i
t<=
1
c
i
1
r r]•
i
i
ee
n r- r
^
»•c:
m
,,
1
: c cjc c
i 
:
! 
I
1 
'
r*l»
'. 
1
' 
j
's
: 
'
 
;
1
1
1
1
}
t
1
«
r1
m
^
m
1
-*V
t
v»
*
1
i
j
JCm
O
w
O
r i
»
X
V
,
Cl
IP
z
-r
<2k
. & -. & r. p -j :i •-
! « > . J . J . J _ J . J l J _ J - J - l ~ / - « .
• ci e • i F o r t c o t o c- c c-1.1 r- o t i • o t-> u c r. n r r> •• CM
»-*->-»-f-.->-.-!-.-K>-»-.-!-.->-.-»-»-t-.-t->-t->-».«-»-»-»-l
^- 
- » - » - »
tt 
! 
«o c
rt?t
O C t* t9 O t? '^ IS C t> I" L" i^ O ' " « • • « . * - C C* **> *-" t* O IT 'J ti O ^ '.» ».*' U* C O 43 »• •- 1* ^ '-'
I 
I
o
_< M.
t «.
41 O
r *
» 0
•I C
no
.j «i
C K
w »-
•« 1
0 «
1 •
•4 ^
« «
j
«i
W Z 1
fc »
1 01
T * 1
»•
C.»-t i
1:
*.-.
*• « in
*> 
* i. 
V !•' ^- »-*
i* 
, T r ^ 
»- it 
^. >• ' 
* M n K r
> z 
T K r k -i o 
r r 
«. 2 e n M
t c « c » - r > o o t * C ' i z o o % M C i c J f i o «
-o e _> **i -j *. « » « 4 J ^ _ j k r 4 o o ^ «c v
- «» * x k v O c » _* i T t at «^ *« x c^ r-
r rcaouwpi-j*- «wu «r ^ O o t j ^ «c
Uu«CMM*-ifc 3 « xi 1 C » J t t C r i I C-
»*i»-ouA«j^«»-<w'4 r o ^- *- *si o w
>- ^ i i i m + * r w w £ » t a » « w « t
9 .«*-*»•• *^ *c K»tfa.****r*»»c * *» f< u
» •« ff » * » f t « i U ' * « » « k 4 i M » 4 f f I •• ii* •
• r^«r«*« « « >«•«««« ••»r>«-nr««#4
-
>•r*-
Ta,
z
o
0
^
K'
C
»- w-
r x
& »
•« or
Z S
U -1
«t •«
*-
c
4J
O
•eej&
«
»i
o
«•
111
>-
1
c.
V
T•.J
z
Mr
i
O
*
i- MJ
^ «
•i * 
&
t
U' ->
0>- J
f
t T »•
tt»- t
X mj >-
a* *• C 41
t » »< 11
«• O M «
4 * « «
*-
*.
V
»-
• •1
Z1
M
C9
r
u.
« 4
^ •
« 1
X 1
* i
u- 4
<0i
t
J^ :
^
31
•*^
+ 4
I
> r
- &
•
c »•
f T r
*- »-
1 Ml X
1 1 «
: wo
« «.J
» e «
» c- •«
' »•
fr-
it *
u »
•J *J
« £.
* »•« c
c z *
U* » Mj ^
Z >»«0 -1
H. >• 1 «.
•r «c •« v
»• * « T
» O O M
:;-!
603 T 
TOO 
.i.n.1.
m
i
i
i
i
ii
j
l» k* U
» « V
•• •• 1
l*> O **
e» •» o
1 t
** •• w
'•M 
»^
O • U
c t- «
.1 Cl -
> cj -
r- t- r
'
C C ,
i 
!
i 
'
: 
,
M
» •« N* * » <d 4
• •»•»•« -o -« *j
r
et a nt u M r
i i i i » -
• ^ •*•*>- -V|
» K» i« *N» a z I
» .-4 r# »- » Z 4
*f» f
i:-;s^.'if,i
M-r-. 
^ ^r
> • -> j i o r> •,
-
c -j e a c e
;
 
:
. 
:
J> 4
• r. ii
• a H
I X •
> » i
i ii
t i n
>«^
ft G
f °
G «
» sfl ^ 
J>«
» T x n
« •• -v
X -« -* '
»»*.!"
1 r» *•* J
i r- O »
r o ir r
* 
cn
m 
1
•» 
^
o
M 
n
• «u
•»
C C C C
tt Cl T '
^r-rr
,
c d e c
I
t
'.!
•
!
i
i
k « » r •
» fw •» CU »
» 0 » 3
• *^ M» •
1 JS C •"
f * 1
» 3 A
• 
» O C
» 
x •* n
• 
i:. vi
v«l- 
G
i i; T r
l •• «. i
' 
1 4 •
"• 
X
^
••
• C T i- «.
'^?r ^
1C ^> ') CJ
t -« -t -< -I
'
,
c. <qc c
i
iiI
a -4
» «
»I i
a c
o c
rj n
c c
f J -
4 -«
cc
J> 4
4> r
> <ci:
e •
-S
r- e
1
0 5r;
c c
1i
!1
•
;
i
!
'
i
.
* * *a 4
> o » x n
1 i~ « i H
i c •-* o :
i * *
M 
r
t X 
I
1 
M
»a
T
M•
a
ci*
; c: c: c c
I 0 C3 O ^
1 -^ -^ -^ -
r
1 w •
' • f H
1 
1
Mut-!
|ii
M
I 
i
1 
!
i
1 
!
! i
i 
,
i!
1i
1 
i
,
••»«•««• j
' >- M »- H Ps* t
1
~ 1 1 1 1
»* «« a O o
1 1 *« 1^ M M C
•<»»•»« z»
•» r» Jt -* « r
2 n <"•«•» j
K» •* x * « r
t o r •* a oc
» -nc f •< H >
r- o x o o c
1 0 » 0 C C n
i » m n t m 4
•^ if 
c
X X Z 
-
f»- »» n. 
3
e. 
"
! c- c c. qc- c
O n r> o t3 •
•»-«-•-«-*-
•
' 
'
: 
j
c t^c c e ,
!
i
1i
i
j
ii
i
i 
'.
\ 
i
1 
;
1
|
:
1
«
«
Ul«
»>
» * • « • » »
( •* M • •*
>fu •» Z •»
« ~ •» K ,•*
>• > o a
i • <• -. i
»•«»•».
!A4;r
• i-><3 ^ ••
> <• * w •
i « m m t«
1 Z • Z 1
f » r- •
Z "» 
-3
» -« 9 
^
!X "1
*• 
•»
!
» 
• 
•<
It 
„
.m 
t*
X 
X
r* 
-«
i
t C C C C
» t. .1 k. 0
1
4 -« -4 -• -«
> 13 -3 0 a
«-< H -« ^
I
1
1 
i
i
i
1
I 
,
: ac q
I 
!
1 
' 
i
1
3*"
1 •
« 1
• i
I i
; :
« i
* I O
-« 1 1 »
0 ( 1 - 4""
!
o . ,
-?;
**S
!
1
r-
9
Xo
V»
)•
X9
•»»
<*;
5
3
4»
4
c
2
3
„.t
mJ
wl
-1a
"
t
<
r-
C
11
i 1
3i
iiii
«
o
«.
mo^
zo
•f*
X
ra
3*
C
X
j
I
1
1
1
1
1I
r»a
X^
••
-5
J
§
M
*
•»
o
^
J*
(«^
O
J*
•^
O»
•H
m
••
-4
X
t*
U*
<
|
1
.
1
i
i
!:
,i
i
••»
o
m
10^
^
S
^
..., 
Ln.i. 
. * 
,-i
' 
• 
'
1 
i
i 
' 
'
;
- 
1 
|
i 
1
1 
:
1
1
|
9TXx,xr+z*oirr~ 
~« 
— T 
Of* 
-« o o »» r- CT T 
r:
.*» M M f* 
n • o O •* V Z 
r" 
f- r- 
•» -t 
Z •* * ~« O ** " 
O J
JE 4 z 
»* 
-n r* r- 
-• 
* * 
X » 
I - ^ * « I X » » L J » I
rni^m 
O 
Z 
X 
n c 
• I 
t* ^ ^ u» » 
n*
f 
o 
•« 
- « ^ - w .t 
4 « Z 
•*
' 
1 
-4
fT 
- f,
(W
.'r---^-^-?---^p (i- I>p : (i f>?-^?- 1ip-p 1i--?p : |:
j j o i i o i j o i j ^ ^ o j o o o > ' ; f » o - > -»^j « o ? o a o <a o o u
t 
• 
!
j 
' 
!
i 
- 
; 
;
' 
! 
'
r 
> 
— 
-40
: 
'
\
*"• •- 1 " f» - ^ - -T - -4 ~ - " "t-*- . : c 3 '•i^ccc 
cj c c — <a c ^ 
c
i 
i 
i 
j 
. 1
;
 
! 
• • ' 
: i
1 
!
1 
i 
i 
I i
- 
! 
• 
' 
i 
' 
1
j
!i
(
,T:
1 1
'we c»i!»ti(
.MLOSOtTMTl
-^
• c c
I-H
i?;
c c
»
!
1
1
'
T? VINTL <
ill 
CHLCRC;
*- '3
r*
c c
o o
C C
4
J
4
1AH19M fll
c r
•* i
<r c
*' C
•1 L
-« -
C C
w
1
1
J»5
4
?!
>
f
>
r
f
:
»t
t
I
!
f
u •
oc
C X
l\
•+
o
1
'
i »
• •
1 1 
m
;: 
«
X
i 
a
O * -4 M
?™ 
J
S*2
• " ii
i
V
, »
r- 
a
-ic»
m
zm
C
» 
1 *
C
j
1
< 
-
f*
«-»
« 
;
« 
j
i 
j
.
,
m
o
-«
X
X
fw
*
1
i
i
t
i
i
i
i
[
1
Ui
5.
^
! 
i
3 *• » ^ * * » » » * * * * *• *• *•
* * * » • * • » * •
^ »* Q O> »* (^ *• l> *- -« U- «~ » O 41 Cf O O* r* Oi**»G«-9O«*l» O**4l<*WU»^a.«MO»»'fV
F**t**«rvr..4««*»«n.*«*i«n-«-t, i * c > » i ' c * o » ' v ^ x ^ » » f v 4 M ' a ; c x » « < * 9 a r » » x
» •• « • • • • • • ewt ~M t w f^r~i^^rZr+**f+ff 
t . n r * r + r * » A * * • i .^ L» ^ >^> •« . •• 
'
J« » ^ » » i * f x , i - 2 O f > R . * < » ( C t 4 i -• r r * x ~ < * 9 » ' r > m r * < ' i > 4 f x * - 4 c
^- I t I I » - » P * ' » - ' » J | - < ' * C - ' - S Z ' - « r H m ^ X * ^ C X - t X » * ' * - 4 ^ » » / 1
M»^t»oo(j l v > i o v r » ^ z x- .•« i r* r x - 4 M * c i r t j * » »r~r^^-^^a^.*
« I •• ^. ^ *-» ^ • ' « ^ O U ' * n t > t * • J 
V - 4 1 » « i z m V • O 3l * * « t » O i
J » 2 ' « < > » « ( r n i » ^ » ^ ? 
* - r r o ^ c f - < r t ^ d ' " a x 4 * r > o O 3 m * «
* r ~ X + - * i % l X * ~ ~ * O * * * 
_ « - • - « » - « 
r - ' C a V - l ' W H ' ^ O ^ X M t A a o
^ • ^ ^ ^ J O ? « - » J ^ r » l j : 
n - 4 f - r « f " a w ^ r n r 4 o 
ra^»U3^On|rt:
m « » r - T » i - « 
^ -4 •« 
- « - « C - 4 O ^ T n *
mz 
.X».K r- * 
9 -• t * ^ x ^
^•"'tr''*^ 
m*i; 
m *it j« f **»
x "i » "*» 
r*
-« 
-^
J •* 
4
o r- -«o o o <
. c XM • •
•« •<
a r
a r
) r- 9 r
iw • c
« a -
•??:
C c
-> c c c c c * 4 c c c - c e c t - c t e . t c c c e - c c c i c c c c e - a c c c c c q c g c d
-^ .T « .-» ci .1 .» ». ci ...» r. i» .-> n ti .1 e- i> o vi ,1 ^ o wi n n ^^ t> -•> o t> o o .•> o tl r> <? o rt
> x x x x x x x x x x x > x x x x x x x x x x x S x x x x x S ^ x x x x x x x x x
r * f ~ r - r - r - r - f * r - r - r - f r r * i - r - » - r - i ~ r — r-r-f-«'»"r^i-r'r-r-r-H»~r*r'r"f-rf»-r{r-r i
; 
- 
i 
( 
1 
' 
•
]________,,___________________, _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ^ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
,
joo > ci j <4 j i-j ju 3 O ^ * * ' J 3 o t > o r j o o o i 3 r j - t ( j ' i j j o u o j o 3 ^ 3 o c j
^r H r
r* r- r- r f r - r * r p r - r - r - r - r f f * - i - * - r r » r - r - r - r * r - r l r *•
-. .4 -- ^ w .J c. q c. c; --: c
H
ct
c d <
oa»f
2 
'
3 
«
:
TUT
ooi 1211
f)'
«0
"^1
-
1
i\
i ..".' :;
r.
M
p
... r.
n
1 
~~
n
n
...._. _ 
n
0
——— -. 
A
n
n
. . . __ Q_ . 
...
— i 
n
c 
n
-i 
n
n
n
'" 
n
n
__ —0-.
n
•^ 
——— 0 ————
w 
n
W 
n
— -a
— 
. i«i»j£ j inn* 
4
ll/Zt/H lll«0 14041I
fc
lUCi
Ill-l
11131
UlLi
lllcl
1V121
•>•!*.!
11101
11131
17111
... O41O1
IflOl
Ulil
1»101
1HJ1
Dial
1I1C.1
1(131
1I1U1
11101
,»11J*J».3
1
i/rn
i/'j.i
l/vn
I/CO
i/ on
l/S.T
i/tn
i/t.i
1X50
ix (.n
I/in
i/in
i/an
•>/'.n
i/ar.
i/vn
i/ in
ly-'fl
ixsn
i/an
i/sn
i/nn
ixon
•
•
?N»M50«ClwDI SI- 1 * t ' t '0$»£ 
0
]NfMi^g)tClH3lO-?'t 
fOIZC
MUCJOIIOlM} *lUt
j^Mii i_nMniui z ^^ t f f •AfcfcC
• CIk«ilH3 liNlA (ll(( 
__
90 1»niMJ lAMliu •!**{ (•(!«« 
. . . . 
.
sniartiT i3it«is>os 
oooo it-ida?
Uil-834 «*»»f 
- 
- 
- . . . . _ _ *
Jl.a*44K01 Ot*4<
aJAHJJlV N I MQN3 99i^f
f>I40kfl 04S 4T 
^
J1VJ1*~S hr^insOCh? TfiCtC 
g .
BOG~»*'9 C2Ci(
3N»0*01li3 OS£»£
xuonio 0ve*c i«cuo 
— - 
- - - - - - —
1»0 
01 
_
>Htl 
11*0 
|. i
nn» jNiiNiriini iiM*k i3arg»4 
m JON i:irot4 
*
KOtflll SIttlVN* CJ1114U03 
^
IS
• t
CP
TOO
=• 3(3 3<=
t • 010 r. c c o c to o c- i, c, ri o o e r- i
ac i ir T in •
»
I x
ir'l'7.1
TOO l-Hl
1 
! I 
! 
1 i 
1
x a| =» D s o| 
=1 = 3! ^ aj o a=> -.- r ^, r
I 
C. «.» C3 O U C. •
c- r r> O T' f • ' i C
, 
o n o O|t? o i/» -•» i* •-•• •• •: •_* i- • •*••• ••. it ir. • ••- ••> <• - J •-• 5 c v* i* <• -1: . •> o • -. •.- -j t-- i.-» V*>,L*
' 
J 3 O . D O — r > O U • > ' » O 3 ' J 3 3 3 C » 3 J I » - > U — ^ 5 - ? - 3 - 3 ^ . • ^ 3 ^ 2 » _ > 3 - J U 1 ) 3 r 5
i
^-l
u.
Xt-
Xft
p
^ X
kW »•
C w
Z -ICJ
— x r
44.
Mh*
>-
.z
1<
_* •«
*- 3
«u& X .
0 >- J '
•• X » •
or *- X
«* A*
;i-.
r T
-< a
J ~ _>
3 a i>
u 
|c
i -iT
z
>•
r *•
.-f*V\
riNTnFf
»• >• 
< U. 
i! j: X
(* o c 
t ^; .* uj u. w z a
(j 
» j -» i 4 j i o «i -.-,-
T Z * ^ i i . f c » . t t » - ^ - J O M .
y r « - j > - c . ^ _ » o r ^ a - 4 i *s.
«& 
»a.**ioc»-»»'t'CiJr 
*-•
2.
O
tt
Z
«*
Wi
O
M-
'4
U.
*/
«
ut
Z
r-..j
UJ
•-
•ft
U'
*
at o«_i
-IT -0
T T^
.L,
°L
_____________.____ 
»A6t 
40
MOJ«CT NOI 2*2
'* 
3»Tt 
TIXE
I 
STATION HO 
' *ROH 
3'
TO 
DAY
I
^ 
............ 
. 
.._._.... ......
TUSP.HUN 
«7/10/>i 
1T15
DOT*! 8980" "IDISTflTtl AQufDUS
OESCIIPTIONI DEVCON 
*!LL «3
1
1
COMPLETED ANALYSIS «EPORT
PRnjECT NAME! TURPENTINE RUN
LAINO 
PlRMO 
PAtANETE* N*»(
j»3*C G»h«*-«MC
3f*00 T?X«PHE'IE
3««tl Pd-1221
nst>i p;s-i:6f>
0»130> 3*»U "FTMTL CiLC»I?i
3*17S *ISTL CHLmiJ'.
3*Jll C1I.O*PtTh;NE
;»*-3 NCTHTLENE CHL'.CIJJ
J*5*6 lfi-T!l<i OT;HIP»C. T^»lrNC
32103 Iti-.nC'HaKCtTrUMc
J*>T* 1 t t t I "T^ICHL JffOr TMfcN E
/2102 CtREjN T 5 T R t C^LOil I tf
J210! CICHLCK(r, J»^"J"l.r -UNT
3*5*1 i> l-dtCMLoanpsoPiNt
3 9 t ' T 
TK1CHL 0.** JCT"iYLtNc
3 « ' ' < j ^ ^ f ^ 2 C ^ c
J21**> f. ^LTSrCI^*tC*> J*fcT H*SC
3*114 
l fl t2ii-TET;A'HL3OFT>U'<c
3*31J TCLOtN1:
J*m 
C^LOROirStcN-
3»JT1 Ernt L!k ''If .'(f
L'"m 
C'
U3/L
Ui/L
V5/L
uG/l
ui/L
O'./L
uC/l
•.•5/L
j'/l
t ;/i
L--./L
O'./L
•ji/L
J'. /I
LT./L
MPO
•
NE«JST»»
TOTIL
TCt»l
TCT«L
TOTIL
TPT»L
TCTiL
TrT»L
TOTIL
TCTIL
T1TII
T i: ML
T •? 1 1 L
f ' T H
T-'UL
ITTdi
i :• : > u
T' Til
1 'Til
V'T.L
TTT U
IT DATE! IT/12/22
VALUE C n •«»•«.
"u " ~" 
,
u 
^ 
1
u 
-'•;
u 
• 
' '
_ ._u. _ ..
0 
,_i
- .. ._ll _ . . O
(J 
O
--- 
----- 
Uu
i —
u
u
u
u
uu
u
U 
i
"Y '""*
'J 
1
''1 
I
u
•J 
' 
1
u
'1 
1
;: 
n
•t 
\
• \
II
O
' 1 
1 
I
:
1 
! 
'
!
,
1
! 
• 
'
!
1
1
I
1
1
i
1
I
I
>/•»>*•>
1-4 1 1 J
1 » e* c- r
r- i-» M n
V W » J
O O O 1
: -•» i •« T
,x rt z */
r- •» r- f
» *
tf C!
Q J
*1 C
2 X
r ~
41 4
& n
a c
•« r
1 
;
j
i 
i
i 
,
1
i
o
w0
:iiJi
*A 
C »
:<n 
-wo
• x "i i
-< 
x m
- * 
t~
^«-<
»
G
e
•4 K
OC
a
-< n
r
2
C
' 
»•
C
*
! I
n
«
•
; 
j
; 
r*
0»r
2
r«
I
1
1
'
1
1
9
O
Xo
•*
z
n
x
r*m
mo
»-*
Vo
t . r - e c c - ' - c C - C C C . C C C C . C C C C C C C C C C C C I
c c r- 
I
»> o .-.
o
X
o, a o i> » ••> i j .1 > o r- .1 '-3 u j •> '
'1 tl O O O o O i 3 C» T c.'.CJ TOO
.-.:C •: .c- - -i r c •- .c c
: !c c «= c ic >; ,c
cc!c cc c 'c w c c ic c ^
i 
i
TL!T 
OOl 1216
'c >;rc cic cte cc c
ir
II
I
t
I
I •
I
r
(i
. n
d
V.
r.
it
_n
n
n
n
~r,
ii
" r.
fi
~' 
r.
H "T"
n
" rr
'? 
°
^ 
n
"iiii. i
T r 1 S I
1I1C1
in.,:
"itlCl
Vl-1
..... 1MC1
ltli.1
111C1
1 V 1 C I
1<Ui
^»l^l
"it i c i
^* i Gl
IMul
ItlJl
_ Tllwl
1(101
It li*l
Tl lb 1
Itlbl
•>fl'Jl
Hie*
1»10l
itici
Itlwl
Illul
1H01
I/ ill
1/r.n
i / •_• o
T / • • P
I/'. O
i/"o
l/Sfi.
I/up
I/ if
1/vf
-,/t.n
"i/ir
l/?r
1/5"
i/cr
i/» -i
i/sn
I/in
i/rn 
ji
i/on
~T/jn
i/on
T/'jfl 
3N:
i/tn
T/'.P
l/'jfl 
3N;
"i/sn" 
-if
T'jP
T/ifl
i/on
SllNf
Tz/JT/ii s»i»0 i»o«i»
-*Z* 
OOf»C
-93<< «b«6r
T S f t t
OS(6C
Olt6C
O t £ o C
o»f »t
1ANiN43*01H}-« £("•»£
A»C 
01
<C 
_ M£ll
JMI1 
11*0
CM
UH»K
i « Y ioN'Tjir oF<
ist«"
-
.-
*-*
! 
'
ii
.
fi
1
,
?;I*
|?S
3s^
a o .
» o ,
*w«» 5
r-c x
fn§
Q m
^1 ••
3s 3
nni "
r-c
r-v
3
*1 —I !.
a 
»
a 
jo
; 
zo
^3S :"
a a -< , w
*" It
O 
-«
» O M
-« T» X
oi 
.
1
1
» « M » > 4 » 9 r r » » r * • » • • • x n x r - r - '
» » i i i 11 -« i ii» 
i i .e 14 x -« i? i:
o f ' < i c i O i - * * O O ^ ^ O O « - -• f r- :» ri ;
C X - t M i H I I O r t M M U ( • - • • ^ ^ J W O J ' O X '
^ f O O rt O X <C 7 JV 4 4~ £ 
O W fr« rf f"* :
J J J E X X « ^ p 1 « - . e > » X - 1 ' 
» J * n 
I
j. . , 1<X»in>nf
i r »•••••• ^ ^ r -« H
O I I I X O •< X X
» « ]• »» M r» i
: OO O I X :
».»llllifl 
.'II
i ^ a » <«(<i-* r* a
o x o «• i x z -« :
^ • W - W v x I O - n 
< - » n 1. f-
r u ^ i r x ' * - * 
£ - < - « J
• ^ l O . n r - o * 
»-T'xl«
c f~ ^ c" c~ *r c. c. c. <- c f. t c" c c: <r w c* c c r ~ c c c. c: r c -c <r cr r. c «- •<" r. T c i_ e,
»- •.» o ^» * 
• r. r. bt '•' t. -.. r T. c- ;• ii .1 .T •-. ,. *» *i "• r i» '.> .» .v-.i -.'-;• ^ -•« c-!.» v» o 1.1 c» o
SJCCf
1>- cic
X 
:O
»• 
!m
M/
N
MOJCtT NOI 242
* 
0«TI 
Tint
STATION N. 
M&R 
OF
TO 
0*Y
.. _ 
...
g
1
——— . —— ——
1
COMPLETED ANALYSIS REPORT
PROJECT NAME* T'.RMNTINE RUN
.'-NO 
MRNO 
MR&lfTM M-KE
0^1313 345?I l(2,4-r«I;Hl.i:o_ iNlM:
34696 S«PHTH_LEM£
342T3 B l S C Z - C H L O R O E T M Y L ) FT.
34-74 81 5(2~C HLOBOETMO< Y ) HEYM.
344C. ISQP^SONE
34447 M TP01.*l€Mti
344.0 N-NXT*CS09I- >4-F'F >3PVt£ | l'l l |Jt:
34413 N-NT M.SOOIP HEKYL'Hl *£
34283 BI SCi-'-hLOROISOMfPYL ) cT.
34JI6 HjXACHt^ilyCYCLJpr^t •^IE" j
34S?1 _-C«L-» jNAPHrHkl* Nt
34;0- 
»CEN_PHT>IYLEN;
_ 4 _ C j 
-CE"*PlTHEHE
34381 FlOU*r:*e
_«700 H.-KHiCHOoF'IItl:
346?^ 4 ~i ^ _ **C P**C t<Y L C H ? N Y L 
rT,
.•44tl PH.NtNTHR'Nv
_4iJJ «»THR1C.NF
343*1 U l d f c T M Y L PHT-*4LiTE
3*31* 3 ! c Y M > L 'HrM-L'Tc
J911; 
? T-N- J JT YLPPl*-''k'Tt
34, 54 buT*L l£l«!YL crlT-«-L-tt
i*-1!* - J - N - " £ ' Y L 
^ H T - < « L I > T ^
19101 
- I _ C : - . - T M Y L « - < Y L ) KhT'il.
3 4 3 7 6 FL'J?t'*'*Yflf.tir
_ 4 » 6 > f > r s f s :
34.?.} CHfcriCri'
3t64l ^-CMl'SOPME'.YL 'i.NYL FY.
3 4 4 3 5 IK_*NC( 1 > ', 1-T»D 
r Y " r \ f
34:47 . F S Z O ( » ) P Y K E - . :
_4*.l 
l f l _ - * _ N l O P ^ d Y L ; M r
J4J54 1,.!5,4-JIH^ <!_'Jl-(< i.r..t
_ 4 _ 3 l 3, 3'-.:UC Hi 9- ."cM IDTi7
!4».» 
?. _-.IMT»OTOl.ur»e
J4511 
2 § *»5 1 N T T P GT . Llj e ^* •
34.46 l,2-Ct»Hr«'Y.-IY06»n'ic
34i30 !t*~SCNl3FLII-»»HYMf»!2
3»-4. 1 1 »lZ-8rNtl)FL!.iJ*lMT'<. .'i
3 « 3 ? Q -I.3P1N
393*0 JI.l.3*tN'
JMT^
Ji/L
UC/L
Ul/L
y J't
U3/L
Vi/L
UC/L
Ul'L
UG/L
y *'L
li"./L
ur./L
'j ~. / L
OC/L
0"i/L
V •"• ^ t
o ". /U
- ">/L
,'i/L
.',/L
K". /L
i, > / 1
•J'» -
J j/.
. » / L
J ,/L
.-/L
o-^/i
-i/'.
J "• / .
O'./l
L' r> / L
L''-/L
L _ / _
Lr " /L
•j •: / 1
b'./L
j-./i
y "• / L
-C-/L
n
REM»T p»Tt« »;
CUE*. HT-f 
vfu? i
TDTlL
'CT'L
t ') t 1 4.
|r; •_
T O I t L
T?T -L
T ~1 iL
TT1 ».
TC ' <L
f ''I *k
T " Y « L
TDHt
T?T«L
TTTIL
I"TIL
T 7 T \ L
rortL
T 3 T « L
T" T IL
1 " 1 -L
f 1 »L
' 1 » L
T'T.L 
1.1
t.' 1 ( .
r • i J L
T '. Y J L
r c T i L
Y - T 1 L
t 
TIL
i r r : L
T " 1 fit
Y-ML
I-ML
i: ML
| 7 » ,1 1^
Y ' T l .
r.-,r»L
T " T - . L
i - r c L
I°l f L
Kit 
6* O-t^7
r/n/iz
RL
M«*<
U 
1
- ... U . . 
J
u 
^
u 
r1
u 
•']
... u
u
J 
_j
u
. . ..Ji O
'j
u.
L' 
'~- 
.
.- 
-U- :--' ..."
•J 
r"
L'
J
- U . . 
... 
.
IJ
. u
u
M
I'
!: 
i
o
ti
LJ
0
• i
' i
V
^
•
• •
,
II'
If
' 
i 
" 
! 
s :!
| 
! 
2 -
; 
1 
j 
?
: 
1 
I! 
t
| 
*: - o
1 
'/* t 
V
: 
, 
... 
>•
; 
i 
-*
' 
i 
-•
»** 
fcj
f~ 
•.?.
i 
t, "
0*
tj 
•
-.
i
1
' "i
i
i
: 
:
•
3"''
4 i«
ca 
' m
5 
;o
: ^.
a 
!<•
14 
|0
i \:
' 0
•4 14 » 
'
rj ci ^ | K*
,
0 
-^ 
'
» a —
-< T! *
«•
r
t J
•*
y
t
J
•'•*
c
K
* •
^
^'
•* u. w •— W
^^ U« »» p^ v
• j n c» > i
f*r %> «i^ *" <
O >• ** f^ »
* * 13
* 
1 N« O
-• » A ;i
Q J X.
» 1- ^
r i o *•*
X •*» -^
r- o x
c» »
n ±
t«
- i~
1 *•
•• a
I
^
I
^
j
'•
2
^
' 
«. w u ww
^* »-•» fc- I 
t- rf
» •" 4- • < i •• r.
1 X 0 -« T T
• * *™ -i 
i^1 r-
r> *n 11 f
X *£ -« t > n
« r- pi * ..,
n. r 
«, v. ...
i~ ^>
O- 
;
41 
i
•»
W
o 
j
fzzfr.£zs;£~szzzssszz2zs
m o t v n i « . i « c » x r j | ^ T v « o c o ^ ' v J * * # - r ~ 
j
•* a tM r* j »-j „» X l 
• * * • * « " » • » .r sr c: --n tJ O 3 o
< . - . * » » .* . j ^» •»• ; "„ a <~ :». r* j ,-» 
n -j ^ iy ,-n -4 x 
'
n i - f i 
i . o JL> r~ 
» a o 
rr
*J 
3 
* ^ O'
c» 
C v*
-^ 
t 
</• r-c 
J
--j 
> 
i- r- >
*« 
p. 
fl ^ E. 
j 
n
•
O
fc.
*•«
r«^
' *w
X
••
-4
J»
•»
•«
X
n-
m
r 
c
» 
z
:
r>ax
!
o
' *
i •*
C t. •- c c a *- ^ t t. v- c c. •: c c '- c c r i ^ r.
.... t •„•,,„ 
. . , . _ • • .1 •: i t. » .•-•*-. wi .•» o - • * . o c.
r- •* »• r* i- i. tf .* .
T •— - -T - c: i, *r T t; cr c. c a ~ c r;
o
z;
o,
3D 
10
C- 
,«
C C C C C C" C
1
TUT 
OO.1. 1221
• m
c f - . i. o L r* * i
c - < . C - « - - J L .
~t 3 'I - > r
* N » L T J I 5
»*>IES
I»BNO
0 * 1 3 1 1 39314
393*0
3*259
3 » 6 T l F C L - I C
39«.Pd PC;-
3950.
0 , 1 3 1 2 3 * » 1 b
3*»l J
"tT-T .'
'•»>'* I t i - T - t ' . j LI:<*L' '•"'i'T"i»L! M
i ? 1 " s CILCh"*-"**
!H-) ; t J - l ! l H c 2 c ~ £ T H i S r
;t-.Jo i i l i l-niChLDS.'FT-;» L
3m: 
li.iP.-l TlT»i:iLti*U::
j ? i: i
Ti».l
;*-;•. i
.<M:u 
f J l C r t L J^ j::'TH»t c
3«J?,1 rfl-:iSt
3 2 l ? 5 ClLC :"JlcPO*:"-
3*>i i i. it--T»i:-iL IP:
3 2 1 C 4 jPC«2F3i»M
3 * 5 1 6 It 1 i i.i'-T'lOi'.rl
3**75 TfTPiCHLO' J I - T - Y
3*010
3 4 3 ^ 1
3 * 3 t l
J '• /1.
C ,'L
U ', / (.
U ./L
|_J , / '^
j-./L
U i ' I
c". / L
•J • / L
v, i'L
J ./I
L ./'-
-i ' /I.
U 'L
.- 
'U
J * /'-
I •/'.
L " 't
•J . / L
J'./.
L.' " f L
J '. / L
y i / _
1', TO t
T 01 «L
FL t II
T ; T s I
I •; t a L
I ' T « i
T :• T i t
:M »L
7 ' ft
I.'' 1L
I - T d ,
I ' T i L
' TT JL
• r J-
K t •• L
1 M Ji.
T- t -i
r "M f L
V1L y
»
T
. J.
II
H
o
COMLETCD ANALYSIS «e»o«r
0 4 1 ) 1 2 3*i*A
3*47* PHENOL
3*»06 I,:
3*621
i*41S *,*-
3»S57 » , » -
fcOL
J*i*6 »-
j*546 1,
HOL
••»&
J< Jlo
?*!(>1
.•'ZOO
it:. TM.
PM;<.»1 
.T.
3*461
4 * t ? 0
j * > * l
PnT-iLit?
MS96 O I - K - O C T Y L
39100
3*JT4
UNITS
0 J/L
L'.'L
u'.'i
.1" / u
J'./L
J." /|
u •/'.
li"./L
•J--/L
U' 'l
J'.'L
J',/1
O'./L
H;/L
J'.'L
JO- 'I
i '. /1
.'/I
, J/L
o'.'t
J;/L
T " T « L
T - T « L
T ' t • L
T - T I L
T ••! JL
T : 11 L
i:: IL
IT-L
r-I L
I' t '. i
' - T J . L
I " T .' L
r- •'.
t - T i i
T Tit
T'T '.L
1 " 1 : i.
T.-KL
TTiL
fllL
r • i •• i.
»*ct
»0» T _0« Tfc! 
?j
II"
niI
__ f «OJEC_T_NOt 2*2
I
rriTiotr NO
TC 
0»r
» < R M O
U N I T S
H* "I > T P t
V a L U " 
f
w
T
01 si;
3* j;o
.)*!?&
3*6*1
ct .
3 * 6 3 1 J , }
3"3'0
39."c o i E L j >-: N
j^ JOo »i» *-oi f
?''j;j •t.'-i.oF
J » 3 t - » , « * - 3 ( J -
f 1C
It;'! r'
5 9 J > J ! '. I - I
.'.*'• f 6 c " - r
. * ? « l t > 
*1-"h^
3>/»ru H'.PTI ,
J 9 3 ? 7 4Li>H,'-(l.
3 T 3 - > o jf r»-' ,r
s ..i ••.•
3*
- e L T j - - " :
f r t -1 r i'..
" C - - 1 .' •<.
I...-. / w
J ./L
u:./i
u j /L
0 ,/l
o ". 'L
0 .'L
i.1 " /1.
L -'I
I "i/L
. ".'i.
j ;/i
•" / i
.j-/l
J '/L
.; "•' i
j .'\.
•i',' i
O-./L
U"/L
J"-'L
U'./L
O''l
L "i f L
T c r a t
T Mil.
r" i • i
T7T.-,.
T Cl I 5 I
T J U L
1 " I ,. L
T - T S L
r M«L
i .? I ; u
" • f'. I
n r .1 L
i ,•> 71 L
T" T J L
T..-T4L
LL
II
U
'J
J
f
U
II
II
O
P>OJ»CT KOI HZ
DATE
TO
rrrmnrKO
TIKE
or ~
DAY
IT/10/DT 
1110
L O C A T I O N COOt: 
S T O O 
S J J S T R A T F S
¥TU
_ _ 
ANALYSIS HHPOP.T
PHOJECT NA4EI TUP.PF.NTINE «UM
P A R A 4 E T E P S * "
051J13 3**1»
CMLO«1-F
39175 VtKYl
J * i l l
j**I3 METMUENt
3 * 5 * 4
: TniIf
JI.HLU'TFTM'L^'
1*536 Itlti-T
3.MO; CAKBJS
3 * 5 1 1 J.l,:-t. ICiL.-.f
' T'LUc'ir
3*501 ^-
34o?l Z.i.i-TPKHl j
3 4 6 4 6 4-
i.'5/L
t'./L
U'.'L
^ j / L
J '•>>.
J •'• / L
.. '•/!.
- j /I
J '•''.
•J '• IL
I.1 '-/I
i. • / L
',-,/L
I/ »/L
I,'/I
u-,/1
• ' /L
I'. / L
. ;'.
.' '-'L
I)*'1.
wi/l
'J '•' L
il'./L
.'I.
T.-.r»L
T - T « L
I .•?! . t
fit.
I 1"-L
f'Tll
T " ? S .
nm.
i IT a L
, "Til
• ' i '-
T - f r L
T 
1 U
I TJL
! TJL
r .r -i
T r T : t
1-llL
1' T 'I
i: r u
! • T H
OJT{!
V ' L u f 
'.
II*
II
?»OJI?_T MOI 261
OiTt 
TIKE
y - -*sr»f 
c*
TO 
0»»
P R O J E C T 1»«t! TUIPf^TINc RUN
•
•
•
•
•
J*6«*
t T H T L ) -T.
f T .
3*4: ••
3*»f 1
'T.
343*1
3*3-".
3*5' j
3»ino
3»iT6
3*526
IN.
3*^21
J » o 2 4 2
3*611 
2
34C?0 3
J9330
O»TI:
/Mrs 
c - < t » l S T » T
L'i/L
J 3 / L
U^'l
U'./L
L'.'L
u"/L
Ui'l
U'/L
oi/L
Ij ', / !.
Uj/L
y j /t.
UC'L
Li/l
jG'L
«1/L
UJ'L
J-./t
Ul'L
y i/ w
U". /L
J'/L
ll'./l.
U » ^L
U-./L
U'./l
U'./L
Jt/L
0 ^/L
u ; / '.
l,:.'.
ut 'l
•...'./• L
t C T « t
T~I «L
T T t L
T C f * L
TTML
TCHL
t r. r • ^
I:TU
fl.tac
• C T JL
T T T t L
T^T »l,
T'-tlL
T' T«L
T : T « L
F:I»L
T" HI
T'-I.'.i.
i •• r IL
TT.-.L
I'jTll
T - T t l
1 : T J t.
' jrn
r.-Ttt
r: I-L
1 1 1 1' L
T ', t 4 L
'"tic
' t .L
i : T t .
t • UL
1 M«^
If
11
t J O O C« r j » *> rj r. •* <4 M> —
tj o »- i— r *-
-• » * • X •
r i a- »- PV r- ».;
It 'J •* I I
< J. ft -« 
£
»- r- c T 
r-
-4 c; -r t* 
:a
y» r. i. * x •"••
•j 3 ^ i^ ^ Q
• • r 
» », «
^ c"1 
i •» »
i * 
»»
•« -*
r i
•* tf <j- o. at* «
i 
I I I 
I 
I
, f 
.- 
N* .-J 
——• >, ,
c ' c - » * c c c - c r r - c r. C c »
« I
.=, .
- «i •-; C .; t. _-
• • • • t
OOl 
1228
a!
o
•**
3*3***
SoiS !
l» «. W i
*»«-*• J
** l\< \^ I.
• J ra •» ,
V> f» *• C
»• v- *M :
r • r > i •
rv r- *~* »
JC JT 7 1
» > r- c
V V O J
i a Ju r
-* -» t» .
j j « i
•n -« » .
^ r T» r
;. •« X -
^ -* <
• i t. r
*» c
r-
oi n
X *
T> -
t
%.
n
2n
M i w f w M» t« *** W
*.*»*••- •**-*-•»
- .-» » - »• » .- r^
,, «•» n. « ^ -^ ^
K U* 4 «* ^» » •» t*»
E w *.»*»->*»j.
n «. * < •-. w. ,-. ^
« v * ^ *• *_• * v
• »x -^ « ** • <"» ^
•» rw — • »* w .* r» iw
c i *.-*-..,,, ,
- t t %-)»_> >ft M t t i i
3 j *"*•«.«.*:**
91 _. ^ ...... r
J _» -» J'-.. • •• 0 o
> * ^ r* « 
« jq
C U 
M 1 •' 
fc-» ^j
- ^. ... * 
^ '^
^ c: ^ * 
J. T
> v -% -* 
« ^
• » _ • » • « • 
•*> ^
< V ^ ^ 
-
• ^ *-• • 
-n
, i* /. » 
-i »
* 
•» 
•*
.** 
t.
* 
4
%n 
<
-» 
v
^* 
C
i-
IS* 
f
• 
1
1-^ 
r
•* 
:
*^ 
a
0
a 
*
r*^ 
j
a
••i
A
t*
• n
4.
•\
n t. (
»• *•
J V »
p •*» -
» »
L *- k
n • «
« PJ 1
» I
> C* l
t ^ ••
" O f
3 t
LI f~ f
J -> -
. T J
^ ;
L •" .
• * i '
Z 
3
1 i * *•
•T* :
^ .
•1* *
a i*.- (.-• 
.j^ t, • j t
r * *» 
»>«•«• 4
A V/i » 
» - ' • « « » (
-• "* 
f- 
\*t •— <t p
•* » <X 
M O » »
-•***• 
*- f*j T> »
• 
1 
• •• 1 «
" ;: 
9 4 - t
1 M l i t *
t o -« 
r • t . r- B
4 — «i 
•-«•-« tj
•* o .1 
r +. *> -
r T T> -» ^i o «
r t 
-^ -^ i »
i i> •» ?> J» t r
* »• Z 
O r | -
j ~J • i 
i TJ ' - r
' «~ 
»- a ». c
? ^ 
.' 0 *• ty. r
. »^ o *» -j n '
•> m t n r . .
: x 
w»
f- 
r
r
" i» C !•. M 
U»
>• *• 9- *• *• 
*•
> 9> \J> O \J\ 
\*t
s» >> »a « «o 
-4
- i- ^ *. »• 
»-
*• »w »** T »« 
**•
- • X I 
- *
f » r * 
T'
1 1 T -t 
-«
r- (_ cj c- -* 
r-
-^ ^* r* •n 
*^
< r> x 
c- 
n»
» t r.? 
-« 
rr
•* r~ -^ 
u 
r^
">0 X i 
w
» » -» r 
^
• i ^ 
o 
•- >
^ •» '. 
i- . 
i
j t T 
r-
3 * W
I t~ *v
i r- c-
^
i- i* U.
» «^ »
O ^ W
•- ^ ««.
O V O-
^ 
— « ••
o <*• *
f- -4 *-
C «•
r r f-
* «-»»
.• a ro
r- i
u -*
« m
13 -*
•n x.
X n
•< X
^ r-
• ii tj
X. •*
.Tl O
-«±»?
tM Ul L
K» ^ h
'j »* i
*. ++ \,
o. >- r
JD * 
J
o»- r
x-* ».
o r\» a
H 1 C
0 -« C
<3 » -
* *- a
f^ x
1 C
r- 3
<_) t_
T« 3
o n
n -
-« j
^ •
^> 2
2 -
r -
O 
f
* 
•
Ul
•- 
c
*• 
1
•» u» 
u 
— 
', 
-<
+ *• 
*• •> 
j 
•
- O 
-J* W» 
3
i U* 
^ * 
4
n o 
*- N« 
t
MO- 
»- »— 
|
c n 
» • 
;
' Z 
I- *4 
J
IN 
II 
j 
1
» rp 
o t 
-
> Z 
-« *- 
J
3't^ 
O O 
H
« 
I i 
: -
fc 
r- r* 
n
I 
O O 
i
i 
n »
r 
o 3 
J
J 
-W •« 
•
t 
*- j» » 
i
' 
m o LJ 
n
i 
z *• •»
M. ^ »
i 
r- s
• ' 
n rw
1 
y
5o
fc 
^.
• 
lit
f 
0
3 
-*
. f
» 
z
• 
m
I
3
•s
9 
m
i. 
'V
• 
m
• 
z
r 
-^
M 
M
4 
X
n 
n
9 
'.»
c:
A
t 
'
i
• C C1 ii C C C «. - C. "
• -• -,i i,i c ,. .t - \r c. .">
-
r. r c . c c c . c c c c c t c . c c c c c
. O * • O fci „• 1,1 C Ct -~i O J1 . i 1,1 C«'b1 wi wt **•*
• V N X X N X ' N X . N X - X X X X 
I 
- ^
• • - r - i - ( - r - r - r - * - ^ - f - r - i - f - * - r - r - f - 
' 
^
I
-1 > j »» 3 •
r i t - . *
r r r- f r
«-:•_ o = c c <: c kr ^ . _-.. ^ i; c c: r
TUT 
O01 1229
r 
A
> 
O
ztr
• mini m 
««on 
ir
TD 
3»»
'•
»E»0»r
LOS?
i'- 3 » M I '.OH*;**
DtlEMri
3feTHf. >
3M1S
3?135
J»i)l } . J ' - 3 I
j » > ? » i»k-3iii;rio'3.u-''
K i l l 
2 i v - 3 I <
I» > 1 '. - i : « I 3 « . U ? f 1411 •
l.t'M
jjjio :^.:
J M J O ti(k'-i3'
3»O 
i k » * - ) ) j
3M»I K M * 
: i n > J . f » V
3 H i l 
: - < D 3 » J . f M SJ'.'U?
J J i l l )
• » .1 « I ) :
>•-,: 
»I_t"
< » / l l ^ 2 !
«'
T
IN
•H
II-
3 j - r » - M t
If
) Mil .1
3H59
5 9 1 3 3
6-1
6 - I I .
b - I ? *
) * i t 3 < : T H r . . > i 1 -1 ' ) ?
)? I 73 
/ I N T . 
I , - t . O R I 1-
3 1 . : 3 ^ ' - T - i r . c M - c i . r 1 1
J ' > ) i 
i . i - ) i : - t . o « i : r ^ » .
. < • • ) ' i . j - j i i H . n a - ' - r H f
;'j*6 
l . J - T ' J i i 01 :H L- 
»
: v c < ; r n <
I.i-J!:".flil3:r'1j
1,1,1 
-rs[ :IL j»
3 2 1 ) 1 
3 f :
3k5-.i i.i-3iC".a
3 * 5 5 1 l , 3 - 3 t : - < .
391'0 
t M C - d O ? : r
J? J • '1 1 1 s L
2 * 5 1 1 
l , l , 3 - t P i ; -
3 2 i : » 1 » C H J « ? ? <
3 * 5 1 6 i , i t 2 . ; - r ?
3* 5»S 2 -.
»
r » : » r si.f !_:
M r i.
nit.,
n M _
MM"
r .1 r»_
MI »L
i: M.
KM.
J ". '.
j'.':
j •''.'•
j » ' . i
j "• ' .
j J '.i
J i ' . '
J". '.
J i ' .
- "• ' _ 1
J ". ' .
j ; ' -. i
j •'.
i :• ' .
w J ' .
'I- '"
J.'.
J "• ' . '
L "• ' '-
J ' ' -
w t ' .
J "• ' .
J • ' .
J 5 ' '-
j; '-•
T ' T > .
' : ' ' ,
r T i .
r • M ..
i:t u
r"
1 M.
t " f i.
r i - .
r o r i .
I 1 r 1;.
t ' r \ .
f " ' > >.
I - r ; .
T T J L
I ' T l .
r ~i r » .
r : T ; .
T "" ' 1.
1 Ml.
r-i i.
1 T 1.
r • r > ^
r .- r i w
TTI I -
i '' i.
7,
*
T
II
II
o
r
r
ri
r
r
K
rrr
fr
t^
r
r
r.
rr
i f• I A
T77TT/JI "i3J
* j. i
' i j: <
" 11. j
'' i .*
' V I '. 1
': 1- I
^'.,.1
' • I I I
' • 1. 1
" ". K J
" t il. I
V J ... 1
': 1^ i
"t JL I
1 I J . J
• -. J . I
• « J L J
•t JL\.
""tlil
'ac i
•uu
': JL j
• < J L l 
i'.
", > i C J
1«J: i
; r
t f-
'.I
If
! I"
T
If
f f
-r
• r
• J c c
:->3S<< » S M I
0(tt C
'li
C l l e f
Hf *f
I 9 ^ » f
C C / t i
31.: ;
-f M
"1CH3K
S1SK C
C f » l < 
Ckt*1
jto<i« sis«*«i>« oii'«»>c:
(
*u 
c*
JC 
_»C»i... 
CJLALUUJ •
IkU 
li»C 
| .
aii riTn i:irc«4 
•
—————————————————————————— 
A
•« t- 
C? > - • ' . ' (u H '
TUT 
001 1233
'
PROJECT NOl in ' -
STATION NO 
'«o< "PE
IO 
CAT
ru«P.FJN 
87/10/04 100J
iE'TMi oooo" SJ?STP»TE» AQU*DUJ
3ESCRJPTJOM PIF.LO SLMH
uaP.RJN 
87/10/04 1123
.......
COXPLITF3 *M»LTSIS »tPO»T 
«fp;
mojFfr ^HEJ -
L»SNO 
P1KHO
090776 01J77
OUU
01 J?«
C1042
7191)0
010J1
01357
011*7
OIOS''
01392
....„„,..,
SILVER
JER^U"^
cISoSiu^
MFRCU!V
NIcKCL
4MTIHONT
SFLENTUM
TH4LLIU1
ZTNC
UNITS
.
U6/L
O&'l
UO/L
u'/L
U'./L
UO'L
vl't
ul'fl
00720 CYANIDE 
" 
HT./L-
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTl>L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
J-m
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
»AGE
i ' ^ , 
3*T-0»TEl 17/11/75
VALUF t »!«
?0
1
1
ft
»
.7n
i
i
i
. »o
0.01A
'»»<
(J 
-!
I)
U 
-:
11
u 
-
U
U 
h"
U
U
U
H
M
• ESCRIPTXONI BRIAN WELL •! 
PROM SMNDPIPE
U»P.»UM 
17/10/04 
I22»
0»0777 01077
oliOi
01DU
01027
0103*
01 U*i
71»00
013M
oiof r
01097
011*7
01092
00720
4CSEMC
tf RTLLIUN
C*t*IUM
tOP't"
MIC?eL
SFLPXIU"
1INC
CTANITJ! 
. . . . . .
U3/L
UT-/L
UC/L
U,;/L
UG/L
U^'L
y f>/L
U5/L
••C/L
TTTAL
TTTAL
TPT»L
TriTAL
TCT*L
TCTAL
TOTIL
TntAL
29
I
1
ft
4
.2
30
1
1
1
8.01*
_.M_. ......
u
11
n
ii
u
u
II
u
i;
U
u
M
II
C»THI oooo $jBiT»ATEi AOJEOUS
FiCRlPTION: TlLLET MFLL
0»077S 01077
01012
SILVI.9
• CSENK 
" 
-
5ERTLLIU1
UG/L
UC/L
T1TAL
TOTAL
,„
1
1
„
II
U
—————————————————————————————— - ———— nTMPLFTFb ANALYSIS ftePoFf ———————
uJCCT NOT 2»i "" 
•-••-----• - - 
- 
PROJECT ««MEt TURPENTINE RUM
D«TI 
TIME 
- - - - -
K* NO 
PNOM 
OF 
LAtNO 
PAR»»0 
PARAMETER NAME
rn 
DAT
09077* 01027 CADMIUM
0103* CHRONIJH
fclO*/ COPPtR
71900 *Ei>'CUi>V
01951 Lf*n
01517 
NICKEL
01097 AKTIM3NV
01U7 SELENIUM
010)9 THuLLluM
010»2 ZINC
00720 CfANIOE
Itf. tub " 17/tO/Ol 13*0
:PThl 0000 JUJSTRITM AQUEOUS
rrCTTPTItlkil "F3UB UlNPS PLAZA - MfLl' * 1
099779 41077 SlLVtCr
010)2 ARSENIC
01012 
BERYLLIUM
01027 C«OMlUrt
"" " 01034 C1ROMIUN
T1900 HfRCUKT
OlQfl LEAD
01367 NtCKEL
01397 AYTHONT
... . 
ontT SELe)||tUM
0105* TH4LLIU*
01392 iH»C
00720 cr«Moe
I«P. RUN 
»7'in/D» 
HOP
PTHI 0000 SJSJTfcATH AflJEOUS
scirpTioNi eLsiM HELL' • » 
. • • • , .
01002 ARSENIC
01312 SMVLLZUM
01027 CADMIUM
Old* CHROMIUM
01042 CDPPcR
PA5Ib 
3 \
REP02T DATCI 97/11/25
UNIT) CH
UG'L 
.
U&'L
UJ'L.
UG'L
UG'L'
UG'L
UC'L
OG'L
NG'L
UG'L
UG'L
UG'L
UG'L
UG'L
UG'Li
Ub'L
UG'L
UO'L
UG/L
U&'L
U5'L
hi'L
UG'L
UG'L
U'J/L
UO'L
UU'L
EHISTRT
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TTT*L
TSTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TCT8L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TCTAL
TCTAL
TOT4L
T3TJL
TOTAL
TrtiL
TOTtL
TCTAL
TOTiL
TcTiL
TOT4L
tCTAL
TTT4L
TOT*L"
TCTA U
TCTAL
VALuf C R|
4
13
.2
.if
1
1
1
ID
9.015
20
1
1
4
&
I
.2
30
26
1
1
il
O.Olt
20
1
1
I
\
E*»P<
it
M
U
U
y
u
u
*
u
u
u
M
M
u
U
uu
y
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
M
M
JO V'M
i
i
i
\
S 
'
^ 
(
T-i
0 
«
t 
i
H 
„
4
1
1
1
M
<
1
i
f
Bf
•
l»
\ . _^_ 
m L T 
m 
l_lf
PACE 
4 8f
—— MD'jrer KOI 141
JATJ -— TIME
STATION NO 
PROM 
OP
~ — ' 
'TO 
Dlf
• L U"™ t E 1 CM "1XALYSIS REPORT
REPORT DATEI RT/11/25
PROJECT NANEl TURPENTINE RUN
LAIriO 
PARNO
090710 71900
01051
01067
PARAMETER NAM£
MERCURY
LEAD
MICntL
01397 ANTINOMY
01147 kELENILiH
rURP. RUN 
87/10/Ok 1525
01012
00720
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
UNITS
UC/L
UG/L
Ul/L
UC/L'
UG/L
US/L
MG/L:
CHEMISTRY
TOTAL
"lit
TOTAL
T1T«L
TOTAL
VALUE I
• z
33
1
1
3
99
0.014
R E M A R K
U 
':
u 
^;:
u
y
u
"
u
JEPTNl 0000 SUBSTRATFl AQUEOUS 
;-
)E&CRIPT10NI fLSSN HILL »2
090TH 010T7
-- -010D2
01012
SILVER
Msmc
BERYLLIUM
010Z7 CIOMIJH
010)4 CHROMIUM
UHP. RUN 
kT/10/Oft i»)D
019(2
T1900
01091
01067
01097
01147
01059
01092
007ZO
ME""Y
NICKtL
AMTIH3NV
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
UC/L
UG/L
L'3/L
UO/L
Or./L
UC/L
U'-./L
U3/L
UG/L
U'./L
XG/L
TOTAL
' TCTAL
TPTIL
TOTAL
TOTBL
" TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL' '
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
THT.L
TOTAL
20
1
1
6
5
*
.2
)0
to
1
1
1
203
o.ou
u
u
uu
u
M
U
u
u
u
<J
u
trim OUD9 
lUBVTKPTCI CUJCbU}
ESCRIPTIONI ELSIN HELL »1
09D7S2 0107T
01902
01012
013*7
010)4
010(2
TlKOO
01051
01DA7
SILVER
USENIC
BERYLLIUM
cIJoJlON
COPPER
LfAU
NICKEL
Ui/L
UC/L
UO/L
u^/L
CS/L.
UT./L
Oi/L
TOTAL
TOTAL
ITTAL
TCTAl
TCT4L
TOTAL
TPTiL
20
1
1
6
J
«
u
u
u
J
•J
y,
U
<J
CO^LfTBB ANALYSIS RtPORT
———————— 5TPGT1
n1-56 J qj^S
r OATH 87/11/25
FBDJICT HOI »6J 
PROJECT NAME! TU»P*NTINc RUN
- -— - - 
DATE riH!
STATION NO 
PRO* 
Of 
L»»NO 
PARNO 
PARAMETER NAME
TD 
OIT
0»07I2 019*7 ANTIMONY
01U7 SUfNlUM
0105S THALLIUM
OW2 
lt*C
00720 CYANlPC
UNITS
U5/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
CMEMISTRY
TOT1L
TCTAL
TPTtL
TOTAL
TOrAL
VAJ.U; t
t
i
i
i»r
OtMACH
u 
C
:;
u 
;
u
,-:
•U»P. IUM 
17/10/01 175J 
. 
... ...
;(»Trtl 000) SU8STRATII AQJEOUS
ifSCHIPTIDMI FRINCOIS «!LL
09B7IJ 61077 JILVSP
01002 ARSfNlC
01012 BEfcVi.LIUM
01027 CAUMIUM
010*2 COPPcR
719PO NCRCUDV
010)1 LfJD
"01367 NICKEL
01097 ANTIMONY
01147 SCLENIJM
0 ) i) $ ^ T^ALLluM
0 1 D $2 if NC
00720 CYANlOC
•il 0000 
SUBlT*»TVl »OJEOUi
'TPTIDNI YIN! HOUSING rfEI.1 11
OVDTBt U1U7T SILVER
01002 ARSfNlC
01312 858TLLIUH
01027 CADMIUM
010S4, IH40M7UM
010*2 COPPSR
OlOil L?AO
010J7 NICKEL
01097 ANTIMONY
01147 SfLfNTUM
013*9 THALLIUM
UG/L
UG/L
OWL
U5/L'
UI/L
UG/L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
HG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Oii/L
Uf./L
U3/L
uc/L
1 '
UG/L
0&/L
UC/L
OG/L
TPTAL
TTTAL
TRIAL
T-JT/U
TOTAL
TCTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TCTAL
TPTtL
TOT«L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TCTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TfrTAL
TOTAL
TCTtL
TOT»L
1DTAL
20
1
1
f>
9
«
.2
30
23
1
1
1
108
3.01*
20
1
1
I
5
.2
JO
20
1n
i
...
U 
r
U
U
u
X
u
u
u
u
•J
u
,,
u
u
u
11
L
1
M
u
I'0
u
— ._. —
- - - - - - 
o/ire 
TI*E
STATION N3 
FROM 
PP
— • ——————— • 
TO 
DAT
i 
RUN 
IT/IO/07 0919
{ -i 0009 SuSSTRITFr AOJFDU5
* 
IfTICMI Vila *DOSlN5 HELL »3
> «.RJN 
17/10/07 10*$
• arnjircrjri sw 
suisTiirfi icurous
CKIPTIONI HAtfNAN ESTATf rffLL
————————— C3HPLFTED II
" 
PROJECT NA*Sl 1
LA5NO 
PARNO
0907to 010*2
'007JO
OWIJ 01077
01092
01312
010)4
01042
01311
01347
01147
01DS9
00)20
090716 01977
01002
01012
01077
01334
01042
71900
01367
0109T
0111,7
010*2
-— - J07JO
P<
ttlVs
i« 6-^
fAlTSIS REPORT 
»Ei»»!i;T OATtj 97/11/2$
TURPENTINE RUN
PARAMCTER NAME
i me
"ANIOE
SILVER
ARSENIC
BFRVLLIUN
CAbNlLIN
C3PP6R
LEAD
NICKEL
SELENIUM
CT^NIOC
SILVER
CHUONIUN
COPPeR
NICKEL
TH4LLIUK" "
CTAN10E 
""~~
UNITS
U&/L
W./L
UC/L
Ul/L
wi'L
Uu/L
JS/L
OC/L
US/L
UC/L
OC/L
UC/L
MC/L
UC/L
U5/L
UC/L
. UC/L
US'L
Ot/l
OC/L
' 
- -— • -U;/L-
or./L
M G / L
CN6MISTRY
TOTAL
TCTAL
T01AL
TOT»L
THT4L
T O T A L
TOTAL
^L
TCT»L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TCU4L
TOTAL
TOTIL
TCT4L "
TCT'-L
" 
TOT4L
TOTAL
" 
TOT*L
T O T A L
TOT4L
VtLU? I
39
0.323
20
1
1
t
22
JO
1
3
1
JO
0.019
20
1
1
&
I
.7
30
1
1
0.017
»Et*ft<
„
U
U 
71
U
'J
U 
-;
L'
U
'U
U
U
H
K
0 
<
U
IJ
U
U
L'
'J
U
U
M
•< 
1
IJ
O A T c J
—pRoiFrt NOI "»»j
3ATE
T A T I O N N O
TIME
P R O J E C T
l A S N C 
P A » N O
UNIT* 
C H t H l S 7 P Y
. rmotf roDtr'iroo SUJSTIATM AOUITCUS
jcSCUPTIPSI OE*1TEIS 
WtLL
090787 01077
01032
01012
01&27
010)*
71900
01051
013J7
01097
u 1 1 1 /
01092
- 
OOTJJ
JM 
87/IO/OJ 
1021
oooo sussrsirrt »!jjfou>-
.KIPMONI RUHICJtZ 
AUTO PARTS
091302 01077
C13D2
01012
31027
0151.2
71»OU
C10>1
01C67
01C97
01147
010?*
01092
OKP.RUN 
•T/10/Ot 
US3 
°°T"
fPTHt'OOOO" SU8ST»ITf» »OU?6US " 
- - - - • • • • 
- -
OCKIPTION! RAisnr hHTOtiS MtLU 
LOCATfO NE*R
AJTO BtFtlH U3PHS
09130!* C10T7
01002
__ _________ 
01312
SILVER
ARSENIC
CAOMJUM
COPP.tR
LEAD
NICKEL
ANTIHONf
TXALLlJN
CTAtJIOf 
" "
SILVER
J^JLL^UM
CAOMtUK '
CHROMIUM
LCiO
'TKALLIu''
ZINC
C»»NIO£ 
" 
'
SlLVtP
A R S f v i C
UC/'L
U&'L
U'i/L
UC/L
UC/L
ur./L
U&/L
MG/L
UC/L
UC/L
U-./L
Ui/L
01/L
Ui/L
• 00/L
U-./L
MG/L
UG/L
TCTtL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TCT3L
TCTCL
TPTAL
TPT4L
TOTAL
TOTftL
TOTCL
TPT4L
T( TAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOT4L
TOTtL"
TOTAL
Tni;u 
•
TTT4L
T1T.'.L
TOKc
^
TTTJL
T r' I « t
30
1
70
iO
.1
100
40
1
3
1
0.017
29
1
1
I
r
.......... __....
zo _
i
i
31
0.017
• :o
i
i
a 
''''•
_ ii _
U 
':•'
J
U
n 
• —
u 
r:
u
u
J
u
u
u
u
I'
II
u
u
•J
IJ
IJ
IJ
H
" ' d' '
11
u
1)
II
1
1
01
4
4
4
- -. . ....... 
-
.
.
_
.
:
' 
^ 
. 
). 
«
~~ r — 
~* " — 
> 
r 
-
MOJicr wor»*j "
• - 
BATE 
TIME
S T A T I O N NO 
PROM 
Cf
ID 
DAT
1
TUTP.KJN 
ITVlO/Oi 
1230
CPPTHl 0000 
SjdSTMTH AQUEOUS
i rsTRrmirei STPILT — FROM SHGOT ir-ueLi "MIIO
1
•
JUHP.RJU 
17/10/01 
1319
IfrCTMl 0000 
SUISTRITCI AQUEOUS
Ol5CHrfniJWT""H»RVir VPLl "IEMINO O'HEMBY 
• ---
0*r 
CLFANtRS Id 
MODUS
—— CDMPLETIO ANALYSIS"* f> a»7 —
PROJECT NAMEl TURPENTINE RUN 
"
LAINO 
PARMO 
P A R A M E T E R NIME
0*130) 01027 ClOMtUl
Oiti)« CHROMIUM
010^2 
C ^ P P b R
OIOM LfAP
01(157 NlCHtL
01D»T 
A M T I M O K ' Y
Oll»7 ifL?Nlu^
OlO'>t T^'LLI'JI
01092 IlNC
007:0 CYANine
0»t3fl» OiDTf SILVER
01002 A»SENIC
01012 8EHVLLIUM
01DS* CHROMIUM
tl»00 MERCuftV
01051 LMO
Olfti/ MlCilEL
U1997 
A X T T H l f c Y
01K7 SELENIUM
01 Oi1* THALLIUM
01692 ZTIJC
00720 CYANIDE
OV13DS OID77 SILVER
01J12 
BERYLLIUM
U1C27 CAOM1JN
ollll c?JpciUM
PAGE
• • W»F
R J P O « T 0 » T e l J7/U/25
UNITS
U^/L
UC/L
t'S/'L
OC/L
L^/L
jr'/t
«/t
Uu/L
UG/L
UC/L
Ui/L
Ui/L
UC/L
Uli-a
uG/L
Uo/L
uC/L
U-'L
- 
U1/L'
U;./L
U''/L
CieMl^TI
T O T * L
T--TJL
TCHL
TOTr.L
T01»L
T-MU
T O T A L
T C T « L
TPT»L
T-Tf.L
T O T A L
T7TA1.
~ t?T«L
T P T J L
TCTAU
i r T « L
T 3 T 4 L
T C T d L
V7T9L
JY 
V « L U P t 
l»t
- - - - -
5
--• -£!-
1
1i:
*ji
A
2?
20
*;
isi
0.017
- - - - - 
-.——-
1
1
13
P
M A R '
y 
J
U 
• ;
—— li. 
; 
_
U
y
L'
M
U
M 
Zi
u 
•-
u
•J
u
u
M
LI
u
u
u
V
——————— -
U
u
. u
M
1 
pftoj "
STATION fcO 
PROM 
OP
TH 
0»Y
1
TUIP.P.UV 
17/10/0* 
1»4»
CJrtPLfTE!) AMALfSl? RtPORf
PROJECT NAMU TURPENTINE RU*
LABMO PARNO PARAHLTER NAME
OM30J 71*00
OlOfl
01067
01097
011*7
01302
007JO
NFRCURT
NlCKCC
4MTI»OHr
SELENIUM
7MALLIUN
ZINC
CVAfllOE
UNITS :
u'.'i
Ui/L
US/L
LCi/L
REPDSIT OATH e7/ii/?>
neniSTPr 
viLu? t f'fiPt.
T3T»L
T-VTiL
T 0 T ft L
TDltL
... .2
J3
1
1
1
O.P17
U 
'
y 
:.;
u
u
J 
:-
u
U
UEPTrtl 0009 
SJfSTRITPI AQjEOUS
uESCRIt'TIONl MAThlAS WELL PU*P NOT OPERATING
fJRP.RUN 
17/10/01 
UOO
041306 01C77
01062
Ol3li
01027
013J*
71^00
013S1
01397
011*7
- 01 o«*
00720
SILVER
A*SEMlC
CAOMIUM
COPPtR
LIAt» 
' - - - - - -
AMTTM^^T
SUFNlU^
MALLIUM
ZINC
CTANIDc
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
U'J/L
UC/L
Ui/L
Ui'L
MG/L"
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOUL
TOTAL
TOT4L
T^TAL
TCTftL
TOT«L
TCI4L
TOTAL
TOTtL
T O T A L
TCTtL """
29
1
1
J
9
iO
1
1
13
0.91?
u 
'
u
u
u
I'
H
u
u
u
u
^ 
N
u
;E*CRIPTIONI SMITH
091307 01377
" "" 
" 013)2
tlCli
01327
01 OJ*
- 010*2
7140U
010)1
OUS7
SILVER
8PRYLLIUH
CACMIUM
CJPPFR
LMP
UC/L
U&/L
U
r./L
O'/L
US/L
UO/L
•J'l/L
TOTAL
TCT4L
TCT4L
TOTAL
TCTiL
T ,^ T 4 L
SO
1
1
I
T
33
u
u
L'
!J
L1
; 
•
u
L
Di
C* 0
£7
*• r
^ •»
r z-
** *•»
<: c
* r
c c
u> ^ >
r— r~
c c
;
-4
•
»•- P-»
J
C
1
j
e. o
« 0»
-« «-i
^ r-
z
•<
c rr
c> o
r- r-
i o
» !•
^
••• &
j
C C.
i
1
0 -
So
-0
*• JO
f3 <">
»»
•<
C t"
»•' l>
l~l"
•1 -J
/• »•
1 to •
O .'^
c «r
0 0
?s
•» «/
« o
3O -•
C
X
c; c
•"" *•*
r-r
1* 
B>
i
^*
** o
1
r: i
o o
S£
x •<
C r"
I •-•
JK
C C
>•* -^
r- r-
3 '3
u* »«
i
T C
U
«
0 O
ss
*• f"
M a
o
c c
<•> r>
i- r
-4 H
<-i Cl
t- B
^j
•- O
C =
X.
»•
•»
-H
j••
m n
•« fa
f t
*> f
» ra
•< r~
5*"•
w
<
n
•»
j>
§
V*
•H
Ca^
< >.
2 •
1 *" ^
|g*
!S.
!*• s
c >
J w ••
«* a
I-«Nrs
•4r
1 
•«
0"-
C^ Wf
ra
Cc
1
>w <•
o ^
o
m
X C
„•» fcl
k
-< -•
11 a
0
•
0
** M
-4 O
C —
oe>
o*.
>-l M
C C
1 *
c c
C< <TI
-4 -<
•1 C>
»•« ••
C C
1
oo
00
^J
o r*
7
*
C C
tie-.
r~*~
•* -*
J 0
»-.
1— 1>
c c
0 -4
1- 0
2
c c
•' *
O 1
LJ •
-y fj
C C
C 0
<j <-i
« *-t
t^
*
e c
" °
r.i o
f «/»
C C
1
o o
o o
-4K»
O3D
»-4 r~
3 •-•
5
c c
»• o
-^^
tF »*.
c c
•*«
••
w
*
o e
««
rw -4
«« f
Z fr
n
C C
o wi
(^
- 0
c c
f
w< •« m
X« T «|
*^ ** "^
'o?
«° 
1
SSJ
me -X
O** O)
O •* V
Z JO <»
11 « j
r- 
••
' » CK
• 0 *«
: **
§
; 
i
ii
I 
'
1
;
i
i 
i
o o
o ••
»» «
o ^
IS
r*
O
A
i
!
'
3t C.
r> • j
T» t
i 
1
a
• 
o **
P— * O1
-* 0
^c
1
;o;i
a
i~*
' c o o
S75
<6 -4 W
z n» z
fc r- ^
r- «• •*
f Z 2
-* •"• O
c c z
(
1
1
iI
c <r e
n o »•>
•
,J3
!
»-• *rf ^
1
C X'C
o •* 
M
c 
-»
»to •-•
2 «
13
m 
fi*
» 
<3
c 
x
o.
*>l
z»
n
——— MDJFCrNOI J*J —— -------
OATP. " 
TIHZ
S T A T I O N NO 
PRO* 
OP
TD 
D&T
TUBP.PJM 
67/10/OS 
1«20
UfPTMl Dfldd 
5 J S S T H I T M 
AQUEOUS
ul' itiJIPTinut 
A L > M A 
LfcONlMO 
WELL HE*0
1
1
TuMP.tUN 
67/10/07 
0«»*
I.IUTTOK CUM! ITPU — SUiSTIHTgr ICUtOUS ————
L'*r«IPT10NI T R A N S P O R T ILfcNR PRDN RO UNIT
;
COMPLETED ANHYsl* REPORt 
R E P O S T O t T C t 8T/H/25
PROJECT M-Met 
1
L»»NO 
f A K N O
0*130* Olt»92
- - - - - 
-- 
00720
011310 01077
01002
OU12
01027
013)0
010*2
71900
010M
oio&r
OU»7
01U7
01392
00720
091311 01077
013P-!
015)
C107 '
0103*
71900
01051
01997
01U7
"0105*
01092
00720
P t t A M E T E R Nitg 
UMT5 
C M c T X T f t r
ZIHC
CUNIOE
SILVER
BfRTLLlUH
CiOMIUH
«"ul»
LEAD
N T C K ^ L
iNn^GNY
SELFNIUM
TMtLLIUH
ZINC
cy*Nioe " ""
ilLVER
»RSfwitr " 
~ ~ 
"
- "ItLLIOM
I:,MIUH
C.IPPIR
M t R C U R V
NlCRfL
SELENIUM
T^ALLlUH "" 
" "
ilNC
c TANIDE
ur./L
HC/L
UC/L
U3/L
UC/t
irJ/L
u*/L
Ul/L
U5/L
MC/L
UC/L
L'5/L
OJ/L;
Uii/L
U.'»/L
Ui/L
UC/t
UG/L
o'-/L
H" /L
T O T » L
T O T A L
T(3T*L
TLTii.
TOT'U
T C T H L
TriTiL
T C T t L
T^ML
T R T « L
T O T A L
YPT»L
T 3 T « t
10T«L
TOT»L
Tr.UL
TTT-IL
T O T 4 L
- 
•• - -----
2C
0.01T
20
1
1
6
*
23
20
1
a. ?i
10
0.017
20
t
1
&
r.
t
30
1I
9
D.Oir
U
y 
"
u
IJ
u
u
u
uu
IJ
u
u
K
u
u
u
'J
11
I!
'J
'1
uIj
u
•J
u
•J
u
PAGE 
12
d«??ilT C A T t J 37/11/25 -tl
pucjecr HOI 2»J
'.fATUM M3 
PROH
TO
TIN£
OP
urr-
PROJECT NAHII TURPENTINI- RUN
LABNO 
PARNO 
PARAMETER MAM*
UNITS
VALUE t P F H A P *
Ti'QP.VUN
87/10/07 
0»5J
)£l JTOO 
Su6iT»ATfl AOUfGUS
> C « I P T J O N l H A R T H H A M N 
CRU&NtR HILL
091312 010TT StLVcP
.... .. 
._........_...... — - 
' ' " 610D2 ARSeXTC
01014 ftEKVLLIUN
01027 CAOH1UM
0103* CHROMIUM
OlOt^ COPPf.R
71*00 MfkCj'Y
JlO'i Lf-iC
01l)»T KICKtL
01H7 SELeNH"*
01359 THALLIUM
0109^ Mt'C
00720 CYANIDE
UG/L
WC./L
UG/L
ui'u
UG/L
OG/L
U'./L
UG/L
UC/L
Ji/L
L'G/L
MG/L
TTTAL
TO T4 fc.
T i T t U
TOUL
TOTiL
T ': T « u
TQTiu
TCTtL
TnT«L
TTT4L
TOTAL
TOTAL
in
15
1
&
(,
i *
I
1
1
10
0.017
u
0 ' "i
u '-.-;
u
« -^
u :"
u
u
'J
'J*
J
47/10/07 
11)0
j D—sui $ T R IT rr i du nu r
IPT1PNI OC3E 
MfLL
0*131} 01077
01032
0101:
• • 
oiDir
0105<>
SILVER
»»S€MIC
bFRTLLIUM
c!S!5SuH
013(2 CCPPtR
7190C NF.KCUHY
01311
01067
01097
01l»T
o!o«2
00770
LfAO
SlCHtL
SfLENldP
ZINC
CY»NIOE
UG/L
UC./L
UG/L
US/L
UG/U
UG/L
Ji/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
Uj/L
UG/L
TOTAL
TOT»L
TCT4L
TCTHL
TOTAL
TOTAL
T"T»L
TpTtL
TPTJL
T O T » L
TCTiL
TPTlc
10
1
1;
10
• b
JO
i'J
1
1
1
0.017
U
U
U
U
tt
V
U
U
(I
'J
u
II
94
U
TUK».RUK 
17/10/07 
1210
LCCiTiDircgoii 1700
Ot^CH 
UFLL
IOUFOUS
0»iai* 01077 SILVER
01002 APSfKll
_ 
01 01^ BSRYLLIU^
UG/L 
TOTAL
U'/L 
TTftL
OG/w 
T ' T « L
20
1
1
U
t,
1
i;
•*" n Vfi^y
P R O J E C T NOl 26)
DATE 
TIM!
'-ITJN NO 
FfcO* 
Of
JO 
DAT
PROJECT MAHEI TURPENTINE RUI
LA8NO 
PA 11 SO 
PARAHCTfcft NilE
0*131* 01327 CADMIUM
013** CHROMIUM
0 1 0 * 2 COHPiR
71VOO MEMCJCY
01351 L?*^
013M NICKEL
Ulb9/ 
A?<TlMPt4V
011*7 jf LCNluH
010)9 THALLIUM
00720 CTANI9C
RcPOkT CiTtl 87/11/25
UNITS 
CHtHIJTPT 
VALU' t 
»(."<-»<
-
UG/L 
T O T 4 L
03/ k 
T H T ^ L
l/'»'L 
7 C r « L
U r> / L 
T 0 T e L
UC/L 
T O T A L
U&/L 
T O T A L
U;/L 
T C T f . L
Uli/L 
T01-&L
MC/L 
T C T » L
»_.«.._ £ 
f
s 
u
13 
M
.2 
Ll
. " 
L1 
" ";
H 
«l
1 
U
12 
> -
3. f»lT 
^ <.<
URP.BUK 
IT/10/01 
1209 
_.
" L A T I JN -CUm JTOu 
S J B S T I A T C S ACjfCUS 
"
TSnrTPTTTJYl HMTNAlf BUERT bfLf " 
- -
09131} 01377 SILVER
01312 o-EhYLLIitH
01027 C»0«J'jM
013l« tHROHTUM
013*2 CDPPtR
TI >06 MfRCJRY
013M 
UF^O
f l 3 * 7 NICReL
Oll*T SELENIUH
oio;* THALLIUM
1 01D9: iINC
0 0 7 2 0 C T A N J D f
U5/L 
T O T A L
f./L 
T ^ T i L
Oi/L 
T.^TtL
O&'L 
T',T»L
uG/L 
UTAL
uo/L 
T O T « L
. uo/L 
T' Tfti.
JO/L 
T T T t L
00/L 
T'lTtL
'Jli/L 
T01*L
M'i/L 
T C T i L
20 
U
1 
U 
<
i 
U
5 
U
! 
. I: 
«
w 
M
.? 
L'
jn 
«
:; 
S 
..
i 
'; 
<
i 
"
^t
1 
M
0.017 
U 
*
I
»*>•» ENU 3f 
PROJECT **•«*
«
4
.... -
or
«
«
. . . . . . . . . . . . 
. . . 
^
REFERENCE NO. 31
PRBJFrT uni
"T
COMPuETCO ANAttSIl «t»ORr
EXPLANATIONS OF REMA** CODES
COLON* COJVIt OuTdOf *(£«»T**LC *»M&{
5STIMTEO VALJ6
JLUUAi..OttLUE INOUK.ia At t£Si THAN ¥41UU-
»CTU»L V » L J E K N O « N TD »F 6if*Te» TH»M
SIMPLFO eUT MIT t N A L f Z E D PUE TO L»l A C C I D E N T
LtIS »M*N-C»ITMI» Of
5», BUT HOT PE
L9C*TIOH CTiiES F0« IOE1TI? ICAT ION D^
S*VJT»BT **CK4tI«l, L»WO»UtS. H»I»«J3U? W A S T * SIT(>S.
£FFLUENT PIP- NU*etR 001 TJ 3SO
OTM = » =«FLJENTS SUCH »s
3isrn»Kr.i-,
IN PLANT SAMPLES - DU»ING PROCESS
IN PLiNT SAMPLES *CTE« PROCESS AMD
TPE'THfiT 0? DlJCHt»5t
IN >LANT SAHPLES - OU»IX
SEFARAT^ lN»LUtHT POlMTS/HATtR SJUgfcS
INFLUENT ASSOCIITF.D MITH EF*LU:*r icx»
BIANK f)K VILATILE DMMICS
»un SAMPLE* FLANI AT s»M»t.r >QSITI:N » x x >
6»OUNO W A T t « F*5M>iLl Ql 13 9S
iEOlMENT SAMPLE (MATER gOTTClO
SOIL SAMPLE 
___
STR'AM M ^ T c * StHPLE
LAC90N $«"f",t
S T O « A 5 £ 
TANH SA»PLl
t E A C H A T « [ JAMPLE
OTHTR 
T Y P T 
S A C P L E
K
<
o
--n—
M
r;
n
—rr
n
1*0
9-TT"
• 4
0014C
OOZtC
99S»f
i«»»f
T09»r
1DN3M4
-Z U<ȣ
"M
u
131*0 1*041*
1*043* SISA1VN*
-i*££———1—«_
• 
COMPLETED AUALVtK RPPflRT 
flrPORT n«T*i IT/II/H 
1
" 
PROJECT NOI 2*2 
fRQJEtT MAHEI 1
OATE 
TIN;
STATION NO 
PRON 
OF 
LAINO 
PARSQ
• 
TO 
DAT
• 
000012 34*61
34170
• 
3*»*1
. m 
3**03
342»T
• 
34321
3*611
34611
• 
342)0
~ TURP.RJN 
IT/10/0* 
1203
' 
•SCRIPTIONt LAI ILANK 
SECOND BATCl
000022 3*5(16
m 
3*«94
- -- — - - - - - - — .—. 
34696
3*452
0 
34, }T
1 I 
3*6*6
_.._.. ———— . . . _ _ _ 
_. 
34J»6
3*571
• 
3*39*
3*551
* 
3* >T 3
0 
34*91
...| 
*****
*
'Ulf EJJIISt RUN 
.
PARAMETER NAME
PTRFNE
^MLBMPHENIi Pjlf NY^ tT.
INOENO(1,2,3-C,0> PYREI.e
1>12-8ENZOMRTLEN!
3i3'-OICMLO»OBENiIOEX'
2,*-OINITROT3LU«NE
liZ^AIPHc.lTLBTJKIZItlC
3i*-bEN10FLU3l'ASTHcN:
2-CMLaROPHtNCiL
PHENOL
P-CHLORO-M-;*fSCL
*.6-OlNIT«0-3-CRE5CL
blS(i-CMLOROtTMYL) CT.
ISOPdORONE
•JN:TS
UC/L
UC/L
uC/L
UC/L
UC/L
US/L
uG/L
UP/L
UO/L
U-J/L
UO/L
U-./L
U3/L
Ol/u
UU/L
Ur./L
U5/L
J'/L
UC/L
U5/L
ue/i
US/L
---- U1/L
JG/L
cxemsTtr
T C T A L
T O T A L
IOJ1L_
T O T A L
..... I;IAL-
T T T A L
T O T A L
ICTiL
T O T A L
TOt»L_ —
T O T A L
T O T A L
1CTAL
TPTAL
TPTAL
T O T A t
I 3 T A L
TOTAL
T C T A L
T C T A L
T t . T A L
T O T A L
TCTAt
T O T A L
—— TOTtt .-
T O T A L
«
VALUE t 
REMARK
4
It
u 
<
,1 
1
u
u 
•
u 
*
. ._._.. .._i 
",
u 
*
u
i
•
u
1! 
*
- 1- — -*
0 
" 
*
^.'. . _._ <
'j
n 
«
.- 
w
S 
«
-»* 
^
u
• 
«
n
V
•
•••I
———————————— »*44 ——— F4«f ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— —————
0 
STATION NO 
FROM 
CF 
LABNO 
PARNO 
PARANEU* NUE 
UNITS
TO 
*• T 
T
000022 3**2i N-NIT»OS3DI-N-?R^P»IA<1WE 
Ul'L
« 
Iwl 
tIS(2*CHLDROlioM9PYL) (T. 
U'!/L
"1 
at"l il-cSLOlioMAplTliSL"!'"'141'* 
U O / L
3*255 ACCNAPHTMENE 
o'^/L
———————————————————————— — - —— — --• ———— y«rrr PLQUEPH; — — -— 
— -•- 
BTTT-
0 
3*700 rtf*ACHL3R06Eli7.ENE 
u G / L
:*»S1 P-lENANTNREhi; 
U',/L
3*3*1 OTrtETHTL "HTnlLlTE 
Ur,/L
0 
J9110 OI-M-1JT*LPPrtTMAL«TE 
U'l/L
•'"B 
i*i*6 JI-N-OCML C i T H A L t T F 
Ur./L
3*)7i FLUOJ)ANT1FNr 
UG/L
0 
3*J?0 ClRYiEN" 
OG/1.
3*0*1 t-CHLOROPHcNr L ^-ifU'L c". 
Ui'L
^ 
— -- 
3«*01 lMOfNC( 1,?,;-C»D r'T^EHf 
o«i/L
A 
3»>i6 1 1 it>i6-DTdf NJANT-'NtC'N; 
'j"/L
' ' 'fl 
3*42* 2»*-3tf»ITSOTCLOE ^t 
^TL
* 
!J**6 !!*^{?M"?"rop?fiNt 
i;/t
A 
3*Z*2 11 f 12-1? HZOFLUOMNTHcrtc 
o'./L
JEPTHI 0000 
S U B S T B 4 T E I *QjEOUS
* 
EXTMCTIO* O A f F 10/10/S7
- 
- - 
• 
- - - - - 
3*»»* PHSNOl 
05/L
1 Ji
0
Ci£"ISTRY
T T T A L
T O T t L
T3T«L
T7T«L" 
'
TOTAL
TOT»L
T O T A L
TOTAL
T1TAL
TC11L
1C 1 1L
TCT«L
T O T A t
T ? T » L
T -, 7 f .
10TJL
TL ItL
Til V A A
T ? T » L
T?T»L
I-T»L
T 0 1 1 L
T C T t L
TOT1L
—————————— P*CT ——— «—
»3»T OATeJ flfUftl
VALUE c *£>>A*K
u
U
u
U
uu
u
u
uu
3.1 
M
U
6.1 
^
5.5 
*
U
U
V
u
,--- — ~tt — ~
w
— Ti-
ll
u
u
u
u
1
r
1
*7 •
4
H'
«n
4
4
M
1
<
n
i
j
II
I
£ *
»
S
a.
t
I
•
I
i
z -
0
o
PROJECT NOI 2*2 
P S O J 5 C T NAnEl TUH^ENTlNfe RU* 
_. __
»
i
Ul
XM
l-
tu
h-«
0
i
i \ 
-=>
r
*
•J
*• 
i
n^•t
^
Be
I 
f 0
T
LJ 
.
a 3 33 r* r»
i
I> D 3 DO D
1
II
Ii
'
 
! 
; 
i 
i
! 
! 
i
-=-•'— '-h -'•-"'•' '-
71 --•'--•''; -1 J
i 
-t 
^
^- 
t~>
j
_. ^'^ ^ j^.,.,-, .-...L, ^ j , ^ ^ j ^ jjjj
___t, _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ „ _ _ , 1
i 
- 
i
* t «
-i -» j
x 
c 
u ^ 
• 
-i 
,"
| 
K- 
-• 
Ul 
t_ 
<
j - j 
* • » - * • * ^ .jr» 
'
»
_
*
.
,
p 
_| ( 
^> 
U- 
_J >-> >- 4 
j 
U. « Uf X 
|
.J O
r a-
IW 
<• -1
Z 
JO
- 
C T
. * » t » »MJ 1
r^ *M^ *. r» * la. -*•
r*
o
j
i
i
L 
- 
;
, ' !
* 
; 
i
E
3
: i
it 
>
)
1
1
! 
i
i
i
ii
i
i 
i
• 
i
i
1
I
i
; 
1
! 
' 
' 
i
• 
!
* 
• 
i
t
i 
' 
• 
. 
\ 
'. 
\
* 
i
¥*
o 
<
^*MJ
X«
^ >4
l MJ U>
^ r •
i
i
i
i
* 
*
^^H^^^HV^MMMVMIBHOTBBMIilBHQIBiHHi^^BHI^^ w*QPMMMiHPH|l|HHnHEIBQFv^b
»^tp-r ; --• r . -. .^ ^^^S^J^8;:,
^^^^•^^^^^n^'-^^^viir^^^
• j
TUT 
001 
i:
Lfi
MC.
<"•
HOJfCT NOI 262
_ 
ANALYSIS
PROJECT NAME: TURPENTINE RUN
suuun nu
DATE
•now
TO
TIN?
—OF—
DAY
L A B N D P A R N D P A R J N E T E p NiHt
070032 34641 4-
3*403
TU«P.»U>.___BT/10/13 
1200
, J'PTH: P3U3 "TUBSTIIATEi'TByfOlfr
3FSCR1PT10N8 LAB BLANK_________
EXTRACTION BATE I0/lT/IT
PTRfNf
34T4T
34521
34356
34631 3«3'-t)ICHLOIO^ENZTDENE
34611 2^-ulNTTROTOLUEM*
"jTir*
34290
3424^
J*?'!
34i?*
3*43o
UNtTS
Oi/L
UC/L
UJ>L
Uu/L
US/L
IT./U
34416
3 4 6 5 7
J4SST
3*534
K?X»C,MLO»3£T-(1NC
39TOJ
34S51
342TJ S I S < 2 - C M L P R O t T n Y L ) F T .
342TJ STStZ-CHLOROETHCXY) MTTH.
34406
344(T H
34>2t___
~j443J if>p^lt^yiuuli'HfKTCTF^TMr 
'.
i FT.
Ol/L
-C/L
JJ'L
JG/L
C'Vi.
U../L
Oi^l
U5/1
ilG/L
U'.i".
U-./L
'j'/L
ul/L
U7/L
T<:T«L
TCTAL
T O T A L
TOTAL
T-1TAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL-
TOTAL
TTTAL
f P T A L
Trr»L
T'-TtL
r: TIL
r nk
TOTtL
T C T l l
rrm
T1T4L
TOT»L
TOI'L
TfTIL
T"TtL
T O T 4 L
TTTTt ——
' C T S L
0 » T t ! ST/12/22
9
9
V»LJE '. «E<(»»«
fin
u
__jj_
u
.__J1,
I
1
u
>j
i
1
u
u
u
'IT'
u
II
H
T"
II
" J*
l» 
.
! 
1
£;
0 O
*-o>
M *
* *
kLi
•-» M
'X M
•- -t
0 X
po <
Pi-
IT a.
oo
0
v»
*• *- >
V 
W» »*
« « .-Jl
*-*-»»
A 1 1
m X r*
o ^r-
r- -» *->
•» T
a T*
.^1 X
* »*
O ^
I—
1
1
i
^. C;
^.> a*
1 '^
"» i^»
ft. CJ
oi-
T* C
r o
*- -^
X X
1 1 1
C'O C:
in -* -«
-«^O
r- H H
« uc ^
r>* *n n
» •• is*
t 
U* 1
0 » *
»-» 1 ^
X f »»*
O * t>
V m * n
1- X *'
w^. S ^
*-i X rn
»^ fW
n,ir
^ /i
t* »
x- «
i* • j
--• i
-
w
n vi
m m
!•* r •
>•
— •1
X
*:*
?s
•i rr
m
•?
i r-
0
•4 f
•< z
^
o r-
3
^ f
r- j.
^
i a
t» -«
•H
•< ~9
t» -<
V T
A »
Z »
»~ n
m
-k
?b
r£
a-*
3:
r
-H '
j
» LJ
C JC
J. *
" Z
? z
''I •<
r-
•D
(T
r*
O 3O
X "t
J Ifl
n
o>
r»
•:-
mif
.
™»
•9
*
X
T
•n
>)» ru 2
)»•* i i»
c: fc- c: c c c
x !x x x x N
i- r~ f r r- r-
. i n :• cj ;j i
-• M -•-«-» -^
i* j» * .» r P
r c - - _ : r c c c r : e . c c : c c c c t c c r c c c . c c c c c : p . r - c
X X X 
X X X X X X ' X X - N X X X X , X X X N , x f x X X X X X f X X - X
, - ^ r - r r - ^ , , - r - r - ^ r - r - , - r - r , - r - ^ r - r - t - , - r ^ ^ r - p r - r
:> t* .3 o o
a 'j . i ra r
F
» «f r- >» * I*' ^ *•
i-i-r-r r-r-rr-
! 
I 
,
1
*.^^H
'9H
m$
?»
,fr
»
*'<5F*1
•,'i
••r
• *»
•1
4
•rav'
••«1
^B'
*$»•
TO?1
'T;
' fr •
rf
m
HB
Blips
mm
tt&m
v> '• i«
\. f. • t V
v«f •'••
1
•
 ; ; ;K1
If: 1
r '• v. 1
tyfcj
i- |.1,: •*•
Pj
•>. 
J
M'/-« •
M
1
"i
>~
i liS'
A.; K
en &•
Ji, ITI
^
,tl| 
PROJECT NO! 262
• 
DATE 
TINc
STATION NO 
««ON 
OP
TO 
OAT
4 
—— •— -— 
• —— -• 
- 
-
4
'•'•
*
»
*
*
f
*
«r
it
+
'"I
«
*
*
*
ft
«,
C3NPLFTEO A N A L Y S I S REPORT
PROJECT HA" El 
TURPENTINE RUN
LABND 
PARN3 
P A R A M E T e Q *t»t
ODO&12 i»452 P-CHL?RO-J»TCRtJ:..
...... . . . 
. _ J4£Jt i.t-jlMtRO-J-CRULL, 
..
J4646 4-NITR3Prt!HOL
3*53i 1(2-31CH11ROBENIE<I':
3*J9^ MEKAQfltBRlJtT'l JN£
j*T02 Hf X«CHL."1Sr»urtCiIE ^f
34696 NAPHTHALENE
3*2Tj 8IS(i-CMLO«n£fHp<¥ ) 4'TH.
34**T NIT*jR£Nkf M?
3 » * 2 5 ^-NITROSODl-M-pii JPTLA"J ( t
!*>'! SlcHLS"""?--^'^!*"""
J * ^ 3 0 
A C c ^ A P d T M V L t N:
J * 2 C ' AC c^APHTH'*-?
Jfc^i ^LQ'JKFNF
34$*e »-aP3"OP^fNTU K h c ^ T L "T.
3*123 A N T H ^ S C r N f
3*3*1 0rH?TMfL PhTi«L'rr
3*33o L'ltTnYL P>iTh«l4TE
?4?»2 
3UTTL 5*NITL i"T-»»tJr'
)*i)« OI-N-QCTTL ^HTHALITV
^'136 »IiCi-ETH»L p'E»TL) PMT-'.'L.
3*3'6 'LvfCRAKTh^Nf
3 4 * 4 * 7YRENF
3*3JQ C'lRTifN1;
3 * 5 2 6 l»i- iF:CANTH^'i.F ^f
J4J41 •»-i,fl!PROP»i£Nr^ PJI'IT^ tTt
3*^*7 e*Nza< fJcTj'N 1
-JJHIIi
SSJt
U'/L
J'/L
l'~''_
Jii/L .
UC/L
J1/L
jJ'L
.US/1.
U1/L
LC/L
i' ; / L
JG/L
J'.^L
U'/U
•J^/L
U'-/L
U'1/L
J'.'L
JJ/L
»EPO»T
Crtf^KTBr
TQTiL-
TQTIL
T O T A L
T T T » L
T O T A L
TOTAL
T3TAL
T U T A L
I2TAI
T T T A L
T:T«L
T-HL
L-r'l
T J T J .
r - T A L
10TH
T P T t L
TPTll
TCUt.
> •: i « L
r- rit
T "i T • L
TOTli.
O A T S : *7/i:/?z 
T 
T
Vll llf 
C. f r «1B<
0
U __ .. 
——— T^
u 
•
u
u
u
u 
*
u
u 
^
JL_._ 
••
u 
"
I'
u 
^
IJ
J
J 
^
u
•\
I. "".."!•]
IJ
•J 
- _ 
*
'" « * 
N
*
J 
II
't
V 
»
C
1
•
. n
T
1 ac
4U
»-
01
X
r>
, 
-1
}
1C
1
*
B
1
>•
M
!
4j
3h
I
I
l m. >
* o «
•• 
c
• X
*• o c
4 • »-
r m.
oz
Xo
^
r 
*
••
i
1
1 at
i
C1 cj
= '1
J
^
"s
, a. *
! S S
2:
• «
»< •-<
~i
w* ^
fNJ
O
o
i
••i
s :
ci d
t= d
U'
2^
S;
S5
o d
X f
o *
*-» J
1 r
» 
1
v4 
<4
«
•
! 
1
:
i
3 ^ ^ $
"ST5
c* • » ( t t»
M
u» »v T ^
JD Q * 3
-»5 * *
CT T <-i j
SifIS
*- -» o a:
v: a J d
o o c. *^i
I I I - *
r« 4> 0 '«
-< 4 ** +
0
Oo
o
Xo
m
j
i
•
A.
ae
V 
^ r
* 
*
•••H
1 
j 
! 
!*' 
- 
! 
•": 
: 
i
1 
1 
i
1 
' 
i 
' 
,
i
. 
i 
•
• 
' 
i 
!
o (9 c> a o i n c> c d o f ; cj ' > r. ci •_< ci c O i O c t r t c . i_i i_ . c. j 
;
^
Z 
ui
•x 
7
** 
T
T 
--J 
<( 
Ltl 
fc-
u-t«lii:C 
U* T ««• *-f JT _ I 
^1 T 
<«7
_J CT r -t 
O C 
X Q i i >• or O O i*« 
OCO 
u<M 
**• t*. X tu
t - c * l H * y I l ^ f » e r h - c i I X « « 
*-4 V u. t J 
u i ? O f t .
(h.
o 
t 
I
i 
!
' 
i
i
*
 
; 
i 
'. 
!
0 
. 
'
Ml 
!
M ! 
: 
i 
|
K. 
' 
!
0
r 
; 
, 
• 
;
o 
' 
•
•" 
,
 
:
** ' 
«i 
^ 
•
«
«
«
«
«
«
•
.
«
•
•
•
•
•
••••IHHHHHHHH^HHHHtti^^ . ^^1
TUT' 
00.11255
C H t M I S T t Y
O*TCI
V 4 L J L I 
Ri-4A?«.
UG/L
V4/t
Ur»'L
-*<WL-
Ui/L
U'./L
^r,/L
fi/L
Ui'L
vli'l
Ui'L
1>&/L
L''-/L
^T'4'
Jt/L
Ui'L
Ui'L
J5/L
JC/4.
U'»/L
U»/t
J 'i/L
u.;/t
U ,/\.
ji/L
J"/L
Ui/L
I' '• ' L
JC/k
y»/i
U»'L
Ur". /L
U J/L
L' "• / L
Ji/l.
«i/L
U;/L
ffr»AL-
T O T A L
_ _ Tft? *L —
T O T A L
T9UL
T O T A L
T P T A L
TPTAL
T O T A L
T O T A L
T9J41
T O T A L
WWU —
TOTAL
1TT1L
T 3 T A L
T-T1L
TOTAL
T t) I « i.
ICIAL
T .' T > L
TOTit
TCT»L
ICTAL .
T 'J T » L
TITit
fTlL
T O T A L
T C t A L
IJIAt- -
MT4 L
TDTiL
r"T»L
iriTAL
Itttt- -
T : T A L
11
U
L1
*,*- ———»»-
U
«-
{J
U
U
U
U-
0
.-X.
•J
U
ij
U
U
II
1}
II-
II
Cr-
C
Cf;
•JM
A'J
w 
' 
" • 
'
COMPLETED. *NALYSIS REPORT
\ 
I
PROJECT NOI 161 
PROJECT NANt 
URPfNTINE RUN
% 
OATf 
TIME
. .(STATION NO 
PROM 
Of 
LAINO 
PARNO 
PARAMETER NAME
" 
TO 
DAY
%
O J O T 7 4 3*6*1 *-CHLOROPHENYL P«fNYL CT.
3*521 lil2-BE>UOPERTLEM?
% 
3*J56 1,215,6-DIBENlANTHRACEKF
34631 S.3'-OICMLOROSENZJOENE
% 
3**U 2.»*-OINJTRQTOLUf 1*
• 
3*3*4 1,2-OIPHENYL^YCRAIINE
• 
?*230 },4-BEM20PLLOR«NTHEf'C
39330 A.LDRI*
393SO OIEL01IN
* 
• 
393SC tJILOROANt
39300 *,*'-OOT
* 
3*310 ».*'-300
?* 3 4* ALPHA tlPO^iJL f<lN
3*3$6 S E T A ENDO'JOLf'N
,-m 
39390 ENCRIN
3*366 tSORIN AL9EHf?E
% 
:»*io HEPTACLP«
393JT ALPHA-BMC
» 
39338 4ETA-SHC
393*0 <A»>MA-ttHC
3*2?V OELTA-3HC
3ia71 PCJ-1016
39*§.' PCS-1221
* 
__ ......_... 
3»»92 PCi-123?
f 
39*96 •CS-12-2
.—_ _ ___ . ...__. 
39SCC PC»-12«J
395fl8 PCB-1260
TURP.RJN 
87/10/04 
1120
OESCRIP'TXClFpRrAii" i»ELL "1 
*RCH 5TA1DPI»E
:•;_::.-;::::
—
JNITS
OG/L
U4/L
UiCL
UG/L
U6/L
JS/L
U'i/L
06/L
Uu/L
UG/L
JS/L
UO/L
J5/L
JG/L
^v/k.
J5/L
UC'L
Ui/L
Ul/L
U5/1.
U'/L
Oi/L
U"//L
U'./L
uu/L
Ui'./L
——— 
———— •
REPORT OATEI
CHEMISTRY 
VALUE
T O T A L
T O T A L . 
. ....
T O T A L
TGTAL
T O T A L
TOTAL
IDTAi
T 9 T A L
TOTAL.. .
T O T A L
IDTIL
TCTlt
TOTAL
T O T A L 
.
T O T A L
TOTAL
TOTAL
T G T A L
TPTAL
TCTiL
TOTAL.... 
._..... __
TPTAL
T O f A L
TOI»L
7 T T A L
T O T A L
T D T « L
T ' T A L
T C T A U
T " T 1 L
1CT4L
TOTiL
-.. 
11 .
IJ/12//
'
t 
llfMARK
U
u
U
If
(J
u
uu
u
. u
u
u
11
u
11
u
u
u
..u.
u
11
u
,M
U
uu
u
IJ
U -
u
ti.
... 
.
-
KJUJlflL «
r v
1
i
4
H
t
4
4
1
M
4
4
4
If'
n
«
PROJlCT N0< 2»Z
l,.rfTATI3» NO
BATt.
'RON
TO
TIME
Of
£A?._-
COHPLETtQ AJUUISJL Ri'CtfT
PROJECT NAHEl TURPtNTINE RUN
gfpnaT BlTtl IT/!?/??
LA1NO 
P A R N O 
P A R t t C T t a N A M E
U N I T S 
C H E K I S T t r
V A L U r t
0*0777 3441b NCTHTL ChLORIPE
O'ftJTT 34*13
3*175
JAill CJUJOICETIIANE . 
. . . .
34473 METNTLCNe CHLORIDE
___ 
34J01 lil-OlCML3ROETnrLHit
344*6 ltl-OICML3ROeTH«N?
1.2-TRANS
32133
34106 liltl-TRKHLjaOETHANt
iJ10i.CA8aCS_njRACm.OJLI£i. .
32191
34541
345*1 1,3-OKHLSROPROPfLE*
jjiea
^i2l2J
94511
32P4
34514
3447$
34301
34*21
P-CMLO*0-H-CRESCL
34416
3*032
3*6»e <.-NIT»QPHtM3L__
3*571 l,4-OICML3R3aENZE1E
3453* 1.2.0ICHL3RPBFN:ENE
3*3*6 H l X A C M L O R O E T H l s E
3*702' H F X A C H L O R O a U r > C I E N E
OG/L
Ul/L
UC/L
UC/L-
Utt'L
Ui/L __
U5/L
UC/L
UC/L
Ui/L
U;>L
US/L
UT-/L
UJ/L
O'.'L
US/L
US/L
UG/L
JC/L
IJJ/S.
Ji/L
Ui/L
UI/L
UC/L
y,^L
VS'U
U"./L
U"./L
L'./L
us.'i..
UO/L
UJ/L
UT./L
U",/L
TOTAL
T2JAL, 
....
TOTAL
IfltAl. 
. ...
TJT»L
rnriL
T O T A L
ISIAL
TOT1L
T O T A L
T O T A L
TOIiL.
T O T A L
TOTAL
T C T A L
TOTAL
T T T 4 L
T P T A L
T2T«L
TtT»L
TCT«l
T T T A L
T?T«L
TJT«L
T?T»L
TTtAi.
T T f t i.
TOTlL
T O T A L
TOTiU
T P T J L
T O T A L
U
— U_
U
U
U
Uy
Uu
'Jij
L
-_U.-
U
11
U
u
2.* 
»»
y _j
uu
u
IJ
u.u
uu
J
u
u
J
'1
(
ft
1
(
1
1
If
1
{
" 
r~ 
' ~~ 
<
_ jr
1
. . .._ —
II
n
c
!
i
ii
i
• 
.
ii
| •
: 
i
t
} 
:
I 
c
f 
i a
4 
_
T 
>
if 
t
1
j
4.<
1
•j j j
« 4 4 4
d O Cj (
13 i» ta i
\-
2:
>o c
1
» l»l
i 3 :
'--
t 4 •
1 r r
i??
i 3 :
i j.
i « «
» c- f
» « t
, = :
• « •
* a i
* 11 1
' =
1 « .
) n c
U
fr
\"
• « .
» 0 r
t., ,
..,
fi.
I <- P
, . , -
' o :
fi:
;s:
> = a
*
c
* « «
ft ri c
r <* •
:-_:
M
r>
• « 4
1- f «
.- ^,
^ -i :
2:
1 r. <
i :• :
i •* <
t o r
t 4" I
i o :
t •n *
» d c
* 0 1
! 
.
1 
' 
1
""'
I
t
1
>-•..-. J J^-, J^-l
f c o o o o c - q < o o n
1 3 0 '^ '5 J J '3 3 3 3
u
a
H
2 
•
3
0 
»-
5 
i
«
- 
-
A
 
: 
»•
2 
*"
4 
<
-1 
. 
c
!
!
r
*-
HI
»-«n
tf
>•
0
a^
*
u*
s<n»o»i
3NHVHJ
i3
z <*
JU
»- . 
a 
*
1U 
rf tu -. _
r 
' 
« z _< r>
M.' 
U- 
T 
I J 
iM 111 
IT
^ - f - 
-J * 
OX 
L4 uv i*
« i 
3 x a >- * 
£ 
£ J £ cl 
z a 
5 o 
3 iu £•
ui 
V T •* t_> •• z 
9 J 
T « T 
T *u 
*K »- I -*e n- .T c* Cl O i: .1 J
«t 
* M
-J* IM t
z a x K
^ f^t ^ f
£« "» -J a
n w « x r ]
« z 3 
at
i
ssaas^ssswJswssasssssSssss
'
i 
.
i
; 
!
1 
i
!
i
i
1
1
i
i
I
1
j
1
1
: 
' 
1
1
i
! 
i 
, 
'
1 
i 
' 
i 
! 
'
I 
! 
: 
i 
1 
i 
!
OQj
k '. f'
1
"il?
....._em .
• 
PROJECT NOl 242 
PROJECT NAMEI
I 
BATI 
TIKe
v 
STATION NO 
*RjON 
&M 
lAtfcO 
PARNO
<-•§ 
TO 
0»Y
*
• 
]J«S
39310
. 
1^141
^ 
39390
•>f 
,.410
* 
3933T
_ 
393*0
.9*00
A 
394^0
* 
J9S30
• '• 
39534
• TURP.RUN 
er/io/06 uzs
DESCRIPTION: TlLLfT KEtL
* 
39175
34311
_ 
3»»2j
• 
J»$01
>• f 
34496
._ . . 
. ._. 
3**k*
W 
3Z104
* 
- 
-_ - - 
-2i3Z
..-.YSI'., > Q«T
TURPENTINE RUN
^AftAMCTftK NAME
«.*'-OOT
4,*'-OfcO
ALPHA iMW5tfL»*M-
5ETA ?N"OSULFAN
ENORIN
C NOD m ALOfeM^dC
HEPTACLoa
ALPMA-aHC
6AMP.A-l.hC
TOXAPMcNt
K.-1221
PC--124*
H!TMTL CHLCdl't
HeTHTL Etr.'HlJE
VINYL C^LCRI5=
KITHYLEN! C«LO»I3i
i,i.T8AN$ (iltHLCBClTriTi.ti!
CNLOROF^ft1*
l*2*UlLHLOR9£lf1All£
lild-T^ICnLCDJ^THANF
CA28UN TETIACHtraiLE
Ul/L
U1/L
UJ/L
US/L
U5/L
Ul/L
Ui/L
Oi/t-
00/L
Ui/L
UG/L
Uft/L
Ui/L
U'-/L
JC/L
u ;/L
!t 
UC/L
U'./L
- Ui/L
Ot./L
UC/L
UG/L
..Mf.
TOTAL
TOTAt-
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTJL
T»T«L
T3TAL
TCTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL —
TOTAL
T9T-L
T"TAL
T GT AL
TCTAL
IDTAL
T1TJL
TCTAL
riTiL
ICTiL
T^TAL
TOTAL
TCTAL
TCTAL
TOTAL
TCT«L
TOTAL
T:I«L
u~. El l.» i», 22 1 » - %
»*L-t« t R-HARH ——— ———
— ——————— e —————
M
u
u
————————————— U ————————
u
u
u
u
u
u
———————————— W ———————
u
u
u
tj
u
__ u • _ . __
u
u
J
-*t
1
<
4
|i
4
4
4
4
If
4
4
1
W
1
1
<
M-
01
r 
• 
•
: 
i
I
i
i
•
»r» 3 » 1 ^ 
*-• 
M n 
M n, »*» 
o
»» •< i-* r- 
«» 
.-n 
r-
rn -* 
r». 
•
1 
C, 
O'
i 
, 
• 
»
•Nt 
.kl
1 
1
~lu wl •.:<-•- w. 'V TIC: c := c. c .c-c: - c c,-— C
; 
i 
] 
.
j 
: : ' 
!
1
1
1
X •
S2
X-\
\'-'-
c c.
1
1 1
0 CT
r> x.
in n
* 7T
'- • l_»
t C
2 M
e> H
Cl
c r
c c
i
1
j
I
! 
t
!
ss^ss:
I H-< OC X
I
jb c, m m ~n X
3?m* 
«
f" J- 
X
-* 
-<
r~ 
r"
i«i 
m
X 
m
' 
*> 
: 
*••
-> 
: 
o
c. w c etc
1
1
1
1
t
t 
;
r* a -« On* C
i 3 jo** 
*
S 55 i
o 
v c 
r
a 
, o P* 
in
r- 
-n -4 I
U 
I -1 »' 
n
1
0 l» »
•n 
zm
4 ;"' :
*
C CJC.CC C
ci si o o ei 1.1
o t? o o o o
-V
1 
'
C CrC C:C
1
i 
j
4
>
^
C
J
i
i
i 
^ >
1 
o «
1 
1
1
1 
I O"i
o 
r
-4 
1
-4 
«
1 1 
>
on 
r
X X
9 a 
*
JD V
(JO 
H
cc- 
a
ra
30 
x
1 
; 
. 
"
i
1 
'• 
1
1 
' - i
r
J
M
c c 
l a?
m
x-™*
MOJICT NOt 242 
MOJtCT NAMI
c
m 
«
z 
»i r
c 
>
z
(
c
1
•
• -ft » r • 
» 
•
«
»
%
%
*
*
ll
g
1 
^f
1
1
•.
1
1
i
r 
i 
!
HJ
If
U'
1C
f 
4 J O
r
Z 
3 3
^ =.
D 0
..
3 3
0 0
3 3
C- 0
-
a 3
,,
n o
a a
L. O
= 3
c- o
3 3
3 "3
ts
•5 3
™ '
1
1i
1
0 TJ3 3
r , C Cj O
3 -D T ;>
i 
1 • 1 
, 
1 
i
i 
: 
i 
i 
i 
i
1 
1
"'"':' •""""""""
o
i
b
3 0 3 ^ . , J J O J ^ ->J_1J J3 3 ->=I33
I 31
•r
«i
I * 
£
I »- 
R
» « UJ 1 
' 
>- X 
»r »'.»., 
72*
(*- j *- a 
* a. 
.u'oz -«iu i-
{•••«« 
4* .u 
U T *" »• t j li> *» T 7
AJ Ct
•UJ 
t ^ I
.2 
BU "5 :
<u 
9 lua
Z 
K X4
LJ c « m»~ :
H v* 3t 
d 
u
»» o * 
j rf o
>- o o f^ m *
j 
« .1 o c- o -« x j 
ja
y. t. f. o ci o 
iM^zaru«
i M r» er i I i<* t^^iM-C'
• b _ J I ^ » » » X «A O b K »- I
< r < r c r c* • * • * • * o« •* e i
-i «!o
c9 a
• 
OATl 
TINE
STATION NO 
PRON 
OP
T 
TO 
DAY
1
*
%
*
%
f\JRP. RUN 
<7S10YDt 
1J*0
•DEPTH! 0000 
SU»ST»ATE: AOU*OU!
DESCRIPTION! FOUR hIMOS PLAZA - HELL «1
%
. 
———— - • — — " 
- 
•
•
-
-
•
•
r
•
9 -
• i
•
•
•i
•
• - — - • - - - • - •-— - 
• -
LA8NO 
PA* 
PARAMETER NAME
^
090778 J9JJ7 ALPNA-BMC
39338 8ETA.BHC
393*0 CAHMA-BHC
3*259 DtLTA-BHC
3*471 PCB-1016
39**2 PCS-1232
39*»& PCB-1242
J950* PCS-12S*
39508 PC8-126C
0 * 0 7 7 j 3**1A Kl-TNTL CrtLilPITi
3**i3 HITHYL SROMT;-
39175 VltTL CHUQSIJ F
3*311 CHLCaOETMK'
3*S51 li l-OlcMt3RC! ThYL£Nf
J*»'e li l-OICHL"l'i"'f Tt(f s;
3*5*6 1»2-T»ANS Oi;HLOR1t THYL
32103 l«2"3T(;HLOI'OcTHAN':
331P2 CARBJN TeT»A:«LP«ir e
3*JS1 l»i-CICHL3ROP f fOP»LEN;
3210* fP OPO'ORM
3*516 1,J ,2,^-TETIii:rtL J»Cf T«^
3 * * T 5 T c T K A C X L O K O ^ T H Y L E M c
3*010 T3tUE>E
3*301 CHLOROB^H)'^1*:
UNITS
Ui/L
UC/L
UG/L
UC/L
i^C/L
UG/L
UC/L
Ui/L
JC'L
i/5/L
UC/L
JG/L
U •• / L
UJ/L
fNf 
U'-./L
Ui/.
u :. / 1
UC/L-
Ui/L
dO/L
J../L
fJ/L
bj/L
J'/l
UT-/L
N? 
Uj/t
CMiXISTRY
T O T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
TCIAL
TOTAL
ItlAL
TCTiL
T 2 T A L .
T T T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
T O T A L
TDT«l,
T T T A L
T E T A L
T ? T » L
IQIAfc 
. . . . . .
7PT1L
TCT»L
T O T A L
T C t A L
TPTAL
T J T A L
T C T t L
r:riL
VALUE L ftm(
. ........ It
u
u
u
u
. 
-U- _
u
11
u
M
u
'J
uII
u
. U.— -
u
u
uu ._
u
.J .
u
1)
u
u
•J
• -
' m
I ,.. 
J
•
•
•
n•
•
•
•
0•
_ . •
•
..... _ •
• •
..... •
•
ir-•
•
•" •
•
01
....... %
• 
i _ • 
• 
9 9-9 
t 
9 9.9 
9 0 ':* 
/ 
f 
r . e
n
U
<i
=»-=!
^==,^^=.3==:=-
^«:
rie. i^oacjcji^rlorjLiaodC'or.ciocit o o c» r £.j r t- t- c_i cj c. 0 t. o v c, o c_
V X X | v N . X X X > X X V X X ' S \ . N . V V X > t a X V X X X X N X
*3 *j is »^ t» o o ir va o is o c« u» ia L? o ' * t»»•» ^ « t> o o o »^ ^ ;"
3 J 3 O 3 J 3 3 3 l 3 J | r » 3 3 3 D 3 3 T D ^ 3 0 ? ^ -3 J' 3 ."3
o. >- a a. .j 
3- r
a. x ci u « 
"jo.
I It* W* .J X II. 
1-4
i *, q o «e o 
M»«4fsiiu»«a 
xo
o w j x u x 
x jd z z 3 ci x r
I *~* *4 ^ rt T _j *t> «• « IT *— n 
uj iu
(^v>*.i«.i_«oc*o^-3-j 
nc 
NU t o cr »• i u- t. n.^v,
| Z t > o c a o z w v u j * c u j a r i & 
x »-**+et u-v -j ^r 
Y z ^
• T * l t t l U O C I O C l C ^ U X a O U J W i O C C 3 O « > - U j 
O l,« WJ I
-»ji»^io<-i-i«ar<rr 
« c «•
^- Ji _* T
•**--«»-
_j •* r r
o 
« i|*- i
•r JIH M i c 11 M u a1 *»* M
o d « r-o a
O K ^ X
.
r H- t. >•
a i j »-• .
a ^ * i
^ _J 3 O .
r >• «• 
«
i- r i _i
TUT 
OO1
1264
€ S *
,u
" ir
a o o c
Jt -J J J -J .
O ^J IS J O tj I* ._> c* v* «- •! «1 t* (J •!> " U1 i* •» «
'
-
1
a
IU
V- HI
* H
*" ^ 
U
«t 3 at «
»•• ^ v l
o -a Vf
m fl « *
n
O
JS 
.:
>• *- 
•
« ft. 
«
«U «. 
M. 1
U 
- 
-J «
•e *• t A «c J
>- "• •« fc •
Z XI N »r O H
« • 
»«L nl C
p>4 O »4 «4 3f |
1 31 Itf rf 01 •
"Vo3-.-J
« ^ r> r-> «« 4
ss^2s3
a*
X
•V0
*-• «• UJ
2 M IU
tw 9 3
0 U 0
o o a
-j « tf
T t. >-
O M »-•
•-t 4< ^
« « •»
^ ••**
<n rt m
*• u
Ml III
»* T
« 7
O 1
T 0
» -1
»"•
u ^
••* *
T°
"-
a
3
^
a
c
,
c
»•
J 
tu
u 
^ ^ i- iu O
t 
** * u <j 4
^O *« -J * 'T 4
•4 O O 3 «.*» O v>
4s.;ssss
u.> 
u
^ 
'
«a X <- 
u 
>*
j u. r> »- a
O I/I > 
O 
K
O Q « 
J« O t»
zrcia. 
«.o-iXu
«u x -* 
j r * T
u 3 X x o t> i a.
«. *- 0 O QO. 0. « »-
•4 4 -^ O«OOr*iv>
S S 5 S S S 5 5 5
hj U Ul
TT X <T »* *M **«••* 0
« . J * < t f r 9 < a ' * d ; 4 &
•9 y> -3 •« <O -4 •* 3 -* TJ
S * S S S 5 . S « S £
r.' 2m
• 
fill* 
10* : 
*• 
' Ml 
ttH 
RUN
B»f f 
Tt"
• 
STATION NO 
'RON Of 
LAINO 
MRNO 
PARAMETER NAME
V 
———————————— Xfl ———— DJLT ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
. nlUIP. RUN 17/10/0* 
ISO)
•DESCRIPTION! ELGIN HELL »3
0»07«0 3»*l| METHYL CuLORl'f
9 
lAkli Ma***HI 
ABflUTilF
3*175 VINYL CHLORIDE
- — 
. 
... 
... 
. - 
-<4M*- CUtOROtTMANj . . . . . .
* 
3»»ZJ NETHVLENE CML^PIJt
- 
3»*t6 Itl-OlCNLOROETHANE
• 
———————— 
———————————————— 
***** U4-TIUMS OICHl»a««T.l»LfWf
• 4 
32104 CHLOROFORM
*
• --— " : -: - 
Illil liiSllilst^iSr
* 
3*511 ltl.2-T»ICrtL3»QfTM»hiE
_ 
3*51* ltltii2-TETPACHLJ»OtT'<iNE
i*01C TCLUtNC
3*331 CHLORQb^Nlil.t
* 
3*JT1 ETMTL'£NlF:,r
-K19&.. lEai-EjTTLJltlMYLtThE *
3*586 2-CHL3RCPHENJL
* 
- 
i*391 2-liITR3PnENOL
f 
3*6«* PHENOL
J»*S2 P-CHLCRO-N-C»«iDL
W 
JA61& 2««-UINITROPHUIOL
3*657 *.6-OimTI>(>-3-C«eSLL
39332 PENTiCHLJRaPrlENQL
3*6*6 »-NlT RJP* CNCL
_ 
3*571 l,*-OICHLrpOREt*:e1t 
'
* 
- 
3*53» liZ-OICMLaPISEMINi
f 
3*3*4 Hf XACHLTROtTilANF
UNITS
U5/t
UtVl
UI/L
n^ *»
U;/L
Uf./L
U4/L
U'-'L
ut/t
UC/L
uG/L
Oi/l
Ji/L
Oi/L
Ui/'.
bO/L
f./L
J^/L
Ui/L
US/L
UG'L
L:/L
Oi/L
U5/L
•JC/L
U&/L
c./t
US/L
Ui/l
Ub/L
Ur- /L
••^^ 
•
CMEMISTRT
T O T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
T O T A L
Tf>T»l
T O T A L
TOTAL-
f:t*L
tOJAV- 
—
T O T A L
TOTAL
T T T A L
T O T A L
T 3 T * L
K T A L
T O T A L
lain.
IPT»L
I3T1L
T T f A L
J JTlL
T f T t L
tJTAL
TOTAL
T O T A L
T - J T A L
I C T A L
IjTiL
T:T»L
T O T A L
T " T » L
,^^f. 
^BB^ 
_ __ _
VALUE t 
REMARK
U
« 
1
u
u
u
u 
1
11
u
».*. 
.. - .. .. —— _
uu 
_... — . _
'J
u
*o 
• 
————
«-. 
. •
J
'•t
a
u
o _ _
0
u
U 
- 
-
" 
*
u
1
III
• ——————— mm —— TINE
STATION NO 
PRON 
OP
j 
'0 
»'
••
— . ... —— . ... .... 
.. .
•sf
1
- -
PKDJECt HAHt^
LABNO 
PARMO
0»OT«0 39792
3*551
3*696
3*771
3*278
jivrr
j*»*7
i»*33
3*213
3*386
3*591
3*200
3*381
11700
3*220
3*316
39110
3*S»«
>»526
3*&«1
3**P3
3*7*7
3*426
3*iU
39310
'PENTINE RUN 
'
PARAilETER N«ME
MEXACMLOROBUT10IENE
NAPHTHALENE
JT3T2"=CmOROETNTL> FT.
BIS(Z-CHLOROeTMO»Y> 4ETH.
IsuPaORflN*
NITROBENIENF
N-NtTROSOOlPHtNVL*M7NE
BISfZ-rHCfJBDlSOPRBPT,.) TT.
M E X A C H L O B O C r C L O P t N T A D I E N t
2-CHL1ROMI7HTHALENE
ACEN*PMTMYLEN!
FLCURFNc
ANTHRACENE
CIETHYL PMTM.L»T6
4JTYL a f S Z Y L PHT-I'L't'
OI-N-CCTfL PHTHILAT'
' B I S ( 2 - c T n r L H c v Y L > PMT-iiL.
l,2-iENZANTH»<3CFNF
*-CHL"R?PME>(YL M'NYL f c T .
1,215,6-OTaf *.Z«NrnP*C'Nf
2l*-OlNlTR3Ti1LUC^F
IfZ-OlPHtNTLtVOmZIWE
3t*-B!N20PLU?4ANTHENc
tLORlN
UNITS
Ufi/L
ucn
US/I
JG/L
UC/L
•~ts/i"
UG/L
U5/L
U5/L
jG/L
Ou/L
UG/L
OI/L
ur./L
UG/L
•jr,/L
JVL
Ul/L
U'./L
J:!/L
IJ5/L
Ui/L
l-'-./L
UG/L
U'S/L
05/T
uG/L
ul/L
U'J/L
•ji/L
Ui/L
01/L
U:/L
«tPO«
CHEMISTRY
T O T A L
TBTtL 
"
T O T A L
TOTAL
TOTIL
T O T A L
T P T A l
T O T A L
T n T A L
TCTU
T ' T A L
T 5 T A L
T O T A L
T ^ T A L
T1TAL
T O T A L
T P T A L
TCTlL
T O T A L
T C T 4 L
T ? T 4 L
T O T A L
T-TJL '
TTT«L
T O T A L
T O T A L
T3TAT "
T-<T«L
T O T A L
TflTtL
T O T A L
T?Tll
TTTir"
T 7 T A L
TnTAL
T O T A L
( OATtl m/llfll
/
(
VALUE t 
BEN»OH
u
u
Ij
u
U
uu
u
u
u
u
u
1.1
u
u
•J
•J
'J
V
M
IJ
•J
u
•
m
9
•
•
n•
•
•
__ •
n•
._ 
•
. . 
^
. _ 
. . 
41
•
- •
~""n*
n
» 
——— MUJIll HlU'Trr ————— 
«OJ!IT »«BH
•
"^TATlaN NO 
MOM 
3P 
LAShO 
PARNO
• 
TD DIT
£ 
090TIC 39380
31350
39300
• 
' 
- - . .- 
. . ... 
JfJ56
- 
~34«1
• 
3*3*6
——— 
—— 
--—— - —————— 
343J1
"» 
19399
• 
* 
J43«»
39410
7^*70
• 
39337
3931J
• 
———— 
—— - 
'-- - 
34251
J9400
... ..... .... 
..._.. 
mn
• 
——— —— — _ - - - 
59500
— - - 
3,531
• 
TURP. RUN H/lO/H 
ls?b
ofpTKT from) 
SUISTRATIT: »oj?3us
DESCRIPTION: ELIIN HELL «2
091/81 3*418
• 
JS17S
M'| 
Stlii
_ 
._ 
. 
34>01
3*J»4
3210*
34906
TUWFIMTINF DUN
PARANET^r Nt'E
OIELORIN
CKLOIOtkiE
4t*'-OOT
»,*'-OOC
ALPHA fvoosUL^AN
IfTA (NOOSULFAN
EMORIN HSEHfCe
HEPTACLOP
nf^T«CHLOR ?^OXT5?
»!T*-»HC
OELTA-m
PCS-1221
PC6-1232
pca-l2*f
PCft-1254
METHYL tMLQPIPt
HETMYL flRCHTJ*
VINYL CNLORUT
1,1-iILHLlOeTMY.ENf.
1,2-TRAN5 CICHLCJOETHTL
CiLO«nf ns«(
l!l (l-TIXChLO*Of THAKl
jNITS
UC/L
JJ/L
UC/L
Ui/L
Uj/L
UO/L
UJ/L
UWL
05/L
dC/L
U1/L
U"./L
L.I/L
UJ/L
•J3/L
J'./L
U"/L
u'./L
?N- 
J-./L
UO/L
UO/L
jr./L
LC-/L
1EPBUT ftiTEt
C^E«ISTR» 
• 
VALJ?
T O T A L
T C T A L
T O T A L
T O T A L
TOTAL
- TcT*L
T O T A L
T O T A L
T O T A L
T9TAL
T " T A L
'T"TAC 
"
T D I A L
TMAL
T 3 T A L
TOTAL
torn 
"
T O T A L
TPTiL
T7TIL
T T A L
TrriL" 
- 
-- - --
T C T A L
T-7TJL
T f T » L
T f; T « L
T ,T«l
I T T ' L
T O T A L
T T T 4 L
T .- J 1 L
t 
??HAP|k
^
u 
•
2 
P"
U 
%
u
u
u 
•
<j
u
u 
•
J
u
u 
«
u 
•
0
u 
•
L1
J
o — — — — »
U
'J
tf
u
J 
K
g 
- —
^'. 
•
i 
•
; 
M
Dl
(
MOJICT bOi 2»! 
PROJECT NAHEI TURPENTINE RUN
BATI 
TIltE 
_ . _ /
t 
STATION NO 
PRO* 
0' 
LAINO 
PAR\ 
PARAMETER NA»E
TO 
nty
i
• | 
090TS1 32101 DICMLORO&POMJHETHANE
lASkl l,2-QlCHLOHQ»P.OP^-"t
3*050 BfNZENE
3*511 1>1|2-TRICHLOR3ETHANE
3210* fctKQMQFQRA
• 
3*514 l t l > 2 i 2 - T E T R A C H L 3 R O F T M A N E
3*010 TDLUENt
• 
fl 
, 
3*371 ETHYL3fNJEM c
————— ._ —— — _______ __ 
. 
»«•»« I»BT-»uT»L*£fM»LtTH£l,
3*49* PHfNOL
3*416 Z.*»OIUITRO»i«EXCL
3*457 *t6-OINlT*0-0-C»iSOL
* _ . - . - 
- 
3«33i PlNTACriLOROPrtcfcGL
_ 
- 
3*»6» X.S-tlCMLOftO-EwIEMi
* 
39732 HExACHLOR3iUT13IENc
3*5!l 1,1, t-TSlCfL'J^J^ENIPilt
* 
3*»73 &ISC2-CHL3inf.THYi.) ET.
* 
. 
J***7 NITRJScNiESt
_ 
-- 
3**33 N»kITRa$COiP>lct.V>.AMIN:
3*i?3 3 I j C 2~C ML *? "D 1 SCP a rPTw ) ?T»
• t
JMtS
U4/L
U&/L
Ui/L
UC/L
OG'L
UC/L
- — U6/U
UC/L
UC/L
JG/L
Uli/L
US/U
Ow/L
UO'L
uC-'L
UO/L
u'-'L
o'-'L
J.'./L
J;,/L
wi/L
uU/L
JU/L
J'i'L
US./L-
Ui/L
UC/L
U^/L
ji/L
UC/L
C^E^lSTRt
T O T A L
TCIAi
T O T A L
T O T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
TOTAL
T C T A L
T r T A L
TOTAL
T C T J L
TOTAL
T O T A L
T C T 4 L
TOTAL
T O T » L
TOTAk.
T P T A L
TClll
I n T ' L
T OT*» k.
T O T A L
T C T » L
T O T A L
T C T f L
Tr.TAL
T O T A L
TOTAL
T!?T1L
r: T«L
. . T O T A L
*.i-*«T ^r .,
VALUE t »E1«4 
J
U
u 
(
^-- 
- - 
«
u 
n
u 
'
u 
,
u
x»0 
-J 
- ——— - ^
_ ..i.___... 1
u 
U
t 
" 
«
. .. 
—— . ——————— u ————————— _
i. 
- —— ._. <
u
•s -•- 
«
,r " 
"n
"u 
" 
" 
«
(I 
t
11 
<
" 
<
<u
4
4
4
• 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 
_ <
H
• 
Bi*S 
J* 
'1
• i —— IBM 
II 11 
FRO 
"Aff '*f f»' 
IUN
4AU-- 
TIME 
- 
.
STATION NO 
MO* 
Of 
LAINO 
PARNO 
PARAMETER N»m
t A 
ft^Y
i
'-• 
0»OT»1 34200 ACENAPMTMYLENE
I A3 A A *r •** '••'TMCttC
34311 FLDUREMf
34434 4-MROMOPHENYL PMFNYL ST.
i 4 4V A & PMft MAMT MB t MC
34220 ANTHRACENE
341AJ OIMTMIL • HTHiLMf
34334 3IETHYL PHTMALATE
1 
}4f94 0>I^M*OCTVL PHTttAlATC
•f 
3*100 SIS(2-ETHYLHE»L> PNTxAL.
3412i) CHRYS4MX
34126 li2-tEN74NTH«>CFx'
— -- 
' 
34441 4-CMkOROPNiMYL P^EliYl. H.
34403 lN3ENO(li!t.1-C,D) PYJltNK
^"i l<l,.2;"!!"!"^'?!ftfl
... 
- 
- . 
J4»26 2(4-3IMITtQT2LJEV£
| 
34-.11 2t*-i.IM!YR'JT:LUE<l-
——— - - - - - - 
34344 ItJ-OIPHEhYL'IYbBAZlNi
34242 ll.12-3JHZOFtUJ2il.lMi.v-.
3 9 3 7 0 JLJBlN
- 
392SJ OIELjitiN
39300 *i4'-OCT
J°315 ^li'-lii"1
— - 
343S6 3ETA EKQjSuLFil.
f 
' 
34391 ENOOSULMN SJLFiT'.
34366 c*0*lk 3LDi!Ht.->t
34*70 MEMTiCrtLKf ^P'lIJt
UNITS
UC/L
tfC/L
U5/L
Ufi 'I
U6/L-
Ui'L
Ui/L
M*f f • —
US/L
UI/L
U5/L
U'./L
Ui/L
UO/L
Ut/L
U3/L
J^/L
J3/L
UG/L-
UI/L
U'-'l
J.'./L
L'l/L
Ui/L
U;/L
Ul/L
OS/L
J'./L
—— 
••^••t*. 
-••' tfc
CHEMISTRY 
VALUE
T C T A L
- 
lOTAt- - — -
TCTAL
T O T A L
- TOTAt-
T 3 T 4 L
TQtAi
TOT»L
T O T A L
1 V f •*
T O T A L
T O T A L
TOTAL
TOTAL
ICTAt
T « T A t
fCTlL
TO T AL
r:m
IDTAt
TOT«'.
Toru
r: T»L
T1T1L
T O T i L
I3IAL
TCT«L
T C T « L
TOI1U- 
-
•^••i^^ 
-^^"^»-
?M of «O
t REtARK
0
U
u
u
u
———— u —————
u
————— V ———————
u
- __. — II —————
u
u
u
u
u
u
J
u
u
L.
'Ju _ _ _ .
a
y. 
- —
ij
.1
«-—
w
^
•
0
ri--•
9
•
^
n•
m
- %
M
- ^
o
01
• i » ^ ( t r * - o n e r
«v
3
_•
*5|J
I
1
I
<
•
wfc
9
,
<t
_
k
iII
1
i
1
^
1
1
1
1
1
5
i
'
1
4
«
I)*
3
4
«
4
i
«
;
«
•t
K 1
*tf
I- |
O I
ii
»*
«^
*
r
*
M
3
•
•
•
J
1
1
!
K
\»
K
|
r
i
0
'0
•^
1
1
0
1
f
i<
<I
*,a
4
«
4
P
«f
3
«
>
c;
3 
:
j 
<
» 
1
J
r 
v,
. •
C 
4
r 
oj
• 
«
t 
«
; 3
a
„
3 O
3 0 1
5 13 <
> 3
> x :
C • I
f i
i * i
» O <
1 4F M
* 0- .
!
i
!
3 3f
30 <
^ t t
P o <
3 O ,
* it*
r Z 4
XAPHC
A** A*
1 *- «
* O »
i e PI
1
i
j
5 = t
i
3 d f.
9 O i
» 3 J
5 — *
'"!
.'SJ
t 0> 4
,r.
j 0 i
?S!
<* *»• i
•* 4f 
'
I
k a. <
K «. |
^ •» 
1
i
|
S=^
1
3 r> c
55!
••« 
C
L K <
> •* 1
h O 4
h c^d
3
3
3
L
9
>
j
On
^
av
««
Xr-
—
•c
•r«
1
\
>
i
1 
i 
i
i 
;
; 
i 
' 
i
3 p r p r> ^ = , s b r - ^ = s - | :• I
I 
*.• 
*
i
rr c < ' c c-> c • • o ki r i c <
^^'c'tc't'^ti'v^tc'v ttc1;
«j
J
w
C 
» 
»TJ
»-* »• ^ O 
« w. (: ^- 4k «. ^ 
*i
Ul 
tit f £ ^ 
t O J U> O O U 
4
>-« r» o 
J 4> uj 1.1 
IL» o »» ri a. Q. ». 
c
r r v £ x £ i i o i * « * r i iv*sii
^
i-»
i
i
l
i 
t
i 
; 
!
m
^^
-t C.
r i? t
^ -3
wz
> r
U 3
1 C*
3 r
> i i
t '
0 c.
- -5
3 O
I
t
,,
1
•_. ;
c
-»
"
H;
r o <
l\\
- 3
£ 
:
0 
i
^ I
rr»cn
IUENE
K" 1
1
|
i
!
1
,-••
(
1
J
h
3
.
t
:
K[
u
>
t
1
1
i
!
1
; 
i
i
i
i
i
'
t
j
i
' «
I
'
1271
inf
;i
I
I
J
j
I
»
M
•C
«
X
«f
•t
•«
IU
_>
_l4>
^
•1^
X
Xu
w*
r
1
: m.
to
•
1 W
•0
t «
1 •.
o
je
Xo
M
fr*
«
fr»
W
I
'
1
I
•
Chr
i
fa c
«t
ct
»
II
<
S!
{
j
fr
<
1
!
>
- 0
9 O
1C
n
r _*
[ MJ
: •.o
> *
u O
- X
r u
u f
i
'1
i
_l CJ 1
£'5'
r
sI -*<
i X
E •**
1 X
1
= = l
1
:> c--
?;
rS;i
M ^*
• i
• *
o o •
J
».
J •«
Bi
M I i
t* O
1 O
»x
)» u
» 1
-••
9T 4 =
D Ci L^ O C3 C"
- •- (- <- t~ »-• i
^c^tc1
J
wf 
r *
!.Y£ 
£f.
i a O * « «t
• >- O r j -i
• •- -<» fc T
1 t- l-c 1 1
t « r x " •»
E«£;^^
i
i
i 
i
«
i
i
, 
' 
i
' t C, C* D t~- 1
1
1
n> 
• I
£' 
^
552 f
x r i K. i
tt« IU » «• M
1
I
1
I
1 
: 
i 
I 
. 
. 
!
r " I " ' ; "
"""'""t""'' 
!
1 
i 
i 
!
' 
c-
: 
l
»c L. • • r i." i^ o e o c o la L- c o f n ti D
t 
,
•
• 
J* 
H- «• 
;
r 
i: 
i:- r 
*
•- 
^« 
ki 
•-
. 
> ». ^* »^ 
*. 
•
f 
-* » _i ri 
•-
». •» C1 f" 3 
V 
*. 
« « . *
^ V t f M i l M C I k . J i J ^ j l A . I T r ^ - i t - * * - * ! ) * - *
J
j
1i
1 
!
i
1
i 
. 
• 
•
* 
^ 
r
r±fSt_!
5 i'& **
fee -- :; "Jv&$2££&- ,- 
I
M 
^ 
»
'• 
! 
i 
i 
' 
i 
! 
!
i 
, 
, 
'
* 
1 
1 
' 
[ 
! 
' 
i
i 
' 
'
t 
• 
i
i 
!
i
*
i
i
i
1
*
• 
. 
$
i 
' 
.
; 
rn r% o 
o 9 » f 
» O O 
n» 
| Z O n i - < ^ a
* 
'J 
Z * ^ O 
' r ^ ^ Z J V v r
ni 
c-i* 
O f -<O U C
-« 
X 
t^f-c 
-B c *- -1 -« '
^ 
-» 
u ^ »" 
r- a z o o c
-« 
» 
t 
• » » »r» ^ a
u 
-^ 
' » ^ » z * H
: 
2 a z 
fi
rn r» IA 
2
"•1 "S1"
• <» -. 9 u
O M -«• •«
•^ 9 -4 N Z
v •» ». m
m r» m (4 JB
z * x « ^ :
fc 1* ' •' *~
K f^ 
0 ^ r
^ i 
%* a.
? 
55
o 
J» r-
m 
m
.1 
3 rr
I 
"•
w ur w U
Z f
« a
* 1
! »
• i
• i
1 >
3 :
j :i i
-< i > »
o< » -«
; t m
0 
-4
» < » l-i
-« ' 1 *
^»e
m
rt•«
zo
IV*t
IM
: i
;
o
i
-* 
' z
r» 
m
*
»
z 
c.
i 
ra 
! 
m 
z
r*
i 
>^
J
1
i 
' • 
• 
' 
•i
: 
^ c c c c 1 e c c c c « c c C c c « « c c e g c « : c « c d c «: c g c d c d t c
i i. o o ti ci e> o u>
k v x x x l x x j x x
•r-r^r-r*i-r?»-r*
.' 
• 
I
• 
rt -3 Q o 'J o ^ T3 Cl l* O O '» ci rj fl -.3 J «J O -:l '_> O O |4 > O O 1 O C
1
3 O O U O d
; 
1
t 
'
' 
i
!
: 
, 
: 
i
i
' 
' 
J
; 
c * _ d t q ( r c ^ . ^ c r ^ c r c c < ^ ^ r ^ c G » i v d c - ^ c c c q c c c a
i 
j 
'
: 
i 
1 
' 
:
1 
, 
1 
! 
j
'
 
! 
' 
i 
'' 
'
a 
>
-
'
'
'
•
1
C C cc cc
1
o a o :»
r ^r r
,
(
C C C d
s
1
-t 
!
^ 
;
ft
»
3
^
<
^
*l
2
i
;
>
1
)
0
o
M
t~
m
-4m
U«v
^
M
*
nt i
•» 
'
e i
^ .
»
•*o
-H
O
»
m
•4
X
X
»
O
M
A
^
w
egi
« H
21
I
T:.''
CSMLETfO ANALYSIS *EPO*T
REPORT CuTfcl S7/12/22 4
-i
9 
PROJECT NOt 261 
PROJECT NAMES TURPENTINE NUN
• f 
DAT* 
TINE
TC 
DAY
»
JEPTNt 0000 
SUtSTRATEl AQUEOUS
^ »3tR».PMiiNi PRANCBTS net-t — — - 
— - 
- . . - . _
0 
j4»i3 METHYL 4R9MUE
— 
3*1*1 VINYL C*L9RIDl
'' * 
. 
34311 CHLDRIETN«NE
14101 
lil-vICHLPROETHYLENf
3*<^8 t » lwOTC^L9VOCTnAlf P
^ 
. 
34)46 1>2-TRANS CICHtO»0£ T H rLcNF
—— - - - - - - - - 
. _ . _ . . . . 
32136 CMLCRW9RN
321^3 1.2-bICHLOROETHAHF
32102 CARBON TET»ACNLO( ID*
5?tOI PICHLORL'»»0»J»mTHir
"T 
39i-'0 T»ICMLO*OtTHrLCNf
» 
3*930 8EN:tNF
———————————— — - 
- 
3*511 l»lit-TIHCt»L3»OPT»»»Ne
^ 
321C4 69 OH; 'OHM
34*75 TFT»»CHL3SO£TMTL«'(l
^ 
3*010 TOLUENE
J4JC1 CHLO*Ciu?>l?ENl
^ 
99499 T£»T-tuT»LNETHVLt.Th'.:«
'"t 
14591 i-NITfDP'lfNCL
f) 
' 
3*69* PNfNn
34606 2,»-D.HF.rHTL?HtN:.l
^ 
3*621 2,4,6-T*lCnLOf 0»-l::i<DL
34616 ^(4-DINlTOQPMr NCL
399)2 P£NTACHL3*0*NfNPL
^ 
34166 ItS-OICHLOROtFNZcNE
"f 
345*4 li2-3ICML3R08'NrE<le
t
tjurrs
U5/L
UC/L
ust
Ui/L
US't
Uo'L
Ufi/L
UC/L
Li/L
U-./L
U1/L
U6'L
u'i/L
01/t
US'l
US/L
US/L
08/t.
UC/L
U8/L
c^ronTtT
TTTTIL
T-JTlL
TOTil"
T O T A L
T?T«L
rnr>L
rmrr- -
TOTIL
TOTAL
T01AL
T1TIL
T O T A L
TTTTIL " 
• • - •
T C T A L
TTTAL
trttL
T O T » L
TPTSt 
- 
—
I' t J^
TCT.-.L
TUT*L
T1T«l
T;T«L
TCT«L
Tom.
T9TJI
T 3 T A L
T'.1 T>L
T;»T*L
T1TH
VHUc C REM(Rf
U
U
- TJ
u
u
103
'J
<J
U
u
-1J--
nu
-I.T-
1 ,0
J
1 .)C 
J
'j
•j
r?
c
~t)
r
T;
i
Ifi
i
^
_ 
__ _ 
<
~ <
«
1
<
II
<
<
•1
•
4
DC
s •
PAG! 
30
*
COHPLITIO A N A L Y S I S tfPO»r
»!PO«T DATE: ti/iz/zt
% 
PROJECT NOI 2»2 
PROJECT 
NAMCI
•"1 
OATE 
TIHE
m 
3TAT18H Nfl ——— P#*« — —— 0»- -- - 
' 
' 
' 
IABNO 
PARttt)
TO 
BAY
* 
—— — _ . _ - _ _ — — ._.— _._ .-._.-. ..-.. 
- C»9TtS WttO
3»J»0
* 
'"20
• 
3*3S1
- 
" 
3*398
•"• 
3»3J1
* 
3*3»6
« 
3**20
3*333
« 
- 
1930
3»Z59
,.._" —— ~ —— ~" 
39»IJ
j ^ 5 0 0
A 
^ ' £ 3 8
i U** v frtftt "~ 
jT^J'ftAOT 
*IJi5
L O C A T I O N CIPe: 
3 T O O 
$JtiT««TEJ AOUE3US
^ Of5C*IPTI9f»t »!•»• n-lUSIHS ^fLL »1
^ 
3**13
1 
3 * 3 1 1
* 
3*!'l
* 
3*5*6
J219»
32133
^ 
»*J06
TURPFMTINE RUV
asss,
J;!^?oJ
4 f * -"OOP
BETA EHOOSULFIR
EN30SULFAN SulMTE
ENCR1N ILOEHTDE
NEPTACLOK
HtPT<CHL?R E P O « I J f
(LPHA-BHC
aETA-iHC
JCITA-BHC
CCK-1014
•Ca-1232
PCS-1?5«
»THTL CMLIRT.'
C-ILORO^THtNC
CXLOROPOR1
CMio/TlTM':HL'om-?C
UHITS
U5/L
UC/L
oca
JC/L
JG/L
U3/L
Ui/L
UT/L
U^/L
UG/L
Ui/L
Jl/L
f./L
'JI/L
U'f/L
•JS/L
JG/L
UJ 
w
L-O/L
U'/L
J;/L
UC/l
IC;/L
CBE-ISTRT
TOT1L
T C T » L
TOTIL
TI*T»L
T?TTt
T O T « L
TOTIL
T O T A L
TOTAL
TITtL
TTTIt
T 3 T A L
T O T A L
T5TAL
TOTAL
TTTJr
T C T A L
TTT1L
rcrtt • • -
T C T 4 L
TOT«l
T-'TiL
1 .1 1 > L
T7TAL
T 3 T » L
T H T 5 L
T'ltL
————————— 
. —————————————— 
,
«
VALUC C RT»i«TT 
" 
~ ' 
4
_ __ _ «
IT 
U'
0 
4
u
u
u 
«
U
u
u
o " "
u 
•
T""~~«.
u 
•
u
u 
•
. ,J— 
- __
J
U " " 
" — — •
u
u 
«
.... *
u 
«
u
u
a 
" 
«
,r
n
.•
c
Dl
32
A N A L Y S I S
»7/i2/22
£ 
MOJCCT NOI 262
'"1 
DATE 
TIM:
TO 
OAY
MOJ5CT NAMtl
LABNO 
p«««ro
0NITS 
CKE^ISTIIT
VILU* t
own* j*2*j
3*311 
F L C U R E U E
19TOO
3*636 *-
»«««-»
FHtNYL
3*220 ANTHRACENE
J»3*l 9TH«THTL •irM»t«Tt
3*316 3IETNYL P H T M A L A T E
3«110 Ot-1-
BUTTL
S l S ( 2 - e T H » L H E » T L )
34376
Jt*»9
3«S2D
J«526
3«««1
s»2»T
3*521
rttENTt n.
C) 
P T R F N F
2,4-UTNIMOTOlUf
3*<ElO
«t«*m
393^0 D I E L O C I N
39350 CHLOtP«NE
3»30D »,*'-32T
39310 *t*'-03t<
s*»«t
3*35t,
ENO«IH
3»»»« flOft* tLOeMTPf
39*10
OS/L
U'/L
U'/L
Ur./L
'J'fl
u'C/L
Ji/L
US/L
US/L
UC'L
Ov'L
U^/L
Ui/L
V!^L
uC/l
o ;/
UG/l
L'5/L
OC'L
U1/L
T O T A L
TCT«t
T O T « L
T3Tn—
TPT1L
T O T A L
TPTIL
T O T A L
T5Tn—
TTTiL
T O T A L
T J T A L
TJTH.
ir TIL
TTTtL
T " < T « L
"rcrrc-
T1T1L
T7TIL
T 3 T « L
T O T ' L
' C t •. L
T-TM
1 JTJL
TCTii.
T O T A L
TOTAL
T J T 4 L
TJ
V
IT
U
"TJ-
U
IT"
'J
U-
~c-
•J
3.-
u
J
u
- T-
II
n
II
CONPLETEO
ISIS REPORT
REPORT OATEI »T/12/2ll
^I^^^^^^B • 
PROJECT NOI 2*2
|I|^|HJ^| " '^j,^ 
0«TE 
TINE
iffll * ^"""^ 
" 
""" "
>fe«-* 
- 
••- - -•-• ••
. A! : :" •• ^| •
!-'•,•••
•M" ••'«,• 
"""""" 
"
.' 
^1
•1' . 
^^1 
TURPtHUH ——— -»T/t»^»T —— ~t»5»
*¥i 
'• 
^^H 
LOCATION COOEt 1700 SJBSTMTfl AOU30US
.^jj-yj... ^l^f ^aemirrioji »n» H3uiiM<i JELL *?
$: " ''^l •
m][m 
•'—---••-•
pi:
:XX -A 
•. • ':^H
Wl-m'*
' '***'•$••••' iH • "
iml-
^."•».- 
-•
^ i- •
PROJECT NtNEl '
L*IHO 
PAIHtO
• »•!»** i«JJT
39330
3*671
)«•*•
39500
»»«T*' *«»!»
i*111
3 * 5 * 5
32106
32113
3*50*
32132
3*5H
34561
J451J
3213*
J**T5
5*010
3*301
TURPENTINE RUN
PAMHfTEP. H*ME
6ETA-BHC
OELTi-tHC
»9XflPHC^(*
PC B ™ 1 0 I ^
PCB-123?
PC3-12»2
PCB-12-'
PCB»1?!» 
'
PCO-KeO
MSTMTL "HOMIU-"
»!NTL CHL9PI5*
CHLCa?ETpl«Nf
HtTHfLtNE CMLCRTJJ
Itl-OICML^RCilHYL^NE
CHLPR'PIP"
I«l,l-TRICiL3»0*TH»«ie
C K^JN T.TK -^LCRJli.
It J-OICHtPROPf"PrL*t«t
TRICHLaffOETMTLiK't
DROH3PORH
T«T»»CHLOSOET"YLENk
Tstueie
C M L O K O a E N Z t X r
JNTTS 
1
UG'L
^5^L
Ul/L
UG'L
J;/L
Ul/L
U'/l
U'./L
UT/'L
U.-/L
US /I
U'./L
UC/L
ur./t
rfftiSTtT
THT«L
TCTIL
T C T A L
TPTAl
TPTIL
T O T 4 L
Tfl T4 L
nrrsir ~~
T 3 T « L
T-JTJt 
- 
-
inr«L
T T T 3 L
T C T A L
TCTBl
T3T«t 
-
T'TiL
T O T « L
T P T » L
1'JtL
T ? T t L
T5TI L
T'jTiL
7-HL
r«t.ur t rr»*»ir
tr
u
uuu
--tr
u
-TT
u
-7
u
....... . . ...p—.
'•
? -,r
L'
• T1 —
0
-t'
J 
•
Tr
0 ^ 
M
1'
L'
•-- ——— 
,
I
~ II
1
(
I
I
n
^
i
~~ 
i
i
_ .. 
._ 
^
<
(
i
,<
<
i
<
<
Bl
Ifrt
u
«»
Xly
X
g
1
f 
9 
t 
9
> => 
3 C> 3
2 !
.J .J iJ -J P Jr J-*i-l-*Lj_*«J-lJ_(J
« « & « f i « i U « & « f i « « « & . «
u o b o g c . u c - b L - p o C r c ' O
. 
i
J-J.j-« Ml_i~>J.H . J . J . - t J _ J . j _ j _ j - S i j _ J . j - t . j - f i J
• « « < U M « H « « f < * t f t « « * * a 
.1 r< « 
M «. <X « 
« «* «>
-»~»_»-l-»~t-»-»-»-»-»-»»'-»- »- i-»-»-t-»-l-»-*-»-
a o o c n o r c p o t - o c - c f- o L- c» r< c o c j C ^ e r c -
l« 
; 
* J J J - J J J J « J _ * J j L l _ l f c J _ * J _ l h l _ J J J k J j ^ l ^ ^ J J J j - ( J J . J . i J _ I J _ J J _ l * f
fc- 
| 
V S . V N . f c K \ . X V X k v V V S
k X k v v x > . N X v V N , V X S N . V N X X V N . V V V X V
^ 
i 
l£ I? ft (.9 |^ i*t 0 vj (A O V1 I* O D 1^ Cl £ ** 49 O (^ O |B *•" '-" ^ «* O1 CS t? <*• Ui 15 t "> •" t? *•" *•" ^ *-"* T"'
e
*
|
i 
•»
-1 <
•- 7- C 
«
I «. K
•1 T »<
C P « 
1
«> 0 tt -J 1
J J»- 0 i
»• X >4 *
c <->*•*>
t< <M*I a.
•-«>•> 0- 1
• « • •»
c*
S^fc^
?S?fiS!
"SJW
L X *r c.
C M • U
i n « ^
1 •!
r -» « o
M IMMft.
> 0 N </\
?JJ*
_J
82
fcj i
P o
& fc
*-« *->
** ^4 1
O 0
* 
* 4
* *.
+4 + i
i,^
** «A
f *<
rj
?!!
M •. r
> «E •-*
r •- o
• •" 1
. * •*
•> o *>
SS £
u • 4 «
l_ O >- S
fjCS E
i T o r«
0 OU V
1 1 « «
--*?
r- *• «r ft
til 
• »
ti. 
b
« 
»- to-
£ssi
" j x r
1 X 1 1
•* *- *M W
*C w w
••« ^ n «
tft • »- Ik
_J
«•>
a.i
«L" 
t
o r *«
o r »
r •&»-
•-• » *
H:
rti!*yi«
• aai>YL>
» E V T « l > I
c o r«
x. v _.
* c. »-
** T e
•r 1 r
»- -M «J
X •* tf
f « r
* *M -n
7
r u
r~ •» ^.
ra« «.
j « •«
r * z
«.« 41 IU
nl « «f
tr» (W r^
•
.J
>•
^i
•u c •. r
U' T T 7!
* u O •«
3 « *t2
O « ««»-
M. r »o.
•*N »^ « *
i- r
• z »-
KO »
*.'
« T »•
? •- r
UJ »-
Si*
? no
« Irt «l
• • 
*
uj <« tu X
fr- -J»- «.
-J t -J **
Jt-rf
fc -10. t
0. *• 
J
"i * » r
fr- •- >- ••
« 
0 |
1 J 
1 A*
r »• * 4*
i •- i *»
n >i o «
«• I*J «« 44
»• « .» •
0
1»o
I. >-
«
o
*
ft..
19
*
•
1
•4
-X
N
—— '
0o
1
' 
t
£
?
,
t
i
1
lUz
1
o
» 
*
1
i
i 
1
!
«H
« 
IM i:
M 
*- 1 >O
* < r *-
•* 
O 1 -
o
0 
0
e 
: :
i •
> •
• i
!
1
i
s z p z i
O O CJ O i
e «3 t* o 4
•a = & -j
: 
!
, 
IU 
1
IU {
•ar 1
*- 
ft.*- 1
!sls«
§s$.ii
t «. y- .
SHS
1
*:j;j
rt*
i
t
!
i
1
1
i
1
|
33 p 3 p r*
i
- J J J r f J
£ c c c. r '• i
3 t5 4.*^ J> <* 1? 1
t
u. 
«.
z 
r
» k. 
« \u
: i 
* a
b 
M- * f. J
k O 
M« 2 Z 1
- 
_) « OJ j
• 1 X IT * O 1
r> v *> * o i
C Ml M>M •» 
1
tt*?^:
1
i 
;
1
1
!
i
|| 
' 
! 
1 
j 
' 
' 
! 
!
1 
!
 
: 
'
i 
i 
! 
| 
! 
! 
' 
i 
.
. 
^ _ _ f j - w 
. 
- . 
f " *
i
%fc 
• 
• 
'
i
i
:sr2£rr?^C£rr^z"r2s;ri''fr*:^*r
l * C O C 3 O O O O O C i ( J O L ' ( - l < * ' f - f O t ' C ' C J O t C i O O C O I ' C J C
t. 
'
4J 
;
t
• 
*
«J 
C *H
3* 
I- •-
JC J X 
• T
-• lu IM I F 
fcJ i.'- 
» 
*J 
t
< U i « c 2 « r » 4 X 
* « 
« - •
3 => O < o 
ba. 
« * « . > * . 
M
3 O T O j 
•* .J 
»J a. *> 
»• 
*.
1 | | « H * ^ f t i 3 * ^ O * « * C « O « 4 t » - » - l « X : i * - « 1 1 1 1
!«S5S*ttS««SASS*SSS*.,SRSS«,
1
:
; 
. 
!
i
t
i
, 
. 
'
j 
; 
.
!
 
! 
i
i 
1 
• 
i 
|
1 
i 
, 
•
1 
' 
1 
J 
'
' 
!
 
! 
: 
i
i 
' 
: 
• 
i
 
:
i 
i 
! 
i 
i 
i 
!
"•'LI''' 
001 
1281
PAGE 
34 QVftf'
^^^^^^^^^| 
COMPLETES ANALYSIS REPORT 
«5pn»T
•
'"^^^^^^^^ 
PROJECT NOt 2il
^9^^^3*^^| ' I 
3ATE 
TIKE
^SBH * ' """ "" "" "'
f^n • - ..-.— - -
ll V^VT^ 
• r ' I^^^^H 
VliBA 
AlIM 
A T * I A « A V 
A A A X
.fni'iV' .^LH 
LOCATION CODE! 3700 
SUISTRATEI AQuFOUS
.;•**.'»«-••.•• •
•fy ••"-• - •-—--- 
•
k^ 
• ^H
^r • • — .._
m; ; •• {• •
'•diri'^i;.1 ^1 
J
m^ i,' IH *
p;;|;
pill i1"
4'^-' •*
'*-A ' ' V
HP
= !•.
'- 
•!% 
•
c I . " 
"- ' "
PROJECT NANEI
LABNfl 
PARNO
»»»78* J»504
39SOB
0»fT?i 3441$
34413
3»1T5
J*311
34101
•*»*6
.1 4 i 4 6
32102
3«1'0
3*411
:•?!?»
14010
34 i^l
3* 3M
34 586
3*5*1
34 •, 9.
3*421
3**52
3*41o
TURpENTINt RUN
PARAMETER N««E
PC8-126n
N'TMYL CWLOtlJE
N£Tn»L BKO*IJt
VINYL Cm. •?»!??
lil-OICMLORCfCTLENC
l>I-OICHLORO;Th>^E
1 » If l"'*lCHLOf ffr TW»Wt
CARfcJN TiTRACHLTaiO'
li J'OtC^tLORSP^O'TLeNS
T»IC1LOKCFT>1tL£*'-
111 i2~T*lCHL3?OsT1*A»»:
ltlf2 >2-TfTPtC''L l3»0«T >«4
T?TP»CHL0 9CFt>ifLEN[
TOLUfeXE
C^LP*08FNIE'•'-
eTfYL'SNZfdt
4,o--lNlT»o-n-CRtSuL
UNITS
01/L
bC/L
UJ'L
'J3/1
JO'L
UO/L
05/t
v/S/L
U3/L
'N? 
oi/L
J'J/L
L'i/L
US/1,
L'"/L
Cl't.
J',/L
j-./L
•J-S/L
uI/L
U-./L
UJ/L
U'./L
Uj/L
C«5ttISTWT
T1T»L
TOTAL
TOML
TOTAL
T.T»L
jr 7 4L
T rT*L
t Cl I • L
T:T«L
T ^ T t L
TI5T«L
T?T«L
TCTH.
TCT8L
10T«L
TPT«L
TfTSL
TPtiL
T.'TtL
T9T«L
T?T'L
T5TIL
T1UL
O A T E I *7/12/22
VALl/r 1 HE«H*
' 
' 
' 
J~-
n
u
u
u
._U ——
u
J
- n — •--
U
U
J
»T-- -— -
.1
u
i.
ir
M
- - -- 
v
ir
•j
w
- „
—— - -
-->
M
11
<
<
<
C
|"S »• »?»
.* m •« » 9 » f N
il O-M -«* »- » o
it. . m * I • x
4,r>'H»zor>^jo
w 1 o * r- «* w
• 4 * 9 * « » ^ * 4 Z
r* xO ^N x «
a v » JB« n> -*
u 2 * ^ r 5 5
S v r- - 
0
™ -« x «* i 4
-> i • i •»
v x> 
•• i '
T( /n 
f*
-n 
»» -*
• £ *
q> -^ o
*• 9- •*
< r- »*
» C IA
Z i>
'•n <4
z r-
•«
^^
»
r-
i.'* s
0 •» —
O- H# 0
-«« «
1 -« 
1
i r i
r% * c
r- m r
•< T>
Ji?
r J r
» l» »
-* f -<
!fi *
•w » «s«
» ^- O
MI-I X
m ^ -4
r- •< r«
Z T r*l
-^ a
» r-
n -<
:f»
* ? *
^ (•*•-*
I- (^ O
A t "»
n- » x
L?S
-«<»i-
.n • 3
'* *
•» 1.
• 1' '
-<
» '» » » i
J> 0 9 c j
»» u. e " c
<-» T* | r
IJ rp l» o >
S n. il- r
Z T X a »
•n « » C
'15;
i e
r ^
m P
Z 4
T> ^•
njj
i"»
( ,„ ^
Ul t*
»Sf
»> *
r.3
o o
^3
« M
1 r) J
f°^
rt««n*
»»?p»t) r
»»»
*** * O
K •* C
i >4 w
z -»o
-»O T
Of» X>
n m i
•-»
i'*
•«
•<
1
a
y
f
t
rt
cn;
>
•«
s
J
:
' » • »
•4 <• t*
U» 9 »-
V> "» *<
*. 5 »
z " ~S
0 t n
> nt 
o
2 S
..
^i
o « ^
tufr a
m •!» *
M M *
rt n c
o a?
t> 0 1
JX .
cUi
1 r
>» 
':
» » » 3>
- — 1 r»
• *• u Z X
i I «5
0 O -. B
o rt o ±
a <• ra Z
•3 ^> 0 *
" 1 *~ J
z 'z 
3
-1 l»
( t c c c - c c d c c c c c c c - c c . c < * c c c c c c d < ~ c c c c c i : . c c c r r a c c c c
<jt .i -.» »,-• ^ wi « o .» *•• ^i -"> -•>«.•' »i *• ,"* .1 •„*> o o -^ ^» - > * . » » . " *> w» (.1 -r» c> (.'• ci ji o c> *.t (,» rt «i i»
^>^^ (ip,i^^^^,5^-^^-?P^->^ 15^ ri^^^>^^?^ r> (2 1> 1i-^
i 
: 
.
.» J J J •> o 1 o O .J •> -3 .•» O it o 3 O <J o i» c, J O •? '3 a O J O 3 J -3 O O ••» O O '^ O O
-.-.-,--.-,-»-.-.^-.-.-«-l-.-t^-.4-«-«-.-.-«H-t-l-.-»-.-l-.-t--l-i-l-i-.-.-.
1 f
1'
c cj c qc c
i 
r-
1 
c
III
r- |
jo I o
z
»
r
»••»*•
*• V ii*
I 2lS i
0 <X
» r- •«
-« x. u
Tl- I>
«- J 0
Z X 1 <
O ^- f
U J V t o W W U ( V ^ ^ > < * ' t J i w M r i * J C 4 W V U \ r f b « M W V t < ' M W k A U * W t t f M
4 > » > O ^ O * * - ' * ^ ' * ^ ' * 1 * ' - * * ' * * ' * * ' ' * * ' * ' * ' * ' * ^ - * ' * ^ *
i ^ o ^ r t t a - f r - O ^ Q ' ^ i - t c i o - O f O t f c ^ G ^ o o o M G a t N *
r » « * » o * i r » r t n c > r t < * | W ' * ' * » i * * Kmr-«|« — j * 4 ^ * f * » •
f o ,
c o o - 4 v«^ *rno»; »!«»•
» i » o » s i . « o i - » » * i j i i
MM** '»« i i«a>ii4i>6oo
z z c « 
g o j o « z i | > ^ > 4 « i H
r« 
n o i f ^ o c * 1 
»» 
x o f ^ - «
»iO 
ZM3 
r* -• 4 J» »
ni 
a u< 
ci r 4 o q
•i ! » 
^Fc 
-«cr»^3
T > - « 
c-««- 
r * o 4 c i o
it -o •< f-
U K O C C
>» z * m m
I c c c c e c
w» n *^ .a c- iA
» i r T C C C C U C ' C C C C O C C C C C Q C C C C C C l f T G C Q
k (.1 r. w< o .1 ci «> &> o :> o ;» t« o e» »i n I.Y o ct o fc( «i «.! o ^i .1 ^>
^ . i ? ? ^ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ^ ? ? ? ? ? ^ ? ? ? ? ? ^ ? ^ ^
•J -> i .1 -J l»
r- r- r- r r r
» » /.
r ? •-
-t-.H-i-t-«-t-l-«-<-(-«
^ • "» rj .j .j r| j ta it ci O
I 
I
^cjccUc
: d
c dcc c c ccac q
X
N
CON»lETto( :
PACt 
)f
TSIS RCfO*T
PROJECT NOI 2*2
DATE 
TIME
PHQH 
- - - oy
TO 
OlY
•RCJECT NAME! TURPENTINE RUN
stuiax MO
}l»m
REPORT DATE! »T/U/t(
oV*f
V»"lUf t T*«t
m*
"M
3*5*6 lt2-T**NS OICHLOROET1VLENE
S2103 
____ 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
5*5^6"ltlfl"T*ICntffROf THANE———*
32102
.9*160 I J I C M L O ' O f T M t L f N E
32103
3213* 6RIJHQFORM
3*516 I,l.ti2-Tf
J * * T S T E T » A C n L O R C r T H Y L E ^ t
M«0 
f?tttr«rfr
3*69* »1ENCL
3*414 •,»-O
3*i5? »f 6-CINTT»o-0-C»5$:L
3*546
3*551 '.,
3*6?e N*
i4,2T> B I S C Z - C H L O R O t T H Y L ) FT.
3*JT»
3*O6
Ui/L
UC/L
UC^L
UG/L
uC'L
U'l / '-
0-,/L
Ui/L
UR/L
uG/L
trt/L
J1/L
JC".
0'i/L
ji/L
UT/L
tnn.
JO/L
li'./t
CG/l
TRT»L
T"T«L
TCT»l
TPT»l.
TCT4L
U
'TT
U
-u~
U
TCTiL
TCT«L
T C T « l
T T T S L
TCTUL-
TTTlL
TPTlL
1 JT«L
IPUt
T3TH
TPT8L
T O T 4 L
T5T«L
T( T«L
TPTJt.
TOTSL
I O T « L
T-'TtL-
O.i
J
-\r
\t
TT
H
-rf-
uu
u1
'.I
V
u
V
u-tr
)
If
u
.II
II
I ' D
na
n
n
IIA.I
nidi
Hit!
iti.i
H1C1
-met
i»ui
IllOi
"UlOl
i*ui
Hill
i«;ji
niii
1*101
niJi
11101
IVlul
_HAiU
1I1C1
inai
u
JtUli-
1T1C1
lllLU
1*101
HUl
-/jo
T/yO
T/'jP
I/'.I
'./in
I/on
T/'j."
I/On
1/5.1
1/30
1^2fl
1/c.n
i/sn
1/50
i/sn
i/in
i/rn
i/on
1/50
1/IA
COti-,*** OlfiC
(1*»;«1AHi3-?)VI? OOTit
lAlRt
Jil1»HH< 1AM1JU1C t«S«t
3MiJMjaO»OlM3»»3»*
... XCIfeiH i
A
V
siiur.
o»«i<<
-w»-
NPK
>ON
J>0«9«
03U14NC3
L
3 =• b=>
i 
!
! 
I
j 
i
1 
:
? 
' 
i r !
i
! 
!
r h :-. r> a p :>
, r c- n c* i*1 c- c* cj n c. t- r*
_i U _i _i j _ * - » £ i j - j j _ j
c» <• r • c i. <i r, t c. c» c- f.
19 U ti. t9 o if -J t* L^ I-
r 
*j
«. 
H 
X
-i 
r. 
r
n 
». 
«.
•n 
r 
«,
<n*n.'ni**)nrt«n*4«ii>«« « * > ^ n
^ ^ • » » 9 ^ ^ ^ « 0 it W1 r W »• w tf
«( u. c> »
r • j _i j
O C r C Z ' O < < Q ( t ^ 
t C T t f O O C O C ^ 
O T
c ii v * j z c> i
r t >- o I i i lot » n r I I W M O
^1^ ^ ^ ^ ~ * ^ r ^ 1 4 ^ A 4 ' 4 k O 4 4 ' O M X ^
U*tt/*-lZuJ » * « T • » « M « » V M ' X
•f. 
!
I 
!
a a
o
iu n
I 2
I O
ooi
II
"^ 
'r-
1^1- I/if.
al«1»MlU« lAMJJklO
.11
r,
n
n
-JL-
n
_c_
•II
n
U_-
itii.1
ititi
1*101
Tsiui
In UJ
H1C1
I V l J l
1«A01
H1J1
11101
lllbl
1^101
iniai
-tin
Ttl-l
131-1
Itui
1C1J1
1S1-1
iiui
1I1U1
KiOl
THC1
IJlDl
I T l & i
i/an
i/in
T/^ft
i/on
1/60
I/'.O
I/on
i/sn
i/en
T/an
-/or
i/^n
1/i.n
-./•jO
I/SO
i/in
t/un
i/sn
i/sn
i/an
i/en
i/sn
-» 9£9»t
001 fcv
**:»'
'I? 
C1AMHC)(linH3--)«JS
i S S k U C H O I h J t X i H
-»'i us«:
-lUNiK^tnaijM--^ sisti
ICNJMd
n-r it?»c
TCNaMdC«UlH3-2
^^3 7 M j ?Q>f
O t O t C
Sl»5»
9lS*f
»OIi£ 24SUO
:3l»0
)9Vd
SllNf
aimed ottsii
I3H«N
AYC 
01
^Q 
^QMj . _.. QM NO I-i B i C 
'
3hll 
31*0 
§
ION
l«0d)«
C J l 3 T d M C 3
HI
^•B
B9
If 1
RpfcS ••
Ife •:- 1
P;:l
fc 11
F-'l
FA*- 
** 
• 
_i9WJ
m^m
if!
«& 1
Rl
If; I
& • * < i
— " 
••
- 
m
1 * 
C3NPLETEO ANALYSIS RE'ODT
1 
£ 
MOJECT NOt 262 
PROJECT NANEt TUIFFHTINE *U*
1 | 
DATE 
TIME
• 
A 
1TATIBN MB —— — H»* —— -«* 
— 
tABNO 
PA»10 
»A«»«eTe» NA<ie
• 
W 
TO 
DAY
1 
—— 
- - - - - — — ———— 
-— - 
«*1J»2 34JJ6 BICTHYL fHTH»LATe
• 
39110 OI-N-eumPPHTH«LIT*
1 
34596 DI-N-OCTTL PHTHAk'TE
• 
' ' H 
' 
3*320 CHRY>CK. :
| 
346*1 *-CHL3in»NtN»L PH'hTL tT.
H 
——— — "~ — - — —— "*- — 
- ' 
'- 
3*5H 1 1 1 t*9E tt OP! H VL t W?
1 ^ 
3*3*6 l|2-JIPHcSYLMYC*i?II>>e
1 
V 
3*2*2 ll>12-dEf I3«liJC'»nT- = >,i
| 
39JtO OlELO«t»:
1 * 
393)0 *,«'-?OT
• 
~ 
39»2o »i»'-3?f
• 
39J10 ».**-fD^
I 
i*356 e f T A fNOjSJL^^f
I A 
3939U ENlitlN
I 
- 
3»s«6 Exotin AL^tHrr:
1 " il 
30.10 ME»T«fL"»
• 
.__. . . 
. . 
;9*?0 HfPTJC^LOP •Pfl«I3?
1 
3*J37 ALCMA-»HC
I A 
393*C CAntA-tHC
I 
l*t)9 3ELTI-4HC
K 
34*00 TnxAPHcME
I » 
3*«T1 PCB-1014
f 
39»»S PCb-1221
i .*.,
L 9
UNITS
Utt/L
UG/L
OC/L
JC/L
»rt/x-
UG/L
J&/L
U5/L
LT./L
US/L
US /I
U'./L
U"j'l
iJj/L
J5/L
U1/L
Ui/L
U-T/L
J3/L
US/L
UJ/L
Jt./L
U5/L
JG/L
y,/L
Ul?/t.
Ul/i.
»»P
CHtHISTWT
T«!TAL
T O T A L
TtTTIL
TntiL
T O T « L
T«TIL
I:T»L
TPT»L
nT«L
T O T A L
T-TAL
Trr»L
TtJTtL
irT»L
TCTIt
T C I A L
TOTAL
T O T » l
T-:T»L
T C T A L
T O T A L
TPT*L
TDTIL
T! UL
TOTiL
T J T 4 L
TCT«L
TOTAL
* m
D«T O A T E l IT/12/22 
""
VALUf I »F*«r " 
^
9
U 
If
u 
- 
0
U
u
u 
^
u
..._... — -JJ —— 
——— ^
u
U 
|>
'"~S"~ 
M
— a— — ••- —— ^
J
•J
u
JII ------ ^
7" """"«*
v — 
• ^
II
- -~ ;r
•j 
^
T 
"
V 
^
• t
5 
- 
W"
u
«
n
COMP LETED/
L«SIS
R E P O R T O A T f t
*'•
^| 
a 
PROJECT NOI 2«2
^H 
•• 1 
3ATE 
TINE
^H 
A 
STATION H9 ——— H*9* —— — ft|L- 
- —— — -.
^| 
TO OAT
H 0
H *
^| 
^ DEPTH! 0000 
SU1STRATE! AQUEOUS
^0 
'• i 
NEAR AJTO REPAIR 
W O R K S
H *
H •
H *
• * •
• * -
• •,
H «
1*
*j • •
% * '
i •
PROJECT NAME!
{.AftttO 
PAR*0
J9500
!Hoi
34*] 'i
3?IT)
34311
34S01
3*5*4
32103
J2102
3*5*1
3*511
3*475
3*019
J4J71
J*S?h
»*»»»
3*59*
3*600
3*501
3*6*1
TURPENTINE RUN
PCe-12.8
PCB-1Z69
METHYL SRJUIO?
"LPBOETM""*
1,1-DlCHLIRflEThYLfN'
Itl-OICHLORCETHAHE
l.Z-T»«>.S O I C H L C R O f T ^ Y L ^ N E
i > *-cit*i-.i*rp»aPYi.tNt
T E T R f c C 1 L O R O F T h Y L : N f
TOLUfNi
J-CHLOROPMENPL
P-CHLOKO*M-C W t SPL
UNIT?
US/L
U5/L
(jt'L
Ui/L
' UC/1
J5/L
JS'L
UC/L
L'3/C'
I.C/L
U5/L
UF/L
UC'L
U'/l
US/'u
U'i'L
U'i/L
uc/v
L f. / L
UC'L
C1EMISTPY
T3T«L
T C T 4 L
TOTH
T3TIL
T O T A L
THTIL
T - T 4 L
TPTtL
T C T A L
T3T8L
T ? T 1 L
TCTIX
T O T A L
T 7 T A L
T P T A t
T3TII
T 9 T A L
T O T J L
T P T t L
rrt«L
T?T«l
TCT«l 
-
TTT1L
Tf.T«L
VJLUf E REMI"R1
U
~tr
U
TT
U
U
U
U
"V
6.3
U
U
U
IT
0
. ,j.
•J
1
-• 
—— B-
rr
tt
I*
c
. . . . 
.^J..
'J
U
Jn
r . 
•t
II"•
9
•
0
II•
----- - •
::>:
-- - 9
+
ii«
•
*
II
*- Wl
COMPLETE! AMITSIS «tPO«f
PROJECT NOI 2(2
I 
O»TI
STtTHM MO - —— P*«*" 
- 9+ -
TO 
DAT
MOJFCT NAMES TUKPEKTINE
tA»no 
PAHIO 
»A*A»eTet
REPO*T D A T E ! IT/12/22
UNtTS 
C«J»I$T*Y
»»IUE t
9461A
J*6JT
3*4*6 *-
3*571 lt*-OICMLO»0»ENZEN£
J«J3*
3*3)6
39702
3*551
3*273 S I i ( 2 - C H L 3 l t O £ T M T L ) 
ET.
StSf 2-C«L1*f»ETm>*r> *«TM.
ISSPHOffPN'
3»»«7
3 * * 2 » fc-N
i*2»3
i*J*« Hf»AC»tf>*OC.tClJPS'«T«
3«5?1 2-
3*200
•'MTMSLMf
19700
J*6M
J**6l
3*3»6 ClfYnYL
j 911 0
3*292
3*100 8TSC2-ITMYIHE 1'TL)
3*J7» FLuOKtNTnMt
J*»4» PYt»!»f
3*320
3*126
3*6*1
PhTi«L«T2
JS'L
01/L
JC/L
UC/L
tTT/L'
•J1/L
Ui/L
Ji'/L
U'/t
U -'I
ur./u
fu/L
v t/L
'j •; / u
3*2*7
cr,/L
•Jii/L
L1 i/L
W. /i
TCTtL
T3T«L
TOTAL
TOT«L
T O T A L
TfVTIl.
T , T 1 L
TOTAL
TCTIL
T O T A L
TCTAL
T'TIL
TCTeL
•T-T5T-
TOIiL
TPTtt
TOTAL
T^TAL
T ^ T A t
Trrti
T C - T 5 L
T?T1L
T T T i u
TfTJL
T O T A L
T O F 4 L
Trru
T C T S t
Tcrti
T ,1T J L
TfTU
II
T»
U
-TT
L1
TT
0
"U~
U
TT~
'Jn
u
n
•TT
J
II
U
II
'IT
PC
Mb*
• 6
COMPLETED
JI J 
RMORT
RE»0*T DITtJ
0 
PROJECT NO! 262 
PROJECT NAMEt TURPENTINE RUN
"1 
OATg 
TINE
0 
STATION MB ——— PR8M 
—~tf- 
- —— 
• 
LAflNO 
P««»0 
PARA»ETEP MA»E 
"JNITS
TO 
OAT
———————— — - —— . . . - . . _ . . . . . — . . - - . . . 
e*i}<?3 j*»56 1*2: Jt»-!»i*E:tf**Tn*re?i»p 
tnn-
3*631 3,3'-OICHLOR3 f.tM2TOEN! 
U5/L
——————————————————— — — ..._...-..... .... . 
-- --yryxi-, 7-atPntMTL|nu»AriMi 
U»/L '
0 
3*230 3i*-BENtOPkUO*ANTHCNt 
UG/L
" • 
. 
39330 ALO»1W 
UJ/L
* 
"'I' 
"LO»D"t 
U''/L
0 
39320 4«**-OOf 
u"./L
34J51 CtJOOS'JL'fcM Sj:F«T' 
y j / L
0 
3*.'*a C1GCIN ILOSHt'E 
Ui'L
Jt»10 MtPTlCLIX 
UI'L
1 
39*?t hECTACHLO1? .TP'XTjE 
U'./L
0 
SIS^T AlPHA-JiHC 
JT./L
3 9 3 3 - 8 t T A - d n C 
JC-'L
39*00 TJXAPiftNt 
uO/l
2*5T1 PTo-lOl'!' 
U » ' L
0 
J9500 PCF-1?** 
0 3 / L
OtPTHS 0000 
5 U J S T B A T F : »1l>£CL'S
j**13 >^fTHTL 'i»3H:j: 
ul/L
0 
• 
J»1T« »t?lTL Ci»L9«Ii)» 
uO/L
1
0
CWf»TSTRT
T O T A L
•P1TU"
T O T A L
TO'«L
T O T A L
TOTH-
T C T A L
TCIT1L
TPTAL
T O T A L
TOTAL
T O T A L
T-JTAL
T O T A L
Trrit
T3I1L
T!-TAL
rnTJL
T.JT »L
»^»H.
•IT .L
t ^ T A L
T?T«L
T'iTiL
————————— .... ... 
v
VA^F I UE«»t
U
Uu
u
U
U
B
U
0
u
u
u
0
u
u
0
u
- - JJ-- - -
u
0
u
-XT—
V
J
V
• I
u
•J
•J
t*
II
(
II'
(
1
4
n
4
M
4
4
<
II
4
4
4
II
-C'
K;
PAGE *T
COMPLETED ANALYSIS RiPORT
PROJICT NOI 2*2 
PROJECT NA«El TURPENTINE RUM
| 
DATI 
TINE
STATUN Ntt —— — ?*9* —— 
0* 
l»»MO 
PARttu 
PA*AMtTP.t *»«t
TO 
DAY
3»$01 Ll-tlCHLOROETHYLfNF
3*5*6 1|2-T*ANS OIC^LntleTNYLFNF
32103 l"2-OICHLl<iOETN«».f
" 
3:i02 C4RHOU TSTSK-tLC'IQE
"**1 l!2-OICHL"RCP8JP»tE e
j213i CHlOROOI6»0*D t <£TllN;
— - - - - - - 
3**lii,l i I-TRI OIL o*?r THAI t
3213* BPOH3F031
3*»'S Tf T R A C M L D » 6 E T > - Y L t N i
--- - - 
3*010 T8ll«*l»f
• 
3*i31 CHLPROSENJfc'i;:
3»3 T1 !T"YLPf 'iI»Nf
*9*9» TSST-IUTYIM" T"»L: f i " y
3*571 2-NlT p'jPr <"-<OL
3*606 2.4-OIHF T H Y L P 1 * - '. -L
J*S16 2 t % ~ C 1 l ^ I T ^ 3 P H : f j r ^
3*6JT *,6-CINTT»0- J-C»!^CL
• 
3S03i P?NTArHLO*J*''r''nb.
3*6*6 *-N!TROPnf nOL
i*i»»* Mf ««C-LO»OtTnlfi«
J^TOi HEXACHLOR9«L'TiOIEME
ONTTi
UC/L
US/L
uc/t
UG/L
05/t
U«/L
Ufi'L
tG/L
Ul/L
UC-/L
U'./l
t.'i/'L
UO/L
J'/L
•J-./L
U'./L
U'./L
US/L
U i/L
U--/L
JG/L
ur/t
c»«ei»isT«
T 3 T A L
TlTtL-
tiTAL
Ttmt-
T O T A L
TI?TAL
T1t»L
TCTItT
T C T « L
T( T»L
TOT«L
TPTM:
TOT«L
Tt'TSL
T O T A L
T"TSL
T ' T t t
T r, T t L
T1T«L
T3TIL
T3T4I.
TPTAL
M f S L
T C T 4 L
T1TIL
TO J«L
TfTJL
REPORT DATE! (IT/12/22
T 
TALU? E PElflflt
U
U
U
U
U
0
1?
-~TT
-0 — ——
'J
j JO
rr - 
-
u
a
;* 
J
j '
\J
L1
r
T*1
1.0 
-
IT
1'
11
' 1
4
It-
4
4
4
a
4
4!
tt
41
4
II •
m
3*6*6 NAPHTHALENE
Bl
PAGE 
*»
COMPLETE:
IS »6PO»T
O A T E »
^^__ 
-v 
——————————————————————————
^^^| 4) 
PROJECT N0< 262 
PROJECT f A M E : TURPENTINE RUN
^^H 
• 1 
DATE 
TIME
^^^H A 
STIM9N MO ——— P***- — -OP-- - - - - - - - 
L*SNC 
'ARWO 
P»»«»tTet M««f
^^^| 
TO 
DAY
^H •
t-I^^H 
34424 N-MT«OSOOI-N-PS JPrL»"I:«f
r'^^H 
———————————————————————————— •— • ——— 
- 
- — - •-" 
- -9»r>3 M-NtTPmoOIP-ttNTLiMlUE ---
r'l^^^l A 
3»iS3 >IS(2-CHL3AOI^OPROPYL) rT
; j^^^l 
'" 
• 
345^1 2-CHLOftONAPHTHALcME
j^^H A 
3970C H E x A C H L ^ R O e E N ^ c " :
^^^1 
— -- 
•-• — .-—... 
- 
J46JS »-B»0»l3»«fHYL r»t*1l TT.
>^^H 
344(1 PMEN«NTH8fNE
'i^^H ^ 
— - . . - - - - - - - - -——.. 
J4270 A"»TH««tf1f
,)^^H 
34JJ6 BlfTHYl prtT^tLATS
*;|^^l 
- - 
- 
- 
34J»* 9UTYt SP.iIYL »HTi«teTF
'f^^^H 
J«.l7t FH.:nR»HT -lENf
^^^1 
itt.'l «-C"L<10 JPHeSYL 
<* -\tH1L ct.
^^^1 ^ 
j»»0l INO*HO( 1 1 7 , 3-r ,") 
PY»»>i«
• ^^^1 
3 » I * 7 3 F * Z G ( t ) P Y R » N ~
v^^^^^^H 
• 
* *
'',^^^^1 
* 
34i2c> 2 ii -rlMITQOTOUijE*"!:
-^^H 0 
34611 2f4-3lNTT»nT;i.uE^r
'• f^^l m 
34242 1 1 , 1 2-^"l»ZO"-UtK ' <T^ : 4-
^H 
— 
39i30 »LO»I««
' 
^^R 
3 4 3 * 0 tlElJVZN
^^^w 
.- - 
34310 CMiCOIMe
J^ 
2«30d 4,4'-?tT
PK* * .
?!<• •
,,' •
UNITS
Ul'L
UC/L
TT.'L
U'./L
Ui/L
UC/L
UG/L
O-TTt
U5/L
J'.'l
L'S/L
UI'L
u'./L
JS'L
t i/L
I'C/L
J-./L
•Jl't.
•J-'/l.
Ui'./L
ij-./L
J'./L
U*./L
UC/L
Ur,/L
CHf^ISTRY
TCT'L
T 5 T A L
TrTU
T O T « L
TrTJL
T T T A L
TCTIL
Y - T » L
TOTH.
T5T1L
T - I T 4 L
i"T«L
T?T«t.
T - T A L
TCTtf
1 :1 1 1 L
T " T « L
TMit
Y~T»t - -
f'T'.L
TCTJl
• ? T « L
'OTkL
T r T 4 L
v
u
11
I)
u
u
u
'Jtr
u
a —
IJ
u
u
".5 
H
CT
U
'J
IT 
-~
I'
U
-
•
•
•
•
• t ; -
<>
•J
I'
J
'}
J
•Jr
>.i
i
II
i
i
i
i
Ql
' " ~~ 
(
'
i
__ 
<
tt
I
(
I
<
II
<
4
4
4
01
I
ft
I ^^
•44
s
5 
!
i
.
: i 
: 
. 
;
•- 
i 
. j - J _ f _ » k j _ f _ J - i . J - - ' M - * < . < ' ~ ' - J - ' * - > - ' - ' - J
r- 
« « « « « k « « * * « « f * « « < i M « « « * i * * «
•- 
I 
. - . - » - i - P » - l ~ » - > » . ~ i - l - » - i ~ « ~ - t - » - » - > -
• 
r c j | 7 c , f c ~ c j c » i . t . C ' ^ f cj c r» i r> f~ r
i*
*>i*
> - j ^ j p ^ _ i - j ^ _ i j _ ( _ j _ j - j ^ i
l «.? f» O t9 O « 13 t? O 1" C« O ( • • < " '
» - J D z > ^ ^ r > 3 t j - i ^ ^ ^ > j : j
-
*A i> 
. w
t z f i t ; « e - j r « . ' t T 2 ^ " f > 4 ^ c " * ^
: ^j Z -J 1 
^ x a i r f o r * * - * * * - ^ * - * ! ! *
« j 3 t - 2 u u « ' i i ro***rf* i-«'*«^»M
z « o
r •. »• O
r s s s i f = J
t C a *. ^- K _i i l I l I l I l
K « S l f e f t . n t i A
« «d«ijiftfT * * *joa*-*.«.ft-*- a. a. a.
> « 4 4 > « 4 « ^ 4 t O O t ^ 9 D O C ^ O ^ i * r ' ' ^ O ^ n
) «4 *^ .
;sj;:
•r t- -t u- T O O
•« «^ O ^- *.
z o ^ «j u
O J * » O r T
or t « ^ at % *•
T O *i ^- «r O «-• u.
U n r » - Z r X ^ C ' T » » - O T l C <
^>- ^ik. » O O ^ « O — « O «J o O X
r z > - o x i i i o i * « r i iu
^ i . » - j - ^ » » * T • » « » • *
•*-.*» * ^ < v . i . - i f f - ^ e o f o e « '
* !
•-• <»
O ae »• -J
V K • •*->
V 3 • I Of
»
S a. »'
u «t
•1^-00
iu-r 001 i^-
C9NPLETEO
OATtt 6T/12/22 (
<r 
——————————————————————— 
————————
0 
PROJECT NOI 2*2
" I 
DATE 
TIM:
f 
STATION MB ——— P*«*~- 
— -e*--
TO 
OAT
•
• 
- 
-"•"• "-•"
•
- f
• 
" " 
"" ' -"~ — " " " ' • • • '
•
• 
- - -- 
- - -
•
•
0 
-
-
-
-
-
•
•
•
1
• 
~ '
•
•
•
1
•
*
PROJECT NAME!
»»13»» 34»S6
3210J
3*311
32104
3*301
345*6
34694
34601
3«»T»
34>5T
n»?*
3 4 9 A ft
Hill
3*m
39">i
34J51
3*6*6
3*2T3
344**
34*47
i « » 2 f
3 4 4 ^ 1
34JBJ
34SM
342PO
34i?5
34301
»»»>»
TURPENTINE RUN
PA»A«tTE* N.-.E
bCMZEwe
CHLCR90I»»OM3M:T1»».F
4Roino"tHLO*0fT''*NE
MMuJwJwImMr^""
CILOKPBFNIEME
2-C1LODOPHEN3L
PrfEkjL
2,4-OICHLOROPHtNJL
P-CHLO*n-««-CRFSO.
'.'t-OINTT^^UESCL
J-NlTRsinfScL''"11'
i t 3""OJi»rtCOH5B*1?ft*'P
l,4-otCHL nRj. cNZEMt
.'fxAtML-'RreTM"!!"4**
ri?X»CML''*18l|T"OIl!1S
l t2»*-T £'ICHL^ eO°i*i/CM c
NAPHTHft LE Ne
MI T* JStMZ't'
M~i*ITRw^QDI~P ~i^P " PVL4^IN*'
N™ttJTPOSC5I^li*NVL^''IN^
»IJ<2-CHLO«OISQPinPyL) FT.
• CtNAPHTMYtfN-:
ACt'NAPHTX'N?
PtOORf N^
H E > A L 1L PR Ofc F M 2 C M !
-4-TMf^-WPitSNTL W»f<iTL «T»
UBITS
ur.xL
Ul/L
Lf./L
U5/L
Jl/L
U'.XL
UR^L
UO/L
uCXL
U*/L
UOXL
U5/L
o3/L
"*'J;
U"".
Uu'L
U*/L
U'XL
Jj/l.
Ufi/L
U'./L
IHXL
Llr>/L
u'./L
UO'L
US XL
U'.'L
'J-./L
tmnuTirr-
T3T»U
T O T A L
TDTH
T O T A L
TCT»L
T O T A L
T3TAL
T O T A L
T O T A L
TOT«t
T O T A L
T T T A L
T O T A L
TTTIL
T O T A L
t'TK
•fTI^
T i T * L
TTTtL
TCT«L
ir r^L
T':r»L
T5T«L
f?T«L
'°T'L
TCT»L
T C T ' L
TTT'L
'YltU^ I 9F"«Trf" ~
- TJ ——
U
U
u
2 0 0 0
U
t)
u
u
u
u
u
u
uu
u
u
IT
u
ir -•
uu
v 
-
f
11
1
1
i
•
_____ •
II ••
_ _ •
•
m
n•
m
^^
- — . — - ^
14
.- —
.. — ^
•— -•-• ^
• - ~
n
- - - • ^
•
•
•
iiA
/63T 
TOO in.1
n
^ < & « l ' 4 l G 4 ^ < * C 9 » * O » ' * C > O O I
t i <• i n.>.
<' « a x • T r-
I* 
O
» 
4_
5
1 nr>
» 
I 
O 
-*
**
je
it* 
•• 
»
OU » •» 
I 
C
•» «« 2 X 
I 
•* 
*
m y -« m 
t 
» 
*v
-• •» X * 
» 
m
r» •» T
X • mi»
-« 
z
if 
m
•
» i O
' » 
-» •< 
! 
I •»
: rt 
» r- 
. 
-« 
_
i r* 
-11 
, 
An*
4 
7-0 
r
r« 
in -H 
I- 
I
< f c c c c c < J c c c c « r < t c . c c c . - c j c c t c c c c j c c c c c a c o c i l c d c c i c c 
' 
a
iA ^* «t •> Ji ,1 * .. o »• o c> c* *i «•• ft «: -ri ^i ;> .-) .> ;.! *i n *•• •> o .» f t| c% o o s> fi^O o o ff> *» 
I 
>-•
•> i '» .j 3 ci .; o • » c > c* o o -> * ^> r.- r» -j r» ^
'j - ci j o "> ca *:
i 
C
rl)
; o c- 3
• r ^ u : . r - 3 c G c ^ i ; a c q r : r ! ,
i 
• 
: 
I 
i 
i
> 
, 
! 
I
c q c a
I 
i
: • • - « Cf
8631 
TOO Ifl.I
( 2 > ~ « X - < C » C « * X » O"« O I I X > * * 101 I » I O -« X X
on -* r- r it n. » * • c1 *•• • w m i ' j o f - u » - o » - H O Q « * 3 » r ' -4-4
^ « r ~ w o j o 0 y * ^ « 
« i o ^ r - < - * » 4 o 4 i ' - « r J ) » i - * » 4 f - C 9 
*• r-
X a 0 - 1 - 3 X L J . l i _ J i - » J c » 0
X 
j 4 
•> r» a r-
O - M 
J O 
- < » * C T J W X 
_ 
_ 
_ _
• t » o 
r-x 
z i u .< » r~ i3 
H.nJtr^nt-iiu
T ' > 
" - * 
r - o ^ « X « - <
^3 
'_.iT r r- o »? I" C1 X
r- r* 
'"-« Z - Q - V H 0 " *
X -* -
r T
o »
•i
f
-
» A •-
-« * »
•»•»•* -o * -v
t> o rt o «» o
I J tl 
•> f> C3 O <J • >
r:c c * c c c
"
c q c -3 c
c c r: c: c c c
Ct Jl vl C> "1 ff-. (.»
-( -4 -I -i
• • > . ? < 1 u
M 9* #• >»
rj f n r-
ae c
^f^KS^f^^^l •— —
HI^^HI
^•^•^•^•^H *
f^^^^Hll^H % 
PROJECT NO* 262
l^^^^El^H 
I 
DATE 
TIHI
MRnt^^^^HR^^^H A 
iTATIBN -»H ——— MHtH- 
tlf
^•ll^VBijI^I 
'° 
°'V
j'Sl^fptH • _._-....
^Hr^'^-t^H
tB$[}^:SB *
%*l-<'f':':-*B •
*'$'' ' ' • 
f
-at,, i 
' 
^^1 
^ 
— -— - - - 
-
Y' 
'" ^1
* ^*- 
^*^^l
^Bjt 
• 
•' ' •' -'^H %
*-&£. f 
V 
. '•''•^^l 
— ' "
•'/••'''- •' °" 
^H
•flE^ ' , ; ''•! • — ~ —
mEvF 
' 
^^
^^j, ' . 
. . • <^~ .^^H
•jfl^v '•*/ 1'' -'Tfi^B ^
«fcjfe'i..- ijL-'
1^.^ <^n^^l 
~
1i *W i ' ' ^ '/i^i^B " '
1||';|^;*S •
gKvr^i:' -• • «.
!HiT<< • 
• 
- ^H 
~ •
9tt»T><'. , -.^1
ji^R • '• *• • 
^k^i A
?|t 
I1, 'i . 
:.^H
fnflLiif?'' f' *~^' 
*^IB
•^ 
i' 
^^^^1 ^h
1M^:? fl 
' '"-
Sf^-.V/! ?:':•• 
V 
*
ll'f'f* -
^•V* A
-: 
n
0 
M •
u-i 
J ; r".
»
•
^
CONPLETCD ANALYSIS REPORT
PROJECT N»K(« TURPENTINE RUN
I««NO Pit-to 
PAWAHereR Nine 
UNITS
0»1-JO» J»»0l t»«-OTC«L5*OPHtnOL 
U5/L
3*^21 2 f 4 f 6~TP I C "L DROP ^? iNOL 
UC/L
3*»16 2>*-OI»<IT*OPHENCL 
ul/L
39032 PENT ACHL t)'OPHcNC L 
UG^L
-'»»64 I, J-OICMnR'*FN7f*f 
oi/L
i*STl 1 1 *~GIC*tORC3!NI?1£ 
Li'S/L
3*J!6 lf2-UIC«LOROjfN:tNt 
jr,/L
S'5^6 ftrX AC "LOP^PTH*KP 
C'C/L
*<70i «EllACML0>r4iJT * JIElE 
o » / L
J»J^t l»Z»4-Ttirnt3^gJ(»(ZrK* 
ui/l
j*6)6 N»PHTM»LtNt 
'Jj/l
J«J7S 6lS<2-CHL9»OrT1Yt.) FT. 
L"S/t
3**09 IST^TRf7If* 
J « / L
j»^4? NITPOt tN JfN> 
Ur. /L
J4**tf N*NlTROSO?I f c^-PR3Pf t A1* IV* 
UT./L
3**3J K"NI TP050? IPHF NYtf »MT Hf 
UO'L
J*2»? f Ii<2-:Ht3*niSiJP«:)PY;.) FT. 
U3/L
2*200 ACeNtPHT^YLfN' 
j(",/t
4*209 ACCNAPrlTHfNF 
Ur''U
3*J»l FLJUR«NC. 
ji'./l.
J*TOO Hf X*CfL<5R?*f H!tN' 
UC/L
3*636 t-MR'jMliPH'NVL f"~\1(- HF. 
u O / L
" "l 
P1tW*WT1RcN 
U */L
J * 2 f c & A N T H R A C ^ N E 
Uij/L
3*j>» DliTnYL PtTltLdTE 
U1/L
j*2?2 dUTYL a^MlTL 'HTrtlL'T' 
Jt'L
jfllOO t I S ( 2 - E T N V L H ; * Y L > PHTHiL. 
U"./L
3***9 P»«fNf 
U'/L
3*520 CHUYJPfJ* 
-Jl/L
3 * 5 2 0 1 , 2-8f NlANTt'R'C'M' 
. 
U'"/L
**ft*l *• — CHL uR^P-^ttl V t. Pw^fiYL *T« 
tffl^t
R f P O R T
"«F HIJTPY
T-T»L
TCT1L
T-HL
TTTtC" '-- ——
T O T » L
T?TIl
TOUL
TTTTJCT
T C T » L
TTTIL
T - T M
TCT1L
T~TU
1 '•Tit
TOTlt
T'%T«t
T7T1U
T C T 4 L
T-T«L
TnT» L
r '.) T a L
T*1 T* L
Y-JTU
T "i T S '
T Q T S L
TTttL
T5T«L ' --
T ' T J L
T T T S l
T T T 4 L
TTTIL
T " T d L
P*« 53^4
OATE: (7/12/22
VlLbT t REKXirr
u
tr
u
II
u-ff
u
P.T • 
-*-•— •
uu 
•
u
tr~
u
J
TJ
I'
a
L1
11 •
''
U' 
——
.-
17
"n 
•
,.•
'
( j
J
«
t-K
•^
— — A
____ •
Ml-
•
0
— --• _
^
— - - 
-n
A
----- 
•
•
- - - *
»
.... 
. ^^^
^^
*
if
•
01
,-.^^git^:,-:r •:^.;^.^ 
•* 
..^I^^H
.,:7V^;,^
9
s«
I ^ ^ >« « *> ^)» 41
* J" » a ^ t O ^ « 0 ^ « A « 4 ^ * ' * * ^ * ^ « > » - »
| | | | | » - 4 X » X " « - « 4 » C » »
« f M I « « w O X 1 1 t* 
1 n r ^ J t - K C T i
c 
> 
A «.
M 
r+ 
~t *
* 
•
X 
«
Cl
X r>
o
t*c
r-•
k «0(- 4 1 ^»-
^ O J « ^ »« H 1
nf -^ ^ z 
.<* t <fi
1 X f
*- M C
i at o
' j ; z
•» ' i
^: 
rt
*• 
' r;
I 1
r» ft
H e N f L ^ T O
IC^LU3t*l
at 2
o* n.
1 1
*4 »*
lTdOTOtU
TTtDTOLUI
-* CM
C
c
c
!J;1*
c
i0
OB
z
r*
!»
X
Z
*•
*
7
»*
r«
tJ*
«
•4r"
ni
r*
fS
-<»
mz
•n
r»
->
t«
1
O
2
o
a
-
o I
s I
•V 
:
O
•> o n 'J o >
' * c j 'i a o "l o d r-» u o 3 o rj o a o •} 13 o o a
C J c ' J
c ac
TovT
r» n» <
*t "•h
st
2*2
***
» Pv * Ul
• I I I
f* o o o
> t 1 1
•> o on
f* V » »
-« o o o
a IT t* a.
n r * x
rr» r» m
C t_ C C
t* I- r- I*
1 U O T
1
1
-
i
r;
ri
4.
r
t * • »
> -4 1 1
» » O <-
i r* MI M
i * » »
Ct>0
•» 1 -v
* r* z
isse,
:^P?
» D.l 0
n »
*•
r »
75
* o
1 3
r\r-
** 0
o
C r.
o o
T 0
5
O
*M
l > x » 4 X - 4 - « r > c ^ « : * * o r « n i I * r» • 1 O i 1 t » O •« I *
OX 
•»• x r» .-» t^ 
»a .n 
r> « 
T, o O * -4 » o t 
«J o 
•» *3 o r*
» -* 
K r r x X n i 
o— JO 
- 4 * » C « 7 3 V 
i JO r* r * » O
or- 
r* x • • » • * . ; 
-n* 
fjt 
r > c i » « » f o 
5 o » ' « t - « * - < *
i 
• 
'
;
i
*> i J J f. r> o > ' ,- O .-• • j •> a j 
» O 1 0 O 0 »4 0 O tj ^ -j '* 0 LJ J J
^? r. r.^ r'!^ r f':«-»^---»?-»- r. r.3??rr.^^
i 
• 
! 
, 
i 
1
' 
r-
*a
xo
! 
I
»
-*
JB
' 
IH
I
i 
a*
n
ji
»«i
i
: I*
c: 
<4
- ^
^ q c i 
e
'
i
I
1
c d c c
i
..
I
/SIS
»§»0*T 0»T£! 87/12/22^
19BB
Ja^K^K^^f
rm^^n^^H
ttiv<-.->
-®.rm
:|Pi:iB
:?•>.'*-•
"}• -> •
'•• •
•' •
}•«-. . <^l
|; ';'^l
•ib .' j^l
ifes.j./j'^M
yS'i :; ' ^B
4^ U ^1
1 •
fjj'i
[;;.h •
•*,.. *
1
**- 
K
* 
- . _ . . . . . , , .
•
f R O J f C T NOt 262 
»
" * 
__ 
°»Tt 
TI"f
TO 
0»Y
• ..._._... 
...
' •
1. . ..... ..___....
1 
•' •
, 
............ _ . . .
• __ _
-
.
• — — " _ . . . _ . . . . .
K
':•.
• "• •
•t•
•
• Q j e C T <«*E, TU«PENTI,t DUN
3*"l 
llII'^TRICHLORaJtNZENt
3*273 SISC^-CHLQaCETNYi.) fT.
i*lOJ ISOHQRONt
J«»*T HTTROSffltNE
3*2*3 jii(I-CMLnR01SOP»"pn* El.
3*280 «tf«(»e«THYl'i»?
3*205 tCENA'HTHENF
39700 M» ktCHLrROeFNZENc
3*3*1 OI^ETMYL »-(TieL»r^
39110 iI-N-'uTYLPP1M»L«TF:
3*5*6 Ot-K-lCTYL »HTH«L»rE
1*374 rLUC/Kl'.Tl'NE
3*»4* f1»tnf
3*320 CHCY'J'N'
3*6*1 *-CHLt)ROPHENrL 
B^F^<*L tT.
J»»"i I(«3FN3(1 • 2, '-c , p) fY»f?«r
3*^*7 c E N Z O < j ) P YRE if
3*321 1 11-f fNZ'JPEUYLFNc
3*556 1 ^t4,4-3I5E'»Z»lilTMS»:FK£
3*611 2 *-Olit'T*OTOLUflB
' UNITS
VC'L
JC/L
U5/L
UG/L
UO/L
U5/L
U3/L
Ol/L
-JT/'L
ufvi
U5/L
t'O/L
jJ/t
U5't
J^/L
tl^/L
L'5/L
UG'L
i»fL
U1/L
TOT»L
TOT»L
TTJTIt ""-
TC-T«L
TTITTtt
TOT»i.
TOTIL
T C T » L
T3T»l
T O T » L
T-'ttL
TCTil -
7 D 7ft L
I f T * ^
TTTIL
TCTU
T O T t L
TOTBl
1DT»L
T5T«t 
-
T<3T»l
TOTif
T 3 T > 1
TCT6L
I T T S L
f T T A L
T C T A L
VllUr fEWITlT
~tr
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
TI
V
- TJ -
u
u
V
uII
•J
IT
ITj
•I
'
n
n
w
..
- 
- •• 
•
1
<
(
(
1
n
*" 
' ™ 
iT I 
' *! 
: 
* 
'
i 
"* ' 
y
i 
•• 
c 
,
•« 
* 
' 
' 
!
nt 
!
i 
• 
' 
:
31 
x
: 
n o
•J 
x
a 
o 
'
i 
: 
i
1 
i :
i 
• 
>* ^ 
i
i
9 
;
9
I Q 
I | I Z O < X X 
1 I I 
t l | l » H 3 » X - 4 « 4 J B * O » X i
! 
« a w * « » « * - o r - r * 
M rwr^ f* «v> rv o J i i ,» I o O *• * c ^ 
t
- t J X O J » » ' a J / " 
JO 
~J 
X M CJ
' J 
Z 
W 4 ^ C 
Ci 
-«
rti 
-< 
n
1 
A
r-
c c r r r c - e c c c c c c 
c c c c c c c c i c c c c c a c c r c e d
' • D O O J 
' i J J f ^ J J ^ J 
C » > - l O O O ~ 3 n O ' J J ' l O T t \ » 1 J i - l ' T
r r r^ 
,,_r_^r,_n,,__
I
i 
' 
. 
j
; 
. - ' • - c , c f c i - J = : * 3 c . v 4 4 - < l 
c ^ ^ c ^ c c c c c d c c ^ c c c ^ c a c c
' 
' 
' 
! 
i
i 
'
; 
' 
• 
I 
|
_ 
, 
m 
, 
; 
i
i
i
o
Ul9
^ » • c»P
1 O » O J»
O O » M
c c c c
0 C1 C- O
"322
.
,,
c c ^ c c ^
1
1
i
i"
1 i
1 
0
o p -4 
m*
2c2 
'
**
. 
H
Jb
^
4
t-«
-•*^
••
r~ 
.
C 
:
«
"t
A
JH
i
m
O
„
**
V
K t
»•
fr 
- d L Y S I S »£»0»t
IQt 16»
DATE
'""nun
TO
of
D*Y
PROJECT *;>«£!_ TU«PfNTIN: RUS
ItBNO 
P»BXO 
P A R A M E T E R MtHc
G 9 ! 3 f l 3 32101
3*5*1
3*S«1
3*020
32105
3*511
3213*
3*516
3M7S
3*310
3*301
3*371 ETHYLltNIfNE
:*566 2-CHLJkJ
3*591 2-NITP
_'*&9i, PHENOL
3*601 2,<
3*4?1 2,»,6-T»lC-LSi;.
i.OL
.1*61 9
i*»Tl
J45Je
3*3Jo
39732
l,2,*-T?IChL it 3F;-
3*^73
3*271 3I5Ci-CMLP»CfTMC«Y)
34.33 N-
34366 i
3*511 2-CHLOOfttpHTMILEMfc
3EPQU
jMrs
u'./L
dG/L
Ji/L
Ui/t
j-i/L
U'./L
Ui/L
o:/u
j-./L
fi/L
Oi/L
- yir't
'J r. ' L
US'L
OG/L
jj/L
lj'« /L
•j'.'t
u'/l
o ;/L
U'./L
J i/L
J "i / L
u J'L
ui/L
U.i/1.
'Ji'L
UJ/L
UO/L
J6/L
U'.'L
L"/L
US'U
" 'OC/L
C H F M I S T P Y
T O T A L
TOTH
T 7 T J L
T1T«L
"In
TnriL
T P T 4 L
T C T » L
T O T » L
T O T » U
TC1T»L
T C T . L
TPT«L
. 
T.J.UV...
T O T « L
T O T » L
T"t»L
T T T t L
TT fit
T ~ T A L
T : T » L
t O T S L
T ? T t L
T C T » L
t ?1 »U
I'm
T ° T - L
T ? T « L
t "T'L
TC Tf -
TCIT'HL"
t"T*L
T T T 4 L
TT«L
T"T»L
T T T t t
1"T«L
V'»LJf 
t. 
»LI»««»
'J
U
U
'J
II
u
U
u
u
'J
...J-u
u
u
Uuu
u "
_ 
. _._..Jt..
J
•J
uij
. ._. __ .-Si-
li
tj
'j
M
' P
U
u
•J
•J
'.I
J
————————— 
T
._„ _. - 
•
•
•
II
•
•
.__. --_-- ^
. . . . . . 
•
n•
.. ._._ •
-. 
— - ^
. .__._ •
M•
•
•
_...- •
n•
Bl
iO"
AT
u
TO
~« o <
» a. :
i o •*»
• c .4
t - c ; c . C f - c « - c : c c . c ' c c . c ^ < c c c ^ t - c c ~ c i r c c c r c c - ( . c r p c e r c c c c c 
i *
-i'w* o 
i r- .•• •-' M i.1 r- .1 .» -• .-i c .•. r ' 
<> *. • •• . -;1 »i •-• •. < *. i .1 *r ;• .> •*% *> t. *."> o t»'ir* ci ti cv 
' 
•-»
c |c c ;e c c
I 
I
. C|C C
6ft
^^L 
. 
COMPLETED' 
LTIIS REPORT
^^1 
• 
PROJECT NO* 26! 
'KnjECT NANEt 
TURPENTINE RUN
^H 
'"' 
DATE 
TIKE
^^H 
• 
ST1TIOH NO —— PRBH " 
~ 3^" 
LA8NO 
PiRtlO 
PARAMEtE* NA««E
^^| 
TO 
OAT
^H 
—— . . . _ . 
......_._.. ........_ 
O S t J O c i»J3l »«TA-9rt<:
^^H 
i«3»C GAHMA-«*C
^^H • 
3*259 OELTA-eMc
^^H 
39*00 T?x«PHE'JE
^^H 
3*471 PCd-lOl*
^H • 
3«*ll PC«-1?21
^^m 
^ 
——— ._.......... — _ ——— ...... 
_ 
S 9 5 C O pCt-l?»'
^^1 
• TUOP.RUN 
S7/10/3i 
1715
^H 
OETTlit 0900 
lU^STOTt! AQjfOUS
^^H 
DESCRIPTION! OEVCON 
K^LL »3
^^H • 
3917S VINTL CHL?eijc.
^^1 
- 
3*Jll CHLORPtTh2NF
^^H 
J » * - J N C T H T L E N E CHL'.ftj;
^^H • 
32l!'6 C4LOKV%- J
^^H 
32103 I t ^ - J I C X L a K O t T n t ^ S
^^^1 |> 
.'2102 ODEjh T E T R j C^LO'lLf
^^^1 
J210! CK HLCii<r/i6u"J><L TM«NT
^^1 • 
3*5*1 1, >-JUHL'*:C»^P»LLN.-
^^H 
_. * 
:i9l*n Tdf-tLO" HTiTLtNc
^^H 
' 
3*030 d F S 2 £ P c
^^H 
• 
J211- C -IL'l(i"CIcli(C>' j^bTnas":
^^H 
3*511 1.1.2-T«ICHL:9^F TH.K!
^H 
• 
3*116 1 ,1 ,2.2-T£T;j rHL j^OFT'U'jc
^^R 
3**73 TFTPACrtL-'CrTHYLC'if
^R 
3*OU ICLOtN":
JHp 
3*371 £ rrtTL!t riZfMF
f 
• .- 
' --- 
- "
1 •'
M •
L'r, I T S
US/t
. U3/L
UC./L
U ~i / L
IJ^/L
uG/L
ui/L
u"/L
•.O/L
•J j/L
U.'L
L'-,/l
L'-./L
J'./L
v » / L
u :• / L
or, /I
REPORT OATEI
C h E » i $ T R » 
V A L U E
TOTIL
T O T A L
- T C T A L ... 
... . ... ._
T O T A L
T O T A L
T O T A L
T O T A L
T T T A L
T O T A L
T C T A L
T.1TAL
T O T J L
T?I«L
T ? 1 « L
T 0 T U
T •• T 4 L
1 IT ti
T *,1 iL
T O T A L
i : r a L
T' TIL
1 "TIL
V'tiL
r-. T.-.I;
T T T i i
J " r '. L
ir/12/r
,-«,»;---
.... ii . 
.
J
u
. . u
u
~u
u
u
u
u
u
u
y
uu
u
0
___ u. _____
''1
u
IJ
J
f
e
')r
»
•
•
•
I!"•
%
~ •
n•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
n•
- ,•
•
•
II
I 
'
1
»t> ajs :
V .o <s ^.
Cto
1LJ
ft.
4H3
T
O
HI
^
or
ft
r*
O
^
O
^o
z
£j
I
•
1
1
1
u. >-
DS
rs
K0
p
n
* a
T b.
V?'
•o
.4
O
1
.j
CN^htflAhi
UJy
2i
J w. 
v>
L. -j ^» a. i o.
! 
!
1 
!
1
1
1
1
•r
-,..,...««-..,..o««.^-,-.«,.,..m««^«,n,1, ————
.
:
! 
i 
'
1
; 
t
i
; 
; 
!
1
[
! 
i 
' 
i
' 
! 
• 
' 
! 
1
i 
1 
i. 
! 
1 
.1
% » » O r* » •- I I I
;••
-i;
n 
X 
^> '
z o ni -H, -^ *
N HZ » 3D I"
Of< 
O O O «*» *
Z 
f[m
C T C C . C . C ct f c tr cz c c. C. c. c c; t c c . c . r c r t c . c ' - c . c c c c c c i c c c i c c .
jo o o o j jo J o »j o o!o •> 1
i 
I
r: c c c i
I 
i
o 
;
l\ I
•* l
k
K"——4
! 
• 
i
• II
u
in .1
T71C1
"" . I w i
T t l J l
1»I. i
"*:'"!
J J J_o J
It JC I
1 V . ^ 1
1 / " '"*
••/or.
•./in
i/"t
"i/. if
1 / :• i
t/'.r
T/--.T
I/-. r
1/1 '
i/i'f
1/MO
-| / V P
1/vl
"!/! 0
1/1'I
"1/^1
I/IT'
* C < i '
* k « » £
us»r
10S34D-C-
-j»>'ijl-J t7 tI'
t l , l H 2
»Ch."
t l e»f
<c!rc
1kO»E
o.i»c
3h{u!JJ!
ih;-»ci3i
lihJidi-tMM tout
rteoiM.-.ia-t'i
urrt
I •
tsitKistns 
cooo :HI<OC
Ciil 
40/01/18 
NT
SlINf,
ONtlH
3HU
01
MD1U
.QM JJOIOJXS
Nils
tJHVN
J ^ "^ => ^ r» n ^
n cj o c-< ca i
i 
I
J '
~J 
^
ii 
« uj 
V .u
t- t a J r. 3
, j - 
I . I M U . - M T Z
r. t. 
.. r X i. " t« ^ a
i ^ i . . . »-*-ic _ » _ j ^ o r i
L > - 
I . - - X - » ^ > f » O T f 1 _ l
*.«'«*• u- te- *i< tf >- ^ ^ Z H.
u j - i j I z - i o o - i T t i ^ r t 
^ T « 7 
o «- • ^ T: c 
i «. . a . ^ o c » - i - i i r i 2
- 4 T Z C Z M W t X C . ' - - t l * - ^ u l 3 a . l . i > j ^ 
» > i u » - ^ ^ 
u * - J r ? * « ^ 7 l i - > ^ ^ ' r » < U . 
^
,5|S
i 'r
:ls:
• I 
MlX
I
10
I
• II
1 7 i > 
1
"71 .1
- v 1 '„ l
V.I 
1
" '. I .- I
"> '. 1 - J
" V 1 . '.
1 / '. 1
-/•in
i A r t i ? H ' ;••»<• TII i-j
•
I '•
Ul
i/-. r
COii
II
T? 1 L J
T, i: i
•••IM
T t l C l
1J1J1
I/' 0
I/'. -.
T/'."
T/'.'
1/00
1 / 0 1"
1/J •'
I/or,
J ' l K J d J i O T w D » i d 3 H f ?
P v l M l O T V f.UONl
Oi-r6C
CSttf OlCIfO
S11MI
'.*
l?i»G LtCdlt
"
NOD
I3NVN
A*Q 
01
iC 
U3IU - CM HCIULS •
live 
• .
ON ijiroii
II
• •II
""11.1
1 7 1 ', I
--K 1
T. i-.l
lr J
111 it
•>»rji
•"ItU
•UIOJ
l/'f!
1/t "
~i / c n
i/'. i
I/'. 0
1/11
l /: ii
I/'..:
1 / v r
I/1 "
-,/''f,
T/-. n
I/in
T/cn
T/ or
I/-jo
i/vn
i/'.n
T/-. n
"T/OTi
i/?ni/cn
3 N 3 Z N J J O t O » f
"?N3 
UH130'«01H}Iki Pilot
I I C U O
'• a j 
, n 1» A
(lllllHlhl 
SH"f
7 / T T / / S :3iVO
AtO
>5
Oi
«» 
ON NCIITI?
ION
pare: S7/i?/J2
3AT£ 
TIME
mnov (.3- 
ion 
DF
TO 
0»Y
m
•ROJ'CT NINE! TUVPENTIW6 (UN
L>9NO 
P A R V O 
O A U J ^ ' T E O NC<c
0'13lJ 3*205 ACENnPrtTMfN'
1*3«1 FLOU»«Nr
;'*tOO H t X A C M L f ' R C f l £ K ? t ^ :
3*636 *-oPO«i3Prt(-NYL PH^^YL '.r.
j**&i PH El* ANTn R £ N^
3*220 AHTMRaCENE
4*3*1 DINFFWfl. •iTH'L'Tt
3*336 OltTdYL PnTM«L»TE
3^110 OI-N- : J T Y L P C ^ T H J i a l E
J*292 
S U Y Y L citiilYl °f T -'lL£Tr
J*>»6 DI-'I-P^TYL P h r n S L I T F
J 9 J O O 3 I S ( 2 - : T H Y L M t X Y L ) PhT-«L.
3*376 plUnR<SI1 -\f
• ' * 2 J C*JYs'«. r
J*i?6 1 1 Z-PJ?"I? A'lTH^JCf vE
3*6*1 »-CNLl«''P>1ENYL *1 = NY» -T.
J * * 0 * 
l * * U F K ^ ( l f ? » 3 ~ C » ' ) ( * Y i * ; r
3 * 4 * 7 b ( N Z O « 4 > P Y s r > l r
;*5ri itii-*ih:3p:>YL.iii '
J*j3t 
i»2!J»S-'"IIbF^.-''M''.>C* ^ r
3*411 Ji j *-3KnL JP j' -"JlTf M '
j*'-26 2,3-OlNTTffOTCL'j' :<"
J f call 2 » 4- J I \ I TC JT C L Jc . '
1*3*0 l i 2 - 0 T P M c ' * Y L M v " > r u 7 l K : .
^^j") 3|*-^^^7^FLl.'J*'«*'f^cf•I
j*2'2 H.!2-- rN7CrL:.'C r«vT>' W-i.
j ° ? ? j «LrRi"
' " 5 5 5 0 orFLjTJi
3°Jr.i.' C MLOO"4 -iE
3 ^ 3 0 ) 4,"'-r.i.T
ji):v 
4,.^-t,0E
343'1 A L P M A ^ L K S a s U L F - ' '
i*3S4 8 ' T A t^^I5jL*•^^
J 4 5 ? t t*u3$L'LF'N ".JL^ ;r r
3°3»0 tN'JSlN
J*j64 ENCi'Jx »t?E.^Y:t
3 9 4 ? 0 n;pT»CKLO' - P C x t 2 '
—
'/
1.1/L
." J ' L
u-./L
wi'.'L
J'./L
u j/L
J&/L
.-1/L
L
1 r, / •.
o '. ';
-/ L
U .. ' L
•J ' L
u ' • f \.
J •' / L
U ". / '.
lf\.
,., r. / L
.. ./L
'!' /L
J."/L
b ,", / '_
>.' . / L
L'i/L
J'i'l
Ji/L
o '. /L
UG/L
j ;/L
U'-'t
J "• / (.
i-t./L
L • / L
J-. /L
i '. / '.
w H e - J j T » Y 
V i L '. • ; !. -"_••«« t
,"T,L
T P T » L 
J
T ' T i L
r- n^ 
j 
_
rntiu 
f 
""
T r T K 
')
T 1 T 4 i 
j
I-.T:'. 
u
T-I.--U 
H
T : f 1 1 
1 , ' 
^
r
 n T r. c 
'i
t r.-. 
i..
*''•*>. 
o 
.
fOI". 
j 
'
T , rL 
_
r • : L 
.1
i ' • L 
•"'
', ". : L
r •> '. L 
• '
l , -^ 
i
1 
•' L 
'
1 ". T. .
T 
T -• L 
• i
:-'^ 
.: 
i
I" f f t. 
:
T ! TCi.
T - T S I 
, .
I~T'L 
''
r rr iL 
i
T ^ T . ' l
I.-",, 
']
T - r \ t
' " T '• ..
trr*.
' TIL 
, 
•
Tr 1 :L
T ; i •> L 
y
' i T . L 
I
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
V
,.
1
'. 
:v
'i
n
i,
i
r
r
K 
• " ..
r,
0
r.
n
P
M
~fi
(i
"f" "
i
r,
n
f!
fi
•fi "
n
n
r.
iju j
1,1 -i
•>? ici
i ; t '. i
: i 1 ; i
T.l^.
"• ; i ,i
"! ' I 'J 1
T. i : i
1 5 1 * I
TK 
1
1li>.l
•" ; 1 "! I
->;. j • i
''tlCi
T V i :' ;
"•"1^1
1 ' i -j I
"I? 1-1
1 T 1 .' i
1 '. 1 ) 1
1 '. 1 ^ i
T i | ;j ;
IflCi
1? IL 1
"> ff iO 1
~?10j
i»ifi
HI"1!
^»iai
T»101
T/'jT
" / '. n
~"';"
-/'!r.
'"'"*
"'^
"/• i
". / '.. "
"i / , r
i/ -••<
T/ n
i / : •'
T / •. «
i / •_• f
I/' f!
1 / '. '•
1 / '.' ,"
I/ -^
'./'•I
i/'.r
i/i
i/fn
i/*j^
i / «. n
i/\.p
"/rn
T/v.n
i/^n
i / '. .1
'i / i r.
IX'-P
TT/n
"TTTTT/
^ ~3~
»a l S l •< _n
O I O » f
IS':NJ; oir»c
D I e J ? '• 11 »'
-s. M !»'=»?
: t; 11 r
'T £ C U f
«;.»-l-7'T
f !»»£
. ISOl-J
U9«>C
C0»6f
6i;»E
C » £ 6 £
H U f O
UN««1
:)tiVK
i To «
i O / O l / i "
AfO 
01
iO_ 
»a«^——. OH HDIllli
91VC 
|
(ON
S T 2 T 
TOO in.I
1 
1 
'
1 
;
1 
i
1 
i
I
i 
!
i
i
i 
i
'
* .*
*.*
i
1 
.
j
1
1
^
p
a
°
«i
o» a
•< 11
-
s•
•H
*4*
*
O
*_mo
z
0
*~
1
i r"»» • i * * '• z i i
2; x 0 * f~ *•*"*• TI z r>
M -« I I Z* I' I Z ~ X
» -4 o. ^ 
ox
•» 
JC*«i 
•» O
^- 
j: •
c 
ar
c e c t_ c '- ^ t c >; r c c. c c c_ c f~ •_ r c t;
• •* + t* ••* i
1 9 -
or *
1 v
tU 
~4
O 
X
^1 
*"
& 
«-.
*
*
- ib t 
•* r i u
i r *_. r a _',*. ^ «•-!-• u * <
i O .C- *** B 
» Ci *+ fr* b^ Ui
r, e > r. c* o
i .-i oe I 
i 
I
TUT 
001 
131&
£3&**y ;:v.'. -.-.-::_i»^Syfcjp;Ss;s-i5Ui|
P>OJ«CT HOI 262
D»Tf
TO
TJ3"
(T/NT/OT 
II JO
LOCATION COOt: 3700 
5USSTR4TF: «ajfOUi
_ _ _ 
A N A L Y S I S »SPU»T
P R O J E C T N » M E I T U » P f N T J N E R O N
091313 3**l8 HFTHrt
Z3 H c T H Y L E N E Ol.:VIj?
I.l-OICMLORH:tnts?
3 21 j Z
34>4I
j * a:«J
3*511
i;-1 I i T L "'V.
i*6*» r^MI-NlL
j 4 S 9 6 ^i^-JlM-'T
j«.j?l 2.»-Jli
.'*»5J P-C.*Lri
3". 6- 6
* f P O » T
PACE 
71
17/12/22
L 3/L
Li/L
1 S'l
v •* / L
U'l/L
J ,/L
j ' f t .
J' 1 '•-
J '•• / 1
.. VL
"j'./L
•J • / L
:.' VL
•j j / L
-.•/L
„ .> / 1.
,'. 'L
L ' ^ L
U-'.'l
(^'•'l
\j',t\.
(j-./L
* ;/L
.'•'L
''•'<•
^ • 
^
- i -
.' " I
. ' j
Ll" 
'.
•J ". ' L
Li".
1 1 '. / !.
u ,/L
., -./I.
.•C./-L
j ,'L
•. r»L
- T « L
"* • MI.
"is"
1 "-L
T r. T • L
T r T s .
T ? T J w
i -T li.
T r i - L
r"i :t
I ?TJ .
1 r TiL
ir T»L
> J T - L
. T J 2 L
' 
Tc_
. "Til
' •• r -• L
' 1 U
T ' 1 ii L
1 " r j>.
T TJL
1 •- T i L
1 "* i»
r .r 'i
r '• i •. L
' 1 1 IL
1 • T "i
i :r -,L
i-:*.!"
T" T k
* ' r -
1 - . •- L
i 1" T ' ..
Tr " ; i
! " T M.
I' T-i.
V • L J f '.
ti-
II
1
II
__PROJKT NO t 262
• 
BATe 
TIME
TO 
o»»
P R O J E C T -<»MEI 
TUDPFXTINc 
BUS
LUSC 
P'BMO 
P»»*K5TEo X'H
P*3e 
71
n»Tt:
C^E>llSTP.r
»iLlif I
3*27,1 B I S C 2 - C H L O K O t t H O « Y )
3**6ll ISufii? RCNF
3*4*7
3*»?H N-n
i*»'3
3*iS3 »IS<i-CHLT»CnjP«i,TPYL) 
cT.
3*336 MtnACHL l3ROCYCLOP5'(T JJI'Mc
3*200
"»20i ACeN»PHThfl»F
2WOO M
3»iii *-&SuMJPr<E 1<YL i'HE'iYL 'T.
•3**M P
143*1
3 < 5 ? j 3I-N-OCTYL °iTr-ALi
3«inO 31 > C : - - : T H » L M E » Y l )
3*i76
3*370 C-iKYii.,\-
3*526 X , 2 - a l
3*541 »-CHL'
3*2*7
3*!. 21
J*t,31 3 i*-OICHLCPC?l> il
3*b26 2 A-^I il T 9:. T ^L Jf *'"
J*»ll 2 *-'..I'<TT«!:T-LU?< f
J9330
39 3 1£"
u;/t
J3/L
UC'L
U'./C
U'l/l
U'/L
Oi/L
U j/L
UJ/L
Ci'1.
xf-'L
»/j/L
05/L
Ui/L
j;/.
O'-'L
ti"/L
U-./L
Ir.'L
or.'i
J:/L
o ^ >'-
T C T « L
II
r r r a t
i c i» L
T r. r»^
r'. i» L
TCUL
7 C T » L
T " I 4 L
T - T S L
i •• r i L
I'.'TSL
7'!tL
I T T i L
t J I 11
T .- T £ L
i: T-L
! "I T t L
'Mil
It
II
II
»«OJE:T NOI jtz
J»Tf 
T I H E
^ifoir 
of
TO 
o*r
3TEI '76C
INSCRIPTION: C£NCH <
•
•
•
•
_ 
.y A"»*L»5JS_»fPOST
'KOJi-CT N t M f l TyBPEfiTISE RUN
911313 39350 C
3«300
3S31J
3*^56
3*351
391iJ
HEPT.CL3C
^9*00 T'X
"2 ,Ce-l."v:
»6 pca-i?*'
>->5P(, "Cr-l.-'
'JMTS 
CH
u r, / L
J J ' L
o'./L
1 "/L
'-•G/L
J " / L
Jl/L
il ./U
iT'/l
vl/L
0 -, / L
(>.', /L
1, j/C
L, ./L
rj '. / '_
0 .• ' I
u j /L
J'. I'.
il/'.
U'.'t
L-/'.
J 'i ' L
•J ./L
i, '•'-
•j - > '-
i/.;/i
L' " / L
j ; ' L
j ~'i.
J '-'L
U'-/.
J-J/t
- •^•H
7
f N I S T M
t " T < L
T-TT*!.
T-iTIL
T"T»l
Tt t «L
f.TJL
T ^ T 31
T ' 1 t- 1
:^1 •: L
r •: i - .
r "T IL
T •. r •< .
1 ^ T A 1
i n T i t
T ? T i 1.
r • 1:1.
r-r«i.
T ? T ' L
' "> I .. L
'Hi-
1 "T )L
T f T .' I
t ' T •' L
I DHL
T'-T.,.
1 .' T M L
T TAi.
I •- r c t.
I-1-L
••-,••. L
1 :• T i L
fB^IM" 
T1H" 
»— ^« 
•«
-' - - — — -—— - ' 
,j
f PCi»T O A T f : 8 7 / 1 ^ / 2 2
- 
•
V •> L L1 f 
1 < • 'I » " <. 
^
•
II-
•
. U— .- , . __
'(
u 
.... •
1!
I/ .
u 
•
I; 
_
1 1
', 
•
,'
; 
'
^ 
•
. ^.__._ 
...
0 
•
•
.1
- •
H•
1
' 
•
,
1 
j
II"
•>
j
•i
i!
t
<
<
<
^
^
^i
i
It
II
• II
II
i J .J
'• - i u 1
I'M U
••'. i - i
'" VJ C J
I" " U !
'• ' U J
"1 Jkl
•l • i - J
••»1. J i
131.J
'• I 'i
' » i , i
1 f 11.
1 J
T 7 1 0 I
f. 1
.1C!
1 V 1 J J
-I/'.I
-1/..0
1 / i .n
-/•.r
/ . M
l / '.• n
T/'.r
i /. fi
i/'.r
i/'j i
i/en
1 / r n .
1/cn
~i / ^ n
l/nn
i/'jn
I/on
1/50
T/'JO
I/: "
1/0"
i/i'h
> i M f j k ; » i ( i ( c : c t j ] » ; - r >*Mt
: A < ; i > 9 ( C t t ; » i".M
i»c t •: >«r! i n M f
• •ujv c » c > - j ; c t o ' * • : - ? ) * ; ( » / ; t f
" i i I " A 4
J C i b F
j«VHl"i;«UlHlf X JH
' N 3 Z N 3 -
O t O ' t
9i
••Nvn^airiMjtyiii-jviM
oco»c
0 g T bf
t V ( *<"
T«iv(
II-'
Y:
i3IT3
5 «
SilN,'
OKil'J
MlK
A«O 
01
ON NOIiliS
31*0
itz ION
l«0di« SIS*' 
\0il3~
»
•
»
•
• II
§
•
*
»
M
•
•
•
•
II
•
~~ — '
•
•
•
"II
»
•
•
A _ _ _ _
(
r
•'
1
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
f
f
r
r
" 
r
K
r
*
r
r
r
f
n
> f >•
~ii~7
J/J l/it : 3j•;
\ i i : 
' ' ,
'• ' ' 
'."
! J 
.' 
1 '"•
t j j 
r.
; j j 
i •
: J 1
•. i j 
r,
; j j 
r.
M l 
> '
• i i 
i"
• j j 
i"
i i J 
r,
i j •: J
, j f . 
r
i it j 
i"
: J L J 
: •.
t 1 1 j 
i '.
nil 
C
r 1 L 1 
' "
! ICJ
< J : i 
' "
1 1: i
i K I
; i ( i 
i "
'. J C J
v J C 1
t i ; 
i"
t ; j
; 
C J 
i •
" ; i 
: "
. C 1
' : i
: . J 
r
« Jl J 
!•
t ; . J
1 1 . i 
i -
! J . 1
'. i . 1 
"<
t 1 i 1 
'"
: K 1 
i " /
r
r
rr
r
r
r
r
rr
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
.'•
r
-
r
n
r
r
r
r
r
r
"
r
,-
r
,-i
rn
*"
r
;-
rc' r
i It
? j! N r
.- c i » L
1 1 = 1 1 • i- : « i < •: > c M ( (
tl"t:(14:^ 0 1 • f f
M- r. ' r i C C » j « I r I < S « 1 r
^ t J ' f S C C M 
«»•<•!» 1 » J i f
CCC-.1"
jcc-.-iv ccm
rr. «;»c*>: o < t « e
• » r « 4 < ( t ) C I K' : ( / ! j 1 f
i : - Z 3 r i t 
C C U C
1*0 •>•
:i»-:i. t>tt(>(
< I H « C
[MM
II
II
II
c-
•II
4 
. _____ _
-*,-«•
r
r,
I
*> 
' 'C
1
(
r
r
r
* 
i ' •.
r
r.
r
rr
T
r.
rr
r
rr
r
r
r
r
< «r ; v • if» j
2/n//( :;jto j(;<;
•t i: i
-« JCi
-iiu
"Ul.1
" t 1.1
•« J ,. I
- t JCi
• » j c. j
" v j C
"11.
~l J..
' ( 1 C
ni:
' * \ i i
"i j^ j
"t JC J
• u .• i
• t J C I
:x jc j
"'.JCI
' • » J C J
• < j c j
i.isu;i.
• '•%*
1 '-^p
.'/tr 
~'.^i^t<.tZ^^••l Sktit 
.^li^K
'•if.f 
iK: 7Ki«"i" J: T j i « f 
0 /jl^^B
* / ? " 
: ) > : 1 i | - j 3 C t C 1 ^ : t ) l l i l S J < t ' 
0 kt^^^^HB
"•i'.' 
• k V ^ J i . ' t ( 1 H ; i t J : J - t ' Z ' 1 ' t 9 1 ( t ( 
• 
K^^^^^B
>*/'. r 
i ^ t t - J J ' t C ' f c C l e J - Z M H T I f t ; 
0 ^^^^^^B[
-.'•If 
- * 4 Z k i ( C t C t f 
' 
^^Ht ' ^>'
/•.r 
;N» Jt-j:Ctoit3it j O c i « c 
• ^^^^•f 
.•• • ...>.! ti.
-/?' 
;K3'J<Ctc!ll!C"h:iC-CM I5J»E 
^^^^^B •'• -V .'/''
'/•'• 
ibU J 3 > C « C t f LlfnCjC 
T C I Z C 
• ^^^^^P ' Jr^l
r-/cr 
iciicii-: ««j?i hcc>i: ecizc 
^^^^Vr''j39|lni
i *. / * r 
; f ) H j ; L i J U ™^ * I C » T * l « £ ^ ) ' 
ft 
^^^^^^^^^^^B ' ' ' •• j 
•
* f 
•
-
•
•
« 
- • - 
W 
^^^^^^^^^^^K . 
( . y ; <
'•/;>• 
•: c i».c>« '-inm cH»t 
I^^^^Kl
•/if 
;i ito'i': ii»hi:t 6 i » » £ ? i t i * c 
. . . _ _ _ • ^^^^Ej 
'.. !
?r; = fc< zuitisirs ccii i3cc : Kcnitc" • ^^^^B«
ctn 
tc/oi/ji 
Krtvirj 
i^^^Bj
> /'r 
ci?i-<t:r t(!(c 
^^^^Vt
i / : r 
< s i i - ? : c » c u t 
_
_
_
.
_
• ^^^^Ri
i /tr 
tizi-g:< oc!6c 
K 
^^^^H|
: /:r 
;-?i-8:c 9 ( t e ( 
. 
^^^^H
i y'.r 
i:2T-«i( F t ' t c 
* ^^^H 
"'•
' '-r 
; K ? » - C » « I J CCKi 
. 
, 
^ 
• ^^^^Bl
I't'.r 
Tt-c-ttfct: d«( t( i* KK c 
.. 
^^^^^B . ?v.
• ^B -:
MC 
CJ 
•WW^k'" l!
' 
»Ji*ir 
;M» tuittitc 
CM«. cstr" 
,c 
>C». 
U\_Mlili5 • i^^^^KV%<! *b
-. .- ...... __ -*'•• ^•gl?£,
tr« -iMj»i4ir J -i;nt i:>rcic 
<<z tcitijcircx 
• •••••R»CV ft.-'..
•••••aBC iL*
j t o c - t . s i s i - 
\c;j3-, kc: 
• 
^••••KE mA
ft 
:<
rx 
t z 11 i^
I
j/ 4- t* C F *
I I I I II
l ^ - l 
I I I ' - * * w f s 0 r>4TTl i
, 1 A I 
LJ «• 
'I *-* -• '
i • <^ >M t 
*J L »—
'^ 
i_l 
^ t. CJ
I" 
l_ U"
> * — - 4 < _ > O f « t . < f M - V 7 J * 
' M
i w r- -» -« v_» A* f« in >n *• .^
w . ^ k j i _ > 
« _ < A I > > * . I - « .
«.' 
-V
f 
'
s
f 
*
» 
» 
t
• » i t I 1
COHPLETFD 4N.LT5IS "fcPORT
PROJECT NOi 2&I 
PROJECT **Mti TURPENTINE RUN
STATION N3 
'«0*l 
Of 
LA8NO MRNO 
P»»»ieTER N»"E
TO 
CtT
ru'P.PJN 
87/10/0* 1003
;E'Thj oooo 5u?sTB»TEi lajroui
JESCRIPUONI MJLO SLMK
090776 01J77 SILVER
01G!»2 *!?Sr»<IC
0131* KERTLLIUH
013J7 CHC/MIU*
OlJ?» CHAOHIUI
cio»i COPPER
719DO XFRCuRT
01051 IS AD
013»7 NtCKIL
Olfl'T 4VTTMOUT
01U7 SFLENTUH
OIOS'' THALLIUM
01392 ZINC
00720 CYANIDE
U3P.RJN 
87/10/04 1123
fi>Th: 0003 
SUJjTStTEi »OJtDUi
ESCRIPTIONt BRY4N WELL 
*1 
PROM ST*NDPIPf
090777 01077 SILVtP
01002 A'SEMC
01DU SfRTLLIUH
C1027 ClGwIifM
010)4 CHIiPHlUH
Olu*i CDP'CP
71900 HF.JCJPY
OUM 
LE.ti
010J7 NICKEL
01097 »MTI*!0"ir
011*7 SPL^NIU"
C1D47 T4iLLIUM
01092 1INC
00720 CT/kNlO!
URP.PUM 
87/10/Oft 122)
C»TH: 0000 Tu"BIT*lTFi~rOJfDU5"" 
- - - - 
.-._-.....
FiCRIPTION: T1LLET MELL
OJ077I 01077 SlLVI«9
OIO?7 •('SfNlC
01012 9ERTLLIU1
UNITS
UC/L
UO/L
UU/L
U'J/L
UC/L
UU/L
L'j/L
KC^I.
U5/L
oca
uc-a
U5/L
UG/L
U-./L
oca
UG'L
o-!a
UO/L
-C/L
UG/L
UC./L
REPDRT
CHEMMTRT
TOT»L
T 0 T 1 L
TOT«L
TOT»L
TOT«L
T3T4L
TOT»L
TOtiL
T*UL
TOT»L
TOT«L
TOT.L
" fCTit"
TTTlL
T-)T*L
InT.*L
rntJt
TPT»L ""
TCTIL
TOT»L
fot»u
nt»L
TOT»L 
""
TOT»L
""
0»m 87/1
VlLUf t P!
20
1
1
ft
t
il
I
1
1
. 10'
0.01A
19
1
I
*
.2
30
iO
I
1
1
JD
9.014
50
1
1
l'^,< ^
1/71
««R<
1
U
0
u
i)
u
u
u
u
u
0
u
u
H
M
Uu
u
II
II
u
u
1)
u
u
u
u
M
«
„
II
u
__„__/ 
_
ni
>
»
1
1 .
IB
1
1
1
I
M
I
1
1
(1
il
i
1
M
f)
n
0
n
0
n
0
r.
n
n
n
n
U
1 
0
nn
n
w
K
0
n
ft
n
n
h
M
fl
*3»h
h
s
TI
o;
110*0
k
t
T
03
CF
9
t
1.
t
0?
S I O ' O
o:iii
0?
i'
cti
?
3D t 
J01»A
i/is nivo itod
1*1:1 
1/10
•>»ioi 
1/90
1*1J1 
I/CO
1»101 
1/LO
1»U1 
1/00
iTiai 
i/an
1V101 
1/C«<
i?iai 
1/20
moi 
i/oo
irui 
l/oo
1*101 
1/flO
1»101 
1/00
iviai 
i/oo
IflOl 
1/00
1»1U1 
1/50
H101 
1/00
1*101 
1/90
IHlCll 
1/50
1*1C1 
1/50
1»101 
1/00
11101 
1/'jO
1W1S1 
'1/90
i»iai 
i/^o
1*131 
1/80
l»10l 
'1/iO
1*101 
1/50
1*lOl 
T/OO
A91SIM9H) 
SllNfi
39
:••.;
K--I
"^
KOiwojiH3 »taio 
d
HOIHC13 Z Z O t O
KnillAMJS lltlO
OlNJU* 200(0
naAi;s Lieio oitnto
c* ilia* nun iNgu^iaj
snoarov taivxissrs 
oooo IHI
30IN"n OZ100
3MI7 ?6CIC
MOliirMi tsoio
unisalas i»tio
ANQkllNV liCTO
laxon i«cio
OV]1 liOIO
lananiH oosu
KOIHO»3 AIOIO
aiN3S«v rcoio
HAHS ilOTC CilOCO
li.naN - »7.id JdNi« »ncd INDIMI«I
tnoarov tanaisffls 
oeoo mi
JOIN*>3 OZlOO
JNJZ ;<oto
hOni"wi 6fOio
HOiNau^ itiio
ANCWIir.« 160(0
U»31" 
X f C ( 0
UVil ISCIO
A»P3SJh OOfU
HpJ^JSg Hill
MOINlia 12010 P11060
110 
Ul
INfN «ai3M*{|V4 
OMafrf 
ONflVI 
dO 
MODd 
ON N
NOH 3WIlNSd»fll I9N*1* A f 3 r 3 t f d 
(4{ 
ION lj3C r
IMOd^tl SIIA1VNV Q^lJIdHO^
Qift
— Mftjrcr NOI i*s 
" "
5»rr- TIME 
-
STATION NO 
PRO* 
OP
' " 
TO 
D«T
UftP. RUN 
87/10/Ok 1525
.COMPLETED ANALYSIS ȣ>OP.T
PROJECT MANEt TURPENTINE RUN
LAINO PARNO 
PARAMETER NAN*
090710 71900 MERCURY
01051 LEAD
01047 NlCKtL
01397 ANTIMONY
0114F »EL6Nll>H
oios4 THALLIUM
01C92 ZINC
00720 CYANIDE
UNITS
UG/L
US/L
UG/L'
UG/L
UG/L
U3/L
MG/L
REPORT
CHEMISTRY
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TTTIL
TOTAL
TOTAL
PAGE
4 8| 
8-1
OATfl R7/11/2S
VALUE t REMARK
.2
33
1
1
3
96
0.014
U 
W
U
U
yu
M
U
EPTHt 0000 SJBSTRITFI AQUEOUS
ESCRIPTIONI flSIN UtLL »2
JUP. RUN 
*7/lO/Ot 
l»JO
09Q7H 01077 SILVER
OlODi ARSENIC
01012 BfHYLLIUM
010Z7 CAOMIJH
010)4 CXROMIUM
01042 COPPER " "
71900 MtiiCjCY
01051 Lf*0
01367 NICKfcL
010P7 AUTIM3NV
01147 itLewlUM
010J9 THALLIUM
01092 ZINC
00720 CYANIDE
UG/L
"TJGVL
UO/L
L'5/L
Ur./L
UG/L
uG/t'
05/L
" NG'/L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOUL
TOTAL
TOT*L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL 
• •
20
1
1
6
5
.2
30
1
1
1
203
O.OH
W
U
U
U
U
M
U
U
U
U
M
U
JiCRlPTlCNl EL5IN WCLL •!
!~
0907*2 01077 SILVER
01302 ARSENIC
01D12 aERTLLIUM
013Z7 CICHIUM
010)4 CHROHIJM
01042 C3PPCR
71400 NMCo'Y
01051 LFAb
010^7 MICKEL
US/L
Ui/L
Uli/L
UG/L
S:/t
TOTAL
TOTAL
TfTAL
TOTAL
TCTfil
TOTAL
TCT4L
TOTAL
TPTiL
20
1
1
6
J
*l
U
U
U
'J
U
li;
ii 
W
U
'J
CBHPLFTTD ANALYSIS BIPORT
PSDjfCT HOI 263 
PROJECT *AHEl TURPENTlNe RUM
DATE 
TIME
TATI3N NO 
PROM 
OP 
L*»*0 
PARMO 
PARAMETER NAN
in 
our
090712 01597 A1TINONY
. 
OlUT SELENIUM
010SS THALLIUM
00720 CYANIDE
amuN • ir/io/or 
ITJJ 
"-• ~
pTrtl 0003 SU3STRATH AQJEOUi
SCRIPTIDNI FIUNCOIS -ELL "
0»DTB3 010TT SILVER
1)1002 ARSENIC
01012 BEKYuLIUM
01327 CAUMIUM
01334 CHROMIUM
010*2 COPPeR
71400 HCRCtiBY
01351 LEAD
01067 NICKEL
01097 ANTIMONY
01U7 SELENIUM
013)9 THALLIUM
01092" 1TNC
00720 CVANlOC
HUU 
17/IO/OT 
OI5S
•il 0003 
SUBSTRAT'I AOJEOUi
•TPTIDNf VIHA H3UJ1NG rfELL 11
QVDTBk D197T SILVER
01002 ARSENIC
01312 
BERYULIU
1*
01027 CADMIUM
01034 CHROMIUM
01UA2 COPPiiP
71900 H5RCURT
OlOil LEAD
01047 NICKtL
T 
01097 ANTIMONY
- 
011*7 SELENIUM
oi9$9 THALLIUM
»FPO»T OATtl 97/11/21
E 
UNITS
US/L
UC/L
UC/L
M;/L
UC/L
UG/L
U^/L
UJ/L
1
US/L
UC/L
UC/L
UC/L
U5/L'
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L
M&/L
UG/L
UC/L
• UC/L
Uu/L
Uf./L
UC/L
UC/L
UG/L.
UG/L
oC/L
CH£MI$TRr
TOTIL
TCT4L
TCT«L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TC1AL
TOTAL
TCT»L
TCUL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TCTSL
TOT«L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTiL
TOTAL
TtTA L
TOTAL
TCTtL
TOT»L
T3TAL
VALU; t RE
1
1
1
0.0>E
20
1
1
f>
9
.2
30
1
1
\
106
3.01*
20
1
1
&
i
IP
.2
JO
20
1
HAOH
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
•J
u
M
u
u
u
u
L'
M
U
Uu
u
u
i
€
,
nr
i
i
•
€
i)
•
i
•
a
M
i
9
,
•
,
II
*
o 
f
f
f
III
PA»E 
fr -
——————— " • • • 
. . . . . . ........ 
C9HPLFTED mirjIS »ENJ»r 
RE^iT
— FJOJrcr NOI 261 -"•• 
" 
PROJECT NA»g| TU»PENTIME RUN
O*TE 
TI*E
T A T I J N N3 
PROM 
OP 
LA}NO 
PARNO 
PARAMETER NAME
TO 
DAY
09078k 010*2
00720
RUN 
»T/|0/07 0919
I INC
CYANIDE
JNITJ 
Ch
UC/L
«'./L
IEMISTRY
TOTAL
TCTAL
DATEl S7/11/2S
V4LU? t 9
J3
0.323
EHA*(
M
1
t
t
91
t
•r 000] SJJSTRATft AQJEDU5
UTICNI VlH. r»OUS INS *ELL ti 
0
010715 01077
01092
01312
SUViR
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
01027 CtOMluH
010)* CHfcOHIUN
01042
01311
01347
01097
011*7
•
•
•
•
•
• 
01059
01092
00)20
'.l»JN 
87/10/07 |0«S
'TUN [J3BI 3700 5(J»5T*1TH ACUEGUS
1KIPTIONI HAITHAN ESTATf rftLL
090716 01377
-•-• 
01 002
01012
0133*
010*2
71900
01 Oil
01367
NtfcCURY
LEAD
NICKEL
AsTlHdNY
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
ZINC
ClT-NlDi
SILVER
ARSENIC
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
MCKCURV
MICKEL
UG/L
Ul/L
UO/L
Ui/L
Uu/L
J3/L
US/L
US/L
UC/L"
UG/L
HG/L
UG/L
U5/U
U&/L
UC/L
. UG/L
UB/L.
or./L
US /L
01097 »MTTC3HT 
UG/L
0111.7 >EL|»»IU^ 
Oli^L
-- 
01359
007JO
O
THALLIUM
ZINC
CYANIDE
ur./u
HG/L
TOTAL
TOT»L
TPTAL
TCTtL
T O T A L
TOTAt
TTT4L
TOTAL
TCTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL 
"
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TCT4L
TCT'.L
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
Toru
TDTiL
TOTAL
TOTAL
20
1
1
I
*,
22
11
1
3
1
JO
C.019
20
1
1
&
5
*
30
1
t
iJ
0.017
U
U
U
'J
- 
U
M
L'
U
•fu
u
U
K
y
U
u
•J
u
u
'J
u
'J
u
M
I)
•4
u
*
•
It
*
•
*
^
M
*
„
*
*
l>
*
m
s 
*
c 
' 
/ 
•
Rl
1 
i
'• 
!
1 
;
j 
'
1 
,'
'• 
t*
; 
C.
d
' 
«
r-
1
"
o
^»^-^
'O
o o o
»•* »•• **
•U 0 0
»• 0 -*
«r B» v»
f1» JO ••*
ir t/« r-
•< rn <
r- *: n
r- M »»
1-1 n
C*
C. C C
ir> ,1 ii
X X X
i- r" r~
-<-»-<
o ? '"J
r- r r-
' •
*- f 0
j 
;
ii
?S*
M •» »
-• 
>c
-4 0 X-
•— O
0 0
Z 01
"* 
' »
» c: x
J. a* »•
t/i l/< O
•1 -t X
^ a> o
T -»
M O W
*~* Cv
r- c
r~ t/*
o ;
r>
m
° '
zm
».
"
i
oo
o.
o
z
»-»
0
fit
,
^o
f
CI
o
•0
*-
I
i
; 
c-
*fm
o a
c. a
p.' ^>-
(^ ^
Z »-
r-n
c
c c
,•> ^.
• •
» S>
»-
Z «~
1
1
! 
i
i
'
i
!
]
I
o o c- o *J a
*- r> o cr * ui
-^ »j -j i-» c: »j
v » z i— x «n
z * n« c "f
C X 
-<
•r -<
i
!
• 
i
]
i 
j
i 
|
•'
c- c c c c c
X C X X X,' ^
— ••"-;- 1
'
'
O J T O O CT
r* r» t* r* i> i*
i
i 
j
;
rv -^ •
«^ C cT C C X
!
o o
e? o
*• -J
o r>
3O O
C X
z
c c
f. fc^
0 0
i> r»
•3 T
o o
0 0
K.M
« »•
r- z-
c
*
d C
»-> o
0 0
/» ^
c c
<•
s
f-r
•
*•
o
40
r*
iff
O
Pv
O
o
-i
!/•
f
rr
C
0
»
K-
O
CT
r.
*n«
•V•• a
*-< a
o a
z a
c c
V^ !•
JT> M
•^ ^
t •
M^
»I
c a
•^ <—
0 <«
a
•• c
2
c.
2
<•
X
O
X
O
o
aa
-<
|rj
O
n
».
»-•
C
X
C1
f-
—
f—
o
0
-J
c
O c:
r^ <•
Z Jh
t^
C
X
c c
n i>
i
3 1—
<- C
1
c c o o
-c. uo
•. ^I^IM
w »• z i-
r- -« r. >•
c z
X -<
1
I
c c c c
5 2 2 ^
r- r- r- i~
!
^t
>^ 0
lj* •-• O O
i
j; c 'c i.;
M
-J o
T1 •»
C C
ei o
^>o
• ^-
,^ ^
c t-
!
0 0
0 0
«> ~l
c 5
C" C
r«o
O.J
O 0
c c
o o
o o
^r^
IX *•
* v<
< m
r z
r~ •*
C
•*
c c
»i <n
o o
i
• r.
0 *-
I
i-^ O
o
<c
0
*4
^
o
o
•^
1^
•>«f<
J0
co
1-
CJ
1
o
c
1
»• -4
^< •-«
T> C3
-« z;
»^•an
*. a
rm
rr
M -J
^ O
rrt ^
C
a. v
rr vt
f «•<
«4
11
O
<=
c>c:
*"
•
Vc* i
j
ot> 
i
X
o 
--
X 
C
2
1
K 
i 
0
tJ 
»
o 
**
1
i
(
1
1
!
;
j
•^
i>
»^» 
^
O 
IP
f 
0
w
O 
11
o
JO ^ 
.
o -^ «*
X rx 
»
c- •»
H X
m
1
1
r- 
or
i)* 
• _ 
r
O» 
rv> 
C3
z 
o x
a 
-• 
-r/
z g
» 
r 
r**
xi 
m 
«_»i
S 
~ *
-« 
z
s l l
M. 
-» H
2 
? r
w 
-w
1C 
C'
z 
c 
»
ir
!
Z^
*
X 
<
f^
^ 
*»
ni
0
A*
1
< 
o
l~ 
• 
' 
-H
C 
' 
rt
~*i 
•*
1
» 
X
« 
: 
*-
r. 
V
o 
rv
^ 
V
I
;!(- 
in i.
i
i
; 
i
1
i
! 
1
1
Oi*
o o c o o o
t^ C^ C' ^* C O
N. / ^4 13 K* H
o n o a » tn
o X » m n IN
•c x- c » v» r
• v o x «t m <
r- « >- r- z n<
v .-4 c. r" « »
C I 11 0
X 
C
X
', 
;
C7 C C C C C
.- >.•> f »> Cl n
— ? -f 
-4 -« — -H
.30 
-} i_> -1 n
r i- r r- r- r
1
1 
i
i
»-• 
r-
: 
i
Z i C vTC- C
1
f «^~2
VI X K
«-< -4 -S
w 3 •
-4JO Z
•-• O
ao
5°
S»c >
< v> a
o m ^ >
r- -4t » o
fW ^ V »
». C--4
Z to •»
~r~-
** ; 0"
•41 
1 t t»
nt c
Z X C
O « W
a z
C 0
**0^
ra
Z
i
1
1
I
i
j
i
,
j
1
iii
• i
O 0
0 ~
O *J
<-» r.
» I"
z n
«
X C
O T("
^.3
0
O
•- rj
•^ 
C
0 0
0 ^
•<• -J
•^ VI
Z "1
» r-
p* «i
i- •*
c c
X X
c c
c. ^
> .-J
*-
c
c o
w o
•»* *«•
» z
^ o
ji m
7
c cr
te't C"'
0 13
*••
C C
4^
O -4
o <a>
f 0
f— ^
*^v m
» n
o rv
c
c c
1? (J
t>< •
•- c
•
o o
««
fw •>
r^ n
3 X
•« •>
« a
<T X
^
C C
4. C>
:?0
N. f^
'
X J
0 0
0 0
-j rt>
n c»
» 01
O *
X 4
— c-
X
c c
o ci
0 0
c c
0
£
*
0 0
o a
mr »•
•A f
FW <
z m
"
c c
•J ••>
»•
c c
">
tr
5
:•
+4
2
!5
f»
f~n
•n
IV
X,
w
^
Oa
-«
fc
•H
C
n»
r~i-
X
o
v^ — »
a •
0 Z
o
0
0
1* -*'
V> 0
^ ^
« o
O u*
C 0
ni 
;
oc
V*
1
i
o o
•-< 0
O r\*
r»»«
*• z
z <->
n>
t
i
-J c.
»- r-
t
•o o
** J>
!r "~
u
0
O» <3
"C 1C
i
1
j 
j
1
j
] 
1
i
' 
1
I
1
1
:
o o o c* o •*
o *•• a c- o **•
C -1 2 ^ »^ C
-* *r » v f- i
v r -•<-» ^ »
t* 2 3C rr 
c
^ ^* O ^" 
^i
1
i
c: c c- c c c
r - r~ i- i- r f~
^ C3 '^ 'J "I 0
r> t> o t- t* r*
I
! 
F»- V- 
•
c cr K <r Ic c
:
i
i
i 
Q
j
a
*
>
j
!
1
1 
'
'O
o
:«*
0 00
oc-o
C r 2
o «-»n
•o » O
*» i-t cr
C Jt
X
!
C C C
I- 1- f-
!
T O O
i
r: c <:
j
»
•4
C3 
XT
z 
a^
z 
«•
o 
r-i
a
O -« 
M
JK nv 
f^
O M
•* B
m 
i
;
j
_
r- 
o
m 
TO 
c
Z 
0 
J
0 
-« 
T
f
z 
n
•• 
»» 
H
» 
X 
w
ID 
r»i 
o
Z 
—
0 
»
-41 
K
c 
»
^ 
•» 
-4
» 
r» 
vt
" 
Z 
H
Z 
^ 
VI
•4) 
Z 
W
nt 
rt: 
ra
JO 
-W
» o
z 
c 
»
V 
z 
-4
JI
r* 
',
'• 
;
_r
1-4
vv
c »
r»
X
» 
'
fH
•oa
to
~*
< 
• 
o
f 
tr
•v 
••
t* 
• 
' 
u*
-» 
' 
! 
x
"•• 
i 
•-
t 
' 
»*
X> 
. 
V
•" 
: 
**
j
i
i
i 
i
i 
|
i
ti
: 
j
1
i
:
i
, 
•
1
1
1 
,
i 
i
;
1 
i
, 
t
•o
m
i
09
3:
0 
'
• 
• - 
- 
• 
CSrtPLETELi AHAL/Sl? RiPORf
~~ pftojtrt HOI Z&J 
- 
- 
PROJECT NAMEI TURPENTINE RUN
DATE 
riM{
TATIQN NO 
P»OH 
OP 
LABNO PARNO PARtmTcq NAME 
UNITS :
TIT 
J»T
0»1JOS 71400
01091
01067
01097
G1U7
0135*
01392
IBP.RUN 
87/lO/Ot 
1»*S
?TMt 0003 
SjeSTRITfl »Qj£OUS
iCRI^TlOM H»ThU5 WELL 
PUHP NOT OPERATING
0*1306 01CTT
01002
01027
01 3J»
71*00
01351
Olu^7
013S7
01U7
Olu«2
00720
DP. RUN 
17/10/06 1600
HFftCURV
MicSeu
4NTIH"!NY
SELE'iluH
THALLIUM
ZINC
SILVER
»»$ENIC """ ••"""•""
eEffVLLIU*
CtbHIuH
CH8Pt«IUH
COPPi.8
NJCKtL
SELFNIU*
ZINC
Cf«MT02
US/L
U;/L
UG/L
Lu/L
JT./1.
NG/L
OC/L
UG/L
ur./L
t>**/ L
U(> /L
US/L
UC«*L
Ui/L
U5/1
MG/L
REPORT c»Tti e7/n/;»
Me»»ISTR» 
_ ViLU! t R5PAPH
T :.' T M L
T?T4l,
T 3 T ft L
TOUL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTtL
Yol'L
TCut
TOT»L
TCT4L
Tfl «L
T C T * L
Tnm
T O T A L
TCT6L
._.... —
.'0
i
i
i
O.P17
20
1
1
5
9
30
1
9.6
1
13
B.01Y
4
«
u 
<
u
u
u._.. 
. 
«
LI
U 
*
4
y 
If
u 
•
u
u
u 
•
M
u
u 
•
L'
U
^ 
M
u 
•
^CRIPTIONI SMITH 
•
0*1307 01377
OUi2
OT3ZT
H 
01 OJ*
": 
• 
71^00
...... ... 
.... _ 
010JI
SILVER
&RSFNIC
aPRYLLIUH
CSOMIUM
C:PPFR 
"
H P (» C U ^ T
L fe A D
06/L
U
r./L
U-'/L
U-/L
U3/L
00/L
•J j/L
TOTAL
.TCT4L
TGTfti.
TCT-L
TOTAL
TCT4L
r^rti.
SB
1
1
I
r
u
u 
•
L'
!J
L.' 
•
;_. . •
u 
•
L
10
—————————————————— 
• 
- - - 
11MHETFD ANALYSIS Rg'ORT
" P R O J E C T MO! 7») 
PROJECT M«M£I TU»PfcNTiMj RU«
R
DATE 
TIME '
STATI3M KJ 
PkCH 
Of 
LtJMO 
PARnD 
^ARAHtTtR N«S6
7 0 " ' D » T
OV1307
(URTVHiOi ——— IT/10/01""" U«"S — " — -— - 
-- —
FPThl 0000 
SJJST8ATEI AQJEOUS
DESCRIPTION*" VE^CON gfLi" «i '~ 
.--—-- 
— 
- 
- --
0«130k
1
•
n -P. RUM 
17/10/01 I7i!
, 
nl 0000 SU1STHA7EI AQJEUUS
i -.rfipTinur VEVCON WELL 13 
MATEI FROM s»7cor
V£»T AFRATEC
B9D09
i _
r.
01017
01U7
00)?0
01D77
01332
C1012
010?7
01334
01051
01067
010*7
01147
01054
00720
Tmrrr
01002
01312
01027
01 0!U
010*2
T1T60
010*1
01347
C11A7
0 1 'J 5 V
ANTIMCNT
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
c»iNm
ARSENIC
CAOKlun
CHfcOHI'jM ' " 
• ••-
COPPtR
LEAD
NICKEL
AMTIMOMT
SELENIUM
THALLIUM
ZtNC
SILVER
ARSENIC
dEfcVLLIllN
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
LfAC
NICKEL
S'L'NtuM 
- - - - -
UNITS
I'G/L
KO/L
U5'L
UC/L
U5/1
OJ/l
U&'L
Oli/L
Ui/L
UJ/L
M'f/L
ufl/L
• us/u
U'1/L
U5'L
\ilf\.
L'C/L
O&'L
Ui/L
Ui/L
CHbMISTRf 
VALU*: t REM«»n
TOTAL
T1T»L~
TTTuL
TPTf-L
TCTAL
T T I » L
Til «L
TOTSL
T 0 T 1 L
TOTJL
TOTlL
TITtL
T.'TAL
TOTAL
TSTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
T 'TiL
TTTJL
TCTJL
I'M AU
T 1) f ft L
TUTAL
1
J
1
O.P17 __
20
i
i
6
s
1,
30
ifl
1
1
10
o.oir
2 1
i
10
«D
1
7.1
u" 
"
M
U
U _
U
u
«'
u
u
•J
u
u
u
u
u
•1
•J 
I
M
i
u
y 
<
u
u
H 
4
L
1
0 
«
L' 
"' '
U
i
( 
(
, "-"HBJECr NOT 263 — — - - - 
PROJECT H-hEJ TUHPfNTlNf Ry*
1
5TAM3N NO 
P«0« 
OP 
L»»NO 
f»KNO 
P A R A M E T E R Nil*
7D 
PtT
0*130* 01092 ZIKC
00720 CYANIDE
•I'RP.RjN 
6T/10/0& 1*20
IPPTHI 0300 
SJSlTHITfJ AQUEOUS
-i icaiPTicm AL>HA itONiMD 
WELL HEAD
0*1310 01077 SILVER
01002 APSENIC
01012 
BERYLLIUM
01027 CiONluM
010*i CJPPTft
71900 HEKCuRY
010M LEAD
01067 NTCK:L
01697 AMIIHCNy
011*7 SELFNIUM
0135» THtLLIUH "
00720 CYANIDE
UrfF'.ftUM 
87/10/07 
Oat*
- •-- 
- - - - ----- •
UMTS
ur,/L
MC'L
UC/L
UC/L
US/L
UC/L
Ui'L
U^/t
'jr,'L
us/u
NC/L
REP:
CHc-IXTRr
TOTAL
TOTAL
TOTAL
ICT-!:
Torit
T^Tii.
TCT»L
TOTAL
TDTtL
"Jlu
TOTAL
Pi
(
ue 11 #afs«
RT DiTtJ 87/11/25
V A L U E t
20.
0.917
20
1
1
6
•j
• L
20
20
I
1
10
0.017
»E-<A(tlt
.M 
'
U
U
U
U
u
u
y
u
y
y
'LATIOK CUDII JTOU 
SUSSTRATCI Aoueoui
'>r«IPTlONI TlANSPOHT »LANH PR OH HO UNIT
091311 01077 SILVER
01302 ARSENIC
01012 
tt'VYLlIC'H
C10J7 C4JMIUH
0105-. CHkOMlUX
013*2 C^PPLR
71»00 HtfiCUBY
01351 
LEAD
013»7 NlCKfL
~* 
01397 ANTIH9NY
±: 
01U7 &(LEhIUM
01059 TMALLlU*
01092 ilsC
X 
. 
~ 
" 00720 CVANIOC 
--••-——
yc/L
UC/L
t'C/L
y&/t
;
Ui/L
U',/L
UG/L
UC/L
U "t / L
yr,/L
M/L
TOTAL
TOTAL
' 
YOT4L
1PT4L
TOTAL
T r T « L
T r, i » L
i r T .1 L
TDI4L
T O T A L
. TOT&L
20
I
1
5
r.
.2
Jo
I
I
1
9
D.oir
u 
*
u
t i
u
•J
u
Ij
tl
•J
t, 
•
L'
P A G E 
12
COMPLETED ANALYSIS UJPORT
PROJECT NOt 26) " " 
PROJECT NAMtt TuBPtMTlNt RUN
_ 
3ATE 
TIME
•.TATI3M NO 
PROM 
UP 
LABNO 
P A R M O
TO 
DAT
fi'RP.RUN 
U7/IO/OT 
0¥SJ
,.: UTing C3QEI 3T06 SuBiTUTfl AODFGUi "
>ChlPUON« HARTNNANN 
CRUSHtR bkLL
0*1312 010TT
•-•- - ' •- 01032
01312
-— 
01027
0103*
71*00
JlO'i
OUST
013*7
01117
P A R A M e T C R MiH«
. . . _ . . .
SILVER
bEKYLLIUN
C»OHIUH
SfJcjPY
NICKtL
SELEMlL'"!
01JS9 THALLIUM
0109J ZlhC
corzo
.BJN 
dT/10/07 1130
CYANIDE
UMTS 
C
..UC/L
UG/L
UG/L
U J/L
UG/L
UU/L_.
UG/L'""
UC/L
L'O/L
MC./L
:ntHis7»
- 
- -
TTTAL
T^TtL
TOTtL
T O T A L
T ': T 4 L
TCTtU
TOT«L
TTT4L
TOTAL
T 0 U u
TOTAL
KfP^^T C<»TtI 37/11/25
Y 
V A L O t I Pf
it)
1
&
c
J
•J-
l 
.
1
1
10
9.01T
M A P *
——————
U
U
u
u
.V . ...
u
u
'J
K
J
1
1
ATI3M COBEi'STBD SJ»ST««Tfl IQuHiuS ' 
' 
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
•Ii»TIONi DBJE 
WfLL
0»U1J 01077
01032
0101:
OIOZ7
01 5V
SILVER
bfRYLLIUH
CIDHlUM - - - - - - "
013*2 CTPPER
M90CHF. «CU«Y
I 
013il
1 
01067
01 1*7
OlD"1)
OlO'Ji
OOT70
;CC17I3M-C30lt-J700" SJlSTMTn IOUFOUS 
^ 
"
'tiCklHTIONl OE"CH WFLL
04U1* 01077
- 
— - 
- 
- - -• — • -- --- 
010D2
0101^
LFAO
SfLESIJH
ZINC
. — .. ... .
ilLVCR
B E R Y L t l U H
UC/L
" US/L " '
UC/L
U5/L
UG/L
UG/L
UO/L
U'./L
ni'L '
UG/L
J'/L
TOTAL
TOT4L
TCTAL
TCf 6L
T O T A L
TPTiL
TCTJL
TOTAL
TfTiL
TTTJl.
TOTAL
T r f t. L
T - 7 « L
20
1
1
J
10
* fc.
JO
i'J
f4
1
1
3D
o . c r/
20
i
i
0
u
u
u
V
'J
u
If
'J
u
II
*
J
u
L1
1 '
M
II
.- ..._._...... .-._ -^
C3NPLETP5~.ii
P R O J E C T HOl 2(3 
P R O J E C T MAriEl '
DATE 
TIME
'~T:JN NO 
"I.OH OP 
LASNO 
PA&WD
TO 
DAT
0»lil* 01327
013~*
010*2
7i»oa
01351
. ...... 
. ... 
..... _ 
_ —.. . ._.... ....... ... OIU7
01059
OUV2
00720
HP. RUN 
BT/IO/OI 1205
IATI jh -C~Hl JTOu 
SjBSTftATC: ACJECUS
srRTPTio^i HAHTMAW BAKERS UELL
0»131> 01377
01312
01027
oillz
71)06
ClOftT
01397
011*7
0105*
0119;
00720
*»»•» END 3'
: ——
_ ;
i-*
L-'-i
'.-•-I
IALVSU Rtpopr
PARAMETfcft N«1E
CADMIUM
c3Jp"I
UM
MlCKtL
THALLIl/H
CTAIHOE
SILVER
"lUJi!;?"'
CHROMIUM
M5RCJ»r
NICntL
SELENIUM
CrAhiD!
PROJECT **««*
...
UNITS
UG/L
t'.'L
UC/L
U&'L
U'.'L
MG/L
U3^L
f./L
uJ/L
UO/L
ui/L
U5/L
UO/L
JG/L
01/L
Ud/L
"AGE 
U 
t^?
1 «»*
R c P n k T C t T t J 07/11/27
CHtMZSTffT 
V » L U * f. fu^-B^
TPT4L 
J 
g
T C T i L 
5 
U
TDT..I. 
15 
n
T C T A L 
. J 
U
T 0 7 * L 
- " 
','
T O T A L 
^0 
L'
T O T A L 
1 
U
TCTC.L 
12
T r 7 » u 
3.0 IT 
'- V
TOTAL 
iO 
U
T r, T i L 
1 
U
T.^TtL 
1 
0
r :. T « t 
6 
u
TOTAL 
5 
. i.
T J T .'. L 
i. 
' '
T,M»L 
.? 
U
T ' T f. i. 
j n 
:•
T7T4L 
20 
U
T?TtL 
1 
y
T C T i L 
i 
ij
T'lTtL 
1 
"
T C T i L 
0.017 
U
• ' •
'Wf
t
t
Bf
«
«
*
.
If
*
,
*
c
It
*
*
1
«
t
4
4
«.
Bl
31
m
•nm
31
mzom
10
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DATF: 
APR 04 1991 
REGION "
SUBJECT: Detection Limits for Turpentine Run
Joseph Soroka, Chief
IRCM-. organic Chemistry Sectio,
T..;,: Kevin Kubik, Chief
Superfund Support Section
Attached, please find the detection limits for the volatile
organic compounds analyzed for in the 1987 Turpentine Run survey.
I hope that this is sufficient; if not, please contact Lisa
Gatton after April 8.
Attachment
TO"
REGION II FORM 132O-1 (9/85) 
<
Federal Register / Vol. 49. No. 209 / Friday. October 26. 1964 / Rules and Regulations
value 2.44 used in the equation in Section
8.3.3 is two times the value 1.22 denved in
this report.]
11. ASTM Annual Book of Standards. Pan
31. D3370-76. "Standard Practices for
Sampling Water.' American Society for
Testing and Materials. Philadelphia.
12. "Methods 330.4 (Titnmetnc. DPD-FAS)
and 330.5 (Spectrophotometnc. DPD) for
Chlorine. Tolal Residual.' .Methods for
Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes.
F.PA-600/ 4-79-020. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory. Cincinnati. Ohio
45268. March 1979.
13 Goerhtz. D.F.. and Law. L.M. Bulletin
fur Environmental Contamination and
Toxicology. 6. 9 (1971).
14. "Manual of Analytical Methods for the
Analysis of Pesticides in Human and
Environmental Samples." EPA-600/ 8-80-038.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Health Effects Research Laboratory.
Research Triangle Park. North Carolina.
15. Burke. |.A. 'Gas Chromatography for
Pesticide Residue Analysis: Some Practical
Aspects, fournat of the Association of
Official Analytical Chemists. 48. 1037 (1965).
16. Webb. R.G.. and McCall. A.C.
"Quantitative PCB Standards for Election
Capture Gas Chromatography." Journal of
Chromatogrophic Science, 11. 368 (1973).
17. "Method Detection Limit and Analytical
-~urve Studies. EPA Methods 606. 607, and
)." Special letter report for EPA Contract
^*-03-2606. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory. Cincinnati. Ohio 4S268.
18. "EPA Method Validation Study 18.
Method 608 (Organochlorine Pesticides and
PCBs)," Report for EPA Contract 66-03-2606
(In preparation).
TABLE v— CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
(mm) 
oeteo-
CO.. 1 
Co.. 2 JJ*,
a-BHC.......... ......................_.._...! 
135 
1 62 
0.003
y-BMC....... ....................... ...........1 
"0 
2.13 0.00V-
&-BHC ........................................ 
2.15 | 
120 
0.009
AkJnn 
....................... __ 
2.40 1 4.10 0.004
EndoauMn i ................................. 
4 SO 
6.20 0.014
4.4--OOE.... 
................. .........1 
5.13 7.15 0.004
Dwtonn .......................... ..........| 
5.45 7.23 0.002
4.4 -ODD ............................... ...| 
763 
90S 
0.011
EndoeuNan II.. ............................. 
6.00 829 
0.004
Endrinaldehya* ................... 
\ 11.12 930 
0.023
Endceurlan surliM .............. — ..| 14.22 10.70 
0.066
PCB-1232.................................... 
u* 
nw 
nd
TABLE 1 —CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS
AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS— Continued
Parameter
PCB-1242 '
PCB-124*
OCB-1254
PC8-1260
R«t«n*on time 
M«moa
(mint 
aettc-
coi i 
Coi 2 
,•""!,
lug/ 1)
mr 
-w 
3 065
TV 
fnr 
nd
ITV 
r^f 
tfl
. .. 
mr 
mr 
no
Column 1 conations. Suoeicoport 1 100' 120 meini coated
with 1 5% SP-22SO/1 9SX SP-2401 pacnea in • 1 8 m long
x 4 mm ID glass column wrtn 5% methane/ 95% argon
earner g» at 60 mL/mm no* rale Column temperature nwd
isothermal it 200 "C need kv PCS-1016 through PCS-
1248, mould M measured It >«0 'C
Column 2 oonaroone: SopMcooon n 00/120 mesm coated
with 3% OV-1 MCMO r\ a 1 8 m long • 4 mm iO gun
column witn 5% metnane/95% argon earner gu u 60 <nu
mm Now rate Column temperature ntu •otnermal «l 2OO 'C
lor tn« petoodet. il 140 'C tor PCB- 1221 ana 1232 ind it
170 'C lor PCB-1016 ind 1242 to 1266
m^MurHeM peak response. See Figures 2 tnru 10
nd-Nttdeiermned.
TABLE 2.— DISTRIBUTION 
OF CHLORINATED
PESTICIDES AND PCBs INTO FLORISIL COL-
UMN FRACTIONS
 2
Parameter
Ardnn....... ............... ......
fl-BMC. .............. .........
&-BHC 
........................
•r-BHC..... ..... ............ .....
CMordeVW. .............. . .....
4.4 -COO .......................
4.4--OOE. .......................
4.4--OOT .........................
Endoeuitan I....................
EndoauHan u ..............
EndneuHen suKata .........
Endnn Mdehyae. ............
Heptaehtor econde..... ...
PCB-1016. .............
PCS-1221 .. ...................
PCB-1232. ....................
PCS-1242......................
PC8-124B .....................
PCB-12S4 .....................:
PCS-1260 ....................
Pwcwit '•covcry Oy Iricoon •
1
2 
3
100....... 
... 
..........
100 .......... .. ....... 
...
.: 
97 ............... ...... 
.. ...
1 
QQ
100 ............ 
....................
100 . ...... 
........ ...........
99 L. ... 
..........................
96
..1 
100 ......................................
..; 
0 I 
tOO ....................
37 ; 
64 ...................
..; 
0 
7 ' 
91
..: 
0 • 
0 
106
4 
96...............
0 
66 
26
100 >..................... ................
100 I............ . .... ...............
..; 
97 i.. .............. ...................
..| 
95 
4 ...............
..| 
97 i......... .............................
1 
103 I................................ ......
..! 
90 L.............. ......................
..; 
95 i... ....... .... ..................
•EkMMoompomon:
Fraction 1-6% «ny< •awr n rmww
Fraction 2-15% «tnyl «hw in nn*m
FracHn 3-50% »OV Ww « Murw.
TABLE 3.— QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA—
METHOD 608
Pranvur
o-BHC ............................
^BHC.............................
»-BHC .............................
r-BHC.............................
4,4 '-OCX) ........._............
4 4 '-ODE
7^! 
Umrl | Rang* i Rang*
'?*;•,• 
lor* 
• 
(or X 
i 
tor P.
"Jj 
(rt/U | (jig/L) | P.(%)
2.0 
042 il OS-2.24| 42-122
2.0 
0.46 1 96-2441 37-134
2.0 ! 
064 1 0.78-2 801 17-147
2.0 
07211.01-2.371 19-140
2.0 
0.4*10.86-2.321 32-127
50 
100 127.6-54.31 45-119
10 
2.6 | 4.6-12.61 31-141
2.0 
055 ! 1.08-2.601 30-145
TABLE 3.— OC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA-
METHOD 608— Continued
7^*1 ' Lima 
Ring* 
Rang*
P«r«m*l*r 
"™- 
tor J 
lo< X 
to> P
"^ 
(U9"-1 
(ug/LI 
P.ISI
4» -DOT 
'0 
36 
46-137 
2S-160
Oieionn 
20 
076 'li-249 
36-146
Enootuitin 
20 
049 114-282 
4&-1S3
Enoosunin 11 
10. 
61 
2 2 - 1 7 1 
D-202
Endourlan Sullal* 
'0 
27 
38-132 
26-144
Enontl 
... 
. . . . . . 
10 
37 
51-126 
30-147
Heoucnjor 
20 
040 086-200 
34-111
HecUKhloi •po«« 
20 
041 113-263 
37.142
Tox«on*n* .. .. ........ ,50 
127 
276-556i 41-126
PCB-1016... ............ 50 
100 
30&-515 
50-114
PCB-1221 
SO 
244 
221-752 
15-178
PCB-1232 .... 
.. 
50 
179 
140-965 
10-215
PCB- 1 242 ........ ............. 50 
122 
246-696 
39-150
PCS-1246.. ................ 
50 
159 
290-702 
3»-lS8
PC8-1J54 
50 
138 
222-579 
29-131
PCS-1 260 ..................! 50 
104 
16.7-549, 
8-127
j»Sumd*nJ dcvwbon <x lour r*cov*ry mMaucmmt*. «i
»>g/L (Section 624)
ug/L (Section 8.2 4)
P P,» Percent recovery menurea (Section 832. Section
842)
D » Detected; tewn muM oe greMer then z*ro
Note.— These cnteni are used drectly upon tns metnod
oertorrnanc* d*t* m TIBH 4 wrier* necesMry tne mm lor
•ecovcry nave oeen broadened to aasur* ipcncaeiMy o< in*
units to concenviiions Deuw tnote used to oeveiop TIOI*
4
TABLE 4. METHOD ACCURACY AND PRECISION
AS FUNCTIONS OF CONCENTRATION— METH-
OD 608
Accuracy, u ^tli 
Overall
Perimeter 
recovery. X 
JjSSi ' Pr«»»»r. *
'«/L1 
' s?w?Li 
<^'L>
a-6HC. ........... 
064C1-0.03 0 13X-004 . 023X-0.00
fl.BHC. ................. 
081C*007 ! 022JC-002 i 0.33)(-095
6-BMC ................. 
061C+007 1 0 18X»009 , 025X+003
•r-BHC .................. 0.62C-005 ' 0 I2X + 006 1 022X^-004
Chkxoeo* .... ... ...... 0.62C-004 1 0.13X4-0 13 ; 0 18X+0 18
4.4'. ODD ............. 
064C+030 I 020X-0.18 027X-014
4.4 -DOE ............. O.S5Ci-014 013X-006 OJ8X-009
4 4 -DOT ............; 093C-0.13 0.17X+039 .0.31X-0.21
Dietdnn ........ 
090C*002 012X*019 016X^-016
Enda*uH*fl 1 ... .. ..; 097C + 004 : 010X+007 : 018X*006
EndoeuMen ll. .. ... .i 093C+0.34 | 04IX-06S I 047X-0.20
EndOeuKan
SuHate ......... .. 
089C-0.37 i 0 13X+033 0.24X+0.35
Endm... ..............i 069C-0.04 I 0.20X4.025 i 024X4-025
HcptaCMor ....,..; 069C4-004 I 006X+013 I 0.16X^0.06
Hepteonlor 
, 
' 
.
epcaode. ....... 069C+0.10 ' 0 18X-0.11 :0.25X-00«
Taaphen*. ...... ...i 
06OC4-1 74 1 009X4-320 020X4.0.22
PCB-1016 ........ 0810+050 I 0 13X4-0.15 I 0 15X»045
PCB-1221 ....... 
096C + 065 '. 029X-0.76 i 0 3SX-062
PCB-1232...........I 091C + 1079 | 0.21X-1 93 i 0.31X4-3.50
PCB-1242 .......: 093C-f0.70 I 0 11X + 1.40 ! 021X4-1 52
PCB-1248........... 
0.9704.1 M 1 017X + 0.41 | 025X-037
PCS-1254 ........... 
0.76C4-207 . 015X4-166 I 0.17X4-362
PCS- 1260 
0.66C + 3.76 1 0.22X-2.37 0.39X-486
X' =. g-p*^«~i recovery tor one or more measurements ol •
s, -E«p*cted *ngM anaryst nanoen) o»««uon ot rnees-
S'-Eqwctad «erl*lioratory standard davaton ol maas-
C.True value tor tne uuncena-aaon. « »ig/L
containing a concannaon ol C, m (tg/L
BIUMO COOe 6MO-«e-M
"lijl 
OOi 1339
146
Federal Register •' Vol. 49. No. 209 / Friday. October 26. 1984 / Rules and Regulations
:rom ;ne EICP or 'ne onmary characteristic
T!'Z given .n Trinie 4. If trie sample produces
in inienerence for :he anrr.ary m;z. use a
seconcarv crMracienstic m z to quantitate
Cd.cu.j'e :.-.e confer.::j'.ior :r. :he sample
jiir.i! rte •p-oor.'.e •^c.'.f.r RF' ietermmea in
Secr.on " j j n^a E^udiior. 2
Concentration i ua Li =
|A UJIRF)
wnere.
As = Area of '.he characteristic miz for the
parameter or surrogate standard to be
measured
A,. = Area of the characteristic m/z for the
internal standard.
C,, ^Concentration of the internal
standard.
13.2 
Report results in Mg/L without
correction for recovery data. All QC data
obtained should be reported with the sample
results.
14 Method Performance
14 1 The method detection limit |MDL) is
defined as the minimum concentration of a
substance that can be measured and reported
with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero.' The MDL concentrations listed in Table
1 were obtained using reagent water."
Similar results were achieved using
representative wastewaters. The MDL
actually achieved in a given analysis will
vary depending on instrument sensitivity and
matrix effects.
14.2 This method was tested by 15
laboratories using reagent water, drinking
water, surface water, and industrial
wastewaters spiked at six concentrations
over the range 5-600 >ig/L."Single operator
precision, overall precision, and method
accuracy were found to be directly related to
the concentration of the parameter and
essentially independent of the sample matrix.
Linear equations to describe these
relationships are presented in Table 5.
References
1 40 CFR Part 136. Appendix B.
2. Bellar. T.A.. and Lichtenberg. |.|.
'Determining Volatile Organics at
Microgram-per-Litre Levels by Gas
Chromatography.' Journal American Water
Works Association. 66. 739 (1974).
3. Bellar. T.A.. and Lichtenberg. |.J. "Semi-
Automated Headspace Analysis of Drinking
Waters and Industrial Waters for Purgeable
Volatile Organic Compounds. " Measurement
of Organic Pollutants in Water and
Wastewater. C.E. Van Hall, editor. American
Society for Testing and Materials.
Philadelphia. PA. Special Technical
Publication 686. 1978.
4. "Carcinogens—Working With
Carcinogens." Department of Health.
Education, and Welfare. Public Health
Service. Center for Disease Control. National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,
Publication No. 77-208. August 1977.
5. "OSHA Safety and Health Standards.
General Industry." (29 CFR 1910).
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration. OSHA 2206 (Revised.
January 1976|.
6. 'Safety in Academic Chemistrv
laboratories. American Chemical Society
Publication. Committee on Chemical Safety.
3rd Edition. 1979
~ Provost. L.P . and Elder. R.S.
'Interpretation of Percent Recovery Ddia
American Lcooratory. IS. 58-63 119831 iThe
value 2.44 used in the equation in Section
8.2.3 is two times the value 1.22 derived in
this report.)
8. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetnc. DPD-FAS)
and 330.5 (Spectrophotometric. DPD] for
Chlorine. Total Residual." Methods for
Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes.
EPA-600/4-79-O20. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory. Cincinnati. Ohio
45268. March 1979.
9. Budde. W.L.. and Eichelberger. J.W.
"Performance Tests for the Evaluation of
Computerized Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry Equipment and Laboratories."
EPA-600/4-80-025. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory'. Cincinnati. Ohio
45268. April 1980.
10. Eichelberger. |.W.. Harris. L.E.. and
Budde. W.L. "Reference Compound to
Calibrate Ion Abundance Measurement in
Gas Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry
Systems." Analytical Chemistry. 47. 995-1000
(1975).
11. "Method Detection Limit for Methods
624 and 625." Olynyk. P.. Budde. W.L. and
Eichelberger. ).W. Unpublished report.
October 1980.
12. "Interlaboratory Method Study for EPA
Method 624—Purgeables." Final Report for
EPA Contract 68-03-3102.
13."Method Performance Data for Method
624." Memorandum from R. Slater and T.
Pressley. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory. Cincinnati. Ohio 45268.
January 17.1984.
TABLE 1.—CHROMATOQRAPHIC CONDITIONS
AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS
Pv»m.Mr
Vinyl chtond* ........... ..............
U*tfi*m &*on*..... ...............
i 1 DiLltiimjiiilum
i 1 nrlWwnaiMfM
1 i.2^-Ta»ae«oroaihana
R annum
lxna(mm|
.......; 
3 1
.......! 
38
46
........ 
9.0
........ 
108
.......! 
114
.......; 
12.1
.......! 
134
.......; 
13.7
.1 
15.7
.......: 
170
i 
171
.......I 
172
18.6
....... 
198
22.1
222
Maihod
oalacaon
U
nd
nd
nd
2.8
nd
2.6
4.7
1.6
1.6
2.6
3.6
it
2.2
6.0
5.0
1.9
4 4
5.0
4 7
69
4 1
TABLE 1 —CMHOMATOGHAPMIC CONDITIONS
AND METHOD DETECTION LIMITS—Continued
Tolu«na
ctny ttanjena
* 3-DcnnroOanzana
• 4-Dcttonx>anzana
735
246
K*
333
350
354
no
Column coodwi Cartooa* B 160/80 rnxni coaiao «im
1% SP-1000 Daoao «i a 6 fl Dv 0 1 »i 10 glaaa column <Mn
HfUum cam* ou «t 30 muovn «o» raw IXMW tonom-
tur« h«d tl 45*C lot 3 nun. ow orogramrwa •! S'C.'m*r lo
220'C and n«»a 'or 15 rnn
no =
TABLE 2.— BFB KEY M/Z ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
•»<••• 
"lit. nwmajjlUV UTWTaaj
50 
...... 
....... ...
75
'95 
. .. .......... 
...
96........... ....... ............
173 
......... 
........
174 
. ...... ..... .
'75 ................ .... .
176.. ...... ..... ... .
177 
..... .... . ...
.... 
.... 15 lo 40% ol maaa M
...... ..... 30 lo 60% ol mat* 95
. ... Baaa Paak. '00% R«a«M
5 to 9% ol maaa 95
........... <2% ol maaa 174
......... >50%olmaaa9S.
5 10 9% ol maaa 174
. >95% but < '01% ot maaa
174
5 lo 9% ol maaa i '6
TABLE 3.—SUGGESTED SURROGATE AND
INTERNAL STANDARDS
Compound
Oonnnsi 44. .................. .. .
1.2-DJCMonMwna 0-4 ..... .
i 4-Ofluorobaraana 
........ ....
Enytwmna o-'O . 
.
F kjfvntMnTiWM
i . 4-DcNoreeuiana ......... 
.
Ratan-
(nwir
'70
12.1
196
264
. 264
. 
93
192
256
' Pn-
; 'nary
m/x
84
! 
102 '
: 
114 .
11 1
96
16*
128
55
63. 86
90 92
•For chromatocraphic condition*. •«• Table 1
TABLE 4.—CHARACTERISTIC MASSES FOR
PURGEABLE ORGANICS
^,; 
Saoonovy
Brotnomattiana
CNoraavwia ..
50
94
62
64
52
98
64
•6.
1.2-t
1.1.1.TncMoraaa)wna,
Carton MracHonda...........
Bromod«*ion>maaiana......
U-Oiertoropropana...........
rant-1.3-OcfHorocrJoana.
TncHoreamana...................
1.1,2-Tr
-1.3-O«Jiior«n»uoana .
84 I 49. 51 and 66.
101 i 103
96 I 81 and 98
83 86 83 U. 9«.
; 
and too
96 I 61 ana 96
89 I 65.
96 I 62. 64. and 100
97 I 99. 117. and
I 118.
117 i 1t9and 121
127 ! 63. 8S. and 129
112 ! 63. 66. and 114
75 I 77
130 96. 97. and 132
78 i
127 i 129. 206. and
206
97 
83. 85. 99. 132.
I 
and 134
75 , 77
106 I 63 and 66
001
158
Federal Register / Vol. 49. No. 209 / Friday. October 26. 1984 / Rules and Regulations
be obtained only from a properly equipped
laboratory through the use of EPA Method
613 or other approved alternate test
procedures.
References
1. 40 CFR Pan 136. Appendix B
2 "Sampling and Analysis Procedures for
Screening of Industrial Effluents for Priority
Pollutants. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Environmental Mor.itonng and
Support Laboratory. Cincinnati. Ohio 45268.
March 1977. Revised April 1977. Available
from Effluent Guidelines Division.
Washington. DC 20460.
3. ASTM Annual Book of Standards. Part
31. D3894-7B. "Standard Practices for
Preparation of Sample Containers and for
Preservation of Organic Constituents.
American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia.
4. "Carcinogens—Working With
Carcinogens." Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare. Public Health
Service. Center for Disease Control. National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
Publication No. 77-206. August 1977.
5. "OSHA Safety and Health Standards.
General Industry." (29 CFR 1910),
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration. OSHA 2208 (Revised.
January 1976).
6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry
Laboratories,"American Chemical Society
Publication. Committee on Chemical Safety.
3rd Edition. 1979.
7. Provost. L.P.. and Elder. R.S.
' "Interpretation of Percent Recovery Data."
American Laboratory. IS. 58-63 (1983). (The
value 2.44 used in the equation in Section
8.3.3 
is two times the value 1.22 derived in
this report.)
8. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part
31, D3370-76. "Standard Practices for
Sampling Water." American Society for
Testing and Materials. Philadelphia.
9. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetric. DPD-FAS)
and 330.5 (Spectrophotometnc. DPD) for
Chlorine. Total Residual." Methods for
Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes,
EPA-600/4-79-020. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory. Cincinnati. Ohio
45288. March 1979.
10. Eichelberger. J.W.. Harris. L.E.. and
Budde. W.L. "Reference Compound to
Calibrate Ion Abundance Measurement in
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectometry."
Analytical Chemistry. 47. 995 (19751.
11. McNair. N.M. and Bonelli. E.[ "Basic
Chromatography." Consolidated Printing.
Berkeley. California, p. 52.1969.
12. Burke. ).A. "Gas Chromalography for
Pesticide Residue Analysis: Some Practical
Aspects.' Journal of the Association of
Official Analytical Chemists. 48. 1037 (1965).
13. Olynyk.'p.. Budde. W.L. and
Eichelberger. J.W. "Method Detection Limit
for Methods 624 and 625." Unpublished
report, October 1980.
14. "Inlerlaboralory Method Study for EPA
Method 625—Base/Neutrals. Acids, and
Pesticides." Final report for EPA Contract 68-
03-3102 (In preparation).
TABLE 1.—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES
i STOHET |
: 
No 
!
CASNo
AHm ..
Bmiri cov pnitmm. .
fl-BHC.............................
&-8HC .............................
Bo<2<NoroMio«y|m«n*nl .
*-8romopn«V pfwiyi
Chiy»»n» ..
4.4'-OOO .
4.4--ODT ..
3.3-^XcNaraMnBctn* ..
DMdnn ..........................
OI-MCtylpMMM* ..
En
34205
14200
34220
39330
34526
34230
34242
34247
34521
34292
39338
3425*
34773
34271
39100
34263
34636
39350
34541
34641
34320
39310
3*320
39300
345S6
39110
34506
34536
34571
34631
3*360
34336
34341
34611
34626
345*6
34351
83-32-9
20S-96-9
120-12-7
309-00-2
56-55-3
205-98-2
207-O6-9
50-32-6
t91-24-2
S5-68-7
319-65-7
319
111-
111-91-1
117-81-'
106-60-1
101-55-3
57-74-9
91-56-7
7005-72-3
218-O1-*
72-54-6
72-55-9
50-29-3
53-70-3
64-74-2
541-73-1
95-50-1
106-46-7
91-94.1
60-57-1
84-66-2
131-11-3
121-14-2
606-20-2
117-64-0
1031-07-6
TABLE 1.—BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES—
Continued
PVMIMMr
Eno>m «KMnva* 
...
FluormBWn* 
..........
^tuofvno . .. 
. . .......... . ......
Haoucnur
HSCHCNO/ •POttl*
M««cnKjroo»nz«n«
HwocMoroDutMwni
neiMiHuiu*t»n» 
...... . ... ..
MO»no(1.2.3-cd)pyr4*i« . . . . . .
isconoron*.
NWlffMMn* 
... . 
. .. .
Nivo40nzwM ... 
... .. . .....
N-Nnra*odMvprapri*/nn*
"C8-1016 .............. 
......... ...
PC8-1221 ................ . ....... 
.
PCS-1232.......... ...... ............
PCS-1242. ..................... .....
PCS-1248 ........... .............. ......
PC8-12S4 
........ 
................
PCB-1260. . ........ .......... ....
PtitfWHnrvnc
Pyr*n« ...... 
............... ..........
ToxApnono . . ............. . ...........
i .2.4-TncniaraMnnn* 
...
STORET
No
34366
34376
34381
39410
39420
39700
34391
34396
34403
34408
34686 '
34447
34428 >
34871
........ 
39466'
39492 '
.......... 
39496 >
.1 
39500 i
. ....: 39504 '
........ 
39506 I
........ 
34461 I
........ 
34469 i
...... 
3*400 I
........: 
34551 I
CASNo
7421-93-4
206-44-0
86-73-?
76-44-8
1024-57-1
118-7*-'
87-66-3
67.72-1
1 93-39- 5
78-59-'
9'-20-3
96-95-3
621-64-T
12674-11-2
11104-26-2
11141-16-S
53469-21-9
12672-29-6
11097-69-1
11096-62-5
85-01-8
129-00-0
8001-35-2
120-82-1
TABLE 2.—ACID EXTRACTABLES
STORET
NO
CASNo
2.4-1
2-McmyM 6-dnvoph*no
2-N
PcmaeMoraptMnoi......
Ph^not..........................
2.4.6-TncMOfopn«no<.
34452
34566
... 
34601
! 
3460*
34616
... 
34657
, 
34591
! 
34646
..| 
39032
.! 
34694
., 
34621
59-50-7
95-57-8
120-63-2
105-67-9
51-26-5
534-52-1
86-75-5
100-02-7
87-66-5
106-95-2
86-06-2
TABLE 3.—ADDITIONAL EXTRACTABLE
PARAMETERS•
STORET
: 
NO 
i
CASNo
92-87-5
31!
959,96 6
13213-65-9
72-20-8
77-47-4
62-75-9
86-30-6
605
606
608
606
612
807
607
•SMSKMn 1.2.
TABLE 4.—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS, METHOD DETECTION LIMITS. AND CHARACTERISTIC MASSES FOR BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACTABLES
1 3-Otttf^ofrtfiMf» 
. 
.
.
.
.
.
. 
. . . .
1.2-OMtoratnnzm
Qfrff (J*t»ff«fQpfopy4| WW
N f^Moci rvprapylwivw
NbVotMrmn*
I <•• •¥<*•! i<>in>ii«i*< 
j
t^^TrWitoofr^ii^w
taaataront
^iVMton* 
•> •• • •• - . ............. 
.
HMW
ton am*
(*W»)
7.4
7.8
84
(4
9.3
116
11*
1Z1
^2-2
13.*
15.*
174
o*/u
19
19
0.*
1.*
2-2
16
5.3
1*
3.5
E>
PHfTM^f
146
117
93
146
77
225
180
82
126
93
162
152
•CVUI N1V
SMOnt-
«y
146
148
201
63
42
123
223
12*
95
235
151
OurKMn
Scoofl^
«Y
113
19*
95
113
101
65
2Z7
145
136
127
123
27Z
127
153
ftc mm«i
H- H=
MMh-
tnt
,46
146
19*
63
77
124
223
1*1
13*
12*
65
235
163
152
M«*v
vw
201
107
135
152
225
1*3
1*7
157
107
237
1*1
153
Meth-
ane
150
137
164
227
209
17*
16*
137
23*
203
1*1
2
2
P
2.
2.
2.
4-
. 2.
2-
P.
1341
Federal Register / Vol. 49. No. 209 / Friday. October 26. 1984 / Rules and Regulations
159
TABLE 4.— CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS. METHOD DETECTION LIMITS. AND CHARACTERISTIC MASSES FOR BASE/NEUTRAL EXTRACT ABLES—
Continued
Parameter
2.6-Ommokiene 
. 
. . . . . . . . 
........... ....
0-AHC*
pt,^^,ii.,.—
4-8HC .................................................................................................................................
FndonOani- 
. . .
MOTl .................................... ...... ......................................... 
......... 
...........
4.4--OOE 
.. ... ... ......... ................. ............................................ .............. . .......................
4 4'-OOD
nj^u^L,-
•A--OOJ ........................ .......................... ......... ................................................ ... ...... .....
3 T-Oit*\f^MHM aJr.
Pi 'tfuduli)perv<ana
PCS ioi0» . ........... .................. ..................... . ........ ............... ......................................
PCS 1232" .. ....................................................................................................................
PCS 12S4« ..............................................................„..........................„.._........__....._.......
PCS 1200"...........-.........................-..................-.................-...........................................
oon nme jj
<«nl 
((
...... ................. ....... 
178
............ 
... 
187 .
................................. 
195 :
..................... ..............: 
201 1
................................... 
205 i
..................................... 
21.2
...... ............................: 
22.4 1...
...,.................................: 
22.8 !
................................... .i 
22.8 i
.....................................I 
234
I 
234 i
............................ .......i 
23.7 !
............................. ......... 
24 7 ,
26.4 i...
..................................... 
265 1
....................................... 
272 i
..................................... 
273 :
................................. 
26.6 i...
.................. ...................; 
29.3 1
9Q Q 
1
...................... .............. 
31.5 I
......................... ..„........: 
32.2 !
.................................... 
32.5 i
................................... ..j 
34.9 1
....................................... 
30.4 i
................................ ...., 
42.7 :
.......... ...........................; 
19-30 i...
.................................... 
25-34 I...
• 
10-30 1
....................................... 
15-30 |
...................................... 
15-32 L-.
.................................... i 
12-34 I...
.....................................J 
23-32 t...
eftWd i-
IMC-
«e/u
1 9 .
1 9
42
57
19 i
19
19
54
4.2 '
19
31
19
22
22
25
1 9
2.0
56
25
2.5
25
165
25
4 8
2.5
25
3.7
25
„
36
Electn
ch«~ 
Sa
• iNuenr
154
165
204 i
169
249 !
183
178 1
178 |
183 |
66 '
353 ;
237
202 i
79
246
202
237
235 I
184 
1
235 '
272 |
67 :
149 
1
220 i
252 i
252 |
252 l
252 
1
276 
1
278 i
276 I
42 
j
373 I
1501
224 
1
190 I
190 j
224 |
71U 
1
3301
CM
an *n0ect
cond- 
Sa
'53 '
89
63 '
160
181 
>
179 |
183 I
272 I
109 I
263!
355 
1
330 ;
101 :
263
248
101
263
237 i
92 '
387 
>
345 '
91 1
226 !
229 i
254 
1
253 i
253 i
253 i
138 
1
139 j
138 i
231 :
200 i
224 
1
224 |
200 
1
330 !
330 i
362 
1
cond- 
M
4Vy 
i
tsa
*64
121
162
167
249 i
109 .......
109 1
176|
109 1 ....
274 ......
181 1 .. ...
220 ......
351 1.....
341 .
100
279 .. ...
176 ......
100
82 ......
341
185
165 i.....
422 1.....
250 1
208
279
229 ,
220 '
126 I...
125 i
125 '
277
279 '
277 '
44 1
233 1
T4J 
1
200 .
20O L
•w>* i
262 1
302 '
304 i
Cnema
e*v 
«.
ne
154
183
177
169 •
249
178
203 .
203
185
228 :
220 
1
252 I
2S2 
1
252 i
270 :
278
278 
>
uonaeaon
Mn- 
U
•ne
155
163
211
223 
•
251 
>
179
231 '
231 :
213 !
229 :
229 '
253 i
253 !
253
277 i
279 !
277 |
..........4...
le«v
HW
'83
223
195
223
198
207
279
243
243
225
257
257
281
201
305
307
305
1.2.
• Thaae compound* are inukxea ol vanoua earn
Column conamonr Supeoopon (100/120 mean
tamcenmn MM leotMrrnel at 50 'C tor 4 mn. den
era. (Sea Apna 2 **u 12.)
I coeted wKh 3% SP-22SO packed *> • 1 8 m long x
piogiKKIHU M 8 •C/mn K> 270 *C and MM tor 30 mn.
2nwn ID gMM oownn «*n Mlun earner git « 30 mL/mn «o» w*. CoMm
TABLE 5.—CHROMATOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS. METHOD DETECTION LIMITS, AND CHARACTERISTIC MASSES FOR ACID EXTRACTABLES
Electron iflnpaKt
(mn) 
|
j Second- I Second-
ary 
I 
an/
?-f*»opntnol 
- -- — -
Phanol 
.. . .... .... ... ............................. ........ ...... .. ..._....,...... .... .. .... ..... ...... _ ..
- 4 Dgne0nejjnenrjt
*4<)k^Bphario«-....-.......-.....-..............---....-....^
Pemauitouptienol ................ _.._.....................„...................—.....—— ....—...-...._............-....-..................-......H
«-N*neftenol ............ ...... .............................................................. ........................................................ — ......
59
65
8.0
9.4
9.0
11.0
132
15.9
1*2
17.5
20.3
3.3
3.0
1.5
27
2.7
2.7
3.0
42
24
3.0
2.4
1 *M
94
122
102
106
142
104
100
200«
65
107
164
190
107
63
102
204
139
130
100
66
121
90
200
154
77
200
100
129
140
95
123
163
197
165
100
207
140
131
100
123
151
165
171
213
227
205
100
157
122
135
103
201
103
225
239
200
122
Corurvt umdreana. ••TTf-yir* (100/120 mean) coaled nr*i 1% SP-124ODA pecked n a 1.0 m long * 2mm ID gHaa column vrin hekum earner gaa al 30 mL/i
lempenmn neM aWhermel at 70 'C lor 2 mn Ihen programmed el 0 •C/mn tt 200 *C.
mn (low rMe. CoMm
.1
, 
' 
< t
.1
]
I
~l
I
I
'ON 3ON3d3d3d 
.
1
I
'V V<' 
' 
' 
•' 
- 
'
I
I
1ST SAMPLING REPORT
SEPTEMBER 1990
TUTU WELLS SITE QUARTERLY SAMPLING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
«•"- -^^ 
" 
" "•'
' 
*
New Jersey 07601
..l""&£&Vi**i
aflSSrr*»> •*'•»•?.;
is*' 
~"--*<£*3^-~- ••-• -^"-ia^r^c**.*****
^•-•^S^g&S&bst&ZL
N-l
CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION ................................................... 1
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES .......................... 1
Procedural Deviations ........................................... 2
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ......................................... 4
Data Quality Provisions .......................................... 4
Organic Analytical Results ........................................ 6
Inorganic Analytical Results ....................................... 7
RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................... 8
TABLES
1. 
Summary of Organics Analysis of Ground-Water Samples Collected From Water
Supply Wells, September 1990 Sampling Event, Tutu Wells Site, St Thomas, USVI.
2. 
Summary of Inorganics Analysis of Ground-Water Samples Collected From Water
Supply Wells, September 1990 Sampling Event, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, USVI.
3. 
Proposed Sampling Effort for the 2nd Sampling Event (February 1991), Tutu Wells
Site, St. Thomas, USVI.
FIGURE
1. 
Well Sampling Locations, Tutu Wells Site Sampling, Analysis, and Monitoring Plan,
St. Thomas, USVI.
APPENDIX
Data Validation Summary Report for the Tutu Wells Site, September 1990 Quarterly
Sampling, St Thomas, USVI.
N-2
1ST SAMPLING REPORT
SEPTEMBER 1990
TUTU WELLS SITE QUARTERLY SAMPLING
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
INTRODUCTION
The Tutu Wells Site 1st Quarter (September 1990) Sampling Report was prepared
by Geraghty & Miller, Inc. for both the Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee
(TEIC), which is comprised of Texaco Caribbean Inc. (Texaco) and Esso U.S. Virgin Islands
(Esso), and L'Henri, Inc. (O'Henry). This report was prepared in accordance with the
requirements detailed in the "Sampling, Analysis, and Monitoring Plan (SAMP) for Wells,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands," September 1990, which was approved by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in its September 21, 1990 letter to
TEIC and the Administrative Order (Order) effective March 22, 1990.
The objectives of the SAMP are to identify, quantify, and monitor the occurrence of
gasoline constituents and tetrachloroethene (commonly referred to as perchloroethylene and
abbreviated as PCE), and its breakdown products, in certain wells in the vicinity of Route
38 within the Tutu Wells Site (Figure 1).
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The sampling was conducted from September 24 through October 3,1990 by Soil
Tech and Geraghty & Miller. USEPA representatives were present for the sampling
conducted through September 28, 1990. Additionally, representatives of the USEPA's
Monitoring Management Branch (MMB) were present in an audit capacity on September
24 and 25, 1990. A representative of the Virgin Islands Department of Planning and
Natural Resources (DPNR) was present throughout the sampling event
TUT 
001 
1346
GFR AnHTV At MTI I PP 1KB"
N-3
2
Sampling and analysis were performed as described in the SAMP, with the exception
of the few deviations outlined in the following sectionJn brief, the wells were sampled and
analyzed for the Target Compound List (TCL) and Target Anaryte List (TAL) constituents,
with the exception of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), under the Contract Laboratory
Program (CLP). Volatile organic compound (VOC) analyses were performed in accordance
with a modified version of EPA Method 5242 in order to achieve lower detection levels.
The modifications to EPA Method 5242 which were adopted are described in Appendix A
of the SAMP.
The samples were collected in 23 of the 24 wells sampled for the September 1990
sampling event utilizing the permanent pumps and piping systems. These wells were
evacuated prior to sampling by pumping the wells for a minimum of 15 minutes. One well
(Gassett), which is not outfitted with a permanent pump, was evacuated and sampled using
a peristaltic pump. The analytical data was validated by Geraghty & Miller in accordance
with the USEPA Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) No. HW-2, February 1990 for
inorganic compounds and the USEPA SOP No. HW-6, March 1990 for organic compounds.
The data validation summary and the complete data set (tabulated) are provided in
Appendix A.
Details of the sampling and analysis procedures, data validation requirements, and
reporting requirements are provided in the SAMP.
Procedural Deviations
Deviations from the scope of work and procedures as presented in the SAMP are
outlined below.
1. 
Four Winds Well No. 1 was not sampled during the September 1990 sampling
event when it was discovered that the pump, which was thought to be in good
working order, was inoperable at the start of the sampling event
'TUT 
OOi 
.!..:!• 4 7
N-4
2. 
The well sampled on the Gassett property (formerly Hartman 1) during the
September 1990 sampling event was the same well which was formerly
sampled by USEPA and was proposed to be sampled in the SAMP. The well
is located near the fence on the north side of the Gassett property. When
USEPA and TEIC representatives examined the well in August 1990, it
became clear that the integrity of the well had been compromised based on
the report of the USEPA Technical Assistance Team (TAT) member who
previously sampled the well It was decided, and approved by USEPA, to
sample a newer well located on the Gassett property, in its place. The new
well is located behind the building and consists of 6-inch diameter PVC which
extends several feet above ground surface. However, during the September
1990 sampling event, the old well near the fence was sampled. Additionally,
the sample from the well was collected using a peristaltic pump, instead of a
Teflon™ bailer. Due to problems associated with sounding and evacuating
the well, the well volume could not be determined, and it is unlikely that 3
well volumes were removed prior to sampling.
3. 
The 1:1 hydrochloric acid (HC1) used to acidify the VOC samples was reagent
grade and not ultra pure grade. The sampling team attempted to obtain
ultra-pure grade HC1, but was unable to do so due to shipping problems.
4. 
The samples for cyanide analysis were preserved by adding sodium hydroxide
(NaOH). However, for some of the samples, the pH was not raised to greater
than 12. While this requirement was not stated in the plan, it is recognized
as a requirement and will be met in subsequent cyanide analyses.
5. 
One sample (Smith) was analyzed for VOGs using EPA Method 624, instead
of Method 524.2 in order to perform the analysis within the holding time.
1348
f>9 ft rrv 
» r*r* •% r^-i
N-5
4
6. 
Although the analysis for PCBs was not required for this project, they were
analyzed for; the analytical results are provided in this report
7. 
The Tillett well was pumped for a minimum of 15 minutes prior to sampling,
as specified in the SAMP. However, due to logistical problems associated
with containing the evacuated water, the water was pumped at a low rate and
only approximately 110 gallons were removed prior to sampling. Data
provided by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) indicates that the Tillett wells
is 100 feet deep and 6 inches in diameter. Assuming a depth to water of 20
feet, it is calculated that 3 well volumes is equal to approximately 360 gallons.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A summary of the organic analytical results is provided in Table 1. Table 1 includes
only the organic compounds which were detected; the complete organics analytical results
are provided in tabulated form in Appendix A. The inorganic analytical results are
summarized in Table 2.
Data Quality Provisions
A discussion of the data validation findings is provided in Appendix A. In general,
the overall quality of the data set is acceptable and meets the project data quality objectives.
For some data, however, there are some provisions which should be noted.
As discussed in USEPA's MMB CERCLA Limited Technical Systems Audit for the
September 1990 sampling, air bubbles were found to be present hi several of the VOC
sample bottles. When the VOC bottles were originally filled, no bubbles were apparent;
the bubbles came out of solution later. While every effort was made to avoid this condition,
a few of the samples (EgUn 1, LaPlace, Tillett, and Tillett Replicate) analyzed by the
laboratory contained air bubbles. In this event, the data validation SOP requires that all
"I'Ul" 
OOl 
1349
5
positive detections be assumed to be minimum values and that all non-detections be rejected
based on the assumption that all VOCs in the water would diffuse into the air bubble, and
consequently escape analysis and detection. In reality, it is likely that any volatile organic
compound present would stabilize in both the air and water at concentrations related to the
compound vapor pressure. In any event, the compounds which were consistently detected
in the four affected samples (PCE, trichloroethene [TCE], and 1,2-dichloroethene [1,2-
DCE]) were also consistently detected throughout the data set and comprise the constituents
of concern at the site. It is unlikely that the undetected compounds in the four affected
samples are present in ground water at the site.
Holding time violations resulted in the rejection of some of the mercury analytical
results. In most instances, the mercury holding time of 28 days was exceeded by only 1 or
2 days; for one sample the holding time was exceeded significantly.
Unsatisfactory instrument calibrations resulted in the rejection of some results. For
some samples, non-detection of acetone, 2-butanone, 2-hexanone, trans-l,3-dichloropropene,
and vinyl acetate were rejected due to poor instrument response factors and continuing
calibration performance. Poor sensitivity for acetone and similar compounds is not unusual
at low detection levels. Moreover, these compounds are not constituents of concern at the
site.
Spike recovery values outside of quality control limits contributed to the rejection of
some data. The acid fraction of the Tillett Replicate analysis was rejected because the acid
surrogate recoveries were out of control limits, and the thallium data was rejected because
the matrix spike recoveries were out of control limits. The laboratory suggested that the
thallium recoveries may be affected by the high natural dissolved solids concentrations in
site ground water. Additionally, some of the antimony and mercury data was rejected for
several samples because the recovery for the laboratory standard for one run was out of
control limits.
TUT 
O01 
l.J-50
r PP rwr
t
N-7
I
— 
6
- 
Many constituent concentrations are estimated due to quality control inadequacies
related to holding times, sample preservation, calibration performance, spike recoveries, and
I 
quality control studies. Although many of the constituent concentrations are estimated, their
identification and quantitation were subject to strict quality control requirements and
therefore, the reported values are likely to be within a reasonable range of the true values.
The overall quality of the data set is acceptable; there was good reproducibility between
replicate samples and the chief constituents of concern were consistently detected.
Organic Analytical Results
As indicated in Table 1, VOCs constitute the chief analyte group of concern at the
Tutu Wells Site. The compounds which were consistently detected in site samples are PCE,
TCE, and 1,2-DCE. All three compounds were detected in the following wells: Eglin 1, 2,
and 3; Hartman 2; Smith; Four Winds 2; Four Winds 2 Replicate; Steele; LaPlace; Matthias;
Tlllet; and the Tlllett Replicate. Additionally, one or two of these compounds were detected
in wells Hartman 3, Harvey, Ramsey, and VTHA 1.
VOC tentatively identified compounds (TICs) were identified in 12 out of the 24 site
samples. Eight compounds were tentatively identified and unknown compounds were
detected. Total estimated VOC TIG concentrations ranged from 3 to 435 micrograms per
liter (ug/L).
The presence of methylene chloride and acetone in site and blank samples is
attributed to laboratory contamination. Other VOC compounds which were detected in site
samples include chloroform in well VIHA 3 (3 ug/L), and vinyl chloride (17 ug/L) and
I 
benzene (32 ug/1) in both the Tillett and Tfllett Replicate sample.
GER AHHTV & Mil r PD
N-8
No semi-volatile (base-neutral and acid extractable organic compounds) or pesticide
organic compounds were detected in any of the site samples. One library search semi-
volatile compound (penta-chlorofluorobenzene; 4 ug/1) was detected in the Tillett Replicate
sample and unknown semi-volatile organic compounds were detected in several samples.
In general, the wells in which VOCs were detected are located in the central Tutu
valley. No VOCs were detected in wells outside the central valley. The wells in which no
VOCs were detected include: the Dimitri and Leonard wells located significantly upgradient
of the central Tutu valley; the Bryan well which is located in the next drainage subbasin to
the west; and the Devcon 1 and 3, Dench, and Dede wells located significantly downgradient
from the central Tutu valley (see Figure 1). Additionally, no VOCs were detected in the
Gassett (Hartman 1) or Rodriguez wells which are located at the southern end of the
central Tutu valley.
Inorganic, AllfllYtiCSl Results
The inorganics analytical results are provided in Table 2. 
The inorganic
concentrations were within acceptable ranges. While some cation concentrations (calcium,
magnesium, potassium, and sodium) were elevated in relation to potable water quality
typical of North America, the concentrations were within the range of concentrations
commonly detected in ground water pumped from domestic; commercial, and public supply
wells in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The heavy metal concentrations detected were all below
the Federal Primary Drinking Water Standards, where applicable. Lead concentrations,
which were of particular interest due of the possibility of past gasoline releases, were all
below the Federal Primary Drinking Water Standard.
fiFR AT.UTV a MTI I CD
N-9
8
RECOMMENDATIONS
The 1st Quarter results meet the prescribed objectives of the SAMP. 
It is
recommended to continue to implement the plan with a few minor changes. First, the
deviations from the sampling and analysis procedures detailed in the SAMP will be rectified
for the remaining quarterly sampling events. Second, it is recommended that the analytical
problems associated with the thallium and antimony analyses be reviewed so that subsequent
analyses will provide acceptable data. It may be necessary to alter the analytical method
in order to achieve this; if so, all revisions will be approved by USEPA before
implementation. Furthermore, it is recommended to resample for mercury for the samples
which were analyzed after the holding time elapsed.
Proposed analyses for the 2nd sampling event, which is tentatively scheduled
to begin on February 4, 1991, are based on the results of this report The proposed
sampling effort for February 1991 is detailed in Table 3. For VOC analysis, it is proposed
to sample only those wells in which VOCs other than laboratory contaminants (raethylene
chloride and acetone) were detected in the 1st Sampling Report Additionally, it is
proposed to sample the Gassett well for VOCs because the September 1990 sampling
procedure used for this well was not in keeping with the procedures described in the SAMP.
It is also proposed to sample for thallium, antimony, mercury, and selenium in the wells for
which these data were rejected due to quality control inadequacies. Sampling and analysis
1JT 
001 
13:
et »*Tf f r-r» »»f<-t
N-10
9
for scmivolatile organic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs are not proposed for the 2nd, 3rd,
or 4th sampling events because these compounds were not detected in any of the wells.
Respectfully Submitted,
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC
MF:gv
#PR00801/1STQTRJUT
Marcia Findlay
Senior Scientist
Daniel A. Nachman
Senior Associate
r.PR AHHTV M Mil I FR IISJT
PajeloM
Table 1. Smu»ary of Organic* Analy* of Ground-Water Sample
Ml from Water Supply Welb, September 1990 Sampling Bvcnl, TUlu Well Site, SL Thomas, US VI.
Sample Idrnliflnrtlnnr
VOLATH* ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Melbyka* chloride
Chloromothane
Acetone
1,2-Dkhloroelhene
TrkUorootheai
Tetrachlacoetbene
Tentatively Identified VOC*
Im^ISo2**-hyl
SBMIVOLATILB ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
PBSTiaDB/PCB*
Dede
ND
ND
R
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4JN
ND
r> _ -1,
ueacn
ND
IJ
R
ND
ND
ND
•JN
ND
ND
ND
Devoon
1
1NDJ
ND
R
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4JN
ND
Devoon
3
8NDJ
ND
R
ND
ND
ND
2JN
ND
ND
ND
WJ 1- |
DfftU 1
R
R
R
68 J
10 J
32J
3JN
ND
12 JN
ND
DfllMft 1
Bgunz
5NDJ
ND
R
120 J
22J
71 J
220 JN
ND
ND
ND
10NDJ
ND
22J
52 J
14
44J
5JN
ND
ND
ND
Hana»n2
1NDJ
ND
R
SJ
IJ
7J
3JN
ND
ND
ND
HarUnan3
3NDJ
ND
R
2
ND
IJ
4JN
ND
Kin
nu
ND
rlwcy
ISO NDJ
ND
R
ND
ND
•90
ND
ND
ND
ND
Leonard
ND
ND
R
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Rodrifucz
1NDJ
ND
R
ND
ND
ND
UN
ND
ND
Rodriguez
Realkale
rTl *•*
2NDJ
ND
R
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Kin
NU
ND
Analytical mute am
VOCt
SVOCf
ND
R
N
per llier(i^«aiii»ileiH to part* per baton.
low ikM Ike contract rao
_!».«__ •- •*•-
i that either the
, or that due to ounlily control problem*, the data k pcovMoaal and Iberefore
.
P«£e2of4
Tablet. Ti«~ rj-f tTijinh rinnlph nf Trnin" "'
TteaWalSlle.StThoBMa.USVi.
d from Water Supply Web, September IMOSMpUng Bveol,
s^*-*^
VOLATILB ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Acetone
1,2-DkhloroetneM
Tricaloroethene
TeUacbloroetheae
Total Xyfaoei
Toluene
Tentatively laoonnflerf VOOi
1.1 J TrirMnro IJJ Irifanimrthane
rnyauc. t nMlln •! 3 mMtiyt
rUrhlnrnhnnmn hnainr
iinkoomoMpound
SBMIVOLATILB ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Tentatively IdemMei SVOCk
PBSnODB/PCBt
t
S*»
V'
12 NDJ
ND
23 NDJ
58
20
330 J
ND
ND
88 JN
ND
ND
ND
Four
14 NDJ
. ND
R
75J
«J
25J
ND
ND
IS JN
ND
ND
ND
Four
Win* 2
Rep.
10 NDJ
ND
R
61 J
4J
18 J
ND
ND
7.5 JN
ND
ND
ND
Trip
Blank
904
25J
ND
12 J
ND
ND
ND
8
ND
5JN
NA
NA
NA
Trip
Blank
•/25
34 J
ND
42 J
ND
ND
ND
7
1
3JN
1JN
7JN
NA
NA
NA
Trip
Blank
9/2*
24 J
ND
4J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7JN
NA
NA
NA
Sleek
140 NDJ
ND
R
120
48
130 J
ND
ND
42 JN
ND
ND
ND
Dimilri
2 NDJ
ND
R
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Bryan
2 NDJ
ND
R
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
per Ifcer (m/lj; eaufraleni to parti per blMoe,
For other OMpMiodt, late data qualifier iodicaio that either Ibe
or to* AM |o quality cooiral ftMtmt, Ike data it provWoewl and Iheref ore
- l..».tJ...I)i M^tin^l an^p.^1
N-13
* 0 0 0 0 0 -
"gggggg
001
Pafc4oM
Table 1.
oT Offtwio* AM** of OnuiMt-Wtfer Snaptei Collected Croat Water Supply Wefc, September l«OS««|*ii»B«ni.TW«iWeiSM«,SfnioeM^USVL
TOp 
Trip 
TOp 
TOp
RlfMk 
RlMik 
Rlatikk 
Ittatnk 
Gn^ueii
Sample ldeMtficatk»: 
OT7 1«/1 192 
1*3 
RMMey Uptece (HartMal) KUllhiat 
VIHA1 
VIHA3 
TUIel
SBMlVOEA'nLB ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 
N A ' N A N A N A N D N D 
ND 
ND 
ND 
N D N D
TeaUtively Identified SVOCt 
NA 
NA 
NA 
NA 
ND 
ND 
ND
iMkaowocoBpNMd 
42JN 
12 JN 
4JN 
37JN
PBSTICIDB/PCBt 
NA 
NA 
NA 
NA 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
TVeM
RepHcale
ND
4 IN
82 JN
ND
Analytical rank* an
SVOO Se^volatile
per liter (Ufl); equivalent to puts per billion.
ND 
CtMDOund not detected.
NA 
CoMpoundnotMulyaed.
J 
Brtimelril fntmtmant. 1^ tentatively ideoUHedocin^KNind^ all cnocntraliont are eMimaled. For other OMDpouixb, Ihit data qualifier indicate* that either the
, L^-T^B,, ^~>nfntTl nr|"lr~<TTmrtf*fl'Hi Haril. CTthai ihminnraHiy rtntrH fr^rm. ifr 'tn't it prr'-Hmt and thrrrf-irrr
N 
fJOMpniind l§ • wntilivcly identified compound.
oo.i
tfra
ON
ON
raci
tzi
a
OOOIIZ
tatii
roNi
80691
ZJ
ON
at
OOE9Z
ran
a ic
ot
rasz
ru
oottt
ON
rat
8(1
ON
*
8tZ
C««-WH
cm
ree
zs
a
OOOS9Z
roNi
ran
aotoi
(6
ON
ON
ootcc
rt-oi
acz
K
raoc
ru
0018C
9
rat
azi
ON
a
r69Z
t<*m»H
an
IBS
a
0009CZ
at
roMoi
8089
ON
a
ere
OOC9Z
ran
mt
raoi
ON
at
OOZIC
ON
at
QL
an
ON
9ZJ
(iw^H)
Il3tf"0
an
86
a
00086C
rst
ran
aojzz
ate
ON
C5
009tJ
rant
aw
86
raoc
roi
ootw
ON
rat
BIS
QNC
H
ra9$i
c-n»a
81-9
U
ooottz
roNt
ran
80Z9I
L9
ON
89
OOWC
rai-z
899
9C
raze
Ul
006tt
II
rat
acz
ON
v
ra69
z-ate
ON
raci
rate
H
000061
ON
ran oi
80Z6
ra9z
H
9$
WJK
raz
raNoz
rati
ON
zi
ooat
ON
at
ON
UN
att
86tl
lonfg
roNt
re9
aoz
OOOrK
taut
ran
aojoz
it
ON
16
OOOIt
rru
aot
C5r«
raNt
OOBCt
ON
rat
an
ON
Hlit
c
oca^a
re 9
azc
oooocc
rant
ran
aota
aci
ON
itz
OOS6C
rr9
ate
ON
ON
rant
009lt
ON
ras
BIZ
ON
Hra«i
I
003MQ
nt
89Z
•009ZC
roNt
raNi
80691
V.
ON
Jt$
ooocz
tVL
C9I
Z(rett
rzz
ooctz
at
rat
8*1
ON
H
rttz
.p^
ON
ran
att
oootzc
roNi
roNi
BOOK
ON
ON
IOZ
009JZ
tit
act
Z€
ro9
r>i
OOJCZ
t
rec
at
ON
«
re9Ei
i
Wl
•nfpog
JMflS
•HfUUfm
•lyMluj
PfM
Xiimayf
•MnfMpf
•npjiiim
p**i
OOI|
Jaddoo
t 
' H»qoj
(|ttOX) ••fVOMD
•npfjQ
•ii|apij
•»ni^»a
•np*a
atoany
ioo«nov
•nofonfv
SBJA1VNV9INVOWMO
^
TUT 
OO1 
1360
ON
fans
ra*t
89
v
riz
rail
861
v
OOOI8Z
ON
riTi
as*
cz
rate
80191
azz
ON
zzi
OOtK
raz
azz
ON
rat
ON
ON
V
It*
rn
0000*
ON
ret
88
ON
raw
8C9
rat
Stl
OOOBIC
rti
ran
aoizi
ON
ON
ON
oo**z
ran
rate
1C
rate
rsi
OOGBC
ON
rat
an
ON
v
ret*
ON
oc
rate
ran*
ra
razt
atz
ON
ma
ON
roHz
a oooi
ON
az
0016*
rac9
rati
ON
at
com
ra*
ac
ON
rant
ON
86*1
rant
roNoi
raoooz
IBM
rat
roostz
nn
rsu
rati
etc
rant
ran
a NII
$*
ON
cz
roHt
raNi
ON
tc
art
r$9
st
OOOSIZ
rcwt
ran
BMIZ
B9C
ON
•z
rzti
ra*
rooste
ret
ra*
roNc
rone
rcuizs
aiz
rss
IB6
a*
rat
atz
ON
H
rz6*
rtt
ats
as
rat*
ooe*s
9
ra*
an
ON
r*ot
r9
ass
tc
ra«z
rzc
0019*
rat
a si
ON
H
IBZ9I
ON
r«ti
ON
II
OOMt*
rout
a OKI
LS
ON
I*
ooss*
r6~oi
•SI
BCI
ON
rn
JMtlOQ
ON
rac
an
ON
«
fKZ
•HfMg
Jnoj
•IASn *«•>«. IS "9WS R»M "*U. '*>*B *«ff>«"^ 0661 »9«
'JP<
Pa(e 3 of 3
Tabfcl StaMwyof iMxpaica Aulyab of Ground-Water Saayk*Collected from Water S«ipply WelKSeptertw 1990SM^^ Bvenl,TUlu Wei Site, S«. llioM^ USVI
INORGANIC ANALYTBS
iMumlnum
Antimony
Aneofe
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium (Total)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
MmwjBMW
Mercury
Nkkel
rmmaiimi
tfikwium
Silver
Sodium
ItaKum
Vaoadtom
Zmc
Cyanide
iMcaltoK 
VIHA1
>....
154 B
54 BJ
ND
5B
3B
4BJ
tt40Q
10
ND
10 B
29 BJ
9J
33900
ND
R
15 B
2000 B
1.4 BJ
16 J
252000
R
67J
16 B
9.7 B
V1HA3
182 BJ
R
ND
14 B
3BJ
ND
43300
5BJ
ND
29
149
17 J
28000
11 B
ND
43
1030 B
1-5 BJ
7NDJ
162000
R
33B
17 BJ
8BJ
Laplace
146 B
578
ND
ND
48
4BJ
41000
8B
ND
49J
55 BJ
Z3BJ
32600
2B
R
18 BJ
1140 B
10NDJ
ND
250000
R
39 BJ
13 BJ
ND
Malllum
227
ND
3NDJ
6B
3B
ND
36300
5B
ND
18 BJ
20NDJ
1.8 BJ
34900
ND
R
20 BJ
1410 B
2NDJ
ND
379000
R
21 BJ
4BJ
ND
Ramtey
187 B
ND
3NDJ
ND
3B
3BJ
43100
11
ND
15 BJ
20 BJ
Z6BJ
34400
ND
R
21 BJ
1140 B
10NDJ
ND
209000
R
43 BJ
7BJ
ND
Harvey
1280
R
ND
35B
3BJ
ND
53700
18 J
38 BJ
59
3360
3Z6J
46200
191
ND
58
2000 B
1.2 BJ
11 J
233000
R
59
248J
7.4 B
TUIell
153 BJ
52NDJ
3NDJ
43 BJ
4BJ
4BJ
54800J
8BJ
18NDJ
48J
953 J
1.5 BJ
38300 J
1260 J
R
33 BJ
760 BJ
10NDJ
7NDJ
192000 J
R
25 BJ
162 J
52NDJ
Tittetl
Replicate
159 B
ND
4.4 B
40 B
4B
3BJ
48600
7B
ND
32J
2660 J
8.5 J
34500
1100
R
15 BJ
1190 B
10NDJ
ND
169000
R
SOJ
124 J
ND
ND
B
J
R
tarn a readioff thai WM IBM than the cootnct required detectioa Harit INM greater Ifaao the ioitniaieiit detectioa taiit.
Data rejected.
T9£T 
TOO 
..! ni.
N-18
Table 3. 
Proposed Sampling Effort for the 2nd Sampling Event (February 1991), Tutu
Weus Site, St. Thomas, USVL
Well
Bryan
Dede
Dimitri
Dench
Devcon 1
Devcon3
Eglinl
Eglin2
Eglin3
Four Winds No. 1
Four Winds No. 2
Gassett
Hartman2
Hartman3
Harvey
LaPlace
Leonard
Matthias
Ramsey
Rodriguez
Smith
Steele
Tfflett
VTHA1
VIHA3
Proose
mercury
antimony, thaiKym
thaiiinmt mercury
VOCs, antimony, thallium
antimony, thallium
antimony, thallium
VOCs, thallium, mercury
VOCs, antimony, thallium
VOCs, antimony, tba^ium
VOCs
VOCs, antimony, thallium
VOCs, thaiKnml mercury
VOCs, antimony, thallium
VOCs, antimony, thallium
VOCs, antimony, thallium
VOCs, thallium^ mercury
antimony, thallium
VOCs, t"fl^nimt mercury
VOCs, thallium, mercury
antimony, thallium
VOCs, antimony, thflni"m, selenhun
VOCs, antimony, tfryflfr
1"
1
VOCs, tnfl^"'vin
l mercury
VOCs, tna^^|rn mercury
antimony, thallium
MF:gv
#PR00801/lstqtrjpt
TUT (.)01 
136!
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
»*»ws aus STHM mm
<8M°u»ori ounauvs TBM
'C-ONVHA at
(awaanv)
I-ONVHA u
uaru.
H
HJUNS 
0-
sanowoou
A3SNVU
SVHiJVM 
N
<aimanv) lavwocn w*
, 
ouvNosn
A3AUVH 
r
NVNIUVH o
NVNIUVH a
juassvo
I-ON SOMM UTKM
CNnoa
z Nnea
INOOA30 
H
tataa
N«U«
TBM TVUN30S3H
N-20
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY REPORT
for the
TUTU WELLS SITE
September 1990 Quarterly Sampling
USEPA REGION H
Standard Operating Procedures HW-2 and HW-6
for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Organic and Inorganic
Data Review
Sample Delivery Group 900731 (Dede)
January 1991
Prepared for
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
International Group
290 Vincent Avenue
Hackensack, New Jersey 07601
f.CD A/-TUTV ea Knt I r-n
N-21
ull
j
1
1
1
IIi
1
1
1II
SOP NO. B»-«
Raviaian 17
OP GRGMHG5 DMA REVIEW
AND PREUKDBRY REVIEW
: 3 -^* ' f O
Itodc and Baz
Saetion
CNOJRRED BY
PFROVED Hf
Garard F. MSKareia, QxLaf
Monitoring Managanant
I
N-22
OPERATING PRCCEZ1FE 
Pag*: 1 - of 
36
Data: Mart-. 1950
Revision 7
1
1
!
I
1
JNUCCUCTICN TO OKZX VALIDATION
.0 Sceoe
1.1 This piuuedure is applicable to organic data obtained froa uuiUactor labors
working for the contract Laboratory Piuyiam (CLP) .
1.2 The data validation is based upon analytical and quality assurance requiremi
specified in the Statement of Work (SOW) .
•° BKSaibilifiiej 
•
Data reviewers will complete the following tasks as assigned by the Data Review
2.1 Data Assessment - The reviewer must answer every question on the checklist.
mil »____~_^»_ _w_ii w*_ j_ j_i.
stories
•nts
Coordinator:
2.2 Data Assessment Narrative (Attachment 1) - Data reviewer is required to use
forms and must match the action in the narrative with the action taken on the Fora I(s).
2.3 Rejection Surrary Fora (Attachment 2) - Fill in the total number of analytes measured by
different analyses and the number of analytes rejected or flagged as estimated due to
corresponding quality control criteria. Place an "X" in the boxes where analyses were
not performed or criteria do not apply.
"2.4 Organic Regional Data A5sa»vnent - Data reviewer is also required to fill out Organic
Regional Data Assessment Fora (Attachment 3).
2.5 Telephone Record Log - The data reviewer should enter the bare facts of inquiry before
initiating any authorized telephone conversation with a CLP laboratory. After the case
review has been completed, mail the white copy of the Telephone Record Log to the
laboratory and the pink copy to SMD. File the yellow copy in the Telephone Record Log
folder and attach a photocopy of the Telephone Record Log to the completed
_Data Assessment Narrative.
2.6 Forwarded Paperwork - Upon completion of the review, the following are to be forwarded
to the Regional Sample Control Canter (RSGC) located in the Surveillance and Monitoring
Branch:
a. data package)
b. completed assessment checklist
c. SMD Cuitract Compliance Screening (CCS)
Forward four (4) copies of the completed Data Ajieiimant Narrative along with four (4)
copies of the Organic Data Assessment Fora: one each for the appropriate Regional DPO,
the Sample Management Office (SMD), and to the last two addresses of the Data Reviewers
Mailiiig List.
2.7 Filed Paperwork - Upon completion of the review, the following are to be filed within
the Monitoring and Management Branch (MMB) files:
*m*f
a. Telephone record Log (copy)
b. Record of Comunication (original)
c. Rejection Summary Fora
TUT 
001 
1366
H-23
SDtfCARD
2 
Of 
36
Data: Marsh 1990
Revision 7
i.o
.0
__ 
valuas datszminsd to ba unan-aj'iMMa on tha Organic Analysia Oat
Shaat (Fora I) oast ba flagged with an "R". As soon as nvisv critaria causas data to t
pajactad, that data can ba aliminatad frtn any furthar revisw or oonaidaraticn.
- m
Standard operating Pi
tha Finctional Guidalinw.
that tha zwisMi ba oonsistant anong varimmn, this
• (SOP) should ba ussd. Additional guidance can ba found in
__ - This is intandsd to aid tha nviswar in
locating any prabl«aa, both corvactad and unococrwrtad. Houawar, tha validation should
ba carriad out avan if CCS is not passant. Hasnliniftiti raoaivad froa tha laboratory
in rwoonsa to CCS aust ba ussd by tha
TUT 
00.1
N ?4 
SwttQASD OFSWeSC RQGSCRE 
Mge: 
3 
Of 
3<
Data: Ma—i 1990
7
AND DCivnaBETS 
CASE
1.1 Bava any missing dalivarablaa baan xvoaiwd and addad 
f ^ 1
ts tba- data padiaija.
OS 
MO 
N/X
X
ACZZCH: call lab for explanation / rawbmittal of any
mining daliwablas. If lab cat not pnvida
nota th* «ffact on raviov of tba purlmija cndar 
.
tija "Contract FPsblana/Nan-aaplianaa11 aaetien
of ravi«w«r narrativm.
v^
1.2 Was ac OS checklist includad with pado^a? 
[_]
2.1 Is tt« Nazxativa or Csvar Icfitar
2.2 Arm Gas* Nisbar and/or SAS "«•»'•'• cantainad in
Karrativa or Csvar I^ttar?
.0
following chacJclist is dividad into thraa parti. Fart'A
is filled out if tn« data pacXaga cantains any TOk analyaaa,
irt B for any EN& analyse* and Art C for Peaticida/Paa.
this pactega
2A data? 
*
data?
ricide/PC3 data?
ACIICN: caeplata carraspanding parts of cbadclist.
TUT 
001 
1368
4 
of 
35
N-25 
Data: Marrr. 1S90
Revision 7
NO 
N/A~
PART A: V3A
1.1 Arm the Traffic 
nepmrt Fbras preiaut for all samples
sf
I
I 
ACIZCK: If no, contact lab for replaceoevrt of missing
1 
or illegible copies.
I 
1.2 Do the Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicate any
I 
problems with saople receipt, condition of **TTHT.
analytical problems or -p~~j«i notations affecting
I 
the quality of the data?
ACTTCN: Use professional judgenent to evaluate the
effect en the quality of the data.
ACITCN: If any saspla analyzed as a soil contains
than 50% water, all data should be flagged as
estimated (J).
ACTICN: If both VQA vials for a sasple have air bubbles,
flag all positive results "J" and an non-detects "R".
2.1 Have any VGA holding tines, detersined fraa date of
collection to date of analysis, been exceeded?,
If unpresarved, aqueous aroratic volatiles oust be analyzed
within 1 days of collection and non-arcoatic volatiles oust
be analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric
acid and stored at 4°C, then both aromatic and non-aranatic
volatiles mart be analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain
about preservation, contact the saqpler to deteraine whether
the sar=>l«a
A ten-day holding tine for soil sacples is i* nmarrieri.
of Holdine Tis« Violations
(See Traffic Report)
Date 
Date Lab 
Date
Sacple 
Matrix 
Preserved ? 
Saspled 
Received 
Analyzed
ACTION: If holding times are exceeded, flag* all positive results as
estimated ("J") and sanple quantitation lioits as estimated
("UJ"), and document in the narrative that holding times
TUT 
001 
1369
5 
cf
N-26 
" 
Date: 
Marcr. 1990
Revision 7
| 
fflS 
NO
If analyses ware done mare than 14 days beyond holding time,
either on the first analysis or upon reanalysis, tha reviewer
oust uaa professional judgenant to determine the reliability
of tha data and the affects of additional storage on the
sample results. The reviewer nay determine that
data are unusable ("R").
3*1 Ara tha TC& Suzxogata Raoovary SUB&ariaa (Form U) piaiant
for aach of tha following satrioas:
a. 10* Watar 
r i/1 
__ 
__
b. Mad Watar 
£_] 
__ 
u^
c. law Soil 
[__]
d. Mad Soil 
[__]
3.2 Ara all tha VCA sarples listad on tna appropriata Surrogata
Raoovery Sucrarias for aach of tha following oatrioaa:
a. law Watar
b. Mad Watar 
[__]
c. low soil 
[__]
d. MKi Soil 
[__]
ACHOK: rail lab for explanation / raaubmittals. Zf
missing dalivarablaa ara unavailable, ^^•9^^
•ffact on data under "Conclusions" • action of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 War* outliers narked correctly with an asterisk? .
ACTICti: circle an outliers in red.
3.4 Was one or more VCA surrogate recovery outside of contract
specifications for any sample or method blank? 
*^ 
[_J
If yes, ware sacples reanalyzed? 
C__]
Were method blanks reanalyzed? 
C__] J^T 
——
ACTXCN: If surrogate recoveries are > 10% but an do not
neet SOW specifications:
1. Flag an positive rasults as estimated ("J").
2. Flag an nan-detects as estimated detection
limits ("UP1).
TUT 001 1370
S3WDA3D OPEWI^C PBCGZLSr 
Pag.: 6 
of 
26
"~
27 
Data: Mars: 1950
Revision 7
If any surrogate has a recovery of <10% :
f 
1. Flag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. Flag all nan-detects as unusable ("R").
[ 
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
I 
data that have method blank surrogate recoveries
out of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard
3.5 Ara tn«ra any *n»«g!HFfcieFy/g«T^'|»+-{,1n CLIUIS bari^an raw
data and Form
ACCZCtf: If larg* arrors axist, call lab for axplanation /
rafiihnutritl, aaJoa any naeassary oarractiona and
nota arrors undar "Conclusions*.
4.1 Is tha Matrix SpiJca Duplicata/?acovary Fora (Form HI)
praaant?
4.2 Ware matrix spUoas analyzed at tha raquirad fraouancy
for each of tha following aatrices:
a. Low Water 
C_kj __ 
__
b. Ked Water
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil
ACIICN: If any matrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How nary TCA spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
t?*tf- 
Sails
\{^
out of 10 
UP 
out of 10
4.4 How many RFD's for matrix spike and matrix spike
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
cut of 5 
Ki 
out of 5
ACTIGK: If tS and >BD both have less than 10% re-
covery for an analyte, negative results for
that analyta should be rejectsd, and
positive results should be flagged' "J*.
Ine above applies only to the sample usad
for the MS/MSO analysis. Ose professional 
TMT
judgecvnt in applying this criterion to other
sanples in the package.
?C OPEPAT2C HGG=L?I 
Page: 7 
cf
"-28 
Data: Mar±-. iss
Revision 7
NO
Blanks (Tars TV1
5.1 Is the Method Blank Sunnary (Fata IV) present? 
L^J 
__ 
__
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of TO*
TO. cccaounds, has a nagenV&ethcd blank been
analyzed for each set of sasples or every 20 sacples
of similar matrix (low water, mad water, low soil, 
^
medius soil), whichever is son frequent? 
f l/\
5.3 Has a V3A instrument blank been analyzed at least
every CJelve hours for each OC/M5 systan used?
ACTICN: If any method blank data an missing, ^"M lab
for eoealanation / nsubmittal. If not available,
reject all awr-iafert positive data ("R").
5.4 Chroratography: review the blank raw data - chrooatog
(RICs), quant reports or data systea printouts and
Is the cnroratographic performance (baseline stability) 
•//
for each instrunent acceptable for TCAs? 
f jXj 
___ 
___
ACTICN: Use professional judgement to determine th«
effect on the data.
Xfl
W7IZ: "Water blanks" and "distilled water blanks" an
validated like any other sacple and are not used
to qualify data. Do not confuse then with the
other QC blanks H *«.-.,««»* below.
6.1 Do any inethcd/instrusent/reagent blanks have poeitive
~ . results (TCL and/or TIC] for VQAS? then applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by th* sample Dilution
Factcr. 
K 
I__]
6.2 Do any field/tr^/rinse blanks have positive TO& results
(TO. and/or TXQ? 
^ 
[__3 __
AcnCN: Prepare a list of the sanpli
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separata sheet.)
NOTE: Only field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as the sarples are used to qualify data. Trip
blanks are used to qualify only those saoples
with which they wen snipped. Blanks may not
be qualified because of contamination in another
blank.. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate,
spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems.
TUT 001. 13
SIXSDM© OFESATac BttCSCSZ 
Page: 8 
of 
35
Data: Marsh 1990
Revision 7
ACXZCN: Follow the directions in the table below to qualify
TO. results due to contamination, use the largest
value from all the associated blanks.
jSasple cone > C&QLjSanple cone < CRQL ftisacple cone > CRQL——
jbut < loac blank 
is < iox blank value value ft >10x blank value
Methylene chloride JFlag sacple result Reject saaple resultiNb
Acetcne with a 'U'; cross and report CRQL; 
is needed
Toluene out 'B' flag 
cross out 'B1 flag
I
1
Snplfl cone > CRQL Sample cons < CRQL ft
OChar
Contaminants
but < Sx blank
Flag sasple result
with a 'U1;
out 'B' flag
is < Sx blank value
Reject saaple result
value ft > 5 blank value
and report CRQL; 
is
No qualification
I *»»*>• *f ^*»j
out 'B' flag
ACTION: For TIC conpounds, if the concentration in the sasple is
less than five tines the concentration in the meet con-
taminated associated blank, flag the sanple data "IT
(unusable).
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipnent blanks associated with every 
/
sasple? 
[__] 
__ 
V^
ACTION: For low level samples, note in data iiieeirnent that
there is no associated fieloVrinse/eguipnent blank.
Deception; sacples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have awriaten' field blanks.
.0 GC/MS TVmirq and Masa
7.1 Are the GC/MS Tuning and Mass Calibration Foras (Form V) 
/
present for Brancfluorobenzene (BFB) ? 
- 
t * i
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(m/z) listing for the BFB provided for each twelve
hour shift?
7.3 Has a tuning performance coBpound been analyzed for every 
/
twelve hours of sanple analysis per instrument? 
' v i
ACTXCN: If any tuning data are missing, take artlm
specified in 3.2 above.
ACXTCK: List date, tiae, instrument ID, and
analyses for which no awvlatert GC/MS tuning
data are available.
N-30
Page: 9 
of 
35
Date: Marsh 1SSO
Revision 7
DMZ
TOS 
\ 
SGTEOSfT
!
1
————— 
1 ——————————
YES 
NO 
N/A
SAHFIZ K1SBS
ACTICN: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
generated outside an acceptable &elve hour calibration
interval.
7.4 Have the ion abundz
instruoent
criteria
set for each
7.5
7.6
ACTION: List all data which do not nest ion abundant
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
ACTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sasple data as unusable ("R").
However, if expanded ion criteria are net
(See 1988 Functional Guidelines), the data
reviewer may accept data with appropriate
• qualifiers.
Are there any transcription / calculation errors
mass lists and For= Vs? (Check at least two vali
if errors are found, check acre.)
but
_ o/f _
Ksve the appropriate nurber of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least two values, but if errors
are found check more values.)
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resuhrdttal, sake necessary corrections and note
rsrs under "Conclusions".
7.7 Are the
rtra of the mass calibration ccnpound
Use professional judgement to determine
whether associated data should be
accepted, qualified, or rejected.
3.0
c
8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Fora I
present with required header inforaation on each
page, for each of the following:
a. Sacples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and matrix spike duplicates
c. Blanks
10 
cf
Data: March isso
Bavision 7
8.2 Ara the Wfc Hanial MI lal Ion Qi
for tha idantifiad astounds, and tha
data systsn printouts (Quant T\ap:niii) includad in
tha saapla parVnja for each of tha following?
a. Sa^las and/or fractions as appropriata 
f i / l
b. Matrix spifcas and aatrix spika
(Mass &pauU.a not raquirad)
c. Blanks
ACTION: Zf any data ara oissing, taka action
apacifiad in 3.2 abov».
8.3 Ara tha rasprnsa factors shown in tha Quant Raport? 
f__1
• 
i—a*
tabla with
Basalina stability 
f IXl 
__
Rasolution 
ft/1 ^
8.4 Is chrcratographic parfonaanoa
Full-scala graph (attanuation)
Othar:________________ 
[__]
ACTION: Usa profassional judganant to dataraina tha
acceptability of tha data.
8.5 Ara tha lab-ganaratad standard mass spactra of tha
idantifiad VGA cccpounds prajant for aach saspla?
ACI7CN: Zf any mass s»jauLLa ara sissing, taka action
spacifiad in 3.2 abova. Zf lab doas net,
ganarata thair own standard spact^a, oaka
nata in "Contract Problans/Ncn-oaipiianoa1'.
8.6 Zs tha KST of aach raportad ocnpound within 0.06 RRT
units of tha standard PRT in tha continuing calibration? 
t ^ 1
8.7 Ara all ions praaant in tha standard BBSS spactrun at a 
.
ralativa intansity graatar than 10% also piaiaut in tha 
{/
sanpla mass spactrua? 
f v 1 
__ 
__
8.8 Oo sarpla and standard ralativa ion intansitias
within 2C%?
ACTION: Usa profassional judganant to dataxmina
accaptability of data. Zf it is dataminsd
that inoorract idantifications wara sada,
all such data should ba rajactad, flaggad
"IT* (prasuBptiva avidarea of tha prasanoa of
tha confound) or changad to not datactad (at 
TUT 001
tha calculatad dataction limit).
N'32 
S3JCAED OFE3AT2JG PPOCSC3E 
Page: 11 
cf
36
Date: MarA 1990
| ' 
Revision 7
I
'.0 T6ntfl^lvllY fr^^l fifd. C
t 
9.1 An all Tentatively Identified Compound Forms (Fora I,
I 
Part B) present; and dp listed TTCs include scan number
* 
or retention tine, •*^i''^»^»i concentration and "J"
qualifier? 
r IXi
II 
9.2 Are the mass speuLia for the tentatively identified
ceopounds and Mtnrfafsrl "best match" spectra included
i 
in the sample package for each of the following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as •jT'mnriata 
f t/i
b. Blanks
ACTICN: if any TIC data are missing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACTICN: Add »j" qualifier if missing and "IT
qualifier to an identified Tic compounds
on Form I, Part B.
9.3 Are any TCL expounds (from any fraction) listed as
TIC expounds (eaocple: 1,2-diaethylbenzene is xyler
a VQA TCL—and should not be reported as a TIC)?
ACTION: Flag with "R" any TCL cccpound T fyt^l as a TIC.
9.4 Are all ions present in the reference aass spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also present in the
sasple cass spectra:? 
f 1 
__ 
__
9.5 Do TIC and "best match1* standard relative ion intensities
20*?
ACTICN: Use professional judgement to determine ~-
acoeptability of TIC identifications. If
it is determined that an incorrect identi-
fication was made, change identification to
••unknown" or to some less specific identi-
fication (example: "C3 substituted benzene")
as
0.0
10.1 An then any transcription / calculation errors in
Fora I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the correct internal standard, quantitation
ion, and KRF wen used to calculate Fora I result.
Wan any errors found?
•
10.2 An the CRQLs adjusted to nflact sample dilutions
and, for soils, saaple moisture?
TUT' 
OOi 1376
N_33 
ff^CASD OPESAI^C HCdLSI 
Page: 
12 
cJ
Data: March 1990
* 
' 
Revision 7
NO
ACTION: Zf errors an large, call lab for ejg^lanation /
r^esubaittal, make any necessary mmefftrifans and,
not* errors 
mn **—
ACTION: ffeen a sample is analyzed at man than one
dilution, the louest CSQIs an used (unless
I
a QC exceedanaa dictates the use of the higher
OCL data from the diluted sample analysis) .
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range -in the original analysis by crossing cut
the "F* value on the original fora Z and substi-
it with data froa the analysis of
le. Specify vhich Fora Z is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire pege of
all Fora I's that should not be used, including
any in the sunnary padage.
11.0
11.1 Are the Reconstructed Zon Chranatograns, and data
systen printouts (Quant. Reports) pi-eient. for initial
and continuing calibration?
ACTZGN: Zf any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
..0 CO^g Initial
12.1 An the Initial Calibration For=s (Fora VI) pieiant
and cccplete for the volatile fraction? 
f ^ 1
Adieu: Zf any calibration standard forms are
missing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.2 Are response factors stable far volatile* ovar the
sntratian range of the calibration (PSD <30%)? 
[__J
ACTICK: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTICK: tfeen BSD >30%, nan-detects may b* qualified
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results "J". When BSD >90%, flag
all nan-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
U policy.)
12.3 Da any ccnpourds have an average RRF < 0.05? 
\/^ 
[_J
ACZIGK: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTTCK: If any volatile aospaund has an average
BRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that
ccnpeund as estimated ("J"), and flag non-
detects for that cacpound as unusable ("R"). 
UlT 
oni 
r,77
13 
of 
36
Date: March 1990
Revision 7
5 
NO
12.4 Are there any transcription / ^1^TT«tim eum.s in
the reporting of average response factors (FRF) or
«SD? (Cheek at least tvo values but if errors are
found, cheoc neve.)
AdlCK: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: If errors are large, «*»! lab for explanation /
resubmittal, aaJce any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Occlusions".
13.0 GC/V5
13.1 Are the Continuing Calibration Fora (fora VIZ) pieseiiL 
j
end ccsplete for the volatile fraction? 
f \s 1 
.^^ 
_
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard been analyzed
for every twelve hours of sanple analysis per 
/
instruaent? 
{V -\ 
__ 
__
ACTION: list below all saaple analyses that _
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACTION: If any foxss are missing or no continuing
calibration standard has been analyzed within
twelve hours of every sasple analysis, ^»" lab
for explanation / renihnilTal If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag all
:iated saaple data as unusable ("H").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard compounds have 
/
a RRF < 0.05? 
V
ACTICN: Circle all outliers in red.
ACncrf: If any volatile conpcund has a RRF < 0.05,
flag positive results for that aii^um! as
estimated ("J"), and flag non-detects for that
nd as unusable ("R").
13.4 Do any ccrpounds have a % difference between initial and 
/
continuing calibration RFF > 25%? 
Jl_ 
C__J —-
ACTICN: Circle all outliers in red and qualify
sacple data as outlined in the table below:
TUT 
001 
1378
N-35
OPERATING
14 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
13.5 J
'J1
rast
for
kn 1
25-50
poaitiva
Jits, no action
nan datacts
:han any teanac
50-90
'J1 poaitiva
nsults, 'UJ'
nan datacts
aription / calc
>90
'J1 paaitiva
nsults, "R1*
MS 
NO 
N/A 
'
i
'
Ln tha
importing of avaraga raaponaa factors (FRF) or difft
(%O) batvaan initial and continuing FRF*? (Ottck at
laast two valuas but if anon an found, chadc aon.)
ACTZCN: tixcla azron in nd.
ACIZCN: Zf arron ara larga, call lab for aaqalanation /
rasubmittal, oaka any nacaaaary corractiona and
not* arrors undar "Oanclusiana".
14.0 lrr^*"'T
14.1 Ara tha intarnal standard araas (Tars, vizi) of avary
sacpla and blank within tha uppar and lovar limits
for aach continuing calibration?
ACTION: List an tha eutlian balow.
Sacpla f 
Zntamal Std
Liait
Limit
(Attach
if
ACTZCN: Zf tha intarnal standard araa count is outsida tha uppar or
lowar limit, flag with "J* all positiva nsults and ncn-
datacts (U valuas) quantitatad with this intarnal standard.
Zf axtranaly low araa counts ara raportad, or if parfe
•xhlbits a aajor abrupt drop off,'flag all associatad
datacts as unusabla ("R").
14.2 An tha retention tins of tha intarnal standards within
30 saconds of tha vn^i**** calibration standard?
ACTZCN: Profassional judganant should ba usad to qualify
data if tha ntantion timas differ by nan than
30
* 
N-36
SaKQttD OFESAZaC PKXSIZe, 
Page: 
15 
of
( 
. 
Date: March 1990
| 
Revision 7
15.1 Were any field duplicates submitted for
YES 
NO
analysis?
ACHCN: Ccqpare the nported rasults for field
and calculate the relative peccent diff
ACXICN: Any gross variation I'efneeii field duplicate
results sust be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences exist,
identification of field *T^"**** should be
conf iraed by contacting the stapler.
N-37
STANDARD OEE3AI2C HCGZI^E 
Ffcge: 
16 
of 
35
Data: Marsh 1990
Revision 7
5 s 5 5
BART B:
I
..O Tral 
______________
———————
:—————— 
/
1.1 AT* the Traffic Report FOODS present for all sanples? 
f V i 
__ 
___
ACTICN: if no, contact lab for replacement of missing
or illegible copias.
1.2 Do tha Traffic Raports or Lab Karrativa iniicata any
with aacpla racaipt, condition of
analytical problem or •p**-**! notations affecting 
/
the quality of tha data? 
__ 
tV \ __
ACITCN: Use professional judgement to evaluate the
effect on the quality of tha data.
ACTICK: If any aacpla analyzad a* a moil contains
ttan 50% vatar, all data should be flagged as
(J).
2.1 Hava any BA holding tinas, datandnad from data of 
/
collection to data of axtraction, baan aaa:aai^1? 
___ tV \ _ .
Sasplas for BA analysis, both soils and waters,
sust be extracted within seven days of the data of
collection. Detracts oust be analyzed within 40
days of the date of extraction.
Table of Ho!| j**7 fism Violations
(See Traffic Report)
Saaple 
Data 
Date Lab 
Date
Sacple 
Matrix 
Saspled 
Received 
attracted 
Analyzed
ACTICN: If holding tSam are exceeded, flag all positive results as
estimated ("J**) and sacple quantitation limits as estjaatad
("UJ1*), and docunent in the narrative that holding tine*
* _ .* 
"!' ! 1
N-38
OPE2ATDC ROOZURS 
Page: 17 
oj 
36
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
I 
If analyses were dona mare than 14 days beyond holding tine,
either on tha first analysis or upon reenalysis, tha raviawar
I
must use prof aasional judganent to determine tha raliability
of tha data and tha af facts of additional storage on tha
sarple rasults. CM reviewer nay determine that n--
data ara unusabla ("R") .
3.0
3.1 Ara tna 9A Surrogate Recovery Suoaarias (Fata ZZ)
for aach of tha following aatrioaa:
a. latt Watar 
f J i
— 
— "7
b. Mad Watar 
[ __ ] 
__ 
/
c. Low Soil 
[ __ ] 
___ 
v/
d. Had Soil 
[ __ 1 
/
•-^— ^ 
•__^ ^^^
3.2 Ara all t!tt BCk sasplas listed on tha appropriata Surrogate
Racsvary Sxcrarias for aaeh of tha following
a. Low Watar 
r /I
b. Med Watar
c. Low Soil
d. Mad Soil 
[__] 
__ 
/
ACTION: call lab for explanation / resubmittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, **^"-i*iii1'
effect on data under "Conclusions11 section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers marked correctly with an asterisk?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 Were two or more lane iienl ill flB acid surrogate recoveries 
/
out of specification for any sample or method blank? 
__ 
rv 1 __
If yes, were samples reanalyzed? 
[__] 
__
Were method blanks reanalyzed? 
[__] 
__ 
JL.
AdTCN: If all TO surrogate recoveries ara > 10% but two
within tha base neutral or acid fraction do not
meet SOW ^nyjflegions, for the aff^EaJLfraefcion
1. Flag all positive results as estimated (*J»). 
, 
, ,:.
t 
2. Flag all non-detacts as estimated detection 
TUT 
• 
''
limits ("in").
N-39 
«r™m*« QFS3AT2C BmTRS 
Pag,: 18 
of 
36
Cats: MarSi 1990
7
If any haie neudiil or; acid surrogate has a
reccvery of <ao* :
1. Flag all positive rasults for that
(i.e. all add or. base-neutral eonpounds) "J*.
2. nag all nan-detect* for that fraction "IT.
Professional judgement should ba usad to qualify
data that have netted blank surrogata recoveries
cut of specification in both original and re-
analyses. Check the internal standard
3.5 Are there any
data and fora
ACnCK: If large mms exist, call lab for explanation /
resubRittal, sake any necessary iMini^i'fl * and
not* errors under "Conclusions11.
4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Fora (Form ZZT) 
/
present? 
iV 1 
__ 
__
4.2 Were matrix spttas analyzed at the required frequency
for ea^i of the following matrices:
a. lat Water 
rv/1 __ 
__
b. Ifcd Watsr 
[__] __ 
\/
c. lat Soil
d. Mad Soil
AC7IGK: If any natrix spike data are missing, taka
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 Hew many BA spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
out of 22 
kiJA cut of 22
4.4 How many RPD's for natrix spixa and natrix spixa
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
out of XL 
A/ 
out of 11
Adieu: If 16 and USD both bava lass than 10% recovery
for an analyta, negative rasults for that
analyta should be rejected, and positive
results should be flagged *J*. The above
applies only to tha sa&ple used for IS/tSD 
<J' 
'" ] 1395
analysis. Cse professional judgenent in
applying this criterion to other sacples.
!
N-40
STANDARD OFS3A12JG HOCS335 
Page: 
19 
of
I 
Data: March 1990
* 
Revision 7
I
5.0 HJiar}fc* fPui.:a TV1
j 
5.1 Is the Matted Blank Sunnary (Form 3V) present? 
rvM 
__ 
__
I
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of BNA
TCL expounds, has a reagent/Bathed blank bean
analyzed for each set of sanples or every 20 saoples
of similar natrix (low water, mad water, low soil, 
/
nediue soil), tdhichever is aore firaquent? 
t\/1 __ 
__
5.3 Has a aa instzuaent blank been analyzed for each OS/MS
ACTION: If any aethoi blank data an missing, *•*'" lab
for explanatiorv/resubmittal. If not available,
reject an awriatefl positive data ("R").
5.4 Chronatograpny: review the blank raw data - chracatograBS
quant reports or data system printcuts and v*-L:a.
Is tha chronatographic performance (basalina stability) 
/
for each instruaant aoeaptabla for V»s? 
f v 1 
__ 
__
ACTICK: Us* prafassional judgawant to datarstina tha
affact en tha data.
6.0
NOTE: "Watar blanks" and "distUlad watar blanks" arm
validated lika any othar sanpla and ara QfiS usad
to qualify data. Do not confus* than %ri.th tha
othar QC blanks ***~~~* balov.
6.1 Do any nethcoyinstriaent/raagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC) 
for BNAs? Mien applied'-as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution 
/
FaAor. 
__ 
fV 1
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive BKA results 
/
(TCL and/or Tiq? 
—— G£J
Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
NOTE: only field/Tins* blanks taken the sana day
as the sacples are used to qualify data. Blanks
nay not be qualified because of contamination
in another blank. Blanks nay be qualified for
surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC
problems. 
• 
TU
H-41
S3UCA3D
20 
Cf 
36
March 1990
Revision 7
ACTICK: Follev tha directions in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to contamination. Use the largest
value from all the assort if ad blanks.
VPC
N/A
'"Vl'V'Un
Rithalata
Esters
Other
Contaninants
Saqple cone > CRQL
but < lOx blank
Flag saqple result
with a 'U'; cross
cut 'B' flag
Saqple cane > CRQL
but < Sx blank
Flag nqpla i^flt
with a 'U'; cross
out 'B' flag 
;
Saqple cone < CSQL &
is < lOx blank value
itajaet «3wpi* result
and ieyuit CRQL;
cross- out 'B1 flag
Saqple cone < CRQL &
is < Sx blank valua
Reject saqple result
and refcutt CRQL;
cross cut 'B' flag
Saqple cone > CRQL
value & >10x blank value
No qualification
4 • 
ea^e^^tfft^Ml
is needed
Saqpla cone > CRQL
value & > 5 blank value
Ho • oual i ti '••tion
ACTION: 
For TIC c
less than five
curds, if the
the <
ration in the saqple is
ntraticn in the
tJininated asa
(unusable).
ited blank, flag the saqple data "R"
ri atari with every
6.3 Are there field/rirse/equipnent blanks as:
saqple?
ACTXQK: For lew level saqples, note in data nneffmenf that
there is no associated f ield/rinse/aquipasnt blank.
Deception: saqples taken from a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
7.1 Are the GC/M5 Tuning and Mass Calibration Fora (Foot V)
present for Para £ luors^riphenylphosphine (DFTPP)?.
7.2 Are the enhanced bar graph spectrum and mass/charge
(m/z) listing for the QFIFP provided for each twelve
hour shift?
7.3 Has a tuning performance ccqpound been analyzed for every
twelve hours of saqple analysis per instrument?
ACXTQH: Zf any tuning data are missing, take action
zified in 3.2
ACrrCN: List date, tine, instn
analyses for vhich no
data are available.
it ID, and saqple
iated GC/VS tuning
rur
I
I
f 
N-42
, 
SaiCARD OFE3A-INC PBDCSERE 
Page: 21 
Of 
36
. 
Date: March 1990
] 
Revision 7
^
'
" 
" 
5 5 5 5 i
y
T
DOE
TIMt 
! 
DftMHJffiH
1
1
——————— | —————————————
——————— > ————————— ____
SAMPIZ NCWBZ3S
ACTICN: If lab cannot provide missing data, reject ("R") all data
(
generated outside an acceptable twelve hcmr calibration
interval.
I 
7*4 Hav* tn* f°" abundance criteria been net for
ACTICN: List all data which do not aeet ion abundant
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
ACUCN: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
fnnnri ared sac?le data as unusable ("R").
However, i£ expanded ion criteria are oat
(See 1938 Functional Guidelines), the data
reviewer cay xreyn data with appropriate
qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation err
nass lists and fora Vs? (deck a
if errors are found, check sore.)
7.6 Rave the appropriate nunfaer of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Qieck at lea
are found check sere values.)
siass lists and fora Vs? (Check at least two values but 
/
been reported?* (Check at least two values, but if errors 
/
C^J _ ——
ACXTCN: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resucRittal, sake necessary corrections and note
errors under "Conclusions".
of the BOSS calibration
ACIICN: Use professional judgement to determine
whether — «~-<«*«H data should be
accepted, qualified, or rejected.
B.Q r»r**t Qanpnmd T.^ Him Analvtee
8.1 Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Tarn I BIA)
prajent with required header information on eech
page, for each of the following:
a. Sanples and/or fractions as appropriate 
[N/J —— 
——
b. Matrix spikes and statrix spixe duplicates 
t\/l —— 
——
„, . 
TUT 001 1386
e. Blanks
N-43
S3W03D OPERAITC 
Z 
Page: 22 
of 
36
Data: Marsh 1990
Revision 7
for tha idantifiad conpcunds, and tha
data system printouts (Quant Imparts) ineludad in
tha saspla package for aach of tha following?
ACHCN: Usa professional judganant to detaraine tha
ability of tha data.
. , _ 
.. 
__ ___ 
YES 
NO N/X~
8.2 Ara tha Bfll Hai mil n f a-1 Ion
a. Sanplas and/or fractions as appropriate 
r \/\ 
__ 
__
b. Matrix spiXes and aateix spiJca duplicates 
fv/ 1 
__
(Mass apactra not required) 
—— ——
c. Blanks
ACZZGK: Zf any data ara Biasing, taka
spaeifiad in 3.2 abova.
8.3 Are the response factors shown in tha Quant Report? 
[__j / 
__
8.4 Zs chronatographic perforaanoe acceptable with
iline stability 
f Si 
__ 
__
Raaoluticn 
f -./i 
__ 
__
Peak shape 
f V l 
__ 
__
fUll-scale graph (attenuation) 
f vn 
__ 
__
8.5 Ara tha lab-^anaratad standard BBSS apactra of tha 
/
. idantifiad BA expounds praaant for aach sanpla? 
[_] 
_ 
V
Acnai: If any mass spauLj.a ara missing, taka action
spaeifiad in 3.2 abova. Zf lab doss not
ganarata thair own standard spactra, aaka
notSi in "Contract Problacs/Nct>^ji.nplianoa1*.
8.6 Zs tha RRT of aach raportad coopaund within 0.06 RRT 
*" 
/
units of tha standard RRT in tha continuing calibration? 
C_J 
_. 
-ic.
8.7 Are all ions prajant in tha standard BOSS spactrua at a 
/
ralativa intsnsity graatar than 10% also piaiaiif in tha 
/
sanpla THITT spactruB?
8.8 Do sanpla and standard relative ion intensities agree 
/
within 20%? 
C_] 
__ 
JL.
ACTICN: Us« professional judgsaant to determine
acceptability of data. Zf it is detamined
that incorrect identifications were oada,
all such data should be rejected, flagged
"N** 
(presumptive evidence of the pntnenne of 
TUT 
QQI. 1587
tha ccopound) or changed to not detected (at
tha <"*t''*Tli**'< ><*^y^:igfi liiait).
f 
N_M 
STANDARD OPSSdNG R*x ij.TS 
" 
Page: 23 
c* 
3€
Data: March isso
• 
' 
Revision 7
I
9.1 Ara all Tentatively Identified ^"1'Mrri iM "^ (Fora I,
Part B) press) it; and do listad TICS includa scan
or ntantion tine, estimated concantration and *J" 
/
qualifiar? 
fy ] 
__ 
__
9.2 An tha mass A^acUa for the tentatively identified
compounds and associated "bast match* gpectia. included
in th« sasple package for aach of tha following:
a. Saz^les and/or fi actions as appropriate 
TV 1 __ 
_
J9. Blanks 
r 
1 
_ 
\/
ACTTTtl; XT any TIC-data-Bra nisaixg, taJoi
aparifiarl in 3.2 absva.
ACTZQK: Add «o» ^oalifiar if -missing and
qualifier-tea all identified TIC c
on Fora I, Part B.
9.3 Ara any TCL ccepounds (frco any fraction)
TIC eccsaunds (axarpla: 1,2-diaathylbanzaas is aylene 
s
a TOa. lOrand nJmlTl not be reported as a TZC)? 
__ 
f\/l __
AfnTK: Flag with *R" any TCL coapound listad as a TTC-
S.4 Ara all ions piaaaiit: in tha lefeiauca mass ijan.LiuB -with a
relative intensity gsaatar than 10% also present in tha 
/
sarpla mass *Lfat,* ^g?** 
f__1 __ 
\s
9.5 Do TIC and **ba*t uatLii" sUmlajd ralativa ion intansitias 
/
agr«« within *0%? 
I_3 
^_ 
^X
Usa profassimal 'judoanaofc to datandzai
aeoapcafaility of TZC identification*, if
nun)oiownlf or to sane less specific identi-
fication (*v»"pl%r %3 substituted
10 J. Ara there any transcription / calculation •u.uts in
Fora I results? Check at laast fee positive values.
Verify that tha uuieut internal standard, njtfinfttaflrn 
/
ion, and KRF were used to ralrnlata Fora 2 result. 
/
Ware any errors found? 
__ 
f 
1 ^^
10-2 An the CBQEs adjusted to nflact sanpla
and, for soils, saapla aoistassi? 
r 
1
OOi 1388
_ 1
N-45
QEERA72C
24 
of 
36
Date: Marsh 1990
Revision 7
YES
N/A
AdZOf: Zf
ACTION:
are large, call lab for
.ttal, aake any
Wien a saople is analyzed at Bare than
dilution, the lowest CRQEs are used (unless
a QC tteeedance dictates the use of the higher
CflQL data from the diluted saople analysis).
Replace ccmeuLrations that eweed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the T* value on the original FOKB Z and 
'
tuting it with data from the analysis of
saaple. Specify tfcich Fora Z is to be used,
then draw a red "X" across the entire page of
all Form Z's that should not be used, including
any in the
LI.O
11.1 Are the Reconstructed Zen Curscatsgraos, and data
systea printsuts (Quant. Reports) present for initial
and continuing calibration?
ACTION: Zf any calibration standard data are missing,
take action specified in 3.2 above.
.2.0 GC/ES
VT1
12.1 Are the Initial Calibration Faxes (Fora VI)
and conplete for the EN* fraction?
ACTION: Zf any calibration standard fc
aissing, talcs action specifierl in 3.2 above.
12.2 Are response factors stable far BOs over the
aentration range of the calibration (PSD <30%)?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: ftoan BSD >30%, nan-detects aay be
using professional judgement, flag all
positive results "J1*. W«n BSD >90%, flag
all nan-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
ZZ policy.)
12.3 Da any
ds have a RRT < 0.05?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in
ACTION: Zf any aa confound has an average
RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that
coqpcund as estimated ("J1*), and- flag nan-
detects far that oonpxmd as unusable ("R").
TUT 
001
N-46
STANDARD OEERAIIJC H« H.LJJKi 
F»ga: 
25 
of
Data: March 1990
Ssvision 7
12.4 An then any transcription / ^^Miftrn arrors in
tha raporting of avanga IM^IIBM factors (FRF) or
%R5D? (Chack at laast tew valuas but if arrors an
found, chack
ACZ7CN: Circla arrors in nd.
ACTICN: If •rrors arm largi, "»''•' lab for a^lanation /
rvaucoit±al, aalca any nacaacaxy comcticna and
not* «rrots undar "CcrclusionB".
«0 Gw^T"^? ^^^^^^TUJiflff ^^ji
13.1 Arm tha Continuing Calibration Pom (Farm VH) jiLMant 
/
and coiplate for tha ENA fraction? 
f v 1
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard baan analyzad
for every te*alva hours of sanrjle analysis par
instruoant? 
r 
1
ACITCN: List balov all saapla analysas that
not within tMalve hours of tha previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACTION: If any forss an missing or no continuing
calibration standard has baan analyzad within
twmlva hours of avary saspla analysis, call lab
for asqplanation / raaiil initial If continuing
calibration data an not availabla, flag all
associated saz^la data as unusabla ("H").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard ooapounds haw
a SRF < 0.05?
ACTION: drcla all outliaxs in nd.
ACnGN: If any BA compound has a BRF < 0.05,
flag positiva nsults for that compound as
astiaatad ("J"), and flag non-datacts for that
ccnpound as unusabla ("R").
13.4 Do any coopcunds hava a % diffaranoa bate»aan initial and 
/
oantinuing calibration 3RF > 25%? 
X_
ACTICN: Circla all outliars in nd and qualify associated
saopla data as outlinad in tha tabla balow: 
, ;T
' 1390
N-47
26
Gate: Mar
Revision 7
of 
36
: 1990
25-50
% DZFFZRQIS
50-90 
'
'J' positive
results, no action
for nan
•J' positive
results, 'HT
>90
'J' positive
results, "R"
non
.1.
*an / calculation errors in the
farrnrs (RRT) or diff •
13.5 Are there any
reporting of 
_
(%O) betoeeM initial and" continuing FRFS? ' (Check at
least two values but if errors are found,
ACTION: Circle errors in
ACTION: If errors ere large, call lab for asqjlanation /
resuboittal, sake any necessary collections and
note errors under
14.0 Intejr^
14.1 Are the internal standard areas (Fora VXXX) of •wry
sacple and blank within the upper and lower limits
for each continuing calibration?
ACTION: List all the outliers below.
Sacple f 
Internal Std 
Area 
Lower Limit
Cfeper Limit
(Attach
if
ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the upper
lower limit, flag with "J* all positive results and nan-
detects (U values) quantitated with this internal
If extrenely low area counts an reported, or if
exhibits a major abrupt drop off, flag all awHntetl
detects as unusable ("R*).
14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards within
30 seuunds of the associated calibration standard?
ACTION: Professional judgement should b* used to qualify
data if the retention times differ by oon than
30
or
1.59.1.
TOO
pt»TJ
•*B3TT*P PT»TJ
w^tj^idup PX»TJ An
056T *^=^W :
30 
13 :
0-FU
1
M-49 
STANDARD OFEPAXSC FKX223£
Age: 23
of 
36
Date: March 1990
1
1
i
1
VAJO* C? PEffnc^^^^FCS ^^ftT^^^S
1 0 T-sf'ie R__ - 
*j 
v 
f 
*,___,
1.1 Are the Traffic Report FOODS present for all samples?
ACCTCN: Zf no, contact lab for replaceBssTt of missing
or illegible copies.
* 
A *^_ ^w _ jek^^K.^.^^ .K. •• 
— _ 
__ 
• _%_ ^— _ 
» • 
• 
• •
Revision
YES
u6
7
NO 
N/A
- 
_^
prablaas with saspla raoaipt, condition of sasplas,
analytical problses or •
tha quality of tha data?
analytical problses or •p'Hil notations affacting 
/
VI
ACUGN: U»« prof assional judganant to svaluata tha
•ffact on tha quality of tha data.
ACIICN: Zf any saopla analyzad as a soil contains
than 50% vatar, all data should ba flaggad as
(J).
2.1 Kava any PEST/P3 holding tiaas, dstaaainad froa data of
collection to data of axtraction.
Sarylas for PEST/PC3 analysis, both soils and totars,
oust ba axtractad within savan days of tha data of
collection, detracts oust ba analyzad within 40
days of tha data of extraction.
3.1 Are the FEST/PC3 Surrogate Recovery Sunaaries (Fora ZZ)
present for each of the following matrices: 
/
a. Low Water 
. 
tV 1 __
b. Med Water
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil
3.2 Are all tha PEST/PC3 sanples listed on the appropriate
Surrogate Recovery Sucaaries for each of the following
matrices:
a. Lew Water 
*** 1
b. Mad Water
c. Low Soil
d. Med Soil
TUT OO1 1393
N-50
OPERATIC HCLLJLSE 
P*oe: 29 
of
Date: Karen 1990
Revision 7
v— '
1
1
1
ACTION: Can lab for explanation / resubaittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, dccuuent
effect on data under "Qsnttliteinne* section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Ware outliers narked correctly with an asterisk?
ACTION: Circle all outliers in red.
TIES 
NO 
N/A
^ _ _
(
3.4 Was surrogate (TEC) recovery outside of the uiiUacL 
/
specificaticn for any saaple or blank? 
>/ 
i_] __
I 
AdlCN: No qualification is done if surrogates are diluted beyond
I 
detection. If recovery is below ouuUaU. liait (but above
zero), flag all results for that saaple "J". If recovery is
zero, flag positive results "J" and nan-detects "R". If
I 
recovery for the blank is zero, flag nan-detects far all
' 
associated sasples "R". If recovery is above contract
linit, flag all positive results for that sacple "J*, unless
in the reviewers professional judgement the high recovery
is due to co-eluting interference (cheek the associated
blank - if recovery is high there also, flag the sanpla
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation etims nefneen raw 
/
data and fora H? 
__ 
f\/l __
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubKittal, sake any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions*.
4.0 Matrix SnU
4.1 Is the Matrix Spike Ouplicata/Recovery Porn (Form HI)
4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the. following aatricss:
a. Low»tsr 
fy 1 
__ 
__
b. Had Water 
C__] __
c. low Soil 
C_J 
__
d. Med Soil 
C_] 
__ 
JL
ACTION: If any iwcrix spike data are aissing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many FEST/FCB spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
TUT 001 1394
out Of 12 
l\\ff out of 12
M-51
QFSSA1XH3 BOC3DURE 
Pegs: 30 
of
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
4.4 Hew aany RPD's for aatrix spike am matrix spike
duplicate reoaveziee an outside QC limits?
Sails
out of 6 
k)|fr out of tf
ACITCN: Zf IS and ISO both have less than zero recovery
for an analyte, negative results for that
analyte should be rejected, and positive
results should be flagged "J*. Tbe above
. applies only to the sample used for M/MSO
analysis. Use professional judgement in
applying this criterion to other
Blarica from IVi
5.1 Zs the Method Blank summary (Tom XV)
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of Pesticide
TCL expounds, has a reagent/method blank
analyzed for each set of sacples or every 20
of siciiar matrix (low water, cad water,"lev soil, 
/
nadiuc soil), whichever is aore frequent? 
t v 1 __ 
_
5.3 Chromatagnphy: review the blank raw data - -
chrasatagrass, quant reports or data system printouts.
Zs the chmmatngraphie perfoxaance (baseline stability) 
/
for each instruaant acceptable for PEST/Pds? 
t\S 1 _ 
_
ACITCN: Use professional judgement to detezaine the
effect on the data.
S.O
MOTE: "Kater blanks" and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other saapla and are na
to qualify data. Do not confuse then with the
other QC blanks discussed below*
tf.l Do any Eerthcd/imUuuMit/reegent blanks have positive
results for PEST/PCSe? \9m\ applied as described
below, the oantaninant conoentraticn in these blanks 
/
»rm im1f-inH»4 hv «ha •amla Dilutifln Ffcctnr. 
f V 1
are sultiplied by the sample Dilution Factor.
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive FEST/PCB 
/
rami11-T* 
__ 
f 
1 
V
Prepare a list of the sanples a.imnrt atari
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
"f[jT 
001 
1395
N-52
SZXNKRD OF5VC2C
31
Ma,
Revision 7
of 
36
1990
NOTE: cnly field/rinse blanks takan the san day
** the sanples are used to qualify data. Blanks
aay not be qualified hennise of contamination
in another blank. Blanks aay be qualified for
tuning or calibration QC
YES
ACHCN: Fallow the diractions in tha tabla balow to qualify
TO. results dua to ccntamination. Uai
value froB all tha «««~-"t-«-^ blanks.
NO
N/A
Saqple
but < 9bc blank
> CRQL
I
Flag sasple result
with a "IT; cross
cut "B" flag
Saople
< CRQL &
is < Sx blank, value
Reject saaple result
and
CPQL;
out "B" flag
>OCLj
& > Sx blank value
Ho qualification
ACHCK: For lew level sarples, note in data meat-ant that
there is no asscciatad f ield/rii»e/equipnent blank.
Exception: saaplee taken frcn a drinking water tap
do not have associated field blanks.
~ .0
7.1 Are the following Gas Qiranatcoran and Data System
Printouts for both Primary and Oonf imeticn
(confirmation standards not required if there
no positive results above CRQL) oolunn
a. Evaluation Standard Mix A
b. Evaluation Standard Mix B
c. Evaluation Standard Mix C
d. Individual Standard Mix A
e. Individual Standard Mix B
f. Kulti-ccn^cnent Pesticides ttaophene ft Chlordane
g. Arcclors 1016/1260
h. Arcclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 1248, and 1254
ACTXCN: Zf no, take action specified in 3.2 above
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipaent blanks associated with every
TUT 
OO1 1396
. 
32 of 
36
Data: Mar=t: 12.j
Revision 7
VTJS
7.2 Zs Foea vxli Pasjt-l present and ooaplete for each CC
coluan (priaary and oonfinjatian) and each 72
of analyses?
ACHCN: It no, tafea action «r*^*T1nr! in 3.2
7.3 Are th*r» any transcription/calculation errors bstueen raw
data and Fora VZH?
ACTZCN: Zf large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resuboittal, aaka ary necessary corrections and
7.4 Has tha total braataicwn on guantitation or ccnfimtticn
cnlim annaaila-l 20% for COT?
- for &drin?
or if Brdrin aldahyda iQd 4,4'-CCD co-aluta and that* is a
paak at thair rwtantion tina, has tha coabinad COT and Enirin
breakdown •amaaJaj 20%?
ACIZCN:
a. If COT braalcdaun is gnatar than 20% on ouantitatien ooluai
beginning with tha aaoplas following tha last in LUILLU! standard:
1. nag all positive DOT results "J".
2. Zf DOT was not datactad but DCO and/or ODE are positive,
flag tha DOT nan-detect "R".
3. nag positive DCO and DDE results "ON".
4. Zf DOT breakdown is > 20% on confirmation colum and DOT
is idantifiad on quantitation colum but not on confiraation
coluan, use professional judgenent to detaraine whether DOT
should be reported en Fora Z (if raportad, f**7 result W).
b. Zf Endrin breakdown is > 20% on quantitation colum, beginning
tha sacples following tha last in oaierol standard:
1. Flag all positiva Bxlrin noults
2. Zf Endrin UM not datactad, but Endrin Aldahyda and/or Endrin
Katona an poaitiva, flag tha Endrin non-datact "R-.
3. nag Endrin Katona positiva nsults "JIT.
4. Zf Endrin braaJcdoun is > 20% en confirmation colum and.
Endrin is idantifiad on quantitatien oolum but not on
confinaatien oolum, usa professional judgaaant to
datannina vhathar Endrin should ba raportad on Fora Z
(if raportad, flag rasult IT).
c. Zf tha oonbinad breakdown is usad (it can only ba
if tha conditions in 7.4 abova *ra mat) and is > 20% en
quantitation colvan baginning with tha last in oantgnl
standard, taXa tha actions spacifiad in 7.4 a and b above.
Zf tha ccnbinad braakdoun is >20% on oonfiraation coluon
arrf Endrin or DOT is idantifiad on quantitation oolum
but not on confirmation colum, usa professional judgement
to determine whether Endrin or DOT should be raportad en 
'u 
° Jj
Fora Z (if JLeyiartarl, flag result "IP).
•»-54 
SSNDMO OPERATIC PPDC3raS 
Page: 
33 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
YES 
NO
7.5 Is the linearity check RSD of all four calibration factors 
/
<10% for the quantitation column? 
f \ / i __
ACHCN: If no, Gag positive hits for all pesticide and PCB
analytas "J" for all associated saaplas. Do not ^"7
toxaphene or DOT if they are quantified from a 3-point
calibration curve.
7.6 Is the 
% difference between the EVXL A and each analysis
(quantitation and canf iraation) DBC retention ***• within
QC limits (2% for packed column, 0.3% for capillary [I.D.
< 0.32 no], 1% for aegabora [0.32 < I.D. < 2 SB]) ?
AdTCtf: DBC retention tiae cannot be evaluated if
f*** is not detected. If it is present and
has a retention time cut of QC limits, then
use professional judgement to determine the
reliability of the analysis and flag results
"R", if appropriate.
7.7 Was the proper analytical sequence followed for each 
/
72 hour period of analyses (page PEST D-36 in 8/87 SOW). 
f V 1 
__ 
__
ACTICN: If no, use professional judgement to
determine the severity of the effect
on the data and accept or reject it
ingly. Generally, the effect.
is negligible unless the
grossly altered or tha calibration was
also out of Units.
1.0 Pegti.cide/?C3
8.1 Is Fora IX present and cenpleta for each OC column and
. 72 hr sequence of analyses?
ACIICK: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
8.2 Are there any transcription/calculation errors bettieen 
/
raw data and Fora DC? 
r v 1
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
leeiiliiiirril. make any necessary corrections and
8.3 Is DOT retention tiaa for packed columns > 12 min 
/
(except OV-1 and CV-101 columns)? 
rv 1 __ 
__
ACTZGN: If no, check that there is adequate resolution
between individual components. If not, flag
results for compounds that interfere with eac
other (co-eluta) "R".
8.4 Do an standard retention times fall within tha windows 
/
established for the first DJD A and IND B analyses? 
fv 1 __ 
——
H e r 
_ _
opsarac HCCSZSS 
paga: 34 of
Data: Mar=r. 1S90
Revision 7
__ 
NO 
N/A
I 
ACTTCN: Beginning with tha soplas fbllowing tha
I 
iMt in di-iiu^ standard, chacfc to aaa if
^3iB ^•UTCDBCflCI^^DDB O^aTICftA^) HaV^B Vltf^Afl flA
aaqpandad window surrounding tha axpactad
] 
ntantion tiaaaa. Zf no paaks an found and,
' 
DBC is visibla non-datacts an valid. Zf
paaks an pnaant and cannot ba idantifiad
j 
through "pactara racagnition" or a consistant
I 
shift in standard ratantien tisav, flar all
8.5 An tha continuing calibration standard calibration
factors within 15* (for quantitation colusi) or 
/
20% (for ecnfiraation colucn) of tha initial (at 
/
beginning of 72 hr sacjoanoa) calibration factors? 
r\/1 
__ 
__
Zf no, flag all aianriifarl poaitiva raaults
•J1*. Osa profassional jvdganant to dataraine
vhathar or not to flag ncn-datacts.
9.1 Zs POTS X ccqplats for avary saspla in which a 
/
pasticida or PCS was datactad? 
[__] __ 
v
ACITCN: zf no, taka action T^-ifl*1 in 3.2 abowa.
9.2 Ara thara any transcription
data and Pora X?
ACITCK: Zf larga arrors axist, call lab for axplanatien /
nsubmittal, saka any
nota arrors undar "Ganclusions".
9.3 Ara ratantien tiaas of sanpla ocapcunds wittin tha
calculatad ratantien tina '
and ccnf imaticn analysas?
calculatad ratantien tiaa vindcws for both quantitation 
/
Was GC/tS oonf iraaticn providad tfcan raquirad («han 
/
nanbnticn is > 10 ug/al in final axtxact)?
ACTICN: Majaet ("R") all positive raaults (testing
quantitation coluon critaria, but aisaing
ccnfinnation by a sacend colum or GC/tS (if
apprqpriAta). Also, njact ("R") aU positiva
rasults not Basting ntantion tiaa window
critaria unlass asaorlatsrt standard ceapounds
ara similarly biasad (i.a. basa on FRT to DBC).
9.4 Cnack chrcnatograiBS for falsa nagativas, aspaciaUy for
tha aultipla paak corponants teoaphana and PCB's. Wan
than any falsa nagativas? 
_
ACTION: Zf aporopriats PCS standards wan not analyzad,
or if tha lab parforaad no ccnfirnticn analysis, 
r'J
flag tha apprqpriata data with an "IT.
* 
K-56 
__ 
_ 
__ __
SaNDARD QrSa^ac HCCDCKS 
F»ga: 35 
of 
36
Data: WarS: 1990
J 
• 
Itevision 7
4 
'
N/A
I 
10.0 Qargg
10.1 Arm than any tiatatuiiption / calculation
Fans Z xasults? oaaek at laast tie positiva valuas.
I 
Wan any arrors fond? 
__ 
[ __ j
NSfZZ: Sinpla paak pasririda rasults can ba chadcad for
rough agraaaant batriaan quantitativa raaults
obtainad on tha tuo GC colu&ns. CM raviawar
should usa professional judgannt to dadda
uhathar « auch larosr conosntration fbtaioad
cftemcolmn varsus tha otfaar indicatas ths
prasanos of an intarf tdssg cccpound. . J£
dntarfaris^ cccpound is indicatad* tha
of thai -bao -vsliMs should ba raportad snd
«stiaat«d ouantity ("JN").
a dataiBdnation of an astiaatsd "'"r
on tha cuxCiiinaLdon colonn. Una na
iaidicaca that tha •prasanca of intarl acsncas
has ff^arsuati tdta attaopt at a saccnd ""^ ""• *
tha G3QIs adjustad to raflact *"i '«'Ta 
M<^n*"<
foT-srrP?, M',I?< joisftint? 
_ 
f 
1 
>/
ACTION: Zf arrors ara laraa, call lab for axplanstion /
rasuianirtal, aaka any naoassaxy oca
ACHCN: Whan a sacpla is analyzad at aora than
as> QC
O^QL data froa "tha *"*<»*^< «»"ip|* analysis)
Kaplaca r'liL'ai^if ^J^^T* that axcaad thu fm
ranga in tha original analysis by crossing out
tha T" valua on tha original Form 2 land substi-
tuting it with data from tha analysis of dilutsd
saqpla. SpacLfy uhica Farm Z is to ba tssad,
than draw a rad "X" across tha antirapaga of
all Xan.Z'.s that should not ba uaad,
any in tha suaaary
31.2 T5sr» any alactrqpositiw displacansnt (nagatiwa 
/
paaks) or unusual paaks saaa? 
««„ 
T ^ 1
11.3 Kara aarly aluting paaks (for aarly alutin? 
/
analytas) lairiliMrl to haaal 1na^
•
AC33OI: Forn.l and 11.2,. cemnant only. For 11*3, 
TUT 001 1400
reject ("R*) thosa analytas that ara not
sufficiantly
"-57
36 of
Deta: Marsh 1990
Revision 7
12*1 ISSySi?*1"" dUpUeait" «*»*«•* for HS1/ICB
• 
ACTION: Qxpare the nported results for field
and calculate the relative percent
ACTION: Any gross variation between field dunlicate
results aust be addressed in the reviewer
narrative. However, if large differences ~*~+
identification of field d^Ucatas ahculd t a ^ '
confiraed by contacting the stapler.
'
i
N-58
SDG # 900731 Dede
Tutu Wells Site
Contaminated Volatile Method Blanks and Their Associated Samples
Method Blank 
Associated Samples
VBLK01 
Devcon I, Hartman n, Rodriguez (P)
VBLK02 
Eglin ID, Four Winds n, Harvey, Tutu
VBLK03 
Smith
VBLK04 
Rodriguez (PD)
VBLK05 
Eglin U
VBLK06
VBLK07
Hartman m, Leonard, Steele, Trip Blank
9/26, VIHA in, Steele MS, Steele MSD
Dede, Dench, Devcon m, Trip Blank 9/24,
Trip Blank 9/25
I'UT 
OOl 
14 O2
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
K-59
SDG # 900731 Dede
Tutu Wells Site
Contaminated Trip Blanks and Their Associated Samples
Trip Blank 
Associated Samples
Eglin II, Eglin in
Trip Blank 9/26
(770-15)
Trip Blank 9/24
(731-05)
Trip Blank 9/25
(731-10)
Trip Blank 9/26
(731-18)
Devcon I, Devcon HI, Rodriguez (P),
Rodriguez (PD)
Dede, Dench, Smith, Steele, Steele MD,
Steele MSD
Hartman U, Hartman m, Four Winds II,
Tutu, Harvey, Leonard, VfflA m
TUT 
001 
i4U.:>
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC
N-60
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE
TOTAL REVIEW
CLP DATA ASSESSMENT
Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organics Analysis
•
case No. ^00131 
SDC No. Ttc/a. 
LABORATORY &/JH/A 
SITE
DATA ASSESSMENT:
The current functional guidelines (1988) for evaluating organic
data have been applied.
All data are valid and acceptable except those analytes which
have been qualified with a "J" (estimated), "U" (non-detects) , "R"
(unusable) ,or "JN" (presumptive evidence for the presence of the
material at an estimated value). All action is detailed on the
attached sheets.
N
Tvo facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R
flag means that the associated value is unusable. In other words,
due to significant QC problems the analysis is invalid and provides
no information as to whether the compound is present or not. "RH
values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be
relied upon, even as a last resort, the second fact to keep in
mind is that no compound concentration, even if it has passed all
QC tests, is guaranteed to be accurate. 
Strict QC serves to
increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains
error.
Reviewer's
S i gnature: lW0T>bvUs'rl's£t46JC_______Date: e>l /
Verified Bv; ^^L^ ^• 
K<a^,^— Date; / /
OOl 
14U-I
N-61
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE2OF2-S
DATA ASSESSMENT:
1. 
HOLDING TIME:
The amount of an analyte in a sample can change with time due to chemical
instability, degradation, volatilization, etc. If the specified holding time is exceeded, the data
may not be valid. Those analytes detected in the samples whose holding time has been
exceeded with be qualified as estimated, T. The non-detects (sample quantitation limits)
will be flagged as estimated, "UJ", or unusable, "R", if the holding times are grossly
exceeded.
The following action was taken in the samples and analytes shown due to excessive
holding time.
The volatile and semivolatile organic compounds and pesticides/PCBs were
analyzed within holding times for all samples.
TUT 
Ool 
1 4 < ;
GERAGHTY & MILLER INC
I
I
N-62
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGEJOF2H
DATA ASSESSMENT:
2. 
BLANK CONTAMINATION:
Quality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., method, trip, field, rinse, and water blanks are prepared
to identify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samples during
sample preparation or field activities. Method blanks measure laboratory contamination.
Trip blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during shipment Field blanks measure
contamination of samples during field operations. If the concentration of the analyte is less
than 5 times the blank contaminant level (10 times for the common lab contaminants), the
analytes are qualified as non-detects, "U". The following analytes in the samples shown were
qualified with "U" for these reasons:
A) 
Method blank contamination
Volatile Organic Compounds
Method blank VBLK01 is reported to contain a tentatively identified
compound (TIC) with a retention time (RT) of 3.78 minutes at a
concentration of 8.0 micrograms per liter (ug/L). The samples Devcon I,
Hartman II, and Rodriguez(P) are associated with this method blank and
contain the same TIC contamination. These TIC concentration values are
qualified as non-detects because they are less than 5 times the contamination
in the method blank and therefore the values are not reported.
Method blank VBLK02 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a
concentration of 3 ug/L and a TIC with a RT of 3£3 at a concentration of 4
ug/L. 
The samples Eglin HI, Four Winds U, Harvey, and Tutu are associated
with this method blank and have methylene chloride concentrations above the
CRQL and the same TIC contamination. 
The methylene chloride
concentration values are qualified with "U" because they are less than 10
times the common contaminant concentration in the method blank. The TIC
values are not reported for reasons stated above.
Method blank VBLK03 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a
concentration of 5 ug/L. 
Sample Smith, which has a dilution factor of 25, is
associated with this method blank and has a methylene chloride concentration
of 11 ug/L. 
This concentration value is raised to 12 ug/L, 
the CRQL, and
qualified with "U" because the value is less than 10 times the common
contaminant concentration in the method blank. Please note that this sample
TUT 
001 
14O6
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
I
I
N-63
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE'iOFiM
DATA ASSESSMENT
I
was analyzed using Method 624 due to high compound concentrations and as
a result the CRQL is higher for this sample.
Method blank VBLK04 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a
I 
concentration of 3 ug/L and a TIC with a RT of 3.83 at a concentration of 4
I 
ug/L. Sample Rodriguez(PD) is associated with this method blank and
contains 2 ug/L of methylene chloride and 3 ug/L of the same TIC The
I
methylene chloride concentration value is qualified with "IT and the TIC
value is not reported for reasons previously stated.
Method blank VBLKOS is reported to contain 5 ug/L of methylene chloride,
2 ug/L of acetone, and 2 ug/L of a TIC with a RT of 3.78. Sample Eglin H
is associated with this method blank and has a 5 ug/L of methylene chloride.
j 
This value is qualified with "U".
I ^
Method blank VBLK06 is reported to contain 5 ug/L of methylene chloride,
| 
and 7 ug/L of a TIC with a RT of 3.83. 
Samples Hartman m, Leonard,
I 
Steele, and VIHA in are associated with this method blank and have
methylene chloride concentrations above the CRQL and the same TIC
I
contamination. The methylene chloride concentration values are qualified
with "U" and the TIC values are not reported for reasons stated above.
I 
' 
Method blank VBLK07 is reported to contain 3 ug/L of methylene chloride
' 
and 2 ug/L of a TIC with a RT of 3.83. Samples Dede, Dench, and Devcon
ffl are associated with this method blank and have the same TIC
contamination. These TIC values are not reported for reasons stated above.
1 
Samples Dede and Devcon in have methylene chloride concentrations above
the CRQL. These values are qualified with "IT.
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
I 
No contaminants are detected in the method blank.
* 
Pesticides/PCBs
No contaminants are detected in the method blank.
i ^
TUT 
OOi 
1407
I
r.FR AHHTV A? Mil I FR TNP
N-64
ATTACHMENT 1
. 
SOP NO. HW-6
I 
PAGE5OF2H
j 
DATA ASSESSMENT:
I 
B) 
Field or rinse blank contamination ("water blanks" or "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample).
I
I
All samples were taken directly from a drinking water tap into a collection
bottle, therefore no field blanks were necessary.
C) 
Trip blank contamination (VOCs only).
Trip blank 9/24 is reported to contain 25 ug/L of methylene chloride, 12
ug/L of acetone, 8 ug/L of xylenes, and 5 ug/L of a TIC with a RT of 3.83.
The samples Devcon I, Devcon III, Rodriguez(P), and Rodriguez(PD) are
associated with this trip blank. Devcon I and Rodriguez(P) have methylene
chloride concentrations above the CRQL and the same TIC contamination.
The methylene chloride concentration values are qualified with "IT because
they are less than 10 times the concentration in the trip blank. The
methylene chloride concentration values are already qualified in Devcon m
and Rodriguez(PD) due to method blank contamination. 
The TIC
concentration values for the four samples are already qualified due to method
blank contamination. 
Devcon in and Rodriguez(PD) have acetone
concentrations above the CRQL. These values are qualified with "U" because
they are less than 10 times the common contaminant concentration in the trip
blank.
Trip blank 9/25 is reported to contain 34 ug/L of methylene chloride, 42
ug/L of acetone, 1 ug/L of toluene,? ug/L of xylenes, 3 ug/L of a TIC with
a RT of 3.82, 7 ug/L of a TIC with a RT of 8.7, and 1 ug/L of a TIC with a
RT of 21.52. Samples Steele, Smith, Dede, and Dench are associated with
this trip blank. Sample Smith contains 25 ug/L of acetone. This value is
qualified with "U" for reasons stated above. All four samples have methylene
chloride concentration values above the CRQL which are qualified with "U"
for reasons stated above. Samples Steele, Dede, and Dench contain the
same TIC contamination. The TIC values are not reported for reasons stated
above.
Trip blank 9/26 is reported to contain 24 ug/L of methylene chloride, 4 ug/L
of acetone, and 7 ug/L of a TIC with a RT of 3.82. The samples Hartman
Hartman II, Four Winds II, Tutu, Leonard, Harvey, and VfflA III are
rUT 
OO1 1.408
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
N-65
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE 6 OF-M
DATA ASSESSMENT:
associated with this trip blank. Sample Hartman H contains methylene
chloride at a concentration above the CRQL. This value is qualified "U" for
reasons stated above. Samples Fourwinds II and Leonard both contain
acetone at concentrations above the CRQL. These values are qualified with
"U" for reasons stated above. Hartman III, Fourwinds II, Tutu, Leonard,
Harvey, and VIHA III have methylene chloride concentration values above
the CRQL which are already qualified due to method blank contamination.
The TIC concentration values for the above samples are already qualfied due
to method blank contamination.
Trip blank 9/27 is reported to contain 16 ug/L of methylene chloride.
Samples Eglin II and Eglin III are associated with this trip blank and have
methylene chloride concentrations at or above the CRQL. These values are
qualified as "U" for reasons stated above.
1
TUT 
001 
1409
I
N-66
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE 7 OF 2H
DATA ASSESSMENT:
3. 
MASS SPECTROMETER TUNING:
| 
Tuning and performance criteria are established to ensure adequate mass resolution,
' 
proper identification of compounds, and to some degree, sufficient instrument sensitivity.
These criteria are not sample specific. Instrument performance is determined using
standard materials. Therefore, these criteria should be met in all circumstances. The tuning
standard for volatile organics is bromofluorobenzcne (BFB) and for semi-volatiles is
decafluorotriphenyl-phosphine (DFTPP).
If the mass calibration is in error, all associated data will be classified as unusable,
"R".
All mass calibrations are acceptable for both the volatile and semrvolatile
analyses.
Two BFB tunes have a sample out of the 12-hour limit by less than 12
minutes. Each succeeding tune is acceptable, therefore, in this reviewer's
professional judgement, no qualifiers are necessary.
I"IJ'! 
OO.l 14.10
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
N-67
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE* OF Z^
DATA ASSESSMENT:
4. 
CALIBRATION:
Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to ensure that the instrument is
capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibration demonstrates that
the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance at the beginning of an
experimental sequence. The continuing calibration checks document that the instrument is
giving satisfactory daily performance.
A) 
RESPONSE FACTOR:
The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific chemical
compounds. The response factor for the Target Compound List (TCL) must be >. 0.05 (a
ratio of areas) in both the initial and continuing calibrations. A value <0.05 indicates a
serious detection and quantitation problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes detected in the
sample will be qualified as estimated, "J". All non-detects for that compound will be
rejected ("R").
Volatile Organic Compounds
The initial calibration performed on 9/19 has response factors >0.05 for all
compounds. Sample Smith is associated with this calibration. No qualifiers
are necessary.
The initial calibration performed on 9/28 has response factors <O.OS for
acetone, 2-butanone, and 2-hexanone. 
All samples except Smith are
associated with this calibration and are qualified with "R" for the compounds
stated above.
„ The continuing calibrations performed on 9/29, 10/03, and 10/09 have
response factors <0.05 for acetone, 2-butanone, and 2-hexanone. The
continuing calibration performed on 10/01 has response factors <0.05 for
acetone and 2-butanone. The continuing calibration performed on 10/08 has
a reponse factor <O.OS for 2-butanone and 2-hexanone. These compounds
are already qualified in the samples associated with the above continuing
calibrations as a result of deficient initial calibration response factors.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/06 has a response factor <O.OS
for acetone, 2-butanone, vinyl acetate, and 2-hexanone. The associated
TUT 
001 1411
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-68
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE*) OF ZH
DATA ASSESSMENT:
samples are Devcon m, Trip blank 9/24, Dede, Dench, and Trip blank 9/25.
The acetone, 2-butanone, and 2-hexanone concentration values are already
qualified as a result of deficient initial calibration response factors. The vinyl
acetate concentration values are qualified with "R" based on this continuing
calibration.
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
All response factors are greater than or equal to 0.05 in both the initial and
continuing calibrations.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
K-69
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE 0OF
DATA ASSESSMENT:
5. 
CALIBRATION:
A) 
PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION (%RSD) AND PERCENT
DIFFERENCE (%D):
Percent RSD is calculated from the initial calibration and is used to indicate the
stability of the specific compound response factor over increasing concentration. Percent
D compares the response factor of the continuing calibration check to the mean response
factor from the initial calibration. Percent D is a measure of the instrument's daily
performance. Percent RSD must be <30% and %D must be <25%. A value outside of
these limits indicates potential detection and quantitation errors. For these reasons, all
positive results are flagged as estimated, T and non-detects are flagged "UT (if %D or
RSD > 50%). If there is a gross deviation of %RSD and %D, the non-detects may be
rejected ("R").
For the PCS/PESTICIDE fraction, %RSD for aldrin, endrin, DDT, and
dibutylchlorendate must not exceed 10%. 
Percent D must be within 15% on the
quantitation column and 20% on the confirmation column.
Volatile Organic Compounds
The initial calibration performed on 9/19 has a %RSD greater than 30% for
chloromethane(35%). Smith is the only sample associated with this initial
calibration. Chloromethane is a non-detect in this sample, therefore no action
is necessary.
The initial calibration performed on 9/28 has a %RSD greater than 30% for
methyiene chloride(66.948%) and acetone(71.280%). All samples except
Smith are associated with this initial calibration. The methyiene chloride
concentration values are qualified with "J" for all positive hits and "UP for all
non-detects. The acetone concentration values are already qualified as a
result of deficient response factors.
i ^
"'"UT 
OOl
i
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
N-70
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE MOF
DATA ASSESSMENT:
The continuing calibration performed on 10/02 has a %D greater than 25%
for the following compounds:
Compound 
%D
Methylene Chloride 
-52.4
2-Butanone 
44.4 .
Vinyl Acetate 
-36.7
trans-13-Dichloropropene 
-99.9
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 
39.1
2-Hexanone 
-58.0
Sample Smith is associated with this calibration. 
The trans-lJ-
dichloropropene concentration is qualified with "R" because it is a non-detect
and the %D is is greater than 90%. The 2-butanone, vinyl acetate, and 4-
methyl-2-pentanone are non-detects, therefore no qualifiers are necessary. 2-
Hexanone is a non-detect, but the %D is greater than 50%, therefore the
quantitation limit is qualified with "UP. The methylene chloride
concentration is already qualified due to deficient initial calibration %RSD.
The continuing calibration performed on 9/29 has a %D greater than 25% for
the following compounds:
Compound 
%D
Methylene Chloride 
4338
Acetone 
27.13
Carbon Tetrachloride 
28.68
Bromoform 
25.15
The samples Devcon I, Rodriguez(P), and Hartman n are associated with this
calibration. Carbon tetrachloride and bromofonn are not detected in these
samples, therefore no action is necessary. Methylene chloride concentration
values are already qualified due to a deficient initial calibration %RSD.
Acetone is already qualified due to a deficient response factor.
TUT 
OOl 
1414
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
N-72
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE'2OFZ*1
DATA ASSESSMENT:
The continuing calibration performed on 10/01 has a %D greater than 25%
for the following compounds:
Compound 
%D
1,2-Dichloroethane 
42.31
2-Butanone 
47.03
Bromodichloromethane 
2524
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 
2828
Dibromochloromethane 
41.51
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 
39.%
Bromoform 
26.97
2-Hexanone 
34.13
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 
56.49
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 
3933
Rodriguez(PD) is the only sample associated with this calibration. 4-Methyl-2
-pentanone concentration value is qualified with "UJ" because it is a non-
detect and the %D is greater than 50%. The 2-butanone and 2-hexanone
concentration values are already qualified due to deficient response factors.
The remaining compounds are non-detects and have %Ds less than 50%,
therefore no qualifiers are necessary.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/03 has a %D greater than 25%
for the following compounds:
Compound 
%D
Chloromethane 
2636
Methylene Chloride 
39.16
Acetone 
34.95
2-Hexanone 
2935
Samples Four Winds n, Tutu, Harvey, and Eglin in are associated with this
calibration. Chloromethane is not detected in any of these samples, therefore
no action is necessary. Methylene chloride concentration values are already
qualified due to deficient initial calibration %RSD. Acetone and 2-hexanone
concentration values are already qualified due to deficient initial calibration
1415
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-73
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE BOF 24
DATA ASSESSMENT:
response factors.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/06 has a %D greater than 25%
for the following compounds:
Compound 
%D
Vinyl Chloride 
33.45
Methylene Chloride 
44.78
Acetone 
48.44
Vinyl Acetate 
66.87
l,lA2-Tetrachloroethane 
30.11
Samples Devcon III, Trip blank 9/24, Dede, Dench, and Trip blank 9/25 are
associated with this calibration. Vinyl chloride and 1,1^2-Tetrachloroethane
are not detected in these samples, therefore no qualifiers are necessary. The
methylene chloride concentration values are already qualified due to a
deficient initial calibration %RSD. Acetone and vinyl acetate are already
qualified due to deficient initial response factors.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/08 has a %D greater than 25%
for the acetone(93.97) and 2-butanone(8237). Samples Steele, Hartman ffl,
Leonard, VIHA in, and Trip blank 9/26 are associated with this calibration.
These compounds are already qualified as a result of deficient initial
calibration response factors.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/09 has a %D greater than 25%
for the following compounds:
Compound 
%D
Chloromethane 
28.83
Bromomethane 
27.13
Methylene Chloride 
33.67
2-Butanone 
75.79
Vinyl Acetate 
46.25
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 
38.55
tfoj.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
H-74
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE flOF 2-M
DATA ASSESSMENT:
Sample Eglin II is associated with this calibration. Methylene chloride is
already qualified due to deficient initial calibration %RSD. 2-Butanone is
already qualified due to a deficient initial calibration response factor. The
remaining compounds are non-detects and have %Ds less than 50%, therefore
no qualifiers are necessary.
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
No semivolatile organic compounds were detected in any of the samples.
Therefore, the CRQLs will be qualified with "UJ" only when calibrations have
%RSDs or %Ds greater than 50%.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/13 has a %D greater than 25%
for 2,4-dinitrophenol(61.8%). The sample Steele is associated with this
calibration. The non-detect value is qualified with "UP.
Pesticides/PCBs
The %RSD for aldrin, endrin, DDT, and dibutylchlorendate did not exceed
10%. The %D was within 15% on the quantitation column.
TUT 
001 
1417
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-75
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
6. 
SURROGATES:
All samples are spiked with surrogate compounds prior to sample preparation to
evaluate overall laboratory performance and efficiency of the analytical technique. If the
measured surrogate concentrations were outside contract specifications, qualifications were
applied to the samples and analytes as shown below.
Volatile Organic Compounds
For the Method 624 analysis, all surrogate recoveries are within quality (QC)
limits.
As specified in Method 524.2, only two surrogate compounds were used,
bromofluorobenzene (BFB) and trans-l,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 (t-DCB). The
recovery of BFB is outside the QC limits (86-115%) in the following sample
analyses:
Sample 
%BFB Recovered
Dench 
60
Eglinll 
84
Four Winds U 
128
Leonard 
118
Rodriguez(PD) 
68
TUTU 
126
VBLK01 
84
VBLK04 
68
VBLK06 
120
These samples were not re-analyzed. 
For each affected sample, the
concentration values for all compounds are qualified T for positive hits, and
"UJ" for all non-detects. 
No QC limits are established for the recovery of
t-DCB; however, when the BFB recovery is within QC limits, the t-DCB
recovery is in the range of 84% to 122%.
TUT 
OO1 
14.1.8
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-76
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE/6OFZM
DATA ASSESSMENT:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
The surrogate compound 2-fluorophenol is out of QC limits (21-100%) in the
sample analysis of Dench. No action is necessary when only one surrogate is
out of QC limits.
Pesticides/PCBs
The Dibutylchlorandate (DBC) 
recovery was high for all samples except
Leonard. No pesticides or PCBs were found in any of the samples, therefore
no qualifiers are necessary.
TUT 
°01 
14j
FR
" 
N-77
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGETOFZH
DATA ASSESSMENT:
7. 
INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE:
Internal standards (IS) performance criteria ensure that the GC/MS sensitivity and
response are stable during every experimental run. The internal standard area count must
not vary by more than a factor of 2 (-50% to +100%) from the associated continuing
calibration standard. The retention time of the internal standard must not vary by more
than ± 30 seconds from the associated continuing calibration standard. If the area count
is outside the (-50% to +100%) range of the associated standard, all of the positive results
for compounds quantitated using that IS are qualified as estimated, T, and all non-detects
as "UJ", or "R" if there is a severe loss of sensitivity.
If an internal standard retention time varies by more than 30 seconds, the reviewer
will use professional judgement to determine either partial or total rejection of the data for
that sample fraction.
All internal standard area counts and retention times are within QC limits for
both volatile and semivolatile compound analyses.
I
I 
TUT 
OO1 1420
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
N-78
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE //OF 24
DATA ASSESSMENT:
8. 
COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION:
A) 
VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE FRACTIONS:
TCL compounds are identified on the GC/MS by using the analyte's relative
retention time (RRT) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained from known standards.
For the results to be a positive hit, the sample peak must be within ± 0.06 RRT units of the
standard compound and have an ion spectra which has a ratio of the primary and secondary
m/e intensities within 20% of that in the standard compound. For the tentatively identified
compounds (TIC) the ion spectra must match accurately. In the cases where there is not
an adequate ion spectrum match, the laboratory may have provided false positive
identifications.
Volatile organic compounds are properly identified on the GC/MS and all
TICs accurately match their ion spectra.
No semivolatile target compounds were found in any sample.
B) 
PESTICIDE FRACTION:
The retention times of reported compounds must fall within the calculated retention
time windows for the two chromatographic columns and a GC/MS confirmation is required
if the concentration exceeds 10 nanograms per liter (ng/ml) in the final sample extract
No pesticides or PCBs were found in any sample.
14 2
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
H-79
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE I?OF 2.M
DATA ASSESSMENT:
9. 
MATRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/MSD:
The MS/MSD data are generated to determine the long-term precision and accuracy
of the analytical method in various matrices. The MS/MSD may be used in conjunction
with other CC criteria for some additional qualification of the data.
All MS/MSD % recoveries are within QC limits for volatile, semivolatile
organic compounds and pesticides and PCBs.
TUT
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-80
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW4
DATA ASSESSMENT:
10. 
OTHER QC DATA OUT OF SPECIFICATION:
A) 
Method Detection Limit Study
Method 524.2 state that a method detection limit (MDL) 
study must be
performed prior to sample analyses.
The MDL study consists of seven repeat analyses of target compounds at
concentrations of 1 ppb. The QC limits for mean accuracy (% recovery) and
%RSD 
are 80-120% and 20%, respectively. The MDL study must be
repeated if these standards are not met The MDL study associated with
SDG Dede results was performed in April 1990 and has the following
deficiencies (*):
Mean
Compound 
Accuracy.% 
% RSD
1.1-Dichloroethene 
72* 
72
Methylene Chloride 
148* 
12.0
1.2-Dichloroethane 
121* 
7.9
Tetrachloroethene 
76* 
9.5
Bromofonn 
88 
28.0 "
1,1^2-Tetrachloroe thane 
. 
122* 
73
In addition, the following compounds were not included in the MDL study:
acetone, carbon disulfide, 2-butanone, vinyl acetate, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, 2-
hexanone. The above compounds are flagged "J" for all samples, except
where-compounds are qualified "R" for other deficiencies.
B) 
Laboratory Fortified Blanks
QC requirements established in Method 524.2 and the Sampling, Analysis, and
Monitoring Plan (Appendix A) state that laboratory fortified blanks (LFBs)
must be analyzed immediately following each continuing calibration and the
accuracy must be between 80% to 120% recovery. The provided data indicate
that the recoveries were out of QC limits for volatile compounds in each LFB.
The LFBs were not always analyzed immediately after the calibrations. The
affected samples and compounds are qualified "J" to reflect these deficiencies.
TUT 
001 
1423
r:co Anirrv K> vfn r PP
N-81
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
11. 
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND OVERALL ASSESSMENT
The compounds of primary importance in this project are the volatile
organics. SDG Tutu has several QC criteria out of specification.
The MDL study had % recoveries out of QC limits as well as compounds
which were not included in the study at all. The FLBs also had several
compounds out of QC Limits and twice was not run immediately after the
continuing calibrations. All target compounds were present in the FLBs.
These MDL and FLB deficiencies indicate that the laboratory instrumentation
has difficulties recovering certain compounds at such low concentrations (1
ppb). As a result, the affected compounds are qualified with T in the
associated samples.
The volatile surrogate recoveries are out of QC limits in several samples as
well as three (out of seven) method blanks. For the affected samples, the
identification of the compounds is acceptable, but for positive hits and non-
detects the quantitation must be considered as estimated only. 
The
concentration values and quantitation limits for the six affected samples have
been qualified as such.
The volatile calibrations are deficient for compounds which were either
common lab contaminants or compounds not detected in any sample. The
majority of the data is not seriously affected by these deficiencies.
During the process of validation, the compound quantitation performed by the
reviewer did not agree with the quantitation performed by the lab. The lab
was notified and the laboratory personnel determined that the incorrect
response factors were used to quantitate the compound concentrations for
samples Hartman UL Leonard, Steele, and VTHA UL The lab corrected the
problem and sent revised Form I(s) and quant Ration reports. These
revisions are included with the data package.
Overall, the volatile organic data is consistent although QC problems do exist
as discussed above.
The semrvolatile data is acceptable. 
One qualifier was needed due to
calibration deficiencies.
1424
r.FR ACiHTV ff MTI I FR IMP
I
I
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE2ZOFZH
DATA ASSESSMENT:
The pesticide/PCB data is acceptable. The surrogate recovery was high for
all but one sample, but no pesticides or PCBs were found, therefore it has no
effect on the data.
TUT 
OOJ. 14-,
I
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-83
ATTACHMENT1
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
12. 
CONTRACT PROBLEMS
The MDL study failed to include six target compounds. Several results were
out of QC limits established in Method 5242 and the Sampling, Analysis, and
Monitoring Plan.
The LFBs were not analyzed immediately after the calibrations and many %
recoveries are not within QC limits.
The volatile organic analyses have several samples and three blanks with the
surrogate BFB out of QC limits. The lab has failed to perform satisfactorily
because there is no evidence of reanalysis for any sample or blank.
Sample Smith was originally analyzed using Method 5242. The compound
concentration values were not within the calibration range of the
instrumentation. In order to analyze the sample within holding time the
laboratory defaulted to Method 624. 
This was a breach of contract The
Sampling, Analyses, and Monitoring Plan calls for all samples to be analyzed
using Method 524.2 in order to reach low detection limits.
1426
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
ft
N-84
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
13. 
This package contains sample re-extractions, re-analyses or dilutions. 
Upon
reviewing the QA results, the appropriate following form I(s) have been used.
Form I(s) for sample re-extraction, re-analysis, or multiple dilutions are not
included in this package because all original analyses were accepted.
TUT 
O01 1427
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-85
3CP MD. W-2
Evaluation of Mrtali OKU for tha Contract Laboratory Piuuiaa «-_?)
SO*. 7/M
REV. 2/99
V
1
« 
(3CP RavlsionX)
1 
' 
.
1
F*=**S3 BY;^A^^^/ Z/AJi'/l'n______ 
__
Hanxf Shaikh. - 
5 
~''' ——
1
ity Assuranca Chamist
and Hazardous Uastt Saction
1
Louis*Bavilacfluirsactioh QUVf
Toxic and Hazardous Uast* Saction
1
APPMUED BY: ^T '^U^»^ "^ C^
Gar^Tjft F. McKlnna. Aiaf
I
1
1428
N-86
OPERATIC
Title: Evaluation of Inorganic Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Page 
i o? 35
Date: Feb. 13?:
Number: 
K-.-2
Revision: 10
1.0
1.1 This procedure is applicable to inorganic data obtained from contractor
laboratories working for Hazardous Waste Site Contract Laboratory
Program (CLP).
1.2 The data validation is based upon analytical and quality assurance
requirements specified in Statement of Work tsnj) ?/•«.
2.0 Responsibilities - Data reviewers will complete the following tasks as assigned by the Da
Review Coordinator:
2.1. For a
2.1.1 ine reviewer oust answer every question on the checklist.
2.1.2 ____ ____ ______________________
The answer on the checklist trust match the action in the narrative
(appendix A.2) and on Form X's. Do not use pencil to write the narrative.
This report is to be completed only when a serious contract violation is
encountered, or upon the request of the Data Review Manager or Deputy Project
Officer (DPO). Forward 5 copies: one each for internal files, appropriate
Regional DPO, Sample Management Office (SMD) and last two addresses of
Failing List for Data Reviewers (Appendix A.4). In other cases, all contract
violations should be appended to end of Data Assessment Narrative (Sec. A. 2.2).
2.1.4
2.1.5
2.1.5.1
:* X
Biter in ink on Data Sumnary Sheet required QC values from Forms I through IX. Cir
air value* that require data qualification "Action".
Fill in the total number of analytes analyzed by different analyses and
the number of aialytes rejected or flagged as estimated due to corresponding
quality control criteria. Place an "X" in boxes where analyses were not
performed, or criteria do not apply.
2.1.5.2
A. 7
Data reviewer is al3Q required to fill out Inorganic Regional Data Assessment
form (Appendix A. 7) provided by Sft Headquarters. Codes listed on the form
will be used to describe the Data. Assessnent Summary.
TUT OO1
1
N-87
I
STMCRSD OPERATING PPQCSCtSI 
page 
2 o: 
35
Titlt: Evaluation of inorganic Data for the 
Date: Fab
Contract, Laboratory Program 
Nurber:
Revision: 10
2.1.6 ttira BeYlfV Tng: It is recjmeitaed that each data reviewer should maintain a log cf
reviews completed to include: a. data of start of cast review
b. date of completion of case review
c. site
d. case number
fcobt laboratory
f
ota^^^&w g±£ •^•MK* M
• nuiioer oz sampu
g. matrix
h. hours
i. reviewer's initials
2.1.7 ttieetan* Pacara T^J . the data reviewer should enter the bare facts of
inquiry, before initiating any phone conversation with CLP laboratory.
After tne case review has been completed, mail white copy of Telephone
Record Log to the laboratory and pink copy to 9O. File yellow copy in
tne Telephone Record Log folder, and attach a xerox copy of the Telephone
Record Log to the completed Data Assessment Narrative (Appendix A.2).
2.1.8
..1.8.1 Upon completion of review, the following are to be forwarded to the Regional
Sample Control Center (RSCC) located in the Surveillance and Monitoring Brancr.:
a. data package
b. completed data assessment checklist (Appendix A. 1,original)
c. S-O Contract Compliance Screening (CCS)
d. Data Sunrary Sheet (Appendix A.S) along with completed Data Assessment.
Narrative (Appendix A.2)
e. Record of Comnuiication (copy)
f. CLP Reanalysis Request/Approval Record (original * 3 copies)
g. Appendix A.7 (original).
..1.8.2 Forward 4 copies of completed Dcta Assessment Narrative (Appendix A.2)
along with 2 copies of the Inorganic Data Mmineni Form (Appendix A.7) and
Telephone Record Log , if any,: one each for appropriate Regional DFO,
Sample Management Office (SfO), and last two anYlreiteee of Mailing List
for Data Reviewers (Appendix A. 4) (the Inorganic Dcta Assessment form
does not go to tne last two addressees).
TUT 001
N-88
OFEWCTG PRQCZSUSZ 
Pa-e 
3 c: 
35
Title: Evaluation of Inorganic Data for the 
Date: Fes. 19«
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
K-:-2
Revision: 10
2.1.9 mad Papfr^rfr . xjp^ completion of review, the following are to be filed
within M-3 files:
a. Four copies of completed Data Assessment Narrative (Appendix A. 2) each carry inc
Appendix X.7.
b. Telephone Record Log (copy)
c. S-O Report (copy Appendix A-3)
d. CLP Data Assessment Senary Form (Appendix A.6).
e. OP Reanalysis Request^pproval Record (copy)
3.0
Indicate incomplete data package on the computer tracking sheet located in M-3 office.
Authorized contractor personnel may contact the laboratory after discovery of an inconplet
data package. If a laboratory win not return phone calls or does not respond to requests
notify M-3 coordinator of Region II for resolution.
4.0 Pa-tagricTi of Data - Ail values determined to be unacceptable on the Inorganic Analysis Oat
Sheet (Form I) must be lined over with a red pencil. As soon as any review criteria cause
data to be rejected, that data can be eliminated from any further review or consideratior
5.0 acceptLancg QrlT.trl? - In order that reviews be consistent among reviewers, acceptance
criteria as stated in Appendix A.I (pages 4-25) should be used. Additional guidance c;
be found in the National Inorganic Functional Guidelines of October 1. 1989.
6.0 fflTI rflnTTMTi <7TTgl<a>T?r^_&:riFairifrBl fm*1 - This is intended to aid reviewer in locating a;
problans. both corrected and uncorrected. However, the validation should be carried o»
even if CCS is not present. Resufcmittals received from laboratory in response to CCS nu
be used by the revi<
7.0 q«^n*gr fpf P*rnlYl1l ~ Data reviewers must note all items of contract non-compliance
within Data Assessment Narrative. If holding tines and sample storage tines have not be
exceeded. DPO may request reanalysis if items of non-compliance are critical to data
Request* are to be made on "OP Re-Analysis Request/Approval Record".
8.0 i^pr* pf rfrMTMnieatLim - Provided by the Regional Sample control center (RSCO to
indicate which data packages have been received and are ready to be reviewed.
• o
TI-^T^. off njrt-~ - TO* tbta reviewer will follow the standard practice.
TUT O01 1431
N-89
SIMDV3D OFOAHKG PRQC3URE 
Pag* 4 
0: 
35
: 
Title: Evmiuation of Mttals Ona for the 
Date: Feb.
Contraci Laboratory Pi'uyiaui 
Mseer: 
™.
I , 
Appendix A.I: Data Mm mail1 - Cuiuact 
Revision: 10
* ! 
Compliance (Total Review - inorganics)
If no, request from RSCC.
Is cover page properly filled in and signed by the lab
manager or the manager's designee?
irrreKt If no, prepare Telephone Record Log, and.
contact laboratory.
Oo numbers of samples correspond to numbers on
of comaunication?
Oo sample numbers on cover page agree with sample
numbers on:
(a) Traffic Report Sheet?
(b) Fora I's?
If no for any of the above, contact RSCC for
clarification.
CC 
(La
(CCS) - Present? 
(_J 
_
If no. contact RSCC.
A. 1.3 Trio Pamrr - Present, and complete? 
I 
i
*rrrrt:-. If no, contact RSCC for trip report.
A. 1.4 <»T7>« Traffic Raaort - Present or on file?
Legible?
If no. request from Regional Saople Control
Center (RSCC).
A. 1.5 Cflv«rPzHf - Present;
TUT 
°°i 
14.
N-90
STWOWO CFSSATIM3 fVi» HUg 
Page 5 
c: 
j
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. i?s
Contract Laboratory Program 
Muter: 
HK-Z"
*PP«ndax A.I: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Cotpliance (Total Review - inorganics)
NO
. 6 Ttorm I (Final natal - Are all Form I's present and corplete? [ j^
agncra if no, prepare telephone record log and contact
laboratory for sutraittal.
Are correct units (ug/l for waters and mg/fcg for soils)
indicated on Form I »s?
Are soil sasple results for each parameter corrected for
percent solids? 
[_]
Are Erft sanpie t s and corresponding laboratory sanple
ID t s tne same as on tne Cover Page, Form I's and 
/
in tne raw data? 
[ v\ 
__ 
__
Are computation/transcription errors less than 10\
of reported values? 
[ v
Are all "less than IDL" values properly coded with "U"? 
(
Was a brief physical description of sanples given on
Form I's? 
[JU
w»re the result qualifiers used correctly with final 
, X
data? 
tJlJ 
_ 
_
amcui if no for any of the above, prepare Telephone
Record Log, and contract laboratory for
corrected data.
Were any samples diluted beyond requirements of contract? 
_ 
[J^J _
If yes. were dilutions noted on Form I's? 
[_] 
_ 
±1
AcncMs. If no, note under Contract-ProblenvNon-Conpliance
of the"Data Assessment Narrative".
A. 1.7 H7l^*T? Tinmm - 
(aqueous and soil saoples )
(Examine saople traffic reports and digestion/distillation logs.)
Mercury analysis (23 days). . . . . . . exceeded? 
_ 
I—1
cyanide distillation (14 days). . . . . . exceeded? 
— 
[J^J —
TUT 
001 
1 4"••! ::
N-91
CFSvMTC PKLJUJTC 
Pagt 
6
c: 
3s.
itle: Evaluation of Metals for the contract 
Date: Feb. m;.
Laboratory Program 
__ 
Number: 
K-.-2"
"rrerilji A.1: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: io
Cccpiiance (Total Review - Inorganics)
5 § I D
Ocfter Metals analysis (6 aoncfts). . . . exceeded? 
_ 
(j/i _
Prepare a list of all staples and analytes
for which holding tines have been exceeded. Specify
the number of days from date of collection to the data
of preparation (from raw data). Actacn to checklist.
If yes, reject (red-line) values less than
Instrument Detection Limit (IDL) and flag
as estimated (J) the values above IDL even
pi sacple(s) was preserved properly.
A.1.8 
_
A. 1.8.1 Digestion Log* for flame AVIC? (Form XIII) present? [J/]
Digestion Log for furnace AA Fora XIII present? 
f \s\
Distillation Log for mercury Form XIII present? 
I 1/1
Distillation Log for cyanides Fora XIII present? 
t v/1'
Are pK values (pH<2 for all metals, pH>12 for cyanide)
present in Digestion/Distillation Logs? 
[_]
*weig^ts, dilutions and volumes used to obtain values.
Percent solids calculation present for soils/sediments? 
[_] 
_ 
J£
Are preparation dates present en Digestion Log?
A. 1.8.2 Measurement read out record present? 
ICP
Flaw AA 
t _ 
J
Furnace AA 
r */\ 
_ 
_
Mercury 
ULJ — 
—
cyanides 
[J^l 
_ 
—
TUT 
OO.1 1434
N-92
OPERATING PRQCX35Z 
Page 
7 o: 35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. 19?:
Contract- Laboratory Program 
. 
Number: KK-2
Appendix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Ccnpiiance (Total Review - Inorganics)
Yfs 
J£
A.l.8.3 Are all raw data to support all sample analyses and
QC operations present?
Legible? 
• 
._. 
_ 
__
Properly Labeled? 
[ l/\ 
_ 
_
Acnai; if no for any of the above, write Telephone
Record Log and contact laboratory. Flag metal
data as estimated if pH of sample is greater
than 2. Flag cyanide data as estimated if pH
sample is less than 12.
A.l.9
A.1.9.1
A. 1.9.l.l 
Is record of at least 2 point calibration
present for 1C? analysis?
Is record of 5 point calibration present for
Hg analysis? 
\.l/\
8C212J: If no for any of the above, write in the
Contract Probl«n/Nan-GcBpliance section of
the "Data Assessment Narrative11.
* 1.9.1.2 
Is record of 4 point calibration present-for:
Furnace AA?
cyanides?
IEIS: 1. If less than 4 standards are measured in absorbance
node, then the remaining standards in concentration
mode must be run immediately after calibration and
be within ±10% of true value.
2. For all AA (except Hg) and cyanide analyses, one
calibration standard is at CRDL level. If not,
write in the contract-Problem/Non-Gompliance section
of the "Data Assessment Narrative".
1435
H-93
OF5EAI2G FTOCSUFI 
Page 
6 o: 
3;
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. i?r
ggyy* laboratory Program 
Nufeer: 
K%-2*
Appendix A. 1: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Conpiianct (Total Review - inorganics)
to 
i"
Flag associated data as estimated if standards
art not within ±10% of true valuas <txctpt CFEL
calibration standard). Do not flag tnt data as
estimated in linear range indicated by good
recovery of standard.
X.l. 9. 1.3 is correlation ^coefficient less than 0.995 for:
Mercury Analysis?
cyanide Analysis?
Atomic Absorption Analysis?
': if y«s, flag the associated data as estimated.
I
reviewer win calculate correlation coefficient.
A.I.9.2 
Form IT A
A.I.9.2.1 Present and corpiete for every metal and cyanide? 
Cj^J
Present and corplete for AA and 1C? when both are
used for same analyze? 
(_]
JCnaj: if no for any of the above, prepare Telephone
Record Log and contact laboratory.
A. 1.9.2.2 Circle all values on data stannary sheet that are
outside contract windows. Are all calibration
standards (initial and continuing) within control
limits?
Metals 90-110%
Hg - 80-120%
Cyanides 85-115%
001 1436
H-94
I
\
I
CPSWCZC PRULLJUSE 
Pagt 
9 ci 33
Titlt: Evaluation of Mstals Data for the 
Datt: Feb. 1990
Contract. Laboratory Program 
Number: K---2
Appendix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
I
Flag as estimated (J) all positive data (not
flagged with a "IT) analyzed between a
| 
calibration standard with %R between 75-89%
1 
(65-79% for Hg; 70-84% for OJ) or 111-125\
(121-135% for Hg; 116-130% for OH recovery and
nearest good calibration standard. Qualify results
<m. as estimated (UJ) , if the ICV or CCV %R is
75-89% (CN, 70-84% ; HG, 65-79%). Reject (red-line)
as unacceptable data if recovery of tha ICV or
CCV is outside tne ranga 75-125% (CN, 70-130%; Hg.
43-135%) . Qualify five sanples on either side of
verification standard out of control limits.
Was continuing calibration perfonned every 10 samples
or every 2 hours? 
[^J
am OK: if no. flag the excess samples (eleventh and
up) data as estimated (J).
Mas ICV for cyanides distilled?
If no, write in the Contract-Problem/Non-Compliance
section of the "Data Assessn«nt Narrative".
A. 1.9. 3 
Form II B (CTTfi |gt'arrt*rl^* ff^* AA and 1CP) -
»
A. 1.9. 3.1 Was a CRDL standard (CHA) analyzed after initial
calibration for all AA metals texeecr HO)?
*was a mid-range calib. verification standard distilled
and analyzed for cyanide analysis?
Was a 2XCREL ( or ^TTr when HL>CRCL) analyzed (OH)
for each ICP run?
(Note: CRI for AL,Ba,Ca,Fe,Mg,Na,or K is not required.)
arrroj: if no for any of the above, flag as estimated
all data falling within the affected ranges.
me affected ranges are:
AA Analysis - **True Value ± OCL
ICP Analysis - **Trua Value ± 2CRH.
OC Analysis - *«7rua Value ± 0.5 x True Value.
/ind the results of mid-range standard in the raw data.
•True value of <3A, CRI or mid-range standard. Substitute IDL for 
CRDL when IDL > CRDL.
TUT 
OO1 1437
N-95
OPERATIC PSOCSISI 
pa?a 10 Cf 2;
! 
Titit: Evaluation of Matais Data for tha 
Data: Fao. i??:
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nunbar: K-:-2
« 
Appendix A.I: Data Assassnant - Contract 
Rtvision: 10
Conpiiarct (Total Raviav - Inorganics)
:
" 
A.l.9.3.2 Was CRI analyzad aftar ICV/IC3 and bafora tht final
CCV/CC3, and for avary four Hours of ICP run?
I
£CZL2?: If no, vrita in Contract ProblawNon-Ccnplianca
Saction of tna "Data Assassnant Narrativa".
•..1.9.3.3 Circla all valuas on sumary shaat that ara outsida
Ara CRA and GUI standards within control limits:
Matals 
80 - 120W? 
[ _ ]
Is mid- rang* standard within control linits: 
_,
Cyanida «0 - 120W? 
I ^T __ _
Flag as astinatad all data within tha affactad
rangts if tht racovary of tha standard is
batvMn 50-79%; flag only positive data if
th« racovary is bacwaan 121~-150\; rajact
(rad lint) all data if tha racovary is lass
than S0\; rajact only positive data if tha
racovvry is graatar than 150\.
A. 1.9.4 
Form ITI (Tnitlll aTtf QonfcimiJia Qlihragiai
A. 1.9.4.1 Prasant and conplata?
For both M and ICP whan both art usad for sam analyta? [ J^J 
_ 
_
was an initial calibration blank analyzad?
Was a continuing calibration blank analyzad aftar
•vary 10 sanplas or avary 2 hours (vAiichavar is rora
frsquant)? 
t__)
If no, praparv Talaphona Racord Log, contact
laboratory and writa in tha contract-problaros/
im-LUJ|jlianca saction of tha Data "
Narrativa.
001 1438
N-96
S3NCARD CKPAT3C PHI r.liRS 
Page 11 of 
35
Title: Evaluation of Mttals Data for the 
Date: Feb. las-
contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
K->i"
Appendix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
to 
r:
A.I.9.4.2 Circle all calibration blank values on Data Sumary Suet
that are above CREL (or 2 x US. when IDL > CRDL). Are
all calibration blanks (when ITL<CREL) leu than or equal
to Contract Required Detection Units (CREL)? 
I
Are all calibratian blanks less than two tines
Instrument Detection Limit (when IDLKROL)? 
[_] 
_ 
_j
ACTION'; If no for any of the above, flag as estimated (J)
all positive data less than or equal to
calibration blank values analyzed between
calibration blank with value over CRDL (or >*Tpri
and nearest good calibratian blank. Flag five
samples on either side of the calibration blank.
A.I.9.5 
T0*t III fPrgr»ratim Blank) -
(Note: The preparation blank for mercury is the same
as the calibration blank.)
A. 1.9.5.1 was one prep, blank analyzed for: each 20 samples? 
[ j
each batch?
each matrix type? 
I_ ] _
both AA and 1C? when both are used for same analyte?
am CM: if no for any of the above, flag-as estimated (J)
all associated positive data <10 x IDLs for which
prep, blank was not analyzed.
Zf only one blank was analyzed for more
than 20 samples, then first 20 samples analyzed
do not have to be flagged as estimated (J).
A.I.9.5.2 Is concentration of prep, blank greater than CRDL
. 
when IDL is less than or equal to CREL? 
__ 
l_T_
If yes, is the concentration of the sample with the
least concentrated analyte less than 10 times the 
^
prep, blank value? 
_ 
(—' —
I ^
TUT 
U01 
1<V39
I
I
QP23AIUC RCCS3URE 
Pag9 ;; 0*
Titlt : Eviiu»ion of Mtcals Data for tne 
Data: Fes.
Contract Laboratory Piuyiam 
Number: K-:-2
Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract 
Ravision: 10
Compliance (Tbtal Raviaw - inorganics)
CD
If yas, reject (red-line) all associated data
greater than CR9L ooncantration but lass than tan
tijaas the prap. blank valua found in the raw data.
A.l.9.5.3 Do concentrations of prap. blank fall balov two times
nz. when nz. is graatar tnan CRDL? 
[_] 
__
*mcN: if no, rajact (rad-ltna) all positive data
that has a concantration lass than 10 tints
tha prap. blank valua in tna raw data..
A.l.9.5.4 Is concantration of prap. blank below tha nagativa OCL? _ 
[j^J* _
If yas, rcjact (red-lina) all associated data
that has a concantration lass than lOxOTL.
A. 1 . 9 . 6 
Fora IV fig Int
1.9.6.1 Prasant and conplata?
1 1/\ 
_. 
_ r
Not required for furnace AA, flame A&, mercury,
cyanide and Ca, vq, * «nd Na. )
Was ICS analyzed at beginning and end of run
(or at least twice avary 8 hours)?
&mcK; if no, flag as estimated (J) all sanplas for
wnich AL, Ca, Fa, or Mg is higher than in ICS.
XI. 8. 6. 2 Circle all values on Data suranary Swat that are more
than •*> 20% of true or established mean value. Are all
Interference Check Sample results inside of control
limita <+ am?
If no, is concentration of Al, Ca, Fe, or Mg lower 
' 
i^
than, in ICS? 
I _ 1 
— 
—
If no, flag as estirwted (J) those positive
results for which ICS recovery is bsBween 121-150%;
flag all sample results as estimated if ICS
recovery falls within 50-79%; reject (red-line)
those sample results for which ICS recovery is 1
tnan 50%; if ICS recovery is above 150%, reject
positive results only (not flagged with a "U").
Tin
001
N-98
re PROC2C3Z 
Pagt 13 o: 35
I 
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date- Fe& '«?••
Contract Laboratory Program 
ttr&e— K<-^
!S^^^^E^Ass«SSI5%"Contract 
Revision: 10 "
Compliance (Ibtal Review - Inorganics)
A-i.9.7 
Form V
( Note: Not required for Ca, Mg, K, and Na (both matricas), M, and r«
(soil only.)
\.l.9.7.l Present and complete for: each 20 samples? 
_
each matrix type? 
(_]
each cone, range (i.e. low, med., high)? 
(_J
For both AA and 1C? when both are used for same
analyte? 
t_1
If no for any of the above, flag as
estimated (J) all positive data less
than four times spiking level for
which spiked sanple was not analyzed.
If one spiked sanple was analyzed for more
than 20 samples, then first 20 samples
analyzed do not have to be flagged as
estimated (J).
A. 1.9.7.2 was field blank used for spiked sanple? 
_
If yes, flag all positive data less than
4 x spike added as estimated (J) for which
field blank was used as spiked sanple.
Matrix spike analysis should be performed on a
field blank when it is the only aqueous sample in SDC.
A. 1.9.7.3 Circle all values on Data Sunmary 9»et that are outside
control limits (7S\ to 125%). Are all recoveries
within control limits? 
[_1
If no. is sanple concentration greater than or equal
to four times spike concentration?
If yes. disregard spike recoveries for analytas
j 
whose concentrations are greater than or equal
to four tins spike added. If no, circle those
analytes on Form V for which sanple concentration
i ^ 
is less than four times the spike concentration.
• 
' 
. 
TUT 
001 1441
N-99
SSX'CWO OP5RAT2G Wt • l?£ 
Pagt 14 o: 
25
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
mtt- Fes
cartract Laboratory Program 
Nunoer: 
"HK
JHPjndix x. l: 
Data Assessment - Contract 
. 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Total tortev - Inorganics)
Art results outside the control limits (75-125%)
flagged with "N" en Form I • s and Fora VA?
aCHO?: If re. write in the Contract - Prablenvtlan -
Carpiianct section of "Data Assessnctt Narrative".
A.l.9.7.4 >ou*ous
Are any spike recoveries:
(a) less than 30\? 
^7 
[__]
<b) between 30-74%? 
± 
( _ ]
(c) between 126-150\? 
__
(d) greater than 150V 
__
If less than 30\, reject all associated aqueous
data; if between 30-74%, flag all. associated
aqueous data as estimated ( J) ; if between
126-150%, flag as estimated (J) all associated
aqueous data not flagged with a "IT; if
greater than 150%, reject (red-line) all
associated aqueous data not flagged with a "IT.
if pre-digestion spike result is rejectable
due to coefficient of correlation of M5t,
analytical spike recovery, or duplicate injections
criteria, disregard spike recovery on Form V.
Flag the associated data as estimated! J).
.1.9.7.5
Are any spike recoveries:
(a) less than 10%? 
_ 
(_J
(b) between 10-74%? 
_ 
I_]
(c) between 126-200%? 
__ 
[_1
greater than 200%? 
_ 
t_I ±1
If less than 10%. reject all associated data; if
between 10*74%, flag all associated data as estimated;
if between 126-200%, flag as estimated all associated
data was not flagged with a "IT; if greater than 200%,
reject all associated data not flagged with a "U".
001 .1442
t
N-100
»
SSAT^G FRDCSE?! 
Pas« 15 C! 
35
tit: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. i
Contract Laboratory Protftan 
Mrtter: 
K-J
Appendix A.i: Data Assessment - Contract 
Rtvision: 10
Canplianct (Ttotal Review - inorganics)
—— 
- 
- 
YES 
fc£
..1.9.B 
Farm VI (T.»h Timiisr^i
-1.9.8.1 Present and complete for: 
each 20 samples? 
[ v
each swtrix type? 
[_] 
_ 
_
roncentration range (i.e. low, wed., high)? 
[„_J 
_ 
^
both AA and 1C? when both are used for sane analyte? 
[_]
If no for any the above, flag as estimated (J)
all data >C3DL* for which duplicate sample was
not analyzed.
1. If one duplicate sample was analyzed for
nore than 20 samples, then first, 20 samples do not
have to be flagged as estimated.
2. If percent solids for soil sample and its duplicate
differ by more than 1\, prepare a Form VI for each
duplicate pair, report concentrations in Mg/L
on wet weight basis and calculate RPD or Difference
for each analyte.
A. 1.9.8.2 was field blank usad for duplicate analysis? 
_
If yes, flag all data XTOL* as estimated
(J) for which field blank was used .as duplicate.
Duplicate analysis should be performed on
a field blank when it is the only aqueous
sample in SDG.
\.l.9.8.3 Are all values within control limits (RF8 20% or
difference < *CHX)? 
I_1
If no, are all results outside the control limits 
/
flagged with an * on Form I's and VI? 
[±11
if no, write in the Contract - Problcns/Non-
COBpliance section of "Data Assessment Narrative".
1. FPD is not calculable for an analyte of the
sanpie - duplicate pair when both values are
less than
Substitute 1TL for GAOL when XDC. > CPCL.
7
TUT OOi 1443
. s
_ 
[ t^l _
N-101
GPE7AJ3C PROCZ3UBI 
Page 16 c: 25
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. 19?;
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nucaer: H«-2
Appendix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Conpiiance (Total Review - Inorganics)
YES 
ND
2. If lab duplicate result is rejectable due
to coefficient of correlation of MS\,
analytical spike recovery, or duplicate
injections criteria, do not apply precision
criteria.
1.9.8.4 Is any value for sanple duplicate pair less than CRDL*
and other value greater than or equal to 10 x •CRDL?
ACTTgi: if yes, flag the associated data as
estimated (J).
A.1.9.8.S Aauaoua
Circle all values or. Data Stannary Sheet that are:
RPD > SOV or
Difference > ± CRDL*
Is any RPD greater than S0\ where sanple and duplicate
are both greater than or equal to 5 tunes *CRDL?
Is any "difference between sanple and duplicate greater
than *C3DL_where sanple and/or duplicate is less than
5 f .-nes *CRDL?
Acrra:: if yes, flag the associated data as estimated.
A. 1.9.8.6 Scil/Sedunent
Circle all values on Data Sunnary Sheet that are:
RPD > 100\, or
Difference > 2 x CRDL*
Is any RPD (where sanple and duplicate are both
greater than or equal to S tunes *CRDL) :
> 100\? 
__ 
I_1 
_
Is any *-difference between sanple and duplicate
(where sample and/or duplicate is less than Sx-CREL) :
* Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > CPDL.
•• use absolute values of sanple and duplicate to calculate
| 
the difference.
*
i 
. 
TUT 
001 1444
\
H-102
^_ ' 
SIMCftSD CPSPMHC PROCZ3J5I 
Page 17 o: . 33
* 
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fet. :«?:
I 
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: Js<-:
Appendix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
, 
Conpiiance (Total Review - Inorganics)
j 
. _ .. _ ________ _ __________________________ _ __
22 
tC ~~
If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.
A. 1.9. 9.1 Were field duplicates analyzed? 
[ \/}
If yes, prepare a Form VI for each aqueous field
duplicate pair. Prepare a Form VI for each soil
duplicate pair, if percent solids for sample and
its duplicate differ by more than It; report
concentrations of soils in ug/1 on wet weight
basis and calculate RPDs or Difference for each
analyte.
1. DO not calculate RPD when both values are
less than IDL.
2. Flag all associated data only for field
duplicate pair.
A. 1.9. 9. 2 Is any value for .sample duplicate pair less than *CRDL
and other value greater than or equal to 10 x *CRDL? 
. _ 
(y.1 ._.
If yes, flag the associated data as estunated.
A.l.9.9.3
Circle all values on Form VI for field duplicates that are:
RPD > 50V, ^T
Difference > * CRDL*
Is any RPD greater than 50% where sanple and duplicate 
/
are both, greater than or equal to 5 times *CRDL? 
_ 
[j/.] 
_
Is any **difference between sanple and duplicate greater
than *CRDL where sample and/or duplicate is less than
5 tijnes *CRDL?
If yes. flag the associated data as esturated.
• Substitute TTr for CRDL when IDL > CRDL.
»« Use absolute values of sample and duplicate to calculate the difference.
TUT 
OO1 1.445
M-103
Page 13 o: 
2:
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. 19?'
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
'«•:-:
Affej-xltx A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (local Review - Inorganics)
" 
" 
ffiS 
&
A.I.9.9.4
Circle all values on Fora VI for field duplicates that are:
RPD >100V or
Difference > 2 x CRDL*
Is any RPD (where sample and duplicate are both
greater than 5 tunes *CRDU : 
.
>100\? 
__ 
[_ J 
_
Is any "difference between sample and duplicate
(wnere sarple and/or duplicate is less than Sx *OTL ):
>2x *CRDL? 
_ 
[_ _] 
*""
;: If yes. flag the associated data as estimated.
required for aqueous Hg and cyanide analyses.)
A. 1.9.10.1 Was one LCS prepared and analyzed for:
every 20 water samples? [ ^
every 20* solid samples? [_]
both AA and ICP when both are used for same analyte? 
[_]
If no for any of the above, prepare Telephone
Record Log and contact laboratory for sufimittal
of results of LCS. Flag as estimated (J) all
data for which LCS was not analyzed.
If only one LCS was analyzed for more than 20
samples, then first 20 samples close to LCS
do not have to be flagged as estimated.
• Substitute HZ. for CREL when HZ, > CRCL.
**Use absolute values of sample and duplicate to calculate the difference.
,-in 
001
N-104
QFESAI3G PRQCS315E 
Page 19 Q: 35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Oatt: Feb. 1??-:
Co"tract Laboratory Program 
Number: KC-2
Appendix A.i: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (lotal Review - Inorganics)
A.I. 9. 10. 2 Acueryjis ITS
Circle all LCS values outside control limits
(80 - 120V except aqueous Ag and Sb>.
Is any LCS recovery: 
less than 50V
between 50% and 79\? 
_ 
[ J^
between 121\ and 150\? 
_ 
_
greater than 150\? 
_ 
(_£tJ
Amo:: Less than 50%, reject (red-line) all data;
between 50% and 79\, flag all associated data
as estimated (J); between 121\ and 150\, flag
all positive (not flagged with a "IT) results
' as estimated; greater than 1SO\, reject all
positive results.
A.I. 9. 10. 3
1. If "Found" value of LCS is rejectable due to duplicate
injections or analytical spike recovery criteria,
regardless of LCS recovery, flag the associated data
as estimated (J).
2. If IEL of an analyte is equal to or greater than
true value of LCS, disregard the "Action" below even
though LCS is.out of control limits.
Is LCS "Found" value higher than the control 
i^
liadts on Fora VII? 
__ 
C_J _
if yes, qualify all associated positive data
as estimated.
Is LCS "Found" value lower than the Control 
'—'
limit* on Form VII? 
_ 
C_ J —
if yes, qualify all associated data as
estimated.
H-105
QPESAITC PROG3URI 
Pagt 20 01 
33
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for ttm 
Date: Tea. 199-
J°""«« Laboratory Program 
Nutter : 
»*.-2
Appendix A.i: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (ibtal Review - Inorganics)
A. 1.9. 11 
Form DC
Serial dilution analysis is required only
for initial concentrations equal to or
greater than 10 x HL.
A. 1.9.ll.l Has Serial Dilution analysis performed for: 
s*
each 20 samples? (J_] _ 
_
each matrix type? 
[_] 
_ _ ^
each concentration range (i.e. low, med.)? 
[_]
ACITO:: if no for any of the above, flag all positive
data greater than or equal to lOxIDLs as
estimated (J) for which Serial Dilution Analysis
was not performed, and summarize the deficiency
on the DFO report.
A.l.9.11.2 Was field blanX(s) used for Serial Dilution Analysis? 
_ 
I.£j _
If yes, flag all associated data 2 10 x IDL
as estimated (J).
Serial dilution analysis should be performed
on a field blank when it is the only aqueous
sample in SDG.
A. 1.9.11.3 Are results outside control limit flagged with an "F* 
.,
on Form I's and Form IX when initial concentration on 
\^
Fora IX is equal to 50 times HL or greater. 
(_] 
_ 
_
>rncNt if no, write in the contract-problem/non-
compliance section of the "Data Assessment
Narrative".
A. 1.9.11.4 Circle all values on Data Summary Sheet that are outside
control limit for initial concentrations equal to or greater
than 10 x *""*« only. Are any % difference values:
2 100%? 
_ 
t.t_]
001 1448
N-106
SIttOVPD GFE?AJ2E mxUUPZ 
Page 21 cf 
3;
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. :?=-
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
H:":-2
Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Ccrpuance (Total Review - inorganics)
Flag as estimated (J) all associated equal
to or greater than lOxULs for which percent
difference is greater than 10\ but less
than 100V Reject (red-line) all associated
sanple results equal to or greater than
lOxULs for which PD is greater than or
equal to 100%.
A.1.9.12 
T\i
A. 1.9.12.1 Are duplicate injections present in furnace raw data
(except during full Method of Standard Addition) for
each sanple analyzed by GFAA?
ACTTCT:: if no, reject the data on Fora I's for which
duplicate injections were not performed.
A. 1.9.12.2 Do the duplicate injection readings agree within 20%
Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) or Coefficient of
Variation (CV) for concentration greater than CR3L?
Was a dilution analyzed for sanple with post digestion
spike recovery less than 40%?
AcncK; if no for any of the above, flag all the
associated data as estimated (J).
A. 1.9.12.3 Is *post digestion spike recovery less than 10% or
greater than 150% for any result?
If yes, reject (red-line) the affected data if
recovery is <10%; reject data not flagged with
*U" if spike recovery is >150%.
Reject the data only if the affected sanple was
not subsequently analyzed by Method of Standard
Addition.
• Post digestion spike is not required on the pre^digestion spiked sample when predigest
jspike recovery is within control limits of 75-125% or when SR>4xSA.
N-107
CWQ OF2SAIZC PRXZDURZ
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Affendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract
Compliance (ibtal Review - Inorganics)
Pace 22 c: 
j-
Date: Fet. !?«:
Nasber: K:-:
Revision: 10
A.l.9.13
A.I.9.13.1
Dann VTIT
of starriart! VMiticn
Present? 
[
If no, is any Form I r«sult coded with "S" or a "*"? _
If y«s, vritt raqucst on Tiltphonc Record Log
and contact laboratory for sutmittal of Form VIII.
A. 1.9. 13. 2 Is coefficient of correlation for
any sarple?
less tnan 0.990 for
if yes. reject (red-line) affected data.
A.I. 9. 13. 3 Was *MSA required for any sanplt but not performed?
Is coefficient of correlation for MSA less tftan 0.995?
Are KSl calculations outside the linear range of the
calibration curve generated at the beginning of the
analytical run?
Arrra:; if y«s for any of the above, flag all
the associated data as estimated ( J) .
A. 1.9. 13. 4 Was proper quantitation procedure followed correctly
as outlined in the SO* on page E-16 through E-17?
Arrra;: if no, note exception under contract problem/
non-compliance of data assessment narrative,
or prepare a separate list.
(— _] t
I- .1
I- J
r 
[_ ] _
A. 1.9. 14.1 were any analyses performed for dissolved as well as
total analytes on the same sample(s).
_ 
L_-J —
Were any analyses performed for inorganic as well as total
(organic + inorganic) analytes on the same sample(s)? 
_
MSV is not required on LCS and prep, blank.
001 1450
N-108
Pag* 13 ci 
2 =
Title: EN-aluatior. of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. 195-
Contract Laboratory Program 
Narcber: 
m-;-2*
Appendix A.i: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
1. If yes, prepare a list comparing differences
between all dissolved (or inorganic) and
total analytes. Compute the differences as
a percent of tne total analyte only wnen
dissolved concentration is greater than CSDL
as well as total concentration.
2. Apply the following questions only if in-
organic (or dissolved ) results are (i) above
CRDL, and (ii) greater than total constituents.
3. At least one preparation blank, ICS, and LCS
should be analyzed in each analytical run.
A.I.9.14.2 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)
analyte greater than its total concentration by 
. >•
more than 10*.? 
_ 
[_ _] __
A. 1.9.14.3 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)
analyte greater than its total concentration by 
^
more than 50\? 
__ 
I. J r
ACTT3:: if more than 10\. flag both dissolved (or
inorganic) and total values as estimated (J) ;
if more than 50%, reject (red-line) the data
for both values.
A.1.9.1S 
Torn I to PC
A. 1.9.15.1 Are all the Form I through Fora DC labeled with: 
,/
Laboratory name? 
[ 1 
_ _ 
_.
Case/SSS number? 
tj^l 
_ _ _
EE* sample No.?
SDG No.?
Contract No.? 
I i^f _ 
_
Correct units?
Matrix?
ArrrcK: if no for any of the above, note under
contract problem/non-compliance section
of the "Data Assessnent Narrative".
»
TUT O01 1451
N-109
£r£3 OPESnTDC FRQCQUPZ 
Page 24 o: 
35
I 
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Dart: res. l?r
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nunber: 
Kv-2
I
Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Total Revi«v - inorganics)
A. 1.9.15.2 Do any corputation/trarscription errors exceed 10\ of
reported values on Forms I-DC for:
(NOTE: Check all forms against raw data.)
(a) all analytes analyzed by ICP? 
_ 
t ^T _
(b) all analytes analyzed by <3AA? 
_ 
t_^_1
(c) all analytes analyzed by AA Flame? _ 
[__]
(d) Mercury? 
_
(e) Cyanide? 
_ 
[f^j
Acrra:: if yes, prepare Telephone Log, contact
laboratory for corrected data and
correct errors with red pencil and
initial.
A.l.9.16 
Form I (Fieltf Bianiti -
Circle all field blank values on Data Summary Sheet
that are greater than CRDL, 2 x IDL when IDL > CRDL.
Do concentrations of field blank(s) fall below CRDL
(or 2 x IDL when IDL > CRDL) for all parameters of
associated aqueous and soil samples? 
_ 
[_]
If no. was field blank value already rejected due to
other QC criteria? 
I_)
If no. reject (except field blank results)
all associated positive sample data less
than or equal to five times the field blank
value.
TUT 
001 
14'5 2
N-110
j 
S3MZPOT CF5PAT2C PROCOjRZ 
Page 25 of 35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. 19?:-
I 
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: K-:-2
I 
Appendix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
1 
Carpiiance (Total Review - InorgarJ.cs)
A. 1.9. 17 
Ftonn X. 3P . XII (Verifir^fjfln of instMngical
A. 1.9. 17.1 is verification report present for:
Instrument Detection Limits (quarterly)? 
t *"]
ICP Interelament Correction Factors (annually)? 
[_] 
_
1CP Linear Ranges (quarterly)? 
(^]
If no, contact DPO of the lab.
A.l.9.17.2 Form X (Insrnrnerr Defection Limits) - (Note: WL is not
required for Cyanide.)
Are IDLs present for: 
all the analytes?
all the instruments used?
For both AA and 1C? when both are used for same
analyte?
Arrra;: if no for any of the above, prepare
Telephone Record Log and contact
laboratory.
Is IDL greater than CRDL-for any analyte? 
_ 
[_ I —
If yes, is the concentration on Form I of'the sample
analyzed on the instrument whose IDL exceeds CRDL, 
^*«~
greater than 5 x IDL? 
t_1 
— 
—
If no, flag as estimated all values
less than five timesEDL of the instrument
whose IDL exceeds CRDL.
H-in
STNCRTO OFSSAT2G PROCESS 
Page 26 of
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. 19?
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nunoer: K-:-2
Appendix A.I: Dita Assessnent - Contract 
Revision: 10
Corpliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
A.I. 9. 17. 3 Form XT fT J
'
Was any sample result higher than high linear range
of ICP. 
_
Was any sanple result higher than the highest
calibration standard for non-ICP paraweters? 
__ 
I _ ] _
If yes for any of the above, was the 
/
sanple diluted to obtain the result on Form I? 
( _ .] 
__ . 
\/_
if no, flag the result reported on Form I
as estimated(J).
A.I. 9. 18 
Paimir ffillftS fff
Is soil canienc. in sedijnentts) less than 50V 
_ 
[_ ]
Ar— J.': if yes, qualify as estimated all data
not previously rejected or flagged due
to other QC criteria.
I
i 
TUT 
001 1454
V 
•
N-112
i:
i:
i;
U.S. EPA - CLP
DUPLICATES
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Ce>
Lab Code:
Contract:
Case No.: 1O&1 
SAS No.: _____ 
SDG No.:
Matrix (soil/water): 1/JrtTgg. 
Level (lov/med):
\ Solids for Sample: &-o 
% Solids for Duplicate:
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): u^ f (~
°-o
IAnalyte
I Aluminum^
I Antimony'
I Arsenic ~
I Barium
I Beryllium
I Cadmium
I Calcium
I Chromium
I Cobalt,_~
I Copper
I Iron
I Lead
IMagnesium
j Manganese
IMercury
INiclcel —
IPotassIS
I Selenium
1 Silver ~
I Sodium
I Thallium__
IVanadium'
IZinc
1 cyanide_|
I______I
Control
Limit
Sample (S)
sg-oo
A.OO
300
HO OOP, oo
1*4.00
St. 00
Se^.oo
3 8 7oo.
1 o . o I-*
/ ,0 0
1.O 0
ao
It.
C| | Duplicate (0) C]
Q
M
FORM VI - IN
TUT OO1
r/88
N-113
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page / of 3
Tide:
Case*
SDG#
Contractor
Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Appendix A. 1: Data Assessment - Contract
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
900731 
Site 
Tutu Well Site
Dede 
Lab 
Ceimic
Geraghty & Miller 
Reviewer Donna Lesch
Date:
Number:
Revision:
Matrix:
Feb. 1990
HW-2
10
Soil
Water 
X
Other
A.2.1 
The case description and exceptions, if any, are noted below with reason(s) for
rejection or qualification as estimated values(s) J.
This data package includes the analysis of the samples for SDG Dede. These
samples originated from St. Thomas on the 24, 25. 26 and 27 of September, 1990.
There are seventeen low level water samples for metals analysis including one
duplicate and one matrix spike QC sample.___________________
Cyanide concentration values for samples Devcon I. Devcon in, Rodriguez (P),
Rodriguez (PD), and VTHA m are flagged "J" because the pH of the samples was
less than 12.__________________________________
Thallium concentration values for all samples are flagged "R" because the matrix
spike recovery is less than 30% (10.5%). Aluminum, Lead and Selenium____
concentration values are flagged as estimated ("J') because the spike_______
recoveries are between 30-74% (Al 70.6%. Pb 72.0%, Se 54.0%).________
The post digestion spike recoveries are low for Selenium and Thallium in all
I 
samples. These concentration values are already qualified due to poor______
recovery in the matrix spike. 
. .., ,
——————i———————————£————————————————————————— 
TIJT 
001 
14o6
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
N-114
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page Z of 3
Title:
Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Appendix A. 1: Data Assessment - Contract
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
Date:
Number:
Revision:
Feb. 1990
HW-2
10
A. 2.1 
(continuation)
For sample Smith, the Selenium concentration value is qualified with "R" _______
because the coefficient of correlation for the Method of Standard Additions
is less than 0.990. This qualifier supercedes all others.
The sample Steele was used for the sample duplicate analysis. The % Difference
is out for QC limits for Aluminum. Chromium, and Lead, therefore all sample
data are qualified with "J" for all positive values and "UJ" for all non-detccts.
The % Difference for Aluminum, Chromium, and Lead are also out of QC limits in
the field duplicate; the sample concentration values are already qualified for
these analytes.
One CRDL standard has several metals with recoveries out of control limits
(80-120 % recovery). The CRI run on 10/11 has the following deficiencies:
_________________ Metal _____________ % Recovery
_____________ Antimony ___________ 49.2
_____________ Beryllium ___________ 130.0
_____________ Cobalt ____________ 121.0
Silver 
60.0
Zinc 
135.0
T l n
TU] 
ooi 
1457
All samples are associated with the above deficiences. All Antimony __
concentration values are rejected because the recovery is less than 50%. _
MTI r FP
N-115
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page 3
Title:
Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
Date:
Number:
Revision:
Feb. 1990
HW-2
10
-
Positive hits for Cobalt. Beryllium and Zinc are qualified with a "J". Silver
concentration values are qualified "J" for positive hits and "UJ" for non-detects.
In the ICP serial dilution analysis, the initial concentration of Aluminum is
greater than 10 times the IDL and the % Difference is out of QC limits. As a
result, all Aluminum concentration values are qualified with "J".________
A.2.2 
Contract Problems/Non Compliance:______________________
There were 2-hours and six minutes between independent check samples for the
ICAP run on October 11, 1990. This is six minutes greater than the two hour
required maximum._______________________________
Devcon I, Devcon in, Rodriguez (P). Rodriguez (PD), and VIHA in were not
correctly preserved for Cyanide._______________________
MMB Reviewer: 
Date:
Signature
Contractor Reviewer: lAjtiMAJL^ M~ J&6*JL> 
Date: 
<*/
Signature
Verified by:
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-116
Title:
S1A1E&RD OFD*AI2C WULUJPZ
Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program
A. 2: Data Assessment Narrative
Page 
30 c: 
3;
Date: 
Feb. :?'-:
Nianber: 
H:-:-:
Revision: 
10
A. 2.2 Contract-Problars/Non-Cotpiiance
TUT 
OO1 1459
Revi«w«rt
.Contractor Revi
Signature
V 
) 
/I/I
• 
/yL> rV(AAAs /' ''
Signature
Verified by:
DMier 
oil 07
n- ii/
Table 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results, September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
Page I of
Sample Identification:
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloro methane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1.1-Dkhloroethene
1 . 1 -Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethene (total)
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1.1.1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dkhloropropane
cis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dtbromochloromethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benzeoe
trans- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Bromoforro
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrmchloroethene
1 , 1 ,2.2-Tetrmchloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethytbenzene
Styreoe
Total Xylenet
Tentatively Identified VOCs
Ethane, 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloro- 1,2, 2-trifluoro
Unknown
Propane-2-Metho*y.2-Methyl
Dichlorobemeoe iaomer
731-01
Devcon I
2UJ
2U
2U
2UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 U
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
1 U
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
731-02
Devcon III
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
8UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 U
1 UJ
1 U
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1UJ
1 U
1 UJ
1 U
1 UJ
1 U
2JN
731-03
Rodriguez (P)
2UJ
2 U
2U
2UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 U
1 UJ
1UJ
R
1UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
1 U
1UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ.
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1UJ
1UJ
1UJ
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
UN
731-04
Rodriguez (PD)
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
R
1UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1UJ
1 UJ
1UJ
1UJ
2UJ
R
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
7314)5
9/24
Trip Blank
2 U
2U
2U
2U
25J
I2J
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
R
IUJ
IUJ
R
1 U
1 UJ
1 U
1 UJ
IUJ
I UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
2UJ
R
IUJ
IUJ
I U
1 UJ
1 U
1 UJ
8
5JN
731-06
Dede 
"-
2 U
2 U
2 U
2 U
2UJ
R
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
IUJ
R
I U
IUJ
I U
IUJ
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
2UJ
R
IUJ
IUJ
1 U
1 UJ
I U
IUJ
I U
All concentration* are reported in raicrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value is estimated.
U - Compound is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
N - Compound i* a tentatively identified compound.
TUT
OO.1 
1460
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-118
Table 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling
Sample Identification:
Volatile Organic Compound* (VOC«)
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroetfaane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulflde
I.l-Dichloroethene
l.l-Dichloroethane
1.2-Dichloroethene (total)
Chloroform
1,2-Dkhloroethaae
2-Butanone
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cii- 1 .3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroetheoe
Oibromochloromethane
, 1 ,2-Trkhloroethane
s
Benzene
trans-1 ,3-Dkhloropropene
DroiDOiorm
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total Xylenea
Tentatively Identified VOC»
Ethane. 1 . 1 ,2-Trichloro- 1 .2, 2-trifluoro
Unknown
Propane,2-Methoxy-2-raethyl
Oichlorobenzeoe isomer
Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
731-07
Dench
1 J
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
UJ
6JN
731-08
Smith
25U
25U
25U
25U
12 UJ
25 UJ
12 UJ
12 UJ
12 U
58
12 U
12 UJ
25 UJ
12 U
12 U
25 UJ
12 U
12 U
12 U
20
12 U
12 U
12 U
R
12 UJ
25 UJ
25 UJ
330 J
12 UJ
12 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
12 U
88 JN
731-09
Stede
17 UJ
17 UJ
17 UJ
17 UJ
140 UJ
R
8UJ
8UJ
SU
120
8UJ
8UJ
R
8UJ
8U
17 UJ
SU
8U
8UJ
48
8U
8U
8U
8UJ
8UJ
17 UJ
R
130 J
8UJ
8U
8U
8U
8UJ
8UJ
42 JN
731-10
9/25
Trip Blank
2 U
2 U
2U
2U
34J
42 J
IUJ
I UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
IUJ
IUJ
R
IUJ
1 UJ
R
1 U
1 UJ
1U
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
UJ
UJ
J
UJ
U
UJ
7
3JN
7JN
1 JN
731-11
Hartman II
2UJ
2 U
2U
2UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
I U J
1 UJ
5J
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
IUJ
i yj
2UJ
1 U
1 UJ
1 UJ
i j
IUJ
IUJ
IUJ
IUJ
IUJ
2UJ
R
7J
UJ
UJ
UJ
U
U
U
3JN
P.ge-Zof J3
731-12
HartraaoUI
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
3UJ
R
IUJ
IUJ
I U
2
IUJ
IUJ
R
1 UJ
I U
2UI
I U
I U
IUJ
I U
IU
IU
I U
1 UJ
IUJ
2UJ
R
J
UJ
U
U
U
UJ
UJ
4JN
All concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value if estimated.
U - Compound is not detected.
R - Value it rejected.
- Compound is a tentatively identified compound.
TUT
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
I 'able 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
PageOot (.5
Sample Identification:
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1
Chloromethane
iromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
fcthylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulflde
,1-Dichloroediene
i , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dkhloroethene (total)
Chloroform
i ,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
.1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
iromodichloromethane
i ,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
'richloroethene
Oibromochloromethane
1 . 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
lenzene
irans- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Bromoform
-Methyl-2-Pentanone
4.-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
, 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
I'oluene
Chlorobenzene
Uhylbenzene
otyreae
Total Xylenea
'entativelv Identified VOCs
Ethane, 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloro- 1 ,2.2-trifluoro
'Inknown
ropane, 2-Methoxy-2-methyl
731-13
Four Winds II
5UJ
5UJ
5UJ
5UJ
14 UJ
R
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
75 J
2UJ
2UJ
R
2UJ
2UJ
5UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
6J
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
5UJ
R
25J
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
15 JN
731-14
Tutu
(Four Winds II
Replicate)
5UJ
5UJ
5UJ
5UJ
10 UJ
R
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
61 J
2UJ
2UJ
R
2UJ
2UJ
5UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
4J
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
5UJ
R
18 J
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
7.5JN
731-15
Harvey
100 U
100 U
100 UJ
100U
150 UJ
R
50 UJ
50 UJ
SOU
50 UJ
SOU
50 UJ
R
SOU
sou
100 UJ
50 UJ
SOU
50 UJ
SOU
SOU
sou
sou
sou
50 UJ
100 UJ
R
890 J
50 UJ
SOU
SOU
SOU
SOU
50 UJ
731-16
Leonard
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
R
1UJ
1UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
731-17
VIHA HI
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
I U
1 U
3J
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 U
2UJ
1 U
I U
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1UJ
1 U
1 U
I U
1 UJ
1UJ
UN
731-18
9/26
Trip Blank
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
24J
4J
1 UJ
1 UJ
I U
I U
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 U
2UJ
I U
1 U
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 UJ
(UJ
7JN
All concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
- Value is estimated.
J - Compound is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
1- Compound is a tentatively identified compound.
TUT 
,OOi
H-*>:•.?
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
.ble 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
"•raple Identification:
ilati'- Organic Compounds (VOCs)
rhlorbwtthane
I oraomethme
I nyl Chloride
rhloroethane
i cthylene Chloride
1 .clone
Carbon DUulfide
1-DichloToethene
1-Dichloroethane
1 .2-Dichloroetbene (total)
Uoroform
2-DichloToethane
2-Autanone
1 J -Tricnloroetnane
then Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
omodichloromethane
Z-Dirhlompfnpanr
-a- 1 ,3-Dicbioropropene
ichloroetbene
bromocnloroinethane
1.1 .2-Trichloroethane
IE
m^Dfchforopropene
Bromoform
Vlethyl-2-Pentanone
Jexanone
-TrtTmr.MnTftfttl~n~
1 .2.2-Tettachloroethane
•bene
ChloTobenzene
^ylfaeozcae
/rene
Total Xytene*
Tttativelv Identified VOCs
<_dume, 1 , 1 ,2-Tricbioro- i^L3. -trifluoro
Unknown
731-19
Eglinll
10 UJ
10 UJ
10 UJ
10 UJ
SUJ
R
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
120 J
SUJ
SUJ
R
SUJ
SUJ
10 UJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
22J
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
10 UJ
*
71 J
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
5VJ
SUJ
SUJ
220 JN
731-20
Eplin 111
10 UJ
10 UJ
10 UJ
10 UJ
10 UJ
22 J
SUJ
SUJ
SU
S2J
SU
SUJ
R
SU
SU
10 UJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
14
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
. 10 UJ
R
44 J
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
SUJ
SJN
AH concentration* are icpuited in nicrognns per liter (ug/L).
' Value is estimated.
• Compound M not detectod.
R - Value a rejected.
- Compound is • Mutati^cty ricirtined cuutauuud.
7/JT
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
ITable 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
Page^of / 3
Sample Identification:
Semivoiatile Organic
Compounds (SVOCi)
1
Phenol
>is(2-Chloroethyl)Ether
2-Chlorophenol
I
I ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dkhlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
' ,2-Dichlorobenzeae
'-Methylpheaol
N-Nitroso-Di-fl-Propylamine
, '{exachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isopborone
""-Nitrophenol
,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic Acid
Ss(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
,4-Dichlorophcnol
1 ,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
-Chloroaniline
Hexachlorobuudiene
'-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
-Methylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
M.o-Trichlorophenol
,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
^•Nitroanilioe
'imethyl Phthalate
Acenapbthylene
"" ,6-Dinitrotoiuene
•Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
"" 4-Dinitrophenol
•Nkrophenol
Dibenzofurmo
1 4-Dinitrotoliieae
iethylphthalate
4-Chloropheny 1 -phenylecher
"uorene
Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
" •Nitrosodiphenylamine
Bromopheayl-phenylcther
HexachJorobenzene
731-01
Devcon 1
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-02
Devcon III
10 U
10 U 
•
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-03
Rodriguez (P)
10U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-04
Rodriguez (PD)
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-06
Dede
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
tou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-07
Dench
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
1 concentrations are reported in micrograros per liter (ug/L).
- Compound is not detected.
1464
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results, September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
Page<«of 13
••nple Identification:
nivolatile Organic
omp^ 
t (SVOCs)
itachloTophenol
henanthrene
-thraceoe
n-Butylphthalate
luoranthene
"ene
ylbenzylphthalate
.3-Dichlorobenzidine
-nzo(a)Anthraccne
ryiene
i»(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate
»
; n-Octyl Phthalate
izo(b)Fluormnlhene
tenzo(k)Ruoranthene
— izo(a)Pyrene
eao<l,2,3-cd)PyT«ae
)tbenz(a,h)Anthracene
'-TZo(g,h,i)Perylene
itativelv Identified SVOCs
Jo tentatively identified compounds found.
731-01
Devcon 1
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-02
Devcon III
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-03
Rodriguez (P)
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
tou
10 U
731-04
Rodriguez (PD)
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-06
Dede
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-07
Dench
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
co^^ jahooi are reported in micrograras per liter (ug/L).
J - Compound is not detected.
rur
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
1 
N-i^J
i able 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900731
I
iraple Identification:
:mivolatile Organic
Compound* (SVOCs)
(
icnol
tS(2-Chlorocthyl)Ether
2-Chlorophenol
3-Dichlorobenzene
> ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
2-Dichlorobenzene
- Methylphenol
N -Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine
:xachloroethane
-. . itrobenzeae
Isopborone
Nitrophenol
- .4-Diraethylphcnol
Benzoic Acid
s{2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
_ .4-Dichloropbenol
1 ,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
tphthalene
. Chloroamline
Hexachlorobutadieae
Chloro-3-Methylphenol
. Mcthylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocydopentadiene
4,6-Trichlorophenol
-,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-CKlorooaphthalene
Nitroaniline
- imethyl Phthalate
AccMphthylene
6-Dinitrotoluene
- Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
4-Dinitrophenol
. Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
4-Dinitrotoluene
-iethylphthalate
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether
uorcne
. Nitroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenol
-Nitrosodiphenylamine
. Brotnophenyl-phenylether
Hexachlorobenzene
731-08
Smith
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
tou
10 U
10 U
731-09
Steele
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 UJ
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
50 UJ
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-11
Hart man 11
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
IOU
731-12
Hartman III
IOU
IOU
IOU
I O U
IOU
10 U
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
Page 7 of /3
731-13
Four Winds II
_____________________ '^/
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU 
-^
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
. 
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
I II concentrations are reported in raicrograms per liter (ug/L). 
TUT 
a, , •<
3 - Value is estimated. 
4 6 6
• '-Compound is not detected.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
. Page* of
able 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900731
.cimple Identification:
I imiv^iatile Organic
Conv 
«lt (SVOCs)
I
mtachlorophenol
henanthreae
Anthracene
I
i-o-Butylphthalate
luoranthene
Pyrene
I
utylbeazylphthalate
,3-Dtchlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)Anthracene
I
hrytene
s(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
|
enzo(b)Fluoranthene
enzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
|
deno( 1 ,2,3-cd)Pyrene
ibenz(a.b)Anthracene
Beozo(glh,i)Perylene
entativelv Identified SVOCs
11 o tentatively identified compounds found.
731-08
Smith
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
tou
10 U
10 U
731-09
Steele
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-11
Hartman II
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-12
Hanman UI
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-13
Four Winds (I
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
' 11 
entrations are reported in micrograras per liter (ug/L).
- Vtatfe is estimated.
U - Compound is not detected.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
--.
Pagelof 13
1 able 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
.caraple Identification:
I eraivolatile Organic
Compounds (SVOCs)
1 heooi
bi$(2-Chloroethyl)Ether
I -Chiorophenol
1 ,3-Dkhlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
I
enzyl Alcohol
.2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
(
-Nhroso-Di-n-Propylamine
exachloroetnane
Nitrobenzene
I
ophorone
Nkropheaol
2 .4-Diraethy Iphenol
I
enzoic Acid
s(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
2 ,4-Dichlorophenol
.2,4-Trkhlorobenzene
aphthalene
4-Chloroaniluw
exachlorobutadiene
-Chloro-3-Methylpheool
2-Methylnapothalene
euchlorocyclopentadiene
,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.4,5-Trichlorophenol
. -Chloronaphthalene
| -Nitroaniline
Dimethyl Phthalate
cenaphthylene
,6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitrouuline
cenaphtheae
,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nkrophenol
ibeazofuran
.4-Diakrotoluene
Diethylpbthalate
I
-CUoropheayl-phenylether
luorene
4-Nitroaniline
|
6-DinJtro-2-Methylphenol
-NitRModiphenyUmine
4-Brooophenyl-phenylethcr
731-14
Tutu
(Four Winds 11
Replicate)
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
731-15
Harvey
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
731-16
Leonard
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
731-17
VIHA III
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
731-19
Eglinll
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
731-20
Eglin III
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
11 concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
u - Compound is not detected.
OO 1
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
*tu 
.
Psgetfof/J
'able 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
Sample Identification:
I iemivoiatile Organic
Vo 
;nds (SVOCs)
riexachlorobenzene
Pentacnlorophenol
1 henanthrene
Anthracene
Di-n-Butylphthalate
Iluorantheoe
yrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
1 .3-Dichlorobenzidine
^>enzo(a)Anthracene
Chrysene
Ls(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate
i-n-Octyl Phthalate
Benzo<b)Fluoranthene
1 :nzo(k)Fluoranthene
l>enzo(a)Pyrene
Indeno(1.2,3-cd)Pyrene
t^a.h) Anthracene
g,h,i)Perylene
r
ay 
dv Identified SVOCs
o htatatively identified compounds found.
All concentrations are reported in micrograms
I - Compound is not detected.
1
1
1
1
1
1
i "
i
731-14
Tutu
(Four Winds II
Replicate)
10 U
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
per liter (ug/L).
731-15
Harvey
10 U
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
731-16 
731-17 
731-19
Leonard 
VIHA III 
Eglin II
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
SOU 
SOU 
SOU
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
20 U 
20 U 
20 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
10 U 
10 U 
10 U
T U T
731-20
Eglin IU
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
001 
J 469
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
| Table 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results, September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
Sample Identification:
1 Pesticide/PCBs
alpha-BHC
(
beta-BHC
delU-BHC
gamma-BHC
I
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Heptachlor epoude
Endowilfan I
Dieldrin
4,4-DDE
< Eadrin
Endoaulfan II
4,4-DDD
Endosulfan sulfate
1,4-DDT
Methoxychlor
indrin ketone
ilpha-Chlordane
gamma -Chlordane
Touphene
\roclor-10I6
Aroclor-1221
\roclor-l232
; \roclor-l 242
Araclor-1248
Vroclor-1254
taxlor-1260
731-01
Devcon 1
0.05 U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.10U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-02
Devcon HI
0.05 U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U •
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-03
Rodriguez (P)
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 
U
0.50-U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-04
Rodriguez (PD)
0.05 U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
- 731-06
Dede
0.05 U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
Page//ofl3
731-07
Dench
0.05 U 
^
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
0.05 
U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 
U
0.50 U
0.50 U 
^-*
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
All concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Compound is not detected.
i'U r 
001
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-128
1 'able 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling RCSL! j, September 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900731
Sample Identification:
I 'esticide/PCBs
alpbV^flC
I
eu-BHC
elta-BHC
gamma-BHC
I
leptachlor
Jdhn
Heptachlor epoxide
I
^ndotulfan I
>ieldrin
4,4-DDE
~ndrin
ndosulfan II
4,4-DDD
"odosulfan sulfate
,4-DDT
Methoxychlor
"ndrin ketone
pha-Chlordane
gamroa-Chlordane
"oxaphene
roclor-1016
Aroclor-1221
rr 
1232
roewf-1242
Arocior-1248
• roclor-1254
roclor-1260
731-08
Smith
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
0.10U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0,50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-09
Steele
0.05 U
0.05U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O . I O U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-11
Hartman II
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0. 10 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O . I O U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-12
Hartman III
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
Pagel2ofl3
731-13
Four Winds II
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
All concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
- Compound is not detected.
TUT 
OOi 14/1
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
.. ...
PigelUofO
1 Table 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results, September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
Sample Identification:
| Pesticide/PCBi
' alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
| delta-BHC
' ganuna-BHC
Heptachlor
1 Aldrin
' Heptachlor ecocide
Endosulfan I
Dieldrin
4,4-DDE
Endrin
Endosulfan H
4,4-DDD
Endosulfan suifate
4.4-DDT
- Methoxychlor
Endrin ketone
alpba-Chlotdane
garoma-Chlordane
Toxapneoe
Aroclor-1016
Aroclor-1221
Arocior-1232
Aroclor-1242
Arodor-1248
Aroclor-1254
\roclor-1260
731-14
Tutu
(Four Winds II
Replicate)
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
0.10U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-15
Harvey
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-16
Leonard
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-17
VIHA III
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-19
Eglinll
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
731-20
Eglinlll
^
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
All concentrations are reported in raicrograms per liter (ug/L).
'J - Compound is not detected.
00 j
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Table 2. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results, September 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900731
Page I of 3
Sample Identification:
Inorganic Analyses
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
731-01
Dcvcon I
139 BJ
R
3 U
21 B
5 BJ
3 U
41600
4 UJ
18 U
4 U
34 B
8.2 J
39500
241
0.2 U
13 B
2970 B
16 BJ
7 UJ
330000
R
32 B
6 BJ
5 UJ
731-02
Devcon III
411 J
R
3 U
IS B
4 BJ
3 U
43800
4 UJ
59 J
53
40 B
11.8 J
41000
91
0.2 U
41
2050 B
1.4 BJ
7 UJ
384000
R
20 B
6 BJ
5 UJ
731-03
Rodriguez (P)
58 BJ
R
3 U
8 B
3 BJ
3 U
40000
14 J
34 BJ
22 B
SO B
2 BJ
38700
122
0.2 U
22 B
1610 
B
1 UJ
7 UJ
281000
R
19 B
17 BJ
21 J
731-04
Rodriguez (PD)
431 J
R
3 U
3 U
3 BJ
3 U
47400
40 J
39 BJ
29
45 B
12.1 J
41400
129
0.2 U
39 B
1730 
B
1 UJ
7 UJ
298000
R
8 B
16 BJ
5 UJ
731-06
Dede
136 BJ
R
3 U
8 B
3 BJ
5
23500
16 J
60 J
32
43 B
3.7 J
25600
201
0.2 U
II U
2000 B
1 UJ
7 UJ
324000
R
21 B
12 BJ
5 U
731-07
Dench
278 J
R
3 U
19 B
4 BJ
3 B
24200
22 J
44 BJ
52
163
7.8 J
25000
545
0.2 U
73
1690 
B
1 UJ
7 UJ
328000
R
28 B
41 J
6.8 B
731-08
Smith
234 J
R
3 U
15 B
3 BJ
3 U
50200
14 J
18 U
13 B
158
10.9 
J
45500
41
0.2 U
57
1540 
B
R
7 UJ
410000
R
5 U
179 J
S U
731 09
Stuele
492 J
R
3 U
27 B
3 BJ
4 B
44000
9 BJ
55 J
21 B
26 B
13.2 
J
40500
23
0.2 U
45
1180 
B
1.4 BJ
7 UJ
313000
R
27 B
12 BJ
63 B
All concentrations are reported in rakrograms per liter (ug/L).
J • Value u estimated.
U - Analyte is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
B - Value is between instrument detection limit and contract required detection limk.
iru.
GERAGHTY & MILLfcK, INC
Table 2. Tutu Residential WeUt Sampling Reiulli, September 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900731
Page 2 of 3
Sample Identification:
Inorganic Analyaea
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Mangancae
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
731-11
Hartman 2
269 J
R
3 U
12 B
3 BJ
8
38100
II J
30 BJ
34
23 B
10.4 I
33400
2 U
0.2 U
95
1040 B
1.6 BI
7 UJ
285000
R
52
9 BJ
5 U
731-12
Hartman 3
278 J
R
3 U
15 B
4 BJ
3 U
41100
II J
25 BJ
30
31 B
1.8 BJ
28300
1 R
J 
O
0.2 U
52
1690 B
1 UJ
7 UJ
217000
R
124
13 BJ
5 U
731-13
Four Wind* II
162 BJ
R
3 U
15 B
3 BJ
5
46100
32 J
29 BJ
37
55 B
8 J
34000
0.2 U
36 B
2190 
B
1.2 BJ
7 UJ
215000
R
75
85 J
8.5 B
731-14 
731-15
Tutu 
Harvey
(Four Winds II
Replicate)
304 J
R
3 U
II B
4 BJ
6
54300
14 J
43 BJ
5 B
57 B
8.7 J
38800
31
0.2 U
44
2060 B
1 UJ
7 UJ
249000
R
83
88 J
5 U
1280 J
R
3 U
35 B
3 BJ
3 U
53700
18 J
38 BJ
59
3360
32 6 J
46200
191
0.2 U
58
2000 B
1.2 BJ
II J
233000
R
59
248 J
7.4 B
731-16
Leonard
93 BJ
R
3 U
II B
3 BJ
3 U
38300
15 J
37 BJ
31
37 BJ
1.8 BJ
24400
2 U
0.2 U
11 U
1210 B
1.4 BJ
17 J
318000
R
135
7 BJ
6.3 B
731-17
VIHA III
182 BJ
R
3 U
14 B
3 BJ
3 U
43300
5 BJ
18 U
29
149
3.7 J
28000
II B
0.2 U
43
1030 B
I.S BJ
7 UJ
162000
R
33 B
17 BJ
8 BJ
All concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value is estimated.
U - Analyte U not detected.
R • Value is rejected.
B - Value is between instrument detection limk and contract required detection limit.
t ^ / f r r
GERAGHTY & MII.LLR. INC
TOO
Table 2. Tutu Residential Welll Sampling Remits, September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900731
Page 3 of.
Sample Identification:
Inorganic Analyse*
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
731-19
Eglinll
69 BJ
R
3 U
23 B
3 BJ
I I
47900
17 J
32 BJ
36
86 B
2.1 BJ
35400
8 B
0.2 U
67
1620 B
1.2 BJ
7 UJ
247000
R
47 B
75 J
6.8 B
731-20
Eglin HI
1S6 BJ
R
3 U
57 B
4 BJ
3 U
81400
10 J
30 BJ
9 B
56 B
1 UJ
54600
53
0.2 U
24 B
2250 B
1.2 BJ
18 J
398000
R
9 B
49 J
7.4 B
CO
no
All concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value is estimated.
U • Analyte is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
B - Value is between instrument detection limit and contract required detection limit.
SZ.t/T 
TOO in.I.
GERAGHTY & MILLfcR. INC
N-133
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY REPORT
for the
TUTU WELLS SITE
September 1990 Quarterly Sampling
USEPA REGION II
Standard Operating Procedures HW-2 and HW-6
for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Organic and Inorganic
Data Review
Sample Delivery Group 900770 (VIHA I)
January 1991
Prepared for
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
International Group
290 Vincent Avenue
Hackensack, New Jersey 07601
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
N-134
-- 
SDMZftPD OFSyCTC HWJLLJJPi 
Pace 30 c: 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Tea. l"?v.
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nimber: 
Hi-:-2
Afpendix A. 2: Data Assessment Narrative 
Revision: 10
A. 2.2 Contract-Problars/Tton-Ccrpliance
MC Reviewer:___________________________ Date:.
Signature
j x^ vContractor Reviewer; l A J l H A A A j t ^ ' / ^ L ^ . D a t e : a/ol^l
1 
Signature
Verified
I 
Table!. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900770
r'age / of
Sample Identification:
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,1-DicbJoroethene
1.1-Dkhloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethene (total)
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1 . 1 . 1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1 ,3-Dichloiopropene
Trichlorbethene
Dibromochlorometnane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
trana-1 .3-Dichloropropene
Bromoforra
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetnchloroethene
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorooeozene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total Xylcaea
Tenwivelv Identified VOCs
Ethane. 1 . 1 ,2-Trichloro- 1 ,2.2 trifluoro
Unknown
Propaae.2-Methoxy-2-raethyl
C5H12 isomer
Aliphatic hydrocarbon
C3-Benzene iaotner
C6H 12 isomer
C9H12 isomer
770-01
Bryan
2U
2U
2U
2U
2UJ
R
IUJ
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 UJ
R
1 U
1 U
2UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 U
770-02
Dimitri
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
R
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
770-03
Matthias
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
9UJ
R
IUJ
IUJ
1 U
22
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 U
2UJ
1 U
1U
1 UJ
11
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 UJ
1 U
2UJ
R
120 J
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
1 UJ
IUJ
16 JN
770-04
Ramsey
4UJ
4UJ
4UJ
4UJ
17 UJ
R
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
R
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
4UJ
R
3J
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2JN
770-05
10/01
Trip Blank
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
13 J
6J
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
R
I U J
1 UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
IUJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
IUJ
I UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 JN
770-06
Eglinl
-««
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
68 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
10 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
32 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
3JN
6JN
All concentration* are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value it estimated.
U - Compound is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
N - Compound is a tentatively identified compound.
Tur ooi i
/S
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
I
N-136
fable I Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900770
. Sample Identification:
Vc 
; Organic Compound! (VOCt)
~hlorometnane
Bromoraethane
| Vinyl Chloride
1 Jhloroethane
Methylene Chloride
| Acetone
Carbon Ditulfide
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
Chloroform
1 ,2-DichloToethane
2-Butanone
1,1.1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Broraodichloromethane
1 .2-DichJoropropane
oil- 1 ,3-Dichloropropcne
Trichloroethene
Di' 
lochloromethane
1 , hx<Trichloroethane
Benzene
trans- 1 ,3-Dichloropropeoe
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 . 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styreae
Total Xylenes
Tentatively Identified VOCi
770-07
LaPlace
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
140 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
24 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
98 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
770-08
Tillet
R
R
17 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
280 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
56 J
R
R
32 J
R
R
R
R
120 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
770-09
Tillet-D
(Replicate)
R
R
12 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
270 J
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
47 J
R
R
26 J
R
R
R
R
981
R
R
R
R
R
R
770-10
H2O
Blank
Tutu
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
R
1UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
IUJ
1 UJ
IUJ
IUJ
IUJ
IUJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
IUJ
770-11
10/02
Trip Blank
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
14 J
7J
1 UJ
1 UJ
I W
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
770-12
Gassett
(Hartmanl)
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
IUJ
R
IUJ
IUJ
1U
1 U
1U
IUJ
R
1 UJ
1 U
2UJ
1U
1 U
1U
1U
1U
IUJ
• 
1 U
IUJ
1 UJ
IUJ
R
IUJ
1 UJ
1U
I U
1U
IUJ
IUJ
Ethane, 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2.2-trifluoro
Unknown
Propane.2-Methoxy-2-methyl
CSH12 isoroer
Aliphatic hydrocarbon
C3-Benzene isomer
C6H12 isoraer
C9H12 isomer
130 JN
21 JN
240 JN
121 JN
6JN
6JN
35 JN
6JN
39 JN
270 JN
230 JN
AlK^ocentratkxu are reported in micrognra* per liter (ug/L).
J - Value is estimated.
U - Compound is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
N - Compound is a tentativdy identified compound.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
3JN
2JN
TIT
OO.1 
1479
ragejoi
Table 1. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results, September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900770
1 .ample Identification:
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1 ^hloromethane
dromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
I "hloroechane
* Mcthylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1.1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dkhloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethene (total)
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1.1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1 , 3-D ichloropropene
Tricaloroethene
Dibromochloromethaoe
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
trana- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Broraoform
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 .2.2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total Xylenet
Tentatively Identified VOCs
770-13
10/03
Trip Blank
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
IUJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
1 UJ
770-14
V1HAI
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
R
IUJ
IUJ
IUJ
6J
IUJ
IUJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 UJ
IUJ
IUJ
I U J
IUJ
IUJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
51
1 UJ
1 UJ
I U J
IUJ
IUJ
IUJ
770-15
9/27
Trip Blank
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
2UJ
16 J
R
IUJ
1 UJ
I U
1 U
I U
IUJ
R
1 UJ
1 U
2UJ
1 U
1 U
1 U
I U
I U
1 UJ
I U
1 UJ
1 UJ
2UJ
R
1 UJ
1 UJ
1 U
1 U
I U
IUJ
1 UJ
Ethane, 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoro
Unknown
Propane,2-Methoxy-2-methyl
CSH12 isomer
Aliphatic hydrocarbon
C3-Benzene iaomer
C6H12 isoraer
C9H12 isomer
1.5 JN
All concentrations are reported in raicrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value is earimatBd.
U - Compound is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
N - Compound is a tentatively identified compound.
TUT
001
1480
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
• • 
> W*J
Table 1. Tutu Resident^ Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900770
Sample Identification:
Serruvolatile Organic
"orapounds (SVOCs)
"Phenol
bis(2-Chloroethyl)Etber
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2-Methylphenol
N -Nitroso-Di-n-Propylamine
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Isophoroae
2-Nitrophenoi
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Benzoic Acid
bis(2 -C hloroethoxy ) Met bane
2.4-Dichlorophenoi
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroaniiine
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
Methylnaphthalene
rlexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2.4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthylene
2.6-Dinitrotoluene
3-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofuran
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylphthalate
4-Chloropbenyl-phenylether
Fluorene
4-Nttroamline
4,6-Dinitro-2-Methylphenoi
N-Nitrofodiphenylaraine
4-Bromophenyl-pheaylether
Heuchlorobenzene
770-01
Bryan
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
770-02
Dimitn
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
770X53
Matthias
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 -U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
770-04
Ramsey
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
u>u
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
tou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
770-06
EglinI
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
Page "»off
770-07
UPUce
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
tou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 UJ
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
sou
sou
10 U
10 U
10 U
concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value is estimated.
U - Compound is not detected.
N - Compound is a tentatively identified compound.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
TUT 
001
I
" -— PJ— 
— - 
1
Table 1. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900770
Sample Identification:
Semivolatilie Organic
Compounds (SVOCs)
PcMttstfJuocophcoot
Pbeoanthrene
Anthracene
Dt-D-Butylphthalate
Fluorentoene
Pyrene
ButyfeenzylpMhaUte
3.3-DicUorobenzidine
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Chiysene
bi»(2-EthylbMyl)Phthalate
Di-o-Octyl Phthalate
Benxo(b)Fluorantbene
Benzo(k)Fluorattthene
Benxo(a)Pyrene
lndeno(l,2.3<d)Pyrene
Dfeenz(a.h)Anthraceoe
Benxo(f,h,i)Peryleoe
Ttfrtttivelv Identified SVOCs
Unknown
Dsniens. peotachlorofluoro-
770-01
Bryaa
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
770-02
Dimkri
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
770-03
Matthias
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
4JN
770-04
Ramsey
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
idu
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
770-06
Eglinl
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
12 JN
770-07
LaPlace 
,
. ^
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
42 JN
J
— «^
All concentrations are reported in mkrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value ia itttimatitil
U - Compound is not detected.
N - Compound is a tentatively identified compound.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Table 1 . Tutu Residential Wells Samj
iivoUtile Organic
Compounds (SVOCs)
Phenol
bis(2-CbJoroethyl)Ether
2-CUoropbenol
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-Oichlorobenzene
Benzyl Alcohol
1,2-Dkhlorobenzene
2-Metfaytphenol
N-Nitroso-Di-a-Propylamine
Hexachloroethane
NitTobenzene
Isophorone
2-Nitrophenol
2.4-Dimethylpbenol
Benzoic Acid
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Methane
2.4-Dichlorophenol
1 ,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
NflpMHllflW
4-Chloroaailine
laehlorobutadiene
VdUoro-3-MethyIphenol
2-Metfaylnaphthalene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2.4,6-Trichlorophenol
2 ,4 tS-Tnchloropbenol
2-CUorooaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acenaphthytene
2,6-Dinkrotoluene
3-Nkroantline
AceMpnthene
2,4-Dinitropbenol
4-Nkropbenol
Dibenzofuru
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Diethylpbthalate
4-Chloropbenyl-pbenyletber
Fluorene
4-Nkroaniline
4,6-Dinitro-2-M«thylpbeool
N-Nitrosodiphenylamiiie
^rontophenyl-phenytetber
^^fhe first extraction results.
jJing Results, Scptemb
770-08
Tillet*
R
IOU
R
IOU
IOU
R
IOU
R
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
R
R
R
IOU
R
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
R
IOU
10 UJ
R
R
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
R
R
IOU
tou
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
R
R
«r 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900770
770-09
Tillet-D
(Replicate)
IOU
IOU
R
IOU
IOU
R
IOU
R
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
R
R
R
IOU
R
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
R
IOU
10 UJ
R
R
IOU
sou
IOU
1.0 U
IOU
sou
IOU
R
R
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
R
IOU
IOU
770-10
H2O Blank
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
tou
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
tou
sou
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
770-12
Gassett
(HartmanI)
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
toy
IOU
sou
IOU
tou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
770-14
VIHAI
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
tou
IOU
tou
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
IOU
sou
IOU
IOU
tou
sou
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
IOU
sou
sou
IOU
IOU
AD concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ng/L).
J - Value is estimated.
U - Compound is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
N - Compound is a tentatively identified compound.
TLT.
OO1
.483
Anirrv x? K/nt i PD
N-141
Table I. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900770
Sample Idratifirehon:
SenivoUtile Organic
Compounds (SVOCs)
Hexftchlorobenzeoe
Pentschloropnenol
Pnenanthrtae
Anthracene
Di-a-Butylphthalate
nuorantheae
Pyiwe
Butylbenzylphthalate
3(3-Dtchlorobenzidine
Benzo(a)Anthraceae
Chrysene
bis<2-Ethylhexvl)Pnthalate
Di-a-Octyt Phthalat*
Bcuo(b)FluonatheM
BenxoOOFluoranthene
Benxo(a)Pyrene
Indeno(1.2,3-cd)Pvrene
Dibenz(a.h)Antnracene
Beow(g^,i)Perylene
Trnrr^T w~*r*d svoc.
Unknown
Dimrena. peittachlorofluoro-
770-08
Tillet
R
R
R
R
R
R
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
77009
Tillet-D
(Replicate)
10 U
R
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
82 JN
4JN
770-10
H2O Blank
10 U
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
770-12
OaMett
(Hartmanl)
10 U
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
770-14
VIHA1 
;
10 U
SOU
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
20 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
'"•"'
All concentrations are reported in raicrograms per liter (ug/L).
I - Value is estimated.
U - Compound is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
N - Compound is a tentatively identified compound.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-142
Table I. Tutu Reaidential WeUi Sampling Remit*. September 1990, Sample Delivery Group 900770
Sample Meatificatioo:
nticide/PCB*
alpha-BHC
beU-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC
Heptachlor
Aldrin
HeptacUor epoxide
Endoaulfanl
Dteidrin
4,4-DDE
Endrin
EndotuUan n
4,4-DDD
Endowlfan wlfate
4,4-DDT
Metboxycalor
Endrin ketone
alpha-Chlordane
gamma-Chlordane
Toxapbcoe
Arodor-1016
\rodor-1221
^ooclor-1232
Arodor-1242
Arodor-1248
Aroclor-1254
Arodor-1260
770-01
Bryan
O.OSU
0.05 U
0.05 U
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
0.10U
0.10 U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10 U
0.50 U
0.10U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
770-02
Dimitri
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.10U
0.50 U
0.10U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
770-03
MattttM
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
770-0*
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
770-06
EglinI
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
7047
LaPlace
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 U
O.IOU
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
0.50 U
050 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
All concentrattofu are reported in microgram* per liter (ug/L).
U - Compound U not detected.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-143
Table 1. Tutu Rendential WeU» Sampling Remits. September 1990. Sample Delivery Group 900770
Sample Identification:
Peetictdet/PCB*
alpha-BBC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC
Heptachlor
Aldrin
Heptacaior epoxide
EndoeuUan I
Diddrin
4,4-DDE
Eadrin
Endoeulfaa 0
4.4-DDD
EndowUan sullate
4,4-DDT
Methoxychlor
Endrin ketooe
•Ipha-Chlordane
(amma-CUordane
Toxaphene
Aroclor-1016
Arodor-1221
Arodor-1232
Arodor-1242
Arodor-1248
Arodor-1254
Arodor-1260
770-08
Tfflet
O.OSU
0.05 U
0.05 
U
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
0.10U
O.IOU
0.10U
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
770-09
TOletO
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
770-10
. HZOBlk
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
770-12
Hartraanl
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
770-14
VIHAI
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.OSU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
O.IOU
0.50 
U
O.IOU
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
0.50 
U 
— -
0.50 
U
0.50 
U
1.0 U
1.0 U
All concentration* are reported in microgranu per liter (ug/L).
U - Compound ii not detected.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. (NC
- £
OSfiBDNO
I-
I-
I-
•l
tfZIA3H YIW SDZHOB
•
"i
•CM 406
"i
I,
N-145
STANDARD OPERATING
1 
Of 
36
Date: March 1990
Revision 7
\
CGN TO DATA VALIDATION
.0
1.1 This procedure is applicable to organic data obtained fros
working for the contract Laboratory Program (OP).
1.2 The data validation is baaed upon analytical and quality
:if led in tha Statement of Work (SOW).
uti. actor laboratoriea
req;ii
2.1 Data
All
will ccoplete tha following tasks as assigned by tha Data Review coordinator;
- The reviewer oust answer every question on tha checklist.
shall be in ink.
2.2 Data Itteiiment Narrative (Attachnent 1) - Data reviewer is required to use
forms and oust natch the action in the narrative with the action taken on the Form Z(s).
2.3 Rejection Suraary Form (Attachnent 2) - Fill in the total number of analytes measured b>
different analyses and the number of analytes rejected or flagged as estimated due to
corresponding quality control criteria. Place an "X" in the boxes where analyses were
not performed or criteria do not apply.
2.4 Organic Regional Data AJI element - Data reviewer is also required to fill out Organic—-'
Regional Data Aiiaignent Form (Attachnent 3). '
2.5 Telephone Record Log - The data reviewer should enter the bare facts of inquiry before
initiating any authorized telephone catenation with a CLP laboratory. After the
review has been completed, mail tha white copy of tha Telephone Record Log to the
laboratory and the pink copy to SMO. File the yellow copy in the Telephone Record Log
folder and attach a photocopy of the Telephone Record Log to the completed
Data Assessment Narrative.
2.6 Forwarded Paperwork - Upon ccnpletion of the review, the following are to be forwarded
to the Regional Saaple Control Center (RSGC) located in the Surveillance and Monitoring
kage
a. data
b. completed
c. 90 Contract ConplL
(CCS)
Forward four (4) copies of the completed Data Augment- narrative along with four (4)
copies of the Organic Data Agiesinen-it Form: one each for the auu.iJtu.iata Regional DPO,
the Saaple Management Office (SO), and to the last two iilireaaes of the Data Reviewer!
Mailing List.
2.7 Filed Paperwork - Upon completion of the review, tha following are to be filed within
the Monitoring and Management Branch (MMB) files:
a. Telephone record Log (copy) 
^
b. Record of Comsunication (original) 
• 
,
c. Rejection Summary Form 
"-
N-146
QFE3AT2C FRDCEZJKE
2 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
Ravisicn 7
i.O Barl
inad to ba maoaptabla on tha Organic Analysis Oat
Sha«t (Form I) oust ba flaoaad with an "IT. Aft aoon as rcviav oritmria eauaaa data to
j
. All val
that data can ba
ad firoa any further rsviav
.0
..0
TC1 rrftirlil - In ocdar that tha raviaws ba oonsistant
Standard Operating Frooadura (SOP) should ba i»ad. Additional
FUrcticnal Guidalinas.
, this
can ba found in
locating any probli
- This is intandad to aid tha raviswcr in
\, both cozractad and umm.iac.tad. Howevar, tha validation should
ba carrlad cut avan if CCS is not peasant, nasuliiid I nil raoaivad frcn tha laboratory
ba
N-147 
STANDARD OFERA1DG PRXUJUHZ 
Paga: 
3 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
I
AOOCE cafftnaiEss AND DELEVERABLES 
asz HCHBER: # 700 770_______
I 
IAB:_
NO 
N/A
1.1 Rava any vissing dalivarablas baan received and
to the data package.
ACIZGN: ^"" lab for «xplanation / rasubaittal of any
Bissing dalivarabla*. If lab cannot provida thsm,
not* tha affact on rwiaw of tba
^}%^h 
M^^PWHP^V^Bi^^^ 
^^MM^Akl ^^^^^ ,^kX*^B^^^^0WHH*Y 4 AM^^^^M
uW ijmnjaCC flUJ^Pa/fKJl 1 rBylia<fcJ»
of r«vl«war narrativa.
1.2 Was SMD CCS chacklist includad with packaga? 
C_]
2.1 Is the Narrativa or Cover l«t±ar praaant?
2.2 Are Cas« Number and/or SAS ruobar contained in the
Narrativa or Caver Latter? 
f ^1
.0 Djtfl yalidation
Ihe following chacklist is divided into three parts. Part A
is filled out if the data packaga contains any WA analyses,
Part B for any BNA analyses and Part C for
this packaga contain:
data? 
_
data? 
S
Pasticide/FCB data?
Caipletft corresponding parts of checklist.
N-148 
S-^NDMO QFSWTTC FRX3TCT; 
Feos: 
4 
of 
35
Data: March 1990 
-
Revision 7
55 
K/T
1.1 Ar« tha Traffic Haport Paras jiiaiaiiL far all sanplas? 
r y/i 
__
ACTION: If no, contact lab for rcplaoanant of nissing
or illagUbla eopias.
1.2 Do tha Traffic Reports or Lab Narrative indicata any
probleas with saspla receipt, condition of sasples,
analytical problaas or special notations affecting 
/
tha quality of tha data? 
V
ACTION: Gee profeeeional judgenent to evaluate the
effect on the quality of the data.
ACTION: If any sasple analyzed as a soil contains aore
than 50% water, all data should be flagged as
(J).
ACTION: If both VGA vials for a saqpla bava air bufcblaa,
flag all positiva rasults "J* and all nan-datacts "R".
2.1 Have any VCA holding tines, detezsined from data of 
/
collection to data of analysis, been exceeded? 
v 
f 1
If unpresezved, aqueous aranatic volatile* sust be analyzed
within 7 days of collection and non-aromatic volatiles Bust
be analyzed within 14 days. If preserved with hydrochloric
acid and stored at 4°C, then both aromatic and non-aronatic
volatilee sust be analyzed within 14 days. If uncertain
about preservation, contact the sacpler to determine whether
the sasples
A tan-day holding tine for soil sasples is
Le of Maiding TJaa Violatiora
(See Traffic Report)
Date 
Gate Lab 
Date
__ Sasple 
Matrix 
Preserved ? 
Saspled 
Received 
Analyzad
^«P«M*_ ,
M«*4 ji^JiV
ACTION: If holding tiaas ara axcaadad, flag* all positiva rasults
astinatad ("J") and saqpla quantitation linits as
and docunant in the narrative that holding times
N-149 
SANDUO OFEWIBC HCGDUSZ 
Page: 
5 
of 
36
Data: Mar±i 1990
Revision?
5 5 5 / T
XT analyse* wan dm BOB* than 14 day* beyond holding tine,
either on tha first analysis or 1901 raanalysis, the reviewer
xuat uaa pmTeaatiiari judgaaant to datazaina tha reliability
of tha data, and. tha effects of ••Mitiff1'*! ff*"T»j» on tzie
aanpla results. The reviewer aay determine that ncn-datact
data ara urua»bl« ("R").
"'.0 Su
3*1 Ara tha VIA Surrogate Baoovazy stmaariaa (Toot
for eaA of tha following
Wrtar 
n/i _ 
_
b. Mad Water 
[_] 
__
c. low Soil 
[__] 
__
d. Mad Soil 
[__] 
__
3.2 Are all tha ^A sozplaa 11<fai1 en tha approprixta
Raoovary Su&nariaa for each of the following i
a. las Water 
r v/1 
__ 
__
b. Mad Katar 
- 
[_] 
__ 
\/
c. low Soil 
[__J __ 
v/
d. Mad Soil 
l__] 
__ 
\/
ACTON: can lab for explanation / resubaittals. If
missing deliverables are unavailable, docunant
effect on data under "Conclusions11 section of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers narked correctly with an asterisk? 
f \/*\ 
__ 
__
ACIZCK: Circle all outliers in red.
3.4 was one or Bare VOX surrogate recovery outside of uuiuau. 
/
^ [—] ——
Ificationa fox* any aaapla or Bathod blank?
If yea, were sanplea raanalyzed?
Were Bathed blanks reanalyzed? 
C__]
ACZZGK: If surrogate racoveziaa ara > 10% but all do not
SOW
1. nag aU positive results as eatiaatad ("J")
2. nag all non-datacts as estimated detection
limits ("ID").
N-150 
STXNEAED OPERAIHC RCOZZ9C 
~ page: 6 
of
. 
Oats: March 1990
I 
Rsvision 7
If any surrogate has a recovery of <10% :
1. nag all positive results as estimated ("J").
2. nag an non^detects as unusable ("R").
Professional judgement should ba used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate
out of specification in both original and
analyses. Check the internal standard an
3.5 Are there any transcription/calculation eums betneeu raw 
/
data and Form H? 
___ 
f vM 
__
ACZZCN: Zf large errors exist, *^11 lab for explanation /
note errors under "Conclusions".
.0 Matarlx SPlkaa fFuini im
4.1 Zs the Matrix Spike Duplicate/Recovery Fora (Fora ZZZ)
4.2 Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the renewing matrices:
a. Low Water
b. Med Water 
r 1
~?
c. Low SoU 
C__J __ 
JC
d. Med, Son 
[__3
ACTZCN: Zf any natrix spike data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 Hew many VOA, spike recoveries are outside QC limits?
O 
OUt Of 10 
Kl/fr 
OUt Of 10
4.4 How many RFD*s for matrix spike and matrix spike
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
outofS 
ijft out of 3
Zf MS and MSO both have less than 10% re-
covery for an analyta, negative results for
that analyta should be rejected, and
positive results should be flagged' *J".
The above applies only to the saqple used
for the MS/KSO analysis. Use professional
judgement in applying this criterion to other,
saaples in the
* 
kl * _ _ 
•__• • K^W^V •*•*. ^•^•^^K .^^^K *^ 
^^^h^h^^^MM^MMMB 
^^__ 
^ 
•
Page: 7 
of 
36
Date: March 1990
Revision 7
!
YES 
NO 
N/A
5.0 Blanks from ITA
5.1 Is the Method Blank summary (Form IV)
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of VDA
TO. ccepounss, has a reagent/method blank been
analyzed for eech set of samples or every 20
of similar matrix (low water, mad water, low soil,
medium soil), whichever is vox* frequent?
5.3 Has a van instrument blank been analyzed at .•••. 
/
once every tt«lve hours for each GC/W system used? 
rVM 
__ 
__
ACZZCK: If any netted blank data are missing, "•'»'' lab
for esqplanation / resuomittal. If not available,
reject an nssnriaferl positive data ("K").
5.4 Qironatography: review the blank raw data - chrenatosr
(RTCs), quant reports or data system printouts and
Is the chranatographic performanoe (baseline stability)
for each instrument acceptable for VQAs? 
tX" 1
ACXTGN: Use professional judgement to determine the.
effect on the data.
NOTE: "Mater blanks'* and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample and are not used
to qualify data. Do not confuse them with the
other QC blanks Jir-——** below.
€.1 Do any inethod/instruwiVraagent blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIQ for TCAs? t*Mn applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are "iltlpU*** by the sample Dilution
Factor. 
*- I__3
6.2 Do any field/trip/rinse blanks have positive UQA results 
/
(TO. and/or Tiq? 
2l_ I__3
ACTICN: Prepare a list of the samples associated
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
MOTE: Gnly field/rinse blanks taken the same day
as th« sasples are used to qualify data. Trip
blanks are used to qualify only those samples
with which they wen shipped. Blanks may not
be qualified br-iyi*t of contamination in another
blank. Blanks may be qualified for surrogate,
spectral, tuning or calibration QC problems. 
>u 
>t 
i; ;
N-152
OrSVCING
Fag«: 8
of 
36
.1990
Invasion 7
AcncN; Ptollow tha di
ions in tha &bla balov to qualify
AM to oontaninaticn. Qaa tha "
YES
N/A
valua from all tha if— «-<»*»* blanks.
sa&pia cone > CflQL
but < lOx blank
Mati^lane Florida
Tbluana out 'B
Flag sassla rasult
with a
< CflQL i! Saspla
is < IOBC blank valua valua ft >lQx blank valua
Raj
and
out *B' flag
NO
is
but < Sx blank
Othar
flag saxpla nsult
Contaminants with a 'U' ;
out 'B' flag
i.
< caoL ft
is < Sx blank valua
and
out 'B' flag
.1.
valua ft > 5 blank valua
.t.
ACTZCN: For TIC cocpounds, if tha eencantratien in tha saspla is
lass than f iva tiaas tha oonoantration in tha anal
taninatad atsnrinrarl blank, flag tha saapla data "R"
(unusabla).
€.3 Ara thara fiald/riisa/aquipsant blanks associatad with avary
ACZ7CN: For low laval sarples, nota in data inaaiiiaiiir that
thara is no associatad f iald/rinsa/aquipnant blank.
lien: sarplas takan fras a drinking watar tap
do nor hava *««t--**in*'^ fiald blanks.
.0
arri Mass
V
7.1 Ara tha GC/tS Tuning and Mass Calibration Tana (Form V)
nt for Brenofluorobanzana (BFB)?
7.2 Ara tha anhanoad bar graph spactnn and Bass/chazga
(m/z) listing for tha BFB provided for aach twalva
hour shift?
7.3 Has a tuning
ocnpound
twalva hours of saapla analysis par instruoant?
analyzad for avary
ACTION: If any tuning data arm missing, taka
spacifiad in 3.2 abova.
ACIICN: List data, tiaa, instnaant ID/ and
analysas for whic±i no awH atari GC/M5 tuning
data ara available.
001
N-153
QF5WC2C
9 
Of 
36
Marti: 1990
Revision 7
NO
N/A
ACTION: If lab cannot provide Biasing data, reject ("R") all data
generated "^tifto an acceptable tvalva hc*jr calibration
interval.
7.4 Have the ion abx
instrument
for
ACZZON: List all data which do not aeet ion abundi
criteria (attach a separate sheet).
ACTION: If tuning calibration is in error, flag all
associated sasple data as unusable (IT).
However, if expanded ion criteria are act
(See 19SI Functional Guidelines), the data
reviewer ney accept data with appropriate
Qualifiers.
7.5 Are there any transcription / calculation
aass lists and Form Vs? (Check at least tuo values but
K«^ 
*»m*^Jt 
J^»A«b ^BBB^ \
are ZOUB, oecjc vore.)
7.6 Have the appropriate nsber of significant figures (two)
been reported? (Check at least twa values, but if
fcmd check aore values.)
ACTION: If large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
^itcal, sake necessary collections and note
under •Conclusions*.
7.7 Are the
a of the
calibration
ACIZCN: use professional judgenent to deteraine
%*Mther associated data should be
bed, 7«*l<*i**j or xej<
i.l Are the Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Form I
present with required header information on
page, for eech of the following:
a. Saqples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spikes and Mtrix spUca duplicates
c. Blanks
for tha idantifiad "«n»»***« and tha
data systBB printouts (Quant jaunts) inclodad in
tha saapla pacaaya for aach of tha following?
a. Sasplas and/or fractions as apprcprlsta
b. Katzix spUcas and natrix apiks duplicatas
(Mass spsc&B not raojuirad)
c. Blanks
ACTION: Zf any data ara Biasing, taka action
ifiad in 3.2 abovB.
8.3 Ara tha iaspataa factors shown in tha Quant
Jull-scala graph (attanuation)
ACIXCN: Usa prafassional judoaoant to dataraina tha
acoaptability of tha data.
ACTICN: Zf any BBSS StjacUa ara aissing, taka action,
spacifiad in 3.2 abova. If lab doas not
oun st
in
N-154 SZWCMO OF5UCDC RCCSETO 
Fao«: 10 
of 
36
Data: March 1990 '
7
8.4 Zs rtwLi.^^•'jifl^hic parforaanoa aooaptabla witii
^ to: 
/
Basalina stability 
r \/i
f \/i 
__ 
__
8.5 Ara tha lab-^anaratad standard aass spactta of tha 
/
idantifiad VQA ooqpounds praaaiit for aach sanpla? 
r\/1 
__ 
__
8.6 Zs tha FRTof aach raportad ocapound within O.Of JRT 
/
units of tha standard RRT in tha .continuing calibration? 
r\/1 
__
8.7 Ara all ions piasaiit in tha standard Bass spactruB at
ralativB intansity oraatar than 10% also praaant in
8.8 Do saspla and- standard ralativa ion intansitias agraa 
/
within 20%? 
\V 1 
__ 
__
ACZ7CK: Us*, profassicnal judganant to datszaina
ty of data. Zf it is dctarminad
all such data should ba rajactad, flaggad
•TT* (prasuqptiva avidanca of tha piaiarrB of
tha ccRpound) or changad to not datactad (at
tha "^"Vlatiad tfat^fficn liait).
1-155 
SONCAPO OPERATING WXUUKS 
Page: 11 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
»svision7
~ ~ 5 § 5 5
9.1 Are all Tentatively Zdentified Cbnpound Forms (Fora Z,
Part B) piaseiit; and do listed TZCs include scan number
or retention tiae, estiaated concentration and "J* 
s
v/i
9.2 Are the aass spectra for tha tentatively identified
in tha sample package for each of tha following:
a. Sanplas and/or flections as appropriate
b. Blanks
ACZZCN: If any TZC data ara aissing, take action
specified in 3.2 above.
ACZZCN: Add, "J1* qualifier if aissiag and "N"
qualifier to all identified TZC compounds
on Fora Z, Part B.
^
9.3 Ara any TCL ozpounds (fran any fraction) listoad «
TZC expounds (exaeple: 1,2-dinethylbentene is xylene—
m VQA TCL—end should not be tested a* a TZQ?
ACTZCN: Flag with "R
1* any TCL confound listed as a TZC.
9.4 Are all ions praient in tha reference BBSS spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also pi as ant, in tha
9.5 Do TZC and "best Batch" standard relative ion intensities 
,
within 20%? 
r VM 
__ 
_
ACTZCN: Use professional judgevsnt to determine
ability of TZC identifications. Zf
it is determined that an immect identi-
fication was nde, change identification to
or to SOBB lass specific identi-
fication (exanpla: "C3 substituted benzene")
iTTpriata*
.0.0
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Fora Z results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that tha cuuact internal standard, qoantitation
ion, and RRF were used to calculate Fora Z result. 
/
Here any errors found? 
__ 
T * ^
•
10.2 Are the CRQZ* adjusted to reflect sanple dilutions 
/
and, for soils, sanple moisture? 
r*sj
N-156 
STANDARD OPERATIC HO23U3S 
Prrjf 
12 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
7
N/A
ACXXQK: It arrors ara larga, all lab for explanation /
' Lttal, nfcft any
ACTION: ftoan a saqpla is analyzad at cars than
dilution, tha lowest QRQIs ara uaad (unless
a QC axoaadanaa dictataa tha use of tha
GRQL data frm tha diluted szqple analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed tha calibration
xangw -in tha original analysis by oossing out
tha "E" valua on tha original Ibnn I and
tuting it vith data fron tha analysis of
sanpla. Spudff 
«hich Taaeat I is to ba
than draw a rad "X" aooas tha antin paga of
all Farm I*s that should not ba usad, including
any in tha suonary paetaga.
11.0 S£3DdarjnS_Q&ta
11.1 Are the Reconstructed Ion Qti'JBiatLIJI ams, and data
systan printouts (Quant. Reports) pieeent for initial 
/
and continuing calibration? 
r v"\
ACncN: If any calibration standard data ara missing,
taka action snacifiad in 3.2 abova.
..0 COTS Initial ^^.ibration (farm VII
12.1 Ara tha Initial Calibration Forma (Fora VI)
and oeqplata for tha volatna fraction?
ACTION: If any calibration standard faros ara
missing, tafca action spadfiad in 3.2 abova.
12.2 Ara responsa factors stabla for volatilas owr tha
ooncantraticn ranga of tha calibration (PSD O0%)? 
[ _ ]
AcnCN: dirrla all outliars in rad.
ACTION: Ww» BSD >30%, non-datacts nay ba
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results "J*. Whan BSD >90%, flag
all non-detacts as unusable ("R"). (Region
IT policy.)
12.3 Do any compounds have an average RRP < 0.05? 
J^. 
[__]
ACTICN: Circle all outliers in red.
ACTION: If any volatile u.m<wiiil has an avenge
KRF < 0.05, flag positiva results for that
coopcund as estimated ("J"), and flag
detects for that cocpound as unusable
N-157 
STWCWO OPE»S21C JRXZIL3Z 
Pags: 13 
of
Oat*: March 1990
7
Jj/r
221
%PSD? (Chadc at l*ast ta« valuas toot if «rrors ara 
/
found* chadc BBBW.) 
f y i
AdXOT: Cixcl« •rrora in
ACZ1CN: If •rrors an laxga, call lab for aaqplanatien /
racubDittal, aaloa any
not* •ZZQTB undar "G&nclucii
13.0
Ara th* continuing Calibration Tbr&s (7liu& Vii) prasant 
/
and coBplct* for tha volatile fracticn? 
r v / 1
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard baan analyzad
for cvary twalv* hours of saspla analysis par 
,
instrxnant? 
r\/1 __ 
__
List balew an saopla analysas that
not within &*lv» hours of tha previous
continuing calibration analysis.
ACTION: Zf any foras ara missing or no continuing
calibration standard has baan analyzad within
twalva hours of avary saopl* analysis, call lab
for asqplanation / rasubaittal. If continuing
calibration data ar* not availabl*, flag all
i«d saqpla data as unusabla
13.3 Da any continuing calibration standard conpounds hawa 
/
a HHF < 0.05? 
j/. 
[__]
ACZZCM: Gird* all outUars in rad.
AcnCN: Zf any volatile ccnpound has a BRT < 0.05,
flag positiva rasults for that ooopound as
actiaatad ("J"), and flag non-datacts for that
and as unusabl* ("R").
13.4 Da any ccqpounds haw a % diffaranoa batMan initial and 
/
continuing calibntion PFF > 25%? 
^_ 
C—J
ACZTGN: Cirri* all cutliar* in rad and qualify
saapl* data as cutlinad in th* tabla balow;
N-158 
S7ANOVTO OPERATING «*» • 7F 
P»Q«: 
14 
of 
26
\ 
Data: March 1990
* 
" 
^ _„_: _• __ «•
. 
NO 
N/A
% uurJ
1 
zs-so
[•J1 positive
results, no action
for nan datacts
50-90 
j 
>90
•J1 positive | 'J' positive
results, 'OP results, "R*
non detects jnon detects
i
-1
r
13.5 Are there any teanscription / calculation errors in
reporting of average response factors (FRF) or diff•
(%D) between initial and continuing FRF*? (Check at 
/
least two values but if errors are found, check nare.) 
__ 
rv 1 __
ACTZCN: Circle errors in red.
ACTION: Zf errors are large, call lab for oatlanatian /
note errors under "Conclusions'1.
14.0
14.1 Ara tha intarnal standard areas (Form VZZZ) of avary
sacpla and blank vittiin tha uppar and lowar lioits 
/
for aach continuing calibration? 
tS "\ _^ 
__^
ACHCN: List all tha outliars balov.
Saspla f 
Zntarnal Std- 
Araa 
LCMBT Liait 
tJppar Ldait
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
ACTZCN: Zf the intarnal standard area count is outside the upper
lower limit, flag with "J" all positive results and nan-
detects (U values) ojuantitatad with this internal standard.
Zf extremely low araa counts ara reported, or if
aodiibits a nejor abrupt drop off, flag all
14.2 Ara tha retention times of tha intarnal standards within 
/
30 gy~^r^* of tha associated calibration standard? 
f v 1 
___
ACIICK: Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data if tha retention tiaas differ by norm than 
TUT 001
30
N-159 
snNDftHD OGERMBC HO F1I.RE 
' 
Ft?*: IS 
of 
36
| 
Data: Marsh 1990
* 
• 
Revision 7
I
15.1 War* «ny field
NO 
N/A
aubnittad for VQ& analysis? 
fv 1
ACIZCN: Occpap» th« x^pottad xwults far fittld
and calculate tte z«lativa paroant diff
ACIZCN: Any gnaaa variaticn batman fiald
ba addnaaad in tfaa
narrativau Pouavar, if larga diffaxanaaa axial:,
of *i*H duplicataa ^"Mfl ba
by
rul 
001 
j.502
N-160 
STANDARD OFSUOSC FHDCSCRE 
Fags: 
16 
of 
36
Data: March 1990 
•
7
I 
YES 
NO 
N/A
* 
^MM^^^B «k. 
^M.M %%v% WJV^SMV*
!
I
1.1 Ara tha Traffic
for all sanplas
ACTION: if no, contact lab for raplacsfflsnt of missing
or <n^j>l«
1.2 Do tha Traffic Reports or Lab Kazrativa indicata any
prbblans with saapla raoaipt, condition of aanplas,
analytical problsas or spacial notations affacting
tha ouality of tha data?
ACTION: Usa profassional judganant to avaluata tha
•ffact on tha quality of tha data.
ACTION: If any sacpla analyzad as a soil contains son
than 50% watar, all data should ba flaggad as
(J).
2.1 Have any BA holding tins, datar&inad frca data of
collaction to data of axtraction,
Saaplas for ENA analysis, both soils and watscs,
nust ba axtractad within savan days of tha data of
collaction. Detracts aust ba analyzad within 40
days of tha data of axtraction.
Tabl« of ftoldim Tism Violati
(S~ Traffic Mport)
Data 
Data Lab 
Data
Sazpla 
Matrix 
Sanplad 
Raoaivad 
Extractad 
Analyzad
to
ACTION: If holding tiasc ara axoaadad, flag aU positiva rasults as
and saspla quantitation linits as astinatad
("UJ"), and docuMnt in tha namtiva that holding tiaas
N-161 
S^NDfcRD OTOUIIBC FRDOHJEE 
Page: 
17 
of 
26
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
NO ——
It analyses were dona acre than 14 days beyond holding tiae,
either on the first analysis or upon reenalysis, tha reviewer
oust use prof essicnal judgenant to determine tha raliability
of tha data and tha af facts of additional storage en tha
sarple results. ISM reviewer nay determine that aon^etect
data ara unusable ("R") .
3.0 SlLLijXfflte_Beopyjarv fTtoHB TT1
3.1 Are the BA Surrogate Heojueij? Suanariee (Foza
for each of the following
^ - _
a. lew Water
b. Mad Water 
__
c. Lwsoil 
__ 
l/
__ 
/
d. Mad Soil 
[ __ ]
3.2 Are an the aa sasples Vstert on the appropriate Surrogate
Recovery Susoaries for each of tha following aatrioee:
a. law water 
f Vl 
__ 
__
b. Mad Water 
[ __ ] 
__ 
s/
soil
d. Mad Soil 
[ __ ] 
__ 
.X
• ACTZCN: rail lab for explanation / resubnittals. Zf
sissing deliverables are unavailable, *** • * i"** >*
effect on data under "Conclusions* •erticn of
reviewer narrative.
3.3 Were outliers aazked correctly with an asterisk? 
f v 1
ACXZCN: Circle all outliers in
3.4 Ware two or «ore liaje nenLial £B •cid
cut of specification for any sample or method blank?
Zf yes, were saaples reanalyzed? 
r\/1 __ 
—
Were netted blanks reanalyzed? 
C_1
AdZCN: Zf all EN* surrogate recoveries ara > 10% but two
within the IHIM iieiil ml or acid fraction do not
meet SOW specifications, lac.
T(JT
1. Flag all positive results as estimated (*J").
2. Flag all nan-detects as estimated detection
linits (TH*).
I
N-162 
saNDMO OFESAS3NG SfOS3SI£ 
Feoe: 
18 
of 
36
) 
Data: Marsh 1990
7
If 
. 
. ^ __ 
25 
NO
recovery of <io% :
1. Flag all positive results for that Pi •* 1.1m
(i.e. all acid or lime reutinl compounds) *J".
2. Flag all non-datacts for that fraction "IT.
Professional judgement should be used to qualify
data that have method blank surrogate lace
out of specification in both original and
analyses. Check the internal standard
3.5 Are there any teansc
data and Fora
ACZZGK: If larga aiiuii aidst, call lab for
aaka any nacaaaary cotractions and
4.1 Is tha Matrix Spike Delicate/Recovery Fora (Fora HI)
present?
4.2 Were matrix spiXas analyzed at the required frequency
for each of the following matrices:
a. low Water 
r vM 
__ 
__
b. Mad Water
c. 
X0wSoH
d. Med Soil
ACTICN: If any matrix spiJca data are missing, take
the action specified in 3.2 above.
4.3 How many BA spiJca recoveries are outside QC limits?
out Of 22 
K l f V ait Of 22
4.4 How many RFD's for matrix spiJca and matrix spiJca
duplicate racovarias ara oitsida QC linits?
OUt Of 11 
M I ft 
OUt Of 11
If MS and MSD both have less than 10% recovery
for an analyta, negative results for that 
,..,
analyta should be rejected, and positive 
'
results should be flagged "J". The above
applies only to the saaple used for MS/KSO
analysis. Use professional judgement in
f~4+m
N-163 
SaNDARD OPSWiaG PRX3SORE 
.Page: 
19 
of 
36
Date: March 1990
Rsvision 7
ACZZCN: If any aathod blank data arm Biasing, call lab
for aaqplanation/rasubnittal. Zf not available,
reject all nwri atari positive data ("P").
5.4 Quranatography: review the blank raw data - cnrooat
(KZGs), quant reports or data system printouts and
6.0
NOTE: "Water blanks'* and "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sanple and are DSt used
to qualify data. Do not confuse then with the
other QC blanks dimmer! below.
*
6.1 Do any re^hod/irstrunanVraagent-blanks have positive
results (TCL and/or TIC} for EN*s? ttien applied as
described below, the contaminant concentration in
these blanks are multiplied by the sample Dilution
NO
5.0 Blanks fTViim Tin
VM
5.1 Is tha Method Blank Summary (Form IV) peasant?
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for tha analysis of BNA
TCL compounds, has a reagenV&sthad blank baan
analyzed for aach sat of samples or avary 20 sa
of similar matrix (low water, mad water, low soil, 
.
mediue soil) , ubichever is more frequent? 
r VM
5.3 Has a BN& instrument blank baan analyzad for —« «/r» 
>
CJ/J
Is the cnrcaetographic perfomance (baseline stability) 
X
for each instrument acceptable for VCAs? 
r v i
Use professional judgement to determine the
effect on the data.
6.2 Da any field/rinse blanks have positive 9A results
(TCL and/or HC)?
ACIIGN: Prepare a list of the samples assccirtad
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
NOTE: only field/rinse blanks taken the save day
as the Maples arr used to qualify data. Blanks 
, UT
may not be qualified because of contamination
in another blank. Blanks may be qualified for
surrogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC
problems.
t 
__
"-164 
S^NDrvO Ut£XAZ3C BOCZX2S 
Faos: 20 
of 
36
i 
Data: Mar
I 
• 
Ravision 7
Data: Marsh 1990
N/T
• ,^^«__. 
__ 
..
ACTION: Follow tha diractions in tha tabla balov to qualify
TCL raaults dua to contaaination. Daa tha ~
valua fm *^ tha asaodatad blanks.
oone > CRQL Saspla cone < (SQL i Sa^la cone > CRQL
jbut < lox blank 
is < IQx blank valua valua £ >lOx blank valua
Qxacn 
Flag sasple rasult Rajact sazple rasult No qaalificati<
Pithalata 
with a 'U'; cross and raport CRQL; 
is naadad
j out *B' flag 
cross out 'Bf flag
i——>•————————
—F— oone > CRQL!Saspla oone < CRQL &{Saqpla oone > CRQL
jbut < Sx blank 
is < Sx blank valua valua t > 5 blank valua
•Fl^T ••! ll • Tmatil^'Cn^^. «' ••!.• il • *>B«O^I1
Othar 
{Flag sample rasult,Rajact saapla result!No »j<»ijf<^tion
Gontaninants with a 'U'; cross and itfU CRQL; 
is
i»*fc*± • -w t \-mrn* ,mm xa^iJiLh. <-(^u« 
j.
out 'B' nag 
cross out 'B1 nag
ACITCN: For TIC csrpounds, if tha ccncantration in tha aaapla is
: 
lass than f iva tiaas tha eonoantration in tha aoat con-
i 
ta&inatad imnri atari blank, f]ag tha sanpla data "R"
(unusable).
| 
6.3 Ara thara fiald/rinsa/aquipBant blanks Mann afar! with avary 
/
«as?la? 
I__] __ 
/
ACUCN: For low laval aaqplas, nota in data •••aiiinant that
thara is no associatad f iald/xinaa/«quipnant blank.
^co^ptionj sanBlas takan tii *n a dr^nkUB uatar tap
do not faava asaodatad fiald. blanks.
.0 GC/fS TLm^rq arri Mflfl f^*1 ^^Ttia^ (Torn V>
7.1 Ara tha GC/M5 Tuniny and Hsss calibration Foncs. (Foza V) 
/
f \/1 
_ . 
__
prasant for Oacanuototripharylphosphina (EF1PP)?
7.2 Ara tha anhanoad bar graph spactrum and aass/charga
(m/2) listing for tha OFEFF providad for each twelve 
/
hour shiftfr 
rvi
7.3 Has a tuning parforaanoa ooopound bean analyzed for every 
/
tMalva hours of saqpla analysis par instrument? 
\J '(
ACTICK: Zf any tuning data ara sissing, take
specified in 3.2
List data, tiaar LaUua«]t ID, and sanpla
analysas for vhich no asaoeiatad GQ/MS tuning
data ara availabla.
TUT
N-165
OFSSAIIJC FRDCSXSE
21 
Of 
36
Data: March 1990
Bavision 7
YES
NO 
N/A
———
———
~~ •
tna M"MiMii
——————————————————
annn«» •— TTBlTfO
ACZZCN: Zf lab cannot provida aissing data, rajact ("IT) all data
ganaratad outsida an
critaria.
ACZXCN: List all data which do not
(attach a
7.4 Hava tha ion abundi
sat for
ion
).
ACTION: if tuning calibration is in error, flag all
Manriafarl sacpla data as unusabla ("R").
Houavar, if axpandlad ion criteria ara aat
19«S Factional Cuidalinaa), tha data
vsay a»:t?a|.x data with appropriata
qualifiars.
7.5 Ara thara any transcription / calculation airurs
mass lists and Fora Vs? (Chack at laast tuo vali
if arrors ara found, chack aora.)
bat
7.6 Rava tha appropriata nucbar of significant figuraa (tuo)
baan raportad? (Chack at laast tfcre valuaa, but if
ara found chack aora valuaa.)
ACTICN: Zf larga arrors axist, call lab for ccilanation /
rasubadttal, rake nacaaaary corrections and nota
arrors undar "Conclusions11.
7.7 Ara tha
of tha
calibration
ACTICN: Baa profaasional judganant to dataraina
whether associatad data should be
aooaptad, qualified, or rejected.
ff.l Ara tha Organic Analysis Data Sheets (Fora Z BSA)
prasant with required haartar inf oraation on —-"•
page, for aach of tha following:
a. Samples and/or fractions as appropriate
b. Matrix spDoas and natrix spike duplic
c. Blanks
00.1
N-166 
SaNDHO QEESAUNG HOQDUKE 
Page: 
22 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
ACTICN: Usa professional judgement to detannine tha
ability of tha data.
thair own standard 
,
not* in "Contract Problas/Hon-aaqpli
_ _ ._ 
.. 
__ „___ 
—— 
NO 
N/A
8.2 Ara tha BJ& Ban mi i n i ml ion Qirooatognms, tha
BBSS spectra for tha idantifiad coBpounds, and tha
data systan printouts (Quant Reports) included in
the saaple package for each of tba following?
a. Saaples and/or fractions as appropriate 
fv/1 __ 
__
b. Matrix spiXas and mtrix spike duplicates 
r>/1 
__
(Mass ayeuLLa not required) 
. 
—*
c. Blanks
ACZZCK: If any data ara missing, taka acticn
iperifierl in 3.2 above.
8.3 Are the rMgianse factors shown in the Quant
8.4 Is chrcDatographic perfozaance acceptable with
to: 
/
Baseline stability 
tv 1
Resolution 
f \/1 
__ 
__
Peak shape 
f \/1 
__ 
__
graph (attenuation) 
f \/\ 
__ 
^_^
8.5 Ara tha lab-ganaratad standard BBSS spautia of tha 
/
idantifiad BA oaqpounds pi-ajant for aach saspla? 
[ _ J 
__ 
v
ACHCN: If any aass spauLia ara aissing, taka action
ad in 3.2 abewa. If lab doss not
8.6 Zs tha URT of aach raportad ceapauA within 0.06 FRP^ •
units of tha standard RRT in tha continuing calibration!? 
[ __ ] 
__
8.7 Ara all ions piaaarit in tba standard BBSS spactruB at a
ralativa intansity graatar than 10% also piaiai'it in tha 
/
••v^ml A utmmm •*^A^4*miHI? 
I 
I 
^
8.8 Do saaple and standard relative ion intensities agree 
/
within 20%? 
C——] —— ^-
ACnCK: Usa professional jxrfgaaant to dataraiaa
ability of data. If it is datarainad . 
i 
001 
i -
that incorract idantif icaticns war*
all such data should ba rajactad,
"N** (presuB^tiva cvidanea of the prManea of
tha uiiyijuiil) or changad to not datactsd (at
N-167 
STANDARD OFSUCZNS H4.1,1-l.TRE 
p^g,. 
23 
Of 
36
Date: March 1990
Revision 7
YES 
HO 
N/A
9.0
9.1 Are all Tentatively Identified Compound Form (Fora I,
Part B) pieeent; and do listed TIC* include scan number
or retention tiae, estiaated enumeration and "J" 
/
qualifier? 
tV 1 __ 
_
9.2 Are the ness speci-ia for the tentatively identified
compounds and ••*~"8 •*••* "beet Batch" speccn included
in the staple package for each of the following:
a. Sa&ples and/or fractions as appropriate 
r v "\ _ m 
_ _
b. Blanks 
[ __ ] __
ACIICN: If any TIC data are aissing, take
-fled in 3.2 above.
ACTZGN: Add "J" qualifier if aissing and "M"
qualifier to all idengifiad TIC ~*^*
on Fora I, Part B.
TIC carpounds (ejacple: 1,2-diatthylbenzane is xylene 
/
vM
9.3 Are any TCL caBpounds (from any fraction) listed
TIC csrpounds (ejocple: l,2-^ii*thylbenzene is »
a VGA TCL—end should not be reported as a TIC}?
ACTION; Flag with "R" any TCL compound listed as a TIC.
9.4 Are all ions piraiant in the reference BBSS spectrum with a
relative intensity greater than 10% also pieeent in ttae 
/
saaple Bass tH
1^* \ in*i? 
. 
f \/ \ 
^^^
9.5 Do TIC and "best aatch" standard relative ion intensities 
/
agree within 20%? 
f VI 
_ 
__
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
^^^^^^^^^^^^^» • *^___ ^^£ siee*tfe> {^C^^^^kv^ eT^jB^ke^4^^^^^k> 
*VeT
it is determined that an iiniuei I identi-
fication was aede, change identification to
"unknown" or to some less
fication (exanple: "C3 substituted benzene")
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Fora I results? Check at least two positive values.
Verify that the collect internal standard, quantitaticn
ion, and FRT were used to calculate Fora I result. 
/
Were any errors found? 
___ 
D£J 
—
•
10.2 Are the CSQLs adjusted to reflect sarple dilutions 
/
and, 
for soils, saopla aoisture? 
C—_] —— -*-—
t 
_
t 
Gate: Marsh 1990
' 
• 
Revision 7
N/A
AdlCN: if errors an large, call lab for explanation /
ittal, aake any necessary collections and
ACTION: then a sacple is analyzed at man than one
dilution, the lowest CRQZs an used (unless
a^QC avTee1nji.B dictates tha use of the Mgfr***
CRQL data froa the rtilTTterl sample analysis).
Replace concentrations that exceed the calibration
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the T* value en the original Item I and substi-
tuting it with data frca tha analysis of •"i**—*
sample. Specify vhich Fora I is to be used,
then draw a red "X* across the entire pege of
an Form I's that should not be used, including
any in the suanary package.
u.o
11.1 An tha Raconstructad Ion dronatogrms, and data
systaa printouts (Quant. Raccrts) piaaaiiL for initial
and ccntjjiuing calibration?
ACUCK: If any calibration standard data an missing,
talca action snarifiad in 3.2 above.
.2.0 GC/M5 Ir^.tial g*i ^>»ratian (T
12.1 Arm tha Initial Calibration Taaa (Fcra VI) piaiant
and cenplata for tha Bft fraction?
ACTION: If any calibration'standard forms
missing, take action specified in 3.2 above.
12.2 An response factors stable for BAs over the
concentration range of the calibration (RSO <30%)? 
f 
1
ACTICN: Circle all outliers in
ACTTCN: ftoen RSO >30%, non-detects may
using professional judgement. Flag all
positive results *J". ftoen BSD >90%, flag
all non-detects as unusable ("R"). (Region
H policy.)
12.3 Do any compounds have a RRF < 0.05?
ACTICN: Circle an outliers in red.
ACTION: If any H*A cotpound has an average
' 
RRF < 0.05, flag positive results for that 
TUT 001 
, ^,,
ccnpound as estiaated ("J"), and-flag nan- 
"
. 
detects for that ccnpound as unusable ("R").
I
OFSWTZJC HCOSURE 
p»g»: 
23 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
I
.4 Are than any Lm»cr option / *»t^i««-i~« aiiuts in
tha raporting of average response factors (187) or
«SD? ffftadc at laast tuo valuac bit if arrors an
found, chadcaorv. )
ACZZGK: Circl* «rzQa in zvi
ACHCN: If aaim.s are large, «*TJ lab for swlamtion /
• 
* - . 
& 
~ 
_ ^ _ ^ ^ _ 
w __ , __ 
_j ^
13.0 Cg/l*S
13.1 AT* the Continuing Calibration FOODS (Para
and cooplatta for tha ENl fzaction?
13.2 Has a continuing calibration standard bean analyzad
for every twelve hours of sanple analysis par 
/
instrument? 
f\/ \ __ 
__
ACTION: list balev all sanple analyses that
not within twelve hours of the previous
continuing calibration analysis.
AC7ICN: If any foxas are missing or no continuing
calibration standard has bean analyzed within
twelve hours of evary sanple analysis, call lab
for esgplanation / resubnittal. If continuing
calibration data are not available, flag all
a<aor1 atari sacple data as unusabla ("R").
13.3 Do any continuing calibration standard aaapoands have) 
/
a RRF < 0.05? 
__ 
fV 1 __
ACIZCN: drcla all outliers in red.
ACXICN: It any BA niijiimd has a RRT < 0.05,
flag positive results for that cmpaund as
astintsd ("J"), and flag nan-detects for that
nuirirril as unusabla ("R").
13.4 Do any ccnpcunds have a % difference betnesn initial and 
/
continuing calibration IZRF > 25%? 
JL.
ACZICN: Circle all outliers in red and qualify
saqpla data as outlined in the table balov:
N-170 
SZMOVTO OF5UC3C en i i±*jg 
P*ge: 26 
of 
36
Data: Mar±i 1990
7
j 
35-50
j'J* positive
results, no action
for nan detects
13.5 Are there any transc
50-90 
>90
•J1 positive -j« positive
results, »nj» results, "R"
ncn detects 
nan detects
xiption / culculaTlfTi ei t* 'i *
k m ^ — mtf .•• « *m.*^~——~, ^HH^H ___ J
YES 
NO 
N/A
i-i
i
lintbs
< **m*~~^
(%D) betoken initial and continuing FRFft? 
(OMdc at 
/
' 
values but if error* an found, cheek sera.) 
__ 
fsAl 
__
ALTIUNt Circle •xiugs in
ACTION: If errors are large, can lab for emanation /
rcsubnittal, sales any necessary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions".
14.0 
lT7te2?^a3. Standards
14.1 Are the internal standard areas (Farm. VTU) of every
sanple and blank vithin the upper and lower limits 
/
for each continuing calibration? 
rv 1 
__ 
__
ACTION: list an the outliers below.
Sasple * 
Internal Std 
Area 
lower limit 
Epp*r Limit
(Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
ACTION: If the internal standard area count is outside the
lower limit, flag with "J" an positive results and
(U values) quantitated with this internal standard.
If extremely low area counts an reported, or if psrfi
exhibits a oejor abrupt drop off, flag an associated
detects as unusable ("R").
14.2 Are the retention times of the internal standards vithin 
/
30 Her mil of the associated calibration standard? 
f V / j ___ 
——
ACTION: Professional judgement should be used to qualify 
,,
data if the retention tiss* differ by nor* than 
' ~ '-Oi lbj -:
30
I 
(OT somfjo ataasx tlosass
I
Oat*: March 1990
Division?
55 
i^r
15.1 Vurm any field duplicate «ubnit±ad fbr V* amlysis?
ACZZCN: Oscar* the rapnrtart results for field
and ealeulata tba relative paiuatit diffi
ACZZCK: Any gross variaticn hatnean field
, if
idwitificatian ef field dqpliat« Mould b»
by
TUT 
OO1 1514
I
N-172 
STANDARD OFE3ATZNG FRQGDL3E 
Ituja: 
28 
of 
36
I 
Data: March 1990
! 
' 
Bavisifln 7
"JljeiLJty7^n
i.o
YES 
NO
cr
1-1 Arm tha Txmffic napart Porns piasant for all sanplaa? 
f y i 
___
ACTZCN: Zf no, contact lab for raplaoansnt of Bissing
or illagibla
1.2 Do tha Traffic Raports or Lab Narrative indicata any
problacs with saspla racaipt, '"•••'ditiqn of
analytical problaos or T*"^! notatiena »*
tha quality of tha data?
ACIZCN: Usa professional judosssnt to avaluata tba
affact en tha quality of tha data.
ACTCN: Zf any saapla analyzad as a soil contain*
than 50% watar, all data should ba flagosd
2.1 Hava any PEST/Pa holding tiaas, datarainad from data of 
/
VI
! 2.0 __
2.1
,^_ 
collaction to data of axtracticn, baan
' 
Saqslas for P£ST/PCB analysis, both soils and
oust ba axtractad within savan days of tha data of
collection. Detracts sust ba analyzad within 40
days of tha data of axtracticn.
3*0
3.1 Ara tha PEST/PCS Surraoata Bacovary Sunaarias (Fora ZZ)
it for aach of tha following
a. Low Watar 
" 
f \/1 
__ 
__
b. Mad Wrtsr 
[_] 
__ ^
c. Low Soil 
[__] *" __ 
^L
A. MadSoil 
C__3 __ 
J*L
3.2 Ara all tha PEST/PCB sanplas Tistart on ttm apprepriata
urrogat* Bacovary Suanarias for aach of tha following
a. Lowttetar 
f i/1 
__ 
——
b. Mad Watar 
C __ } 
——
c. 
Low Soil 
- 
t —— ]
Ll 
°°i 
1515
d. Mad Soil 
C __ )
—— 
^~
N-173 
SaNDftSD OFSWVTINS PRDGTLSE 
Page: 
29 
Of 
36
Data: Marc*} 1990
7
NO 
N/A
lab fbr ajqplanation / raaubmittals. If
dalivarablas an unavailable, Ouuuiant
aff act en data wdar "p** l^HJBrw1* faction of
3.3 Wan outliars aazfead corractly with an astarisk? 
f \/l 
__ 
__
circla aU outliars in rad.
3.4 Has surxooata (OK) raoovacy outaida of tha uui&aut 
/
•pacification for any saspla or blank? 
V 
[_J
ACTION: Mb qualification is dona if surrogate* ara rtllitfarl bayond
datacticn. If raoovary is balew cuiUaut limit (but above
zaro), flag all results for that ample "J*. 
If recovery is
zero, flag positive raaults "J" and nan-detects "R". If
jvery for the blank is zaro, flag non-datacts fbr all
"R". 
Zf recovery is above
Unit, flag all positive results for that sacpla "J", unless
in tha reviewers professional judgement tha high
is due to co-eluting interference (check tha
blank - if recovery is high thara also, flag tha
3.5 Ara thara any transcription/calculation aiiuis hatnaan rav 
/
data and Tcaes H? 
__ 
\^/^ __
ACHCN: Zf larga arms axist, call lab for
nota arrors undar
4.1 Is tha Matrix SpiXa Duplicata/Racovary Form (Tbra HI)
4.2 Wara matrix apiXaa analyzad at tha ragjoirad fraouancy
for aacb of tha following aatrioaa:
ua _
a. Low
b. MadUrtar 
C_3
c, ZowSoil 
I__]
dL ItadSoil 
t—] 
—— ±L-
ACTGN: If any ratrix spifca data ara aisainj, tmJca
tha action spacifiad in 3.2 abova.
4.3 How nany FEST/FCB spiJca racovarias ara outsida QC linits?
TUT °01 1516
out of 12 
NJJA- out of 12
1
N-174 
S^NOPD OFBIAIDC EROGSUFE 
Page: 30 
of 
35
I 
Date: March 1990
Revision 7
ACIICN: Zf IS and MSO both hava lass than zero
for an analyte, negative results for that
analyta should ba rejected, and positiva
rasults should ba flagged "J". lha above
applies only to the sample uMd for VB/tBD
analysis. Use profassional jtidganant in
applying this citation to othar saaplas.
Blanks
"Uatnr blanks11 and "distillad vatar blanks" ar«
validatad life* any othar supl* and ara ca
to qualify data. Da not oonfus* than with tha
QC blanks T111 mail balow.
__ 
_ 
NO
4.4 How many RPD's for matrix spike and matrix spike
duplicate recoveries are outside QC limits?
Baler. 
soil*
out of 6 
A//A out of 6
5.1 Is the Method Blank. Suonary (Fora IV)
5.2 Frequency of Analysis: for the analysis of Pesticide
TCL cccpounds, has a reagent/method blank been
analyzed for each set of samples or every 20 samples
of similar matrix (low water, mad water, low soil,
medium soil), whichever is more frequent?
5.3 Qircratcgraphy: review the blank rev data -
cimxatuyiaas, quant reports or data system printouts.
Is the chrcDatographic performance (baseline stability) 
/
for each instruaant acceptable for PEST/PCBs? 
f \/i 
__ 
__
ACTION: Use professional judgement to determine
effect on the data.
6.1 Do any method/instnnant/reagent blanks have positive
results for FEST/FCBe? Wien applied as deecribed
below, the contaminant concentration in these blanks 
/
are T^^ipH^1 by the sample Dilution
6.2 Do any field/rinse blanks have positive PEST/PCS
results?
ACTION: Prepare a list of the samples Menriaterl
with each of the contaminated blanks.
(Attach a separate sheet.)
TUT O01 1517
OFEWCING FKX-___RE 
Fege: 
31 
of
^ata: Martt 1990
Revision 7
NOTE: Cnly fi«ld/rinse blanks taken tha same day
as the sa-plae art uaad to qualify data. Blanks
aay not ba qualified because of carTtaninaticn
in another blank. Blank* aay ba qualified for
aurzogate, spectral, tuning or calibration QC
problecs.
ACTION: follow the dixeetiona in the table below to qualify
TCL results due to ocntaninatien. Use the ~
value frsn all the associated blanks.
Saaple cenc > CHQLJ Saaple cone < OCL ft{ Sasple cenc"?
but < 5x blank 
! is < 3x blank value ! ft > Sx blank value
Flag sasple result! Reject saqple result Ho qualification
with a "U"; cross 
and I^-JILI CRQL; 
is
cut "B- flag 
cross out "BN +i~
I 
——*. 
B 
fc_g»j 
j rma». eu. 
"B 
ri.«y 
j
I——-————-————————' 
________________)
6.3 Are there field/rinse/equipnent blanks associated with every 
/
aasple? 
[__] _ 
V
AOZGK: For lev level sacples, note in data tttmmmi\t that
there is no associated f ield/rir_w/equipa_nt blank*
Lcn: 
sasples taken frcn a drinking
do not have associated field blanks •
7.1 Are the foUowing Gas
fointouts for both Fri 
_ 
_
(confirmation standards not regured if there
no positive results above CRQL)
a. Evaluation Standard Mix A
b. Evaluation standard Mix B
e. Evaluation Standard Mix C
d. Individual Standard Mix A
«. Individual Standard Mix B
f. Multi-ocnponent Pesticides Vaxaphene ft Qilordane
g. ArcdcES 1016/1260
h. Arcclors 1221, 1232, 1242, 124S, and 1254
ACZ7CN: If no, take action specified in 3.2 above
N-176 STANDARD OP5WT2C PRDCE3L7Z 
Peoe: 32 
of 
3«
Data: M&rct 1990
Revision 7
___ 
YES 
JJQ 
N/A
7.2 Is Fora VUX Past-1 present and comlete for each GC
colutan (priaary and confiaatian) and each 72 hour 
/
eetjiame of analyses? 
r V/J
' 
» 
y J —__
ATTirK; If no, take action -r*^*^^ in 3.2 above.
7.3 Are there any t-i*rsagy^p<;ia^/r^ii^^»^j>^< errors between raw
data and Form Vlil?
ACTION: If large arrars exist, «»T» lab for explanation /
note errors under "Conclusions".
7.4 Has the total breakdown on quantitation or confirmation 
/
colum exceeded 20% for COT? 
__ 
[V 1 __
- for Endrin? 
__ 
f v/l __
or if Endrin aldehyde and 4,4'-COD co-elute and there is a
peak at their retention time, has the ccobined DOT and Endrin 
/
breakdown eiireeMel 20%? 
__ 
[_J 
\s
ACTICN:__
a. If DOT breakdown is greater than 20% on quantitation colum
beginning with tha saaplas following the last to UJILLO! standard:
1. nag all positive DOT results "J".
2. If DOT was not detected but ECO and/or DDE are positive,
flag the DOT nan-detect "IT.
3. Flag positive ECO and DOT results "JIT*. 
__
4. If DOT breakdown is > 20% en confirmation "^V*"" and. DOT
is identified on quantitatien colum but not on confirmation
column, use professional judgement to determine whether DOT
should be lapn tart on Form I (if reported, flag result. "IP).
b. If Endrin breakdown is > 20%' en quantitation colum, beginning with
the sacples fallowing the last in mit-rel standard:
1. Flag all positive Endrin results "J1*.
2. If Endrin was not detected, but Endrin Aldehyde and/or Endrin
Ketcne are positive, flag tha Endrin nan-detect "R".
3. Flag Endrin tatene positive results «JN".
4. If Bill In breakdown is > 20% on confirnetion colum ejg
Endrin is identified on quantitation colum but not en
confirmation colum, use professional juJueueut to
determine whether Endrin should be reported on Fora I
reported, flag result
c. If the corbinad breakdown is used (it can only be
if the conditions in 7.4 above are sert) and is > 20% on
quantitation cnlum beginning with the last in miual
standard, take the actions specified in 7.4 a and b above.
If the ccnfeinad breakdown is >20% on confirmation colum
and Endrin or COT is identified on quantitation colum
but. not on confirmation colum, use professional judgenen) 7 LIi 001 
j -n v
to detaraina whether Endrin or DOT should be 
• •-
Form I (if reported, flag result "IT*).
f 
„ ,,, 
STANDARD OPERATING
Data: March 1990
. 
• 
Revision 7
7.5 Zs the linearity check BSD of all feur calibration factors 
/
I 
<10% for the quantitaticn colon? 
f y/i
ACZZCN: Zf no, flag positive hits for all pesticide and PCB
analytes "J" for all associated samples. Do not flag
toxaphene or COT if they are quantified from a 3-point
calibration curve.
7.6 Zs the % difference batueeu the EVAL A and each analysis
(quantitation and ccnfixaation) OBC retention tiae within
QC liaits (2% for packed column, 0.3% for capillary [Z.O.
< 0.32 am], 1% for aegabore [0.32 < Z.D. < 2 SB]) ?
ACZZCN: OK retention tiae cannot be evaluated if
OBC is not detected. Zf it is pieeent end
has a retention tiaa out of QC Units, then
use professional judgement to deteraine the
reliability of the analysis and flag results
"R", if appropriate.
7.7 Was the p-Livet analytical sequence followed for each 
/
72 hour period of analyses (page PEST D-36 in 8/87 SOW). 
fV i
ACZZCN: Zf no, use professional judgement to
deteraine the severity of the effect
on the data and accept or reject it
accordingly. Generally, the effect
is negligible unless the sequence was
grossly altered or the calibration was
also out of liaits.
8.1 Zs Form ZX present and ccBplete for each GC column and
72 hr sequence of analyses? 
t* 1
ACTZCN: Zf no, take action specified in 3.2 above.
8.2 Are there any transcription/calculation errors
raw data and Fora XX?
ACIZGN: Zf large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
8.3 Zs DOT retention tiae for pecked columns > 12 Bin
(except 07-1 and OP-101 colum)?
ACZIGN: Zf no, check that there is adequate resolution
batiiesn Irrilirldnnl mr|ii>aiiri 
Zf not, flag 
n rr
results for corapounds that interfere with each
other (co-elute)
8.4 Do all standard retention times fall within the windows 
/
established for the first ZHD A and ZND B analyses? 
f^ 1
M_178 
STANDARD QFEWHH3 W* U'l^l 
Faoa: 
34 
of 
35
Data: Marcn 1390
Revision 7
YES 
NO 
N/A
ACXICN: Beginning with the saoplas following the
last in iIuiLroi standard, check to aaa if
the cnrcflBtcgraas contain peatai within an
ratantion tiaes. Zf no peaks are found and,
OK is visible non-detacts ara valid. Zf
paaks are present and cannot be identified
through "pattern recognition* or a consistent
shirt in standard retention tiaas, flag all
affected ' • "f -jiil results
8.5 Are the continuing calibration standard calibration
factors within 15% (for quantitation colunn) or
20% (for confixnation colvnn) of the initial (at 
/
beginning of 72 br sequence) calibration factors? 
f */i
ACX1CN: If no, flag all associated positiva raaults
"J". 
Usa profaasional judganant to datazmir
whathar or not to flag non^datacts.
9.1 Zs Form X ompleta for every sanple in which a 
s
pesticide or PCS was detected? 
[__1 _m 
\S
ACTON: Zf no, take action ^racifiad in 3.2 abovav.
9.2 Ara there any transcription arrors between raw
data and Form X? 
__ 
[_J
ACTION: Zf large errors exist, call lab for explanation /
resubnittal, sake any necessary corrections and
9.3 Are retention tinea of sasple oonpounds within the
calculated retention tine windows for both quantitation
and confirmation analyses?
Was QC/tS confirmation provided when required (when
ntration is > 10 ug/ml in final extract)?
ACXZCN: Reject ("R") all positive results (nesting
quantitation ooluwi criteria, but sissing
confiraation by a seoond oolunn or OC/tS (if
appropriats). Also, reject ("R") all positive
results not Beating retention tiaa window
criteria unless associated standard oatpounds
ara similarly biased (i.e. base on RRT to OBC).
9.4 Cneck chronatogrma for falsa negatives, esneHally for
the Bultipla peak consonants toxaphene and; PCB's. Wars
there any false negatives?
ACIZCN: Zf appropriate KB standards ware not analyzed,
or if the lab perforaad no confirmation analysis
flag the appropriate data with an "9f»
iLi i
N-179 
att&SD OrWraC HCCDCRE 
Page: 35 
of 
36
Data: March 1990
Revision 7
__ 
NO 
N/A
10.0 Qjjr^T^srf ftMHti^a^ion IITT* ™——""—* ™—'—~~^' 
-• •• 
*
10.1 Are there any transcription / calculation errors in
Fora Z results? Check at least taw positive values.
Ware eny errors found? 
___ 
f 
\
NOTE: Simple paak pesrlrlrts results can be checked for
rough •j'.aa.mii 
Tien laai i quantitative results
obtained en tha taJo GC calms. Tna reviewer
should uaa professional judgement to decide
whether a such larger concantratian obtained
on ana cnlt.gr> vanua tha othar iniicatas tha
j:iraaanra of an interfering oa^ound. Zf an
interfering oaopound is indicated,
of the owo value* ahould be ienju.ted and
qualified ae fiieeuiifirivaly pieeeiit at an
ectiaated quantity ("ON**). mis na
a detazBination of an eetiaated conoencratien
on the eenf izaatian colum. Tha narrative
should indicate that the preeenor of interf i
has obeeured the atxeopt at a second
10.2 Are the CRQU adjusted to reflect sa&ple
and, for sails, sample aoisture? 
___ 
r 
1
ACZZCK: Zf errors are large, call lab for ajojlanetian /
resubmittal, oake any neoeesary corrections and
note errors under "Conclusions'*.
ACTION: When a sarpla is analyzed at aore than one
dilution, the- lowest CRQCs are used (unless
a QC exoeedanoe dictates tha use of the
data from the diluted sanple analysis) .
range in the original analysis by crossing out
the "F* value on the original Focm Z and substi
tuting it vitfa data frontna analysis of
X jJat vO J9e
than draw a red "X" across tha entire page of
all Fora. Z's that should not be used,
page of
including
fV 1 
—— 
——
U.I Ware baselines stable?
U.2 Ware any electropositive displacenent (negative 
/
peeks) or unusual peeks seen? 
__ 
LJLJ
U.3 Ware early eluting peaks (for early eluting 
/
analytee) resolved to baseline? 
L&J 
——
ACIZCN: For U.I and 11.2, cooment only. For U.3,
reject ("R") those analytes that are not 
: 
(">i
suf f icienUy reeolved.
: 
36 
cf 
36
12.1 War* any fiald Aalicataa aut&ittad for
^ 
w^ 
- 
^^^^^*^^^^^ ^^^^
/
^
f \/i _ 
_
naulti for fi«ld
and calculat* tha nlativ*
ACdCK: Any gro«« variation
raaults aust ba addnaaad In
naxzstiva. nougvar, if lax^a diffaranoaa axist,
ti
N-1B1
SDG # 900770 VIHA I
Tutu Wells Site
Contaminated Volatile Method Blanks and Their Associated Samples
Method Blank 
Associated Sanmles
VBLK01
VBLK02
VBLK03
VBLK04
Matthias
Tfflet, Hartman I (Gassett), Tillet(D), Trip
Blank 10/03, Trip Blank 9/27, VIHA I
Trip Blank 10/01, H2O Blk Tutu, Trip
Blank 10/02, Dimitri, Dimitri MS
Ramsey, Dimitri MSD, LaPIace, Bryan,
EglinI
rur
001
1 524
GERAGHTY » MTI.1 FR INC
N-182
SDG # 900770 VIHA I
Tutu Wells Site
Contaminated Trip Blanks and Their Associated Samples
Trip Blank 
Associated Samoles
Trip Blank 10/01
(770-05)
Trip Blank 10/02
(770-11)
Trip Blank 10/03
(770-13)
Trip Blank 9/27
(770-15)
Biyan, Dimitri, Dimitri MS, Dimitri MSD,
Matthias, Ramsey
Eglin I, LaPIace, Tillet, Tillet(D)
Hartman I (Gassett)
VIHAI
001 
1525
N-183
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE I OF2J
TOTAL REVIEW 
~ —
CLP DATA ASSESSMENT
Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Organics Analysis
Case NO. ^00110 SDC No. ^/HAlLABORATORYfe/*.^ SITE^/I^/
DATA ASSESSMENT:
The current functional guidelines (1988) for evaluating organic
data have been applied.
All data are valid and acceptable except those analytes which
have been qualified with a "J" (estimated), "U" (non-detects) , "R"
(unusable) ,or "JN" (presumptive evidence for the presence of the
raterial at an estimated value). All action is detailed on the
attached sheets.
Tvo facts should be noted by- all data users. First, the "R"
flag means that the associated value is unusable. In other words,
due to significant QC problems the analysis is invalid and provides
no information as to whether the compound is present or not. "R"
values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be
relied upon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in
irind is that no compound concentration, even if it has passed all
QC tests, is guaranteed to be accurate. 
Strict QC serves to
increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains
error.
Reviewer's
S i gnature : /X/fot*KO W- tfZet^U* _____ Date : 6J / 0-7 /19 JJ
Verified By; ^^L — ""^J^M^*- 
Date; // /</ /19/f/
TUT
1
' 
N-184
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE Z OF Zl
DATA ASSESSMENT:
1. 
HOLDING TIME:
The amount of an analyte in a sample can change with time due to chemical
instability, degradation, volatilization, etc. If the specified holding time is exceeded, the data
may not be valid. Those analytes detected in the samples whose holding time has been
exceeded with be qualified as estimated, T. The non-detects (sample quantitation limits)
will be flagged as estimated, "J", or unusable, "R", if the holding times are grossly exceeded.
The following action was taken in the samples and analytes shown due to excessive
holding time.
All samples were analyzed within the holding time for volatile organic
compounds except the trip blank dated 10/01/90. The chain of custody does
not indicate whether or not this sample was preserved, therefore it is assumed
that it wasn't The trip blank 10/01 was analyzed 5 days over the 7 day
aromatic volatile holding time; all aromatic volatile compound concentration
values (hits and non-detects) are qualified with T.
All samples were analyzed within the holding time for semrvolatile organic
compounds except Tillet (RE) and Tillet(D)-RE (RE - re-extracted and
reanalyzed). These samples are re-extractions which exceeded the 7 day
holding time by 29 days and 31 days, respectively. 
All compound
concentration values (hits and non-detects) are rejected for Tillet (RE) and
Tillet(D)-RE. Note: The -RE suffix is used in this report to make a
distinction between the first (original) extraction and second (re-extraction)
extraction. All first extraction data are labelled "original" and the re-
extraction data have the suffix -RE.
The pesticides and PCBs were analyzed within holding times for all samples.
' 
. Tin oo i
I
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
I
N-185
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE3 OF*I
DATA ASSESSMENT:
2. 
BLANK CONTAMINATION
Quality assurance (QA) blanks, i.e., method, trip, field, rinse, and water blanks are
prepared to identify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samples
during sample preparation or field activity. 
Method blanks measure laboratory
contamination. Trip blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during shipment Field
blanks measure cross-contamination of samples during field operations. If the concentration
of the analyte is less than 5 times the blank contaminant level (10 times for the common
laboratory contaminants), the analytes are qualified as non-detects, "U". The following
analytes in the samples shown were qualified with "U" for these reasons:
A) 
Method blank contamination
Volatile Organic Compounds
Method blank VBLK01 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a
concentration of 5 micrograms per liter (ug/L) and a tentatively identified
compound (TIC) with a retention time (RT) of 3.83 minutes at a
concentration of 7 ug/L, The sample Matthias is associated with this method
blank and contains 9 ug/L of methylene chloride and 5 ug/L of the same TIC.
The methylene chloride concentration value is qualified with "LT because it
is less than 10 times the common contaminant concentration in the method
blank. The TIC concentration value is qualified as a non-detect because it is
less than 5 times the contamination in the method blank and therefore it is
not reported.
Method blank VBLK02 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a
concentration of 5 ug/L, acetone at a concentration of 2 ug/L, and a TIC with
a RT of 3.78 at a concentration of 5 ug/L. The sample Tillet, which had a
dilution factor of 5, is associated with this method blank and has a methylene
chloride concentration of 40 ug/L and the same TIC at a concentration of 42
ug/L. The methylene chloride concentration value is qualified with "U" and
the TIC concentration value is is not reported for the same reasons stated
above. The samples Tillet(D) and VTHA I are also associated with this
method blank and have methylene chloride and acetone concentrations at or
above the contract required quantitation limits (CRQLs) as well as the same
TIC contamination. The methylene chloride and acetone concentration values
TUT 
OO.1 1528
r FR nsir
N-1S6
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE ^ OF
DATA ASSESSMENT:
are qualified with "U" and the TIC concentration values are not reported for
reasons stated above.
Method blank VBLK03 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a
concentration of 2 ug/L and a TIC with a RT of 3.93 at a concentration of 6
ug/L. The sample Dimitri and the H2O Blk Tutu are associated with this
method blank and have methylene chloride concentrations above the CRQL
and the same TIC contamination. The methylene chloride concentration
values are qualified with "IT and the TIC values are not reported for reasons
stated above.
Method blank VBLK04 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a
concentration of 2 ug/L and a TIC with a RT of 3.97 at a concentration of 5
ug/L. The samples Bryan, Eglin I, Ramsey, and LaPlace are associated with
this method blank and have methylene chloride concentrations at or above the
CRQL and the same TIC contamination. 
The methylene chloride
concentration values are qualified with "U" and the TIC concentration values
are not reported for reasons stated above.
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
No contaminants are detected in the method blank.
Pesticides/PCBs
No contaminants are detected in the method blank.
B) 
Field or rinse blank contamination ("water blanks" or "distilled water blanks" are
validated like any other sample).
All samples were taken directly from a drinking water tap into a collection
bottle, therefore no field blanks were necessary.
C) 
Trip blank contamination
Only volatile organic compounds were analyzed for in trip blanks.
TUT 
001 
1
GERAGHTY/tf MTiTFR risir
N-187
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE/OF
DATA ASSESSMENT:
Trip blank 9/27 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a concentration
of 16 ug/L. Sample VIHAI is associated with this trip blank and contains 3
ug/L of methylene chloride. This value is already qualified due to method
blank contamination.
Trip blank 10/01 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a concentration
of 13 ug/L, acetone at a concentration of 6 ug/L, and a TIC with a RT of
3.95 at a concentration of 4 ug/L The samples Bryan, Dunitri, Matthias, and
Ramsey are associated with this trip blank. The methylene chloride and same
TIC concentration values for these samples have already been qualified due
to method blank contamination. Acetone is not detected in any of the
associated samples.
Trip blank 10/02 is reported to contain methylene chloride at a concentration
of 14 ug/L, acetone at a concentration 7 ug/L, and a TIC with a RT of 3.95
at a concentration of 3 ug/L, The samples Egiin I and LaPlace are associated
with this trip blank. The methylene chloride and same TIC concentration
values for these samples have already been qualified due to method blank
contamination. These samples also have acetone concentrations above the
CRQL. These values are qualified with "U" because they are less than 10
times the common contaminant concentration in the trip blank.
01
r PP
N-188
j 
SOP NO. HW-6
ATTACHMENT 1
PAGE 6 OF*'
I 
DATA ASSESSMENT:
' 
3. 
MASS SPECTROMETER TUNING:
| 
Tuning and performance criteria are established to ensure adequate mass resolution,
proper identification of compounds, and to some degree, sufficient instrument sensitivity.
I 
These criteria are not sample specific. Instrument performance is determined using
| 
standard materials. Therefore, these criteria should be met in all circumstances. The tuning
standard for volatile organics is bromofluorobenzene (BFB) and for semi-volatiles is
decafluorotriphenyl-phosphine (DFTPP).
If the mass calibration is in error, all associated data will be classified as unusable,
"R".
All mass calibrations are acceptable for both the volatile and semivolatile
analyses.
• S L I T 
001 1531
r:co Arrurv & \/n\ i CD
N-189
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE 10F
DATA ASSESSMENT:
4. 
CALIBRATION
Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to ensure that the instrument is
capable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibration demonstrates that
the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance at the beginning of an
experimental sequence. The continuing calibration checks document that the instrument is
giving satisfactory daily performance.
A) 
RESPONSE FACTOR:
The response factor measures the instrument's response to specific chemical
compounds. The response factor for the Target Compound List (TCL) must be >_ 0.05
(a ratio of areas) in both the initial and continuing calibrations. A value < 0.05 indicates
a serious detection and quantitation problem (poor sensitivity). Analytes detected in the
sample will be qualified as estimated, T. 
All non-detects for that compound will be
rejected ("R").
Volatile Organic Compounds
The initial calibration performed on 9/28/90 has response factors <0.05 for
acetone, 2-butanone, and 2-hexanone. All samples are associated with this
calibration and are qualified as stated above.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/08 has response factors < 0.05 for
2-butanone and 2-hexanone. The continuing calibrations performed on 10/09,
10/13, and 10/14 have response factors <0.05 for acetone, 2-butanone,and 2-
hexanone. These compounds are already qualified in the associated samples
as a result of deficient initial calibration response factors.
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
All response factors are greater than or equal to 0.05 in both the initial and
continuing calibrations.
TUT
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE i OF
DATA ASSESSMENT:
5. 
CALIBRATION:
A) 
PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATION (%RSD) AND PERCENT
DIFFERENCE (%D):
Percent RSD is calculated from the initial calibration and is used to indicate the
stability of the specific compound response factor over increasing concentration. Percent
D compares the response factor of the continuing calibration check to the mean response
factor (RRF) from the initial calibration. Percent D is a measure of the instrument's daily
performance. Percent RSD must be <30% and %D must be <25%. A value outside of
these limits indicates potential detection and quantitation errors. For these reasons, all
positive results are flagged as estimated, T and non-detects are flagged "UP (if %D or
RSD > 50%). If there is a gross deviation of %RSD and %D, the non-detects may be
rejected ("R").
For the PCB/PESTICIDE fraction, %RSD for aldrin, endrin, DDT, and
dibutylchlorendate must not exceed 10%. Percent D must be within 15% on the
quantitation column and 20% on the confirmation column.
Volatile Organic Compounds
The initial calibration performed on 9/28/90 has a %RSD greater than 30%
for methylene chloride (66.948%) and acetone (71280%). All samples are
associated with this initial calibration. The methylene chloride concentration
values will be qualified as stated above. The acetone concentration values are
already qualified as a result of deficient response factors.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/08 has a %D greater than 25%
for 2-butanone (8237%) and acetone (93.97%). The sample Matthias is
associated with this calibration. These compounds are already qualified as a
result of deficient response factors.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/09 has a %D greater than 25%
for the following compounds:
1 533
i PP
N-191
ATTACHMENT!
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE 10F 2-i
DATA ASSESSMENT:
Compound 
%D
Chloromethane 
28.83
Bromomethane 
27.18
Methylene Chloride 
33.67
2-Butanone 
75.79
Vinyl Acetate 
4625
4-Methyl-2-Pentanonc 
38.55
The samples Tillet, Tillet(D), Hartman I, Trip Blank 10/03, VIHA I, and Trip
Blank 9/27 are associated with this calibration. The concentration values of
the above compounds are qualified with T for positive hits. No action is
taken for non-detects, except for 2-butanone, which are already qualified as
a result of deficient response factors.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/13 has a %D greater than 25%
for the following compounds:
Compound 
%D
Bromomethane 
39.46
1.1-Dichloroethane 
28.41
trans-l,2,-Dichloroethene 
30.42
Chloroform 
40.08
1.2-Dichloroethane 
48.71
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 
37.61
Carbon Tetrachloride 
34.44
Bromodichloromethane 
40.12
1,2-Dichloropropane 
31.95
trans-lJ-Dichloropropene 
108.79
Trichloroethene 
2637
Dibromochloromethane 
40.43
1,1,2-Trichloroe thane 
34.86
Benzene 
33.19
Bromoform 
27.06
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 
31.53
Chlorobenzene 
27.12
TUT 
001 
15
^r>r» * /-«f i "fir
I
I
I
N-192
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE 0OF 2.1
DATA ASSESSMENT:
The samples Dimitri, Trip Blank 10/01, H2O Blk Tutu and Trip Blank 10/02
are associated with this calibration. The concentration values of the above
compounds are qualified with "J" for positive hits in the affected samples. No
action is taken for non-detects, except for trans-l,3-dichloropropene, which
will be qualified with "R" because the %D is greater than 90%.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/14 has a %D greater than 25%
for the following compounds:
Compound 
%D
Acetone 
36.79
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 
29.70
Vinyl Acetate 
26.53
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 
38.95
cis-13-Dichloropropene 
29.80
The samples Bryan, Ramsey, Eglin I, and La Place are associated with this
calibration. The concentration values of the above compounds are qualified
with "J" for positive hits. No action is taken for non-detects, except for
acetone, which is already qualified as a result of deficient response factors.
1 
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
No semivolatile organic compounds were detected in any of the samples.
Therefore, the CRQLs will be qualified with "UT only when calibrations have
%RSDs or %Ds greater than 50%.
The continuing calibration performed on 10/27 has a %D greater than 50%
for hexachlorocyclopentadiene (66.0%). Samples La Place, Tillet (original),
and Tillet(D) (original) are associated with this calibration. The non-detect
values will be qualified with "UJ".
The continuing calibration performed on 11/08 has a %D greater than 50%
for benzoic acid (55.0%), 2,4-dinitrophenol (65.0%), and 2,4,6-tribromophenol
(-55.0%). 
Sample Tillet(RE) is associated with this calibration. 
All
semivolatile concentration values are already flagged with "R" due to holding
time exceedence.
'i'U'!' 
OO.l .1535
I
N-193
!
— 
ATTACHMENT 1
I 
SOP NO. HW-6
' 
PAGE II OF 2.1
DATA ASSESSMENT:
Pesticides/PCBs
The %RSD for aldrin, endrin, DOT, and dibutylchlorendate did not exceed
10%. The %D was within 15% on the quantitation column and within 20%
on the confirmation column.
JT 
OO1 1536
N-235
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page 3 of -T
Title:
Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Appendix A. 1: Data Assessment - Contract
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
Date:
Number:
Revision:
Feb. 1990
HW-2
10
A.2.1 
(continuation)
The CRA run on 10/31/90 has a 45% recovery for Mercury. The samples Bryan.
Dimitri. Matthias. Ramsey. Eglin I. LaPlace. Tillet. Tillet(D), H20________
blk Tutu, and Hartman I are associated with the above deficiencies. _____•
Positive hits for the listed metals are qualified "J" in the affected samples.______
The mercury concentration values are qualified "R" for all affected samples________
because the recovery is below 50%.__________________________
The CR1 run on 11/01 has the following deficiencies:_________________
_______Metal__________%R_____________________
_______Antimony________71.7___
________Cadmium_________130.0______________________
__________Silver__________140.0_____________________
The CRA run on 11/05 has a 50% recovery for Mercury. VIHA I is the only____
sample associated with the above deficiencies. The positive hits for the___________
listed metals are qualified "J". The Mercury value has previously been____________
qualified "R"._______________________________________________
The CRA run on 10/20 has a 133% recovery for Selenium. Samples Bryan,_______
Dimitri, DimitriD, DimitriS, Matthias, and Ramsey are associated with this CRA
analysis. The positive hits for Selenium are qualified with "J" for the samples._______
HJT ooj. 153-7
K-236
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page V of S
Title: 
Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: 
Feb. 1990
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
HW-2
Appendix A.I: Data Assessment-Contract 
Revision: 
10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
A. 2.1 
(continuation)
The CRA run on 10/25 has a 125% recovery for Thallium. The samples Matthias.
Ramsey. Eglin I. LaPlace, Tillet, Tillet(D), and the H2O blk Tutu are______
associated with this deficiency. There are no positive hits, therefore no_____
qualifiers are necessary. However. Thallium has previously been qualified_________
"UJ" for these samples._________________________________
The Iron concentration value in the field duplicate has a RPD that____________
is greater than 50% where sample and duplicate are both greater than 5__________
times the CRDL. As a result. Iron values are qualified as estimated ("J")____
in all samples. The Lead concentration values are less than 5 times the__________
CRDL in both the sample and duplicate and the difference is greater than the
CRDL, therefore all Lead values are qualified as estimated ("J") in all samples.
Sample Dimitri was used for the matrix spike analysis. Selenium (36%) and_____
Thallium (25%) have % recoveries out of QC limits (75-125%). All Selenium
results are qualified "UJ" for non-detects and "J" for positive hits. All_________
Thallium results are qualified "R", which supercedes previous qualifiers._____
In the ICP Serial Dilution, the initial concentration of Vanadium is greater____
than 10 times the IDL and the % difference is out of QC units. As a result,_______
all Vanadium concentration values are qaulified with "J".______________
TUT 
001 
1538
GFRAGHTY-vvtTT r PP r\ir
N-237
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page>5"of>r
Title: 
Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: 
Feb. 1990
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: HW-2
Appendix A. 1: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 
10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
A.2.2 
Contract Problems/Non Compliance
The holding time for Mercury analysis was exceeded for nine samples.______
Samples Dimitri and Tillet were not correctly preserved._____________
The correlation coefficients were out of QC limits for Arsenic and Thallium
analyses._______________________________________
The Selenium analysis had eleven samples betwen the ICV and CCV. one sample
over the QC limit. ________________________________
MMB Reviewer: ______ _________________ 
Date:
Signature
Contractor Reviewer: 
IAJFIMAA^ W> ,/y-rV^ _____ 
Date:
Signature
Verified by: CAII.™^^.!^ ^ j^fck^ ^ f L j t a j ) 
Date:
TLJi 
OOl 1539
OFRAGHTY^VfTr 1 FR
Table 1 Tatu Res.denuU
Sampling Results, September 1990. Sanpie Delivery Group *XT70
N-236
Sample Identification:
Inorganics Analysis
Aluminum
.Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
770-01
Brvan
149 B
52 U
3 V!
3 U
3 B
4 BJ
54300
7 B
18 U
17 BJ
63 BJ
4.6J
49100
2 B
R
U U
1000 B
2 UJ
7 U
83000
R
37 B
30
5 U
770-02
Dimitn
163 BJ
52 UJ
3 UJ
3 UJ
4 BJ
3 BJ
37500 J
4 BJ
18 UJ
17 BJ
115 J
2.6BJ
27800 J
7 BJ
R
14 BJ
2000 BJ
10 UJ
7 UJ
328000 J
R
92 J
4 UJ
5 UJ
770-03
Matthias
227
52 U
3 UJ
6 B
3 B
3 U
36300
5 B
18 U
18 BJ
20 UJ
1 8BJ
34900
2 U
R
20 BJ
1410 B
2 UJ
7 U
379000
R
21 B
4 BJ
5 U
770-04
Ramsev
187 B
52 U
3 UJ
3 U
3 B
3 BJ
43100
11
18 U
15 BJ
20 BJ
26BJ
34400
2- U
R
21 BJ
1140 B
10 UJ
7 U
209000
R
43 B
7 BJ
5 U
"70-06
Eftlin 1
149 B
52 U
3 U
3 U
4 B
3 U
35300
12
18 U
14 BJ
20 UJ
2 BJ
28700
56
R
26 BJ
920 B
10 UJ
7 U
190000
R
34 B
13 BJ
5 U
"0-0"
UiPlk-e 
— '
146 B
57 B
3 U
3 U
J B-
4 BJ
41000
8 B
18 U
49 J
55 BJ
2.3BJ
32600
2 B
R
18 BJ
1140 B
10 UJ
7 U
250000
R
39 B
13 BJ 
^
5 U
All conceatratjoni are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
} • Value is estimated.
U - Analyte is not detected.
R - Value a rejected.
B - Value is between instrument detection limit and contact required detection limit.
TUT 
OO1 
154O
no
N-23S
.able I. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Saripie Qe.i.o-v Group •W0?"0
1
1 
Sample Identification
•organic Analysis
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
inadium
^Zinc
Cyanide
770-08
Tillet
1
153 BJ
52 UJ
3 UJ
43 BJ
4 BJ
4 BJ
54800 J
8 BJ
18 UJ
48 J
9S3 J
1.5BJ
38300 J
1260 J
R
33 BJ
760 BJ
10 UJ
7 UJ
192000 J
R
25 BJ
162 J
5 Ur
770-09
Tillet-D
(Replicate i
159 B
52 U.
44B
40 B
4 B
3 BJ
48600
7 B
18 U
32 J
2660 J
8.SJ
34500
1100
R
15 BJ
1190 B
10 UJ
7 U
169000
R
50J
124 J
5 U
770-10
H2O stank
Tutp
85 B
52 U
3 U
3 U
4 B
3 U
74 U
5 B
18 U
12 BJ
27 BJ
1 UJ
95 U
2 U
R
11 UJ
300 B
2 UJ
7 U
158 B
R
10 BJ
4 UJ
5 U
770-12
Gassett
(Hartman 1)
526
52 U
3 U
7 B
4 B
3 U
31200
4 B
18 U
10 BJ
418 J
I.4BJ
26300
853
R
11 U
880 B
10 UJ
7 B
236000
R
26 BJ
5 BJ
5 U
770-14
VIHAl
154 B
54 BJ
3 U
5 B
3 B
4 BJ
49400
10
18 C
10 B
29 BJ
9 J
33900
2 U
R
IS B
2000 B
I.4BJ
16 J
252000
R
67 J
16 B
9.7B
1
\
All concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
J • Value is estimated.
U - Analyte is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
B - Value is between instrument detection limit and contract required detection limit.
L
JO
001
11541
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
H-194
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGEIZOFZI
DATA ASSESSMENT:
6. 
SURROGATES:
All samples are spiked with surrogate compounds prior to sample preparation to
evaluate overall laboratory performance and efficiency of the analytical technique. If the
measured surrogate concentrations were outside contract specifications, qualifications were
applied to the samples and analytes as shown below.
Volatile Organic Compounds
As specified in Method 524.2, only two surrogate compounds were used,
bromofluorobenzene (BFB) and trans-l,2-dichlorobenzene-d4 (t-DCB). The
recovery of BFB is outside the quality control (QC) limits (86-115%) in the
following sample analyses:
Sample 
%BFB Recovered
Dimitri 
82
H20 BLK Tutu 
76
Trip Blank 10/03 
82
Trip Blank 10/01 
70
Trip Blank 10/02 
74
VIHAI 
82
DimitriMS 
80
VBLK01 
118
VBLK03 
78
These samples were not re-analyzed. 
For each affected sample, the
concentration values for compounds are qualified T for positive hits, and
"UJ" for all non-detects. No QC limits are established for the recovery of t-
DCB; however, when the BFB recovery is within QC limits, the t-DCB
recovery is in the range of 80% to 120%.
Semivolatile Organic Compounds
The laboratory narrative states that in the original analyses of sample Tillet
and Tillet(D) the recovery of the surrogates phenol-dS (PHL) and 2-
fluorophenol (2FP) were low, which lead to a re-extraction and re-analysis of
TU1
GERAGHTY & MILLER FNC
N-195
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
PAGE 3 OF Zl
both samples. After the re-extraction, the Tillet (RE) surrogate recoveries
were all within QC limits and the laboratory reported only this set of results.
This re-extraction was performed out of holding time, therefore those results
are qualified with "R" and are not reported. The original Tillet results were
requested from the laboratory. The recoveries for PHL and 2FP were 8%
and 11%, respectively, in the original Tillet analysis. Both PHL and 2FP are
surrogates for the acid fraction, therefore only the acid fraction concentration
values are qualified with "R" in the original Tillet sample as a result of one
surrogate having less then a 10% recovery.
After re-extraction, the Tillet (D)RE recoveries of the surrogates PHL and
2FP remained out of QC limits. The lab reported both sets of Tillet(D)
results. The following are the recoveries for both Tillet(D) (original) and
Tillet(D) RE analyses:
Sample
Tillet(D) - original
Tillet(D)RE
%PHL
7
9
%2FP
9
15
Only the acid fraction will be qualified "R" in each sample as a result of at
least one acid fraction surrogate having less than a 10% recovery.
Pesticides/PCBs
The Dibutylchlorandate (DBC) recovery was high for sample VIHAI (191%,
QC limits 24-154%). No pesticides or PCBs were found in this sample,
therefore no qualifiers are necessary.
1543
Ant-TTV O tk/nt I f?r>
N-196
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE/1! OF 2-1
DATA ASSESSMENT:
7. 
INTERNAL STANDARDS PERFORMANCE:
Internal standard (IS) performance criteria ensure that the GC/MS sensitivity and
response are stable during every experimental run. The internal standard area count must
no vary by more than a factor of 2 (-50% to +100%) from the associated continuing
calibration standard, the retention time of the internal standard must not vary more than
+. 30 seconds from the associated continuing calibration standard. If the area count is
outside the (-50% to +100%) range of the associated standard, all of the positive results for
compounds quantitated using that IS are qualified as estimated, "J", and all non-detects as
"UJYor "R" if there is a severe loss of sensitivity.
If an internal standard retention time varies by more than 30 seconds, the reviewer
will use professional judgement to determine either partial or total rejection of the data for
that sample fraction.
All internal standard area counts and retention times are within QC limits for
VOC analyses.
The internal standard area count for Phenanthrene-dlO is extremely low for
sample Tillet (original). All associated sample data quantitated using this
internal standard are rejected. Sample Tillet (original) is reported to contain
20 ug/L of Di-n-Butylphthalate. This concentration was quantitated using the
Phenanthrene-dlO internal standard area count. In the reviewer's professional
judgement, this value is rejected because the quantitation is greatly altered by
the low internal standard area count If the area count were within QC limits,
the reported value would be dramatically lower and would most likely be a
non-detect The internal standard area counts are within QC limits for the
remaining volatile compound analyses.
'"UT 
001 
1544
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-197
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
8. 
COMPOUND IDENTIFICATION:
A) 
VOLATILE AND SEMI-VOLATILE FRACTIONS:
TCL compounds are identified on the GC/MS by using the analyte's relative
retention time (RJRT) and by comparison to the ion spectra obtained from known standards.
For the results to be a positive hit, the sample peak must be within ±_ 0.06 RRT units of the
standard compound and have an ion spectra which has a ratio of the primary and secondary
m/e intensities within 20% of that in the standard compound. For the tentatively identified
compounds (TIC) the ion spectra must match accurately. In the cases where there is not
an adequate ion spectrum match, the laboratory may have provided negative proofs.
Volatile organic compounds are properly identified on the GC/MS and all
TICs accurately match their ion spectra.
No semivolatile target compounds were found in any sample. TICs accurately
match their ion spectra.
B) 
PESTICIDE/PCB FRACTION:
The retention times of reported compounds must fall within the calculated retention
time windows for the two chromatographic columns and a GC/MS confirmation is required
if the concentration exceeds 10 nanograms per milliliter (ng/ml) in the final sample extract
No pesticides or PCBs were found in any sample^
I
i
I 
• 
TUT 
001 
l?4b
I FP
N-198
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
9. 
MATRIX SPIKE/SPIKE DUPLICATE, MS/MSD:
The MS/MSD data are generated to determine the long-term precision and accuracy
of the analytical method in various matrices. The MS/MSD may be used in conjunction
with other QC criteria for some additional qualification of the data.
All MS/MSD % recoveries are within QC limits for volatile, semivolatile
organic compounds and pesticides/PCBs.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
I
N-199
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE n OF 2.1
DATA ASSESSMENT:
10. 
OTHER QC DATA OUT OF SPECIFICATION:
A) 
Sample Receipt
The chains of custody indicate that the lab received several vials which
contained bubbles. As a result, all volatile organic data is assumed to be
biased low and additional qualifiers are necessary. Bubbles were found in
both vials for samples Tillet(D), LaPlace, and Eglin I. All positive hits for
these samples are qualified with T and all non-detects are qualified with "R".
These qualifiers supercede all others. Bubbles were found in only one vial for
sample Tillet, but the lab was not able to distinguish which vial was used for
the volatile organic analysis. Therefore, we must assume the vial with bubbles
was used and additional qualifiers are necessary. All positive hits are
qualified with "J" and all non detects are qualified with "R".
B) 
Method Detection Limit Study
Method 524.2 state that a method detection limit (MDL) study must be
performed prior to sample analyses.
The MDL study consists of seven repeat analyses of target compounds at
concentrations of 1 ppb. The QC limits for mean accuracy (% recovery) and
%RSD are 80-120% and 20%, respectively. The MDL study must be
repeated if these standards are not met. The MDL study associated with
SDG VIHAI results were performed in April 1990 and has the following
deficiencies (*):
Mean
Accuracv.% 
% RSD
1.1-Dichloroethene 
12* 
12
Methylene Chloride 
148* 
12.0
1.2-Dichloroethane 
121* 
7.9
Tetrachloroethene 
76* 
9.5
Bromoform 
88 
28.0
l,lA2-Tetrachloroethane 
122* 
13
TUT 
O0.1. 1547
I
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-200
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
In addition, the following compounds were not included in the MDL study:
acetone, carbon disulfide, 2-butanone, vinyl acetate, 4-methyl-2-pentanone and
2-hexanone. The above compounds are flagged "J" for all samples, except
where compounds are qualified "R" for other deficiencies.
C) 
Laboratory Fortified Blanks
QC requirements established in Method 5242 and the Sampling, Analysis, and
Monitoring Plan (Appendix A) state that laboratory fortified blanks (LFBs)
must be analyzed immediately following each continuing calibration and the
accuracy must be between 80% to 120% recovery. The provided data indicate
that the recoveries were out of QC limits for volatile compounds in each LFB.
The LFBs were not always analyzed immediately after the calibrations. The
affected samples and compounds are qualified "J" to reflect these deficiencies.
CERAOHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-201
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
DATA ASSESSMENT:
11. 
SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
The compounds of primary importance in this project are the volatile
organics. SDG VIHA I has several volatile QC criteria out of specification.
The MDL study had % recoveries out of QC limits as well as compounds
which were not included in the study at all. The FLBs also had several
compounds out of QC Limits and in two instances was not run immediately
after the continuing calibrations. All target compounds were present in the
FLBs. These MDL and FLB deficiencies indicate that the laboratory
instrumentation has difficulties recovering certain compounds at low
concentrations (1 ppb). As a result, the data is assumed to be biased low and
the affected compounds are qualified with T in the associated samples.
The volatile surrogate recoveries are out of QC limits in several samples as
well as two (out of four) method blanks. For the affected samples, the
identification of the compounds is acceptable, but for positive hits and non-
detects the quantitation must be considered as estimated only. 
The
concentration values and quantitation limits for the six affected samples have
been qualified as such.
The volatile calibrations are deficient for compounds which were either
common lab contaminants or compounds not detected in any sample. The
majority of the data is not seriously affected by these deficiencies.
During the process of validation, the compound quantitation performed by the
reviewer did not agree with the quantitation performed by the lab. The lab
was notified and the laboratory personnel determined that the incorrect
response factors were used to quantitate the compound concentrations for
sample Matthias. The lab corrected the problem and sent a revised Form I(s)
and quantitation report These revisions are included with the data package.
The bubbles in the vials have an impact on the quality of the volatile organic
data for the affected samples. In samples Eglin I, LaPlace, TiHet, and
Tillet(D), all non-detects in the affected samples are rejected "R" and all
positive hits are qualified with T.
TUT 
O01
AriLrrv cs \n\ r CD
N-202
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE2DOFW
DATA ASSESSMENT:
Overall, the volatile organic data is consistent although QC problems exist as
discussed above.
The semivolatile acid fraction surrogate recoveries for the samples Tillet and
Tillet(D) were originally out of QC limits. Both samples were re-extracted
and re-analyzed. 
Although the re-analysis presented some surrogate
recoveries within QC limits, the re-extractions far exceeded the holding time,
making the re-analysis data unusable (qualified "R"). The original Tillet
sample results were received from the laboratory, and are reported in the
table with the acid fraction concentration values rejected. In addition, several
compounds are rejected because the associated internal standard area count
was out of QC limits. The original Tillet(D) results are acceptable except for
the acid fraction concentration values, which are rejected. 
All other
semivolatile data is acceptable.
The pesticide/PCB data is acceptable. The surrogate recovery was high for
one sample, but no pesticides or PCBs were found, therefore it has no effect
on the data.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
N-203
ATTACHMENT 1
SOP NO. HW-6
PAGE 21 OF 5^
DATA ASSESSMENT:
12. 
CONTRACT PROBLEMS:
The MDL study failed to include six target compounds. Several results were
out of QC limits established in Method 524.2 and the Sampling, Analysis, and
Monitoring Plan.
The laboratory fortified blanks were not analyzed immediately after the
calibrations and many % recoveries are not within QC limits.
The volatile organic analyses have several samples and two blanks with the
surrogate BFB out of QC limits. The lab has failed to perform satisfactorily
because there is no evidence of reanalysis for any sample or blank.
13. 
This package contains sample re-extraction, re-analysis or dilution. Upon reviewing
the QA results, the following form I(s) are identified to be used.
The Form I(s) for the original analyses of samples Tillet and Tillet(D) are to
be used because they were performed within the holding time.
TUT 
001
0 / —"7^-
nopotzwH put
Aarprp *
y arprp *mrt»ts *>u»H
/jl»TV7c I^^JT*'-
ftl/3 '/OH
UD
jo uopsnre,
#« *CN
fe
h
h
h
H
h
bv
t
H
hi
h
H
ki
ILI
tI
N-205
Pac«
35
Title: Evaluation of Inorganic Data for. the
" 
t Laboratory Program
Date: Fab. :<??:
Number: 
s*:-2
Revision: 10
1.0 Scope
1.1 inis procedure is applicable to inorganic data obtained from contractor
laboratories writing for Hararrtems Waste Site Contract Laboratory
Program (dP).
1.2 ln« data validation is based upon analytical and quality assurance
requirements specified in Statement of work (scan 7/aa.
2.0 Responsibilities - Data reviewers will complete the following tasks as assigned by the D
Review Coordinator:
2.1. For a
2.1.1
fX H
reviewer oust answer every question on tne checklist.
2.1.2
The answer on the checklist must match the action in the narrative
(appendix A.2) and on Form I»s. Do not use pencil to write the narrative.
2.1.3
fXt
This report is to be completed only when a serious contract violation is
encountered, or upon the request of the Data. Review Manager or Deputy Project
Officer (DPO). Forward 5 copies: one each for internal files, appropriate
Regional DPO, Sample Management Office (SMD) and last two addresses of
Mailing List for Data Reviewers (Appendix A.4). In other cases, all contract
violations should be appended to end of Data Anemian. Narrative (Sec. A. 2.2).
2.1.4 filter in ink on Data Summary Sheet required QC values from Forms I through IX. Cir
all values that require data qualification •Action".
2.1.5
2.1.5.1
ix
Fill in the total number of analytes analyzed by different analyses and ^
the number of aualytes rejected or flagged as estimated due to corresponding
quality control criteria. Place an "X" in boxes *fter» analyses were not
performed, or criteria do not apply.
2.1.5.2
X 7
Data reviewer is also required to fill out Inorganic Regional Data Assessment
form (Appendix A. 7) provided by S* Headquarters. Codes listed on the form
will be used to describe the Data Assessment Summary.
TUT 
001 
1553
N-206
QFE3AT2G PSOCZ3JFZ 
Page
Title: Evaluation of Lrorganic Data for the 
Date: Feb. mo
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nisnber: 
K*-2
Revision: 
10
2-1-6 Ifca RaVifV Tflg: It is recommended that each data reviewer should maintain a ice
reviews completed to include: a. date of start of case review
b. date of completion of case review
c. site
d. case outer
race laboratory
f. runber of samples
g. matrix
h. hours worked
i. reviewer's initials
2.1.7 itei«hgn« Parwa T/^ - the data reviewer should enter the bare facts of
inquiry, before initiating any phone conversation with CLP laboratory.
After the case review- has been completed, mail unite copy of Telephone
Record Log to the laboratory and pink copy to 9O. File yellow copy in
the Telephone Record Log folder, and attach a xerox copy of the Telephone
Record Log to the completed Data Assessment Narrative (Appendix A. 2).
-.1.8.1 Upon completion of review, the following are to be forwarded to the Regional
Sanple Control Center (RSCC) located in the Surveillance and Monitoring Srancr.:
a. data package
b. completed data assessment checklist (Appendix A. 1,original)
c. S-O Contract Compliance Screening (CCS)
d. Data Sunrary Sheet (Appendix A. 5) along with completed Data Assessment.
Narrative (Appendix A. 2)
e. Record of Connunication (copy)
f. CLP Reanalysis Request/Approval Record (original + 3 copies)
g. Appendix A.7 (original).
..1.8.2 Forward 4 copies of completed Data Assessment Narrative (Appendix A. 2)
along- with 2 copies of the Inorganic Data Assessment Form (Appendix A.7) and
Telephone: Record Log , if any,: one each for appropriate Regional DPO,
Sarple Management Office (SMJ), and last two artrlreffteea of Mailing List
for Data Reviewers (Appendix A. 4) (the Inorganic Data Assessment font
does not go to the last two addressees).
2G PRCCEDU?.! 
Page 
3 c: 
35
Title: Equation of Inorganic Data for the 
Date: Fes. 195-:-
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
K-:-2
Revision: 10
Filed Paa»rM?rE - Upon completion of review, the following are to be filed
within M-S files:
a. Four copies of completed Data Assessment Narrative (Appendix A. 2) each carryirvr
Appendix A.7.
b. Telephone Record Log (copy)
c. S-O Report (copy Appendix A-3)
d, CLP Data Assessment Sumary Form (Appendix A.6).
e. CLP Reanalysis Request/Approval Record (copy)
3.0
Indicate incorplete data package on the computer tracking sheet located in M-3 office.
Authorized contractor personnel may contact tne laboratory after discovery of an incorrpie
data package. If a laboratory will not return phone calls or does not respond to request
notify M-S coordinator of Region II for resolution.
4.0 Rg tertian ef Pita -Ail values determined to be unacceptable on tne Inorganic Analysis Oa
Sheet (Form I) must be lined over with a red pencil. As soon as any review criteria caus
data to be rejected, that data can be eliminated from any further review or consideratic
5.0 Aocgpcjmee criteria - in order that reviews be consistent among reviewers, acceptance
criteria as stated in Appendix A.l (pages 4-25) should be used. Additional guidance c
be found in the National Inorganic Functional Guidelines of October 1, 1989.
$.0 9C Qorrtr*^ nenpiianea fcreeniffy JfT^ - This is intended to aid reviewer in locating ;
problems , both corrected and unconnected. However, the validation should be carried c
even if CCS is not present. Resubnittals received from laboratory in response to CCS R
be used by the reviewer.
7.0 *af*T**v f?r ^^iPJlTnll ~ B"t* reviewers must note all items of contract non-ccrpliano
within Data Assessment Narrative. If holding times and sample storage times have not b
exceeded, DPO may request reanalysis if items of non-compliance are critical to data
assessment. Requests are to be made on "CLP Re-Analysis Request/Approval Record".
8.0 ^rmr* r* rrm"'nirjrHr" - Provided by the Regional Sample Control Center (RSCCJ to
indicate which data packages have been received and are reedy to be reviewed.
• o
off ^frrrr ~ 1ft* data reviewer will follow the standard practice.
TUT 
OOi
N-208
OFSPAI3G PRCC3X2S 
Page 4 
c: 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for tna 
Data: Fes. 19?:
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nisfier: 
Kv-2
Appendix A.l: Data, Assessment - Contract 
Revision: ic
Carrpiiance (Tatal Review - Inorganics)
i: if no for any of the above, contact RSCC for
clarification.
Srr-nfM P*rr.rr 
*
:: if no. contact RSCC.
X. 1.2 Pfl^mi* nf QJlUmlrflfifT1 f*r™» R3J1 - Present? 
I 
1 
Y
ATTTO:: if no, request from RSCC.
A.I.3 Trio RgBOTT: - Present and complete? 
t_.1 _ _ 
¥.
Arrrrt:.' if no, contact RSCC for trip report.
A. 1.4 gan^i* Traffic *~*nr+ - Present or on file? 
ULl 
- 
_»^*
Legible? 
[J^l .. 
_
Arrra:; if no, request from Regional Sample Control
Center (RSCC).
A.I.5 
Cover Pace - Present.? 
tJL.1 -_ 
__
Is cover page properly filled in and signed by the lab 
/
manager or the manager's designee? 
(_VJ __ 
—
;.- Zf no, prepare Ttlephone Record Log, and
1 laboratory.
Do nunbers of samples cuiiaA^xiiA to n n^eii's on RecunA 
/
of Cm*m1catifln? 
[ \j ] 
_ 
_
Da sample numbers on cover page agree with sample
numbers on:
(a) Traffic Report Sheet?
(b) Fora X»s? 
C^Ll
n.JT 
OOl 
15!:v
N-209
' 
STANDARD QFEPAI2G FTOGZUS1 
Page 5 
c: 
2;
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: FeS. 19?:
C^^ract Laboratory Piuyiam 
Number: 
*c-2
*FP«ndix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Coipiiance (Ibtal Review - Inorganics)
NO
A.l.6 
form I (Final tet*i - Are all Form I's present and ccnplete? [ v/ :
If no, prepare telephone record log and contaci
laboratory for sutraittal.
Are con-ecu units (ug/1 for waters and n^/xg for soils)
indicated on FOOT I's?
Are soil sarple results for each parameter corrected for 
/
percent solids? 
(__] _ 
«/
A. * E5A sxiple • s and corresponding laboratory sanple
ID * s the same as on the Cover Page, Form I's and 
/
in the raw data? 
I v \ 
_ 
_
Are conputation/transcription errors less than 10\
of reported values? 
(
Are all "less than XDL" values properly coded with "U"? 
[
Was a brief physical description of saoples given on 
/
Form I's? 
lj£] __ 
_
were the result qualifiers used correctly with final 
/
data? 
t^Ll 
_ 
_
If no for any of the above, prepare Telephone
Record Log, and contract laboratory for .
corrected data.
were any samples diluted beyond requdreaenes of contract? 
__
If yes. vere dilutions noted on Ida I's? 
t_] 
__ 
X—
if no, note under Ccrtract-Problem/Non-CcBpliance
of the"Data ^••eniieini Narrative".
XI.7 
tiallVTg Tta^ - (aqueous and soil sanples )
(Dcamine. saople traffic reports and digestion/distillation logs.)
Mercury analysis (2S days). ...... exceeded? 
*/ 
I—
Cyanide distillation (14 days). . . . . exceeded? 
—— t±£
TUT 
001 
155
N-210
rcwa QFSSAITG PKSSX& 
Page 
s c:
Title: Evaluation of Medals for the Contract 
Date: res. !
Laboratory Program 
Nutter: 
»:
Appendix A.1: Data Assessment - contract 
Revision: 10
Ccrpiiance (Total Review - Inorganics)
Other Metals analysis (6 manths). . . . exceeded?
_ 
ukl _
Prepare a list of all samples and analyses
for which holding rimes have been exceeded. Specify
the number of days from date of collection to the date
of preparation (from raw data). Attach to checklist.
If yes, reject (red-line) values less than
Instrument Detection Limit (IDL) and flag
as estimated (J) the values asove 1EL even
though sasple(s) was preserved properly.
A.1.8 
______
*. 1.8.1 Digestion Log* for flame AVIC? (Fora XIII) present? 
IV 1
Digestion Log for furnace AA Fora XIH present? 
f VI
Distillation Log for mercury Fora XIII present? 
[ v 1
Distillation Log for cyanides Fora XIII present? 
t \/\
Are pK values (pH<2 for all metals, pH>!2 for cyanide)
present in Digestion/Distillation Logs?
*v«e:gnts, dilutions and volumes used to obtain values.
Percent solids calculation present for soils/sediments? 
( _ J 
_ 
v
Are preparation dates present on Digestion Log? 
[J/J _ 
_
A.l.8.2 Measurement read out record present?
FuniaceAA 
[ \ 
_ 
_
Cyani
N-211
CPSRAT2C PHX -,)I?Z 
pase 
7 o: 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Datt: Feb. 19?:
Contract Laboratory Piuyran 
. 
Number: 
»<-2
A^endix A. 1: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
A. 1.8.3 Are all raw data to s^port all saople analyses and 
/
QC operations present? 
[ v/] 
_ 
__
Legible? 
• 
[ N/i 
__ 
_
Properly Labeled? 
[ \/\ 
_ 
_
If no for any of the above, write Telephone
Record Log and contact laboratory* Flag metal
data as estimated if pH of sanple is greater
tnan 2. Flag cyanide data as estimated if pH
rple is less tnan 12.
A. 1.9 
n»ra Va'Hrtarian and_________
/». 1.9.1 
Cal ifarar i rfi
A. 1.9.l.i 
is record of at least 2 point calibration
present for 1C? analysis?
Is record of 5 point calibration present for 
/
Hg analysis? 
- - 
fv 1 
_ . 
_
Acrrm: if no for any of the above, write in the
Contract Problem/Non-compliance section of
the "Data Assessnent Narrative".
• 1.9.1.2 
Is record of 4 point calibration present for: 
.
AA? 
(__] 
_.
Furnace AA? 
f >/l 
_ 
_
1. Zf less than 4 standards are measured in absorbanc*
mode, then the remaining standards in concentration
mode) must be run immediately after calibration and
tarn within ±10% of true value.
2. For all *& (except Hg) and cyanide analyses, on*
, 
calibration standard is at CRDL level. If not,
writ* in the Contract-Problom/Nan-Conplianc* section
_ 
of the "Data Assessment Narrative*.
i
I
N-212
3JQ IFLrlATZC »"» • i~" 
Page 
6 c: 
35
Title: Equation o; Metals Data for the 
Date: res. I??:-
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nir&er: 
K%-2
Appendix A.i: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Ccrpliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
Flag associated data as estimated if standards
are not within ±10% of true values (except COL
calibration standard) . Do not flag the data as
estunated in linear range indicated by good
recovery of standard.
A.I. 9. 1.3 Is correlation -coefficient less than 0.99S for:
Mercury Analysis? 
_ 
{ }/
cyanide Analysis? 
_ 
(v ] _
Atomic Absorption Analysis? 
\s 
( _ ] _
:: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.
A. 1.9.2 
Fiona IT X
A.I. 9. 2.1 Present and conplete for every metal and cyanide?
Present and ccnplete for AA and 1C? when both are
used for same anal>te?
ArrrcM-. if no for any. of the above, prepare Telephone
Record Log and contact laboratory.
A. 1.9. 2.2 Circle all values on data sunnary sheet that; are
outside contract windows. Are all calibration
standards (initial and continuing) within control
limits?
Metals 90-liO*
Hg - 80-120\ 
[.VJ __ 
__
Cyanides 85-115\
reviewer will calculate correlation coefficient.
001
N-Z13
CARD OPSSATZC PRCCSOSE 
Page 
9 ei 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. 199-:-
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
«-:-2
Affersdix A.I: 
Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Total Review - inorganics)
Flag as estimated (J} all positive data (not
flagged with a "U"J analyzed between a
calibration standard with \R between 75-89\
(65-79* for Hg; 70-84\ for CN) or 111-125\
(121-135\ for Hg; 116-130\ for CN) recovery and
nearest good calibration standard. Qualify results
<IDL as estimated OJJ). if the ICV or CCV W is
75-89*. (CN, 70-84t ; HG, 65-79*,). Reject (red-line)
as unacceptable data if recovery of the ICV or
CCV is outside the range 7S-125\ (CN, 70-130*,; Hg,
65-135*.). Qualify five samples on either side of
verification standard out of control limits.
was continuing calibration performed every 10 samples 
/
or every 2 hours? 
I_] 
>£. 
__
ATTTCK: if no, flag the excess samples (eleventh and
up) data as estimated (J).
Mas ICV for cyanides distilled?
If no, write in the Contract-ProblBn/Nbn-'TTpliarce
section of the "Data Assessment Narrative".
A.1.9.3 
Form II B (CRCL. Standards far Mk and___
A. 1.9.3.1 Was a CRDL standard <CRA) analyzed after initial
calibration for all AA metals
•was a mad-range callb. verification standard distilled 
/
and analyzed for cyanide analysis? 
[j£j _
was a ZxCRDt ( or **""* wnan 1DL>CFDL) analyzed (CRI) 
/
for «ach ICP run? 
t^L.1 _ 
«
(Note: GU for AL3a,Ca.FefM9^iafor K is not required.)
AcncNi if no for any of the above, flag as estimated
all data falling within the affected ranges.
The affected ranges are:
AA Analysis - ••True value ± CRDL
ICP Analysis - ••True Value ± 2CRDL
oc Analysis - ••True Value ± 0.5 x True Value.
/ind the results of mid-range standard in the raw data.
••True value of CSA, CRI or mid-range standard. 'Substitute IDL for CRDL when IDL > COL.
TUT O01 1561
N-214
CPSSAITC WJLa-iaS 
Pagt 10 cf
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. '
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nuaaer: 
K^
Affendix x.l: Data Assessnrt - Contract 
Rtvisior.: :o
Compliance (ItotaJ. Review - Inorganics)
A.l.9.3.2 was CEZ analyzed after icv/lQ ard before the final 
/
CCV/CC3, and for every four hours of 1C? run? 
[ V} 
_ 
_
If no, write in Contract Problem/Nan-Ccnpliance
rtion of the "Data Assessment Narrative*.
•..1.9.3.3 Circle all values on suomary sheet that are outside
acceptance windows.
Are CRA and CSI standards within control lunits: 
/
Metals 
80 - 120W? 
[ _ ] v 
_
Is nud-range standard vithin control limits: 
/
cyanide 80 - 120W? 
[ vl _ 
_
x^ii- Flag as estimated all data within .the affected
ranges if the recovery of the standard is
be'.ueen 50-79\; flag only positive data if
the recovery is between 121-150%; reject
(red line) all data if the recovery is less
than 50\; reject only positive data if the
recovery is greater than 150%.
A.i.9.4 
Form ITT
A.l.9.4.1 Present and coiplete? 
tV 1 
_
For both AA and 1C? when both are used for same analyte? [_] 
_ 
v
Was an initial calibration blank analyzed? 
t v 1 
__ 
_
Mas a continuing calibration blank analyzed after
•very 10 saoples or every 2 hours (whichever is rore
frequent)? 
[ _ 1
ACHOJ: If no, prepare Telephone Record Log,
laboratory and write in the contract-problenay
non-ccrpliance section of the Data.
Narrative.
N-215
CFSSAT2G PDL'i
1 • isr 
Pace 11 o: 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. i?«:
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nutter: 
K-:-;
Appendix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Conpiiance Cttstal Review - Inorganics)
NO
A. 1.9.4.2 Circle all calibration blank values on Data Stannary Sheet
that are above CRDL (or 2 x 3H. wnen HL > CRDL). Are
all calibration blanks (when HL<CRDL) less than or equal
to Contract Required Detection Limits (CRDL)? 
[
Are all calibration blanks less than two tines 
/
Instrument Detection Unit (when IDL>CRDL)? 
I_] 
_ 
V
Arrrg^.- if no for any of the above, flag as estimated (J)
all positive data less than or equal to
calibration blank values analyzed between
calibration blank with value over CRDL (or ZxIIT.)
and nearest good calibration blank. Flag five
sanples on either side of the calibration blank.
A.l.9.5 
FTIfrt TIT fPmratian Blank) -
(Note: The preparation blank for mercury is the
as the calibration blank.)
A. 1.9.5.1 Was one prep, blank analyzed for: each 20 samples? 
[V 1
each batch? 
[^ 1 _ 
_
each matrix type? 
[_1 
__ 
v
both AA and 1C? when both are used for same analyte? 
[_]
If no for any of the above, flag-as estimated (J)
all associated positive data <10 x IDLs for which
prep, blank was not analyzed.
If only one blank was analyzed for mare
than 20 samples, then first 20 samples analyzed
do not have to be flagged as estimated (J).
A.l.9.5.2 Is concentration of prep, blank greater than CRDL 
/
when UK. is less than or equal to CRDL? 
__ 
lj£J 
——
If yes. is the concentration of the sample with the 
/
least concentrated analyte less, than 10 tines the 
/
prep, blank value? 
_ 
i—J ^-
00i 1563
N-216
CnRD OPSWTTC PROCEDURE 
page 12 cf 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Cats for the 
Dra: Fes.
ConuaLi Laboratory Piuyian 
Wc*tr: 
*;
Appendix A. 1: Deta Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
SS 
EC
JdflU: If yes, reject (red-line) all associated data
Theater tnan CRDL concentration but less than ten
times tne prep, blank value found in tne raw data..
A.l.9.5.3 Do concentrations of prep, blank fall below two tines 
/
IBL.when HZ. is greater tnan CRDL? 
[_] 
_ 
v/_
if no, reject (red-line) all positive data
that has a concentration less tnan 10 tines
tne prep, blank value in tne raw data.;
? _ 
[vL] _
A.l.9.5.4 Is concentration of prep, blank below the negative CRDL
od£LT: If yes, reject (red-line) all associated data
that has a concentration less than lOxCREL.
1.9.6.1 Present and conplete? 
\.v\ 
_. 
^
(ICIE: Not required for furnace AA, flame AA, mercury,
cyanide and Ca, MS, * and Na.)
was ICS analyzed at beginning and end of run
(or at least twice every a hours)?
If no, flag as estimated (J) all samples for
vihich AL, Ca, re, or Mg is higher than in ZCS.
A.l.a.6.2 Circle all values on Oeta Sumnary Sheet .that are more
than * 20% of true or established mean value. Are all
Interference Check Sasple results inside of control 
/
limits (+ 20%)? 
t^L.1 _ 
_
**• ' 
••
If no, is concentration of Al, Ca, re, or Mg lower
than, in ZCS? 
I—]
If no. flag as estimated (J) those positive
results for which ZCS recovery is lamean 121-150%;
flag all sample results as estimated if ZCS
recovery falls within 50-79%; reject (red-line)
those sample results for which ZCS recovery is less
than 50%; if ZCS recovery is above 150%, reject
positive results only (not flagged with a "IT).
TUT 001 1.564
N-217
. 
• SZXSNQ GF3vCZC PROGDUES 
Pace 13 o: 35
Title: Evaluation of Mttals Data for the 
Date: Fes. l«9v
Contract Laboratory Progjan 
Ntrser: K<-2
Appendix X.I: Oeta Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (lotal Review - Inorganics)
( Note: Not required for Ca. MS, K, aod Na (both matrices) , Al, and re
(soil only. )
'-..1.9.7.1 Present and corplete for: each 20 samples? 
f t/1 
_ 
_
each matrix type? 
[ j _ J 
_ _ 
</
each cone, range (i.e. low. med. . high)? 
[ __ ]
Tor both AA and 1C? when both are used for
analyte? 
[_]
If no for any of the above, flag as
estimated (J) all positive data less
than four times spiking level for
which spiked sample was not analyzed.
If one spiked sample was analyzed for more
than 20 samples, then first 20 samples
analyzed do not have to be flagged as
estimated (J).
A. 1.9.7.2 was field blank used for spiked sample? 
_
If yes. flag all positive data less than
4 x spike added as estimated (J) for which
field blank was used as spiked sample.
Matrix spike analysis should be performed on a
field blank wnen it is the only aqueous sample in SG.
A.l.9.7.3 Circle all values on Data Summary Sieet that are outside 
.
control limits (75% to 125%). Are all recoveries 
/
within control limits? 
t_] 
Y— —
If no, is sample concentration greater than or equal 
/
to four times spike concentration? 
[__J 
Jt_ ——
agnate if ves. disregard spike recoveries for analytes
whose oj*.euuaiicns are greater than or equal
to four t*M spike added. If no, circle those
analytes on Form V for which sample concentration
is less than four times the spike concentration.
TUT
OO1
N-218
SiCWO CF5WI3C FROZDlSe 
Page 14
o: 
35
Titlt: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. i?«-
Contact Laboratory Program 
ttzser: "*;-2
Appendix A. i: 
Data. Assessment - contract 
Revision: 10
Conpiiance (ibtal Review - Inorganics)
2ZS 
CD
Are results outside the control limits (75-125%)
flagged with "N" on Form I's and Fora VA? 
_ 
_ 
_
2CZO?: If no, write in the Contract - Problcn/Non -
Conyliance section of "Data Assessment Narrative".
A. 1.9.7.4 2ffi]K2US
Are any spike recoveries: 
/
(a) less than 30%? 
v 
(__] _
(b) between 30-74%? 
V 
(_] _
(c) between 126-150%? 
__ [J/] _
(d) greater than 150%? 
_
If less than 30%, reject all associated aqueous
data; if between 30-74%, flag all associated
aqueous data as estimated (J); if between
126-150%, flag as estimated (J) all associated
aqueous data not flagged with a "IT; if
greater than 150%. reject (red-line) all
associated aqueous data not flagged with a "IT.
If pre-digestion spike result is rejectable
due to coefficient of correlation of MA,
analytical spike recovery, or duplicate injections
criteria, disregard spike recovery on Fora V.
Flag the associated data as estimated(J).
'..1.9.7.5 
aMA^UUBhUIUBAb 
I
Are any spike recoveries: 
/
(a) less than 10%? 
__ 
t_I 
V
(b) between 10-74%? 
_ 
I_I
(c) between 126-200%? 
_ 
[_I
(d) greater than 200V 
_ 
t—1
If less then 10%. reject all associated data: if
between 10*74%. flag all associated data as estimated;
if between 126-200%, flag as estimated all associated
data was not flagged with a "IT; if greater than 200%.
reject all associated data not flagged with a "IT.
•
001 1566
N-219
CWO CPSAT2C P5DCS7.7Z 
Par* 15 c: 
3:
\tle: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. i??:
Contract Laboratory Program 
l*re*r: 
Kv-2
Appendix V.1: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Tbtal Review - inorganics)
..1.9.8 
Ftora VT ft** _______^
.1.9.8.1 Present and ccrplete for: 
each 20 samples? 
_
each matrix type? 
t_1 
__ 
V
each concentration range (i.e. low, 
med., 
high)? 
t_1
both AA and 1C? when both are used for sane analyte? 
[_]
If no for any the above, flag as estimated (J)
all data >C3DL* for which duplicate sample was
not analyzed.
1. If one delicate sample was analyzed for
mare than 20 samples, then first 20 samples do not
have to be flagged as estijnated.
2. If percent solids for soil sample and its duplicate
differ by more than 1\, prepare a Form VI for each
explicate pair, report concentrations in Hg/L
on wet weight basis and calculate RTO or Difference
for each analyte.
A. 1.9.8.2 Was field blank used for duplicate analysis? 
_ 
[>/) 
_
If yes, flag all data >CRDL* as estimated
(J) for which field blank was used as duplicate.
Duplicate analysis should be performed on
a field blank when it is the only aqueous
sample in SEC.
v. 1.9.8.3 Are all values within control limits (RFCL20\ or
difference < +CHDL)?
If TO, are all results outside the control lisdts 
/
flagged with an • on Form I's and VI? 
I_1 
. __ 
^L
_ 
If no, write in the contract - Problews/Non-
Compliance section of "Data Assessment Narrative".
TOTE: i. RPD is not calculable for an analyte of the
sample - duplicate pair when both values are
less than IDL.
Substitute IDL for G3DL when IDL > OftDL.
N-220
Page 16 c: 35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. 
:??:-
Contract Laboratory Pzutfiam 
Nuwaer: 
K^
Appendix A.I: 
Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Ccrpliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
2. If lab duplicate result is rejectable due
to coefficient of correlation of FSl,
analytical spixe recovery, or duplicate
injections criteria, do not apply precision
criteria.
1.9.8.4 Is any value for sanple duplicate pair less than CRDL* 
/
and other value greater than or equal to 10 x «CRDL? 
__ 
Iv ] 
_
Agraji If yes. flag the associated data as
estimated (J).
A.l.9.8.5 Agjgotia
Circle all values or. Data Sunnary Sheet that are:
RPD > 50\. or
Difference > » CRDL*
Is any RPD greater than 50\ where sanple and duplicate 
/
are both greater than or equal to 5 tines •CRDL? 
_ 
[y J 
^i
Is any ••difference between saqple and duplicate greater
than *C3DL where sanple and/or duplicate is less than
5 t;jnes -OC3L? 
_
if yes. flag the associated data as estimated.
1.9. 8.6 soil/Sediment
Circle all values on Data Sunwary Sieet that are:
RED > 100%, 
or
Difference > 2 x CRDL*
Is any RPD (where sanple and duplicate are bath
greater than or equal to 5 tines *CRDL) :
_ 
t_j y_
> 100%?
Is any **difference Uiueen savple and duplicate
(where sanple and/or duplicate is leas than 5x*CRDL) :
__ 
t«_1 
^L
• Substitute IDL for CRDL when XDL > CRDL.
•• use absolute values of sanple and duplicate to calculate
the difference.
rur
001
S3MCMD CSPS5C2C PMI ^iar 
Page 1? o: 35
Title: equation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. :??:
Contract Laboratory Piuyiain 
N^nber: 
K«
Appendix A.I: Data. Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Conpiiance (Tbtal Review - Inorganics)
If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.
A. 1.9. 9.1 Were field duplicates analyzed? 
[ v / i
If yes. prepare a Fom VI for each aqueous field
delicate pair. Prepare a Form VI for .each soil
duplicate pair, if percent solids for sample and
its duplicate differ by more than 1%; report
concentrations of soils in ug/l on wet veight
basis and calculate RFDs or Difference for each
analytc.
1. Do not calculate RPD when both values are
less than IDL.
2. Flag all associated data only for field
duplicate pair.
A. 1.9. 9. 2 Is any value for sample duplicate pair less than *QCL
and other value greater than or equal to 10 ,x «OTL? 
_ 
(Y, ] _ .
If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.
X.l.9.9.3
Circle all values on Fora VI for field duplicates that are:
RPD > 5Q\, or
Difference > ± CRDL*
Is any RPD greater than 50\ where sample and duplicate
are both greater than or equal to 5 times "CRDL? 
V_ [_.] 
_
Is any ••difference between sanple and duplicate greater
than *CREL where sanple and/or duplicate is less than
5 tines KRDL7 
zL 
I- J 
__
aciTQ?: if yes. flag the associated data as estimated.
• Substitute IDL for CRDL when HL. > OOL.
« Use absolute values nt sanple and duplicate to calculate the diff
00 i 156V
N-222
CFSSATTC
•4.0 o: 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: 
reb 1??:.
Co"traet Laboratory program • 
Ntsrser: 
K*:-i
Appendix A.I: 
Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Coipiiance (Total Review - Inorganics)
A.I. 9. 9. 4
Circle all values on Fora VI for field duplicates tTat are:
RED >100\, or
Difference > 2 x CRDL*
Is any RPD (where sanple and duplicate are both
greater than 5 tines "CRDL) : 
/
>100\? 
__ 
[_ ] V
Is any **difference betveen sanple and duplicate __
(-•here sanple and/or duplicate is less than 5x *CRDL ):
>2x •CTOL? 
_ 
[_ J 
V
',: If yes, flag the associated data as estimated.
A. 1.9.10 Form VTT rr*+r*ratarv p-gymi Sami*! -nanr*- LCS - not
required for aqueous Hg and cyanide analyses.)
A. 1.9.10.1 was one LCS prepared and analyzed for: 
/
every 20 water sanples? [v ] 
_ .
every 20* solid sanples? [_ J 
_ .
both AA and 1C? when both are used for sane analyte? [_] 
_ _ 
\X
If no for any of the above, prepare Telephone
Record Log and contact laboratory for sutanittal
of results of LCS. Flag as estimated (J) all
data for which LCS was not analyzed.
If only one LCS was analyzed for more than 20
samples, then first 20 sanples close to LCS
do not have to be flagged as estimated.
• Substitute HZ. for CRDL when HZ. > CRDL.
••Use absolute values of sanple and duplicate to calculate the difference.
>ur 001 
15/0
N-223
o:
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. !??•:
C?sr^ct Laboratory Program 
Number: 
nx-2
Appendix A.i: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Conpiiance (Ttrcai Review - Inorganics)
A.l.9.10.2
A.l.9.10.3
Circle all LCS values outside control limits
(80 - 120\- except aqueous Ag and Sb).
Is any LCS recovery: 
less than S0\? 
_
between 50\ and 79\? 
__ 
. 
__
between in\ and 150V 
_ 
[_v/J _
greater than 150\? 
_
Less than 50*., reject (red-line) all data;
between 50V and 79%. flag all associated data
as estimated (J) ; between 12U and 150\, flag
'all positive (not flagged with a "IT) results
as estimated; greater than 150\, reject all
.positive results.
1. I- Tovnd" value of LCS is rejectable due to duplicate
injections or analytical spike recovery criteria,
regardless of LCS recovery, flag the associated data
as esLitfated (J).
2. If HZ. of an analyte is equal to or greater than
true value of .LCS, disregard the •Action" below even
though LCS is out of control limits.
Is LCS "Found" value higher than the control 
/
linits on Form VII? 
_ 
l_J vC.
if yes, qualify all associated positive data
Is LCS "Found* value lower than the Control 
/
linits on Form VII? 
__ 
L. J J£
if yes. qualify all associated data as
estimated.
00-i 
1571
f
1 
N-224
CF5SAI-E PROCEDURE 
P*g« 
20 01 
35
Title: Evaluation o* Metals Data for the 
Date: Feb. 199:
Contract Laboratory Piuyram 
Number: 
K*-2
Affendix A.l: Da-a Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Coipiiance (Ifctal Review - Inorganics)
A.l. 9. 11 
Fbnn PC fICT
Serial dilution analysis is required only
for initial concentrations equal to or
greater than 10 x ZDL.
A. 1.9. 11.1 Was Serial Dilution analysis performed for: 
/
each 20 sanes? 
v
each 20 sanples? 
[v 1 
_ 
.
each matrix type? 
[ _ ] 
_ _ 
_
each concentration range (i.e. low, mad.)? 
[ _ ] 
__ 
\s
If no for any of the above, flag all positive
data greater than or equal to lOxIDLs as
estimated (J) for which Serial Dilution Analysis
was not performed, and susmarize the deficiency
on the DPO recoil. 
., 
^
A.l.9.11.2 was field blanK(s) used for Serial Dilution Analysis? 
_ 
[V/J _
If yes, flag all associated data 2 10 x ZDL
as estimated (J).
Serial dilution analysis should be perforated
on a field blank when it is the only aqueous
sample in SDC.
A.l.9.11.3 Are results outside control limit flagged with an "£"
on Form I '$ and Form IX when initial concentration on
Form zx is equal to SO times ZX. or greater. 
[_] 
_
>CTroji if no, write in the cxirujci-vi'oblen/nan-
compliance section of the "Data Assessment
Narrative".
A.l.9.U.4 circle all values on Data sumnary Sheet that are outside
control limit for initial concentrations equal to or
than 10 x •"»« only. Are any % difference values:
> 10%? 
v^ 
t_] 
__
2 100%?
TUT 
00
N-225
CF5SAT2C FKXSXPS. 
Page 21 cf 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fe±. :??•:•
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
K-:-2~
Appendix A. l: 
Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Compliance (Tctal Review - Inorganics)
r: -x
Flag as estimated (J) all associated equal
to or greater than lOxIELs for which percent
difference is greater than 10\ but less
than 100\. Reject (red-line) all associated
sanple results equal to or greater than
lOxIDLs for which PD is greater than or
equal to 100\.
A.1.9.12 
TVuTmy Affpir AhBpftaH.cn
A. 1.9.12.1 Are duplicate injections present in furnace raw data
(except during full Method of Standard Addition) for 
/
each sanple analyzed by GFAA? 
[V I 
. __
if no. reject the data on Form I's for which
duplicate injections were not performed.
A.l.9.12.2 Do the duplicate injection readings agree within 201
Relative Standard Deviation (PSD) or Coefficient of
Variation (CV) for concentration greater than CRTL?
was a dilution analyzed for sanple with post digestion 
S
spike recovery less than 40\? 
(_] 
_ _ 
2L.
if TO for any of the above, flag all the
riated data as estimated (J).
A. 1.9.12.3 Is *post digestion spike recovery less than 10% or 
/
greater than 150% for any result? 
__ 
tX—I 
—
If yes, reject (red-line) the affected data if
recovery is <10%; reject data not flagged with
"tr if spike recovery is >150%.
Reject the data only if the affected sanple was.
not subsequently analyzed by Method of Standard
Addition.
* Post digestion spike is not required on the pre-digestion spiked sanple when prediges-
ssike recovery is within control limits of 75-125% or when SR>4xSA.
N-226
Page 22 c: 
2;
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fe±. 199:
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nirser: 
hv:-z •
Appendix A.i: Data-Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Ccnpiiance (Total Review-Inorganics)
JES 
EL ~Ls"
A.l.9.13 
Fbrm VTTT (M»*-rry^ Q| iTti^rrianJ Afr^tim RftBllT'.'S}
A.I.9.13.1 
Present? 
[ \/] 
_ 
_
If no, is any Fora I result coded with "S" or a "*"? 
_ 
[_ m] 
\/
acrTJ:; If yes, write request on Telephone Record Log
and contact laboratory for submittal of Form VIII.
A. 1.9.13.2 Is coefficient of correlation for MSk less than 0.990 for 
/
any sarpie? 
_ 
[_ _] ^
Acrrg-ii If yes, reject (red-line) affected data.
A.l.9.13.3 Was *KS^ required for any sample but not performed? 
__ 
(J/{] _
Is coefficient of correlation for MSA less than 0.995? 
_ 
[_ J 
_^,
Are M5i calculations outside the linear range of the
calibration curve generated at the beginning of the
analytical run? 
_. 
[_ _]
AT?ra!i if yes fOr any Of the above, flag all
the associated data as estimated (J).
A. 1.9.13.4 Was proper quantitation procedure followed correctly 
/
as. outlined in the SO* on page E-16 through E-17? 
[_] 
_ 
^
Acnoc: if no, note exception under contract problem/
non-compliance of data assessment narrative,
or prepare a separate list.
A.I.9.14
A.l.9.14.1 were any analyses performed for dissolved as well as
total analytes on the sane sanple(s). 
_
Were any analyses performed for inorganic as veil as total 
/
(organic + inorganic) analytes on the sane sanple(s)? 
__ 
f v/l 
__
is not required on LCS and prep, blank.
Ui 
OOl 
1574
N-227
^-C PRDCSvSS 
Page 12 c; 2;
Title: r.^luation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. 19"
Contract Laboratory Procrar. 
N-jsber: 
*K.>2~
Appendix A.I: cata Assessment - Contract 
Re/ision: 10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
1. If yes, prepare a list comparing differences
between all dissolved (or inorganic) and
total analytes. Coopute the differences as
a percent of the total analyte only wnen 
•
dissolved concentration is greater than C3DL
as wen as total concentration.
2. Apply the following questions only if in-
organic (or dissolved ) results are (i) above
C30L, and (ii) greater than total constituents.
3. At least one preparation blank, XCS, and LCS
should be analyzed in each analytical run.
A. 1.9.14.2 Is tne concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)
aralyte greater than its total concentration by 
/
more than 10%? 
_ 
[_ J _V.
A. 1.3.14.3 Is the concentration of any dissolved (or inorganic)
arsaiyte greater than its total concentration by 
/
more than 50\? 
_ 
[ I V
A£Hi': if more than 10V flag both dissolved (or
inorganic) and total values as estimated (J) ;
if more than 50\, reject (red-line) the data
for both values.
A.l.9.15 
Ftarm T to "Dt
A. 1.9.15.1 Are all the Form I through Fora EC labeled with: 
/
Laboratory name? 
t */ ] 
_ _ 
_.
Case/SVS nvanber? 
f^l
EPA sample No.? 
I ^1
SD5 No.? 
I \/\ 
... 
_
Cam-act No.? 
r \Xl 
_ 
_
Coiiect. units? [^_J _ 
—
»trix? tj/1 _ —
j: If no for any of the above, note under
contract problem/non-compliance section
of the "Data Assessment Narrative".
•
ru"i" 
OOl 1575
N-228
ZWQ OPSRnT2C PRGCZDURZ 
Pace 24 c: 
35
Title: Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Tea. :«?:•
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nusaer: 
'A'--2
A^ersiix A.I: 
Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
Gx?:liance (Total Revie.- - Inorganics)
A. 1.9.IS.2 Do any ccrpctation/transcription errors exceed 10\ of
reported values on Forms I-DC for:
(NDTE: Check all forms against raw data.)
(a) all analytes analyzed by ICP? 
__ 
[ VI _
(b) all analytes analyzed by GFAA,? 
_f 
IjiO 
_
(c) all analytes analyzed by AA Flame? _ 
[__] S
(d) Mercury? 
__ 
[_>/] _
(e) Cyanide?
AgT-rg:-. if yes, prepare Telephone Log, contact
laboratory for corrected data and
correct errors vith red pencil and
initial.
A.l.9.16 
Torn T
Circle all field blank values on Data Summary Sheet
are greater than OTL, 2 x IDL tften IDL > CRDL.
Do concentrations of field blankts) fall belov CPDL
(or 2 x IDL when EX. > CRDL) for all parameters of
associated aqueous and soil samples? 
_ 
(_]
If no, was field blank value already rejected due to 
/
otn«r CC criteria? 
t_1 
— 
X..
if no, reject (except field blank results)
all associated positive sample data less
than or equal to five tines the field blank
value.
00 
>• 15/6
N-229
S3C3WD OP3WI3C PROC3U?£ 
Pace 25 cf 
21
Title: Evaiuatior. of Medals Data for the 
Date: res. 195:
Contract r Juratory Program 
Nunser: 
K..-2
Appencix A.:: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 1C
Corpiiance (Tctal Review - Inorganics)
225 
ffi 
U_^
A. 1.9.17 
FQnn X. 3P . 3CCT (Verifiearc.iofi of
A. 1.9. 17.1 Is verification report present for:
Instrument Detection Linits (quarterly)? 
ljL_ ]
ICP Interelement correction Factors (annually)? 
[^_]
1C? Linear Ranges (quarterly)? 
\V_ ]
if no, contact D?0 of the lao.
A.l.9.17.2 Term X (Irisr.rjnerrr Qg^ac~ior Liatirs) - (Note: IDL is not
required for Cyanide.)
Are IBLs present for: 
all the analytes?
all the instruments used?
For botn W. and 1C? when both are used for same
analyte?
arrrrr:: if no for ani* of the above, prepare
Telephone Record Log and contact
laboratory.
Is XDL greater than CRDL for any analyte?
If yes, is the concentration on Form I of the sanple
If nor flag as estimated all values
less than five times ZDL of the instrument
whose IDL exceeds CRDL.
yes, 
s 
.
analyzed on the instrument whose XDL exceeds CRDL, 
/
greater than 5 x XDL?
N-230
OF5RAT2-C PSOLLJJrZ 
Pag« 
26 of 
3:
Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: Fes. l??:
Contract Laboratory Program 
Nvanber: 
. K-.-2
Appendix A.l: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 10
:iiarce (Trtal Review - Inorganics)
A.I.9.17.3 ror-n XT fT.i_TMr
Was any sanple result higher than high linear range
of
Was any sample result higher than the highest 
/
calibration standard for non-IC? parameters? 
__ 
t\/ ] _
If yes for any of the above, vas the 
/
sanple diluted to obtain the result on Form I? 
[_J 
_ . Y_
If no, flag the result reported on Form I
as estimated!J).
A.I.9.18 
Perreng Solids of
Is soil cjni.tTA in sedijnent(s) less than 50\? 
_ 
I_ ] ^/
if yes, qualify as estimated all data
not prenously rejected or flagged due
to other QC criteria.
JUT ooi
N-231
Lab Nase:
M I
U.S. £?A - Cl?
DUPLICATES
Lab Cade: C-gt *tic_ 
Case No.:
Matrix (soil/water):
* Solids for Sample: £>
Contract:
SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE N'O.
Ti
SDG Mo. :
Level (low/med):
% Solids for Duplicate: Q • 0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/Jcg dry weight):
(Analyte
I _______
I Aluminum_
I Antimony"
I Arsenic ~
I Barium _
I Beryllium
I Cadmium
I Calcium
j Chromium
I Cobalt _ 2
I Copper
I Iron ___
I Lead 
' —
j Magnesium
( Manganese
j Mercury _
_i
I Potaasium
I Selenium
I Silver ~
I Sodium
j Thallium_
j Vanadium'
Control
Limit
Sample (S)
Q M
FORM VI - IN
N-232
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
MERCURY HOLDING TIMES EXCEEDED
SAMPLE
DATE
LAB I.D. 
. SAMPLE COLLECTED
DATE
SAMPLE ANALYZED
#DAYS
EXCEEDED
VIHAI
LaPlace
EglinI
Tillet
Tillet D
Dimitri
Bryan
Matthias
Ramsey
770-14
770-07
770-06
770-08
770-08
770-01
770-09
770-03
770-04
9-27-90
10-2-90
10-2-90
10-2-90
10-2-90
10-1-90
10-1-90
10-1-90
10-1-90
11-5-90
10-31-90
10-31-90
10-31-90
10-31-90
10-31-90
10-31-90
10-31-90
10-31-90
11
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC
N-233
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page / of S"
Tide:
Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program
Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
Date:
Number:
Revision:
Feb. 1990
HW-2
10
Case# 
900770 
Site 
Tutu Well Site 
Matrix: 
Soil
SDG# 
VIHAI 
Lab 
Ceimic 
Water
Contractor Geraghty & Miller 
Reviewer Donna Lesch 
Other
A.2.1 
The case description and exceptions, if any, are noted below with reason(s) for rejection
or qualification as estimated values(s) J.
This data package includes the analysis of the samples for SDG VIHA I. These____
samples originated from St. Thomas on the 27th of September and the 1. 2, and 3___
of October 1990.______________________________________
Samples VIHA I, LaPlace, Eglin I. Tillet. Tillet(D). Dimitri, Bryan, Matthias, and
Ramsey were analyzed beyond the holding time for Mercury. All non-detects_____
(values less than the Instrument Detection Limit) are rejected and a red line is_____
drawn through the data. The Mercury concentration value for LaPlace, the only____
positive hit, is qualified with a "J"._____________________________
The metal logbook indicates that samples Dimitri and Tillet were____________
preserved at a pH of 5. Samples correctly preserved for metals and Mercury analyses
should have a pH of 2 or less. All data for these two samples are qualified with____
"J" (except Mercury and Cyanide). The Mercury values in the affected samples
remain qualified with "R".________ 
____________________
N-234
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE 
Page Z of 5"
Title: 
Evaluation of Metals Data for the 
Date: 
Feb. 1990
Contract Laboratory Program 
Number: 
HW-2
Appendix A.I: Data Assessment - Contract 
Revision: 
10
Compliance (Total Review - Inorganics)
A. 2.1 
(continuation)
The calibration correlation coefficient is less than 0.995 for the atomic _________
absorption analysis of Arsenic (0.99219). The affected samples are Bryan. ______
Dimitri. Mattnais. and Ramsey. The Arsenic concentration values for these _____
samples are qualified with "J". ____________________
The correlation coefficient is less than 0.995 for the atomic absorption ______
analysis of Thallium (0.98954). The affected samples are Matthias. Ramsey,
LaPlace, Tillet, Tillet(D), and H2O blk Tutu. The Thallium concentration ________
values for these samples are qualified with "UJ". _________________________
The Selenium analysis run on 10/29/90 at 16:48 contained 11 samples between the
ICV and the CCV. The allowable number is 10 samples. The eleventh sample is
not included in SDG VIHA I therefore no qualifiers are necessary. ________
The CRDL standards are out of control limits (80-120% Recovery) for several
metals and in several analyses. The CRI run on 10/17/90 has the following _______
deficiencies: _______________________________________________
________ Metals __________ %R ____________________
_______ Cadmium ________ 150 ________________________
_______ Copper __________ 136 
________________________________
Nickel 
121 
,,
Zinc 
128
<eex.oi —
.able i. Tutu Residential Wells Sampling Results. September 1990. Sanpie De.;.^ Grout
Sample Identification:
inorganic Analysis
.Aluminum
.Antimony
.Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
~hallium
'••-•• Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
770-08
Tillet
153 BJ
52 UJ
3 UJ
43 BJ
4 BJ
4 BJ
54800 J
8 BJ
18 UJ
48 J
953 J
I.5BJ
38300 J
1260 J
R
33 BJ
760 BJ
10 UJ
7 UJ
192000 J
R
25 BJ
162 J
5 UJ
770-09
Tillet-D
(Replicate)
159 B
52 U
44B
40 B
4 B
3 BJ
48600
7 B
18 U
32 J
2660 J
8.5J
34500
1100
R
15 BJ
1190 B
10 UJ
7 U
169000
R
50J
124 J
5 U
770-10
H2O Blank
Tutu
85 B
52 U
3 U
3 U
4 B
3 U
74 U
5 B
18 U
12 BJ
27 BJ
1 UJ
95 U
2 U
R
11 UJ
300 B
2 UJ
7 U
158 B
R
10 BJ
4 UJ
5 U
770-12
Gassett
(Hartman I)
526
52 U
3 U
7 B
4 B
3 U
31200
4 B
18 U
10 BJ
418 J
1.4BJ
26300
853
R
11 U
880 B
10 UJ
7 B
236000
R
26 BJ
5 BJ
5 U
770-14
VIHA I
154 B
54 BJ
3 U
1
3 B 
'
4 BJ
49400
10
1* U
10 B
29 BJ
9 J
33900
2 U
R
15 B
2000 B
1.4BJ
16 J
252000
R
67 J
16 B
9.7B
All concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (ug/L).
J - Value is estimated.
U - Analyte is not detected.
R - Value is rejected.
B • Value is between instrument detection limit and contract required detection limit.
) <
AflUTV K> \m\ \ CD
I
I
I
1
I
I
•4
> ' >,
REFERENCE NO. 34
TUT 001 1534
\\
Protection of
Environment
40
PARTS 190 TO 299
Revised as of July 1, 1988
TUT 
OO1
§ 261.24
40 CFR Ch. I (7.1 -88 Edition)
ate toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a
quantity sufficient to present a danger
to human health or the environment.
(6) It is capable of detonation or ex-
plosive reaction if it Is subjected to a
strong initiating source or if heated
under confinement.
(7) It is readily capable of detona-
tion or explosive decomposition or re-
action at standard temperature and
pressure.
(8) It is a forbidden explosive as de-
fined in 49 CFR 173.51. or a Class A
explosive as defined in 49 CFR 173.53
or a Class B explosive as defined in 49
CFR 173.88.
(b) A solid waste that exhibits the
characteristic of reactivity, but is not
listed as a hazardous waste in Subpart
D. has the EPA Hazardous Waste
Number of D003.
1261.24 CharaeterfetkofEPtoxielty.
(a) A solid waste exhibits the charac-
teristic of EP toxicity if. using the test
methods described In Appendix n or
equivalent methods approved by the
Administrator under the procedures
set forth In if 280.20 and 280.21. the
extract from a representative sample
of the waste contains any of the con-
taminants listed in Table I at a con-
centration equal to or greater than the
respective value given in that Table.
Where the waste contains less than 0.5
percent filterable solids, the waste
itself, after filtering, is considered to
be the extract for the purposes of this
section.
(b) A solid waste that exhibits the
characteristic of EP toxicity. but is not
listed as a hazardous waste in Subpart
D, has the EPA Hazardous Waste
Number specified in Table I which cor-
responds to the toxic contaminant
causing it to be hazardous.
TABUE I — MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF CON-
TAMINANTS FOB CHARACTERISTIC OF EP
Toxemr
EPA
ooos.
0006.
0007.
ddmunt.
Ctmmun
w
(mrifemfni
p*rMir)
S-0
100.0
. 
1.0
5.0
TABLE I — MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF CON-
TAMINANTS FOR CHARACTERISTIC OF EP
TOXICITY— Continued
EPA
**"'*"* i 
Comimnim
nun«Mr
ton
(rmtgrtms
0008..
0009.
0010..
0011..
0012-
Mvcury
.J Endrni 
(1 J.3.4.i0.104imcn- i
1.4.4«.5.6.7.».ii actm»dio-
1.<«ndo. 
•noo-S^dnwov
0013.
0014.
0015.
.———.{ Lindm (1.2J.4.S.6-h«m». CMor- ;
i ocydotanm. gvnm* Mm«r. :
••••KayeUte 
(1.1.1-ThcMoro-
U«i 
C(M««ho«y- |
iO
0.2
10
SO
0.02
0.4 •
100
01
10.0
10
Swbpart D— Lists of Hazardous
Wattot
1 261 JO
(a) A solid waste is a hazardous
waste if it is listed in this subpart.
unless it has been excluded from this
list under f I 260.20 and 260.22.
(b) The Administrator will indicate
his basis for listing the classes or types
of wastes listed in this Subpart by em-
ploying one or more of the following
Hazard Codes:
ffl
Id
(R)
IE)
EP Tone Want..
Aa
ToKWd
01
Appendix VII identifies the constitu-
ent which caused the Administrator to
list the waste as an EP Toxic Waste
(E) or Toxic Waste (T) in f 1261.31
and 261.32.
(c) Each hazardous waste listed In
this subpart is assigned an EPA Haz-
ardous Waste Number which precedes
the name of the waste. This number
must be used in complying with the
POC.
pa-
406
^ -•«
TUT 
00.1 1586
J ' 
"
\
REFERENCE NO. 35
.^ .f-.>:^
1 
;- 
,-. • .*•' . • ,- • 
./ >-•-- .. V- 
'
• ^ • 
,*; < 
, ,. ;
"•- . • 
*• » ' -
' .f.
f !.J i 
OO1 
t h° 7
i
k-
The Geological Society of America
Memoir 98
CARIBBEAN GEOLOGICAL
INVESTIGATIONS
By
H. H. Hm, £i*r
• Dtft. GMttgy, Primum UmMrtUf, PrimHtu, Mm Jmmj
CarlO. Bowia
Wmdt HtU OrmtgnfUr tiutit*u*, W*i* H*,
Thomas W. Doaadly
Dtft. GMfafjr. Rut Um*rnty, Hmutm, T»*u
John T. Wheneo
Dtft. G<»Ufj «W Oamtftfk,, Um~rntj tf Wmdiiftm, SttltU.
E. R. Oxburyh
Dtft. CttUfj «W MiMrti^y. Oxf*d Um*rn*, Otftrd. £<«teW
yi IT 
<XJ1 l.
I960
88
T.U«
CARIBBEAN GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
TABLES
1. X-ray diflr*ctiua data lor ccladoniic and iHimptllyiic, Si. Tliuinai . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1(12
2. Gravity bate ualioa d«u, S«. Thomai and futilo Kico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142
3. Partial chemical ajialvtci of Virgin lilandi igrwuui rocU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
4. Complete chcnikal aiulyicf ofrwb. Virjin llUmli. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
156
ABSTRACT
I'he oldest rock unit of the northern Virgin Islands is the ?Lowcr Cicta-
ccous Water Isljnd Formation (10,000-15.000 feet plus), which consists of
keratophyre flows and luffs, spilitc flows, and radiolarian lulls. Tetrigenous
sediments are absent, and the entire volcanic sequence appears to have been
extruded on the ocean floor.
Overlying the Water Island Formation with a mild angular unconformity
is the Virgin Isljnd Group, consisting of the Louisenhoj Formation. Outer
Brass Limestone, Tutu Formation, and (fans Lollik Formation, all of |M»-
sible Albian age. The Louisenhoj Formation (8000-13.000 feel maximum)
(unsists of augite tndesiie tuff and volcanic breccia with intercalated con-
' glomerate (Cjues Point Conglomerate lithofacies) containing pebbles and
cobbles of Water Island Formation lithologies. The eruptive' center during
Louisenhoj lime was probably located close to Pillsbury Sound) between Si.
Thomas and St. John. In western St. John and eastern St. Thomas this for-
mation consists of coarse cone debris derived largely from a postulated sub-
aerial cone. In central and western Si. Thomas pyroclastic rocks, frequently
showing slumping*, predominate.
The Outer Brass Limestone (200-600 feet) consists of thin-bedded, car-
bonaceous. radiolarian. luffaceous limestone with intercalated luff beds.
The Tutu Formation (4000-6000 feel exposed) is a relatively coarse vol-
canic wacke which consists almost entirely of unweathered taiiisenhoj debris
with a small quantity of limestone fragments. The Coki Point Megabreccia
liihofacies is an intercalated slumped mass of andesite and limestone blocks,
the latter containing a nerilic .ra:ina of corals, gastropods, pelccypods {in-
cluding the riidist Catrinuloid.ti), anil ecllinoids. and is of apparent Albian
age. The Congo Cay Limestone, near the lop of the Tutu Formation, croju
out on only one of the American Islands.
I'he poorly exposed llans Lollik Formation (6000-10,000 feel ex|>oscd) is
the youngest unit present and litliologically resembles the Louisenhoj For-
mation. 
,
Late Cretaceous or early Tertiary deformation caused mild folding, with
dips averaging 40* north. There are two prominent sets of strike slip faults:
a dextral one trending northwest, and a sinistral one n ending noitheast.
There is also a north-south set of normal faults. The sinistral si i ike slip
faults in many cases have a considerable normal component, and appear to
parallel the principal fault of the Anegada Trough.
Late intrusive rocks include dioritic plutons (with minor acid differen-
tiates). qtiarti andesine porphyry. andesine hornblende |x>rphyry, lampio
phyre. breccia dikes, and rare pegmatites. The emplacement of the pinions
picceded much of the major faulting, but the late dikes followed this fault-
ing and were commonly emplaced along fractures parallel to the fault planes.
Coniact-metamorphic aureoles of hornblende nornfels and probably py-
toxene hornfels facies surround the pluton*.
T. W. IIONNtll.Y — $r. 1IIOMAS AND SI. JOHN. II. V \ IMI.IN 111 tNI» 
|l'|
Kfiatoph)ic magma is believed to have been J low niching II.K(ion of
hydialc'l niaiille if '?iial which was deptcsscd dining Kdiijui isiic .Icd-i
inalion. Spi.liir, augiic andesilc. and dioiiic m.i|;iii.is win- \ i i > similar .mil
icpiescnt moie completely fused maiillc. The lonu.isiiiiK mnni.iloyy of llic
spilile and augiie andcsiie is thought to have oii^iii.Hril fnnn i outlasting
tiiviioiiinciiis of ex m is ion. Whereas (he spiliir iv.is cxiiudol .di)ssally and
(lie voLililcs tvcic largely retained iiniil most of the IH-JI lo»s li.id i.iki-u
plate, llic auijiic andrsilc was ciupicd suhaciially ami ih<- u.l.uili > li.id si p
aialcd fioin the magma al a high teni|iriaiuie well uiiliin ili<- milicc ul
extiusion.
ACKNOWLKDCMKNTS
This sluily ivas begun at I'liiirclon (Inivrisiiy .•> .1 I'd I' .li\M iijiion,
since IOCO it has been continued ai Kite Jlnivtrjiiy tvitii SII|IJ>.>M fiuni the
National Science Foundation (Ci.ini (Ml 107) Half (In .•••,! <>l ilu 011^111.11
study was met by ihe Jackson Hole 1'irstive. Itu . iluonj;li iln N.iiion.il I'.ul
Scrvkes. which is tiiueuily developing pan of Si. John j> a N.iiion.il I'.ul
I'he remainder of the cost was bome by the Caiiblu.in KcxMtili I mid of
the Department of Geology, Piinccioii Dinvcijity. In .nl.linoii. tin- wiiin
gratefully acknowledges National Sticnir FoniMl.itinn hVllmi>lii|if lu.-ld
during 1957-1958 and 1958-1959.
Any field study undertaken in a group of inlands IIHI>( dr|icnd l.ngi-ly <m
the generosity of local inhabiiants for logistical aiiaiii;riiifius .uid lio.ii
iraniporiaiion. anil it is with great imlchicdncsf dial (lit fnlloum^ .UIIM-
ance is acknowlctlgctl. Siewait Af. Moigan and liclfiu.di liuili an.in^fd
for housing on St. Thomas and otherwise gieatly iissisinl (he |>io|ni \\'il
liam liaclnnan, Matdonald Laplace, Kidge Folk, ami Ciiiisi.iiiiiiins Ciiiili.iin»
generously provided boat nansjiorialion iti small hl.mds. The {.ulson
Hole Presetve. Inc., provided housing al Cancel Hay 1'l.mi.nion on St. Julin
The staff of this hotel was of great assistance; the writer cs|tci.ially appreci-
ates the assistance of Euaii McFatlane and Dairy llairis. who airanged (mat
trans|>oiiaiion from Canee! Hay to many suinll islands. Mr. and Mis. Arthur
Lynch helped in many ways on Si. John. Dining l'J.
r>7 the N.iiion.il I'.ul
Service (Harold Hubler, Park Superintendent; Vincent Mni/ek, I'.nk Ran-
ger; and Elwood Shade, Park Natnr.ilisi) proviiled housing at l..imcslmr
liay, St. John, and piovided ttaiis|ioiia(ioii f.iciliiics cm (hat itl.nid Sii|icr
inientleiil John Lewis provided facilities dining a lairr visit and John Cnod
provided the photographs used for dale 2.
Several specialists examined the fo»il collections: I.. J. ("lml>l> identified
the rudisls, and P. Ilionnimanii. |. \V. Wells, and N. Soli I examined other
fossils.
Prof. II. II. Hess suggested the project aiid has provided (onnilrss lirljidd
tiiiicisins dining the si inly. Piof. A. F. Hiiililiiigimi h.if'm.idr many xalnaldr
suggestions throughout the siudy. (' K. lliMey and M. I ninei sli»ucd
writer much of the geology in ihe ncighhoiing Iliiiisli Vii|;m
II
*>?2. P n ^ S r -
PmJ|1}3?
SflKlW
•'f'tftfrtll
rs >§•*.« - £
'*• *8 * frfr*
IT s s -B a. * *
^
5 s -3* -"a.*- r =
UttUllfo
,]ilH^-rfl
" N
U^|l^
Ihil?
•»• | :i £.5-
s
fcr* n
nvllrilil
U>i>!|2-
lilif If
H'P5
S 1, § K.3.
9 r ^ i i i ; § & |
H7ll82Jrf?
i
5
i M~5
triJi
I s - i s - ?
;§r-i?j ?
r £> = 5 C' 5
If^Jl I
?ff?£|. {
T 5 
B ? 
*
£. s-o5 u 5 £ 
x-
s. s s- s o - 
_
LS c f H e 
i
L : § £ i r f
K• ~ 'f i = r 
~
^^ 5 = I <
rf^-T'i i
UIHl
»« • T - ? S.
I ^ f L 5" I
•^ 2 ? 5 * I
•: - - "' " •€
• • r ^ - z
CRETACEOUS 
(?Albionj
'SL*ND 
6ROU~P
i»f 11
SiJ5!s 
!•
ri§ i
:n ?
I!S 
?
„
Fi" i
= 2 i- 
I
r Ft 
r
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
S * S 5 ~
- z s"*'£
tis*$
* s E-Is
•« 
** ™ ^
*rl?r
— > _ . . < * r
1^f»il
:iiutt
-«^ •«« 2. S fc • *
•
?ir|H5
a t? s ^ 9 ? 9
1
en 
p
z 
B
c cIII I
5 I
r"*
az
< 
Z ! :: - o f r * ; r ? f H "M i = *
7 
F 4 f 5H§ M-> 
f £: fll :?
- ! !i.vJS!Tl;Sj 4 = H = f : t
5 ! J§l8^|?3:j; ^il*i = ! =
cr
2
C
:i*e«J'i|
s 5 s .; t r.|
niiaFili'jJ*4"!i
'i;Miil!ii^ntjH
5 .* ^ s $ « fc s.js f A
l|Jt|jH'M
•Xiimi*jtj4
<B n
2 J-
L*il]|Ui*
iiii i! n
Illihi!
i-Ss** s
I -2 S -a -~ S1 ~ 
5 55 * =
l\\\i^l\'^\
ir^l«f::sus-
l 8 - 2 * S e - . n - J <
i fifili I.MII
! «!ii|l ilH!
?ihj^i---3"
? i S * j { i 8 g 2 » - g .
" v.* •» I - " e-3 " * .3
^JliUlDfU
— 
,-
IW 
CAataaiAN CIOLOCSCAL WVUTICATIOH*
Ctbri 1'oinl Conglomerate li»*o/«i>J. Near llie bate of the
i,, ,.« tkiniiy of Qiu Bay. St Jolm. and C,be. Point, r™~ 
Gat**,
and Bunker Hill. St Tlsoma.. conglomerates are imerbedded with andeti
tk pyrotbstk and epstbttk lotkt. These conglomerate, consist almost
rniiicly of uell rounded keratophyre cobbles and ,rbblet derived from UK
i.i.deil)ing Water Isbisd Formation. At Cru< Bay. however, these eonglom.
eratct are more or lest mile* »fl* J^M* ***• I"*!*1"* ""V"*
aeiial erosion of the cone Jc^SW ** «"* '!«"•"»"• k"'V£^
beds were simulianeou.. Al Sbtt MM ibe conglomerate b compoKd of
*ell rounded and fairly well sorted kmiophyte and tj-hie cobblet awl
pelAlet Tfceie conglomeiate bed* appear to have been dejwstted in
shallow water, and were not products of lubklity-cwrem depouis
aie well toried. are not graded, and bave rebllvely iNtk matrl
pretence indkates tubacrial erosion, irampml. and deposition 01
toiitdui ing early IxHiisenhoj time.
Iftirr MuNf.|onrimlMf «w««cl. Tliere are few placet where the
cuniaii between the U'aier Island and l.oni»enboj Formaliom it well
eitiosed In St. Jolm there n one cucellent e>posure of the contact along
the wetl thore of Monte B..y. and iheic are poor «,««"'" »« K*m
Bay. Tlie eitmsuic on MOMM Bay showt a conglomerate of the Louisennoj
overling a spiliie bed Tbe spiliie it quite fresh al H* contact. •"J.'hV"fr
King conglomerate contains a wide assortment of U'aier Island hihologies
i»,h,,lingThowe»er. very lew rockt identifiable with the underlying t,-lite.
At Calvary Bay. St. Jolm. ibeie it an e«po»nie of a conglomerate of the
Louisrnhoi Formation overlying keratofihyre.
On St. I homat the conla«i iisell n pooily exposed, but an extensive e«-
posure of Uubenboj beds above the contact al the beadbnds between
BTewer • Bay and ibe airport it of great Intemt becaute of the enient of
apparenily cotttempwaneout «eaibert*g dbpbyed bere. The Loubenhoj
beds here combi dominantly of tubaerially. varkolored amJetitic ath inter-
bedded with conglomeratic Waier Island deiriiut. Some of Hie ath unlit
are brkk red and comiii tolely of albite. hematite, and a Mile illite (X ray
difraction). Tlie albitired plagioclase phenocrysu evidently withsiootl the
weathering ahnoti perfectly, but the entire mafk part of the rocl; hat been
converted to oxide. Other miitt combl of varkoloreil fragment* ranging fiom
deep red 10 green, evidently reflecting differential »iHceptibiliiy 10 weather-
ing. Still other unit* consist of greenbh or graybh fragnsentt in a "oilornily
ituiplish matri«. Tlie basal tubaerially weathered itnit b lest than 100 feel
ihkk and wa» found at only thb «ne locality. The color of the be* tomewhat
resemble* thai of the weathered hy.lrotbermally altered rock* (dhcutied in
a following seciion). biit the latter grade into wbiibh mtweaihered rock
within a few feel of the tuilace and ate mineralogkally quite disiiiKi. The
exicni of ibis Keaiheiing it completely unlike any lecenl weathering of any
rotk |)|HTI in these islands and mntmwtnlly reirri* weailieiing foniem|«ia
neous Kiili otiginal dr|iosiiiuii.
T. W. DONMU.LV— IT. 1MOMA1 AMI SI. JUIIN. I' * \IHt.lH ISI
I .'I
Anotlicr ocr m rente of toiiieiit|>oijm-oii> wrjilinioj; it |»»>il) < \|H>,«| .u
Winlberg Hill. Si. 'fhoni.it. 'Hie JMNJI luinial I\|H»HU>, ulmli .nc nl
lightly mctanioi piloted rotk. weie oiigiiully ilionjjln i«> IK- nl li)ilioilMi
mally alleieil rotk. However. ic«ein (I%J) eK«jvjin>ii\ Im i<ml M.MMI inii<ni
revealed the originally weailim-il n.iliiie nl ihr%r tin U
Mineralogy of mafic /mgwirNfi. 'Hie |uiini|».il IMIIKI il. luiinil in ni.ilu
fragmentt arc |>bgioclaie, clino|i)iu\riie. ililmiic. .mil |MIIII|K-||)I'<'. JHI! .il>»
mairii and ojia<|iie mincrah.
1
H*N$ IOLLIK ru
rvru en.
D
8
O
iO
our fit t**ss is.
—— 9 ——
1 ^
O 
|
0
S
••
H
) 0O
) M«w
S*n*lct
O
t —— )
• 0
1 
°
LOUISCNHOJ FM
__L—(
Spililitcd Au( Ic Andrtdf
WtTfft 
151 AND fM
f
Mon,O
") Samples
-o
o
"
"80
"WO
tT Mtf OLT (OoMitHy. If C3» opllct
NT cplict
>» tn
AU: MoM phenorrytl^of the l-ouitenhoj andesiics aie
about An* (Fig. 10). Near the bate of the fomiaiion nuny |»)i«»l.mic toiks
contain a dittincily more cakk jibgi<Hlase (An,, in J|HHU An..) Some u(
these pyrodattk rocki contain both bytowniik and LbiailiHiiic lu(iurni>.
but a few contain only bylownitk (or anortliitk) fragmrnis 'I he ft (.Kjuis aie
tbarpfy eirhedral and tliglnly toned. Ihey thow abnmljiii sini|>lr luinninj
and tome alWie twinning. Gioumlmass (ibgiixljses and |il.i|:i<« l.i» » in llie
niairi* of coarse pyiocljsiic rockt aie my line guiiu.l .in. I il<iml> M utf
aie distinctly moie toclic ili.m the |>hcnoii)riu ami ui'gr in i.iliiiun louiriii
down to AnN. In many |j|>illi mlts. llie only feMt|>.n lonml is jll'iK- (An,);
n'
•- I
ill
CARIBBEAN CCOLOCICAI. INVESTIGATIONS
jbiindant c|>iilolc :itul pum|iellyile in the gioundni.!** iiiggois thai this
jlbilc it icioiidjiy alu-r an originally mote t.ilcic plagiw fosc. No K fchlsp:iis
ucre detected, either optically or by X-iay diffraction.
ci INOI-YKOKIM.: In all cases the p)ruxenes arc calcic augite (Fig. 5). Coin-
|it»ilions uric bated on nieasiiieinenls of 2V and iir. arcoiding to the
iiHtliod of Mess (1919). The pyroxenes are all cnhcdral with well dcvvlo|>cd
crystal faces and range up to J nun. Twinning on (100) is very common; in
many grains multiple twinning on this plane was seen. No evolution
lamellae tveie seen in any grains. Orthopyroxcne was not found in any py-
roclastic ioil,»; late seijieniiiie |iseiMloniinpin in MIIIIC :ne |KMsihly alter
olivine.
cniORirt:: Cliloiiic it abinulanl and widv>|Me:id ilnonghoni I lie l.ouitrii-
lioj Formation. Thrse chlorites ate very finegiained and show inixlri.iif
bitcliingeiiic and disunion. Much tliloiitc ap|icars to have foimt-d :u a
conieniporaneous alteration product of andesite glass.
ruktrELLvnc: In a few andesite fragments puni|>cllyiie was identilicd :is
an amygdule filling (along with cliloiite). as crystals' within chloritic. pre-
sumably originally vitrie, fragments, or as obscure clusters of grains in the
gioundmass of slightly metamorphosed albilic andesites. Perhaps the most
interesting occunenrc of pnm|>ellyiie, however, is as an apparent devitrifi-
cation mineral after calcic andesite glass. At one locality, laigc (tip to '2
inches) angular, conchoidally fractured, apparently vitric fragments were
found* along with holocrysialline andesite fragments in a roar* lull bed.
These fragments appear to be either completely isotropic or only slightly
birefringent under the microscope. The deep-green color, index of refrac-
tion (1.725 ± .01). and X-ray dilfraciion pattern (Table I) of the "glass"
show that it is an ultramicroscopic aggregate of iron-rich puni|>cllyiic. The
texture and presence of liny plagioclase and clinopyroxene phcnocrysts in
this material suggest that it formed as a glass, with a chemical composition
similar to that of calcic bytownite augiic andesile fragments.
MATRIX MINERALS: Quarti, chlorite. feldspar (sodic plagioclase). and cpi-
dote are the common matrix minerals. Qnarti. occurring as liny sphernlitie
domains of chalcedony cementing together rock fragments and lulfaceous de-
bt is. is the most abundant matrix mineral. Labradoriic and angite fragments
are more or Ins abundant in the matrix. Most chloriie is in irregular amoeboid
masses inteigroivn with quant or calcile and suggesting in form an altera-
tion or devitrification product of glass. This chloriie is very fine-grained
and appeals lo be aggregated into radiating sheaves. Some chloriie has a
peculiar, almost vesicular structure, probably resulting from complete chlo-
ritic alteration of vesicular glass. Calcite is abundant in the matrix of many
pyroclasiic rocks but seems in these to be a product of weathering. In many
rocks the calcite has replaced the chalcedonic cement during weathering but
has not replaced the chloriie.
orAQuc MINERALS: Doth magnetite and pyrite are fairly common acces-
sory minerals in fragments in these rocks. Hematite is rare and confined
lo relatively minor reddish fragments near the base of the formation.
r'lcu«E I. 
St. Jyhn from above taticrn Si. Thomas. Toricil.i is in tin lift li.icLprmiii,!,
ami Cm* II.iv in I lie center niiililliyrounil. Concoiil.int siniiiiiiit .11 .in iliv.itimi nl
*|NMI| 9(10 (IT! are slum n.
I'lMlc J. ICaitt-rn St. jjnlin (miililleground) anil Tortofo (liatLi>roiiiul) fiom lluf.l. m\
Mountain, St. John. Village of Knitnaiit in the fortgrounil. Nine pro.iltiui ol ilu|»
ami lolmiergeil shore line.
ST. JOHN, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
Hu>li>i!r.i|>lis cmirlii)- of tin. U. S. N.ini.n.il P.ul. Smiic
DONNEI.LY, I'LA I If. 2
Vic.il Societjr of America Memoir 9S 
I
9C 'ON 30N3U3J3U
U. S. Geological Survey
Water Resources Division
Caribbean District
Open - File Report
A SURVEY OF THE WATER RESOURCES OF
ST. THOMAS, VIRGIN ISLANDS
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS OF THF iiMlTFn
•I
!
>• 
v 
Caribbean District
I 
Open-File Report
I
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Geological Survey
A S U R V E Y OF THE WATER R E S O U R C E S OF
ST. 
THOMAS, V I R G I N ISLANDS
by
D. G. Jordan and O. J. Cosner
Prepared in cooperation with the
Government of the Virgin Islands
of the United States
i U'
1973
ATLANTIC 
OCEAN
y ,
• ^ £ ^ ^ 7 ' . '
~ 
f 
/
*-
~ 
~~i 
i 
i
-(••to
CARIBBEAN 
SEA
0I
I 
?
I •)!••
qi
-0
•9*00*
r99 
Gtoloor g«A*roliitd afltr T W Donntlly, I960
•49°
E X P L A N A T I O N
•i «•
ALLUVIUM-Silt, cloy, ond thin, discontinuous beds of sand ond gravel.
Includes beach sand. Estimated maximum thickness 50 ft.
CM
c
TUTU FORMATION - Tuffoceous conglomeratic mixture derived from older
rocks. Contains some limestone, especially near the top. Maximum thickness
greater than 6,000 ft.
OUTER BRASS LIMESTONE-Thin-bedded siliceous limestone and a few
thin beds of tuff. Estimated maximum thickness 600 ft.
LOUISENHOJ FORMATION-Water-laid tuff, breccia, and a few thin beds
of limestone. Maximum thickness known 13,000 ft.
WATER ISLAND FORMATION-Lava flows, flow breccia, and water-laid
tuff intruded by dikes and plugs. Maximum thickness greater than 15,000 ft.
Contact
Inferred fault, dotted where concealed
Figure 3.—Geology of St. Thomas.
Geoloov
The general geology of St. Thomas (fig. 3) has
been studied for many years, but only recently
have the geologic formations been named and
described in detail (Donnelly, 1960, 1966). The
names of geologic formations used, in this report
are after Donnelly. The names have not been
adopted by the U.S. Geological Survey.
The volcanic and sedimentary rocks of St.
Thomas are of Cretaceous (and older?) age. The
oldest rocks, those of the Water Island Formation
of Donnelly (1960) are predominantly lava flows
and flow breccias deposited at great depth on the
sea floor. Uplift and subareal erosion followed
deposition.
The Loulsenhoj Formation overlying the Water
Island Formation was extruded from a volcanic
center probably sited in what is now Pillsbury
Sound between St. Thomas and St. John. Near the
presumed location of the volcanic orifice the rocks
are mostly very coarse reworked cone debris.
Farther from the orifice, coarse material lessens
and tuffs predominate. Near the base of the
Loulsenhoj Formation is a conglomerate composed
chiefly of rock from the Water Island Formation.
The Outer Brass Limestone was deposited on the
flanks of the Loulsenhoj volcanic cone during a
period of volcanic quiescence. It consists of 200
to 600 feet of thin-bedded graphitic slllclfied
radlolarian limestone and a small amount of
Included tuffaceous material.
The Tutu Formation, the youngest rock exposed
on St. Thomas proper,is composed almost entirely
of angular debris derived from the Loulsenhoj
rormation and minor limestone debris from thin
limestone deposited contemporaneously with the
Tutu Formation.
The rocks were subsequently tilted to form a
northward-dipping homocline. Dips range from 15
to 90 degrees arid average about 50 degrees.
Locally the formations are overturned.
The permeable zones that these rocks once may
have had after deposition have been destroyed by
metamorphism or by deposition of minerals in pore
spaces. Ground-water movement is now limited
to openings along joints and fault zones. The
homoclinal structure is cut by sets of faults trend-
Ing N 45* W, N 55° E and north. Three well-
defined joint sets parallel each of the major fault
directions. The valleys of the island have
similar trends and are apparently the result of
selective erosion of rock weakened by faulting
and jointing. Prime zones of ground-water
availability, therefore, follow the vaUeys.
Small alluvial deposits ranging from
Pleistocene (?) to Holocene in age lie in the
valley of Turpentine Run in east-central St.
Thomas and the larger coastal embayments.
The alluvium of Turpentine Run lies in a narrow
band seldom more than 200 feet in width along the
stream. Maximum thickness of the alluvium is
about 40 feet. Most of this alluvium, which is
composed of silt, fine sand, and clay and contains
discontinuous beds of sand and gravel 2 to 3 feet
thick, lies in the Mt. Zlon-Tutu area of the upper
basin and in the narrow valley from Mariendal to
Mangrove Lagoon in the lower basin. The
alluvium extends out under the lagoon near the
mouth of Turpentine Run. 
Although composed pre-
dominately of fine-grained material, the alluvium
readily infiltrates streamflow when the ground-
water level is below the base of the stream. As
such, the alluvium forms a readily rechargeable
aquifer, although it is of small extent and yield.
Some coastal embayments headed by Intermit-
tent streams contain small deposits of alluvium
similar to that of Turpentine Run. 
Maximum
thickness of these deposits is estimated to be 50
feet, and their areal extent seldom is greater than
a few acres (an exception being the Long Bay and
Airport areas near Charlotte Amalie). Near the
sea, the alluvium interftngers with calcareous
sand and at times contains lenses of mangrove-
swamp deposits. Therefore, the deposits are of
minor significance as sources of water.
OCCURRENCE AND MOVEMENT OF WATER
Water moves through a cyclic pattern—the
hydrologic cycle—in which there are three storage
areas : the sea, the land, and the atmosphere.
On the land, surface water and ground water
depend on: (1) the amount, intensity, and areal
extent of the rainstorms; (2) the slope of the
land; (3) the moisture content of the soil and
vegetal coven (4) the infiltration capacity of
the soil and underlying rocks; and (5) the size.
TUT 
00.1.
»s supplemental sources of water for domestic use,
stock, >nd irrigation.
Natural Water Resources
r.ie r.;u.ral water resources of the island—
-round v.-jiar and surface water—are the residue of
rainfall c:ter evapotranspiration. Rr.in, as such,
;s s v/oter resource on St. Thomas, for in many
places it is collected and stored for future use.
n th& rrilowing pages only the •'natural" water
resource: are discussed, end the sea is discussed
onlv 45 it directly affects the natural resources.
Water ircra Streams and Other Surface Sources
Surface-water resources are negligible on St.
Thomas. Ctroams are small and generally intermit-
tent, 
mere are no lakes, although, numerous farm
roods lizvs been constructed. Killsido rainfall
r-ntchnsents for many years were an important source
of w*ter for public supply. Rooftop catchments are
still the rajcr source of water for most private
-.or.es.
During the study period, 1963-67, rainfall was
JUOY« average only in 1965. There were 2 years
of extreme drought: 1964, when rainfall was 27
inches: and 1967, when rainfall was 24 inches.
Streaniflcvs in particular was greatly affected. The
worst prcwble conditions, therefore, could be
studied.
Stream flaw
Streams generally flow only after heavy rains.
None o: the streams on St. Thomas are perennial in
the ordinary sense. A few spring-fed pools and
short reaches of two streams flow throughout the
year, but :n extreme drought even these disappear.
The variability of streamflow Is shown in the
hydrographs, figures 9, 10, and 11, of Turpentine
Run and Bonne Resolution Gut, the only two streams
that generally have some flow throughout the year.
Streams head in the volcanic rock uplands,
where valleys are steepslded and stream courses
have steep gradients and are commonly strewn with
boulders. Near the sea, larger valleys broaden,
stream gradients are gentle, alluvial deposits are
present, and boulders are less numerous. Drain-
age basins are small, few being larger than half a
square mile in area. Turpentine Run is the only
drainage basin exceeding a square mile in area.
Historical stream How.—Historical reports,
geologic evidence, and older residents indicate
that streamflow was once greater than at present.
The decline in ground-water levels and in
streamflow (as noted, the discharge of ground
water supports base flow of the streams and
springs) is attributed to changes in land use. In
the not-too-distant past much of the island was
under cultivation or in grass pasture. Now it is
covered by a dense growth of deep-rooted brush.
The brush, which has a greater transpiration rate
than grass pasture and croplands, probably inter-
cepts a large part of the water that previously
reached the ground-water reservoir and was sub-
sequently discharged as streamflow.
Several small spring-fed streams on the south
coast from the vicinity of long Bay to Fortune Bay
and along the north coast from Santa Marfa Bay to
Water Bay (tig. 12) no longer flow. Two of the
springs on the south coast reportedly flowed S to
10 thousand gpd each. The water from Staabi
Spring (9 on fig. 12), was piped into Charlotte
Amalie for water supply. The other, on John
Dunko Estates (8 on fig. 12) above Crown Bay.
was once considered as a potential source of
water for Charlotte Amalie.
Staabi Spring still contributes a trickle of
water to streamflow. Small spring-fed pools still
exist at Fortune Bay and Estate Solberg. All other
springs and streams on the south coast are dry,
although many have small dams built on them,
indicating former flow.
Calcareous tufa, deposited by former streams,
is present in nearly all water courses on the north
coast between Santa Marfa Bay and Water Bay on
the north coast. At Caret Bay, until a few years
ago H-stream flow was reportedly perennial. Spring-
fed pools are still used for stock watering, and
one in the vicinity of Estate Barren is used for
public supply.
Turpentine Run
Turpentine Run in eastern St. Thomas drains
an area of 3.4 square miles. About two-thirds of
the drainage basin lies in the interior and is sur-
rounded by high hills. Discharge to the sea is
through a relatively narrow V-shaped valley, 200
13
001
feet wide at its narrowest place. The valley
widens as it approaches the sea, where it empties
into Mangrove Lagoon. About three-fourths of a
mile from the sea a tributary valley drains a 0.5-
square-mile subbasin.
Turpentine Run near Mt. Zion
The flow of Turpentine Run has been measured
at the site of the Mt. Zion gage from time to time
since 1920. At this point the stream drains a
basin of 2.3 square miles. Flow from the basin is
highly variable and is predominately storm runoff.
Base flow (ground-water outflow) of the stream is
meager and, at times, ceases altogether. It did
not flow for 8 months in 1921 (Johnson 1936) and
for 3 months in 1965 and probably has not at other
times.
Discharge during 1958-62 was calculated on a
daily basis/using rainfall at Estate Fort Mylner in
conjunction with a rainfall-runoff ratio based on
1963 rainfall-runoff and stage recession of 1963
runoff. Discharge from 1963-67 was determined
by the stage-discharge relation of a continuous
recording gage established in late November 1962.
Figure 13 presents the relation of monthly and
annual discharge to monthly and annual rainfall.
The rainfall-discharge relation is presented in a
different manner in figure 14. Scatter in the
monthly relation is caused by antecedent rainfall
and soil-moisture conditions in the basin.
The annual discharge of Turpentine Run is a
small percentage of the total rainfall on the basin
(table 2 ). In a year of near-average rainfall, dis-
charge is less than 2 percent of the rainfall on the
basin. The lack of runoff is attributed in part to
high evapotranspiration and, at times, lack of
ground-water contribution from the greater part of
the upper basin to base flow of Turpentine Run. In
extremely dry periods all ground-water is dis-
charged through a zone of hydrothermaiiy altered
rocks at Mt.Zion directly to the alluvium and bed-
rock aquifer in the lower basin.
Base flow.—Turpentine Run had only base
flow about 90 percent of the time during 1963-67.
Except for the drought years of 1964 and 1967,
base flow was less titan one-third of the total
annual discharge. Base-flow contribution in 1963-
64 is shown by the unshaded area in the hydrograph
in figure 9. The 10-percentile line of the duration
curves in figure 15 is essentially the dividing line
between base flow and storm runoff.
Table 2.—Annual discharge, Turpentine Run near Mt. Zion
Year
1958*
1959*
1960*
1961*
1962*
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
Flow,
million gallons
34.5
2.9
290.0
24.3
21.4
27.3
1.5
32. 9
19.8
3.0
Rainfall,
inches
47.02
29.66
71.34
48.46
41.10
43.75
28.05
42.83
39.88
22.91
Runoff, percent
of rainfall
1.83
.34
10.20
1.25
1.30
1.56
.13
1.92
1.24
.33
Discharge computed from daily rainfall.
Flow in Turpentine Run during 1964, 1967, and
the first 10 months of 1965 was almost entirely
base flow. Discharge seldom exceeded 15,000
gpd and more than half the time was less than
S.OOOgpd.
During 1963 and 1966, when rainfall was near
normal, base flow was as large as 90,000 gpd and
as small as 4,000 gpd. Average base flow was
about 27 ,000 gpd in 1963 and 1966.
Monthly rainfall of about 4 inches is necessary
to maintain base flow. When rainfall is less,
base flow declines sharply. Once base flow has
begun to decline, rainfall in excess of 4 inches
for 2 or 3 consecutive months is necessary to
reverse the downward trend, as shown by compar-
ing monthly rainfall and discharge during the latter
part of 1965 (fig. 13).
Storm runoff.—During periods of near- normal
rainfall, storm runoff contributes the greater part
of the total annual discharge. However, storm
runoff prevails only a few days each year. Storm
runoff in 1963 was 65 percent of the annual dis-
charge. Nearly 40 percent of the annual discharge
occurred in 4 days, the result of one storm
of 4 inches in the upper basin.
Two curves drawn through the points plotted In
figure 16 are related to antecedent storm runoff.
One curve passes through points where storm run-
off had occurred in the previous 15 days, whereas
the other curve passes through points where storm
runoff had not occurred in the previous 15 days.
The curves, in a crude way, indicate the quantity
15
001
.1.6 O2
1/1 maier recnarged to the aquifers, evaporated,
transpired, and needed to replace soil moisture.
Maximum runoff from an individual storm was 20.5
million gallons (8.7 mg/sq mi) from the storm of
December 10-15, 1965, when 4.3 inches of rain
fell on the watershed. Runoff on this occasion
was more than twice that from a 5.1-inch rain on
the watershed August 28-29, 1963. The qreat
difference in runoff was probably related in part to
rainfall intensity but mostly to antecedent soil-
moisture conditions.
Turpentine Run at Mariendal
Turpentine Run at the Mariendal gage has a
drainage basin of 2.8 square miles, which includes
the upper basin and a major tributary that joins the
main stem about 1,500 feet upstream from the gage.
Alluvium underlies the stream channel to a point
about 1, 500 feet upstream from the gage. All base
flow infiltrates this alluvium before reaching the
Mariendal gage, except on the rare occasions when
the alluvium is saturated to the level of the stream.
Consequently, flow at the gage is almost solely
major-storm runoff ( fig . 10).
Base flow.—Base flow at the Mariendal gage
30
reportedly was continuous from May 1960 to
September 1962 and was observed in October and
November 1962. No further base flow occurred at
Mariendal until December 1965, when there was
flow for about a month between periods of storrr.
runoff. 
"""'
Storm runoff.—Storm runoff seldom lasts more
than a few days, usually ceasing abruptly, owing
to infiltration into the alluvium at the declining
stages of the flow.
Because of the irregular distribution and inten-
sity of rn in storms, the volume of runoff per square
mile is generally not the same at Mt. Zion as it is
at Mariendol. Nearly twice as much runoff per
square mile has been recorded at Mariendal.
However, flows as great as 100,000 gpd recorded
at Mt. Zion never reached the Mariendal gage,
owing to infiltration losses.
Maximum runoff from an individual storm was
34 million gallons (12 mg/sq mi) between
December 10 and 15, 1965—the result of a series
of rains totaling about 4.3 inches over the water-
shed . Runoff per square mile was nearly twice
that at the Mt. Zion gage.
CO
0
<xo
20
10
CO
10
R
o
Mill
I I . J l l l l . l l l l l l . . I
1963
1964
lnll
ll,
1965
1966
1967
Figure 17.—Monthly discharge of Bonne Resolution Gut and monthly rainfall at
Dorthea Agicultural Station.
20