This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project to make the world’s books discoverable online. It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that’s often difficult to discover. Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book’s long journey from the publisher to a library and finally to you. Usage guidelines Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. We also ask that you: + Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes. + Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google’s system: If you are conducting research on machine translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. + Maintain attribution The Google “watermark” you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. + Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can’t offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book’s appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe. About Google Book Search Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers discover the world’s books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web at http://books.google.com/ SA 2725 Barbard College Library Tg OO TAS FROM THE BRIGHT LEGACY One half the Income from this Legacy, which was re- celved In 1880 under the will of JONATHAN BROWN BRIGHT of Waltham, Massachusetts. is to be expended for books for the College Library. T ‘hy e other half of the Income is devoted to scholarsh: benefit of descendants ay in Harvard University for the HENRY BRIGHT, JR., Massachusetts, in 1686, In the who died at Watertown, hi ry are eligible to the schol The will at ment shall be made In every book added to the Library ander its p THE DANISH WEST INDIES “* How thé colonies were actually governed; what the colonists did at work and play; how the mother country stamped her image upon them, and to what extent the lineaments of that image were modified by contact with local forces—these are matters that interest the reader of to-day.” —W. R. Shepherd. Le] THE DANISH WEST INDIES, UNDER COMPANY RULE. cL (1671-1754) WITH A SUPPLEMENTARY CHAPTER, 1755-1917 BY DJPx. D. ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF HISTORY AT POMQNA COLLEGE WALDEMAR WESTERGAAR ie WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY H. MORSE STEPHENS, M. A., Lrrr. D. (Harv.) GATHER PROFESSOR OF HISTORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA MAPS AND ILLUSTRATIONS THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1917 All rights reserve SA279 5-2 Thorméhlen’s examination of Captain Iversen and ‘“‘Irnst” Rongel (Sep- tember 20); Thorméhlen’s nine charges against Delavigne (September 25); Thor- méhlen’s order to George Lorentsen (September 25, 1698). Ibid. The latter's name was also spelled Laurentsen. “In his letter of January 17, 1695, Lorentz mentions having sent a letter from Curacao on October 22, 1694. C. B., 1690-1718. THE GOVERNERSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 107 not a whit too soon, for the English authorities in the neighbor- ing islands had already forbidden their people from trading with St. Thomas, while the French were designing to remove Delavigne from his fort by force and bring him to the general at Martinique because of alleged high-handed treatment of a French ship in St. Thomas harbor. Lorentz found two of the company’s three plantations © badly run down, the inhab- itants dissatisfied with the government, and the Brandenburgers still smarting under the robbery perpetrated by the “blond” Legendre scarcely three weeks before. He prepared to apply himself immediately to the task of rehabilitating the colony as best he might under the liberal set of instructions with which the directors had furnished him. These instructions deserve some passing notice. With respect to the Brandenburgers ({ 14) he was to abide by the three-year arrangement made on April 28, 1692, after which he should proceed according to the original treaty of 1685. He was to keep on good terms with all foreign “generals” and governors, assert the company’s right to St. John, Passage (a small island just east of Porto Rico), and Crab Islands, resist attacks from without, and prevent re- bellion, whether of blacks or whites, from within. Governor Lorentz was especially urged, by way of keeping on good terms with his neighbors in the West Indies, to have noth- ing to do with “sea-robbers,” though he was to be allowed to buy properly condemned prizes when they might be offered for sale. In his relations with the English, who were becoming more aggressive as the war went on, he was soon to have a chance to show his mettle. The most radical departure from the previous policy, however, came as a result of an offer made by Lorentz himself to the directors. ‘Inasmuch as he [Lo- rentz] had undertaken to support himself and all the company’s employees and soldiers on the income from the company’s plantations and the poll tax,” so ran their acceptance of his offer ({ 8), “we are satisfied on behalf of the company to accept for it such surplus as may be left over, if any there be, leaving it to his honesty and his oath to see that the conipany may re- 5 These were known as the “‘ New Quarter plantation,” the “Sugar plantation” and “ Krumbays plantation.” 108 THE DANISH WEST INDIES ceive what is due.”® In other words, Lorentz was given a free hand to administer the Company’s affairs in the West Indies exactly as he saw fit. The concluding paragraph of their in- structions gives a still better idea of the new incumbent’s lati- tude of action. “He may do whatever he finds needful for the Company’s best interests, provided he immediately notifies the directors; and inasmuch as we have confidence in his re- liability and in his desire to promote the Company’s welfare in all things, we shall not hold him responsible if he should risk some of the Company’s resources and (which may God in his mercy prevent) it should not turn fortunately as was expected. And we shall besides, when the Company gains headway and gets upon its feet, show our appreciation for his faithful service in such a way that he shall see that he is not dealing with un- grateful people. Finally,”’ they concluded by way of a parting benediction, “we will wish him such a measure of success that his good resolution may redound to the service of his Majesty, the prosperity and growth of the Company, and to his own honor and fame.”’? The success or failure of the West Indian colony was put squarely up to the new governor. The part he played in curb- ing the efforts of the Brandenburgers and helping to bring about the collapse of their plans for commercial expansion has been discussed in the previous chapter. The perfect unity that had characterized his former relations with directors Juel and Moth continued during the years following his return. In March, 1701, he was able to report to his masters that the Branden- burgers were carrying on little or no trade, having for a long time bought nothing from outside merchants but a few slaves ® * The original resolutions of the shareholders, passed at their meeting of March 19, was signed by the following directors and shareholders: Jens Juel, P. Bran{djt, M. Moth, W. Worm, A. Gyldensparre, N. Krag, R. Meier, W. Mule, V. Lerche (Lerke), F. C. Adelaer (Adeler), P. Hiort, P. Lemvig, Nicol. Janson (sic) Arf[f], C. Braem, J. Wurger, J. Kréyer, J. Matisen (for “Hr Canc. Raad Adelaer”), and Frid. and Niels Miller. Resolutions of Directors (March 19, 1694). C. B., 1690-1718. 7 Directors’ instructions to Lorentz (March 29, 1694). C. B., 1690-1718. ® Lorents and Van Belle had together bought a cargo of 154 slaves from a Zeeland slave ship. THE GOVERNORSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 109 and some “Campeachy” wood. On the island they had no trade except a little in cotton when they made an occasional purchase from a planter. “On the whole, they are quite civil,” he reported, “and are waiting for a new treaty.”® John Lorentz had every reason to be pleased with such a quiescent situation and to pray for its long continuance. The most numerous nation among the planters of St. Thomas was the Dutch. Inasmuch as the number of prosperous planters largely determined the size of the return cargoes, there was considerable competition among the islands to secure planters of means and induce them to settle permanently. Organized into a militia corps these burghers could become an important factor in defence against outside attack. As early as 1688, when Europe was on the verge of war, Adolph Esmit had offered eight years’ exemption from taxes to intending planters. In the years 1690 and 1691 a number of Dutch planters had come from St. Eustatius and Saba to avoid confiscation of their property, especially their negroes, by the French who had just taken possession of the island.” During the course of the war, Governor Lorentz took measures to prevent their leaving. As the war closed, and the refugees repeated their desire to go, on the ground that St. Eustatius was a more healthful place to live than St. Thomas (which was admittedly true) he intimated that their real reason was the expiration of the eight years’ tax exemption. He tried to induce those leaving to pay the tax for four of the eight years but was unable to prevent five families from going, although one planter, Lucas Beverhoudt, left his plantation on St. Thomas in full working order, to the governor’s great joy. Just how many others eventually re- turned does not appear.!! The greatest obstacle to Lorentz’s constructive efforts was privateering. Although Brandenburg was ostensibly an enemy ® Lorentz to Directors (March 27, 1701). C. B., 1690-1718. %* Among these were Adrian Rinnels, Lawrence Westerbaen, Adrian Sorgeloos, and John le Ducq (Duq). Delavigne papers; Lorents’s Journal (February 11, 1601, passim). 11 Lorentz to Directors (September 6, 1696), C. 3., 1690-1718; same to same (January 22, 1698), Gov. C. B., 169$-1700; same to same (June 20 and 24, 1698), C. B., 1690-1718. 110 THE DANISH WEST INDIES of France, its African company’s factor in the West Indies bought Spanish and English prizes captured by French priva- teers whenever opportunity offered.'? These difficulties reached their height in 1696 when French captains holding commissions from Governor Du Casse of Petit Goave swarmed like birds of prey around the mouth of St. Thomas harbor, seizing not only enemies’ ships but vessels belonging to St. Thomas inhabitants." To Governor Lorentz’s vigorous protests against these acts of violence towards a friendly 4 power, Du Casse gaily replied that those complained of were rascals, and advised Lorentz to have them hanged when they came to St. Thomas again. Farther, Du Casse accused Lorentz of selling passports to Curacao skippers at 10 rdl. each. According to Lorentz’s account, the Petit Goave governor bore a particular grudge against the St. Thomas government because of Delavigne’s failure to pay him for two kegs of indigo which he claimed were still due him, and he threatened to get Lorentz out of his government “‘as he had Delavigne.” The last thrust probably did not disturb Lorentz, who knew better than Du Casse why Delavigne had been re- moved. For the Count of Blenacq, “general’’ at Martinique, the governor had mainly words of praise for the good order he had kept among his privateers." Although Denmark had not openly sided with Louis XTV, her attitude of neutrality was looked upon as an indication of her friendliness. For the Spaniards who had joined the league against Louis XIV and Sweden it was not difficult to find an excuse for attacking St. Thomas. The report that they were planning an attack upon the island with three thousand men in the summer of 1696 spread consternation among the planters and well-nigh demoralized the population. The planters took 12 Lorentz to Directors’ (October 19, 1697); same to same (November 30, 1696), C. B., 1690-1718. 13 Governor Lorentz cites several instances. Benjamin Frank, a Jew, but a Danish subject, had his ship detained and his skipper maltreated and robbed; John de Windt’s ship was seized on the way from Curacao to St. Thomas, the cargo was confiscated and the ship only released on deposit of 5,080 rdi. as surety; two inhabitants who had a bill of sale from the Brandenburg factor had their bark seized. Lorentz to Directors (September 6, 1696). C. B., 1690-1713. 4 Ibid. 112 THE DANISH WEST INDIES In January, 1697," the French fleet above referred to left Brest for the West Indies under Jean-Bernard Desjeans, baron de Pointis. At Petit Goave, Pointis was joined by a fleet of privateers under the command of Governor Du Casse and de- parted in March for Carthagena on the coast of New Granada. After a difficult siege the citadel was captured, and booty esti- mated to be worth forty million crowns (écus) was loaded on the French ships and promptly started for home. The English vice-admiral Nevell had meantime come to the West Indies in search of the French, who were assumed to have gone to some part of the Spanish Main, probably to Porto Bello.” It was important to prevent the captured loot from reaching Louis XIV who might be able with it to prolong the war considerably. As soon as a Martinique bark had brought the news of Nevell’s presence in Caribbean waters to Petit Goave, the French au- thorities compelled a Brandenburg captain in the latter harbor, one Arduin, to take on board a French captain, a steersman, and six French seamen and proceed to Carthagena to warn Pointis and Du Casse of Nevell’s whereabouts. The French fleet ar- rived in Brest on August 29 with the loss of but a single ship. Admiral Nevell was furious when he heard how the warning had been sent and fixed the blame upon the Danish authorities on St. Thomas, who were after all responsible for the govern- ment there. He wrote to the surrounding English governments that they should try to break up St. Thomas’s trade on the sea, and three privateers from Curacao and several from Jamaica “‘were sent out to cruise on this island’s vessels, to prevent the carrying on of trade with the French islands.” 4 The conclusion of the Peace of Ryswick in September, 1697, helped presently to relieve the tension between St. Thomas and her neighbors. With the consummation of peace, however, piracy took the place of privateering.” During the course of the war it had been 32 Chevalier, in his Histoire de la marine francaise (Paris, 1902), p. 205, mis- takenly places the date at June 7, 1696. Guerin (Histoire maritime de France, Paris, 1862) is probably more nearly accurate in placing the date of de Pointis’ departure at January 9, 1697 (IV, 69). 3 Cal. Col., 1696-97, No. 824 (March 18, 1697). 34 Lorents to Directors (October 19, 1697). C. B., 1690-1718. % Cal. Col., 1697-98, No. 269 (March 1, 1608) and passin. THE GOVERNORSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 118 deemed necessary only to determine whether a prize had been legally condemned by a properly constituted admiralty court before it was offered for sale in a neutral port. After the peace it would be more necessary than ever for skippers to present a clean “bill of health” for ships brought into foreign harbors. The attitude of John Lorentz toward strange craft suspected of irregularities is well illustrated by his action in the case of cer- tain “rovers of the sea” of whom the most notorious is Captain Kidd. Captain Kidd has passed into tradition to such an extent that it may be interesting to see how this arch-pirate of legend impressed people of his own time who had had unusual facilities for studying men of his alleged profession at close range. Kidd appeared before St. Thomas harbor on April 6, 1699 (O. S.?) having lately come from Madagascar in the Quidah Merchant, a Genoese vessel of four hundred tons, thirty guns, and eighty men, and having been refused succor by the English at An- guilla.* His appearance and action may best be told in Gov- ernor Lorentz’s own words as he put them down at the time in his carefully kept diary.” “April 6.—Today, Maundy Thursday, there arrived before the harbor an English ship which anchored just outside of can- non range. Presently the captain sent his sloop [boat] ashore with a person on board who came to ask the vice commandant [%. e., Lorentz] whether he might come in free with his ship, which his men had compelled him to seize from the Moors in the East Indies—he could produce proof that he had been com- pelled to seize it. The vice-commandant answered that if he could produce proof in writing that he was an honest man, he might enter, which message he sent by Lieut. Claus Hansen and Peter Smith [a well-to-do merchant who had been associated with the Brandenburgers in the slave-trade] who, however, were not satisfied with his explanations, for he [Kidd] had re- ™ Cal. Col., 1699, No. 404 (May 18); ef. Cal. Col., 1689-92, No. 136 (May 18, 1689), where a letter from council of Nevis to Blathwayt has been dated 1689 instead of 1699. ® Lorents's Journal (April 6, 1699, etc.). Lorentz spelled the captain’s name Cidd. Maundy Thursday: the day preceding Good Friday, Green Thursday. The translation is not close, though reconstructed from very full notes. 114 THE DANISH WEST INDIES quested the vice-commandant to give him protection from the English royal ships, should they seek him here without orders, from which the vice-commandant saw that he was a pirate, and therefore deferred his answer till the morrow. “April 7.—In the morning the vice-commandant called the council together to consult as to whether or not the said sea- robber’s request could be granted; but as he saw that it would produce considerable friction between this land and the English if the pirate were admitted and not delivered up on their re- quest, it was resolved that no word, beyond yesterday’s mes- sage, should be sent to him. ‘‘A man came ashore . . . with a written request that Kidd receive protection on land until he could send a bark to New England, present his case there, and prove that he was no sea- robber, inasmuch as the governor there, Mylord Bellamont, was the chief owner in the ship in which he sailed out of England three years ago to cruise on the Red Sea for pirates. But his request was flatly refused him, and besides, he was forbidden to send his men ashore again unless they came into the harbor with the ship. “Long Friday was celebrated in the church today. “April 8.—Today the pirates lying outside the harbor have twice sent boats ashore at the harbor’s point. The vice- commandant at once sent his men there, and they found that seven men had been put ashore who maintained that they were passengers . . . [and proved it]. Two of these secured permis- sion to take a canoe and fetch their baggage, but when they were on the way the ship spread sails and left, the canoe follow- ing. ** Watch was kept in the harbor that night by Captain Vinck’s boat.” Although Captain Kidd was forced meekly to leave the harbor of St. Thomas in his leaky vessel, and ceases thereupon to have any personal connection with St. Thomas history, the island authorities were presently to concern themselves with part of his cargo,—his “treasure.” On leaving St. Thomas, Kidd steered for San Domingo, but instead of risking putting in at Petit Goave, he stopped at the little island of Mona, just off the THE GOVERNORSHIP OF JOHN LORENTZ 115 southeast coast of Hispaniola, and apparently he anchored later in the mouth of the “River Romano” near “Catherine” island on the same coast. Here he was met—or followed—by traders from Curacao, Antigua, and St. Thomas, to whom he disposed of a large part of his cargo. According to information given by the St. Thomas trader, Peter Smith, to Nevis officials, one Henry Bolton of Antigua had furnished him with provisions, and had undertaken to act as his agent in getting rid of his cargo. To William Burke,” an Irish trader who had recently taken a cargo of slaves from Barbados to Carthagena, and who had done considerable business with the Dutch at Curacao in his time, Kidd sold one hundred and twenty or one hundred and thirty bales of muslin,” and finally, when he had disposed of nearly all of his cargo, he bought a smaller boat (from Bolton?) and left for New York.?! There he was to attempt to prove his innocence before Lord Bellamont, part owner of the ship in which he had left England, and the admiralty judges. On Friday, May 27, 1699, about seven weeks after Kidd’s departure, Burke came into St. Thomas on an English barken- tine, approached Governor Lorentz, and asked the favor of a private interview. With only Madame Lorentz present to act as interpreter, Burke stated that he had been with the sea- robber Captain “‘Cidd” and that if the governor would partic- ipate with him, a large profit could be got from the said pirate. To this the governor vigorously replied that he would have nothing to do with pirates, and thereby give the land an evil reputation. But if Lorentz was unwilling to receive the stolen goods, the Brandenburg factor, Van Belle, had no such scruples. That very night the searobbers’ goods were landed and stored in the Brandenburg warehouse. The guard had informed the governor of the stir in the harbor during the night, so the latter began an investigation on the following day with a view to finding out whether Van Belle had made the investment on his own account or on that of the Brandenburg company. 3 Cal. Col., 1699, No. 616, I (July 7), No. 680, IX (July 10). ® Also spelled Bourck, Burch, Burcke. * Cal. Col., 1699, No. 616, I (July 7). ®' Lands-Protokoller for St. Thomas . . . 1694-1711 (June 7, 1699). 116 THE DANISH WEST INDIES The governor’s prompt measures alarmed the Brandenburg officials. Their bookkeeper, Sivert Hoesz, as well as Burke, came to parley with him in the hope of reaching an agreement. On Monday the governor managed to seize some of the goods which had been brought into the house of an inhabitant.** Lor- entz, in a letter written July 4, 1699, mentions fifteen small packages and sixty sacks of saltpetre as having been seized and placed in the fort. Perhaps these included the goods referred to. On June 1 Burke was arrested, to be released on June 7, when the suit against him was begun. In the course of the hearing, Burke testified that besides Van Belle, Messrs. Beck and Moyart from Curacao and some gentlemen on Barbados had a share in the cargo in question,*‘ and that he remembered having paid Kidd 12,000 pieces-of-eight. A [Brandenburg?] gunner testified that he had recorded delivery of 158 packages, large and small, into the Brandenburg magazine. The court concluded that Van Belle must have been cognizant of the origin of the goods, and that he should therefore have a protest sent to him, charging him with action prejudicial to the island, that Burke should pay a fine of 300 pieces-of-eight for his In- solentie, and deposit 5,000 pieces-of-eight by way of guarantee that Kidd’s title to the goods was a legal one.** In his letter to the directors describing the affair, Lorentz mentions their having fined Van Belle 5,000 rdl.,* which helps to confirm a suspicion that the latter was forced to put up the deposit for Burke, who was only a go-between. The governor refrained from seizing those goods which actually reached the Brandenburg magazine. They were eventually put on board the Brandenburg ship, the Seven Provinces, which Lorentz re- 32 Lorents’s Journal (May 27, etc., 1699). 33 Lorentz to Directors (July 4, 1699). C. B., 1690-1718. Ina letter of April 15, 1700, Lorentz informed the Directors that he had caused the 69 sacks of saltpetre and 12 bales of cotton and “‘Netteldug” to be loaded on the Christian V on the company’s account. 34 Burke case (June 7, 1699). Lande-Prot., 1694-1711. 46 Ibid. The court was composed of the governor and John (Johannes) de Windt, Thomas Berentsen, Claus (Claes) Hansen, J. Rasmussen and Abraham Matheusen, who signed with his mark. % Lorentz to Directors (June 19, 1699). C. B., 1690-1718. 118 THE DANISH WEST INDIES or surrender the money that Burke (or Van Belle) had deposited in the Company’s treasury.“ Instead, Benbow made a report on the island and its harbor, in which he stated that it “would be of great use to our English nation in case of war in these parts,” that it could be easily fortified, whereas at present it was but “‘a receptacle for thieves.” “* The stubbornness of Lorentz, whose main concern was the retention of the five thousand pieces-of-eight and the seized goods for the Company, led the Earl of Bellamont, the English governor of New York, to con- tend that Burke had bought protection from the Danish gov- ernor with the proceeds of Kidd’s spoils.‘ His statement that Burke “will not be parted with” turned out entirely true, for in August, 1701, that pirates’ friend was reported out of reach of the arm of English law in the French part of St. Kitts.“ Lorentz was able to assume so bold a front because he knew through in- formation secured by Peter Smith on Nevis that Admiral Ben- bow was merely putting up a bluffing game, and was exceeding his orders in the hope of forcing the restitution of Kidd’s and Burke’s boat.“ In July, 1699, another Madagascar pirate, Tempest Roger (or Rogers) a former acquaintance of Kidd’s from those regions, appeared in St. Thomas harbor to ask leave to repair his ship, but he was not allowed to remain.“ But pirates did not always get off so easily. In a letter written in April, 1700, Lorentz mentions having meted out exemplary punishment to four out of nine pirates “who came here some time ago,” leaving the fate of the remaining five in the hands of the directors.“ Their con- fiscated goods, amounting to 2,600 rdl., helped to justify his zeal for the interests of his masters and make the performance of duty doubly joyous. © Lorentz to Directors (November 9, 1699). Goo. C. B., 169§-1700; Cal. Col., 1699, No. 907 (October 28). ® Benbow to Vernon, Cal. Col., 1699, No. 907 (October 28). “4 Bellamont to Lords of Trade, ibid., No. 890 (October 28, 1699). “ Codrington (Antigua) to Council of Trade, ibid., 1701, No. 784 (August 25). @ Lorentz to Directors (November 9, 1699). Goo. C. B., 1694-1700. | Same to same, ibid. (August 10, 1699); Cal. Col., 1699, No. 880, II (Au- gust 17, etc.); thid., 1700, No. 848 (October 18). Lorentz to Directors (April 15, 1700). C. B., 1690-1718. 120 THE DANISH WEST INDIES negroes, and maintain good relations with the neighboring governments. He must see to it that the Company’s planta- tions and magazine pay a surplus above their expenses, and particularly that homeward-bound ships of the Company have a good cargo that will enable the shareholders to secure dividends on their investment. That even as capable a man as John Lorentz should be successful in all these respects was quite im- possible, but that he should be able to hold his position until his death, and retain possession of the island against the threats of Spaniards and English, is something for which he deserves no little credit. Lorentz was always alive to what he considered the Com- pany’s best interests. His prompt report of John Mathew Leers’ attempt to lease the island in 1695 helped to nip that proposal in the bud, for he wrote that the rumor had “caused considerable grumbling among the inhabitants, who had all sworn to leave the land if it were leased out again.” ©! His letters concerning the lucrativeness of the slave trade led the share- holders of the Company to undertake with Jacob Lerke the sending of a ship to Guinea for a cargo of slaves, and eventually brought the Company into the business on its own account.®? On June 10, 1702, Governor John Lorentz died in office, the first governor save one to obtain that distinction. Of the six- teen years that had elapsed since he first arrived in St. Thomas as an humble “‘assistant,’’ he had served the Company eleven years as its governor. Under his clear-headed and vigorous guidance, the Company had been brought from bankruptcy to solvency, and its colony had become firmly established in the Caribbean. 5! Lorentz to Directors (May 8, 1695), C. B., 1690-1718. The Leera’ project was supported by the Brandenburgers, who expected to be able to agree with Leers better than with the Danish company. Schtick (I, 248, 249) discusses the matter, but is unable from the Brandenburg documents to explain why it was dropped. 82 Ibid (November 30, 1696), Gov. C. B., 1694-1700. 8 Christopher Heins. See above, p. 80. CHAPTER VI ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN AS PLANTATION COLONIES (1688-1788) Ir the importance of the history of the Danish islands in the West Indies is to be judged by the extent of the interests in- volved, or is to be measured by the actual influence of the is- lands upon the history of the Caribbean or on the state of Den- mark-Norway, the propriety of devoting an entire volume to them might well be questioned. But if a rather detailed study will disclose the rise of a fairly typical plantation society, if it will show on a small scale the sort of thing that took place in West Indian lands in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries on a large scale, such as the rise of the sugar industry and the slave trade, the effort need require no apology. For the islands reflected very distinctly the economic solidarity of the West In- dian community at a time when it was looked upon as one of the main sources of the world’s wealth. St. Thomas can scarcely be said to have assumed its place as a regular plantation colony until 1688, when the Company’s accounts first began to be kept in money instead of sugar. In that year the first census was taken, and although not a scien- tific affair, its results are not without interest.! This report showed that there were 90 plantations surveyed, and a total white planting population to record of just 148. These were distributed among eleven nationalities as follows: 66 Dutch, 31 English, 17 Danes and Norwegians, 17 French, 4 Irish, 4 Flem- ish, $ Germans, $ Swedes, and one each of Scotch, Brazilians, and Portuguese. Of the 76 adults listed, 56 are entered as plant- ers, 5 as carpenters, 2 as planters and merchants, and one each as minister (Lutheran), schoolmaster, fisher, captain on the 1 Land Lister for St. Thomas, 1688. The figures given in Hust, op. cit., 29, vary slightly from those given here. The report was signed by Franz Martens, who was a member of the council and a tavern keeper, Andreas Brock, who acted as secretary, and Sigmont Lick. (121) 122 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Company’s bark, tavern keeper, overseer, turner, planter and tailor, and planter and miller. In the village of Charlotte Amalia,? 87 persons were enumerated, of whom 21 were adults (12 men and 9 women), 11 were children, one was an indentured servant, and 4 were negroes. Of the adults, 8 were Dutch, 4 were Danish, $8 were English; there was one each of French, Spanish, and “high German” inhabitants, while the nationality of the remaining three was not recorded. The trades repre- sented in the village and the number in each were: tailor, 2; innkeeper, 1; seamstress, 1; shoemaker, 1; carpenter, 2; black- smith, 1; and cotton ginner, 1. Among the 21 adults were 10 Calvinists (Reformed), 7 Lutherans (distributed among high Germans, Danes, and Dutch), and 2 Catholics. The number of white men, women, and children in the island totalled 317, and the negroes 422, which latter figure includes one Carib Indian, three squaws, and three mulatto women. In the census taken three years later (1691), just when Thorméhlen’s proprietor- ship began, the information seems to have been gathered with greater precision, especially with regard to the plantations. The increase from 317 whites in 1688 to 399 in 1691 was no doubt partly due to the publication of the edict concerning the eight years’ exemption from taxes offered to new settlers, coupled with the outbreak of hostilities in Europe. The num- ber of negroes had risen at a rather more rapid rate, they num- bering 555, of whom 361 were put down as “capable,” which meant full-grown negroes capable of performing their full quota of work.® It must be borne in mind that despite the voluminous na- ture of the census records, they are not such as to permit the investigator to claim absolute accuracy for the figures drawn from them. They will, on the whole, give a reasonably ac- curate idea of the actual state of affairs in many respects; but with regard to the number of slaves, especially in the second decade of the next century and after, when St. Thomas has be- 2 Charlotte Amalia, the name which the port of St. Thomas still bears, was named in honor of the queen of Christian V, in whose time the town was founded. For present-day view of town, see photo facing p. 257. * One Indian squaw and four children are included in the list of negroes. 1% THE DANISH WEST INDIES sugar mill should be put up on Milan’s former plantation, and ventured the opinion that if sugar cane should prove successful on the Company’s plantations, it would prove more profitable than cotton or tobacco.’ The main reason for the Company’s having hitherto received so scant returns from its investment was explained by the fact that the older islands yielded more sugar than the newly settled. As the area devoted to sugar increased, the culture of tobacco decreased. There was always a good market for the latter in Denmark, however, and to- bacco from Porto Rico, Virginia, and other regions frequently found a place in the Company’s homeward-bound cargoes. Sugar and cotton remained the leading products during the period under discussion. The sugar cane was cut by the ne- groes with a sort of hatchet called kapmesser, and carried by them to the mill or “sugar works” with which the greater part of the plantations after 1700 were usually provided In 1606 Governor Lorentz reported seven sugar mills to be at work pro- ducing brown sugar, which was to be sent to Denmark by a ship expected from Copenhagen.” By 1715, the number of sugar plantations provided with mills had reached thirty-two out of a total of forty plantations devoted solely to sugar.""_ The motive power was furnished mainly by windmills, though these came gradually to be supplemented by treadmills turned by mule-power. Compared with modern methods the waste was of course tremendous. At least ten negroes were required to keep one such mill running; two, who were called “rollers,” feeding the cane stalks between the upright wooden cylinders, ported a successful trial in growing ginger. Heins to Directors (January 2, 1689), B. & D., 1688-89. 7 Resolutions of governor and council (February 19, 1689). The members of the council were Henry Irgens, Joachim Delicaet, John de Windt, and John Lorentz. * Heins to Directors (August 20, 1689). B. & D. 1688-89. 9 See Appendiz H., p. 318. * 10 Lorents to Directors (November 30, 1696), C. B., 1690-1714. " Land Lister for St. Thomas, 1715. For description of an eighteenth century sugar mill, see Oxholm, De danske vestindiske ders Tilstand . . ., pp. 44 ef seq., and J. C. Schmidt, Blandede Anmerkninger samlede paa og over Ejlandet St. Kroiz . . . (Samleren, 1788, 2 B). 126 THE DANISH WEST INDIES period of the War of the Spanish Succession. This was due to a variety of causes, both local and general. John Lorentz, with Juel and Moth, had done much to put the Brandenburg African Company out of the running. Quarrels within that company’s management had done the rest. The revival of the Danish company’s slave trade had bene- fited both it and the planters. The liberties allowed the latter in disposing of their plantation produce had helped to make them capitalists. This prosperity is indicated by the increase in the number of plantations laid out just after the opening of the new century. In the years 1692 to 1700 only fourteen new plantations were assigned to planters.'* These plantations had a total working force of seventy-nine slaves. By 1705 an addi- tional thirty-seven new plantations had been laid out, with a working force in that year of two hundred and eighty slaves. From 1691 to 1715, the total number of plantations had risen from one hundred and one to one hundred and sixty. It is the increase of negroes, both relatively and absolutely, that gives the most striking proof of the rapid development of St. Thomas as a plantation colony during these years. While the number of white men, women, and children increased only from three hundred and eight-nine to five hundred and forty-seven (1:1.4), thenumber of negro slaves increased from five hundred and fifty- five to three thousand and forty-two (1: 5.5), during the same in- terval (1691-1715). In other words, the number of slaves had risen nearly four times as fast as the number of whites. John Lorentz had laid the foundations of a fiscal system by which the inhabitants of the colony bore a proper share of the expenses of the civil government. These expenses were largely defrayed by a poll and a land or “ground” tax. The poll tax, which appears first to have been collected in the year 1692-1698, amounted to 214 rdl. for each planter and for each “capable” slave, and to 114 rdl. for the planter’s wife and for each of his adult children. For “manquerons,” or those unable to do a full 18 Land Lister for St. Thomas. The names of the planters as they appear in the records are: David Liron, Reynier Claever, Jean Cramy, Zent van Wundergem, Jan Arnout, Samson Burin, Mintje de Tooy, Jiirgen Hansen, Mathias Terling, Jtirgen Carstensen, Joris van Overschelde, Pieter de Windt. 128 THE DANISH WEST INDIES placing from four to six men there and encouraging them to begin planting,” but it was not until 1717 that the project was actually carried out. In November, 1716, Governor Erik Bredal wrote the directors that many of the St. Thomas in- habitants were inclined to go to settle St. John, but that they were held back solely by fear of the English, who were unwilling to let any nation go there to cut down the timber. On the twenty-fifth of the following March, the governor had a vessel loaded with guns and ammunition, and with provisions from a ship that had recently brought in a cargo of flour, meat, etc., to take him to St. John with twenty planters, sixteen negroes, and five soldiers. ‘*T have planted there the flag of our most gracious king, and fired a salute,” wrote the governor, “and then we feasted, and drank the health, first of our sovereign, and then of the Com- EH pany. Later, I selected a place on which to build a fort, a con- venient location which commands the inlet to the harbor as well as the harbor itself, and a level space beneath it on which a village can stand. The harbor is quite secure, and when a person is within it . . . he sees land all about him. I have permitted the planters to indicate which pieces of land they preferred, and have selected a place for the Company’s plantation just a cannon-shot distant from the fort (which is to be built there). Later the planters have returned because of their fear of the English and are simply waiting cautiously to see what the latter will attempt... .” 17 Directors’ instructions to Esmit (November 9, 1687). A. E., 1689-89. 38 Bredal and Council to Directors (November 24, 1716), B. & D., 1717-20. In a letter dated July 28, 1715, Governor Crone and council informed the directors that John Henry Sieben had recently proposed, on behalf of himself and fifteen other planters from St. Thomas, to begin the occupation and cultivation of St. John. B. & D., 1714-17. 1 Bredal to Directors (May 8, 1718), B. & D., 1717-80. “‘ Thi de frygter for ds Engelske og sidder ikkun og lurer paa, head de ville tentere.”” 180 THE DANISH WEST INDIES needed.” By 1720-1721, thirty-nine planters had received deeds to plantations on St. John.” The early inhabitants came entirely from St. Thomas and were equally varied in their nationality. Nine of these were Danes, five were French Huguenot refugees or of refugee stock, and nearly all the rest were Dutch. Their coming was prompted by a variety of motives. Some had sunk hopelessly into debt on St. Thomas, others had had badly located plantations there, while many of them naturally expected to improve their previous state. Their plantations were nearly fifty per cent. larger than those on St. Thomas, their average width being one thousand five hundred and fifty-six feet. The number of negroes held at this early period cannot be ascertained, but within a decade of the actual settlement,—namely in 1728—there were one hun- dred and twenty-three whites to six hundred and seventy-seven blacks (1: 5.5), while in 1788, the year of the first serious slave insurrection, the whites numbered two hundred and eight, and the slaves one thousand and eighty-seven, a slightly higher ratio of white inhabitants (1: 5.2). Although the number of plantations was increased only twenty-five per cent. in those five years, the number of negroes on them increased sixty per cent. Nevertheless in 1788 St. John had but ten negroes on the average to each plantation, to St. Thomas’s twenty-five. The Company went into the plantation business on its own account early in its career. The encouragement that it was ex- pected to give to plantation life on St. Thomas undoubtedly accounts in large part for the willingness of the Company’s di- rectors to permit the Brandenburgers to establish a factory 33 Conditioner tilstaaed St. Jans Indeaanere (March %, 1718). Ibid. See Appendiz H., p. 407. 35 Governor Frederick Moth wrote to the Directors early in 1726: “St. John is now entirely settled, [so] that there is no more land left to give away except at the Fort, and the Company’s plantation, which is still lying idle, as it is not yet surveyed. ... Next year the greater number of the St. John inhabitants are to begin paying the poll and land tax. There are already about 20 sugar works built, and others in process of building, so that I calculate that St. John will produce 600,000 to 800,000 pounds of sugar, besides [some] cotton, on [all of] which customs duties must be paid. . . .” Moth to Directors (March 6, 1726), B. & D., 1785-87. 182 THE DANISH WEST INDIES figures for 1705. At this time, when the island was prepared to reap the advantages of Danish neutrality, the number of negroes had jumped to 251, their inventory value to 13,441 rdl. (58.7 rdl. each), while the three plantations were entered on the books at 6,289, 3,141, and 905 rdl. respectively. Although the second had fallen eight per cent. in value, the first had in- creased seventy-two and one-half per cent. and the third sixty- nine per cent. over its inventory value in 1698. After 1715 the value of the plantation as recorded in the books remains stationary, while the number of the negroes gradually decreases from two hundred thirty-eight in 1716 to one hundred ninety- six in 1726.77 The following table, while based upon a careful examination of the Company’s books, is not presented as giving an absolutely dependable picture of the plantations as dividend-paying propo- sitions. It is never quite certain that accounts have not been “doctored” for emergencies, or that the intricacies of the elaborate bookkeeping of two centuries ago have been con- pletely solved. In fact the officials themselves were at times hopelessly tangled in the meshes of their own system. THE COMPANY'S PLANTATIONS ON ST. THOMAS M Abbreviations: 1 5. Company's “Sugar Plantation”; N. Q., ‘“‘ New Quarter Plantation”; Year 1690 1691 1683 1698 1700 170 1702 =: 1703 1704 Total negroes.. 122.. 158.. 193.. 178.. 180.. 176.. 177.. (69) .... Value of ne- see eee 10,957. . 14,038. .16,144.. 9,043.. 9,504.. 9,380.. 9,500.. 4,019.. Value of 8. Pl.. 4,572.. 4,743.. 7,122.. 3,651.. 3,654.. 3,638.. 4,155.. 5,415. . Value of N.Q.. 2,318.. 3,300.. 6,871.. 3,414.. 3,763.. 3,763.. 3,679.. 2,081.. ValueofM.B. 457... 457.. 1,112.. 536.. 536.. 536.. 536.. 380. Total _invest- ment....... 18,424. .22,538. .30,749 ® 16,644. .17,457. .17,317. .17,870. .12,795. . Proceeds from 8. PL....... 1,137.. 2,026.. 2,514.. 2,041.. 2,422.. 807.. 2,260.. 2,219. .2,849 | 28 Proceeds from N.Q........ 410.. 3,486.. 2,851.. 1,441.. 1,337.. 720.. 936.. 360..1,663 Proceeds from M.B....... 248.. 645.. 268..——.. 135.. 134.. 155..[-472].. 464 Total..... 1,795.. 6,157.. 5,133.. 4,882.. 3,704.. 1,661.. 3,351.. 2,116. .4,976 Per cent. profit oninvestment 9.7.. 27.2.. 16.7.. 26.38 21.6.. 9.6.. 19.1.. 17. .26(%) Cf. Appendiz H., p. $18. L. L., St. Th. 28 The figures given for 1708 cover the period from June 9, 1702, to Decem- ber. $1, 1708. All money values are given in rdl. * This includes only the sound or “capable” slaves. » The high values for 1698 apparently have some connection with Thor méhlen’s contract which was discontinued in 1694. 31 This percentage covers 1)4 years (August 8, 1698, to February 8 1700). 184 THE DANISH WEST INDIES were stored in the Company’s warehouses until one of its ships arrived from Copenhagen or the Guinea coast. If the directors were not certain of a cargo they would leave it to the Guinea slave-ship captain to take whatever cargo was on hand back with him to Denmark. As long as the company had only St. Thomas and St. John, it was rarely necessary to employ more than two ships a year to empty the St. Thomas magazine, and frequently a single vessel was ample. The difficulties that the local factor often met when he tried to force the planters to sell their produce to the Company at a fixed price, will be dealt with in a later chapter. Europe-bound ships usually took dye woods (pockwood, fustic, Campeachy wood, etc.) on board for ballast. Sometimes a schooner was sent over to Porto Rico for hides or tobacco if interloping trade at St. Thomas had been dull. A few illustrations will serve to show the character of the trade, and give some indication as to its extent. The Frederick the Fourth, under Captain Peter Andersen Weerde, left St. Thomas on April 6, 1706, with the following cargo, secured at the prices indicated,* quoted in rixdollars, ‘“ Mark” and “Skill- ing.” Rd. M. Sk 9,112 lbs. Campeachy wood at 2 rdl. per 100 182 1 6 7,507 “ stock fish (dried cod) at 2 rdl. per 100 10 - 4,484 “ fustic . 67 s — 88,867 “ Brazil wood 529 $s _- 360,005 ‘‘ [brown] sugar at $}4 rd. per 100 12,600 1 — 11,672 “ white sugar at [price not given] 620 1 - 29,137 “‘ cotton at 12 sk. per Ib. $8,642 - i 6,789 “ cacao . 914 2 _ 1,42 “tobacco “4 5 10 129 “‘ indigo at 1 rdl. per lb. 129 - = 89 “ caret (sea turtle) 69 $s il staves for barrels and casks 180 2 nails $2 - - provisions beyond those needed 167 s — 19,829 Rdl. 4 M.— In the following year, Peter Smith, the wealthy Dutch mer- 38 N. J. for St. Th., 1705-08 (April 6, 1706). 186 THE DANISH WEST INDIES ’ The foreign ports to which the West Indian cargoes were re- shipped were mainly in the Baltic region, and included Ltibeck, Danzig, Stettin, Kénigsberg, on the South Baltic, Stockholm and Gotenborg in Sweden, and (beginning with 1750) St. Peters- burg in Russia, and Amsterdam in Holland. Among local towns to which West Indian products were distributed were Kiel, Flensborg, and Aabenraa in the duchies; Elsinore, Nyborg, Slagelse, Odense, and Aalborg in Denmark proper; and Bergen, Christiania, Trondhjem and Fredrikshald in Norway.” According to the list of shipments from Copenhagen to foreign and domestic points which is contained in the Company’s “Udskibnings og Passeer Sedlers Copie-Bog, 1709-1754,” no sugar and little cotton were shipped out of Copenhagen from 1712 to 1720, inclusive. From 1721 to 1738, when St. Croix was purchased, the shipments to foreign ports were more than twenty times those to domestic ports. During the period from 1729 to 1749, sugar was exported but a single year *! to a foreign port. It was in September, 1729, that the Company began re- fining its own sugar,“ and this fact, combined with the king’s edict of July 4, 1788, requiring privately owned refineries to use only the sugar that came from the West Indian colonies as long as the supply held out, will explain the falling off in exports. The purchase by the Company in 1787 of the two principal refineries, those owned by the Pelt and Weyse families, gave the Company a monopoly of the refining business,“ and made it possible for it to absorb most of its own sugar.* © Udekibnings og Passcer Sedlere-Copie-Bog, 1709-1754, passim. “1 In 1741, 11,448 Ibs. of sugar were sent to Stockholm. Jbid. «2 Mariager MS., 180. The Company had been granted the privilege of put- ting up a refinery, by the king on April 17, 1721. Vest. Reg., 1699-1746. *? Mariager MS., 149. 44 See table showing exports to domestic and foreign places in Appendiz L, pp. 328-831. 188 THE DANISH WEST INDIES particularly Barbados, in the first half of the seventeenth cen- tury, and Jamaica in the second half, led the English to begin exporting slaves to their own American possessions. It is worth noticing that the English slave trade began in earnest about 1640, just when a Dutchman is said to have introduced the art of sugar making to the English colony of Barbados.* The es- tablishment in 1672 of the Royal African Company of England has been previously noted. This company was enjoying its greatest prosperity during those years when the Danish West India and Guinea Company was attempting in the face of tre- mendous obstacles to secure a permanent foothold for its col- ony at St. Thomas.‘ A trade that had had the sanctity of century-long custom was little disturbed by the conscientious scruples of reformers. There was no one to plead the rights of the negro as Las Casas had championed those of the Indian. The few timid voices that had dared to raise themselves on the negroes’ behalf be- fore 1700 were scarcely heard in the din of the struggles for commercial supremacy and exploitation.5 Once the sugar planting had been well begun, the demand for suitable labor would become insistent. To the seventeenth-century planter there was but one course to pursue. Over on the Guinea coast, in a latitude but slightly lower, was an unlimited supply of la- borers, many of them already accustomed to servitude, who readily adapted themselves to the conditions of plantation life. The problem of the day, so far as the planters and the adminis- trators interested in plantations were concerned, was simply one of method,—how best to bring these laborers where they were needed. The attempt of individuals to solve this problem led to interloping, an art in which the Dutch were preéminent; while the attempt of merchant-statesmen led to the formation of companies under state or royal patronage. § Lucas, III, 80, 81. ‘The average annual dividend declared between 1676 and 1688 amounted roughly to eight per cent. annually, reaching as high as twenty-two per cent. during the first two years. See Beer, The Old Colonial System, 1660-1688, I, 848. 5 Beer (I, $22) cites an anonymous pamphlet published in 1684 and a protest against the slave trade by the Pennsylvania Quakers in 1688. 140 THE DANISH WEST INDIES A single illustration will serve to indicate the nature of the slave market at the Guinea factory from the solely commercial point of view. To those who were in the trade, it was purely a business matter. The Hope Galley under Captain Lawrence Span arrived at Christiansborg castle on December 15, 1726, with a cargo, not counting the brandy, of 16,185 rdi. A fort- night later when the New Year’s stocktaking took place, the Company was credited on its Guinea books with fifty men slaves valued at 84 rdl., twenty-five women at 48 rdl., three boys at 50 rdl., and four girls at $6 rdl. each. This appears to have been the Company’s wholesale purchase price. The actual cargo taken on board on March 6 included 238 souls, indicating a brisk business in the opening months of the year. The invoice of the departing ship shows the following cargo and values: one hundred and forty-seven men at 88, seventy women at 56, eleven boys at 56, and ten girls at 40 rdl., making a total value of 17,872 rdl® If the discrepancy in the prices of adult male and female slaves as shown in the above invoice was general, it might appear that the mortality among the women in the cargo was higher than among the men, for in the St. Thomas market women sold for nearly or just as high a price as the men, but there is no direct evidence to show that such was the case. The horrors of the “middle passage” have been frequently painted in most lurid colors. Indeed, at its worst it would be difficult to exaggerate the picture of misery presented by a re- turning slaver. Naturally, it was to the captain’s as well as the Company’s interest to bring as large a part of his cargo safely to the other side as possible. But where the captain’s reward depended on the number brought over, or where the officers could bring over slaves on their own account, the temp- tation to overcrowd the vessel was very great. In case of stormy weather, when the hatches had to be closed down, the air in the crowded hold became s0 stifling as to suffocate many. Good water was often difficult to obtain, and bad water, as well Three Points, and between Ziode Wolta (river Volta?) and Hardra, as these were usually better than the Loanga or Angola slaves. Martfeldt MSS., V1; Secret-Raadets Breve, 1783-$9. *N. J. for Guinea; N. J. for St. Th. (1727). See Appendiz J., pp. 820-926. 142 THE DANISH WEST INDIES he took over the Guinea trade in 1689, the directors required the lessee to keep a minister on board the slave ships and at the Guinea factory.” It is nevertheless to be feared that the zeal of the trader met with greater rewards from the authorities than that of the priest. There is good reason to suppose that the extent of the slave trade must have standardized its processes, so that there was little difference in the treatment of negroes along the various parts of the Guinea coast. The Dutch probably got their car- goes across the ocean with the least loss of life. The Branden- burg officials at the Gross-Friedrichsberg factory were largely Dutch, and what happened there may be considered typical for the coast. A surgeon of the African Company gives in his journal a vivid description of what he saw up to the time that the slave-ship was ready to sail. The surgeon, who began his service there in December, 1692, wrote as follows: !! **As soon as a sufficient number of these unhappy victims were collected, they were examined by me, the healthy and strong ones were bought, while those who lacked as much as a finger or a nail or were in any way defective—called Magrones '* —were returned. ‘The slaves that were taken were made to kneel, twenty or thirty at a time; the right shoulder was greased with palm-oil, and it was branded in the middle with an iron that bore the initials C_—AB—C. (churfirstlich afrikanisch-brandenburgische Compagnie); then they were strictly guarded in the lodgings provided for them. Where a band of fifty or sixty slaves had “been secured, they were coupled together in twos or threes and driven to the coast under escort. It was my duty to watch over the transport, for which purpose I was carried in the rear in a hammock, so that I could see the entire column. Once the coast was reached, a prearranged signal brought the ship’s boats ashore to bring their black cargo on board. Some of these un- fortunates followed their leaders weakly and unresistingly, even 1 Vest. Reg., 1671-99, fol. 166, 16 (July 27, 1689). 11 Surgeon Johann Peter Oettinger’s Journal (quoted in Schtick, I, $81 et seg.). 18 Probably a corruption of “manquerons,” a term applied in the West Indies to negroes who were below standard. 144 THE DANISH WEST INDIES negroes secured. Certain parts of the coast had a bad reputa- tion as sources of slave supply, for their negroes were liable to grow violently mutinous when threatened with bondage. Such, for example, were the E] Mina negroes from the Dutch part of the coast. The percentage of loss on the Guinea-West Indian slave- ships varied from ten to about fifty-five per cent. of those taken on, so far as the limited number of available statistics shows.'* The scenes that ensued when the prospective buyers boarded an incoming slave-ship were frequently well-nigh riotous and frightened the poor blacks, who had little or no idea of what awaited them, almost to death. The white men would make a wild dash for the negroes that they intended to buy, and sep- arate them from the main group by way of securing first right to purchase. Sometimes the cargo would be taken on shore, kept under guard, and sold in small lots until entirely disposed of. The eagerness with which the directors of the Company took up the slave trade as a means of increasing the shareholders’ profits, and the tenacity with which they clung to their monop- oly of the trade once they had begun it, emphasize the impor- tance ascribed to this traffic by the moneyed interests of the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. It was not until the governorship of John Lorentz, whén St. Thomas begins to be administered as a normal, well-ordered colony, that the directors were able to carry out any plan for direct participation in the slave trade with ships owned by the Company; and it was not until 1738, after the Company had suffered a number of severe losses at sea, and about the time it began negotiations for the purchase of St. Croix from France, that it was ready to let the slave trade fall back into private hands. This experience of over a third of a century, during which the Danish West India and Guinea Company attempted to supply slaves to its own colony, and also to make St. Thomas a depot for the supply of slaves to the neighboring lands, needs to be explained in some detail. ‘6 These percentages are drawn from the figures of ships sailing in 1608, 1690, 1700, 1707, 1714, and 17838. THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH WEST INDIES 145 It was the profits made by the Brandenburg African Company in some of its early Guinea voyages that brought home to the observant governor Lorentz the possibilities of the slave trade as a source of revenue for the Danish company. Two Branden- burg slave-ships * that arrived in St. Thomas in November, 1696, before the peace at Ryswick had been concluded, and hence while Louis XIV was still at war against the league of opposing states, brought to St. Thomas more than one thousand one hundred pieces of human freight. One of the Brandenburg captains whose cargo contained four hundred and eighty slaves remarked to the governor that if he had had more room on board he could have made as fine a bargain in slaves as he could ever desire.” The other captain confided to the governor the opinion that the Danish forts on the Guinea coast afforded excellent prospects for the slave trade. These successful ven- tures and the information he received from the captains led the Danish governor to express to the directors the hope that the Company would take up the Guinea trade, “since all other trade is as nothing compared with this slave trade.” If the directors would only make a beginning with a few hundred Guinea slaves, urged Lorentz, they would not find it a bad ven- ture, but “the first experience would give them such joy, that the slave trade would hold its place before all other sorts of commerce, and the Company would feel itself impelled to con- tinue it.” * The governor’s enthusiasm was not lost on the di- rectors, who had great faith in their representative at St. Thomas and were especially anxious to get the Company to the point where it could pay dividends and thus regain the confidence of the investing public. Nicholas Arff, the Guinea lessee, had, as we have seen, per- Frederick III under Capt. Jacob Lambrecht with six hundred and thirty, and the Electoral Princess under Capt. Wouter Ypes with four hundred and eighty slaves. 47 Lorents to Directors (November 80, 1696), C. B., 1690-1718. %8 Ibid. The French were also becoming increasingly active in the Guinea trade during the interval preceding the outbreak of the War of the Spanish Succession. On July 9, 1701, Louis XIV issued an arrét granting to a new Guinea company certain rights that had been held by a former one. Scelle, Le traite negrisre, Tl, 687. 146 THE DANISH WEST INDIES mitted his lease to expire because of serious and unforeseen losses brought about by the European war. Just at the time that the Ryswick negotiations were being concluded, the Danish West India and Guinea Company was being reorganized under a new charter which bore the date of September 28, 1697. New conditions demanded a corresponding readjustment. Baron Jens Juel and Mathias Moth, who had so faithfully backed the governor in his endeavor to stifle the Brandenburg African Company’s activities at St. Thomas, were retained as directors.” The Company’s total capital, including a ten per cent. assess- ment made in 1695 in order to secure capital to send a ship to St. Thomas for a cargo,” was just 84,888 rdl.,2 marks. On this investment the shareholders had received no other returns than the three or four per cent. yielded by the Thormdhlen lease. It was not until late in 1697 or early in 1698 that the directors decided to send a ship and cargo to Guinea and the West Indies. Finding themselves unable to secure a large enough sum from the stockholders, the directors turned to a wealthy merchant, one Jacob Lerke, who contributed half of the funds necessary for the new venture. The result was the voyage of the Copen- hagen Bourse to the Guinea coast under joint auspices. But this initial venture fell below expectations, for out of the five hundred and six slaves taken on at Christiansborg and along the Guinea coast, only two hundred and fifty-nine were delivered at St. Thomas in September, 1698, and thirty-seven of these died shortly after landing. A mutiny had broken out on board, in the course of which many had been killed or had jumped overboard. To cap this misfortune scurvy had helped to reduce the numbers to scarcely more than half of the original cargo.*! The surviving slaves were sold at 85 rdl. each, which appears to have been three times their cost price in Guinea.?? The excellent state of the West Indian market as compared with the low prices prevailing 1 Mariager MS., 108. ® The Company had resumed its administration after the Thormdhlen fiasco late in 1694, On March 7, 1702, Matthias Moth made a clear and fairly detailed résumé of the Company’s activities in Guinea and the West Indies since 1695. See Comp. Prot., 1697-1734. *1 Lorentz to Directors (October 12, 1698), Gov. C. B., 1694-1700. 33 See Appendiz J, pp. 320-S26. 148 THE DANISH WEST INDIES When the report spread through the islands that the Danish governor was expecting a slave-ship to arrive, a Jamaica trader sent word to St. Thomas that he would like to invest 30,000 rdl. in slaves if the governor would guarantee their delivery at a certain time.” This the latter was unable to do, so that when the expected slave cargo did arrive he had to employ a local merchant to take the surplus slaves to Hispaniola and the sur- rounding islands.” A very considerable share of the negroes sold at St. Thomas were brought in by interlopers.” Unless its treasury happened to be empty, the Company rarely permitted planters to buy directly from the slave captain, and never allowed slaves to be landed without charging an import duty,—usually four per cent. This duty or “recognition” was as a rule paid in natura, which in a cargo of men, women, and children of assorted sizes often required some ingenious calculations. The selling price varied from twenty-five to one hundred per cent. above the cost or wholesale price, according to market conditions. In one of the agreements with the Brandenburgers it was stipulated that either party might share with the other in the purchase of interlopers’ cargoes. After the coronation of Frederick I as king in Prussia in 1701 the Brandenburg African Company was left to its own fate, and practically its sole activity until its discontinuance in the reign of Frederick William I consisted of such occasional purchases as those referred to, and of pro- testing if its rights appeared to have been transgressed or ignored. The distribution of slaves to other islands was usually done by traders from those islands. The keen trader, hearing of the approaching arrival of a cargo from Guinea would hasten to St. Thomas, if business conditions would warrant it, and wait there for weeks in order to get the first chance at buying a sion of the buccaneers, Jamaica in particular progressed rapidly in its plantation life. Lorentz to Directors (January 22, 1698), C. B. 1694-1700; W. RB. Scott, Joint-Stock Companies to 1720 (8 v., Cambridge, 1910-1912), II, 28. % Lorentz to Directors (January 22, 1698), C. B., 1694-1700. » In this way Peter Smith took a batch of forty-four negroes off on his bark, on condition of receiving half the profits. % Appendix J. THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH WEST INDIES 149 slave cargo. The local St. Thomas traders frequently bought considerable numbers of negroes for customers in other islands. Some good-sized fortunes were built up at St. Thomas during the War of the Spanish Succession in just this way. The following summary taken from the Company’s journals kept at the St. Thomas factory indicates how the Company disposed of one entire cargo. On July 8, 1710, a Zeeland ‘nter- loper, Captain David Diniesen, sold the following slaves to the Danish company: 26 women = 26 11 “2/8 boys” = 71/8 90 “1/8 boys” = 10 2“1/8boys” = 2/8 200 head = 181 5/6 Pies de Indies at 65 rdl, = 11,819 rdl., 1 mark. RECEIPTS (in the order of purchase) Ral, Ral. Dete Number Price each Total} Date Number Price each Total July 10 . 2 *°1/2 boys” 50 100\July 12 men 300 1“1/2 ” 2 **2/3 boys” 85 170 1°°1/2 girl” 50 9 men 900 11/2 boy” 68 1 girl” "3 1°1/2 ” 60) 1 ‘ia girl” 85 1 “1/2 boy” 60) 3 men 100 300 8“1/2 boys” 60 480) 2 women 100 200 1 “1/2 boy” 40) 24 men 100 2400 1“1/2 boy, 60 3 women 100 300 1“1/2 ial 60) 11/3 boy” 33 1/3 2 as ” 90 180 1 “1/2 boy” 45 12/3 boy,, 100) 5 men 100 1 “3/3 girl” ROlJuly 14 1 man 100 21/2 "60 120|July 26 8 men 100 800 1“H2 & ” 60 2 women 100 4°2/3 boys” 75 300 37 men 100 3700 1 “1/2 boy” 60 4 women 100 400 1“ 1/2 boy” 60jAug. 14 20 men 100 2000 4 men 100 9 men 100 900 1 woman 100 omen 800 4 men 100 400/Sept. 19 1 “2/3 boy” 80 Totals...... 187 head 14,443 1/2 rd. tErovissous from July 10 to August 31... .140 rdl., 1 mark. een July 10 to November 8, 7 negro men died and were debited on the books at 665 rdl. No. ing we negroes sold dying belare sale 19.. 187 o 6 oo 150 . THE DANISH WEST INDIES Total receipte from negro sales......... 0... e cece ee ete eee 14,443 1/3 rdl. Total cost of wettiininnnststpesssesesessssesssrs ga gages 11,950 1/6 Food. 2.2" 76 11,959 1/6. ———_—__—_ Net profit. 0.0.0.0. ..cccc cece ce ceeececeseseeeecueeees 2,484 1/6 rd. 2,484'/, -+- 11,959'/, = 207/10, the percentage of net profit on the cargo, according to the books, exclusive of current ex- penses. It will be noticed that the cargo was sold mainly in small lots, that the Pies de Indies had no definite relation to the price except in the case of the full-grown negroes, and that the cargo was practically disposed of within five weeks. The larger lots were sold mainly to government officials who knew the intrica- cies of the business and were often able to take advantage of the situation to their own profit.”? The prices of slaves, wholesale and retail, during the War of the Spanish Succession afford a good trade barometer for St. Thomas. Denmark was neutral, and in a better position than in the previous war to reap the advantages of neutrality. From 45 and 80 rdl. in 1702, the wholesale and retail prices respectively rose by 1704 to 60 and 100 rdi. and three years later to 80 and 100 rdl. The highest point seems to have been reached in 1714, when slaves sold at St. Thomas for 120 rdl. each. This price is excelled in 1722 by a cargo that brought 125 rdl. per head. Business conditions at St. Thomas, which were evidently stimulated by Denmark-Norway’s neutral position during the Spanish Succession War, suffered a slump after its close. Not until the end of the Northern War (the treaty of Nystadt was concluded between Sweden and Russia in 1721) when Sweden had been reduced to a second-rate power, do commercial condi- tions in the Danish islands, as evidenced by the state of the slave trade, begin to show improvement. During the years preceding the conclusion of peace with Denmark (1720) the St. Thomas government prepared itself more than once to resist a rumored Swedish attack.*? The depredations of pirates, re- 31 See below, p. 191. 8 Udtog af Secret-Raads Prot., 1710-20 (August 5, 1715; June 2@, 1716). Martfedt MSS., Vol. VI. ‘ ‘THE SLAVE TRADE IN THE DANISH WEST INDIES _ 151 viving difficulties with the Spanish neighbors of St. Thomas, complications with the English in the Leeward Islands because of Danish occupation of St. John, and the peculations of its local officials, combined to make the position of the Danish company and its colonists extremely uncertain. Besides, this was a period of hard times when the St. Thomas government supplied the lack of coin by issues of paper money. In attempt- ing to account for the business depression the St. Thomas au- thorities were inclined to place the emphasis upon the ruin of the formerly lucrative trade with Spanish America.”* The planters on the other hand were convinced that the Company’s officials at St. Thomas and those directing the Company’s policy were responsible for the changed conditions.** Certain it is that the loss of the principal foreign market and the disappearance of hard cash were bound to affect all forms of business and partic- ularly the slave trade, which was very difficult to carry on except on a cash basis, and which required considerable sums for its successful prosecution. To be forced to wait until crops matured and then to find themselves face to face with a variety of petty local restrictions, was the prospect that awaited the traders who attempted to carry on business at St. Thomas on a barter basis. The Danish West India and Guinea Company seems rarely if ever to have had more than two ships at a time on the Copen- hagen-Guinea-West India run. Dutch interlopers furnished far greater numbers of slaves for the St. Thomas market than the Danish Company.** In view of the expertness and daring of the ubiquitous Dutch trader it was not necessary to invest much of the Company’s capital in slave-ships except when the Dutch slavers failed to appear. As a rule the St. Thomas au- thorities had only to await the arrival of a cargo which they could accept or refuse as they saw fit according to the condition of the slaves and the state of the market. During the years from 1697 to 1738,—that is, from the time 33 Governor and Council to Directors (August 10, 1714), B. & D., 1714-17. ™ The commission sent over by St. Thomas planters in 1715 in order to bring about certain changes in policy is dealt with in Chapter IX. % See Appendiz J. 152 THE DANISH WEST INDIES the Company began the Guinea-West India trade on its own account until the directors voted for its discontinuance,—the Company lost not fewer than eight ships. The greater number of these were employed in the Guinea as well as in the West India carrying trade. The total number owned by the Company at one time or another in this period amounted only to twenty.* The following résumé of the losses will show their approximate extent: The Guldenlew, intended for the Copenhagen-St. Thomas run, was lost at Lessde, off the Norwegian coast, on Novem- ber 20, 1702. The Cronprincen (the Crown Prince) was lost at Isle de Prince in the Guinea gulf on May 81, 1706, through the explosion of its powder magazine while en route from Guinea to St. Thomas. Only five on board were saved of whom three eventually reached Denmark. The Christian V and Frederick IV left Guinea on May 29, 1709, with a rich cargo of gold and slaves. Both of them missed St. Thomas and were wrecked in the Bay of Honduras on March 7, 1710. The Spaniards confiscated their cargoes and brought them to Porto Bello. The Christiansfort, while on its way to Copenhagen from Bergen where it had been forced to winter, was lost with its West Indian cargo at Héje Weerde March 2-8, 1713. The Jomfru Alette was captured on October $1, 1717, by a Swedish privateer, while on its way from Norway to Copenhagen with a West India cargo. The Salvator Mundt was wrecked, August 15, 1729, on Anegada reef near Virgin Gorda while en route from St. Thomas to Copenhagen with a return cargo. The Christiansborg was wrecked in the Cattegat on its return from St. Thomas on September 17, 1780. During the decade preceding the purchase of St. Croix (1788) the policy to be pursued with regard to the slave trade was an all absorbing question at the meetings of the stockholders. In their instructions of November 16, 1723, the directors had specifically sought to encourage private traders to sell their © Vest. Reg., 1699-1746; Mariager MS., 110 ot seq. THEE SLaue Yeeee 1% YEE DANISH WEST INDIFS 158 slaves af the St. Whee: fectory.™ Four years later Frederick Holansted whe lend beem eouployed as bookkeeper in the Com- pany’s Cepesingen office for about twenty years advised the darectess agemet the Company's active participation in the slave trade, but is advice was not heeded. From 1728 to 17531, inclastve, the Cammpany made a vigorous attempt to revive ilx Gutnes-West Indian commerce. At least three new ships were pet isto active commision, and about 200,000 rdl. according to Holmsted’s account were sunk in the venture, but with no prospect of the Company's being able to pay interest on more than half of that sum. When the directors and chief stock holders met m February, 1734, there ensued a heated debate as to whether or not the Company should continuo the trade In this discassion there seems to have been no mention of humanitarian or religious arguments, the sole question being one of dividends. The news of the arrival of the Jaurhury Galley at St. Thomas with only two hundreid forty. two of her original cargo of four hundred forty-threo slaves ™ wan ined with telling effect by those who opposed the continued partlei pation of the Company in the slave trade. ‘These opposition leaders included three directors ® and three “chief sharchold ers”’ ® (Hovedparticipanter). In the written argument drawn up by these men is included the following estimate of moneyn ox pended and received in connection with the Jaarburg Galley, which statement they assert to be a “proper and true rela. tion” of how matters really stood.*! The ship Learburg Galley has cost................0555 7H rl 4 ab. Repairs and equipment... .............0.. cc cece eens 12,881 .u' Cargo . . . and insurance on slaves.................. 81,000 “ a “is" Interest om sip and oquipment from date of sailing to return, and of cargo . . . at only 6 per cent......... 3o22 “3 “ Total cost of expedition................. 55,554 rdl. 1 m. ® Holmsted's “ Deduction” (February 4, 1734), Co. Prob., 1697-1734. Cf. also Hist 64 et seg. ™ B. & D., 1788-34 (May 8, 1783). ® Blome, Holmsted, Klauman. * C. A. von Plessen, Dose, Kreyer. “! Deduction og Voto (February 25, 1734), Comp. Prot., 1697-173§. 154 THE DANISH WEST INDIES On the other hand, there should be deducted for deteriora- Profit on gold and other goods. . .3,157 rdl. 4 m. 10 sk. Freight which ship should earn from St. Thomas hither. ...... 4,110 “2“ 6“ 7,268 “ lm. 12,268 rdl. 1 m. Delivered to Fort Christians- borg surplus of various goods from the ship, which with usual 10 per cent. advance for freight amounts to.......... 14,281 rdl. 4 m. 14 ak On the other hand, the ship has taken slaves, etc., at the fort | Cr 3,976 “ Leaving. ..............0005 10,805 rdl. 4 m. 14 sk. An order (Assignation) for which is to be redeemed at Cape Coast. ......0 00. cecccecceeeeeeeseeeeeues 1,608 “ $“ Slaves on St. Thomas have been sold for goods, in part for 50 per cent. above the cash price.............. 26,658 “ 3“ 6% To balance account. ...........--0ceeee eee 16 “ 8 “ Total......... 50,857 rdl. 8 sk. The advocates of Company participation in the slave trade had used figures based on the Laarburg Galley’s last voyage as an argument in support of their views. “‘ According to the figures we have quoted,” ran in effect the arguments of the opponents of slave-trade under the Company, “‘there is a loss, up to the time of the ship’s return, of but (sic) 4,697 rdl., 4 sk. on this voyage, which with one exception is the most fortunate of twenty voyages which have been undertaken. It must at best be called a bad business, when so considerable a capital as over 50,000 rdl. must be furnished and is expected to yield interest while it is being risked in the waters of three continents, and, after all that, is still unable to make a better showing to the stockholders.” The victory of the opposition was decisive. In the final vote eighty-five out of a possible one hundred and thirty-four votes were registered against the Company’s continuing in the - 186 THE DANISH WEST INDIES labor problem as it appeared to the merchants and statesmen who were called upon to solve it was merely one of method; for African slaves remained in the eighteenth, as they had been in the seventeenth, century “the strength and sinews of this western world.” They were indeed the chief agency that fur- nished the wealth, for the control of which European nations were willing to throw down the gage of conflict and usher in titanic wars. In fact, no small part of those resources which were dissolved in the smoke of eighteenth-century European battlefields was extracted from fertile West Indian plantations of cotton and cane by the sweat of the negro’s brow. CHAPTER VIII THE SLAVE AND THE PLANTER Few indeed are the negroes in America who are able to tell from what part of Africa their ancestors came or to what tribe they belonged. Though they have every “prospect of pos- terity” the sources by which they might develop a “pride of ancestry” are. shrouded in impenetrable mystery. Which of his forbears came from Calabar or Loango, from the El Mina tribe or from Madagascar, it would be next to impossible for any negro to tell, and the problem would certainly tax the in- genuity of the most skilful genealogist. Yet the black popula- tion was as varied in its way as the white. Besides the brand of the importing company and the owner there might be found on the imported negroes ' in any plantation colony the tattoo marks and slashings that were peculiar to tribes of many differ- ent characters, scattered along the African coast from Senegal to Loango. These imported negroes were drawn from all sta- tions of life in their native land. Their numbers embraced rich and poor, haughty chiefs and humble retainers. Not in- frequently had a chief been forced to sell some of his own numer- ous wives that he might keep his contract with a punctilious trader.? A negro who had been accustomed to rule in his na- tive land was not unlikely to prefer death to bondage. If he was landed alive he might be expected to make trouble for his owner by running away or by stirring up rebellion among his fellows. Freshly imported slaves were distributed among the older and the native-born slaves in order that the problem of adjustment to the new condition of servitude might be ren- dered less acute. But the period of “apprenticeship,” during which the raw laborer had to be broken in to the routine of his task, must always have been trying both for slave and owner. 1 Called Bosal negroes by the Danes and Dutch. 2 Oldendorp, Udiog . . . (Kjtbenhavn, 1784), Part 1, p. 179. 187} 158 THE DANISH WEST INDIES The status of the negro was not fixed by any single “black code,” but was determined by a series of laws passed by the colonial authorities from time to time. These regulative mandates began to appear before 1700 and became more severe as the ratio of negro to white population increased. When there were three adult whites for each five adult slaves, as was the case in 1691, there was obviously little difficulty; but when there came to be not fewer than eight full-grown slaves for each adult white person, as was the ratio indicated by the census re- ports made in 1720 and 1725, the situation became vastly more complicated. With the increasing size of the plantations * absentee landlordism became more general, a larger number of planters was forced to resort to white managers, and in many instances the supervision of the slaves was left to negro drivers.‘ The local government often found it difficult to impress upon the planters the urgent need of keeping close watch upon their slaves. Upon an owner’s taking possession of a plantation, his first care was to have his negroes clear a plot of ground and plant such things as maize, yams, sweet potatoes, beans and cassava upon it. The negroes were expected to raise all their own food, except for such low-grade fish or defective Irish beef as might be allotted to them when the food supply ran short.® A very few plantations were devoted mainly to “provisions,” particularly on St. Thomas, but never to exceed four per cent. of the total number.’ In course of time each negro or negro family was allotted a plot of ground, and not infrequently the negroes were permitted to sell the surplus for themselves. In the busy season the negroes’ working day was long and hard, though no harder than the lot of many a white farm hand of to-day in the Mississippi valley during the harvest and threshing season. At about four o’clock in the morning the 3 The size of the average plantation on St. Thomas in 1725 was nearly twice that in 1691. ‘ Usually referred to as Bomba negroes. 5 Bredal to Directors (July 8, 1718), B. & D., 1717-20. Provisions are generally referred to as Kaast or Cost in the documents. © In 17265, out of a total of one hundred and seventy-seven plantations on St. Thomas, seven were used for producing provisions. Cf. Appendiz H, p. $18. rr 160 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Such goods were too frequently found to have been stolen from the slave’s owner or from some neighboring planter. The planters’ most constant difficulty was with runaways. Although St. Thomas was but a small island, it did not reach its maximum cultivation until towards the end of the first quarter of the eighteenth century. The result was that with the increasing severity that accompanied the development of the St. Thomas plantations, slaves were constantly disappearing into the “bush” or wild forest. In order to cope with this problem the planters were early organized into a sort of militia whose members were assigned to do duty, either on horseback or on foot, in the various parts of the island. This planter-police was especially useful during the War of the Spanish Succession in guarding against raids on St. Thomas plantations by lawless elements from among the belligerents.? Not infrequently hunts for runaways (maron-negers) were organized in which slaves who could be trusted were employed to do the rough work. The chief means of communication between the more remote and inaccessible plantations and the harbor on the south side was by canoe. The mountainous character of the island and the torrential downpours to which it was subject rendered the making and repairing of roads a costly matter; but the numer- ous “bays” with their convenient beaches lent themselves to the keeping of canoes and small sailboats. The latter were frequently used by white men who with a few negroes would sail off to Crab Island, for instance, the best turtle-fishing ground near St. Thomas. When the slave-hunt in the bush became too successful, it is not strange that the hunted negroes, who were often proficient in handling the canoes, should take to the boats and pull for Porto Rico. There, just beyond Crab Island, was a promised land from which rarely indeed was a slave returned. The government at St. Thomas labored in- Placater for St. Thomas. The preceding paragraphs on negro life on the planta- tions are drawn mainly from an article by J. C. Schmidt, an employee on the Princess plantation owned by Governor-General Schimmelman. It appeared in Samleren for 1788 (2. B.) under the title Blandede Anmarrkninger, samlede paa og over Ejlandet St. Kroiz i Amerika. *In Kopibog for St. Thomas, 1708-15 (July 2@, 1704) is a list of the various planters, etc., with their duties and places to which they were assigned. 162 THE DANISH WEST INDIES The matter of doling out punishment to unruly negroes had its serious difficulties. It early became apparent that with the establishment of sugar planting as a fixed industry, the punish- ment of slaves would have to be done under the supervision of the Company’s officials. In theory the “Danish law” of Christian V was supposed to apply, but the local officials were given considerable leeway in its administration, with the result that punishments were inflicted pretty much according to custom and necessity. The planter would recommend what he wished done, and the privy council with the governor would issue the final order. One planter’s request, made in 1704, that a slave be punished for running away by having his foot chopped off, was considered too severe, so the poor wretch was only “hamstrung.” '* Sixteen years later another negro belonging to the same planter was punished with the amputation of a foot, and his owner was reimbursed with an indemnity of 120 rdl.'* From 1720 onwards, indemnification of planters for legally killed or injured negroes appears to have been regularly re- sorted to, a special tax being levied on the planters for that purpose. Occasionally a case for which no law could be found to apply was appealed to the directors in Copenhagen, and judgment requested. This occurred once when a planter’s daughter had had illicit relations with a negro belonging to another planter. The West Indian officials recommended corporal punishment and life imprisonment for the woman, and burning [alive?] “according to the custom of the English and the Dutch” for the man. The negro appears to have escaped, though the king’s sentence seems to have been solemnly pronounced from the pulpit, both in the West Indies and in Guinea. The woman’s fate is not revealed.” The privy council of St. Thomas, itself a body of planters, was naturally inclined to give the planter the benefit of the doubt when his relations with his slaves were called into ques- 47, P., 8t. Th., 169§-1711 (April 21, 1704). UN. J. for 1720 (May 18). Yn 1748, a planter who thus lost a slave received 170 rdl. Roy. Libr., Uldall. Saml., No. $0 fol. (October 21, 1748). “" 1p, Mariager’s note to Directors (May 26, 1782). B. & D., 1738-34. 164 THE DANISH WEST INDIES other inhabitants from selling intoxicants to negroes.” The idea that alcoholic drinks helped to acclimatize the new arrival had a firm hold on the popular mind. Negro feasts and dances were considered a constant menace. It is easy to understand why the whites should especially fear a negro mob crased by drink. The legislative device of prohibition by law was not to be seriously applied to the negro until after slavery had ceased to exist, and then in the present chief home of the American negro, the southern United States. Insurrection among its slaves has always been considered the most terrible experience that a slave-holding society could suffer. Whether in Rome with its slave risings, in Sicily or on the Italian peninsula, in Virginia with Nat Turner, or in a sugar colony in the West Indies, the prospect of a general servile uprising has equally alarmed the ruling class. It was during the first governorship of John Lorentz in 1691, a year after the first serious insurrection reported in the English colony of Jamaica,” that clearly defined rumors of a negro plot against the whites are first heard.*> During those early years, when the greater number of the slaves on St. Thomas were native Africans, it is not strange that threats should have been breathed against the governor’s life and that planters and Company officials alike were constantly on the lookout for conspiracies among the slaves. Cruelty on the part of an individual planter was likely to be rewarded by his slaves running away. Planters and officials must have realized the economic advantages of good treatment of so valuable a part of their plantation invest- ment as their slaves. It was likely to require something more than individual cases of cruelty to bring about actual insurrec- tion. The most persistent motive that led to general unrest among the slaves was lack of food. When months of drought ruined the crops of maize, sweet potatoes, and other foods which the * §. P., 1699-1714 (March 19, 1706); ef. Martfeldt M8S., Vol. I (Mandate of Governor Moth’s bound with Martfeldt’s notes, dated December 11, 1741). 24Southey, Chronological History of the British West Indies (2 vols., London, 1826), II, 158. 34 Lorents’s Journal (February 28, 1691). 166 THE DANISH WEST INDIES ing those five years, but of only twenty-five per cent. in the number of plantations. Clearly St. John was rapidly forg- ing ahead as a sugar island. St. Thomas, on the other hand, had begun to decline as a plantation colony; much of its ground had been under cultivation for half a century. Many of its planters, as the census lists show, secured planta- tions on St. John which they managed by means of hired over- seers, they themselves remaining on St. Thomas.” The difficulty so often experienced by planters in securing honest and capable managers (Mesterknegte) intensified the dangers of absentee landlordism. It was not always possible for all the plantation owners to keep their plantations supplied with white overseers despite the Company’s threats of fines and confiscation. The uprising of the slaves on St. John began late in Novem- ber, 1788. During the spring and summer preceding there had been a long period of drought, followed in July by a destructive hurricane which had inflicted considerable damage upon the already suffering crops as well as upon buildings and shipping.?! A plague of insects had destroyed many of the products of the islands, and the negroes were threatened with famine. Another storm in the early winter was especially severe on the maize crop on which the negroes largely depended for their food. In order to check the disorders among slaves which such a suc- cession of disasters naturally encouraged, Philip Gardelin, © Land Liste for St. Jan, 1738; ibid, St. Thomas, 1733. 31 The governor and council reported two ships, thirteen barks, two schooners, and two two-masted boats, many canoes, sloops, and ships’ boats to have been washed ashore and practically destroyed. Martfeldt MSS., Vol. VI, 227 et seq. (July 28, 1788). In the report (Generalbrev) sent by the St. Thomas govern- ment to the Directors on June 18, 1788, it is stated that because ‘of the drought, the Company's plantation on St. John yielded only sixty-two hhd. of sugar, where one hundred and fifty hhd. had been expected. B. & D., 1782-3}. 168 THE DANISH WEST INDIES Thus did the authorities attempt to strike terror into the hearts of the restless, half-famished negro population. On Monday afternoon, November 23, 1788, a very badly frightened soldier and some panic-stricken refugees from St. John appeared in the fort at St. Thomas harbor and poured into the ears of the astonished governor and his council a most fearful tale. Early that morning twelve or fourteen of the Company’s negroes had come up the path on the mountain- side to the fort overlooking Coral Bay on St. John, each of them with an armful of wood. When the sentinel shouted, “Who is there?” he received the answer, “Negroes with wood,” and opened the door. Rushing inside, the negroes pulled sagar- cane knives (Kapmesser) out from the wood and murdered the soldier on the spot. Meantime other negroes had assembled and together they rushed in upon the sleeping corporal and his six soldiers, killing all but one (John Gabriel) who in the early twilight managed to save himself by crawling under a bed, and later escaped through the bush and down to a canoe by the seashore. With the garrison out of the way the negroes pro- ceeded to raise the flag and fire three shots from the cannon at the fort. This was the signal for a general slaughter on all the plantations on the island. The ranking magistrate on St. John, John Reimert Soedt- mann,** and his stepdaughter were among the first victims of that fateful day. A band of negroes, including some of Soedtmann’s own, routed them both out and put them to death in the early morning. Soedtmann’s wife was saved by the cir- cumstance of her being on a visit to St. Thomas. Roaming about from plantation to plantation in that dim tropic dawn they slaughtered such whites as they could find, planters and overseers, women and children. As the bloody work proceeded, the band increased their numbers. The Company’s and Soedt- mann’s negroes were joined by others;** and by the middle of the afternoon a body of eighty desperate blacks, half of them 34 Host (p. 91) refers to him mistakenly as Christian Soctman. 36 Among the others were the negroes of former Governor Suhm, of town- judge Lorentz Hendricksen and of Pieter Kriyer. Gardelin MSS. (Novem- ber 28, 1783); ef. Martfeldt MSS., II, “Om Rebellionen paa St. John.” 170 THE DANISH WEST INDIES his plantation, consequently they did not descend the mountain path toward Deurloo’s plantation until 3 o’clock in the after- noon. When they came they found themselves confronted by the few cannon with which the plantation was furnished. Fear- ing to face the cannon with their charges of ball, they betook themselves to the bush, from which they emerged at intervals to fire blindly and clumsily at their ertswhile masters. Had they rushed their opponents at the start the negroes might at the expense of a few lives have mastered the plantation and captured its defenders. Instead they kept up their desultory firing during the greater part of the night and resumed it the following morning with scarcely any loss to the whites. The arrival of the news at St. Thomas had paralyzed all. Wives trembled for their husbands, mothers for their children. Gov- ernor Gardelin shared the general consternation. It was not until former Governor Moth appealed to Gardelin not to aban- don the children of his government to the barbarity of their heathen slaves that a boat with sixteen or eighteen soldiers, led by a sergeant and a corporal, was provisioned with food and ammunition and sent to the relief of the St. John planters. Several creole slaves with guns accompanied the party. The arrival of the reinforcements which were commanded by William Barens, a well-to-do Dutch planter of St. Thomas,” put new heart into the besieged party. Further reinforce- ments, consisting largely of negroes belonging to the Company and to planters on St. Thomas,*! enabled the planters to retake the fort and disperse the negroes to the woods. Urged on by the Company’s officials, the soldiers and planters on St. John began a war of extermination. Fora time the negroes managed to use the Suhm plantation as their rendezvous,” but before the Christmas season they had been pretty effectually scattered mother which was $000 x 1500 feet in size. Three “capable” slaves and four children constituted his labor outfit in 1788. L. L., St. J., 1788. “ He was credited in the census of 1783S with more than forty slaves. “' Gardelin reported sending twenty-one of the former and twelve of the latter. Gardelin to Sergeant Thomas Magens (November 25, 1783). Gardelin MBS., Bancroft Collection. 4 Pannet’s Relation. 172 THE DANISH WEST INDIES forces.“ On February 17, that is, not long after this disap- pointment, the St. John planters again appealed for assistance from the English. On Sunday, March 7, another English cap- tain, John Maddox, came from St. Kitts and landed on the island with about fifty volunteers,” though his entire party was reported to Governor Gardelin as consisting of seventy men.*! A carefully worded contract was drawn up specifying with pre- cision the duties of both parties and enumerating the rewards to be given for slaves captured. The attorney for the govern- ment, “fiscal” Ditlof Nicholas Friis, was sent to St. John to see that the contract was adhered to. Such elaborate pre- cautions proved quite unnecessary. After a vain and wearying search Captain Maddox suddenly came upon the rebels on the eleventh day (March 18), but he was taken by surprise, for the negroes killed three of his men and wounded five others without any loss to them, so far as could be ascertained.’? Maddox’s men stood not upon the order of their going; they fled at once and left the island on the following day. Stratagems, attempts at poisoning, and the armed forces of Danes and English had failed alike to dislodge or exterminate the desperate slaves. In the extremity of their despair the Danish colonists turned to the French on Martinique. A French boat was lying in the harbor, and three or four days after Maddox’s departure, the French skipper set sail for Mar- tinique with the Company’s bookkeeper, John Horn, on board. Horn’s instructions permitted him to offer the French four-fifths of the remaining rebels—(their numbers were estimated at a hundred men and women)—if they could catch them. Twenty of the worst ones were to be handed over to the Company, evidently for exemplary punishment. The St. Thomas gov- ernment pledged itself to furnish provisions for anywhere from © S. P., St. Th. 1728-35. The first appeal to the Tortola authorities was made by Gardelin in a letter to Markox at Spanishtown, dated November 29, 1738. See Gardelin MSS. under that date. © Om Rebellionen . . . March 16, 1734. Martfeldt MSS., Ill. The arrange- ment seems to have been made on February 18. Cf. Gardelin MSS. (Febru- ary 18, 1734). 51 Gardelin to Bewerhoudt (March 9, 1784). Gardein MSS. 8 Om Rebellionen . . . May 4, 1734. Martfeldt MSS., III. 174 THE DANISH WEST INDIES tressed planters and Company it was the fact of assistance and not its motives that mattered. On the day following their arrival the French under their commander Longueville were promptly dispatched to St. John. The Danish governor lost no time in sending on planks for the soldiers’ barracks and fresh meat for food. Crown attorney Friis was ordered to St. John to take charge of the negroes as they were captured. He was to try and judge half of those caught and the others were to be sent to St. Thomas for trial. The French commandant was to preside over the drumhead court-martial when it should be called, but a Danish represen- tative was to be present.” A force of twenty-five or thirty Danes under Lieutenant Fréling was got together and sent over to work in conjunction with the French.® Within three or four days of their arrival the French forces were encamped and ready for their grim labors. Only five days before the arrival of the French on St. John, a party of about forty rebels had made a fierce attack, lasting an hour and a half, upon the burghers who were encamped on Deurloo’s plantation. They managed to set the supply magazine on fire, but suffered a loss of three killed and six badly wounded.” From April 29 when they met their first party of rebels to May 27 when they returned to St. Thomas, the French force clung tenaciously to the heels of their quarry until they were unable to find the trace of a single live rebel. During the first three weeks they had to march up hill and down dale, through bush and bramble in an almost continual downpour of rain. By working in shifts they completely wore out the energies of the rebels, some of whom in lack of guns had armed themselves with bows and arrows.” On May 9 they learned that the ne- groes were assembled on a certain point or small peninsula of land. The band escaped, but a wounded boy showed the % Gardelin to “Commandeur Sergiant” Ottingen (April 28, 1784). Gar- delin MSS. 5? Gardelin to Friis (April 24, 1784). Gardelin MSS. Gardelin to Friling (April 24, 1784). Ibid. * Om Rebellionen . . . (May 4, 1734). Martfeldt MSS., III. © Domme afeagt over Negere (May 21, 1784), B. & D., 1782-3§. 176 THE DANISH WEST INDIES ment and the planters, each side trying to blame the other for the uprising with a view to being relieved of part of the expense. But the end of the rebellion was not quite at hand; for early in August—two months after the French had left—the report came in that a party of fourteen negroes and negresses, led by one Prince “ was still at large, though without firearms. To avoid an expensive “maroon hunt” Theodore Ottingen, an officer who had taken part in the suppression of the rebellion since its beginning, managed on promise of pardon to lure the fifteen remaining rebels to their former owners’ plantations. On the pretext that they would have to be appraised, every one of them was seized at a given signal on the morning of August 25 and brought to St. Thomas. Prince was not among them, for he had—fortunately for himself—been beheaded, and his head was a trophy in Ottingen’s baggage. Of these fifteen rebels four “died” in prison before they could be brought to trial, four were condemned to be worked to death on the St. Croix fortifications, and the rest were done to death in various ways “such as they deserved because of their gruesome deeds,” as the official letter has it.” With this piece of treachery, as it would be called in this age, a success for which the responsible officer received high praise from his superiors and a lieutenancy on St. Croix, the insurrec- tion of 1788-1784 on St. John came to an end. Besides those killed in conflict and those belonging to the Company, twenty- seven negroes were estimated to have been tried and executed.” A list made out in February, 1734, just before Maddox’s ill- fated attempt, showed one hundred forty-six negro men and women implicated in rebellion at that time. It is clear that the story of the three hundred negroes found dead in a circle on a mountain near “Brims Bay” is pure fancy. It was first told by Hist ® whose account of the rebellion is based partly on “ A negro belonging to Madame Elizabeth Runnels. & See Gardelin’s instructions and letters to Ottingen in Gardelin MS8. (Au- gust 9, 16, and 21, 1784.) “ Om Rebellionen . . . December 28, 1784. Martfeldt MSS8., Vol. III. 67 Ibid. 6 Hast, Efterreininger, 96. A recent repetition of this story is to be found in Keller, Colonization, p. 500. 178 THE DANISH WEST INDIES humaneness. At any rate, it was a quarter of a century before the Danish colonists were again seriously threatened with a slave insurrection, and then it was on the new and rapidly de- veloping island of St. Croix. The story of the attempted re- bellion of 1759 belongs to the post-Company history of that island. 180 THE DANISH WEST INDIES When matters which especially affected the stockholders in general came up, such as the need of securing additional funds to enlarge the Company’s activities, the situation was presented to the General Assembly of the Company, where each holder of a full share of stock had one vote.? Serious problems con- nected with the Company were sometimes referred by the king to a special commission appointed (as was the case during the first two decades of Christian V’s reign) from the membership of the Board of Trade, or they were turned over (as was the case from 1690 to 1705) to special bodies known from their place of meeting as “‘Commissions in the Council Chamber of the Royal Castle.” The majority of the members of such commissions were usually officials of the Company. In 1704, early in Frederick IV’s reign, the Board of Trade was revived, and four years later it was combined with the Police Board of Copenhagen into the Board of Police and Trade which continued down to 1781. On at least two occasions, in 1715 and in 1720, this body submitted to the king reports on petitions from St. Thomas planters.’ The dimensions of Denmark’s commercial and colonial enter- prises were never such as to permit the Board of Trade to develop into a body which could be compared in its specialized advisory functions to the Board of Trade and Plantations in England. When William III founded the latter board in 1696, the greater number of the English colonies had already passed out of the control of chartered companies. The active control of the business of the Danish West India and Guinea Company rested, as has been indicated, almost solely upon the directors. They selected the governors and chief officials both in Guinea and in St. Thomas, subject only to confirmation by the king; they found captains for their trading vessels and pro- vided ministers to care for the souls of employees, planters, and slaves. The directors through their factor in Copenhagen were expected to find a market either at home or abroad for African ivory and West Indian sugar, cotton, and indigo.‘ They were 2 See above, p. 34. 3 See below, pp. 190-191. See also Appendiz F, pp. 306-314. ‘ Parts of the cargoes were usually offered at auction to local buyers. 182 THE DANISH WEST INDIES position of the council, or privy council (Secrete-Raad), as it came early to be called, until the reorganization of the Company after the purchase of St. Croix. With the governorship of John Lorentz the Company began the policy of procuring its adminis- trators from officials who had had experience in actual service in the Company’s government at St. Thomas. Lorentz himself had begun as an assistant and was secretary and ez officio mem- ber of the council when Heins’ death called him to the governor- ship. His successor Claus Hansen had been lieutenant at the fort and a council member. In fact, of the eight governors who held office in St. Thomas from 1702, when Lorentz died, to 1733, when Gardelin became governor, only two had not had their preliminary training in St. Thomas. One of these, Otto J. Thambsen, had been a commander (Schoutbynacht) in the Danish navy; and the other, Henry Suhm, had been in charge of Fort Christiansborg on the Guinea coast.’ Neither of these men found his work congenial or was able to get on well with the inhabitants of the colony. The success of the Company as a commercial venture de- pended very largely upon the ability and integrity of its West Indian representatives. In order to procure those full return cargoes on the advantageous sale of which the Company relied mainly for its dividends, the West Indian government needed to keep on good terms with the planters. Whenever a planter re- ceived better offers from Dutch or other skippers than from the Company, it became a difficult and delicate matter to force him to part with his produce. Although in theory the Company’s officials held all administrative, legislative, and judicial powers in their own hands, they were obliged in practice to pay very real heed to the desires of the islanders. The relations between government and planters were affected by a variety of circumstances. Too high duties or other annoy- ing trade restrictions led the planters to attempts at evasion. In this they were aided by the numerous indentations or “bays” which made smuggling easy. Threats of shortage in provisions through drought, hurricanes or other causes sometimes forced the local government to take prompt measures for the relief of 1Cf. Appendiz A, p. 285. 184 THE DANISH WEST INDIES On the death of Governor Hansen’s successor, Joachim von Holten in 1708 the privy council actually called in twelve in- habitants to assist them in electing a governor.'* The War of the Spanish Succession, with the West Indies as the scene of much of its sea-fighting, furnished a golden opportunity for venturesome neutrals; and especially on St. Thomas had the planters and traders become wealthy and influential through dealing in captured ships and cargoes brought in by the priva- teers of the warring nations. The fact that the governor rarely succeeded in outliving his term of office had resulted in giving the local officials and planters their opportunity to take a hand in naming their chief executive, at least until the directors could be heard from. Governor Erik Bredal who succeded Michael Crone in 1716 in- sisted so strongly on being relieved of his office that in Sep- tember, 1728, the directors found themselves for the first time in many years nominating and electing a governor.” The re- cipient of this signal honor was Otto Jacob Thambsen, Com- mander in the Royal Navy. He was awarded the unusually large salary of 1200 rdl. per annum. On his arrival late in April, 1724, he found the books in great confusion, the secre- tary quite useless, customs duties uncollected for years back, the council refractory, and the planters unwilling to do the directors’ bidding.'* After ten weeks at St. Thomas he wrote to his masters: ‘“‘ You must not suppose that because I do not complain, I find it enjoyable here . . . I pray that the gentle- men will not take it amiss if I remark that St. Thomas and my office appear to me like the lion’s cave, where all the footprints pointed in and from which none pointed out.” The directors who often exhibited a painful obtuseness could hardly miss the point, but before they could take any action, the sickness of the incumbent appears to have compelled the privy and the com- mon councils to elect a successor whom they found in Captain 12 Martfeldt MSS., Vol. VI, 1703-1709 (December 31, 1708). 13 See list of governors in Appendiz A. 16 Thambeen to Directors (May 16, 1724), B. & D., 1721-24; S. P. for St. Th. (May 25, August 18, 1724). 18 [bid., (July 14, 1724), B. & D., 1781-24. 186 THE DANISH WEST INDIES curred during the first week in April, the planters held a meet- ing, appointed two of their number, Andrew Zinck and Anthony Zytsema, to act as commissioners, and prepared for them an elaborate set of instructions with the demands enumerated in an imposing list of sixteen paragraphs. The instructions were signed by sixty-nine planters of whom eight signed with their marks. The signers included practically all the influential planters.*? A résumé of these demands will serve to show the sort of con- ditions and regulations by which the planters of St. Thomas felt themselves aggrieved. They began by urging an appeal to the Danish government to bestir itself to secure the St. Thomas vessels that had been seized by the French, English, and Spanish during the war. A number of the planters owned vessels with which they had carried on various kinds of trade, both permitted and forbidden. The St. Thomas inhabitants rightly felt that something might be gained if the home govern- ment could secure exemption from seizure of vessels not carry- ing contraband. But in such a titanic struggle, nothing but a generous display of force could make the powers involved accede to any request that Denmark might make, especially when it touched upon their own interests. They desired, as St. Thomas planters continued to desire for the next forty years, the return of slaves that had escaped to Porto Rico. This presupposed their expressed hope that Denmark might again come into peaceful relations with Spain, something that was not likely to be speedily brought about, since Denmark had not even had an envoy at Madrid after the beginning of the Spanish Succes- sion war.?? With respect to matters of local taxation they asked for the revocation of the charges known as “‘sixth”’ and “tenth” taxes, amounting to twenty-five per cent., which were laid upon the property of persons leaving the island. These were especially 1 B. & D., 1706-10. The instructions are in Dutch and undated. The copy in the Danish State Archives was apparently secured by the governor and sent with his comment to the directors by the ship on which the commissioners sailed. 33 Extr. af Gen. Brev fra St. Th., Punks 24 (April 8, 1706), C. B., 1690-1718. 188 THE DANISH WEST INDIES privilege the directors tried to induce the planters to assist the Company: in securing full return cargoes. But the Com- pany’s policy of forbidding exports while any of its ships were in the harbor was never popular among the planters. The credit for achieving this wished for result was claimed by Direc- tor Jacob Lerke in the letter in which he congratulated Governor von Holten on his accession to office.” From this letter it ap- pears that the “sixth” tax above mentioned was abolished by the directors, likewise through Lerke’s efforts. The taxes on imports and exports fixed by the governor and privy council as a result of the directors’ orders were as follows: on goods leav- ing St. Thomas, six per cent.; on incoming European goods, four per cent.; on incoming West Indian goods, two per cent.; on all provisions from New England, four per cent.” The results of the planters’ mission of 1706 were on the whole meager enough, yet in 1714-1715, when the planters felt their situation again becoming desperate, they proceeded as before to send a delegation to Copenhagen. The pressure of hard times was already being felt in the West Indies; the home country was fully occupied with the Northern War against Sweden under Charles XII; in St. Thomas prizes and confis- cated cargoes ceased being brought into the harbor. The Spaniards on Porto Rico and the larger islands upon whom the planters depended for cash were sufferimg severely, for it had been more than two years since the Spanish fleet had visited them.” What cash the planters were able to get hold of went for provisions; they were concerned with keeping alive the slaves they had, rather than with buying new ones. When under these conditions the Company insisted on re- taining the hated twenty-five per cent. tax on the property of persons leaving the island, feeling among the planters ran high. In numerous secret meetings the Company and its St. Thomas 7 B. & D., 1717-20, copy (November 5, 1707). % The letter mentioned “de gepretendeerds 6% penning,'het welcke uyt de brief kan gesien worden, is opgehoven,” which, if the copy be accurate, may possibly refer to the sixth “penning” tax. But the tax seems to have remained in force nevertheless. ™* Cop. og Extr., 8. P. for St. Th., 1699-171§ (April 2, 1708). > B. & D., 171§-17 (August 10, 1714). The Cruise of the Snark By JACK LONDON Author of “The Call of the Wild,” “The Sea-Wolf,” “The Scar: Plague,” etc. Illustrated with over 150 halftones from photographs by the auth: -and a frontispiece in colors Decorated cloth, 8vo, $2. “Deserves an honorable place in the literature of travel an! adventure.” —Outlook. “Nowhere is it without that insistent touch of personality that makes everything from Mr. London’s pen irresistible.’"— Boston Transcript. “In Mr. London’s most rapid and vivid style.”,—N. Y. World. “A delight.” —Philadelphia Ledger. The Early History of Cuba, 1492-1586 By IRENE A. WRIGHT, Author of ‘‘Cuba”’ This book represents a vast amount of research. It is nc’ often that a political history such as this, covering nearly ot: hundred years, is written almost wholly from original source. Miss Wright, however, who has for many years been a residet' of Cuba and Spain, has had unusual facilities for discoverir: and employing in her narrative hitherto unused and unknow: documents and manuscripts. Her work is almost the first seriou: one from a historical point of view to deal with this period. THE MACMILLAN COMPANY Publishers 64-66 Fifth Avenue New York x‘N ee ee ere eee emer ee ae ee 4