FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN
CAROL LILES,
Plaintiff,
v.
REVETAW, INC., d/b/a WATER ISLAND
FERRY, STEVE RAMPINO, and STEVE
SCULLY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)  
)     Civil No. 2003-88
)
)
)
)
)
APPEARANCES:
Carol Liles, 
Water Island, U.S.V.I.
Pro se plaintiff,
James M. Derr, Esq.
St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.
For defendants Steve Rampino and Mike Clemens,
Steve Scully
St. Thomas, U.S.V.I.
Pro se defendant.
ORDER
GÓMEZ, C.J.
Before the Court are the renewed motions of defendants Steve
Rampino (“Rampino”) and Steve Scully (“Scully”) (collectively,
the “Defendants”) to dismiss and for summary judgment against the
plaintiff Carol Liles (“Liles”).  For the reasons stated in the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion of even date, it is hereby
Case: 3:03-cv-00088-JRS-RM   Document #: 182   Filed: 03/06/09   Page 1 of 2
Liles v. Revetaw, et al.
Civil No. 2003-88
Order
Page 2
ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment is DENIED
without prejudice; it is further
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent
it seeks dismissal of Liles’ claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et
seq. (“Title VII”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983") asserted
in Count One; and it is further
ORDERED that Count One is DISMISSED insofar as it asserts
Title VII and Section 1983 claims; and it is further
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is DENIED insofar as it
seeks dismissal of Liles’ claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“Section
1981") alleged in Count One.   
S\                         
     Curtis V. Gómez
       Chief Judge
Case: 3:03-cv-00088-JRS-RM   Document #: 182   Filed: 03/06/09   Page 2 of 2