PHASE n REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
VOLUME m OF m
April 1995
Prepared for
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee
Prepared by
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
201 West Passaic Street
Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662
(201) 909-0700
TUT 
CO5 
0774
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 
V
*64557*
64557
VOLUME HI - CONTENTS
APPENDICES
A. 
Site Inspection Report, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
B. 
Field Gas-Chromatograph Analytical Report, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands.
C. 
Previous Investigations Sampling Results, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands.
D. 
Sample/Coring Logs, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
E. 
Petrographic Study, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
F. 
Borehole Geophysical Logs, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
G. 
Geologic Logs, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
H. 
Monitoring Well Construction Details, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
I. 
Surveyor's Data, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
J. 
Water Sampling Logs, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
K. 
Data Validation Summary Report, Phase II Soil Sampling, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas,
U.S. Virgin Islands.
L. 
Data Validation Summary Report, Phase II Groundwater Sampling, Tutu Wells Site, St.
Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
M. 
Eglin III Supply Well Pumpage Impact Test Hydrographs, May 1994, Tutu Wells Site,
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
GERAOHTYeO MILLER. INC. 
°03 
°775
APPENDIX A
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
TUT 
OO5
GERAGHTYc* MILLER. INC.
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PHASE n REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
August 1994
Prepared for
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee
Prepared by
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
201 West Passaic Street
Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662
(201) 909-0700
GERAGHTY ^MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°S 
°777
CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.0 INVESTIGATED SITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.1 
FAITH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2.2 
VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.3 
CURRICULUM CENTER (FORMER LAGA BUILDING) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.4 
TRACY DODD PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.5 
ANTILLES AUTO PARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.6 
USVI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.7 
ARCHIE'S WELDING AND AUTO BODY REPAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.8 
UNKNOWN PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.0 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.1 
FAITH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.2 
VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.3 
CURRICULUM CENTER (FORMER LAGA BUILDING) . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.4 
TRACY DODD PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.5 
ANTILLES AUTO PARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.6 
USVI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.7 
ARCHIE'S WELDING AND AUTO BODY REPAIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.8 
UNKNOWN PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
ATTACHMENTS
A. Site Inspection Forms.
B. Site Inspection Correspondence
TUT 
CO5 
0778
GERAGHTYc* MILLER. INC
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PHASE H REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
As specified in the Phase D Remedial Investigation (RI) for the Tutu Wells Site Work
Plan (Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 1993), site inspections were conducted at eight facilities in Tutu,
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). The site inspections were carried out because results
from previous investigations suggested that these sites might have been sources of the petroleum-
related compounds and chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detected in soil and
groundwater in the Tutu Wells Site. The purpose of the site inspections was to gather
information regarding the potential for each site as a likely source of contamination, and if so,
whether additional field work was warranted to delineate the potential contaminant sources.
2.0 INVESTIGATED SITES
The site inspections included examination of the properties for such features as
aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), underground storage tanks (USTs), manholes, vents, septic
systems, dry wells, oil/water separators, drum storage areas, and oil pits/sumps. Any evidence
of on-site waste disposal or releases, such as stained soils or stressed vegetation, were noted
during the site inspections.
The following eight sites were inspected:
• Faith Christian Fellowship Church
• Virgin Islands Housing Authority (VIHA)
• Curriculum Center (Former LAGA Building)
• Tracy Dodd Property
• Antilles Auto Parts
• U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) Department of Human Services
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
O77<?
• Archie's Welding and Auto Body Repair
• Unknown Property
Formal site inspections were performed at the Faith Christian Fellowship Church, VIHA,
Curriculum Center, and Tracy Dodd Property. At the four other properties, site inspections
were not conducted because site access could not be obtained, or sufficient information was
obtained while performing other RI activities at the property (such as groundwater sampling or
water-level measurements during aquifer testing) to assess whether the sites are potential sources.
The results of the investigations at each of these sites is described below. Site inspection forms
are provided in Attachment A, and relevant correspondence is provided in Attachment B.
2.1 
FAITH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
The Faith Christian Fellowship Church is located about 500 feet north of the VIHA
property and is not shown on any of the study area maps in the Phase II RI Work Plan
(Geraghty & Miller 1993). Mr. Brian Turnbull, vice president of the church, and Ms.
Essansonne, church administrator, were contacted on April 13, 1994 for information regarding
the site.
The Faith Christian Fellowship Church purchased the property in 1992 from Storage
Facilities, Inc. which was a subsidiary of Island Block Corporation. Mr. Turnbull indicated that
the building was used for storage of materials by a hardware store owned by Island Block
Corporation. According to Arthur D. Little, Inc. (ADL), Storage Facilities, Inc. purchased the
building in 1988 from Ms. Sue Mortimer (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993). According to Mr.
Turnbull, the West Indies Company originally owned the property and constructed the building
to use as a staging ground for the construction of many of the houses in the Tutu area in mid-
1970s. Mr. Turnbull did not know when the West Indies Company ceased their operations at
the site.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
O78°
3
In April 1994, approximately two-thirds of the building was used by the Faith Christian
Fellowship Church for their meeting area, kitchen, and offices. The other part of the building
(on the west side) is leased to D & C Marine, which is engaged in welding and fiberglass repair
for boats, and to Better Roots and Fruits, a produce wholesaler.
There are no known USTs or septic tanks on the property. The sanitary sewer is
connected to the public sewer system. An AST is located on a concrete pad at the southeast
corner of the building. Piping from the roof drain is connected to this AST. According to Mr.
Turnbull, this tank has always been used for storage of rain water collected on the roof of the
building.
2.2 
VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY
The VIHA is located on Route 38 and is east of the Curriculum Center. A site inspection
of the VIHA complex in Tutu was conducted by Geraghty & Miller personnel on March 18,
1994. Ralda Simmonds, legal counsel for the VIHA, was contacted to obtain access to the site.
Ms. Simmonds provided information regarding past and present operations, and toured the
property with the Geraghty & Miller site inspector.
The VIHA property includes a main building, service bay, drum storage shed, storage
shed, waste oil storage area, and an unused water purification plant. The VIHA acquired the
property from Joseph Sanson in 1978, and began using the upper two floors of the main building
for offices in 1981. The VIHA maintenance department moved into the first floor of the
building in 1982. Prior to purchase of the facility in 1978 by the VIHA, a car repair shop
(Tropical Motors) operated at the site (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993). However, there is no
further information available about when the shop was operating.
Potential sources inspected include a vehicle maintenance area, a former UST, and a
waste oil drum storage area. Light maintenance of VIHA vehicles is conducted at the site. A
service bay with a pit for accessing the underside of vehicles is located about 50 feet to the west
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
07Sl
4
of the main VIHA building. At the time of the visit, the sump in the service bay contained
water with a sheen of oil on top. Oil stains are common in the paved area between the service
bay and a vehicle maintenance area located on the west side of the main building.
A UST is located on the property on the west side of the main building at the entrance
to the vehicle maintenance area. The UST is reported to have been used by Tropical Motors.
A sample of the contents was taken in 1987 (Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 1993). The contents were
sampled and removed in 1989 by Safety Kleen when the UST was abandoned in place. A copy
of the analysis of the contents by Safety Kleen is included with the Site Inspection Form in
Attachment A. The tank contents were also sampled by Weston/Spill Prevention & Emergency
Response (SPER) personnel in 1987. The contents were identified as waste oil (Geraghty &
Miller, Inc. 1993). Based on the site information compiled, a soil-gas survey was recommended
and performed a part of the Phase n RI. The results of the soil-gas survey showed no detectable
VOCs in the soil gas in the vicinity of the UST (see Appendix B).
A concrete pad was constructed by the VIHA (date unknown) for storage of drums
containing waste oil from the vehicle maintenance operations. The pad does not contain a cover
nor any type of berm to contain spills. A drum storage shed is located on the northwest corner
of the property and contains about 20 drums of unknown contents. There was no visual
evidence of spills or leakage from the drums. ADL collected liquid samples from 11 drums in
1993 (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1994). Chlorinated VOCs including tetrachloroethene (PCE), 1,1,1-
trichloroethane (TCA), and 1,2-dichloroethene (1,2-DCE) were detected in four drum samples.
2.3 
CURRICULUM CENTER (FORMER LAGA BUILDING)
The Curriculum Center (Former LAGA building) is located on the north side of Route
38, just west of VIHA. Geraghty & Miller conducted a site inspection of the Curriculum Center
on March 11 and 18, 1994. Alda Donastorg, Maintenance Supervisor, was contacted by
Geraghty & Miller personnel to obtain site access and to identify any individuals that could
GERAGHTY ^MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
O78?
5
provide information. Mr. Donastorg indicated that Mr. Lagos, a Curriculum Center employee,
was the most knowledgeable individual about the history of operations at the facility. Mr. Lagos
was unwilling to discuss the site because of restrictions by the Department of Justice on
discussing the matter without prior permission. However, Mr. Lagos said that he knew very
little about previous operations.
The Curriculum Center is owned by the USVI Department of Education and is used for
offices, maintenance work areas, and storage of frozen food and other materials. 
The
Department of Education has occupied the building since 1982. The Panex Company owned the
facility from 1979 to 1982, but there is no available information about the nature of their
operations. The building was originally constructed by the West Indies Company, Inc. in about
1970, for LAGA Industries, Ltd. (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993). LAGA Industries had a textile
manufacturing operation in the building from 1971 to 1979. A dry cleaning facility in the
northwest corner of the building was a part of the operation.
Potential source areas include a drum disposal area at the northwest corner of the
building, a former discharge pipe suspected to be associated with dry cleaning operations, a sink
that discharges water directly outside the building, and a reported former waste pit. Sampling
activities carried out by ADL (1993; 1994) and Geraghty & Miller (1993) suggest that the north
side of the Curriculum Center is an area of possible releases of VOCs to the environment. Soil
samples taken from that area show elevated levels of PCE, TCE, and 1,2-DCE. A waste pit
was reported to have been used by LAGA Industries for storage of fluids from the dry cleaning
operation (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993). A portion of a 4-inch diameter steel pipe exits the west
wall of the building and extends about 20 feet to the north where it has been welded shut. From
the location of the pipe, it appears to have been associated with the process fluids from the dry
cleaning operation. Another area of concern is along the north wall of the building, where a
sink inside the building discharges outside directly to the ground. This sink is used by the
Curriculum Center maintenance workers for cleaning materials in an area where paint and
chemicals are stored and used. Based on the site inspection information, a soil gas survey was
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC 
TUT 
°05 
°783
6
recommended and implemented. The soil gas survey showed the presence of chlorinated VOCs
in soil gas at several places north and west of the building (see Appendix B).
2.4 
TRACY DODD PROPERTY
The Tracy Dodd property is located on an unnamed road approximately 200 feet
northeast of a five-way intersection of Route 38, Route 382, and the unnamed road. Site
inspections of the Tracy Dodd property were conducted on March 27 and April 13, 1994.
Geraghty & Miller personnel met with Mr. Dodd on April 13 to discuss present and past uses
and owners.
Mr. Dodd purchased the property in 1988 from a company (Top Banana) that operated
a fruit wholesale company. The property had been vacant for several years prior to the sale.
Mr. Dodd did not know any details about uses and ownership of the property prior to the
occupancy by Top Banana, other than that the Winter family had owned the property in the
1960s and 1970s and had used the buildings for residences. Title records show that Branko Inc.
owned the property briefly in 1978, and MET Motors, Inc. owned the property from 1984 to
1986 (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993).
Mr. Dodd operated a used car lot at the site from approximately 1988 to 1993. There
are currently four buildings and two trailers on the property. At present, all buildings are leased
to various tenants. The house on the northeast side of the property is leased to HMS Pest
Control Systems, which uses the house and surrounding grounds for office space and storage of
chemicals for their domestic pest control business. The building on the northwest side of the
property is occupied by Caribbean Sunset, Ltd., Country Radiator and Auto Glass, which is a
car radiator repair shop. The building on the west side of the property is used as an equipment
storage and vehicle maintenance area for a St. Thomas dive shop. On the south side of the
property, Auto Kool, Inc. operates a car air conditioner repair shop. Two trailers are located
on the western and central portions of the property; these were leased by Geraghty & Miller for
office and storage space during the Phase II RI.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
°784
7
Mr. Dodd did not know of any problems with hazardous material at the site prior to his
ownership. During visits to the property, he indicated that he never observed any problems with
his tenants' handling or storage of chemicals or waste oils from their operations. During the site
inspection conducted on March 27, 1994, 55-gallon drums were observed at the HMS Pest
Control Systems property. One drum contained acetone; the contents of the others were
unknown. Four apparently empty 55-gallon drums were also observed at the south-central
portion of Auto Kool.
2.5 
ANTILLES AUTO PARTS
Antilles Auto Parts is located on the east side of Route 382, approximately 150 feet north
of the intersection with Route 38. A letter dated March 10, 1994 was provided by the property
owners, Siegfried and Waltraud Torinus, that provided a history of the site since it was
purchased in 1968 (Torinus 1994). This property was purchased from West Indies Enterprises,
Inc., a land developer. In 1969, West Indies Enterprises constructed a building and a cistern.
The Torinus letter indicated that no hazardous materials were stored on site during this time.
In February 1971, a portion of property including the building was leased to Fred Eglin
and Seth Larrabee for use as an auto parts retail shop known as E. & L. Auto Parts. According
to the Torinus letter, only auto accessories were sold; there was no repair work conducted
(Torinus 1994).
In March 1978, a new tenant (Tutu Autos) took over the lease and sold auto parts, tires,
and batteries. The front portion of the site was paved at this time. Around 1980, Tutu Auto
began selling some British cars, which were shipped from Tortola, British Virgin Islands (BVI).
According to the Torinus letter, there was reportedly no storage of oil or hazardous materials
(Torinus 1994).
Tutu Autos was purchased in 1981 by Consolidated Parts/Prime Automotive Warehouse,
Inc. The entire Torinus property was leased, and the back portion of the property was paved.
GERAGHTYc* MILLER. INC. 
TUT °°5 
°785 
O
8
In addition to selling auto parts, repair work was conducted including brake, front-end, and
muffler repair. The March 10 letter reported that there was some storage of waste oil drums
(Torinus 1994).
In May 1988, Thomas Gassett took over the lease. Site activities included selling cars
and spare parts, under the business name GS Industries, Inc. Mr. Gassett installed a 10,000-
gallon aboveground waste oil UST (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993). The property was subleased
to Antilles Automotive at an unknown time (between 1991 and 1993). Antilles currently
performs automotive repair. According to the March 10, 1994 letter, the waste oil tank was
emptied by Safety Kleen on February 9, 1994 (Torinus 1994). The site currently has several
vehicle maintenance bays, one reported UST (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993), and the waste oil
AST.
Site access agreements were required from three separate parties at Antilles Auto Parts.
These included the owners (Siegfied and Waltraud Torinus), the lessee (Thomas Gassett), and
the tenant (Brad Creeger of Antilles Auto Parts). The lessee resisted signing the site access
agreement, and the USEPA intervened and required site access for the purpose of sampling the
aboveground waste oil tank. Geraghty & Miller collected a sample from the waste oil tank on
June 22, 1994. Analysis of this sample showed the presence of petroleum-related compounds,
PCE, and TCA. Results are discussed in Section 5.1.4 of the RI Report.
Previous sampling was conducted in 1987 by Weston/SPER personnel (Weston/SPER
1988). Water samples were collected from a gutter and a storm drain. Soil and water samples
were collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) in 1988 and 1989 (Camp, Dresser & McKee
Federal Programs Corporation 1989). In addition, a preliminary site assessment was performed
in 1989 by NUS Corporation. This assessment indicated that there had been a surface release
of waste oil which apparently flowed onto the adjacent Ramsay Motors property (NUS
Corporation 1989). ADL conducted a site visit in October 1993 (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993)
that confirmed the existing information.
TUT 
OO5 
O786
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
2.6 
USVI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Difficulty was encountered obtaining site access to the USVI Department of Human
Services property at the time the inspections were being conducted. However, a questionnaire
requesting site information was submitted to the Department on May 9, 1994 and the Department
responded to the questionnaire on May 24, 1994. This form is provided in Attachment B.
The information provided indicates that the Department of Human Services purchased
the property from Mr. Earle Ottley on November 29, 1989. The property is currently used by
the Center for Independent Living, which provides a rehabilitation program for the handicapped,
and a Senior Citizen center. Prior to purchase by the Department of Human Services, the
property was occupied by Superior Printing and the Senior Citizen Center. This site was
referred to by ADL as Classic Printers because they observed a sign on the side of the building
(Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993). The uses and ownership prior to Mr. Ottley are unknown.
Based on the responses provided by the Department of Human Services, there are
currently no drums, other containers, or storage of hazardous materials. In addition, there have
never been any underground or aboveground storage tanks at the site. The Department indicated
that hazardous materials may have been used in previous operations conducted by the print shop.
There is a cistern and a septic tank on the property. The supply well (Ottley well) could
not be located by Geraghty & Miller personnel during the comprehensive groundwater sampling
event conducted during the Phase II RI in 1994. A standpipe exists along the south side of the
access road near Route 38. This standpipe is believed to have been used to fill water trucks with
groundwater pumped from the Ottley well. A site representative (name unknown) indicated that
the pipe had not been used for approximately 20 years, and based on visual observation by
Geraghty & Miller personnel, it appeared the pipe had not been used recently. It is suspected
that the well may have been paved over during construction of the driveway.
TUT 
OOl^i 
O787
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
' 
'
10
2.7 
ARCHIE'S WELDING AND AUTO BODY REPAIR
A formal site inspection was not performed at Archie's Welding Shop. However,
Geraghty & Miller personnel made general observations while collecting water-level
measurements from the onsite supply wells during the aquifer test of the Eglin wells. Archie's
conducts welding, auto body repair, and painting of automobiles. In addition, some minor
mechanical repairs are conducted, such as oil changes. Some concrete staining was observed,
and scrap metal was observed throughout the property.
ADL personnel toured the facility in October 1993 and observed paints, primers,
thinners, and one empty 30-gallon drum of engine degreaser (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993). The
personnel noted that scrap metal, auto parts, and empty containers were littered throughout the
yard. There was no information regarding the waste management systems, septic systems, or
underground piping (Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993).
2.8 
UNKNOWN PROPERTY
An unknown property was observed approximately 300 feet to the east of Archie's
Welding. Based on a review of a 1954 aerial photograph, this property was one of the few
buildings in the Tutu area when most of the area was pasture land. Since there was no public
water supply available in 1954, this property may have had a supply well. Review on a 1992
aerial photograph indicates the presence of light-colored circular objects, approximately 3 feet
in diameter to the south of the building.
On inspection during the Phase I RI, it was determined that the property was a residence.
Geraghty & Miller personnel interviewed the tenant, who indicated that there was no supply well
onsite. No septic tank was observed. The property is owned by Drs. Gorrochateguj and
Vigoreaux, who reside elsewhere.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
°788
11
3.0 CONCLUSIONS
The conclusions regarding the eight properties are discussed below.
3.1 
FAITH CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
Based on the present information, it does not appear that there are any potential sources
at the church property. There are no known USTs or septic tanks, and the sanitary sewer is
connected to the public sewer system. The AST reportedly is a water tank. Therefore, no
additional work is required.
3.2 
VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY (VfflA)
Three potential source areas were identified at the VIHA including a former UST, a
vehicle maintenance area, and waste oil storage drums. Although oil stained soils indicated the
possibility that isolated small spills had occurred at the vehicle maintenance area, no impact to
groundwater has been observed. In addition, no VOCs were detected in soil or soil-gas samples
collected at the site. Therefore, the VIHA is not considered a potential source area and no
additional work is required for delineation.
3.3 
CURRICULUM CENTER (FORMER LAGA BUILDING)
Potential source areas were identified at the Curriculum Center, including the drum
disposal area at the northwest corner of the building, a former discharge pipe and sink located
on the north wall of the building, and the reported waste pit north of the building. The
constituents of concern are dry cleaning chemicals, such as PCE, and PCE's breakdown
(daughter) products, including TCE and DCE. At the northwest corner, there is no direct
evidence of a release, and the presence of PCE and its daughter products in the groundwater can
not be tied to this area because of other onsite sources. The former waste pit is likely a source
of PCE, TCE, and DCE impact to groundwater based on reports by Arthur D. Little (1993) and
GERAGHTY^ MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
O78<? 
O
12
Geraghty & Miller (1993). Additional work may be warranted to delineate the extent of
impacted soils in the vicinity of the waste pit and to identify maximum VOC concentrations in
soil north of the Curriculum Center building.
3.4 
TRACY DODD PROPERTY
The Tracy Dodd property has been dismissed as a potential source and no additional
work is required.
3.5 
ANTILLES AUTO PARTS
Based on the investigations and inspections conducted at Antilles Auto Parts, there are
no potential sources of impact to groundwater. The waste oil sampling conducted during Phase
II of the RI satisfied the data gap regarding waste oil content.
3.6 
UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Based on information provided by the Department of Human Services, there does not
appear to be a potential source of impact to groundwater. As such, no additional work is
required.
3.7 
ARCHIE'S WELDING AND AUTO BODY REPAIR
Although departures from good housekeeping practices were observed at Archie's, there
is no specific information that suggests that this property is a source of impact to groundwater.
3.8 
UNKNOWN PROPERTY
The unknown property was determined to be a residence and there are no potential
sources. As such, additional investigation at this property is not required.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
079° 
O
13
4.0 RKFERKNCFS
Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1993. Groundwater Contamination Occurrence and Sources in the Tutu
Area, St. Thomas, USVI, November 1, 1993.
Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1994. Environmental Investigation Report, Tutu Area, St. Thomas,
USVI, February 16, 1994.
Camp, Dresser, & McKee Federal Programs Corporation. 1988. Field Notes, Tutu Well Field,
September 6-15, 1988.
Camp, Dresser, & McKee Federal Programs Corporation. 1989. Field Notes, Tutu Well Field,
June 5-10, 1989.
Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 1993. Phase H Remedial Investigation Work Plan, Tutu Wells Site,
St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, December 20, 1993.
NUS Corporation. 1989. Preliminary Assessment Report for Gassett Motors, St. Thomas, US
Virgin Islands, TDD No. 02-8902-41, March 24, 1989.
Torinus, Siegfried and Waltraud. 1994. Letter to Thomas V. Danahy Re: Phase II Remedial
Investigation, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, 4.1.4 Antilles Auto
Parts History of Parcel 214 Estate Anna's Retreat, March 10, 1994.
Weston/SPER. 1988. Memorandum from Arnaldo Martinez, TAT II Project Manager and
Douglas Henne, TAT Quality Control Officer, to Carlos O'Neill, USEPA Caribbean
Field Office, January 27, 1988.
PROOl 3. •••WP6\Mcup.rpt
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 °791
ATTACHMENT A-l
SITE INSPECTION FORMS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
TUT 
COS 
(V/9
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
STTF INSPECTION OF COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
AT TUTU WELLS SITE
NAME OF SITE: 
F^.fL 
e./>n *•£,»» F-+/Io~t£'m
Date of Visit: 
Af> r. / 
\r { ! if-t _________
A. Site History
• 
Names and titles of individuals contacted.
I »-+>
-*.i*»fl r- "r
^ Vie*.
• 
Previous occupants and dates of occupancy. 
. /
ox«.tf I*.J,*i CQ. - /-A.r^«^x ,^ o,^- 11*10* •/..*. ' 
?
Past operations. 
.
« 
u i. m.o> 
f>~ iia ~*j 
J 
•-'
tf.r«.». 4»r 
eo *tTrvc.rt**. 
- T 
kat^*.± 
i~. 
TV "tu . /A*. 
A »»••/«.
^ Tg re 
\Slt-ft 
1~i~. 
O»^i'^''-v- 
>g r- ^ "TO r-i »^ «L. 
t» o. T* r /-- /I.
Review listings in business manuals, telephone books, etc., where necessary.
""""" 
jolv
B. Current use of site
Describe operations. 
,
T/. 
«.«.j"T«-r» 
4-c^0 - i-tnr*lj 
y-f 
-- 
y l f l ^ * 
It
T' 
Slfft*- 
* "T 6t/, /<//«., 
>»
*..••**. T to »*) /i^
*r*»S C ^-»e»u*^w
ta,/i
Available documents and permits (maps, environmental permits, compliance
documents, past environmental audits, material safety data sheets).
TUT 
OO5 
O793
Relevant geological information.
vntMi
Soil type (field observations); paved areas, etc.
Estimated depth to bedrock (outcrops onsite?, nearest outcrop).
Depth to water table.
C. Field Observation of Adjacent Land Use
It
D. PCBs
Identify transformers and capacitors that may contain PCBs.
^•*»«- s «-•••. x^r.^g 
y i r / r . 
______
E. Above-ground tanks and plumbing:
• 
Identify past and present materials stored in the tanks.
^r **> tLttr***- •r
' ' r 
*>oi»».»<. .
TUT 
OO5 
C)'/94
Visually inspect for leaks.
K/A-
Review leak-testing records.
Determine age, composition, etc. to estimate integrity.
/o..^ 
l\ 
»~.*.et~ 
tfT 
-CTc*-
Measure dimensions of tanks (length, width, height or length & diameter).
-g-A-f J.^^^r .-16, 4-f-
F. Underground storage tanks (USTs):
• 
Review available leak-testing records.
USTs (Size, use, age, composition).
.^ 
.r..c~-f >.-/• +L 
*,*/•* •
TUT 
OO5 
O795
Identify past and present materials stored in the tanks.
G. Visual Inspections:
• 
Identify stains, discolored soils and distressed vegetation.
A/o *. t. 
_________________
Identify waste pits, landfills, lagoons or other impoundments.
• 
Identify hazardous waste treatment, storage, transfer or disposal facilities on site.
A/o M t,________________________________________
H. Water Slippy and Disposal
• 
Identify all wells, septic tanks and similar underground structures on site.
GO5 
O796
Determine sources of drinking and process water supplies.
[4/--t..< 
Vl*J 
^-f" 
^/> 
*|T«. iT 
f"c^ ,->.^w»K
IS
£ •+* rt*t 
.^ 
^Xi. Ta.^^ 
/x r 
T*'^- t ••><*> •-*•£'!
T 
j~L+ 
ut&i****.
Closest known supply wells and distance.
.So ./ "ML 
af
1. Conclusions
• 
Areas of concern identified (possible sources).
Contaminants suspected from sources.
• 
Potential for release.
J. Recommendations
TUT 
005 
0797
"sITE INSPECTION OF COMMERCIAL
TUT 
00
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
O798
AT TUTTT WELLS SITE
NAME OF SITE: 
VI fM
Date of Visit:
,M »r c u 
/ 9 . 1
A. Site History
• 
Names and titles of individuals contacted.
*.~
Previous occupants and dates of occupancy.
^! 
JiM>4orj 
- 
A g-T^c t 
, j - t <
V J- H
tf'J-v 
T r» t~.
Past operations.
JA^
.
f.t-f»*.t 
<u^«- *»«.
LM.S * r *•
^^^^^^^^^^j^
f 7
Review listings in business manuals, telephone books, etc.. where necessary.
B. Current use of site
Describe operations. 
,
T/t. 
TP> !•>*** 
4-UorS 
e (- j-b. Lv, let'e
5 »g. c C .
<I./^T' «-^ a. H< c «.
^
. -
r g r > I C «-
V
r£ /«./«. o'P *^«
•^•Ipor 
*.***• 
j- «U- 
Arc.^. 
g-/X jfl>- e-t^lT 
r» 
TA«. L
LviltJf**. L\ tfA r ». n. i^ Tt.»% a- *c*. /i^ 
V2.HA" 
y«-M»e/*< 
IX j>«.r T>»«x»l
U'-.af*. ^.,f 15 Xl^prcX '«. J'v~*s e» «. *«^ 
0» f^- 
•^^fct. »-'«*•'* J itf/«
^ 
^,/^,*«,. >4 ^^.^^.^ .fjL/ p^ -f^- -C-^ *fr4±u~*-{ 
JlJ*-. o-f- f
Available documents and permits (maps, environmental permits, compliance
documents, past environmental audits, material safety data sheets).
• 
Relevant geological information.
Soil type (field observations); paved areas, etc.
X- (L7 /..,
Estimated depth to bedrock (outcrops onsite?. nearest outcrop).
Depth to water table.
(tu\jr<bii fa. fiwSik- ktotdpnq 1Mb
^
C. Field Observation of Adjacent Land Use
-J»v T~i.it/*. t I - 
Cn rntv /t»«»^ 
£e.n T*-r • 
K.»rT"Z Urt-s T ~ \f+.Ca. ». T A. r€^w
<v <r ^> sLrv4>c 
ttt^ff 
>>> /' *r».f£' 
K o »• "r L - 
t f » / « e 
A^««^/*»Q-
J 
J '
So^L 
o-fcV Jo^L dkfT — se.{»+' 
*.*** 
rt j>a/c*. SKLI 
a-rc*.
D. PCBs
• 
Identify transformers and capacitors that may contain PCBs.
g « e >.
E. Above-ground tanks and plumbing:
• 
Identify past and present materials stored in the tanks.
*s«.»KJ
rc_ 
i e «.*»
TUT 
GO5 
O799
TUT 
005 
0800
Visually inspect for leaks.
Kl tr
Review leak-testing records.
Determine age, composition, etc. to estimate integrity.
• 
Measure dimensions of tanks (length, width, height or length & diameter).
F. Underground storage tanks (USTs):
• 
Review available leak-testing records.
USTs (Size, use. age. composition).
4 l
lOr.e* >crf 
*c**<«.f^v 
rvC- t.vrt*J,J 
r»0'r 0*1 f-^ 
uu-T
• 
Identify past and present materials stored in the tanks.
V*T 
H,^ 
used 
-L. 
r-A»rc 
u^,T*. 
Olff 
ff.^
a.~.*!y'ric~. * 
r*
G. Visual Inspections:
• 
Identify stains, discolored soils and distressed vegetation.
/A.C 
C g » v f »•*./«- 
'K 
*^"^. 
V ^ t t - l ^ l > y 
OT 
T **•
"v ,t.»>
• 
Identify waste pits, landfills, lagoons or other impoundments.
JP«^, /^ 
* f / c »»4ztJ~ 
\rt.L,c£- 
«^>.^T-«
I «« 3 
O >• «v U^o.?^* r .
• 
Identify hazardous waste treatment, storage, transfer or disposal facilities on site.
k'fkxT* oil is j io
H. Water Suppy and Disposal
• 
Identify all wells, septic tanks and similar underground structures on site.
T" ^^•«-J*.«%T-'V 
i^ 
**tr».Ti»—. 
' /*- TA. «.< i > r«.
"t» 
r^ 
o » 4 // 1 t v ^ > f 
J tx /> A /v 
<^ «
n i T «>. <• y 
S*->v er
TUT 
OO5 
O801.
,*
. Itr
£O80 
GOO
_3PC
-D«c
QPR
DOC
G BRESLUBE
^_ fucu
D RECYCLE
D TOLLING
DOC
MATERIAL SURVEY
tMCantmt Mr,
Nature of Business ——'._____
Slate ID Numbers: IBjpeis 10________ ______ 
Missoun 10————.—————————— »
Manifest Address: CBifling Address 
D F-atty Address 
Manifest to:€TSaiety-Kleen 
_ Other
_ _______ 
- 
———— 
———— —
S.I.C. Numoer.
State___ I0_
B. Matenal
Process
e.—fi-JL
•v uf /
Volume (gal.) —————
Volume on Hand (gat.).
Shipping Frequency _
DYr
In
In G Drums D Bulk
Layers
Physical State
Liquid Viscosity
GyOne 
€3rWo 
D Three
*G Liquid 
GSemisolid C Solid
•dM»
GLow
GHigh
D.MatenaJComposit>on(vor%) 
Mm 
Max 
Typical
Non-volatile Matenal
Settled!
E. Anach material safety data sheets lor maienal components requiring employee communication under OSHA (Ref. 29 CFR I9t0.1200).
Attach any current analysis of the material. 
O MSDS attached 
G Analysis attached 
£^No attachments
F. Check allot the folio
atai
which may be m the material.
Amount
Units
O DOT Corrosives. Poisons. Forbidden*. Radioactive*. Explosives, or Gases.
C TSCA regulated materials (PCS. PBB. Chlorinated dibenzodknrins or furans).
G Materials used exclusively as pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, etc.
Q OSHA carcinogens above exclusion levels (Ret. 29 CFR 1910.1001 -).
C Toxc components with OSHA PEL or ACGIH Tly less than 2 ppm or 8 mg/m*.
G Taxc metals (Arsenic. BervHtum. Cadmium, Mercury, Selenium).
G Reactive components (SwHides. Cyanides. Shock Sensitives. Pytophoncs. etc.).
G Water reactive components (Isocyanates. Acid Chlorides. Anhydrides, etc.).
G Biological hazards (Pathogenic*. Infectious agents, Ebotogic agents, etc.).
G None of the above 
D Special Handling Required ______________
CO
O
ifj
O
h-
G. DOT Hazardous Matenaf DescrptiopJRe/.
Proper Shipping Name . £"<?&? C>'//
* /
72.101)
/ /I r
Hazard n** O«0*S'Vf'l#t** Number
G Not DOT Hazardous Material O Need assistance to determine
H. EPA Hazardous Waste Description (Ref. 40 CFR 261)
Waste Numberis) O D0« D0002 DP*
QF004QF005 ______
Hazard Codets) Ql GT QC ~f( 
QE
EPA Hazardous Waste G Need assistance to determine
I. Safety-Kteen requires a sair^e andXharges a leejpr the qualification of all new material. Purchase Orde/No.
Type of sample: O grab Gtank tjcompositeof _~T #drums 
Sample taken by G Customer ^Salety-K
Sample taken by G Customer 2*Salety-Kleen Representative
J. To the best oS my knowledge, this is an accurate material description and the sample submitted is representative ol the material
Name
Signature
Comments
THJe .
Date
Sales Representative Name Je
Representative
Branch
UELS
I HOUSING AUTHORITY
MATERIAL ANALYSIS
E N V I R O S Y S T E M S
CONTROL*: 0012347-1
SAMPLE* 
: 076465
ACCEPT
.NEPAL ANALYSIS OF TOTAL SAMPLE
CCLCS
-ATER CONTENT
NCN-VOLATILE RESIDUE:
?LAMM»8ILITY
3" SCREEN:
BLACK
O.S WTX
95.1 WTX
FLASHED AT 200 F BY CLOSED-CUP
5.8
EXTRACT 
BY METER 
5.B
UEL EVALUATION OF TOTAL SA
-EAT 
CONTENT :
TCTiL HALOGENS:
CMLCSINE
SLUC3 I NE
,NPLE ~
CL:
f 
•
18230 BTU/LS
0 . 1 WTX
O. 1 WTX
0.0 WTX
ASH UPON COMBUSTION:
BROMINE 
BR
SULFUR 
S
3.8 WTX
0.0 WTX
0.0 WTX
COMMENTS: CC SHOWS LOW BOILING POINT ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS
'ETALS CONTENT OF TOTAL SAMPLE (PPM): DIGEST 
BY: AA
CA3MIL-V 
(OOO6) CO: < 
0.1 
CHROMIUM (DOO7) CS:
LiAO 
(D008) PB: 
2.8 
ZINC 
Zh.
0.7 
IRON
3. 1
ft:
45
.ENERAL COMPOSITION:
GENERAL COMPOSITION BY:
SPECIFIC 
VISCOSITY 
APPEARANCE TOTAL
GRAVITY 
<CENTIPOISE) 
(VOLX) 
(WT X)
iOUEOUS PHASE 
( F R E E WATER ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
. . 
00 
0 C
ORGANIC PHASE (FEEDSTOCK I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
. . . . . iQO.C 
100.C
20TTCM SLUDGE (SEMISOLIDS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
. . . . . . . 
00 
0 0
BOTTOM SOLID (SETTLED SOLIDS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
0.0 
0.0
TOTAL
. 89O
135 CPS
1OO.O
1OO.O
'PECIFIC COMPOSITION OF TOTAL SAMPLE
COMPOSITION OF:
— - __ - _- 
— - 
TOTAL
SAMPLE
(WTX)
WATE9 CONTENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
O.8
NON-VOLATILE R E S I D U E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95.1
VOLATILE ORGANICS BY D I F F E R E N C E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
4.1
TOTAL
SAMPLE
0.8
95. 1
4. 1
TOTAL
10O.O 
1OO.O
••OLATILE ORGANIC COMPOSITION OF TOTAL SAMPLE
SAMPLE PREPARATION METHODS: NEAT
DETECTION METHODS 
: FID
BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
COMPOSITION OP: 
VOLATILE VOLATILE TOTAL
ORGANICS 
ORGANICS 
SAMPLE
MMPOUNO NAME 
—— 
---
ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS (CS-C20)
•QLUENE
YLENES (ORTHQ-. META-. AND PARA-)
iCETONE
;THYL ACETATE
ZfCLOHEXANE
-ROPYL ALCOHOL. ISO-
{THYL ALCCHOL
-OTAL
CODE 
CAS NUMBER 
(AREAX) 
(WTX) (WTX)
ALIP 
O-Oi-i 
59.1 
54. i 
TOL 
1O8-88-3 
19.8 22.4 0
XVLS 
95-47-€ 
15.3 17.4 
0
ACE 
S7-C4-1 
1.8 
1.9 
0
ETAC 
141-78-* 
1.1 
1.3 
0
CHEX 
11O-82-7 
1.1 
1.1 
0
IPA 
67-63-O 
1.1 
1.1 
0
ETOH 
64-17-5 
0.7 
O.7 
0
1OO.O 
1OO.O 4
.2
.9
.7
. 1
. 1
.0
.0
-0
. 1
SUMMARY OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOSITION BY COMPOUND CHEMICAL CLASS AREAX:
ALCOHOLS 
1.8 
ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBONS 
CO. 2
AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 
35.1 
CHLORINATED SOLVENTS 
O.O
ESTERS 
1 . 1 
ETHERS 
O.O
GLVCOL ETHERS 
O.O 
INHIBITORS 
O.O
KETONES 
1.8 
NITROGEN COMPOUNDS 
O.O
.ABORATOav REVIEW: A 
— ------ 
-
.EVEL: 
SEC CODE: 
RELEASED: 12/OG/89
.AB REVIEWERS: 
HE 
MP 
ANALYZED: 12/06/89
TRACKING INFORMATION: 
DATE 
FACILITY
SURVEY RECEIVED 
: 
12/O5/89 SK MANAT1.
SAMPLE RECEIVED 
:
RESAMPLE SHIPPED :
RESAMPLE RECEIVED:
PR
OSO4
Detennine sources of drinking and process water supplies.
f i l l 
l^/ «* T t-r 
i^go.fc.1 
4- *••*. 
^"L^. 
A
T" k.*. *-uxo 
Ust-tlS. 
0k. 
X. i~r<- 
4ffer«_ 
S l~u T
Closest known supply wells and distance.
T arc 
yor 
1. 1/ r <*c «~ i^-» 
4ct*«
y£ t ft
I. Conclusions
• 
Areas of concern identified (possible sources).
0 «^ 
K» r ^L»^*» T 
< / af « 
g T~ A Ag O*Jt T\
Contaminants suspected from sources.
Potential for release.
J . Recommendations
vr\ ? ^ T C - ^^ ^idU-
TUT 
OO5 
O3OS
COMPLETE 
12/15,as
CONTROL* OO12347-1
SAMPLE' 
076465
A C C E P
FUELS
safeiii'kieen
E N V I R O S Y S T E M S
CUSTOMER INFORMATION:
VI HOUSING AUTHORITY
PO BOX 7668
ST THOMAS 
VI
ATTN: MR. BRIDGES
SALESPERSON: 
JEFFREY SEVENS 
7£RRITORV 
0136 CCUNTV
NATURE OF BUSINESS. CITIZEN SERVICE
r£D£RAL EPA 10: 
SMALL GEN 
STATE EPA : 
10:
ADDRESS IS 
________MANIFEST TQ SAFETV-<L££N
MATERIAL: 
WASTE GIL
VOLUME: 
BOO GALS PER
STORAGE CAPACITY 
0 IN DRUMS
CDLCR 
5PQWN
•.AVERS
rwo
PROCESS: WOTCS OIL
VOLUME ON HAND; 
0
SHIPPING FREQUENCY: f£AHLT 
.'N DRUMS
STAT; •.:ouio
MATERIAL COMPOSITION! VOLX > :
ALIPHATIC HYDROCARBON'S JC5-C20I
CODE
AL:P
MIN
C O
MAX
TYPICAL
BESTRICTED SUBSTANCES: NONE
P.O. NO:
TVPE OF SAMPLE: TANK
CONT ACT MR SRIDCES
SUBMITTER:
NUMBER OF DRUMS SAMPLED:
________________TTTLE
0138 JEFFREY STEVENS
2
3EPUTV DTREC~OR CF s-ANT
DATE: 12/O5/B9
BY 
SALESREP
"-CNE 
8O9-95J-T90
^IRPORATE REVIEWS:
TECHNICAL:
REGULATORY
_^ 
OPERATING
DISPOSITION REVIEWER 
DATE
ACCEPT 
EJE 
12/14/89
ACCEPT 
JWH 
12/1J/89
ACCEPT____LWG 
12/14/89
HANDLING CCSES. S02/T5C
PRICINS CODE:
UNPROVED FACILITIES:
(«SO) SAFETV-KLEEN ENVIR
KMS1 
MWY *2
MAMATI PR OO701
FED EPA': PR0090399718
TATE EPA*:
TELEPHONE: 8O9/854-1O90
IL. AUTM»:
'PROVED OOO1OS7 DRUM OR BULK
3T-EPA BO WASTE COMBUSTIBLE LIQUID. S O.S.
•SC. 
NA1993 (EPA FOOS)
3MMENTS: OK FOR FUEL.
THIS SERVES AS NOTICE PER. 40CFR284.12<8 ). THAT THE FACILITY!tES) NOTED ABOVE
HAS THE APPROPRIATE PERMITS AND IS WILLING TO RECEIVE THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED.
TUT 
005 
O8O6
wooei
SITE INSPECTION OF COMMERCIA1 AhJD INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
AT TUTU WELLS SITE
NAME OF SITE:
Date of Visit: M*^L // ——t ;g 
f I ? ?*v
A. Site History
• 
Names and titles of individuals contacted.
K«..f >o r .«< - 
A^ fr- ' »•» T «••»*- *« «•••
o -> «- 
a. T 
*/-/A t tT<- 
K~+**VJ 
*>vt£. 
t~±A*T
Op «-»•«•- >/«»«X , O r 
^^*-7 
U^t*-«- 
u-«*»"/^'~« "f» etn't'lj'- 
*"--7 
i^+-»r~-*J>
Previous occupants and dates of occupancy.
/ *r»j 
l/s \/I 
£>. r-. a- 
LJ~~*><»* 
ii ra-
Past operations.
r «- 
»\» "r 
A <^> «-. ~ .
Review listings in business manuals, telephone books, etc., where necessary.
B. Current use of site
• 
Describe operations.
T 
e> T 
Cgf«/c ».>•/•». , «B»A 
'^•»> T< ^ ^ K
fm. 
r- -A«~> -t<v 
k « . . ~ T « * « ). 
ft-^</ 
^
S TV r * - - * ^"*r f*-l*oot 
r + - L ~ t " + . t .
Available documents and permits (maps, environmental permits, compliance
documents, past environmental audits, material safety data sheets), 
/
A r-trivr 
D. 
L,?VA. 
,«^,gff- &r»~~L JV ~.T*r 
C* ~ •/•<- - t»«- >* • «>
»». 
;^fc- fi/T-v 
/A r^-*.
TLJ'i 
COS 
OBO7
Relevant geological information.
\ r
Soil type (field observations); paved areas, etc.
Estimated depth to bedrock (outcrops onsite?, nearest outcrop).
Depth to water table.
1L (LX
C. Field Observation of Adjacent Land Use
A/g 
B^ 
C , T c - V-J:. fl.Vf
.ol . g" , T *>rc <,r»-
D. PCBs
• 
Identify transformers and capacitors that may contain PCBs.
£. Above-ground tanks and plumbing:
• 
Identify past and present materials stored in the tanks.
~< 
4-^t-' t*.> F 
V»r 
t«^,^^^^t.y 
<ie.Kt>r«.TO> 
U 
/ o e^
TUT 
GO5 
O8O8
Visually inspect for leaks.
rj o 
/C.M./TJ 
l*s «. r •-
Review leak-testing records.
Determine age, composition, etc. to estimate integrity.
'«-«-l-
.»*t».rj 
Te 
»«- 
o »> S 
t l ir»-r». ' 
>/c».«-j
fT 
"~~~~-~" ~T ' 
" 
T
• k*, ^^J ^ J0~? c.^4,0^.
Measure dimensions of tanks (length, width, height or length & diameter).
F. Underground storage tanks (USTs):
• 
Review available leak-testing records.
• 
USTs (Size, use, age, composition).
TUT 
GO5 
O8O9
Identify past and present materials stored in the tanks.
G. Visual Inspections:
• 
Identify stains, discolored soils and distressed vegetation.
Identify waste pits, landfills, lagoons or other impoundments.
^ »*•/•> »,4 ,C r^.,,4^ 
j. 
U~ 
L~* 
fcrcjc^
I* Mr-U. S(*JL 
.{ 
l*,U.^ 
J*r,~* 
L***. a^^J.,0^
U* lv^l< .1 e,4 r*^ >LJjL L sl<i. 5iL
St,rC^. 
*
Identify hazardous waste treatment, storage, transfer or disposal facilities on site.
*-^^ Bot/f or g./A*-^«^»./i 
<_>•«- ^ ro'**^ ^^ 
^»- *f>* IK
l*»^*-' »,pp+j*.rj 
4* i-«. •.•*. t/t^e.**' "irw/t*** 
*%*«-•••»«»•. 
6rv«^l 
r»kr«.
H. Water Suppy and Disposal 
-f»*~ 
27*" * 
.^*r^««"^-/ ?•»!* c«^i».^ •_
f 0 »^ tv-*-T«- j «.*./*•''.
• 
Identify all wells, septic tanks and similar underground structures on site.
TUT 
OO5 
OS1O
• 
Determine sources of drinking and process water supplies.
Closest known supply wells and distance.
I. Conclusions
• 
Areas of concern identified (possible sources).
0t 
AC4X »- *l rw 
c^/t-+.»+>**t 
fft ci A T/CS.
.- 
7 
—
xit*L**£t 
40 i-L. ~,ot,^ff 
i
tsf
Contaminants suspected from sources.
V O Cj 
4 *-c»-~ 
Jt r~* t-f>~».t~>-^ 
Q f *- r+- >
• 
Potential for release.
' Ose.
ru c
J. Recommendations
r
TUT 
005 
O8.ll
OC!
SITE INSPECTION OF COMMERCIAL A|MD INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES
ATjniTtTWELLS SITE
NAME OF SITE: 
T r *. <. y 
D
Date of Visit: 
pr 
U ( / 9 q *J_________
A. Site History
• 
Names and titles ot' individuals contacted.
T
Previous occupants and dates of occupancy. 
f
tVi^T-t-r 
+-*-•*, !•* " 1
TrA.t.
*>* r»-*. 
CL >B r- e> «<«*«.« 
H/ *>^ '*• J*- ' «• g c r o . r»o «-. t*.llt
rt^r+* vv^J 
^*>c.-.-.'T
Se».J S T e *. I £a^ -mo. T>»» - eTT
>er»., a*/ -, «. f«. / an>./ 
tv^lSt^m «>«.T*»-«W.f
till . T'-*-*-y
4. 
/ « » T J .
Review listings in business manuals, telephone books, etc., where necessary
B. Current use of site
• 
Describe operations.
• 
/
J "fa-- ..«.». A- 
J0-*>t.i't
Co-.>r«l ft,hcf-.T/ao' 
/?»/ ro A'o*!" f«.r 
a-i r ctn^at i T/O »-. »-^» 
r*<a*tr-'
-f'»O»-a.^» 
-T 
fcyu-l^Jwy-."! ^»y Jllrl- 
J La p \ 
T r » C y J 
A£ 4-g^fo- T*^ » -
Available documents and permits (maps, environmental permits, compliance
documents, past environmental audits, material safety data sheets).
TUT 
CO 5 
OS 13
Relevant geological information.
Soil type (field observations); paved areas, etc.
Estimated depth to bedrock (outcrops onsite?, nearest outcrop).
Depth to water table.
C. Field Observation of Adjacent Land Use
r— 
f c 5 « X«->»fc*-S '
5 « 
«->»fc*-S ' 
Jo »
D. PCBs
• 
Identify transformers and capacitors that may contain PCBs.
/Vo»c____________________________________
E. Above-ground tanks and plumbing:
• 
Identify past and present materials stored in the tanks.
TUT 
005 
OS14
Visually inspect for leaks.
Review leak-testing records.
• 
Determine age, composition, etc. to estimate integrity.
Measure dimensions of tanks (length, width, height or length &. diameter).
F. Underground storage tanks (USTs):
• 
Review available leak-testing records.
USTs (Size, use, age, composition).
TUT 
OO5 08I
Identify past and present materials stored in the tanks.
tj Pr ______ ______
G. Visual Inspections:
• 
Identify stains, discolored soils and distressed vegetation.
V*L,-U* 
^~J 
**L.~L 
K^.»/».,-___ 
a**r~t,.~.______
Identify waste pits, landfills, lagoons or other impoundments.
Identify hazardous waste treatment, storage, transfer or disposal facilities on site.
0" 
*r-Ov»JL •*•-*-*'" 
C+~. T*. •-.«.». >•»*•. .
H. Water Suppy and Disposal
• 
Identify all wells, septic tanks and similar underground structures on site.
». 
fr- 
fc>»*rern
i ~. LL> A. r"€^
TUT 
005 
081.6
Determine sources of drinking and process water supplies
/• L^ !•*-
^ A M I A. TO f 
A L*** •
Closest known supply wells and distance.
1. Conclusions
• 
Areas of concern identified (possible sources).
Wo «i e___________________
Contaminants suspected from sources.
• 
Potential for release.
J. Recommendations
TUl 
UOtJ 
OB.17
TUT 
O05 
OS
ATTACHMENT A-2
SITE INSPECTION CORRESPONDENCE
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
TUT 
O05 
O8.1.9
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
"
.
Siegfried and Waltraud Torinus 
March 10( 1994
presently: Holzhauser Sir. 73
32760 Detmold / Germany
Phone and Fax - 49 - 5231 - 47393
GERAGHTY & MIUER, INC.
Environmental Services
201 West Passaic Street, 3rd Floor
Rochelle Park
New Jersey 07662
To: Mr.Thomas V. Dahany Senior Sientist / Project Manager
Re: Phase II Remedial Investigation, Tutu Welk She, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
4.1.4. Antilles Auto Parts (Former Oassett Auto Parts and Former Consolidated Auto Parts)
HISTORY of Parcel 214 Estate Anna's Retreat
Dear Mr. Dohany:
To complete your report we are providing you with the history of our property at Anna's Retreat,
Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Enclosed you find the history of parcel 214 at Estate Anna's Retreat (2 pages) and 8 pages with
pictures (la, 1b, 2, 3a, 3b, 4, 5, 6) and one drawing (1 page).
Don't hesitate to call us if you need more information.
Please would you kindly confirm the receipt of our mail with enclosures.
Sincerely,
Siegfried and Waltraud Torinus
cc. Attorney Aur*lto Rashld, E*q. at BORNN BORNN HANDY & RASHID
8 Norre Gad* 
P. O. Box 1500 St Thomas, U.S. Virgin bland*
Tel. |809).774-1-400 
Fax(809)-774.9607
TUT 
OO5 
0820
History of Parcel 214, Estate Anna's Retreot
Tutu, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Page 1
Documents:
Warranty Deed
Dec. 14, 1968
West Indies Enterprises, Inc. developed (he Tutu area.
Parcel 214 Anna's Retreat was purchased by Siegfried Torinus and
Wahraud Torinus from West Indies Enterprises, Inc. in 1968. West
Indies Enterprises, Inc. graded and leveled the ground.
Contract 10/20/69 West Indies Enterprises, Inc. constructed the building: a steel building
(l a, 1 b| 
24'X60' with 16'eave hight, including cistern and slab; 2 end walls, office
and parts area with siding. Galvanized steel panels.
On July 22, 1970 the place was bulldozed and thereafter the property was
fenced and landscaped with Hibiscus hedge around the perimeter. Various
Virgin bland trees as Yellow Cedar were planted.
There was no storage of any hazardous material.
Lease 2/26/71
(2)
In 1971 Fred Eglin and Seth Lorrabee leased a portion (124.20'X91.38')of
parcel 214 Anna's Retreat with the building. They first finished the interior of
the building and then started a small autoparh retail shop: E. & L AUTO PARTS.
The back portion of the parcel |40*X91.38') was left to the owner for future
developement. It was landscaped. (1968-1981)
During the time of this lease there was no repair work done and no service.
There was only the sale of auto parts, auto assessories and hardware and
there was no contamination possible. The tenants kept the Hibiscus hedge
along the fence and around the building well maintained.
Lease 3/30/78
(3a, 3b)
Lease 9/1/81
Keith Maddox and Ernie Sorrentino of Motorholdings, lid. Tortola, B.V.I. look
over the lease from Fred Eglin and Seth Larrabee and operated the small auto
parts business: TUTU AUTOS. A new lease was signed with them in 1 978.
The business was very small. Tutu Autos sold automotive parts, mostly for
foreign cars (Bristish like M.G.), tires and batteries and later (about 1 980)
some British oars (as Landrovers) which they shipped over from Tortola.
In 1978 the front portion of the parcel was paved (by Meridian Engineering).
During the time or Tutu Autos me tenants look special care of the Hibiscus hedge
along the fence and of the plants around the building. They kept the place
dean. There was no storage of oil or any hazardous material and no pollution.
In 1 981 Tutu Autos was purchased by CONSOLIDATED PARTS / Prime Automotive
Warehouse, Inc. with Doug Smith and Henry Owens and a new lease was
signed. They leased the entire parcel (164^0-X91. 38'). The bock yard was paved
and a shade erected.
The business was in the first place wholesale and retail of auto parts, and repair
work was secondary. They did brake-, frontend-, and muffler-repair, but mainly
they sold auto parts, batteries and tires. The used tires were brought to their branch
"Tread-Nu Tire Recapping" at Sub-Base (Tel. 77A0700) nor recapping.
The property was still landscaped. There were some drums for garbage and
some for waste oil as anywhere else in car places on St. Thomas. At our visits
we did not see any pollution.
TUT
uuo
OS 21
History of Porcel 214, Estate Anna's Retreat
Page 2
Assignment and
Assumption to
Lease 5/2/88
(6)
In May 1988 Thomas A. GASSETT took over the lease from Consolidated /
Prime Automotive Warehouse, Inc. His mayor activities were selling cars and
spare parts. His business was named GS Industries, Inc.
Gossett installed a 5000 gallon above ground storage lank for waste oil.
The Hibiscus was removed.
At the present time ANTILLES Automotive is operating at the site and it is
visible that they keep the place in good shape.
Since the owners of the property are off the Islands for some time of the year
(retired and not in best health conditions) they hired an inspector to check the
property on a monthly base and to write reports about the conditon of the facj;
lity. If necessary he is giving orders for cleanup or repairs to keep the environ-
ment dean. He informed us that the last pick-up of waste oil from the tank was
done on February 9, 1994 by the SafetyClean-Up Company.
The numbers In ()
refer to Ihe enclosed
pages with pictures
March 10, 1994
Siegfried Torinus and Waltraud Torinui
TUT
0822
)))
>
•> 
__
•4
1
J
i
3
00
i 
2
; 
1 -:
j 
S 
S
-«
a
c
A
r~ 
S^~^
r 
H 
x
: 
o 
/
£ 
S
3
M
40
3
X
——— 13-
0
I—
scorm dra
^-24'^
p - n
X
cc
1
>
PARCEL RAhSAY MOTORS
—————— 16420' ———————— : —————————— +
bl "D
s £n
DIP
n 
o ^;
CO
£>
*
r*
drain to sewerllne
PARCEL M5 TEXACO
CD
TI|
•<
n
LJ
X
I
TJ
CO
J
TUT 
OO5 
OS 2J
n«c<&
'
"f
_i.~'>.'n *!'/•'>
H..TT TMJ
TUT 
OO5 
0826
E & L AUTO PARTS. INC
mco
r T T\JJ O T _ P T _ T O r
/.sso 
QOO ini
T u t u -
Moxor aoldiags , -Imltedi' lac.
Jar,. A.eiTa J. daaaox and Ernie 
Sorre&tiso , ftoosevelt 3ut~-er
Road Iowa, Tortola JrfX - 425 1 3 - 7 
T&elna Suttiar -
Laaae from April 1, 1977 - 31. aiarch. 1981
TUTU AUTOS INC.
•AUTOMOTIVE PARTS 
• FAIR PRICES ON
_ 
FOR ALL FOREIGN 
FACTORY PARTS
CARS
BODY SHOP SUPPLIES
BATTERIES - ACCESSORIES
PRECISION AUTO PARTS
Cl«t Man BuIldJnj, Air Port Turn Off.
OMiiln* <•«•<•• fwn^^
XjLl ;"- 'SPECIAL ORDERS ACCEPTED!
TElS.t 775-1885 
774-7305 'i
Old Tutu.214 Anna Itaimt 
CUnMon6aMin|, Air Port Turn Off,
~ ~ 
J. 
StThom«,V.I.
COM
00
COflSOUDOT€D PORTS
HM ncMM for Ports, Tbm 0 lotteries In Ih* CoribUanl
2 Convenient locatfons
HAJ?WOODH/CHWWK.................«..., 776-0381
77S-SS66
ncrnn DISTRHIUTOHS
i A Compfete Uhe of Foreign A Domestic Ptrts.
Jket t Batteries.
ffhofenfe A ffctjl OMrMora of Tftt
SriKtton of ftratm jntf oomemc Part»,
rm. and Bfttenes «i OM
en
TUT 
OO5 
O83O
Jttto
GAS SETT
GASSbl I JhElVEAGLE 
Phone (809) 776-4600
GASSFITMERCEDES BENZ 
FAX(809)77SJ778
GS. Leasing/ Inc 
fl Ca««tt Blvd. Tutu Park
GS. Industries, Inc 
stTho«nM»U5.VJL 00802
A n nc. 'i 
Rerfrea i
^!^Tn•7 
'Crtl UU J
!«.. TT TVJ CT_CT_Tnn
TUT 
OO5 0831
CHEVROLET • PONT1AC • OLDSMOBILE
BUKX • CADILLAC •
Q*ne A. UPUce
St.TTKNMS 
^^
U.S. Virgin talands 00801
i»• •"'T T\IJ eT_RT_nnr
29.1989
g^. TTT-TT— vz owoi
ttnm my komvldif iboMt otroMi pitor » totLtmrt Vto. wkn wm ttayBdmtet
»
'a «-crwe fmior fimt-r
ii ponfUy
print shop*
1X*By<feumi«r«h»roMMM»ftfbntl
lOTfeqrOlMljWflfltott 
ID
ittOaVtttktktADlfee? ff
WhltiiftcbundlCihBift|ttaBdfbrmh»ftniatf 
SmfW GUlana* Owterl Outer for ladcpeadcn
^V 4 Ji
TUT 
OO5 
(J832
APPENDIX B
FIELD GAS-CHROMATOGRAPH ANALYTICAL REPORT
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
TUT'
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
'& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
Ground Water 
Engineering 
Hydrocarbon 
Remediation
March 22, 1994
Caroline Kwan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region II
26 Federal Plaza, Room 737
New York, New York 10278
Re: 
Soil Gas Survey Report for the Curriculum Center and Virgin Islands Housing Authority,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Dear Ms. Kwan:
In accordance with the Phase II Remedial Investigation (RI) Work Plan, Tutu Wells Site,
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands (Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 1993a), Geraghty & Miller, Inc., on
behalf of the Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee (TEIC), conducted a soil gas survey
at the Curriculum Center (former Laga Building) and the Virgin Island Housing Authority
(VIHA) properties from February 28 through March 10, 1994. As stated in the work plan, the
purpose of the soil gas survey was primarily to provide a screening tool to optimize the locations
of proposed new monitoring wells, and to provide a preliminary indication of the potential
contaminant source areas. The final location of two shallow new proposed Monitoring Wells,
(MW-16 at the Curriculum Center and MW-13 at VIHA) are to be selected after analyzing the
results of the soil gas survey. This letter report presents the methodology and results of the soil
gas surveys.
TUT 
OOS 
OS34
201 West Passaic Street. 3rd Floor • Rochelle Park. New Jersey 07662-(201) 909-0700* FAX (201) 909-0567/0568
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
METHODOLOGY
A Photovac 10S50 portable gas chromatograph (GC) was used to analyze the vapor
samples collected at the site. 
The Photovac 10S50 portable GC is equipped with a
photoionization detector (PID) and a CPSil-5 capillary column. The oven temperature was set
at 40* Celsius (C). Based on previous data collected at the site, the GC was calibrated with the
following compounds: trans-1,2-dichloroethene (trans-1,2-DCE); cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-
DCE); benzene; trichloroethene (TCE); toluene; tetrachloroethene (also known as
perchloroethene and abbreviated as PCE); meta-xylene; and ortho-xylene. An unbiased 40-foot
grid was laid out over the Curriculum Center property and the VIHA property. Some soil gas
points were relocated if buildings or concrete pavement presented obstructions. Soil gas survey
points were located at each node of the grid. In areas where greater resolution was needed to
identify possible contaminant source areas, a 20-foot spacing was employed until the areas of
concern were delineated. Soil gas survey sample points were numbered SGC-1 through SGC-46
at the Curriculum Center and SGH-1 through SGH-26 at VIHA, as shown on Figures 1 and 2,
respectively.
Even though the column temperature is constant, due to the lack of a heated injection
port, the temperature of the injection pon and the lines leading to the column changes throughout
the day, which changes the retention time of the compounds. Therefore, Geraghty & Miller
relies on the chemist, rather than the GC, to identify all compounds. Also, due to software
limitations, an internal calibration is based on only one injection. Geraghty & Miller's external
calibration is derived from an average of 5 injections which is more accurate. The internal GC
library was not used for these reasons; therefore, all peaks were identified by the GC as
unknowns.
CALIBRATION
An air standard was prepared by withdrawing headspace gas from pure stocks of each
selected compound using a gas-tight syringe and injection into a 1-liter Tedlar bag previously
'TUT 
O05 
O835
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
3
filled with ultra zero air. The concentration of the compounds in the standard were 2 parts per
million by volume (ppmv) of trans-l,2-DCE and cis-l,2-DCE and 5 ppmv for benzene, TCE,
toluene, PCE, meta-xylene, and ortho-xylene. This standard was prepared daily. 
Each
morning, the standard was injected into the GC five times. A response factor was calculated
for each compound by dividing the standard concentration by the average peak area from the five
injections. Detection limits were calculated daily based on instrument response.
QUALITY CONTROL
Standards were analyzed at a minimum of once every 4 hours and at the end of each day
to check for retention time drift. Syringe blanks were analyzed after all standardizations, and
equipment blanks were analyzed after running each sample that contained volatile organic
compound (VOC) peaks with areas greater than 0.3 millivolt seconds (mv/s). The analysis of
syringe blanks and equipment blanks prevents carryover of compounds from one run to the next
run. Duplicate sample analyses were conducted every ten samples. Steel rods were rinsed with
Micro liquid detergent and distilled water between soil gas points. After each soil gas point
where VOCs were detected, probe blanks were analyzed. The probe tube was not reused unless
the blank contained no peaks with areas greater than 0.3 mv/s.
SAMPLING PROCEDURE
A 1 1/2-inch diameter borehole was created in the soil with a slide hammer and solid rod
assembly. The depths of the boreholes were approximately 1.5 to 3 feet below land surface.
The solid rod was removed and a hollow 1/4-inch diameter stainless steel pipe was inserted with
a 1/8-inch Teflon tube contained inside. The Teflon tubing extended above the hollow stainless
steel tube; midway down the exposed Teflon tubing was a stainless steel tee through which
syringe samples were collected. A nail inserted into the end of the Teflon tubing prevented
clogging of the assembly as it was lowered into the borehole. The nail was then disengaged,
and the top of the borehole was sealed around the stainless steel pipe with modeling clay. The
clay used is reported to be non-toxic and safe for children. A sample of the clay was heated for
TUT 
COS 
O836
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
4
15 minutes in a VOC vial and the headspace analyzed; no VOCs were detected. The Teflon
tubing was attached to a diaphragm pump and the borehole was evacuated.
A purging test was performed to determine the correct evacuation time. During the
purging test, samples were collected from the stainless steel tee using a gas-tight syringe at 1-
minute intervals for 5 minutes. No peaks appeared on the chromatogram of samples collected
from Soil Gas Point SGC-1. The study done at Soil Gas Point SGC-3 indicated that all five
samples collected during the study had approximately the same concentrations. Therefore, a
purging time of 2 minutes was used for all further sampling. The technique used to collect soil
gas samples is consistent with that described by Dr. Thomas Spinier, USEPA Region I Lab
Director, in his course on soil gas sampling and analysis. The purging time study is designed
to indicate at what purging time the area surrounding the probe has its maximum concentration
of total VOCs. If the hole was overpumped, the study would show a decreasing concentration
of VOCs over time. This recommended purging time study and has proven to be practical and
useful at many sites.
RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION
The soil gas survey results are presented in this section.
CURRICULUM CENTER
The soil gas sample results for the Curriculum Center are provided in Table 1.
Chromatograms for the analyses are included in Appendix A; soil gas sample locations are
shown on Figure 1. Soil descriptions for the Curriculum Center from Geraghty & Miller soil
boring and monitoring well logs indicated the presence of silty clay (saprolite) varying in
thickness from 1.8 feet (at Monitoring Well MW-1) to 10.3 feet (at Soil Boring B-l). Fill
placement in the northwest corner of the property has created the thickest soil cover (near Soil
Boring B-l). All other boring logs, for locations north and west of the Curriculum Center,
TUT 
OO5 
O837
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
5
indicate soil thicknesses equal to or less than 3.7 feet. The soil horizon lies directly over
bedrock
PCE was detected at 32 locations, at concentrations ranging from 0.06 ppmv (Soil Gas
Point SGC-13) to 140 ppmv (Soil Gas Point SGC-43). TCE was detected at eleven locations,
at concentrations ranging from 0.03 ppmv (Soil Gas Point SGC-30) to 30 ppmv (Soil Gas Point
SGC-43). Cis-l,2-DCE was detected at eight locations, at concentrations ranging from 0.1
ppmv (Soil Gas Point SGC-3) to 5 ppmv (Soil Gas Point SGC-29). Trans-l,2-DCE was detected
at six locations at concentrations ranging from 0.04 ppmv (Soil Gas Points SGC-24 and SGC-35)
to 0.4 ppmv (SGC-43).
Toluene was detected at only one location (Soil Gas Point SGC-37), at a concentration
of 0.02 ppmv. Benzene, meta-xylene and ortho-xylene were not detected at any soil sampling
locations.
The highest concentrations of chlorinated VOCs in soil gas were detected north of the
Curriculum Center Building, centered around Soil Gas Point SGC-43 (estimated concentration
of approximately 174 ppmv). An area approximately 150 feet long (in an east-west direction)
and 90 feet wide (north-south) showed total chlorinated VOCs greater than 1 ppmv (see Figure
1).
Two other areas of elevated concentrations of chlorinated VOCs (above 1 ppmv total
chlorinated VOCs) were identified at the Curriculum Center. One area is centered at Soil-Gas
Point SGC-14 (estimated concentration of 30.1 ppmv). The other area, centered at Soil-Gas
Point SGC-04, showed concentrations between 1.0 and 5.0 ppmv. An isolated concentration of
3 ppmv total VOCs was detected at Soil-Gas Survey Point SGC-25.
'TUT 
O05 
0838
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
VIRGIN ISLANDS HOUSING AUTHORITY
The soil gas survey results for the VIHA property are provided in Table 2.
Chromatograms for the analyses are included in Appendix A. Soil gas sample locations are
shown on Figure 2. Twenty-six soil gas locations were sampled. VOCs were not detected in
any of the soil gas samples collected at the Virgin Islands Housing Authority. According to
Ms. Ralda Simmonds, Esq. (VIHA Attorney), an underground storage tank (UST) is located at
the southwest corner of the canopy along the west side of the VIHA maintenance building (see
Figure 2).
RECOMMENDATIONS
• 
Based on the results of the soil gas survey conducted at the Curriculum Center,
Geraghty & Miller recommends that proposed shallow Monitoring Well MW-16
be installed at the location of Soil Gas Point SGC-29 (grid coordinates N0340,
E0260). The highest concentrations of chlorinated compounds (estimated value
of 174.04 ppmv) were detected 30 feet Northeast (upgradient) of this location.
The soil sample from this boring with the highest photoionization detector (FID)
reading should be collected and analyzed for the Target Compound List (TCL)
VOCs. An underground water supply line is located near this location. If this
water line interferes with the proposed location for Monitoring Well MW-16, the
well will be located downgradient (i.e., southwest), as close as possible to the
proposed location.
• 
Since no VOCs were detected in soil gas samples collected at VIHA, proposed
shallow Monitoring Well MW-13 should be located within 10 feet of the existing
deep Monitoring Well MW-13D; this will form a well pair to provide comparison
of shallow and deep groundwater elevations and ground water quality.
TUT 
OO5 
0839
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
In Geraghty & Miller's Phase n RI proposed Work Plan, the proposed monitoring well
at the Curriculum Center was called MW-13 and the monitoring well at VIHA was called MW-
16. These designations have been reversed to be consistent with existing deep Monitoring Well
MW-13D at VfflA.
Geraghty & Miller, on behalf of the TEIC, would like to request that the USEPA respond
promptly to the proposed locations for Monitoring Wells MW-13 and MW-16, so the drilling
program can be scheduled accordingly.
Sincerely,
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
John Burke
Project Scientist/GC Operator
Lu 
,
. Danali ^~
^/Thomas V
Seni
;er
Daniel A. Nachman
Vice President/Project Officer
c: 
Ana Gloria Ramos - TEIC
Paul Ryan - Texaco
Michael Law, Esq. - Dept. of Justice
Ralda Simmonds, Esq. - VIHA
PRP Technical Committee Members
TVD:nr
PROMS. •••-WP2/03 l}94«.fer
TUT 
OO5 
O84O
P«0« 1 of 2
T.W. . ..-H. of tauM. OC A-,., of Soi, O.. S..*.. M^ 
on F.bn,.,, »
«* 10. IfM « ft. C.m»ta. C.-,. T- W.H. Sta. ft. I*———. U.I. Vfc*. W-*.
Soil
O» MM
SOC-I
SOC1
SOC-1
SOC-4
SOCJ
SOC-4
SOC-7
SOC-I
SOC-9
SOC-IO
SOC-II
soc-ii
SOC-ll
SOC-14
SOC-II
SOC-lt
SOC-17
SOC-II
SOC-19
SOC-10
SOC-ll
SOC-ll
SOC-ll
SOC-14
SOC-15
SOC-M
SOC-17
SOC-ll
SOC-19
SOC-M
SOC-ll
SOC-ll
SOC-ll
SOC-14
SOC-15
SOC-M
SOC-17
Dtu
S.mpk4l
1/2144
1/1/94
1/1/94
1/1/94
1/1/94
1/1/94
1/1/94
1/4/94
1/1/94
1/4/94
l/4/9-i
1/1/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/4/94
1/444
1/444
1/444
1/744
1/744
1/744
1/744
1/744
1/744
NoS«vl<-
1/744
1/744
1/744
1/744
1/744
mix I.1DCE
<H>ni»)
<OOS
<005
0 1
<005
<005
<005
<005
<001
<OOJ
<001
<001
<OOI
<001
<001
<001
<001
<001
<0.01
<001
<001
<001
<0.01
<002
<0.01
<001
<001
<0.01
<0.01
0.04
<0.01
<0.01
Location NMCMMiMl;
<001
<0.01
0.04
<0.01
<0.01
ciil.lDCE
(ppm.)
,0.07
<0.07
01
<007
<007
<007
<007
<001
<007
<001
<001
<007
<001
<001
<001
<001
<001
<001
<002
<0.01
<001
<001
<001
<0.01
<001
<OOI
<O.OI
0.1
s
<oot
<O.M
OTCIflOT* V«f*U4k»
<00i
<00»
04
0.1
<00«
ft«auiic
(ppm»)
<0 1
<0 1
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0.
<00t
<0.l
<OM
<00t
<OI
<OOI
<OOI
<oot
<OOI
<00»
<oot
<OOI
<0<M
<oot
<OOI
<0(W
<O.OI
<OM
<004
<004
<004
<004
<004
<0.04
<004
<0.04
<004
<004
<0.04
TCE
(ppmv)
<OOI
<OOI
0.1
<00»
<OOI
<OM
<00»
<OOI
<OM
<0.05
<OOI
<OOI
<OOS
O.I
<005
<0«
<005
<OOI
<OOJ
<005
<005
0.05
<005
<0.05
<O.OS
<001
<0.01
0.1
1
0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
4
0.
<0.01
Tohxnt
(Pl>m»)
<OI
<OI
<0 1
<0.l
<OI
<0.l
<0.l
<006
<0.l
<00»
<006
<00>
<OM
<006
<006
<006
<OW
<006
<006
<0«
<0.06
<006
<006
<0.0t
<OM
<0«
<0.0t
<00t
<006
<004
<006
<0.0t
<0.06
<00t
<00»
0.01
PCE 
m-XykM 
o-XyWa.
(•pmv) 
(ppinv) 
(Pf««)
<006 
<0.1 
<0.1
<00* 
<0.1 
<0.1
0.4 
<0.1 
<»1
I 
<0.1 
<0.1
] 
<0.1 
<0.1
<O.M 
<0.1 
<0.1
0.7 
<0.1 
<0.1
0.1 
<0.l 
«*.!
| 
<0.1 
<•).!
1 
<0.| 
«M
0.1 
<0.l 
<0.l
<0.04 
<0.l 
<U.I
006 
<0.l 
<0.l
Ml 
<0.l 
<0.l
<004 
<0.l 
<0.i
<004 
<0.| 
<».!
009 
<0.l 
<«l
0.07 
<OI 
<0.l
04 
<0.l 
Oil
o.i 
<o.i <n.i
o.i 
<o.i 
on
0.4 
<0.l 
<»l
<004 
<0.l 
OH
<004 
<0.l 
O.I
l 
<o.i on
<0.01 
<OI 
01.1
I 
<0.l 
«l.l
1 
<0.l 
<0.l
7 
<0.l 
<U.I
0.1 
<0.l 
OH
<o.oi 
<o.i oi.i
<001 
<0.l 
<«.!
O.I 
<0.l 
<OI
Ml 
<0 1 
<0.l
4 
<o.t <n.i
O.I 
<0 1 
OI.I
NumtMC
orUokaow.
CoMBOUI^t
01
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
CJi
SM p*|* 1 *" !«>«««>•"•
•04O1742.XLS
l.n !
M
"aaai
I
jj! 7
1 1
1 1
* 
iti
llll^lll
tillllfll
•
jj*
A A A e A A 0 o 1
33S*SS8a|
'
«
A A A 
A A 
'
o o o ^ o o w "
boo b p * * «
www 
w> 3» 
5
*
I
----2222
888-SS-
3SSi52»22
-»s|gs!-
W M M M — — — —
ooo — oooo
r
M
{1
a
m
A
s -
a ^**
1 j?
m
5 IP
If
*-
I 
S
1 
|
la
ll
if
«i
H
r
m
A
o
1
S
I
«
i
E
I
n
f&
S7
1
1
s-
'5-r
s
1
r
2
inrkulum Cc
1
I
V»
K
r
e
M
4
i
TobUl.
fUlulll ol Portoblo GC Anolytoi ol Soil Go* SomplM CoK«ctod on M.rch I through 10, 1t»4 it Ih. Virgin* UUndl Houling Authority. Tutu WoN Silo. St. Thomo*. U.S. Virgin Mond*..
SoH
CM Point
SON 1
SGH :
SGH 3
SGH-4
SGH 5
SGH-i
SGH 7
SGHI
SGH-9
SGH 10
SGH- 11
SGH 12
SGH- 11
SGH- 14
SGH- IS
SGH- 11
SGH- 17
SGH 11
SGH- It
SGH 10
SGH-11
SOH 11
SGH 13
SGH 24
SGH-2S
SGHI*
Pl>cnv
TCf
DCE
ret
D*i* 
tror
Somilorf
3/1/14
3/»/»4
3/I/J4
3/1/94
3/8/14
3/9/14
3/8/14
3/9/14
3/9/14
3/1 0*4
3/8/94
3/9/14
1/10*4
3/»/»4
3/*/*4
3/9/14
1/9/14
3/9/94
1/9/94
3/9/14
3/9/14
3/9/14
3/9/94
1/9/14
1/9/14
3/9/M
Pont pot minion by volunM
Trichlorootliono.
DicNorr<iri*no.
T*trocMoro*trwno.
.•1.1 DCE
(ppmvl
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<002
<001
<002
<0.02
<001
<0.03
<001
<0.02
<0.03
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<002
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<002
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
ei« 1.2DCE
1 ppmvl
<0.05
<OOS
<OOS
<005
<OOS
<005
<005
<0 05
<OOS
<003
<OOS
<O.OS
<001
<OOS
<005
<O.OS
<OOS
<005
<OOS
<005
<OOS
<O.OS
<005
<O.OS
<0.05
<O.OS
B«n»no
(ppmvl
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
<009
<0.09
<O.09
<0.1
<009
<0.09
<0 1
<009
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
<0.09
<009
<009
<0.09
<009
<0.09
<009
<0.09
TCl
(ppmvl
<O.OS
<O.OS
<005
<O.OS
<O.OS
<0.04
<O.OS
<O.OS
<O.O4
<O.(
<00«
<0.04
<0.08
<O.O4
<0.04
<0.04
<O.O4
<0.04
<O.O4
<0.04
<0.04
<O.O4
<0.04
<O.O4
<OO4
<0.04
TohMIM
Ippmvl
<0.01
<0.01
<001
<001
<0.01
<001
<OOI
<0.01
<001
<007
<001
<0.01
<007
<001
<0.0t
<0.01
<001
<0.01
<001
<0.01
<001
<0.01
<001
<0.01
<001
<0.01
PCE
(ppmvl
<005
<O.OS
<OOS
<005
<O.OS
<OOS
<o.os
<oos
<0.05
<oos
<005
<O.OS
<O.OB
<OOS
<O.OS
<o.os
<o.os
•COOS
<005
<o.os
<OOS
<005
<005
<005
<005
<OOS
m-Xy..no
lopmvl
<01
<O.J
<OZ
<0.1
<0.1
<02
<01
<O.X
<01
<0.2
<0.1
<O.I
<0.1
<02
<O.J
<0.1
<0.2
<O.J
<02
<0.2
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.1
o-XyloiM
j... ,-Lui
IPP*"V|
<01
<0.1
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.1
<02
<02
<0.2
<01
<0.2
<O.I
<0.1
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.2
<0.1
<0.1
<0.2
<0.2
<02
<0.1
<01
<0.2
Unknown Numbor
ol Compound*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
- 
PHOOII.'-'XI/VIHASO.XIS
CURRICULUM CENTER
(FORMER LAGA FACILITY)
„,... 
x
• 
V 
S
MW-1D 
I*. 
S
\ 
SGC-OJ'N-.I.^X'^
X 
tn*\ ^•"•1 -
IW-ID
6-U
S3-1
\
LEGEND
• 
EXISTING SHALLOW MONITORING WELL LOCATION
OOS11NG OOP MOMTORMC WELL LOCATION
9 
son. BORwc LOCATION
•#• 
SURFACE SOIL SAMPLE APPROXIMATE LOCATION
PERIMETER OF PROPOSED SOS.-GAS SURVEY
SCC-01 
g 
LOCADON OF SCC-CAS POMT
PPUV 
PARTS P€R MILLION PER VOLUME
(0-2)
TOTAL CHLORINATED VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNC
CONCENTRATION. M PPMV
(MD) 
NONf DETECTED
I 
ESTMATED VALUE
NOC 
VOLAT1E ORCAMC COMPOUND
. 
LINE OF EOUAL
I——— 
VOLATU ORCAMC COMPOUND CONCENTRATION
(DASHED WHERE MFERRED)
CONTOUR INTERVAL - 1. 10. 100 PPMV
GRID SPACING: 20 FEET
GRID TIE-IN WAS SOUTHWEST
CURRICULUM CENTER BUILDING
CORNER SET AT N0060. E0180
SCALE
0 
40 FEET
CD
GERAGHTY
& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
DRAWING CONFIDENTIAL: THS DRAMNC
AM) ALL (NTORMATION CONTAMEO THEREON IS
AM> SHALL REMAIN T>C PROPERTY or GERACHTT
k MILLCR. NC AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFES-
SIONAL SERVICE. 
THIS INFORMATION SHALL NOT
K USED M «HOLE OR IN PART WITHOUT THE
FLU KNOWLEDGE AND PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT
Of GERAGHTY * MILLER. MC.
SCALE VERIFICATION
THB MR RfPRBOffS
ONE MCM ON TMC
OWOMAL ORAMNG:
UK TO VOMFY nCUNC
REPRODUCTION SCALE
MOJECT HO: «WOIieH
M-M7
rrs T. D«mmr
•U NOt
IOT nt i
BATE;
.PATE; aima»4
DATE tiMARM
PHASE I REMEDIAL NVESTIGATION
CURRICULUM
(F=ORMER LAQA FAC
SOL-GAS SURVEY RESULTS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE
CURRICULUM CENTER
(FORMER LAGA FACILITY)
m-i]
w-i»
LEGEND
rmraoi JHAIIM UOMTMM «u IOCATON
MMC DOT MMnmC MU. lOCtlMH
t«1M« *jm* «11 LOCA«*
tdl KMNC IOCA1KN
UVACC sn. wvni Amnnun IOUIKM
nmtm or MOFOCD KH-CAJ sunn
B 
SOL-CU tU*UK tfHMMMtn UJCAIKH
(vcumi cttraMs «BK NOT DCKcm
«T «m suvuw ioe<rai)
ucnanuM) sniAa TAW
»mt
CKO TIE-IN WAS SOU1HKCST
VWON ISLAND HOUSING AUTHORITY
lUHOINC CCRNEN SCT AT HOMO. E0200
GERAGHTY
& MILLER, INC.
Strvicts
DRAWING CONRDENTIAL: Ml DMWC
WO Hi mmiAIMN CONTAIO THOtOt S
ma BUU KOMI K morem <r otiuain
k Hum, NC. AS M nsnuan or n«ns-
SOHAI aaa. 
THJ mnumi »>u. NOT
K UStB N WOU 01 » >MT MTNOUT THt
RAL KWMaet «• mat Mnm eamr
cr CCUCXTY * num. «c
SOU VOBF1CAT10H
un TO «w neuM
•mooucrai ICAIE
wtj
PHASE I
VflON ISLAND HOU8NQ AUTHORTTY
80L-OA8 SURVEY QRD
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. WGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE
APPENDIX C
PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS SAMPLING RESULTS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC 
T 
°°5 
°846
Table C-l. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in an Oil Sample Collected on August 17, 1987
at the VIHA Building, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
Sample ID: 
3239B-21
Sample Location: 
Waste Oil UST
97
98
500
2,900
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Samples collected by Region n Technical Assistance Team (TAT), Weston/SPER Division, New Jersey, and
U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) personnel.
Samples received at S-Cubed Laboratories of San Diego, California on September IS, 1987; holding times were exceeded.
VIHA
UST
Source:
Virgin Islands Housing Authority.
Underground storage tank.
Weston/SPER Division Region D TAT (1988b).
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
COS 
OS47
Table C-2. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Report for Curriculum Center (former LAGA Building), Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Site Data
Site:
Report:
Site Reconnaissance Date:
Site Information:
UST Location Record
of Tank Leaks:
Disposal Procedures:
Areas of Concern:
Potential Sources to Soil
and/or Groundwater
Identified:
Sampling of Areas
of Concern:
- 
Sample Results:
LAGA Building.
Preliminary Assessment Report, LAGA Building/Virgin Islands Department of Education, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands,
NUS Corporation, March 24, 1989.
February 15, 1989
No RCRA permit. Active status. Dates of operation unknown. Owner: Virgin Islands Department of Education.
No UST at this location.
No indication in this report.
Drums behind LAGA Building:
* Drums were located less than 100 feet northwest of the corner of the Laga Building.
* NUS Corporation observed 22 55-gallon drums over a grassy area: 21 steel drums and one plastic drum. Some during
were corroded, some were perforated, some were empty; only one was found full.
* No containment in this waste unit. Drums were found dispersed and on their sides over the ground surface.
* No stains observed at the drums area.
Potential of release to soil, surface water, and groundwater:
* Drums laying on their sides, no labels, corroded, deposited over the ground.
* No containment structures.
* No records or information on drum contents.
* DPNR indicates that the LAGA Building was a former textile processing facility that used solvents in its processes.
No readings above background were detected on the OVA or the PID during the NUS Corporation site reconnaissance.
There is no reference of sampling activity conducted at this site in this report. No stains on the ground were observed during
site reconnaissance by NUS Corporation.
None.
03*
CO
RCRA 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
UST 
Underground storage tank.
DPNR 
Department of Planning and Natural Resources.
OVA 
Organic vapor analyzer.
PID 
Photoionization detector.
Source: 
NUS Corporation, Region II FIT (1989a).
GERAGHTYfl'MII.I.I-K.INC
Table C-3. 
Summary of Analytical Results for Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 at the
Curriculum Center (Former LAGA Facility), Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands.
Sample Location: 
Curriculum Center (former LAGA Building).
Sample Type: 
Four soil samples and one water sample were collected from an area behind the
LAGA building according to Graber letter to C. Kwan of the USEPA dated April
27, 1990. Field notes from CDM dated June 6, 1989 described two soil samples,
eL-02-Ols and eL-02-02s, and one aqueous sample, eL-02-04L. Soil samples
were collected from the ground surface area of dumped drums. The aqueous
sample was collected from an open drum found during the sampling activity.
Two field blanks, eL-02-FBl and eL-02-FB2, were collected during this sampling
event at LAGA (CDM 1989a).
Samplers: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee Federal Programs Corporation personnel.
Analytical
Results:
(CDM letter dated
April 27, 1990) 
Toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes were detected in sample eL-02-Ols.
Xylene was detected in sample eL-02-02s.
Phenol, methylphenols, naphthalene, methylnaphthalenes, and other hydrocarbons
were detected in sample eL-02-Ols.
Endosulfan I was detected in sample eL-02-Ols.
Concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) ranged between 544 to
3,470 micrograms per gram (ug/g).
Cadmium and lead were detected in all samples.
Heptanes were tentatively identified in water sample eL-02-04L.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1989a).
f:\apr<9ect\tuliAPIlOO13.a34\ljval .tbl
TUT 
OOS 
OS49
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Table C-4. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in an Oil Sample Collected on August 17, 1987
at Ramsay Motors, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Acetone
2-Butanone
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Total Xylenes
Sample: 
3239-20
Waste Oil
Storage Tank
ND
15,000
210,000
1,400,000
290,000
1,700,000
Analyte concentrations in micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg).
ND 
Not detected.
Source: 
Weston/Spill Prevention Emergency Response Division Region II, Technical Assistance Team (1988b).
(:WroJKI\lulu\l>lttl013JIMVIiM\TBL2ICOCJCLS
TUT
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Table C-5. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds for Soil and Water Samples Collected on
September 8, 1988 at Ramsay Motors, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Xylene
Sample: 
e-02
Ramsay Motors
Groundwater
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
ND
ND
eR-07s
Ramsay Motors
Soil
ND
ND
55
8
ND
2
1
eR-08s
Ramsay Motors
Soil
6
18
ND
ND
ND
ND
7
Analyte concentrations for groundwater in micrograms per liter (ug/L) and for soil in micrograms per
kilograms (ug/kg).
ND
Not detected.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1989a).
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 0851
Pagel of 2
H
•in
CD
Table C-6. 
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Report of Ramsay Motors, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Site Data
Site:
Report:
Site Reconnaissance Date:
Site Information:
UST Location
Record of Tank Leaks:
Disposal Procedures:
Areas of Concern:
Ramsay Motors.
Preliminary Assessment Report, Ramsay Motors, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corporation, March 24, 1989.
February 15, 1989.
No Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permit. Active status. Operation: unknown to present. Owner: Rita Ramsay.
Waste oil UST located underground below the workshop area.
No record or indication of tank leakage.
Waste oil stored on-site. Report indicates no other disposal procedures.
Waste oil drums:
* Unknown age.
* Drums located inside an overhanging garage in the northeast corner of Ramsay Motors property.
* Twenty-five 55-gallon drums of waste oil observed during NUS Corporation site reconnaissance.
* Drums contain automotive waste oil. Substances such as gasoline, kerosene, and degreasing solvents may also be present in the
drums.
* Drums located over a concrete floor. No berms or curbs observed during NUS Corporation site reconnaissance.
* Many drums were open during site reconnaissance.
Waste oil UST:
* No RCRA permit.
* Unknown age.
* Unknown volume.
* No evidence of tank leaking.
* UST contains waste oil from automotive repair and servicing activities.
See Page 2 for footnotes.
GERAGHTY^MII.I.l R.INC
CO
Page 2 of 2
Table C-6. 
Summary of Preliminary Assessment Report of Ramsay Motors, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. 
Virgin Islands.
Site Data
Potential Sources to Soil
and/or groundwater
Identified:
Drainage ditch at Gassett property line:
* Waste oil discharging onto Ramsay Motors property from Gassett Motors.
Waste oil drums:
* Potential of release to groundwater. Some minor oil spills observed on the concrete floor of the garage area and at the drum
storage area during site reconnaissance.
Waste oil UST:
* There is no indication of tank leakage.
Waste oil was observed discharging from an oil pool at Gassett property into a drainage ditch on Ramsay property. This ditch
discharges into the storm sewer.
PID and OVA readings of open drums ranged between 10 to 90 ppm (PID) 
and 60 to 300 ppm (OVA).
Soil and groundwater samples were collected, but NUS did not report when this sampling occurred. Soil samples were analyzed by
Cenref Labs of Brighton, Colorado.
No laboratory information for groundwater sample analysis was provided by NUS.
Detected in soil: toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and 2-b.exane.
Detected in groundwater: tetrachloroethane, ethylbenzene, and xylene.
Sampling of Areas
of Concern:
Sample Results:
RCRA
UST
OVA
PID
ppm
Source:
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
Underground storage tank.
Organic vapor analyzer.
Photoionization detector.
Parts per million.
NUS Corporation (1989b).
GERAGHTY^MII.I.PR.INC
Table C-7. 
Conceotrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in an Oil Sample Collected June 8, 1989,
at Ramsay Motors, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
2-Hexanone
Total Xylene
Toluene
Sample: 
eR -02-0 la
Ramsay Motors
Oil
64,000 J
130,000 J
1 80,000 J
1, 200,000 J
450,000 J
Analyte concentrations in micrograms per kilograms (ug/kg).
Four tentatively identified compounds reported.
J 
Estimated value.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1990a).
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
°854
Table C-8. 
Summary of Analytical Results for a Soil Sample Collected June 5 to 10, 1989
at Ramsay Motors, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample Location: 
Ramsay Motors.
Sample Type:
Samplers:
Analytical
Results:
One soil sample (eR-02-02s) collected from 2 to 12 inches below ground
surface in an area adjacent to Gassett fence on Ramsay property.
Camp, Dresser & McKee Federal Programs personnel.
Methylene chloride and xylenes were detected in sample eR-02-02s.
Tentatively identified benzenes were also detected in sample eR-02-02s.
Naphthalene, methylnaphthalene, fluorene, fluoranthene, pyrene, and
benzofluoranthene were detected in sample eR-02-02s.
No pesticides or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were detected.
Concentration of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) 
was 23,400
micrograms per gram (ug/g).
Cadmium was detected at a concentration of 6.1 micrograms per liter
(ug/kg).
Lead was detected at a concentration of 15 ug/kg.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) 
Federal Programs Corporation (1990a).
\PR0013 <m/1Umi»yl.tbl
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUT 
OO5 
OS55
Table C-9. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Samples Collected on August 17, 1987
at Gassett (Former Consolidated Auto Parts), Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample:
Sample Location:
Analyte 
Sample Type:
Acetone
2-Butanone
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Total Xylenes
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
J 
Estimated value.
ND 
Not detected.
3239B-18
Gutter
Water
2.1
4.2
0.39
0.78
2.6
3239B-19
Storm Drain
Water
ND
2.6
ND
0.10J
ND
Samples collected by Region n Technical Assistance Team (TAT), Weston/SPER Division, New Jersey, and
St. Thomas Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) personnel of St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Samples collected on August 17, 1987 and received in S-Cubed Laboratories of San Diego, California on
September 15, 1987.
Holding time for volatile organic compounds were exceeded.
Source: 
Weston/SPER Division Region II, TAT (1988b).
t:\4trapcltolii\rmol3.a34\3IM9CTB.XLS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
0856
Table C-10. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil and Surface-Water Samples Collected
on September 12, 1988 at Gassett (Former Consolidated Auto Parts), Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas,
U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Sample Location:
Analyte 
Sample Type:
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
4-Metbyl-2-pentanone
Styrene
Toluene
Xylene
eC-09Js
Garage
Border
Soil
ND
1.3
ND
ND
0.56 J
2.5
eC-lOJs
Open Bay
Garage
Soil
0.004 J
2.1
0.033 J
0.006
1.3
5.6
eC-lla
Standing
Water
Water
ND
0.003
ND
ND
0.010
0.013
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (rag/kg) for soil samples and in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
for water sample.
ND 
Not detected.
J 
Estimated value.
Samples collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) personnel.
eC-09s Collected behind open four bay garage in back of facility. Grab sample from entire rear border of garage.
eC-lOs Collected on upgradient gable-End of open bay garage adjacent to drum storage area.
eC-1 la Collected from standing water in an area adjacent to drum storage area.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1989a).
TUT 
OUfn
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
Table C-11. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Reports for Gassett, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Site Data
-i
Site:
Report:
Site Reconnaissance Date:
Site Information:
UST Location Record
of Tank Leaks:
Disposal Procedures:
Areas of Concern:
Potential Sources to Soil
and/or Groundwater
Identified:
d 
Sampling of Areas
~" 
of Concern:
Sample Results:
Gassett.
Preliminary Assessment Report for Gassett Motors, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corporation, March 24, 1989.
February 15, 1989.
No RCRA permit. Active status. Dates of operation unknown to present. Owner unknown.
Former Consolidated Auto Parts. Site is bordered by Ramsay Motors on the northeast and Texaco on the southeast.
No UST reported at this site.
Waste oil stored on-site. No indication of other disposal procedure in the report.
Waste oil drums:
* Waste oil drums were at the facility when Mr. Gassett leased the property in May 1988.
* Waste unit is located behind the main building adjacent to a garage overhang. Drums stored above ground surface.
* Drum quantity: four 55-gallon drums and three 20-gallon drums.
* Drums contain waste oil from automotive repair and servicing activities. Drums may also contain small quantities of
gasoline, kerosene, and/or degreasing solvents.
Waste oil from drainage ditch on Gassett property discharges into Ramsay Motors property.
Potential of soil and groundwater contamination:
* Waste was not properly contained. Drums stored over ground surface. Numerous spills and a large pool of oil in the northwest
comer of the property (drum area) were observed during site reconnaissance by NUS Corporation.
* Oil-stained area was observed during site reconnaissance on the Ramsay Motors property where drainage ditch left the Gassett
property. The drainage ditch discharges into a storm sewer.
OVA and PID readings below background at the area of concern during site reconnaissance. No reference of samples collected at
this site in this report.
No sample results in this report.
rn
RCRA 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
PID 
Photoionization detector.
UST 
Underground storage tank.
OVA 
Organic vapor analyzer.
Source: 
NUS Corporation, Region II FIT (1989c) (1989d).
GER ACUITY Ml I.I.I R.INC
Table C-12. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Oil Samples Collected on June 8, 1989 at Gassett
(Former Consolidated Auto Parts), Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Sample I.D.:
Sample Location:
Sample Type:
eC-02-Ola*
Drain
Oil
Acetone 
0.013 J
Analyte concentration in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)
J 
Estimated value.
* 
Sample mistakenly analyzed as water. All other values were rejected (R).
eC-02-Ola 
Sample of oily water collected from drain leading to Ramsay property.
Sample collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) personnel.
Sample analyzed by Versar, Inc.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1990a).
t*vni**'*uu\HU»\ 3.0M\riM>lTBL5<nC JCLS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
GO 5 
O859
Table C-13. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Oil and Water Samples Collected on August 17, 1987 at the Texaco Service Station,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. 
Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Sample Location:
Sample Type:
Analyte
Acetone
2-Butanone
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
3239B-12
Bay #1 Sump
Water/Oil
1.4
3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3239B-13
Bay #2 Sump
Water
1.5
3.1
0.27
2.3
1.3
9.1
ND
ND
ND
3239B-14
Bay #3 Sump
Water
2.2
4.1
ND
0.9
1.0
7.0
0.26
ND
ND
3239B-15
Oil/Water
Separator
Oil
ND
5.3
2.8
43.0
14.0
110.0
ND
2.4
ND
3239B-16
Waste Oil
Tank
Oil
1.9
6.3
ND
ND
1.0
9.3
ND
ND
ND
3239B-17
Storm Drain
Water
2.2
4.0
ND
1.1
0.66
4.4
ND
ND
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L) for water and water/oil samples, and in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for oil samples.
ND 
Not detected.
No field or trip blanks collected.
Samples collected by Region II Technical Assistance Team (TAT), Weston/SPER Division, New Jersey and St. Thomas Department of Planning
and Natural Resources personnel.
Samples received at S-Cubed Laboratories, of San Diego, California on September 15, 1987. Samples analyzed using U.S. 
Environmental
Protection Agency-Contract Laboratory Program (USEPA CLP) 
Methodology. Holding time was exceeded.
~~iC 
Source: 
Weston/Spill Prevention Emergency Response Division Region II, Technical Assistance Team (1988b).
i:\aprojectVpi0013.034\tutu\diti\61493Mb.xb
03
GERAGHTY<^MII.
o
Table C-14. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil, Oil, and Water Samples Collected from
September 12 to IS, 1988 at the Texaco Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands.
Sample ID:
Sample Location:
Sample Type:
Analyte
Carbon disulfide
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
Analyte concentrations for water in
kilogram (ug/Kg).
J 
Estimated value.
ND 
Not detected.
* 
Samnle rnll«-.tftrl nnrt
eT-01W
Cistern
Water
2 J
ND
ND
ND
micrograms per liter (ug/L) and
h of the. first nrvji hav with lift
eT-02s 
eT-02sd
* 
Duplicate
of eT-02s
Soil 
Soil
. ND 
ND
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
for soil and oil in micrograms per
hAtu/M^n r>_nnr*retp nnH anri f*»nrj»
eT-62
Oil/Water
Separator Oil
rag/kg
ND
140
400
160
Samples collected by Camp, Dresser &. McKee (CDM) personnel.
Sample eT-62 analyzed by Cenref Laboratories of Brighton, Colorado.
No results available for eT-23s and eT-23sd.
Samples analyzed using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Contract Laboratory Programs (USEPA CLP) methodology.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1989a).
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 0861
Page 1 of 2
Table C-15. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Report for Texaco Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Site Data
Site:
Report:
Site Reconnaissance Date:
Site Information:
UST Location Record
of Tank Leaks:
Disposal Procedures:
Areas of Concern:
Texaco Service Station.
Preliminary Assessment Report for Tutu, Texaco, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corporation, March 31, 1989.
February 15, 1989.
No RCRA permit. Active status. Operation unknown to present.
Waste oil UST of unknown age. Unknown location. A previous investigation by DPNR on August 5, 1987, indicated two
USTs: one with a concrete top and a concrete partition, and the other covered with a square steel plate. No reports of leaks or spills.
Waste oil drums:
No RCRA permits.
Unknown age.
Drums located in the northern corner of the Tutu Texaco property.
Twenty-seven 55-gallon drums in the waste unit. Twenty-five drums contain waste oil from automotive repair and servicing
operations. Two drums contain dirt.
Three 20-gallon drums with waste oil.
Few 5-gallon pails with waste oil.
Drums stored over a concrete surface. No berms or curbs observed in this area.
Evidence of oil spill in storage area.
One drum was found open during site reconnaissance.
Waste oil may contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing solvents.
•in
See Page 2 for footnotes.
GERACiHTY^MIU.I K.INC
Page 2 of 2
Table C-15. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Report for Texaco Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Site Data
Waste oil USTs:
Construction and integrity is unknown.
USTs contain waste oil from automotive servicing.
USTs operated in violation of USVI laws.
Waste oil may contain small quantities of gasoline, kerosene, or degreasing solvents.
Waste oil drums:
Potential of release to surface water, soil, and groundwater.
No containment structure in storage area.
Spilled oil and soil staining observed during site reconnaissance.
OVA readings of 20 ppm from the open drum. No readings above background in the ambient air in the storage area. Waste oil
sample collected.
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane was detected in waste oil sample. Sample results invalidated because the sample holding time was exceeded.
Potential Sources to Soil
and/or Groundwater
Identified:
Sampling of Areas
of Concern:
Sample Results:
-i
CO
0-
RCRA 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
DPNR 
Department of Planning and Natural Resources.
UST 
Underground storage tank.
USVI 
U.S. Virgin Islands.
OVA 
Organic vapor analyzer,
ppm 
Parts per million.
Source: 
NUS Corporation, Regional FIT (1989a).
i:\afHOJect\tuni\pfOO! 3.034Vlau\52l WE.xta
(iERAGHTY0?MII.I.I R.INC
Page 1 of 3
Table C-16. 
Summary of Tank Excavation Procedures, September 7 to September 16, 1988 at Texaco
Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Site:
Field Activities Date:
Excavation and Installation
of Underground Storage Tanks
(USTs):
Field Activities Oversight:
Sampling Activities:
Soil Venting System:
USTs Removed:
USTs Installed:
Removal Operation:
Sampling of Excavation Pit:
Texaco Service Station.
September 7 to September 16, 1988.
Local contractor.
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation.
U.S. 
Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural
Resources, (removal and transportation activities).
Lebrdn Associates, Inc.
Groundwater Technology, Inc.
Three 4,000-gallon steel USTs, one containing motor fuels were
removed from the south end of the Texaco Service Station.
Three doubled-walled steel tanks (two 10,000-gallon and one
6,000-gallon capacity tanks) with leak detection systems were
installed at the west end of the Texaco service station.
USTs were excavated and removed from September 7 to
September 9, 1988. 
USTs were degassed with carbon dioxide
prior to removal. Large holes were noted in one of the USTs
during an initial investigation. No holes were observed in the
other two USTs. 
During UST removal excavated soils were
placed over polyethylene sheeting at the eastern boundary of the
site. Excavation depth was approximately 6.5 feet. USTs were
transported to the Texaco terminal outside of Charlotte Amalie, St.
Thomas.
An attempt to collect soil samples from the excavation was made
after removal of the USTs. Soil sampling procedure was delayed
due to a tropical storm event on September 8 and 9, 1988.
Excavation pit was filled with the runoff produced by heavy rain.
The soil piles were covered with plastic sheeting. CDM requested
that Texaco analyze the water accumulated in the excavation pit
and pump out the water prior to infiltration through the excavation
walls.
See page 3 for footnotes.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT
O864
Page 2 of 3
Table C-16. Summary of Tank Excavation Procedures, September 7 to September 16, 1988 at Texaco
Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sampling of Excavation Pit
(continued):
Water Sampling:
Soil Pile Sampling:
A tanker truck was not available until September 10, 1988. By
this date the water inside the pit had dropped approximately 3 feet.
Two 55-gallon drums provided by Texaco were filled with water
from the excavation pit for later sampling. A 4,000-gallon tanker
truck from the Texaco terminal arrived on September 10, 1988 to
remove the water from the excavation pit.
Another hurricane advisory was in effect by the evening of
September 10, 1988. Operations were shut down and the
excavation pit was protected and bermed to keep surface runoff
from going inside the excavation. A third 55-gallon drum was
filled with the water that had accumulated in the excavation pit.
Two tanker trucks were filled to empty the excavation pit.
CDM requested soil samples from at least 10 feet downgradient of
the excavation area due to flooding of the excavation pit. Three
holes were drilled in the concrete pad at the south-southwest
portion of the excavation. Borehole depth was not indicated in the
letter.
Soil samples from the excavation pit were collected on September
13 and 14, 1988: four soil samples were collected from the corners
of the excavation pit floor and four soil samples were collected
from the center of each wall. Three soil samples were collected
in the vicinity of the excavation pit.
Three water samples were collected from the 55-gallon drums that
were used to store water removed from the excavation pit. One
sample per drum was collected.
Two soil piles were sampled on September 15, 1988. Three
composite samples were collected from the first soil pile. Two
composite samples were collected from the second pile. A third
pile was generated during excavation for the new tanks installed at
the west end of the Texaco service station on September 15, 1988.
This soil pile was sampled the following week. One sample was
collected from this soil pile.
See page 3 for footnotes.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
O865
Page 3 of 3
Table C-16. 
Summary of Tank Excavation Procedures, September 7 to September 16, 1988 at Texaco
Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Installation of New USTs:
Soil Venting System:
Air Monitoring:
Three new double-walled steel tanks and leak detection systems
were installed at the west end of the Texaco service station on
September 15, 1988. Excavation procedures began on September
14, 1988. The first 4-feet of soil removed during the excavation
was used as backfill for the old tank excavation pit. Remaining
soil was piled at the eastern and northern boundaries of the service
station. Due to HNU readings obtained from soil samples during
field activities of 10 to 15 parts per million (ppm) of total volatile
organics, the soil could not be used as landfill. Fill material was
utilized to backfill the excavations. The source of this fill material
was not indicated in the letter.
Soil removed from both excavations was placed over a slotted
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe for venting. Air was removed from
the pipe with a high vacuum pump system. This system was
monitored weekly with an HNU photoionization detector at
selected points. Soil samples were scheduled to be collected after
completion of the soil venting procedure for final disposition of the
soils.
An HNU photoionization detector and Draeger tube during field
activities. HNU readings during tank excavation ranged between
20-30 ppm with peaks of 80 ppm of total VOCs during soil
removal activity. HNu background readings ranged from 0.2 to
1.0 ppm total VOCs. HNu readings above the soil pile surface
ranged between 80 to 150 ppm. Breathing zone readings ranged
from 5 to 10 ppm.
Draeger tubes for benzene levels during UST removal ranged from
1 to 2 ppm during peak activity.
HNU readings at the new tanks excavation soil pile were from: 10
to 15 ppm.
USTs 
Underground storage tanks.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (COM) Federal Programs Corporation (1989b).
i:\«projat\Jutu\?RO013.034\d»U\Te«co6.WP
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT
O866
O
0-
Table C-17. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Split Soil Samples Collected from September 12 to 15, 1988
during Texaco Tank Excavation, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Split samples were collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) personnel during Texaco tank excavation soil sampling activities.
i"—
H 
Source: 
Camp Dresser & Mckee (CDM 1989b)
Page 1 of 2
Sample:
Location:
Analyte
Acetone
Chloroform
1 ,2-DichIoroethane
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
2-Hexanone
Toluene
Xylene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
2-Butanone
TP-01
Test
Hole
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
43
ND
5
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per
J 
Estimated value.
B 
No explanation in
ND 
Not detected.
* 
Samnle, mav be a t
TP-02
Test
Hole
18BJ
ND
ND
2.7
14J
4.8
22
1.4
13
2.3J
kilogram (mg/kg).
TP-03
Test
Hole
ND
0.0 13J
ND
ND
ND
0.013J
ND
0.087J
0.1 7J
0.006J
EX-01
Excavtion
Pit
ND
ND
ND
6.2J
ND
14J
31J
1.2J
16J
ND
EX-02
Excavation
Pit
ND
ND
ND
49J
ND
6.9
58
4.6
59
ND
EX-03
Excavation
Pit
ND
ND
0.01
ND
24J
3.6
8.1
0.28J
4
ND
EX-03d
Excavation
Pit
ND
ND
ND
30J
ND
11
25
11
ND
2.6J
EX-04
Excavation
Pit
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.28J
2B
ND
1.4
ND
reported results.
lunlicate oir matrix snike.
GERAGHTY & MII.1.1*. I N C ' 
O
CD
Cr-
CD
Table C-17. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Split Soil Samples Collected from September 12 to 15, 1988
during Texaco Tank Excavation, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
C 
Split samples were collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) 
personnel during Texaco tank excavation soil sampling activities.
o 
Source: 
Camp Dresser & Mckee (CDM 
1989b)
Page 2 of 2
Sample:
Location:
Analyte
Acetone
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
4-M ethy 1-2-pentanone
2-Hexanone
Toluene
Xylene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
2-Butanone
SP-1T
Soil
Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.72J
ND
0.99
ND
SP-2T
Soil
Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.72J
ND
0.92
ND
SP-3T
Soil
Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
17J
0.67J
5.6
ND
3.2
ND
SP-3DT
Duplicate
ofSP-3T
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.8
ND
1.9
ND
1.4
ND
SP-2M
4.5J
ND
ND
ND
7.9J
0.52J
1.7
ND
1.4
ND
SP-3DM
Duplicate
ofSP-2M*
ND
ND
ND
ND
12J
0.28J
1.3
ND
1.7
ND
SP-4T
Soil Pile
Trip Blank
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.24J
1.9
ND
1.3
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
J 
Estimated value.
B 
No explanation in
ND 
Not detected.
* 
Samnle mnv tv>. a <
reported results.
Innliratp nr mntriT snilrp..
GERAGHTY & Mil ,1 I H. INC' 
O
Table C-18. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Samples Collected by Camp, Dresser &.
McKee Corporation from September 12 to IS, 1988 During Texaco Service Station Tank Excavation,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte 
Sample I.D.: 
PW-02
Location: 
Excavation Pit
Pumped Water
Xylene 
0.002J
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
No tentatively identified compounds (TICs) reported in Sample PW-02.
Sample analyzed using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Contract Laboratory Program (USEPA CLP)
methodology.
J 
Estimated value.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1989b).
t:\iFnpcl\uu\PfUIOI 3 A34VTEXACO] JCL
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
Table C-19. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in QA/QC Samples Collected from September 12 to IS, 1988 During the Texaco Service Station
Tank Excavation, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample I. D.:
Analyte
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
Bromoform
Xylene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
TFB-01
Field
Blank
ND
0.005J
ND
0.006
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TFB-02
Field
Blank
ND
0.005J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01
0.024J
0.034B
TFB-03
Field
Blank
0.004J
0.013
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SP-FB-59
Field
Blank
ND
0.012
ND
0.002J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SP-T-60
Trip
Blank
ND
0.01
ND
0.002J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SP-T-61
Trip
Blank
ND
0.026J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
648-WB
Water
Blank
ND
0.005J
0.008
ND
0.006
0.008
0.01
ND
ND
ND
Water blank concentration in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
No tentatively identified compounds (TICs) reported in
J 
Estimated value.
B 
No explanation in reported results.
ND 
Not detected.
QA/QC 
Quality assurance/quality control.
the blank samples.
Source: 
Camp Dresser & Mckee (COM 1989b).
00
"vj
GERAGHTYtf MILLIiU. IN(
Table C-20. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Oil Samples Collected on June 8, 1989 at the Texaco Service Station,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Ui
co
Sample ID:
Sample Location:
Analyte 
Sample Type:
Methylene chloride
Acetone
2-Hexanone
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
eT-02-Ola
OilAVater
Separator
Oil
ND
ND
ND
ND
340 J
190 J
1600 J
ND
ND
eT-02-02a
Middle Bay
Collection Pit
Oil
ND
ND
ND
7J
76 J
35 J
190 J
ND
ND
eT-02-03a*
Waste Oil
Drum
Oil
R
2.4 JR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
eT-02-04a
Waste Oil
Drum
Oil
ND
ND
59 J
46 J
490 J
140 J
900J
ND
ND
eT-02-OSa
Waste Oil
Drum
Oil
ND
ND
ND
11 J
130 J
49 J
330 J
ND
ND
eT-02-06a
Waste Oil
Drum
Oil
ND
ND
ND
4J
110J
61 J
88 J
3.9 J
ND
eT-02-07a
Waste Oil
Drum
Oil
3.8J
ND
ND
ND
24 J
13 J
120 J
ND
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (rug/kg).
Samples analyzed using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Contract Laboratory Program (USEPA-CLP) methodology.
Samples collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) personnel.
Samples analyzed by Versar, Inc.
J 
Estimated values.
* 
Sample mistakenly analyzed as water by the laboratory.
ND 
Not detected.
R 
Sample analysis rejected.
Holding times exceeded for all samples.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1990a).
GERAGHTYfl'MIU.I-R.INC.
o
Table C-21. Summary of Analytical Results for Split Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to
10, 1989 from Texaco Soil Pile, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin
Islands.
Sample Location: 
Texaco service station soil pile generated during tank excavation.
Samples collected after on-site soil ventilation procedure.
Sample Type:
Split soil samples from ventilated soils. Grab samples were collected from
the top, middle, and bottom section of each sampling location for VOAs
analysis. Composite samples for other analysis were prepared from the
top, middle, and bottom section of the soil pile at each location.
Samplers:
Camp, Dresser & McKee Federal Programs Corporation personnel. Other
personnel involved were not mentioned.
Analytical
Results:
Source:
VOAs
PCBs
EP
Methylene chloride was found in soil samples and in the laboratory blank.
The letter does not specify which samples.
Sample SP2-022 from the middle section of location SP-3 contained
chlorinated 
hydrocarbons and 
xylenes. 
Tentatively 
identified
hydrocarbons were detected in semivolatile analyses at this location.
No pesticides or PCBs were found in these samples.
Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) were detected in all split samples.
TPH concentrations ranged from < 10 to 91 micrograms per gram (ug/g).
Metals detected by EP Toxicity were cadmium from 0.35 to 2.8
micrograms per liter ug/L, and lead from 1.8 to 31 ug/L.
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1990b).
Volatile organic analyte.
Polychlorinated biphenyls.
Extraction procedure.
t:\aproJKt\bm\PR0013.a34\diU\Teuco5.WP
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
GO5 
G872
Table C-22. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds and Tentatively Identified Compounds in Soil Samples Collected
on September 13, 1988 at Tillett Gardens, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Sample Location:
Analyte 
Sample Type:
eTT-14
Paint Cleaning
Drain
Soil
eTT-15
Paint Cleaning
Drain
Soil
VOCs
Xylene (total) 
0.011J 
ND
Tentatively Identified VOCs
2-Ethyl-l,3-dimethylbenzene 
0.30 JN 
2 JN
l-Ethyl-2,3-dimethylbenzene 
UN 
3 JN
Acetic acid (methylester) 
ND 
0.03 JN
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (rag/kg).
J 
Estimated value.
N 
Presumptive evidence of the presence of the analyte.
ND 
Not detected.
VOCs 
Volatile organic compounds.
Samples collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (COM) personnel.
eTT-14 surface sample collected at the foot of the concrete drainway at beginning of gravel pit.
eTT-15 drainline location inside fence line collected from the 2-foot drainpipe where it exits the building.
Samples were analyzed for VOCs by using the method specified in the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)
Statement of Work (SOW).
Source: 
Camp, Dresser and McKee, Federal Programs Corporations (1989a).
TUT
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
Table C-23. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Oil Samples Collected on August 17, 1987,
at Esso Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID: 
3239B-22
Analyte 
Sample Location: 
Oil/Water Separator
Benzene 
59
Toluene 
970
Ethylbenzene 
200
Total Xylenes 
1,200
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 
58
Tetrachloroethene 
110
Analyte concentrations for oil in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Only detected compounds are reported.
Samples collected by Weston/SPER Division Region n Technical Assistance Team (TAT) of New Jersey,
and St. Thomas Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) personnel.
Samples collected on August 17, 1987 and received in S-Cubed Laboratories of San Diego, California
on September 15, 1987.
Holding time for sample was exceeded.
Source: 
Weston/SPER Division Region II, TAT (1988b).
GERAGHTYe? MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
°874
Table C-24. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Oil Samples Collected on September 12, 1988
at Esso Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Sample Location:
Analyte 
Sample Type:
Methylene chloride
2-Butanone
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
eE-63
Holding Tank
Oil
ND
ND
ND
1,800
230
1,600
ND
ND
eE-64
Oil/Water Separator
Oil
57
62
29
2,900 *
4,500 *
1,900 *
100
65
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
* 
Value from analysis of a diluted aliquot of this sample.
ND 
Not detected.
Samples collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) personnel.
Samples analyzed by Cenref Laboratories in Brighton, Colorado.
Source:
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1989a).
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUT
OS 7 5
Table C-25. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Report for Esso Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Site Data
Site:
Report:
Site Reconnaissance Date:
Site Information:
UST Location Record
of Tank Leaks:
Disposal Procedures:
Areas of Concern:
Potential Sources to Soil
and/or Groundwater
Identified:
Sampling of Areas
of Concern:
Sample Results:
Esso Service Station.
Preliminary Assessment Report for Tutu Esso, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, NUS Corporation, March 24, 1989.
No indication on the report.
No RCRA permit. Active status. Operation: 1969 to present.
Waste oil UST installed in 1969. This UST is located below a tire rack inside the maintenance garage. Volume of tank unknown.
Waste oil UST contains waste oil generated from automotive repairs and servicing operations. Solvents and cleaners are not stored
in the tanks according to information provided by an Esso manager during site reconnaissance. No records of incidental spills or
dumping on-site. No indication of tank leaking.
Tanks are periodically emptied by Esso Corporation and the waste is shipped off St. Thomas for disposal, according to information
provided by Esso station manager during site reconnaissance.
Waste oil UST:
* No RCRA permit.
* Unknown volume.
* Installed in 1969.
* UST contains waste oil from automotive services.
* No records of incidental spills or tank leakage.
UST for gasoline suspected of leaking.
Potential of groundwater contamination.
* Waste oil is containerized in a UST.
* No evidence of spills or releases to the environment were observed by NUS Corporation during site reconnaissance.
Waste oil samples from UST collected by Belgedere Associates, Inc. and analyzed by Cenref Laboratories, Brighton, Colorado,
according to report.
Toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes were detected in waste oil samples.
RCRA 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
UST 
Underground storage tank.
Source: 
NUS Corporation, Region II FIT (1989f)
o
Table C-26. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds and Tentatively Identified Compounds in Oil Samples Collected on June 8, 1989
at Esso Service Station, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Sample Location:
Analyte 
Sample Type:
Volatile Organic Compounds
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethane
Tentatively Identified Compounds
1 ,2,3-Trimethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
3-Methylpentane
2-Methoxy-2-Methylpropane
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram
J 
Estimated value.
eE-02-Ola
Holding Tank
Oil
12 J
91 J
32 J
28 J
25J
30 J
140 JN
16 JN
7.9 JN
25 JN
(mg/kg).
eE-02-02-a
Oil/Water
Separator
Oil
ND
57 J
19 J
150 J
42 J
63 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
eE-02-03a
(eE-02-02a
Duplicate)
Oil
ND
92 J
ND
230 J
ND
91 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
N 
Presumptive evidence of the presence of the analyte.
q 
ND 
Not detected.
Samples collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) personnel.
Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) sample analysis by Versar, Inc.
CD
Source:
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1990a).
i:\qirajectMlM\pf0013.034\d<u\«793AJ(LS
GERAGHTY (!* MIU.rR. IN(
Table C-27. 
Concenlntioiu of Volatile Organic Compound! in Soil Samplei Collected by Soil Tech in June 1989 from the Esso Tank Excavation Pit Area, Tutu Welli Site, St. Thomat,
U.S. Virgin Itlandi.
Analyte
Sample ID: 
TP-1 TP-2 TP-3 TP-4 TP-5 TP-5A 
TP-6 TP-7 TP-8 
TP-9 
TP-10 TP-IOA 
TP-10RE 
TP-11 TP-12 TP
Replicate
Acetone
2-Butanone
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.6E
ND
0.4 BJ
0.23 J
5.2
2.1
31 E
0.014
ND
0.002 J
ND
0.005 J
ND
ND
3.6 B
1.1
ND
7
ND
ND
4.4 B
0.87
ND
14
ND
ND
19 BJ
23J
180
55
540
0.029
ND
ND
ND
0.005 J
0.30 E
ND
ND
0.093
ND
0.52
0.22
0.005 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0051
0.003 J
ND
0.009
ND
0.053
0.004 J
0.013
ND
0.016
ND
0.032
ND
0.009
ND
0.014
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.11
0.004)
ND
ND
ND
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
B
E
J
ND
Analyte found in the method blank. The reported results have been adjusted for the quantity found in the blank.
The reported concentration is an estimate only. The response factor was assumed to be 1.000 relative to an internal standard.
Estimated concentration below the method detection limit.
Not detected.
Source:
Soil Tech Corporation (1990s).
i:\aprajectMu\PROOI3.014\VOLATENI J(U
TUT 
OO'5 OS 78
GERAGHTY^MIU.I-K.INC
Page 1 of 2
Table C-28. Concentrations of Base Neutral and Acid Extrectable Organic Compounds in Soil Samples Collected by Soil Tech in June 1989 from the
Esso Tank Excavation Pit Area, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Analyte
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Diethylphthalate
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Di-n-butylphthalate
Butylbenzylphthalate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per
E 
The reported concentration
TP-1 
TP-2
ND
0.11 
J 
0
ND
ND
ND 
0
ND 
0
ND
ND
ND
0.069 BJ
ND
0.28 
BJ
kilogram (mg/kg).
is an estimate only.
ND
.68 J
ND
ND
.18J
.12J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
The
J 
Estimated concentration below the method detection
B 
Analyte found in method blank. The reported
ND 
Not detected.
DL 
Diluted.
NA 
Not available.
TP-3
3.2 J
45 E
0.4 J
ND
1.4
1.1
0.13 
J
0.12J
0.21 
J
ND
ND
0.4 BJ
response factor was
limit.
results have been adjusted
TP-3DL
49
45
ND
ND
1.6J
1.2 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
assumed to be 1
for the quantity
TP-4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
.000 relative
found in the
TP-4DUP
(Duplicate)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
to an internal
blank.
TP-5
9
9.6
ND
ND
ND
0.37 
J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.11 
BJ
standard.
TP-5A
7.9
11
ND
0.13 J
0.69 J
0.47 
J
ND
ND
0.09 
J
0.2 J
1
0.26 
BJ
TP-6
45 E
47 E
ND
ND
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
NA
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
i:\iprojoclMuhiMHOOI 3 OM^U \BAJNEUAE.XLS
TUT 
CO5 
OS79
GERAGHTY<^MIU I R.IN(
o
Page 2 of 2
Table C-28. Concentrations of Base Neutral and Acid Extractable Organic Compounds in Soil Samples Collected by Soil Tech in June 1989 from the
Esso Tank Excavation Pit Area, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Analyte
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Diethylphthalate
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Di-n-butylphthalate
Butylbenzylphthalate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per
E 
The reported concentration
TP-6DL
55
47
ND
ND
2J
1.5J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
kilogram (mg/kg).
is an estimate only
TP-7
0.3 J
1.1
ND
ND
0.29 J
0.16J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TP-8
1.1
2
ND
ND
0.29 J
0.18J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. The response factor was
TP-9
ND
0.14J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TP-10
0.19J
0.18 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.063 BJ 
0.094 BJ
ND
ND
assumed to be 1.000 relative
0.31 J
0.36 J
to an internal
TP-10A
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.13BJ
standard.
TP-11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J 
Estimated concentration below the method detection limit.
B 
Analyte found in method blank. The reported
ND 
Not detected.
DL 
Diluted.
NA 
Not available.
results have been adjusted for the quantity found in the blank.
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
I \«pnj^\luw\PROOI3 OMN<i.U\BAJNEUAE.XLS
TUT 
OO5 
0880
GERAGHTY & Mil .1.1 R. INC
Table C-29. 
Concentrations of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Samples Collected in June 1989 from the Esso
Tank Excavation Pit Area, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample I.D. 
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
TP-1 
ND
TP-2 
15
TP-3 
40
TP-4 
ND
TP-5 
10
TP-5A 
11
TP-6 
40
TP-7 
6
TP-8 
23
TP-9 
7
TP-10 
ND
TP-10A 
ND
TP-11 
ND
TP-12 
9
TP-13 
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Samples analyzed by Soil Tech Corporation.
ND 
Not detected.
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
GERAGHTY<P MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 °881
Table C-30. Concentrations of Metals in Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 from the Esso Tank Excavation Pit Area, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas,
U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID: TP-1 TP-2 
TP-3
Analyte
TP-5 
TP-5A 
TP-6 TP-7 
TP-8 
TP-9 TP-10 TP-10A TP-H TP-12 TP
Lead
Arsenic
Chromium
Selenium
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
0.0002 
ND 
ND 
ND 
0.0001 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
ND 
Not detected.
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
(:\«f*<^\n*u\PROOI 3.034Uiu\mORANL2.XLS
TUT 
O05 
O8S2
CiERAGHTY^MII.I.l-R.INC.
Page 1 of 2
Table C-31. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compoundi in Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to June 10, 1989 from the Eiio Tank Excavation Soil Pile, Tutu Welli Site,
St. Thomai, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Sample ID: 
SP-l-Top
Location: 
Top of
Soil Pile
Methylene chloride 
0.003 J
Acetone
2-Butanone
Vinyl acetate
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene (total)
0.006 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.046
SP-l-Mid
Middle of
Soil Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SP-l-Bot
Bottom of
Soil Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.027
0.14
SP-2-Top
Top of
Soil Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.028
0.92 E
SP-2-Mid 
SP-2-Bot 
SP-3-Top
Middle of 
Bottom of 
Top of
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND
3.2 B 
ND 
3.8 B
ND 
ND 
0.21 J
0.033 J 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
1.6
0.83 
ND 
1.4
16 
0.58 
20
SP-3-Mid 
SP-3-Bot 
SP-4-Top 
SP-4-DU-T
Middle of 
Bottom of 
Top of 
Top of
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile
(Duplicate)
0.004 J 
ND 
ND 
ND
0.007 J 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
0.0031 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
0.003 J 
ND 
ND
0.073 
0.14 
ND 
ND
SP-4-Mid
Middle of
Soil Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram! (mg/kg).
ND
J
B
Not detected.
Estimated concentration below method detection limit.
Analyte found in method blank. Reported result! have been adjusted for the quantity found in the blank.
The reported concentration is an estimate only. The response factor was assumed to be 1.000 relative to an internal standard.
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
f:\aproieaUuuVPROOI 3 OHV1.U\SPVOLORC.XLS
TUT 
OO5 
OS83
GHRAGFITYfl'MIU.I'R.INC
o
Pige2of2
Table C-31. 
Concentntiom of Volatile Organic Compoundi in Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to June 10, 1989 from the Euo Tank Excavation Soil Pile, Tutu Wella Site,
St. Thomai, U.S. Virgin Iilandi.
Analyte
Methylene chloride
Acetone
2-Butanone
Vinyl acetate
Benzene
Toluene
Elhylbenzene
Xylene (total)
Sample ID: 
SP-4-DU-M
Location: 
Middle of
Soil Pile
(Duplicate)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Analyte concenlrationi in milligrami per kilograms
ND
J
B
E
Not detected.
SP-4
Bottom of
Soil Pile
ND
0.005 J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(mg/kg).
SP-4-DU-B
Bottom of
Soil Pile
(Duplicate)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SP-5-Top
Top of
Soil Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SP-5-Mid
Middle of
Soil Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.046
SP-5-Bot
Bottom of
Soil Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SP-6-Top 
SP-6Mid
Top of 
Middle of
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
ND 
ND
SP-6-Bot 
SP-7-Top 
SP-7-Mid 
SP-7-Bot
Bottom of 
Top of 
Middle of 
Bottom of
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile 
Soil Pile
ND 
ND 
0.003 1 
0.001 1
ND 
ND 
0.056 
0.0091
ND 
2.9 B 
0.0061 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
0.009 
7 
ND 
0.072
Estimated concentration below method detection limit.
Analyte found in method blank. Reported results have been adjusted for the
The reported concentration is an estimate only. The response
quantity found in the blank.
factor was assumed to be 1 .000 relative to aninternal standard.
Source :
Soil Tech Corporation ( 1 990a) .
TUT 
005 
0884
GERAGMTY C* Mil .1.1 -R. INC
CO
CO
Table C-32. 
Concentrations of Base Neutral and Acid Extractable Compounds in Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 from the
Esso Tank Excavation Soil Pile, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample I
Analyte 
Location
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Di-n-butylphthalate
bis-(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Analyte concentration in milligrams per
Analyses were performed by Datachem
.D.: 
SP-1
: 
Soil Pile
ND
0.1 8J
0.1 6J
0.1 5J
0.048BJ
0.16BJ
kilogram (mg/kg).
of Salt Lake City, Utah
SP-2
Soil Pile
2.6
5.2
0.33J
0.23J
ND
0.13BJ
SP-3
Soil Pile
0.32J
1.7
0.26J
0.22J
ND
0.1 1BJ
SP-4
Soil Pile
ND
0.085J
ND
ND
0.098BJ
0.1 3BJ
SP-4
Dup
ND
0.082J
ND
ND
0.1 BJ
ND
SP-5
Soil Pile
0.16J
0.81
0.16J
0.12J
0.04SBJ
ND
SP-6
Soil Pile
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
J 
Estimated concentration below the method detection limit.
B 
Analyte found in the method blank. Reported
Dup 
Duplicate.
ND 
Not detected.
results have been adjusted for the quantity found in the blank.
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
GERAGHTY^MII.1.1 K.INC 
O
Table C-33. 
Concentrations of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 from the Esso Tank Excavation Soil Pile,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Sample I.D.: 
SP-1 SP-2 SP-3
SP-4 
SP-4-Dup 
SP-5
SP-6
SP-7
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
18
24
21
20
14
19
12
12
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Analyses were performed by Datachem of Salt Lake City, Utah.
Dup
Duplicate.
H
CO
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
|T\«proJect\tulii\PROOI3.034UM.\ESSO4.XL
GERAGUTY^MII.I 1 R . I N (
CO
CO
Nj
Table C-34. Concentrations of Metals in Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 from the Esso Tank Excavation Soil Pile, Tutu Wells Site,
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte 
Sample I.D.
SP-1
SP-2
SP-3
SP-4
SP-4-Dup
SP-5
SP-6
SP-7
Lead
Arsenic
Chromium
Selenium
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Analyte concentrations in micrograms per kilogram (mg/kg).
Analyses were performed by Datachem of Salt Lake City, Utah.
ND
Dup
Not detected.
Duplicate.
Source:
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
M>ROOI J 0)4Vi«u\ESSO].XL
GERAGHTYPMIU I R.INf
QG
CO
CO
Table C-3S. 
Results of Ignitability Analysis of Soil Samples Collected from the June 5 to 10, 1989 from Esso Tank Excavation Soil Pile,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Ignitability
(oC)
Ignitability
(Torch)
Sample I. D.:
SP-1 
SP-2 SP-3 SP-4 SP-4-Dup 
SP-5
>60 
>60 
>60 
>60 
>60 
>60
N-I 
N-I 
N-I 
N-I 
N-I 
N-I
SP-6 
SP-7
>60 
>60
N-I 
N-I
Analyses were performed by Datachem of Salt Lake City, Utah.
Flashpoint >60 degrees Celsius (oC) defines sample as nonignitable.
N-I
Dup
Nonignitable when tested with torch.
Duplicate.
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
t:\tpmfra\ntu\rHOO\ 3.034VkUVESSO«.XL
C.F.RACiHTY^MIU.I R.INC
Table C-36. 
Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 During Esso Tank Excavation, Tutu
Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Sample I.D.:
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
2-Butanone
Vinyl acetate
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Total Xylenes
DW-1
ND
190B
ND
ND
ND
3.5J
ND
ND
ND
FB-1
0.009J
0.26E
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FB-2
ND
0.015
0.018
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FB-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TB6-8-89
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
TB6-9-89 
TB6-10-89
ND
0.017
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T-E-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.8
3.5
1.8
5.0
WB-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
Analyses were performed by Datachem of Salt Lake City, Utah.
J
B
E
DW
FB
TB
T-E-1
WB
ND
Estimated concentration below the method detection limit.
Analyte found in the method blank. Reported results have been adjusted for the quantity found in the blank.
Reported concentration is an estimate only. The response factor was assumed to be 1.000 relative to an internal
standard.
Water sample from decontamination
Field blank.
waters.
Trip blank.
Sample collected from a 55-gallon drum that was
Water blank from deionized water.
Not detected.
used to store liquid residues pumped out from tanks at the site.
Source:
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
CO
CO
•-o
f:\aproieclUuni\PR0013.0MUiu\ESSO7 J(L
GERAGHTY^MII.I I R.IN(
CO
•-0
Table C-37. 
Concentrations of Base Neutral and Acid Extractable Compounds in Water Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 During Esso Tank Excavation,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte 
Sample I. D.: 
DW-1
Phenol 
0.02
Benzyl alcohol 
0.041
2- Methylphenol 
ND
4-Methylphenol 
ND
Naphthalene 
0.067
2-Methylnaphtalene 
0.031
Fluorene 
0.004J
Phenanthrene 
O.OOSJ
Pyrene 
ND
bis-2-Ethylhexylphthalate 
0.084
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L)
FB-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FB-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FB-3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
WB-1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
WB-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
T-E-1
0.15
ND
0.028
0.036
0.67E
0.44E
0.015
0.009J
ND
0.046
TE-l-DL
0.13
ND
ND
ND
0.72
0.39
0.02J
0.012J
O.OOSJ
0.049
Analyses were performed by Datachem of Salt Lake City, Utah.
E 
Reported concentration is an estimate only. The reponse
J 
Estimated concentration below the method detection limit
factor
.
was assumed to be 1 .000 relative to an internal standard.
DW 
Water sample from decontamination waters.
FB 
Field blank.
WB 
Water blank from deionized water.
T-E-1 
Sample collected from a 55-gallon
DL 
Diluted sample.
ND 
Not detected.
drum that was used to store liquid residues pumped out from tanks at the site.
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
GERAGHTY & Mll.l.hR. IN('
r_n
CD
••0
Table C-38. 
Concentrations of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Water Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 During Esso Tank Excavation, Tutu
Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte 
Sample I.D.: 
DW-1 FB-1 FB-2 FB-3 WB-1 
WB-2
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 
39 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND 
ND
T-E-1
7.5
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
Analyses were performed by Datachem of Salt Lake City, Utah.
ND 
Not detected.
DW 
Water sample from decontamination waters.
FB 
Field blank.
WB 
Water blank from deionized water.
T-E-1 
Sample collected from a 55-gallon drum that was used to store liquid residues pumped out from tanks at the site.
Source: 
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
,:\.pro)eel\lv«u\P*OOI 3.0W\d.u\ESSOI 1 .XL
G H R A G H I Y ^ M I I .l.HR.INC
Ol
Table C-39. 
Results of Ignitability Analysis of Water Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989 During Esso Tank Excavation, Tutu Wells Site,
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Sample I.D. 
DW-1
FB-1
FB-2
FB-3
WB-1
WB-2
T-E-1
Ignitability
c-Degree
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
>60
Flashpoint > 60 degrees Celsius defines sample as nonignitable.
Analyses were performed by Datachem of Salt Lake City, Utah.
DW 
Water sample from decontamination waters.
FB 
Field blank.
WB 
Water blank from deionized water.
T-E-1 
Sample collected from a 55-gallon drum that was used to store liquid residues pumped out from tanks at the site.
Source:
Soil Tech Corporation (1990a).
I \«proiec<'Mu\PRW13.0W\d.u\ESSOI2.XL
GERAGHTY^MII.I I;R.INC
Table C-40. Summary of Analytical Results for Split Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989
from Esso Tank Excavation Pit, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample Location:
Sample Type:
Samplers:
Analytical
Results:
Esso service station tank excavation pit.
Split samples from seven of the 13 sampling locations.
Soil Tech Corporation and Camp, Dresser & McKee Federal Programs
Corporation personnel.
Xylene and ethylbenzene were detected in all samples except one.
Benzene was detected in four samples.
Toluene was detected in two samples.
The highest combined concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and
xylene were detected in sample TE-X-03 at 311 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Several tentatively identified benzenes were detected in various samples.
Chlorobenzene was detected in sample TE-X-05 at a concentration of 0.008
mg/kg.
Semivolatiles detected included naphthalene, methylnaphthalenes, fluorene,
phenanthrene, bis-2-ethylhexylphthalate, and benzene isomers.
No pesticides or polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were detected.
Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) were detected in all samples. 
The
concentration of TPH in sample TE-X-03 was 2,550 micrograms per gram (ug/g).
TPH concentrations in other samples ranged from < 10 to 69 ug/g.
Barium, cadmium, and lead were detected in most of the samples.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) Federal Programs Corporation (1990b).
(:\aptoiect\limi\PR0013.034\<teU\ESSO13.Wt>
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
On5 
O893
Table C-41. 
Summary of Analytical Results for Split Soil Samples Collected from June 5 to 10, 1989
from Esso Soil Pile, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample Location: 
Esso service station soil pile generated from tank excavation procedures. Samples
collected prior to soil ventilation procedures.
Sample Type: 
Split samples from three of the seven sampling locations. Grab samples were
collected from the top, middle, and bottom sections of the soil pile at each
location for volatile organic analyses. Composite samples for other analyses were
collected from the top, middle, and bottom sections of the soil pile at each
location.
Samplers: 
Soil Tech Corporation and Camp, Dresser & McKee Federal Programs
Corporation personnel.
Analytical
Results: 
High concentrations of xylenes and ethylbenzene were detected in all samples
except one.
Toluene was detected in two samples.
Tentatively identified compounds for hydrocarbons and benzenes were detected
in all samples.
Semivolatile compounds detected 
in all 
samples 
were 
naphthalene,
methylnaphthalene, fluorene, phenanthrene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and
benzene isomers.
No pesticides or poly chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were detected in the samples.
Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) ranged from 48 to 139 micrograms per
gram (ug/g).
Barium, cadmium, and lead were detected in all samples.
Arsenic was detected in one sample.
Source: 
Camp, Dresser & McKee (COM) Federal Programs Corporation (1990b).
(:\aprajectMulu\PROOI3.034\dM«\Euol4.WP
I UT 
OOL-i 
OQQ
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
av
Table C-42. Concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Samples Collected on September 8, 1988 and June S, 1989 at O'Henri Cleaners,
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
e-01 
e02-01*
Sample Location: 
Area Near 
Area Southeast
Fuel Tank 
of Fuel Tank
Sample Depth (bis):
Analyte 
Sample Date:
Tetrachloroe thane
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Trichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/Kg).
bis 
Below land surface.
Not analyzed or not detected. No clear indication
NA 
Not available.
in 
Inches.
NA 
6-15 in.
9-8-88 
6-5-89
440
-
-
-
from available data.
e02-02*
Area Southeast
of Fuel Tank
15-24 in.
6-5-89
.
0.02
0.075
180.00
e02-03*
Area Southeast
of Fuel Tank
NA
6-5-89
-
-
-
* 
Base neutral and acid extractable compounds (BNAs), pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), and metals were also sampled, but no results were available.
Samples collected by Camp, Dresser & McKee (CDM) personnel.
A total of three soil samples was collected from an area of discarded filters from the dry cleaning process on June 5, 1989. Samples were identified
as e02-01, e02-02, and e02-03 according to CDM personnel field notes. Samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs),
BNAs, pesticides, PCBs, and metals (Camp, Dresser & McKee 1990b).
f:\iproject\tutu\pr0013.034Uata\61493tbxb
CO
•-0
GHRACJHTY^MIl.l.l-K.INC
Table C-43. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Report for O'Henri Cleaners, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Site Data
Site:
Report:
Site Reconnaissance Date:
Site Information:
UST Location Record
of Tank Leaks:
Disposal Procedures:
Areas of Concern:
Potential Sources to Soil
and/or Groundwater
Identified:
Sampling of Areas
of Concern:
Sample Results:
O'Henry Dry Cleaners.
Preliminary Site Assessment Report, O'Henry, Inc., St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, Pedro Panzardi & Associates, October 1989.
Not available.
Dry cleaning operation:
* One dry cleaning unit.
* One industrial size washing machine and dryer.
Operation started January 2, 1982.
Historical purchases of PCE: 17 to 20 drums per year (1.5 to 1.75 gallons per month).
No UST at this site.
Dry cleaning unit filters, PCE sludge and lint have been disposed at a local dumping site. Total amount of PCE disposed does not
exceed 22 gallons per year. At the time of the site reconnaissance and sampling activity, arrangements were made for disposal of
PCE at a Safety Kleen facility in Puerto Rico.
Reported disposition of PCE residue on-site by an operator. Approximately 36 ft u2 area with a lot of lint residues. In June 1989, soil
samples were collected from this area by an inspector. After the inspection, O'Henri removed topsoil and stored it in two containers.
No indication of inspector name, sample location, analysis, or laboratory in the report.
Pedro Panzardi personnel collected two composite samples on August 23, 1989 (one from each container).
Potential of soil and groundwater contamination. Pedro Panzardi proposed soil borings at different locations on the O'Henry
to property to collect soil samples for PCE analysis.
Composite samples were collected from two containers that were filled with excavated topsoil. Sampling date: August 23, 1989.
Sample ID: Station ffl and Station #2. Samples analyzed for PCE by EQ Lab of Puerto Rico.
Station #1: PCE<0.03ppm. Station #2: PCE <0.03 ppm.
IT:
PCE
O 
UST
-0 
PPm
& 
ft u2
Tetrachloroethene.
Underground storage tank.
Parts per million.
Square feet.
Source: 
Pedro Panzardi & Associates, Inc. (1989).
( J K R A C J U I Y ^ M I I . I . I R . I N C
Page 1 of 6
Table C-44. 
Concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes in Soil Samples Collected from the Rodriguez Esso Service Station
from May 22 to 24, 1990, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Depth:
B-l
(0-2)
B-l
(2-4)
B-l
(4-6)
B-2
(0-2)
B-2
(2-4)
B-2
(4-6)
B-2
(6-8)
B-2
(8-10)
B-2
(10-12)
(ft bis)
Sample Location: 22-May-90 
22-May-90 
22-May-90
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90
Analyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes (total)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.78
0.37
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
0.26
56.71
5.95
34.81
See footnotes on last page.
CO
•-C
'xj
g:\iproject\tutu\PROO 13 034\daU\cssosoil.xls
GERAGHTY^MIU.! IMNC
Page 2 of 6
Table C-44. 
Concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes in Soil Samples Collected from the Rodriguez Esso Service Station
from May 22 to 24, 1990, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Depth:
B-2
(12-14)
B-2
(14-16)
B-2
(16-18)
B-2
(18-20)
B-2
(25-27)
B-3
(0-2)
B-3
(2-4)
B-3
(4-6)
B-3
(6-8)
(ft bis)
Sample Location: 24-May-90
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90
Analyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes (total)
ND
4.2
0.80
5.48
ND
8.8
1.27
7.74
ND
0.18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
See footnotes on last page.
cH
i
•-C
CD
g:\iproject\tutu\PROOI3034\daU\essosoil.xli
GER ACUITY Ml I.I .lilt. INC.
o
Page 3 of 6
Table C-44. 
Concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes in Soil Samples Collected from the Rodriguez Esso Service Station
from May 22 to 24, 1990, 
Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. 
Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Depth:
B-3
(8-10)
B-3
(10-12)
B-3
(12-14)
B-3
(14-16)
B-3
(16-18)
B-3
(18-20)
B-3
(20-22)
B-3
(22-24)
B-4
(0-2)
(ft bis)
Sample Location: 24-May-90
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90
Analyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes (total)
NR
NR
NR
NR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
NR
NR
NR
NR
ND
ND
ND
ND
See footnotes on last page.
g:\aproject\Uitu\PROO 13.034\data\essosoil.xls
GF.RAGH1 Y^MII.I.I K IN(
Page 4 of 6
Table C-44. 
Concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes in Soil Samples Collected from the Rodriguez Esso Service Station
from May 22 to 24, 1990, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Depth:
B-4
(2-4)
B-4
(4-6)
B-4
(6-8)
B-4
(8-10)
B-4
(10-12)
B-4
(12-14)
B-4
(14-16)
B-4
(16-18)
B-4
(20-22)
(ft bis)
Sample Location: 24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90 
24-May-90
Analyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes (total)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.23
1.42
ND
0.81
ND
0.94
ND
0.76
2.13
44.75
7.15
40.71
ND
0.71
ND
1.33
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
See footnotes on last page.
-0
g:*projec1\tutu\PROOI 3.034\dati\essosoil.xls
GERAGHTY^MII.I I R.INC
Page 5 of 6
Table C-44. 
Concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes in Soil Samples Collected from the Rodriguez Esso Service Station
from May 22 to 24, 1990, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample ID:
Depth:
B-4
(25-26.5)
B-5
(0-2)
B-5
(2-4)
B-5
(4-6)
B-5
(6-8)
B-5
(8-10)
B-5
(10-12)
B-5
(12-14)
B-5
(14-16)
(ft bis)
Sample Location: 24-May-90 
23-May-90 
23-May-90 
23-May-90 
23-May-90 
23-May-90 
23-May-90 
23-May-90 
23-May-90
Analyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes (total)
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.0
ND
ND
0.23
ND
ND
ND
0.29
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
0.23*
See footnotes on last page.
g:\aprojec1\tiitii\PROO 13.034\daU\essosoil.xls
GERAGHTYf-fMim-K.INC
Table C-44. 
Concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes in Soil Samples Collected from the Rodriguez Esso Service Station
from May 22 to 24, 1990, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Sample ID: 
B-5 
B-5 
B-6 
B-6 
B-6
Depth: 
(20-22) 
(22-27) 
(0-2) (2-4) (4-6)
(ft bis)
Sample Location: 23-May-90 
23-May-90 
22-May-90 
22-May-90 
22-May-90
B-6
(6-8)
B-6
(10-12)
B-6
(15-17)
Page 6 of 6
B-6
(20-25)
22-May-90 
22-May-90 
22-May-90 
22-May-90
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes (total)
ND*
ND*
ND*
0.29*
ND*
ND*
ND*
0.24*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
ND*
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
ft bis 
Feet below land surface.
ND 
Not detected. Below lower limit of detection.
NR 
No recovery.
* 
Sample collected below water table and results are a combination of soil and groundwater concentrations.
Lower limit of detection is 0.010 mg/kg.
Source:
Soil Tech. Corp. 1990a.
g:\iproject\tutu\PROO 13.034\d*U^essosoil. xls
CiERAGMTY^MIU.I-R.lNC
Table C-45. Concentrations of Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes in Soil Samples Collected
from the Rodriguez Esso Service Station on July 9, 1990, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas,
U.S. Virgin Islands.
Analyte
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes (total)
Sample ID: 
MW-2
Date: 
9-M-90
8.66
5.60
1.65
8.83
MW-3
9-Jul-90
ND
ND
ND
ND
Mw-4
9-Jul-90
9.23
36.51
1.30
8.57
MW-5
9-Jul-90
ND
ND
ND
ND
MW-6
9-Jul-90
ND
ND
ND
ND
Analyte concentrations in milligrams per liter (mg/L).
ND 
Not detected, below lower limit of detection.
Source: 
Soil Tech. Corp. 1990a.
g:\»projecMutu\PROO 13.034\d»Ia\T ABCBTEX.XLS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
""" 
°°5 
O9°3
APPENDIX D
SAMPLE/CORING LOGS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
GERAGHTY^ MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
O9°4
GERAGHTY
9 MILLER, INC.
ScrviM*
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§zl_Project/No. TUTU STC/PR013.01
.Page
Location ST. THOMAS
7/30/92
.of.
^0/92
TotQl
Depth Drilled
Hole
feet Diameter
Type of Somple/
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT-
Length and Diameter -,
of Coring Device 
2
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surf ace Elev. 
201 
feet 
D Surveyed 
H Estimated 
Datum 
MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Controct<
Prepored
Drilling U«H.»H HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
By
R. PONCIANO
J. D!AZ
Driller J- RIVERA 
Helper J-
Hammer
__ Drop 
3°
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
T« 
ItaH)
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.5
4-3-
4-4
4-3-
4-5
6-11-
9-6
6-5-
6-5
SILTY CLAY; little Rock fragments, small to medium;
trace Sand, fine to coarse; trace
Gravel, fine; soft, brown to light brown, reddish brown.
dry.
HNu = 52 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Same as above.
GC sample: 2-4'.
HNu = 32 ppm.
Same as above.
HNu = 392 ppm.
GC sample: 4-6*.
Same as above.
GC sample: 6-8'.
Soil sample collected for BNA, metals, and TPH analysis.
HNu = 62 ppm.
o--
CM>
10-147
GERAGHTY
S MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contd)
Page
of.
Boring/Well.
B-1
Prepared *y 
*• PONCIANO
((•M
To
> •» 6
8.0
10.0
10.0
10.3
1.2
0
6-5-
9-75
50/0.3'
The first 0.5' is same as above. 
The rest is Silt; trace
Cloy; trace Sand, very fine; stiff, brown to tan. moist.
GC sample: 8-10'.
HNu - 42 ppm.
No recovery.
Top of weathered bedrock inferred at 10.3 ft bis.
Total Depth « 10.3 ft bis.
TUT 
005 
09O6
CAD FILE: TU-146
GERAGHTY
67 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
a^nj/wii B-2 ^^/^ TUTU SITE/PRQ13.01_________Page
Type of Sample/
.of.
Location ST-
Drilling 
R/,/Q, 
Drilling 
R/-«/Q,
Started 
8/3/92 
Completed 
8/3/92
Total
Depth Drilled
Hole
feet 
Diameter .
.inches Coring
__, _ ____.,
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter _.
of Coring Device 
z
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surface Elev.
180
feet 
O Surveyed 
B Estimated 
Datum
MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid Used _N°_N_L
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Drilling Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ
R. PONCIANO
Driller J- R'VEKA 
Helpcr _J
Hammer
_ Drop _
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
30
. inches
(fWt MMv 
MM4
T«
(i-O
0
2.0
2.0
3.5
1.4
1.0
12-20-
23-30
23-26-
50/0.461
CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, medium to coarse; trace
Rock fragments; trace organic materials, roots; brown,
hard, dry.
GC sample: 0-2'.
HNu = 0 ppm.
CLAY; trace Silt; trace Sand, medium; trace organic
materials, roots; very hard, reddish brown to red; dry.
HNu = 0 ppm.
GC sample: 2-4'.
Soil samples collected for VOC. BNA, metals and TPH
analysis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 3.5 ft bis.
Total depth - 3.5 ft bis.
CM} FILE: TU-149
- _ 
GERAGHTY
jir 8 MILLER, me.
tnvinnmtntal
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§zl_ Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
.Page
.of.
Location ST. THOMAS
Total
Depth Drilled 
3-
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
Hole
feet Diameter
Drilling 
R/,/Q. 
Drilling 
R/,/Q,
.Started 
8/3/92 
Completed 
8/3/92
Type of Sample/
. inches Coring Device __
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surface Elev. 178.5 feet 
D Surveyed 
B Estimated 
Datum
MEAN SEA LEVEL
NONE
Drilling Fluid
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———
Driller
Drilling u-»h«H HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ
_ Helper ^ "'HET
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer ,
Drop 
30
.inches
(«Mt)
0.0
2.0
2.0
3.3
1.4
2.4
12-20-
20-18
12-12-
50/0.3'
CLAY; and Silt, little Rock fragments, small to medium;
trace Sand, fine to medium; trace Sand, coarse to very
coarse; trace Gravel, fine; trace organic material, roots;
trace of black stains (~ 0.8%); hard, dry, brown.
HNu = 0.2 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA. metals and TPH
analysis.
Same as above.
HNu = 0 ppm.
GC sample: 2-4'.
Top of bedrock approximately at 3.3 ft bis.
Total depth = 3.3 ft bis.
CAD FTLt TU-190
GERAGHTY
& MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well__§Zi_Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
.Poge
Location ST. THOMAS
6/9/92
of.
6/9/92
Total 
Hole 
Type of Sample/ 
oonnw
Depth Drilled 1BB-° feet Diameter 
6 
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT -SPOON
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
9>
2
.Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 167.61 feet 
D Surveyed 
_2 Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
NONE
Drilling Fluid
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Drilling Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER
R. PONCIANO
Driller °- GARCIA 
Helper M. MORALES
__ inches
Hammer
Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop _
((•It
0
0.5
2
4
0.5
2
3.5
4-
0
0.3
1.3
0.9
J3-31-3;
7-15-17
4-21-
21-17
FILL.
Spoon was redriven.
CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, medium; trace Rock
fragments, fine to medium; very hard, brown, dry.
GC sample: 0.5-2.0'.
HNu = 0 ppm. 
CGI « 0% LEL
Clay; some Silt; trace Sand, medium to coarse; trace
Rock fragments; brown to reddish brown, dry to moist,
hard.
HNu = 0.1-0.4 ppm.
GC sample: 2-4'.
Same as above, but little Sand, medium to coarse and
moist.
GC sample: 4-6*.
HNu = 0.1 ppm. 
CGI - 0% LEL
CAO F1UL- TU-141
GERAGHTY
9 MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contd)
Page
of.
Boring/Well.
B-4
Prepared *y 
R- PONCIANQ
Mr e
6
8
10
8
10
10.8
1.4
1.5
0.8
32-50-
34-40
12-23-
29-21
34-50/
0.25'
CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, medium to fine; trace rock
fragments, fine to large, brown to gray, moist, hard.
GC sample: 6—8'.
HNu - 0.1 - 0.3 ppm. 
CGI «= 0% LEL.
CLAY; little Silt; trace Sand; fine to medium; light brown
to greenish gray, moist, hard; trace gravel, fine.
Top of bedrock is approximately at 
8.3* 
bis.
HNu = 0.1 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC. 
SNA, 
metals and TPH
analysis.
ROCK; fragments, small to large; little Sand, fine to
medium, little Silt; trace Clay; trace Sand, coarse; light
gray, saturated, very hard. 
Top of weathered bedrock
inferred at 10.8' bis.
GC sample: 10-12'
HNu = 0.1 ppm.
No water in borehole. 
It was raining before
sample 10—12" was examined.
Total depth = 
10.8 
ft bis.
CAD FILE: TO-142
TUT 
O05 
O91O
GERAGHTY
9 MILLER. INC.
Invironrnrntal
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well__§z!_Project/No. TUTU SrTE/PR013.0l
Location S1- THOMAS___________
.Page
.of.
8/13/92
Total 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilied__££_ feet Diameter __S__ inches Coring Device
Length and Diameter _t/-»
of Coring Device ___z ' J_______________
.Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 181-° feet 
D Surveyed 
E Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid n«»ri NONE
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———
R. PONCIANO
_____ Drilling u«fh»H HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ
Driller 
J- RIVERA 
Helper J- M|LLET
Hammer
__ Drop 
30 
inches
Hammer
Weight 
14°
_
<*•*)
P* *
0
0.4
2.4
0.4
2.4
2.80
1.6
0.4
5-8-
12-14
50/0.4'
ASPHALT.
CLAY; little Silt; little Sand, fine to medium; trace Gravel,
fine; trace Sand, coarse, gray to reddish brown, stiff, dry
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA, metals and TPH
analysis.
HNu «= 5.0 ppm.
GC sample: 2.0'.
CLAY; little Silt; little Sand, fine to medium; trace organic
material, wood; gray, very hard, dry.
HNu = 1.0 ppm.
GC sample: 2-4'
Split-spoon was refused at 2.8 ft bis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 2.8 ft bis.
Total depth - 2.8 ft bis.
r-
CAD FILE: U)-1*4
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_BdL_Project/No. TUTU SITE/PRO 13.01
Page
Location ST. THOMAS
355* 
V30/92
.of.
V30/92
Totol 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled__lii__ feet Diameter __JL_inches Coring n»wir» 
S>HLH-
Length and Diameter 
^, 
-«..,,. 
«
of Coring Device 
2 /•>________________Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 200-5 feet 
D Surveyed 
B Estimated 
Datum ____________
Drilling Fluid Used,
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———
Drilling
Driller JL
HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ
M»lp»r J. MILLET
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop — 30
.inches
(Ml)
0
2
2
4
1.2
1.4
25-20-
11-12
9-8-
9-12
SILTY CLAY; little Rock fragments, small to medium;
trace Sand, fine to coarse; trace of organic materials.
roots; brown to dark brown, dry. stiff.
GC sample: 0-2'.
CLAY top (0.5'): some Silt; trace Rock fragments, small
to medium; trace Sand, fine to coarse; Peat (0.4');
Clay (0.5'); little Silt; trace fine Sand; stiff.
dark gray to black, dry.
HNu = 25 ppm.
GC sample: 2-4'.
CAO HLE: TU-145
ft
J^f tn
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER, INC.
fnvtnnmtnlul
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contd)
Page
of.
CAD Fit 
TU-
Borinc
Prepa
SOTMM/C
(taM MM.
ffwn
4
6
. /\IJm\\ 
B — 6
)/ We" - ——————————————
red By
«n taMr.
MM UlrtlM
To
6
7.3
R. PONCIANO
1*mfl\,timt\i
_ Con 
C***"" "
(«Mt) 
IMMi
1.3
1.4 1
6-12-
11-9
2-48-50
0.29'
Clay; little Silt; trace fine Sand; stiff, dark
gray to black, dry.
Soil sample collected for VOC analysis.
GC sample: 4-6'.
HNu = 100 ppm.
Same as above (0.4*), the rest is highly altered bedrock;
weak, grayish green.
Soil samples collected for SNA, metals and TPH analysis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 7.3 ft bis.
Total depth - 7.3 ft bis.
GC sample: 4-8'.
HNu « 50 ppm.
TUT 
OO5 
O91
146
GERAGHTY
f MILLER, INC.
HinnmfBtal S»
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§zZ_-Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01_________ Poge
Type of Sample/
of.
Location 5T.THOMA5
Drilling 
7/,1/Q, 
Drilling 
-,/,1/Q,
Started 7/31/92 
Completed 
7/31/92
Total 
Hole
Depth Drilled 4-D 
feet Diameter
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device 
2
. inches Coring Device
SPLIT-SPOON
Land-Surface Elev.
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
_______________ Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
t 
* 
n e 
^ 
«n r_*- 
* ^ 
^. 
MEAN SEA 
LEVEL
feet 
D Surveyed 
IS Estimated 
Datum ___________
_________________ Drilling u»»hnri HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Driller
RIVERA
J. DI.A2
Helper jL
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
Weight 
14°
Hammer _„
Drop 
30
.inches
0
2.0
2.0
4.0
1.5
1.4
3-24-
48-78
23-45-
17-25
FILL: SILT; little Rock fragments, small; trace Clay; trace
Sand, medium to fine; trace Sand, coarse; trace roots;
stiff, light— brown, dry.
GC sample: 0-2'.
HNu = 0 ppm.
FILL: SILT; little Rock fragments, small; trace Clay; trace
Sand, medium to fine; trace Sand, coarse; trace roots;
stiff, light— brown, dry.
GC sample: 2-4'.
HNu = 0 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC, 
SNA, 
metals and
TPH analysis.
Auger refusal at 3.0 ft bis.
Total depth - 4.0 ft bis.
CAD FILE: TU-151
GERAGHTY
& MILLER, INC.
imnn»»»t*l Srrvien
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§zi_Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
.Page
of.
Location ST- THOMAS
Total 
Hole
Depth Drilled 
3-6 
feet Diameter 
b
Length and Diameter „,
of Coring Device ___2
Drilling 
R/19/Q9 
Drilling 
Q / 1 9 / Q,
-Started 8/12/92 
Completed 
8/12/92
Type of Sample/
. inches Coring Device __
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surface Elev.
feet 
D Surveyed 
09 Estimated 
Datum
MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor.
Prepared
By ————
Drilling Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ
SOIL TECH
Driller _i_
Helper
MILLET
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight
140
Hammer ,„
Drop 
30
. inches
(MO
0
0.8
2.8
0.8
2.8
3.6
1.3
0.8
5-10-
16-16
50-50/
0.3'
CONCRETE.
FILL: SILTY CLAY; trace Sand, medium to coarse; trace
Gravel, fine; trace organic material, roots; trace Rock
fragments, small; brown to reddish brown, hard, dry.
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA, metals and
TPH analysis.
Soil sample collected for matrix spike and matrix
spike duplicate.
SILTY CLAY; trace Sand, medium to coarse; trace Gravel,
fine; trace Rock fragments, small; very hard, reddish
brown, dry.
HNu = 0.1 ppm.
GC sample 2—4'.
Split spoon and augers were refused at approx.
3.6 ft below land surface.
Total depth * 3.6 ft bis.
OD FILE; TU-132
GERAGHTY
6T MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_J±L_Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
Location ST. THOMAS
—————— Page _
Drilling 
7/,Q/Q9 
Drilling
.Started 7/29/92 
Completed
of.
Total 
_ 
Hole 
R 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled 
3-' 
feet Diameter 
b 
inches Coring Device ——
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
_,
z
Land-Surface Elev.
Drilling Fluid LI««H NONE
Drilling,
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———— R. PONCIANO
Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
MEAN SEA LEVEL
Surveyed 
IS Estimated 
Datum
Driller
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Drilling Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ
_ Helper •»• M'LLF
Hammer
__ Drop 
3°___ inches
T»
0
0.2
2
4
0.2
2
4
5.1
1.4
0.5
1.2
10-15-
9-10
19-12-
8-9
5-8-
50/0. V
ASPHALT.
FILL: CLAY; some Silt; little Rock fragments, small to
medium; trace Sand, fine to medium; trace Sand, coarse;
trace Gravel, fine, dark gray to reddish brown, stiff, dry.
HNu « 0 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Same as above.
GC sample: 2-4'.
HNu * 0 ppm.
Soil sample collected for VOC analysis.
Same as above.
HNu = 0 ppm.
Soil samples collected for SNA, metals and TPH analysis.
GC sample: 4-5.1
Top of bedrock inferred at 5.1 ft bis.
Total depth - 5.1 ft bis.
CAD FIX: 1U-1U
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§Zl£_Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
.Page
.of.
Location ST. THOMAS
Drilling .,in/Q, Drilling 
R/,n/Q,
.Started 8/10/92 
Completed 8/10/92
Total 
_ 
Hole 
_ 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled 
7-9 
feet Diameter 
6 
inches Coring Device ——
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
_.
z
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surface Elev. T41.8 feet 
rj Surveyed 
GD Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid UsedJjPUL
SOILTCCH
Drilling Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ
Prepared
By ———
R. PONCIANO
Driller J- KiVERA 
Helper J-MU-LET
Hammer
— Drop
Hammer
.Weight 
'40
30
inches
T.
i Mr •
0
2
4
2
4
6
1.3
1.2
1.3
17-16-
10-8
7-16-
20-16
8-12-
12-12
FILL: SILTY CLAY; little Rock fragments, small medium;
little Sand, fine to medium; trace Sand, coarse to very
coarse; trace Gravel, fine; soft, brown, dry.
GC Sample: 0-21.
HNu » 0.1 ppm.
FILL: CLAY; little Rock fragments, small to medium;
trace Sand, coarse; trace Gravel, fine; brown to dark
brown, hard. dry.
GC Sample: 2-4'.
HNu « 0.1 ppm.
Same as above.
HNu = 0.1 ppm.
GC Sample: 4—6*.
JV
T-i
in
CAD FU: TV-IS-*
GERAGHTY
6? MILLER. INC.
•^
Boring
Prepa
toMM/C
(«•« MM
ff«*
6
O>
./u/.ii 
B— 10
/ we" ————————
red By
"*" **"**
u
7.8
R. PONCIANO
'MVirL.n/v^jjnn I.V^NJ vwoni.a;
Page 
2 
nf 
2
Tbw/MiMtfK
_ €•• 
^••MP* «r
(ta«) 
(MIT
1.42 5-38-50
50/0.3' "CLAY; little Silt; iittie Rock frugrnents. srr.c!! to rnsdium;
little Gravel, fine to medium; trace Sand, fine to
medium; trace Sand, coarse to very coarse; very hard.
brown, moist to wet.
Water encountered approximately at 7.9' bis. Soil
samples collected for VOC, BNA, Metals, and TPH analysis.
Total Depth - 7.9 ft bis.
Bedrock not encountered.
TUT 
OO5 0918
CAO FILE: TU-1S5
GERAGHTY
67 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§Zll_Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
.Page
Location ST. THOMAS
B/10/92
.of.
S/10/92
Total 
Hole 
Type of Sample/ 
CDnnw
Depth Drilled _i±_ feet Diameter __2__ 
inches Coring rwi™ 
SKUI-SPOON
Length and Diameter _,,—
of Coring Device ___z 
'___________________
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ 
feet
Land-Surface Elev. 1*1-5 
feet 
D Surveyed 
El Estimated 
Datum
Drilling Fluid tig»ri NONE
Drilling
MEAN SEA LEVEL
HOLLOW STEM AUGER
rwrn:,,,.
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Driller
J. DIA2
Helper 
J- -!^-=
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
. Weight
140
Hammer
Drop — 30
. inches
T.
(tad)
0
0.6
2
0.6
2
3.5
0.0
1.3
0.7 2
8-10-
10-15
0-19-50
50/0.0'
CONCRETE.
SILTY CLAY; little Rock fragments, small; trace Sand.
fine to medium; trace organic roots; stiff, brown, dry.
HNu « 5.0 ppm.
GC Sample: 0.2'.
Soil samples collected for VOC. BNA, metals and TPH
analysis.
~ Same as above.
HNu » 1.0 ppm.
GC Sample: 2-41.
Split-spoon and augers refused at 3.5' bis.
Top of bedrock approximately at 3.5' bis.
Total depth - 3.5 ft bis.
CM) FILE: TU-1M
TUT 
CO 5 0919
GERAGHTY
& MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well _J^ll__projcct/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
Location ST. THOMAS____________
.Page
.of.
R/I 1/0-7 
R/-M/Q-5
Started 8/11/92 
Completed 8/11/92
Total 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled 
°-4 
feet Diameter 
6 
inches Coring Device
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
_,
z
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ 
feet
MEAN SEA LEVEL
Land-Surface Elev. T^O-S feet 
D Surveyed 
IS Estimated 
Datum.
Drilling Fluid H««H NONE___________________ Drilling u^hnri HOLLOW STEM AUGER
SOIL TECH
Driller
J. DIAZ
Helper -• ™
Prepared
By ————
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop
inches
(tait)
0
0.5
2
4
0.5
2
4
6
0
1.3
1.4
1.6
2-4-3-3
5-7-4-6
3-13-
36-31
CONCRETE.
SILTY CLAY; little Grovel, fine to medium; trace Sand.
fine to medium; trace organic materials, roots; brown,
soft, moist.
HNu « 1.0 ppm.
GC Sample: 0-21.
CLAY; little Silt, little Sand, fine to medium; trace Peat;
trace Rock fragments; gray, soft, moist.
HNu = 1.4 ppm.
GC Sample: 2-4'.
CLAY; little Silt; little Sand; fine to medium; trace of
Rock fragments; gray, hard, moist.
HNu « 0.1 ppm.
GC Sample: 4-6'.
CM) FILE: TU-137
TUT
OO5 
0920
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contd)
Page
of.
Boring/Well
Prepared Ry 
R. PQNCIANO
T.
i Mr •
6
8
8
8.4
1.8
0.3
26-24-
16-28
50/0.42*
SILTY CLAY; some Rock fragments, small to medium;
trace Sand, medium to coarse; brown to tan. hard.
moist.
HNu » 2.2 ppm.
GC sample: 6-8'.
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA, metals and TPH
analysis.
Same as above.
HNu «• 0.1 ppm.
GC sample: 8-10'.
Split— spoon and augers were refused at 8.4 ft bis. Top
of bedrock inferred at 8.4 ft bis.
Total depth = 8.4 ft bis.
CAD nut Tu-i
TUT 
GO5 0921
GERAGHTY
& MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§±L3_ Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01______
Location ST. THOMAS_______________%£%& 
8/10/92
.Page
.of.
8/10/92
Total
Depth Drilled
Hole
feet Diameter
.inches
Length and Diameter 
^ 
mwTiwunnc
of Coring Device 
2/y________________ Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 139.8 feet 
Q Surveyed 
IS Estimated 
Datum ____________
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———
Drilling
HOLLOW STEM AUGER
R. PONCIANO
CAD FILE: TU-1SS
J.DIA2
Driller **• RiVERA 
Helper J. MILLET
Hammer
_ Drop __rP___ inches
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
0
2.0
4.0
6.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
6.4
1.1
1.3
1.4
0.2
10-12-
21-14
10-25-
17-12
9-11-
11-19
50/0.4'
nil: CLAYEY SILT; little Gravel, fine to medium;
little Sand, fine to medium; trace Rock fragments, small
to medium; trace organic materials, roots; medium stiff,
brown, dry.
GC sample: 0-2'.
HNu = 0.2 ppm.
First 0.55' is same as above, the rest is highly altered
bedrock; gray; very weak.
HNu = 0.2 ppm.
GC sample: 2—4'.
SILTY CLAY; little Sand, medium to coarse; brown, stiff, dry.
HNu = 0.3 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC. BNA. metals and TPH
analysis.
Same as above.
GC sample: 6-8'.
HNu * 0.1 ppm.
Top of bedrock inferred at 6.4 ft bis.
Total depth » 6.4 ft bis.
TUT
0 0 5 
o'-? ~? ".'•'•
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER, me.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well-Izlf—Project/No. TUTU SITE/PRO! 3.01
.Page
.of.
Drilling 
B/1,/Q<7 
Drilling 
R/1A/Q,
.Started 8/14/92 
Completed 8/14/92
Site
Location ^*
Total 
Hole 
Type of Sample/ 
opnnw
Depth Drilled _±f_ 
feet Diameter __^__ inches Coring rw/i™ 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter _.,_.
of Coring Device ———z /J
______________ Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 205-3 feet D Surveyed 
E Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid UsedJlPUL
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Driller jL
Drilling Method HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ
_ Helper J- !
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop — 30
. inches
/C~<>
U
<*•»
i nr •
0
2.0
2.0
3.2
1.2
1.0
5-5-
6-6
6-40-
50/0.17'
FILL: CLAYEY SILT; some Sand, fine to medium; trace
Rock fragments, small; trace organic material, roots, wood;
light brown to light gray, soft, dry.
HNu * 0.2 ppm.
Soil sample collected for VOC, SNA, metals and TPH analysi
GC sample: 0-2'.
The first 0.6' is same as above, the rest is highly altered
Rock, very weak, grayish green.
GC sample: 2-4-'.
Replicate sample was collected: MW— 103.
Split-spoon was refused approx. at 3.2' bis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 3.2' bis.
Total depth = 3.2 ft bis.
CAD FH£. TUTU 181
TUT 
CO5 
O923
GERAGHTY
67 MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_Jzl_L__Project/No. TUTU SITE/PRO!3.01
Location ST. THOMAS______________g£Sj 
8/14/92
. Page
.of.
B/1V92
Total 
_ _ 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled _fL±__ feet Diameter __£__ 
inches Coring n«wi^ 
bPLii -SPOON
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
2
~«irr 
,« -
_______________ Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 205-° feet 
D Surveyed 
B Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA
Drilling Fluid Used
SO.LTECH
____ 
Drilling u,thnH HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J. DIAZ_
Driller J- K'V£*A 
Helper J- ^'i-i-=-:
Prepared
By ———
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop 
30
inches
(taM 
I
Fn
T*
0
2
2
2.2
1.3
0.2
-
6-4-4-5
50/0.17'
CLAYEY SILT; some Sand, fine to medium; trace Rock
fragments, small; trace organic materials, roots; soft,
reddish brown, moist.
Soil sample collected for VOC, 
SNA, 
metals and TPH
analysis.
HNu = 0.2 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Same as above. Trace weathered (highly) bedrock.
Split-spoon sample refused at approximately 2.2' bis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 2.2" bis.
Total depth = 2.2 ft bis.
HNu = 0.2 ppm.
GC sample: 2-4'.
CAD RLE: 
TU-162
TUT 
GO5 
0974
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§z!i_Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
Location ST. THOMAS_______________g^ 
B/14/92
.Page
.of.
8/U/92
Total 
Hole
Depth Drilled 
3-7 
feet Diameter
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___ 
-
Type of Sample/ 
conn
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT-SPOON
_______________Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS
9ru.R 
- 
MEAN SEA LEVEL
Land-Surface Elev. ^u*-g feet 
D Surveyed 
SI Estimated 
Datum ____________
Drilling Fluid H-«H NONE___________________ Drilling Method .HOLLOW STEM AUGER
Drilling 
Trrw
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
J. DIA2
Driller J- KiVERA 
Helper J- M'^~
Prepared
By ————
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop _
inches
T»
> m* f
0
2
2
3.7
1.2
1
10-10-
10-10
2-14-45
50/0.29'
CLAYEY SILT; some Sand, fine to medium; trace Rock
fragments, small; trace organic materials, roots; soft.
reddish brown to light brown, moist.
Soil sample collected for VOC, SNA, metals and TPH
analysis. Sample collected for matrix spike and matrix
spike duplicate
HNu » 0.2 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
" The first 0.7' is same as above. The rest is highly
altered bedrock, very weak, grayish green.
Split— spoon refused at approximately 3.7' bis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 3.7" bis.
Total depth = 3.7 ft bis.
HNu = 0.2 ppm.
GC sample: 2-4'.
CAD FILE; TU-1U
TUT 
O05 
0925
GERAGHTY
? MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_§Zl3A_ Project/No. TUTU SfTE/PR013.01
.Page
.of.
Location ST. THOMAS
Total 
Hole
Depth Drilled 
2-Q 
feet Diameter
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___
Drilling 
R/19/Q9 
Drilling 
/,,/„,
.Storted 
8/12/92 
Completed 8/12/92
Type of Somple/
. inches Coring Device __
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surface Elev. 139.4 feet 
D Surveyed 
B Estimated 
Datum
MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid n««rf NONE
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Drilling u.thoH HOLLOW STEM AUGER
J 
DIAZ
R. PONCIANO
Driller J- R|VERA 
Helper J. MILLET
Hammer
—— Drop
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
30
inches
(to*
£- it.-) .Cm
P^^^^V]
T*
0
2.0
1.7
8-47-
37-29
FILL: CLAYEY SILT; little Grovel, fine to medium; little
Sand, fine to medium; trace Rock fragments, small
to medium; trace organic material, roots; hard, brown
to reddish brown, dry.
HNu = 2.4 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Soil samples collected for VOC, SNA. and metals analysis.
Soil samples taken for risk assessment.
Bedrock not encountered.
Total depth - 2.0 ft. bis.
CAO FILE; TU 160
TUT
OO5 
O926
GERAGHTY
_ 
gMPJ?' wc- 
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
^^^•r f^ im^m^mntmt 3**^*^»m
^^^^^r 
*¥WW^^W^W^«"** «*^T^^BWB
Boring/Well_]^Zl_Project/No. TUTU SITE / PR013.Q1
6/30/92
Page
Location ST. THOMAS
_of_^
6/30/92
Totol 
.._ 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled _*!LiL_ feet Diameter __!—inches Coring rw*/ir» 
SPLIT-
Length and Diameter 
2 1/3"
of Coring Device ______________„__________
0-2.0
Sampling Interval ____ 
feet
Land-Surface Elev. 195-05 feet 
IS Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
AIR / VUATTP (SMALL AMOUNT OF WATER
AIR / WATER TO MINIMIZE DUST)
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contract
Prepared
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
DOWN HOLE HAMMER
M. MORALES
Driller 0- G^CIA 
He|per 
j. NiEVES
By
W.I. 
MORALES
Hammer 
,_ , __. Hammer
Weight 
14° US. Drop 
30
.inches
(Mt)
0
1.8
1.4
47-70
75-50/0.3' ASPHALT (0-0.1 ft.)
SILTY CLAY, hard, brown; little Sand.
intermixed w/weathered Rock Fragments.
angular, greenish gray, fragments degraded
into a fine to coarse Sand; dry.
HNu = 0 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC. SNA. metals and
TPH analysis.
One split— spoon soil sample collected at
MW- 1 . 
Continue drilling with downhole hammer
to a depth of 46.0 ft. 
Monitoring
well installed at 43.6 ft. Water level measured
on 6/30/90 after completion: 29.9 ft.
Approximately 30 gallons of water were used to minimize
dust during downhole hammer process before
encountering groundwater.
CAD FIX: TUTU-11S
TUT 
GO5 
G927
GERAGHTY
67 MILLER. INC.
SAK^LE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well-*!*^ Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01_________ Poge __i
Drilling .,,-,_. Drilling
_____________Started 
°/'J/9Z 
Completed _
.of.
Site
Location _ri
Total 
Hole
Depth Drilled 20-u feet Diameter.
Length and Diameter _,«_.
of Coring Device ___z / J______
Type of Sample/ 
eo^r,
inches Coring n«wir» 
SPUT-SPOON
Sampling Interval 
CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 
178 
feet 
El Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Ruid Used NONE
Drilling Method HSA
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Driller
-
J. MILLET
Helper J. D!AZ
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop
~
inches
(tax
Fn
(tan)
0
0.40
2.4
0.40
2.40
3.10
1.5
0.5
10-19-
28-15
40- 50/
o.r
ASPHALT.
CLAYEY SILT (.81); little Rock
fragments, small; trace Sand, fine to medium;
trace roots; hard, brown to tan, dry.
SILTY CLAY; (1.2') little Rock fragments, small;
trace Sand, fine to medium; hard, gray, dry.
HNu = 0.6 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Soil samples collected for VOC, SNA, metals and TPH
analysis.
SILTY CLAY; little Rock fragments, small;
trace Gravel, fine to medium; trace Sand,
fine to medium; gray, very hard, dry.
GC sample: 2—4'.
HNu * 0.4 ppm.
Split— spoon and auger were refused approximately
3.1* below top of pavement. Continued drilling with
downhole hammer to 28.0 ft. 
Set well at 27.0 ft.
CAO FILE: TU-118
TUT 
GO5 
O928
GERAGHTY
7 MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well.
Site
Location ST-
Project/No. TUTU StTE/PR013.Q1
.Page
SS& 
B/5/92
of.
7/B/92
Total 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled 9D-° feet Diameter 
6 
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter -./-.
of Coring Device ___z 
/ **______________
Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 195-14 feet 
E Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid ii*»d NONE___________________Drilling 
Method
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
J. NIEVES
Driller °- GARCIA 
Helper Ji
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight
Hammer
Drop 
30
.inches
0
0.3
1.0
2.5
0.3
1.0
2.5
2.8
1.5
0.2
44-26-
50/0.5'
50/0.2'
ASPHALT.
FILL: Gravel, medium to fine: some Silty Clay; trace Sand
medium to coarse; brown, dry to moist.
HNu • 0 ppm.
CGI = 0% LEL
CLAY; some Silt; little Sand, medium to coarse; little Rock
fragments, medium to large, angular; little Gravel, fine to
medium; trace pieces of wood; light brown to brown.
very hard, dry.
HNu « 0 ppm.
CGI « 0 % LEL GC Sample: 1-2.5'.
Soil samples collected for VOC, metals, BNA, and TPH
analysis.
CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, medium to coarse; trace
Gravel, fine: brown, dry to moist.
Bedrock encountered at 2.8' bis.
HNu - 0 ppm.
CGI « 0 % LEL 
Continued drilling by diamond coring bi
to 89.0 ft and downhole hammer to 90 ft bis.
CAD FILE; TU-117
TUT 
005 
O97C?
GERAGHTY
7 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/COFE LOG
Boring/Wel!_JWz3_ Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
.Page
.of.
Location 5T-
6/9/92 
completed 
6/11/92
Total 
,. _ 
Hole 
_ 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled _£±£_ feet Diameter __£___ inches Coring n»wir» 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter _.,_.
of Coring Device ———z '^——————————————
Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 181.85 feet 
B Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid n«»ri NONE___________________ Drilling Method
Driiiing
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
M. MORALES
Driller °- GARCIA 
Helper J- N1EVES
CAD FU£; TU-119
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop — 30
. inches
T.
•v •
0
0.4
2.0
0.4-
1.7
2.3
0.6
0
27-48-
50/0.3'
50/0.3'
CONCRETE
FILL: SILTY CLAY; trace Sand, fine to
medium; trace Rock fragments, small to medium.
brown, reddish brown, hard, dry;
HNu = 0.2-12 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC. BNA, metals,
and TPH analysis.
No recovery. 
Spoon and
augers were refused
approximately at 2.4'. Continued
drilling with downhole hammer
to 34.0 ft. 
Set well at 30.4 ft.
TUT 
CO5 
0930
GERAGHTY
& MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well J^Lf-Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
Site 
Drilling
Location ST. THOMAS______________Started 
6/16/92
.Page
.of.
6/17/92
Total 
OQ _ 
Hole 
_ 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled _£2^_» feet Diameter __2——inches Coring Device——SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device __
zyr
Sampling Interval 
^.0
Land-Surface Elev. 175.69 feet 
E Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid Used _NONE_
Drilling
Contracto
Prepared
By ————
Drilling Method
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
J. NIEVES
Driller 0- GARCIA 
Helper M. MORALES
W.I. 
MORALES
Hammer 
__ 
Hammer _n
.Weight 
14° I65- Drop 
30
. inches
(tart
T.
0.0
0.7
2.7
4.7
6.7
0.7
2.7
4.7
6.7
7.1
1.0
1.5
1.2
0.7
24-22-
22-14
10-15
12-16
15-19-
30-50
50/0.4'
CONCRETE
SILTY CLAY; trace Sand; trace Grovel, fine to coarae;
reddish brown to dark greenish gray, moist; hard.
HNu « 0 ppm.
SILTY CLAY; trace Sand, fine to coarse; trace
Gravel, subangular to rounded, 1—2 inch
pieces; brown to dark brown and gray,
moist; very stiff.
HNu * 4 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA. metals and
TPH analysis.
SILTY CLAY; trace Sand, fine to coarse; trace Grovel,
subangular; some organic content; dark gray.
moist; hard.
HNu « 3 ppm.
SILTY CLAY; trace Sand, fine to coarse; trace
Gravel, angular to rounded; some
organic content; reddish brown to dark gray; hard.
HNu « 0 ppm.
CM) FILE; TU-120
TUT 
GO5 
O93J
GERAGHTY
6T MILLER. INC.
Jnvir
CAO Flit TU-
Borinc
Prepa
Kimii/C
«•« MM
Frwn
8.7
9.7
OJ
/WHI. 
MW~4
red By
"• ""P
MM ai^B*l
T.
8.8
9.8
W.I. MORALES
>MWir L.C/ wwnc L-^-HJ vv-'Wiiuu/
Page_L_of_2__
•nwiii«i*i
_c»» 
£"•"• "
(tal) 
twIT
0
0
50/0.08'
50/0.08'
Auger down to 8.7 ft.
No Recovery.
Auger down to 9.7 ft. Auger grinding
during drilling. 
Top of bedrock
inferred at 8.7 ft. below land surface.
No Recovery.
Change drilling system to downhole
hammer. 
Drill down to 28.0 ft.
Set well at 27.0 ft.
TUT 
005 
<wv;
121
GERAGHTY
67 MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well J^ZlP_Project/No. TUTU StTE/PROl3.01
.Page
Location ST. THOMAS
3S£ 
6/4/92
_of_f_
6/17/92
Total 
_. 
Hole
Depth Drilled 71-° feet Diameter.
Length and Diameter 
, _,.
of Coring Device 
2/3____
,inch«
SPL*-SPOON
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surface Elev. 175-99 feet 
E Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
NONE
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Drilling Method
W. MORALES
J. DIAZ
Driller 
J- *IVER* 
Helper J- MILLETT
Hammer
. Drop —30 
inches
Hammer 
__
. Weight 
14°
0
0.7
2.7
4.7
0.7
2.7
4.7
6.7
—
1.3
1.5
0.9
—
9-12-
3-3
3-4-4-4
1-2-2-5
CONCRETE.
SILTY CLAY; little Sand, coarse to fine; little Gravel.
reddish brown at the top to brown, blue— gray
Gravel fragments; moist at the bottom; plastic; hard.
HNu * 0 ppm.
SILTY CLAY; little Sand, coarse to fine; little Gravel.
angular, weathered fragments, blue— gray; dark reddish
brown, moist; very plastic, stiff.
HNu « 0 ppm.
CGI = 0 % LEL
(4.7-5.2*) SILTY CLAY; little Sand, medium to fine;
little Gravel; dark reddish brown.
(5.2-5.6*) As above but dark gray; plastic to medium
stiff, moist.
HNu * 0 ppm.
CAD OLE; TU-179
TUT 
005 
O933
GERAGHTY
6T MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contd)
Page
of.
Boring/Well 
MW-4D
Prepared py 
W. MORALES
T.
(•"•«
6.7
8.7
10.7
12.7
8.7
10.7
11.7
13.15
1.3
1.75
0.1
0.9
7-11-16
-16
9-34-- 38
-36
50-60
60/0.45'
SILTY CLAY; little Sand, medium to fine: little Gravel.
angular, dark gray, reddish fragments 2 inch pieces:
moist; brown and dark gray; plastic to hard.
HNu « 0 ppm.
SILTY CLAY; some Sand, coarse to fine; some Gravel,
angular to semi— rounded, brown and dark gray;
weathered Rock fragments at 9.5* bis. crystalline, gray in
a sandy silty clay matrix; hard. 
HNu » 0 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA, metals, and TPH
analysis.
ROCK; weathered, angular 2-4 inch fragments, blue-
green porphyritic Rock fragments, with white feldspars,
dry; 
some Sandy Clay, brown, moist.
HNu * 0 ppm. Top of bedrock inferred at 10.7 ft bis.
Same as above; HNu - 0 ppm.
CAD FIX: TU-130
TUT 
CO5 
0934
GERAGHTY
fir MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contd)
Page
.of.
Boring/Well 
MW~4D
Prepared »y 
w-
13.7
14.7
15.7
16.7
14
14.9
16.1
16.86
0.9'
0.2'
0.4
0
50/0.3'
50/0.16'
50/0.4'
50/0.16'
ROCK; weathered in a Clayey matrix; angular fragments.
coarse to fine grains (like Sand and Gravel); dark gray;
moist. 
HNu « 0 ppm.
ROCK fragments; weathered, gray to dark gray; range
from silty 
to Gravel sized fragments; moist; slightly wet.
HNu » 0 ppm.
ROCK; weathered in a Silty Clay matrix; angular
fragments (0.5— 2.0" ); gray, brown, white, red mottled;
black stains; crumbled; moist in Silty areas between
weathered fragments.
HNu — 0 ppm.
No recovery: Wet split spoon sample of retrieval. Working
Zone: HNu « 0 ppm. CGI « 0 % LEL 
Wet cuttings on
augers, gray green, Silty Clay.
CAO
TU-131
TUT
O9 3 5
GERAGHTY
67 MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contd)
Boring/Well 
MW~4P
Prepared »y
w-
Page
of
18.7
20.7
22.7
18.8
20.8
22.8
0.4
0
0
50/0. V
50/0. V
50/0.13'
ROCK; weathered fragments in a Silty Clay matrix;
angular fine to coarse fragments; gray; wet.
HNu « 0 ppm.
No recovery (Hard a tigering between 20.7 
and 21.0 ft)
No Recovery. Top of competent bedrock inferred at
22.8 
ft bis. Auger down to 24.7 ft. 
No sample
collected at this interval. 
Start pulling out augers.
After augers were retrieved, 
a 4 inch PVC casing was
placed at approximately 8 ft bis. PVC stick up: 1.5 ft.
Continued drilling by diamond coring from 24.0 
to
67.25 ft and downhole hammer from land surface to
71.0 ft.
CAO OLE; TU-132
TUT 
O05 
0936
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_!Wz5_Project/No. TUTU Snt/PR013.01
, Page
of.
SI-
Drilling 
R/../„- 
Drilling 
R/,»/«-
.Started 8/n/92 
Completed 
8/25/92
Site
Location
Total 
.- _ 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled 40-B feet Diameter 
6 
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___£
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ 
feet
Land-Surface Elev. 187-24 feet 
E Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid Used JiP±L
Drilling Method
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
J. DIAZ
Driller J- R1VERA 
Helper J-
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer ,„
Drop 
30
. inches
T.
0
2
4
2
4
4.B
1.1
1.4
0.8
13-19-
18-21
25-30-
24-39
35-50/
0.25'
FILL: SILT; little Sand, Fine to medium; little Gravel,
fine to medium; trace of Rock fragments, small; trace
pieces of wood; trace Clay; brown medium stiff, dry.
HNu » 0.1 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Soil samples collected for BNA, metals, and TPH analysis.
Same as above
HNu « 2.0 ppm.
GC Sample: 2-4'.
Soil sample collected for VOC analysis.
ROCK; highly altered; grayish green, very weak.
HNu « 0.1 ppm.
GC Sample: 4-6*.
Top of bedrock approximately at 4.8* bis. Continued
drilling with downhole hammer to 40.8 ft. Well installed
at 39.0 ft.
CAD FILE: 7U-1M
TUT 
O05 
0937
GERAGHTY
07MHLER. INC. 
SAMPLE/COFE LOG
^^^fc^^*^! C^vMd^M*
WfH»HpBi J»TVl^«w
(ABANDONED)
zi- 
Project/No. TUTU SITE/PRO! 3.01
.Page
.of.
Location ST. THOMAS
Drilling 
Drilling 
7/9l/Q,
.Started 7/21/92 
Completed 
7/21/92
Total 
__ _ 
Hole 
Type of Sample/ 
r.0««kl
Depth Drilled _2i2_ feet Diameter __!__ 
inches Coring n«vir» 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device _________:
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land—Surface Elev.
Drilling Fluid u«*ri NONE
feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum 
MEAN SEA LEVEL
________________ Drilling Method Jj§i.
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
J. DIAZ
Driller 
J- RIVERA 
Helper •*•
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
Weight 
14°
Hammer 
__
Drop 
30
. inches
u
(M)
0
0.3
2
0.3
2.0
2.5
1.3
0
12-20-
50-34
50/0.5'
ASPHALT.
SILTY CLAY; trace Sand, fine; trace Sand, coarse
to very coarse; little Rock fragments, small to
medium; brown to gray, stiff, dry;
GC sample: 0-2'. HNu « 0 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC, 
SNA, metals and TPH
analysis.
No recovery.
Continued drilling by diamond coring from 2.6 to
65.0 
ft (seeMW-6D) and downhole hammer to 35.0 ft.
This hole was abandoned and re— drilled (MW— 6R).
CM) FILE: TU-137
TUT 
CO5 
0938
GERAGHTY
& MILLER. INC.
SAK^LE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_M*z6P_ Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
Ration ST. THOMAS_______________gS& 
S/6/92
.Page
.of.
8/10/92
Total 
c_ 
Hole
Depth Drilled 63-° 
feet Diameter
Type of Sample/
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device __
273"
CONTINUOUS
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surface Elev. 171-26 feet 
B Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum 
MEAN SEA LEVEL
________________ Drilling Method Jj§*_________
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———
Driller 0-
M. MORALES
Helper •*• "IEVES
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
. Weight
140
Hammer
Drop
30
. inches
(tat
0
0.35
2
4
0.35
2.0
4
4.9
1
1.4
1.0
0.3
12-40-
33-28
10-9-
12-15
13-50./
0.42'
ASPHALT
SILTY CLAY (0.6*) little Rock fragments, small to
medium; trace Sand, medium; trace Gravel, fine to
medium; very hard, brown, dry. Remaining materials are
Silt; little Sand, fine to medium; trace Clay; orange to
tan. hard. dry.
HNu « 0 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'. Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA,
metals and TPH analysis.
Same as above, upper description.
GC sample: 2-4'.
HNu = 0 ppm.
ROCK; fragments, medium to large; some Silt; little Sand,
fine to medium; trace Clay, trace Sand, coarse to very
coarse; brown, dry; hard.
Continued drilling with downhole hammer to 65.0 ft.
CM FILE: TU-1M
TUT 
OO5 
O939
GERAGHTY
fir MILLER, me.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_M*t2L Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
.Page
.of.
Site
Location ^*'
Total
Depth Drilled.
7/16/92
Holc
feet Diameter
Length and Diameter .....
of Coring Device 
* ' J
Tvpc Of
 
CDI rr CDAOK,
inches Coring CWir» 
SPLIT-SPOON
(CONTINUOUS)
Sampling Interval ____ feet
Land-Surface Elev. 171.26 feet 
QQ Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid Hwt 
NONE
Drilling Method
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———— W. MORALES
Driller J- RIVEKA 
Helper
Hammer
. Drop —
J. DIAZ
Hammer 
_
.Weight 
14°
30
. inches
T.
•v •
0
2
2
6
2
4
5.3
6.4
1.31
1.1
1.2
0.4
22-23-
38-37
^--^8-
17-35-
50/0.29'
50/0.38'
FILL; SILTY CLAY; little Rock fragments, small to medium;
trace Sand, medium; trace Sand, coarse to very coarse;
trace Organic roots; hard, brown, dry.
GC sample: 0-2'.
HNu « 0 ppm.
Same as above but without the rock fragments.
GC sample: 2 - 4*.
HNu « 0 ppm.
Rock, highly weathered; Sand, fine to medium; some
Silt; trace Sand, coarse to very coarse; trace Gravel, fine
trace Clay; hard, gray, dry.
GC sample: 4 - 6'. HNu = 0 ppm.
ROCK, highly altered; weak, grayish green.
GC sample: 6 - 8'. HNu « 0 ppm.
Top of weathered bedrock inferred at 6.0 ft bis.
CAD Fie TU-13»a
TUT 
OO5 
O940
GERAGHTY
6T MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contd)
Page
.of.
Boring/Well ——MW~7——
Prepared py *• PONCIANO
T«
<«•*)
8
10
12
14
9.0
10.2
12.6
15
0.9
0.1
1.2
1.9
27-42/
0.46'
50/0.13'
78-128/
o.ir
42-154/
0.51
Same as above.
GC sample: 8-10'.
HNu = 0 ppm.
Same as above.
GC sample: 10-12'.
HNu « 0 ppm.
Same as above.
GC sample: 12-14'.
HNu » 0 ppm.
ROCK; highly weathered. 
Same as above.
GC sample: 14-16'.
Soil samples collected for VOC, SNA, metals and TPH
analysis.
HNu » 0 ppm.
Competent bedrock approximately at 15 ft bis.
Continued drilling with downhole hammer to 39.6 ft.
Well installed at 35.4 ft.
CAD FltC: 1U-140
"LIT
GO5 
O941
GERAGHTY
1 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well_MWz8_Projcct/No. TUTU SITE/PRO! 3.01
.Page
Site
Location -
Total 
Hole
Depth Drilled Z6-° feet Diameter.
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___?_
SS& 
V20/B2
.of.
7/23/92
Type of Somple/<;PI rr
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT-
.Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS fmm<
Land-Surface Elev. 167-61 feet 
B Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid U««M NONE
Drilling Method
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Driller _i_
J. DIAZ
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
_ Helper
Hammer
Drop —:
inches
•r •
0
0.35
2
4
0.35
2
4
5.9
1.4
1.8
1.1
12-10-
12-16
10-8-
11-10
27-50/
0.42'
ASPHALT.
FILL: SILTY CLAY; trace Sand, very fine to fine; trace Roc
fragments, small to medium; trace Sand, coarse to very
coarse; stiff, brown, dry.
GC sample: 0-2'.
HNu - 0 ppm.
Same as above (the first 1 .3'); the rest is Silt; little Clay
trace Sand, very fine; little Rock fragments; stiff, brown
to reddish brown, dry.
GC sample: 2—4'.
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA. metals, and TPH
analysis.
ROCK; weathered; Silt; little Clay; trace Sand, very fine
to fine; trace Rock fragments, very hard, brown, dry.
GC sample: 4-6'.
HNu » 0 ppm.
CAD FILE: TU-122
TUT 
CO 5 O94;
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/COFE LOG (Contd)
Page
.of.
CAD FILE; TX>-
Borin^
Prepa
laimi/C
(taM MM
6
8
/\u»\\ 
MW— 8
red By
•Ww M^MMM
T.
6.8
8.3
R. PONCIANO
HM/H*M*C
_ t*» 
£*f*0m m
<M) 
taJT
0.8
0
50- 53/
0.25'
50/0.25'
Same as above.
GC sample: 6-8'.
HNu «= 0 ppm.
No recovery.
Split— spoon refused at approximately 8.3 ft bis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 8.3 ft bis.
Continued drilling with downhole hammer to 26.0 ft.
Well installed at 25.5 ft.
TUT 
CO 5 
O94T:;;
123
GERAGHTY
7 MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well J^Zi_ Project/No. TUTU SfTE/PR013.01
Location ST. THOMAS_______________gJJSJ, 
7/24/92
.Page
_of_L
7/30/92
Total 
,_ _ 
Hole 
Type of Sample/ 
«-„„«..
Depth Drilled 35-° 
feet Diameter 
6 
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter _, ,_»
of Coring Device 
2 '^______________
.Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 162-32 feet 
SI Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Ruid UsedJlPUL
Drilling Method
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———
Driller _i_
J. DIA2
Helper J-
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop 
30
inches
T.
..
(••*)
t*r I
0
0.35
2
4-
0.35
2
4
5.5
1.8
1.1
0
16-22-
27-26
9-23-
31-15
24-50/
0.5'
ASPHALT.
FILL: SILTY CLAY; little Rock fragments, small to large;
trace Sand, fine to very coarse;
brown to reddish brown, stiff, dry.
GC sample: 0-2'.
HNu * 17 ppm at approx. 1.4' bis.
Same as above.
HNu - 25 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC. metals. BNA and TPH
analysis.
No recovery.
Top of bedrock approximately at 5.0' bis.
Continued drilling by diamond coring from 5.5 to
35.0 ft. and downhole hammer from 3.7 to 34.3 ft.
•
CAO HUE: TU-174
TUT 
oo;
G9 4 4
GERAGHTY
S MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well J™Zl°_ Project/No. TUTU S[TE/PR013.01_________ Pagc
Type of Sample/
of.
Location ST. THOMAS
8/4/92 
°±p?eted 8/20/92
Total
Depth Drilled
Hole 
_
feet Diameter __£
__. _ __„.
inches Coring n«uir» 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter -,,.-.
of Coring Device ___ *• '*
.Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 161-36 feet 
O Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid Used _NONE_
Drilling Method HSA
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
Driller
•J D!A2
Heipcr J. MILLET
R. PONCIANO
T.
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop 
30
inches
(NM)
> *v *
0
0
2
0.5
2
2.9
1.5
1.4
15-33-
27-35
21-50/
0.38'
ASPHALT.
RLL; SILTY CLAY; little Sand, medium; little Rock fragment!
small to medium; trace Gravel, fine to medium; brown, dr
Hnu = 0.2 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Same as above.
HNu = 0.4 ppm.
GC sample: 2 - 4'.
Soil samples collected for VOC. BNA. metals and TPH
analysis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 2.9' bis.
Continued drilling with downhole hammer from surface
to 36.7 ft. Well installed at 35.6 ft
CM) PLE: TU-123
TUT 
005 
094S
GERAGHTY
8 MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/WellJ^ZlOLProject/No. TUTU SITE/PR013-01
Location ST. THOMAS______________
. Page
,of.
8/4/92 S l t e 
8/19/92
Total 
__ 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled_Z±J_ feet Diameter ___2——inches Coring n«*/ir» 
5PUT-5POON
Length and Diameter -./-.
of Coring Device 
z /J
Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surf ace Elev. 161-52 feet 
CD Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
________________ Drilling Method HSA
Drilling Fluid Used,
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ————
J. DIAZ
Driller 
J- RIVERA 
Helper J- M|U-ET
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop —
inches
CAD
0
0
0.5
1.71
1.5
14-9-33
50/0.21
ASPHALT
" SILTY CLAY; little Rock fragments, small to medium;
trace Sand, fine; trace Gravel, fine to medium; very
hard, gray to brown, dry.
HNu = 0.3 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
Soil samples collected for VOC. 
BNA. 
metals and TPH
analysis.
Top of bedrock inferred at 1.71 ft bis.
Continued drilling by diamond coring from 1.71 ft to
75.0 
ft and downhole hammer from 2.0 ft to 75.1 ft.
1U-126
TU
OO5 
O946
^_ 
GERAGHTY
JOT & MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well^±LI2.Project/No. TUTU S1TE/PR013.01
.Page
Location
B/26/92
±_of_J_
7/20/92
Total 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled 74-3 feet Diameter 
6 
inches Coring Device 
SPLIT-
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device 
z
Sampling '"*——i CONTINUOUS
Land-Surface Elev. 153-11 feet 
00 Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum 153.22 ET ABOVE MSL
Drilling Fluid Used _NONE_
Drilling Method HSA
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
Prepared
By ———
Driller J- RIVERA 
Helper
J. DIAZ
R. PONCIANO
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
Hammer
Drop 
30
.inches
T»
<«•*>
0
2
4
2
4
5.88
0.7
1.1
1.42
11-14-
9-11
14-4-
14-13
1-29-31
50/0.38'
FILL: CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, fine to medium; trace
Sand, coarse; trace organic materials, roots; light brown.
dry. stiff.
HNu » 0 ppm.
GC sample: 0-2'.
CLAY; little Silt; trace Sand, fine; trace organic materials;
brown to reddish brown, moist, stiff.
HNu = 0 ppm.
GC sample: 2-41.
"SILT; little Sand, fine; trace Clay; trace Sand, coarse to
very coarse; brown, dry. hard.
GC sample: 4-6*.
FH£; TU-1T7
TUT 
COS 
0947
GERAGHTY
S MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (ConLd)
Page
.of.
Boring/Well
Prepared Ry *• PQNCIANO
(MM
T»
(•M)
6
8
10
6.8
8.3
10.2
0.9
0.5
0.2
50- 50/
0.3'
50/0.33'
50/0.17'
Same as above.
GC sample: 6-8'.
HNu « 0 ppm.
Same as above.
GC sample: 8-10'.
HNu * 0 ppm.
Same as above.
GC sample: 10-10.2'.
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA, metals, and TPH
analysis. Top of bedrock at 10.2 ft bis. Continued
drilling by diamond coring to 75.0 ft and downhole
hammer from 5.0 to 74.3 ft.
CAD FILE: TU-12B
O05 
0948
CAO
GERAGHTY
S MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well^tllLProject/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
Location ST. THOMAS
.Poge_L_of__l_
^ 
7/23/92
Total 
__ _ 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled _i2±L_ feet Diameter __£——inches Coring r>«»ir» 
SPLrr-SPOON
Length and Diameter 
_, 
««..„. 
« ,.
of Coring Device 
2 /r________________Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 161-58 feet 
O Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Method Jj§i.
Drilling Fluid n«»H NONE
Drilling
Contract
Prepared
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH
By
(NM
R. PONCIANO
TU-133
J. DIAZ
Driller J- RIVERA 
Helper J
Hammer
Drop
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
30
inches
T.
0
2
4
2
4
5.9
0.7
1.41
19-15-
35-25
17-7-
13-21
3-27-44
r50/0.38'
FILL: SILT; some Clay; trace Sand, very fine
to very coarse; trace roots; trace Gravel, medium;
trace Rock fragments; hard; brown, dry.
HNu * 0 ppm.
GC Sample: 0-2'.
CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, very fine to very coarse;
trace roots; trace Rock fragments, medium to large;
very stiff.
GC sample: 2-4'.
HNu « 0 ppm.
" SILT; some Clay; trace Sand, very fine to coarse; trace
rock fragments, medium; brown to yellowish, stiff.
GC sample: 4 - 6 '
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA. metals and TPH
analysis. 
Top of bedrock at 5.9 ft bis. Continued drillin
by diamond coring
from 5.9 to 75.0 ft and downhole hammer from 3.9 to
88.0 ft.
HNu « 0 oom. '
TUT 
O05
O949
GERAGHTY
<y MILLER, INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Project/No. TUTU SfTE/PR013.01
.Page
.of.
Location ST. THOMAS
Drilling 
R/1Q/Q9 
Drilling 
7/,c/ Q 9
Started 
5/19/92 
Comnteted 
7/15/92
Completed
Total 
-_ , 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled_1±2^_ feet Diameter ^_L__ inches Coring n»/ir> 
SPLIT-SPOON
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___
.Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS 4mmt
Land-Surface Elev. 236.67 feet 
O Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
Drilling Fluid n««ri 
NONE———————————————————Drilling Method
Drilling
Contractor 
SOIL TECH____________
Prepared
By ———— R. PONCIANO
J. MILLET
Driller J- RIVERA 
Helper J- DlA^
Hammer
Drop 
-50 
inches
Hammer
.Weight 
14°
U
0
2
4-
0.83
4
5.0
0.7
0.6
0.7
14-50/
0.25'
23-31-
26-40
25- 50/
0.46'
CLAY; some Silt; little Sand, very fine; trace Gravel, small
to medium; trace organic materials (roots); very hard.
light brown, dry.
HNu » 1 —3 ppm.
CGI = 055 LEL
GC sample: 0-2'
CLAY; some Silt; little Sand, very fine to medium; little
Gravel, fine; trace Sand, very coarse to coarse; trace
Rock fragments, large to medium; light— brown, hard, dry.
HNu - 0 ppm.
GC Sample: 2-4'
Same as above.
HNu « 0 ppm.
Soil samples collected for VOC, BNA, metals and TPH
analysis.
GC sample: 4—5'.
Continued drilling by diamond coring 4.6 to 120 ft and
using a downhofe hammer from land surface to 120.3 ft.
CM) Fife TU-134
TUT
GERAGHTY
MILLER. INC.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Well J<Wzli_Project/No. TUTU SITE/PR013.01
.Page
.of.
Location ST. THOMAS
Drilling 
-/1/Q, 
Drilling 
7/,/Q9
.Started 
7/1/92 
Completed 
7/2/92
Total 
- n 
Hole 
Type of Sample/
Depth Drilled 4B-° 
feet Diameter 
8 
inches Coring Device ——
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___£.
.Sampling Interval CONTINUOUS feet
Land-Surface Elev. 196-04 feet 
E Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum MEAN SEA LEVEL
__ (Small amount or water
Drilling Fluid M««H AIR/WATER 
to minimize dusO 
railing u«th»ri DOWNHOLE HAMMER BIT
Drilling 
M- MORALES
Contractor _SpJLJECH________'
Prepared
By ————
W. I. MORALES
__ Driller.
Hammer
.Weight _ 140
_ Helper __:
Hammer
Drop 
56
. inches
0
0.1
2
0.1
2
3
1.1
0.5
60-35
35-78
90-100
ASPHALT
SILTY CLAY; some Sand; trace Gravel, brown to gray.
intermixed with weathered Rock fragments, greenish gray,
angular; hard. Soil samples collected for VOC, SNA.
metals and TPH analysis.
HNu = 0 ppm.
Same as above, less Clay, more weathered Rock
fragments, very angular; Saprolite
HNu * 0 ppm.
Two split— spoon samples collected at MW— 14. Proceeded to
ream hole down to 48.0 ft. Water found at approximately
45.0-46.0 ft bis. Monitoring Well installed at 45.2 ft.
Water level on 7/2/92 after completion: 28.24 ft.
Approximately 30 gallons of water were used during
downhole hammer procedure to minimize dust.
CAD nut TV-US
TUT
09 51
5? MILLER. INC
Ground- Water Consultants
LOG
Total Depth Drilled .
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
•
feet 
Hole Diameter ±Ml— inches CoringDevice
Type of Sample/ r /./
J#/i r
» , » " . ,
/ J /«/•
. Sampling Interval.
Land-Surface Bev.
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
f^i !•»!• ni !• ir
wOnuaClDr
Prepared
By ——————
.feet 
D Surveyed 
O Estimated 
Datum.
Drling
Tt
*rl
0
u:i7 Ji± 3.5
A
10-
s/n-
JV
O
\ /
4S
O.3
7>
-ft
/WT
~r
GERAGHTY <P MILLER. INC
rwneK 
».inches
1/86
TUT 
CO5 
O952
^-^ 
v_iL.r>_r-v>_ji * * *
££& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Page 
/ 
nf
fJSjSfH
Type of Sampte/^0*^-^--^1*
Total Depth Drilled __aHp3.feet 
Hole Diameter _l_2___inches 
Conng Device V-^^-rvW:V
Length and Diameter 
rs.o^—i^ 9•«*-«*•—
l Devce 
**«
. Sampling Interval 
^
.feet
Land-Surface Bev__
Driying Ruid Used ____________
Drilling 
^ 
, 
_.
Cantraary 
O^A-c-V.** ~U r^ «. .
Prepared 
, _
By—————<+3~
Jeet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
.Drilling Method.
.Drier.
(1M MOB M •*••) 
CM
**
Harnmef 4^"\ji.
^
A 
-T ^~>- --— VCT • « /•» *»«_
<;z
\
\
\/
Gftw Fom 03 Ml
GERAGHTY o? MILLER. INC,
TUT 
OO5 
O953
BEDROCK CORING MOTES
Client: 
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee 
Project Number:
PR01301
Site:
Borinq/Wj
Logged by
Run
Number
1
A
^
-M
s
|_ -<r 
.J
a
«t
10
1 1
r=x
'3 
/
•v/.iN
0
Tutu Hells Site
i»«
: (O^^^a^
Mio^.^
^^™ 
I^K 
D
~ 
* 1^1 u i i "^ *
Depth
of Run
(feet)
B-C,
C-T
>T-«^
«s-^
s-io
10- u
n-O.
>J>»3
^5-»M
vH-iS
1-5-JC
vt-n
^^^v
^T^vrt^
VJ^y
Penetration
(feet)
1
1
1
' 
J
,
,
/
,
/c^\
/ f} ^
\ ^
\ >
/
1
1
/
/
Run
Duration
(min)
1
3
,
,
1 /
A ^
o.<\
f^ _ fE 
\
C5« ^^
^>.«s
^s
o.s
«.s
^^ . ^y
on
,
1
Location:
v 
\l
^WM»r>-*"*
Date e< OegfcH
Driller:
Penetration
Rate
, 
/
cx^*^
, \
1^
> , >
/^
) n.
a.
^
a_
A
o.
».fj
i-«
1
/
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
/ui^4 PS-^M^-'^— ^ &*^
/^/
Recovery ~
(A 
-
c/^>
^.J^Yj
^«U>r-a ^(-r— >«
'
•K.
Percent
^C° /
J^fl -7.'
J
.
RQD
1
1
S f «J-
t
\
1
i
j
Percent Recovery • Run Penetration 
™ Recovery 
tl J^mi i(~i_ p»T^rBlir-r ^oo»st
ROD - Hnrlr O - i a l i f v n««irm«r1nn 
U"^**" 
l\«»il • ••••• 
^ - »1U~ r-~ 
'
RQD • Sum of Cere Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
O954
BEDROCK CORING NOTTS
Client; Tutu Environmental Investigation Conmittee Project Number;
PR01301
Site: 
Tutu Hells Sit*
Location:
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islar.is
Boring/Well;
Logged by; tO*..
r ( fmr i -L-
-» 
ij 9
-jar
Run
Number
SO-
Depth
of Run
(feet)
-5,
Penetration
(feet)
\
V
Run
Duration
(rain)
0.9
.0.4.
0.8
0.4
0.8
Penetration
Rate
(feet/min)
i . 1 1
l.fe-7
Recov
Percent Recovery • Run Penetration -*- Recovery
RQD - Rock Quality Designation
RQD - Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length v- penetration.
PROl301.XLS/B«droc)c
Percent
Recovery
\ 
>
RQD
GERAGHTY # MILLER. INC.
TUT 
COS 
O955
osa
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client: Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number
Site:
Boring/We
Logged by
Run
Number
%r.
3fc
3"?
38
**
-Ho
-i;
-0
-<»,
-**/
-*5
-It
-0 /
^/ ^
\
S<
Tutu Hell
11: 
t
, uD^li
Depth
of Run
3l-«*o
10-«l
HI--OL
-<*--»*
^ta-Y</
"HL«5
«S-V*
-<t-</-?
-47-Hfi
-<6 -fT ^
-H-50
50 -S^
7^).
'Sxs»>\
aa^sy
vSV/4s
^5-54
s Site
»^1,.V^or«Jt«J
Penetration
<feet)
1
e»U
I
1
J
1
1
,
/. 
?t
7 O ^
\ 'X^^
\ /^
,
,
*t
/
1
*
r
Run
Duration
<min)
C.Q
&.L
<=>.4.
* 
^"i1
o^
o.\ \
o A
-•AV
I.I
>p.s
o.g
0.1
I.JX
O.Q
o.S
o.a
o.l
Location:
^» «*•»-«
Date el Outlif
Driller:
Penetration
Rate
(feet /Bin)
/
^ 
"
\
* -,
^^^
> ^ /
(
)
"
St. 
Thomas, U
14. _ 
L _ i 
L^
^ 
A.I »,
fkol«^^ fc*^
/
Recove ry^
//\
x/ 
*
\
V
•
• -
jf
.S. v^rsi:- :»iar.2f
__ , ,^ ^,r- J _
D.l^H
CJX«-l-r| £>*^
•\
Perhfir.^ | 
RQC
Xecove,,
i
1
I
I
i
,
;
^accent Recovery • Run Penetration ~ Recovery
RQD • Rock Quality Designation
RQD - Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock 
'
GERAGHTY cf MILLER. INC.
TUT 005 O956
<
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client; Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number; 
PRO 1301
Site:
Tutu Wells Site
1
Boring/Well: 
J-*l«J-J^
Logged by
Run
Number
£>SX
5*
feM
«_,_
f
/
^
\
i \\ Vi — ^— i x. t-i^JU.
Depth
of Run
(feet;
su-s-)
s-j-sa
56-St
5-^-UO
s— x
/^\ 
^
\ ) >
( V
x/
Penetration
(feat)
,
J
1
1
,. 
• •
-
/^\
/ /-] ^
k Xx\
\ >•
N/**
Run
Duration
0.^
o.->
o.=;
00 /"
\ ^\\\
/ '-
Location:
Date of Cjjim
Driller:
Penetration
Rate
<2e«t/min)
/ . / / 
/
/.^»/" '
-a. \
i.^
^^
^ 
^y
~ /^s
-}
/
St. Thomas, D.S. Virgin Islands
'ST" 
"pt»\ JO. i^^H
CUlv«r4. &^yt
Recovery
< /\
(feet)
'A
c^^>\\/
-
-
JXsa^L^
37 
-3
Percent
k^lecovkry
\/
RQD
i
Percent Recovery • Run Penetration -~ Recovery
^ 
'
RQD • Rock Quality Designation
RQD « Sun of Core Piecea > 4 inchea in length -7- penetration.
m 
r
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 005 O9S7
^GERAGHTY
8 MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
r 
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
^r^J^ Rx) PP.oo.?
Page 
/ 
nf 
/
Type of Sampte/o, 
( 
\
Total Depth Drilled LO 
teet 
Hole Diameter 
10 
inches 
Coring Device ^t-i «-crs b. 4
Lengln and Diameter
of Coring Device
. Sampling Interval
Jeet
Land-Surface Elev..
Jeet
I Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor
(M tam iMd wrt«)
FtM 
To
GERAGHTY <^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
O958
v 
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
*
« 
.
: 
Tutu Environmental Investigation Conmittee 
Project Number: _____ PRO 13 01
«*•
Location;. .. St. Thomas, T>.S. Virgin Islands
Site: ___ Tutu Hells Sit*
Date of Pering;
Logged by;'
* 
Driller: A-
Run
Number
J.
Jl
5
-i
^>
lo
J// ,\\
Depth
of Run
(feet)
5*>-SH
•^M-SS'
S^r-St
5"C-5~J
51- sa
S^-feO
/^r^
^\ ^
\^ /
, ^ /
V
Penetrationv.
•
(feet)
*""
1 
- 
...
1
1
I
1
•
\
-
^
/ ^
/r> l
\ ^^
\ >'
.
 
v^
j.
•
Run"
Duration
(«in)
. I
»
.1 
.:
1
- ./
-. A\\
V
^
7 *
•*•
j
Penetration
Rate
(feet/min)
i 
/
„ <
" ' ^
i
^>s^
>., >
/ ^
•y
/
^•— -
^
»
Recovery .*
(fe*t)
/\'A
v/\
V
-
-
j
>
Pcrosnt
Rfcoveiv
v-'
.
RQO
1
»
Percent Recovery - Run Penetration ~ Recovery
RQD - Rock Quality Designation
RQC = SUIT, 3- Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -y- penetration.
PRO1301.XLS/Bedrock 
•
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT GO5 0959
-1 —— Vc^
4> {^
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUT 
005 
O960
^GERAGHTY
LLER, INC
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
i±S
Rage
Total Depth Drilled (9O-S teat 
Hole Diameter.
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___LI
Type of Sample/
.inches 
Coring Device ^*-*
Sampling Interval
.feet
Land-Surface Elev_
Jeet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
*-°
.Drilling Method
Prepared
iMMtant 
COT
%
J. ao.al-Jl
vz
Z7A
L/
\
\/
GAM <rvn<03M6
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 0961
V
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client; Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number
.->•
Site:
^~
^—»
Logged by
Run
Number
i
.2
3
4
/
/ <
\
Tutu Well
li
Tyv 
r
Depth
of Run
V-^U,^
£^.^->l.«
7/.5-*74.5
Tfc.S-QO.S
<
X^^ 
^^v^
^~\ 
\
\/ /
*
• Site
Mt^-t^
^ Ho^i
Penetration
(feet)
JT
5
5
• ^
^
.-
^-^
/_ 
}
/ <^ ^
\ ^
\y
Run
Duration
(•in)
3
^
5
9
/**•
/ ».
\ ^
\
\,
*
>•'
Location:
Date flf rnjjm
Driller: j
Penetration
Rate
(feet/min)
/.7
/•I 
/
' <;\
^^
7/^/
(/
St. Thcmas. '.'.S v^r--: Is.ir -
ur> | 5^»^*^ 4*««^ b:^
UL^e^ f^ff^r 
r^eV """' 1 f l l l ^ 
^P^el~ J^^lf^*^
^ 
J
Recovery /I ^erce:--. 
RQ'_
'' \ /
v_
X>"-.. - . -
/ 
' 
;
>
N/ 
:
I
1
•1
t
|
1
1 
1
1
1
i 
;
Percent R\cqy«ry - Run Penetration 
-- Recovery 
'J ' i f M _ i»i4"
RQD - Rock Quality Designation 
U-u«lr^—Jkl c
RQD • Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock
»^«JhtT"
P"
GERAGHTY c? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
O962
AV& MILLER. INC
Ground-Wattr Consultants
Boring/Well MV-lf
Site
Location
SAMPLE/
LOG
Total Depth Drilled ____ feet
^'yj*
TypeofSemple/
CoringDavic*
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
-SamoHnolnlaival
Land-Surface Bev.
Drilling RuidUeed
Drilling
.feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Denim
.Driller.
U/y/^r 
/ 
Helper V**/'*
Hammer X/ 
l^ammeK..
Wak^n /*// 
PfaB 
JO
>»*•
! 
i I
> 
I
\-0
17 fl
c-o
1-0
r-
//- yi
ii- n
^T/i<^ / A
! 
i
•^ 
• 
! 
'
\l\±o 
7^
~r*
*>^ \/s>
y
^y
/ tv
/
\
fir* •
-f
't'tS
. 2.
/* ' '
-rs**+*s+tKS
TO
Wr
T»
/A}~ 
,
~r 
•=• 0.
*5
tr
f 
7 S-/Y
~c^————v
GERAGHTY c? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
O963
^•TGERAGHTY
MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Piryrt/Nn
AUts*
.Page
-Of.
, e 
• 
.Jftrt 
Type of Sample/
Total Depth Drilled _^2__feet 
Hote Diarneter(0/jQa__,nches 
Conng Devce _
Length and Diameter
of Conng Device _
Land-Surface Etev..
Drilling Ruid Used
Dritting
Contractor.
Prepared
By ———
. Sampling Interval
.feet
Jeet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
Drilling Method Klf fkai^
•Ju^St^
Hammer
.Weight .
/
CT / ™i
^
\
"TU£JL
u)Ui7>.
7
GERAGHTY c^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
O964
^GERAGHTY
Sg& MILLER, INC.
Ground' Water Consultants
Boring/Well M
•WdByJU
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Cont.d)
por •
rUo.7
*>/
\>
\
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
O965
JJL.
eo-»ir»^ \r\*a 4«-l\o^O~>
.1
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
O966
1*1'
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER. INC.
Ground- Water Consultant!
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/Wett A&tdL- Project/No. 
-*Z7« A I. /S£00f302.X
Site 
<-/ 
J^- 
/ 
.
Location 
~>f 
~Ao***3 
(carritHl***. C-
Total Depth Drilled _
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device __
Land-Surface Bev.
J___of__Z_
>»// " 
Type of Sample/ r 
/./
Hoto Diameter _£_£:__ *>cnes CoringDevice J/>///
l
>AJ-
.Sampling Interval.
.feet
.feat 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor ..^^M^..
Prepared
By———————/
lariMrtMt Cm
inches
O 
\2--0 I I-H
b.^
. +'*/£ ^ t///
GERAGHTY <* MILLER. INC.
C
TUT 
OO5 
0967
^GERAGHTY
J& MILLER, INC
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Site
Total Dei
Length £
at Conn,
Land-Su
DriUing F
Drilling
Contract
Preparec
By
Oh Dhlle
ind Dian
3 Device
lace Ele
tod Use
or 
r
Type of Sampte/ci_ 
1 i
d ^SrO 
taet 
Hole Diametar 1 2- 
inches 
Conna Device 
>"H *^, 
b? 4-
teter 
, i i
S-O ^*-if|
l^-ioc£»-e_s 
Samolino Interval 
J»W S-O 
feet
v 
feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum
iri 
nrMinjj Method tJXr ftu^oj-
^— *So3 ^-/-e.. 
Drilter K.&«s-« 
XH«lfv.NA. Atm
J 
,-N ,, 
i 
Harrime/ ,<f ./Idammerv.! . ^
UL>. H«riJL«-a 
\Atenht Plftx/ 
nW> 
><lA inrhoc
(M Me* M MM) 
Cam 
PIMMOTOT 
/\.
tocoMry 
MM**! 
/^ 
>
Ftow 
it 
HMQ 
MM 
8«M^pfri Pjifripnyii
O
50
/ 1
^ 
^
\
»>/A
x—— v
^^
\ )
"V
\/
„. ——
J>
\
\
J'
^, Av _ ^,ii ^y^jk ^ _ .^
\" v 
*T
J ' 
^^
rCi ^./IL 73bsSLc**^ ^r s.o (**J-
\ ^ /^y
\ <
^ \/
-~\ i
R- >
V
^
GERAGHTY fif MILLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
O968
-fo-
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
O969
c
^GERAGHTY
S&& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
r-.
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
- Page 
I 
of_L
Bonng^Wj
Site
Location. 
_
Type of Sampte/S-riM.-* fes I
Total Depth Drilled ocL_fct__feet _ Hole Diameter _J_O____inches 
Coring Device
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device __
. Sampling Interval _ -^
.feet
Land-Surface Elev..
.feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor _
Prepared
By ————
.Drilling Method.
. Driller.
Hammer
.Weight _Ji
Cow
***0fR** ^^Xj0"
\/
Pi A.
\ 
^ 
•---— -^ _jj. ^x' 
^^»—
r N 
*
L^
\
< )
GERAGHTY 6^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
0970
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client: Tutu Environmental Investigation Coonittee Project Number; _____ PRQ1301
Sire: 
Tutu wells Site • 
Location;..-. St. Thomas, U.S. virgin Islands
3ors.n<£7we]Ta.:
^*- 
-gy
Logged by: LJ.
Run
Depth
of Pun
; feet)
-iO
Penetration
(feet)
t K^r.
I
b.-*-1
Run
Duration
(min)
IO
Penetration
Rate
(feet /rain)
O--70
"*"
v
Perce\t
Recover
\/
\/
3QC
»r.; Recover/ «• Run Penetration -*- ReFovery
- SOCK Quality Designation
- our-. ;f Cert Pieces > 4 inches in length •£- penetration.
'«- rr
RQD
J —— ,3
. -r-J(e>-s y3«j-«-;«.
PRO 12C1.XLS/ Bedrock
GERAGHTY cf MILLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
O97.1.
«
GERAGHTY <^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
CO5 
O972
£& MILLER. INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
±PPvOOi^.O.
Total Depth Drilled
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
Type of Sample/ Y-v*«r-.kJ+-
Jeet 
Hqte Ftometef 
L 
inches 
Conng Device l>Q^~.-d'W -_
Land-Surface Elev..
.feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated
Sampling Interval
Datum_____
». o
.feet
Used
Dnlling
Dnlling
Contractor
Prepared
By
SwwM/Con Dtptt
IM MM Mid wtat) 
Cen
Method.
Hammer
Weight
X/^p^
.inches
\/
\/
34M M»m 03 6-86
GERAGHTY c^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
O973
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client: 
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee 
Project Number: 
PRO 1301
o*a
>^
Site:
BoringVWe
Logged by
»
Run
Number
j_
r^ ——
^^
5
•
/\
N
Tutu Wells Site ;
• «
ill 
HuD- Vt>
: (2 , N-4p, , , _ < _
Depth
of Run
(feet)
.M.S-.V?
5-«-^5
5S-5-
M-Hi
-Hl-^i
>f5.5-M«t.<.
,
x^X
s~\
\) }
•^ /
\S
Penetration
(feet) .
J.M
*A
*\ ~
JL
^.5
r.^ "- -
-
/ ^
/ <0
\ ^
\ >'
V
1 — -
-•-
•
Run
Duration
(•in)
^5
S
- "J
M
.5 /
S\
\
\
•
v.
/ *
-
-
*•
Location;..-..
* 
Q £L
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Hlr IS» -T— ^ ^» 
i _
Date of eeginei 
J 
*SI «
* Driller:
• Penetration
Rate
( feet /mln )
CT. 0^ /
J-fc"? <"
O.ST 
\
o-sa
^«>p
v>.^>
/^
- )
/
•
•
i-I^M
Ps--V«-l A, r^Tft- ^ *4 &
7-y 
j
Recovery^
( teet )
V^. u
V
Vv
-
< f
••
-
Percent
Recovery
\/
(s.s.-~!
k«,l«: U
RQD
L-Nj
•**»%«fcr""C^»
1
i»er;er.t: Recovery • Run Penetration , ~ Recovery
RQD - Rock Quality Designation *
RQE - Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
PRO130l.XLS/Bedrock 
•
* 
r
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
O974
C
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
Baring/Wall MlO-H 
Project/No.
Site 
^ , <
Location 
<-?•+ •
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
I PAQO*S.
cSSeiBd
-, 
Type of Sample/
Total Depth Drilled _JL5__feet 
Hole Diameter _i___inches 
Conng Device .
Length and Diameter 
r
of Conng Device 
•34 **^
. Sampling Interval
**» 
feet
Land-Surface Elev.
.feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
Dnllmg Fluid Used
Dnlling
Drilling
Contractor _s±ii±j
Prepared 
. _ 
\
By 
___ LOft^.4^
. DrillerJi
Hor-JLa
Hammer
Weight
»•» w /Hammers.,
W ^y D^P ^
«-e>v
1506
i551
16-17
-^1-* Ir^L- 
5^___Q."^ -C*^ **T r~o4^
04M forw, 03 MS
•0.187
GERAGHTY ^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
0975
^GERAGHTY
£gSMILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Cont.d)
Bonng/Wejj
Prepared By,
GERAGHTY 6? XflLLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
O976
^GERAGHTY
Sf& MILLER, INC.
Services
Pmpet/Nln
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
l"LJL- JLJTJ PfLQO 'V
Page 
L
Location
Drilling
.Completed
Total Depth Drilled _
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device __
_teet
Hole Diameter.
C,;~ JL_
Type of Sample/
.inches 
Conng Device _
Land-Surface
.feet 
D Surveyed 
Q Estimated
. Sampling Interval
Datum_____
5-S 
te«»t
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor _
Prepared
By ———
Drilling Method
Hammer
.Weight _
.inches
COT
*9O9Nf\
I**)
N>M
I\ \
\
2.
GERAGHTY c? MILLER. INC.
12ST
TUT
COS 
0977
S& MILLER, INC
Envtronmtniol Servtctt
Project/No.
~ 
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
i C*jk
Pay 
/
Total Deptn Drilled jj£S__teet 
Hole Diameter __^_
Length and Diameter
of Conng Device
S±S
_inch
Type of Sample/
Conng Device
. Sampling Interval
aiM2teL3_feet
Land-Surface Bev..
Jeet 
D Surveyed 
D Esbmated 
Datum.
DriUing Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor
4,
13
\
Alpi+AL
</ /
tx. r*c
*ff
/«yyg j
*fi e. *TJ^.
GERAGHTY ^ MILLER. INC.
Soumom »<2S7
TUT 
DO5 
O978
^GERAGHTY
.'& MILLER, INC
Environmental Strvices
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Cont.d)
Rnnng/Wril
Prepared By
GERAGHTY <? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
0979
^GERAGHTY
£&& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Pm|ar*/No ^V^jK^ A.JT /
.Page_L
.of_J_
Total Depth Drilled.
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device __
•5 
feet 
Hole Diameter
S l~-4- J o .y
Type of Sampled
ce Jtotao-'
.inches 
Conng Device
Land-Surface Dev.
Sampling Interval
Datum______
Jeet
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor
'8
\
;8
>
X/
\
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
raM.1257
TUT 
OO5 
O98O
1 
^arGERAGHTY
£&& MILLER. INC.
' Ground-Water Consultants
'H.-03
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Boring/WeJ 
____________
P£L~ JV -T^L, '<;..< «fU~ .l" 8558 «/«/»
Total Depth Drilled "'^ 
feet 
Hole Diameter
Length and Diameter 
< 
>(
of Coring Device _____2 f J 
>v/._______
V 
^TuV^A f^9 C^MV^P^^k/
inches Coring Device
_ SemnMnq tnt
Land-Surface Bev..
Drilling RuidUead
Drilling
Con
.feet 
D Surveyed 
GEsbnuted 
Detum
Dritor
Prepared
By ———
T«
ipwt
l.f
l-M
?-
J.\ -
.? S.I4
r,c
Ci
Sa ,'J}
-*'* . /iVV
K
r**
'fr*
^^MSf+'tt/A
5F-
-5
e>f
/ <f n rfw 
u
O X
t Arts .
—p/'S 
-fir
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
.feet
/• V
£?& MILLER, INC
Ground-Water Consultants
Boring/WeJL
Prepared ay
To
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Cont.d)
M6/ 5 .
r-7-i7
Ji**t+> }
f*
10. o
I-H
SD/f
\ 
{ 
^
y» 
wrK 
p**rfe\. f*4— ***i »*/*»- .
10-0
M.
V
*j*z~l
*~
»0. 3
0 
Lr
Aae K
V
1 
/> 
1
s ' V/Vt r«
Mr r
CO*
*r
.
ar\s i^e.3"*X'
re»et,-*j 
- 
0
*5~
\
0*~r
'J*rr •*"-
GERAGHTY c? MILLER. INC
TUT 
GO5
O982 
»•
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
L
I 
nf
Site
Location
Drilling
.Completed
Total Depth Drilled _ClJi__feet 
Hole Diameter.
Length and Diameter
of Conng Device
Typeof Sample/
jnches 
Conng Device
. Sampling Interval 
»
Jeet
Land-Surface Elev..
Jeet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
Drilling Fluid Used
DriUtng
.Drilling Method.
Can
•WM^M
n>B^W»l
* 
(M)
iprl
IS.
0//>
\
l.n,~, J- 1-7.ft 4_f. P...
\7
\/
O&M
GERAGHTY fi? MILLER, INC.
TUT 
O05 
0983
^GERAGHTY
^MILLER, INC.
'Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
Page 
I 
nf I
Drilling
ffrmpimiiri
Type of Sample/
Total Depth Drilled _lfL®__feet 
Hole Diameter _LQ^_incnes 
Coring Device
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___L3_
.Sampling Interval
Jeet
Land-Surface Elev.
Dnlling RUKJ Used
Drilling
Contractor
Prepared 
-,
By 
W-
Jeet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum
34U fom 036^6
GERAGHTY 6^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
CO5 
O984
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
client: 
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee 
Project Number:_____PR01301
Site: 
Tutu Wells Site • 
Location**-.. St. Thomas, D.S. Virgin Islands
Logged by.
Run
Number
Depth
of Run
(feet)
Penetration
(feet)
Run
Duration
Penetration
Rate
(feet/min)
RQD
0-S
xv
- (,
(. -
N
- S
O.
tO
7
LO- U
\
•*?
11-
i a
- m
n
"O-fe
feO
O.feT
•n
CD
IT1
o .80
-f=-
i
Percent Recovery • Run Penetration ~ Recovery
RQD = Rock Quality Designation 
_ _____ 
_ 
.3
ROD - Sum ~i Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
PRO i:-01. XLS /Bedrock 
• 
•
^|> ^ Jcr-MJ%;
*^1*^
;<>JL
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client: Tuzu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number;______PRO 1301
Site: 
Tuzu w*lls Sit* • 
Location;. -. St. Thomas, U.S. virgin Islands
Boring/ We^jg)
Logged by:__I
Oat* of -POL lay;
* 
Driller:
Run
P«n*tration
reeo | 
(feet)
Hun
Durat3!on
(min)
P*n«tration
Rat*
(f**t/mln)
R*cov*
A""'
RQD
18
O-O
O-bl
•*f-
e^r"
0-65
^ 
" *^ -p
OflSL
f
V
*>
C
v —
•^
I.-7O
33
1
?mr~*r.~ Recovery « P.un P«netrat^on 
~ R*cov*ry
9
?.Q3 - ?.cc:< Quality 0«*i?natlon
^0- 
i'.:- .: 
CCL-= Pie-res > 4 incn*s in l«ngth -f p*n*tration.
GERAGHTY <* MILLER. INC.
TUT 
GO5 
0986 
™
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client: 
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee 
Project Number;______PR013Q1
*
Sire:___Tutu Hells Site • 
Location:.-... St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Bonng^Wel
Logged by;
Date of
* 
Drillers
\
Run
Penetration
(«eet)
Run
Duration
P«n«tration
Rat*
(fMt/min)
\/
RQD
•^tt
CJU .•T
?«r:er.i Recovery » Run Penetration ~ Recovery
•
RQC -- ROCK Qua.lj.ty Designation
- OU.T. -r Cert Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
GERAGHTY <P MILLER. INC.
PRC1201 .XLS/Bedrock.
TUT 
GO5 
O9S7
•78.5
\y
r-, ^i
GERAGHTY c? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
0988
J^GERAGHTY
£*'& MILLER, INC
Environmental Services
Bonr
Site
Location
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
. Page 
f 
Of__L
Drilling
.Started.
Type of Sample/v 
. 
/ 
/
Total Depth Drilled_fefl__feet 
Hole Diamatef 
fe» 
inehee 
Connq Dgw^» X...-.«-<U^-U>U Lv
Length and Diameter
of Conng Devce __
. Sampling Interval
_feet
Land-Surface Elev..
.feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor _
Prepared
By ———
.Doling Method.
.&«r-% 
/ 
Hfllp^kPy-
~t
Hammcri|V ./\Hammec-\
Weight W*S 
N«p _^
.inches
COM
/\
/ \
/ /
\mpttCmtj6^tm
\\
1>
O4M Rrm 03 Mf,
GERAGHTY fi? MILLER. INC.
TUT' 
005 
0989
U
CORING VOTES
Client; Tutu Environment*! Investigation Committee Project Number:_____PRO 1301
^^~^~ 
. 
*
Sit at 
Tutu Well* Site 
- Location! 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Boring^Well)
Logged by>
Date
Driller:
Run.
Number
to
((r
Depth
of Run
(feet)
S3-SU
Penetration
V
Run
Duration
. (minj.
Penetration
Rate
(feet/mln)
0.50
O.SO
0^
/o.so
0-50
O-5C5
o.so
coi«jry/S
(teet)
\/
Percent
Recovery
\/
4
RQD
Percent Recovery - Run Penetration ~ Recovery 
J
•^
RQD • Rock Quality Designation
RQD - Sum of Core Pieces*> 4 Inches in length ~ penetration.
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
GO5 
O99O
^GERAGHTY
SS& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
^25) Project/No. T^T° ^>Tg /
QaL^
Total Depth Drilled
Length and
of Conng Device
Land-Surface Bev.
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor
7*7 ' 
***** 
Hote Diameter _LQ___inches 
Conng Device* »*c^ IP'* 4
- •&"
**J -
GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
CO5 O991
^GERAGHTY
LLER, INC
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Cont.d)
Prepared
iMwlnl Con
iprl
=_\
\
V.
/
G»M harm O
GERAGHTY c? 1VHLLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
O992
•s
J^
.1
GERAGHTY <^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
O993
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
1 Pfr 0013.0;
Drilling
.Page_
_, _ 
, 
-,— - Sample/ \.
Total Depth Drilled _£LtiQ_teet 
Hole Diameter _JB__inches 
Conng Device
Length and Diameter
of Conng Devce
. Sampling Interval 
5 .O
Jeet
Land-Surface Elev.
feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor
Prepared
By
( \ 
x/ 
L. 
0
• .1 L^i L^ 
^P f *~ ~*r-~. 
O»-<3lji/~^ r*""*»/XJ"*>V^
SUM Fomm MB
GERAGHTY <? MILLER. INC
TUT 
005 
O994
BEDROCK CORING HOTES
Client: Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Mumper;
PR01301
Site: 
Tutu Walla Site
Boring/ 
_________
Logged by; I0p>.i. j.o-'X..r\or«-l<
Location; 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Data off
Driller:
Run
Numoer
Depth
of Run
(feet)
5
LO
.3
Sfl-84?
,W
f5
Penetration
(feet)
Run
Duration
(min)
5
Penetration
Rate
(feet /min)
g.Ki
0^0
0.50
o./v
a
0.33
0.50
/
Recovery
Pexcent>
Recoy«ry
RQD
U J
£>
0--
Percent Recovery - Run Penetration -/• Recovery
RQD = Rock Quality Designation
RQD * Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
-Lr-
l
^GERAGHTY
M& MILLER. INC
Environmental Services
Project/No
SAMPLE/CORF LOG
fP/2-QOiX.OOfl
Page_L_ of
• tLo^»c
(x? V_r.
Drilling
Started.
.CorfSeted
Type of Sample/
Total Depth Drilled _LQB_feet 
Hole Diameter _iO___inches 
Coring Device
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device ___
. Sampling Interval
Land-Surface Bev.
.feet 
D Surveyed 
O Estimated 
Datum
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor
Prepared
By
.feet
C$*——e. ^^ Jk,
GAM
GERAGHTY w' MILLER. INC.
TUT 
COS 
O996
J^TGERAGHTY
<S? MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Cont.d)
Bonng/Vtejl
Prepared B
I Mo* tad wrtan)
E^B^ 
^-
rVBHI 
ID
1
38
P / A
f^ri
^jjo-?-.
». -» 
— i-^——— . 
c->O— ^ <i 3;<p.» (rr-<g.eLt*-. ••» •«»
3AM torm M
GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
0997
JlTGERAGHTY
£&& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Contxl)
Prepared Py f
\
fej/
t.-«»r *-"t- ^r^t „
.r.zJ
i «•• — «e_ fh *- ^ 
^>-«.
*~VT )
\
13
•J/A
^py-
V.
r^ W
"'S
Qbji •-'«•
"t>
rr*-** i 
n 
— t jfT^~—-
C_K1*V«.
103
GAM Fom CM 4-OS
GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC.
^;
TUT 
OO':' O998
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
•a*- -
1
TUT 
005 
O999
Client; Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number;_____PR01301.OQfi
Site: 
Tutu wells Site 
Location; 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Boring/well-'
Logged by:
Date-e-TCortSS: 
Aon) Ifl.
-cer-. Recovery - Run Penetration -™ Recovery
RQC = Rack Quality Designation
AC- ^ SUIT of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -y- penetration.
PRO 1301.XLS/Bedrock
: O
•
a«>
GERAGHTY c*' MILLER. INC* 
"" 
-«
l><|:
~*« °f f
r« ISO f *•
_;
^JU,^
•4s-
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client: Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number:
Site: 
Tutu Wells Site
PR01301
Location; 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Logged bv: L"U .. .A-
(e*._
•
ric»--> J
Run
Number
S-o
Depth
of Run
( feet )
SB-SM
5S-S9
- CO
V
Penetration
(feet)
1 
-
V
Run
Duration
(min)
O.MS
o .
\
1.
0.8
Penetration
Rate
(feet /min)
-r-a
a-a.
4.B-
'•3
0.5
o.S
o.
O.T
1 -3
1-3
Recove
(feet)
Percent
•Recov
\x
RQD
Percent Recovery - Run Penetration ~ Recovery
RQC = Rock Quality Designation
RQC = Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -y- penetration.
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT OO5 1OOO
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
«
*
Client; Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number;_____PR01301
Site: 
Tutu Wells Site 
Location: 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Boring/Well;
Logged by: \jD
Run
Number
•HO
-H-H
Depth
of Run
( feet)-
Penetration
(feet)
- I
Run
Duration
o.S
O.T
..8
1. CT
Penetration
Rat*
(feet/min)
•1-3
05-
7 /
nt
(feet)
RQO
C3.Q
>
»• 5
V
o.-?
8t
0.5-
30
-J&i
Q-«a
i
. •
Percent Recovery - Run Penetration — Recovery
.... 
• 
>>
RQD * Rock Quality Designation
RQD = Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length •£- penetration.
PRO 1301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
10O.1
.4 5
BEDROCK CORING MOTES
Client; 
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Humbert_____PR01301
Site: 
Tutu Wells Site 
Location; 
St. Thomas, O.S. Virgin Islands
Logged by: L
i n . j n
mp*jj 
**" ^O
I :*-r.«
1(01
Run
Number
55
57
fel
Depth
of Run
( feet )
1*4 aS
cu—-,
»H^.a
ts
\
ta
RW5H ';
-?o
V
Penetration
• ( feet )
I '
>
V
Run
Duration
(•in)
0.-7
S
1 1
to
•t
Penetration
- Rate
Jfeet/min)
o.oB
O .
o.o~7
. JO
o.oS
o.oi.
(reet)
Co
CQX4J t."t^^
RQD
033 -U
Percent Recovery • Run Penetration ~ Recovery
•
RQC * Rock Quality Deaignation"
RQD = Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -y- penetration.
j
PRO1301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
GO5 1O02
V
T-
BEDROCK OORZHG MOTES
Client: Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number; 
PR01301
Site: 
Tutu Wella Site 
Location; 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Island*
Percent Recovery - Run Penetration ~- Recovery
P.QD = Rock Quality Designation
•
RQD = sum of Core Piece* > 4 inches in length ™ penetration.
PRO 130 1 . XL£ /Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
GO5 
1GG3
^ -.^J^iuJL,.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
1OO4
^GERAGHTY
Sfe 
MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
^ 
Type of SampteV
Total Depth Drtted_L^L_teet 
Hole Diameter.pa_^_incnes 
Coring Device -"•'
Length and Diameter 
P 
0 / 
I 
*z
of Conng Device 
=> -freest- / ?b .^ i/siJ^c-a__________ Samolina Interval __O
Jeet
Land-Surface Bev..
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor_
Prepared
By _____
Jeet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated
(IM MM tad wrtH*) 
Con
foe
\£ -*\T~
m-3
Fonn 03 »-a6
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
1OO5
TUT CO'5 1006
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
0-1 1
Q.H4
Client! Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number;_____PRO 1301
Site: 
Tutu Hells Site 
Location; 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Island?
Boring/We
Logged by; L^~ «- j -^-"T^
-jf-'
: *>JQH
Driller:
Run
Number
Depth
of Run
/JO-;//
///-
Penetration
Run
Duration
(sin)
lie
>o
Penetration
Rate
(zeet/oin)
o-ot
0^^
/
RecoWry^
(feet,
Percent '
^Recovery
N 
X
V
RQD
I«IIO
/30O
llt-KS
8
\
/
/o
o.o«/
ii
a./4/
0.3-0
-5
1U
o. 08
Ik,
a.o
0.0.2.
Percent Recovery - Run Penetration ~ Recovery
RQD - Rock Quality Designation
RQD • Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
|4v» nron - -^jt
tv?«u*l<J- ro>e-
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
BEDROCK CORHfC NOTES
Client; 
Tutu Envirown*ntal*lnv«*tigation Co«mitt*e 
Project Number;
PR01301
Site:
Logged by
Run
Number
/ f t
1*
^0
/
/\
\
Tutu Nell
lp 
/
: (jOa-u-t
Depth
of Run
(feet)
05-/^fe
/P4-07
&T-IZ&
S~^\
S~\
\J ;
K /
• Sit*
^(O^^^h
L»— ' _L . A^r-<
Penetration
/
/
7
•-
^
X A
/ 0 l
\ x>
"\ 7
\
'
JL.
Run
Duration
(air.;
s
5-
Q.
*
/~
\ '\\
\
-^/
p-
Location: .
v ^
Driller:
Penetration
Rat*
- o./a /
0.3<f(
0.50 \
^^-^
v> ^ 7
/)
s
—
•>•
St . Thomas , D
L / ^ 
L l 
/
^, 
^ 
J
R«feJ4 fi
^"v^
(f««t)
A
v ?
l5^p^to
N/7
*
-
.S. Virgi
^_» 
J
efc^ WS/ A| • 4-tfte
Percent
V
;uJU«
n Islands
5 £- ; _ .. L.
*r^ Oe^-«
~s
RQD 
,
J*38*~*
..
Percent Recovery • Run Penetration ~ Recovery
*^»
RQD - Rock Quality Designation
RQD - Sum of Core Piece* > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT COS 1OO7
£f& 
MILLER. INC.
'Ground-Water Consultants
Total Depth Drilled
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device __
' v 7 lf •
- X 3 
r &•
.Sampling
^ r» J./ASQUJ 
foot
Land-Surface Bev.
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
wOntrdctoc
.feet 
D Surveyed 
D
Datum
7O05"
1/88
GERAGHTY^MILLER. INC. 
TUT 005 1008
^•TGERAGHTY
MILLER, INC.
Ground' Weitr Consultants
Boring/Well
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Cont.d)
A 
Page_^_of.
Prepared ay
M . C ~\.^><
(tMt Mow Mnd Mrtm) 
Com
To
6.
3.*
o.-r
3D/0.-/
cfocv
u.
-X
tO.
O-.D-
5o/a/
Orr>>i—ig ^-
\
<=i'^« a^
tl-O
II. 1
0*1
,
'if ^'^'0 ^
" J
vJtll 
iu<*b.Ua,4\»^ 
i.S
o
i 
MuG-3.s&
SS
i D €.
'4
£
1\ .0
M.O CP«± \A/e*t
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
O05 
1O09
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Servers
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
I
Page_J_
.of_L
Drilling 
. 
•
Started SI II t*H
Wing
Total Depth Drilled
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
Land-Surface Elev.
Drilling Fluid Used
Drilling
Contractor
of Sample/
.feet 
Hole Diameter 
< J- 
inches 
Coring Device 
i~i-*efr~)_
^l/l-L-.^J^^
feet
GERAGHTY c? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
.10.10
BEDROCK CORING MOTES
Client! Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee Project Number;_____PRO 1301
»
Site: 
Tutu Wells Site ' 
Location? .• -. St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Boring^Wj
Logged by; tPo-
^.. "X.
Date of
* 
Driller i
Run
Numoer
Depth
oi nuft
(feet)
Penetration
(feet)
Run
Duration
(•in)
Penetration
Rate
(£eet/min)
Recovery
/Mfeet)
Reaovepy
RQD
1
o.s
V
<D-
ft
i-S
\a
0.
n
10-K
o. a.
•a.
0.09
\/
Percent Recovery • Run Penetration ~- Recovery 
Q«
• 
>
RQD • Rock Quality Designation
RQD - Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
PRO1301.XLS/Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT OO5 
lOli
'-3
y
GERAGHTY c^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
1012
^GERAGHTY
Sf& 
MILLER, INC
Environmental Services
Bonn
Site
Location
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
.Page__L_of_J_
ComSned
Total Depth Drilled _l
Length and Diameter
of Conng Device _
Hole Diameter _LQ.
Type of Sample/
inches 
Conng Device
Land-Surface Elev._
Drilling Fluid Used
tart
Surveyed
Esbmated
. Sampling interval
Datum_____
Jeet
.Drilling Method
Drilling
Contractor.
Prepared
By ———
^~*0,
Ce>«
pvl
N/
V
Ftr^ 03 6-B6
GERAGHTY c^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
.1O13
c
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
Client; 
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee 
Project Number; 
PR01301
Site:
Logged by
Run
Number
A
^
3
//\\
Tutu Wells Site •
^Jv . 
l-li ,T_ -\ it
• • 
v~r •
T-eJU,3
Depth
of Run
(feet)
i^m
14-lfc
»u-i8
/""~"X\
/^\
\) /
k /
Penetration
( teetj
^
3
3.
*
'V
/ \
/ o
\ ^N
\7
* «?.
j
,
-
*
Location : .,--.
^ Data of •e>ii>
"""*' Driller:
Run
Duration
.(•in)
*
4
5
(o
. 
/\\
' \
•
/ *
%
-
Penetration
Rate
(feet/min)
0.^ /
o.t,'~7 \
O.^a* 
^
- -
^\
\S 
y^ 
/
/
.-;)
/
%
9
•
St. Thomas, O.S. Virgin Islands
^1 
^1 t^hM
D 
i 
1 n_ /I tXv {
M»,C9Ty«j^- r\_«4>| rwcXk^Lnt, ^fl.
/ J^ 
-^
Recovery s\
( teet )
/A
v/\\/
-
*
J
,
\
Percent
Recovery
RQD
*
Percent Recovery » Run Penetration 
-„- Recovery
SQD - Roclc Quality Designation
^ 
^;
RQC. * Surr. of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
— «.»«^pr
PR013Q1 .XLS /Bedrock
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
101.4
KO-.
4-x»
d) *-,-,-*<v
a
'T"
*flLl« lc »! 3'4«.«J'
~?3J
.- no ^-J
GERAGHTY cf MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
1O15
^•TGERAGHTY
S&& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
Bonk
Site
Location
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
ftKOO i"*
Page
n< 
/
Type of Sample/ gy 
i
Total Depth Drilled SR.^ teBt 
Hole Diameter 
6. 
inches 
Conng Device 
*"ri*^«. to'.
'_________ Sampling Interval 
S
Length and Diameter
of Conng Device _
Land-Surface Elev.__
S-S -.rs
Jeet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum.
_feet
Dnlling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor
Prepared
By
.Driing
/HalpeK.^e
GERAGHTY <^ MILLER. INC
TUT 
OO5 1O16
BEDROCK CORING NOTES
*•
Client; Tutu Environmental Investigation Conmittee Project Number:_____PRO 1301
Sit*: 
Tutu Walls Site 
* 
Location; 
St. Thomas, D.S. Virgin Islands
Boring/
logged byt "3. Voj\\+—
Date of Cegiae;
Driller:
Run
Number
Depth
of Run
(feet)
Penetration
(feet)
Run
Duration
(nxin)
Penetration
Rate
(feet/mln)
Rec
RQD
±*
cr.
i-S
,<. \
x/
O-
10
\
ffi.-56Us'
P—• sent Recovery - Run Penetration ~ Recovery
RQD • Rock Quality Designation
RQD - Sum of Core Pieces > 4 inches in length -£- penetration.
4. 
'f
PR01301.XLS/Bedrock 
^
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 
1.O17
^•TGERAGHTY
MW& MILLER. INC.
Ground- Water Consultant}
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
of.
Total Depth Drilled
Length and Diameter
of Coring Device
/, 
Type of Sample/ 
i /
_ inches Coring Device 
Sf/t'r 
S*00AJ
- , .
2 / J
.Sampling Interval.
feet
Land-Surface EJev.
Drilling Ruid Used
Drilling
Contractor
.feet 
D Surveyed 
O Estimated 
Datum.
. Drilling Method.
PriHar
*4**>'« 
/ 
/
**"»———XH*piv
0335"
1/86
GERAGHTY <w MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
1018
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER, INC
d-Wgitr Consultants
TUT 
O05 
IO19
SAMPLE/CORE LOG (Cont.d)
Paoe^±Z_of
Prepared By 
H-
(iMt tatow tand wrfMM)
To
Cora
'fl- 0
ays^./4-
ru.G
p«r«
\
- a
-X
C LA
^*y
 
rtg>
0. 3 -
L
^-
*
,~Z6—J
^-^ri
roc.
. ^v
GERAGHTY <? MILLER. INC.
^GERAGHTY
A& MILLER, INC
Environmental Services
TUT 
OO5 102O
Bonng/Well
Site
Location
Profaet/NQ
SAMPLE/CORE LOG
^. 0*7.6_______
Pay.
Total Depth Drilled.
Length and Diameter
of donng Device __
Type ol Sample/
feet 
Mote Diameter_!°__inches 
Conng Device
.Sampling Interval
Jeet
Land-Surface Elev.
feet 
D Surveyed 
D Estimated 
Datum
Drilling Fluid Used
ComrLor
O4M ton- 03 6-86
GERAGHTY c'MlLLER. INC.
-T •'<*•» •r. 
'• i
4-vf
———
GERAGHTY c^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 1O21
TUT 
O05 
1O22
n
L
LLER, INC.
C
Environmental Services
SUBJECT
CUENTWIOJKT NO: tt^to l?»
CHKD: 
DATE:
NEV: 
DATE: c
iHEE
/
O — I *v\»*\ j
/ mm..
( Mi VN / *•/ S
\ *\A, SO sec.
31
\/
S2L
(/HUVV 1
US
^MILLER:
? MILLER, INC
nvironmental Services
.TJTU UJU/LS SfTT.
0*Tt
CHKO: 
OCTt
REV: __ WJt
r _ _• .. . ^
SHEET
UJELk
a* /
\\0
or
[K\UM5
*J/A
\
loo
AJ/A
\\
»0/A
Zo
N /
8
is
TUT 
005 
1O23
APPENDIX E
PETROGRAPHIC STUDY
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TU' 
°°b 
°^
International
October?, 1992
Mr. Michael D. Reive
Geraghty and Miller, Inc.
201 West Passaic Street, 3rd Floor
Rochelle Park, NJ 07662
Subject: 
Petrographic Study (detailed thin section petrography analyses)
Wells 
MW-4D. MW-6D: MW-11D, MW-13D
Location: 
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
File: 
192187
Dear Mr. Reive:
This report presents the final results of a Petrographic Study performed on four rotary drilled
bedrock samples. The sample remnants will be sent to you via regular mail.
It has been a pleasure performing this study for Geraghty and Miller, Inc. Should you have any
questions about these analyses, or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Sincerely,
CORE LABORATORIES
Reservoir Geology Group
Debra J. Malek
Senior Geologist
TUT 
005 
1O25
Dallas Advanced Technology Center
P O Box '15044. CarroWon. Texas 75011-5044 1875 Monetary Drive. Carrollton. Texas 75006. (214) 466-2673, Telex 163166 CORDAL UT. Fax (214) 323-3930
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
DISCUSSION
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
REFERENCES CITED
Table 1: Thin Section Analyses: Composition
Table 2: Thin Section Analyses: General Descriptions
PHOTOMICROGRAPHS AND DESCRIPTIONS
PLATE 1 - MW-4D Well Sample Depth: 59.0-60.0 feet
PLATE 2 - MW-6D Well Sample Depth: 51.2-51.6 feet
PLATES - MW-11DWell Sample Depth: 73.5-74.0feet
PLATE 4 - MW-13D Well Sample Depth: 65.0-70.0 feet
TUT 
GO5 1O26
INTRODUCTION
Four bedrock samples were received on September 9, 1992 by the Reservoir Geology Group
of Core Laboratories, in Carrollton, Texas. The samples were obtained from the MW-4D, MW-
6D, MW-11D, and MW-13D Wells, located in St Thomas. U.S. Virgin Islands. The samples
were analyzed by detailed thin section petrography. The objective of this study was to
characterize the texture and mineralogy of the samples. The sample depths for the respective
wells are as follows:
Well 
Depth (feet)
MW-4D 
59.6-60.0
MW-6D 
51.2-51.6
MW-11D 
73.5-74.0
MW-13D 
65.0-70.0
DISCUSSION
The four analyzed bedrock samples are gabbro (well MW-4D), porphyritic basalt (well MW-6D),
diorite (well MW-11D), and reworked andesite (well MW-13D). The gabbro and diorite exhibit
slightly inequigranular textures with interlocking crystals which average medium grained (1 to 5
millimeters) and fine grained (0.1 to 1 millimeter) sizes, respectively. 
The inequigranular
basalt has a bimodal distribution of the crystal sizes, as does the reworked andesite. The
samples appear to be holocrystalline (devoid of glass); however, extensive alteration of the
epiclastic andesite from well MW-13D makes the assessment difficult for this sample.
Plagioclase is observed to be the predominant primary mineral. Other primary minerals
observed in various samples as phenocrysts include pyroxene, magnetite, quartz, hornblende,
and apatite. The primary mineralogical composition of samples from the wells of MW-4D, MW-
60, and MW-13D are similar, whereas the sample from MW-11D contains primary quartz,
abundant hornblende (both primary and secondary), and primary apatite. Pyroxene is most
abundant in the gabbro from MW-4D. Hornblende occurs as both a phenocryst of primary
origin and also as a secondary replacement of pyroxene in the samples. Sample MW-13D
may also contain rock fragments, although alteration makes this assessment difficult.
Alteration in the four samples is variable. The gabbro and diorite from wells MW-4D and MW-
11D are significantly less altered than the porphyritic basalt. 
Nearly all of the minerals
observed in the reworked andesite from MW-13D are secondary replacement minerals.
Cement-filled fractures are observed in all four of the samples. Cement-filled and open
fractures are particularly abundant in the sample from MW-13D.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A Petrographic Study allows for characterization of reservoir rock texture, mineralogy, and
porosity. Information about the relationships among rock textures, allochemical/detrital grains,
cement and matrix composition, and porosity characteristics are determined from thin section
analyses.
TUT 
OO5 1O27
The sample fraction is prepared for thin section analysis by first impregnating the sample with
epoxy to augment sample cohesion and to prevent loss of material during grinding. A blue dye
is added to the epoxy to highlight the pore spaces. Each sample is mounted on a frosted
glass slide and then cut and ground in water to an approximate thickness of 30 microns.
Samples containing known water-soluble phases are prepared using odorless kerosene.
Prepared thin sections are subsequently stained for calcite (Alizarin Red-S stain), iron-bearing
carbonates (potassium femcyanide stain), and potassium feldspar (sodium cobaltinitrate stain)
as necessary. The thin sections are analyzed using standard petrographic techniques. The
terminology in this report is that of Streckeisen (1978).
REFERENCES CITED
Streckeisen. A.L., 1978, To each plutonic rock its proper name: Eartn Sci. Rev., 
Vol. 12. p. 1-
34.
TUT 
OO5 1O28
W4
Western Atlas
International
CORE LABORATORIES
Geraghty and Miller, Inc.
TABLE 1
THIN SECTION ANALYSES
file No.: 192187
COMPOSITION
Well:
Sample Depth (feet):
Plagioclase
Quartz
Chert
Epidote
Calclte
Dolomite
Magnetite
Titanium-oxide
Pyroxene
Hornblende
Pennine
Chlorite
Sericite
Undifferentiated clay
Kaolinite
Zeolite
j 
Apatite
; 
Aphanocrystalline matrix
Fracture porosity
MU-4D
59.6-60
50.8
0.0
0.0
0.8
tr
0.0
2.4
0.0
25.6
4.4
8.0
1.2
2.4
4.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MU-60
51.2-51.6
33.6
0.8
tr
S.6
22.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
13.2
6.0
0.4
1.6
1.2
12.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.8
0.0
HW-11D
73.5-74.0
36.4
4.8
0.0
2.8
9.2
0.0
2.4
0.4
0.4
19.6
7.6
11.2
2.8
2.4
0.0
0.0
tr
0.0
0.0
MU-130
65.0-70.0
tr
0.0
4.0
4.4
23.6
0.0
0.0
2.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.4
7.6
21.6
4.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.6
Total
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
W4
Western Atlas
International
Geraghty and Miller, Inc.
CORE LABORATORIES
(Streckeisen, 1978)
Primary Constituent!:
TABLE 2
THIN SECTION ANALYSES: GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Abundant plagioclase and pyroxene; letter 
Plagioclase, augite, hornblende,
magnetite, hornblende 
aphanocrystalline Matrix
FILE; 192187
Well: 
MU-40
Sample Depth: 
59.0-60.0 feet
Rock Type: 
Igneous
Rock Name: 
Gabbro
MU-6D
SI. 2-51.6 feet
Igneous
Amydaloidal porphyritlc basalt
MU-11D
73.5-74.0 feet
Igneous
Diorl'Ce
Plagloclase, hornblende, Magnetite,
quarti, pyroxene, apatite
Secondary Constituenta:
Grain Size Estimate
Minimum:
Maximum:
Average:
Orientation:
Texture/fabric:
Other:
Minor to trace amounts of pemlne (type of 
Calclte, undlfferentlated clay,
chlorite), undiffcrentiated clay, serlcite, hornblende (alteration of pyroxene),
hornblende, chlorite, epldote, calclte 
epldote, zeolite, chlorite, aerlclte,
pennine, dolomite, quartz
Chlorite, some of the hornblende, pennine,
serlcite, calclte, indifferent Ieted clay,
epidote, titanium-oxides
0.9mm (fine grained)
5.Bum (coarse grained)
1.9na (medium grained)
Random
Holocrystalllne; phaneritic; Inequl-
<0.01im (microlltlc/aphanocrystaUlne) 
O.OSmi (very fine grained)
3.3mm (medium grained) 
2.0m (medlua grained)
Phenocrystt average la 0.8mm (fine grained) 0.8m (fine grained)
Random
Holocryttalline (no glass observed);
granular; intergroun subhedral plagloclase 
Inequigranular porphyritlc; monomineralic
and anhedral to subhedral pyroxene;
clay and carbonate-filled fractures
Alteration Is not extensive; pennine and
most of the hornblende are present as
alteration products
clusters of plagioclase and pyroxene form
glomerocrysts; rock alteration/weathering
has produced calcite, clay, and zeolite-
filed amydules; calclte-filled fractures
Alteration is extensive
Random
Holocryttalline; fairly equigranular;
interlocking phenocrytts; calclte- and
clay-filled Interconnected fractures
Common alteration, especially of mafic
minerals; chlorite and pennine ere common
to abundant
TUT OO5 1O30
W4
Western Atlas
International
Gereghty and Miller^" i'nc!""""
CORE LABORATORIES
TABLE 2
THIN SECTION ANALYSES: GENERAL DESCRIPTION
FILE: 192187
Well:
Sample Depth:
NU-130
65.0-70.0 fe«t
Rock Type:
Rock Name:
(Streckeisen, 1978)
Primary Constituents:
Eplclastlc
Reworked endesite(?)
Plagioclase (•Iteration of primary Mineral*
Is nearly complete)
Secondary Constituents:
Chlorlte, undifferentiated clay, calcite,
serfcite, kaollnlte, chert, epidote,
titanium-oxide
Grain Size Estimate
Minimum:
Maximum:
Average:
Orientation:
Texture/Fabric:
Other:
<0.01mM (•Icrolitic/aphanocrystalllne)
3.4m» (medium grained)
0.7na (fine grained)
Random
Hypocrystalline(7); alteration makes
Identification of possible glassy
constituents Indeterminate; Inequigranular
porphyrltic; highly fractured, with cement-
filled and open fractures; fractures are
filled by calcite and chert
Extremely altered; appears to be epiclastlc
in origin
TUT
OOI5 1031
THIN SECTION PHOTOMICROGRAPHS
The scale of the thin section photomicrographs in each plate is a function of the magnification:
15X: 
Horizontal width of the photomicrograph (127mm) represents
8.467mm.
31X: 
Horizontal width of the photomicrograph (127mm) represents
4.097mm.
TUT 
O05 
1O32
Geraghty and Miller, Inc. 
File: 192187
Bedrock Samples
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
WELL: MW-4D
SAMPLE DEPTH (feet): 59.0-60.0
PLATE 1A
This sample is a medium grained igneous rock. Using Streckeisen's 1979 classification
scheme, it is considered to be a gabbro. The predominant constituents are interlocking
subhedral plagioclase (seen with abundant polysynthetic twinning; B15.5, J12, F8) and
anhedral to subhedral pyroxene (minerals with high birefringence in view; H3, C5). (15X
magnification, crossed polarizers)
PLATE 1B
This photomicrograph, taken at a higher magnification (31X), shows a localized area of finer
grained crystals. Magnetite (opaque crystals at H6, G-H9, E10) is observed in this view, along
with plagioclase (J2, A14.5) and pyroxene (C9). A cement-filled fracture extended diagonally
across the view at C1 to J15. It is filled with pennine, which is a variety of chlorite, and other
undifferentiated clay, possibly smecitic or illitic (H13 to K16). Several intersecting fractures are
observed in the thin section. (31X magnification, crossed polarizers)
TUT 
CO5 
1O33
International
LABORATORIES
Reservoir Geology/Stratigraphy
B
TUT 
O05 
1O34
Geraghty and Miller, Inc. 
File: 192187
Bedrock Samples
St Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
WELL: MW-6D
SAMPLE DEPTH (feet): 51.2-51.6
PLATE 2A
An amygdaioidal porphyritic basalt is shown in this view. Plagioclase phenocrysts (E8.5, G4.5,
J2, K6) float in a very finely crystalline groundmass of tiny plagiodase, altered pyroxene, and
undifferentiated microlites and clay. Large amygdules are filled by calcite (E1; 
stained pink),
undifferentiated day (A9, B14-16), chlorite and possibly actinolite (poorly visible here), zeolites
(not in view) and chert (K14.5). Small calcite- and day-filled fractures are observed (C1 to
C16, 
K12-E12, E12 to D16). 
(15X 
magnification, plane-polarized light)
PLATE 2B
This photomicrograph shows a partially altered pyroxene phenocryst. Much of the pyroxene in
the porphyritic basalt has been altered to secondary minerals. Even at higher magnification,
minerals in the groundmass still appear very small. A calcite-filled amygdule is in the upper left
of the view. (31X 
magnification, crossed polarizers)
TUT 
005 
1O35
W4
WMearnAtlM
Intel'national
LABORATORIES
Reservoir Geology/Stratigraphy
B
TUT 
005 
1036
Geraghty and Miller, Inc. 
File: 192187
Bedrock Samples
St Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
WELL: MW-11D
SAMPLE DEPTH (feet): 73.5-74.0
PLATE 3A
This diorite igneous rock contains interlocking, fine-grained crystals cf plsgicdsss, hcrr.bien.de,
and lesser magnetite, quartz, and pyroxene. Minerals in this view include plagioclase (E11,
F5), magnetite (G8, K7), and quartz (B3). Hornblende at D-E4 appears dark at this
magnification, but is actually green. Much of the hornblende, along with chlorite and pennine,
appears to be an alteration product. The green minerals in this view are chlorite and pennine
(E7) Calcite fractures intersect at H10. (15X magnification, plane-polarized light)
PLATE 3B
Another view of the sample shows interlocking crystals similar to those in Plate 3A. The
texture of this sample is homogeneous. Several phenocrysts in this view, however, are altered
to yellowish day, possibly seriate and/or smectite (C5.5, J9, 013.5). (15X magnification,
plane-polarized light)
1"UT 
005 
1O37
W4
Western AtiM
International
ORE
LABORATORIES
Reservoir Geology/Stratigraphy
B
TUT 
GO5 
1O3S
Geraghty and Miller, Inc. 
File: 192187
Bedrock Samples
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
WELL: MW-13D
SAMPLE DEPTH (feet): 65.0-70.0
PLATE 4A
This extensively altered rock appears to be a reworked ahdesrte. Large caldte-filled fractures
and smaller-aperture open fractures are abundant As illustrated in this view, much of the
original mineralogy and texture is obscured by secondary alteration. Intercrystalline clay is
abundant. Only trace amounts of the primary minerals, such as plagiodase, remain in this
rock. For example, the plagiodase(?) phenocryst at C-F6 is completely altered to secondary
minerals, mostly day. (15X magnification, plane-polarized light)
PLATE 4B
Areas of the sample that are located farthest away from the large caicite-filled fractures appear
to be slightly less altered. This view shows altered plagiodase phenocrysts (white crystals) set
in a day matrix. The large dark areas (E13, G2, B2) are probably altered mafic phenocrysts.
Based on the texture and plagiodase-rich composition, this sample appears to be an epidastic
rock derived from an andesite. (15X magnification, plane-polarized light)
TUT 
O05 
1O39
WA
Western AtJaa
International
.ORE
LABORATORIES
Reservoir Geology/Stratigraphy
B
TUT 
005 
104O
APPENDIX F
BOREHOLE GEOPHYSICAL LOGS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
TUT 
O05 
1O41
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
~__A"55M.£&!!!!?
TUBE WAVE AMPLITUDE
""6"" 
" 
raotive 
* 255"
TRANSIT TIME
0
Microsec/n 
200 "
WELL MW -1 D . JUNL 1 S. 1 (Jy2
I
Microseconoc Transit Time Tx lo N«y Receiver
120 
200 
200 
400 
500 
600 
700 
800 
900
I 
! 
I 
I 
I 
I 
I ' 
1 
;
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
TUT 
O05 
1042
WELL M'.v
.3-AKMCALIPFR
1"I.C"" 
" "incri*V ~ " ~ " To " 
j
....I^.^AXT.^'.-iJ.1.^... ...iletords' 
'
' 6 
relative 
2io 
Mtcrococonos Transit Time Tx to Near Keceiver
OLOG
TRAN3T TIM!______ 
120 
200 
300
Microsec/Ft 
200 " 
I 
i 
i
500 
600 
700 
800 
900
TUT 
CO5 
1O43
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
(~276 
." 
Inches 
~7.0"* 
.
TUBE
 WAV£ AMPy IUDE 
„ 
""I
^ o"""""""r«atTve"""""255"'
TRANS1TTIME
WELL MW-6D (RUN 2) 
AUGUST 1 0, 1 992
Microseconds Transit Time Tx to Far Receiver
500 
600 
700
120 
200 
300 
400
I 
i 
i
8CC 
9CC
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
TUT 
OO5 1044
WLLL M*-IUU IHUN i i AUGUST ig. 'Qj;
TMM3TTIX
Trml Time Ii lo far S«ee>»«r
0__ 
UercBCC/M 
&G
1 2 0 2 0 0 J 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 D C O
l 
i 
i 
i 
i 
i 
i
WELL MW-1 00 (RUN 2) 
AUGUST 1 9. I 992
-r3---™-riss"s—rr«
TRANSIT Tltg
*r*itude
McroHea<d$ Trawl Tim» Ti to f<* R«m««r
0 
Mera9«c/Ft 
20O^ 1 7 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 1 '
I 
i 
i 
i 
i 
i 
i 
i 
i
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC
TUT 
CO5 1045
3-ARU CALIPER_
O 
I'ncHe"
TUBE WAVE AMPLITUDE
WELL MW-1 
1 D (RUN 
2) 
JULY 20. 1 992
TO'* 
, 
.
•AA A* I U" VUWC
Microseconds Transit Time Tx to For Receiver
TRANSIT TIME
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
TUT 
O05 
1O46
WELL MW-l 2D 
JULY 22. 1 9SI
(-z
relative
TRANSIT TIME
.......
255
... J 
I 
,^___^^
Min| 
I 
^^^BHBBN4ax Rx A;rontuue
Microseconas Transit Time Tx to Near Receiver
XQ 
400 
500 
600 
70C
120 
200
I 
i
400
I
500i
800
i
TUT 
OO5 
1O47
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
WELLMW-13D JULY 15. 1992
3-ARM CALIPER 
...
•JJS""""TiH«"""~Tl)"3'
TUBE WAVE AMPLITUDE 
„
"6"" 
rSotive"""" 23$
TRON3T Tl>€
Uicrncconds Tronsit Time T* to Meor Receiver
* 
120 20
2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 0 9 0 0
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUT 
005 
1O48
APPENDIX G
GEOLOGIC LOGS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
TUT 
005 
1O49
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
Geologic Log of MW-1
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface}
ASPHALT 
0 - 0 . 1
CLAY; some Silt; little Sand, fine to coarse, trace weathered 
0.1 - 1.8
rock fragments; angular, hard, dry, brown, greenish-gray.
Top of bedrock inferred at 1.8 feet below land surface.
(See also Geologic Log of MW-1D)
TUT 
OO5 
1OSO
GERAGHTY P VflLLER. INC
Geologic Log of MW-1D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface)
ASPHALT 
0 - 0.3
Fill consisting of GRAVEL medium to fine; some Clay; trace silt; 
0.3 - 2.5
trace Sand, medium to coarse; dry to moist; brown.
CLAY; some SILT; little to trace Sand, medium to coarse; little rock 
2.5 - 2.8
fragments, medium to large, angular; little to trace gravel,
fine to medium; trace pieces of wood; very hard, dry to moist,
light brown to brown.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA (coarse grained); greenish-gray; strong to moderately 2.8 - 15.0
strong; fine, medium, large grained, rectangular and irregular
shape, moderately sorted; plagioclase feldspar, pyroxenes, and
chlorite minerals, dull to vitreous; calcite veins, iron stains;
fresh to slightly altered.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA (finer grained); mottled gray and white; some pebble 15.0 - 21.2
sized, angular clasts; contact metamorphism; plagioclase feldspar,
hornblende, pyroxene, magnetite.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA - Debris Flow; dark, grayish-green; competent, 
21.2-89.0
jointed interval; porphyritic, fine to coarse; large (8 cm) slump
clasts; large plagioclase and pyroxene crystals.
Fracture zones observed from 2.34 to 15.09 feet bis, 19.34 to 21.2 feet bis, 34.5 to
35.5 feet bis, and 54.0 to 55.0 feet bis.
bis 
below land surface
ntOlMI/QRin.loc/Ick
TUT 
005 
1O51
r.rv Anu-rv fj> VJTT T CD
Geologic Log of MW-2
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface1)
ASPHALT 
0 - 0.4
SILT; some Clay, little rock fragments, small; trace Sand, fine to 
0.4 - 1.2
medium; trace roots; hard, dry; brown to tan
CLAY; some Silt; little rock fragments, small; trace Gravel, fine to 
1.2-3.1
medium; hard to very hard; dry, gray.
Top of bedrock inferred at 3.4 feet below land surface.
TUT 
GO5 1052
ir-.u-rv --> \ru t CD rvv™
Geologic Log of MW-3
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
CONCRETE
Fill, CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, fine to medium; trace rock
fragments, small to medium; hard, dry; brown, reddish brown.
No recovery.
Top of bedrock inferred at 2.4 feet below land surface.
0-0.4
0.4 - 2.0
2.0 - 2.4
Ht0130l/052l93.k«/kb
TUT 
O05 
10153
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
Geologic Log of MW-4
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface1)
CONCRETE 
0 - 0 . 7
CLAY; some Silt; some organic content (4.7 - 6.7 feet); trace Sand, 
0.7 - 7.1
fine to coarse; trace Gravel; subangular, very stiff to hard;
reddish brown, dark greenish-gary, brown, dark brown, gray, and
dark gray.
No recovery. 
8.7 - 9.8
Top of bedrock inferred at 8.7 feet below land surface.
(See also Geologic Log for MW-4D)
nt0130l/QJ2in.k|/lefc
TUT 
OO5 1054
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
Geologic Log of MW-4D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Page 1 of 2
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
CONCRETE PAVEMENT 
0 - 0.7
CLAY; some Silt, little Sand, fine to coarse; little Gravel; stiff to 
0.7 - 9.5
hard; moist; reddish brown to brown, bluish-gray, dark gray;
medium plasticity.
Weathered rock fragments and CLAY; some Silt; some to little Sand. 
9.5 - 10.7
Top of weathered bedrock inferred at 10.7 feet.
Weathered rock fragments and CLAY - some Silt; angular, small to 
10.7 - 22.8
large; hard; moist to wet at 14.7 and 18.7 feet, gray, blue,
green, brown, white, red, black stains; crumbled.
Top of competent bedrock inferred at 22.8 feet below land surface.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; dark green; highly fractured to 
22.8 - 28.2
26.5 feet bis; gray; moderately strong to strong; very fine grained;
pyroxene, plagioclase feldspars, some quartz, chlorite, and orthoclase
minerals; calcite veins; iron stains; contact metamorphism and
hydrothermal alteration 26.5 to 28.2 feet bis.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; gray; fine to medium grained; plagioclase, 
28.2 - 33.0
pyroxene, magnetite; pyroxene crystals (2 cm); fining upward
sequences.
Weathered VOLCANIC BRECCIA; SILT and CLAY; light brown, very 
33.0 - 35.0
fine grained to pebble sized fragments; semi-angular.
No recovery 
35.0-37.1
PW>lMI/OS2l93.lo|/kb
TUT
HPR ACWTV -•> VtTI I PR
OO5 
1O55
Page 2 of 2
Geologic Log of MW-4D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. 
Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface)
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; dark green, gray; strong; aphanitoc, very 
37.1 
- 58.3
fine grained; pyroxene, plagioclase feldspars, epidote, some quartz,
magnetite, chlorite, and orthoclase minerals; calcite veins; black
minerals 60% rock matrix; white plagioclase amygdules 35% of rock
matrix, slightly altered.
DIORTTE; dark gray; very dense; strong; very fine to coarse grained; 
58.3 
- 64.0
pyroxene, plagioclase feldspar, quartz, chlorite, and orthoclase
minerals; pyroxene minerals ranged from 35 to 60% of rock matrix;
plagioclase minerals ranged from 35 to 40% of rock matrix, slightly
altered.
Weathered VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; altered to SILT and CLAY; 
64.0 
- 66.5
very fine to medium grained; friable, vertical foliations; calcite,
kaolinite, chlorite; white-rust color.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; dark green; fine grained; aphanitic; 
66.5 
- 68.0
pyroxene, plagioclase, epidote; calcite filled vertical fractures.
Fracture zones observed from 9.0 to 25.5 
feet bis, 
30.0 
to 38.2 
feet bis, 
and 65.0 
to
66.5 
feet bis.
Highly weathered fracture plane at 40.9, 
55.0, 
and 64.0 
feet bis.
bis 
below land surface
P»01301/Q52l93.tat/kk
TUT 
OO5 
J.O56
OFR Ar.MTY & ViTI 1 FR TNC
Geologic Log of MW-5
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. 
Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface)
Fill, SILT; little Sand, fine to medium; little Gravel, fine to medium; 
0 - 4.0
trace rock fragments, small; trace clay; trace pieces of wood;
hard; dry; 
brown.
Highly weathered bedrock; very weak; grayish-green. 
4.0 - 4.8
Top of bedrock inferred at 4.8 feet below land surface.
PR0130l/ani93Ja|/ltb
TUT 
OO5 1O57
» MM t PP
Geologic Log of MW-6D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Page 1 of 2
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface1)
ASPHALT 
0 - 0.3
CLAY; some SILT; trace Sand, fine to very coarse; little rock fragments, 
0.3 - 2.0
small to medium; hard; dry; brown to gray.
No recovery. 
2.0 - 4.0
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; grayish-green to dark green; moderately strong; 
4.0 - 32.0
porphyritic, medium to coarse grained; rectangular to massive
phenocrysts (2 mm to 6 cm), moderately sorted; plagioclase feldspar,
pyroxene minerals, dull, glassy, vitreous; white minerals ranged from
10 - 15% of rock matrix; slightly to highly altered and stained;
Clay - little Silt; trace Sand, fine to coarse; light gray; soft; wet;
magnesium and iron oxide.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; grayish-green; moderately strong to weak; 
32.0 - 45.0
fine to medium grained, rectangular and irregular shape, moderately
sorted; plagioclase feldspar, pyroxenes, epidote and chlorite minerals;
dull, glassy; calcite veins; iron staining; moderately to highly altered.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA - Debris Flow, with slump casts; competent, jointed 
45.0 - 53.0
interval; medium to coarse grained, plagioclase, epidote, chlorite,
pyroxene; rounded slump blocks (6 cm) of dark gray, coarse grained
Tuff in a mottled dark gray-green matrix.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; grayish-green; competent, jointed interval; strong to 53.0 - 60.0
moderately strong; coarse grained, rectangular, cubic and irregular
shape; plagioclase, chlorite, and epidote minerals, dull, glassy;
calcite veins; fresh to slightly altered.
nU>1301/QJ2193Jat/tcb
r,FR AHMTY f» M1M FR INC
TUT
1O58
Page 2 of 2
Geologic Log of MW-6D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface)
VOLCANIC BRECCIA - Debris Flow, with slump casts; greenish-gray; 
60.0 - 65.0
moderately strong; fine grained, rectangular to irregular shaped slump
casts (8 cm), dark gray, pyroxene rich, coarse Tuff; matrix is fine
grained; well sorted; plagioclase, dull, glassy, slightly altered.
Fracture zones observed from 9.6 to 32.0 feet bis, 35.0 to 35.5 feet bis, 37.0 to 40.0 feet bis,
and 43 to 60 feet bis.
Note: This log is a combination of the geology observed at MW-6 (abandoned) and MW-6D.
bis 
below land surface
P»01301/(&21».la|/lcb
TUT 
GO5 1059
GER AGHTY f* MTLl FR INC
Geologic Log of MW-7
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
Fill, CLAY; some Silt; little rock fragments, small to medium; trace Sand, 
0 - 4 . 0
medium to very coarse; trace roots; hard; dry; brown.
Highly weathered Rock; SAND, fine to medium; some Silt; trace Sand, 
4.0 - 6.0
coarse to very coarse; trace Gravel, fine; trace Clay; hard, dry, gray.
Highly weathered bedrock; weak, grayish-green.
6.0 - 15.0
PM1301/QS2193.taf/kb
TUT
1O6O
Geologic Log of MW-8
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface)
Fill, CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, very fine to very coarse; trace rock 
0 - 0.35
fragments, small to medium; very stiff; dry; brown.
Moderately weathered rock; SILT; little to trace Sand, very fine to fine; 
3.3 - 8.3
little trace rock fragments; very stiff to hard; dry; brown to
reddish-brown.
Top of bedrock inferred at 8.3 feet below land surface.
PR01301/QS2193.la|/k»
TUT 
OOS 1O61
r,pp Ar.wrv fy vf?i i PR
Geologic Log of MW-9
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
Fill, consisting of CLAY; some Silt; little rock fragments, small to large; 
0-5.0
trace Sand, fine to very coarse; hard; dry; brown to reddish-brown.
Top of bedrock inferred at 5.0 feet below land surface.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; light greenish-gray; moderately strong; porphyritic, 
5.0 - 15.0
fine to large grained, rectangular to irregular shape, moderately
sorted; plagioclase, epidote, and chlorite minerals, some chert;
dull, vitreous; calcite veins; plagioclase minerals range from
10 to 25% of rock matrix; slightly altered; Clay; observed at
10 feet, little Silt, trace Sand, medium to coarse.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF, and Silt and Clay; homogenous, aphanitic,
very fine grained; plagioclase, pyroxene, chlorite, some quartz;
calcite veins; slightly to highly altered; bluish-green to grayish-green.
15.0 - 28.0
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; grayish-green; moderately strong; porphyritic, fine 
28.0 - 35.0
to coarse grained; moderately to poorly sorted; plagioclase, calcite,
hornblende, magnetite, chlorite, and pyroxene minerals; calcite veins;
slightly altered.
nt01301/tB2l93.k)|/lcfe
TUT 
OO5 1062
\ rn t
Geologic Log of MW-10
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface)
Fill, CLAY; some Silt; little Sand; medium, little rock fragments, small to 
0-2.9
medium; trace Gravel, fine to medium; hard; dry; gray to brown.
Top of bedrock inferred at 2.9 feet.
See also Geologic Log of MW-10D.
PM>1301/QS2193.tat/kk
TUT 
OO5 1O6::
OFR *r,wTY ^ vru t FR
Geologic Log of MW-10D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Page 1 of 2
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
ASPHALT 
0 - 0.5
CLAY; some Silt; trace Sand, fine; trace Gravel, fine to medium; 
0.5 - 1.7
little rock fragments, small to medium; hard; dry; gray to brown.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA, greenish-gray; moderately strong; medium to 
2.3 - 5.0
large grained, rectangular to irregular shape, moderately sorted;
plagioclase minerals, dull; manganese oxidation, iron stains;
calcite stains; moderately to slightly altered.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; greenish-gray; moderately strong, 
5.0 - 6.0
fine grained, plagioclase, hornblende, less pyroxene.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; greenish-gray, moderately strong, medium to 
6.0 - 8.2
coarse grained, plagioclase, pyroxene, heterogeneous, zoned
rectangular clasts, alteration to iron oxides.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; grayish-blue, moderately strong and 
8.2 - 12.0
competent, fine grained, plagioclase, pyroxene, calcite.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; grayish-blue, highly fractured and 
12.0 - 19.0
crushed, fine grained, pyroxene, plagioclase, calcite.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; mottled olive-green, moderately strong and 
19.0 - 21.0
competent, fine grained; plagioclase, calcite, pyroxene, epidote,
hornblende, alteration to magnesium and iron oxides.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; light gray, highly fractured and crushed; 
21.0 - 22.0
very fine grained, homogeneous, plagioclase, calcite, pyroxene,
epidote, hornblende.
TUT 
O05 
1O64
MT1
INC
Geologic Log of MW-10D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Page 2 of 2
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; greenish-gray; weak, highly fractured to crushed 
22.0 - 32.0
at 22.0 to 27.5; medium to coarse grained, rectangular to irregular
shape, moderately sorted; plagioclase, pyroxenes, and some quartz
minerals, dull, glassy; manganese oxidation, iron stains, calcite
veins; moderately to slightly altered.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA - Debris Flow; mottled greenish-gray; strong, 
32.0 - 75.0
moderate jointing; medium to large grained; rectangular, irregular
shape, large clasts; poorly sorted; plagioclase, quartz, pyroxenes,
epidote and chlorite minerals; calcite veins; fresh to slightly altered
Fracture zone observed from 6.0 to 8.2 feet bis, 12.0 to 19.0 feet bis, 21.0 to 27.5 feet bis, and
53.4 to 55.0 feet bis.
bis 
below land surface
TUT 
005 
1O65
tro
Geologic Log of MW-11D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surfaced
Fill consisting of CLAY; some to little Silt, trace Sand, fine to coarse; 
0 - 4.0
trace Organic material; very stiff; dry to moist; light brown, brown
to reddish-brown.
SILT; little SAND, fine; trace clay; trace Sand, coarse to very coarse; 
4.0 - 10.2
hard; dry; brown.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; bluish-green; strong to moderately strong; 
10.2 - 52.0
fine grained, rectangular, cubic and irregular shape, well sorted;
plagioclase feldspar, epidote, quartz, and pyroxene minerals, dull,
glassy, bright to silky; calcite veins, iron stains; white minerals
ranged from 10 to 25% of rock matrix; fresh, slightly to highly altered.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; contact metamorphism, zoned (heated) 
52.0 - 75.0
clasts (1 cm); bluish-green, strong to moderately strong; fine grained;
well sorted; plagioclase feldspar, epidote, quartz, and pyroxene
minerals, glassy, silky dull; calcite veins, iron stains; fresh to
slightly altered; white minerals ranged from 10 to 25% of rock matrix
(plagioclase content increases with depth).
Fracture zone observed from 12.0 to 25.0 feet bis, 30.0 to 32.0 feet bis, 36.0 to 37.0 feet bis,
at 38.0 feet bis, 42.0 to 45.0 feet bis, and 50 to 52.0 feet bis.
bis 
below land surface
ra01301/OS7193.k»/k*
TUT 
005 
1066
GERAGHTY ^ MILLER. INC
Geologic Log of MW-12D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Page 1 of 2
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
Fill consisting of SILT; some Clay; trace Sand, very fine to very coarse; 
0 - 2.0
trace Gravel, medium, trace rock fragments; trace Organic material;
hard; dry; brown.
CLAY, some SILT; trace Sand, very fine to very coarse; trace rock 
2.0 - 4.0
fragments, medium to large, trace organics; very stiff.
No recovery. 
5.9 - 10.0
Highly weathered and altered VOLCANIC BRECCIA, SILT and CLAY; 
10.0 - 15.0
crushed; little to trace rock fragments, small to medium; trace
Sand, very fine to coarse (5 cm clasts); stiff to very stiff; dry;
brown to yellow, light brown.
Top of weathered bedrock inferred at 15.0 feet below land surface.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; orange to light brown, light gray to reddish-gray; 
15.0 - 29.0
coarse grained, competent; pyroxene and plagioclase phenocrysts,
calcite veins, iron stains; moderately to highly altered.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA - Debris Flow; dark greenish-black; coarse 
29.0 - 31.0
grained matrix with fine grained angular slump clasts, plagioclase,
pyroxene, epidote.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; bluish-green and gray; strong to weak to 
31.0 - 50.2
moderately strong; fine to very fine grained, aphanitic, angular
fragments; plagioclase feldspar, pyroxenes, quartz and pyrite minerals,
dull, vitreous, metallic; calcite veins, iron stains; plagioclase minerals
range from 5 to 10% of rock matrix; slightly to moderately altered.
PROl301/OS2l93.k|/kb
TUT 
COS 
1O67
i CD ?vr*
Geologic Log of MW-12D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Page 2 of 2
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
VOLCANIC BRECCIA - Debris How; dark grayish-black, moderately 
50.2 - 65.0
fractured, coarse grained matrix and clasts, pyroxene and hornblende
clasts and plagioclase, pyroxene, and hornblende matrix.
No recovery. 
65.0 - 75.0
Fracture zones observed from 10.0 to 15.0 feet bis, 18.5 to 19.0 feet bis, 20.0 to 21.0 feet bis,
37.0 
to 40.0 feet bis, 45.0 to 46.0 feet bis, 48.5 to 49.5 feet bis, 51.0 to 53.0 feet bis,
and 59.7 to 63.0 feet bis.
bis 
below land surface
TUT 
OO5 1068
vm i
i\ir
Geologic Log of MW-13D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Page 1 of 2
Description
Sampled Interval
(feet below
land surface)
CLAY; some Siit; iittie Sand, very fine; trace Gravel, small to medium; 
0 - 2.0
trace Organic material; very hard; dry; light brown.
CLAY, some Silt; little Sand, very fine to medium; little Gravel, fine; 
2.0 - 5.0
trace Sand, very coarse to coarse; trace rock fragments, large to
medium; hard; dry; light brown.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; dark green with white mottling in 
5.0 - 20.0
some areas; moderately strong to very weak at 20.0 feet bis;
highly fractured and crushed, fine, medium grained, irregular
shape, moderately sorted; plagioclase feldspar, quartz and epidote
minerals, dull; calcite veins; slightly to moderately altered at
5.3 feet bis, highly altered with iron stains at 20.0 feet bis;
plagioclase minerals range from 10 to 35% of rock matrix.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; fine to coarse grained, highly altered and 
20.0 - 45.0
fractured (20.0 to 30 feet bis), vertical foliations, friable, alteration
to Clay minerals (calcite, chlorite, kaolinite), mottled grayish-green.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA - Debris Flow; coarse grained with 6 cm slump 
45.0 - 55.0
clasts, clasts are very fine grained Tuff, epidote, chlorite, pyroxene,
plagioclase, and calcite, FeO7 staining, dark green and mottled.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; dusky yellow green to grayish-green; moderately 
55.0 - 88.0
strong to weak; epiclastic, fine, medium, large grained, occasional
clast of 1 to 3 cm (40 to 55 feet bis), rectangular, cubic, and
irregular shape, moderately to well sorted; plagioclase feldspar,
epidote, chlorite, and pyroxene minerals, glassy, dull; calcite veins,
iron stains; slightly to highly altered (55 to 85 feet bis); plagioclase
minerals range from 10 to 35% of rock matrix (40 to 55 feet bis).
nt01301/QS2l93.kf/kb
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUT 
005 
1O69
Page 2 of 2
Geologic Log of MW-13D
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. 
Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface)
VOLCANIC BRECCIA; finer grained, competent, primary minerals are 
88.0-92.0
pyroxene and hornblende, secondary minerals are epidote, plagiociase,
and chlorite, vertical foliations, grayish-blue green.
VOLCANIC BRECCIA - DEBRIS FLOW; fine and coarse grained slump 
92.0 
- 110.0
blocks (7 to 15 cm), 
rounded, plagiociase, pyroxene, some pyrite,
calcite veins oriented 45°, 
grayish-green to blue green.
VOLCANIC ANDESITE TUFF; fine to very fine grained; competent and 
110.0 
- 120.0
relatively unweathered, plagiociase, epidote, and pyroxene, calcite
inclusions, dark greenish-blue.
Fracture zones observed from 5.0 to 36.0 
feet bis, 
56.0 
to 60.0 
feet bis, 
63.0 
to 65.0 
feet bis,
and 70.0 
to 75.0 
feet bis.
bis 
below land surface
nt0130l/QS}l»3.ta|/kb
TUT 
005 
1070
HFP Ar.WTY & Vfif I FR INC
Geologic Log of MW-14
Tutu Service Station Investigation
St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Sampled Interval
(feet below
Description 
land surface)
ASPHALT 
0 - 0 . 1
CLAY; some Silt; some Sand; trace Gravel to some weathered rock 
0.1-3.0
fragments, angular; very hard; greenish-gray, brown gray.
Top of bedrock inferred at 3.0 feet below land surface.
PR01301/052193.tat/kfc
TUT 
005 
1O7JL
Ar.HTY & VTTl.l FR INC
APPENDIX H
MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC 
TUT O05 1O72
^tTGERAGHTY
'(^MILLER. INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
.03Tt Flush Mounted
LAND
JL
. inch diameter
drilled hole
-Well casing,
_:5____ inch diameter.
Stainless Steel (SS
Backfill
I Grout Cemgn t
Water
19.1 ft-
Bentonite
21.1 
ft-
D slurry
S pellets
_2_LJLft*
Well Screen.
4 
inch diameter
SS 
Q.Q2Qinslnt
I Gravel Pack
I Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
. 6 ft*
46. Oft*
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
•Depth Below Land Surface
Project
Town/City.
County_
Permit No.
TEIC/PR01301
Anna's Retreat/Tutu
.Well.
MW-1
St. Thomas
. State.
ITSVT
Land-Surface Elevation 
195.05 feet msl
and Datum 195.08 
feet 
3 Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate(s) 
June 30. 19Q2_____________
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Angpr & Ai r Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech_____________
Drilling Fluid Water____________________
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Submersible ptimp; 8/9Q./Q7_______________
NA
.gallons
Fluid Loss During Drilling ___
Water Removed During Davaiopmant 60 (approximate lv)gaiion<
Static Depth to Water 29.5 
before develop. 
teet below M.P
Pumping Depth to Water_____40.Q________ feet below M.P
Pumping Duration 
" * ^2_____ hours
Pat* 8/29/92
NA
Yield.
Specific Capacity.
Well Piirpost.
.gpm
NA
Monitoring
, gpm/ft
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land
surface to 1.7 feet.
7.5-inch air hammer from land surface to
46.0 feet.____________________________
Borehole cave in UP to 43.6 feet
Tnp
if 
horlTTir>lf at- 1_fi foot:
Prepared by
Wanda I. Morales
G4M
05 '2 M
TUT 
005 
1073
_'GERAGHTY
£*3 MILLER, INC
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
0 ft Flush mounted
i 
L*KO SU«PACE
/////
»v///
<«//
10
drilled hole
. inch diameter
•Well casing,
inch diameter,
Stainless Steel
3 Backfill
Grout Cement/Water/
Bentonite
2. 8 ft* Top of bedrock
70.0 
ft*
90.0
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project 
TETC/PRQ1301
Anna's Retreat/Tutu
.Well.
State 
TTSVT
Town/City _
County 
St. Thomas
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 195.14 feet msl
and Datum 195.14 
feet ms 1 
S Surveyed
________________ 
G Estimated
InstallationDate(s) 
Julv 7 & 8. 1992_____
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech______________
DrillingRuid Water when diamond coring was performsc
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. Flushed well with water
to facilitate development; 8/28/92
Fluid Loss During Drilling
NA
gallons
gallons
.P.
Water Removed During Development 250 (approx.)
Static Depth to Water 70.6 before develop. 
feet
Pumping Depth to Water_____89 .0_________ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration 
0 • 5_____ hours
Yield 
NA 
gpm 
Date 8/28/92
NA
Specific Capacity _
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well
Fracture Zones ______________
gpm/ft
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land_____
surface to 2.5 feet. Top of bpHrnrlc af 7 - f l foot-
3-inch diamond coring from 2.5 to 89.0 feet.
10-inch air 
hammer from land surface to 71.0 f<
Borehole cave in up to 70.0 feet.________
6-inch casing installed to 70.0 feet.______
5.5-inch air hammer from 70.0 to 90.0 feet.
Prepared by ___Wanda T. Morales________________
GAM
06 5 y
TUT
1O74
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER. INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
Oft Flush mounted
LAND SURFACE
10
drillsd hole
. inch diameter
•^-Well casing,
4 
inch diameter,
Stainless Steel (SS)
D Backfill
3 Grout Cement/Water/
Bentonite
3.0 .ft*
Bentonite 
D slurry
5.0 ft* 3 pellets
7.0
Well Screen.
A
inch diameter
. Q.Q2Qin slot
Gravel Pack
Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
27.0 
ft-
28.0 
*.
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project 
TEIC/PRQ13Q1
Anna's Retreat/Tutu
.Well.
MW-:
. State.
Town/City.
County 
St. Thomas
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 178.31 feet msl
and Datum 178.15 
feet ms 1 
CXSurveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate(s) 
August 25 r 1Q92______
USVI
Drilling Method Hollnv Sfpm
& Air
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech
Drilling Ruid
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. 
Flushed well with water
to facilitate development: 9/2/92 ________
NA
. gallon:
Fluid Loss During Drilling ____
Water Removed During Development 72 (approximately gallon*
Static Depth to Water 13.6 before develop. 
feetbalowM.P
Pumping Depth to Water_____26.0________ feet below M.P
Pumping Duration 
Q . 41___ hours
Yield 
NA______gpm 
pate Q / 2 / 9 2
Specific Capacity ____HA.______ gpm/ft
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well________________
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land
surface to 2.0 feet._________________
10-inch air hammer from land surface to
29.0 feet._____ 
_______
Bnrphnle pave in up to 28.0 feet.
Top of bedrock at 3.1 feet.
Prepared by
Wanda I. Morales
GAM Fom OS 1? M
TUT 
OO5 
1O7'~,
Souny* novt
'MILLER, INC
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
Oft Flush mounted
__i 
LAND SUHFACE
. inch diameter
drilled hole
-Well casing,
4___ inch diameter,
Stainless Steel (S5
O Backfill
{3 Grout Cement/Water/
Bentonite
6. A 
ft'
Bentonite 
D slurry
fi.A 
ft* B pellets
ft'
Well Screen.
^ 
inch diameter
SS 
0.0 20 in slot
I Gravel Pack
I Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
34.0 
ft'
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
•Depth Below Land Surface
TEIC/PROI3Q1
.Well.
MU-?
Town/City 
Anna's Retreat
County 
St. Thomas
Permit No.
State,
USVI
Land-Surface Elevation 
181.85 feet msl
and Datum 181 .HA 
feet msl 
xJ Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate(s) 
June 9 & 11 r 1992____
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger/Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech_____________
Drilling Ruid __________________________
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Submersible pump. August 25, 1992______
Ruid Loss During Drilling
Water Removed During Development
130
. gallons
. gallons
Static Depth to Water 17.35ft before d e VP lop feat belowMP
Pumping Depth to Water_____28.AQ_______ feet below M.P
Pumping Duration 
Q. 5____ hours
Yield 
A . 3_____gpm 
Data B/2S/9?
O.A
Specific Capacity _
Well Purpose 
M o n i r n r i n g
. gpm/ft
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land
surface to 2.4 feet 
(Bedrock).__________
5.5—inch air 
hammpr from 2.L to 3A.0
Borehole cave in UP to 33.3 feet.____
Prepared by
Piih£n Pnnriann
GiM
1? 88
TUT
O05 
1O76
Sounon* aWS
^•TGERAGHTY
'& MILLER, INC.
'Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
|0 ft Flush mounted
: 
LAND SU*F»CE
. inch diameter
drilled hole
-Well casing,
A 
inch diameter.
Stainless Steel (SS)
Backfill
Grout Cement/Water/
Bentonite
ft*
Bentonite 
Q slurry
5.0 ft* a pellets
l^i 
7.0 ft'
Well Screen.
A 
inch diameter
SS 
. O.Q2Qinslnt
I Gravel Pack
Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
27.n 
ft-
28.n ft*
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project 
TF.Tr/Ppm im _______ Wan
Town/City 
Anna's Retrpat /Tutu
County 
St. 
Thnmas
Permit No.
. State__HSJLL
Land-Surface Elevation 175.69 feet msl
and Datum 175 .66 
feet msi 
S Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
Installation Date(s) 
June 17. 1992________
Drilling Method 
Hollow
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech
Drilling Ruid
Atippr/Air Hammer
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Submersible pump : 8/24/92
Fluid Loss During Drilling ___
Water Removed During Development.
NA
.gallon;
73
.gallon;
Static Depth to Water 11.54 ft before developMtbaiowM p
Pumping Depth to Water____25.0_________ feet below M.P
Pumping Duration ___0 . 5___ hours
Yiald 
2. A 
gpm 
Date 8/2A/92
Specific Capacity 
0.2______ gpm/ft
Well Purpose___Monitoring Well__________.____
Remarks 
6-inch hollow stem auger from land
tn Q.fl
7.5-inch air hammer from 9.8 to___
28.0 fppf. Top of bedrnrk at fl.7
Prepared by
Wanda I. Morales
GAM
!? K
TUT
OOS
1O77
Soumcxn 89-097t
_'GERAGHTY
£f& 
MILLER, INC.
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
7/////////
//
Flush mounted
lamp
/
/
/
/
/
*v///
drilled hole
. inch diameter
-Well casing.
. inch diameter,
Stainless Steel
Q Backfill
xjGrout Cement/Water
Bentonite
__i*JLft* Top of
47.7 
ft'
bedrock
Project
Town/City 
Anna's Retreat/Tutu
Well 
MW-AD
State 
USVI
Cnunty 
St. 
Thomas____________
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 175.99 feet msl
and Datum 176.02 
feet ms_ 
gj Surveyed
________________ 
D Estimated
Installation Date<s) 
June 17. 1992________
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech___________________________
DrillingRuid Water when diamond coring was performei
competei t
hoHT-noir 
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Submersible pump; 8/2A/92.
Fluid Loss During Drilling ______]
Water Removed Dunng Development.
360
. gallons
. gallons
1 71.0 ft-
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
* Depth Below Land Surface
Static Depth to Water 12.2Qft before develop feet below M.P.
Pumping Depth to Water______fifi.Q________ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration ____0.8 
hours
Yield 
7.2 
gpm 
Pate 8/24/92
Specific Capacity
Well Purpose__
Fracture Zones _
gpm/ft
Monitoring well
Remarks 6-ineh hollow stem auger from land
surface to 2A.7 feet.________________
______diamond coring from 24.0 to 67.25 feet.
7.5-inch air hammer from land surface to______
4fl.O feet.Top of weathered bedrock at 10.7 fee
6-inch casing installed at 47.7 feet.__________
5.5-inch air hammer from 47.7 to 71.0 feet.
Prepared by 
Wanda I. Morales_____
G4M (•»"• 06 S 87
TUT
(")O5
1O78
^•TGERAGHTY
*!f& MILLER. INC.
'nvironmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
T
Oft Flush mounted
I/I
LAND
10
drilled hole
. inch diameter
-Well casing,
___»____ inch diameter.
Stainless Steel (SS)
Backfill
| GrOUt romont /Wafer/
Bentonite
15.0ft-
Bentonite 
D slurry
i 7. n ft* a pellets
19.0 ft-
Well Screen.
A 
inch diameter
SS 
, Q.Q20inglnt
Gravel Pack
Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
39.0 ft-
A0.8 ft-
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project 
TEIC/PRm30T
.Well.
MW-S
State 
USVT
Town/City Anna's Retreat/Tutu
County 
St. 
Thomas___________
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 
187.24 feet msl
and Datum 187.09 
feet ms 1 
S Surveyed
_________________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate<s) 
August 25. 1992______________
Drilling Method 
Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Sni 1 Tet-»h____________________________
Drilling Fluid _____________________________
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. Flushed well with water
to facilitate development: 9/2/92._____
Ruid Loss During Drilling ___
Water Removed During Development.
NA
.gallons
66
.gallons
Static Depth to Water 22.8 ft before develop feet below M.P.
Pumping Depth to Water______37 . 5________ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration ___Q . 4*3 
hours
Yield__NA_____gpm 
Date 9/2/92
NA
Specific Capacity __
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well
gpm/ft
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land
surface to A.O feet.___________________
10-inch air hammer from land surface to
A5.0 feet. Top of bedrock at A.8 feet.
Grout seal from 44.8 UP to 40.8 feet.
Prepared by
Wanda I. Morales
G&M Form 05 12 88
TUT
Soumom IM9TI
005 
1O79
,'GERAGHTY
AW& MILLER, INC
Ground- Water Consvtlinil
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
0 ft Flush mounted
U j 
L-MD SUKF-CE
/
/
/
10
inch diameter
drilled hole
-Well casing,
6 
inch diameter,
Stainless Steel
Q Backfill
•3Grout Cement /Water /
Bentonite
4.9 
ft* Top of bedrock
45.n ft*
LJ.65.0 ft-
Measunng Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
* Depth Below Land Surface
G4M I
06 S8T
Project 
TEIC/PRO 1301
Anna's Retreat/Tutu
Well
MW-6D
. State.
Town/City _
Cnunty 
St. Thomas
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 171.26 feet msl
and Datum *?1 -01 
feet ms 1 
_5 Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
USVI
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method
A u u s t 6 & 10. 1992
Stem Anger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Sni 1 T»fh_____________
DrillingRuid 
Water when diamond coring was
erformed .
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump; September 2, 1992
NA
240
Ruid Loss During Drilling ______
Water Removed During Development.
Static Depth to Water20.2ft before develop
Pumping Depth to Water_____74.0_______
Pumping Duration 
u. 33_____ hours
____ 
gallons
____ 
gallons
. feet below M.P.
. feet below M.P.
Yield 
12
.gpm
0.22
Date 9/2/92
Specific Capacity _
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well
Fracture Zones ______________
gpm/ft
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land______
surface to 4.9 feet.Depth to bedrock 4.9 fee
10-inch air hammer from land surface to_____
45.0 feet,.____________________________________
S S-inrh air hammer from 45.0 to 65.0 feet.
Prepared by 
Wanda I. 
Morales______
TUT 
OO5 
1O8O
&& MILLER. INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
Oft Flush mounted
LAND SU*FACE
10
drilled hole
. inch diameter
casing,
4 
inch diameter,
Stainless Steel (S3)
Backfill
I Grout 
Cement /Water /
Bentonite
n.R ft'
Bentonite 
D slurry
1.6 ft' B pellets
?. - 7 
ft'
Well Screen.
4 
inch diameter
SS 
Q.020in sint
! Gravel Pack
I Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
22.7
Measunng Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
TETr/ppm
Anna's Retreat/Tutu
well
St- . Thomas
State 
TTSVT
Project
Town/City.
County _
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 171.44 feet msl
and Datum 
1 7.
1. - 1 ? feet as 1 
a Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
7 
1QQ?
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method 
Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech __________________
Drilling Fluid ____________________________
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Submersible pump; 9/9/92 ________________
NA
4R6
Fluid Loss During Drilling __
Water Removed During Development.
Static Depth to Water 8.2ft before develop
Pumping Depth to Water_____20.6_______
Pumping Duration 
Q . 9____ hours
Q_____gpm 
Date
____gallon!
____gallons
feet below M.P
feet below M.P
Q / Q / Q 7
0.7?
Specific Capacity _
Well Purpose___Monitoring Well
gpm/ft
Remarks 
10-inch air hammer from land surface
to 26.0 feet.______________________________
Borehole cave in UP to 23.7 feet.__________
Bedrock at approximately 4.92 feet bis
(see MW-6D) . 
__ 
__________
Prepared by Derrick Stepanof /Rube'n Ponciano
GAM f-crrr, 05 I?
TUT
GO5 1O81
^GERAGHTY
/& MILLER. INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
Oft Flush mounted
i 
LAND
10
drilled hole
. inch diameter
casing.
4 
inch diameter,
Stainless Steel (S3
{3 Backfill
3 Grout foment- /Uaf*»r/
Bentonite
11.0 ft*
Bentonite 
D slurry
i ? - R ft* S pellets
15.4
.ft*
^_ Well Screen.
4 
inch diameter
SS 
0.020in slnt
x-O Gravel Pack
«~3 
Sand Pack
^Q 
Formation Collapse
3 5 . 4 
...
39.6
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project 
TEIC/PRQ13Q1 _________ Well .
Town/City 
Anna's Retreat* /Ttifn ____
County ____ Sf . Thomas _________ State_
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 180.3 feet msl
and Datum 180. 13 
feet oi» 1
MW-7
ITSVT
3 Surveyed
D Estimated
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method Hollow
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Ruid
Julv 29. 1992
Ang«»r & Air Hammpr
' i
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. Flushed well with water
to facilitate development; 9/2/92. ______
Ruid Loss During Drilling
Water Removed During Development.
NA
8A
.gallons
. gallons
Static Depth to Water 17.14 ff 
before develops belowM.P
Pumping Depth to Water
Pumping Duration ___
Yield 
NA
34.0
.feet below M.P.
. hours
Date 9/2/92
NA
Specific Capacity _
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well
gpm/ft
Remarks 6—inch hollow sEgm auger from land
surface to 15.0 feet. 
__________
10—inch air hammer from land stirfar^ fo_____
40.0 feet._____________________________
Borehole cave in up to 39.6 feet._________
Competent bedrock approximatlev at 15.0 feet
Prepared by
Wanda I. Morales
G4W
TUT 
OO5 
1OS2
^•TGERAGHTY
/& MILLER, INC.
'Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
0 ft Flush mounted
i 
LAND
. inch diameter
IA
10
drilled hole
well casing.
inch diameter.
Steel (SS
Backfill
I Grout 
Cement /Water
Bentonite
1.5 ft'
Bentonite 
D slurry
3.0 ft* S pellets
N. 5.5 
ft'
Well Screen.
A 
inch diameter
SS 
0. 020 in slot
I Gravel Pack
I Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
2 5 . 5 
ft-
26.0 
ft-
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
•Depth Below Land Surface
Project
TEIC/PRQ13D1
Anna's Retreat/Tutu
.Well.
MW-8
U5VI
Town/City __
County 
St. Thomas
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 
167.61 feet tnsl
and Datum 167. 5A 
feet ms 1 
S Surveyed
_______________ 
n Estimated
InstallationDate(s) 
July 91, 1QQ?________
Drilling Method 
Hnllntr Stem Angpr R Ai r
Drilling Contractor 
Soil
Drilling Ruid
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. 
Flushed well with water
to facilitate development: 8/31/92. ______
Fluid Loss During Drilling ______
Water Removed During Development.
NA
110
. gallons
.gallons
Static Depth to Waterl7.70ft before develop feet below M.P
Pumping Depth to Water_____25 .0________ feet below M.P
Pumping Duration ___D . 7ft 
hours
Yield 
NA____gpm 
Date
.gpm
NA
Specific Capacity __
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well
gpm/ft
Remarks 6~inch hollow stem auger from land
surface to 8.3 feet
10-inch air hammmer from land surface to
27.0 feet._______________________________
Borehole cave in up to 26.0 feet.
Prepared by
Morales
GAM Fom 
OS <
TUT 
CO5 1O83
^GERAGHTY
£&& MILLER. INC
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
0 ft Flush mounted
LAND
10
. inch diameter
drilled hole
<-Well casing,
__£____ inch diameter,
Sfainless Sfpel (SS
Q Backfill
gg Grout 
Cement/Water
Bentonite
Bentonite 
D slurry
JLLJL_ft* a pellets
.ft*
Well Screen.
^ 
inch diameter
SS 
, 0.020in<tint
Gravel Pack
Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
34.1
.ft"
34.3 
ft-
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
•Depth Below Land Surface
Anna's Refreaf /Tiif.n
.Well.
St. Thomas
Stam 
USVI
Prryet 
TEIC/PR01301
Town/City.
County_
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 162.32 feet msl
and Datum 162.26 
feet ms 1 
2 Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate(s) 
July 30. 1992________
MW-Q
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech_______________
Drilling Fluid 
Water when diamond coring was
__________performed .___________________
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
C!pnf"ri fugal pump, PliicVioM trail tr-i t-h isai
to facilitate development: 9/2/92.
Fluid Loss During Drilling _____HA.
Water Removed During Development _
70
.gallons
.gallons
Static Depth to Water 13.14 ft before develoRMthelOM,M P
Pumping Depth to Water______33.0_______ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration 
n . "^"\___ hours
Yield___HA___gpm 
Pate 9/2/92
Specific Capacity
Well Purpose__
NA
gpm/ft
welL
Ramarks 
ft— inrh hollow
a u p r from land
surface to 5. 5 feet. Bedrock at 5.0 feet.
3-inch diamond coring from 5.5 to 35.0 feet
10-inch air hammer from 3.7 to 37.0 feet.
in up go 34.3 feet.. 
__________
Prepared by
Wanda I. Morales
GAM Fern Oi 12 88
S«luino«« WOWt
TUT
OO5
1O84
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER. INC.
TEnvironmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
0 ft Flush mounted
1 
LAND
. inch diameter
drilled hole
-Well casing,
A 
inch diameter,
Stainless Steel (SS
O Backfill
Q Grout Bentonite
5.7 ft-
Bentonite 
D slurry
6.7 ft- S pellets
8.7 ft'
Well Screen.
4 
inch diameter
SS 
0.020insiQt
I Gravel Pack
I Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
.18.7 
ft'
.20.0 
ft*
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
•Depth Below Land Surface
TEIC/PRO 1301
.Well.
MW-QS
Town/City.
County_
Permit No.
Anna's Retreat/Tutu
St. Thomas
State 
USVI
Land-Surface Elevation 
162.47 feet msl
and Datum 
162. 37 
feet msl 
S Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
Installation Date(s) 
September 14. 1992__________
Drilling Method 
Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech_______________
Drilling Fluid ____:_________________________
Development Technique^) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. Flushed well with water
facilitate development: 9/15/92._____
to
Fluid Loss During Drilling ______NA
Water Removed During Development ____
Static Depth to Water n.iAfi- h<»fnrp
20
Pumping Depth to Water_____18.0_____
Pumping Duration 
0 • 20___ hours
Yield 
NA_____ gpm
Specific Capacity ____tLA______ gpm/ft
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well___
____gallons
____gallon!
. feet below M.P
. feet below M.P
Date Q / 1 S / Q 2
Remarks 10-inch air hammer from land surface
fn 
7.0 .O foot- ._____________________________
Borehole cave in from 20.0 UP to
1 ft . 7
Riarfrnrlc InratoH
at 5.0 feet.
Prepared by
Pnnriano
G4M Form 05 1? 88
FUT
OOS 1085
^•r'GERAGHTY
V& MILLER, INC.
~nvtronmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
L ,ft Flush mounted
IQ. 1A
LAND SUT»CE
10
drilled hole
<-Well casing,
. inch diameter
TLTT/PRQ1301
inch diameter,
_ _____
Stainless Steel (SS)
Backfill
I Grout Cement/ Water/
Bentonite
11.0 ft'
Bentonite
13.0 ft'
D slurry
a pellets
m. 15.6 ft-
. Well Screen.
& 
inch diameter
SS 
0.020in slot
xO Gravel Pack
« —[3 Sand Pack
Q Formation Collapse
35.6 
ft
36.7 
ft.
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
"Depth Below Land Surface
Anna's Retrpat/Tutu
Well 
MW-10
St. Thomas
State 
USVI
Project _
Town/City.
County_
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 161.36 feet msl
and Datum 161.50 
test -31 
g Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate(s) 
August 20. 1992_____________
Drilling Method 
Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Teen_________________
Drilling Ruid ______________________________
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. Flushed well with water
to facilitate development; 9/2/92._______
Ruid Loss During Drilling ______
Water Removed During Development.
NA
.gallons
.gallons
Static Depth to Watar20.80ft before develop feet below M.P.
Pumping Depth to Water______3^-0_______ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration 
0 . 3_______ hours
Yield___HA___gpm 
Date 9/2/92
Specific Capacity
Well Purpose__
, gpm/ft
Monitoring well
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land
surface to 3.0 feet. (Bedrock at ?.Q ftn*r)
10-inrh air hammpr from land surface to
36.7
Prepared by
JWanda I. Morales
CAM
Sounom tuxn
TUT 
CO5 
1O86
_'GERAGHTY
£g& MILLER. INC.
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
////////////
- T
/////
V-///
«/
/
/
/
•>v 
10 
inch diameter
drilled hole
^Well casing.
6 
inch diameter,
Stainless Steel
Q Backfill
j^iGraut Cement /Water/
Bentonite
J^LL_fr Top of bedrock
55.1 ft-
-ILin-
Project 
TEIC/ PRO 1301 
Well 
MW-10D
Town/City 
Anna's Retreat /Tutu
County 
St. 
Thomas 
State 
USVI
Permit No.
Land-Surface Elevation 161.52 feet msl
and Datum 161.38 
feet msl 
3 Surveyed
3 Estimated
Installation Date(s) August 17. 
18 & 19. 1992
Drilling Method 
Hollow Stem Auger & Air 
Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil Tech
Drilling Fluid 
Water when diamond coring was
performed.
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. 
Flushed well with water
fn f a r i l i t a f p 
r1pv*»l npm«»nt • 9/2/92.
Fluid Loss During Drilling 
NA
Water Removed During Development .. .. 
240
Static Depth to Water 20.20ft before develop feet
Pumping Depth to Water 
74.0 
feet
Pumping Duration 
0 . 3 "\ 
hours
Yield 
NA 
. 
gpm 
Date 9
Specific Capacity 
NA 
gpm/ft
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well
Fracture Zones
gallons
gallons
below M.P.
below M.P.
/2/97
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land surfa
to 1.71 feet (Top of bedrock).
3-inch diamond coring from 1.71 to 75.0 feet.
1O— inrh air hammpr from 2.0 rn 56.0 feet.
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
•Depth Below Land Surface
6-inch casing installed at 55.1 feet._____
S 5 — i nrh 
a i T hatnmor from S5 1 to 
7 5 ^ L f ge tl.
G&M form 06 5 87
Prepared by 
Wanda I. Morales
TUT 
OO5 
1O87
Sounom gt'T".
^GERAGHTY
f& MILLER. INC
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
_ w- Flush mounted
Oil L-ND SU«r-CE
10
. inch diameter
drilled hole
•Well casing,
6 
inch diameter.
Stainless Steel (S!
Q Backfill
-jGrout Cement/
bentonite/water
Top of bedrock
^ 5 3 . 0 
ft*
..7A . 3 tt'
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
•Depth Below Land Surface
Project TETC/Tnfii 
PR01301
Town/City 
Anna's Retreat /Tutu
w»n MW-I in
County St. Thomas
State USVI
Permit No. __________________
Land-Surface Elevation 153.11 feet ms 1
and Datum 153.22 
feet ms 1 
09 Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate(s) July 16. 17. 20. 1992______
•Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor Soil Tech__________________
DrillingRuid Water when diamond coring was performed
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. Flushed well with water to
facilitate development: 9/2/92._____________
Ruid Loss During Drilling
NA
84
gallons
gallons
Water Removed During Development _
Static Depth to Water 
17.20 before develop teet below M.P.
Pumping Depth to Water 
7 3 . Q___________________ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration 
0.43____ hours
Yield__NA_____gpm 
Date 9/2/92
Specific Capacity 
NA______
Well Purpose 
Monitoring
Fracture Zones ___________
gpm/ft
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land surfac
to 11.Q feet.(Top of bedrock approx. 10.2 feet)
3-inch diamond coring from 10.2 to 75.0 feet.
10-inch air hammer from 5.0 to 53.5 feet.
6-inch casing installed at 53.0 feet._______
5.5-inch air hammer from 53.0 to 76.3 feet.
Prepared by Wanda I. Morales
G&M fen" 06 •
PUT 
O05 1088 Saur«-« mm
& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
10
. inch diameter
drilled hole
Well casing.
4___ inch diameter.
Stainless Steel (SS
Backfill
rout Cement/bentonit
water
5A.O ft-
Bentonite 
D slurry
A 
ft- E pellets
ft-
Well Screen.
A 
inch diameter
SS 
,0 . Q20in 
slot
Gravel Pack
Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
80.5 
ft-
88.0 
ft-
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project TETr/Tiitu 
PKOI3Q1
Town/City Anna's Retreat- /Tnf n
Well 
MW-1?T>
County 
St. 
Thoiqag
.StateJISZL
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 161. 58 feet msl
and Datum 161 -81 
feet ms 1 
£ Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate(s) Julv 23. 1992________
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger & Air 
Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Snil Terh________________________
DrillingRuid Water when diamond coring was perfori
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. Flushed well with water tc
facilitate development: 9/1/92.___________________
NA
Ruid Loss During Drilling _
Water Removed During Development 
76
illon
Static Depth to Water 26.0 before develop
Pumping Depth to Watar 
79.0_____________
Pumping Duration 1.1_______ hours
____gallon
.feet below M.F
.feet below M.F
Yield.
NA
Patp 9/1/92
Specific Capacity.
Well Purpose ___
NA
gpm/ft
Monitoring well
Remarks 6~inch hollow stem auger from land
surface to 5.9 feet (too of bedrock)._____
3-inch diamond coring from 5.9 to 75.0
10— inrh air 
hammer from _"\ Q fn BR D
Prepared by Wanda I. 
Morales
GAM Fo>m OS 12 88
TUT
GO5 
1O89
JTGERAGHTY
i£&& MILLER, INC.
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
///////
////
L_
0 ft Flush mounted
LANOSUSfACE
10
. inch diameter
drilled hole
-Well casing,
6 
inch diameter,
Stainless Stael
3 Backfill
jjGrout Cement/Water
5. 0
100.0
Bentonite
.ft* Top of bedrock
.ft*
u.
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project TEIC/PR01301
Town/City.
County_
Well 
MW-13D
Anna's
/Tuf.ti
St. Thomas
State 
U5VT
Permit No.
Land-Surface Elevation 236.67 feet msl
and Datum 236.60 
feet msl 
B Surveyed
_______________ 
13 Estimated
& 15. 1992
Installation Date(s) 
July 9r 13
Drilling Method Hollow Stem Auger & Air 
Hammer
Drilling Contractor 
Soil
Drilling Fluid Water when diamond coring was performed
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Submersible pump. Flushed well with water
fn faril i t-.af-P ri*>v«»l nptngnt- ; 9/3/92._________
Ruid Loss During Drilling ___
Water Removed During Development.
NA
150
.gallons
.gallons
Static Depth to Water 57.60ft before develop feet below M.P.
Pumping Depth to Water______106_________ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration 
0 - A2___ hours
Yield 
NA______gpm 
Date 9/3/92
Specific Capacity ____HA_____
Well Purpose 
Monitoring well
Fracture Zones ______________
gpm/ft
Remarks 6—ineh hollow stem auger from land___
surface to 5.3 feet. (Bedrock at 5.0 feet)
3-inch diamond coring from A.6 to 120 feet
ID—inrh air hammer from land surface to____
TOO.
fli r hfltnmor from 1 DO t-r>1?0.3 feet
Prepared by
Wanda I. Morales
O&M form 06
TUT 
OO5 
1O9O
^•TGERAGHTY
'& MILLER, INC.
'Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
in *rb Flushed mounted
10 .00 
LAND
. inch diameter
8
drilled hole
-Well casing,
—— _! ——— inch diameter,
Stainless Steel (S3
Backfill
I Grout
/Water /
Bentonite
19.8
Bentonite 
D slurry
22.4 ft« 3 pellets
25.2 
ft-
_ Well Screen.
4 
inch diameter
SS 
, 0 . 020in slot
D Gravel Pack
« —S Sand Pack
Q Formation Collapse
.ft*
48.n ft-
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project 
TEIC/PR01301_______ Well 
MW-1A
Town/City 
Anna's Retreat/Tutu______________
County 
St. Thomas
State 
USVI
Permit No. _________________
Land-Surface Elevation 196.04 feet msl
and Datum 196.12 
feet ...»1 
3 Surveyed
_______________ 
D Estimated
InstallationDate(s) 
July 2. 1992________
Drilling Method 
Hollow Stem Auger & Air Hammer
Drilling Contractor Sni 1 Tprh__________________
Drilling Fluid _____________________________
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Centrifugal pump. 
Flushed well with water
to facilitate development: 8/31/92._______
Ruid Loss During Drilling ___
Water Removed During Development.
NA
.gallons
108
.gallons
Static Depth to Water 28.40ft before develop te«t hatowv M P
Pumping Depth to Water_____43.0________ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration 
0.55___ hours
Yield ____________gpm 
Date fl/31 /Q2
MA
Specific Capacity _
Well Purpose Monitoring well
gpm/ft
Remarks 6-inch hollow stem auger from land
surface to 3.0 feet, (top of bedrock).
7.5-inch air hammer from land surface to
48.0 feet.
Prepared by 
Wanda I. 
Morales
GAM fvm, 05 12 M
Soumonn a»om
TUT 
OO5 1091
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER, INC.
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
/////////[///
T
Oft
LAND SURFACE
/.O
drilled hole
. inch diameter
casing,
inch diameter,
Q Backfill
ft* Top of bedrock
ft*
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project Tit
Town/City _
County.
Permit No.
.0.36 
Weii M <*>-
n
state
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum _______ feet
Installation Date(s) £4pr
Drilling Method iJ+lt—i
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Fluid ___
D Surveyed
D Estimated
7T
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Fluid Loss During Drilling ____^
Water Removed During Development
Static Depth to Water
Pumping Depth to Water
Pumping Duration 
** %•
Yield 
^>-____ gpm
Specific Capacity _
Well Purpose__t
Fracture Zones __
____ gallons
____ gallons
. feet below M.P.
. feet below M.P.
hours
Date.
gprn/ft
» -roH^ <
Remarks
Prepared by
X. k«^-**
G&M f tv" 06 5 8'
TUT 
OO5 
1092 
Somton 87-177!
J^GERAGHTY
£Sf& MILLER, INC.
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
T
0 ft
1 
LAND SURFACE
/
drilled hole
. inch diameter
^Well casing,
. inch diameter,
Q Backfill
ft* Top of bedrock
kJ&Lff
ft*
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
•Depth Below Land Surface
.Well.
County.
~SJ .
. State.
Permit No.
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum _______ feet
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method 
Air
Drilling Contractor .
Drilling Fluid __L
D Surveyed
D Estimated
••*
Development Technioue(s) and Date(s)
Fluid Loss During Drilling ______'
Water Removed During Development.
/ «> O
Static Depth to Water _
Pumping Depth to Water
Pumping Duration /^
Yield *%/ &____ gpm
Specific Capacity 
>M
Well Purpose 
H ar-rf 4-
Fracture Zones _______
1 ' S> . "£*
-3 3
____ gallons
____ gallons
. feet below M.P.
. feet below M.P.
-fours'
Date
gpm/ft
Remarks
1* M.
-^
Prepared by
G&M Fom 06 5 87
TUT 
OO5 1O93
Souhpnn 67-irrs
J^GERAGHTY
£Sf& MILLER, INC
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
1 
LAND SURFACE
/ 
%
/ •s^. 10 
inch diameter
/ 
drilled hole
/ ^Well casing,
/ 
6 
inch diameter,
'Q Backfill 
. 
.
* pg Grout &es+t*f»r4f.f
/ ^?.0 
ff Top of bedrock
^-.3<£& 
ff
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
* Depth Below Land Surface
Prnipct Yu^ 
AX //% 0 0 ^ .
A
t 
n j_
._„.___., 
r*r\o*j 
/•N«^ty-«
County 
C& + * T"M-o/V»tt-3
Permit No.
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum 
feet
Installation Date(s) Aprt | O">, Mt«f / A
Drilling Method r4a Ilou3^te^» Ao
~<*
Drilling Contractor 
J (f «£ CTY
Drilling Fluid
Development Technique(s) and Datei
— ^ »-Jfc>-»^«-T* UjL, r-^r->p / S
03fl 
Well A4U?-/£>
JT
State U3 KI
D Surveyed
D Estimated
wt'lO'f.'^H 1 Mu-*.3 . /R1*/
l/W/ Air K«^iry
s)
Fluid Loss During Drilling 
*3 A 
oallons
Water Removed During Development.
Static Depth to Water 
^ M &
Pumping Depth to Water 
2>) • "^sc
Pumping Duration O.«^
Yield 
L 
gpm
Specific Capacity 
J F\
Well Purpose 
M a/\t hatlr*^
Fracture Zones
Remarks 
tO l~~{i_ *J*L~jf cr^
I O O 
gallons
feet below M.P.
7 
feet below MP
hours
Date ^UL«VM
gpm/ft
*,^ /rx^ jL/A. J C^J/ ^.^ {**}
J 
'
pr_su -J^L r.Ho^c,
G4M fcxm 06 5 8'
TUT
O05
1094
Souhpnn 8MT7S
^•TGERAGHTY
\W& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(UNCONSOLIDATED)
ter,
inch diameter
Well casing,
Q Backfill
Grout <Je*n*j*
Bentonite 
D slurry
7-a 
ft' 
ST pellets
>_ Well Screen.
inch diameter
Gravel Pack
Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project
Town/City _nn
County.
Permit No.
Well
~ I"!
State
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum ______ .feet
D Surveyed
D Estimated
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Fluid __
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Fluid Loss During Drilling _____^ A
Water Removed During Development __
Static Depth to Water _____*?• ^2.
JJ_
Pumping Depth to Water
Pumping Duration
Yield AVrt______ gpm
Specific Capacity
Well Purpose_
gallons
gallons
feet below M.P.
feet below M.P.
hours
gpm/ft
Rsmarks
Prepared by
i*«_ ^\ •
G&M Fom 05 12 88
TUT
oo:
1O95
Soumpnm 89O978
f 
MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(UNCONSOLIDATED)
r
oft
i 
LAND SURFACE
<9
. inch diameter
drilled hole
--Well casing,
•* 
inch di
D Backfill
Bentonite 
D slurry
_LS___tt* K pellets
ft*
Well Screen.
*t 
inch diameter
, 
0.030 
slot
Gravel Pack
Sand Pack
Formation Collapse
.ft*
.ft*
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project
Town/City _&£
County
Permit No. _________
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum ______ feet
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Ruid _b
Well
State 
<-«-? y
D Surveyed
D Estimated
* c. .
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
f-L-fc
Fluid Loss During Drilling
Water Removed During Development
Static Depth to Water 
/f .2 V__
Pumping Depth to Water__
Pumping Duration 
$ iv
Yield 
NA____ gpm
Specific Capacity
Well Purpose_
____gallore
____gallon]
.feet below M.P
.feet below M.P
Date__ZJ___L_Ii
. gpnVft
Remarks.
Prepared by
G&M Pom- 05 12 88
TUT 
005 
1096
IfS? MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(UNCONSOLIDATED)
'ft
LAND SURFACE
drilled hole
-Well casing,
. inch diameter
inch diameter,
a Backfill
•H Grout
ft*
Bentonite 
D slurry
IQ.O 
ft' 
K pellets
ft'
Well Screen.
^ 
inch diameter
, 
0.0 JO slot
D Gravel Pack
'«f —S Sand Pack
Q Formation Collapse
n ft-
Measuring Point is
Top of Well Casing
Unless Otherwise Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
lAr> ^o-a &e.-+~
Project
Town/City
County 
TSV. rt««xnr»e>.y
Permit No. _________
MOO/3.QJfl
Well
State
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum ______ feet
D Surveyed
D Estimated
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method 
fr/o/ki*>
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Ruid _*:
fi/ >7
~+*s-
jLr\< .
/ A
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Fluid Loss During Drilling ____£L
Water Removed During Development.
Static Depth to Water ______U_l
Pumping Depth to Water
Pumping Duration A-M
Yield ^ft______ gpm
Specific Capacity
Well Purpose __bLa
hours
gpm/ft
Remarks
c/g Cy
Prepared by
-IT. Mgr
____ gallons
____ gallons
.feet below M.P.
.feet below M.P.
Date
G4M
05 '288
fU7
005 
1O97
Soumonm 8»O97B
, INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
I/
T
Oft
i 
LAND SURFACE
/
/
k/
/
/
JO.
drilled hole
-Well casing,
. inch diameter
inch diameter,
a Backfill
gGrout
ft* Top of bedrock
P.. L ft*
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Project
T«i»m/City
County
Permit No.
Well
State
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum ______ feet
D Surveyed
D Estimated
Installation Date(s) _±
Drilling Method 
A'»<
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Ruid ___
.4oJ- *i
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Fluid Loss During Drilling 
^ 1 A
Water Removed During Development _L
Static Depth to Water _
.gallons
Pumping Depth to Water__
Pumping Duration Q- (*>
Yield 
dl A____ 
gpm
Specific Capacity 
PI A
Well Purpose^__bXoc
Fracture Zones _____
J3"?- <S M
(si«W) j fe Cs(n|s«A gallons
feet below M. P.
feet below M.P.
hours
Date
gpm/ft
Remarks.
Prepared by
TUT 
GO 5 
1O9S
SoUhcnn 09-1464
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
T
Of t
1 
LAND SURFACE
/
///
•4///
1 0
. inch diameter
drilled hole
-Well casing,
_fe___ inch diameter,
-—» "Siifte.1
Q Backfill 
.
g Grout ^—'—•*!-
ft* Top of bedrock
-fft 
ft-
. 4^ ft'
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
* Depth Below Land Surface
TUT 
OO5 1O99
.Well.
Town/City
County.
Permit No.
.State.
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum ______ feet
D Surveyed
D Estimated
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method A-.^
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Ruid ___
Xr,t .
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Ruid Loss During Drilling 
tJlft
Water Removed During Development.
Static Depth to Water _
Pumping Depth to Water__
Pumping Duration 
-i
Yield 
01A 
gpm
4C, . &O
_ gallons
_ gallons
.feet below M.P.
.feet below M.P.
hours
Date Sl< JQ«<
Specific Capacity.
Well Purpose__
Fracture Zones _
»JJA
. gpm/ft
Remarks.
rAdtL
\l~tC •^KS~ 
CL*-*-*"*/ ^3-
Preparedby
rVi '-^•^•--^L. . r\eyr-oJLie
SouromW-MC
& MILLER, INC.
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
T
13.6ft
i 
LAND SURFACE
V/
//
/
10
drilled hole
^Well casing,
. inch diameter
inch diameter,
iamet
J
Q Backfill
rciGrout
ft* Top of bedrock
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
* Depth Below Land Surface
Well
Town/City.
County _
Permit No.
State
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum _______ feet
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Fluid
D Surveyed
D Estimated
•1 //.
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Fluid Loss During Drilling _____tLA___ 
. 
____^gallons
Water Removed During Development J5>5 CffiV*jxV- ^rlf/^fjftgallons
Static Depth to Water 
~^9'• fO__________________ feet below M.P.
Pumping Depth to Water 
93_________._________ feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration 
A^A_____ hours
Yield 
^A____ gpm 
Date".
Specific Capacity __
Well Purpose___t±t
Fracture Zones ____
gpm/ft
t TE»iV> •
Remarks.
Prepared by
for-. 
06 S 67
TUT 
OO
11.00
Souxpnnl 87-1775
^GERAGHTY
<S? MILLER, INC
Ground- Water Consultant?
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
T
Oft
I 
LAND SURFACE
•^ 
IQ 
inch diameter
drilled hole
"^Well casing,
So___ inch diameter,
P Backfill 
| 
1
Grout Ci«j-^*>rNj4=L
ft* Top of bedrock
(Ofl 
ft*
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
'Depth Below Land Surface
Town/City.
County _
Permit Nn.
•°33 
Well
State
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum _______ feet
Installation Date(s) Ap^l iM
Drilling Method 
Ai/- t^-L^r
Drilling Contractor .
Drilling Fluid ____
D Surveyed
G Estimated
/f^pHJ /ft
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
lO A
Fluid Loss During Drilling
Water Removed During Development 
£ S^
Static Depth to Water 
^0. jQ______
Pumping Depth to Water./
____ gallons
____gallons
. feet below M.P.
.feet below M.P.
Pumping Duration ^-MA<*A>
fcenrs-
Specific Capacity.
Well Purpose__
Fracture Zones _
.gpm
/oA
Date
gpm/ft
Remarks
Prepared by 
k-^Q-<j»-x*o^!X'' Mo.-
G4M f o-n- 06 5 8^
TUT'
COS 11O1
Scuwrrt 87-1775
^GERAGHTY
'& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
V
V
T
Oft
LAND SURFACE
»o
drilled hole
inch diameter
Q Backfill
roGrout
' >
ft* Top of bedrock
ft*
tt*
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
* Depth Below Land Surface
TUT 
OOS 11O2
Well
Town/City
County
Permit No.
State 
0-5 KL
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum ______ .feet
G Surveyed
D Estimated
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method _
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Fluid ___
Hr
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
^^rr.kU J)>l^o f
Fluid Loss During Drilling 
^ IA
Water Removed During Development.
Static Depth to Water 
"i."lQ
Pumping Depth to Water__
Pumping Duration 
d.
Yield 
»JIA_____ gpm
Specific Capacity
Well Purpose 
Ho
Fracture Zones ___
____gallons
____gallons
. feet below M.P.
. feet below M.P.
hours
Date
. gpm/ft
Remarks.
Prepared by
Soulhonrt 89-146.
£g& MILLER, INC.
Ground- Water Consultants
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
(BEDROCK)
VI
T
Oft
i 
LAND SURFACE
to
. inch diameter
drilled hole
-Well casing,
fa 
inch diameter,
Q Backfill
gGrout ft*~i-«-w4g,
ft* Top of bedrock
ft*
Measuring Point is Top of
Well Casing Unless Otherwise
Noted.
* Depth Below Land Surface
Project
Town/City 
^»^
County
Permit No.
fUT/PROQ'31.003 well
State
V.
Land-Surface Elevation
and Datum _______ feet
Installation Date(s)
Drilling Method
Drilling Contractor
Drilling Fluid
D Surveyed
D Estimated
Development Technique(s) and Date(s)
Fluid Loss During Drilling __
Water Removed During Development.
Static Depth to Water 
/
cSO
Pumping Depth to Water.
Pumping Duration
Yield 
^A____ gpm
Specific Capacity
Well Purpose.
Fracture Zones.
____ gallons
____ gallons
.feet below M.P.
. feet below M.P.
hours
gpm/ft
Remarks.
Prepared by
TUT
OO5 11O3
Somtxmn S7.1775
APPENDIX I
SURVEYOR'S DATA
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
Tm 
°°5 
jl°4
MEMORANDUM
TO: 
Tutu Wells Site Project File (PR0013.000) and Tom Danahy
FROM: 
Joanna Jasiorkowski
DATE: 
August 26, 1994
RE: 
Surveying at the Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Several surveying tasks have been performed at the Tutu Wells Site. The main contractor
was R. LOPEZ DE AZUA & ASSOC. (RLDA) of Puerto Rico.
In 1992, RLDA surveyed the measuring point elevations (ie. top of inner casings), top
of outer casings, and ground-surface elevations of the Tutu Phase I Remedial Investigation (RI)
monitoring wells installed by Geraghty & Miller, Inc. In September 1993, RLDA was asked to
extend the topographic control on the base map to the northeast and the southwest to increase the
size of the base map for the Phase II RI Work Plan proposed in December 1993. 
In February
and March of 1994, 
RLDA surveyed the monitoring wells installed by Blasland, Bouck & Lee,
Inc. (designated "DW-" 
and "SW-") and the monitoring wells installed by GCL (designated
"TT-"). In May 1994, 
RLDA surveyed the Phase II RI monitoring wells installed by Geraghty
& Miller, Inc.; the monitoring wells installed by Caribbean Hydro-Tech, Inc. (designated "CHT-
"); the monitoring wells installed by Terra Vac, 
Inc. (designated "KFC-"); the monitoring wells
installed by Geo Caribe, Inc. (designated "OHMW-"); and the VIHA-I, VIHA-II, LaPLACE,
HARTHMAN WILFRED, EGLIN-I, EGLIN-II, and EGLIN-III supply wells.
In July 1994, discrepancies were noticed in the elevations reported at the Monitoring
Wells OHMW-1, OHMW-2, OHMW-3, and OHMW-4, and Control Monument 202 at the
intersection of Route 38 and Highway 382 with respect to the topographic map. 
Due to delays
associated with the response of RLDA, Brian Moseley and Associates of St. Thomas were
contracted to resurvey the monitoring wells designated "OHMW-", and Control Monument 202;
and survey the tops of casing at the Church, Steele, and Harvey supply wells. The measuring
point elevations at Monitoring Wells OHMW-2 and OHMW-4 changed less than two tenths of
a foot, the measuring point elevation at Monitoring Well OHMW- 3 increased by approximately
2.6 feet, and the measuring point at Monitoring Well OHMW- 1 increased by approximately 2.5
feet.
GERAGHTY ff MILLER. INC 
TUT 
°°5 
11OS
MILLER, INC.
nvironmental Services
Ground Water
Engineering
H\droiarbi»>
Remediation
Education
October 12, 1993
Ana Gloria Ramos, P.E.
Designated Coordinator
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee
P.O. Box 364269
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-4269
Re: 
Confirmation of Authorization for Base Map Revisions, Tutu Service Station
Investigation, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Dear Ana Gloria:
As requested in your telephone conversation with Thomas Danahy on October 8, 1993,
Geraghty & Miller, Inc. has prepared this letter confirming your authorization, on behalf of the
Tutu Environmental Investigation Committee (TEIC), of $11,038 for Geraghty & Miller to
implement the base map revisions as discussed in our September 8, 1993 letter proposal. We
will be contacting the surveyor today to schedule the work.
If you have any questions or require further information regarding this confirmation of
authorization, please contact us immediately.
Sincerely,
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
Thomas V. Danahy
Senior Scientist/Project Manager
Jamel
Vice Presulent/Project Officer
c: Paul Ryan - Texaco
TVD:nr
PROOl3."*/PROOI3.001/I01293.ltr
TUT 
UO5 
11O6
201 West Passaic Street. 3rd Floor • Rochelle Park. New Jersey 07662-(201) 909-0700 • FAX (201) 909-0567/0568
.& MILLER, INC
Environmental Services
Ground Water 
Engineering 
Hydrocarbon 
Remediation 
Education
September 23, 1993
Alberto Colberg
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
809 Femandez Juncos
Santurce, Puerto Rico 00907
Re: 
Lopez De Azua & Associates, Inc., Extension of Base Map for Tutu Wells Site, SL
Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Dear Alberto:
We have enclosed two figures illustrating the approximate boundaries of the areas to be
extended on the current site base map for the Tutu Wells Site. These figures are provided for
your use in procuring a cost estimate from Lopez De Azua & Associates, Inc. The base map
should be extended by Lopez De Azua & Associates to the south, southeast and northwest as
indicated, and should include cultural features (i.e., buildings, roads and portion of Turpentine
Run).
*
Upon completion of the extended draft base map on or before October IS, 1993, we will
review and locate monitoring wells, supply wells and designation on the map for incorporation
by our drafting department. It is assumed that base map extension can be made without further
aerial or ground work. If sufficient ground control is not available and further aerial or field
work will be required, please let us know.
We look forward to receiving your response regarding the surveyor's scope of work and
cost estimate to complete the work.
Sincerely,
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
i
Marie F. MTDonnell
Project Scientist
PM13.--WP1/092393.LT*
TUT 
005 
.1.107
201 Vfest Passaic Street, 3rd Floor• Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662*(201) 909-0700-FAX (201) 909-0567/0568
September 28, 1993
Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
201 Wets Passaic Street, 3rd Floor
Rochelle Park, New Jersey 07662
Altn. Alberto Colberg
Re:
Extension of Base Mflp
Tutu Wells Site
Sk
Gentlemen:
U)
,\1
After reviewing the specifications and the information issued for performing survey
services for the Extension of Base Map for Tutu Wells Site, Si Thomas, U.S.V.l, we '
propose to accomplish these services as specified on your RP.P. dated September 23, '
1993, after notice to proceed is issued and for a lump sum price of Seven Thousand, '
Two Hundred Dollars (S 7,200.00). Invoicing will be dr>ne upon completion of the project '
and will be payable upon presentation.
R. LOPEZ DE AZUA &. ASSOCIATES is confident of its professional capabilities and
is proud for the opportunity to work with Geraghty & Miller, Inc. for the successful
completion of this important job.
If you have any further questions or information, please do not hesitate to contact me
at our San Juan, Pueno Rico office, (809) 268-6049 or (809) 268-6049, our FAX number
is (809) 726-6536.
Cordially yours,
OCIATES
PLS, MBA
snior Partner
R. LOPEZ DE AZUA & ASSOC,
TUT 
005 
11 OS
01-29-93 I1:44AM
TO EOCHILLE PARK
(GJ 
N V C O : t l 
C9-6--LO
15-53 
OMv 7298838
R. LOPKZ DC AZUA
July 21, 1999
SOIL TECH
P,O, B«x 19J7Q4
Hmto Ray Station
Ann. 
Mr. Jost M. Cardona
Project Manager
Hai
Dear Mr. Gardenia:
As per your request for information regarding the HoriwntaJ and Vertical of Controls
"For Monitoring and Production Well* for the survey performed at the Tutu Site, St Thomas,
USVI, we provide you the following information:
Oepanure Controls utilized are Control Point T74 NQ& and Control Point Dec* which are
in Lambert Grid Ooordinate for Puerto Rico & the Virgin Islands. North American Datum
1927, located at the Southern end of the Island. The Vertical Control utiHzed was U.S.G.S.
AM. 2/16 1954 with its elevation referred to Mean Sea Level.
If you have any further questions or information, please do not hesitate to contact me ut our
San Juan, Puerto Rico Office, (fl09) 268-6049 or (809) 268-6049, our FAX number is (809)
726-fiS36.
Cordially yours,
ft. LOPEZDEAZUA & ASSOCMTKS
Renfcn Lbpez da Azua, BAS, MDA
Senior Partner
RLA/hs
R. LOPEZ DE AZUA & ASSOC.
TUT
OO5 
1.1.O9
Monitoring Well Elevadons Data, Tutu Wells Site, SL Thomas.
U.S. Virgin Islands - March 24, 1994.
Elevations (feet amsl)
Monitoring Well Number
TT-1
TT-1D
TT-2
TT-3D
TT^
TT-5
TT-6
MW-8
DW-1 (near MW-8)
DW-2 (near SW-6)
sw-i
SW-2
SW-3
SW-4
SW-5
SW-6
SW-7
Ground Surface
(WeU Cover)
179.34
179.65
179.91
182.04
180.71
182.58
169.46
167.70
167.50
148.19
166.76
166.80
167.08
153.14
142.56
148.06
167.38
Measuring Point
(Top of Casing)
179.03
179.45
179.69
181.75
180.51
182.34
169.18 
^i—^^
-*KL*9^1(r? &
167.16
147.73
166.36
166.52
166.68
152.96
142.21
147.60
167.02
DRAFT
TUT 
OO5 
JL11O
TC ICCHELiZ PA2K
rim;, ST. THOMAS
GERAGHTY ft MILLER , INC.
849 lEBNANDEZ JUNCOS AVENUE
SAKTUKCE. PUERTO RZCO
MW22-D
TOP OF PIPE 167.572 FT.
TOP OP CASINO 167.742
GROUND 107.604
DRAFT
CHT6-D
TOP OF PIPE 174.202
TOP OP CASINO 174.444
GROUND 174.352
CHT-4
TOP OF PIPE l«6.953
TOP OP CASINO 147.196
GROUND 167.026
COT-I
TOP OF PIPE 167.696
TOP OP CASINO 167.9§
GROUND 167.102
CHT-7D
TOP OP PIPE 151.293
TOP OP CASING 158.479
ASPHALT 158.482
CHT-3
TOP OF PIPE 161.159
TOP OF CASING 162.252
TOP OF CONCRETE 162.259
orr-2
TOP OF PIPE 161.856
TOP OF CASING 162.180
GROUND 162.051
MW-24
TOP OF PIPE 167.754
TOP OF CASINO 168.017
TOP OF CONCRETE 167.868
DRAFT
VfflA-1
TOP OF PIPE 234.164
TOP OP RIM 236.236
TUT
O05 1111
DRAFT
VTHA -1
GROUND 232.167
VKA-2
TOP OF PIPE 235.986
TOP OP RIM 237.304
GROUND 234.304
MW-13
TOP OP PIPE 236.310
TOP OF RIM 236.752
GROUND 236.675
MW-25
TOP OF PIPE 166.341
TOP OF CASINO 166.573
TOP OP SIDEWALK 166.447
MW-13
TOP OF PIPE 159.261
TOP OF CASINO 159.495
ASPHALT 159.404
MW-19
TOP OF PIPE 14S.784
TOP OF CASING 148.963
GROUND 148.759
MW-20D
TOP OF PIPE 174.703
TOP OF CASINO 174.933
GROUND 174.68
MW-20
TOP OP PTPB 174.915
TOP OF CASING 175.139
GROUND 174.779
DRAFT
TUT 
OO5 1112
PAGE 3
EGUNI 
___. . ._-.
TOP OF CONCRETE 14«.64« 
OK A F1
EGLIND
TOP OF PVC PIPE 151.981
GROUND 150.484
BGUN HI
TOP OP PIPE 135.174
TOP OP GROUND 153.248
HARTM AN WILFRED
TOP OP PVC PIPE 142.16
TOP OF CORRUOATED PIPE 144.136
KFC-1
TOP OF PIPE 121.809
TOP OF CASINO 122.217
KFC-2
TOP OP PIPE 122.023
DRAFT
TUT 
OO5 1113
•±-- Jl
2?!i 
1C £OCHEL1E PA2K
PAGE 4
r\n *\
TOP OF PIPE 167.SOT 
U V>- * ^""l' 
5 M 
L/K 
f*A
GROUND 167.739
MW-17
TOP OF PIPE 177.H
GROUND 177.42
MW-15
TOP OF PIPE 178.947
TOP OF CASINO 179.421
MW-16
TOP OF PIPE 202.331
TOP OF CASINO 202.801
LAPLACE
TOP OF PIPE 114.229
OROUND 112.901
NW -21D
TOP OF PIPE 123.473
TOP OF CASINO 123.765
GROUND 120.70
DRAFT
TUT 
GO5 1114
S T T T 
'500
<2.'£
\0\
01
• TO«X»APHIC • MJWMSiOM* . uwo CONSULTANT*
Mosetey and Associates
FOUR WIHDfl PLAZA
STORM flINER SUBVIY
12991
8/17/94
FS800 - F8S01
F8801 - F8802
78802 - 78803
F8803 - 78404
78804 - F8605
FS805 - FSS06
F8806 - 78807
F8807 - F8808
78806 - F8809
F8809 - F8810
Bl Storm fi.waj
F8800
F8S01
F8802
F8803
F8804
78605
F8S06
F8B07
FSS08
78809
FBB10
— --,... ****„ g»Tw* w»tjn
30.9' 
Cb-io -
f 37.4' 
ce>;<1 -
54 s 9 ' 
C & - 9
108.1' 
C£>->
140.2' 
. . C6-U
98.3' 
cS-5"
iaa.4- 
ce>-H
144.21 
ce>-"
159.4' 
c.e>-':
58.4' 
C_fr-\
Qrata B1mv«»4r>T>a 
CAic-rt ^A-sn
(6B*»- 0»»fa
1 7 S Q *
i / D' s 
cB-lo
175.3' 
C B - ^
175.4' 
C & - 8
175.4' 
C.&- 1
172.2' 
£6 - u
169.4' 
CG>-5"
166.6' 
C & - H
164 . 8 ' 
(Te>~3'
161.5' 
C & - 2 L
157.9' 
C& - 1
152.4' 
CC3"- OO
ce>
-5
-3
' 2_
P.O BOX 1710. ST THOMAS, U.S. VIRCUN ISLANDS 00*33
(BOB) 7744310
-f AH
F T
TUT 
OO!5 1116
TtTlE • TOKXWAPHir - WMTIIUICKM* .
l?rum Moseley and Associates
FOUR Kiiros PLAZA
STORM 8IHBB SURVEY
Required Offa«t
«2»«0
8/17/94
PS303 - north curb
F8B03 - South curb
- Manhole
FIB07 - Corner pavon«nt
- Corner w»li
73808 - Corner wall
- Perpendicular to wall
- Perpendicular to curb
18809 - MW 18
PS809 - Sanitary MH
FSdlO - Curb
36, 3 •
0.0'
19.3'
33.6
47.1'
36.9'
30.1'
41 8'
99.3'
14.0'
P.O BOX 1710, ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIMIN ISLANDS
(809) 774-5310
TUT 
005 1117
08-23-94 05:24PM
TO ROCHELLE PARK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
10
19
20
21
22
23
101
202
1 IIWI H1I ' •
Brie
360.6354.
423.6262
633.6669
869.7255
228.9899
259.5957
294.2900
348.5326
312.3249
457.2573
456.4090
588.7489
. 678.9195
796.3023
796.0703
716.4040
940.1399
930.0043
1078.9036
1038,4274
1019.9110
1127.3047
1127.0722
379.0844
1114.5394
IMhV w •WT'WWV^^THW v WWVVMMWI 1
in Moseley and A
•ASTIKO
488.1592
i 
• •
634.8094
655.5796
638.7252
485.9388
490.1653 
J-
C04.2C27
508.5305
506.5324 
j
495.2993
514.6056
560.9974
(00.0306 . .
673.2612
634.6102
681. VUU*
683.6778
71D.T8T*
697.4689
687.1706
703.7803
716.4480 
|
730.4959
491.8266
491.8266
O • Uinir »»xi mm*f^9r*rv •
Isspciates
BLHV.
176.1000
175.9800
176.0900
166.7300
175.6900
1 175.2500
175.4400
175.4000
176.5500
1 174.8200
172.1500
169.4200
1*6.6000
164.8400
166.5600
let* 6700
161.5000
157.9400
159.4100
110.7000
159,2800
152.4400
175.8900
160.8600)1
m
naacpip .
KL/W
1LDG
BLDG
HL/W
fggOO CB-IO
78801 ce -1
7B802 ce»-S
78803 C6- 1
CURB
HH
F8804 c&-U
P8805 cB-?
78806 ce-M
F8807 ca-3
WALL
BLDO
P8808 d&-2-
CUfta
?8fl09 cB- 1
WILL
Mil
WALL
VBB10 , dB -OO
LOPBZ TABOBT
LOPBZ TARGET
BOX 1710. ST. THOMAS. U*. VIMIN ICUNO6 00609
(808)774-8110
TUT 
OO5 1118
APPENDIX .T
WATER SAMPLING LOGS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
TUT 
OO5 1.119
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
-Q3O
of
{ i\«.jH-
Pureine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Z5 Jtf. i- U- T-J-
.7*1 *f~*t«Jb-^ ^r
a.
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty *»*
PID (ppm)
,,3q
-i.-i
•So
1-3
O
II ^t.
-71
30
I/H
O.J
/ /3ft
~7-S
5>o
Ml
±
1 i^O
1.1
-=>•/l.n
O.I
. V
'5
a- \
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCs TC <_
BNA-r<TL.
TALg?,^^
Cvanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
y?flt>r
Preservative
(Oo^e
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Colleaed
i )"to
n-sr»
n«fc3
• •5a
yo-r-J"-e.
o-u«k
US-0
i-y<"-o.o6
1-1/2- -0.09
2- - 0.16
21/2: -026
r-037
3 1/T - Oi6
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
TUT
OO5
112O
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D. 
HuD-16
Replicate I.D.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
PP-OO'Vo5O
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
«~>lA
. c«
Pureine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Abovc/Betow Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
• J
tr> «-*C*gj
Q-«-5
3-30
-i r
Sampling Data
3c\oS 
Time
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty^r^ j Jc^J^
PID(ppm)
O~> 
1 1
•7. a
3-8
aseo.
—
J
•7-b
c3k5
/.J.
—
^
-, ^
-P^, ^
—
<3T^5
7.4
^&
\-~±
—
15 cwl'.o.' + Ml. '*•) 
° 
O.\ 
O.i 
<=* 1
;/>«
Color
Odor
Appearance
t^o~.•^
Constituents
VOCs TCI-
BNA
TAL
Cyanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
1 - liter
Preservative
Oo-,^
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
O1 ^S
PROOBOHula
Well Casing Volumta (GAUFl)
1-1/4" -0.06
l-W-0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1/2- - 0.26
T-OJ7
3 Ifl" - OO6
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUT 
OO5 1121
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location 
F
WeU I.D. 
Hu)-(<9
Replicate I.D. 
*> lA
Page
Date
of
Sampling Personnel: 
(£>. i
*"V Cec^o
Purnne Data
Description of Measuring Point (MF)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of WeU Below MP
Water Column in WeU
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in WeU
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
. I 
I 
|W 
I
V
o fa?
C
Oop
^J~^f
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
PID (ppm)
o.to
o
Sampling Data
«3
o
<=>•!
-7.0
;.•=<>
O~iO_3
0-70-J
0-733
0. 1
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCsTcL
BNA-rcu
TPAl CT^^^"^ 
I
1 m~r{yi y^Jy ^f*
Cyanide
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
5°-B&
Preservathe
NJ<3^«.
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
O~l<4<3
0~?VO
o~mo
Q-?^0
0-lM.O
1 0
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1-1/4" -0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
2" - 0.16
2 15" - 0.26
3" -037
3 Ifl" - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PROQBOlAilfonD
TUT 
CO5 1122
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. V^^fcx
Site Location Ge4 tfiiLli
Well I.D. 
r-io-
Replicate I.D. 
I ^ | A
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
£>-Ot
Purnne Data
Description of Measuring Point (MF)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
^^Jj——
"0
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivttf,^,/^-^
PID(ppm)
i-S
c3.<*
1-1
0
fcs^lf^l O 
->•"!
Color 
Lj^LuJ- V^-OLOO
Odor 
h^~e
Appearance 
"^is-Lai-Ci -r;|J>
—— IT 
————
-l.T
30
<•&
0
-,-,
3-^
'•5
0
llO 1
1-3
2>o
o
uo5
-13
J<^
!•«.
o
• «oq
T-M
.5^
..T
O
M,5
-».*!
d<x
..-1
O
otl 
^- ' 
O-* 
o- ' 
°" ' 
Ot '
JL-
Constituents
VOCs TCL
BNA -rtu
TAL^^iLl
Cyanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
^?Trtcf
Preservative
»ifcrv-e.
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
1 1 1^
m5
HIS
t»5
10
J
II 01
500
i. 14-
•MS
1115
Well Caiing Volumes (GAL/Ft)
Q«-
1 - 1/4" - 0.06
1 - 1/2" = 0.09
2" - 0.16
2 \!T - 0.26
T-037
3 \IT - Oi6
4' - 0.65
6' - 1.47
PROOMUufcm
TUT 
005 1123
GERAGHTY <w MILLER. INC.
TUT
1.1.24
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
WeDI.D.
Replicate I.D.
fcr I ffiOQi5-Q3O
Page
Date
of
Sampling Personnel 
tO
Purone Data
Descnpuon of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Field Parameters
C\\,-,a"-
(a i^
(- o c
Sampling Data
J^Time
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty ir^ |
PID (ppm)
O
0.3
O
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCs -rt L
BNA -rt c
TALFJfftstJ
Cvanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
sr""EUr
Preservative
Pt^*
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected"
"%IO
1 M ID
iM 1C
i H lo
II
'4
Well Casing Volume* (GAlTFl)
1-1/4- -0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
2" » 0.16
2 1/2- - 0.26
r-037
3 1/2" - 0.26
4' - 0.65
6" - 1.47
or- J.
IO
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
•IcjK—t
—L- UJ
Project/No. —^
Site Location £
WeU I.D. 
_
Replicate I.D.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
lPfyoo'~s.o5ft
Page
Date
of
Sampling Personnel: 
uXH0r- JLj
3.
Purging Data
Dcscnpuon of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
4PVC r^v.^.
v
~ 
'
J
>
J):
CMS
r _ .L-c^i P.
^
Sampling Data
I Jt (o J *<U-'T
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductrvty ^ L^~3
PID (ppm)
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCs-,cu
BNA-TCL
TAL^.cLal
Cvanide
i3,i<C3
<9.0
3H
&.t
0.3.
•"I
3' 2^ ^
K^r-e"' 
)
-5'.^
}
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - nter
S^^-3 RWr
/=*05
-?-•»
3,^
*.:!
0.3
iS'i
-7 &
3ias
C.I
Q-n&
G-o
33
J.O
o
o.^i 
O.i 
O.i
85 
8i> 
t.V
Preservative
f-to^t
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Colleaed
"Vi^ 
ftWi-^
,_,-, 
l(«, 
/..Li^hu
o~i i ft dfclJOhs")
j"-^;/ J
Ccr*-S)
^>OJ*c^ :
l — P,
j**j-+s\.
Ar-ty
o
^.
Well Casing Volumei (GAL/Fl)
8
(GAL/Fl
7-Ue^L
j^l-i-V
l-f/4"-0.06
'T^lC" - 0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1/2" - 0.26
r - 0.37
3 1/2" - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PROOBOHulora
TUT 
OO5 1125
GERAGHTY <^ MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
<J/
Purone Data
Description ot Measuring foint (Mr)
Height of (MP) 
Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
I ft.
I • I O.
r-^
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivtvfr^ |o«-^
PID(ppm)
0 MOM
-i.o
~*>2L
*3.*41
oa^s
-, i
^> O
3 U
3
O&Ztr
~>.Q
^0
j.q
e
,,«,5
"7- O
30
<3.<Y
<^
bo 
t
Color
Odor
Appearance
i-,-^
Constituents
VOCs-rct
BNA T<;L
TAL^^tslj
Cvanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
5T°-TiUr
Preservative
Nix-e
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
/I«/CT
I I V ^ "
1 ' *< S
i / v S
i/l
WeU Casing Volumes (GAL/Ft)
I - 1/4" - 0.06
1-V2"-0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1/2- - 026
r-037
3 1/2" - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
MH5"
OOliJ 
11.26
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. ^
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
k^ fix I
1^.050
of
:5cO-1
Date
Sampling Personnel:
H •
a IS.
Purrine Data
Description ot Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
- O- * 
—
(i
uj «J K>-^ s/O
(I
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty^rv^ /c/^
PID (ppm)
CRO^
-r.n
^
i&
±
o-.irj_
^7.0
*>0
|.«
±
c^?-<5
-7.1
«S4%
i.«
0.3.
/
/
/
J
/
3A i
bo (^jlO
Color
Odor
Appearance
Sampling Data
Time
.-,
, IcrL
Constituents
VOCsT<-L
BNA -TCL
TAL^'^wJ
Cyanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
*?fQ Trier
Preservative
K=.~«_
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
cy?v^
01 V5
O^V^
01 -/S"
•3o-l+-««te 
Boo^l 
p«(jK>*7>'-x: Acjc^c^x. 
o^SS
Well Gating Volume* (GAL/Ft)
1-1/4" -0.06
1-L2--0.09
2' - 0.16
2 Ifi" - 026
3--037
3 \ar - 026
4' - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PROOMMuronn
TUI
1127
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
, -5O
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Pureine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
v r 
Sampling Data
1-35 -l^
o. us
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty
PID(ppm)
J
a.o
AS
t.s
o
— ^ ———
"7-fl^
/•3
O
'
•>.?
J<}
(-7
O
CttST?
-?.«?
•s>^
I-T
O
O.I
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCss*o
BNA 
i
TALJ£££itj
Cyanide
rO ——
\r^r ^ . , 1
~} 
)
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
^f^Ti'tar
Preservative
K-boc.
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
C3^^-l
ns^i-i
01 rvi
Cf\=>-t
V
o-
1^0
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Ft)
1-1/4" -0.06
1-1/2- -0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1C" - 026
3" -037
3 15" - 026
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
ROOBOUufom
• (O«*oi
TUT 
GO5 1128
GERAGHTY 6^ MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
PRQQ<5.Q3o
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of 
/
-Hor
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Wel]
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
fe ; /
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
PIP (ppm)
/•I
Color
Odor
Appearance
fc^ 
o.i
•.•.•jc^(.«••«JL) 
Q. i
' 
Clei--
T.M
i-O-
o.l
O.I
Q.M
0.1
8-5
Consutuents
VOCs-TCL^
BNA -TCL
TALlS^rt
Cvanide
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
6y%^tcr
Preservative
•Oa^c.
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
lil=k-
f%i2.
l^>iO.
iSis.
-rPw
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1 _ 1/4- > 0.06
l-W-0.09
r - 0.16
21/T" 026
T-OJ7
3 Ifl" - 026
4" - 0.65
6"~ 1.47
PROOM) MU torn
GERAGHTY cf MILLER. INC.
I.
TUT 
CO5 1129
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
ProjectVNo.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
of
Date _K!
Sampling Personnel:
n.
tO .
>3| A
h.
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
r>^ ror-4 Q-4 *J^3<f(
(o \r*
^sle. rui
f
Sampling Data
Time
ru/>
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conducuvtyt/Wi L^)
PID (ppm)
1500
-7.^
*,0
l-ft
——
(511
-l.'a,
31
I.H
——
IS 1 (a
-f.-^
0<»
l.c,
—
/
/
/
/
/
3otii^;4-<^(%^ 
o. I 
o. i 
o. I
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents ! Container
BNA
£*-
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
Cvanide
Preservative
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
o-l^Jt
500/rsl
Well Caung Volumes (GAL/Ft)
I_y4'-0.06
1-W -0.09
r - 0.16
2 1/T - 076
3" -037
3 1/T - 076
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY c? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
g A.
Project/No
Site Location
Well I.D. 
-3-reeie
Replicate I.D. 
K-) | &
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in WeU
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty<.j*»/c«^
PID (ppm)
10.3.0
c.q
in
3-5—
^a;^:-U 
(f±) 
o. >
Col"" 
f> [jfftJ^
Odor 
*^fc K^o->c
Appearance 
(\ Le«V
1035
T.O
^B
O..M
——
1030
-7.0
=^Q
J.M
——
lO^fi
1.Q
03
D.M
——
o. i 
o. | 
CU
«-^- 
a. 3 
a-fe
Constituents
VOCsTcL
BNATCL
TAL'£Z££ri
Cvanide
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
Sf.sqg&r
Preservative
KJcr-NC.
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
/o<V5
(0^5
io?»S
10^5
l035'
1035
1055
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fi)
1 - 1/4- . 0.06
l-W-0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1/2- - 0.26
3- - 0.37
3 1/2" - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6"- 1.47
PROCSOHufo
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
005 1131
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D. 
_£
Replicate I.D.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
•/PAoo<?^3q
TTT
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
o.
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
J)
s£
36
JL « -• 
I
TO jOj^cTP^/N^t OL^
IT —' ->
T<J
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
mio
"7-3
So
Specific Conductivtyq^.3/4*^j J3-3
PTFl fnnm \
I^/S
1-3>
50
J.-^
»Y.Dc3
1-3
30
S.-H
i-/as
-7- ^
^0
J.4
°- '
o.l
o.l
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCs (.TcO
BNA CTCL^)
TALJS^jtj
Cvanide
(LleaLr'
••Mr Oor^«.
cx**^-
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
S3S Trter
Preservative
»^y>«.
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
/H3-5
/VOS^
/*OS-
^05T
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1 - 1/4- - 0.06
1-1/2- -0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1/2- - 0.26
r - 0.37
3 1/2" - 0.26
4" « 0.65
6" » 1.47
PROOBOMucom
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
.1.1.32
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
of
Sampling Personnel: 
H
Purging Data
Description ofMeasuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
" :I'nns Per Foot
'uilons ir V-.'el!
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Seiune (feet below land surface;
Purging Method
Sampling Data
Time
• old Paramc'ers
- UJ
T .eelcius)
Specific ConduaivTy(rr^5/oC}
*>t l~^ ^rinm '.
0-JC7S
T.il
c3-/
., .
O1/0
-j.e;
.37
<=>./
09/5
-7.E
«£><«».
O./
<=>^t°l
-i-s
3-^
O- J
J»'O3-
1 ijlor
• cjor
Appearance
0. 1
•7-4
>. i
-i.S
. t
•3
Consutuents 
Container
Preservative
V'OCs~rci_ ; 
4o ml 
! 
f."\_ j.
3NA -re,. 
1 - liter
T--^-"S^«t, 
1 ~ l«er 
i
Cvanidc 
n'^TTSLf
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
C3«M1
O-111
Old
O-l ««i
C.r
JT.
O
0-Cc—i.
Well Caiing Volume (GAUFi)
! 1-1/4" - 0.06
! 1-1/2" -0.09
2" - 0.16
2 Ifl" - 0.26
3- - 0 37
3 1/T - 0.26
4- - 0.65
6" - 1.47
"T "HP
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TU
OO5 1133
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Sue Location
Well l.D
Replicate l.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
Desjnpnon of Measuring Point (MP)
Height ol (VtP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
'vVater Column in Well
Du meter of Casing
GaUons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallon: r'-imped Prior to Sampling
Pump Seiung (leet below land surface)
Purcine Method
•JIA
<0|A
Sampling Data
Time
i fr __.
• ^J v«^ t^S
O
Field Parameters 
tyo*Z
pH 
1-3
T . - . - i O L b , 
3*\
, mo
~7.-a,
S-\
MH-c-.-cr.in^aiv./^U^T) i.<\ 
l |.e,
(M'5
T3,
^--l
1.5
P I D - p p m , 
i 
—— 
| 
—— 
j 
——
imft
~l-"5>
^«
1.5—
Color 
J
Odor
Apncarjnce
. i
I0..3-
Constituents
VOC-.-TXL
SNA TC,
TAL5"*t^A
C van id i
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
^^I"™ ^TlTtJT
Preser.ative
P™-*_
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
I H I f l
, H \ S
1 Li 
1 _P
IT 1 <2
I Lj 1 A
Aiki4
KJOJO
n i_
Well Casing Volume* (GAL/Ft)
1 i - 1/4- =. 0.06 i
, l-W-0.09!
2" - 0.16
2 1/2- - 076
r-0.37
3 15" - 026
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY S1 MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 1134
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
o/3.<33Q
(<e -a;
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
~5.
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Of A
W / A
>—
g*.-,^
Sampling Data
Time
cyA
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty(rri'5 kf^
PID (ppm)
a-i «^
-7.3
S~i
0-5
——
OSQO.
T.5
^~1
^^
——
0&Q-)
7.5"
OL-I
.2.5
——
°B\11_
•7-4
->e»
J<5
—
Color*""
Odor
Appearance
O. 1
<7. 1
a. <.
o.l
«s.-7
Well Gating Volume* (GAUFl)
Ho
OSes.
1-1/4- -0.06
l-W-0.09
2~ - 0.16
2 1/2- - 0.26
T-OJ7
3 Ifl- - Oi6
4- - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PROOWMuIom
GERAGHTY <? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
GO5 1135
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.^ <^&. fer / P AOQ»^ -Q3 O 
Page
of _J_
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Col
Date
Sampling Personnel:
H .C^
to
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
p »*• i **J «-»lc/y J 34-«*<
Vjuo v<. /v^^AfrCjtt
Qo-CD
l i a
Sampling Data
Tune
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty (r»<3 It^i
PID (ppm)
too.
-».•»>
^0
m—
ion
T.i
^0
I.H
—
1 O r^-^
•>•?»
jO
I.**
—
IOMO
-)(M
3o
I-O.
—
O . V
8<s
Odor
Appearance
Constituents | Container
VOCs
4o ml
BNA
Cvanide
1 - Uter
1 - liter
Preservative
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
loM O
10 HO
IOMO
10*40
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Ft)
1-1/4--0.06
1 -1/2- -0.09
2" - 0.16
2 Ifl" • 076
r-037
3 1/T - OJ6
4- - 0.65
6W - 1.47
PRonoilurorra
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC
L. K
L-J.. jus- ea
WM^
1040
WHO
O4O
IOH.O
TUT 
GO5 1136
Project/No.
Site Location 
Q*
Well I.D. 
Q
Replicate I.D. ^^
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
-CT3O
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
M-
Pureine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
i
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Field Parameters
^QO *4- aVo
ft
J
o.
Sampling Data
pH
T(celcius)
Specific Conductivty^'S Jt^
P4&
C.'/-)
"
1.5
-1. 1
•7. a.
O.I
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCs Tck
BNA TCL.
TALTK^JL
Cvanide
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
re°KT»V
Preservative
h^W^e
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
OflSS
CTQ C,"5
0^5iH
o"\SS"
500
5.0* «s
Well Gating Volumes (GAL/Ft)
1 _ 1/4" - 0.06
l-LCT-0.09
2" - 0.16
2 \IT - 0^6
3--OJ7
3 1/T - 0.26
4- » 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
1137
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location Q'Mg>-.
Welll.D.
Replicate I.D
O U
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of 
I
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
. otal Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
'•a. 
n< in Well
'jailors ?umpe<J Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet oclow land surface)
Purging Method
cat- ra"4al<-ale.3:a
Field Parameter*
Sampling Data
C3q.J) 
CbyJ^ Time (fl 3^
1 1 O<0
specific Conoucuvty(>^-»5(c«vr|
O \
0. \
i\ OS
0.
. a.
Color
Odor
Appearance
t-Q
(.6
ICTJ.S
CX<r-e
Constituents ; Container
Preservative
4o ml
1 - liter
None
1 - liter
HNO3
Cvanide
NAOH
Sample Collected
K
il IS
ll
Well Caung Volumo (GAL/Ft)
\-l/4" = 006
1 - 1/2" - 0.09 i
r - 0.16
2 1/2- - 0.26
3" - 0.37
3 1/2- - 076
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 11.38
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location Q*
Well I.D. 
g
Replicate I.D. __
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
' M . <
. ^~~^or~aJ^^l
t-f.i
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
O fj OT-
J. 0
I U
^fi-U-
.3 .V
O.lb
6-5
•••I A
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty (^r.SL-»«^)
F I Lr (^ffp^M -L^v
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCs -[c L
BNA-rcL
3 C-^l O
|-a,o a.
i.n
o<^
3-5
<s t.
>"^ 
<=»• i
Por^L
VC^-vj -J-, |4v
-1 
J
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
t^OL.
-, ,
3-S
3.3
<RS
'3"fl
-7. 1
«oa
3-5
A -4
ibDS
-7.^
^Q
«P3
O. i 
O. 1 
O. 1
Preservative
^Or^C
None
TAL^itLii 
1 - liter 
i 
HNO3
Cvanide 
> f*^Tii«
NAOH
Sample Collected
i=«uas
l^^s
(3<Q5
1535
Mk-_ i /!_,/(.
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1 - 1/4- = 0.06
1-1/2- = 0.09
2~ - 0.16
21/2- = 0.26
3' - 0.37
3 1/2" = 026
4" = 0.65
6" = 1 .47
TUT
O05 1139
GERAGHTY <* MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D
pioo
Page 
j
of
1
Date 
SJ^.il\SM
nnel: 
H-C«cWr^«
U3 .
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) 
Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in WeU
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Field Parameters
>> L3*w
O.lfe
J l^^^
RH_
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty
.t
0.
Sampling Data
Time
•M
I.T
0 .1
s-
If 35
o.\
(.•7
O-l
e-s
ISOO
T.W
O.I
i-S
Color
Odor
Appearance
10. I
ISfe.U
Vej-u *\\i.
Constituents
VOCs TCL
BNA -re i.
TAL5>*:^v.,i
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
Cyanide 
i *=P0 UTc i
Preservative
HJOC-
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
1505
i-roc?
• SOS
'STo-5-
1 5 OS
V.
- lijo-
'505
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1-1/4" -0.06
1 - 1/2" - 0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1/T - 026
r - 0.37
3 1/2" - 026
4" - 0.65
6" » 1.47
PROOOMulann
GERAGHTY # MILLER. INC.
TUT
UO.T
1140
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Projcci/No.
Sue Location
I.D.
c-yju •!«, HoJtc
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Replicale I.D 
_£> ]_£
Purging Data
nr>.rrinimn nf VlPMKiirmi> Point IMP~\
Heigh! ol (MP) AbouvBclow Land Surface
Total Sounded Deptn 01 Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter ot Casing
Gallons Per Foot
da lions in Weli
dallons Pumped Prior 10 Sampling
Pump Setting (teet below land surface)
Purcinc Met hud
O i- r>
> L W
Sampling Data
Time
C J pi
^,p
0
eld Parameter^
T icelcius i
Specific Conduinvt\fr-ir»s(onrO
STo
Color
Odor
Appe:ir;mce
^C4>_^.
O- I
o. 1
-7-6
-r. U
a. i
Container
4.. ml
Preservative
BNA TC l_
1 - liter
None
- liter
HN03
Cvanide
NAOH
soo
Sample Collected
0350
0850
OQ5O
**
assro
OOSO
O-W-J-
osso
Well Gating Volumes (GAL/Fi)
; ]- |4 
= 0.06 I
. 1 - 1/2" = 0.09 I
2" - 0.16
2 1/2" - 0.26
3" - OJ7
3 lO." - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
CO5 1141
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location 
' ', I (c
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
.35.
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
(4 -^u.
(0 1 A.
U l A
^IA
fa-.^jL,,
P (A
P IA
?OS
r- 
J 
-< 1 
/
>««X-73^^ — «. ^A>-±>-*~eJ-^i t
Lc. J- p^»>-^.p J—^'-N 4 LH i S r»«
\ 
_! 
V
— t ———
^ 
P ——— D
. r
1
Sampling Data
Time
5——f-3
Field Parameters
PH
T(celcius)
\ \\~j
-,.=,
•50
Specif icConducuvt\(V-«->~$le/-rO! 
\.^
PID(ppm)
0.0.
H^.2-
~T.^
•3°!
1-3
0.2.
n MS
T»,
SO
1.3.
o.a.
II M t
T^
a,0
1-3
0..3L
10.5
^lor
Odor
Appearance
Constituents 
Coniamer | 
Preservative
VOCs-rcL i 
4o ml
| BNA -r^i ! I - I«er
i TALj^—^J 
1 - liter
1 Cvanide 
i ^P^fiTcF
Vo~*.
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
ii -/t.
• / ^t.
ii ft
ii It.
0-U-«>J
-o-a.i -36-5
4- COb
Well Casing Volumes (GA1VFQ
1 - 1/4- =. 0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
2" = 0.16
2 1/2" - 0.26
3" = 0.37
3 1/2" - 0.26
4- - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PRWKOlnjfonn
TUT 
005 
1142
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
IS.
- c.
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of WeU Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
I
O.'pp-
_J
Data
Time
Field Parameters
'5^>^>
pH 
j 1..0.
T(celcius) 
! "s»^
Specific Conductivt\(nr>j|c~.~)l ^3.'=,
PID(ppm)
;5i»A. -,->;•*•«< C'
bo 
l~-
Color
Odor
Appearance
1 Constituents
iVOCs TCL
1 BNA 
TC i
0- I
3^_ ^
r~rr Pw-e.
-5Y, ^v>u.-5-,|l
— ' 
j 
i
>*>=><.
1-0.
•=si
.->.?>
o.\
1^1
7.^.
•3 I
^>.=,
O. i
|a,5S
->^L
•51
« ^
O.I
& . \ 
o< i 
o.I
Container 
< 
Preservative 
Sample Collected
4oml
1 - liter
j TAL^I^Jj 
1 - liter
1 Cvanide
P««-.e
None
HN03
^pSfifi^r 
i 
NAOH 
.
,-^^C;
i^«v=;
,aja,5
i-l'.-ier-
cob
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1 - 1/4" - 0.06
1 - 1/2" = 0.09
2' = 0.16
2 1/2- = 0 .26
3" = 0.37
3 1/2" = 0.26
4" - 0.65
6'= 1.47
PROOBOHulom
TUT 
GO 5 1.143
GERAGHTY c* MILLER. INC
Project/No.
Siie Location
Welll.D
TUTU WATER WELL S/JvlPLING
•^
•JPfLao\-*>~o<
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel: 
jO.
Replicate I.D. MS
M-
CEP
Purring Data
Descripnon of Measuring Point (MP)
•-' ::rht of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column ui Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
A"
«o
-i CS T*r. > 
r
Sampling Data
Time
CoulU 3a^r-o
Field Parameters
Oi9 l O
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conducuviy r^-«5t^v>
'.rsAi^ 
/
C7S
O . )
O- I
O.| 
0-1
CoiOT
Odor
Appearance
Container
Preservative
c ml
, ENA TCL 
1 - bier
None
Cvamde
HN03
Sample Collected
0310
NAOH
1-1 (
O88O
Well Cuing Voluma (GAUFl)
1 - 1/4- - 0.06
l-W-0.09
2" - 0.16
2 :&• - O26
r-037
3LC--OJ6
4' - 0.65
6' • 1.47
GERAGHTY ^MILLER. INC.
TUT 
CO5 1144
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D
ffiop.
Page
Date
of 
i
P \ft
Sampling Personnel: 
(J . I
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
0) A
PI A
^u
Sampling Data
Time
•^4- 
p.-i^-r-'/-^ «-M .^ 
Lj 
' S»
P-SA-4J Sc^r-cl^ ""£
•V.^*»**-T^.
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductrvt\^~3 It—")
PID(ppm)
i 0=^0
-'i
«s><=.
i M
03
10^3=,
-l-?>
3-S
'•H
o. a,
II OO
•7."^
SJ-©
1 .-H
0.^
1 1 CO.
~'-2)
sq
I - M
0-5
C. I
o i
S.M
/*»•». a
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents 1
VOCS-UL 
1
BNA-rtL. 
1
Container
4oml
1 - liter
TAL^^^j 1 - liter
Cvanide 
} Sf^liUf.
Preservative
i Sample Collected
t-^c^-tr 
1 
\ \ O3.
None
HN03
NAOH
' 
IIO^.
i
r, , ' 
i'0^_
- i—L
ii o 21
MOO-
^.
Well Casing Volumes (GAUFQ
1 _ 1/4- - 0.06
i - \n~ " 0.09
2~ = 0.16
2 W - 0.26
3" - 0.37
3 1/2- - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6"- 1.47
PROOPOHutonn
TUT 
005 1145
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
Project^,
••lie Location
Well I. D.
Replicate I.D
TUTU WA FER WELL SAMPLING
^^0013.030 
'
— L
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
MigLM
H-
U).
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in \Veli
Diameter of Casing
<"-ill.-tis Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
:'ump Seiurg n'eei bclou land surface)
e& 
T I C c-o--*"-*-
Sampling Data
-:eld Parameters
Ph
T (celcmsj
Specif^ ConUuctivt
. . u ( ppm j D*xJ^r»-
ISXHt 
• 05"5>
| -7.0. 
1 -7.1
1 
1
*r~3tc~-d 
!•«» 
i I-4*
-a:0.i. ; O.3. 
i O.-i
l-a^Q
T.I
•^ t
l.<\
O.M
(310
~M
5o
,.q
0.3
Color
Odor
Appearance
a-3
SV,
O.I
8-U
O.I
B-t
Consuiuents
• UCi 
TCL
BNA TCL
Container 
j 
Preservative
4o ml 
, 
»io/-.e.
1 - Liter
T.AL5r^5r JJ 
1 - liter
Cvanide
None
HNO3
sP°TffAr 
NAOH
Sample Collecied
i 310
!>>|Q
15.0
i*>\0
Well Gating Volumes (GALTFl)
1-1/4" =• OCX) .
. 1--1/T - 0.09 i
2" - 0.16
2 1/2' - 026
?- - 0.37
3 1/T - 0.26
4- - 0.65
6" - 1.47
J R
1310
1310
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 
1146
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. 
_
Site Location £VQr-^.c-4- I—
Well I.D.
————4
Replicate I.D. 
Pi ft.
r
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Field Parameters
pH
T(celcius)
Sampling Data
C tQ ?J^ 
CicsyA Timecvso?.J^
So
i .u
innn.\
(ppm)
l-U
O. (
Color
Odor
Appearance
Consutuents 
Container 
i
Preservative
VOCS-TT:L 
4oml 
! rO^^
BNA -TCL 
1 ~ li«r 
|
TAL^°^_| 
1 - liter 
!
Cvanide 
5T3 "Tiler 
'
None
HNO3
Sample Collected
OT^UZ>
O^^-O
OSJ-O
NAOH 
! 
cn2.o
500^-1
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fi)
1 - 1/4" - 0.06
i 1-1/2" = 0.09
2" = 0.16
2 1/2- - 0.26
3" = 0.37
3 1C" = 0.26
4" - 0.65
6"= 1.47
GERAGHTY c- MILLER. INC
.5)3
?.3
TUT 
005 
1147
TUT 
OO5 
.1.148
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
? OOP i ^ -Q3O
Site Location j^
Well I.D. 
_
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
' - H
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
(p i
as.
Field Parameters
Sampling Data
fcx4rau~0 luoy-0 Timetoqo^
pH
-7.1
T (celciusi
Specific Conductivty,
*t&ft»t*m ^"^q •• ~ -. +sCO 
o
1 . U
o.
o.^S
Color
Odor
Appearance
K^o^g
11
Constituents I Container
Preservative
4o ml
IBNA
1 - liter
None
HN03
! Cvanide
NAOH
Sample Collected
1
Well Casing Volumes (GAUFl)
1-1/4- -0.06
1 - 1/2- - 0.09
r - o.ib
2 1C" - 0.26
3" = 0.37
3 1/2- = 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY,- MILLER. INC
«' —— P.
te_/eP-
i-l,.Ur
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
RlL<f>P%Ootg..O'5O
Site Locatiori
Welll.D.
Replicate I.D
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel.
of
Purging Data
Description 01 Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Suunded Depth of Well Below MP
W.'.io' Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallon* Per Foot
Gallon:, in \Vcll
Oailn.. P Tiped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting >';ee; below land surface)
Purging Method
U
\&"\-^
. J P—
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters
nH
T ''celciusi
SpeC'.lX ConUUCtlVtV rrNS(e-^
PID Opm) Cse-iK^rwu-JiH.*^
1 11-7
C o,
30
L.-S
0.3
u^o
n.^
30
1.4
O.JL
I / 3 T
•>. =».
3o
I - M
0. |
1
/
/
/
/
n 1-7
nV
-SO/*
*4A~,
HIS
U IS .
Color
Odor
-7.W,
Constituents 
Container
Preservative
VOCi
4o ml
BNA
Cvar.idv.
1 - liter
None
1 - liter
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
n m
"3-7
Well Casing Volumes (CAUFl)
1-1/4'
1-1/2'
= 0.06
- 0'/9 i
T*
2U
-0.16
r - 0.26
r-
3i/r
OJ7
- 026
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
CO 5 
1.149
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
15 .050
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
t-tO-io
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
Ocscnption of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
") 
C
>-»-^'*e-o
'ir-> t_-t»-<-?
O .
Sampling Data
?———— f>
Field Parameters 
| 
—— • 
j ———
pH 
1 -r.*>
T(celcius)
Specific Conductivty
PID(ppm)
^Cx-
i-S
Q
-7.«»
3»
I S
0-5
'^00
-*M
•3^
I - M
0-5
I^H5
•»-s
5l
I - H
O
8.S
8-a.
'80
o, i
o. i
o. i
0.1
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents |
IVOCs TCL |
|BNA TCL 
1
C_ \f_oJ-
MCT-.C
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
! TAL^."^,..^ ! 
1 — liter
i Cvanide 
• ^1°° Infer
Preservative 
| Sample Collected
>°o-^«.
None
HN03
NAOH
1 *^t W ^
^ o *r
l^a \i ^
I^US
i-l.
±-r.4«r-
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Ft)
1 - 1/4' » 0.06
1-U2' 
-0.09
2" = 0.16
2 1C' - 0.26
r = 0.37
3 1/2" = 0.26
4" = 0.65
6" = 1.47
GERAGHTY ^ MILLFR. INC
TUT
1150
Project/No.
Site Location
WeU I.D.
Replicate I.D
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
P£-OOi=>.05O
V-
i-.oJ-T I Ca^r
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
I.
Pureine Data
y~j-"—•-.:-j- -.f » *- --.-_;..^ n~;_. /\*n\
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of WeU Below MP
Water Column in WeU
Diameter of Casing
GaUons Per Foot
GaUons in WeU
GaUons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
itajoW TJ3 —•
. 16
<0 i^
.SQ
MO
J
D_
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conducuvtv(r~5!c/'-0
PID-(ppm)
iV
^1
'•5
O
———— 7 ——————
1 =S
=0
>•?>
o
1 VJ^ 
j /-H55
-?.-,
a,,
!••?>
O
•7.5
/.^>
0
•y n VQ. »J J-~T Y e ' * - ' 
a. i 
o.i 
Oi 
01
bo 
f"3!i-) 
s.a 
^.fe n^ 
.«,
>«fetcn« 
(«x»3 
. — „ 
.->»-, 
'^ 
"^
15/5
1 ^
0
O.I
I M M "5
Odor
Appearance
Consutuenis I Container
VOCs -TCL ' 
-toml
BNA TCL
TAL£-tllj
Cvanide
1 - liter
1 - liter
5-°°fitor
Preservative 
Sample Collected
'-'c^e
None
HNO3
NAOH
i«ki5
i-=,iS
i5i5
I5i5
i- I.'
ISIS
Well Casing Volumes (GAUFQ
1 - 1/4- - 0 06
1 - 1/2" = 0.09
2- = O.I6
2 1/2- = 0^6
3' = 0.37
3 1C" = 0.26
4" - 0.65
h"= 1.47
GERAGHTY c> MILLER. INC
TUT 
OO5 1151
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. ^
Site Location
Well I.D.
Kepiicaie l.D.
. Q30
o^- »3»~gLi
Page
Date
of
C vx T- b
Sampling Personnel: 
[J .
r-
M=i>
Purging Data
Descriptor ol Measurirm Point (MP)
Hciizm oi : MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Cok'mn rn \Vel!
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallon in Well
Gallons ? .imped Prior to Sampling
Pump Seu.iig (feet below land surface)
Purging >'lethod
. S —— K
J :
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters 
; 0^3 
o 
lOoo
1
Tfcelaus] 
=,1
S".-C;:K •' Jiuuaivu^sJ^ 
,. ^
P:D -- - 
o
1 -7-3
<S>^
1.5
O
1059
^
Sl
1-1
O
II JO
^. te
^\
i - M
O
*^*TT ••^<-*;^.«
O.I
O.|
10. a.
o./
10.
0.)
Odur
Appcarar.^
Constituents
Cuaiamer 
,
Preservative
VOCs TCI_ 
-«o ml 
! 
»^4»-.«
BNA -rti_
T.AL^tt^^i :
1 - bier
1 -- liter 
|
None
HNO3
rvaniJc 
s-^° TTtfrf- 
i 
NAOH
Sample Collected
H i o
ii 10
n 10
I M O
V. pw
o-u
UojJ'
MO
>o
Well Casing Volumea (GAL/Pl)
] - 1/4- = 0.06 |
l-W-0.09)
2" - 0.16
2 1/2- - 076
T-OJ7
3 15" - 026
4" - 0.65
6' - 1.47
GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC.
TUT 
00 S 1.1!
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No
Site Location
Well I.D.
replicate l.D
f Pp>oo
C.H-T-3
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height 01 '.MP) 
Above/Below Land Surface
Votal Sounded Depth of WeU Below MP
Water Column in Well
DiameK" of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons . umptd Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
P VC ^,-,
\*.*m\:
. I t-
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters 
. i-a^^s 
' 1 M O^_
pH 
! -7..S. 
! -i. i
Tfcelcius; 
j a,t 
3o
Specific rjnductiviv(r».3lo»^ 
i . ~j 
| i.t,
FID 
y;-i 
t 
O- 
S
I S I 4
l-^f
So
1.4,
S
IM^O
T.)
^l
1. 101
^m .\:r*.-\^ C"to} 
^-l 
o-l 
o>1 1 
°-'
bo 
CT'i1*-^ 
S'' 
Ql<l 
*' f c *'^
Color
Odor
"SJ——•&-f
Cuniainer
Preservative
SNA TC
4o ml
1 - Her
None
in,_i_! - liter
HNO3
Cvanide
NAOH
Sample Colleaed
no
0-U-i.
"*
OS
Well Caiing Volumes (GAUFi)
1-1/4- = 0.06 
i
1-1/2- - O.IW |
2" - 0.16
2 1/2" - 0.26
T-037
3 1/2" - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" « 1.47
GERAGHTY fi" MILLER. INC
TUT 
O05 1153
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I. D.
Reriicaie I.D.
Pl
Rage
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
•3.
Dti,cnpnon of Measuring Point (MP)
Heichi ni (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Toia: S. .unded Depih of Well Below MP
'.V'atcr Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
GaUuns Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
P'jTip Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
P+
^eL J-r
eJ c «--•..->—•
r- le.wjl
»^A*^ «i
1 .H"?
(••=:
Sampling Data
Time
Par-'.neters
T . c
l-i,
I 
1-5
PiD ippm •
0830
OS
8.0
Color 
J
Odor
Appearance
0.1
s.a.
Constituents 
Container 
i
Preservative
VOOTc-L 
i 
4o ml 
1 
tO.n*.
3NA Te.i_ 
; 
1 - bier 
!
TAL"K££.J 
1 - liter 
j
. •.,::.,.<. 
, gp-Tltcr 
1
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
'"^^ OQ
C3 ^^?*^^
D *i o O
o ^oo
^l —— ,
A ll
0^00
-U-i
c«=»b>
Well Cuing Volume* (CAUFl)
i 1-1/4" - 0.06
' 1 - I/I' - 0.09
2" - 0.16
2 IS" - 0.26
r-037
3 1/2" - 026
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY 6f MILLER. INC.
TUT 
OO5 1154
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Sue Location
Well I.D
.Replicate I.D
ft^L I
i^ .Q3O
iOe^a U. /
- u?wJn. fl»~
Page
Date
Of
Sampling Personnel: 
(Q .
H • c f L«^
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Heicht of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Tuul Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallon- "\T Fooi
Gallons in Well
GiUons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump So:: ng (feet below land surface)
Purjia Viethou
Purging Data
^
PVC
I SO
Sampling Data
Time
i U cJb—,
Field Parameter-; 
^ i oo 
' li &U
PH 
• -j.i 
-i.«=>
T(celcius) 
3o~
Specific Conductivt\(^sJc^Ti 
l-M
PID(ppm 
O
^0
m
o
1 5 0 7
7.H; i
» - M
O
J3c5O
7.^.
50
i.M
0
•^pJ.-.i-A+l L'Jtf) 
0-1 
°' 1 
O.X 
O.I
So £~2>IL.~) 
83 
«*i.H 
^ _ £ , 10
33.
i> -50
Odot
Appeararcc
Constituents
V'OC 
TCi. -i
3NA Ttc.
TAL"^i^,J;
Cvanid'.
Container 
i
4o ml 
:
1 - liter
I - liter 
:
^s^rnn1
Preservative
Oe*->e
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
(•"SOO
,3,00
/•a no
/3^to 
1
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
| 1 - l/'-t" » 0.06
1 1 -11"- 0.09 i
2" -0.16
2 15" - 0.26
3" -037
3 1/T - 026
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
TUT 
CO 5 11.55
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
M . C
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of WeU Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty frrOk^}
PID (ppm)
Ot5-7
TO
,D«=?
I.Li
O
0-iOJ.
tu
SO
l - b
O
OTI«<
e.*»
^•1
I S
o
oass-
-}.-}
s>i
l.<5
O
U'e.Vl
C=>. I
O.I
Odor
Appearance
Constituents I Container
Preservative
BNA-r
Cyanide
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
£3,335
,A^UL
Well Citing Vol
Cob
0835
OB 35~
0835"
(GAlTFt)
i-yr-o.06
1-1/2" -0.09
2' - 0.16
2 15' -"026
r-037
3 1/T - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" -1.47
PROGBOUwium
GERAGHTY «S? MILLER. INC
TUT 
GO 5 11.56
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
. ft Jl
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
^ .030
Pa8e
of
^ 3 LJL-
V-tcO ~
Sampling Personnel:
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Field Parameters
11- fcfa. 
-
p.Lj—fu.^U«~e 4~Jt»
Well Citing Volumq (GAL/Ft)
1-1/4" -0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
2" - 0.16
2 IJZ" - 0 26
3- -037
3 W - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PROOMUiKcra
GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC
TUT 
OO5 1157
TUT 
OO5 1158
Project/No.
Site Location
Welll.D.
Replicate I.D.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
.030
Page
Date
of
Sampling Personnel: . H - C e tlg^=.c
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point f MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
J 4 O
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivttfrvo L,^
PID (ppm)
1OH.L
•7.B
^> \
l . M
0
lOCiS
"'•M
^l
1-M
O
i i o n
-1.3
^1
,.q
———
l^x?
~7-V
5,
I-M
O
i o is
10-HO
Color
Odor
Appearance
<H.
-,y
Consotuents
VOCs^r^i.
BNATCL.
TAL^Tiu.A
Cyanide
Container
4ornl
1 - liter
1 - liter
^f0 "Bier
Preservative
rO«»oc.
None
HN03
NAOH
1 —— = ————— i ————— —— n ——— 1 —— 1 ————
Sample Collected
f ^N /~*\ s~*<*
iO-OO
1^00
U i o
as
Ciob
Well Cmng Voluma (GAL/Ft)
1-1/4" -0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
2' - 0.16
2 1/2" -026
3- -037
3 \Or - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
000
FRMMlAiircra
13.00
GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location 
-f~—^. 
Is/'-fe/C-t
Well l.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
?
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purrinc Data
Descnn'ion of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) 
Above/Below Land Surface
Toial Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
'A atcr Couirnn in Well
'Jiaosji. 
•" Casing
'i 3 lions Pt-r 
Fcv t
Gallons in We!'
ualJons Puutpcd Prior to Sampling
Pump betting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Field Parameters
p_H_
lO.'if
Sampling-Data 
y
.) 
f»7.W)Thnefj5'«l.\ 
J>«,/r>'
—i"——*"^—I— 
v •/ i——__
(celaus)
pm;
I'd •
— ra
7-?
1-3
5»TT
Odor
Appearance
o.i
o.i
7-J
/•J
7-H
o.i
o-l
'
ti«
A^ITV
• ?r.i-Ji'ic.i.is
vucs TCL
BNA TCL
Container
4o mi
1 - liter
TAL^tlwi' 
l - llter
Cvanitie 
^ — E«.
Preservative
^<»->e
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
ftnfi
TIO«?
1 1OS
Uos
1>05nof
1-1/4" -0.06
J-W-0.09
2' - O.M
(OAL/FQ
T-037
4" -0.65
.6- - 1.47
O.
30
. /V/.
UOS
1105*
TUT 
OO5 1.159
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project.lso.
Site Location 
-?
Welll.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
* *
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
/cf
.*/. <f S.P.
PunrinB Data
.jescnpuon ot Ms-isuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in V.'jll
Diameter of Casing
• a lions Per Foot
Gallons in Weh
Gallon5 Pumped Pnor to Sampling
«
KLjmp Sen. ;g fleet below lar.r surface) 
.
•^urging Mi-trio!
Vf? 
-CceJ-
o.
.
C ^ n1^ .( \5 .^
tz :
T icelciui)
7-J
J+'c.
'. 2.1
Jl'C
Color
Odor
C(cc*r-
o.\ri
2:: it
j f . J 
S^flfr
if 
I2:3S
1-3
-O 
—
7-3
Zt'C.
1-5-
0. (
0- |
0. /
1-7
VO
-uiuenb) 
Container_____Preservatrve
1 TC L 
-*«' ml 
:
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
500.—— I
WeU Qaing Volumq (GAL/Ft)
1-1/4--0.06
l-W-0.09
2" - 0.16
2 15". 0.26.
:r-OJ7
.31^-006
4' - 0.65
.6" - 1.47
5". J.
li
i^-.4_^X
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
TUT
116O
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No
jif: Location
vVcUI.D
Replicate ! n.
'+/Sj 
rr*"<.
Page
Date
of
~ C
Sampling Personnel: .
p ) A
Pureinc Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Wa-'T 
olumninWell
diameter of Casing
>. iaiioni Per Foot
Gallon* ir, We!'
•r>ll.-n> 
.--ir^ Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting : leet nclow land surface)
Pureinu Mo i hoc
Field Parameters
- 
Sampling-Data
C.f yl.) 
CIJ.Q«|.^ Time(j.3j-4|.V &«'/<>•
7-1
T (cclaus)
A V
PIP (ppm)
Color
Odor
£?./
7-V
7-3
M'c,
. 1 ^
O.I
.i-r
7-7
I - M
0.1
C/f
Constituents 
Container
Preservative
VOCi Tec
ml
- - liter
None
HN03
ZJ-Af.
NAOH
Sample Collected
en so
Well Oiing Volume* (GAUFt)
1 1-1/4' -0.06 I 
2"-0.16
i-i/2"-o.wj 2ifl--o.26.
3" - 037
P) A
4' • 0.65
<^>- 1.47
PROQB01 tufonr
GEP.AGHTY ff MILLER. INC.
?.JQ AD.
sis-*
7 
7
TUT 
CO5 1161
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Page
ol
Site Location
Well I.D
Scphcati.- ' D.
Date 
f:/-7/9fi
Sampling Personnel: 
stf{_ J /> 
<
rJ I A
Pnrrine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height ot (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
puir. i Setting (feet below land surface)
-urging Method
"TV/*
to/A
•> V//35-73
tia
Sampling-Data
tt'-ir
7
•7-3
• i
O.I
-7-5
So
7
I I MS
HSl
(•<*-
O. 1
C. I
£) . (
Odor
\npearano.'
Constituents 
Container
Preservative
VQC> T^ L ' 
4o ml
Cvanide
!
1 - liter
None
1 - liter
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
l-W-0.09
Well Cuing Volume* (GAL/Ft)
2" - 0.16
• r -
4' - 0.65
3V.T.
, J -.
GERAGHTY fif rvOLLER. INC
TUT 
OO5 1162
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
of
7
- / 7
Sampling Personnel: ._
Porcine Data
Descnption of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of CMP) 
Above/Below Land Surtace
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well'
Diameter <'f o. ing
Gallons Per Foot
Cations in Wel!
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting ,'feet below land surface)
~'-rgin_: Method
*T?f? *^\ 
£g"-g«O-^
0 
!-
Sampling Data
-S
1 \'Time
O.I
Odor
Cyanide
1-U4--0.06
l-W-0.09
Well Cmng Volume* (OAL/Ft)
2" - 0.16
2 IS" - O26
y - o 37
.30
o .
7
r
Field Paramctcis 
' i|'. 03-
pH 
1. 7
~ i cclnusi 
Jtf'c-
j-..>ecuicConauctiviy^.i5/t.^') 
l-M
ir-oM -
l-f
$o°C,
*-v
PID-fonm) 
^ 
1 
O 
•
T? r<T
~7-C.
"^^
l-t
O
/// '
/
-/
ents , Container
PreservativB
:L 
*• 'm' 
i°oor
/ 
i - liter
j^Ji 
1 - 'Her 
I
-^P2fiJ&. 
;
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
<=^iS
r?rLS
;5/S
/a.15-
6' - 1.47
.0
. S".
^^
500^1
,3,5
GERAGHTY ff MILLER, INC
TUT 
OO5 1163
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location c . .
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
_of
Q .
). Kor-Jce
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
i£ 
A .
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivtv
PID (ppm)
092G
~7_3
<2&
'•^
o.-*>
Oc?«/3
7.3
3#
l.S
o.'i
—J ————
->-H
«D<9
/ 5
0.2.
Cllt
-!.<<
S-&
i-5
O.ZL
boT^Ili-) 
. , 
<9-° 0.~r <i.^. ie-O
Color
Odor
Appearance
-,^k:J
Constituents
VOCS TfL
BNA TCL.
TAL^T^Lj,
Cvanide
Container 
!
4oml 
|
1 - liter 
|
1 - liter 
|
gPST?^f 
!
Preservative
N^o.-»<.
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
o^is-
Ofl'5
O9/^
O«»'S
CV.
c^/S"
— "5
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
] - 1/4- - 0.06
j 1 - 1/2" = 0.09
2" = 0.16
2 1/2" = 0.26
r - 0.37
3 1/2" - 0.26
4" = 0.65
«"<•= 1.47
GERAGHTY c^ MILLER. INC
TUT 
GO5 1164
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No^Tool^ £r ( Rft QQi 3 -0 "5 O
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D. 
>^A__________
Purging Data
Dcsi-iipiujii of measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
I (_JL U=-^Mr»"-J 
O
of 
/
Date
Sampling Personnel: 
V-\
03 . h-oroJle-S
I IQ
^<0 
/ aa
^J*^ <Lro.O.
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1 _ 1/4- <c 0.06
i - i/r = 0.09
r - o.i6
2 1C" = 0^6
3" = 0.37
3 1C" -= 026
4" « 0.65
<2)- 1.47
O T.
GERAGHTY c^ MILLER. INC.
TUT 
005 1165
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. 
^. AlT / P&oa /3.g3Q
Site Location 
-f"gX> CO
—— /
WellLD. 
-aP5- -\-J — | _
Replicate I.D. 
»P( A
Page.
_ _ 
Date
*
Sampling Personnel:
of
Description of Measuring Point (MP) ...
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
A//I/U
Sampling Data
/5V Time
Color
Odor
Appearance
C(*.
J.
U.I
9. 0
rPsc.DtPt
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty «->3L« ^
PID (ppm)
f-2-7
7.1
3/°
1.7
V.0
y .' J/
7.0
30'
/.r
7-0
%n
7.1
30"
-. A?
l.t
(010
•7. .3.
<3-~>
/•9 
-
10
Constituents
VOCs-rcc
BNA -re L
TALS^iiLi
Cyanide
Container
4om!
1 - liter
1 - liter
jSfBffl1
Preservative
t^o^c
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
L0,o
1010
i O IO
i o /n
uo,o
101 0
V-
IOIO
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
l-W-0.06
1-1/2- -0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1)2- - 026
3" - 0.37
3 1/2" - 026
4' - 0.65 j
6" -1.47 j
/TO- -
fVc
*/
A"
PROQBOLAiKfORB
GERAGHTY & MILLER.
TUT 
O05 
.1166
-t-rr-
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
#/*170 JO
-hf—lt/
Page 
t____ 
of
„, 
Date __
* Sampling Personnel: 
^tC~ 
tf 
J*.f+*j
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
13.7
17
2.5'
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivtyf,.^/^^
PID (ppm)
oq«rc-i
~>-3-
~$0°
».*/
-f
If/
-J..3.
5o'
LS
s^
yf-(f
7. "i-
Zf
IS
1.0
/Q3T
7-q
.3.1
/.v
0-^
Odor
Appearance
Constituents 
Container
VOCS T6L
BNA
Cyanide
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
Preservative
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
(Ol-«>/ 
0 
' 
lXt
Well Ci»n{ Votuoet (GAL/Fl) — -.
1-1/4' -0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
r - 0.16
2 Ifl" - 026
r-037 -
3 III" - 026
4' - 0 65
6"- 1.47
PROOMUutim
GFRAGHTY ^ MILLER. !
/
^^dAjUe
J.U,
— Jj—
TUT 
005 
1167
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. T^
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
•030
Page
of
T-T-.
Date JT
Sampling Personnel
K.
Purrine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of rMP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total S '.:rued Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column tn Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Mer Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallon-- Pumped Pnnr to Sampling
"-'umr Setting ifeet h>.lo\vland surtace)
Purging Method
>^ Pv/C c^\f
I ft,
iij Parameters
Sampling- Data
l^>3~0 
f 11 3 «J) Timec jS«^ ^
M lo
(celcius
Specific
PfD (ppmi
Odor
Appearance
- o
I o
i .1
0
O.I
O. 1
c t
' Constiiucnts < Container
VO ".s 
: 
*>ml
BNA 
, 
1 - liter
TAL 
1 - liter
Cvaniae 
• g>f»'inJr
Preservative
K^«^
None
HN03
NAOH 
,
Sample Collected
n^»»~i
i-tio
Uitcr
n -3 f)
Well Ctoin| Volume* (GAL/Ft)
1 - W - 0.06
l-W-0.09
r - o.i6
2UT-026.
• T - 037
.31^»026
r-0.65
6" -1.47
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUT 
OO5 1168
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D
Replicate I.D.
—T-CK*'• C e>
Page
Date
of
-A/fv
~« 
. 
7"
Sampling Personnel: .
Porcine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of CMP) Abow/Below Land Surface
rn-" bounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Pe- Foot
GaUons in We!!
Gallons Pumped Pnor to Sampling
Pump Setting (leet below land surface)
Purpne Method
pff
r .jld Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
PID (ppm)
7.J
$«(
Jdor
Appearance
o-t
ft*
f. r
7-2-
o-/
0 - 1
Constituents | Container
Preservative
vOCsT^L 
4o m!' 
^O~^
SNA TCL 
1 - li«r
'rAlJg££(Lk 
1 - liter
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
-'-•-1-S.OtS
T:aafcg
13-OQ
Well Ctoing Volume* (GAL/FQ
1-V4"-0.06
i-ia'-o.o9
2' - 0.16
2 iyr - 026 .
• -r-037
-31^-0^6
4" - 0.65
.«• - 1.47
GERAGHTY fif MILLER. INC
TUT 
005 
1.169
Project/No.
Site Location
WeU I.D.
Replicate I.D.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
PfkX)<3.O3O
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
3",
Description of Ivicasuiing Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of WeU Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
. fln
O-
-7-55
<J
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T(celcius)
Specific Conductivty(^r.5/c^, 1
PID (ppm)
foc^2V*J
O<-5^
a. 3
3 i
i-fl
3c
<=>•(
e.3-
3o
1.1
i*»r^
oiD5
A.I
3c
<3-. o
(O
o.t
&.*,
0->3o
e..a
cS)^
i •»
i O
O .1
Color ^
Odor
Appearance
Constituents |
rVflwpt. ^^ 0-»"
•^^ 
r- J;^«J0r-
•5";TV'
Container
VOCsVcL ! 
-to ml
BNA ^TCL 
j
TAL^.f^^j
1 - liter
1 - liter
Cyanide 
> ^-Titer
Preservative
tJrr-*^.
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
o-r^o
o^^,o
OT50
OT=50
U<xr-4 u
0-750
Well Gating Volumes (GAbFt)
1 - 1/4- - 0.06
1-1/2" = 0.09
r - o.i6
2 Ifi- - 0.26
3- « 0.37
3 1/2" - 076
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
J :
'—»
. 
c
^
-]—
1.-^'
3 o.'^
GERAGHTY c> MILLER. INC
TUT 
005 
117O
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
PA60IJOJO
- I (.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
iiGii Oi iviCaSufliig i Giiti
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of WeU Below MP
Water Column in WeU
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
M iO>^ L c- Jky^^~± • Off—
(Z 
VlO
l / O t
id-JLC
, / -
J——~
Dala
Time
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductrvty^, i|t^
PID(ppm)
5-' 
— •> C°4^\
Of 
05
1 3
2/"e
\ -C
O
O 
1
or.fi.
?. i
2* c
] - C
c?
0-1
OS i°i
8.3.
39
t-^.
o
O.i
OS3S
&-.2-
£>&,
1 L,
O
O. 1
Color
Odor
Appearance
Consutuenis 1 Container
VOCSTCL
BNA TCI_
4o ml
1 - liter
TAL^rtLti 1 - 1'ter
Cvanide
Preservative
^3
None
HNO3
P^ifo'r 
NAOH
Sample Collected
O«35
0835
05^5
oflj?=;
0935"
O-
OS35
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/FQ
] - |/4- - 0.06
1 - 1/2" = 0.09
2" = 0.16
2 Ifl" - 076
3" = 0.37
3 \IT = 026
4- = 0.65
6"- 1.47
[•KOCKOHuiotn,
GERAGHTY ^ MILLER. INC
TUT 
005 1171
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Punrine Data
Description of Measuring Pcir.t (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Sampling Data
Well Casing Volumea fOAL/Fl)
• c
C^/
(
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivtx— cSlt^D
PID(ppm)
'c3.Po,^ 
(>5q ~O Time (*0+S>
i iS*^ 
ii3-OO
-j.a, 
n.n
^^ 
3Q[
l.^ 
/.-H
o 
o
-2faJl.-.-4-} (%) 
O.I 
O. 1
Color 
3 
l.-^Lj- t^O"
Odor 
^o~c.
Appearance 
^SlwloH— , -,-, U-,
-^
1.2.
^1
/.H
CX
i3^fo
7.3
3^
1.*!
o
O.I 
O.I
s.a. 
e.o
"St. ^J —— i
: .50.
- Constituents
'VOCs-rcL
IBNA -rci
Container
4omi
1 - liter
i TAIr^^^LjJ 
1 - I'ter
1 Cvamde 
; -^2£45et
Preservative
•°o^<_
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
12)34
l^i-5^
i^^i»
l^f^t,
SOO^J 
t^-^li^t^AvejUAo 
0=iU
| - 1/4- « 0.06
1-1/2" = 0.09
2" = 0.16
2 1/2" - 0.26
r - 0.37
3 \li" - 0.26
4" = <) ft<
A"- I.J-
GERAGHTY c^ MILLER. INC
TUT 
005 
1172
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
^. PJ f ffiOO-3 -
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
-10.
A".
—— ^ ^U P,
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivtvc-s/^-)
PID-(ppm)
10 *f\
~7.«r
=50
'•=,
0
clo?^™,^- 
°V
Odor 
rO,.^*.
Appearance 
cl— -
-,.•5
3*\
1-1
O
\ *—"—;-•'
1 1 =,«
-7..Q_
s^
I.-4
O
I2IS
-J.-l
3~>
'••=}
O
o- 1 
o.i 
a i
94 
B.8 
Q.B
Constituents
VOCs-rcL
BNA Try
TAL\.-;^4
Container
4oml
1 - bter
Preservative
Poi-^
None
1 - liter 
1 
HN03
Cyanide 
j n^Titor
NAOH
Sample Collected
i^)5
\&^
i^iS
IOJ«=,
Pn
1 - 1/4- = 0.06
1 - 1/2" « 0.09
2" = 0.16
2 1/2" = 026
3' = 0.37
3 1/2" = 026
4" = 0.65
6"- 1.47
PRIVWOI inform
GERAGHTY o- MILLER. INC
TUT 
O05 
1.173
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Welll.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
M- C«rU-^«=,
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
^Gc^o^i : O (j>p~-
ex, . -
* C^LJ 
<-*
_
' ' ' ~~\
V.
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
— . ———— —— i — - ——
O— ^ l 
C5TSM
-70 
~l • ~i
«3^a 
: ^-,
Specific Conductivtyf,^ lc~?i 
m 
' l-H
PID(ppm) 
1 o 
O
——— y ———
-,3
^S
I.U
O
OS3T
-7.M
_^a
, u
o.-$
-3-J:«\4-«. fV«) 
O.I 
O.i 
O-l 
O.i
v»o 
fi»~iO 
- > - M ~i-«o 
""'•S 
<S2>
Color 
^ J 
^ i^, ,_
0-750
^4-,
CoISr 
^3
Odor
Appearance
Constituents !
VOCs -IYL '
BNA -r^i 
j
r \f~ r~
v^t>^«_
"Si; kA*. v./L
3 ^ 
^
Container 
Preservative 
Sample Collected
4o ml
1 - liter
TAlS'fJ^JI 
1 - liter
Cvanide 
sf="lneF-
l^e^e
None
HNO3
NAOH
OS3-S
oa?,=;
oa^s
OS-5S
KKO,
O-Vco.1
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/FQ
1 - 1/-)' = 0.06
1 - LC- = 0.09 i
r = 0.1b
2 1/2- = 026
T = 0.37
3 1£" =• 0.26
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY o> MILLER. INC
TUT
OO5 
1.174
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Site Location ^"
WeU I.D.
Replicate I.D.
o R -03O
Page
of
Date -H",^,
-r-r-3b
Sampling Personnel: 
M .
Purging Data
Dcitripuun of measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
'•&-*$-
=3
{^ J. / (O^J^r 1 ^o J): r?. u.
O. 1L
V—gj->^"-»' •^•IS 
$
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty^r^i ^^S
PID(ppmt
v3«i-Jj
O.So-1
e. o
il
1 =>
A
6-5-J 3 Timefiiop.J )
O<3 1 1
-J.3
^JC,
i. CT
o
J
T-M
3*1
l.s
o
cnM
-7.S
^Q
,.q
±
O.I
-..a.
030
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCs Tc L
BNA Tcf.
TAL^t^uJ
Cvanide
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
Preservative
No^C.
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
O-s^^
0«N3=\
OS^>-?,
v.pu»,p
i4o^«i««
SOO
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Ft)
1 - 1/4- « 0.06
1 - 1/2- » 0.09
2- =0.16
2 Ifl" - 0.26
3" - 0.37
3 1/2- - 026
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
TUT 
OO5 
1.1.75
GERAGHTY c> MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Site Location
WeU I.D.
Replicate I.D.
icc^
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
-s.
Purging Data
Description uf ivicasuiing Point (MP)
Height of (MPjI^bo^Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of WeU Below MP
Water Column in WeU
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in WeU
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
kiOm. .bo_<JC-v-•-••-~-^ : 
°
.3. -? a
fo; /
l. 1-1
.
i*"* ^"
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
pH
T(celcius)
no^
-7.M
3°\
Specific Conductivty (<-r>S|eo-*)| ^.^
PID(ppm)
a
— j ——
-,.3
50
=>-R
O
1 — • — j ——
•7.C
O-R
5.-)
O
1^00
-r-a.
5-7
^-ao
p^~—p cJh 5o-(!=^J--
U-«,^ 
^!<^->-ii»N^«: p^_J-^;^^.
' P——f «J-
".*"—
to.s
,. Vi
Odor
Appearance
«j*- "^ L>
Constituents
VOCs TCL
BNA-TCL
TALj^iiJ
Cvanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
=^4S»
Preservative
Mor^.
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
1 C^XO
IW^lO
lu^O
IUOO
-M .
•300^-4
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1 - 1/4" - 0.06
1 - 1/2" - 0.09
2" = 0.16
2 1/2" - 076
3" - 0.37
3 1£" - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6"- 1.47
KoOO
r-ROWO Union
GERAGHTY c> MILLER. INC.
'TUT 
005
1176
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. Qj-^
Site Location 
ft u
WeU I.D.
Replicate I.D.
K 01 - To c
Page 
(____ of 
;
Date 
U,_M-,<r 151
Sampling Personnel: _L£
. P~Ll
M.
Purging Data
Description of measuring roint (MI*)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in WeU
Diameter of Casing
GaUons Per Foot
Gallons in WeU
GaUons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
I 
_
fP'
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductrvty<V«'5 jt^
PID(ppm)
J
-,.,_
JX-P
,.-^
O
———— =» —————
l.-f
«^~7
i-a.
o
—— j—
-i.fi
^•(S
1.0.
0
\ "5.
-t A
as
i-a_
0
. S-
^3-8
C7.,
r>c?
Color
Odor
Appearance
lOe-Lr1
<-3<
^A, 
55
\ ,r
O8I*<
Consuiuents | Container
Preservative
Sample Collected
VOCs TC L 
!
BNATrL 
|
TALSr,tL]
Cvanide 
1
4oml
1 - liter
Oo-xt
None
1 - liter 
j 
HNO3
ygTBer 
NAOH
1 ) I S
1 1 1^
M i^
111^
WAj-yJ^^-33
• US'
'"5
) I I
Well Casing Volumes (GAUFl)
1 - 1/4" = 0.06
1-1/2- -009
2" -0.16
2 1£" - 026
3" = 0 37
3 \0~ - 026
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
I'HOOROMuform
GERAGHTY c> MILLER. INC
TUT 
OO5 
1.1.77
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. V
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
PROO-V<J3 O
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
. Kor-ol.
Purging Data
5.
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
i^-
> i r» C>\c_
1 I
•3^-V'^* 
500^1
3v^-\-«^4«=- 
3«3ca^-\
^.Pk^COb 
'500'-1
OS'S
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1 - 1/4- « 0.06
1-1/3' = 0.09
2" = 0.16
2 1£" = 0.26
r = 0.37
3 1/T = 026
4" = 0.65
6" - 1.47
GERAGHTY c* MILLER. INC
TUT
005 1178
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
PlA
Purging Data
3-
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
K O ^- to -_ Jtf 
° ——** • ^ " - -
tr »—
to
c^ <^JOr>r->e_
I t -•f-
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T(celcius)
ll-i<!S
C.8
08
Specific Conduct rvtv£»,3lc/^l i . a.
PID(ppm)
—
UHt,
~7. I
^.ft
l-i
——
—————— 3 ——————
fc.1
01
i-3
——
|M|«T
t.8
-3»
'3
O
Color
Odor
Appearance
'is
r.ll
Constituents
VOCs -T^ ,
BNA -TCL
TAL£°£iLl
Cvanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
ypo'fr.L-
T 
llll'I
Preservative
H^^
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
14 '5
i^AiS
'MiS
iMiS
o-
rsoo—i
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Ft)
1 - 1/4" = 0.06
1-1/2" = 0.09
->it
r = o.i6
\rr = o2<>
r - 0.37
3 Ifi" - 0^6
4" - 0.65
6"= 1.47
GERAGHTY cv MILLER. INC
TUT
UUD
.1.1.79
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
of
Sampling Personnel: 
U . |
Purging Data
DcM.npiion of measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
:_2<2.
T i n
O. fo
.^v< 
£..u.c«
Sampling Data
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
•7. 1
i«?
Specific ConductivtV(V-,'3(t^> S j =;
PID(ppm) 
j o-i
110=1
•7.2.
^1
, c;
C.B
• j
1 i / q
>a
^q
).=;
0.3
/I^T
~7./
^q
IS
O.I
^ 
-n.Q
O.I
M/O
"5
Odor
Appearance
-i«».fc
no
L f\\*r<*
) 
J
\ Constituents
| VOCs TC L
IBNA-rcL
ITAliSiLj
1 Cvanide
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
sf£4J?W
Preservative
N>0^<_
None
HNO3
Sample Collected
n *.^
Ii35
'155
NAOH 
. 
. 1 ,,3S
O-
TSiJik lk4C.br-
Well Casing Volumes (OAL/Fl)
1 - 1/4" =- 0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
r = 0.16
: \ar = 0.26
3- - 0.37
3 \IT - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6"- 1.47
"RIKKOKuiocm
TUT 
OO5 
118O
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
PR 0015.050
r-tiO -
pfft
Page 
l
Date 
:TI>~«
Sampling Personnel: 
J) .t-\a
of 
;
T oAfr
"^ 
f/ 
_| .\ \
\^J - I Q 
1 | -a^
Purging Data
Destt ipiiun uf "viej»ui ing Foin; (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
V U*gU.
fa I,
Sampling Data
Time CS«
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivtv
PID(ppm)
—— i ————
oa*i i
1. S
3n
O.~l
O
OSHS
~7-<«,
^58
O.~l
o
——— 3 ———
OIOl
n.^
^a-)
on
o
*=**=>
T-M
S-8
O.-7
O
S « J .
Color
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
[VOCs-rc,.
BNA -rcL
TAL:^^
Cvanide
C U«^r—
K-fcs^
CJt-eir-
Container
4o ml
1 - liter
1 - liter
y Tiief
Preservative 
i Sample Collected
lQ=>-x=
None
HNO3
NAOH
l^LdJO^I'S^M^
'25"7 
( i 4itl« J
ISlS-7 
tfellfch'O
i ^*O 
CfcllchM
5oo ^->
Cok
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Ft)
1-1/4" -0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1/2" = 0.26
r - 0.37
3 Ifl" - 0.26
4" - 0.65
6- - 1.47
GERAGHTY c> MILLER. INC
TUT
1.18.1
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. ^V^J^ ftj
Site Location V0^.
Well I.D. 
___
Replicate I.D. 
N> ) A
MuO-Q.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
i-i. 
1
U) .
<e-S-
Purging Data
of mcasoiLfig Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
-o "-~« ' Onv
*fj
r L«-«-T ' — »-i-\o **r**C£-C-
0-feS
a. as
^^-^ ^*s ^ '^^ ^ )» !•i^-^-yJ
——' o 
r~
' v 
Sampling Data
C
0-7
^10^4
Field Parameters
PH
T(celcius)
Specific Conductivty ^^ |t^
PID (ppm)
—— * — ™ ———
~7. O
:ia
•..•=;o
o->^<9
-7.^
— ~^~ } —— '—
-1.-=.
ZL& 
\ =iS
1.^
C)
I.«Ao
0-><^Q
-7.^
-1«
/•So
O.|
a~iMo v
0-)M=. ^>i,
Color
Odor
Appearance
Consutuents
VOCs-r^L
BNA-rcu
TAL^r.,!^
Cvanide
Container 
' 
Preservative
4o ml 
I 
iCt,^^.
1 - liter
1 - liter
•5pv"Tji' r
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
cnso
o-i So
C~75O
01 SO
—^ 
Qf. \ 
SOOrt— I 
KJ ftOU *-"2j^c Aoc^Jc 
OTSO
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
| _ 1/4" - 0.06
1-1/2- -0.09
r - o.i6
2 Ifl" » 0.26
r = 0.37
3 10" = Oi6
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PRIXKOHufom
GERAGHTY ^ MILLER. INC
TUT 
CO5 1132
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
-P \
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
Pureine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MF)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
lJl/\
Olft
PIA
/^-. /-p»-^-»i- .• -. ^j x—<L>< )
T*i 
I
£*;:
r<
n 
C 
• 
• 
J_ 
4
Sampling Data 
o-no ^J«_r4- /i^J-yO .
Time 
. 
1 
()
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivty(<-^"<j/c~-}
PirT(ppm)"^c.C,^.^-^ c/0
n°i IL
-l.^T
^-fl 1
m~7
O.Ofc
>s o (.^jO ^ 
^-05
Color 
(- i^.^,^
Odor 
Por^t
Appearance 
c Voe--^
0^3.0
-7.VS
JcS.fc
/ ^^
o. ot.
0=1^0
-, sc/
3.^.0
'.••/A
O-ot,
blMl
-l.ui
_2, fc
1-44
o.ou
•^ .-7 1 
$ .7*~ 
^>.c,°\
lO IO 
^^TC=/^ D«-<^vSP
\> 
r i 
j 
i j-
r IAXT-, o~i 1 » -^ r«_T=- o->|- yv^e.
Constituents | Container
VOCs -TCL
BNA-rcL
TAL
Cvanide
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
f^2gft^
Preservative
Por-v^
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
OSM1
n^M~?
OSM^
O^M~7
± 1;
5C30——V
WeU Gating Volumes (GAlTFl)
1_V4"-0.06
l-W-0.09
2" - 0.16
2 1/2" - 076
T-037
3 1/r - 026
4" - 0.65
6' - 1.47
PROOMUufcnB
TUT 
GO5 1183
GERAGHTY <w MILLER. INC.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No.
Site Location
WellLD.
Replicate I.D.
I Pft
Pay
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of 
<
L9. Kor
| A
6-
Purone Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
-.1 A
f i r\
/oJA
N>IA
L ;.
C_jt i ^ ^~>* o *^ 
I '
Pn*-oTC^
t
Sampling Data
Time
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius) 
<°C )
Specific Conductivty
PID (ppm)
-7-0
I.IS
T
_r«i,c_4~AM
o.cn
0.05 0.05
Odor
Appearance
Constituents
VOCssx.O.
BNA-rcL
TAL-Tftu
Pvanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
sasort.r
Preservative
t^Q-x^
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
ion
in L~7
• on
i r^l~^
J l-«
too
/on
Well Casing Volumes (GAL/Fl)
1-1/4" -0.06
1-1/2" -0.09
r - 0.16
2 Ifl" - 026
r-037
3 1)2" - 026
4" - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PROOMUxfonn
TUT
OO5 
.1.184
GERAGHTY <? MILLER. INC
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
-Q
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of
y i M
Purging Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Below MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
c\A W3
Ex-.J-krv* -avA,
-=:UU
Sampling Data
Time
O.5M-1
Field Parameters
PH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductrvty(,T^;kr>.N
PTDr (ppm)
•>. as
1.4-7
o.ot,
1.4-1
O.Ofc,
i-Ml
O.O (.
/H~7
O.OT
p —— -vp
.-70
Color 
C \
Odor 
__^
Appearance 
f ^,
Constituents
VOCs -re L
BNA -TCL
TAL
Cvanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
^S^fiW
Preservative
NW-<e_
None
HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
I / 47
I / H~l
I IM~7
MM"J
O-
>T53
Well Casing Volume* (GAL/Ft)
1-V4"-0.06
l-W-0.09
2" - 0.1«
2 VT - 026
r-oj7
3 1/2" - 026
4' - 0.65
6" - 1.47
PRMMLtufora
:'UT 
GO 5 1185
GERAGHTY 6? MILLER. INC.
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project-"No.
Site Location
Well l.D.
Replicate l.D.
Page
ol
Date 
7/2-7 /W
Sampling Personnel: . X/- 
CettfS^ 
J~- r*tf/'//<*
Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well delow MP
. lu-.r Column ir 'Veil
"'lameter of Casing
Gallons P_-r Foot
•-".allot 
i; 'Veil
'-ialu ru> I'umj-u'! Prior to Sampling
Pump >cit"-.E ; ifV oelciw lar J surface)
Purcmg ML..MM
Bl/r
l.OL.
131- 12._X
Sampling- Data
Field Paran.. .-.TS
T (ceinus^
Specific (-'.'Qciuctrvii,
1 V. 
J
u:so 
izvoi-
}0-\
L.L
PID-frpm) 
L &/A
*•«!
>.Oiar 
c_[f*^
^i 
yu«*'-t
• npcurance 
c,{f+v
Consotuer'is | Coniainer
. u
7- i-H
It.r
i -it
-V/4 
-
li-57
7- Jo
' -z* 5"
2.I5"
->*/«
^•^y^
7.fM
J-1.O
i-OC
"/*
.10 
>iO 
-OT
7 lu 
V
** • 
T* * ^ 
^ W 4J
Preservative
'•'OCs ~T(_<~- 
4o ml 
/vo*>C-
IN,- — C(_ ' 
1 - liter
11 '•-•'. h<^-^-' 
! ~ ''ter
QQQ j*jr» 1
-. uuQc 
. 
utef
None
"HNO3
NAOH
Sample Collected
^- 'Y^ro
•• '• - zr / '/so
»«/SO
i«0
Z.LZ,
.11
>r^l 
jOAO«4-«- 2.'"«
WeUOnajVol
(OAIVFt)
1-U4'-0.0(S
1-1/2* -0.09
-2--O.W
2W-OJ6.
•T-037
.31^-026
«• - 0.65
fi"-1.47
•1-0
.sr-^l
"«S-0
CERAGHTY 6f MILLER, INC.
TUT 
O05 1186
TUTU WATER WELL SAMPLING
Project/No. 
/tf0Q(J0jQ
Site Location
Well I.D.
Replicate I.D.
Page
Date
Sampling Personnel:
of 
/
Pureine Data
Description of Measuring Point (MP)
Height of (MP) Above/Below Land Surface
Total Sounded Depth of Well Betow MP
Water Column in Well
Diameter of Casing
Gallons Per Foot
Gallons in Well
Gallons Pumped Prior to Sampling
Pump Setting (feet below land surface)
Purging Method
Sampling Dau
Tune
» '
Field Parameters
pH
T (celcius)
Specific Conductivity
PIP (ppm)
is:/ 7
2. •
J
Color
Odor
Appearance
C-IC." "
f-SO
£-OM^+ /-'
/Constituents
VOCssCH.au
BNA
TAL
Cyanide
Container
4oml
1 - liter
1 - liter
1 - liter
Preservative
4/0A/Z.
None
HN03
NAOH
Sample Collected
^/5^o
0-f b»m,j
Me. f-f&S
c.Hcc-lrJ. .
V
Well Cuing Volumet (GAL/Ft)
I
1-1/4' -0.06
l-W-0.09
2" - 0.16
21£--O26
3" -037
- 3 W - 0 M
<" - 0.65
6' - 1.47
PROQBOUafoTB
TUT
005 1187
GERAGF-TTY <ST MILLER. INC
APPENDIX K
DATA VALffiATION SUMMARY REPORT
PHASE H SOIL SAMPLING
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
GERAGHTY^ MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°05 
118S
CONTENTS
Page
OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K-l
SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K-l
ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K-2
VALIDATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K-3
OVERALL ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K-4
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K-7
TABLE
K-l 
Summary of Sample Delivery Groups, Sample Identifications, Collection Dates, and
Parameters for Soils and Blanks, Phase n Remedial Investigation, Tutu Wells Site, St.
Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
ATTACHMENTS (submitted separately)
Kl 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33590.
K2 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33590.
K3 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33735.
K4 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33735.
K5. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33745.
K6 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33745.
K7 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33835.
K8 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33835.
K9 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33878.
K10. 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 33878.
GERAGHTYff MILLER, INC. 
TUT °05 
li89
APPENDIX K
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY
OF THE PHASE D
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
SOIL RESULTS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, VS. VIRGIN ISLANDS
OVERVIEW
This report presents the data validation summary for soil samples collected in March and
April 1994 for the Phase n Remedial Investigation at the Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S.
Virgin Islands conducted by Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
SAMPLING
The samples were collected on 6 days during the period of March 26, 1994 through April 6,
1994 
They were delivered to the laboratory using chain-of-custody (COC) procedures in five
sample delivery groups (SDGs). Each SDG was assigned a unique laboratory project number.
An SDG and sample identification (ID) summary is provided in Table 1.
Eight soil samples, one field replicate, one field blank, and four trip blank samples were
collected during the sampling period.
The field blank sample, identified as FB032694, was collected on the first day of sampling.
This field blank is associated with every soil sample collected during the sampling period and
was used in the validation of all field samples.
Four trip blanks were prepared and shipped with the field samples. The trip blank collected
on March 26, 1994 is associated with both SDG 33590 and SDG 33735. SDG 33590 was held
for shipment with SDG 33735. This trip blank, identified as TB032694, is associated with the
soil samples in the first two SDGs and was used in the validation of MW-18 (12-141), MW-17
(6-81), and MW-15.
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
oos 
H9O
K-2
A field replicate sample was collected on April 4, 1994 for MW-16 
(0-3*) and provided to
the laboratory with a blind field identification. The field replicate sample was identified as
sample MW-135 (0-3') and is in SDG 33835.
Matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples were collected for MW-19 
(4-6'
and 4-8') and analyzed in SDG 33878.
For three of the soil samples, the field replicate, the MS, and the MSD samples collected
during the sampling period, samples from different borehole depths were provided for the volatile
organic compound (VOC) analyses than those provided for all other parameters. The following
table summarizes the depths and sample IDs that pertain to the analytical parameters:
Soil Boring
VQC Analysis
Non-VOC Parameters
MW-24
MW-16
MW-135
MW-19
MW-19 
MS
MW-19 
MSD
MW-24 (4.5-6.51)
MW-16 
(0-21)
MW-135 (0-2f)
MW-19 
(4-6()
MW-19 
(4-61) MS
MW-19 
(4-6') MSD
MW-24 (6.5-8.51)
MW-16 
(0-3')
MW-135 (0-3*)
MW-19 
(4-81)
MW-19 
(4-81) MS
MW-19 
(4-8') MSD
ANALYSIS
The samples were sent to Enseco-Easl in Somerset, New Jersey for analysis of the target
compound list (TCL) VOCs, TCL semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), target analyte list
(TAL) inorganics, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), and three site-specific VOCs. The site-
specific VOCs included the following compounds: methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE); 1,2-
dibromoethane (EDB); and n-propylbenzene.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
TUT 
CO5
1191
K-3
The TCL VOCs and TCL SVOCs were analyzed in accordance with the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) methodologies contained in the
March 1990 Statement of Work (SOW) for Organics Analysis (USEPA 1990a). The TAL metals
and cyanide were analyzed in accordance with the USEPA CLP methodologies contained in the
March 1990 SOW for Inorganics Analysis (USEPA 1990b). Analyses for TPHs and site-specific
VOCs were conducted in accordance with the methods and requirements of the quality assurance
project plan (QAPP) prepared for the remedial investigation at the Tutu Wells Site (Geraghty &
Miller, Inc. 1992).
VALIDATION
All TCL VOCs, TCL SVOCs, TAL metals, and cyanide were validated in accordance with
the USEPA Region II data validation guidelines for organic and inorganic analyses performed
in accordance with CLP methods for routine analytical services. The guidelines for organics and
inorganics are provided in the regional Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Number HW-6,
Revision 8 and in regional SOP Number HW-2, Revision 11, respectively (USEPA 1992a;
1992b).
MTBE, EDB, and n-propylbenzene results and quality control criteria were reviewed and
validated using the USEPA Region II guidelines for TCL VOCs (USEPA 1992a).
Data validation of TPH data was performed according to criteria specified in USEPA Method
4 1 8 1 (USEPA 1983) and in accordance with the following guidelines:
• 
Method and/or reagent blanks - Reported concentration should be less than the
quantttation limit. Blanks, including field blanks, associated with field samples were
reviewed for contamination. Sample results were evaluated using a five times multiplier
of the highest concentration in the associated TPH blank.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 
TUT 005 1192
K-4
• 
Precision of duplicates - Acceptable precision was demonstrated by calculation of relative
percent difference (RPD) 
with a limit of 20 percent. For calculated RPD between 20 and
40 percent, all associated sample data for the analytical batch were estimated and
qualified with a "J" flag.
• 
Accuracy of matrix spikes - Acceptable accuracy was demonstrated by percent recovery
(%R) 
of MS and MSD in the acceptance window range of 80 to 120 percent. For %R
values outside of the 80 to 120 window, but within 50 to ISO %R, associated sample
data were qualified as estimated and flagged with a "J."
• 
Accuracy of laboratory control spikes - Acceptable %R of blank spikes was within the
window of 80 to 120 percent. For %R values outside of the 80 to 120 window, but
within SO to ISO %R, associated sample data in the SDG were qualified as estimated and
flagged with a "J."
Individual organic and inorganic data review checklists and data assessment narratives were
completed for each SDG. This information and any required tables pertaining to the data
assessments may be found in Attachments Kl through K10 by SDG number. The information
about the data review of MTBE, EDB, 
n-propylbenzene, and TPH are located in the organic data
assessment narratives for each SDG.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
Overall, the majority of the data submitted by Enseco-East for analysis are of good quality
and demonstrate acceptable precision, accuracy, and completeness. The problems found with the
data are discussed below.
In the analyses for TPHs, the laboratory failed to report estimated concentrations detected
in the method blanks, field blanks, and several field samples. The laboratory was required to
report estimated analyte concentrations as specified in the site QAPP (Geraghty & Miller, Inc.
GERAGHTY6? MILLER, INC. 
TUT oos 
1193
K-5
1992) This information would allow the data reviewer to evaluate potential sample and blank
contamination originating in the field and during analysis. It would also identify target analytes
present in concentrations below the CLP contract required quantitation limits and laboratory
reporting limits. The TPH data were corrected during the data review in order to evaluate
potential sample contamination.
In the analyses for the three site-specific VOCs, the laboratory calibrated instruments and
quantitated sample concentrations for MTBE only. 
The laboratory failed to calibrate the
instruments for EDB, or n-propylbenzene. In addition, due to an error in the COC record and
the project specifications at the laboratory, the laboratory thought that the samples were to be
analyzed for dibromomethane instead of EDB. The laboratory narratives for several SDGs did
not address the compound discrepancy between EDB and dibromomethane, but noted the lack
of calibration for EDB and n-propylbenzene. The laboratory narratives indicated that although
calibrations were not performed, the laboratory analysts had reviewed the sample spectra for the
presence of EDB and n-propylbenzene and determined that both were not present in any of the
samples. In actuality, the laboratory review was for dibromomethane and n-propylbenzene.
Since the laboratory review was based on standard reference spectra not associated with the
analyses of the samples, the results for dibromomethane and n-propylbenzene are qualitative only
and should not be considered quantitative. On this basis, the data for dibromomethane and n-
propylbenzene were rejected in the quantitative VOC analyses for all of the field samples and
associated blanks.
Other data qualifications pertaining to the organic parameters are as follows:
• 
Some data generated for the VOC, SVOC, and TPH analyses have been negated due to
blank contamination and estimated due to calibration outliers.
• 
All of the VOC data for SDG 33590 were estimated due to sample condition upon
receipt at the laboratory.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC 
TUT oos 1194 
\
K-6
• 
The 2,4-dinitrophenol result for MW-15 and the associated SVOC method blank were
rejected due to a poor response factor in the calibration analysis.
• 
The results for tetrachloroethene and TPH were estimated in samples MW-16 and MW-
135 because of poor field precision.
In the data review of TAL inorganics, the following analytes were qualified because of
quality control outliers:
• 
Antimony results were estimated in all field samples and blanks due to calibration
deficiencies.
• 
Antimony and chromium results were estimated in all field samples due to MS
recoveries.
• 
Cobalt results were estimated in samples MW-19 (4-81), MW-16 (0-3'), and MW-135 (0-
3') due to outliers in the inductively coupled plasma (TCP) serial dilution analysis.
• 
Chromium was estimated in sample MW-13 (2-3.5') due to an outlier in the ICP serial
dilution analysis.
• 
Selenium was estimated in sample MW-13 (2-3.5') due to graphite furnace atomic
absorption analytical spike recovery.
As stated above, with the exceptions noted, the data was found to be acceptable and usable
and meet the data quality objectives for the Phase n Remedial Investigation. The qualifications
given to the results discussed above are based on the USEPA data validation guidelines and,
given the relatively small number of samples qualified, especially for the compounds discussed,
are well within the normal range for a validated data set of this size.
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 
TUT oos 1195
K-7
REFERENCES
Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 1992. 
Quality Assurance Project Plan, Tutu Service Station
Investigation, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, March 1992.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (USEPA). 1983. Methods of Chemical Analysis of
Water and Wastes, EPA-600/4-7-90-020, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, Ohio, March 1983.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990a. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program,
Statement of Work for Organic Analysis, Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration, SOW No. 3/90
including Rev. 12/90 and 2/91, United States Environmental Protection Agency, March 1990.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990b. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program,
Statement of Work for Inorganic Analysis, Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration, SOW No.
3/90, United States Environmental Protection Agency, March 1990.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992a. Evaluation of Organic Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program (CLP), Region H Standard Operating Procedure No. HW-6,
Revision No. 8, United States Environmental Protection Agency, January 1992.
U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992b. Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program (CLP), Region n Standard Operating Procedure No. HW-2,
Revision No. 11, United States Environmental Protection Agency, January 1992.
c \wpwin\dociUutu\P2SOlI_DV.DOC
June 23. 1994
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
TUT
Table K-l. Summary of Sample Delivery Groups, Sample Identifications, Collection Dates, and Parameters for Soils and Blanks. Phase II
Remedial Investigation. Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
SDG 
Field ID
33590 
MW-I8(12-14')
FB032694
TB032694
33735 
MW-l7(6-8')
MW-15
33745 
MW-13 (2-3. 5')
MW-24 (4 5-6.5')
MW-24 (6 5-8.5')
MW-25 (12-14')
TB033I94
33835 
MW-16 (0-21)
MW-16 (0-31)
MW-135 (0-21) (a)
MW-135 (0-3') (b)
Trip Blank
33878 
MW-19 (4-6')
MW-19 (4-6')
MW-19 (4-61) MSD
MW-19 (4-8')
MW-19 (4-81) MS
MW-19 (4-81) MSD
Trip Blank
Laboratory ID
33590-01-SA
33590-02-FB
33590-03-TB
33735-01-SA
33735-02-SA
33745-OI-SA
33745-02-SA
33745-03-SA
33745-04-SA
33745-05-TB
33835-01-SA
33835-03-SA
33835-02-SA
33835-04-SA
33835-05-TB
33878-01-SA
MS33878-01-MS
33878-01-SD
33878-02-SA
33878-02-MS
33878-02-SD
33878-03-TB
Matrix
Soil
Aqueous
Aqueous
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Aqueous
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Aqueous
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Aqueous
Collection Date
March 26, 1994
March 26, 1994
March 26, 1994
March 28, 1994
March 28, 1994
March 29,1994
March 3 1,1994
March 31,1994
March 31,1994
March 31,1994
April 4, 1994
April 4, 1994
April 4, 1994
April 4, 1994
April 4, 1994
April 6, 1994
April 6, 1994
April 6, 1994
April 6, 1994
April 6, 1994
April 6, 1994
April 6, 1994
Parameters
VOCs, SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOCs, SVOCs, TPHs, metals
VOC
VOCs, SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOCs, SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOCs, SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOC
SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOCs, SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOC
VOC
SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOC
SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOC
VOC
VOC
VOC
SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
SVOCs, TPHs, metals, cyanide
VOC
(a) 
Field replicate of sample MW-16 (0-2').
(b) 
Field replicate of sample MW-16 (0-3').
•-0
SDG 
Sample delivery group.
ID 
Identification.
VOCs Volatile organic compounds.
MS 
Matrix ipike.
SVOCs Semivolatile organic compounds.
TPHs 
Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
MSD 
Matrix spike duplicate.
r.l-'RAf'iiri Y ^ M I I I I U
APPENDIX L
DATA VALroATION SUMMARY REPORT
PHASE n GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC. 
TUT 
°05 
119S
Paee
OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L-1
SAMPLING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L-1
ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L-2
VALIDATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L-3
OVERALL ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L-3
REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L-5
TABLE
L-1. 
Summary of Sample Delivery Groups, Sample Identifications, Collection Dates, and
Laboratory Receipt Dates for the Water Samples Collected as Part of the Phase II
Remedial Investigation, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
ATTACHMENTS (submitted separately)
L-1. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34399.
L-2. 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34399.
L-3. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34496.
L-4. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34545.
L-5. 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34545.
L-6. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34647.
L-7. 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34647.
L-8. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34584.
L-9. 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34584.
L-10. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34656.
L-ll. 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34656.
GERAGHTYtf MILLER, INC. 
TUT °°5 
1199
ATTACHMENTS (continued)
L-12. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34666.
L-13. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34666.
L-14. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34706.
L-15. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34706.
L-16. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34731.
L-17. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34731.
L-18. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34732.
L-19. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34732.
L-20. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34769.
L-21. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34769.
L-22. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34776.
L-23. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34776.
L-24. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34812.
L-25. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34812.
L-26. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34905.
L-27. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34905.
L-28. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34960.
L-29. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34960.
L-30. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34952.
L-31. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34952.
L-32. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34982.
L-33. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 34982.
TUT 
GO5 
12OO
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
ATTACHMENTS (continued)
L-34. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35014.
L-35. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35014.
L-36. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35016.
L-37. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35016.
L-38. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35029.
L-39. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35029.
L-40. 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35033.
L-41. Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35035.
L-42. 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35035.
L-43 
Organic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35037.
L-44. 
Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35037.
L-45. Inorganic Data Review for Sample Delivery Group 35144.
TUT 
CO5 
12O1
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
APPENDIX L
DATA VALIDATION SUMMARY
OF THE PHASE D
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
WATER RESULTS
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
OVERVIEW
As part of the Phase H Remedial Investigation at the Tutu Wells Site, located in St. Thomas,
U.S. 
Virgin Islands, Geraghty & Miller, Inc. collected water samples from May through July
1994. 
A majority of the May through June 1994 data were validated; the validation results are
discussed in this Appendix. Several of the water-supply well samples collected in May and June
1994 
and all of the samples collected in July 1994 
did not have to be validated.
SAMPLING
Groundwater wells and water-supply wells were sampled from May through July, 1994. 
The
samples were delivered to the laboratory using chain-of-custody (COC) procedures, and the
laboratory provided the analytical data results in 28 sample delivery groups (SDGs). Each SDG
was assigned a unique laboratory project number. An SDG and sample identification (ID)
summary is provided in Table L-l. Sixty-seven water samples, four field replicates, four field
blanks, and 28 trip blank samples were collected during the sampling period. Samples Four
Winds I, CHT-6D, MW-7, 
MW-3, 
and SW-7 
were also analyzed as matrix spike/matrix spike
duplicate (MS/MSD) samples.
Several of the water-supply well samples collected in May and June 1994 and of all the
samples collected in July 1994 did not have to be validated and are not discussed in this report.
The data from water-supply wells Gassett, Steele, Eglin I, Eglin TO., La Place, WTS-2 (Port 3),
and Mathias, which were sampled in May and June 1994, 
were not validated.
TUT 
COS 1.202
GERAGHTY & MILLER. INC.
L-2
ANALYSIS
The samples were sent to Enseco-East in Somerset, New Jersey for analysis of the target
compound list (TCL) 
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), TCL semivolatile organic compounds
(SVOCs), target analyte list (TAL) 
dissolved metals, TAL total metals, cyanide, and three site-
specific VOCs. The site-specific VOCs included the following compounds: methyl tertiary-butyl
ether (MTBE); 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB); and n-propylbenzene. In addition, a majority of the
samples collected were analyzed for total dissolved solids, total suspended solids, alkalinity,
hardness, ferrous iron, chloride, nitrite, nitrate, phosphorous, sulfate, sulfide, chemical oxygen
demand, and organic lead. Two samples collected on June 29, 1994, DS-1 and DS-2, were only
analyzed for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) parameters, ignitability,
corrosivity, and reactivity.
Samples collected from the Gassett, Harthman Race Track, Delegarde, VIHA I, WTS-1 
(Port
3), and WTS-2 (Port 3) supply wells were analyzed for TCL VOCs according to U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 524.2 Revision 3.0 (USEPA 1989) with
USEPA Region II modifications. Geraghty & Miller requested that these supply well samples
be analyzed for the three site-specific VOCs. However, none of the samples analyzed according
to Method 524.2 was analyzed for these additional compounds. AH the other VOC samples and
all the SVOC samples were analyzed in accordance with USEPA Contract Laboratory Program
(CLP) 
methodologies contained in the March 1990 Statement of Work (SOW) for Organics
Analysis (USEPA 1990a). The metals and cyanide were analyzed in accordance with the USEPA
CLP methodologies contained in the March 1990 SOW for Inorganics Analysis (USEPA 1990b).
Analyses for the other parameters were conducted in accordance with the methods and
requirements of the quality assurance project plan (QAPP) prepared for the remedial investigation
at the Tutu Wells Site (Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 1992).
TUT 
OO!=i
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC.
L-3
VALIDATION
All VOCs, SVOCs, metals, and cyanide were validated in accordance with the USEPA
Region n data validation guidelines for organic and inorganic analyses performed in accordance
with CLP methods for routine analytical services. The guidelines for validating organic and
inorganic data are provided in the USEPA Region TJ Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
numbered HW-6, Revision 8 and HW-2, Revision 11, respectively (USEPA 1992a; 1992b).
MTBE, EDB, n-propylbenzene, and Method 524.2 results were reviewed and validated using
the USEPA Region H guidelines for TCL VOCs (USEPA 1992a).
Individual organic and inorganic data review checklists and data assessment narratives were
completed for each SDG. This information and any required tables pertaining to the data
assessments may be found under their SDG number in Attachments L-l through L-47. The
information about the data review of MTBE, EDB, n-propylbenzene, and Method 524.2 VOCs
is located in the organic data assessment narratives for each SDG.
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
Overall, the majority of the data submitted by Enseco-East for analysis are of good quality
and demonstrate acceptable precision, accuracy, and completeness. Some of the reasons for data
qualification are discussed below. Detailed discussions regarding the validation of the data and
the qualifiers added to the results are found in Attachments L-l through L-47.
When analyzing VOC samples following Method 524.2, the laboratory failed to calibrate the
instruments for MTBE, EDB, or n-propylbenzene. However, if these compounds were present
in the samples, they would have been detected as tentatively identified compounds (TICs). When
analyzing VOC samples following the CLP method, the laboratory failed to perform five-point
initial calibrations for MTBE, EDB, or n-propylbenzene. Only single-point calibrations were
routinely performed for these site-specific compounds. Therefore, all the MTBE, EDB, and n-
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 
TUT oos 
1204
L-4
propylbenzene sample results were estimated because of calibration deficiencies. Some data
generated for the TCL VOC and TCL SVOC analyses were rejected because of low response
factors reported in the calibration analyses.
Several coolers containing samples being shipped from the site to the laboratory were delayed
in customs. As a result, cooler temperatures were above 7 degrees Celsius when the coolers were
received at the laboratory. Therefore, the VOC and SVOC results for the samples contained in
these coolers were estimated.
For several trip blanks and one field blank, the volatile organic analysis (VGA) vials
containing these blanks contained air bubbles. The non-detect results for these blanks were
rejected, and the positive results were estimated.
Several aluminum sample results were rejected because of high MS recoveries. A few
thallium sample results were rejected because of a low MS recoveries. Several metal results for
sample CHT-3 were rejected because the concentrations of the dissolved metals exceeded the
concentrations of the total metals by more than 50%.
As stated above, with the exceptions noted in the attachments, the data were found to be
acceptable and usable, and the data meet the data quality objectives for the Phase II Remedial
Investigation. The qualifications of the results discussed in this Appendix are based on the
USEPA data validation guidelines and, given the relatively small number of samples qualified
(especially for the parameters discussed), are well within the normal range for a validated data
set of this size.
Tl IT 
OOS 
t'2<>5
GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. 
1 J1 
' ""
L-5
REFERENCES
Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 1992. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Tutu Service Station
Investigation, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, March 1992.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. 
Method 524.2, Measurement of
Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry, Revision 3.0, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory (EMSL), Office
of Research and Development, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
Ohio, 1989.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990a. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program,
Statement of Work for Organic Analysis, Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration, SOW No. 3/90
including Rev. 12/90 and 2/91, United States Environmental Protection Agency, March 1990.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1990b. USEPA Contract Laboratory Program,
Statement of Work for Inorganic Analysis, Multi-Media, Multi-Concentration, SOW No. 3/90,
United States Environmental Protection Agency, March 1990.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992a. Evaluation of Organic Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program (CLP), Region n Standard Operating Procedure No. HW-6,
Revision No. 8, United States Environmental Protection Agency, January 1992.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1992b. Evaluation of Metals Data for the
Contract Laboratory Program (CLP), Region n Standard Operating Procedure No. HW-2,
Revision No. 11, United States Environmental Protection Agency, January 1992.
g:\chen w*I\<Uu-v*J\lutu\1994\wifler\p2wildv .rep
October 4, 1994
GERAGHTY ff MILLER, INC. 
TUT 
°°5 
12°6
Table 
L-1. Summary of Sample Delivery Groups, Sample Identifications, Collection Dates, and Laboratory Receipt Dates for the Water
Samples Collected as part of the Phase II Remedial Investigation, Tutu Wells Site, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.
Sample Identification
MW-1
MW-1D
MW-2
MW-3
MW-4
MW-4D
MW-5
MW-6R
MW-6D
MW-7
MW-8
MW-9S
MW-10
MW-10D
MW-1 ID
MW-12D
MW-1 3
MW-1 3D
MW-1 5
MW-1 6
MW-1 7
MW-1 8
MW-1 9
MW-20
MW-20D
MW-21D
MW-22D
MW-24
MW-25
CHT-3
CHT-6D
CHT-7D
DW-1
DW-2
SW-2
SW-3
SW-4
SW-5
SW-6
SW-7
OH MW-1
OHMW-2
OHMW-3
OHMW-4
TT-1
TT-1D
TT-2
TT-3D
TT-4
TT-5
KFC-1 
(KFMW-2)
DW-6 (SW-7 FR)
DW-4 IMW-11D FR)
DW-5 (TT-2 FR)
TT-1FR
CHT-6D (FR)
Four Winds II (FR)(dw-7)
Sample
Date
6/8/94
6/8/94
6/17/94
6/14/94
6/13/94
6/13/94
6/22/94
6/6/94
6/7/94
6/6/94
6/3/94
5/31/94
5/31/94
5/31/94
5/27/94
5/20/94
6/15/94
6/15/94
6/7/94
6/10/94
6/7/94
6/24/94 and 6/27/94
6/20/94
6/15/94
6/15/94
6/14/94
6/22/94
6/3/94
6/2/94
6/1 /94
6/1 /94
6/2/94
6/3/94
5/27/94
6/22/94
6/23/94
6/16/94
5/25/94
5/26/94
6/23/94
5/24/94
5/24/94
5/24/94
5/24/94
6/9/94
6/9/94
6/9/94
6/14/94
6/10/94
6/9/94
6/22/94
6/23/93
5/27/94
6/9/94
6/9/94
6/1/94
7/21/94
Laboratory
Receipt Date
6/10/94
6/10/94
6/20/94
6/1 6A94
6/20/94
6/20/94
6/27/94
6/7/94
6/10/94
6/7/94
6/6/94
6/2/94
6/2/94
6/2/94
5/28/94
5/21/94
6/1 6/94
6/16/94
6/10/94
6/1 1 /94
6/10/94
6/28/94 and 6/30/94
6/21/94
6/1 6/94
6/16/94
6/16/94
6/27/94
6/6/94
6/3/94
6/2/94
6/2/94
6/3/94
6/6/94
5/28/94
6/27/94
6/24/94
6/17/94
5/27/94
5/27/94
6/24/94
5/27/94
5/27/94
5/27/94
5/27/94
6/10/94
6/10/94
6/10/94
6/1 5/94
6/1 1 /94
6/10/94
6/27/94
6/24/94
5/28/94
6/10/94
6/10/94
6/2/94
7/25/94
Sample Delivery Group
Number
34776
34776
34982
34905
35014
35014
35029
34812
34776
34812
34769
34666
34666
34666
34656
34545
34952
34960
34776
34732/35144
34776
35033/35037
35016
34960
34952
34952
35029
34769
34731
34706
34706
34731
34769
34656
35029
35035
34960
34584
34647
35035
34584
34584
34584
34584
34776
34776
34776
34905
34732
34776
35029
35035
34656
34776
34776
34706
35541
TUTUGW.XLS
r'UT 
OO5 
12 O7
APPENDIX M
EGLIN m SUPPLY WELL PUMPAGE
IMPACT TEST HYDROGRAPHS
MAY 1994
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
TUT 
f>05 1208
GERAGHTY^ MILLER. INC.
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
[FILE:
[DRAWING: SV-fe 
[CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
140i
S"
 
135
Q _ |
^ u)
_jz 
130
Ul
^ 1—
|jj
t^UJ
£ 
120
———— 1 —
9.o
UJ
——— 3-
_ 1
6i*
u
115 —————— i ————
8 
8
i i
i
*4fcr GERAGHTY
£bf & MILLER, INC.
^^fF Environmental Services
L.
^
— — ——— _ •••B^M^MH^BV
I
)
(
L
AO
s'te
— 
_
in
S=
z
(9
, ——— ———— —— .- —— — ———
| 
| 
8 8 8 | 
|
s 
i 
s 
s 
s 
s 
s
DATE AND TIME
O
Z
o
z3u
l
i
•* —— r—
9
0
! —— ?• ——
>• 
t
9 
0
r 
1
^1 
S
8rj
ft
%
O
=
z
19
UJ
! 
§
1 
f
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III = 248 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
FIGURE
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL SW-6 HYDROGRAPH OF DATA
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
M.I
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
c
H-
M
•5
CJ!
i-^
hJ
H-
DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
| PRJCT NO.: PR0013033
loo
137
UJ
S <
< r
£ "
d ji_
U
S
_l 2
l*J -~
> 2
uj i- 
«•"•
-J t_
1 JO
J
1 £
o: »•
UJ *
* t 
134
UJu
>»
,
^f
133
• — 
—^— x
fx
9o
z
——— 5--
o &
1*
1 
!
i 
i
5 
S
A& GERAGHTY
Jjg & MILLER, INC.
^^^ W Environmental Services
..
nl-E: 
[DRAWING: SV-6A 
CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKI] APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
[DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
s^
^--
8
2
^ ———— .- — ' ———— ^— .
3
0
cc
9
i
32
oo
^——^.
M
01
=
z
0
111
^
^
^
£9
5;o
O
u
C
£
Cw
i
'^v*^
§o
g ?i
^ 1
i 3
**\ 
UJ
jX""*
n
^j
£
z
o
zi
! 
! 
! 
1 ! 
1 ! ' i
« 
* 
^ 
I 
I 
I 
1 
i
*• 
*^ 
x 
r< 
" 
F 
^ 
*^
S
*
*
$
S
5
*
5
DATE AND TIME
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=1.7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III * 248 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
FIGURE
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL SW-6 HVDROGRAPH OF DATA
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
M-2
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
I DWG DATE: 
8/25/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
I DRAWING: DHMV3 
I CHECKED: J. JASORKOWEKII APPROVED: T. OANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
140
_ £ 
135
g §
^ s
uj S 
130
UJ o
UJ
_l UJ
a: f= 
125
UJ 5
I- UJ
* fc
£ 
120
115
-
— —— ——
oo
UlZ
——— 3-i-
Z |
— P
Z M
o t
8 
8
6 
«
1 
1
A 
A
I
JfcT GERAGHTY
^|T 
6? MILLER, INC.
^^ew Environmental Services
L.
_
— — —
b
p>
ce
9
E
L
|_J 
————————
of
00
Jo
= 1-
• 
-
in
£to=
Z
(9
_ — 
— » —— — ———
8
S
u
^
Z
O
==
Z
c
———
g
o
2 
*
? 
t
3 
0
5 
=
$ !
f«4
ft
Ul
2-
O
=
Z
19
Ul
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
? 
I 
i 
1 i 
i 
1 1 i
DATE AND 1IML
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 198 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL OHMW-3 HYDROGRAPH OF DATA 
FIGURE
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
M-3
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
C
Ui
r-J
H-
TZT 
SOD mi
*& GERAGHTY
gg & MILLER, INC.
^9r 
Environmental Scruicts
^
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL OHMW-3 HYDROGRAPH OF DATA
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
5 -
• 
8
* I
C
P1
>
-z.
C
I
p-
o
— 4m
3i| li
5^' 1 g
§2>^
2*5 3 8
m^s i £
r^ ~^ i 
r^
PmR m ^
ZTJ° Q at
MS*-
2 m = 5
zoo - ^
°r 
» ^
3)> - i
^^
j s a a
to 
-<
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
(FEET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL)
CJ 
CO 
CJ 
CO 
OJ 
CJ
CJ 
A 
(Jl 
CT) 
-vl 
00
5/iimo-oo 
. 
i 
.
5/11/946:00 -
5/11/9412:00 -
5/11/94 18:00 -
' 
5/12/940:00 -,
1
1
5/12/946:00 .
I
5/12/94 12:00 -
5/12/94 18:00 .
1/13/940:00 .
5/13/946:00 -
5/13/94 12:00
•GLIN III ON-
XT3tT3PM-
NbHtAS>tU f
TO 41 GPM
EGUN III OFF
EGLIN III ON-
(g»46-4O GPf
EGUN III OFF
EGUN III ON-
INE @ 10:07
JMflNQ HAT
917:15
INE 9 07:00
©10:00
JNE912.-33
; <^>OH:OO
/
/
/
/
\
\
[
/
/
t\
1
/
)-
/
^
o
3
0>
r?
CO
ro(ii
to«
TJ
7)h
— 4
0
T3
2)
8i
u
Ol
•n
f?
o
73>|
O
|
C
LJ
>
"i
m
8
m
O
e_i
a
S
35
O
>
73
•D
X
O
iSio
_-H
O>z
-<
"i
«;
r)
3J
<
o
so
I DWG DATE: 
8/25/94 
[ PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
[DRAWING: DHMV 1 
I CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
120 
———————————
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
(FEET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVE
> 
o 
o 
— 
-
i 
o 
ui 
o 
a
Io
n
H
9o
&
Ul
o
Z
ao 1 ———— •• i — —
8 
8
8 
8
! 
I
*n 
5S
^fcT GERAGHTY
4|f # MILLER, INC.
^^f 
Environmental Services
i
o
5
E @08:00 TO
\-
oc
OI
p
INCREASED F
in
ItO
z
o
Ul
§ 
! 
1 
1 
S 
1 
1
i 
I s I 
I I 
1
5 
S 
» 
» 
ft 
ft 
«
DATE AND TIME
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL OHMW-1 HYDRC
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAG
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
iiiiii-t*
iiiiiiiii
Ej —————
ll
• 
"
pl 
£
l\ °
3! 
=1
3] 
J2
I I
I I
• 
DATA POINT
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 374 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
FIGURE
DGRAPH OF DATA
E IMPACT TEST 
M-5
Ul
I DWG DATE: 8/25/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
| FILE:
I DRAWING: DHMW-4 
I CHECKED: J. JASORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
EET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL)
3 
O 
O 
— 
^
0 
(j 
QO 
u 
go
LL. 
OU
q-j -
i
i
INE @ 10:07
•GUN III ON-l
jrrartJPM"
8 
8
6 
«
1 
1
«n 
*n
^ 
GERAGHTY
4^ 6? MILLER, INC.
^^Pr * nvironmtntal Seruicts
B
0I
JMKINtj KAI
PL
3i
j«t«h
in
£
O
!to
z3
(3
UI
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
ri 
« 
o 
« 
ri 
•> 
4
i 
i 
1 I 
S i 
!
5 
S 
ft 
« 
5 
5 
?
DATE AND TIME
INE 9 07:00
i
z
8
i
?.o
, •
5 
8
! 1
«< 
n
^ 
S
nnri
»
Ul
-\
0
z
o
IU
8 
?
» 
n
i 
i
» 
m 
<C
• 
M 
|Kt
51 
5
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 259 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
FIGURE
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL OHMW-4 HYDROGRAPH OF DATA
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
^j.g
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
[DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
[ PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
IF1L£:
[DRAWING: HV-IO 
[CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKI| APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
• m
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
(FEET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL)
ro 
u 
u 
* 
A 
c
01 
O 
w 
o 
01 
c
Io
n
I-
S6
UJ
O
Z
19
III 1
8i
> 
s
ty 
GERAGHTY
AV & MILLER, INC.
^^tr Environmental Services
t
__ ^
-. 
— — —
_ 
._.
Ia
E 908:00 TO
i
a|
in
It
O
5
2
^^^
E
\
8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
S
N 
S 
6 
* 
rj 
5 
J 
.
? 
I 
1 | 
s | 
| 
!
DATE AND TIME
i !
t i
S 
5
3 
2
! 
S
S 
j
!
1Iit
• 
DATA POINT
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III = 600 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
ripi ipc
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL MW-10 HYDROGRAPH OF DATA
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
|\/|_7
TUTU WELLS SITE '
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLAND'3 
J
r-j
H-
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
I DRAWING: SV4
(CHECKED: J. JASORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY
[DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
1 ilC
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
(FEET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL)
) 
M 
U 
U 
* 
4
5 
W1 
O 
01 
O 
t
o
r-n
»-
O6
111
——— §--
Z
o
1 ZU 1 ———————
8 
8
8 
*
3 
3
3 
S
^•T GERAGHTY
4^ & MILLER, INC.
^^*
^^^P Environmental Services
i
_ i .
iii
i
ii
^ 1
* 1
t!
< i
j|
«i
i!
ini
i
2
8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
| 
1
i i i i | | j
DATE AND TIME
\ ——— ——
>
t
* ——— —
?
> i
j "rr
I i
I 
I 
I
t 
9t 
9t
• 
DATA POINT
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGUN III = 462 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL SW-4 HYDROGRAPH OF DATA 
FIGURE
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
jyj.g
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS 
J
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
DRAWING: SV-5
[CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKI| APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
120
UJ UJ
110
105
100
o
3'
P
e*
8
88
a
?i
?
?
8
8
o
§
DATE AND TIME
• 
DATA POINT
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III = 297 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
Ui
_ 
GERAGHTY
^ir & MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
SHALLOW MONITORING WELL SW-5 HYDROGRAPH OF DATA
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE
M-9
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
[FILE:
I DRAWING: EGLIN 3 
I CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
O
>
2
UJ O
DC <$i
^t
140
120
8
8
Mi
Ii
I5
Ii
S
c
DATE AND TIME
• 
DATA POINT
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=23 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
w
03
GERAGHTY
6? MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
EGLIN III SUPPLY WELL HYDROGRAPH OF DATA COLLECTED
DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE
M-10
[DWG 
DATE: 9/12/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
I DRAWING: EGLIN-8 
I CHECKED: J. JA30RKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
LU
UJ
135
130
125
120
115
110
H
DATE AND TIME
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH»7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 88 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
H-
rO
w-
:-0
GERAGHTY
& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
EGLIN II SUPPLY WELL HYDROGRAPH OF DATA COLLECTED
DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE
M-11
1
Ul
_J
Ul
Ul
1oe
Ul
<
DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
| PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
|FILE: 
|DRAWING: MV-11D 
| CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKI APPROVED: T. DANAHY
140 
———————————
« or-
1 Jb
QJ
Ul 
4 «Jrt
t/5 
13O
Z3
^ 
125
%
Ula:
. _ _
tjt
^•MM^^^^MI ———
9o
IUZ
——— 3—
B 'i;
3 il
SR 4
115 i —————— i ————
* 
1
5 
«
__— i ••——— —
a
I
t
p|
E5
1) ••
c*
1°
——^-~-~~- m
in
———— f--
= i
z |
2!
—— — — ^ 
—
Q9
o
IL
—————— 3
H
Z
O
1
"" ———
DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
-_•
?
o
i—S-
S 1
S 
s
« 
^
1 i
I 
I 
I 
! 
I 
I 
I 
I
\
\
l
\
l
l
l
\
s
s
^
^
s
s
5
^
HAir AKIH TIUF
,-
•
^•^
n
M
»
IU
z
s
1
5
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 363 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
AA
AW GERAGHTY
lr & MILLER, INC.
W Environmental Services
^
DEEP MONITORING WELL MW-11D HYDROGRAPH OF DATA 
RGURE
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
N\-\2
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
[DRAWING: HV-11DA 
[CHECKED: J. JAS10RKOWSKI[ APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
138
137
a:
133
DATE AND TIME
VtRT,CAL SCALE ,S 1 ,NCH=1.7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III «= 363 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
rjl
i—
Ki
hO
GERAGHTY
& MILLER, INC.
Environmental Services
DEEP MONITORING WELL MW-11D HYDROGRAPH OF DATA
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
FIGURE
M-13
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
[DRAWING: MV-12D 
I CHECKED: J. JASORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
(DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
140
a 
135
Ul
I"1
$ v 
11O
^ 
1 JW
LJz
1.1 2j
LJO
ui. , 
OR
^1 111 
1 A t)
1 ir
^"1 ft*
^5 
12°
•^,
115
9.o
Vf
Ul
§
O i
= I:
2t
8 
8
6 
«
$ 
!
5 
5
*W GERAGHTY
jig & MILLER, INC.
^^fr 
Environmental Services
L.
— 
_
n-H
|i
t
UL
jo
—— — — . .
in
i^
Qi
H"
Q
Szi
—
o
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
r4 
•> 
6 
« 
ri 
ii 
e
i 
i 
^ 
1 
jjj g 
|
DATE AND TIME
zo
s
§
§o
8 — ?• —
L 
C |
3 
O
i 2
» I;
r-l
fj
•n*
Osi
! 
-
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III = 390 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
FIPl )RF
DEEP MONITORING WELL MW-12D HYDROGRAPH OF DATA
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE
TUTU WELLS SITE
IMPACT TEST 
.. 14
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS 
1
K'j
w
[DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
[ PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
[FILE:
I DRAWING: MV-12DA 
I CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
Z jjj 
"8
O ^
< ^
UJ z
uJ iS 
137
UJ o
> !=
y u
~~P ^
i fe 
136
UJ -J
H- ^
^
* t
K^ 
135
9o
IUZ
g
=
Z
0
IU
8 
8
6 
«
i i
% 
A
A& GERAGHTY
>lr 
«S^ MILLER, INC.
^^r 
Environmental Services
^
2c
rp
tf
^^
P"***-*^.
8
0i
c
J
iP
Q
l)t
j^
-°
^-s-
in
ix
Ai
jt
i
22
^^
8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
S!
i 
I 
1 1 i 
i 
§
DATE AND TIME
O
zi
o
z
UJ
'"^^
8
0*
L 
It
0 
0
6 
Z
a>l 
22
rf-»i
8
ft
UJ
Z
zo
z
iu
! 
1
1 
i
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=1.7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 390 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
DEEP MONITORING WELL MW-12D HYDROGRAPH OF DATA 
FIGURE
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
IMPACT TEST 
M-15
-
PJ
K'l
c.
u
rOJi
*-
s
2 &
o -
DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
PRJCT NO.: PR0013033
140 
———————————
•^
i 
135
i
<£
«-j ^r 
i &\j
Id LJ
Ld O
?~ L
$ t
L
Ll
v_
1
>
*
: 
I/O
j
j
i 
120
^
oo
ft
UJz
±o
z
a
8 
8
a 
«
i i
ft 
*
^feT GERAGHTY
lir & MILLER, INC.
P^ i'rtvtronmenfoZ Services
L
Z
V
I
FILE:
• — - ——
8
?
*
DRAWING: DV-2 
CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKI APPROVED: T. DANAHY
DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
s 
!
• 
o
i i
s
DATE AND
i
5
>i
>
<
J
ij
35
?3
ct
t£
• 
-
10
£
ft
1
=
z
(9
IU
——— . —— ——
—— —— ———
§
e 
o 
S>
8 
8 
c>
« 
f4 
» 
H
I i i I
TIME
DEEP MONITORING WELL DW-2 HYDROGRAPH OF
V
0
IU
Si
o
B
Z
CIII
\
— —— —
?0
* — t" —
3 
5
: 
s
5 
z
^•^
3
ft
IUt
S
^
I 
S
1 
1
*
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=1.7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 248 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
FIGURE
DATA COLLECTED
DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
R/j-16
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
^
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
I DRAWING: DV-2
[CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKH APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
c
r n
i-".
K;
Kj
01
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
(FEET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL)
1 
U 
GJ 
U> 
U 
U>
> 
.u 
ui 
O) 
">J 
CD
— —— ~v
6
IU
* 2
o 3
Ul r
I jj T ——————— r
8 
8
£ 
«
I 
I
s 
S
i
A^f GERAGHTY
JfjT # MILLER, INC.
^9r 
Environmental Services
L.
^
"^^-^
Ii
u
t
'.
3
\\
==^t
in
Ito
z
s
x^
1^oft
Ul
8 
| 
8 
8 
8 
§ 
|
A 
A 
?i 
S 
y 
g 
5t
^ 
^ 
r< 
C*i 
j^ 
2» 
2
w 
*• 
*^ 
»» 
W 
Ff 
p
2i 
St 
*^ 
*" 
wt 
A
DATE AND TIME
g
=
B
6
Z 
*
L 
It
3 
0
B
S
z
?4
-i
Os
X
2
! i
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=1.7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 248 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
DEEP MONITORING WELL DW-2 HYDROGRAPH OF DATA COLLECTED 
RGURE
DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
M-17
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
i
I OWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR001J033 
IFIIE:
I DRAWING: MV-81D 
I CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
f—
,~
Ul
\-*
PJ
K'i
i>
OR
CT
UJ
t>. 
90
•2. y
>
u1 § 
85
UJ UJ
1 1— 
on
Ul UJIt
s _ ^ 
-*r-
7o -
_ 
'. 
—
INE eno.o?
•GUN III ON-l
AT-34-GPM-
70 —————— i — ———
8 
8
6 
«
s 
s
^^ 
GERAGHTY
AY & MILLER, INC.
^^^ 
ffnvinmTntntoZ Services
•^-^
^ ——— ^
*——- — .= • —— *
Bi
c
I
I
%
^*
in
=z
a
_^
^--~
•*
JNE 9 07:00
§
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
2 
a 
6 
* 
a 
2 
*
DATE AND TIME
DEEP MONITORING WELL MW-21D HYDROGI
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
8oi
i t
JNE 91 2:33
a
1 
§
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 446 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
FIGURE
RAPH OF DATA
: IMPACT TEST 
j^j.-jg
[ DWG DATE: • a/25/94 
[ PRJCT NO.: PRQ013033 
[FILE:
I DRAWING: CHURCH 
I CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
[DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
142
137
*»— s
UJ
zfc
o ->
P<; 
132
2%
"i
wfi
d* 
127
UJ
Y>
*5
UJ J
$# 
122
*fc
tf
*-*-
Iu
r)
»-
r»o6
Q>
UJ
——— 3-
0
z
o
Ul
117 —————— , ————
8 
8
8 
8
1 
?
5 
5
^f 
GERAGHTY
MV & MILLER, INC.
^^tr Environmental Services
^
—— — •^— — __ -^^~—^^__ —— ——— —— _ "*-* »-»
tt.
U
5oiI
-£
j ——
<
oci
p
INCREASED P
—— • —— .-
U)
i^
<&
It
O=
z
U
UJ
^- ——— -*•
——— ——— ———
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Ci 
2 
8 
S 
2 
= 
g
i i i I i i i
m 
^ 
tin 
^ 
^ 
i^ 
M
DATE AND TIME
CHURCH SUPPLY WELL HYDROGRAPH OF D
DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMP/
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
1
1
14*
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
E|
ii
* ii
i[
LINt (E'U/:UU
©10:00
l\ 1
i i
"^
8 
?
S 
2
I 
!
A 
«
• 
DATA POINT
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III = 644 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
ATA COLLECTED 
FIGURE
,CT TEST 
M-1
,~,
r n
(•*
NJ
NJ
•vj
I DWG DATE: 8/25/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
I FILE:
I DRAWING: STEELE
I CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
T RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL)
> 
O 
O 
-* 
-
» 
o 
w 
o 
a
.^
I0
n
1-
—
06i
IU
O
Z
o
901 —————— i ————
8 
8
8 
X
1 
I
ft 
ft
>fcT GERAGHTY
Jjg & MILLER, INC.
^^fr 
Environmental Services
L.
**^
•***
^~-.
OL
O
5o
8
00
r ——
OCi
y
INCREASED F
"^'^v,
in
t
O
z
2
^x
8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
8 
S
ij 
2 
g 
8 
2 
2 
K
? 
1 
1 
? 
1 
1 
*
- 
- 
s 
s 
ft 
S 
:i
S 
S 
5 
5 
ft 
ft 
«
DATE AND TIME
iii
iiii
ii
piiiii
_ i
1 1
O ————— | ——
si
8 I
?M^
§! i
31 
O
8 
8
8 
SS
• 
DATA POINT
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 270 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
STEELE SUPPLY WELL HYDROGRAPH OF DATA COLLECTED 
RGURE
DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
M_2
TUTU WELLS SITE
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
H-
Nj
hO
CO
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
(FILE:
[DRAWING: MV-10D 
I CHECKED: J. JASIORKOWSKII APPROVED: T. DANAHY 
I DRAFTER: V. CARUNCHO
O
r_n
I-"-
to
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
(FEET RELATIVE TO MEAN SEA LEVEL)
j 
ro 
CJ 
w 
A 
J
j 
in 
O 
w 
O 
i
(9
n
INE 010:07
o
o
liJ t
1 4V
8 
8
i I
5 
S
Jf 
GERAGHTY
4r & MILLER, INC.
^^^^F Snv^Tonfnfmtol StTvicts
^
i
Io
5
£
1
1^ ——
O
INCREASED 1
i
IA
£
•
ItO
I
| 
| 
! 
! §
i 
i 
? I 
g
ft 
5 
5?
DATE AND TIME
DEEP MONITORING WELL MW-K
COLLECTED DURING THE EGLIN
TUTU WELLS
ST. THOMAS. U.S. VIR
I 
1
S 
*
H-
!r
»!
\\
.1
m 1 
5
?,! 
S
-
§ 
I
I 
!
i
t
S
1
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 600 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGLIN III
FIPI IRF
DD HYDROGRAPH 
OF DATA
III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
M-2
SITE
GIN ISLANDS
\
1r
I DWG DATE: 7/21/94 
I PRJCT NO.: PR0013033 
IF1LE:
WATER-LEVEL ELEVATION
t TO MEAN SEA LEVEL)
i 
— 
-* 
N
i 
o 
tn 
c
APPROXIMATE
(FEET RELATIV
> 
0 
C
1 
O 
C!
U
n
1-
10=0 to 3Nr
|i
go i ——————— - —
8 
8
§ 
8
! 
S
s 
s
AW GERAGHTY
J|r # MILLER, INC.
^^r 
£nvfamtn«nia£ St rutc«s
L
i
0
5
Ol OPBOO 3
i
8
tf>
r"
EGUN IN OFF
DATE AND TIME
!
j 
i
j 
i
i
j
i
J
\ ——
\
!J I
?i *
i! 
K
"" " " ">
i i ;
• 
DATA POINT
VERTICAL SCALE IS 1 INCH=7 FEET
DISTANCE FROM EGLIN III - 242 FEET
NOTE: VERTICAL DASHED LINES MARK THE
TIMES THAT THE PUMPING RATE WAS
CHANGED IN EGUN III
HARVEY SUPPLY WELL HYDROGRAPH OF DATA COLLECTED 
RGURE
DURING THE EGLIN III PUMPAGE IMPACT TEST 
M-22
TUTU WELLS SITE '
ST. THOMAS, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS
H
C
H