DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. CROIX
5
CARMEN McALPIN CLARKE,
5
5
Plaintiff,
5
1:08-cv-86
v.
5
5
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
5
5
Defendant.
5
__________________________________________5
TO:
Lee J. Rohn, Esq.
Andrew C. Simpson, Esq.
ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the
Order of August 4, 2006 (Docket No. 32) and Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to
Compel (Docket No. 33).  Defendant filed an opposition to each motion, and Plaintiff filed
replies thereto.
Being advised in the premises and being satisfied therein, the Court finds that
reconsideration is not warranted.  Nothing in Plaintiff’s said motions persuades the Court
that its previous orders require clarification, modification, or reversal.  With regard to both
motions, the record is exceedingly clear that the period for discovery limited to Defendant’s
liability closed on April 18, 2009, and the Court did not err in either of the orders at issue.
Case: 1:08-cv-00086-WAL-GWC   Document #: 43   Filed: 09/04/09   Page 1 of 2
Clarke v. Marriott International, Inc.
1:08-cv-86
Order
Page 2
Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the Order of August 4, 2009 (Docket No. 32)
is DENIED.
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider Denial of Motion to Compel  (Docket No. 33)
is DENIED.
ENTER:
Dated: September 4, 2009
/s/ George W. Cannon, Jr.                           
GEORGE W. CANNON, JR.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 1:08-cv-00086-WAL-GWC   Document #: 43   Filed: 09/04/09   Page 2 of 2