DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
DIVISION OF ST. CROIX
5
ANTONIA HARVEY,
5
5
Plaintiff,
5
2007-CV-0115
v.
5
5
SAV-U-CAR RENTAL, TOYOTA MOTOR
5
COMPANY, BRENDALYN STEVENS,
5
HERTZ d/b/a/ HERTZ PREFERRED
5
RENTALS, INC., ABC CORPORATION, and 5
SIMEON CLERCENT,
5
5
Defendants.
5
__________________________________________5
TO:
Martial A. Webster, Sr., Esq.
Rachelle Shocklee, Esq.
Joel H. Holt, Esq.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL
THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion For Service by
Certified Mail (Docket No. 30).  This order is issued without necessity of response.
Plaintiff seeks to serve Defendant Toyota Motor Company via certified mail. 
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f), parties in a foreign country may be served
1.  Plaintiff cites Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2).  However, it is clear from a reading of the Rule, that 4(f) is the
applicable subparagraph.
Case: 1:07-cv-00115-RLF-GWC   Document #: 31   Filed: 09/22/08   Page 1 of 3
Harvey v. Sav-U-Car Rental
2007-CV-0115
Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion For Service by Certified Mail
Page 2
(1) by any internationally agreed means of service that is reasonably
calculated to give notice, such as those authorized by the Hague Convention
on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents;
(2) if there is no internationally agreed means, or if an international
agreement allows but does not specify other means, by a method that is
reasonably calculated to give notice:
(A) as prescribed by the foreign country's law for service in that country in
an action in its courts of general jurisdiction;
(B) as the foreign authority directs in response to a letter rogatory or letter of
request; or
(C) unless prohibited by the foreign country's law, by:
(i) delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual
personally; or
(ii) using any form of mail that the clerk addresses and sends to the
individual and that requires a signed receipt; or
(3) by other means not prohibited by international agreement, as the court
orders.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f).  A review of the caselaw considering the rule, reflects a split among the
circuits and even within the Third Circuit regarding whether the Hague Convention, to
which Japan is a signatory, allows service by certified mail.  See, e.g., In Re Harnischfeger
Industries, Inc, 288 B.R. 79, 85 (Bkrtcy. D. Del. 2003); Friedman v. Israel Labour Party, No. Civ.
A. 96-CV-4702, 1997 WL 379181 at 3 (E.D. Pa. July 2, 2997).
Case: 1:07-cv-00115-RLF-GWC   Document #: 31   Filed: 09/22/08   Page 2 of 3
Harvey v. Sav-U-Car Rental
2007-CV-0115
Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion For Service by Certified Mail
Page 3
Despite the differing interpretations of Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention, we
will follow our sister courts in the District of Delaware and the District of New Jersey.  See,
e.g., EOI Corp. v. Medical Marketing Ltd., 172 F.R.D. 133 (D.N.J. 1997).  Because Japan has not 
objected to the use of postal channels to serve judicial documents upon persons in Japan,
Permanent Bureau Report on the Second Special Commission, 28 I.L.M. 1556, 1561 (1989), 
this Court holds that Plaintiff may serve said Defendant by certified mail.
Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion For Service by Certified Mail (Docket No. 30) is
GRANTED.
2.
Plaintiff may serve Defendant Toyota Motor Corporation with the summons
and complaint for the above-captioned matter by certified mail, return
receipt requested.
ENTER:
Dated: September 22, 2008
                                /s/                                    
GEORGE W. CANNON, JR.
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case: 1:07-cv-00115-RLF-GWC   Document #: 31   Filed: 09/22/08   Page 3 of 3